Sosnik Et al-RPBE-Published
Sosnik Et al-RPBE-Published
Sosnik Et al-RPBE-Published
Received: September 28, 2007; Accepted: November 13, 2007; Revised: November 15, 2007
Abstract : Drug low solubility and stability in physiological environment constitutes a main hurdle in attaining the
appropriate bioavailability. Several polymer-based nanotechnologies are being intended in order to optimize the
technological (e.g., solubility, stability, bioavailability, etc.) aspects of drugs. Among them, polymeric nanoparticles,
dendrimers, polymeric micelles and polymersomes appear as the most attractive and promising. Concomitant with efforts
in the academic arena that aim at overcoming these drawbacks and, strongly motivated by a constant search for innovative
therapeutic strategies, a very rich intellectual property has been produced in the last years. This phenomenon has been
moved forward by the fact that aiming at registering off-patent or about to be off patent products, pharmaceutical
companies develop new formulations of old products. Another ambit of research is the design of more sophisticated drug
delivery devices (e.g., targeting, localized delivery) in order to minimize adverse effects that make the administration of
certain drugs risky or to enhance the patient compliance. A recent report by Cientifica Ltd. foresees a critical expansion in
the nano-based drug delivery market from its current $3.4B (about 10% of the total drug delivery market) to about $26B
by 2012, being this only a promising beginning for the $220B forecasted by 2015. Given the present circumstances, we
are probably witnessing a new revolution in therapeutics that will take treatment to a different dimension. The goal of the
present review is to provide a comprehensive and updated patent compilation of the most recent inventions relying on
polymer-based nanoparticulated carriers (polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, polymeric micellles and polymersomes)
for the optimization of the technological aspects of therapeutic agents. This article also includes a thorough review of the
patents made public in recent years (2003-2007).
Keywords: Pharmaceutical nanotechnology, polymeric nanocarriers, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, polymeric micelles,
polymersomes, drug solubilization and stabilization, enhanced bioavailability.
important strategy is the design of nanocarriers. From the where the molecules are homogeneously distributed across
first liposomes developed by Gregoriadis and colleagues the bulk or attached to the surface The different aspects of
more than three decades ago [12] until the current state-of- nanoparticles as well as the biomaterials employed for their
the-art, a pronounced increase in the variety of production have been comprehensively reviewed by several
macromolecular-based approaches for drug delivery was research groups [19]. The most broadly investigated
observed [13]. Among the technological alternatives, the polymers include the natural chitosan [20,21], alginate [22],
most broadly implemented are polymeric nanoparticles, gelatin [23] and albumin [24,25] and the synthetic polylactic
dendrimers, polymeric micelles and polymersomes. acid (PLA) [26], poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) [27],
polycaprolactone (PCL) [28], poly(cyanoacrylate) (PCA)
Several facts have contributed to the generation of a
[29], poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethylacrylate) block copoly-
broad and rich intellectual patrimony available and worth to
be revised in the area of polymeric nanocarriers: (1) a mer [15,16] as well as combinations with other materials
such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [30]. Also, inorganic
constant search for innovative therapeutic strategies aiming
nanoparticles have been developed [31,32]. In the case of
at improving not only technological features (e.g. higher
highly hydrophobic drugs, increased entrapment can be also
patient compliance, targeting, etc.) of a drug but also in order
attained [13]. From a pharmaceutical perspective, the appli-
to add technological value to the products and differentiate
cation has been extended to formulations for a broad
from the competitors, (2) stronger academia-industry interac-
tion mainly founded on a more compromised involvement of spectrum of administration routes including intravenous
injection and pathologies (e.g., cancer [33,34]). It is worth
academic scientists as scientific directors and advisors and
stressing that microparticles do not enable i.v. adminis-
(3) the high economic impact that a broader intellectual
tration. Especial emphasis was dedicated to the design of
property portfolio has nowadays on a company positioning
orally administered peptide and protein-loaded preparations
in the market. This process has gained impulse because in
[35]. The main advantage stems from the improved stability
order to register and license off-patent or about-to-be-off-
patent products, pharmaceutical companies develop new and absorption of these biologically active molecules in the
GI tract. Another area of interest is the drug delivery to the
formulations of old products. Also, the design of more
brain. Nanoencapsulation enhances the transfer across the
sophisticated drug delivery devices (e.g., targeting, localized
main hurdle: the brain blood barrier (BBB) (for recent
delivery) enables administration of certain drugs that display
reviews read [36,37]). However, nanoparticles are removed
high toxicity or to enhance the patient compliance by the
from the body by opsonization and phagocytosis [38]. Thus,
modification of disadvantageous characteristics like
bitterness. A recent report by Cientifica Ltd. foresees a the modification of the surface with highly hydrophilic
chains (e.g., polyethylene glycol) that results in lower recog-
critical expansion in the nano-based drug delivery market
nition by the host and longer circulation times was perfor-
from its current $3.4 billion (from about $33 billion of the
med. The profuse academic literature found its parallelism in
total drug delivery market) to about $26 billion by 2012,
the patent arena. Prokop patented particles made of
representing a ~ 37% annual growth and a promising
oppositely charged polymers such as dextran, derivatives of
beginning for the $220B forecasted for 2015 [14]. Given the
present circumstances, we are witnesses of a revolution in poly-methacrylamide, PEG and maleic acid [39,40]. Slower
release rates are attained by covalently binding the drug to
therapeutics. The goal of the present review is to provide a
the matrix. Desai and co-workers designed nanoparticles of
comprehensive and updated patent compilation of the most
water insoluble drugs stabilized with a protein coating
recent developments on polymer-based nanoparticulated
[41,42]. Oh et al. developed a series of drug-polyester
carriers (polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, polymeric
complexes obtained by the conjugation of the drug with the
micellles and polymersomes) for the improved solubility,
stability and bioavailability of therapeutic agents. Every polymer, attaining a zero order release profile and preventing
the burst effect [43]. Other groups produced biodegradable
section contains a general descrip-tion and then a table
nanoparticles for local delivery (e.g., bladder [44]) and cell
summarizing the most relevant inventions in the period
targeting [45-47]. These systems were also investigated in
2003-2007 is included.
diagnostics, detection and purification of biologically active
2. POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLES (NP) agents. For example, the group led by Mirkin patented
several inventions based on surface-modified gold nanopar-
The application of polymer made particles (micro and ticles containing oligonucleotides with sequences comple-
nano) as means for drug vehiculization was one of the most
mentary to portions of the sequence of a nucleic acid to be
broadly investigated strategies during the last decades.
detected [48]. Table 1 summarizes the most recent patents
Particles display interesting features related to the protection/
pursuing this approach [49-61].
stabilization of sensitive active compounds and their delivery
profiles [15,16]. Due to the higher surface area leading to 3. DENDRIMERS
faster solubilization rates, nano-sized structures usually show
higher plasma concentrations and AUC values [17]. How- Dendrimers are macromolecules combining a number of
unique characteristics: (1) a well defined, regularly hyper-
ever, this phenomenon also depends on the properties of the
branched and three-dimensional architecture, (2) a relatively
drug and some studies did not show statistically significant
low polydispersity and (3) a high and tunable functionality.
differences [18]. Depending on the production methodology,
This molecular structure confers the molecule properties
nanocapsules or nanospheres can be obtained. While the
substantially different than the linear counterparts. The first
former are vesicular systems where the solid or solubilized
drug is surrounded by a polymeric membrane, the later family was described by Tomalia et al. during the early ´80s
and stemmed from a step-by-step synthetic path-
comprise a solid matrix with different levels of porosity
Polymeric Nanocarriers for Optimized Technological Aspects of Drugs Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1 45
Table 1. Patents Describing the Development of Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Improvement of Technological Aspects of Drugs
(Refs 39-61)
(Table 1) Contd….
US20036645721
US20046812334
US20046818753
US20046828432 The invention provides methods of
detecting a nucleic acid. The methods
US20056861221
comprise contacting the nucleic acid
US20056878814 Nanoparticles having
with one or more types of particles
Mirkin, oligonucleotides
US20056902895 - having oligonucleotides attached thereto.
CA. et al. attached thereto and
US20056903207 The oligonucleotides are attached to
uses therefor
gold nanoparticles and have sequences
US20056969761
complementary to portions of the
US20066986989 sequence of the nucleic acid.
US20067098320
US20077259252
[48]
Polyacrylates, Polymethacrylates
Polycyanoacrylates, Polyarylamides
US20030152636A1 Nanoparticles used as a tool to deliver
Sabel, Polylactates, Polyglycolates, Polyanhydrates Method of treating
Polyorthoesters, gelatin, Polysaccharides drugs to a specific target within or on a
BA. et al. [49] cancer
albumin, Polystyrenes, Polyvinyls mamalian body.
(Table 1) Contd….
Nanoparticles of chitosan
and polyethyleneglycol as Systems for the release of biologically-active
Alonso, MJ. WO06097558 a system for the molecules comprising chitosan modified
PEGilated chitosan
et al. [55] administration of chemically with polyethyleneglycol and cross-
biologically-active linked with a cross-linking agent.
molecules
Poly-gamma-glutamic acid-
WO06041613 For targeting liver cancer cells, galactosamine
Sung, HW. Poly lactic acid block Nanoparticles for targeting
was conjugated on the prepared nanoparticles
et al. [56] copolymers conjugated with hepatoma cells
as a targeting moiety.
Galactosamine
(Table 1) Contd….
Biodegradable or non-biodegradable
Polymers derivatized with PEG and
coated with mucoadhesive polymers Coated controlled release
The composition includes a polymer
WO07001448 like chitosan, Poly(Lysine) polymer particles as
core encapsulating the active agent and a
Jon, S. et al. Poly(Ethylene imine), lecithin, lectin efficient oral delivery
[60] mucoadhesive coating disposed about
Polycarboxylic acids, Poly(Acrylic vehicles for
the core.
acids), Polysaccharides, Hydrogels biopharmaceuticals
monosaccharides, Oligosaccharides
oligopeptides, Polypeptides
way comprising successive Michael-type addition reactions and the shell that are reactive with each other rather than
between methylacrylate and ethylenediamine, rendering the with themselves [79]. These materials were denomined
polyamidoamines (PAMAM) [62,63]. The kind of core and tectodendrimers. Other noteworthy work is the design of a
number of synthetic cycles determines the generation of the product (Vivagel®) based on a pharmacologically active
dendrimeric molecule (nomenclature) and also the associated dendrimer for prophylaxis or treatment of sexually trans-
molecular weight, the number of superficial moieties and mitted diseases and actually investigated as contraceptive
their nature. [80]. Hubbell et al. patented a group of polyethylene glycol/
poly(lysine) (PEG/PLL) tissue coatings showing preventing
These highly functionalized materials enable drug incor-
cell-cell contact and inhibiting post-surgical tissue adhesions,
poration into the core of the molecule and drug complexation
and conjugation on the surface [64-67], being the ability of metastasis of tumors and restenosis in damaged blood
vessels [81]. A synopsis of patents focused on dendrimer-
the molecules to enter the ramified 3D structure fully related
based approaches is presented in Table 2 [77-95].
to the size of the dendrimer. Thus, it is assumed that due to
sterical hindrance, PAMAMs larger than generation 4 (G4) 4. POLYMERIC MICELLES
are only capable of superficial complexation or conjugation
and drugs cannot access the inner domains of the molecule. Polymeric micelles are nano-structures formed by the
Cytocompatibility investigations suggested the concentra- self-assembly of amphiphiles in water, above a minimal
tion-dependent toxicity of -NH2-terminated derivatives. The concentration called the critical micelle concentration or
main mechanism is apparently related to the cationization of CMC [96]. Polymeric micelles are composed by internal and
the molecule and later membrane damage [68]. A similar external zones named core and shell, respectively. Due to the
effect was observed in contact with red blood cells. In high molecular weight of the amphiphiles, they display
contrast, dendrimers with a carboxylic or hydroxyl surface higher stability (slower dissociation upon dilution) than
are, in general, less toxic. Regardless some compositional micelles formed by regular surfactants (e.g., polyethoxylated
drawbacks of NH2-terminated PAMAMs, this rationale was castor oil or Cremophor® EL, polysorbate 80 or Tween® 80),
capitalized to the design of modifications that led to more even at concentrations below the CMC, extending their
compatible materials. For example, poly(ethylene glycol)- circulation times in blood [97]. These materials are also safer
containing materials were synthesized by modifying the for parenteral administration [98,99] and display larger cores
terminals with PEG chains [69,70] and pro-adhesive peptides and hence, result in higher solubilization capacity. The
like RGD for tissue engineering and drug delivery appli- hydrophobic character of the core enables the inclusion of
cations [71]. Similar findings were observed by D´Emanuele hydrophobic drugs by physical means or chemical conju-
and collaborators by modifying the surface with lauroyl and gation and their dispersion at the molecular level, resulting in
PEG chains [72]. Also, PEG-diamine was used as the initia- enhanced water-solubility [100]. Also, the isolating effect
tor to generate novel molecular structures and larger cores (from the environment) of the polymeric entity can protect
[73,74]. Inspired in this technology, other interesting appro- molecules sensitive to chemical or biological triggers from
aches like dendrimer-shape DNA structures were developed degradation and metabolism [101]. Based on the core-drug
[75]. In terms of intellectual property, Dow Chemical Co. interactions through chemical and physical forces, drugs
and Dendritech Inc. have made a tremendous contribution display different release profiles. Also, polymeric micelles
along the last 21 years. From the first reported PAMAMs containing poly(ethylene oxide) as the hydrophilic compo-
(the first patent was published in 1986 [76]) to more nent evade opsonization and uptake by the macrophages of
innovative and biocompatible modifications to fine tune the the reticuloendothelial system (RES), prolonging circulation
properties and applications [77,78] a long way has been times in blood [102,103]. Another aspect of relevance is the
transited. For example, in 2003 Tomalia et al. patented inhibition of efflux transporters like PGP [104].
dendrimers displaying different reactive moieties in the core
Polymeric Nanocarriers for Optimized Technological Aspects of Drugs Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1 49
Table 2. Patents Describing the Development of Dendrimers for the Improvement of Technological Aspects of Drugs (Refs 77-95)
Patents No.
Inventors Polymers Title Observations
[Ref.]
(Table 2) Contd….
Patents No.
Inventors Polymers Title Observations
[Ref.]
Multifunctional
Diaminobutane poly(propylene dendrimers and Synthesis of multifunctional dendrimeric and
Paleos, C. US2006204472 imino) dendrimer (DAB) or other hyperbranched hyperbranched polymers for application as drug
et al. [93] dendrimeric molecules of similar polymers as drug delivery systems of bioactive pharmaceutical
structure, e.g. PAMAM dendrimers and gene delivery compounds and as gene delivery systems.
systems
Polymeric Nanocarriers for Optimized Technological Aspects of Drugs Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1 51
(Table 2) Contd….
Table 3. Patents Describing the Development of Polymeric Micelles for the Improvement of Technological Aspects of Drugs (Refs
115-141)
Polycaprolactone-
b-poly (ethylene
US20030176406 oxide) copolymer The drug delivery system (micelles) maintains the
Allen, C. Polycaprolactone-b-poly(ethylene
non-cross-linked release of the steroid compound in a patient
et al. [117] oxide) (PCL-b-PEO)
micelles as a having a deficient steroid level.
delivery vehicle
for steroid
pH responsive
D,L-polylactic acid, a copolymer of biodegradable
Polylactic acid derivatives capable of forming
D,L-lactic acid and mandelic acid, a polylactic acid
micelles in an aqueous solution with a pH of 4 or
US20040247561 copolymer of D,L-lactic acid and derivatives
Seo, M.-H. above. The polylactic acid derivatives may be
glycolic acid, a copolymer of D,L- forming polymeric
et al. [120] applied as a drug delivery system in various forms
lactic acid and caprolactone, and a micelles and uses
since poor water soluble drugs can be entrapped
copolymer of D,L-lactic acid and 1,4- thereof for poorly
inside the micelles.
dioxane-2-one water soluble drug
delivery
(Table 3) Contd….
Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(2-(4-
vinylbenzyloxy)-N,N-
diethylnicotinamide), Poly(ethylene
glycol)-block-poly(2-(4-
vinylbenzyloxy)-N- Hydrotropic polymer micelles are formed in
picolylnicotinamide), poly(ethylene solution from copolymers that comprise a
glycol)-block-poly(2-(4- hydrophilic polymer and a hydrophobic polymer
vinylbenzyloxy)-nicotinamide) having pendant hydrotropic agents. A hydrophilic
Pharmaceutical
US20050158271 Poly(oligoethylene glycol chain comprises polyethyleneoxide (PEG) and a
Lee, SC. applications of
methacrylate-co-poly(2-(4- hydrophobic chain comprises hydrotropic
et al. [122] hydrotropic
Vinylbenzyloxy)-N,N- monomer units derived from nicotinamide. The
polymer micelles
Diethylnicotinamide) micelles are found to be much more effective in
Poly(oligoethylene glycol solubilizing poorly soluble drugs and exhibit an
Methacrylate-co-poly(2-(4- excellent long-term stability even at high loading
vinylbenzyloxy)-N- of drugs.
Picolylnicotinamide) and
Poly(oligoethylene glycol
Methacrylate-co-poly(2-(4-
vinylbenzyloxy)-nicotinamide).
Biodegradable
copolymer, and
US20050019303 The micelles possess good drug and bioactive
Tsai, B.-H. Polycaprolactone (PCL) and polymeric micelle
agent delivery characteristics and are suitable for
et al. [123] Polyethylene glycol (PEG) composition
use in drug delivery or cosmetic applications.
containing the
same
Monoacetoxypolyethylene glycol
Polyethylene glycol, polyethylene-co- Amphiphilic block The present invention relates to polymeric
Propylene glycol, polyvinyl copolymer and compositions capable of forming stable micelles
US20050201972 Pyrrolidone, polylactides, polymeric in an aqueous solution, comprising the
Seo, MH. et
Polyglycolides, polycaprolactone, composition amphiphilic block copolymer and a polylactic
al. [124]
Polydioxan-2-one, polylactic-co- comprising the acid derivative wherein one or more ends of the
Glycolide, polylactic-co-dioxan-2-one same for drug polylactic acid are covalently bound to at least
Polylactic-co-caprolactone and delivery one carboxyl group.
Polyglycolic-co-caprolactone
Polyethylene glycol
Monoalkoxypolyethylene glycol and A composition for the sustained delivery of a drug
Composition for
Monoacyloxypolyethylene glycol comprising an amphiphilic diblock copolymer.
sustained delivery
US7153520 Polylactides, polycaprolactone When administered into a particular body site, the
Seo, M.-H. of hydrophobic
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composition forms an implant containing the drug
et al. [126] drugs and process
Poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) and drug containing polymeric micelles, which
for the preparation
Poly(lactide-co-p-dioxanone) are slowly released from the implant for an
thereof
Polyorthoesters, polyanhydrides extended period of time.
Poly(amino acid) and polycarbonates
(Table 3) Contd….
siRNA-
Hydrophilic The present invention relates to conjugates
WO07021142 polymer between siRNA (small interfering RNA)
Kim, S-H. et Polyethylene glycol (PEG),
conjugates for molecules and hydrophilic polymers, which can
al. [128] Polyvinylpyrolidone or polyoxazolin.
intracellular effectively be used for gene therapy for treatment
delivery of siRNA of cancers and other infectious diseases.
and method thereof
Amphiphilic
The nanotube may have magnetic properties. A
nanotubes and
Polyoxypropylene (POP) or therapeutic agent may be incorporated in the
micelles
WO07042833 Polyoxyethylene (POE), micelle. The micelle may be coated to form a
Chowdhury, comprising same
Polyoxyethelyne glycol (PEG), capsule and can be introduced to the human or
DFH. [129] for use in the
Lecithin, Phosphatidylethanolamine animal body for treatment of tumors or targeted
delivery of
(PE) and poloxamers. drug delivery when a magnetic field or near-IR
biologically active
radiation is applied.
agents
(Table 3) Contd….
Encapsulation and
deaggregation of The micelles can be reconstituted with the
US20040116360 polyene antibiotics Amphotericin B (or other hydrophobic
Monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol)- using compound) in a deaggregated state and safely
Kwon, GS. WO04034992
phospholipid. poly(ethylene used in therapy for fungal infections of humans or
[136] glycol)- animals, especially for systemic fungal infections,
phospholipid or other desired application.
micelles
Table 4. Patents Describing the Development of Polymersomes for the Improvement of Technological Aspects of Drugs (Refs 146-
151)
Patents No.
Inventors Polymers Title Observations
[Ref.]
Poly(ethylene oxide)-
Polyethylethylene The instant invention concerns compositions comprising
Poly(ethylene oxide)- Polymersomes polymersomes, visible or near infrared emissive agents, and
Hammer, US20050019265 Poly(butadiene) incorporating optionally a targeting moiety associated with a surface of the
DA. et al. [149] Poly(ethylene oxide)- highly emissive polymersome. The invention also relates to use of these
Poly(epsilon-caprolactone) probes compositions in the treatment of disease and in imaging
or Poly(ethylene oxide)- methodology.
Poly(lactic acid)
Poly(ethylene glycol)-
WO07038763 Polycaprolactone diblocks Self-assembled The invention concerns biodegradable polymersomes, more
Therien, MJ.
and copolymer of biodegradable particularly, polymersomes made of poly(ethyleneoxide)-b-
et al. [150]
Polyethyleneoxide and polymersomes polycaprolactone diblock copolymers.
Polycaprolactone
Table 5. Marketed Products Utilizing Polymer-Based Nanotechnological Strategies for the Optimization of the Technological
Aspects of Drugs
Silicone- Used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish the loops of the
Lumirem® Guerbet S.A. [154,155]
nanoparticles bowel from other abdominal structures and physiology.
The FDA approved paclitaxel albumin-bound particles for injectable suspension for
Albumin- American
Abraxane® the treatment of metastatic breast cancer after failure of combination chemotherapy [156,157]
nanoparticles Bioscience, Inc.
or relapse within six months of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Polymeric Nanocarriers for Optimized Technological Aspects of Drugs Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1 57
(Table 5) Contd….
Polyisohexylcyanoacryl Doxorubicin Transdrug® has been approved by the FDA for the multi-
Bio-Alliance
ate (PIHCA)- Transdrug® centre randomised Phase II/III clinical trial for the treatment of [158]
Pharma.
nanoparticles hepatocarcinoma.
REFERENCES [20] Alonso MJ, Sánchez A. The potential of chitosan in ocular drug
delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol 2003; 55: 1451-63.
[1] Kasim NA, Whitehouse M, Ramachandran Ch, et al. Molecular [21] Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM. Recent advances
Properties of WHO Essential Drugs and Provisional Biopharma- on chitosan-based micro- and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J
ceutical Classification. Mol Pharm 2004; 1: 85 -96. Control Rel 2004; 100: 5-28.
[2] Lindenberg M, Kopp S, Dressman JB. Classification of orally [22] Ahmad Z, Pandey R, Sharma S, Khuller GK. Pharmacokinetic and
administered drugs on the World Health Organization Model list of pharmacodynamic behaviour of antitubercular drugs encapsulated
Essential Medicines according to the biopharmaceutics classi- in alginate nanoparticles at two doses. Int J Antimicrob Agents
fication system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004; 58: 265-278. 2006; 27: 409-416.
[3] Amidon GL, Lennernäs H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis [23] Coester C, Nayyar P, Samuel J. in vitro Uptake of gelatin
for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro nanoparticles by murine dendritic cells and their intracellular
drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res localisation Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006; 62: 306-314.
1995; 12: 413-420. [24] Yang L, Cui F, Cun D, Tao A, Shi K, Lin W. Preparation,
[4] Lipinski C. Poor aqueous solubility–an industry wide problem in characterization and biodistribution of the lactone form of 10-
drug delivery. Am Pharm Rev 2002; 5: 82-85. hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT)-loaded bovine serum albumin (BSA)
[5] Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG. Current perspectives on the clinical nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2007; 340: 163-172.
experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the [25] Markovsky E, Koroukhov N, Golomb G. Additive-free albumin
camptothecins. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 641-61. nanoparticles of alendronate for attenuating inflammation through
[6] Barreiro-Iglesias R, Bromberg L, Temchenko M, Hatton TA, monocyte inhibition. Nanomedicine 2007; 2: 545-553.
Concheiro A, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Solubilization and stabilization [26] Bourges J-L, Gautier SE, Delie F, et al. Ocular drug delivery
of camptothecin in micellar solutions of pluronic-g-poly(acrylic targeting the retina and retinal pigment epithelium using polylactide
acid) copolymers . J Control Rel 2004; 97: 537-549. nanoparticles. IOVS 2003; 44: 3562-3569.
[7] Hasirci V, Vrana E, Zorlutuna P, et al. Nanobiomaterials: A review [27] Italia JL, Bhatt DK, Bhardwaj V, Tikoo K, Ravi KMNV. PLGA
of the existing science and technology, and new approaches. J nanoparticles for oral delivery of cyclosporine: Nephrotoxicity and
Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2006; 17: 1241-1268. pharmacokinetic studies in comparison to Sandimmune Neoral. J
[8] Hu J, Johnston KP, Williams III RO. Nanoparticle engineering Control Rel 2007; 119: 197-206.
processes for enhancing the dissolution rates of poorly water [28] Chawla JS, Amiji MM. Biodegradable poly(-caprolactone)
soluble drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2004; 30: 233-245. nanoparticles for tumor-targeted delivery of tamoxifen. Int J Pharm
[9] Overhoffa KA, Engstromb JD, Chenc B, et al. Novel ultra-rapid 2002; 249: 127-138.
freezing particle engineering process for enhancement of [29] Mesiha MS, Sidhom MB, Fasipe B. Oral and subcutaneous
dissolution rates of poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm absorption of insulin poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. Int
Biopharm 2007; 65: 57-67. J Pharm 2005; 288: 289-293.
[10] Müller RH, Jacobs C, Kayser O. Nanosuspensions as particulate [30] Zweers MLT, Engbers GHM, Grijpma DW, Feijen J. Release of
drug formulations in therapy. Rationale for development and what anti-restenosis drugs from poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(dl-lactic-co-
we can expect for the future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 47: 3-19. glycolic acid) nanoparticles. J Control Release 2006; 114: 317-324.
[11] Kipp JE. The role of solid nanoparticle technology in the parenteral [31] Ueno Y, Futagawa H, Takagi Y, Ueno A, Mizushima Y. Drug-
delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. Int J Pharm 2004; 284: 109- incorporating calcium carbonate nanoparticles for a new delivery
22. system. J Control Release 2005; 103: 93-98.
[12] Gregoriadis G, Wills EJ, Swain CP, Tavill AS. Drug carrier [32] Zhi Ping Xu, Qing Hua Zeng, Gao Qing Lu, Ai Bing Yu. Inorganic
potential of liposomes in cancer chemotherapy. Lancet 1974; 1: nanoparticles as carriers for efficient cellular delivery. Chem Eng
1313-1316. Sci 2006; 61: 1027-1040.
[13] Couvreur P, Vauthier C. Nanotechnology: Intelligent design to treat [33] Brannon-Peppas L, Blachette JO. Noparticle and targeted systems
complex disease. Pharm Res 2006; 23: 1417-1449. for cancer therapy. J Control Release 2004; 56: 1649-1659.
[14] http://www.cientifica.com The Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Market. [34] Torchilin VP. Targeted pharmaceutical nanocarriers for cancer
[15] Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni AR, Rudzinski WE. therapy and imaging. AAPS J 2007; 9: E128-E147.
Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. J [35] Allemann E, Leroux J-C, Gurny R. Polymeric nano- and micropar-
Control Rel 2001; 70: 1-20. ticles for the oral delivery of peptides and peptidomimetics. Adv
[16] Delie F, Blanco-Prieto MJ. Polymeric particulates to improve oral Drug Del Rev 1998; 34: 171-189.
bioavailability of peptide drugs. Molecules 2005; 10: 65-80. [36] Koo Y-EL, Reddy GR, Bhojani M, et al. Brain cancer diagnosis
[17] De Jaeghere F, Allémann E, Cerny R, et al. pH-Dependent and therapy with nanoplatforms. Adv Drug Del Rev 2006; 58:
dissolving nano- and microparticles for improved peroral delivery 1556-1577.
of a highly lipophilic compound in dogs. AAPS Pharm Sci 2001; 3. [37] Jain KK. Nanobiotechnology-based drug delivery to the central
[18] De Jaeghere F, Alleman E, Kubel F, et al. Oral bioavailability of a nervous system. Neurodegen Dis 2007; 4: 287-291.
poorly water soluble HIV-1 protease inhibitor incorporated into pH- [38] Owens III DE, Peppas NA. Opsonization, biodistribution, and
sensitive particles: Effect of the particle size and nutritional state. J pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2006;
Control Rel 2000; 68: 291-298. 307: 93-102.
[19] Brannon-Peppas L. Recent advances on the use of biodegradable [39] Prokop, A.: US20036589563 (2003).
microparticles and nanoparticles in controlled drug delivery. Int J [40] Prokop, A.: US20046726934 (2004).
Pharm 1995; 116: 1-9. [41] Desai, N.P., Soon-Shiong, P.: US20036537579 (2003).
[42] Desai, N.P., Soon-Shiong, P., Yang, A.: US20070092563 (2007).
58 Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1 Sosnik et al.
[43] Oh, J.E., Lee, K.H., Park, T.G., Nam, Y.S.: US20036589548 (2003) [78] Malik, N., Duncan, R., Tomalia, D.A., Esfand, R.: US20067005124
and US20077163698 (2007). (2006).
[44] Leong, K.W., Haller, M.F., Malavaud, B.A., Le Visage, C.S.: [79] Tomalia, D.A., Uppuluri, S., Swanson, D.R., Brothers, II H.M.:
US20046797704 (2004). US20036635720 (2003).
[45] Sung, H-W., Liang, H-F., Tu, H.: US20077267090 (2007). [80] Matthews, B.R., Holan, G., Karellas, P., Henderson, S.A., O'Keefe,
[46] Sung, H-W., Lin, Y-H., Tu, H.: US2007116772 (2007). D.F.: US20050008611 (2005).
[47] Turos E., Shim J-Y.: US20070190160 (2007). [81] Hubbell, J.A., Elbert, D.L., Herbert, C.B.: US20060122290 (2006).
[48] Mirkin, C.A., Letsinger, R.L., Mucic, R.C., Storhoff, J.J., [82] Matthews, B.R., Holan, G.: US20030129158 (2003).
Elghanian, R., Taton, T.A.: US20036645721 (2003), [83] Weber, M., Dennig, J., Erbacher, C.: US20030096280 (2003) and
US20046812334 (2004), US20046818753 (2004), US20046828432 US20077192744 (2007).
(2004), US20056861221 (2005), US20056878814 (2005), [84] Malik, N., Duncan, R.: US20046790437 (2004).
US20056902895 (2005), US20056903207 (2005), US20056969761 [85] Goodman. M., Seong, C.M., Harms, G., Min, C., Choi, B.H.,
(2005), US20066986989 (2006), US20067098320 (2006), Chung, H.H.: WO04009666 (2004).
US20077259252 (2007). [86] Yu, L., Van, S., Ji, S., Matsumoto, K.: US20056878374 (2005).
[49] Sabel, B.A., Schroeder, U.: US20030152636 (2003). [87] Jiménez, O., Moll, F.: US20050175669 (2005).
[50] Alonso Fernandez M.J., De la Fuente Freire, M., Seijo Rey, M.B.: [88] Brechbiel, M.W., Star, R.A., Kobayashi, H.: US20056852842
WO04112758 (2004). (2005).
[51] Reddy, G.R., Erathodiyil, N.: US20050196343A1 (2005) and [89] Frechet, J.J., Ihre, R.H.: US20067097856 (2006).
WO05089106 (2005). [90] Kobayashi, H., Choyke, P.L.: US20060204443 (2006).
[52] Mumper, R.J., Jay, M.: US20067153525 (2006). [91] Liskamp, R.M.J., Rijkers, D.T.S., Pieters, R.J., Brouwer, A.J.,
[53] Alonso Fernandez M.J., Remunan Lopez, C., Cuna Vilan M.M., Joosten, J.A.F.: WO06135233 (2006).
Alonso Sande, M.: US2006134785 (2006). [92] Tomalia, D.A., Pulgam, V.R., Swanson, D.R., Huang, B.:
[54] Alonso Fernandez, M.J., Garcia Fuentes, M., Maestrelli, F., Mura, WO06105043 (2006).
P.: WO06128937 (2006). [93] Paleos, C., Tsiourvas, D., Sideratou, O.: US2006204472 (2006).
[55] Alonso Fernandez, M.J., Janes, K., Csaba, N.: WO06097558 [94] William, B., Shukla, R., Baker, J.R.: US20070041934 (2007).
(2006). [95] Chauhan, A.S., Diwan, P.V., Jain, N.K., Raghavan, K.V.:
[56] Sung, H.W., Tu. H.: WO06041613 (2006). US20070014757 (2007).
[57] Pai C-M., Min M.H., Hwang J.S., Cho K.M.: US20070154559 [96] Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for
(2007). drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance.
[58] Sung, H-W., Lin, Y-H., Tu, H.: US20070116772 (2007). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 47: 113-131.
[59] Radosz, M., Shen, Y., Tang, H.: WO07001356 (2007). [97] Kwon GS, Polymeric micelles for delivery of poorly water-soluble
[60] Jon, S., Farokhazd, O.C., Langer, R.S., Cheng, J.: WO07001448 compounds. Crit Rev Therap Drug Carrier Syst 2003; 20: 357-403.
(2007). [98] Le Garrec D, Gori S, Luo L, et al. Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-block-
[61] Vila Pena, A.I., Suarez Luque S., Alonso Fernandez, M.A.: poly(d,l-lactide) as a new polymeric solubilizer for hydrophobic
WO07042572 (2007). anticancer drugs: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Control Rel
[62] Klajnert B, Bryszewska M. Dendrimers: properties and 2004; 99: 83-101.
applications. Act Biochem Pol 2001; 48: 199-208. [99] Strickley RG, Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable
[63] Tomalia DA. Birth of new molecular architecture: dendrimers as formulations. Pharm Res 2004; 21:201-230.
quantized building blocks for nanoscale synthetic polymer [100] Rapoport N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for
chemistry. Prog Polym Sci 2005; 30: 294-324. anti-cancer drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2007; 32: 962-990.
[64] Vandamme THF, Brobeck L. Poly(amidoamine) dendrimers as [101] Croy SR, Kwon GS. Polymeric Micelles for drug delivery. Curr
ophthalmic vehicles for ocular delivery of pilocarpine nitrate and Pharm Design 2006; 12: 4669-4684.
tropicamide. J Control Release 2005; 102: 23-38. [102] Barratt G. Colloidal drug carriers: achievements and perspectives.
[65] Fernandez L, Gonzalez M, Cerecetto H, Santo M, Silber JJ. Cell Mol Life Sci 2003; 60: 21-37.
Solubilization and release properties of dendrimers. Evaluation as [103] Moghimi SM, Muir IS, Illum L, Davis SS, Kolb-Bachofen V.
prospective drug delivery systems. Supramol Chem 2006; 18: 633- Coating particles with a block co-polymer (poloxamine-908)
643. suppresses opsonization but permits the activity of dysopsonins in
[66] Yiyun CH, Tongwen X. Dendrimers as potential drug carriers. Part the serum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993; 1179:157-165.
I. Solubilization of non-steroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs in the [104] Batrakova EV, Li S, Li Y, Alakhov VYu, Elmquist WF, Kabanov
presence of polyamidoamine dendrimers. Eur J Med Chem 2005; AV. Distribution kinetics of a micelle-forming block copolymer
40: 1188-1192. Pluronic P85. J Control Release 2004; 100: 389-397.
[67] D´Emanuele A, Attwood D. Dendrimer-drug interactions. Adv [105] Moghimi SM, Hunter AC. Poloxamers and poloxamines in
Drug Del Rev 2005; 57: 2147-2162. nanoparticle engineering and experimental medicine. TIBTECH
[68] Duncan R, Izzo L. Dendrimers biocompatibility and toxicity. Adv 2000; 18:412-420.
Drug Del Rev 2005; 57: 2215-2237. [106] Aliabadi HM, Lavasanifar A. Polymeric micelles for drug delivery.
[69] Yang H, Lopina ST. Penicillin V-conjugated PEG-PAMAM star Exp Op Drug Del 2006; 3:139-162.
polymers. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2003; 14: 1043-1056. [107] Chiappetta DA, Sosnik A. Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene
[70] Ambade AV, Savariar EN, Thayumanavan S. Dendrimeric micelles oxide) block copolymer micelles as drug delivery agents: Improved
for drug release and targeted delivery. Mol Pharm 2005; 2: 264- hydrosolubility, stability and bioavailability of drugs. Eur J Pharm
272. Biopharm 2007: 66: 303-317.
[71] Yang H, Kao WJ. Synthesis and characterization of nanoscale [108] Vakil R, Kwon GS. Poly(ethylene glycol)--poly(-caprolactone)
dendritic RGD clusters for potential applications in tissue and PEG-phospholipid form stable mixed micelles in aqueous
engineering and drug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine 2007; 2: 89-99. media. Langmuir 2006; 22: 9723-9729.
[72] Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, Jalal R, Attwood D, McKeown NB, [109] Lavasanifar A, Samuel J, Kwon GS. Poly(ethylene oxide)-block-
D´Emanuele A. The influence of surface modification on the poly-(L-amino acid) micelles for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv
cytotxicity of PAMAM dendrimers. Int J Pharm 2003; 252: 263- Rev 2002; 54:169-190.
266. [110] Adams ML, Lavasanifar A, Kwon GS. Amphiphilic block
[73] Yang H, Kao WJ. Dendrimers for pharmaceutical and biomedical copolymers for drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 2003; 92: 1343-1355.
applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2006; 17: 3-19. [111] Sezgin Z, Yüksel N, Baykara T. Preparation and characterization of
[74] Kim T-I, Seo HJ, Choi JS, et al. PAMAM-PEG-PAMAM: Novel polymeric micelles for solubilization of poorly soluble anticancer
triblock copolymer as a biocompatible and efficient gene delivery drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006; 64: 261-268.
carrier. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5: 2487-2492. [112] Li T, Lin J, Chen T, Zhang S. Polymeric micelles formed by
[75] Yougen LI, Tseng YD, Kwon SY, et al. Controlled assembly of polypeptide graft copolymer and its mixtures with polypeptide
dendrimer-like DNA. Nat Mat 2004; 3: 38-42. block copolymer. Polymer 2006; 47: 4485-4489.
[76] Tomalia, D.A, Hall, M.J.: US4599400 (1986).
[77] Tomalia, D.A., Majaros, I.J.: US20067078461 (2006).
Polymeric Nanocarriers for Optimized Technological Aspects of Drugs Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1 59
[113] Zhang X, Burt HM, Van Hoff D, et al. An investigation of the [142] Discher DE, Ahmed F. Polymersomes. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2006;
antitumor activity and biodistribution of polymeric micellar 8: 323-341.
paclitaxel. Cancer Chem Pharmacol 1997; 40: 81-86. [143] Discher DE, Ortiz V, Srinivas G, et al. Emerging applications of
[114] Agrawal SK, Sanabria-DeLong N, Coburn JM, Tew GN, Bathia polymersomes in delivery: From molecular dynamics to shrinkage
SR. Novel drug release profiles from micellar solutions of PLA- of tumors. Prog Polym Sci 2007; 32: 838-857.
PEO-PLA triblock copolymers. J Control Rel 2006; 112: 64-71. [144] Luo L, Eisenberg A. Thermodynamic size control of block
[115] Ranger, M., Leroux, J.-C.: US20026780428 (2002). copolymer vesicles in solution. Langmuir 2001; 17: 6804-6811.
[116] Hubbell, J.A., Napoli, A., Tirelli, N.: US20030059906 (2003) and [145] Ahmed F, Pakunlu RI, Brannan A, Bates F, Minko T, Discher DE.
US20067132475 (2006). Biodegradable polymersomes loaded with both paclitaxel and
[117] Allen, C., Eisenberg, A., Maysinger, D.: US20030176406 (2003). doxorubicin permeate and shrink tumors, inducing apoptosis in
[118] Jackson, J.K., Zastre, J., Burt, H.M.: US20040234472A1 (2004) proportion to accumulated drug. J Control Rel 2006; 116: 150-158.
and US20060189785 (2006). [146] Discher, D.E., Discher, B.M., Won, Y.-Y., Lee, J.C.-M., Bates,
[119] Seo, M.-H., Lee, S.-W., Kim, H.-J., Kim, J.-K., Huyn, M.-H., Yu, F.S., Hammer, D.A.: US20046835394 (2004).
J.-Il.: US20040253195A1 (2004). [147] Discher, D.E., Ahmed, F.: US20050003016A1 (2005).
[120] Seo, M-H., Kim, B-O., Choi, I-J., Shim, M-S.: US20040247561 [148] Discher, D.E., Discher, B.M., Won, Y-Y., Lee, J.C-M., Hammer,
(2004). D.A., Bates, F.S.: US20050048110 (2005), US20070218123 (2007)
[121] Lavasanifar, A., Kwon, G.S.: WO05118672 (2005). and US7217427 (2007).
[122] Lee, S.C., Huh, K.M., Park, J.H., Park, K.: US20050158271 (2005). [149] Hammer, D.A., Therien, M.J., Ghoroghchian, P.P.:
[123] Tsai, B-H., Chen, J-H., Chen, M-L., Chen, Y-H., Liu, M-J.: US20050019265 (2005).
US20050019303 (2005). [150] Therien, M.J., Hammer, D.A., Ghoroghchian, P.P., Li, G.:
[124] Seo, M.H., Kim, B.O., Choi, I.J., Shim, M.S., Lee, S.-W., Hyun, M- WO07038763 (2007).
H., Yu, J-Il., Chang, D-H., Yoon, H-J., Kim, J-K.: US20050201972 [151] Qin, S., Yang, S., Discher, D., Geng, Y.: WO07075502 (2007).
(2005). [152] Flynn T, Wei C. The pathway for commercialization of nanome-
[125] Torchilin, V.P., Lukyanov, A.N., Gao, Z.: US20060216342 (2006). dicine. Nanomedicine 2005; 1: 47-51.
[126] Seo, M-H., Yi, Y-W., Lee, S-J., Kim, J-H.: US20067153520 [153] Weissleder R, Bogdanov A, Neuwelt EA, Papisov M. Long-
(2006). circulating iron oxides for MR imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1995;
[127] Breitenkamp, K., Sill, K.N., Skaff, H., Breitenkamp, R.: 16: 321-334.
US20060240092A1 (2006). [154] Bonnemain B. Superparamagnetic agents in magnetic resonance
[128] Kim, S.-H., Jeong, J.-H., Park, T.-G.: WO07021142 (2007). imaging: physicochemical characteristics and clinical applications.
[129] Chowdhury, D.F.H.: WO07042833 (2007). A review. J Drug Targ 1998; 6: 167-174.
[130] Uhrich, K.E., Tian L.: US20077262221 (2007). [155] Wang Y-XJ, Hussain SM, Krestin GP. Superparamagnetic iron
[131] Jeong, J.H., Park, T.G.: US20070041932 (2007). oxide contrast agents: physicochemical characteristics and
[132] Rapoport, N., Pitt, W.G.: US20036649702 (2003). applications in MR imaging. Eur Rad 2001; 11: 2319-2331.
[133] Rapoport, N.: US20050003008 (2005). [156] Gradishar WJ. Albumin-bound paclitaxel: a next-generation taxane.
[134] Kwon, G.S., Samuel, J., Lavasanifar, A.: US20056939561 (2005). Expert Opin Pharmacother 2006; 7: 1041-53.
[135] Kwon, G.S., Law, D., Adams, M., Kostick, K.E., Schmitt, E.A.: [157] http://www.abraxane.com/
US20040005351 (2004). [158] http://www.bioalliancepharma.com/products_transdrug.asp
[136] Kwon, G.S.: US20040116360 (2004) and WO04034992 (2004). [159] McCarthy TD, Karellas P, Henderson SA, Giannis M, O’Keefe DF,
[137] Lavasanifar, A., Kwon, G.S.: WO05118672 (2005). Heery G, Paull JRA, Matthews BR, Holan G. Dendrimers as drugs:
[138] Kwon, G.S., Forrest, M.L.: US20060251710 (2006). Discovery and preclinical and clinical development of dendrimer-
[139] Sant, V., Leroux, J-C.: US20067094810 (2006). based microbicides for HIV and STI prevention. Mol Pharm 2005;
[140] Ng, S.Y., Heller, J.: US20030152630 (2003). 2: 312-318.
[141] Bronich, T.K., Kabanov, A.V.: US20040228823 (2004). [160] http://www.starpharma.com/vivagel.asp
[161] Accelrys, Inc. Press release, July 26th 2006.