Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 163 views

    Group/Individual Project Peer Evaluation Form: Hurting Those Who Did The Most and Helping Those Who Did The Least

    Uploaded by

    Yuki Wong
    This document is a group/individual project peer evaluation form. [1] It asks members to assign scores from 1 to 5 in four categories to evaluate each other's contributions to the project. The categories are contribution, quality, timeliness, and communication/collaboration. [2] Scores of 1 indicate poor performance and 5 indicate excellent performance. Members must justify their scores with comments for each person. [3] The form collects names, scores, and comments to provide feedback on unequal workloads within the group.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Group/Individual Project Peer Evaluation Form: Hurting Those Who Did The Most and Helping Those Who Did The Least

    Uploaded by

    Yuki Wong
    163 views2 pages
    This document is a group/individual project peer evaluation form. [1] It asks members to assign scores from 1 to 5 in four categories to evaluate each other's contributions to the project. The categories are contribution, quality, timeliness, and communication/collaboration. [2] Scores of 1 indicate poor performance and 5 indicate excellent performance. Members must justify their scores with comments for each person. [3] The form collects names, scores, and comments to provide feedback on unequal workloads within the group.

    Original Title

    Peer Assessment RMIT

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a group/individual project peer evaluation form. [1] It asks members to assign scores from 1 to 5 in four categories to evaluate each other's contributions to the project. The categories are contribution, quality, timeliness, and communication/collaboration. [2] Scores of 1 indicate poor performance and 5 indicate excellent performance. Members must justify their scores with comments for each person. [3] The form collects names, scores, and comments to provide feedback on unequal workloads within the group.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    163 views2 pages

    Group/Individual Project Peer Evaluation Form: Hurting Those Who Did The Most and Helping Those Who Did The Least

    Uploaded by

    Yuki Wong
    This document is a group/individual project peer evaluation form. [1] It asks members to assign scores from 1 to 5 in four categories to evaluate each other's contributions to the project. The categories are contribution, quality, timeliness, and communication/collaboration. [2] Scores of 1 indicate poor performance and 5 indicate excellent performance. Members must justify their scores with comments for each person. [3] The form collects names, scores, and comments to provide feedback on unequal workloads within the group.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    GROUP/INDIVIDUAL PROJECT PEER EVALUATION FORM

    Please complete this form for all members of your group.

    If you want to award unequal marks to group members based on inadequate performance of some/all members
    of your group then please complete this form with everyone present. If you do not want to complete this form for
    your group, please complete it individually and email it to your tutor. This method should be used only in
    extreme circumstances. Everyone in your group is reminded that each person may be assessed individually.

    The best result is alerting your tutor to group issues you are having PRIOR to submission.

    Assign scores that reflect how you feel about the extent to which the other members of your group contributed to
    your group’s performance. This is your opportunity to acknowledge the members of your group that work hard on
    your behalf. If you give everyone the same score when there is unequal contribution to the workload you will be
    hurting those who did the most and helping those who did the least.

    Instructions:
    1. List the name of each team member.

    2. Evaluate the contributions of each person to the project by giving a score out of five (5) for each of
    the four categories.
    Scores: 1 = Poor (little or no effort)
    2 = Fair (makes an attempt)
    3 = Average (meets minimum requirements)
    4 = Great (strong contribution)
    5 = Excellent (exceeds expectations)
    Categories:
    a. Contribution = Completely assigned tasks and making a strong effort to contribute to the
    final outcome of the group project
    b. Quality = of work produced
    c. Timeliness = ability to meet agreed contribution deadlines, attendance and participating
    at meetings
    d. Communication & Collaboration = ability to work effectively with the group, communicated
    progress and work with the group, has a positive attitude to work and group members
    date Draft Submitted

    Final submitted

    3. Include a comment for each person to justify your scores.


    Communication &
    Contribution

    Quality

    Timeliness

    date
    collaboration

    STUDENT ANY
    NAME COMMENTS?

    Chen Yuanyu 5 5 5 5 10 August 13 August Very helpful and contributes to


    2021 2021 most of the assignment, helped
    me to complete the parts
    which are unsatisfactory

    Gavin Goh Zi Jun 3 3 5 4 12 August 12 August Receptive to comments, quick


    2021 2021 to respond, helped to change
    certain parts of the report
    which were unsatisfactory
    Tan Jui Han 3 3 5 3 12 August 12 August Not very receptive to
    Danny 2021 2021 comments, helped to change
    certain parts of the report
    which were unsatisfactory,
    little research done

    Neo Yi Wei 2 2 2 3 11 August 11 August Not responsive, bad quality of


    2021 2021 work, little research done

    You might also like