Vol. 9, No.

2, May 2021
 JURNAL ILMIAH PEURADEUN
The International Journal of Social Sciences
p-ISSN: 2338-8617/ e-ISSN: 2443-2067
www.journal.scadindependent.org

Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021

Pages: 413-434

The Hoax of SARA (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup) as a Threat to the
Ideology of Pancasila Resilience
Kuntarto1; Rindha Widyaningsih2; Muhamad Riza Chamadi3
1,2Faculty of Humanity, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia
3Faculty of Biology, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia

Article in Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun

Available at : https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/539
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.539

How to Cite this Article

APA : Kuntarto, K., Widyaningsih, R., & Chamadi, M. (2021). The Hoax of SARA (Tribe, Religion,
Race, and Intergroup) as a Threat to the Ideology of Pancasila Resilience. Jurnal Ilmiah
Peuradeun, 9(2), 413-434. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2. 539
Others Visit : https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun

Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, the International Journal of Social Sciences, is a leading peer-reviewed and open-
access journal, which publishes scholarly work, and specializes in the Social Sciences, consolidates fundamental
and applied research activities with a very wide ranging coverage. This can include studies and reviews
conducted by multidisciplinary teams, as well as research that evaluates or reports on the results of scientific
teams. JIP published 3 times of year (January, May, and September) with p-ISSN: 2338-8617 and e-ISSN: 2443-
2067. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun has become a CrossRef Member. Therefore, all articles published will have
unique DOI number, and JIP also has been accredited by the Ministry of Research Technology and Higher
Education Republic of Indonesia (SK Dirjen PRP RistekDikti No. 48a/KPT/2017). This accreditation is effective
from October 30, 2017 until October 30, 2022.

JIP published by SCAD Independent. All articles published in this journal are protected by copyright,
licensed under a CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution,
use, and reuse of scholarly works. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and
not of Editorial Board Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun (JIP) or SCAD Independent. JIP or SCAD Independent cannot
be held responsible for views, opinions and written statements of authors or researchers published in this
journal. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or
damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of
the use of the research material. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles.

JIP indexed/included in Web of Science, MAS, Index Copernicus International, Sinta, Garuda, Scilit,
Sherpa/Romeo, Google Scholar, OAJI, Crossref, BASE, ROAD, GIF, Advanced Science Index, JournalTOCs,
ISI, SIS, ESJI, ASI, SSRN, ResearchGate, Mendeley and others.

Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun | Copyright © 2021 SCAD Independent, All Rights Reserved
 Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
The International Journal of Social Sciences
doi: 10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.539

Copyright © 2021 SCAD Independent Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun

All Rights Reserved Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021
Printed in Indonesia Pages: 413-434

THE HOAX OF SARA (TRIBE, RELIGION, RACE, AND INTERGROUP)

AS A THREAT TO THE IDEOLOGY OF PANCASILA RESILIENCE
Kuntarto1; Rindha Widyaningsih2; Muhamad Riza Chamadi3
1,2Facultyof Humanity, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia
3Faculty of Biology, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia
1Contributor Email: [email protected]

Received: May 13, 2020 Accepted: Apr 29, 2021 Published: May 30, 2021
Article Url: https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/539

Abstract
This research aimed to provide an overview of the mechanisms and schemes of hoax
news spreading. Research was also trying to provide an explanation threat of hoaxes
about SARA (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup) towards the resilience of the
Pancasila ideology. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative
method by describing the results of the 2019 Mastel survey of national hoax
outbreaks using the Pancasila ideology approach as a perspective of the study. To
support the data, interviews were also conducted and were strengthened by literature
studies. The results showed that the hoax on the issue of SARA was the second most
widely hoax news content received by the public with a popular channel for hoax
distribution is social media, with a kind of text messaging. A hoax about SARA is the
most frequently accepted hoaxes in the community every day. The scheme of
spreading hoax news is by spreading slander to political opponents, excessive branding of
leader/figure, fake testimony, irresponsible quotation, and bombastic photos or titles.
Hoax news about SARA issues poses a severe threat to Indonesia's unity and
weakens Pancasila ideology because triggering controversy, public unrest, sectarian
sentiment, security disturbances, and political instability.
Keywords: Hoax; Tribe-Religion-Race-and Intergroup (SARA); Ideology; Pancasila.

p-ISSN: 2338-8617 e-ISSN: 2443-2067 JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {413
 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

A. Introduction
Industrial Era 4.0 has had a significant impact on changes in patterns
of human interaction and communication. The presence of the internet
and the digital world has had a tremendous influence on human life. Changes
in digitalization affect people's communication patterns and social life very
significantly. Through cyberspace, the internet, and computing systems,
information flows smoothly in a short time. Now humans live in two
dimensions of reality, the actual world, and the virtual world. Even though
cyberspace is a term for access to technology and information through
networks, the virtual world is a reality and has a real impact. The virtual
world becomes a part of our daily lives, influencing the real world. The
high flow of information in communication networks makes it vulnerable
to being exposed to fake/hoax news. (Finneman & Thomas, 2018).
Mastel's survey (Masyarakat Telematika Indonesia) shows that
Indonesian people have a high level of vulnerability exposed and affected
by hoaxes. Based on the survey results obtained data that 34.60% of respondents
receive Hoax news every day. The survey results also showed that 76.20%
of the Hoax content received contained SARA issues (Tribe, Religious,
Race, and Intergroup) (Mastel, 2019). Political issues and SARA are the most
frequently raised material for hoax content. Sensitive issues concerning
social, political, then tribes, religion, race, and among groups, used by hoaxes
to influence public opinion. As many as 93.20% of respondents claimed
that they most often received hoax content about social politics, such as
regional elections and government.
Naturally, Indonesia is composed of complexity, which is marked
by horizontal and vertical differences. Horizontal differences can be traced
to differences in religion, tribes, ethnicity, race, customs, and language,
while vertical differences are non-existent in the achievements or awards
achieved. These differences manifest in social, economic, educational, occupational,
political, and settlement conditions (Mulawarman & Nurfitri, 2017). Based
on data from the Central Statistics Agency, there are 1,331 ethnic groups
in Indonesia. While the number of languages in Indonesia, the Language
Development and Development Agency of the Ministry of Education and

414} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

Culture, or the Language Agency has mapped and verified 652 different
regional languages (Azanella, 2019), this amount is to the extent that can
be verified by BPS and related institutions. Facts on the ground could be
that this number is increasing.
Many tribes, ethnicities, religions, and races are directly proportional to
differences in the community's customs and habits. Indonesia naturally has
extraordinary complexity and has existed before we united to become an
independent country. The high diversity in many aspects in Indonesia is a
big challenge for country management because it can trigger conflict. On
the one hand, primordial bonds can be a united bond but, on the other hand,
can foster fanaticism, which can manifest into discrimination and intolerance.
Ideology plays a vital role in ensuring the survival of the country. The
ideology must be able to accommodate differences so the country's goals will
achieve. The Indonesian people chose to establish Pancasila as a state ideology
based on the belief that a right ideology is born from the motherland,
generated from the formulation of thought based on society's reality and based
on values that have lived in society (the existing law) (Taufiq, et.al., 2016).
This research aims to provide an overview of the mechanism of
SARA-based hoax distribution and study how hoaxes pose a threat to the
ideology of Pancasila. In the context of national and state life, understanding
the threat of hoaxes to the resilience of the ideology of Pancasila is an
essential point because it is related to the sustainability of Indonesian
human life. The crucial point of the problem of hoaxes on the resilience of
the Pancasila ideology is how we can actualize Pancasila to overcome
SARA-based hoaxes that threaten the Indonesian people's ideology
pragmatically. This research tries to discuss SARA's hoax by conducting a
literature study through the ideology of Pancasila as an essential perspective.

B. Method
This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research
specifications. The processes include data collection, data reduction, data
presentation, verification, and conclusions. Data collection techniques in
this research using surveys, interviews, and literature studies.

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {415

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

This research uses data related to hoaxes that discuss ethnicity,

religion, race, and between groups based on the MASTEL Survey results
in 2019 (Mastel, 2019). The MASTEL (Masyarakat Telematika Indonesia)
survey explores information related to public knowledge of hoaxes,
people's behavior in responding to hoaxes, forms and channels of hoaxes,
the impact of hoaxes on national life, tackling hoaxes, and comparing the
results of the MASTEL 2019 survey with 2017.
The MASTEL survey involved 941 respondents from all regions in
Indonesia, consisting of 28.30% female respondents and 71.70% male
respondents. Most of the MASTEL respondents were in the age range of
25-40 years, as many as 35.80% of respondents, and the age range less than
15 years was the smallest number of respondents (0.30%). The respondents'
current education profile was a bachelor's degree graduate (34.15%), and
the elementary education level was the least respondent (2%). The respondents'
profession consists of 27.90% of students, 39.20% are employees, 23.405
are self-employed, and 9.50% unemployment.
Interviews apply to examine critically the information or data obtained
from the survey results. Interviews were conducted with stakeholders related
to handling hoax problems. Stakeholders consist of the Communication and
Information Technology Office and National Unity and Politics Office.
Interviews were conducted in a structured interview to obtain data
reinforcement and verification regarding hoaxes related to SARA. Data
collection is also supported by studying the latest journal literature about
SARA and Pancasila's theme as data strengthening. The data analysis process
is carried out by interpreting the data using the Pancasila ideology's resilience as
the theoretical basis. Data verification was carried out using a data
triangulation model by comparing survey data, interviews, and literature.

C. Result and Discussion

1. Result
a. Content of Hoax News in Indonesia
Hoax news content that we receive daily covers all fields with
different levels of seriousness. Some are merely giving false information,

416} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

but some are raising anxiety and unrest in society. The results of the 2019
national hoax outbreak survey conducted by the Masyarakat Telematika
Indonesia (Mastel, 2019) regarding the content or content of hoax news show
that socio-political issues still dominate from hoax news content. Respondents
accepted hoax news content about social politics in the amount of 93.20%.
This figure has increased compared to the survey in 2017, where the socio-
political hoax content is in the range of 91.80%. The second-largest content
of hoaxes received by respondents was SARA hoax content (Tribe, Religion,
Race, and Intergroup), which was 76.20%. On an overall scale, this figure
occupies the second-highest position after the hoax content on social politics. In
many cases, the SARA issue hoax is closely related to political issues, especially
those related to alignments and polarization (Utami, 2019). Identity politics by
prioritizing primordialism ties are considered quite successful as a strategy of
winning politics, which impacts the relationship between political issues
and SARA issues as a content hoax.
The third highest hoax content is the issue of governance, reaching
61.70%. The high content of hoaxes on government issues is closely related
to the results of the 2019 elections, which became a heated battle between
two camps of presidential candidates. Hoaxes about health become the
following highest hoax news content, which is in the range of 40.70%.
Hoax news about the health that is widely circulating includes hoaxes
about vaccines, the AIDS virus in canned foods, the use of masks, and the
latest is about the COVID 19 virus that causes anxiety.
Hoaxes about food and drinks are hoax news content that is
widely circulating among the public. From a survey conducted by Mastel,
as many as 30.00% of respondents said they received hoax news about
food and drinks. News hoaxes about food and drinks, among others,
contain elements of the lie regarding the ingredients content of food and
drinks, dangerous chemicals that are suspended from food and drinks, to
be associated with conspiracies to destroy specific religious communities. In many
cases, it was found that Hoaxers used false claims of organizational misdeeds
or failings to tarnish the organization's reputation (Sellnow et al., 2019).

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {417

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

The following hoax news content is about financial fraud, which

has a range of 18.50%. Financial fraud has various modes that convince potential
victims, such as lucky draws or bulging investments. The widespread news
about various modes of fraud has caused public confidence. Fake news
about science and technology is hoax content that is quite widely accepted
by the public. In the 2019 survey, the amount of hoax content on science
and technology received by respondents was 20.00%. An interesting example of
a hoax about science and technology is the emergence of pseudoscience, or what is
known as fake science. An explanation that seems scientific and is based
on data but lies and is misleading. To appear convincing hoax news about
science and technology as if sent by experts or related credible institutions.
Hoax news content about the mourning news of someone's death
is quite a lot of news received by respondents in the 2019 Mastel survey.
As many as 16.80% of respondents claimed to receive hoax news about
someone's death. News of celebrity deaths or public figures to be quickly
spread. During the COVID 19 pandemic, news of the death of corona
sufferers was among those that were circulating. Reports about deaths
due to the coronavirus are often false or exaggerated deaths, giving rise to
anxiety and fear in the community.
Fake pictures or videos, even intended only as material to joke, can
lead to criminals. The picture or video is usually an image or video editing.
Even though the purpose is just joking, the content is considered harassing,
insulting, or causing public unrest. Mastel's survey shows hoax news
content about this joke is at 18.10%. This figure has increased compared to
a survey in 2017, which placed hoax content joked only at 17.60%. The
2019 Mastel survey also noted hoax news content about social culture
increased slightly by 0.60% in the 2019 survey compared to the survey in
2017. The amount of hoax content on social culture was 17.60% in 2017
and rose to 18.10% in 2019.
Indonesia is a disaster-prone country, so hoax news about natural
disasters is so easily shared and trusted by the public. An increase in the
number of hoax news content in the 2019 Mastel survey. In the 2017 survey, hoax
news content about natural disasters was received by respondents by

418} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

10.30%. This figure jumped threefold in the 2019 survey, which was 29.30%
following the earthquake and tsunami disasters in various regions such as
Palu and Lombok. The emergence of hoax news about natural disasters
immediately caused panic and anxiety, which caused national upheaval.
Some examples of hoax news about natural disasters are hoax news about
the potential for earthquakes in Lombok, Banten, and Central Java, Mount
Merapi's eruption, and the potential for tsunami in various regions.
The amount of hoax news content about traffic accidents is quite
surprising in the 2019 Mastel survey because it experienced a very significant
increase of up to 9.5%. In the 2017 survey, hoax news content about traffic
accidents was only around 4%, but in the 2019 survey, the number rose to
13.50%. Accident news aroused sympathy from many parties so that it
was so easily shared and trusted. Most intend to provide information and
slip messages to be careful. The message to be vigilant on the road is not
wrong, but misinformation and narration with an unrelated photo are
included in the crime of spreading hoax news.
The reasonably new hoax news content presented in the 2019
survey was hoax news about job vacancy information. Respondents even
received hoax content figures about job vacancies up to 24.40%—many
fake job postings circulated by bonafide companies and even government
companies through chain messages. The high unemployment rate in Indonesia
causes news of job vacancies to be hunted by job seekers to spread across
various media lines and become viral quickly. This condition causes the
collapse of the company's image because it is considered to provide false
information about employee recruitment, even though the companies' names
only followed. In some cases, hoax news about job vacancies served as a
modus operandi for the fraudulent crime. Some hoax news about job
vacancies that are quite viral is Pertamina, PLN, and PT. Angkasa Pura.

b. Survey Figures on Hoaxes

According to the 2019 Mastel survey, the most widely circulated
form of hoax news is written text. The number is relatively high, at around
70.7%. The second most commonly circulated form of hoax news is old

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {419

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

news/photos/videos that reposted, reaching 69.20%. The third highest way of

hoax news is photos with fake captions. Respondents received this hoax
news in the 2019 Mastel survey of 66.3%. The following kind of hoax news
that is widely accepted by the public is a photo-edited hoax. Respondents
received this type of hoax news in the 2019 Mastel survey of 57.8%. The
following form of hoax news is videos with false captions. The percentage of
videos with false narratives was received by respondents as much as 53.2%.
Video edited by cutting edited is a form of hoax news received by respondents
as 45.7%. Cutting edited videos is an attempt to framing a particular case
causing disinformation. The least kind of hoax news received by respondents
in the 2019 Mastel survey was an edited video with fake dubbing. This
form of hoax news is the most complex to do because it requires particular
readiness and expertise. The percentage of story-edited video hoaxes with
fake dubbing was received by respondents as much as 33.2%.
The most widely accepted form of hoax content is 70.7% text messaging,
while the rest is in the form of edited photos 57.8%, photos with fake captions
as much as 66.3%, video edits (fake dubbing) as much as 33.2%, edited videos
(chopped up) 45.70%, videos with false captions/narratives as much as 53.2%,
and old news, photos, and videos posted back as much as 69.20%. As
many as 87.50% of respondents stated that they get hoax content through
social media, social media are Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Path.
This figure is quite far, compared to the website (28.20%), television (8.7%),
newspapers (6.40%), e-mail (2.60%), and radio (1.2%) (Mastel, 2019).
The most popular hoax channel used in Indonesia is social media.
In the 2019 Mastel survey, 92, 40% of respondents claimed to receive hoax
news and sometimes resumed hoax news through social media. The most
popular social media platforms are Facebook, followed by tweeters and
Instagram. Facebook's popularity as a social media even occurs in many
countries (Fletcher et al., 2018). According to Weber Shandwick, a public
relations company and communications service provider, there are around 65
million active Facebook users in the Indonesian region. As many as 33 million
active users per day, 55 million active users use mobile devices to access it
per month, and around 28 million active users use mobile devices per day

420} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

(Pratnyawan, 2019). The next most popular hoax news channel is the chat
app. Mastel survey results in 2019 showed that 67.00% of respondents
received hoax news through the chat application channel. Whatsapp is the
most popular chat application compared to others. The number of chat
application users in Indonesia is a very high rate of up to 83%. This penetration
rate symbolizes the percentage of the number of chat application users and
the total active social media users in Indonesia (Rahardja et al., 2019). The
website is the third-highest hoax distribution channel after social media
and chat applications.
Mastel's survey in 2017 showed that respondents accepted the
website as a hoax distribution channel of 35.90%. However, in the 2019 survey,
this figure has decreased to 6.70%. Surprisingly, the print media contributed
as a hoax news channel. The principle of strict journalism should fortify
the newspaper from irresponsible reporting, but the Mastel survey in 2019
showed that at least 6.40% of respondents received hoax news originating
from the newspaper. Circulation of hoax news via e-mail is not as popular
as other hoax news distribution channels. In the 2019 Mastel survey, only
2.60% of respondents received hoax news via e-mail or mailing lists. The
2019 Mastel survey also showed around 8.10% of respondents received
hoax news through television and radio channels.
A survey conducted by Mastel showed that 34.60% of respondents
received hoax news every day. Even 14.70% of respondents stated that
they received hoaxes more than once a day. The same hoax information
they sometimes receive from more than one source. While 18.20% of the
respondents received hoax news once a month, and the remaining 32.50%
claimed to receive hoax news on average once a week (Mastel, 2019). This
figure shows that hoax news is spread so massively through various
media lines that we can access it every day.
The Mastel survey results are in line with the results of interviews
conducted with stakeholders (Communication and Information Technology Office
and National Unity and Politics Office) regarding the threat of hoaxes against
the Pancasila ideology's resilience. Based on the results of the interviews,
it was found that the public received hoaxes almost every day, and most

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {421

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

of them circulated through instant messaging applications. The perpetrators

and victims of the spread of hoaxes can come from various ages. The
interview results also confirmed that hoax news that carries religious
arguments is often accepted and easily trusted by adults compared to
teenagers. Reports of crime caused by hoaxes have increased from year to
year. There are still many community members who easily believe the
news they receive without making confirmation beforehand, so they are
prone to becoming victims of cybercrime. Many internet sites or social
media accounts deliberately spread hate speech, fake news and cannot be
accounted for but are trusted by the public because they are also spread
by people who have influence, such as scholars or celebrities. Interviews
conducted with the communication and informatics office also confirmed
that hoaxes endanger national unity because they trigger society's opinions.
Massive persuasions were found to change the Pancasila ideology with
narratives that contained criticism and blasphemy against the government.

c. Scheme of SARA Hoax News

Picture 1. Scheme of SARA (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup) Hoax News

News about tribe, religion, race, and intergroup is a sensitive issue

in Indonesia (Widyaningsih & Kuntarto, 2019). A hoax about SARA is a high
selling point commodity to lifting or even destroying political electability.
The scheme in the picture above shows various ways to spread the Hoax

422} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

with SARA issues. The first scheme is to bring up false news, slander by
utilizing SARA issues to bring down political opponents or specific parties. An
example is the alleged involvement of Joko Widodo as an Indonesian
presidential candidate in a banned party. The second scheme is to over-
imaging the performance and achievements of political figures or parties.
Over-reporting of a political figure/leader from a specific tribe or religious group
is an example of the second scheme. The news describes religion and tribe
owned by a figure/leader correlate with his performance and achievements. The
third scheme continues with false statements or testimonies delivered by a public
figure with religious issues. An example is a piece of fake news about the
Minister of Religion, stating prohibition on loudspeakers' use during the call
to prayer. The fourth scheme is to quote precise program figures that are
not related at all but are deliberately linked and considered to have the
same context. The fifth scheme is the use of a pretentious title or picture
that attracts the reader's attention.
The hoax news headlines' tagline and diction make people more
curious, more selling, and mysterious through this scheme (Ellcessor, 2017).
When examined, many reports are not following journalistic principles and only
provoke excitement. Aside from selling titles and taglines, in some cases,
hoax news also includes photos of precise figures to support reporting—
for example, pictures of religious leaders (Assidik, 2018). The language
used to create hoax news content is often just hollow language, containing
only bombastic titles but lacks essence. Nevertheless, fanatical supporters
often ignore the rationality of language and logic. They emphasize emotional
factors because of primordial bonds.

d. Hoax About SARA as a Threats of Ideology Pancasila Resilience

The year 2019 became a hectic year for the Indonesian people
because it coincided with implementing a five-year democratic party that
would determine the leaders and legislative ranks. Bringing down
opponents to win political contestation uses many issues of the tribe,
religion, race, and intergroup (SARA) in black and negative campaigns. The
SARA issue is also a valuable tool for gaining sympathy and electoral support.

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {423

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

The distribution of SARA content in various social media is widely used to

propagate certain groups to create various discrimination (Andu, 2018).
The 2017 DKI regional election is a real example that the SARA
issue has a significant impact on the political struggle. The spread of hoaxes
with racial issues based on religion has successfully grown a barrier for
Ahok (Basuki Tjahja Purnama) to win the regional election battle in DKI
Jakarta. This case is clear evidence that hoaxes have a significant influence
on political life. Another example is the 212 demonstration, which shows
that hoaxes spread through digital media can move the masses into an
actual demonstration that presents tens of thousands of people.
"A lie that is campaigned continuously and systematically will turn into
(as if) a reality! While the perfect lie is the truth that is twisted just a little".
The Goebbels theory is the essential reference of the strategy to spread
hoaxes (Hoax) to achieve political and power goals. The Saracen case shows that
hoaxes are planned strategies that have political objectives. At present, every
day, we will very quickly encounter hoax news, slander, and various hate
speech that always crosses in the social media age line or which enters
through messages in the device. SARA discrimination is a view and action
based on identity sentiments concerning heredity, religion, nationality or ethnicity,
and class. Every action that involves violence, discrimination, and harassment
based on self and group identity is a SARA act. This action castrated and
abused independence and all fundamental rights inherent in humans (Evelina,
2015). The use of religious and tribe identities has been seen as getting
more reliable since the 2014 presidential election and is increasingly
developing in a destructive direction after the narratives of lies have been
disseminated massively on various social media and easily trusted.
Internet in millennial times has become a "war of political
communication". Social media is a weapon of disinformation for various
purposes—the emergence of cyber troops or the cyber army as a critical
component in the communication war (Mihailidis & Viotty, 2017). The
community becomes easily dissolved, touched by emotions, and involved
in the communication war. The largest group of hoaxes is Misinformation,
Disinformation, and Malinformation. Misinformation is false information

424} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

that is conveyed either intentionally or not. While disinformation is intentional

in making false information with a specific purpose, while it is different
from the two previous categories, in the news of malinformation category,
the news is delivered with correct information, but deliberately disseminated
by certain parties with bad intentions, in the realm of someone's privacy
(Anshar, 2019; Molina, et.al., 2021).
Hoaxes can create anxiety and distrust because hoaxes are targeted
to scare most people through the spread of fake news with news using
clickbait or sensational techniques to attract netizens. Hoax creates an
atmosphere of "scary," "gripping," and does not believe in the circumstances so
that the country needs leaders who are challenging, decisive, and brave
(Molina et al., 2021). Not a meek, humble, and populist leader. News
hoaxes are considered capable of influencing someone through an image,
which can cause fear and threats to the basic instincts, causing a first reaction
(attacking Croc Brain/Amidala)—resulting in gathering the neocortex
(sane mind) so that thinking is irrational and easily directed. According to
research by the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), fanatical people are
more susceptible to hoaxes (Anshar, 2019).
Hate Speech, fake information, or hoaxes are intended to trick the
reader by distorting the facts and spreading hate speech. This term refers to
media propaganda to incite and hate certain people or groups with specific motives.
Hate speech is a form of anti-democracy and anti-tolerance (Salam, 2018).
The difference that should have been a force to strengthen citizens
were used as a source of disputes and hostility. An attitude of tolerance
towards weakening differences will be the seeds of division for the Indonesian
people. If citizens have a Pancasila foundation that upholds diversity and
pluralism, it should not be easy to be divided, let alone based only on hate
narratives and hoax content circulating on social media (Salam, 2018).
Besides, if citizens have an attitude of nationalism that prioritizes the
interests of the nation and the state compared to groups or individuals' interests,
the attitude of seeing SARA differences as material for contradiction should
not be necessary (Evelina, 2015).

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {425

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

SARA's issue becomes very wild in the spread, and the acceleration of
the issue becomes quickly spread. The main threat to hoaxes is the potential to
divide unity and undermine harmony and tolerance in society's social life (Septanto,
2018). Propaganda and hate speech affect psychological conditions to attack
others (Mulawarman & Nurfitri, 2017). Intolerance appears to those who
differ in their opinions or views. Dichotomies will lead to civil war. Lack
of respect for differences of opinion and even a tendency to impose opinions.
There have been many examples of hoax news cases capable of leading
public opinion to hate fellow citizens who disagree with the majority. The
potential for the national division is not impossible, born from digital
provocations. In this case, hoaxes pose a severe threat to the unity of Indonesia.
In democracy terms, hoaxes violate the principle of freedom of
speech. Freedom of speech is the freedom that refers to a right to speak
freely without censorship or restrictions but is not included in the case of
spreading hatred. Freedom of opinion in Indonesia has even been guaranteed in
article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. The outbreak of hoaxes on social media
led the government to take decisive steps by passing Law No. 11/2008 on
ITE. Individually, violation of freedom of speech is regulated in article 27
of the ITE Law(Rahutomo et al., 2019). ITE Law does not eliminate freedom of
expression in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution, but it is an affirmation
that the government highly values individual freedom and limits individuals
not to disturb the freedom of others at will (Gumelar et al., 2020).
The third Pancasila precepts read "Indonesian Unity," which implies that
Indonesia is a unified whole consisting of mutually integrated parts (Kaelan,
2002). This unity is reflected in the national motto Bhinneka Tunggal Ika,
which means that even though it consists of diverse ethnic groups, it still
upholds the Republic of Indonesia's Unitary State (unity in diversity)
(Kaelan, 2002). The third precept is strongly opposed to forms of action
that threaten national unity, especially propaganda and hate speech hoaxes.
The nature of the position of humans is as God's creatures and free
beings. By spreading hoaxes, he has neglected his position as a creature of
God, where morality and responsibility are inherent. In ethics, freedom
should be accompanied by responsibility, but they ignore it. Therefore, it

426} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

is only natural that the ITE Law was passed so that the misappropriation
of human nature, according to Pancasila, no longer occurs (Faqihuddin, 2018).

2. Discussion
The hoax has become a national problem, including triggering controversy,
public unrest, divisions, political instability, and security disturbances that
can hamper national development. Fake news (Hoax) is a widely discussed
theme because hoaxes on social media have contributed to rising political
temperatures in many countries (Utami, 2019). The survey conducted by
Mastel shows that Indonesian people are exposed to hoaxes every day,
with the most uploaded issues in the form of political and SARA issues
(Mastel, 2019). In multicultural societies such as Indonesia, SARA issues
significantly contribute to political and electoral conditions (Utami, 2019).
Motivation to spread hoax includes motives of political, ideological,
and economic affiliation (Meinarni & Iswara, 2018). Hoax is a new kind of
crime to study because it is a blend of information technology sophistication,
cybercrime, and law (Meinarni & Iswara, 2018). The hoax has now been
considered a plague that has the effect of hostility that can damage national
unity. Diversity as a social binding is a serious issue because of hate speech
promoted through social media. This condition is exacerbated by the
misuse of social media, such as the spread of hoaxes or fake information
(Hoax), the effects of which are hostile, and not following Indonesian
culture that prioritizes tolerance (Juliswara, 2017).
Hoax aims to create public opinion, lead public opinion, form
perceptions, and have fun that tests the intelligence and accuracy of
internet and social media users. The purpose of spreading hoaxes varies,
but in general, hoaxes are spread as a joke or fad, dropping competitors
(black campaigns), promotion by fraud, or invitations to practice good
practices that have no clear argument in it. Many hoaxes recipients were
hooked to immediately spread to colleagues so that eventually, the hoax
was quickly spread (Rahadi, 2018).
People are more likely to trust hoaxes if the information is following
their opinions or attitudes (Juditha, 2019). For example, if someone who

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {427

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

believes in flat earth gets an article that discusses various conspiracy

theories about satellite photos, that person instinctively will easily believe
because he supports the flat earth theory, which he believes. Naturally,
positive feelings will arise in someone if their opinions or beliefs get affirmation
so that they tend not to care whether the information they receive is correct.
They also quickly spread the information again. This situation becomes
even more severe if the hoax spreader has less knowledge of utilizing the
internet to find more in-depth information or check and re-check the information.
Today, hoaxes have developed into an industry that is no longer
seasonal and certainly cannot be underestimated. Hoax news is often
produced intentionally and spread massively, as revealed by the police
about the Saracen Team. Besides being paid by specific individuals, hoax
content creators also take advantage of the number of clicks and share
news often filled with advertising content from third parties. Then, after
the hoax news spread, the people and young people who did not know
about this will be ensnared by hoaxes and become free endorse agents
who can boost these elements' income. In hoaxes with socio-political and
SARA issues, it will result in the emergence of hatred, which will ignite
national unrest and disintegration if left unchecked. In the younger
generation, especially those who are still junior and senior high school
students, the prevalence of hoax reports is feared to create a mindset that
tends to be aggressive, chauvinism, and vigilantism.
The spread of hoaxes on social media and online media always has
underlying interests. There are interests behind the politics of power,
economy (industry and business hoaxes), ideology, personal sentiment,
and fun (Astrini, 2017). An example of a very viral and worrying hoax is
that it has thickened sectarian and racial sentiments towards Chinese
citizens of Chinese descent in the form of false information and misleading the
invasion of 10 million foreign workers from China to Indonesia. China's
workers then linked the latent danger of communism and the PKI's rise
(Partai Komunis Indonesia) to the latent danger.
Economically, hoaxes have become promising new businesses and
industries because of the relatively opening of the internet and social

428} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

media platforms and the ease and dynamism of their accessibility (Astrini,
2017). Everyone can become a producer of information with promising
benefits directly proportional to the increasing traffic on the site, social
media accounts, and online media. When hoax information is marked
"like," "shared," or "retweeted," sites and accounts containing the hoax will
be increasingly promoted and reach a wider audience.
So far, public awareness to be more concerned with hoaxes news
has increased. The results of the 2019 Mastel survey in which only 1% of
respondents immediately forwarded the exciting news they received. 69.30%
of respondents choose to check the truth before spreading, 15.90% immediately
delete and silence it, 7.50% have counted the news if they disagree with its
contents, even 2.10% of them dare to reprimand the sender of the news.
The public also has the awareness to check the truth of splashy
news that is considered suspicious, for example, unclear or provocative news
sources. The Mastel survey (2017) showed that 82.80% of respondents conducted
a crosscheck through the internet (search engine) when they wanted to
check the truth of the news (MASTEL, 2017). 43% of them crosschecked by
asking people who were considered to know better or more expert, 35.60%
conducted a crosscheck through mass media, like newspapers, television,
and radio, and 36.10% of respondents chose to crosscheck through social
media when receiving suspicious news.
The presence of hoaxes that increasingly disturbs the public also
encourages the birth of applications or particular websites used to conduct
checks on the truth of news, photo, or video. For example, Turn Back
Hoax, HoaxEye Twitter, Hoax Buster Tools, BaBe, and cekfakta.com.

D. Conclusion
This research would like to emphasize that the high number of
hoaxes circulating in Indonesia, as evidenced by survey figures, is a powerful
trigger for the emergence of political chaos and instability, which can be
confirmed from demonstrations and protests against the government
political battles, and security disturbances. Indonesian society's characteristics
that have a high religious character and prioritize primordial bonds make

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {429

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

SARA-based hoaxes easy to spread and win public trust. Hoaxes constitute a
significant threat to Indonesian unity and weaken the Pancasila ideology's
toughness, prioritizing the values of peace and unity.
Hoax attempts to deceive or fool the reader/listener to believe
something, even though the creator of the fake news knows that the news
is fake. One of the most common examples of false reporting is to claim an
item or event with a designation that is different from the correct item/event.
Another definition states that a hoax is a hoax used to believe something
that is wrong and often does not make sense through online media.
The SARA-based hoax mechanism has enormous potential to
weaken the Pancasila ideology. Hoax news is disseminated continuously
within various communication media lines and is also spread by trusted
public figures, causing "opinions" to be perceived as "facts." Hoax news triggers
a dichotomy in society in the form of pro-contra narratives. The pros and
cons encourage each side to seek justification and support. The pro-contra
narrative was used as a weapon for each party to support and bring down
the opposing party. The emergence of a dichotomy is strengthened by
provocations and then presents actions that cause chaos, unrest, and
discomfort, often triggering quarrels to horizontal conflicts. On a broader
level, even hoax news impacts security disturbances and political instability, as
can be seen in various cases of security disturbances in Indonesia.
The hoax on the SARA issue has potential damage to the nation
and a threat to its ideology. The analysis of Pancasila ideology resilience is
expected to provide awareness to fight against hoaxes and present alternative
solutions to prevent the spread of hoaxes from maintaining the ideology
of Pancasila and national unity.
The study of the tenacity of the Pancasila ideology has many
benefits. Academically this research can bridge the level of concepts and
practical concepts of Pancasila. Practically, the results of this research are
an attempt to identify national problems that can weaken the resilience of
the ideology of Pancasila. Furthermore, this study could be a basis for the
preparation of policy recommendations in strengthening national resilience.

430} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

Acknowledgment
The authors thank the Research and Community Service (LPPM)
of Jenderal Soedirman University as the research funder in 2020.

Bibliography
Andu, C. P. (2018). Efek Postingan SARA di Media Sosial Terhadap
Pertemanan. Kritis, 4(1), 1–10.
Anshar, T. (2019). Pengaruh Hoax Bagi Kehidupan Bernegara.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Assidik, G. K. (2018). Kajian Identifikasi dan Upaya Penangkala Pemberitaan Palsu
(Hoax) Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Kongres Bahasa Indonesia, 1–20.
Astrini, A. (2017). Hoax dan Banalitas Kejahatan. Transformasi, II(32), 92–98.
Azanella, L. A. (2019). “Cek Fakta: Jokowi Sebut Ada 714 Suku dan 1.001
Bahasa di Indonesia.” Kompas.Com.
Ellcessor, E. (2017). Cyborg hoaxes: Disability, deception, and critical
studies of digital media. New Media and Society, 19(11), 1761–1777.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642754
Evelina, L. W. (2015). Analisis Isu S (Suku) A (Agama) R (Ras) A (Antar Golongan) Di
Media Social Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Ultima Comm, VII(1), 5.
Faqihuddin, N. H. (2018). Ancaman Hoax Terhadap Sila Persatuan Indonesia
Dan Pentingnya Literasi Media.
Finneman, T., & Thomas, R. J. (2018). A family of falsehoods: Deception,
media hoaxes, and fake news. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(3),
350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918796228
Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., Graves, L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Measuring The
Reach of “Fake News” and online disinformation in Europe. In the
Reuters Institute University of Oxford.
Gumelar, G., Erik, & Maulana, H. (2020). The Effect of Need for Cognition
and Need for Affection on The Intention of Spreading Fake News.
Peuradeun, 8(1), 99–108.
Juditha, C. (2019). Agenda Setting Penyebaran Hoaks di Media Sosial. Jurnal
Penelitian Komunikasi, 22(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v22i2.669

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {431

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

Juliswara, V. (2017). Mengembangkan Model Literasi Media Yang

Berkebhinekaan Dalam Menganalisis Informasi Berita Palsu
(Hoax) di Media Sosial. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 4(2), 142–164.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v4i2.28586
Kaelan. (2002). Filsafat Pancasila Pandangan Hidup Bangsa Indonesia. Paradigma.
Mastel. (2019). Hasil Survey Wabah Hoax Nasional 2019. Website
Masyarakat Telematika Indonesia, 35. https://mastel.id/hasil-survey-
wabah-hoax-nasional-2019/
Mastel. (2017). Hasil Survey Mastel Tentang Wabah Hoax Nasional. In
Mastel. http://mastel.id/press-release-infografis-hasil-survey-
mastel-tentang-wabah-hoax-nasional/
Meinarni, N. P. S., & Iswara, I. B. A. I. (2018). Hoax and its Mechanism in
Indonesia. ICCSR 2018, November, 183–186.
https://doi.org/10.2991/iccsr-18.2018.39
Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture:
Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in
“Post-Fact” Society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441–454.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217701217
Molina, M. D., Sundar, S. S., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2021). “Fake News” Is Not
Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of
Online Content. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 180–212.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224
Mulawarman, M., & Nurfitri, A. D. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial
beserta Implikasinya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan.
Buletin Psikologi, 25(1), 36–44.
https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22759
Pratnyawan, A. (2019). Pengguna Instagram dan Facebook Indonesia Terbesar
ke-4 di Dunia. Suara.Com.
Rahadi, D. R. (2018). Perilaku Pengguna Dan Informasi Hoax Di Media
Sosial. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 58–70.
https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v5i1.1342
Rahardja, U., Lutfiani, N., Lestari, A. D., & Manurung, E. B. P. (2019).
Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi Raharja Dalam Era Disruptif
Menggunakan Metodologi iLearning. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi
Informasi Asia, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.32815/jitika.v13i1.298

432} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences

 The Hoax of Sara (Tribe, Religion, Race, and Intergroup)
Kuntarto, et.al.

Rahutomo, F., Pratiwi, I. Y. R., & Ramadhani, D. M. (2019). Eksperimen

Naïve Bayes Pada Deteksi Berita Hoax Berbahasa Indonesia. Jurnal
Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 23(1).
https://doi.org/10.33299/jpkop.23.1.1805
Salam, A. (2018). The Hoax Phenomenon in Indonesian Society: Observing
Anti-Diversity Memes since 2014. Jurnal Humaniora, 30(3), 315.
https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v30i3.38891
Sellnow, T., Parrish, A., & Semenas, L. (2019). From Hoax as Crisis to
Crisis as Hoax: Fake News and Information Disorder as
Disruptions to the Discourse of Renewal. Journal of International
Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 2(1), 121–142.
https://doi.org/10.30658/jicrcr.2.1.6
Septanto, H. (2018). Pengaruh Hoax dan Ujaran Kebencian Sebuah Cyber
Crime Dengan Teknologi Sederhana di Kehidupan Sosial Masyarakat.
Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 157–162.
Taufiq, M., S., & Widyaningsih, R. (2016). Forms and Mechanisms of Law
Dispute Resolution Using the Principle of Pancasila Based on Local
Wisdom. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 16(1), 24–30.
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.399
Utami, P. (2019). Hoax in Modern Politics: The Meaning of Hoax in
Indonesian Politics and Democracy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu
Politik, 22(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.34614
Widyaningsih, R., & Kuntarto. (2019). Local Wisdom Approach to Develop Counter-
Radicalization Strategy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental
Science, 255(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/255/1/012049

JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences {433

 p-ISSN: 2338-8617
Vol. 9, No. 2, May 2021 e-ISSN: 2443-2067

434} JIP-The International Journal of Social Sciences