Assignment Problems On Sediment-Transport Lectures at Iowa Instit
Assignment Problems On Sediment-Transport Lectures at Iowa Instit
L E C T U R E S A T IO W A IN S T IT U T E O F H Y D R A U L IC R E S E A R C H
Compiled by
February 1998
H is t o r y o f H y d r a u lic s
The
U n iv e rsity
o f Iowa
Libraries
TC175.2
K46
1998
ASSIGNMENT PROBLEMS ON SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT
LECTURES AT IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH
Compiled by
February 1998
PREFACE
From 1966, when he came to Iowa from MIT, until 1991, when he died, at age 57
from Multiple Myeloma, Prof. John F. Kennedy taught “Mechanics of Sediment
Transport” at the College of Engineering's Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research (IIHR),
The University of Iowa. He demonstrated a profound knowledge and an incredible
enthusiasm for the subject. His lectures were so well-known all over the world that
many foreign students came to Iowa just to attend his classes.
I took Prof. Kennedy’s class for the first time in the spring of 1971 when I arrived
from Japan. I vividly remember that long, wintry semester, working through a hefty load
of assignments, and being impressed by the fantastic, sometimes humorous nature of
the assignment problems. Prof. Kennedy had a desire to compile his assignment
problems in a systematic manner, and he finally prepared an unbound problem booklet
in 1972. Included therein, in addition to many problems he developed, were three
problems developed by the late Prof. Arthur T. Ippen (Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) and fifteen problems authored by Prof.
Vito A. Vanoni (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.). Prof.
Kennedy apparently collected those problems through his academic association with
them before arriving at IIHR.
Prof. Kennedy revised the booklet in 1975. Revisions 2 and 3 followed in 1989
and 1991. All the problems he compiled were typewritten and the figures were pencil-
drawn. Following Prof. Kennedy’s death, I started teaching his course in 1993. I began
re-typing all the problems that he compiled and re-drawing all the figures using a CAD
program on a PC. I added my own assignment problems to his collection in 1994,
including some of the old problems from my lectures in “Advanced Topics in Sediment
Transport,” which were offered at IIHR in 1979. In the meantime, I distributed draft
problems to students in my classes in 1993 and 1995. Some IIHR graduates have since
heard of my work to expand the work to this monograph and asked for copies of it, and I
have been happy to oblige.
With great personal satisfaction I have just completed my work. This monograph
contains sixty-four problems authored by Prof. Kennedy, eighteen problems authored by
both the late Prof. Ippen and Prof. Vanoni, and thirty-one problems developed by me.
The sole intention of the present monograph is to disseminate this fascinating collection
by Prof. Kennedy on sediment-transport problems to the hydraulics community
worldwide. My dream would come true if any one of Prof. Kennedy’s former students or
anyone interested in sediment-transport mechanics would utilize this monograph in the
classroom to enhance his or her educational endeavor in sediment transport.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paae
1. SEDIMENT PARTICLE CHARACTERISTIC 1
II. BED FORMS 14
III. FRICTION FACTORS 18
IV. INITIATION OF MOTION 23
V. SUSPENDED-LOAD DISCHARGE 27
VI. TOTAL-LOAD DISCHARGE 36
VII. SEDIMENT DISCHARGE IN PIPES 68
Vili. WIND-DRIVEN SEDIMENT TRANSPORT 76
IX. RIVER MEANDERING 78
iii
/. SEDIMENT PARTICLE CHARACTERISTICS
<PROBLEM K-1P>
<PROBLEM K-2P>
Find the fall velocity in water at 24 °C of a Bakelite particle with a sieve diameter
of 0.8 mm and a shape factor of 0.7.
<PROBLEM K-3P>
You are stranded on the planet Mitiap. While waiting for NASA to retrieve you,
you undertake a study of transport of Mitiap sediments. You construct a set of
sieves from pieces of your demolished space capsule and rocket, and perform a
sieve analysis. However, you have no log-probability paper, so you make your
own. Give the coordinate positions for a normal distribution horizontal scale that
extends from 0.01 to 99.99 in a distance of 10 in. or 25 cm and a vertical
logarithmic scale that includes two cycles in 8 in. or 20 cm. (Note: Tables of the
normal distribution, or integrated error function, can be found in most books of
mathematical tables, and in Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, by Hoel,
p.315.)
1
<PROBLEM K-4P>
where D’ is the sieve diameter. Obtain an analytical relation between ag and the
uniformity coefficient for sediments with log-normally distributed sieve diameters.
Then, plot the graphical relation between Cu and ag.
<PROBLEM K-5P>
(1 ) A sieve analysis yields the data given in the table below. Find D50 and ag
for the sieve diameters, and the median and geometric standard deviation
for the fall velocity distribution.
2
<PROBLEM K-6P>
<PROBLEM K-7P>
For the distribution of sieve diameters given in Problem K-5P, find graphically the
cumulative distribution of fall velocities in water at 24 °C, using Figs. 2.10 and 2.2
(ASCE Sedimentation Manual No. 54). Compare the values of w50 and aw
obtained graphically with those yielded by the analytic procedure developed by
Kennedy and Koh ("The relation between the frequency distributions of sieve
diameters and fall velocities of sediment particles," Journal of Geophysical
Research, 66, 12, December, 1961, pp. 4233-4246).
3
<PROBLEM K-8P>
You are exploring the newly discovered planet Mitcit. You find that the natural
sediments on Mitcit are spherical (Be careful not to spill any on the floor of your
space capsule!) and have a frequency distribution given by
where Dm and Dm are respectively the largest and smallest particle sizes present
in the sediment. You have also found that in the Mitcit gravity field, the fall
velocity Reynolds number of the sediment particles in Earth fluids is less than
about 0.5.
(2) Derive the distribution function (i.e., the cumulative frequency function) for
fall velocities of Mitcit sediments in Earth fluids. Use Stokes’ law to
calculate fall velocities.
(3) Derive a relation between the uniformity coefficient (D60/D10), and Dm and
Dm for Mitcit sediments.
(5) What does the spherical shape suggest about the weathering process on
Mitcit?
4
<PROBLEM K-9P>
where
where
<PROBLEM K-10P>
Find the distribution of fall velocities for a sediment which has log-normally
distributed sedimentation diameters, D, with D50 = 0.3 mm and geometric
standard deviation ag = 1.40. Assume that the water temperature is 30 °C ( v =
0.00780 cm2/sec). Refer to the paper by Kennedy and Koh (1961 ).
5
<PROBLEM K-11P>
Spherical particles with a diameter of 0.305 mm (0.001 ft) fall in water with
kinematic viscosity of 10'5 ft2/s. The densities of the particles are distributed as
shown. Find the frequency distribution of the fall velocities. Assume that Stokes’
law is applicable.
<PROBLEM K-12P>
Now consider Problem K-11P with specific gravity, S.G. = 1.5, but D variable.
(2) Find the frequency distribution of diameters that gives the same frequency
distribution of fall velocities as the particles with S.G. > 1.5.
6
<PROBLEM K-13P>
Find the frequency distribution of the sediment particles, f(D), that produces the
frequency distribution of the fall velocities, f(w), shown below. Assume Stokes’
law to be applicable, and take S.G. (specific gravity) = 2.5 and v (kinematic
viscosity) = 10'5 ft2/sec.
<PROBLEM K-14P>
7
For the time-pressure record shown above:
(2) What is the weight of the sediment sample added to the tube?
(3) What is the volume of sediment solids placed in the tube, and what is the
specific gravity of the sediment particles?
(5) Assuming that the particles are spherical, what are the maximum and
minimum diameters present in the sediment?
8
<PROBLEM K-15P>
Using Fig. 2.5 (ASCE Sedimentation Manual No. 54), find upward water velocity
through a fluidized sand bed that will give concentrations of 1%, 2%, and 4% if
the sand has a standard fall diameter of 0.1 mm and the water temperature is
24°C.
<PROBLEM N-16P>
Using the Iowa Rapid Sediment Analyzer (IRSA) developed by Tatsuaki Nakato,
the time history of the differential pressure transducer was obtained at Iowa
Institute of Hydraulic Research on 4 February 1987, as shown, with a glass-bead
sample (approximately 6 grams). The inside diameter of the settling tube was
7.00 cm; the initial water depth was 121.92 cm; the sensitivity of the pressure
transducer was 15.27 volts/cm H20 ; and the water temperature was 19.5 °C.
(1) What are the true weight and the volume of the sample tested? Can you
say that glass beads are quartz?
(2) Obtain the minimum and the maximum fall velocities of the sample
particles.
(3) From the given data and curve, obtain the frequency distribution of fall
velocities (do not take more than 15 discrete data points from the graph).
(4) Assuming that the particles are spherical, obtain the size distribution
curve, and determine the median diameter and the geometric standard
deviation of the particles. The manufacturer claims that the particles are
between 0.90 mm and 1.23 mm. Do you agree with the claim?
9
Figure N-16P Temporal changes in hydrostatic pressure
10
<PROBLEM N-17P>
(1) Find the cumulative distribution function of fall velocities, G(w), for each
sample.
(3) Another quartz sample will be made by mixing one kilogram of Sample 1
with three kilograms of Sample 2. Find a frequency distribution, g(w) for
the new composite sample, expressed in terms of the original frequency
distributions, gi(w) for Sample 1 and g2(w) for Sample 2. Please do not
carry out detailed calculations (if you wish to do it and have time, you can
do it, of course!).
11
<PROBLEM N-18P>
f(w) = (n/2)sin 7i(w-0.5) 0.5 ft/s < w < 1.5 ft/s; and, (2)
Assuming that the fall velocities of the particles are given by Stokes’ law,
w = (gD2/18v)(s-1) (4)
find the frequency distribution of the specific gravity, g(s), of these particles in
water with specific gravity equal to one and kinematic viscosity equal to 0.00001
ft2/s.
«PROBLEM N-19P>
A sediment sample was introduced into the top of the Iowa Rapid Sediment
Analyzer (IRSA) at time t=to, and a pressure-time history for Pressure Cell 1,
located above Pressure Cell 2, was obtained as shown below. Note that y is the
specific weight of water.
(1 ) Explain briefly what took place physically at each stage between A-B, B-C,
C-D, D-E, E-F, F-G, G-H, and H-l. Pay particular attention to the
difference in slope between E-F and G-H.
(2) From the p-t plot shown below, make a crude sketch of the expected size-
frequency distribution (no detailed scaling is needed -- just a distribution
shape is being sought in this case).
12
(3) Find the pressure-time history for Pressure Cell 2, p2(t), and relate the
significant times and pressures for p2 to those for p^t); i.e., derive
equations for the important times and pressures for the pr t record. Do
this only for t <t3.
<PROBLEM N-20P>
You are assigned to design a new settling tube for determining fall-velocity
distributions of fine-gravel materials with a specific gravity of 1.5 at a room
temperature of 25 °C. What is the appropriate height of the settling tube it you
wish to accomplish pressure measurement of each sample within 20 seconds?
13
II. BED FORMS
<PROBLEM K-1B>
where f is a general function. Derive an expression for the local rate of sediment
transport, G(x,t), in terms of r| and c.
<PROBLEM K-2B>
<PROBLEM K-3B>
(2) Let d co to obtain the analysis for sand ripples in the desert. Show that
14
<PROBLEM K-4B>
derive a linearized expression for the mean velocity at any section, U(x,t).
da
(2) Derive an expression for — . For a sediment-transport law, use
<PROBLEM K-5B>
Repeat Problem K-3B using a modified form of the local transport relation given
by Taizo Hayashi (Journal of Hydraulics Division, Proc. ASCE. 96, HY2,
February, 1970),
15
<PROBLEM K-6B>
A stream with a depth of 1.0 ft has antidunes that are 8.0 ft long. Estimate the
water discharge, per unit width, of the stream.
<PROBLEM K-7B>
Read the following excerpt from von Kármán's paper* and derive his equation
(2).
16
<PROBLEM K-8B>
The sand dunes on the beds of the rivers from another planet have the quarter-
circle form shown in the figure below. Derive a formula, based just on the
kinematics of dune movement, for the time-averaged rate of sediment transport
due to migration of these dunes.
<PROBLEM N-9B>
17
III. FRICTION FACTORS
<PROBLEM K-1F>
18
<PROBLEM K-2F>
The lengths and heights of the dunes formed by the runs summarized in
Problem K-1F are as follows:
(1) Find f and f" for each run, using Dg as the equivalent sand-grain
roughness.
(3) Find f for the flat-bed flows (Runs 3-6a, 3-6, and 3-6b) using a pipe-
friction diagram and Lovera’s curve ("Hydraulic relations for alluvial
streams," Journal of Hydraulic Division, Proc., ASCE. 97, HY1, January
1971).
<PROBLEM K-3F>
19
Find the corresponding error in velocity dll/U.
<PROBLEM K-4F>
The Rio Grande at Bernalillo, New Mexico, has the following characteristics:
Bed-material properties:
Dg = 0.29 mm;
°g 1 .21;
Q
0.24 mm;
II
CO
m
D 65 = 0.35 mm
Prepare a stage (depth)-velocity curve for the Rio Grande at this site, using the
Einstein-Barbarossa procedure, Engelund’s method, and Alam-Lovera-Kennedy
method. Plot the results of all three calculations on a single graph, and discuss
your results.
20
<PROBLEM K-5F>
A river is 500 ft wide, 10 ft deep, and has a slope of one foot per mile and side
slopes of 1 vertical to 1-1/2 horizontal. The bed sediment has a geometric mean
size of 0.5 mm and a geometric standard deviation of 1.5. The banks are
covered with vegetation and have a Manning roughness coefficient of n = 0.030.
Find the roughness coefficient of the bed and the mean velocity using the
Einstein-Barbarossa method and the sidewall correction method described by
Vanoni and Brooks.
<PROBLEM K-6F>
<PROBLEM K-7F>
The following data were obtained from an experiment in a rectangular flume with
smooth walls:
21
<PROBLEM N-8F>
(1) Estimate, using the sidewall correction method, the water discharge and
the mean shear stresses exerted on the bed and banks when the flow
depth is 2.0 m.
(2) What kind of bed forms would you expect under these flow conditions?
22
IV. INITIATION OF MOTION
<PROBLEM K-1I>
<PROBLEM V-2I>
From a Shields’ graph, calculate the critical shear stress for a quartz sand with
mean size of 0.25 mm. Assume a water temperature of 20 °C.
<PROBLEM V-3I>
C.M. White * obtained the following expression for the critical shear stress, xc, for
bed material,
in which D is the grain size; a is the angle of repose of the material; and ps and p
are the mass densities of the sediment and fluid, respectively. How does this
agree with the corresponding results of Shields? Explain any differences.
23
<PROBLEM V-4I>
Derive a relation between critical shear stress for initiation of motion of bed
sediment and mean flow velocity.
<PROBLEM V-5I>
What is the critical velocity of a flow 3 ft deep over a flattened bed of sand with a
medium size of 0.3 mm?
<PROBLEM V-6I>
A wide stream is 4 ft deep; has a slope of 0.00015; and the sand in the bed has
a medium size of 0.5 mm.
<PROBLEM V-7I>
The banks of the Los Angeles River near Compton are revetted with quarry
stone with an average weight of 45 kg per stone. The bottom width of the
channel is 150 m; the bank slope is 1 vertical to 2 horizontal; and the channel
slope is 0.00080. At design discharge, the water depth is 4.3 m. Is the
revetment stable? The stone has a specific weight of 2.5 tons/m3.
24
<PROBLEM V-8I>
Assume that you are given the job of designing a channel with a loose boundary
so that none of the sediment forming the boundary will move. Would you use
the Shields curve to calculate the safe value of the boundary shear stress? If
not, how would you proceed?
<PROBLEM N-9I>
On 5 May 1988 the IIHR river crew collected several bed-material samples from
the Missouri River using U.S.G.S. bed-material sampler BM-50. The result of the
sieve analysis done for one of the samples is shown below. This sample was
taken 60 ft away from the circulating-water pump intake of the Omaha Public
Power District, Nebraska City Station located along the concave bank of the
Missouri River at River Mile (RM) 556.2 near Nebraska City, Nebraska. The
local mean flow velocity measured was 4.06 ft/s; local depth-averaged
suspended-sediment concentration was 142 ppm; and local flow depth was 23 ft.
(1) Plot the size frequency curve and determine D16, D50, D84, Dg, and cg.
(2) Under the given conditions, what grain size material was in motion?
(4) If the mean velocity increases by 20%, what percentage of bed material
would move as bed load?
25
<PROBLEM N-10l>
An IIHR field crew headed by Tatsuaki Nakato obtained the following data on 13
April 1988 near River Mile 556.3 (RM: mileage measured from its mouth in St.
Louis) of the Missouri River immediately upstream from Omaha Public Power
District Nebraska City Station’s circulating-water pump intake:
L L
Water temperature
C D
T
o
Mean flow velocity, U 4.73 ft/s;
Mean flow depth, d 15.2 ft; and,
Geometric mean size of bed material, Dg = 0.75 mm
(1 ) Find Darcy-Weisbach's friction factor and estimate the energy slope under
these conditions. Please make sure that you clearly identify the
procedure you have employed.
(2) What kind of bed forms do you expect under these conditions? Why?
(3) Estimate, using the Shields curve, the largest bed-material size that can
be moved under these conditions.
26
V. SUSPENDED-LOAD DISCHARGE
<PROBLEM K-1S>
<PROBLEM K-2S>
In a steady, uniform flow in a wide open channel, the velocity distribution is found
to be given by
S f f i . ( 1)
where u(d) is the maximum (surface) velocity at y/d = 1. Derive an equation for
the distribution of suspended-sediment concentration. You may assume 1/n « 1
if necessary when integrating the equation.
<PROBLEM V-3S>
A wide stream 4 ft deep has a slope of 0.00015 and the sand on the bed has an
average size of 0.5 mm.
(1) Will the flow appear turbid to an observer on the bank? Give reasons for
your answer. The water temperature is 60 °F.
27
<PROBLEM V-4S>
<PROBLEM V-5S>
Given the following velocity and sediment profiles at the centerline of a flume 33
inches wide set on a slope of 0.0025 (RUN 43 Sta 45 Center).
Note that the flow depth d = 0.298 ft; the size of suspended-load particles =
0.106 mm; and settling velocity of suspended-load particles = 0.0301 ft/s.
y u C
(ft) (ft/s) (grams/liter)
0.01 2.03 32.080
0.02 2.15 24.670
0.05 2.54 15.410
0.07 2.73 11.960
0.10 2.98 8.980
0.15 3.31 5.360
0.20 3.53 2.960
0.25 3.69 1.300
0.27 3.75 0.866
28
<PROBLEM K-6S>
The table below gives the distributions of local time-averaged mean velocity and
suspended-sand concentration for the fraction of the material passing the 0.104
mm sieve and retained on the 0.074 mm sieve at vertical C-3 on the Missouri
River at Omaha on 4 November 1952. On this day, the slope of the stream was
0.000120; the depth was 7.8 ft; the width was 800 ft; the water temperature was
7 °C; and the flow was approximately uniform.
(1) Plot the velocity profile on semi-logarithmic paper (u vs. log y) and
concentration profile on log-log paper (C vs. (d-y)/y). Draw straight lines
giving the best fit to the points.
(2) Compute from the data given and your graphs the following quantities:
29
(3) Compute the rate of transport of this particular size fraction of sand in
pounds per second per foot by graphical integration of the product (Cu).
(4) Prepare a "bar graph" showing the fraction of the total suspended load for
this size fraction carried in each 10% of the depth.
(5) Obtain the transport rate of this size fraction from Brook’s nomogram.
(6) Using tabulated values of the Einstein integrals, obtain the transport rate
using the other two values of the lower lines of the integral which were
discussed in class.
(7) Using the value of u* obtained from the Einstein-Barbarossa procedure for
this unit discharge, find the suspended load of this size fraction using
Brook’s nomogram. Note that Dg = 0.20 mm and ag = 1.20 for the bed
material.
(8) Plot the concentration distribution in the format of the relation derived from
the power-law velocity distribution.
(9) Calculate the suspended-sediment discharge for this size fraction given
by the power-law velocity-distribution formulation.
(10) If D50 = 0.25 mm, find the total suspended-load discharge using the
power-law formulation.
<PROBLEM K-7S>
A wide stream has a depth of 10 ft and a slope of 0.003; and its bed material is
well sorted sand with a mean size of 0.50 mm.
(1) Estimate the percent increase in the suspended-load discharge when the
temperature of the water decreases from 60 °F to 32 °F.
30
(2) If the bed of this stream were composed of 0.25 mm sand, would the
percent increase in the suspended-load discharge with the above
decrease in temperature be greater or less? Give the basis for your
answers. Assume that the bed-load discharge, the concentration near the
bed, and the mean velocity do not vary with temperature.
<PROBLEM V-8S>
where m > 0 is a parameter and the other notation has the same definitions as
on Earth.
(1 ) Find the mean velocity of the stream, and the elevation at which it occurs.
(2) Derive an expression for the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor of the flow.
<PROBLEM K-9S>
31
D35 = 0.25 mm = 8 .2 0 x1 0‘4 ft;
D50 = 0.30 mm = 9.84x1 O'4 ft;
D65 = 0.35 mm = 11.48 x 10'4 ft;
(1) Determine the median fall velocity of the bed material. Assume a shape
factor of unity.
(2) Determine the geometric standard deviation, ag, of the bed-material size
distribution.
(3) Find the friction factor and slope of the stream. Use the Alam-Lovera
procedure, and D50 as the characteristic bed-material size.
(4) Use the Shields curve to estimate the largest bed-material size that can
be moved by this flow.
(5) For material in the size range 0.25 mm < D < 0.35 mm, the volumetric
concentration of suspended sediment at a distance y = 5.55 x 1 0 3 ft
above the bed is found to be 0.0766. Compute the mid-depth
concentration of material in this size range. Use the Rouse-Ippen-Vanoni
relation, and assume k = 0.3 and p = 1.0.
(6) Determine the sediment discharge of material in the size range of Part (5)
above. Use the Brooks nomogram.
(7) This flow is observed to form antidunes. Compute the wave length of the
antidunes.
32
<PROBLEM K-10S>
A wide stream with depth d, and slope S has a power-law velocity distribution,
where V = mean flow velocity. The turbulent exchange coefficient for suspended
sediment may be assumed to be constant with an effective value of
es = mu.d (2)
<PROBLEM N-11S>
(1 ) Show that the lowering rate of the sampler, RL, at any instance is given by
33
where
where
and plot four curves showing relationships between RL and D/Ds (=d) for
Ds = 10 ft, 20 ft, 30 ft, and 40 ft. Plot the velocity profile in the same figure
(horizontal axis = R l/ V ; and vertical axis = vertically decreasing d).
Assume that the container intake nozzle is 3/16 in. in diameter and the
sample container is a one-pint milk bottle (Vi = 1.671x1 O'2 ft3).
<PROBLEM N-12S>
34
and qso = suspended-load discharge for an undisturbed flow.
35
Vi TOTAL-LOAD DISCHARGE
<PROBLEM K-1T>
The following data were obtained from the Colorado River near Taylor’s Ferry on
24 July 1956:
On asemi-log plot of the velocity profile [i.e., a plot ofu(y) vs. log y], it is found
that the velocity, u, changes by 2.30 fps for a ten-fold (1cycle) changein y. On
a logarithmic plot of (d-y)/y vs. concentration [i.e., a plot of log (d-y)/y vs. log
C(y)], it is found that for a ten-fold (1 cycle) variation of log (d-y)/y, the sediment
concentration also changes by a factor of 10.
(3) Find the discharge rate of suspended sediment for this section. State
which choice of the lower limit of the suspended-load integrals you have
chosen.
(4) Briefly tell how you would calculate the bed-load discharge for this section.
36
(5) u.’ for this section is given as 0.108 fps. Find the velocity predicted by the
Einstein-Barbarossa method.
(7) Estimate what the bed form was for this flow condition. Give the basis for
your estimate.
(8) Why is the suspended material finer than the bed material? Is this
normal?
<PROBLEM K-2T>
The Colorado River at Taylor’s Ferry, California, has the following characteristics:
Pi Di w¡
37
(1) Use the Lovera-Alam method to calculate a rating curve for this section.
Then use the Einstein Bed-Load Function procedure to calculate qs and
qb for this channels for a unit discharge q = 20 cfs/ft. The measured total
load varies from 0.12 to 0.54 lb/sec/ft at this section.
<PROBLEM K-3T>
The following data were obtained from the Rio Grande at Section A-2, Bernalillo,
New Mexico, on 2 June 1953 [Refs., U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 462-B (Nordin
and Demster, 1963); and 462-F (Nordin and Beverage, 1965)]:
(1 ) For the suspended material in the size range 0.25 mm < D < 0.50 mm, the
logarithmic plot of (d-y)/y vs. concentration shows that for a ten-fold (one
cycle) change in (d-y)/y corresponds to a change of exactly one-third of a
log cycle in C. A plot of velocity, u(y), vs. log y, where y is the distance
38
from the bottom, yields a straight line with the velocity changing 1.20 fps
for a ten-fold change in y. Find Kármán's constant, k , and also (3=8s/8m.
(2) It is known that VF' = 1.59 for the flow at this section. Find the mean
velocity, U.
(3) The mid-depth concentration of this size fraction is 62 ppm. Find the
suspended-sediment discharge. State clearly what lower limit of the
suspended-load integral you used.
(6) Outline concisely the steps you would follow in obtaining ib for the size
fraction, given that ¡b=0.4 and that the bed material diameters are log-
normally distributed. Do not carry out the calculation!
(7) What was the bed configuration? State the reasons for your conclusion.
(8) During another flow, antidunes 10 ft long were observed at this location.
The flow depth was 3.7 ft. Estimate the unit discharge for this flow
condition.
<PROBLEM K-4T>
The following data were obtained for the Rio Grande at Section D on 19 May
1954 [Ref.: U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 462-B (Nordin and Dempster, 1963)
and U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 462-F (Nordin and Beverage, 1965)].
39
River width: =
401 ft;
Mean depth: = 1.50 ft;
Slope of energy grade line: = 0.000864;
Water temperature: = 73 °F;and,
Kinematic viscosity: = 1.05 x IO-5 ft2/s
(1) A plot of concentration vs. (d-y)/y for the suspended material in the size
range 0.25 mm < D< 0.50 mm yields a straight line which for a ten-fold (1
log cycle) change in (d-y)/y, C changes from 2.5 ppm to 14 ppm. A plot of
u(y) vs. log y, where y is the upward distance from the bottom, yields a
straight line with the velocity changing 1.0 fps for each one log-cycle
change in y. Find von Kármán's constant k and also p = es/sm.
(2) For this flow, VF' = 3.80. Find the mean velocity, U, and compare with the
measured velocity, Um = 2.35 fps.
(3) The mid-depth concentration of this size fraction is 14 ppm. Find the
suspended-sediment discharge. State clearly what lower limit you used in
the suspended-load integral.
(5) Find the transport rate of the bed load for this size fraction (given range of
D).
(6) Estimate what the bed configuration was for this flow. State the reasons
and show supporting data for you conclusion.
40
<PROBLEM V-5T>
The data in the following table were observed in the Missouri River at Omaha on
two days during which the discharge was 27,000 cfs;. the slope was 0.000145;
and the bed-sediment size properties were D’35= 0.17 mm, D’50= 0.20 mm, D’65=
0.23 mm.
(1) Explain those observed temperature effects that you can in terms of fluid
mechanics.
(3) On which of the two days was the bed-load discharge of 0.125 mm
sediment the greater?
<PROBLEM l-6T>
Two wide canals of the same width are to be built in the same alluvial deposit
(mean size and specific gravity of bed sediment: D50 = 8.2 x IO'4 ft and S.G. =
2.65). The second canal is to have a slope of 20% greater than the first (Si =
0.002). To retain the same sediment-transport rate in both canals, when the
depth of the first is fixed at 20 ft, what must be the depth of the second canal?
Utilize the following expression:
41
<PROBLEM l-7T>
Assume the classical DuBoys equation for bed-load sediment transport to hold:
<PROBLEM l-8T>
The following two equations are assumed to apply to a certain length of a river
channel:
42
The sediment-transport equation:
It has been proposed to deepen the channel for navigation to twice the mean
depth of ym. It is desirable to maintain the existing sediment-transport rate by
proper adjustment of the channel geometry in width and length.
(2) Are these measures feasible? State the reasons for your conclusion.
<PROBLEM V-9T>
Two wide streams with water temperature of 60 °F flow over beds of identical
sands with means velocities of 3 ft/s. One stream is 3 ft deep and the other is 6
ft deep. The size properties of the bed sediments are D50 = 0.30 mm, D35 = 0.25
mm, and Ü65 = 0.35 mm.
<PROBLEM V-10T>
<PROBLEM K-11T>
On 24 May 1960 the following data were obtained at Section A-2 of the Rio
Grande (U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper 1498 H):
43
V —
2.71 ft/s;
s = 0.00083; and
V = 1.13 x IO-5 ft2/s
You may assume, for the purposes of this problem only, that the bed material is
uniform with D35 = D50 = Des = 0.29 mm = 9.51 x 10~4 ft and x = 1.
(1) Calculate the depth using the Einstein-Barbarossa procedure. Note that
this does not require a trial-and-error procedure.
(2) Calculate the bed-load discharge using the Einstein bed-load function.
<PROBLEM K-12T>
<PROBLEM K-13T>
An alternate design for the canal of Problem K-12T involves a "de-silting" works,
which would reduce the sediment discharge in the canal to 30% of its original
value. Design a canal for these conditions.
44
<PROBLEM K-14T>
For the data of Problem K-4T, calculate the total-load sediment discharge using:
<PROBLEM K-15T>
For the data given in Problem K-4T, compute the total sediment discharge for U
= 2.35 fps using Yang’s equations (ASCE, C.T. Yang, 1973 and 1979).
<PROBLEM K-16T>
Q =
39.08 m3/s; V = 1.032x1 O'6 m2/s;
d = 1.51 m; D50 = 0.028 mm (bed material);
B = 2 2 .8 6 m (width); üg = 1.49 (bed material);
= 9.81 m2/s; Bed material = quartz sand;
9
Suspended-load discharge = 0.0212 m3/s; and
Suspended-load sediment volumetric concentration = 5.43 x 10*4
(1) Determine the median fall velocity of the sediment. Assume that the
particles are spherical.
45
(3) Determine the mid-depth concentration using the Brooks nomogram.
Assume that the size of the suspended-load sediment is the same as the
size of the bed material.
(5) Estimate the bed-load discharge using Karim’s procedure, and the results
of Parts (3) and (4) above.
(7) For this channel, D35 = 0.238 mm and Des = 0.322 mm. Calculate
Einstein’s R’ from the Manning-Strickler equation. Use the Einstein-
Barbarossa graph to obtain a calculated value of the mean velocity, U, for
this flow.
(8) What was the bed configuration for this flow: ripples and dunes, flat bed,
or antidunes? Justify your answer.
(c) How fast does the bed aggrade (build up)? Let porosity =
0.3.
46
<PROBLEM K-17T>
The following data were measured at Section A-2 of the Rio Grande on 27 May
1958:
(2) What was the bed configuration for this flow? Give the basis for your
answer.
(3) What was the wave length of the bed forms (if any) identified in Part (2)
above?
(4) What were the local depths and velocities of flow at distances of 20 ft
from the concave bank and from the convex bank?
(5) Using a simple formulation (not e.g., the Einstein or Toffaleti procedure)
of your choice, calculate the total sediment discharge of the river for the
given conditions. Disregard curvature effects for this calculation. (The
measured transport rate was 80,000 to 85,000 tons/day.)
(6) What is the largest bed material this flow could transport at each of the
locations identified in Part (4), above?
(7) Is u/u." for this flow consistent with the Einstein-Barbarossa bar-resistance
graph? If not, what is the reason?
47
<PROBLEM K-18T>
One of the Pakistan LINK canals has the following operating characteristics (No.
10 of Brownlie’s compilation, page 128B or page 176):
Q = 72.6 m3/s;
S = 1.16 x10-4;
C = 142 ppm (total-load sediment concentration); and,
D50 = 0.15 mm
where
and utilize
to design a canal (i.e., determine the width, depth, and velocity) for this flow.
[Hint]: Assume an initial value of channel width, guided by regime theory or other
ideas. Then analyze the flow in a channel of that width, and adjust width,
by iteration until a solution is arrived at.
<PROBLEM N-19T>
The following flow and bed-sediment data were collected by the IIHR river crew
in Pool 20 of the Mississippi River (Keokuk, Iowa - Canton, Missouri) in May
1976. The specific gravity of the bed sediment can be assumed to be 2.65.
48
(1) Estimate the sediment discharge for each section using the Inglis-Lacey
formula.
(2) Estimate the sediment discharge for each section using the Engelund-
Hansen formula
(3) Estimate the sediment discharge for each section using the Einstein-
Brown formula.
<PROBLEM N-20T>
Flow and sediment discharges were measured by the IIHR river crew at Section
1-2 near Fox Island in Pool 20 of the Mississippi River on 7 May 1976. Bed-
material samples from five different verticals along the cross section were sieve-
analyzed as a composite sample. The result of the sieve analysis is shown
below.
49
Fraction Sediment Size Geometric Mean Size Size Fraction
I.D. Dsi P¡
i (mm) (ft) (%)
32
1 7.42X10-2 2.5
16
16
2 3.71x10-2 7.2
8
8
3 1.86x10-2 6.1
4
4
4 9.28x10-3 6.5
2
2
5 4.64x10-3 12.9
1
1.000
6 2.32x10-3 33.1
0.500
0.500
7 1.16x10-3 29.5
0.250
0.250
8 5.80x10'4 2.0
0.125
0.125
9 2.89x10‘4 0.2
0.062
50
(1) Apply the Toffaleti formulas to estimate the suspended- and bed-load
discharges for this section.
(3) Apply the Schoklitsch formula to estimate bed-load discharge for this
section.
(4) Apply the Engelund-Freds^e formula to estimate the suspended- and bed
load discharges for this section.
Note: Fall velocity can be calculated using the Rubey formula for each sediment
size:
where
<PROBLEM N-21T>
The following field data were collected by the U.S.G.S. at Butte City in the
Sacramento River on 16 December 1977:
51
D35 = 1.02 x 10-3 ft;
D50
= 1.54 x 10-3ft;
^65 = 4.43 x IO3 ft; and,
Ys = 2.65
i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Dsix104 (ft) 742 371 186 92.8 46.4 23.2 11.6 5.8 2.89 1.46
Pi (%) 17.5 6.7 5.7 3.5 3.5 10.9 26.9 23.6 1.6 0.1
(1) Apply the Ackers and White formula to compute the total-load discharge
and compare the result with the measured Qs.
<PROBLEM N-22T>
One of the lectures you have had in this course was related to “The Great Flood
of ’93.” On the basis of the knowledge gained through that special presentation,
answer the following questions:
(1) What were the major causes for the flood? List at least five contributing
factors (please do not attempt to describe each in detail).
(2) What were the major long-term impacts of the flood in terms of sediment
yields during the flood?
(4) Look at the Iowa River flow through the window, and estimate the
suspended-sediment concentration and the water discharge; hence,
calculate the suspended-sediment discharge (in tons/day). Doesn’t
regular exercise in each sediment transport class to predict these
parameters help you?
52
<PROBLEM N-23T>
While inspecting the flood damage in City Park in Iowa City immediately after the
Flood of ’93, the park was found to be covered by large-scale sand dunes
composed of rather uniform medium-size sand. Water marks on trees showed
that flow depth over the dunes was about 5 ft. As shown in the following sketch,
the park is located in the inside bend of the Iowa River.
(1 ) Explain how such sand dunes were formed in the floodplain in the park.
(2) A beautiful scour hole, similar to scour holes around bridge piers, was
detected around a 4-ft diameter oak tree which was buried partially by a 3-
ft high dune.. The maximum scour depth was measured to be about 18
in. Estimate the mean flow velocity which produced this scour hole.
53
<PROBLEM N-24T>
The following data were collected from the Wapsipinicon River by the U.S.G.S.
on 21 March 1979 at DeWitt, Iowa:
(1) Using Engelund and Freds^e’s formula, estimate both the bed-load and
suspended-load discharges.
(2) Compare your results with the measured values and discuss primary
causes of discrepancies if there were any.
Use the effective fall velocity (w = Zp¡w¡/Zpi) which can be calculated from the
following bed-material size distribution (p¡=size fraction and wpfall velocity for i-th
size range): [Note] Use Rubey’s formula to calculate fall velocity, w¡.
54
<PROBLEM N-25T>
The following field data were collected from the Missouri River near Council
Bluffs, Iowa by the IIHR river crew on 30 November 1982 during a diagnostic
study of Iowa Generation’s Council Bluffs Station Unit 3 water-intake shoaling
problems:
Note: Water temperature = 4 °C; energy slope = 1 ft/mile; and channel width =
719 ft.
55
<PROBLEM N-26T>
where u is the mean longitudinal flow velocity, h is the flow depth, cb is the
friction coefficient, and e is the local bed elevation. The equation of the mass
conservation of the bed is given by
56
where
<PROBLEM N-27T>
Equation (4) in Problem N-26T has characteristic curves which are the solutions
of the ordinary differential equations,
(2) Show that the characteristics (1) are given by the following equations if
q i’=q2’=0:
57
<PROBLEM N-28T>
where subscript, i, is used to number the roots, which gives the order of the
approximation. By substituting this series into equation (2) of Problem N-27T,
obtain the following characteristics which give celerities of disturbance in an
erodible bed channel.
Note that u - h -1 and Qb=qb for the undisturbed, steady and uniform flow.
<PROBLEM N-29T>
58
K6V'= O (1)
where
where
<PROBLEM N-30T>
59
where k = 2nH (wave number), / = wave length, v = wave celerity, and <|>* =
amplitude of <j>.
Substitute equation (2) into equation (1) and obtain the following relationships:
[Hint]: Take k'1 as the characteristic length so that 7= 1/(kuT) and J=So/(kh).
<PROBLEM N-31T>
Assume that the continuity equation for the one-dimensional sediment-laden flow
is given by
where
Q = flow rate of water-sediment mixture;
B = water-surface width = function of y = B(y);
y = flow depth; and,
q = lateral water inflow
60
(4) Assuming that the upstream and downstream boundary conditions are
respectively given by
Determine Ei and E2 in terms of f(yi); and AyN in terms of g(yN), EN, and
Fn.
<PROBLEM N-32T>
Assume that the following linear relationship holds between Ayj and AQj for any x
= jAx for a particular time step:
Now consider the river reach with a storage basin, as sketched below, and obtain
Ej+i and Fj+1 in terms of Ej, Fj, At, yjn, yj+i n, Qjn, Qj+i n, and Ab, where Ab = Ab(yb) =
water-surface area of the basin.
[Hint]: Assume that the water-surface elevation at the storage basin, yb, is equal
to that at the river section.
61
<PROBLEM N-33T>
Starting from this equation, obtain the governing equation for z = (CJt^c),
where
62
Note: Refer to Gary Parker’s paper (Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, Voi. 89,
Part 1, pp. 109-125)
<PROBLEMS N-34T>
The following data were obtained at Section C-6 of the Niobrara River on 3
August 1951 (Colby and Hembree, 1955):
Cross-section profile
(v: distance from the riaht bank and D: flow deDth)
y (ft) 0 6 14 16 22 24 30 32 40 42 48 50 54
D (ft) 0 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.6
_D_(ftL_ 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8 0
% finer 2 37 71 92 96 98
River width = 134 ft; mean flow depth = 1.52 ft; water temperature = 23 °C; flow
area = 138 ft2; mean velocity = 2.53 ft/s; water discharge = 349 ft3/s; and water-
surface slope = 1.402x1 O'3.
63
(1) Plot the cross section and the cumulative sediment particle size
distribution, and determine approximately the center depth, Dc, L (bank
region), and D5o.
(2) Assuming that the channel is in equilibrium (i.e., Dc = Ec), calculate FL and
qBL. Is your K value (FL/qBL) close to 24/7? You can assume that DS=D50.
(3) Evaluate y for this case and see how small this parameter is - justification
of the asymptotic expansion in terms of y.
Note: Refer to Gary Parker’s paper (Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, Voi. 89,
Part 1, pp. 109-125)
<PROBLEM N-35T>
where
64
v = mean flow velocity; D = flow depth; z = bed elevation; u* = shear
velocity; R = hydraulic radius (= D); A = cross-section area; Q = water
discharge; W = channel width; z0 = bank elevation; qs = sediment
discharge per unit width; and K = coefficient.
You can use the following parameters when determining matrices A, B, and C:
<PROBLEM N-36T>
65
where
(1) Calculate <; for different values of rj (10'3 ~ 1) four different sets of £, (i.e.,
0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00), and plot the results on an r\-^ plane with a
parameter Assume that y is equal to 0.22 (So = 2.1x1 O'3; and =
9.5x10 3).
(2) Estimate values of r| for the following set of field data and obtain a
relationship between r| and t.
March 1961 (t = 0)
March 1962 1,500 5.4
March 1963 1,500 6.0
March 1964 6,000 36.6
October 1964 3,000 14.3
September 1966 4,500 26.3
66
<PROBLEM N-37T>
The following data were obtained by the IIHR river crew at Section 1-2 in Pool 20
of the Mississippi River on 7 May 1976:
V = 3.19 ft/s; u- = 0.205 ft/s; T = 54 °F; Ys/y = 2.65; ds = 2.26x1 O'3 ft; D =
18.6 ft
(2) For navigation purposes, a 5-ft deep, 250-ft wide (base) trapezoidal
channel was provided on the bottom of the Mississippi River by a dredging
operation. The side slope of the channel was 1V:2H. Using Freds(j>e’s
formula (ASCE Proc., Voi. 104, No. HY2, 1978), estimate the bed profiles
for t = 1 hr, 10 hrs, 1 day, and 10 days, and plot the results in one graph
for comparison. Assume that the dynamic friction angle is 27°, and
porosity of the bed material is 0.45.
(3) Suppose that the cross section of Section 1-2 is in a stable condition
under the given hydraulic conditions. Estimate the flow depth at the
center region using Parker’s result (Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, Voi.
89, Part 1, pp.109-125).
67
VII. SEDIMENT DISCHARGE IN PIPES
<PROBLEM V-1SP>
(a) Heterogeneous flow is one in which all the sediments in the system
are in suspension but the concentration is not uniform.
(b) Homogeneous flow is one in which all the sediment in the system is
in suspension and the concentration is uniform.
<PROBLEM K-2SP>
68
The inside diameter of the pipe is 1.0 ft; the transported sand has a diameter of
0.20 mm; the water temperature is 20 °C; and m = 0.1. The mean velocity of the
mixture is 10 ft/s, and the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor is 0.025.
(1) Find the maximum sediment transport rate that can be achieved without
bed deposition (i.e., keeping 0b = 0). For deposited material, C = 1,850
gm/l (grams of sediment per liter of mixture). Do not neglect the
settlement of the material along the pipe.
<PROBLEM K-3SP>
(1) Estimate the maximum discharge of sand (Dg = 0.15 mm) that can be
conveyed without significant bed deposition (i.e., with 0b = 0).
(2) Using Durand’s curve, estimate the energy gradient of the flow.
<PROBLEM K-4SP>
69
m = 0.10;
K = 0.25;
f -
0.035; and,
T — 20 °C
<PROBLEM K-5SP>
The attached figure shows a scheme that has been proposed for measurement
of sediment concentration in slurry lines. The mixture is pumped through a pipe
loop with two vertical legs, and the pressure drops, (A p )^ in the ascending leg
and (Ap)3_4 in the descending leg, are measured and compared. The sediment
concentration is determined from the difference between those two pressure
drops.
(1) For the situation shown in the sketch, which will be greater, (Ap)-|_2 or
(Ap)3-4? Justify your answer.
70
(2) Find the difference between (A p )^ and (Ap)3_4 for the following
conditions:
L = 30 ft;
D = 0.5 ft (inside pipe diameter);
f = 0.04;
Qs/Qw = 0.15;
V = 15 ft/s (mean velocity of mixture);
Fluid = water; and,
Sediment = sand
Assume the flow is fully developed at all sections between the piezometers.
<PROBLEM K-6SP>
where, in addition to the quantities shown in the sketch on the attached figure, w
= particle fall velocity; m = constant; Co = centerline concentration; and u. = 0.363
ft/s. The data shown in the attached sketch were obtained in an experiment with
0.16 mm sand in water at 80 °F.
(1 ) Find m, using the slope of the data presented in the attached graph.
(3) Find Qs and Qw. Assume k = 0.35 and B = 5.5Co = 6,020 ppm; f =
0.0159; r0 = 2 in.; and 0b = 0 for the data shown in the graph.
71
72
Special Function Table
ijx )= n jjix )
X
0.0
________
1.0000
m h (x)
0.0000
________ m
0.0000
________
0.1 1.0025 0.0501 0.0012
0.2 1.0100 0.1005 0.0050
0.4 1.0404 0.2040 0.0203
0.6 1.0921 0.3137 0.0464
0.8 1.1665 0.4329 0.0843
1.0 1.2661 0.5652 0.1358
1.2 1.3937 0.7147 0.2026
1.4 1.5534 0.8861 0.2876
1.6 1.7500 1.0848 0.3940
1.8 1.9895 1.3172 0.5260
2.0 2.2796 1.5906 0.6890
2.2 2.6292 1.9141 0.8891
2.4 3.0492 2.2981 1.1342
2.6 3.5532 2.7554 1.4338
2.8 4.1574 3.3011 1.7994
3.0 4.8808 3.9534 2.2452
3.2 5.7472 4.7343 2.7884
3.4 6.7848 5.6701 3.4495
3.6 8.0278 6.7926 4.2538
3.8 9.5169 8.1405 5.2323
4.0 11.302 9.7594 6.4224
4.2 13.443 11.705 7.8683
4.4 16.010 14.046 9.6259
4.6 19.093 16.863 11.761
4.8 22.794 20.253 14.355
5.0 27.240 24.335 17.505
5.2 32.584 29.254 21.332
5.4 39.010 35.181 25.980
5.6 46.738 42.327 31.621
5.8 56.039 50.945 38.472
6.0 67.235 61.341 46.788
6.2 80.717 73.886 56.882
6.4 96.963 89.025 69.143
6.6 116.54 107.31 84.021
6.8 140.14 129.38 102.08
7.0 168.59 156.04 124.01
7.2 202.92 188.25 150.63
7.4 244.34 227.17 182.94
7.6 294.33 274.22 222.17
7.8 354.68 331.10 269.79
8.0 427.57 399.87 327.60
73
<PROBLEM K-7SP>
The Consolidation Company’s coal slurry pipeline in Ohio has the following
operating characteristics:
Material: coal;
Length: 108 miles;
Capacity: 1.30 x 106 ton/year
Particle size: 0.14 mm;
a9 1 .2 (assumed);
Specific gravity: 1.40; and,
Operating factor*: 90% (assumed)
(* % of time pipeline is operating)
Using the curves and equations presented in your reading assignment in ASCE
Sedimentation Manual No. 54, design a slurry line to meet the above
requirements. The design parameters should include, but not be limited to,
74
<PROBLEM K-8SP>
(1) Propose a reasonable velocity distribution (i.e., give the equations of u(z)
for the three subsections shown in the sketch, using the "law of the wall",
which states that the velocity at any point is determined by the distance z
to the nearest wall, as well as by u*, etc. Note that the same velocity
distribution may be applied to all three subsections.
(2) Set up the integrals which give the sediment discharge. Do NOT carry out
the integration(s)!!
In subsection ^,z^ = y
In subsection 2, z2 = f(y) — to be determined by trigonometry
In subsection 3, z3 = g(y) — to be determined by trigonometry
75
Vili. WIND-DRIVEN SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
<PROBLEM K-2A>
Calculate the total momentum exchanged between the air and the particle in
Problem K-1 A.
76
<PROBLEM K-3A>
Wind blows over a desert sand bed. The sand is quartz with a uniform diameter
of 0.25 mm.
(2) Prepare a curve of sediment-transport rate per unit width vs. wind velocity
measured 1 m above the bed, for velocities up to 30 m/s
77
IX. RIVER MEANDERING
<PROBLEM K-1M>
A curve in the river described in Problem K-1T has a centerline radius of 4,000 ft.
For this flow:
(3) Calculate the lateral distribution of unit discharge, V(r)d(r), and compare
Jvd-dr (integrated numerically) with the discharge given. Assume f is
constant across the channel.
<PROBLEM K-2M>
For the data given in Problem K-1T, calculate the following for a long river bend
with rc = 1,500 ft.
(2) The velocities near the concave and the convex banks. Please base your
calculations on the given value of D’50, and assume the following values:
0 = 0.06 and p = 0.45
78
<PROBLEM K-3M>
A bend in a river has width B and centerline radius rc > B/2. The vertical
distribution of streamwise velocity is given by
which corresponds to constant eddy viscosity. The bed material has density ps
and uniform diameter D. Derive an equation for the lateral (radial) bed slope, St,
in terms of us (surface velocity) and the other pertinent variables. Assume that
the radial slope is sufficiently small that the section may be treated as
rectangular in certain respects, and assume that the bend radius is constant (i.e.,
the centerline of the channel is circular).
<PROBLEM K-4M>
<PROBLEM K-5M>
On 2 May 1978 the following data were obtained for the Sacramento River near
Chico, California:
Calculate the average transverse bed slope of the stream, and the maximum
and minimum depths across the channel.
79
<PROBLEM N-6M>
The net radial momentum flux, M r , through the small control volume in the polar-
coordinate system of bend flow consists of the streamwise difference in radial
momentum passing through the upstream and downstream faces, and the radial
difference in radial momentum passing through the inside and outside faces, and
is given by
Show that
where
v = linear secondary flow velocity in the R direction = 2V[(z-zb)/h-1/2];
u = local streamwise velocity based on a power-law relationship =
us[(z- zb)/h](,/n>= U(n+1)/n)[(z-zb)/h](1/n|;
zs = water-surface elevation; and,
zb = bed elevation
80