What is a Hate Crime?

“The UK Government’s plan for tackling hate crime”

July 2016
H ate crime of any kind, directed against any community, race or religion has absolutely no place
in our society…. Rt Hon Amber Judd, Home Secretary
“Our country thrives precisely because of the rich co-existence of people of different
backgrounds, faiths and ethnicities. And that rich co-existence is something we must treasure and
strive to protect. Through this action plan, we hope to strengthen that protection over the coming
years, to ensure we uphold the shared values that underpin the British way of life.
Hate crime has a particularly harmful effect on its victims, as it seeks to attack an intrinsic part of
who they are or who they are perceived to be: their race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or
transgender identity.
Hate crimes are pernicious; they send the message that some people deserve to be targeted solely
because of who they are or who they are believed to be . Such crimes have a deep impact on
victims because they are targeted against some intrinsic part of their identity (their race, religion,
sexual orientation, disability or transgender identity). Those who commit hate crimes also attack
the fundamental values that underpin our diverse society, values of acceptance and respect for
others. Through the spread of fear, abuse and violence, hate crime can limit people’s
opportunities, stopping them from enjoying the full benefits of our society and can lead to
isolation and segregation.
Any crime that is motivated by hostility on the grounds of race, religion, sexual orientation,
disability or transgender identity can be classed as a hate crime.
There are three categories of hate crime in legislation:
• incitement to hatred offences on the grounds of race, religion or sexual orientation;
• specific racially and religiously motivated criminal offences (such as common assault); and
• provisions for enhanced sentencing where a crime is motivated by race, religion, sexual
orientation, dis ability or transgender identity.
We will only be able to drive down hate crime by tackling the prejudice and intolerance that fuel
it. Unless we work to challenge bigotry and to educate young people, hate crime will continue.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government -support-for-communities-in-united-drive-

A “Real World” Hate Crime-Scene

“O n the 4th March 2013, in London, a religious fundamentalist, in instigating a process
culminating in what can rightly be described, as the most insidious and potentially devastating of
hate crimes, placed in jeopardy the life and livelihood of Hindu children. His act threatened to
destroy their professional advancement, the rewards of honest endeavour, the spiritual and
religious evolution which is the expectation of every Hindu and of many peaceful contented
persons, and threatened them their place of respect and dignity in society, indeed the human
rights and very well-being of my children, were assaulted by this assailant.
His assault was calculated, it was manipulative and it was premeditated. He chose his location and
timing with diligence and his weapon was one which had been carefully precision engineered over
many decades, by historically the most violent of religious fundamentalists, and in the use of
which he was fully trained.
The hate-crime scene had been set, his co-conspirators were also prepared, having been briefed
in the dark corners of the palace, having been given ample opportunity to prepare their own
ammunition and choice of weapons and having been briefed on the strategy itself. They too took
up their places to both help prepare the minds of the gathering and also to launch their
projectiles in support of the impending assault. At a time of tranquillity, in a setting when the
assault was least expected, he deployed his lethal projectile and at his signal, his co-conspirators
launched their volleys in rapid succession, raining down a hail of hatred upon the wholly
unsuspecting victims.
Once the weapon had been deployed and the assault completed, the settling emotional and
intellectual dust revealed three casualties – every Hindu ever born (including my children) and yet
to be born had been injured, the reputation of all British Hindus lay slaughtered and the dignity
and reputation of the institution itself as a seat of “evidence based debate & reasoning” had
been, in the eyes of all rational observers, crucified.
The masterful assailant who instigated this act of religious persecution, was Baron Lord Harries of
Pentregarth, former Bishop of Oxford, the scene was the British House of Lords and the
devastating weapon, a favourite of centuries of Hinduphobics and other spiritually corrosive
“assassins of indigenous traditions”, was the word ‘CASTE’. “
...an account written by a Pt Satish K Sharma, following the House of Lords debate of the 5th
March 2013.

Introduction
A s is customary these days, before embarking upon any critique, irrespective of how justified, it
is appropriate to make a “declaration of innocence”, simply to meet the inevitable “ad
hominems” and “knee-jerk” uproar which follows, usually from those for whom their own vested
interests and prejudices are sacrosanct and for whom evidence is an optional desirable but not a
prerequisite.
This note is not an “attack on Christians” but an evidence supported response to the manner in
which the primary Anglican Institution, the Church of England has abused its dominant position to
architect and inflict a hate crime upon the Dharmic community, Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and other
communities of non-Abrahamic Indian origin, resident in the UK.
It is a response to the manner in which Parliament, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission
failed in their duty to require evidence and remain impartial, and failed in their duty to protect a
non-violent, fully integrated and successful British religious minority, the Dharmic community.
We bear no animosity to Lord Harries the instigator of this hate crime, an elderly member of the
Upper Chamber and respected in matters of “Faith & Belief” but in this issue, his actions have had
devastating consequences, consequences which we submit were both predictable and anticipated
as well as advantageous to an Evangelical Institution committed to the conversion of Dharmic
communities, here in the United Kingdom and particularly in their declared target marketplace,
India.
We accept that the former Bishop of Oxford was continuing in the culturally “hard wired”
tradition of his institutional ancestors (a tradition moulded by a white supremacist Colonial past in
which a heaven exists from which Hindus are still barred, an orientation which must be difficult to
shed in a single lifetime) a tradition of “religiously colonising and oppressing” my own Dharmic
religious ancestors, an activity which if it were not protected by cassocks and crosses, would be a
Hate Crime, past and present.
When the Church fathers first encountered the “life – affirming” Dharmic ideals in the India of the
16th/17th century, their own institutions’ “life-dominating” ideals were naturally jeopardised and
whilst the plunderers set about colonising the physical continent, the Church’s missionaries set
about their “religious colonisation” of the minds of the Dharmic community. Both employed
tactics which fall well within the definition of “Crimes against Humanity” and breach every “Hate
Crime” definition being diligently and rightly promoted by PM Teresa May’s government. We
submit that the Church of England is still engaged in “religious colonialism” and actively pursuing
its mission of “saving the heathen” using the weapons of denigration followed by religious
grooming and radicalisation, the deliberate creation of an atmosphere rife, particularly with
“Hindu-odium – deep seated hatred of all things Hindu” and thus is actively engaged in Hate
Crimes, today.
Religious Colonialism, i.e. the replacement of heathen cultures and religions is as much if not
more an act of genocide as the physical genocide, in that it seeks to destroy not only the fabric of
a community, but the core psychological links with its ancestors and their spiritual and cultural
knowledge. It is an act of emotional and intellectual violence of the most heinous kind, a crime
which has no place in the 21st Century, and we petition those responsible for the protection of
justice & human rights, to ensure that the Dharmic community of the United Kingdom receives
justice and protection from this institution, and its “Caste Proliferation” initiative.
Pt S. K. Sharma, B.Sc (Hons) MBCS FRSA @dharmarising

The Anatomy of the Hate Crime

O n the 4th March 2013, a debate was underway in the House of Lords, the Upper Chamber of the
British Parliament, a debate on the Governments proposals concerning Enterprise and Regulatory
Reform Bill, a dry and business like subject, one which hadn’t drawn particularly significant
interest from outside of the House, but a debate which was well attended and which was
important for the Government to see successfully concluded. (Ref Hansard 4th March 2013)
Lord Harries of Pentregarth stood to participate in the debate and introduced what has since
become commonly known as the “Lord Harries Caste Amendment”. In the hour that followed, in a
performance worthy of the best of Shakespearean actors, Lord Harries demanded, pleaded,
cajoled and implored the gathered Peers to rush to act and to protect 480,000 of her Majesty’s
subjects who did not have the protection of the Law and suffered on a daily basis.
Lord Harries demanded that the word Caste be swiftly added to the list of “protected
characteristics” already included in the Equality Act of 2010, i.e. Age, Disability, Gender
reassignment, Marriage and civil partnership, Pregnancy and maternity, Race, Religion or belief,
Sex, and Sexual orientation.
What followed was a masterful nurturing of “Hinduodium” - a passionate hatred for all Hindus, a
precise execution of “vilification and denigration by association”, co-ordinated with generous
helpings of entirely unjustified indignation, self-righteousness and the unrelenting flagellation of
the British Hindu community. With manipulation and orchestration worthy of Machiavelli, clothed
in cloying false piety, Lord Harries skilfully misrepresented data, which if true, branded 50% i.e. 1
in 2 of all British Hindus, as being guilty of being born prejudiced, perpetrators of discrimination,
on a daily basis.
The baton was eagerly taken up by Lord Singh, who, in a remarkable display of prejudice and
ignorance, diminished both the Sikh and Hindu traditions by abandoning Satya,
“Truthfulness/Reality” in a thinly veiled act of religious persecution. This perfidy was achieved by
misrepresenting the fully humanist teachings of the oldest scriptures of humanity, the ancient
Vedas. In a speech which brought shame to the memory of the deep ancestral relationship
between the Hindus and Sikhs, Lord Inderjit Singh wielded hearsay and religious prejudice itself in
connecting Lord Harries’ unevidenced, fabricated account of crimes of hatred, directly with the
Hindu scriptures. The Honourable Sikh Lord completely avoided the inconvenient truth that over
90% of the cases referred to in the report being contemptuously brandished under his nose by Lord
Harries, named his own British Sikh brethren and their British Sikh institutions, as guilty of the
self-same charge, an accusation which he was deliberating misdirecting towards the British Hindu
community.
The shade of Lord Macaulay bent double in laughter as the epitome of ‘Macaulay’s children’,
Honourable Baroness Flather reminisced about her “high caste” Brahmin cook (skilfully
sidestepping any explanation of the metric being used to measure “high”, as Hinduphobes have
always done and continue to do so in the Upper House). She tightened the noose, maliciously and
unjustifiably connecting British Hindus to Caste, Dowry Killings and Female foeticide.
In a parade which called longingly to the glory days, when Bible brandishing Anglicans delighted in
pouring contempt on Pagans and Heathens alike from their elevated pulpits, Baroness Lady
Thornton, who co-sponsored the amendment, pronounced: “Studies confirm the caste system
exists in the UK, with over 850,000 people affected”, not for a moment feeling the need to
consult census data (which records 15,000 British Dalits) or evidence.
Lord Deben called to a mythical imaginary past, populated by those Anglican British saviours who
had magnanimously passed legislation to protect non-whites, whilst glossing over the fact that the
very need for the legislation was the prevalence of a white supremacist, race-hate filled psyche,
one only recently deprived of the benefits of the global “non-white” slave trade and the
unrestrained rape of brown and black peoples and nations. A “rose tinted glance” at a period of
history which saw Africans being shackled and ferried across oceans in a slave ship named the
“Jesus Christ”, enterprises which were fuelled and endorsed by the self-same Church whose
representative, the former Bishop of Oxford, was that day standing as the saviour of the
downtrodden brown folk of India, the so called “Dalit” or “crushed” community.
Lord Harries basked in the glory of being the Saviour to whom the community, whose largely
converted Anglican descendants and their Anglican co-religionists, had turned in despair. With
arms outstretched, they beseeched his Lordship to free them from the shackles of the notoriously
discriminatory British Hindu community with its abhorrent Hindu caste system, and hundreds of
their angry community leaders were demanding justice, clamouring at the gates of Parliament
that very moment, or so everyone was led to believe.
An honourable Lord of Pakistani Muslim descent, Lord Sheikh launched into a further targeted act
of Hindu hatred, whilst completely overlooking his own traditions’ ongoing genocide of minority
communities, a tradition which has seen Christian, Sikh and most noticeably Hindus, ethnically
cleansed in multiple acts of genocide, in both Pakistan and Bangladesh, in even this decade. In the
spirit of public service both Lords Deben and Baroness Flather, flamboyantly prideful in their air of
Lordly infallibility and supremacy, concluded by pouring scorn and contempt upon democratically
elected representatives and the religious leaders of the British Hindu Community.
The remaining Peers bathed in the joy of their most rejuvenating and nourishing pastime,
shouldering Kipling’s “White Man’s Burden” and saving their “new-caught, sullen peoples, half-
devil and half-child” the British Hindus, the dark skinned heathen of the 21st Century, from the
ravages of their “foreign” uncultured unbridled passions and prejudices.
In a manner reminiscent of the famous “Gungadin”, Hindu members of the Lower House led by
Labour MP Virendra Sharma and MP Seema Malhotra, a few weeks later regaled their audience
with tales of woe and sorrow, tales which inconveniently conflicted with the grass roots
experience and personal evidence of many MP’s, critically even those like Jon Ashworth of
Leicester, from the most Indian of constituencies, and which conflicted also with the
community’s’ own experience of having lived in this country for over 70 years.
Being typical “British Hindus”, fully-fledged politically somnambulant members of Aurobindoji’s
“Hindu Bourgeoisie”, the news that the above had happened struck us with the force of the
proverbial runaway train.
Lord Harries’ assault reached into the very heart of our homes and disrupted the tranquillity of
our families and our community, it cast a cloud over our children’s future, British children born in
places such as Leeds, Ascot and educated in British schools in counties such as Berkshire and
Staffordshire, and fully decent gentle members of our British community. The Church of England
through the functioning of the House of Lords, The Upper Chamber of the “Mother of
Parliament’s” had launched an attack on the British Hindu community.
As members of the British Hindu community which, with only 2% of the population, contributes 6%
of GDP, has the second lowest rates of arrest, trial or imprisonment at 0.5% i.e. only 421 Hindus in
prison nationally (after British Jews 0.3%) we were stunned to learn of this allegation against us.
According to the United Kingdom’s Office of National Statistics, of all ethnic minorities in Britain,
the British Hindus had the highest rate of economic activity in 2011 whilst suffering
disproportionate levels of institutional prejudice and discrimination. Scholars state that the Hindu
community in the United Kingdom, and Europe in general, has consistently faced discrimination in
immigration policies adopted by the local governments. In local councils, construction or
expansion permits for Hindu temples and community centres have been turned down for years,
while Muslim mosques and Christian churches have been approved by the same councils and built.
Nearly 50% of Hindu children, both boys and girls, in British schools have reported to being victims
of bullying for being Hindu and their religious heritage. Incredibly, 28% of reported Islamophobic
Hate Crimes have been now disclosed as crimes perpetrated upon members of Dharmic
communities.
To emphasise the level of anti-Hindu discrimination, the recent much publicised Hate Crime
Policy, all 40+ pages mentioned the Hindu, Sikh and other non-Abrahamic traditions not a single
time, focussing entirely upon the Muslim and Christian communities. Institutional indifference to
the suffering of a whole religious community is itself a hate crime, not that the civil servants are
the slightest bit concerned about “Casteist Hindus”.
All of this and yet, with NO reliable evidence, no social impact analysis, no public consultation
and no genuine participation from the targeted minority community – how was it possible that
such a Hinduphobic amendment had found its way to the floor of the House of Lords?
The impact of this legislation, the unrestrained hatred towards and denigration of the minority
Dharmic religious community and also the torrent of pain being expressed by so called “Dalits”, all
caused us to stop, dumbfounded in our tracks. A detailed review of the process which climaxed
that day in the Lords, uncovered even more deeply troubling and wholly unexpected revelations.
In today’s sadly not so Great Britain, a Britain where in 2016
• a Labour Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has been condemned in the strongest of terms for initiating
an illegal war, amidst calls for him to be tried as a War Criminal,
• where a Chief Constable is on record as declaring that there are probably in excess of 750,000
paedophiles inflicting incalculable harm upon vulnerable citizens at this very moment,
• where the latest report reveals that in excess of 50% of all girls are sexually harassed in schools
• where surveys have indicated that 1 in 3 of the indigenous British population are racist,
• where we are now on the 4th attempt to conduct an Enquiry into the INSTITUTIONALISED sexual
abuse of vulnerable adults and the wholesale grooming of Hindu, Sikh and White young girls
spanning a period of 30 years,
• where the Church of England is on record as admitting that it has repeatedly failed to protect
vulnerable children entrusted to their care,
• where the Archbishop of Canterbury has accepted that sexual abuse, Bullying, Sexism and
Racism are rife and are systemic problems in the “by law established” Church of England,
• where TV Channels are required to seek justice for young men chastised and thrashed until they
bled, by evangelical Anglican fundamentalists
• where the latest reports disclose that 7% to 20% of clergy are engaged in abuse.
• where Parliament has been rocked by a succession of scandals concerning abuse and bullying….
... how on Earth was it possible, in the midst of all of these devastating social and religious
challenges, with so much work for decent Parliamentarians and Community volunteers to deal
with, that the British Hindu community would be been singled out for such generous Parliamentary
attention and be targeted for such an insidious corrosive assault?
The Labour Party, the traditional darling of all British Indians, was approached but in response,
they deployed the ultimate “weapon of mass compliance” (traditionally very sparingly used as a
coercion of last resort, used only to force MP’s to toe the party line despite their own
assessments). The draconian 3 line Parliamentary Whip itself was summoned to ensure that this
legislation was passed, carried on a wave of indignant self-righteousness, without detailed Labour
party scrutiny nor consultation with its Hindu community representatives, and yet there was no
reliable evidence to support the dire need nor the desperate urgency, merely Lord Harries’
masterful manipulation of the Parliamentary process.
We British Hindus asked ourselves,
• was it conceivable that such an eminent figure as Lord Harries of Pentregarth, had deliberately
briefed and beguiled fellow Peers with falsified data and accounts, his own religious Institution
having already groomed them in advance with tales of horror about the dreaded British Hindu
community and its demonic Caste prejudices?
• had he in reality relied on the hope that none of his Lordly colleagues would check his data?
• had he judged each of their prejudices and inclinations with such perfection that by pressing the
right emotional buttons, they could be relied upon to toss away all of the long established
principles of “unemotional scrutiny of evidence” demanded of the House of Lords, and like a flock
of sheep be herded into the “Aye” camp, carried on a wave of Hinduphobic revulsion and
unbridled condescension?
• Was it possible that Lord Harries, like his philosophical predecessor, Matthew Hopkins, the
WitchFinder General of East Anglia whose job was to find, hunt and burn witches, was intent on
seeing evil where none existed, purely to protect and resurrect the crumbling ideology of a Church
in crisis? A fundamental skill in the WitchFinder Generals repertoire was to create an air of
suspicion and hatred towards any wise woman who had the temerity to question the nonsense
which was being peddled by the medieval Church, so much so that when her trial occurred, her
guilt had already been established in the minds of her own community; a leveraging of human
emotional irrationality which occurred with such frequency that it became a legal principle in its
own right, the principle of the infamous “crimen exceptum” and which resulted in an instinctive
institutional mistrust of women, existent in the Church to this day. Was this possible?
• Would it be too cynical to suggest that this was merely the latest in a long tradition of
denigration of the oldest, non-violent spiritual tradition, by Bishops belonging to the Institution
which gave moral and religious authority to the white supremacist atrocities of the genocidal
Anglican Colonialists, the world over less than a century ago?
The famous Anglican fundamentalist Wilberforce, in 1813 addressed the same Parliament, in the
Commons saying “Our religion is sublime, pure and beneficent, theirs (the Hindus) is mean,
licentious and cruel” whilst James Canning standing tall on the Anglicans belief in their own
superiority, told a gathering of Hindus “You are all a parcel of poor ignorant semi barbarians, you
do not even understand your own language and system as well as we enlightened Englishmen who
have been at regular Grammar schools..” all whilst Bishop Heber was crafting a hymn chanting ..
“The heathen in his blindness, bows down to wood and stone… can we whose souls are lighted
with wisdom from on high, can we to men benighted, the lamp of life deny”? Judging from the
words of Lord Deben, one has to ask whether the “white supremacist orientation of old” of the
House of Lords, with its assumed superiority over even grass roots heathen community
organisations, is still alive and well, thriving and active, covertly if not overtly. Has so little
changed in the Upper chamber in over 200 years?
We reflected upon the number of times in history that the Church of England had filled the minds
and hearts of the innocent British peoples, subjecting them to stories of “sullen peoples, half-
devil and half-child” witchdoctor bogeymen, and then simultaneously fanning the flames of
prejudice, sympathy and anti-Hindu hatred, whenever funds or favour were required? Many now
feel that there is more evidence for the present existence of this attitude as an active policy of
Lambeth Palace, than there is supporting the entirely divisive and intrinsically prejudiced “Lord
Harries’ Caste amendment”.
What had occurred was perfectly described in “Racism without the Racists” (Bonilla-Silva, page
41) in remarking “When cultural racism is used in combination with the ‘‘minimization of racism’’
frame, the results are ideologically deadly”. We submit that this was the intention.
 Prime Minister May meeting the traditionally hereditary,
hierarchical, endogamous i.e. Casteist British Royal Family.

Who created the Caste System and how?

W e wondered about the consequences to Hindu Christian InterFaith dialogue when it became
common knowledge, that the Caste system which Lord Harries was railing about, was itself a
creation and imposition of white Anglican Colonialist missionaries. There were indeed then, as
now a very small minority of decent men and women who abhorred their own creation seeing its
destructive effect, whilst continuing to impose it, but history is clear that the overwhelming
majority of Anglican Clergy revelled in its effectiveness when it came to deconstructing an
integrated and robust indigenous culture and society, softening its vulnerable psychological
underbelly, ripe for the stab of a supremacist evangelist’s missionary thrust.
The Lords did not refer to the annotation made by the white Anglican ML Middleton “We pigeon
holed everyone by caste and if we could not find a true caste for them, labelled them with the
name of hereditary occupation. We deplore the caste system and its effect on social and economic
problems, but we are largely responsible for the system we deplore. ML Middleton, ICS,
Superintendent of the Government of India, in the Census 1911 Report for Punjab and Delhi (Vol.
15, Part I, p. 343). ”
Lord Harries, former Bishop of Oxford, graced with the mantle of academic rigour associated with
a Dean of Kings College, moulded in scholarship by Selwyn College Cambridge, and a Gresham
Professor of Divinity, can be expected to know what most informed Hindus know, that amongst
the educated Hindus it is accepted that the Anglican plunderers, known romantically as
“Colonialists”, created what is referred to as the modern day caste system in India. In doing so in
India, the social engineers of the Anglican Church were recreating the horrific power structures
which they, as the religious and moral force in Victorian Britain, had also created in Britain and
successfully inflicted upon the British population in the 18th and 19th centuries.
And here in the 21st Century, an Anglican Bishop supported by a post-colonial establishment was
once again, blackening whole swathes of a minority British community, using the same philosophy,
only this time he was bringing home one of Colonialist Britain’s most successful exports, the
concept, the trope and ideology of Caste.
Even Wendy Doniger (hardly a friend of Hindus) also asserts that the British colonial administration
nourished and sustained the caste system because it echoed the subtle and deeply entrenched
social hierarchy already prevalent among the British themselves. Subsequently, the colonial state
deliberately raised the caste consciousness of the sepoys of the Bengal army, manipulating
Brahmins and Jats both to regard themselves as elite and to become more particular about jati
principles such as the preparation and eating of their food. Doniger has noted that the notions of
caste, which in India had traditionally been relatively fluid and secondary, became rigid because
the sepoys were made to understand caste as being central to their notions of self- identity and
respect. “Subsequently, the idea that the caste is the basis of the Indian social order and that to
be a Hindu is to be a member of a caste became a dominant colonial axiom” (Doniger 2009).
Dr Shashi Tharoor, former Under-Secretary General to the UN, in his book “Inglorious Empire –
What the British did to India”, writes “The British however promulgated the theory that Caste
Heirarchy and discrimination influenced the workings of Indian Society. This is arguably a very
narrow definition of how Indian Society actually functioned in the pre-British era, and it is thanks
to colonial rule that it has now become conventional wisdom.” Tharoor continues to quote Dirks’
“seminal work - Castes of Mind” in saying “it was under the British that caste became a single
term capable of expressing, organizing and above all systematizing India’s diverse forms of social
identity, community and organisation. As a result of a concrete encounter with colonial modernity
during two hundred years of British domination… colonialism made caste into what it is today.”
History, no doubt inconveniently for the British (and especially for the moral and religious guiding
hand behind the depredations of the Raj, the Anglican Church of England) establishes clearly and
irrefutably that the responsibility for the horrors of Caste lies at the gates of Lambeth Palace.
After all if they were not at all connected with the moral values prevalent then (and now) what
function do they perform for which they receive exemption from taxation, access to the public
purse and automatic influence in the law making process of the nation?
The answer to the question “who created the Caste system?” is that the missionaries, Anglican
Jihadis of the British Raj, with their headquarters in Lambeth Palace, blessed by the Archbishop
and Bishops of the time, created the Caste system as an intrinsic element of their 19th century
Census activities and colonialist, evangelical mission. The Church of England is responsible and to
be held accountable for the creation of the Caste ideology in the context of India and for today
trying to impose it yet again on Hindu citizens of Great Britain.

Who created the “Dalits”/Untouchables and how?

T he Honourable Lords avoided mention of the policy established by Lord Elphinstone, which he
trumpeted in saying “Divide and rule (Divide et Impera) was the Roman motto and it should be
ours” and Lord Deben avoided mention of the British creation of legal instruments such as the
“Criminal Tribes Act” of 1871 which labelled whole communities of Hindus as being “Guilty at
BIRTH”, in precisely the same manner as Lord Harries’ amendment seeks to do today, 145 years
later.
James Fitzjames Stephen , another honourable Parlia-mentarian addressing the House in 1871
noted, “people from time immemorial have been pursuing the caste system defined job- positions:
weaving, carpentry and such were hereditary jobs. So there must have been hereditary criminals
also who pursued their forefathers’ profession.” On another occasion defining his theory he
commented, “When we speak of professional criminals, we...(mean) a tribe whose ancestors were
criminals from time immemorial, who are themselves destined by the usage of caste to commit
crime, and whose descendants will be offenders against the law, until the whole tribe is
exterminated”.
When the Anglican white supremacists of the Raj arrived in India, of the 540 principalities existent
at that time, over 400 were ruled by Shudra Kings (Professor Vaidyanathan, IIM Bangalore). When
the British left, the second largest landowner in India after the Indian Government, was the
Church and thus it’s reasonable to note that the largest transfer of assets and land from was in
fact from the Shudra groups (Lord Harries’ so called low-castes) to the Church. Further, there is
readily available overwhelming historical evidence that the Dalits “the Untouchables” were
themselves a creation of the crushing sanctions created and imposed by the Anglican Colonialists
of the Church of England as is clarified below.
The castes and tribes “notified” under the 1871 Act were labelled as Criminal Tribes for their so-
called “criminal tendencies”. As a result, anyone born in these communities across the country
was presumed a “born criminal”, irrespective of their criminal precedents. This gave the British
Colonial police sweeping powers to arrest them, control them, and monitor their movements.
Once a tribe was officially notified, its members had no recourse to repeal such notices under the
judicial system. From then on, their movements were monitored through a system of compulsory
registration and passes, which specified where the holders could travel and reside, and district
magistrates were required to maintain records of all such people. However, when they tried to
make a living like everybody else, they did not find work outside the settlement because of public
prejudice and ostracisation and this has continued to this day. The British rulers enforced this law
for almost 80 years, with the determination, meticulous attention to detail and diligence which
has become the hallmark of “Britishness” with vast numbers being removed from their ancestral
communities and culture and being marginalised in society, forced to live in “reservations” on the
outskirts of towns and villages. Denied all other livelihood they resorted to scavenging and
performing the most degrading tasks such as sewage workers and tanners. Madras alone saw 273
tribes being grouped as “criminal by birth” in one fell swoop of the British Legislators pen.
When India gained freedom from the British in 1947, when Lord Harries was 11 years old, thirteen
million people in 127 “criminal by birth” communities faced search and arrest if any member of
the group was found outside the area prescribed to them, by Anglicans.
This was the genesis of the Dalit or “untouchable”. This masterfully destructive British legislation
of 1871, precisely like the Lord Harries’ amendment, was posed widely as a social reform
measure, which reformed “by-birth criminals” through work. The Colonial white supremacist
agents of the Church of England created the “Untouchable Caste” and today wring their hands in
shared compassion and solidarity with the self-same “Dalits”, supporting them in their hour of
need, against the terrible wrongs done to them by those demonic Brahmins, those educated
Hindus who had the temerity to challenge the predator priests of the Church of England, then and
now. The Shudras and tribes challenged the British with physical force and were crushed to
become the downtrodden, the Brahmins challenged the Anglicans with knowledge and religious
spiritual wisdom and were vilified and denigrated and portrayed globally, as the oppressors of the
Dalits, “divide et impera”… divide and rule.
It beggars belief that decades later we are still hearing the same reasoning from luminaries such
as Lord Harries, and yet almost all of the British establishment are quite happy to accept without
scrutiny, the reasonableness of what is being proposed. This implies that even today it’s perfectly
natural to assume that such reasoning only applies to “brown non-Christian folk”. If “criminal- by-
birth” were universally applicable, the present-day white Christian descendants of the Slave
Traders and Colonialists, almost all of European “nobility” and certainly the Bishops of the Upper
Chamber, are guilty of crimes against humanity on such a scale that a whole continent would have
to be converted into prisons to contain all of them.
The horrors inflicted upon Hindus by the conversionary missionary strategies and bumbling social
experimentation of the Anglican invaders were so grave that when Emily Eden arrived in India
accompanying another agent of cultural genocide, Lord Auckland, she wrote back to her relatives
in England “I wonder how we are allowed to keep this country a week …. Why don’t they cut all
our heads off and say nothing about it?” A slightly different observation to the self-deluding
remarks made by Archbishop Rowan in 2007 when he remarked that the “British experiment in
India was an example of caring colonialism”.
The answer to the question “who created the “Dalits/Untouchables” is that the Anglican
Missionaries and their agents of the British Raj, created the Dalits/Untouchables in the Anglican
“concentration camps” under the authority of the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871.
Today’s Dalits are the descendants of those who survived the horrors and degradation of the
Anglican concentration camps. The Church of England is morally and legally responsible for these
concentration camps and the ensuing 140 years of “crimes against humanity” targeted at Hindus
and especially Hindu Dalits, and must now be held accountable.
Caste & the Creation of a “Hindu-Odic” Hate Brand
H induphobia is an inadequate word since no-one has an irrational fear of Hindus, but a precise
word is needed to describe the manner in which hatred of Hindus has been instigated and the
flames of Hindu hatred fanned, an air of contempt for Hindus so carefully nurtured. Using a Latin
word to convey a degree of academic or religious grandeur is in keeping with the occidental
traditions and the word Odium ie “general or widespread loathing and hatred” is a better
descriptor for the ideology and process being presented. Hinduodium - i.e. “general or widespread
loathing and hatred of Hindus”
The Right Honourable Lords further ignored the manner in which the evangelical Church has
carefully and diligently developed the word “Caste” into the global, ultimate anti-Hindu,
Hinduphobic, “Hinduodic” brand, the use of which can be relied upon to instantaneously trigger
hatred and fear of Hindus – it was crafted with this purpose in mind by Anglican missionaries and is
knowingly and unknowingly leveraged by them to this day. It is now a trigger word, a word which
can, like “n***er”, “paki”, “chink” and “wog” before it, be relied upon with Pavlovian
predictability, to create feelings of contempt for all things non-white, foreign, Hindu or Indian, so
much so that, like all advertising brands the faculties of thought, reason and the need for
supporting evidence, are not even considered necessary or even relevant. The falsehood of Caste
has become an assumed truth – i.e. a Hindu phobic, hindu odic prejudice, a classic trope.
As evidence of this pinnacle of the achievements of the supremacist Anglican clergy, we submit
the following incident which occurred as recently as 29th May 2016 and which was broadcast upon
the BBC’s national television channel BBC1 and in which the NCHT’s own General Secretary, Pt.
Satish K Sharma, was participating as a Hindu representative. The subject of this TV programme
was “Did Man Create God?” and as one can rightly assume, Caste has no relevance and should
never even have entered the course of the dialogue. The reality was however starkly different;
when Pt Sharma was receiving a degree of audience support for the Hindu view, the host Nicky
Campbell true to his no doubt unconscious conditioning, immediately interjected “But you Hindus
have the Caste system”… again the principle of the Pavlovian dogs at work, because as everyone
knows, “Hindu” automatically equates with Caste. Unconscious conditioning is the most favoured
weapon of the supremacist racist and we could almost hear the Bishops in their gilded Palaces
clapping their hands with delight.
Relying upon the unquestioning acceptance of this “hate crime” brand, and certain that the same
Pavlovian forces and principles would to be effective and available to him on the 4th of March
2013, Lord Harries transformed the Upper Chamber of the British Parliament, the House of Lords
itself, into British Shimla, the summer retreat of choice of the plundering pirates of the Anglican
Raj. Kaye writing about Shimla in 1851 recalls “that pleasant hill sanatorium, where our Governor
General, surrounded by irresponsible advisers, settles the destinies of empires without the aid of
their legitimate fellow counsellors, and which has been the cradle of more political insanity than
any within the limits of Hindustan”….. Listening to Lord Deben’s speech on that spring day in
March, one can’t help but be thrown back into memory, to the balmy, good old days of the Shimla
hill station, mem sahibs and the glorious Raj. Whilst listening to Lord Deben wax lyrical about the
tradition of British values another memory also springs to mind when in 1857, the Governor-
General Lord Canning another devout Anglican, wrote to a British official :
“As we must rule 150 millions of people by a handful (more or less small) of Englishmen, let us do
it in the manner best calculated to leave them divided …… and to inspire them with the greatest
possible awe of our power and with the least possible suspicion of our motives.” Anglican
Interfaith at its finest.
Noteworthy is the fact that devout Christians had equally successfully applied this policy in the
New World. According to one 1859 account, the native proverb that the “white man spoke with a
forked tongue” originated as a result of the colonialists tactic, in their war with the Iroquois , of
inviting their enemies to attend a Peace Conference, only to be slaughtered or captured 16.
Returning to the present, and scrutinising the alleged solution itself in more detail, any rational
unconditioned academic or government legislator (assuming one such can be found in this non-
secular establishment) would understand that the enshrining in Equality law, which details as
protected characteristics, non-hierarchical, naturally occurring, involuntary attributes such as
colour and gender etc, of a hierarchical social man made construct, is unquestionably a
mechanism for the destruction of the very fabric of any harmoniously cohesive interfaith society,
a society to which we British Hindus fully aspire in this Great Britain, our home. Even more so
when the construct is an Anglican instrument of colonial cultural and social genocide of the
indigenous people of India.
Upon further inspection of the solution suggested by the honourable Lord Harries, it becomes
clear that in profile and policy, this amendment to the Equality legislation is consistent with the
very contemporary profit motivated tradition adopted in almost commercial frauds. Take for
example pharmaceutical frauds such as Vioxx etc. i.e. peddle a solution which on the surface
appears to deal with the symptoms whilst leaving the root cause carefully untouched, generating a
future revenue stream to be harvested for decades to come. The “ayurvedic” holistic solution
would be to grasp the very root and either negate its action or even better, to wrench it out once
and for all, allowing the body to heal from the flow of natural energies of wellness and life. This is
an approach the Dharmic community has adopted in re-establishing itself here in the UK, having
wrenched out the caste memetic virus, becoming “caste free” and the evidence of our Dharmic
children’s harmonious coexistence proves that it has worked successfully, so much so that the
Bishops have evidently been moved to re-launch such a desperate strategy.
In the Caste Clause scenario, architecting a genuine solution also requires that we recognise that
the Anglican Bishops do not have what legal tradition calls “clean hands” and that since they
themselves initially infected the Indian psyche with this evil mental virus, for purely political and
monetary gains, it’s unlikely that their contribution at this time will be in the interests of British
Hindus or Indian Hindus nor indeed the interests of the wider multi-faith British community. It is
also pertinent to note that the complete ascendency of the Anglican theocracy in India was
thwarted by the sustained challenge presented by the Hindu intellectuals, the philosophers and
the spiritual teachers (known as Brahmins), the natural foe of the aggressive proselytising
missionaries and this remains the case, to this day.
To avoid any shred of doubt, this law seeks to make hate speech against Hindus, Sikhs and Jains,
i.e. Dharmic religions, the law of the land, in precisely the same manner as was so effectively
implemented by the colonial Anglicans in India as their legacy, a parting gift of the Anglican
“Jihadis” of the Raj. The Church of England is both responsible and accountable.

The Conversion Agenda and the Threat to Anglican Expansion

T he fundamentalists of the Anglican tradition are at this very instant, fully engaged in grooming
and radicalising the least educated and most vulnerable, sowing discord and creating an “army of
the discontented” in India and now it would seem, here in the Britain of the 21st Century.
Archbishop Justin Welby trumpeted his desire to concentrate upon Evangelism, which to non-
Anglicans and indigenous cultures means “grooming in preparation for radicalisation”. The most
despicable but wholly critical and vital aspect of this strategy, includes repeatedly blaming the
“high castes” for the poverty in India, ignoring all of the evidence which indicates that over 40
TRILLION POUNDS of wealth was the monetary harm to India, during and since the heady days of
the Anglican jihad.
It should be further noted that the maximum number of conversions has been amongst the least
educated and least knowledgeable and also the most innocent and most vulnerable and these are
the peoples who are even today being groomed and radicalised by the Christian proselytisers in
India’s hospitals and schools and other places where vulnerable desperate souls can be coerced
and converted. Even a cursory inspection reveals the favoured strategy of the white supremacist
plunderer at work, “Divide et Impera”, divide and rule, in full flow and being sustained by the
present day Church of England.
There is one key fact which the Hinduodic manipulators of Lambeth Palace rapidly skip, hoping
that no one will ever ask……. What is the metric by which a Hindoo was classified as high caste or
low caste? It wasn’t money, the Brahmins were always traditionally poor having taken a vow of
simplicity, it wasn’t political power or land because when the Anglican plunderers arrived in India,
two thirds of the country was ruled by Shudra kings and Queens, like the famous devotee of
Paramahansa Ramakrishna, Rani Rajmohini of Kolkata. So what metric was used to denote
whether a person was “High” or “Low”? There is only one metric which applies consistently to
every occurrence of “caste measurement” and that is simply this …. the threat level to the Church
of England. The educated spiritual priests and intellectuals were all banded together into one and
labelled “highest caste” because they represented the “highest threat” to Anglican domination
and those who represented the “lowest threat” to the Anglican jihadis were pushed into the
lowest caste. It then became a simple task of applying the “civilisational asset strippers” weapon
of cultural genocide “divide et impera” and the rest, as they say is history.
The Colonialist Anglicans having built their religious empire in Britain by leveraging physical force
and fear, found in India religious ideas which, if shared with their flock, would reveal the shallow
emotional and intellectual manipulation of the Church’s ideology. They discovered, like thousands
of pilgrims to India before them, teachings and wisdom which celebrated and elevated humanity
as inherently and intrinsically, divine and not sinful. They found concepts which applauded
exuberant human creativity and ingenuity and which above all, worshipped as divine, the human
sibling faculties of “jnana” and “bhakti”, wisdom and devotion, in a unique union, a wholeness of
blissful tranquillity, a natural state called Yoga. They found teachings which celebrated and
elevated the Divine Feminine and gave equality of status to women in all matters, established and
protected with the power of religious sanction. To this day Hindu Temples in every corner of the
world celebrate the Devine Feminine and the Divine masculine, as equal.
The late Huh Shih, nationalist scholar, diplomat and one of the legendary leaders of Chinese
thought, in a paper presented at the Harvard Tercentenary Conference of Arts and Science in
1936, made a fundamental observation on India’s contribution to the evolution of Chinese
civilisation.
“India”, argued Huh, “conquered and dominated China culturally for two thousand years without
ever having to send a single soldier across the border.… Never before had China seen a religion so
rich in imagery, so beautiful and captivating in ritualism and so bold in cosmological and
metaphysical speculations. Like a poor beggar suddenly halting before a magnificent storehouse of
precious stones of dazzling brilliancy and splendour, China was overwhelmed, baffled and
overjoyed. She begged and borrowed freely from this munificent giver…China’s indebtedness to
India can never be fully told.”
Fearing a similar fate, the Anglican Church fathers however adopted a different approach.
Selecting a pathology most akin to cancer, they attacked the physical, spiritual, academic and
linguistic organs of the civilisation, with a truly British level of meticulous determination. Had
they applied the same effort to understanding Hindu teachings with love and honesty, the world
would have seen a global evolutionary leap of all of humanity. The price to be paid for such a
leap, being the death and possible resurrection of the Church of Empire, was deemed too high.
Seeing this dire threat to their multi-national, transgenerational religious land grabbing “Ponzi”
scheme, they set about the deconstruction of the very being of India and chose a path of
destruction of the best of all things human.
And now, woe of all woes, those heathen followers of Dharmic traditions, in all of their ebullient
variety and diversity, had found their way to the shores of Britain, and started living and sharing
this vision of a blissful tranquil interfaith union. The threat level was detected as “high” and the
Caste legislation strategy brought back to its philosophical home. Honourable Lord Deben was only
partly correct when he stated “If there is one thing that really annoys people about immigration,
it is when people bring to this country, attitudes that are wholly contrary to the traditions of
Britain”. We would suggest to Lord Deben that Caste is very much a British ANGLICAN tradition, as
British as Colonialism itself.
This legislation is a deliberate assault on all British Hindus, Sikhs and Jains and in its spirit and
purpose is identical to that social manipulation so skilfully wielded by the Anglican profiteers of
the days of the “Raj”. Durant in 1930 writes “The British Conquest of India was the invasion of and
destruction of a high civilisation by a trading company utterly without scruple or principle,
careless of art and greedy of gain, overrunning with fire and sword a country temporarily
disordered and helpless, bribing and murdering, annexing and stealing, and beginning that career
of illegal and legal plunder which has now gone on for one hundred and seventy three years, and
goes on at this moment while in our secure comfort, we write and read.” It is noteworthy that the
moral and religious sanction of the Church of England was very much present in every shade of the
above devastation and desecration, a period in which the Church of England too, filled its coffers
with blood stained plunder, and the same spirit of societal corruption is worryingly evident in this
Church of England inspired, Lambeth Palace endorsed, Bishop Lord Harries’ “Caste Amendment”.
To avoid any shred of doubt, this law seeks to make hate speech against Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and
Hinduism, the law of the land, in precisely the same manner as was so effectively implemented by
the colonial Anglicans in India as their legacy, a parting gift of the Anglican jihadis.
Sustained denigration of all Hindu scholars, priests and educated families and guilds was as critical
to the success of this cancerous assault as was undermining the Dharmic teachings themselves and
Anglican scholars did this by deliberately conflating and mistranslating texts that had been
unchanged for over 4 thousand years. Suddenly the fluid, supportive empowering social structures
which had created the greatest, most harmonious and unwarlike civilisation, were gleefully
misrepresented as vehicles for social injustice, sustainers of discrimination and oppression.
Western scholars and historians like Arnold J Toynbee and Will Durant have written that Hinduism
represents the oldest wisdom known to humanity and is the mother of all religions in the world. It
has been well said that the “gentle wisdom and learning” tradition of Hinduism supported and
nourished the world, at a time when divisions of humanity on the basis of “Religion & Belief” were
non-existent. This was the Hinduism the Anglican missionaries found when they arrived in India.
This is the Hinduism Lord Harries is fearful of today.
The interest in Caste of the conversion obsessed missionaries, as we have seen, is not a new
phenomenon. On 4th January 1844, in colonial Madras, Rev Joseph Roberts of the Royal Asiatic
Society of Great Britain addressed a gathering of lead missionaries of the various Churches. He
began his address as follows:-
In consequence of very strong opinions recently put forth in a Madras publication respecting Caste
in the Church, and the sentiments still entertained by some Christians as to its character and
toleration; the determined adherence of numerous native members to this system, in the various
duties of life; and the solemn fact that next to the love of sin, Caste is the great barrier betwixt
the Pagans and Christ, I have thought it advisable to call your attention to this difficult and
painful subject…
Roberts then proceeds to speak of its probable historical source but remarkably refers to Caste as
follows – we think however that this wonderful institution of India, merging in the wisdom and
craft of man … and then he describes at length the benefits of this OCCUPATION based social
structure ie guilds.
So we have a 19th century missionary recording in the clearest terms that there was in existence
in India a “wonderful institution” of guilds whose existence presented an obstacle to the
acceptance of Christ, ie conversion.
To provide further confirmation of such a social structure, we find Sunderland writing : “The
wealth of India was created by the Hindus vast and varied industries. Nearly every kind of
manufacture or product known to the civilised world nearly every kind of creation of man’s brain
and hand, existing anywhere, and prized either for its utility or beauty had long, long been
produced in India. India was a far greater industrial and manufacturing nation than any in Europe
and or than any other in Asia, her textile goods – the fine products of her looms, in cotton wool
linen and silk – were famous over the civilised world, so were the exquisite jewellery and her
precious stones cut in every lovely form, so were her pottery, porcelains, ceramics of every kind,
quality colour and beautiful shape, so were her fine works in metal, iron steel silver and gold. She
had great architecture – equal in beauty to any in the world. She had great engineering works, She
had great merchants, great businessman, great bankers and great financiers. Not only was she the
greatest ship building nation, but she had commerce and trade by land and sea which extended to
all known civilised countries. Such was the India which the British found when they came.”
Within a hundred years of Anglican domination, millions of Hindus had died of famine and poverty
and her economic infrastructure had been all but dismantled, converted into a resource extraction
process of unyielding torture, horror and genocide. A nation which had never suffered famine saw
its land being used instead by the British Anglicans to grow Poppies for export to China in support
of the British InterFaith activities with China, otherwise known as the Opium wars.
As computed by Brooks Adams in the 57 years from 1783 the Anglican pirates extorted or simply
stole between 2.5 Billion and 5 Billion US Dollars out of India. Indeed records show that Robert
Clive, the Anglican 1st Baron of Plassey sent 4 million dollars of plunder to Calcutta in one
shipment alone, remarking “When I think of the marvellous riches of that country, and the
comparatively small part which I took away, I am astonished at my own moderation”…. One can’t
help again recalling Lord Deben’s remarks about traditional British values.
The inherently fluid and naturally life-embracing wisdom of Varna, Jati, and Kul were deliberately
and maliciously transmuted into clinically corrosive Caste and the cultural and religious
deconstruction of the oldest living indigenous civilisation, the last remaining threat to global
domination of the Church of Empire, began. In Lord Harries’ amendment, it continues unabated,
even today.

Caste, Varna, Jati & Kul

A s to ‘Caste’ – It first appears in mid-16th century Europe (in the general sense of ‘race, breed’):
from the Spanish and Portuguese casta ‘lineage, race, breed’, feminine of casto ‘pure, unmixed’,
from Latin castus ‘chaste’. Modern day Caste is defined as having three attributes – “hierarchical,
endogamous & hereditary”, and was the word describing the Portuguese and European social
structure of Pope/Cardinals, Aristocracy, Merchants and ‘Peasants’. There is no equivalent word
or concept in the Hindu Scriptures and no identical structure either recorded or promoted in
Hindu Scriptures. Caste is simply Portuguese for “Social Class”
As to ‘Varna’ - This is a Sanskrit word which means “type, order, colour or class.” It more
precisely means “variations/variety, choice from a varied selection.” As in Varmala – the Garland
of choice used by a Hindu Princess at her SwayamVar (“self choice”) to declare to all her chosen
suitor, the Varnmala ie the alphabet – a garland of variations ie different sounds. Var like so many
Sanskrit roots has found its way into English as in variation and variety.
In the context of the often deliberately and unknowingly misquoted core Hindu Scripture the
Bhagavad Gita, Sri Krishna says “I have created 4 variations of person – the intellectual, the
warrior, the trader and the labourer”. There is no connection in the verse quoted with hereditary,
no mention of hierarchy and no connection with endogamy. Indeed there are verses clearly
denying the hereditary and hierarchical claims. Varna clearly does not mean a hereditary,
hierarchical, endogamous social class structure, which is what the word “caste” means.
Sri Aurobindo, one of India’s greatest Hindu saints recorded “The spirit of ancient India was
aristocratic; its thought and life moulded in the cast of a high and proud nobility, an extreme and
lofty strenuousness. The very best in thought, the very best in action, the very best in character,
the very best in literature and art, the very best in religion and all the world well lost if only this
very best might be attained, such was the spirit of ancient India. The Brahmin who devoted
himself to poverty and crushed down every desire in the wholehearted pursuit of knowledge and
religious self-discipline; the Kshatriya who, hurling his life joyously into the shock of chivalrous
battle, held life, wife, children, possessions, ease, happiness as mere dust in the balance
compared with honour and the Kshatriya dharma, the preservation of self-respect, the protection
of the weak, the noble fulfilment of princely duty; the Vaishya, who toiling all his life to amass
riches, poured them out as soon as amassed in self-forgetting philanthropy, holding himself the
mere steward and not the possessor of his wealth; the Shudra who gave himself up loyally to
humble service, faithfully devoting his life to his dharma, however low, in preference to self-
advancement and ambition; these were the social ideals of the age”. This was the Hindu India the
British discovered.
Historically, in India, just as in any nation anywhere in the world throughout history, sons and
daughters followed in the footsteps of their fathers and a whole community was dedicated to
single professions, preserving and refining the knowledge capital of a civilisation. But this is a
universal social phenomena, whether it is the coal miners of America’s Appalachian mountains or
the cattle ranchers of Africa’s nomadic tribes. There is also social injustice along these
class/guild lines in many different countries not to mention the fault lines between Celtic and
Rangers, Catholics and Protestants and so on.
But the Anglican British social engineers, by their own admission, were largely responsible for the
deliberate corruption and attempted stratification of the fluid Varna system into a rigid Caste
system in India, one which simultaneously destroyed the economic fabric of an ancient civilisation
whilst destroying the cultural, spiritual and social heritage of a prosperous people.
There is ample evidence available for those impartial enough to seek it, confirming that the early
Christian missionaries recognised that the social structure of India’s millennia old Jati system was
a marvel of organisation, occasionally even labelled as wonderful. At the time when religiously
sanctioned Christian zealots, pirates and plunderers were engaged in the massacre of the
indigenous Ganai peoples of Austrailia, Rev Joseph Roberts addressed a gathering of Missionaries
in Madras on 4th January 1844. There are three elements noteworthy from his address (which is
reproduced below)
The first is that the when he uses the word Caste – it is clear that he refers to Jati ie occupational
Guild. Secondly he identifies the system of occupational guilds as “the great barrier in India
betwixt Pagans and Christ”, and finally he describes the system as “this wonderful institution of
India”. In a nutshell, in order to proselytise and convert, the Church missionaries needed to
destroy the occupational guilds of India – so spoke a respected Reverend of the Christian
establishment.
Noteworthy is the fact that whilst Brahmins were speaking of Varna (non hereditary, non
hierarchical, non-endogamous aptitude-based divinity-inspired “spiritually egalitarian” and
glorious humanity, Christian missionaries were hearing what suited their conversionary designs,
they were hearing and preaching Caste. In the following, it is clear from the Reverends address
that missionaries were delighted to overlook this inconvenient inaccuracy, either through lack of
philosophical sophistication and spiritual experience or simply because it was strategically
inconvenient to do so. In order to convert the infidel, they needed for Hindu society to be evil and
for Hindu society to be evil, they needed the Hindu religious teachings to be evil. The gold
standard meritocracy-driven Varna concept as enshrined in Hindu scriptures and declared by
Brahmin teachers and priests was transmuted into the leaden Christian construct of Caste, and
exported back to Europe as the prime reason why domestic Christians needed to support the
Church in its mission to civilise the heathen.
Little has changed.
The penultimate paragraph is pure conjecture and the last paragraphs graphically demonstrate
the theocrats inability to appreciate the subtlety of the “wonderful” system they had discovered
and in the words that followed, one can see the asset stripping minds superimposition at work,
even in 1844. By the time the Criminal Tribes Act was completed in 1871, the above teachings had
been imparted in the Colonial colleges of England, the institutions which specialised in preparing
the Lord Lundy’s of Victorian England to “Lord over the dark skinned heathen” and the
transformation of the understanding of Jati had been successfully morphed into the horror of
“India’s Hindu Caste system”. This is the lie that is still spouted with such confidence in many
corners of decaying Colonialism even today, and this is the untruth which was peddled in the
House of Lords, on 4th March 2013.
Does social injustice that falls along class lines exist in India? Of course, as it does in Great Britain
and in the US, where they have a prison population of 85% black men, yet no one places this
problem at the feet of Christianity, even though a clear connection can be made to certain verses
in the Bible, slavery and even current day race relations in many countries. The Rockefellers and
Lords of London are not dining with the janitors of London, while the rich get richer and the poor
get poorer. Unlike the case of India and Hindus, no one ascribes this social injustice to a religion.
The Lords are not troubled by the horrific racism statistics propelling America’s
#BlackLivesMatter initiative and yet the mission of elevating the British Hindus out of their
backward ways, like a lodestone drawing iron filings, perennially draws all of their attention – and
we are asked to believe that it has nothing to do with conversion.
“No aspect of Indian society is as poorly understood as its social organization. The caste system,
as described in Indian textbooks, is a creation of the anthropologists and sociologists of the
nineteenth century who were then studying the bewildering complexity of Indian society. The
informants of these social scientists used the theories of the archaic Dharma Sastras to fit the
communities in a four-varna model. Although such classification was wrong, it has been used by
generations of Indologists and filtering into popular books it has, by endless repetition, received a
certain validity and authority. In an example of reality being fashioned in the image of a
simulacrum, many Indians have started believing in the enduring truth of the classification (Subash
Kak,1994)”
Caste as a concept, practice and social cancer is purely and exclusively a European Christian
Colonial creation, and has no roots nor support in any Hindu ideology. The Church of England is
responsible for every hateful act resulting from their perpetuation of the “bespoke Indian Caste”
concept and it is the Church that must now be held accountable.
The Victims and Casualties of the Lord Harries Amendment
A nd what of the casualties of this ill-conceived, malicious piece of legislative mischief, which is
deliberately disruptive of interfaith harmony and community cohesiveness?
It has been established from statutory records, (Appendix A) that the Church of England fully
supported Lord Harries’ faithless, supremacist expedition, despite the window dressing of shallow
disingenuous murmurs of disapproval. It would also appear that Lord Harries was willing to abuse
and pervert the dignity of even the House of Lords, an institution which should be a force for
security, stability and service to British citizens of all religious and non-religious traditions, in the
furtherance of the conversionary agenda of the Church of England. That Lambeth Palace was
selfishly pursuing its own spiritually bankrupt agenda in trying to resurrect its colonial policy of
“divide and rule”, is now very difficult to refute and cannot be swept under the carpet.
Like all fraudulent scams and schemes, a time comes when such duplicity is revealed and placed
upon display for all to see and that too is fast approaching. This manipulation of the legislative
process, destructive of community cohesion, if sanctioned, supported and specifically approved of
by Lambeth Palace, will have immeasurable consequences. The impact of this action on British
interfaith dialogue is at present, like thunder rumbling in the distance, but fast approaching.
British Hindus and members of other Dharmic traditions are asking the question - “On what basis
should the Dharmic communities trust any member of the Anglican clergy, ever again?” Are we
moving towards the end of all authentic Anglican-Hindu InterFaith dialogue?
The assertion that the Church of England acted in bad faith, knowingly and deliberately for its
own sectarian, anti-Hindu evangelical objectives, has been established with a far greater degree
of evidence than the foundational “truth claims” upon which even its own core evangelical
mission is constructed. Most pertinently the fact of the Church’s betrayal of a sacred national
trust is also established with far greater evidence than that presented in support of this act of
religious persecution, couched as a legislative clause, allegedly in protection of Equality and
human rights.
The House of Lords will not recover any shred of its already weather-beaten and tarnished
reputation until relief has been provided for the Hinduodic hate crime perpetrated upon British
Hindus by the Upper Chamber. The fact that such discriminatory, prejudiced and cynical
manipulation was concealed and presented as “Equality legislation”, legislation designed to
protect the vulnerable from the powerful, should give grave concern for all legislators as to the
real ability of the Upper Chamber to protect the needs of the most vulnerable, least culpable
members of British society. There are Parliamentary processes and Government bodies such as the
GEO and the EHRC whose very purpose, whose “raison d’etre”, is to prevent a skilful bigoted
orator from manipulating emotions whilst at the same time inflicting human rights abuses
– this whole Caste issue is a sad reflection upon all of these bodies and has created a question
mark over their real world “suitability for purpose”.
It should be clear to any impartial legislator that this law denies every British Hindu the right to
be treated as equal to any other British Hindu, and in enshrining in law the false premise of the
“Indic Caste system” further demotes from a position of equality with all other British
communities, all of the Dharmic communities. It creates the very inequality which equalities
legislation is intended to challenge. It is the only piece of legislation to have been passed which
enshrines a presumption of inequality and it was introduced by a representative of the “by law
established” dominant religious institution of the United Kingdom.
What is starkly unavoidable and quite extraordinary is that from all of the political parties,
Government departments, Parliamentary APPG’s, Equality NGO’s, Human Rights Champions and
Legal eagles, Ministers and Peers, the ONLY body which agreed to inspect the data and evidence
and to consider the impact in an impartial manner, was the Government headed by PM David
Cameron, surviving the unrelenting pressure of even a coalition Government partner.
In time to come, this pivotal insistence on due process, community consultation and scrutiny by
the Conservative Government will be noted with deep gratitude by all Hindus in all nations and by
true proponents of religious freedoms. History will record that whilst Labour leader Hon Jeremy
Corbyn was standing by his dishonourable and wholly inflated claim that there were “1 million
Dalits in the UK” (as opposed to the census record of circa 15,000), the integrity and reputation of
Parliamentary process was itself protected by only Prime Minister David Cameron and his
Conservative party.
All others danced blindly, intoxicated by the emotionally manipulative tune so skilfully played by
the Pied Piper of Pentregarth and we all need to give serious consideration upon how they
permitted themselves and their prejudices to be so easily manipulated. Hon Lord Popat, Hon Alok
Sharma MP, Hon Bob Blackman MP, Hon Paul Uppal MP are to be acknowledged for adhering to the
principle of scrutiny of the actual evidence, as opposed to yielding to the “religious persecution”
based smear campaign being wielded by the supporters of this amendment.
The, clearly unwholesome, presence of 26 Bishops in the Upper Chamber is a theocratic pothole
on the British “roadmap” and journey towards genuine interfaith harmony, especially at the very
dawn of a post theocratic, post colonial British community, Europe and world. As many legal
experts have repeated in the Houses of Parliament and elsewhere, this most intransigent Church
of Empire cannot be relied upon to deliver justice and protection of Human rights to its own
members, at this time it clearly can no longer be entrusted with the most delicate and sensitive
work of our time, InterFaith engagement either.

Recognition, Remorse, Reparation and Reconciliation

O n the basis of the evidence above, as well as innumerable other records of impeccable and
unimpeachable provenance, it is clear that the suffering of Hindus at the hands of Anglicans is one
of recent history’s unreported “crimes against humanity” including genocide and that there are
millions of Hindus who have been devastated by the atrocities inflicted upon them, and as a result
of which they are still struggling every day. We look forward to hearing from the Archbishop of
Canterbury, the Rt. Honourable Justin Welby, his proposals with regard to justice and reparation
for the Hindu, whether Dalit or Non Dalit, British or Indian for past hate crimes and anticipated
hate crimes, perpetrated by his Institution or with its blessings and “Divine” sanction,
encouragement and support.

Conclusions
T he British Hindu community asked the protectors of Equality “Did no one in the Upper Chamber
even think to check the context, the data and the possible motives before embarking on this 21st
Century Witch Hunt?” Or even worse can no religious minority now rely on the Upper Chamber or
British Human Rights bodies for protection from the religious persecution being so skilfully
perpetrated by the majority aggressively evangelical religion? The House of Lords needs to justify
its competence, perhaps its very existence, once again, thanks to Lord Harries of Pentregarth. It is
respectfully suggested, that only once it has been purged of those who act with blatantly
sectarian, wholly non-secular and supremacist motives, can it rightfully be a voice for the good of
all British citizens, especially the minority Dharmic, non-aggressive, non- conversionary British
Jains, Sikhs and Hindus.
The 18th century Anglican mission of “One Church to rule them all and One Church to find them,
one church to bring them all and in the darkness bind them..” seems less incredible now than it
did before the 4th March 2013.
It is our hope that once all see the above design laid out before them, the gentle deeply
philosophical and entirely peaceful depths of the Dharmic community’s presence will be also
increasingly accepted and appreciated again, as is the Dharmic vision of harmonious community
co-existence. The insane pursuit of “Unity in conformity”, the mainstay of this Anglican
Institution, will have been seen to again have generated friction and dischord, and the ancient
Dharmic principle of “Unity in Diversity” will again come to the fore, bringing tranquillity and
harmony with it.
And what of the Caste concept itself? Once the psychological virus, which is the caste concept,
has been removed, dissolved from humanity’s consciousness, the Dharmic traditions, free of this
cancerous, wholly Colonialist Anglican ideology, will again be able to contribute their 5,000- year-
old holistic, inclusive, respectful vision of tranquil co-existence. Enshrining the concept of Caste
in law, under the guise of equality legislation is a retrograde step which will enforce its
resurrection here in the UK of the 21st Century. A fuller explanation of the science, social and
material behind Jati, Varna and Kul and Gotra, will be presented in the full British Board of
Dharmic Scholars (BBDS) Report on the Caste Legislation, of which this forms a part and which will
be published shortly.
It should now be clear that by entrenching a falsified and fabricated, Christian concept of Caste
into Law, the Church of England sought to protect its centuries old anti-Hindu negative-branding
project. The “divide and rule” policy being so skilfully executed to separate and maintain distance
between Dharmic communities along the lines of Caste required the concept of Caste to be
enshrined in law. This would allow Christian Clergy the world over to leverage the concept as a
platform from which to denigrate the oldest most tranquil spiritual tradition in the world, thereby
facilitating “easy conversionary pickings” year after year, generation after generation.
We are at a juncture in British Indian history where the past atrocities instigated and often
inflicted by this Institution, have now been brought centre stage. Very soon they will be
appearing on every negotiating table and will become the subject of every post Brexit trade
dialogue or political engagement. The British Government, obliged and desirous of acting on
behalf of all of the British people will falter and stumble each time the issue of the Churches
sponsored and supported past atrocities are revealed, not just in the Indian context but in the
global context. It is clear that without the help and active support of the British Hindu
community, the past cannot be reconciled and a path towards a mutually Indo British respectful
future, with both nations benefiting will not so easily be laid.
It’s also self-evident that only in a world where Dharmic ideals are providing guidance (as was the
case in pre-Abrahamic days) can intercultural harmony exist. We must recognise the Dharmic
principles which teach that
• none are deemed sinners at birth, nor criminal at birth
• none can claim exclusive entry to higher realms of consciousness,
• no theocracy is required for humanity to exist according to our naturally endowed higher
qualities and aspirations,
• Divinity can be found in the deepest heart of all people simply by sustained tranquil
introspection,
• thus all are truly equal in the eyes of Divinity.
Consider a possibly extreme, light hearted example. Even if one think’s that the “Hare Krishna’s”
are a little “dynamic” in their devotion, it is certain that if all humanity were “Hare Krishna’s”,
there would be food for all, more dancing and singing and no religious warfare. The same applies
to all members of the Dharmic family of spiritual traditions. The record (as opposed to the
marketing literature) of the Abrahamic traditions of enforcing with violence, their exclusivist,
aggressive insistence on uniformity and submission over 2,000 years, rests in stark contrast and is
also plain to see.
It has not escaped our attention that this issue has been the favoured “stomping ground” of vast
hordes of “academics” and politicians, many of whom have made lifelong careers by ensuring that
this long standing wound in the psyche and the body of the former colony is not permitted to heal,
and by diligently avoiding any number of solutions. Many “academics” and Anglican Bishops have
beaten their breasts with indignation, fueled with cheap moral indignation and ever present self
righteousness and yet how many have accomodated the historical facts presented by an
insignificant and unpolished community organisation such as the NCHT(UK)? These academicks,
these Bishops and these scholars MUST be asked this question … where did all that “public purse
supported” research funding go?
They must also be asked, that if the obvious solution is to reverse the harm done by the Anglican
colonial power and to re-unite the Dharmic family, why is it that every solution presented by them
after all of their lifetimes of study, revolves around the denigration and vilification of the Dharmic
religions and the conversion of their communities from their “false religion” to Christianity?
Pseudo academics play many games, most pernicious of which involves the maintenance of endless
public funded “academicking” ie mimicking real academic effort and this activity can be best seen
in the endless circles of peer reviewed self referential, generally unintelligible, nonsense which
emerges. A recent academick escapade, at the taxpayers expense, sought to define Caste and
concluded that an “elastic definition” was necessary, overlooking the fact that no definition by
definition can be elastic, since in being elastic it ceases to define. Obvious to any A level student
and yet this was the output of the EHRC, and its preferred vastly experienced academicks, all at
the public expense.
Recalling the words of the ancient Hindu Mundaka Upanishad, and the Indian national motto,
‘Satyam Eva Jayate – truth/reality alone triumphs’, recalling also St Augustine’s pronouncement
“truth does not need to be defended, it is a lion and merely needs to be released”, we present
our understanding of the truth of the Bishop Lord Harries “Caste Amendment”.
We shall be encouraging all British Hindus, Sikhs and Jains to give the deepest reflection as to
whether there is benefit in adopting a policy of avoiding Anglican Clergy altogether. If it is agreed
that in the opinion of the Dharmic Organisations who will be sent a copy of this note, that the
Church of England has acted in bad faith and aggressively towards British Hindus, Sikhs and Jains,
we may have no choice
but to explore all avenues to ensure the protection and wellbeing of our Dharmic community
against the aggression of the professional Clergy of the Church of England, whilst welcoming closer
interaction with grass roots Anglicans and Christians, especially those no longer infected with
supremacist conversionary predatorial predilections.
The permanent solution to eradicating any Caste discrimination is to erase the Colonial concept of
Caste from Consciousness altogether and clearly not to preserve and sustain it, by enshrining it in
Law.
The Global Hindu community can then turn its attention to recognising and acknowledging fully
the incomprehensible suffering of the “Dalit” community and their ancestors at the hands of the
Anglican Colonialists, to helping their communities back to health and prosperity as Hindu
brothers and sisters, from a position of respect and fraternity, fully equal members of the Dharmic
family. This without, it must be noted, the help, guidance, or advice from any third person
wishing to carry the “White man’s burden” thank you very much.
“The Government’s commitment to tackling hate crime is underpinned by some of the strongest
legislation in the world, which protects communities from hostility, violence and bigotry. This
includes specific offences for racially and religiously aggravated activity and offences of the
stirring up of hatred on the grounds of race, religion and sexual orientation. It is imperative that
those laws are rigorously enforced”. Rt Hon Amber Judd, Home Secretary ”
The British Hindu community recognises that many who are innocent of Hindu-odium, merely
trusting of the Anglican Bishops and of the members of the Upper Chamber, will have come under
the sway of a passionate but unevidenced and prejudicial arguments and we look forward to
working with them to undo the harm which has been done to the British Dharmic community. They
have the opportunity to approach us which we would welcome, and to offer their support in
reversing the effects of this act of malice and we look forward to hearing from them. Together we
will find means to repair the harm and as the “good book” says by their works shall ye know them.
In conclusion we would like to thank Lord Harries for giving us an opportunity to draw the
attention of the wider British public to the tragic and cynical machinations of the Church of
England, past and present, and forcing upon us the necessity, however misguided and
unintended, to share the truth behind the creation of “Dalits” and “Caste” as well as being able to
draw a contrast between the violent history of the Church of England and the Anglicans who acted
in accordance with its teachings, and the most ancient and longstanding of Dharmic values, with
our fellow British citizens.

An Appeal to “Dalits”
T he Church of Empire drove your ancestors from their homes and trades, put them in chains and
destroyed your spirit, simply because your ancestors resisted the tyrannical British Colonial Laws.
The Colonial Anglicans then declared your whole community as “criminals by birth” … and for 200
years they have been blaming your own family members, brother and sister Hindus Sikhs and
Jains, the “non-Dalits”, for your plight.
Please reflect upon the motives of those who have done this to us and those who have benefitted
from sustaining and inflaming this family rift. Irrespective of colour or religion, whether we see
them as our own or as others, those who divided us for political gain or favour, they are the
source of unimaginable suffering, within our family. Those who seek to exploit this wound even
today, whether it is for reasons of conversion, academic patronage, political advancement or
personal prominence, now know the real cause of the Dalit suffering and their conscience must
ask “Who benefits from prolonging this rift and who is truly going to continue to suffer?” Knowing
now the truth of the source of Dalit suffering, we each need to re-assess our loyalties and choose
our “camp” – the colonial evangelicals or our ancestral brothers and sisters, all of whom were
victims of the Anglican Jihad.
We are led to believe that the Anglican white supremacists who were responsible of enslaving
Indian and other non-white nations and cultures, suddenly disappeared in 1947, being replaced by
a benevolent, paternal, welcoming Clergy and “fairy godmother” establishment. The process of
this legislation, its creation and guidance through Parliament, its approval by the EHRC and the
Governments Equality Office, the existence of this word Caste in legislation at this very time,
requires this assumption to be scrutinised as a matter of urgency, if multicultural interfaith
harmony and social integration is to be achieved.
An Appeal to Hindus, Sikhs & Jains – British and Non British, White and non-white.
The Author and associated Hindu Scholars express their deepest gratitude and acknowledges their
debt to the Dharmic wise ones in our families and the intellectuals, teachers, gurus and priests of
all Jatis, Kul and Biradri’s whether Kshatriya, Vaishya or Shudra, whether, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist or
Jain, the true Brahmins of India , for their sacrifices and determination to ensure that the Dharmic
knowledge of our ancestors should not die – humanity is indebted to you and all will see this soon.
We declare upon the strength of the evidence provided that your ancestors were not guilty of
“caste discrimination” and that our scriptures and sages have always challenged ignorance and
prejudice at every turn.
For the younger British Hindus who have recently become concerned that their ancestors were
“casteist” we state with certainty that they were not. You are descendants and inheritors of the
last great life affirming, free thinking civilisation extant and your ancestors were NOT CASTE
PREJUDICED. Many of our contemporaries in India were infected, and continue to be infected with
this Colonial legacy, this mental virus and we must help them to recover from it with all speed.
Shed your burden of guilt, it is founded upon baseless accusations made by invaders and pirates,
the worst the world has ever seen, of whom Tagore said “the sun never sets upon their Empire
because not even God can trust the British in the Dark”. You are free to stand tall and give voice
to the vision of your ancestors.
Resume your caste free friendships and seek especially to give respect to our Dalit brothers and
sisters, they have suffered as much as all of us at the hands of these Anglican Colonialists, even if
in different ways, and in many ways their physical suffering was and continues to be at a level at
least matching the evils inflicted upon the Aboriginals in Australia, the Native and African slaves in
the Americas. It is time for them to come home, welcome them.

An Appeal to British Christians

P lease study and scrutinise the sources mentioned above and in the bibliography and realise that
the perpetrators of these Colonial “crimes against humanity” inflicted these policies of “divide
and rule” FIRST upon the natives of these very islands, the British Isles. Reflect upon the manner
in which the Dalits were created and then reflect upon the attitude towards the English
peasantry, the Irish, the Scots and the Celts. Recall that the agents of this Church of Empire came
back to this country and lied about the cultures and civilisations which they had encountered in
the lands of “Johnny Foreigner”.
Whilst erasing indigenous societies and populations on distant continents, they lied at home about
the truly glorious and diverse history of a global humanity and they concealed and manipulated
accounts of their own guilt and perverse violence. Your children are already exploring the wider
world and the richness of eastern cultures and history, now even from their very phones, with
eyes open to time and space, they are seeing the falsehood and fear that the Church of Empire
has built its empire upon – go find out for yourself if what the Church fathers and Bishops have
been telling your children and yourselves is true. The reason pews and Anglican Churches are
empty is because your descendants are freeing themselves of fear and falsehood, the critical lies
which the Church of Empire wielded to maintain its grip on its enslaved population, and which are
the sands upon which this Institution stands today. The glaring dischord between the Gospel of
Christ and the Church of Empire can no longer be ignored if there is to be any tranquillity between
British faiths, traditions and religions - it is still very much present and lies at the heart of
InterFaith dialogue in our 21st Century Britain.
Please muster extraordinary courage and just consider the possibility that the strategy which
brands an innocent brown Hindu in rural India as a member of the “Criminal by Birth Tribe” is the
same doctrine which has branded humans “Sinners by Birth” by the same Institution for centuries.
If you are repelled by the concept of whole tribes being “Criminal by Birth” why do you accept
that your own children are “Sinners by Birth”? Your children and our children are increasingly free
again and they will grow into full complete human beings, free from the “heart stifling” guilt of
being “Criminals/Sinners by birth”. They are also free from the second mental virus, the mind-
numbing reason-crippling disempowering doctrine of blind loyalty to a small group of sad, grey
unstable and unhappy men, otherwise known as “the Church”.
Your children are already becoming what Christ envisioned when he declared “greater things than
these shall ye do” and it will be, simply because of their freedom from the mental slavery of the
Church of Empire. Once they are completely free of these two psychological viruses, their
contribution to the world will be earth shaking, healing and liberating and the ripples of its arrival
are already visible to those who care to look.

An Appeal to British “Pagans”, the Original Dharmic Community of the UK

T he same institution which inflicted horrors dredged up from the depths of hell and rained them
down upon your mothers and sisters in its depravity, which then denigrated your worship of
Mother Nature and the Earth for a millennia of years and which, gave unofficial sanction to the
hate filled “WitchFinder General”, did the same to all who respected the very earth which gives
us life and sustenance, the world over. When they had finished here in these British Isles, they
carried their hate filled pogroms of extermination of all indigenous knowledge systems, the
wisdom that comes to gentle tranquil minded people naturally, and violently replaced it with
blind destructive and divisive, supremacist belief. They came to India and, the Jewel in the Crown
and flooded the country with the same rivers of pain and suffering, only 100,000 times over.
The Dharmic community declares its sympathy for your suffering and declares that your ancient
holistic traditions resonate with ours. We have not only a shared vision of the Earth as Mother, of
Humanity as inherently Divine by birth, but also a shared pain received at the violent hands of the
same institution, the Church of Empire.

An Appeal to Anglican Clergy

S tudy the history of your ancestors and your institution, the above is becoming common
knowledge throughout the world, particularly in the coming days weeks and months and years,
simply because we are in the time when no hate-filled misdeeds can remain secret.
Your institutions’ abuse spanning cultures and continents, encompassing vulnerable far off
civilisations to vulnerable British children in London itself, is plain to see for all and becoming
impossible to conceal or deny. Your corporation has grown fat by feeding on the life energy of the
British people of all traditions and of “foreigners” for millennia, by instilling fear and hatred, by
dividing and ruling as opposed to uniting and serving. Its history of abuse and exploitation of the
English and the non-English, calls to you for justice with flowing tears, calling from the mouths of
every soul this institution has tormented in this country and around the world. There is a limit to
how much suffering any corporation can inflict upon humanity and a day of reckoning fast
approaches.
Are you, as persons on a declared quest for divinity loyal to the victims, the people, the children
of this Earth or to this institution whose very name is globally synonymous with exploitation in the
name of Divinity?
We urge you to make that choice today, remembering that the consequences of taking the name
of Divinity in vain, especially for the gratification of personal ambition or salacious appetites, at
the expense of the innocent and vulnerable, is the greatest of all sins.

Message to Chair, Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)

T he EHRC supported and participated in the perpetration of a Hate Crime against the British
Hindu Sikh and Jain communities. When the truth of their actions was brought to the attention of
the EHRC team and Project Leader, in multiple correspondences and whilst interacting with the
InterFaith Network, the complaints were shrugged off as meaningless and of no consequence. The
EHRC “Caste legislation” project was biased, prejudiced and contemptuous of the British Dharmic
Community from the very outset, with even the EHRC’s own website declaring the desired
outcome and the religious and philosophical orientations long before the project was even
commenced. The British Dharmic Community were assumed guilty, without evidence or trial and
the EHRC gave official sanction to this act of Religious Hatred. The Governments Hate Crime Plan
states:There are three categories of hate crime in legislation:
• incitement to hatred offences on the grounds of race, religion or sexual orientation;
• specific racially and religiously motivated criminal offences (such as common assault); and
• provisions for enhanced sentencing where a crime is motivated by race, religion,
The Governments published statement clarifies that “Hate crimes are pernicious; they send the
message that some people deserve to be targeted solely because of who they are or who they are
believed to be .”
Your organisation pandered to the desire of Lord Harries and his “anti-Hindu” coterie in
proliferating without evidence that CASTE was a reality for British Hindus, when there is more
than ample evidence that the community groups are merely geographical, ancestrally
occupational, or religious denominations. Your organisation supported fully the attempts to
misrepresent these groupings as a “caste system” an attribute of a barbaric community and
therefore worthy of vilification and denigration.
Your organisation gave official sanction and fully participated in “incitement to hatred offences on
the grounds of race, religion or sexual orientation”. Therefore the British Dharmic community has
NO confidence in the EHRC as the custodian and guardian of our human rights and equality
legislation. Once again we remind you that this is an injustice of the greatest magnitude and one
which cannot disappear. Like all hate crimes the ripples of such a hate inspired act will ripple
ever outwards and it will persist in consciousness until justice and reparations have been made.
Since all other communication has been dismissed, perhaps this report could be assumed to be a
formal complaint, prior to our proceeding with a request for a full Judicial Review.
Any crime that is motivated by hostility on the grounds of race, religion, sexual orientation,
disability or transgender identity can be classed as a hate crime.

Message to Archbishop Justin Welby, Lambeth Palace

W ith regard to this Christian supremacist and colonialist “Caste legislation”, you have an
opportunity to make some small atonement to help right an injustice which has caused pain and
suffering to millions, for almost 300 years. Your Institution is directly responsible and is soon to be
held accountable on the global stage, for the decades of torture and murder which transformed
the courageous Hindu and Sikh tribes who challenged the criminal Anglican expansion into India, in
to the long suffering people today known as the Dalits.
Your Institution provided the moral and religious approval which led to the inflicting upon them,
of unbearable levels of contempt, poverty and denigration, filling them with justifiable rage
permeating generations. We submit that your Institution then groomed, radicalised and converted
their own vulnerable and dependent children, and further directed this rage towards their own
indigenous culture, history, civilisation and finally at their own Hindu brothers and sisters. Lord
Harries’ actions are entirely consistent with the white supremacist colonialist tradition and history
of your institution and are evidence of a continuation of the tired old religiously predatorial
colonialist policies.
We overlooked the self- delusional remarks made by your predecessor in 2007 when he remarked
that the “British experiment in India was an example of caring colonialism” but your institutions’
sustained attack upon Hindus must cease. Muslims in their Mosques are not having meetings about
the terrible “Hindu Caste” system, neither are the Jewish, Zoroastrian, Pagan, Mormon
community, why is Lambeth Palace stoking the fires of intra – community friction? Dame Louise
Casey’s report highlights the failure of InterFaith in this country and if the interference and
deliberate denigration of the British Hindu community is anything to judge by, it’s perfectly
possible that the failure of InterFaith in this country is by design and not by lack of effort nor lack
of public funding. As the prime custodian and directional force behind the current InterFaith
vision, responsibility for such failure must be placed at the gates of Lambeth Palace and the
question of conflict of interest is now a worthy question. Is it possible that the failure of
InterFaith can be to the advantage of the Church established by Law? As CEO of this corporation,
on the strength of all of the evidence presented and much more yet to be presented, the British
Hindus call upon you to respond and to account for these acts, for these centuries of Hate Crimes
against vulnerable children, peoples and indigenous cultures.
Message to Lord Harries, our “Pied Piper of Pentregarth”
I am not an academic in the conventional sense of the word but my strongest credentials are that I
was brought up in the stolid gritty East Midlands of the 60’s, with the firmly Dharmic, Hindu and
English tradition of resisting bullying and prejudice coupled, with the Midlanders finely tuned
“flannel” detector. I write as a British citizen, living and revelling in being such in this country at
this challenging time. I write in service not of those who live in the rarefied atmospheres of
Palaces (either educational, political or religious) but in the service of those British citizens
struggling to make sense of a world in flux and desperate to make friends and build diverse
harmonious communities, citizens like myself.
I write as a person, born to Hindu parents, in a Brahmin “Kul“ (lineage), a Kshatriya’s (Warrior)
“Varna” (aptitude/human variety), within the Pandit “Jati” (Guild), with Rishi Gotra’s as my
genetic lineages, working as a “Vaishya” Businessman “Jati” (Guild), a Brahmin teacher “Jati”
(occupation) and in the garden under the guidance of my dear wife at weekends, as a Shudra
(manual worker). I am a member of the Punjabi Doaba, Anglican schooled, British-Indian-NRI-
Delhiite-Nottingham Forest supporting, Vegetarian-Samosa loving Biradri’s
(brotherhoods/communities) many of which I share with my Sikh, Jain Gujarati, Muslim and
Christian friends and families. And I am at ease with all of the diverse flavours of my identity,
each bringing unimaginable gifts and challenges in delightfully unequal measure and I have never
discriminated against any other human being.
Having expended so much time and effort, having disbursed public and government funds in their
millions in trying to shoehorn me into a legal box consistent with your seemingly diabolical design,
please consult with your “lead expert” Dr Meena Dhanda, your discriminatory, pseudo experts at
NIESR, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission and the Government Equalities Office, and
the Doyens of the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties, and do send me a legally sound certificate
enlightening me as to what my “Caste” is? I look forward to appearing in front of Justices one day
to hear them attempt to define me.
I could provide you with the similarly diverse and colourful profiles of my British parents and
British children if it would help but you would need to determine the caste of a Punjabi born
retired Bus-driver who is a teacher of the Vedas, a volunteer who has built both Gurudwaras and
Temples and is a scholar of the Granth Sahib as well as Punjabi poetry, who writes in Urdu as
fluently as he does in Punjabi, Hindu and English, not to mention a mother who loves the Punjabi
Sikh Sukhmani Saahb as much as she does the Hindu Chandi Paath. I respectfully deny you the
right to put us in your Evangelists “legislation by vilification” created, discrimination driven,
colonialists box.
“Any crime that is motivated by hostility on the grounds of race, religion, sexual orientation,
disability or transgender identity can be classed as a hate crime. “ Rt Honourable Home Secretary
Amber Rudd MP
To dispel any remaining shred of doubt, This “criminal by birth” approach to enshrining Caste into
Law, seeks to make prejudice and hatred of Hindus, Sikhs & Jains, the law of the land.
It is in itself, by all definitions, a Hate Crime.
To assume that all persons who have a surname associated with an ancestral profession, are
potentially guilty of being “caste supremacist” is itself an act of prejudice.
To include into law a colonial missionary trope is akin to accepting into law, equally reprehensible
tropes such as the “blood libel” against the Jewish people, the “Rapist” libel against Americas
Blacks, the “born criminal” libel against Europe’s Romany community.
Notable is the coincidence that all of these tropes have the same ethnic and religious source.
We conclude as follows with the daily Hindu prayer “Aum Sarve Bhavantu Sukinah” from the
ancient Brihadaaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.14, with a slight modification of our own:--
Aum, May All become Happy, May all be Free from Illness, May All See what is Auspicious, May no
one suffer, Aum Tranquility, Tranquility, Tranquility, Aum , And may all such wholly hateful
attempts to enshrine prejudice and discrimination into Law be repealed and never again see the
light of day
And may Caste Consciousness be erased in its entirety.

Pt Satish K Sharma@dharmarising www.satishksharma.com www.castebomb.com

 “White and Black…”

Appendices
Letter from Mike Purton (1st March 2017)
(A former BBC television producer and writer on spiritual matters)
EQUALITY ACT 2010 AMENDMENT
I have been shocked by your assessment of the Lord Harries amendment and your interpretation of
the real intentions behind it. While accepting your outline of the events leading up to this, I find it
extraordinary that there are issues here of which until now I have had absolutely no knowledge.
My feeling is that the majority of native Britons will share this reaction.
It has long been clear that this country’s occupation of India was an unholy alliance between state
and church. The state, Great Britain, in pursuit of international standing absurdly out of
proportion to its own size and the massive material advantages that went with it. The Church,
Christianity, which had perverted the simple message of its founder and believed it could justify
imposing its own version on a “primitive” people with a concept of original sin and the claim that
it alone possessed the means to personal salvation. Between them they were able to devise an
extraordinarily successful divide-and-rule format which did immense damage to that country.
The tragedy seems to be that they chose to ignore the fact that they were working hand in hand
to gain power over a nation whose spiritual tradition had already been in existence for three
thousand years when Jesus Christ was born. A tradition, moreover, based on the direct religious
experiences of its founders, rather than the man-made tenets of a self-serving priesthood.
The class system already so successful in Great Britain (and still firmly in place to this day) was
the obvious model to achieve this end. But as I understand you, what I – and I believe many other
people here – did not know was that in India before we arrived only a social system which defined
people according to the work that they did, often passed on from father to son, was in existence.
I had no idea that it was the British and its Church which turned these people into a criminal caste
– and worse – one to which they were condemned from birth, with no possibility of escape or
redemption . I had been led to believe that this appalling idea was something which the British
inherited from the Indians themselves. As such, it has always been quoted as a major criticism of
pre-colonial India, and by extension, as a justification of our time there. Against this, you refer to
the absence of the word caste in Hindu scriptures… To learn what really lay behind the British Raj
places a wholly different complexion on “the jewel in the crown.”
Clearly, it seems to me you are right in demanding an apology for this disgraceful falsehood. And
also such reparation as is possible at this distance in time for the damage it has caused – and is
still causing to people both in India itself and among the Dharmic residents of this country. An
amendment to the Act must, in addition, contain the clearest possible assurances that a
continuation of any remnants of caste will be fully addressed by the legal system. This brings me
to the question of your approach to this matter at this particular time.
The West, quite understandably despite all its statements about “the battle against terrorism,” is
now reaping the whirlwind for the sins of our fathers. We are seeing the collapse of our world on
the same two fronts that brought about the exploitation of the Indian sub-continent, of Africa and
everywhere else where the opportunity for material or religious gain could be seen. We have long
had it coming, and now it has arrived. At this moment we are almost certainly closer to destroying
the world than we have ever been. So far, we have been discussing fairly recent events which
have helped to bring us to this point. The bigger picture, however, reveals a fundamental
aberration regarding man’s attitude to this universe and our purpose in being here.
As the founding fathers of the Hindu tradition – and others even before them – were aware, both
man and his fellow sentient creatures are spiritual beings. But science, which set out to discover
the mind of God, after early successes in explaining the workings of the universe, decided in its
hubris that it no longer needed him, switching its focus to a purely material reality, a thing of
chance mutation subject only to the prevailing environment as to what should and should not
survive. And so began our descent into materialism from which all our problems stem.
I see our situation as a reflection not of gross human wickedness but of man’s frailty in his role as
the present cutting edge of progress. In a godless, purposeless creation of only material substance
at the whim of chance mutation what else is there but every-man-for-himself and the pursuit of
personal wealth? We have learned the hard way that if that really is how things are there is a
heavy price to pay. Greed, the exploitation of the weakest, the widening gulf between the haves
and have-nots lead to violence, mass rape and child-abuse and all the other horrors of which we
now hear every single day. The result is that both our materialist science and Christianity in the
perverted form in which it has come down to us are now both in their death throes.
Again, though surprised by the vehemence with which you express your feelings in regard to the
treatment of your people, I must say again that I recognise that you appear to have right on your
side. But it brings us to the living individuals against whom you are currently directing your attack.
Yes, of course we collectively share the inherited responsibility for what the British did. Those
personally responsible, however, are now long gone. The targets at which you are aiming are not
those people themselves. I wonder, too, just how many of those on the receiving end of this
attack are any more aware of the full background to the hate crimes to which you refer than I
was. A number of the people you quote suggest that it is a large proportion. Unfortunately there is
a great deal of repetition in your response to the Harries amendment. This has the effect of
progressively reinforcing the sense of animosity that already pervades it.
Unlike the Jihad element of Islam, the Dharmic nations have not, thank God, descended into the
extremes of mass killing and suicide bombers. You have so far retained the moral high ground,
despite the high proportion you quote of racist threats, bullying and especially Islamophobic hate
crimes directed against Hindus.
The West is at a crucial point in its history. Both the reductionist scientific method, which has
sought to explain creation in purely material terms, and the perverted form of Christianity which
has come down to us have each failed and are now in their death throes. But my intuition tells me
that they are linked in a way which will soon bring about major changes for both. The key is the
present state of physics, which I believe will now be forced to accept the existence of nonlocal
mind. It is only this which will enable science to overcome the greatest challenge it has ever
faced: the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics. For almost a hundred years
the two have seemed totally incompatible.
The acceptance of nonlocal mind will bring about immense changes. In science, it will open the
door to a range of psychic human experiences which so far have been anathema to the materialist
position. In the Christian religions, it will affect such issues as direct spiritual contact with the
godhead and reincarnation, which have for so long been barriers to the reality of the cosmos. So I
believe change is on the way, and the experiences which the Dharmic traditions have accepted for
so long will be an important part of it.
Which brings me back to that Sunday morning and the television programme “The Big Questions”
when I first saw you in action from your position on the moral high ground. As the spokesmen (and
women) of the warring Christian factions were knocking seven bells out of one another, you sat
quietly in the front row. When the chair-man finally came to you, suddenly here was a grown-up,
talking real sense and from a much longer perspective, gently chiding them, but with humour and
more in sorrow than anger.
In addition to his healing mission to the planet Earth, the man Jesus brought the message that the
most important means of dealing with the ills of the aberrant creation into which we have got
ourselves is forgiveness. Please forgive us now, so that we can move forward together.
Ends

Extract from Voice of Dalit International - Annual Accounts 2013-2014 Lambeth Palace
meeting:
“Meetings with Lord Bishop Richard Harries and participation in the Church Urban Forum [CUF]
conference on ‘Poverty in London’, wherein the ArchBishop of Canterbury was giving the keynote
address, gave an opportunity for VODI to raise a criticism from the Dalit Diaspora Communities,
who felt that despite living in a Christian country, the UK Church seemed inactive on the caste
legislation issue. This led to a meeting for VODI and DSNUK representatives at Lambeth Palace,
with Canon Toby Howorth, Inter - Religious Affairs. He said that unfortunately they did not have a
Dalit Desk, that the Church of England [C of E] supports the caste legislation, which could be seen
clearly through Bishop Lord Harries, one of the main persons driving the course of the legislation.
Other C of E Bishops were also there in the House of Lords. VODI suggested that the Hindu section
of the Dalit Diaspora communities be invited for the inter-faith meetings of the Hindu and
Christian organisations. Canon Howorth said that if caste was put on the agenda, the mainstream
Hindu representatives who refused to discuss it, would not attend. However he said he would raise
the concerns of the Diaspora communities to the ArchBishop, that it seemed that the Church was
not active enough on the caste issue and see what more could be done.”