Interventional Examination: Information Bulletin For Certification As Fellow of Interventional Pain Practice (FIPP)
Interventional Examination: Information Bulletin For Certification As Fellow of Interventional Pain Practice (FIPP)
Interventional Examination: Information Bulletin For Certification As Fellow of Interventional Pain Practice (FIPP)
Information Bulletin
(2018 Edition – for use with 2018 FIPP Examinations)
for Certification as
Fellow of
Interventional Pain
Practice (FIPP)
REVIEW Page 10-12 for Examination Description.
1
Members of the Board of Examination
Chair (2015-2018) Nicholas Chua Hai Liang, MD, FIPP
Peter Staats, MD, MBA, DABIPP FIPP Singapore
New Jersey, USA
An Liong Liem, MD, FIPP
Vice Chair for FIPP The Netherlands
Frank Huygen, MD, PhD, FIPP
The Netherlands Milan Stojanovic, MD, FIPP
Massachusetts, USA
Vice Chair for CIPS
Michael Gofeld, MD, FIPP, CIPS Immediate Past Examination Chair
Ontario, Canada Maarten van Kleef, MD, PhD, FIPP
Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
Vice Chair for Training/Certification
Eric Wilson, Mb, BCh, FIPP Past Examination Chairs
Cape Town, South Africa Miles Day, MD, FIPP, DABIPP, DABPM
Lubbock, Texas, USA
Registrar of Examination
Monique Steegers, MD, PhD, FIPP Nagy Mekhail, MD, PhD, FIPP
Malden, The Netherlands Cleveland, Ohio USA
EXAMINERS
Mert Akbas – TURKEY Alan Berkman - CANADA Nicholas Chua - SINGAPORE
Abddelmuhsen Al Sahhaf – Anuj Bhatia - CANADA Manuel Cifrian Perez - SPAIN
KUWAIT Hemmo Bosscher – USA A.R. Cooper- UK
Susan Anderson – USA Mark Boswell – USA Peter Courtney – AUSTRALIA
Fabricio Assis - BRAZIL Lora Brown – USA Gautam Das – USA
Mahammad Ather – UK Allen Burton – USA Beja Joseph Daneshfar – USA
Diego Beltrutti – ITALY Alex Cahana – USA Sukdeb Datta – USA
Meir Bennun – ISRAEL Aaron Calodney – USA Miles Day - USA
Ramsin Benyamin – USA Kenneth Chapman – USA Javier De Andres - SPAIN
Philippe Berenger – USA Jianguo Cheng - USA Timothy Deer – USA
2
Richard Derby – USA Daniel Le – USA James Rathmell – USA
Neels De Villiers – SOUTH Marion Lee – USA Richard Rauck – USA
AFRICA Sang Chul Lee – SOUTH Enrique Reig – SPAIN
Teresa Dews – USA KOREA Jose Rodriguez – PUERTO
Sudhir Diwan – USA Liong Liem - BELGIUM RICO
Dennis Dobritt – USA Sean Lin - TAIWAN Olav Rohof – NETHERLANDS
Elmer Dunbar – USA Glenn Lipton – USA Ricardo Ruiz-Lopez – SPAIN
Richard Epter- USA Steve Litman – USA Matthew Rupert – USA
Serdar Erdine - TURKEY John Loeser – USA Jamil Sabit - PAKISTAN
Lorand Eross, HUNGARY Leland Lou – USA Sherif Salama – USA
Miron Fayngersh – USA Marc Maes - BELGIUM Richard Sawyer – UK
Tacson Fernandez – USA Osama Malak-- USA Cristy Mark Schade- USA
Gertrude Filippini-de Moor - Pierluigi Manchiaro - ITALY David Schultz – USA
NETHERLANDS Laxmaiah Manchikanti – USA Rinoo Shah – USA
Philip Finch - AUSTRALIA Philippe Mavrocordatos - Jehad Shaikhani -
Juan Carlos Flores – SWITZERLAND NETHERLANDS
ARGENTINA Patrick McGowan – UK Hariharan Shankar - USA
Ira Fox- USA Nagy Mekhail – USA Vijay Singh – USA
Michael Frey – USA Marcello Meli - SPAIN Menno Sluijter –
Charles Gauci – UK Renier Mendez – PUERTO SWITZERLAND
Ludger Gerdesmeyer – RICO Judson Somerville – USA
GERMANY Jeffrey Meyer - USA Micha Sommer -
Michael Gofeld, USA Jee Y Moon – SOUTH KOREA NETHERLANDS
Willy Halim - Heinrich Moser – Peter Staats – USA
NETHERLANDS NETHERLANDS Michael Stanton-Hicks – USA
Michael Hammer- USA Samer Narouze – USA Monique Steegers -
Hans Hansen – USA Mohamed Abd El Rauf Abd El NETHERLANDS
Jon-Paul Harmer – USA Nasr - EGYPT Agnes Stogicza - USA
Michael Hartmann - John Nelson - USA Milan Stojanovic - USA
SWITZERLAND *David Niv – ISRAEL Raj Sundaraj– AUSTRALIA
Craig Hartrick – USA Carl Noe – USA Pankaj Surange - INDIA
*Samuel Hassenbusch – USA Charles Oliveira - BRAZIL Gul Talu - TURKEY
Salim Hayek – USA Einar Ottestad - USA Murray Taverner –
James Heavner- USA Nuri Suleyman Ozyalcin – AUSTRALIA
Dominic Hegarty - IRELAND TURKEY Alexandre Teixeira –
Standiford Helm – USA Umeshraya Pai - USA PORTUGAL
Kok-Yuen Ho - SINGAPORE Mahdi Panahkhahi - Subodha Thanthulage - UK
Frank Huygen - AUSTRALIA Simon Thomson- UK
NETHERLANDS Nileskumar Patel – USA Tariq Tramboo - INDIA
Eduardo Ibarra- PUERTO Vikram Patel – USA Andrea Trescot – USA
RICO Jordi Perez-Martinez - Jose Trevino – USA
Robert Ickx - NETHERLANDS CANADA Ricardo Vallejo- USA
Magdi Iskander – EGYPT Carmen Pichot- SPAIN Sandra van den Heuvel -
Subhash Jain – USA Ricardo Plancarte – MEXICO NETHERLANDS
Benjamin Johnson – USA John Prunskis- USA Maarten van Eerd -
Rafael Justiz – USA Shaym Purswani – USA NETHERLANDS
Leonardo Kapural – USA Martine Puylaert – BELGIUM Maarten van Kleef –
Grigory Kizelshteyn – USA Gabor Racz - USA NETHERLANDS
David Kloth – USA Tibor Racz – USA Jan Van Zundert – BELGIUM
Edvin Koshi - CANADA Prithvi Raj - USA Kenneth Varley – USA
Mehran Kouchek - IRAN Robert Rapcan – CZECH REP. Giustino Varrassi – ITALY
3
Giambattista Villa - ITALY Eric Wilson – SOUTH Alp Yentur - Turkey
Kris Vissers - NETHERLANDS AFRICA * Deceased
Christopher Wells – UK Alex Sow Nam Yeo –
Michael Whitworth – USA SINGAPORE
4
In order to be eligible for the Certification Examination in Interventional Pain Medicine,
you must meet the following requirements:
Requirement 1
Licensure
All licenses you hold to practice medicine must be valid, unrestricted, and current at the time of
the examination.
Each applicant must hold a license issued by (a) one of the states of the United States of America
or (b) its equivalent in the applicant’s country, state, province, parish, county, or other
governmental unit within the applicant’s country.
Requirement 2
Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Approved Residency
You must have satisfactorily completed a four-year ACGME-accredited residency training
program or its equivalent that included pain management. Applicants must submit a
chronological list of all completed ACGME training or equivalent (see Page 2 of the application).
Requirement 3
American Board of Medical
Specialties (ABMS) Board Certification or Equivalent
Alternative A: You must be currently certified by a board accredited by the American Board of
Medical Specialties.
or
Alternative B: You must be currently certified by a board in your country of residence that
certifies you to be a pain physician.
2. The documentation of your training in pain management must include a letter or form signed
by the program director of the ACGME-accredited training program you attended that
describes your training. The documentation must describe the scope, content, and duration of
training in neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropathology, pharmacology,
psychopathology, physical modalities, and surgical modalities relevant to the field of pain
medicine.
5
3. **Subspecialty Certification requirement applicable for USA candidates. To be eligible
to sit the FIPP examination, it is mandatory that USA candidates hold one of the following
Pain Boards:
Note: Please contact the WIP Board of Examination office if you desire further instructions or a
form for submission by the program director of the ACGME-accredited program that you
attended.
Requirement 4
Clinical Practice Experience
By the date of the examination you apply for, you must have been engaged in the clinical practice
of Pain Medicine for at least 12 months after completing a formal residency-training program.
A substantial amount of this practice must have been in the field of Pain Medicine. Time spent in
a residency-training program does not satisfy this practice requirement; however, if you
successfully completed a post-residency fellowship program in pain management that lasted 12
months or longer, you may count the fellowship as 12 months of practice in the field of Pain
Medicine.
To be qualified to take the Examination in Interventional Techniques, your practice must either be
devoted full-time to Pain Medicine or at least half of your practice must be devoted to Pain
Medicine and the remainder to another specialty. To demonstrate the scope of your Pain
Medicine practice, you must document your current practice in Pain Medicine. This
documentation must include detailed descriptions of your day-to-day practice, including time and
procedures allocated throughout your practice schedule. A summary of your overall practice,
documenting specific evaluation, management and procedures in pain medicine, should be
included in your description.
You also must provide the following information regarding your practice:
• Whether your license to practice your profession in any jurisdiction has ever been limited,
suspended, revoked, denied, or subjected to probationary condition.
• Whether your clinical privileges at any hospital or healthcare institution have ever been
limited, suspended, revoked, not renewed, or subject to probationary conditions.
• Whether your medical staff membership status has ever been limited, suspended, revoked,
not renewed, or subject to probation.
• Whether you have ever been sanctioned for professional misconduct by any hospital,
healthcare institution, or medical organization.
• Whether the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration or your national, state, provincial, or
territorial controlled substances authorization has ever been denied, revoked, suspended,
restricted, voluntarily surrendered or not renewed.
6
• Whether you have ever voluntarily relinquished clinical privileges, controlled substance
registration, license to practice or participating status with any health insurance plan,
including government plans, in lieu of formal action.
• Whether you have ever been convicted of a felony relating to the practice of medicine or
one that relates to health, safety, or patient welfare.
• Whether you presently have a physical or mental health condition that affects, or is
likely to affect your professional practice.
• Whether you have or have had a substance abuse problem that affects or is reasonably
likely to affect your professional practice.
• Whether there have been any malpractice judgments or settlements filed or settled against
you in the last five years.
Requirement 5
Adherence to Ethical and
Professional Standards
Upon application, and any grant of certification, you agree that you adhere to all WIP
requirements, agree to continue to adhere to these requirements, and agree that should you fail to
do so, WIP and/or its Board of Examination may revoke or otherwise act upon your certification.
As a means of demonstrating your adherence to ethical and professional standards, you must
submit a minimum of two (2) letters of recommendation from practicing physicians. The letters
will be used to assess the applicant’s adherence to professional and ethical standards and to
confirm information regarding the applicant’s Pain Medicine practice, including the assessment of
whether the applicant has been satisfactorily practicing Pain Medicine and practicing this
specialty on a full-time basis.
Note: Only one letter may be from a physician partner. The second letter must be from
another physician who can speak to the applicant’s practice in Pain Medicine.
Included with the application is a form detailing what must be included in the letter and to whom
it should be addressed. Please provide this form to the recommending physicians so that the
content of the letter is complete.
Requirement 6
Declaration and Consent
Please refer to the FIPP Examination Application for the declaration and consent.
7
The World Institute of Pain (WIP) was founded in 1994. It is incorporated in the State of
California as a nonprofit corporation and operates as an autonomous entity, independent from any
other association, society, or academy. This independence permits WIP to maintain integrity
concerning its policy-making on matters related to certification.
The World Institute of Pain and its Board of Examination administers a psychometrically-
developed and practice-related Interventional Examination in the field of Pain Medicine to
qualified candidates. Physicians who have successfully completed the credentialing process and
examination will be issued certificates of diploma in the field of Interventional Pain Medicine and
designated as Fellows in the Interventional Techniques. A list of physicians certified will be
available to medical organizations and other groups in the general public.
Mission
The mission of the World Institute of Pain – Board of Examination is to protect and inform the
public by improving the quality and availability of Interventional Techniques in Pain Medicine.
2. To maintain and improve the quality of graduate medical education in the field of Pain
Medicine by collaborating with related organizations. Objectives to meet this goal
include:
• Maintenance of a registry for public information about the certification status of physicians
certified in interventional techniques.
• Provision of information to the public and concerned entities about the rationale for
certification in interventional examinations.
• Facilitation of discussion with the public, professional organizations, health care agencies and
regulatory bodies regarding education, evaluation and certification of Pain Medicine
specialists in interventional techniques.
INSTRUCTIONS
PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE ENTERING ANY
INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION.
Applicants bear the sole responsibility for meeting all eligibility criteria, application deadlines,
and submission requirements, as delineated in both the application and the Bulletin of
Information.
8
Only applications that are received by the deadline and that are legible, clear, complete, and
accurate will be reviewed by the Credentials Committee. This committee determines each
applicant’s eligibility for certification.
Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. Once all information has been received at the
World Institute of Pain office, it will be sent for review. Any delay may jeopardize the
timely review of the application for the current certification cycle.
After initial review of application materials, each candidate will receive a notice from the World
Institute of Pain office indicating that the materials appear complete and will be forwarded to the
Credentials Committee or that the materials are incomplete and require additional information.
Note: It is the responsibility of the applicant to notify the World Institute of Pain office
immediately of any change in mailing address that takes effect during the certification process.
Notification should be sent to: Board of Examination, World Institute of Pain, 150 Kimel Park
Drive, Suite 100A, Winston Salem, NC 27103, USA ([email protected]).
Your acknowledgment and your examination results will be sent to the mailing address you
indicate on the application form.
If you rotate among clinics or hospitals, or if you have more than one office, please provide the
telephone number where you will be most likely to receive a timely message. If possible, include
the name of a contact person if you are not readily available.
Application Fee
The application fee of $2,500.00 must accompany all submitted materials. Payment must be in
U.S. dollars via credit card, bank wire transfer, or in the form of a money order or cashiers check
payable to the World Institute of Pain. Failure to submit the fee in the correct form will result in
the rejection of your application. Applications will not be reviewed until payment in full has been
received.
Refunds/Cancellations/Rescheduling
No refunds of the $2,500.00 application fee will be made, except when the Board of Examination
determines that an applicant is not eligible to take the FIPP Examination. In this case, your
application fee will be refunded less a $250.00 administrative fee.
If an applicant is unable to attend an exam after applying, they must notify the Certification
Program Manager ([email protected]) AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, but no
later than the application deadline for the exam in question (usually 4-6 weeks prior to the exam).
The application fee will not be refunded, but the applicant will be allowed to participate in a later
FIPP Examination, subject to an additional $100 rescheduling fee. All applicants MUST attend
an exam within 2 years or 4 examinations (whichever is greater) of their original application; after
this point the application fee will be forfeited and a new application must be submitted.
Pain Medicine has emerged as a separate and distinguishable specialty that is characterized by a
distinct body of knowledge and a well-defined scope of practice and is based on an infrastructure
of scientific research and education. Competence in the practice of Pain Medicine requires
advanced training in interventional techniques, experience, and knowledge. The interventional
techniques are unique procedures performed by pain physicians, and appropriate examination and
certification are designed to accurately reflect the quality of care given to pain patients. The WIP
Board of Examination FIPP certification program has been designed to help recognize
practitioners’ knowledge and skill in this field; however, certification by WIP cannot and is not
intended to serve as a guarantee of competence.
Scope of Certification
The World Institute of Pain and its Board of Examination have developed the eligibility
requirements and examination materials for the Examination in Interventional Techniques based
on its review of the current state of medical and scientific knowledge about the treatment of pain,
as documented in medical literature. The WIP Board of Examination and its Examination
Council have developed this certification program, which it believes recognizes currently
accepted levels of knowledge and expertise in interventional techniques in order to improve
patient care.
New developments are included in the examination only after practitioners of interventional pain
management techniques have accepted them. Periodic reviews are conducted to ensure that the
examination continues to reflect actual practice conditions.
WIP Board of Examination welcomes comments from the public and the profession designed to
assist in improving this program.
10
candidates are evaluated by two examiners from a pool of about 30 examiners. Candidates may not
be evaluated by examiners who are well-known to the candidate.
Note:
During this part of the examination, the examinee will have at his/her disposal a fresh cadaver,
necessary instruments, C-Arm and a radiology technician.
12
PART 2B- ORAL EXAMINATION
In Part 2B, each examinee is individually questioned by two (2) examiners on two separate cases
(medical vignettes to assess clinical reasoning). The examinees spend up to fifteen (15) minutes on
each of the two cases for a total of thirty (30) minutes.
For each of the cases, the examinee has a maximum of five (5) minutes to review a short case history.
One of the examiners asks the examinee for a diagnosis and the interventional procedure that should
be performed. The examiner also asks a series of up to ten (10) questions that relate to the care and
treatment of the patient. This portion of the examination lasts for up to fifteen (15) minutes. The
second examiner follows the same procedure with the second case. This portion of the examination
also lasts for up to fifteen (15) minutes. Both examiners award a score for each case based on the
examinee’s diagnosis, suggested interventional procedure and answers to the questions posed.
The oral cases/medical vignettes will be drawn from among the following topics:
The WIP Board of Examination FIPP Certification Examination will be administered at locations
announced on the WIP webpage (http://worldinstituteofpain.org). The organization reserves the right
to change the examination site, city and date based on logistical or other concerns.
Nondiscrimination Policy
WIP does not discriminate against any person on the basis of age, gender, sexual orientation, race,
religion, national origin, medical condition, physical disability, or marital status.
It is very important that your application form be completed carefully and accurately. The
information you provide in the application and any accompanying required documents will be used
by the WIP Board of Examination to determine your eligibility to sit for the examination.
13
During the post-examination evaluation of examinee scores on the three parts of the FIPP
examination and any subsequent discussions regarding the scores of individual examinees, all
candidates are identified by number only. No names accompany these numbers.
Examination Scoring
The final score for the examination is a criterion-referenced, weighted composite score. The
examination components are weighted as follows: practical/cadaver = 60%; oral = 20%; written =
20%. The Practical/Cadaver and oral portions are each evaluated by the examiners using a four-point
scale with 1 = Unacceptable, below basic competence, potentially harmful; 2 = Unacceptable, below
basic competence, not harmful; 3 = Acceptable, basic competence; 4 = Acceptable, exceeds basic
competence. The FIPP is a pass/fail determination and the final score is based on an evaluation of
performance on all three components of the examination.
Passing candidates will receive a letter informing them that they have passed the examination. The
examination is designed to assess knowledge associated with the minimal professional competency
required for safe and effective practice. It is not intended to distinguish among scores at or above the
passing point; therefore, WIP will not report numeric scores to passing candidates.
WIP will send failing candidates notice of their score, the minimum passing score and a diagnostic
report showing performance on each of the three parts of the examination. WIP does not limit the
number of times candidates may apply for and take the examination. However, a candidate who fails
the examination three (3) times is required to complete a minimum of one (1) additional year of
practice before being eligible to reapply for the examination. A new application form and all
applicable fees and required documentation must be submitted each time reexamination is requested.
Note: All answer sheets and scoring documents will be destroyed six (6) months after the
administration of the examination.
Appeals
A candidate who fails the examination and wishes to challenge the results may request that the
examination be re-scored by hand to verify reported scores. A request must be submitted in writing
within twenty (20) calendar days of the postmark on the score report along with a check for $50.00
(USD) payable to World Institute of Pain to cover the cost of hand scoring the examination. Results
of hand scoring will be considered the final examination result. WIP offers no further appeal.
Certification
Candidates who pass the examination will receive a certificate suitable for framing and may identify
themselves as Fellow of Interventional Pain Practice (FIPP). Each candidate who passes the
examination shall be required to sign a license to use any name or acronym for the certification
offered by the WIP and agrees not to use the certification in such a manner as to bring the WIP or its
Board of Examination into disrepute (including the failure to maintain competent practice) and not to
make any statement regarding the certification that the WIP or its Board of Examination may
consider misleading or unauthorized. The certificate remains the property of WIP and must be
surrendered to WIP in the case of termination of certification.
14
Re-certification
Certificates awarded by WIP and its Board of Examination are time-limited. WIP and its Board of
Examination are in the process of establishing a re-certification policy. The WIP Board of
Examination has this requirement to ensure that its certificants continue to meet the knowledge and
skill required of a Pain Medicine physician board-certified in interventional techniques.
Examination Preparation
2. Answer the sample questions in this Bulletin of Information to familiarize yourself with the
nature and format of the questions that will appear on the examination.
The WIP Board of Examination Credentials Committee reviews all applications submitted for the
examination.
The review process takes approximately four (4) weeks. The review process does not start until
ALL required materials are received from the applicant.
If your application is approved, you will receive an e-mail confirming your eligibility, and containing
specific information about the date, time, and location of the examination.
The Board of Examination independently verifies the information submitted in applications. State
agencies or other licensing bodies sometimes take time to respond to verification requests. The Board
of Examination is not responsible if these agencies do not reply in a timely fashion.
Strict security measures are maintained throughout all phases of examination development and
administration. All candidates will be required to present some form of photo identification in
order to enter the testing center.
Trained proctors will supervise the administration of the examination, maintaining the strictest
security throughout the testing period.
Irregularities observed during the testing period, including but not limited to, creating a disturbance,
giving or receiving unauthorized information or aid to or from other persons, or attempting to remove
test materials or notes from the testing room. Any of these may be sufficient cause to terminate
examinee participation in the examination administration or to invalidate scores. Irregularities may
also be evidenced by subsequent statistical analysis of testing materials.
15
The Board of Examination reserves the right to investigate each incident of suspected
misconduct or irregularity.
2. If symptoms persist after appropriate management of acute cervical disc herniation, the next
step is to perform a:
A. cervical laminectomy and fusion.
B. cervical epidural injection.
C. chemonucleolysis.
D. cervical facet injection.
3. A 45-year-old patient with a history of chronic low back, left hip and left thigh pain whose
status is post multiple lumbar laminectomy received a differential epidural block of 3% 2-
chloroprocaine. Some pain resumed with return of full sensation and motor function in the
lower extremities; all pain returned with return of sympathetic function. The pain was
transmitted via which fibers?
A. A alpha
B. A delta
C. C
16
D. A delta and C
4. Examination of a patient with neck and shoulder pain reveals referred pain in the lateral aspect
of the forearm, with weakness and dysfunction of the biceps and brachioradialis, and
hypoesthesia in the lateral aspect of the forearm and thumb. The patient MOST likely has a
lesion of which nerve root?
A. C4
B. C5
C. C6
D. C7
5. The MOST appropriate diagnostic nerve block for pain in upper abdominal viscera is a/an:
A. intercostal block.
B. lumbar sympathetic block.
C. celiac plexus block.
D. hypogastric plexus block.
6. Sympathetic innervation to the upper extremity is carried by which fibers of the brachial
plexus?
A. T1-T2 preganglionic fibers
B. T3-T5 preganglionic fibers
C. T1-T2 postganglionic fibers
D. T3-T5 postganglionic fibers
7. Intense whiteness of fingers with subsequent blue coloration with coldness and red
coloration on rewarming is MOST likely due to:
A. frostbite.
B. Raynaud’s disease.
C. reflex sympathetic dystrophy.
D. acute venous thrombosis.
8. Indications for lumbar epidural steroid injections include all of the following EXCEPT:
A. radicular pain with corresponding sensory change.
B. radiculopathy due to herniated disc with failed conservative treatment.
C. acute herpes zoster in the lumbar dermatomes.
D. postlaminectomy (failed back) syndrome without radiculopathy.
9. Which of the following nerve blocks is LEAST helpful in diagnosing sympathetically mediated
pelvic pain?
A. Differential spinal
B. Pudendal nerve
C. Superior hypogastric plexus
D. Differential epidural
10. Which of the following statements regarding the anatomy of the superior hypogastric plexus is NOT
true?
A. It lies anterior to L5 vertebra
17
B. It lies just inferior to the aortic bifurcation
C. It lies right of midline
D. It branches left and right and descends to form the inferior hypogastric plexus
11. All of the following are indications for a stellate ganglion block EXCEPT:
A. reflex sympathetic dystrophy.
B. acute herpes zoster (ophthalmic division).
C. hyperhidrosis.
D. pancreatitis.
12. Which of the following regional anesthesia techniques is NOT commonly used with
children due to its side effects?
A. Epidural block
B. Subarachnoid block
C. Caudal block
D. Brachial plexus block
13. A brachial plexus block is indicated for all of the following conditions EXCEPT:
A. sympathetic independent pain due to reflex sympathetic dystrophy.
B. brachial plexalgia.
C. angina.
D. Raynaud's disease.
14. A celiac plexus block is effective in reducing pain originating from all of the following
organs EXCEPT the:
A. pancreas.
B. transverse portion of the large colon.
C. gall bladder.
D. descending portion of the pelvic colon.
15. A patient is positioned prone on the fluoroscopic table, the T1-T4 spinous processes are
identified on the ipsilateral side, and a skin weal is raised 4-5 cm lateral to the spinous
process. A spinal needle is directed to the lamina and "walked" laterally until there is loss of
resistance. These procedures are consistent with which of the following types of block?
A. Stellate ganglion
B. Thoracic sympathetic
C. Interpleural
D. Thoracic epidural
17. Cell bodies of preganglionic fibers of the lumbar sympathetic chain arise at which of the
following sites?
A. T5-T9
B. T11-L2
18
C. L3-L5
D. S1-S4
18. A lateral femoral cutaneous block is indicated for which of the following conditions?
A. Meralgia paresthetica
B. Femoral neuralgia
C. Saphenous neuralgia
D. Groin pain
19. Which of the following statements is true of neurolytic concentrations of less than 2%
phenol?
A. They have no effect
B. They selectively destroy A-delta and C fibers
C. They have a reversible local anesthetic action when applied to nerve bundles
D. They destroy nerves but have no effect on blood vessels
20. Mydriasis, tachypnea, tachycardia, delirium and a modest decrease in pain can be produced
by agonists of which receptor type?
A. Mu
B. Kappa
C. Delta
D. Sigma
22. To achieve sympathetic denervation of the head and neck, the BEST site of blocking is the:
A. middle cervical ganglion.
B. superior cervical ganglion.
C. stellate ganglion.
D. sphenopalatine ganglion.
23. The lesser splanchnic nerve is formed by which of the following sympathetic nerves?
A. T5-T7
B. T8-T9
C. T10-T11
D. T12
1. Correct answer is C
2. Correct answer is B
3. Correct answer is D
19
4. Correct answer is C
5. Correct answer is C
6. Correct answer is A
7. Correct answer is A
8. Correct answer is D
9. Correct answer is B
10. Correct answer is C
11. Correct answer is D
12. Correct answer is B
13. Correct answer is C
14. Correct answer is D
15. Correct answer is B
16. Correct answer is A
17. Correct answer is B
18. Correct answer is A
19. Correct answer is C
20. Correct answer is D
21. Correct answer is D
22. Correct answer is C
23. Correct answer is C
REFERENCES
The following is a list of references that may be helpful in reviewing for the examination. This
listing is intended for use as a study aid only. The WIP – Board of Examination does not intend the
list to imply endorsement of these specific references, nor are the examination questions taken from
these sources.
1. 2013 Physicians Desk Reference (67th ed). Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics. American
Pain Society. (2013).
2. American Pain Society. (2009). Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain
and Cancer Pain (6th ed.). Glenview, IL.
3. Aronoff, G.M. (1998). Evaluation and Treatment of Chronic Pain (3rd ed.). Baltimore:
Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins.
4. Bonica, J.J. (Ed). (2009). The Management of Pain (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
20
5. Braddom, R.L. (2006) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W.B.
Saunders Co.
6. Brown, D.L. (2010). Atlas of Regional Anesthesia (4th ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders
Co.
7. Cousins, M.J., & Bridenbaugh, P.O. (Eds.). (2008). Neural Blockade (4th ed.).
Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.
8. Charlton, J. (2005). Core Curriculum for Professional Education in Pain (3rd ed.). Seattle:
IASP Press.
9. Goodman, L.S., Limbird, L.E., (Eds.) et al. (2012). Goodman & Gilman’s The
Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (12th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Text.
11. Raj, P.P. (Ed.). (2008) Practical Management of Pain (2nd ed.). Chicago: Mosby Year
Book Publishers.
12. Raj, P.P. (Ed.). (2002) Textbook of Regional Anesthesia, Churchill Livingston
13. Raj, P.P., Lou, L, Erdine S, Staats P., et al. (Eds). (2008) Radiographic Imaging of
Regional Anesthesia and Interventional Techniques (2nd ed.).
14. Raj, P.P, Erdine S. (2012) Pain-relieving Procedures: The Illustrated Guide. New Jersey:
Wiley-Blackwell.
15. Saper, J.R., Silberstein, S., Gordon, C.D., & Hamel R.L. (1999). Handbook of Headache
Management (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
16. Travell, J., & Simons, D.G. (1998). Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point
Manual, Vol. 1 and 2. (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
17. Van Zundert J, Patijn J, Hartrick C, Lataster A, Huygen F, Mekhail N & van Kleef M
(Eds.). (2012). Evidence-based Interventional Pain Practice: According to Clinical
Diagnoses. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
18. Waldman, S.D. (2009). Atlas of Interventional Pain Management (3rd ed.). Philadelphia:
W.B. Saunders Co.
19. Wall, P.D., & Melzack, R. (Eds.). (2006). Textbook of Pain. (5th ed.). Edinburgh,
Scotland: Churchill Livingstone.
21
FIPP REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Address FIPP Examination application and information requests to:
D. Mark Tolliver, MA
Certification Program Manager
145 Kimel Park Drive, Suite 208
Winston Salem, NC 27103
USA
Phone: 336-760-2939 - Fax: 336-760-5770
E-mail: [email protected]
22