The Payment of Gratuity ACT, 1972: Statemant of Object and Reasons
The Payment of Gratuity ACT, 1972: Statemant of Object and Reasons
The Payment of Gratuity ACT, 1972: Statemant of Object and Reasons
ACT,1972
INTRODUCTION
The Working journalists ( Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Ac, 1955
(45 of 1955) under section 5 provided for the payment of gratuity to the journalist. But there was
no other Central Act which provide for the payment of gratuity to industrial workers. The
Goverment of Kerala enacted legislation for payment of gratuity to workers employed in
factories, plantations, shops and establishments. The Governor of West Bengal promulgated an
Ordinance on 3rd June, 1971 wherein a scheme for payment of grtauity was enacted. The
Ordinance was later replaced by the West Bengal Emplpoyes’ Payment of Compulsory Gratuity
Act, 1971 enacted by the president on 28th August 1971. Gratuity was also being paid by some
employers to their workers under Awards and Agreements. since the enactment of the Kerla and
West Bengal Acts, some other State Goverments also wanted to enact similar measures. taking into
account the intention of the State Govermnets it was felt necessary to have a Central law on the
subject so as to ensure a uniform pattern of payment of gratuity to the employees through out the
country. The proposal for Central legislation on gratuity was discussed in the Labour ministers’
Conference held at New Delhi on 24th and 25th August, 1971 and also in the Indian labour
conference at its session held on 22nd and 23rd October, 1971. There was general agreement at
the Labour Ministers, conference and the Indian Labour Conference that Central legislation on
payment of gratuity might be under taken at the earlist. Accordingly the Pay- ment of Gratuity Bill
was introducted in the Parliament.
STATEMANT OF OBJECT AND REASONS
There is at present no Central Act to regulatet the payment of gratuity to industrial
workers, except the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions
Act, 1955. The Government of Kerla enacted legislation last year for payment of gratuity to
workers employed in factories, plantations, shops and establishments. The West Bengal Governor
Promulgated an Or- dinance on the 3rd june, 1971 prescribing a similar scheme of gratuity. This
Ordiance has since been replaced by the West Bengal Employees’ Payment of Compulsory
Gratuity Act, 1971, enacted by the President on 28 th August, 1971. Gratuity is also Being paid by
some employers to their workers under Awards and Agreements.
Since the enactment of the Kerla and the West Bengal Acts, some other State Goverments
have also voiced their intention of enactingsimilar measures in their respective States. It has
become necessary, therefore, to have a Central law on the subject so as to ensure a uniform pattern
of pay- ment of gratuity to the employees throughout the country. the enactment of a Central law
would also avoid different treatment to the employees of estsablishmants having branches in more
than one State when, under the conditions of their service, the employees are liable to transfer
from one State to another.
The proposal for Central legislation on gratuity was discussed in the Labour Ministers’
Con- ference held at New Delhi on 24th and 25 th August, 1971 and also in the Indian Labour
Conference at its session held on the 22nd and 23rd October, 1971.
There was general agreement at the Labour Minister’ Conference and the Indian Labour Conference
that Central legislation on payment of gratuity might be under taken as early as possible. it is
accord- ingly proposed to undertake such legislation.
In enacting the President’s act for west Bengal in August 1971, care has been taken to so
design its provisions that they could serve as far as possible as norms for the Central law. the Bill
has, therfore, been draftyed on the lines of the West Bengal Employees’ Payment of Compulsory
Gratuity Act, 1971 with some modifications which have been made in the light of teh views
expressed at the Indian Labour Conference relating to forefeiture of grtauity in cases of dismissal
for gross misconduct.
The Bill provides for gratuity to employees drawing wages up to Rs. 270/- permonth in
facto- ries, plantations, shops, establishments and mines, in the event of superannuation, retirement,
resigna- tion and death or total disablement due to accident or disease, The quantum of gratuity
payable will be 15 days’ wages based on the rate of wages last drawn by the employees concerened
for every com- pleted year of service or part thereof in the excess of six months subject to a
maximum of 15 months’wages. The term “wages” will mean “ basic wages plus dearness
allowances”.
It is proposed that the appropriate Government for administering the Act in relation to estab-
lishment belonging to or under the control of the Central Goverment or a railway company, or mine,
a major port and oilfield or in relation to establishments having departments or branches in more
than one State, will be Central Government, and in relation to other establishmnets, the State
Government.
The Bill seeks to give effect to the above proposals.
ACT 39 OF 1972
The Payment of Gratuity Bill having been passed by bothe the Houses of Parliament
received the assent of the President on 21st august, 1972. It came into force on 16th September,
1972 as THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 (39 of 1972).
An Act to provide for a scheme for teh payment of gratuity to employees engaged in
factories,mines, oilfields, plantations,ports,railway companies, shops or other establishments and
for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
BE it enacte by Parliament in the Twenty- third Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
1. Short title, extent, application and commencement - (1) This Act may be called the
Payment of Gratuity Act,1972.
(2) It extends of the whole of India.:
Provided that in so far as it relates to plantations or ports, it shall not extend to the State of
Jammu and Kashmir.
(3) it shall apply to-
(a) every factory ,mine, oilfields, plantation,port,railway company:-
(b) every shop or establishment within meaning of any law for the time being in force
in relation to shops and establishments in a State, inwhich ten or more persons are
employed,
or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months.
(c) such other establishments or class of establishments, in which ten or more
employees or employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve
months, as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf.
1
[(3A) A shop or establishment to which this Act has become applicable shall continue to
be governed by this Act notwithstanding that the numbar of persons employed therein at
any time after it has become sos applicable falls below ten. ]
(4) It shall come in to force on such date2 as the Central Government may, by notification,
ap point.
COMMENTS
(i) The expression “law” used in section 1(3) (b) means any law in respect of shops, estab
lishments- commercial or non- commercial; K. Gangadhar v. The Appellate Authority
under The Payment of Gratuity Act, (1993) 66 FLR 648 (AP).
(ii) The provisions of section 1(3) (b) of the Act are comprehensive. Municipal Board
is covered under the act; Municipal Board v. Union of India, (1993) 67 FLR, 973
(All).
(iii) Payment of gratuity in a business cannot be regarded as ex gratia and such payment
is, therefore, allowable as business expenditure for income-tax purposes; Commissioner
of Income Tax v. Seshasayee Bros. (Pvt.) Ltd., (1982) 62 FLR 315 (Mad).
2
[* * *]
(g) “ d to it in clause (m) of section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);
fact (h) “family” in relation to an employee, shall be deemeed to consist of-
ory (i) in the case of a male employee, himself,his wife, his children, whether married or
” unmarried, his dependant parents 1[ and thedependent parents of his wife and the
has widow] and children of his predeceased son, if any,
the (ii) in the case of a female employee, herself, her husband, her children, whether
mea married or unmarried, her her dependant parents and the dependant parents of her
nin husband and the widow and children of her predeceased son, if any,
g
assi Explanation.- Where the personal law of an employee permits the adoption by
gne him
of a child, any child lawfully adopoted by him shall be deemed to be include in his family, and
where a child of an employee has been adopted by another person and such adoption is, under
the personal law of the person making such adoption, lawful, such child shall be deemed to be
excluded from the family of the employee;
(i) “major port” has the menaing assigned to it in clause (8) of section 3 of the Indian Ports
Act, 1908 (15 of 1908);
(j) “mine” has the meaning assigned to it in clause (j) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the
Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952);
(k) “notification” means a notification publishe in the Official Gazette;
(l) “oilfield” has the meaning assigned to it in clause (e) of section 3 of the Oilfields
(Regulation and Development ) Act, 1948 (53 of 1948);
(m) “plantation” has the meaning assigned to it in clause (f) of section 2 of the Plantation
Labour Act, 1951 (69 of 1951);
(n) “port” has the meaning assigned to it in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act,
1908 (15 of 1908);
(o) “ prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(p) “railway company” has the meaning assigned to it in clause (5) of section 3 of the Indian
rail ways Act, 1890 (9 of 1890);
(q) “ retirement” means termination of the service of an employee otherwise than on
superannua tion;
3
[(r) “ superannuation”, in relation to an employee, means the attainment by the emplpoyee of
such age as is fixed in the contract and conditions of service as the age on the attainment of
which
the employer shall vacate the employment;]
1. Subs. by Act 22 of 1987, sec. 2, for “and the widow” (w.e.f. 1-10-987).
2. The proviso omitted by Act 22 of 1987, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 1-10-1987).
3. Subs. by Act 25 of 1984, sec.2, for clause (r) (w.e.f. 1-7-1984).
(s) “wages” means all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on duty or on
leave in accordance with the terms and conditions of his employments and which are paid or are
payable to him in cash and includes dearness allowance but does not include any bonus, commis-
sion, house rent allowances, ovetime wages and any other allowance.
COMMENTS
(i) The phrase “under the control” in clause (a) (i) (a) is the deciding factor regarding
“Ap- propriate Government”. The factor of the “control” is a question of facts and it would be
decide in the merit of each case; NTC v. Addl. Labour Commissioner, (1987) 54 FLR 299 (All)
(ii) Service, whether rendered prior to, or after the commencemet of the Act, has to be
taken in to consideration for the purpose of section 2(c) of the Act; Duncan Agro Industries
Ltd. v. Subhann, (1984) 1 LLJ 96 (AP).
(iii) If the main duties of an employee are only supervisory in nature, then certainly he
can not be excluded from the category of “employee” nor can he be deprived of the
benefits of
this Act, even thoughfor a short period he is reqyired to discharged additional or incidental func-
tions; Vishwanath v. M.P.S.R.T. Corporation, (1987) 55 FLR 1 (Summary) (MP).
(iv) Any workman engaged for work on temporary basis according to the avaibility of
work is not an “employee” within the meaning of section 2(e); K. Velukutty Achary v. Harrisons
Malayalam Ltd., (1993) 66 FLR 423 (Ker) (DB).
(v) A workman who rolls beedis for his employer but at his own house is an “employee”
within meaning of section 2(e) of the Act; P.H. Ramlal & Co. v. Smt. Chand Bibi, (1981) 1 LIC
790 (Guj).
(vi) Home worker is very much a person working in the establishment within the meaning
of section 2(e). since, the place where he rolled the beedies, though situated away from the Beedi
factory, was nevertheless a part of the establishment within meaning of section 2(h) of the Beedi
and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment ) Act, 1966. Hence, Home maker is an employee of
the establishment M/s. Bagi Beedi Factory v. Appellate Authority, 1998 LLR 23
(vii) After attaining the age of superannuation no employee is entitled, as a matter of right,
to be in the employment in any establishment; Sir J.P. Srivastava Group of Industries v. State of
U.P./ (1993) 66 FLR 248 (All).
(Viii) “ Incentive wages” are included in the definition of “wages” under section 2(s) of the
Act; Anglo French Textile Ltd. v. P.O.Labour Court, (1981) 58 FJR 252 ( Mad).
1
[2A Continuous service.- For the purposes of this Act,-
(1) an employee shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he has, for that
period, been in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted
on account of sickness, accident, leave, absence from duty without leave (not being
absence in respect of which an order 2[* * *] treating the absence as break
in service has been passed in accordance with the standing orders, rules or
regulations governing the employees of the estanlishment), lay-off ,
strike or a lock-out or cessation of work not due to any fault of the employee,
whether such uninterrupted or interrupted service was rendered before or after
the commencement of this Act;
(2) where an employee (not being an employee employed in a seasonal establishment ) is
not in continuous service with in the meaning of clause (1), for any period of one
year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under the
employer-
COMMENTS
Mere absence cannot be said to result in breach of continuity of service for the pur
pose of the Act; Kothari Industrial Corporation v. Appellate Authority (Deputy
Commissioner of Labour), Karnool, 1998 LLR 223.
3. Controlling authority.- The Appropriate Government may, by notification,
appoint any officer to be a controlling authority, who shall be responsible for the
administration of this Act and different authorities may be appointed for different areas.
4. Payment of grtauity.- (1) Gratuity shall be payablel to an employee on the termina
tion of his employment after he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years,-
1. Subs. by Act 22 of 1987, sec.8, for “at the rate of 9 percent per annnum” (w.e.f. 1-10-1987).
by notification, specify], from the date of expiry of the prescribed time as arrears of land revenue
and play the same to the person entitled therto:
1[Provided that the controlling authority shall, before issuing a certificate under this section,
giove the employer a reasonable apportunity of showing cause against the issue of such certificate.
Provided further that the amount of interest payable under this section shall, in no case
exceed the amount of gratuity payable under this Act.]
COMMENTS
(i) If gratuity is not paid, it must be paid with compound interest at the rate prescribed under
section 8 of the Act, calculating till the date of payment; Nagar palika v. controlling Authority,
(1988) 57 FLR 425 (All).
(ii) Interest is admissible only if a certificate for recovery of dues as a public demand has
been issued; Charan Singh v. Jt. Labour Commissioner-cum- Appellate Authority, Air 1907 Pat 96.
9. Penalties.- (1) Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment tobe made by himself
under this Act or of enabling any other person to avoid such payment, knowingly makes or causes
to be made any false statement or false representation shall be punishable with imprisionment for a
term which may extend to six months or with fine which may extend to 2[ten thousand rupees] or
with both.
(2) An employer who contravenes, or make default in complying with, any of the provisions
of this Act or any rule or order made therunder shall be punishable with imprisionment for a term
[which which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to one year, or with which
fine shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or
with both]:
Provided that where the offence relates to non-payment of any gratuity payable under this
Act, the employer shall be punisable with imprisionment for a term which shall not be less than 4[
six months but which may extend to two years] unless the court trying the offence, for reasons to be
recorded by it in writing, is of opinion that a lesser term of imprisionment or the imposition of a
fine would meet the ends of justice.
10. Exemption of employer from liablity in certain cases.- Where an employer is charged
with an offence punishable under this Act, he shall be entitled, upon complaint duly made by him
and on giving to the complainant not less than three day’s notice in writing of his intention to do so,
to have any other person whom he charges as the actual offender brought before the court at the
time appointed for hearing the charge; and if, after the commision of the offence has been proved,
the employer proves of the certification of the court-
(a) that he has used due deligence to enforce the execution of this Act, and
(b) that the said other person committed the offence in question without his
knowledge, consent or connivance,
1. Subs. by Act 34 of 1994, sec.4, for “ presidency Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class” (w.e.f. 24-5-1994).
2.Ins.by Act 22 of 1984, sec.6 (w.e.f. 1-7-1984).
COMMENTS
Pension scheme cannot defeat thet benefit of gratuity; C. Kuppuswami v. E.I.D. Parny
(India) Ltd., (1989) 1 LLN 85 (Mad).
15. Power to make rules. - (1) The appropriate Government may, by notification, make
rules for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act.
(2) Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may
be after it is made, before each House of Parliament while it is in session, for a total period of thirty
days which may be comprised in one sesion in two or more succesive sessions, and if, before the
expiry of the session the immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid,
both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or boath Houses agree that the rule
should not be made, the rule shall, thereafter, have effect only in such modified from or be or no
effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without
prejudice to the validity of anything previously done u nder that rule.