GAD Checklists 2: For The Project Identification and Design Stages

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

GAD Checklists 2: For the Project Identification and Design Stages

Note: Put 'X' mark on appropriate box


Done? Score for Comments/
Element and items/question (col.2) an item/ gender issues
(col.1) No Partly Yes element identified
(2a) (2b) (2c) (col.3) (col.4)
1.0 Involvement of women and men (max score: 2; for
0
each item, 1) 0 0.5 1
1.1 Participation of women and men in beneficiary
groups in the identification of the problem
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
1.2 Participation of women and men in beneficiary
groups in project design (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated data and gender-
0
related information (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and identification of
gender issues (max score: 2; for each item, 1) 0
3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and inequalities related to
gender roles, perspectives and needs, or access to
and control of resources (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
3.2 Analysis of constraints and opportunities related
to women's and men's participation in the project
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs
(possible scores:0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project have clearly stated gender 0
equality goals, objectives, outcomes or outputs?
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Do the strategies and activities match the gender 0
issues and gender eqality goals identified?
6.0 Gender analysis of the likely impacts of the
0
project (max score: 2, for each item, 0.67)
6.1 Are women and girl chldren among the direct or
inderect beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
6.2 Has the project considered its long-term
impact on women's socioeconomic status and
Empowerment? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
6.3 Has the project included strategies for avoiding or
minimizing negative impacts on women's status
and welfare? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.66)
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project include gender equality targets 0
and indicators to measure gender equality
outputs and outcomes?
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirements (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project M&E system require the 0
collection of sex-disaggregated data?
9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each item, 1) 0
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient
for gender equality promotion or integration?
OR, will the project tap counterpart funds from
LGUs/ partners for its GAD efforts? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote
gender equality and women's empowerment?
OR, is the project committed to investing project
staff time in building capacities within the project
to integrate GAD or promote gender equality?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
10.0 Relationship with the agency's GAD efforts
0
(max score: 2; for each item, 0.67)
10.1 Will the project build on or strengthen the
agency/ PCW/ government's commitment
to the empowerment of women?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD PLAN: Will
the project help in formulating the implementing
agency's GAD plan?
10.2 Will the project build on the initiatives or actions
of other organization in the area? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
10.3 Does the project have an exit plan that will ensure
the sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR THE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
AND DESIGN STAGES 0

Interpretation of the GAD score

0 - 3.9 GAD is invisible in the project (proposal is retured).

4.0 - 7.9 Proposed project has promising GAD prospects (proposal earns
a "conditional pass," pending identification of gender issues and
strategies and activities to address these and inclusion of the collection of
sex-disaggregated data in the monitoring and evaluation plan).

8.0 - 14.9 Proposed project is gender-sensitive (proposal passes the GAD test)
15.0 - 20.0 Proposed project is gender-responsive (proponent is commended).
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project include gender equality targets
and indicators to measure gender equality
outputs and outcomes?
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirements (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project M&E system require the
collection of sex-disaggregated data?
9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each item, 1)
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient
for gender equality promotion or integration?
OR, will the project tap counterpart funds from
LGUs/ partners for its GAD efforts? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote
gender equality and women's empowerment?
OR, is the project committed to investing project
staff time in building capacities within the project
to integrate GAD or promote gender equality?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote
gender equality and women's empowerment?
OR, is the project committed to investing project
staff time in building capacities within the project
to integrate GAD or promote gender equality?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

You might also like