Lecture 1 - Aggregate
Lecture 1 - Aggregate
Tarek Uddin
CHAPTER 4
AGGREGATES
Aggregate
Fine Aggregate
Coarse Aggregate
(Sand)
Picked Brick
Coarse Sand Fine Sand Brick Chips Stone Chips Shingles
Chips
WHAT IS SAND?
Sand is an engineering material in concrete work. It is usually termed as fine aggregate. Sand is a
form of silica (quartz) and may be of argillaceous siliceous or calcareous according to its composition.
More or less 75 % volume of concrete is aggregate. So good quality of aggregates should be used.
Aggregates act as a filler material in concrete
We need good quality aggregate for making good quality concrete.
Sand should be free from dust (clay + silt) and sand
Sand should be free from reactive silica or carbonate and organic matter
Sand should be well graded
If we have different sizes of particles, we will have less amount of voids. So, we need less amount of
cement and get strength in concrete
Washing of sand is necessary to remove dust
Dust: which passes through the # 100 sieve. (Dust = Clay + Silt)
DENSITY OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF CONCRETE: (SPECIFIC GRAVITY)
59
ESTIMATE THE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS WEIGHT OF UNIT WEIGHT OF CONCRETE
1 m3 concrete = 2300 kg concrete
Aggregates = 75 % of 2300 kg
FA: 780 kg
CA: 1000 kg
CLASSIFICATION OF SAND
According to Source: According to Size:
Pit Sand Coarse Sand (3/8"), FM: 2.6
River Sand
Sea Sand Medium Sand (1/8"), FM: 2.2
According to Shape: Fine Sand (1/16"), FM: 1.8 ~ 2.0
Angular ( )
Flaky ( )
20-30%
8-10 %
% of water
60
Various Types of Pointing
BULKING-PERCENT
(By Volume)
Fig: Bulking of Different Types of Sand
GRADATION OF AGGREGATES
Gradation is the proportion of the different sizes of particles making up the aggregate
Suitable gradation is required to ensure strength, workability and economy of concrete.
Principle of Gradation: Smaller size particles fill up the voids left in large size particles
Sieve analysis is the method to determine grading of aggregates
For same size particles: void is more
For different size particles: void is less
61
ASTM STANDARD SIEVE
1
1 "
2
38.1
1"
3/4" 19.05
3/8" 9.5 # 100 1 in2 100 × 100 (Opening)
#4 4.75 # 200 200 × 200 (Opening) in 1 in2
area of sieve
#8 2.36
Smaller size sieves are defined by the
# 16 1.19 number of opening per linear inch
Fineness Modulus
It is an index which gives an idea about fineness or coarseness of aggregate.
FM is not an indication of grading of aggregates as an infinite number of grading can have same FM.
Mathematically, FM is
Cumulative % retained on each standard sieve
FM =
100
The smaller the value of FM, the more is smaller sizes in aggregate.
Grading Curve
The results of a sieve analysis can be grasped much more easily if represented graphically and for this
reason, grading charts are very extensively used. By using a chart, it is possible to see at a glance whether
the grading of a given sample conforms to that specified, or is too coarse or too fine, or deficient in a
particular size.
Gap grading caused uneconomical mix
Uniformly grading --------- lot of voids
More finely grading caused --- less workability, low strength concrete
More coarsely grading caused segregation
Uniformly grading caused segregation
62
Combined Grading: Mixed grading of CA and FA. FA fills up the voids left in CA.
Combined FM:
m1FM 1 m2 FM 2 mn FM n
FMcomb =
m1 m2 mn
FM 2 FM comb
R=
FM comb FM 1
63
Problem
For a bridge construction project, the recommended FM for sand is 2.6. From a market, two sand samples
(sand-1 and sand-2) were collected and were sent to a nearby Concrete Laboratory for sieve analysis. The
sieve analysis data are given below:
(i) Calculate FM of the sand samples (Note: It is necessary to screen the sand samples by # 4 sieve to
calculate the FM)
(ii) Draw the grading curve of the sand samples
(iii) In what proportions, the sand samples are to be mixed to get the recommended FM?
(iv) Comment on the samples based on the sieve analysis data and grading curves
64
Solution:
Sand 1 Sand 2
Sieve
% Cumulative % Finer Materials % Cumulative % %
Sieve Opening Materials
Materials % Retained Retained Materials Retained Finer
Size (mm) Retained
Retained (gm) Retained
(gm)
304.8 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
152.4 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
76.2 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
38.1 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
19.05 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
3/8 9.5 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
#4 4.75 70 13.73 13.73 86.27 0 0 0 100
#8 2.36 70 13.73 27.46 72.54 0 0 0 100
# 12 1.70 70 13.73 41.19 58.81 70 15.56 15.56 84.44
# 16 1.19 70 13.73 54.92 45.08 70 15.56 31.12 68.88
# 30 0.59 70 13.73 68.65 31.35 70 15.56 46.68 53.32
# 40 0.425 70 13.73 82.38 17.62 70 15.56 62.24 37.76
# 50 0.30 0 0 82.38 17.62 35 7.78 70.02 29.98
# 100 0.15 0 0 82.38 17.62 35 7.78 77.8 22.2
# 200 0.075 45 8.82 91.20 7.8 100 22.22 100 0
Pan 45 8.82 100 0 0 0 100 0
Total 510 450
Cumulative % retained on each standard sieve
FM1 =
100
13.73 27.46 54.92 68.65 82.38 82.38
= = 329.52/100 = 3.29
100
FMcomb = 2.60
2.26 2.60
R = m1/m2 =
2.60 3.29
m1 : m2 = 1 : 2
66
GRADATION CURVE
100
90
80
Sample 1
70
Sample 2
60
% Finer
50
40
30
20
10
0.1 0.15 0.30 0.59 1.19 2.36 4.75 9.5 19.05 38.1 76.2 100