American Structuralism Final

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

American Structuralism

Shafqat Zaidi
Roots of American Structuralism

Franz Boas

Bloomfield
Sapir

Whorf
Leonard Bloomfield (1887 – 949)
interested in language from a scientific, descriptive
viewpoint. He believed that linguistics, just like the
natural sciences, should deal objectively and
systematically with observable data.
Language study must always be centered on the
spoken language, as against written documents;
Definitions used in grammar should be based on the
forms of the language, not on the meanings of the
forms
Language at a given time is a complete system of
sounds and forms that exist independently
Phoneme was the most basic element.
Meaning, according to Bloomfield, was not
observable using rigid methods of analysis,
and it was therefore ‗the weak point in
language study.‘
American structuralists, the ultimate goal of
linguistics was the perfection of the discovery
procedures – a set of principles which would
enable them to ‗discover‘ in a foolproof way
the linguistic units of an unwritten language.
Franz Boas (died 1942) less concerned with the
construction of a general theory of the structure of
human language than prescribing sound
methodological principles for the analysis of
unfamiliar languages.
Boas and Sapir were both attracted by Humboldt‟s
view of the relationship between language and
thought, but it was left to one of Sapir's pupils,
Benjamin Lee Whorf, to present it in a sufficiently
challenging form to attract widespread scholarly
attention.
language determines perception and thought has
come to be known as the Whorf hypothesis.
The Sapir–Whorf „Hypothesis‟
Edward Sapir* (1884-1939) & Benjamin Whorf**
(1897-1941) claimed that language influences our
worldview. likening language to a polarizing lens on
a camera, filtering reality.
Sapir suggested that man perceives the world
principally through language.
Under the influence of Edward Sapir, … Whorf
developed the concept of the equation of culture and
language, which became known as the Whorf
hypothesis, or the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. Whorf
maintained that the structure of a language tends to
condition the ways in which a speaker of that
language thinks.
language and the thoughts that we have are somehow
interwoven, and that all people are equally affected by the
confines of their language. In short, he made all people out to
be mental prisoners; unable to think freely because of the
restrictions of their vocabularies.

Whorf fully believed in linguistic determinism; that what one


thinks is fully determined by their language. He also supported
linguistic relativity, which states that the differences in
language reflect the different views of different people. An
example of this is the studies Whorf did on the Hopi language.
He studied a Hopi speaker who lived in New York city near
Whorf. He concluded that Hopi speakers do not include tense
in their sentences, and therefore must have a different sense of
time than other groups of people.
Characteristics of American Structuralism

Corpus-based
Examples from observation, not from
introspection
Taxonomic: no universals
Bottom-Up: phonetics, phonology, etc…
Each level is autonomous
Based on early 1900s ideas: behaviorism,
Problems with American Structuralism

Neglected Syntax
Ignored Meaning
Bottom-Up: This approach limits what can
be done
Behaviorism “Behaviorism is a theory in the
philosophy of mind which maintains that talk
of mental events should be translated into talk
about observable behavior. Behaviorism parts
company with dualistic traditions which hold
that mind is a distinct substance from material
bodies” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
www.utm.edu/research/iep/b/behavior.htm

You might also like