Lab 3
Lab 3
2/4/2021
Capacitors lab
Abstract
For this lab we determine the capacitance of three capacitors using two experimental approaches.
We will also use mathematical expressions that relate to capacitance. We will measure voltages,
circuit resistance, and discharge time.
Goals:
Using derived forms of Capacitance and voltage formulas, we are verifying if the
capacitance of capacitors can be estimated using a constant current applied to the
capacitor.
Procedure:
Materials:
Constant Current Source (~1 mA) [Serial # 14]
Constant Voltage Source (~3 V) [Serial # 9]
Board of capacitors [Board #1]
Resistor (~1000 ohms)
LabQuest Mini
Laptop computer running Logger Pro software
Digital multimeter [Serial # PHOE-40]
Voltage probe
assorted leads
Brooks, Fultz, Morales Campoverde 2
1. Plug the power adapter to the LabQuest Mini. Connect the LabQuest Mini to the laptop via
the USB and connect the voltage probe to the interface into channel 1.
2. Start LoggerPro software. To set up the probe click Experiment → Connect Interface →
Show All Interfaces.
3. A window should pop up, select CH1 → Voltage → voltage (+/- 10 v.). Sensor is now set up.
4. To check to see if the probes are reading correctly, connect the probes and check
LoggerPro. The potential voltage should be close to zero.
5. Before collecting data make sure to zero out the probes. To do so click Experiment → Zero.
This should bring the potential voltages to zero.
6. [Insert procedures for the two experiments, maybe?]
Measurements:
The graph of the measured data and the best fit lines can be viewed in the next section.
C1
The best fit line for C1 resulted in m (Slope)= 0.08557 2.388E-005 V/s and
b (Y-Intercept)= -0.2141 0.0005462 V
C2
The best fit line for C2 resulted in m (Slope)= 0.1197 4.391E-005 V/s and
b (Y-Intercept)= -0.2361 0.0008126 V
C1 & C2 parallel
The best fit line for C1 & C2 parallel resulted in m (Slope)= 0.04982 1.246E-005 V/s and
b (Y-Intercept)= -0.08128 0.0004415 V
Experimental values:
Theoretical values:
C1 & C2 series
The best fit line for C1 & C2 series resulted in m (Slope)=: 0.2074 9.666E-005 V/s and
b (Y-Intercept)= -0.1998 0.0009260 V
Experimental values:
Theoretical values:
C1
The best fit line for C1 discharge resulted in m (Slope)= -0.08576 4.604E-005
b (Y-Intercept)= 1.106 0.0006638
C2
The best fit line for C2 discharge resulted in m (Slope)= -0.1182 0.0001105
b (Y-Intercept)= 1.211 0.001721
Plots
C1
Brooks, Fultz, Morales Campoverde 5
C2
Series
Brooks, Fultz, Morales Campoverde 6
Parallel
Discharge
C1
Brooks, Fultz, Morales Campoverde 7
C2
Analysis
As we can see our capacitance for C1 and C2 within each other's error. Our experimental and
theoretical values are not with each other's error.
Due to our starting voltage at times not reaching zero, this could result in a slight error in our
calculations. There is also the chance that our capacitors were not completely discharged in
between trials, which means that capacitance would be lower than expected for the trials. The age of
the capacitor could also affect results, as capacitors naturally lose their capacitance over time. We
also assumed a small error for both the current and the resistor. We gave the current a small error of
and the resistor had an error . Since the values of both the current and resistors
were given we decided to be conservative in our estimated error.
Brooks, Fultz, Morales Campoverde 8
Conclusion
From our observation of the capacitors, we are able to determine the capacitance of the capacitors
within relative range. The discharge rate of the capacitors are also within estimate, proving the
theory of the measuring discharge. However, the quality of capacitors and minor errors with the trials
could be potential factors for future labs.