Hs Ar 2020 en
Hs Ar 2020 en
Hs Ar 2020 en
2020年年報
Corporate Profile 1
Results in Brief 4
Chairman’s Statement * 7
- Business Review 12
- Financial Review 16
- Risk 30
- Capital Management 97
Subsidiaries 251
* Where possible, percentages in this section have been rounded to the nearest percentage point
The abbreviations ‘HK$m’ and ‘HK$bn’ represent millions and billions of Hong Kong
dollars respectively.
CORPORATE PROFILE
Hang Seng Bank is celebrating its 88th anniversary this year. Founded in 1933, the Bank has
continually innovated to provide best-in-class, customer-centric banking, investment and
wealth management services for individuals and businesses. It is widely recognised as the
leading domestic bank in Hong Kong, currently serving more than 3.5 million customers.
Combining its award-winning mobile app and strong digital capabilities with a vast network of
about 290 service outlets in Hong Kong, Hang Seng offers a seamless omni-channel experience
for customers to take care of their banking and financial needs anytime, anywhere.
Its wholly owned subsidiary, Hang Seng Bank (China) Limited, operates a strategic network
of outlets in almost 20 major cities in mainland China to serve a growing base of Mainland
customers locally and those with cross-boundary banking needs. The Bank also operate
branches in Macau and Singapore, and a representative office in Taipei.
As a homegrown financial institution, Hang Seng is closely tied to the Hong Kong community.
It supports the community with a dedicated programme of social and environmental initiatives
focused on future skills for the younger generation, sustainable finance and financial literacy,
addressing climate change and caring for the community.
Hang Seng is a principal member of the HSBC Group, one of the world’s largest banking and
financial services organisations. More information on Hang Seng Bank is available at
www.hangseng.com.
RATINGS
Moody’s
Long-term Bank Deposit (local and foreign currency)
Aa2
Outlook
Negative
Outlook
Stable
1
88 YEARS, AND EVER-GROWING
On 3 March 1933, Hang Seng opened its doors for business for the first time. Operating initially as a money
changer, Hang Seng’s assets were modest, with just 11 employees working in an 800-square-foot premises
in Sheung Wan. But its principles were lofty: Hang Seng would welcome Hong Kong people from all walks
of life and treat them as individuals and honoured guests.
The establishment date of Hang Seng – 3/3/33 – is highly auspicious in local culture. The word for ‘3’ in
Cantonese rhymes with the characters for ‘life’ or ‘grow’, and the repetition of 3s means ‘never-ending’, a
sentiment that is echoed in the name ‘Hang Seng’, which means ‘ever-growing’.
This year we mark another auspicious date – our 88th anniversary. The number ‘8’ rhymes with the character
for ‘good fortune’ and we hope the repeating 8s will bring never-ending good luck and good fortune to our
customers and the communities we serve. Throughout our history, we have remained true to our founding
principles and to our name: growing together with the people of Hong Kong by continually innovating and
acting to deliver customer-centric services, support livelihoods, strengthen community ties and promote
sustainability.
Our long history of putting people first has made us one of Hong Kong’s most trusted brands and a banking
partner to more than half the adult population. Our goal is to meet the diverse banking needs of all our
customers in ways that are convenient, fast, easy and secure – anytime, anywhere.
Our contribution to building a better future for all includes playing an active role in addressing social and
environmental issues, such as social mobility, youth development and climate change. It also encompasses
a determination to make Hang Seng an employer of choice. We engage our people through a variety of
well-being and professional development initiatives, and provide a dynamic workplace environment that
encourages creativity, collaboration and different ways of working.
As we look ahead to the next 88 years and continue to transform for the future, we aim to remain ‘ever-
growing’ on all fronts: for our business and for everyone we serve.
2
SUPPORTING CUSTOMERS AND THE COMMUNITY DURING THE PANDEMIC
Our accelerated development of digital banking services allowed personal customers to enjoy
uninterrupted banking services amid social distancing. e-Banking and digital transactions grew by 124%
year-on-year.
eTicketing service was rolled out at all 74 street-level branch outlets to shorten customer queuing times.
Extra protective measures were also implemented, including the installation of acrylic screens to keep
customers and staff safe.
A robust digital infrastructure enabled up to 85% of our office staff to work from home.
We donated HK$10 million to support underprivileged children who had to learn from home when
schools closed.
To support SMEs in the challenging business environment, we were the 1st bank to launch a dedicated
online application portal for the Special 100% Loan Guarantee under the SME Financing Guarantee
Scheme.
When physical DSE mock examinations were cancelled, our youth Instagram page GO! GingerOnion
developed an online mock examination to help students maintain momentum. It registered more than
300,000 engagements.
3
RESULTS IN BRIEF
% %
HK$ HK$ %
At 31 December At 31 December
2020 2019 Change
At year-end
HK$m HK$m %
% %
Capital ratios
- Common Equity Tier 1 ('CET1') Capital Ratio 16.8 16.9
- Tier 1 Capital Ratio 18.5 18.7
- Total Capital Ratio 20.0 20.8
Liquidity ratios
- Liquidity coverage ratio 230.4 205.9
- Net stable funding ratio 152.9 149.1
4
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Ratios % % % % %
Return on average ordinary shareholders’ equity 12.1 14.2 16.0 15.2 9.6
Post-tax return on average total assets 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.0
Capital ratios
- Common Equity Tier 1 ('CET1') Capital Ratio 16.6 16.5 16.6 16.9 16.8
- Tier 1 Capital Ratio 17.9 17.7 17.8 18.7 18.5
- Total Capital Ratio 20.8 20.1 20.2 20.8 20.0
5
PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO
OPERATING PROFIT SHAREHOLDERS AND DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
EARNINGS PER SHARE
HK$bn HK$bn HK$ HK$
30 28 14 9
28
8
26 24 12
24
7
22 20 10
20 6
18
16 8
5
16
14
12 6 4
12
10 3
8 4
8
2
6
4 4 2
1
2
0 0 0 0
16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20
PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO
OPERATING PROFIT SHAREHOLDERS DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
180 26 20
1600 2.2
24 18
160
1400 2.0 22 16
140
20 14
120
1200 1.8
18 12
100
16 10
1000 1.6
80
14 8
800 1.4 60
12 6
40
10 4
600 1.2
20 8 2
400 1.0 0 6 0
16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20
6
CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching economic and social consequences around the world.
Challenges to the movement of goods and people have severely disrupted industrial and commercial
activity and led to major shifts in patterns of consumer demand.
In terms of our business, non-interest income and net interest income were adversely affected by lower
transaction volumes as commercial and personal banking customers stepped back from investment
plans and spending activity. Low interest rates exerted growing pressure on the net interest margin. The
weakened credit environment resulted in an overall increase in expected credit losses for the year and
we recorded a net deficit on property revaluation, compared with a net surplus in 2019.
The combined impact of these factors affected our bottom line. Profit attributable to shareholders
declined by 33% to HK$16,687m. Earnings per share were HK$8.36 per share. Return on average
ordinary shareholders’ equity was 9.6%. Return on average total assets was 1.0%.
While the difficult operating conditions in 2020 made it a challenging year for financial performance,
there is positive progress in terms of our long-term strategy.
Our proactive steps to continuously improve agility and resilience enabled us to smoothly engineer our
operations to ensure customers enjoyed uninterrupted access to convenient, reliable and safe banking
services amid the pandemic environment. In traditional Hang Seng fashion, our dynamic approach also
made it possible for us to go the extra mile and continue to roll out new service innovations, develop
new markets and offer support to those in need. These achievements, which were accomplished while
maintaining strong cost control and effective risk management, have further enhanced Hang Seng’s
institutional sustainability.
The Directors have declared a fourth interim dividend of HK$2.80 per share, bringing the total
distribution for 2020 to HK$5.50 per share.
Economic Outlook
The near-term outlook for the global economy is closely tied to the world’s ability to bring COVID-19
under control. While the development of vaccines, along with continuing policy support from major
central banks, offer some hope for general global economic recovery in the second half of 2021, it is
likely that the impacts of the pandemic will continue to reverberate beyond the end of the acute phase
of this worldwide crisis. While financial markets have shown some vibrancy since the second half of
last year, many real-economy uncertainties remain.
Although Hong Kong recorded an economic contraction for the whole of 2020, there was a return to
the path of expansion in the second half. Further growth is potentially within view with the continuation
of supportive government policy initiatives and the improvement in financial markets resulting from
monetary easing by the US Federal Reserve. The situation remains fragile, however, with much
depending on external variables and it may be some time before economic activity returns to its pre-
recession level.
Mainland China has had a head-start on recovery from the global health crisis. After seeing its GDP fall
by an annual rate of 6.8% in the first quarter of 2020, the economy picked up to register modest growth
for the full year. Thus far, industrial production and property investment have been the major drivers of
growth. Consumers have been slower to return to ‘business as usual’, prompting the government to
focus on boosting domestic demand in its recent economic strategy. We anticipate the Mainland
economy will deliver growth in the range of 6% to 8% in 2021.
7
A Progressive Approach, A Sustainable Strategy
Following our AGM in May, I shall retire from my position as Chairman of Hang Seng’s Board of
Directors after 13 years of service. I would like to express my gratitude to my fellow Board members
for their support and wise counsel over the years, and to congratulate my successor, Ms Irene Lee. She
knows the Bank’s business well, having been an Independent Non-executive Director of the Board since
May 2014. I have no doubt that Irene’s deep experience and far-sighted vision will help lead Hang Seng
to even greater success.
I also wish to express sincere thanks and profound appreciation to Hang Seng’s professional colleagues,
past and present, for their unwavering determination, dedication and drive in executing our vision to
provide innovative, best-in-class services to customers. I am extremely proud of what the Bank has
achieved during my tenure as Chairman. We have strengthened our position as a market leader through
a strategy of customer-centric innovation that combines the power of technology with the expertise and
personal touch of our people.
This past year has been a strong test of the actions we have taken to build a business that is fit for the
future and able to handle the challenges that lie ahead. We have shown ourselves to be responsive,
adaptable and resilient, with the right infrastructure and culture to overcome difficulties and take
advantage of new opportunities.
The pandemic has also reminded people around the world of the importance of community and of
working together to overcome major societal challenges. Our deep roots in Hong Kong include a long
history of initiatives to enhance local development and well-being. On this front too we are stepping up
our actions, with the establishment last year of an ESG Steering Committee that reports to the Executive
Committee and the Board, and a renewed commitment to helping to tackle issues that are specific to
our community, as well as those that affect the entire planet, such as climate change.
For 88 years, the trusted Hang Seng brand has been built on the strengths and talent of its people, sound
financial fundamentals and close community ties. The Bank will continue to grow with its progressive
strategy, leveraging the best of technology and its more dynamic corporate culture to further encourage
innovation and creativity, supporting customers and the community while providing long-term value
for shareholders. It is a privilege to serve as Hang Seng’s Chairman and, from another vantage point, I
look forward to being a lay cheerleader of Hang Seng Bank in the years to come.
Raymond Ch’ien
Chairman
23 February 2021
8
CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT
COVID-19 has affected economies around the world in ways that were hard to imagine a year ago.
Industry, commerce and the way we live were all seriously disrupted in 2020. Our priority last year was
to support our customers through difficult times while ensuring we had robust measures in place to
protect the health and safety of our community and our employees.
Six months ago, we pointed to four key factors that adversely affected our 2020 first-half financial
performance. These were:
1. pressure on net interest margin (NIM) and net interest income due to low interest rates;
2. the impact of market volatility on our insurance business;
3. the impact of economic uncertainty on expected credit losses (ECLs); and
4. a net deficit on property revaluation.
Although the contribution to income from our life insurance business contracted year-on-year, we
recorded a good recovery in the second half. We achieved a 61% increase in revenue compared with
the first half by robustly managing our investment portfolio as equity markets became more active.
The other three factors, however, continued to weigh on our full-year performance. In particular, there
was even greater downward pressure on NIM and net interest income in the second half with the decline
in HIBOR.
In credit risk management, our strategy continued to be prudent. On a year-on-year basis, our ECLs
increased by 49% to HK$2,738m. However, the ECL charge in the second half was 44% lower than in
the first half, reflecting the adequacy of our credit loss reserves as well as some signs of an improving
economic outlook.
While investment property revaluation recorded a deficit in 2020 against a surplus in 2019, the decline
in the second half was less severe than that in the first half.
As a result of these factors, attributable profit for 2020 was down by 33% year-on-year at HK$16,687m.
Our key financials show the impact of the market challenges, but they also reflect our prudent approach
and robust control of the balance sheet. Our strategy to invest in digital capabilities, including our omni-
channel services platform, facilitated continued business flows amid social distancing measures. Our
enhanced agility will enable us to move quickly on new opportunities as economies recover.
The investments and actions we have taken to transform our business over the past several years
supported our swift and seamless adaptation to the realities of the pandemic.
Leveraging our digital strength, we continued to provide convenient and easy remote access to banking
and wealth management services, while also launching new initiatives to further benefit customers.
We rolled out about 475 digital innovations and enhancements in 2020, more than three times the
number in 2019. Major new initiatives such as Savings Planner, SimplyFund and Invest Express have
made money management and investment simpler and more accessible, especially for the younger
segment. For commercial customers, new digital solutions have helped them to more efficiently track
real-time transactions and manage their accounts and cash flows.
In November we unveiled our ‘Branch of the Future’ service concept at MOSTown in Ma On Shan. It
combines innovative technology and service models with in-person expertise and tailor-made services
from our team of wealth management professionals to deliver best-in-class, customer-centric banking
experiences.
9
New and enhanced partnerships with market leaders in other sectors such as Dairy Farm and OpenRice
have added further value for our customers through spending offers and lifestyle benefits and
conveniences.
Our subsidiary Hang Seng Indexes Company continues to track the pulse of the Hong Kong market and
support the development of new market segments. The July launch of the Hang Seng TECH Index to
follow the performance of the 30 largest innovative technology companies listed in Hong Kong was
very well received in both local and international markets.
While technology is central to our long-term strategy, our real competitive strength rests in our people.
I am deeply proud of the way in which my colleagues have stepped up to the many challenges created
by COVID-19 to ensure uninterrupted services for our customers, while showing care and compassion
to the community and each other.
An important part of our business transformation strategy has been to create a new, highly collaborative
culture that gives our people more agency to try new ideas, speak up and take decisions. Our people
provide the creative energy that drives our business forward. Their professionalism and expertise are
what make Hang Seng a highly trusted brand.
Our business is guided by four key brand values – customer-centric, progressive technology, creativity
and corporate social responsibility – which are derived from growing and evolving with the community.
I am pleased to note our efforts are being recognised. In a banking service survey conducted in the third
quarter of last year, we ranked first in Hong Kong for customer service, creativity and inclusion. We
also achieved a notable strengthening of our brand appeal among young people, who play an important
role in our future business growth.
Financial Overview
As outlined above, the difficult operating environment significantly affected our financial performance.
Net interest income dropped by 17% to HK$26,906m. We recorded increased volumes from balance
sheet growth and a 6% rise in average interest-earning assets. However, the persistent low interest rate
environment and decline in HIBOR continued to tighten deposit spreads. Year-on-year, NIM fell by 47
basis points, or 21.4%, from 2.20% to 1.73%.
Non-interest income dropped by 19% to HK$9,162m. Income from many of our fee-generating services
was down due to the pandemic’s disruptive impact on commercial activity and consumer spending. One
highlight was fee income from stockbroking and related services, which rose by 58%, as we benefited
from increased investor activity in the second half and the popularity of our securities trading mobile
app, Invest Express.
Net trading income and net income from financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or
loss together grew by 18%, due mainly to increased income from foreign exchange activities.
Net income from assets and liabilities of the insurance business measured at fair value fell by HK$766m
to HK$823m, reflecting unfavourable market movements in the first half followed by some recovery in
the second half.
Net insurance premium income was down by 2%, with lower income from new business sales largely
offset by more renewals business.
Change in ECLs and other credit impairment charges increased by HK$901m to HK$2,738m.
During the year, we proactively supported clients through the difficulties of the pandemic by offering a
number of financial relief measures and arrangements. As at the end of December, gross impaired loans
10
and advances as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers were 0.60%. However, much
of the impacted loans and advances are secured by tangible collaterals. We believe our ratio is on the
low side of the industry average.
Operating expenses were on par with 2019. Our cost efficiency ratio was 36.6%.
Operating profit fell by 30% to HK$20,125m. Operating profit excluding the change in ECLs and other
credit impairment charges declined by 25% to HK$22,863m.
Investment property revaluation recorded a net deficit of HK$636m, compared with a net surplus of
HK$35m in 2019, reflecting softer sentiment in the commercial property market.
Profit before tax was down by 33% at HK$19,414m. Attributable profit fell by 33% to HK$16,687m.
Our capital base remains strong. At 31 December 2020, our common equity tier 1 capital ratio was
16.8%, our tier 1 capital ratio was 18.5%, and our total capital ratio was 20.0%, compared with 16.9%,
18.7% and 20.8% respectively at 2019 year-end.
Our strong financial fundamentals will allow us to strategically deploy resources to maintain
momentum in our core businesses when economic activity picks up again post-pandemic.
The consequences of COVID-19 are still playing out. Financial markets have shown some signs of
improvement since the second half of 2020, but uncertainties continue to weigh on the real economy
around the world. It could still be some time before we see economic recovery and a gradual return to
pre-pandemic levels of business and consumer activities. The low interest rate environment will
continue to put pressure on the net interest margin, which will also provide challenges for us.
This year, Hang Seng will proudly celebrate 88 years of service and connection to the Hong Kong
community. Since our founding in 1933, we have established ourselves as a trusted brand and the
leading local bank by standing with the people of Hong Kong in good times and in bad. We are
transforming our business to enhance our long-term capacity to positively transform the lives of
customers and the community.
With a more dynamic corporate culture and investing in people and technology, we are building a
business that will grow together with our customers, offering innovative, best-in-class services to
support them in achieving their financial goals. At the same time, we will continue to play an active
role in social development and environmental programmes.
2020 will be a difficult year to forget. It reminded us of the vital importance of human connections. We
have nurtured and grown these connections with our customers and the Hong Kong community over
the past 88 years. This bond is firm and deep. From this, we have drawn strength to overcome many
challenges in the past. We will do so again to move past COVID-19 and build an even better and more
sustainable bank, and community, for our future generations.
Finally, on behalf of the management team and all Hang Seng staff members, I would like to wish our
Chairman, Raymond Ch’ien, all the very best for after he retires later this year. Over the last 13 years,
we have benefitted greatly from his wisdom and guidance. We could not have accomplished so much
without his support. We are delighted that Independent Non-executive Director Irene Lee will be our
new Chairman. With her rich experience and far-sighted vision, we look forward to working even more
closely with her to take the Bank to its next level of success.
Louisa Cheang
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive
23 February 2021
11
BUSINESS REVIEW
The widespread effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic created very difficult operating conditions
in 2020. Leveraging our more agile business infrastructure and strong digital platform we were able to
smoothly handle significant shifts in how and where our customers preferred to use our services, while
also continuing to launch new innovations to make it easier and more convenient for them to meet their
financial management needs.
Gross advances to customers were HK$950bn, broadly unchanged from the end of 2019. In the
challenging operating environment, we leveraged our deep understanding of local business and close
customer relationships to focus on enhancing the quality of our lending assets rather than expanding the
size of our portfolio.
Loans for use in Hong Kong rose by 1%. Lending to corporates was on par with the previous year,
while lending to individuals grew by 4%, due mainly to increased mortgage business. Loans for use
outside Hong Kong were broadly in line with 2019 year-end.
Customer deposits, including certificates of deposit and other debt securities in issue, increased by 4%
at HK$1,304bn. We have increased our issuance of certificates of deposit in Hong Kong and the
Mainland to diversify our sources of funding. Our strong deposit base provides us with a good
foundation for future growth.
Wealth and Personal Banking recorded an 18% year-on-year decrease in net operating income before
change in ECLs and other credit impairment charges to HK$19,663m. Operating profit dropped by 31%
to HK$10,546m and profit before tax decreased by 32% to HK$10,470m.
Backed by our trusted brand, we leveraged our multi-channel platform to deepen customer
relationships, achieving a 7% increase in deposits and a 3% rise in lending. Despite this solid growth in
the balance sheet, low interest rates continued to pressure margins, resulting in a 17% decline in net
interest income to HK$14,733m.
Non-interest income fell by 22% to HK$4,930m, reflecting the impact of market volatility, investor
caution and decreases in banking transactions and card spending. Wealth management business revenue
fell by 15% year-on-year.
Amid the pandemic, there was a marked migration of customers to our digital services. New Personal
e-Banking registrations increased by 40% year-on-year, mobile app log-ons rose by 73% and the total
number of e-Banking and digital transactions grew by 124%.
With a particular emphasis on younger customers, we launched around 350 new digital solutions and
enhancements in 2020, including online and WhatsApp chat channels, an integrated budgeting app, and
SimplyFund, an entry-level investment fund platform. We also collaborated with multiple business
partners – including New World CLUB and SmarTone – on API initiatives to provide more convenient
and value-added banking and lifestyle services.
Leveraging our strong wealth management brand, we launched our new Signature service to provide
bespoke banking services to high-net-worth customers. We also continued to attract new business in
other segments, recording a 15% year-on-year rise in the Prestige and Preferred Banking customer base.
Total investment services income grew by 19%. We successfully captured increasing investment
activity in the second half with our stock trading app and swift adoption of non face-to-face channels
to stay in close touch with customers. Strong digital and data analytics capabilities supported enhanced
frontline productivity by facilitating our understanding and anticipation of customer needs in fluid
12
market conditions. This made it easier for us to proactively offer the right products and services at the
right time.
Insurance income fell by 32%, due mainly to a drop in new business amid the pandemic. Despite the
challenges, we made good progress with our digital insurance business, achieving an 89% increase in
terms of policy count and a 59% growth in new premiums. We also launched DigiLife, an online
insurance information and policy management platform. Active portfolio management improved
investment returns from the life insurance portfolio in the second half.
Looking at secured lending, we grew our mortgage balances in Hong Kong by 5% and our new
mortgage business continued to rank among the top three. Our collaborations with Midland Realty and
mReferral enhanced opportunities to make contact with potential customers and offered a more
convenient and streamlined mortgage application process.
Credit card business was adversely affected by changes in consumer behaviour over the year.
Nevertheless, we managed to outpace the market in card spending by refocusing our promotions to
capture new consumer patterns. We also benefited from the rejuvenation of our enJoy cobranded card
reward programme in partnership with Dairy Farm and expanded our Cash Dollars dining rewards
network through an API collaboration with OpenRice. Our online food & beverage transactions tripled
in 2020 in terms of number, and our e-commerce transactions, excluding travel, grew by 31%.
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banking recorded a 21% year-on-year decline in net operating income before change in
expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$10,300m. Operating profit and profit
before tax both decreased by 42% to HK$5,101m.
Net interest income fell by 20% to HK$8,307m due to persistently low interest rates. Deposits grew by
5%. Lending was down by 2%.
Although the downgrade of a few customer loans in the difficult economic conditions led to an increase
in change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges, our overall asset quality remains
resilient and we continue to be vigilant in monitoring and managing our credit risk.
Severe disruptions to commercial activity adversely affected non-interest income, which dropped by
23% to HK$1,993m. We moved effectively to capture opportunities when they arose, recording a 14%
increase in investment services income from market trading activities. We also achieved double-digit
growth in syndicated loan fees and ranked no. 2 in the 2020 League Table for Hong Kong Mandated
Arranger in terms of number of syndicated lending deals.
A new Business Banking Remote Account Opening Service allows commercial customers to open an
account at any time and from any location. As part of our strong support for clients, we actively
participated in the Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation’s SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS).
We were the first to launch a dedicated online application platform to make it easier for customers to
apply for SFGS loan guarantee products.
Customers can simplify and streamline cash flow management by using our corporate API to integrate
their daily business operations with our core banking services. Our Digital Business Banking platform
provides real-time updates on the status of payments and receivables. Our Flexi-Fixed Deposit offers
customers the ability to enjoy preferential interest rates without needing to fix the tenor of their deposit.
13
Enhancements to our customer service channels, including our AI chatbot BERI, Live Chat and our
Customer Contact Centre, provided additional opportunities to strengthen relationships with customers
by providing services and support for their specific needs.
Our digital innovations won us several industry awards during the year, including ‘API Project of the
Year’ in the Asian Banking & Finance Wholesale Banking Awards 2020, and ‘Best Payment Bank in
Hong Kong’ and ‘Best Frictionless Transaction Award – One Collect Merchant Acquisition Solution’ in
The Asian Banker Transaction Banking Awards. We also received the ‘Best Payment and Collection
Solution’ and ‘Best in Treasury and Working Capital – SME’s Hong Kong’ awards from The Asset.
Global Banking and Markets recorded a 2% year-on-year decrease in net operating income before
change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$6,146m. Operating profit
and profit before tax were both broadly on par with a year earlier at HK$4,979m.
Global Markets
Global Markets recorded a 2% year-on-year increase in net operating income before change in expected
credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$3,414m. Operating profit and profit before tax
both increased by 2% to HK$2,829m.
Net interest income increased by 2% to HK$2,046m. The Markets Treasury team managed interest rate
risk effectively, taking steps to proactively defend the interest margin and achieve yield enhancement
while upholding prudent risk management standards.
Non-interest income increased by 1% to HK$1,368m. We took actions to further diversify the revenue
base and increase product penetration rates among our commercial and personal banking customers.
The increase in volatility in foreign exchange markets, together with the changing interest rate
environment, resulted in an increase in non-fund income from trading and client activities.
Besides equities and structuring, trading departments responsible for repo, foreign exchange and option
trading achieved strong revenue growth, which offset the revenue drop in rates trading. Sales revenue
remained resilient despite the challenging market environment. Increased investment in foreign
exchange from Wealth and Personal Banking customers and use of interest rate hedging products by
corporate customers largely offset a drop in corporate foreign exchange.
Established as part of our commitment to diversifying our sources of revenue, our new Repo Trading
department has become a solid source of income since its establishment in the second half of 2019.
Global Banking
Global Banking recorded a 5% year-on-year drop in net operating income before change in expected
credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$2,732m. Operating profit and profit before tax
both fell by 2% to HK$2,150m.
Net interest income fell by 6% to HK$2,372m, reflecting a 65% decline in deposit interest income in
the low interest rate environment. The drop in interest income from deposits was somewhat offset by
the 7% rise in interest income from lending business, due largely to the success of our lending portfolio
optimisation strategy and higher demand for stagging loans in the second half.
We recorded a 2% increase in non-interest income to HK$360m, due mainly to fee income from credit
facilities on the back of the solid lending growth.
We also broadened our fee income stream, particularly through our Debt Capital Markets Origination
team and effective cross-business collaboration.
14
Amid the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, we assisted customers in need through the Principal
Payment Holiday Scheme offered by Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
Wholly owned subsidiary Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited (Hang Seng Indexes) continued to lead
the way in tracking the performance of Hong Kong and mainland China markets from various aspects,
and in supporting the development of new market sectors by compiling and launching new indexes.
Leveraging its deep understanding of current and future market demand, Hang Seng Indexes enriched
its suite of offerings in 2020, adding 21 new indexes, with an emphasis on tracking the performance of
ESG investing, technology and other ‘new economy’ sectors, as well as cross-border themes.
With more technology companies choosing to list in Hong Kong, the Hang Seng TECH Index
(HSTECH), launched in July 2020, aims to address growing investor interest in this theme by reflecting
the performance of the 30 largest innovative technology companies in the market and serving as the
basis for various index-linked products. As the sector continues to develop, Hang Seng Indexes aims to
have the HSTECH join the Hang Seng Index (HSI) and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index
(HSCEI) as a third flagship index.
As the HSTECH was well received by the local and overseas markets, different financial products
linked to the HSTECH were launched in the market. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
launched futures and options linked to HSTECH in November 2020 and January 2021 respectively. As
at 2020 year-end, Hang Seng Indexes had licensed the HSTECH for use as the basis for launching 14
different funds – 13 exchange-traded funds and an index fund – in markets such as Hong Kong, Taiwan,
Singapore, South Korea and the UK.
Hang Seng Indexes continues to keep pace with market developments in the Hong Kong and Mainland
markets by making adjustments to constituent eligibility and universe size for its indexes in close
consultation with its stakeholders. Following a market consultation exercise conducted in the first
quarter of 2020, weighted-voting rights companies and secondary-listed companies from the Greater
China region are now eligible for inclusion in the HSI and HSCEI universes. In December, the number
of constituents in the HSI was increased to 52 to ensure the leading benchmark continues to provide the
best possible coverage of the Hong Kong market.
As part of Hang Seng Indexes’ long-standing efforts to support continuous improvement in corporate
sustainability and make it easier for investors to follow ESG investment strategies, the company
launched an ‘ESG Service’ on its website in September. The service provides a rich range of ESG
resources and information for investors, including a searchable database of over 200 companies that are
constituents of the Hang Seng ESG series of indexes.
As at the end of 2020, there were 88 exchange-traded products based on the Hang Seng Family of
Indexes worldwide – with listings on 17 different stock exchanges. Assets under management in
products passively tracking indexes in the Hang Seng Family of Indexes at 2020 year-end had reached
a total of about US$38bn.
The total number of futures and options contracts traded on the HSI, the HSCEI and the HSTECH Index
in 2020 was over 117 million.
As at the end of 2020, Hang Seng Indexes was compiling more than 1,000 indexes, including 164 real-
time indexes.
15
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Income Statement
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the global economy and peoples’ lives made 2020 one of the
most challenging years for business in recent decades. Under the shadow of Covid-19, many industries
experienced extremely difficult operating conditions. The economic effects of the pandemic on the
Bank’s customers were the main driver of the change in the Group’s 2020 financial performance, which
compares unfavourably with that for 2019. The decline in the Group’s income reflects stagnant lending
and lower transaction volumes, as well as decreased insurance-related income given the volatile nature
of international capital markets particular in the first half of the year. Although the economic outlook
remains uncertain, the Group will continue to work closely with the Hong Kong government and
regulators, and to use the strength of its balance sheet and business model to support customers, the
community and the Hong Kong economy.
The Group delivered a resilient performance in 2020 given the very challenging economic environment
created by the global pandemic. Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and
other credit impairment charges was HK$36,068m, down 17%, due to lower net interest income and
non-interest income. Net interest income was 17% lower, reflecting narrowing margins as global
interest rates fell in response to the effects of Covid-19. Wealth management business income was down
by 14%, due mainly to subdued levels of customer activity, a decrease in insurance business-related
income due to lower investment returns and a decline in retail investment fund sales income, although
these declines were partly offset by growth in income from securities broking-related services.
Operating expenses went up by 1% when compared with 2019. Change in expected credit losses and
other credit impairment charges (‘ECLs’) increased by 49% to HK$2,738m, reflecting higher charges
related to stage 3 specific wholesale exposures and the impact from updates to the forward-looking
economic outlook model. This had an adverse impact on operating profit, which dropped by 30% to
HK$20,125m. Investment property revaluation recorded a deficit compared with a surplus for 2019,
resulting in a 33% drop in profit before tax to HK$19,414m and in profit attributable to shareholders
to HK$16,687m.
16
Net interest income decreased by HK$5,349m, or 17%, to HK$26,906m, with increased volumes from
balance sheet growth more than offset by the narrowing net interest margin. The impact of the
significant reduction in interest rates that occurred during the year was reflected in the full-year results,
with net interest margin down by 47 basis points to 1.73%, due mainly to balance sheet repricing. Net
interest spread declined by 40 basis points to 1.59% and contribution from net-free funds dropped by 7
basis points to 0.14% as a result of the decline in market interest rates.
17
The HSBC Group reports interest income and interest expense arising from financial assets and
financial liabilities held for trading and income arising from financial instruments designated at fair
value through profit and loss as ‘Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through
profit or loss’ (other than for debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities, together with
derivatives managed in conjunction with them).
The table below presents the net interest income of Hang Seng Bank, as included in the HSBC Group
accounts:
Net fee income decreased by HK$86m, or 1%, to HK$6,367m, reflecting lower levels of customer
activity across the Group’s fee-generating business activities, due largely by the effects of the pandemic.
Income from retail investment funds was down by 14%. Card services income decreased by 22%, due
mainly to lower card spending and merchant sales. Account services fees dropped by 17%, due partly
to the removal of service fees on certain banking products. Fee income from insurance, trade finance
and remittances fell by 7%, 18% and 42% respectively. Credit facilities fees were down by 11%, due
to lower corporate lending activity. These declines were significantly offset by stockbroking and related
services fee income, which grew by 58% from increased transaction volume, supported in part by the
Group’ standalone securities trading app.
Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss decreased by
HK$382m, or 10%, to HK$3,320m.
Net trading income and net income from financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or
loss together rose by HK$380m, or 18%, to HK$2,503m, driven by the increase in income from foreign
exchange activities.
Net income from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses measured at fair value through profit or
loss fell by HK$766m, or 48%, to HK$823m. Investment returns on financial assets supporting
insurance liabilities contracts was substantially impacted, reflecting unfavourable movement in the first
half of the year with the significant volatility in global equities prices and a partial recovery in the
second half, compared with more favourable market movement trends in 2019. To the extent that these
investment returns were attributable to policyholders, there was an offsetting movement reported under
‘net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders’ or ‘movement in
present value of in-force long-term insurance business (‘PVIF’)’ under other operating income.
18
Analysis of income from wealth management business
Insurance income:
- life insurance:
- net interest income and fee income 4,177 3,907
- investment returns on life insurance funds
(including share of associate’s profit/(losses),
net surplus/(deficit) on property revaluation
backing insurance contracts and
change in expected credit losses and
other credit impairment charges) 724 1,704
- net insurance premium income 15,301 15,652
- net insurance claims and benefits paid
and movement in liabilities to policyholders (18,254 ) (19,827 )
- movement in present value of in-force
long-term insurance business 2,082 4,559
4,030 5,995
- general insurance and others 245 263
4,275 6,258
8,223 9,597
1 Income from retail investment funds and securities broking and related services are net of fee expenses. Income from structured investment
products includes income reported under net fee income on the sales of third-party structured investment products. It also includes profits
generated from the selling of structured investment products in issue, reported under net income from financial instruments measured at fair
value through profit or loss.
Income from insurance business decreased by HK$1,983m, or 32%, to HK$4,275m. Net interest
income and fee income from life insurance business rose by 7%. Investment returns on the life insurance
portfolio decreased by HK$980m, or 58%, to HK$724m, mainly driven by the unfavourable equity
market performance in 2020 as compared with a favourable equity market performance in 2019. To the
extent that these investment returns were attributable to policyholders, there was an offsetting
movement in ‘net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders’ or
‘movement in PVIF’ under other operating income.
Net insurance premium income fell by 2%, reflecting lower new business sales due largely to the impact
of the pandemic, partly offset by higher renewals business. In the challenging operating environment,
the Group continued to enrich its comprehensive range of tax and retirement planning products as well
as healthcare solutions to suit different customer needs, and extended distribution to a new non-face-to-
face channel to facilitate sales amid social distancing measures. The Group also supported customers
through concessionary measures that provide additional Covid-19-related coverage.
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders decreased by 8%.
Despite a strengthening of policyholders’ liabilities under the regular review of the discount rate to
reflect the decrease in the prevailing interest rate for both 2020 and 2019, the impact was less significant
for 2020 than in the previous year. The decrease in movement in liabilities to policyholders also reflects
lower new business sales, though this was partly offset by the recapture of a portfolio of policyholders’
liabilities that was under a tactical reinsurance arrangement.
19
The movement in PVIF decreased by 54%, due to lower new business sales and lower impact arising
from the abovementioned revision of the discount rate on policyholders’ liabilities in 2020 compared
with 2019. The effects of these factors were partly offset by a positive adjustment to PVIF to account
for the sharing of unfavourable investment returns attributable to policyholders.
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges increased by HK$901m, or
49%, to HK$2,738m, reflecting the deterioration in the macro-economic environment as a result of
the impact of Covid-19.
2,738 1,837
The Bank regularly reviews its forward economic guidance to reflect changes in the economic outlook
and other factors that may influence the credit environment. The estimated impact of Covid-19 was
incorporated in ECLs through additional scenario analysis, which considered different severity and
duration assumptions. This included probability weighted shocks to annual GDP and consequential
impacts on unemployment and other economic variables, with different economic recovery assumptions.
Change in ECLs reflected a significant increase in stage 1 and stage 2 (unimpaired credit exposures) in
the first half of the year, which reflected the then potential future losses in light of the Group’s revised
economic outlook taking into account deterioration in the forward economic outlook globally as a result
of Covid-19. The outlook and economic scenario were updated in 4Q 2020 to reflect the improving
economic environment compared with the conditions that were anticipated at the end of the first half, as
well as the relatively improved outlook for key economic variables such as GDP and house prices. As a
result, change in ECLs for stages 1 and 2 registered a net decrease of HK$594m when compared with
2019, reflecting a more resilient economic performance in 2020. Wealth and Personal Banking (‘WPB’)
accounted for HK$149m of the reduction, with the remaining HK$445m coming from Commercial
Banking (‘CMB’) and Global Banking and Markets (‘GBM’). The decrease in ECLs for stage 1 and 2 is
also partly due to the downgrade of a handful of corporate customers from stage 2 to stage 3, which led to
larger shift between stage 2 and stage 3 ECL charges.
Change in ECLs for stage 3 and purchased or originated credit-impaired exposures (impaired credit
exposures) increased by HK$1,495m when compared with 2019, with the rise related largely to a small
number of wholesale credit exposures. WPB accounted for HK$286m, due mainly to higher charges on
credit card and personal loan portfolios. The remaining HK$1,209m was due to the downgrade of
several CMB customers during the year.
Gross impaired loans and advances were up by HK$3,651m, or 176%, against 2019 year-end at
HK$5,724m. Several impaired corporate loans through our Mainland banking subsidiary and Hong Kong
office were downgraded during the year as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. Taking into account the
collaterals and the ECL allowances provided, the Group considers that the current provision level is
20
adequate. Gross impaired loans and advances as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers
stood at 0.60% as at 31 December 2020, compared with 0.32% at 30 June 2020 and 0.22% at the end of
December 2019. Overall credit quality remained robust.
The Group remains vigilant and will continue to closely monitor the market situation. Regular reviews on
credit portfolios and sectors are carried out to help identify and mitigate any potential risks.
Expected credit losses as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers are as follow:
At 31 December At 31 December
2020 2019
Staff costs were down by 2%, driven by lower performance-related pay and headcount, partly offset by
the salary inflation.
Depreciation charges increased by 6%, due mainly to higher depreciation charges on equipment and
increased depreciation of right-of-use assets. Amortisation of intangible assets increased by 81%, related
mainly to capitalised IT system development costs.
General and administrative expenses were up by 1%. IT costs increased but these were partly offset by
lower marketing and advertising expenses.
The cost efficiency ratio increased by 6.6 percentage points to 36.6%, due mainly to the impact of lower
revenue resulting from decreased net interest income and wealth management business income amid the
pandemic.
21
*Included depreciation of right-of-use assets of HK$595m in 2020 (2019: HK$528m)
At 31 December At 31 December
Full-time equivalent staff numbers by region 2020 2019
Reflecting the unfavourable property market as compared with 2019, net surplus/(deficit) on property
revaluation recorded a net deficit of HK$636m in 2020, compared with a net surplus of HK$35m in the
previous year. Share of profits/(losses) of associates recorded a loss of HK$75m, compared with a profit
of HK$168m for 2019, largely reflecting the revaluation loss of a property investment company.
In this historically challenging year, the Group’s first-half results reflect the business impact of the Covid-
19 pandemic, the downward movement in interest rates, and geopolitical and macroeconomic risks around
the world. The Group’s relatively more robust second-half results reflect its actions to grow wealth
management business income as financial markets began to recover and a reduction in ECL charges
following an improvement in the economic outlook. However, the progressive impact of lower interest
rates in the second half continued to have an adverse effect on net interest income, leading to an overall
decline in second-half bottom-line performance. The Group will continue to monitor the effectiveness of
its strategy and to drive business momentum to ensure it remains well-positioned to capture business
growth opportunities as markets and economies recover.
Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges was
HK$16,881m, down by HK$2,306m, or 12%. The impact of the 18% fall in net interest income due to
lower interest rates was partly offset by the 8% increase in non-interest income as economic activity began
to pick up. Operating profit decreased by HK$2,143m, or 19%, due mainly to higher operating expenses,
partly offset by lower ECL charges. The reduction in net deficit on investment property revaluation
compared to the first half, together with a share of profits from associates versus a share of losses from
associates resulted in a HK$1,599m, or 17%, decrease in profit attributable to shareholders.
Net interest income decreased by HK$2,678m, or 18%, with the increase in average balance sheet growth
more than offset by the narrowed net interest margin in the declining low interest rate environment.
Average interest-earning assets grew by 5%, driven by the increase in average deposits. Net interest
margin was under increased pressure, falling by 44 basis points to 1.52%, reflecting the flow-through of
falling interest rates and compressed deposit spreads. Contribution from net-free funds was also adversely
22
affected by the low interest rate environment and the significant drop in HIBOR during the last quarter of
the year.
Non-interest income was up by HK$372m, or 8%, due largely to a 32% growth in wealth management
business income. Investment services income rose by 11%, driven mainly by increased income from
stockbroking and related services, facilitated in part by the Group’s standalone securities trading app.
Insurance businesses income also grew strongly, rising by 56%, attributable to the success of our active
portfolio management following the partial rebound of financial markets in the second half.
Operating expenses increased by HK$619m, or 10%, driven mainly by higher general and
administrative expenses with increases in marketing and advertising costs and data-processing fees. The
increase in marketing and advertising costs was to support investment services and insurance business,
which moved swiftly to capture returning business opportunities and achieved good growth in the
second half. These increases in costs were partly offset by reduced staff costs, due mainly to lower
headcount through natural attrition. We will continue to actively manage operating expenses to facilitate
the continued direction of resources towards further optimising our digital capabilities.
ECL charges decreased by HK$782m, or 44%, largely due to reduced impairment charges under stage
1 and 2 unimpaired credit exposures, partly offset by higher impairment charges on stage 3 impaired
credit exposures. Stage 1 and 2 ECL charges increased significantly to HK$904m in the first half,
reflecting updates to certain key variables of our prudent model for the economic outlook to account
for the challenges of the pandemic. Subsequent updates to these variables to reflect changes in the
economic environment during the second half, together with the impact of government support
measures, led to a HK$360m net release of stage 1 and 2 ECL charges in the second half. Stage 3 ECL
charges increased by HK$482m when compared with first half to HK$1,338m, reflecting the downgrade
of several Commercial Banking customers across multiple sectors, partly offset by lower ECL charges
on credit cards and personal lending.
Net surplus/(deficit) on property revaluation recorded a lower revaluation deficit of HK$220m when
compared with the first half. Share of profits/(losses) of associates recorded a profit of HK$12m, compared
with a loss of HK$87m for the first half.
Segmental Analysis
The table below sets out the profit before tax contributed by the business segments for the years stated.
Wealth and Personal Banking (‘WPB’) recorded an 18% year-on-year decrease in net operating income
before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$19,663m compared
with 2019. Operating profit dropped by 31% to HK$10,546m and profit before tax decreased by 32% to
HK$10,470m.
We leveraged advanced data analytics and our digital platform to deepen customer relationships,
strengthen engagement and grow our portfolio. Deposit balances grew by 7% and loans balances
23
increased by 3% compared with 2019 year-end. The significant decline in market interest rates during
the year, resulted in a 17% drop in net interest income to HK$14,733m.
The volatile global investment markets had an impact on investor activity, resulting in a 22% decrease in
non-interest income to HK$4,930m. Wealth management business revenue fell by 15%.
We ramped up the development of our digital infrastructure to meet changes in banking behaviour
among our customers. The number of Personal e-Banking new registrations increased by 40% in Hong
Kong, mobile app log-ons rose by 73% and the total number of e-Banking and digital transactions grew
by 124% year-on-year. We added new online products and services to expand and enrich our suite of
customer-centric solutions. We delivered more than 350 new digital features and enhancements in 2020,
including online authenticated chat with our customer contact centre, chat with our virtual assistant –
HARO – via WhatsApp, our SimplyFund investment platform that offers young and novice investors
the opportunity to begin investing with as little as HK$1, and new digital insurance products. We also
collaborated with multiple business partners - including New World CLUB and SmarTone - on API
initiatives to provide more convenient and value-added banking and lifestyle services.
Total investment services income recorded year-on-year growth of 19%. We achieved strong securities
business growth, facilitated in part by the rolling out of new eIPO and financing features in our Invest
Express Stock Trading app. We also leveraged strong digital and data analytics capabilities to enhance
frontline productivity by facilitating our understanding and anticipation of customer needs in fluid
market conditions. This made it easier for us to proactively offer the right products and services at the
right time.
Insurance income fell by 32%, due mainly to a drop in new business amid the pandemic. Despite the
challenges, we achieved strong digital business growth, recording a 89% increase in terms of policy count
and a 59% rise in new premiums, and establishing a good foundation from which to further build our
online insurance business. We also launched DigiLife, an online platform that aims to provide an enhanced
experience for customers by making it easy for them to view their policy details anytime, anywhere and
to purchase different insurance products online. Our active portfolio management improved investment
returns from the life insurance portfolio in the second half.
We leveraged our extensive network to strengthen engagement with customers in both the primary and
secondary property markets. This helped facilitate the 5% growth in our mortgage balances in Hong Kong.
Our new mortgage business continued to rank among the top three in Hong Kong. Our collaborations
with Midland Realty and mReferral enhanced opportunities to contact potential customers and offered
customers a more convenient and streamlined mortgage application process.
Although card spending was adversely affected by reduced travel and consumer spending amid the
pandemic, we launched a series of effective product and marketing initiatives that enabled us to maintain
solid momentum and outpace the market average. Our strategy centred on adapting to the changing
priorities of our customers, with a shift in focus towards everyday spending and e-commerce, as well as
our relaunch of the enJoy Co-brand Card reward programme. We also solicited a new partnership to
further expand our Cash Dollar ecosystem and deliver rewarding dining experiences – both in restaurants
and when ordering deliveries online – for our cardholders. In 2020, our online food & beverage
transactions grew by three times, while our e-commerce transactions, excluding travel, rose by 31% year-
on-year.
We continued to build solid customer relationships. Our enhanced data analytics capabilities and more
agile business structure enabled us to anticipate changing customer needs and act swiftly to offer suitable
products and services. This brought us new business and we recorded a 15% year-on-year rise in the
Prestige and Preferred Banking customer base in 2020. To further expand the high-net-worth customer
base, we launched Signature, which offers personalised and exclusive banking services to top-tier
customers.
24
Commercial Banking (‘CMB’) recorded a 21% year-on-year reduction in net operating income before
change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$10,300m. Operating profit
and profit before tax both decreased by 42% to HK$5,101m.
Net interest income was severely impacted by the low interest rate environment and dropped by 20% to
HK$8,307m. With the significant decline in commercial and industrial business activities due to the
impact and challenges of the pandemic, non-interest income declined by 23% to HK$1,993m. Our agile
business structure enabled us to move quickly to capture opportunities from market trading activities,
resulting in a 14% increase in investment services income. We were focused on structured finance and
syndicated loans, which led to Hang Seng ranking second in the League Table for Hong Kong Mandated
Arranger in terms of number of deals in 2020.
Our dedication to provide swift and safe online transactions ensured our customers experienced seamless
banking services during the Covid-19 pandemic. With our new Business Banking Remote Account
Opening Service, commercial customers can now open an account anytime, anywhere without the need
to make an appointment or visit a Business Banking Centre in person. Customers are also able to apply
for the loan guarantee products under Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation’s SME Financing Guarantee
Scheme (‘SFGS’) through a dedicated online application platform that includes a documents upload
function.
We further enhanced our transactional banking capabilities to make it easier for customers to manage their
operating cash flow. We introduced Corporate API, which enables customers to integrate their daily
business operations with our core banking services in order to increase the visibility of account balances
and transaction activities for greater operational efficiency. Our new payment and receivables tracker
enables customers to enjoy real-time, end-to-end tracking of the status of their outward and inward
payments. Our Flexi-Fixed Deposit product enables customers to enjoy preferential interest rates without
needed to fix the tenor of their deposit.
Other initiatives to improve the service experience of customers include enhancements to our digital
channels, including our desktop and mobile e-banking platforms, AI chatbot BERI, Live Chat and
Customer Contact Centre. Supported by strong data analytics capabilities, customised services are
provided to customers at the right time via their preferred channel.
We continued to support our customers during the pandemic by actively participating in the SFGS. Change
in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges increased due mainly to the downgrade of a
few customers with the deterioration in the global economy. We continued to uphold vigilant credit risk
management and the overall asset quality remained resilient.
Our commitment to digital innovation has been recognised with awards including ‘API Project of the Year’
in Asian Banking & Finance’s Wholesale Banking Awards 2020, and ‘Best Payment Bank in Hong Kong’
and ‘Best Frictionless Transaction Award – One Collect Merchant Acquisition Solution’ in The Asian
Banker Transaction Banking Awards. We also received ‘Best Payment and Collection Solution’ and ‘Best
in Treasury and Working Capital – SME’s Hong Kong’ awards from The Asset.
Global Banking and Markets (‘GBM’) recorded a 2% year-on-year decrease in net operating income
before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$6,146m. Operating
profit and profit before tax were both broadly on par with a year earlier at HK$4,979m.
Global Banking (‘GB’) recorded a 5% year-on-year drop in net operating income before change in
expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$2,732m. After expected credit losses,
operating profit and profit before tax both fell by 2% to HK$2,150m.
Net interest income decreased 6% to HK$2,372m as compared with 2019. With our lending portfolio
optimisation strategy and the strong demand for stagging loans in the second half of the year, loan
interest income grew by 7%. Our proactive approach in offering customers tailor-made cash
management solutions helped to drive growth in the current and savings deposits balance, which
25
increased by 46%. However, net interest income from deposits declined year-on-year, due mainly to
the adverse impact of the low interest rate environment.
Despite challenging market conditions, non-interest income rose by 2% to HK$360m, due mainly to
fee income from credit facilities on the back of the solid growth in lending.
Leveraging strong customer relationships, we continued to broaden the fee income stream, particularly
through our Debt Capital Markets Origination team and effective cross-business collaboration. We also
continued to help customers in need through the Principal Payment Holiday Scheme offered by HKMA
amid the prolonged pandemic situation.
Global Markets (‘GM’) recorded a 2% year-on-year increase in net operating income before change
in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges to HK$3,414m. Operating profit and profit
before tax both increased by 2% to HK$2,829m.
Net interest income increased by 2% to HK$2,046m. The Markets Treasury team managed interest rate
risk effectively, taking steps to proactively defend the interest margin and achieve yield enhancement
while upholding prudent risk management standards.
The new Repo Trading department has become a good source of revenue since its establishment in the
second half of 2019, demonstrating our commitment to diversifying our sources of revenue for
sustainable business growth.
26
Balance sheet Analysis
Assets
Total assets increased by HK$83bn, or 5%, to HK$1,760bn compared with 2019 year-end, with the Group
maintaining good business momentum and advancing its strategy of enhancing profitability through
sustainable growth.
Cash and balances at central banks decreased by HK$2bn, or 14%, to HK$11bn, due mainly to fund
redeployment. Trading assets were down by HK$10bn, or 22%, to HK$37bn, mainly in Hong Kong
Exchange Fund Bills.
Customer loans and advances (net of ECL allowances) were HK$945bn, broadly unchanged from the
end of 2019. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the government introduced a number of measures
to support businesses and the community. The Group actively supported these measures and launched
additional initiatives to support retail and corporate customers. Loans for use in Hong Kong grew by
1%. Lending to industrial, commercial and financial sectors was broadly in line with 2019 year-end,
with the growth in wholesale and retail trade and working capital financing for certain large corporate
customers operating in industries that are classified under the ‘Others’ sector largely offset by the
decrease in lending to property investment and financial concerns sectors. Lending to individuals grew
by 4%, due primarily to a rise in residential mortgages and Government Home Ownership
Scheme/Private Sector Participation Scheme/Tenants Purchase Scheme lending, which outweighed the
decrease in credit card lending due to lower card spending. Trade finance lending decreased by 20%,
due to the slowdown in global trade volumes. Loans for use outside Hong Kong were flat year-on-year,
with increased lending by the Group’s Mainland banking subsidiary offset by loans for use outside
Hong Kong granted by the Hong Kong office.
Assets Deployment
At 31 December At 31 December
Figures in HK$m 2020 % 2019 %
27
Liabilities and equity
Customer deposits, including certificates of deposit and other debt securities in issue, increased by
HK$54bn, or 4%, to HK$1,304bn against the end of 2019. Current and savings deposits increased, but
there was a drop in time deposits. To diversify the funding source, the Group issued more certificates
of deposit in the fourth quarter of 2020. At 31 December 2020, the advances-to-deposits ratio was
72.4%, compared with 75.4% at 31 December 2019.
28
Shareholders’ equity
At 31 December At 31 December
Figures in HK$m 2020 2019
At 31 December 2020, shareholders’ equity increased by HK$4bn, or 2%, to HK$183bn compared with
2019 year-end. Retained profits were up by HK$4bn, or 3%, reflecting profit accumulation after the
appropriation of dividends paid during the year. The premises revaluation reserve decreased by HK$2bn,
or 10%, reflecting the unfavourable movement in the commercial property market during the year.
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income reserve were up by HK$1bn, or 38%,
mainly reflecting the fair value movement of the Group’s investments in financial assets measured at fair
value.
There was no purchase, sale or redemption by the Bank, or any of its subsidiaries, of the Bank’s listed
securities during 2020.
29
Management Discussion and Analysis
(Figures expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars unless otherwise indicated)
Risk
We recognise the importance of a strong risk culture, which refers to our shared attitudes, values and norms that shape behaviours
related to risk awareness, risk taking and risk management. All our people are responsible for the management of risk, with the ultimate
accountability residing with the Board.
We seek to build our business for the long term by balancing social, environmental and economic considerations in the decisions we
make. Our strategic priorities are underpinned by our endeavour to operate in a sustainable way. This helps us to carry out our social
responsibility and manage the risk profile of the business. We are committed to managing and mitigating climate-related risks, both
physical and transition, and will continue to incorporate this into how we manage and oversee risks internally and with our customers.
The following principles guide the Group’s overarching appetite for risk and determine how our businesses and risks are managed.
Financial position
• We aim to maintain a strong capital position, defined by regulatory and internal capital ratios.
• We carry out liquidity and funding management for each operating entity, on a stand-alone basis.
Operating model
• We seek to generate returns in line with a conservative risk appetite and strong risk management capability.
• We aim to deliver sustainable earnings and consistent returns for shareholders.
Business practice
• We have zero tolerance for any of our people to knowingly engage in any business, activity or association where foreseeable
reputational risk or damage has not been considered and/or mitigated.
• We have no appetite for deliberately or knowingly causing detriment to consumers, or incurring a breach of the letter or spirit of
regulatory requirements.
• We have no appetite for inappropriate market conduct by a member of staff or by any business.
Enterprise-wide application
Our risk appetite encapsulates consideration of financial and non-financial risks. We define financial risk as the risk of a financial loss
as a result of business activities. We actively take these types of risks to maximise shareholder value and profits. Non-financial risk is
defined as the risk to achieving our strategy or objectives as a result of inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or
from external events.
Our risk appetite is expressed in both quantitative and qualitative terms. It continues to evolve and expand its scope as part of our
regular review process.
The Board reviews and approves the Group’s risk appetite twice a year to make sure it remains fit for purpose. The risk appetite is
considered, developed and enhanced through:
30
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The RAS consists of qualitative statements and quantitative metrics, covering financial and non-financial risks. It is fundamental to the
development of business line strategies, strategic and business planning, and senior management balanced scorecards.
Performance against the RAS is reported to the Risk Management Meeting ('RMM') regularly so that any actual performance that falls
outside the approved risk appetite is discussed and appropriate mitigating actions are determined. This reporting allows risks to be
promptly identified and mitigated, and informs risk-adjusted remuneration to drive a strong risk culture.
Risk Management
We recognise that the primary role of risk management is to protect our business, customers, colleagues, shareholders and the
communities that we serve, while ensuring we are able to support our strategy and provide sustainable growth.
We are focused upon implementation of our business strategy and it is critical that we ensure we use active risk management to manage
the execution risks.
We will also perform periodic risk assessments, including strategies to ensure retention of key personnel for our continued safe
operation.
We use a comprehensive risk management framework across the organisation and across all risk types, underpinned by our culture and
values. This outlines the key principles, policies and practices that we employ in managing material risks, both financial and non-
financial.
The framework fosters continual monitoring, promotes risk awareness and encourages sound operational and strategic decision making.
It also ensures a consistent approach to identify, assess, manage and report the risks we accept and incur in our activities.
31
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Non-executive risk governance The Board approves the risk appetite, plans and performance
targets. It sets the 'tone from the top' and is advised by the RC.
Risk governance
Our executive risk governance structure is responsible for the
Executive risk governance enterprise-wide management of all risks, including key policies and
frameworks for the management of risk within the Group.
Risk appetite
Policies and procedures Policies and procedures define the minimum requirements for the
controls required to manage our risks.
32
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Risk governance
The Board has ultimate responsibility for the effective management of risk and approves our risk appetite. It is advised on risk-related
matters by the RC.
The Chief Risk Officer, supported by the RMM, holds executive accountability for the ongoing monitoring, assessment and
management of the risk environment and the effectiveness of the risk management framework.
The management of regulatory compliance risk and financial crime risk reside with the Head of Regulatory Compliance and Head of
Financial Crime Compliance respectively. Oversight is maintained by the Chief Risk Officer in line with his enterprise risk oversight
responsibilities, through the RMM.
Day-to-day responsibility for risk management is delegated to senior managers with individual accountability for decision making. All
our people have a role to play in risk management. These roles are defined using the three lines of defence model, which takes into
account the Group’s business and functional structures.
We use a defined executive risk governance structure to help ensure there is appropriate oversight and accountability of risk, which
facilitates reporting and escalation to the RMM.
A Product Oversight Committee reporting to the RMM and comprising senior executives from Risk, Legal, Compliance, Finance, and
Operations/IT, is responsible for reviewing and approving the launch of such new products and services. Each new service and product
launch is also subject to an operational risk self-assessment process, which includes identification, evaluation and mitigation of risk
arising from the new initiative. Internal Audit is consulted on the internal control aspect of new products and services in development
prior to implementation.
This model underpins our approach to risk management by clarifying responsibility and encouraging collaboration, as well as enabling
efficient coordination of risk and control activities.
• The first line of defence owns the risks and is responsible for identifying, recording, reporting and managing them in line with risk
appetite, and ensuring that the right controls and assessments are in place to mitigate them.
• The second line of defence sets the policy and guidelines for managing specific risk areas, provides advice and guidance in relation
to the risk, and challenges the first line of defence on effective risk management.
• The third line of defence is our Internal Audit function, which provides independent assurance that our risk management,
governance and internal control processes are designed and operating effectively.
Responsibility for minimising both financial and non-financial risk lies with our people. They are required to manage the risks of the
business and operational activities for which they are responsible.
We maintain adequate oversight of our risks through various specialist Risk Stewards, along with our aggregate overview through Chief
Risk Officer.
33
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The Group uses a range of tools to identify, monitor and manage risk. The key tools are summarised below.
Risk appetite
The RAS is a written articulation of the aggregate level and types of risk that the Group is willing to accept in order to achieve its
business objectives. Our risk appetite encapsulates consideration of both financial and non-financial risks and is expressed in both
quantitative and qualitative terms.
The RMM reviews the Group’s actual risk appetite profile against the limits set out in the RAS regularly to enable senior management
to monitor the risk profile and guide business activities in order to balance risk and return. The actual risk appetite profile is also
reported to the RC and Board by Chief Risk Officer including material deviation and related management mitigating actions.
Risk map
The Group uses a risk map to provide a point-in-time view of its residual risk profile across both financial and non-financial risks. This
highlights the potential for these risks to materially affect our financial results, reputation or business sustainability. Risk stewards
assign risk ratings, supported by commentary. Risks that have an 'Amber' or 'Red' risk rating require monitoring and mitigating action
plans being either in place or initiated to manage the risk down to acceptable levels.
We proactively assess the internal and external risk environment, as well as review the themes identified across our organisation and
global businesses, for any risks that may require escalation, updating our top and emerging risks as necessary.
We define a 'top risk' as a thematic issue that may form and crystallise within one year, and has the potential to materially affect the
Group's financial results, reputation or long-term business model. It may arise across any combination of risk types, countries or global
businesses. The impact may be well understood by senior management and some mitigating actions may already be in place.
An 'emerging risk' is a thematic issue with large unknown components that may form and crystallise beyond a one-year time horizon. If
it were to materialise, it could have a significant material impact on the Group's long-term strategy, profitability and/or reputation.
Existing mitigating action plans are likely to be minimal, reflecting the uncertain nature of these risks at this stage. Some high-level
analysis and/or stress testing may have been carried out to assess the potential impact.
Our stress testing programme assesses our capital strength through a rigorous examination of our resilience to external shocks. As well
as undertaking regulatory-driven stress tests, we conduct our own internal stress tests, in order to understand the nature and level of all
material risks, quantify the impact of such risks and develop plausible business as usual mitigating actions.
Many of our regulators – including the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ('HKMA') – use stress testing as a prudential regulatory tool,
and the Group has focused significant governance and resources to meet their requirements.
34
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
In addition to the Group-wide stress testing scenarios, the Group also participate, as required, in the regulatory stress testing
programmes of the jurisdictions in which they operate, and the stress tests of the HKMA. Functions and businesses also perform
bespoke stress testing to inform their assessment of risks in potential scenarios.
The Group stress testing programme is overseen by the RC and results are reported, where appropriate, to the RMM and RC.
We also conduct reverse stress tests each year at a group level and, where required, at subsidiary entity level to understand potential
extreme conditions that would make our business model non-viable. Reverse stress testing identifies potential stresses and
vulnerabilities we might face, and helps inform early warning triggers, management actions and contingency plans designed to mitigate
risks.
We have been actively managing the risks resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak and its impacts on our customers and operations during
2020 as well as other key risks described in this section.
35
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
During 2020, a number of areas were identified and considered as part of our top and emerging risks because of the effect they may
have on the Group. We place particular focus in this section on geopolitical and macroeconomic risks, IBOR transition and risks related
to Covid-19.
The Covid-19 outbreak dominated the political and economic landscape through much of 2020. The twin shocks of a public health
emergency and the resultant economic fallout have been felt around the world, and hit both advanced and emerging markets. The
closure of borders threatened medical and food supplies for many markets, leading to countries and territories focusing efforts on
building resilient supply chains closer to home. Covid-19 and the corresponding vaccine rollout will likely dominate the political and
economic agenda for most of 2021.
Tensions could be raised as countries compete for access for the array of vaccines under development, approved or pending approval,
while the potential differences of protection offered, the speed and scale with which they can be manufactured, and the take-up rates of
vaccines will impact the speed of economic recovery.
The Covid-19 outbreak also heightened existing US-China tensions. Tensions span a wide range of issues, including trade, finance,
military, technology and human rights. The Covid-19 outbreak has accelerated US and Chinese efforts to reduce mutual dependence in
strategic industries such as sensitive technology, pharmaceuticals and precursor chemicals.
A range of tensions in US-China relations could have potential ramifications for the Group and its customers. These tensions may affect
the Group as a result of the impact of sanctions (including sanctions that impact the Group's customers), as well as regulatory,
reputational and market risks.
The US has imposed a range of sanctions and trade restrictions on Chinese persons and companies, focusing on entities the US believes
are involved in human rights violations, information technology and communications equipment and services, and miltary activities. In
response, China has announced a number of sanctions and trade restrictions that target or provide authority to target foreign officials
and companies, including those in the US.
The Hong Kong Autonomy Act passed by the US provides 'secondary sanctions' authority that allows for the imposition of US
sanctions against non-US financial institutions found to be engaged in significant transactions with certain Chinese individuals and
entities subject to US sanctions as a result of a US determination that these individuals or entities engaged in activities undermining
Hong Kong's autonomy. The US has also imposed restrictions on US persons' ability to engage in transactions in or relating to publicly
traded securities of a number of prominent Chinese companies. China has subsequently adopted regulations providing a framework for
specific prohibitions against compliance with, and private rights of action for damages resulting from, measures that the government
determines have an unjustified extraterritorial application that impairs Chinese sovereignty.
No penalties have yet been imposed against financial institutions under any of these measures, and their scope and application remain
uncertain. These and any future measures that may be taken by the US and China may affect the Group, its customers, and the markets
in which we operate.
It remains unclear the extent to which the new US administration will impact geopolitical tensions.
36
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
While UK-China relations have historically been shaped by strong trade and investment, there are also emerging challenges. Following
the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, the UK offered residency rights and a path to citizenship to eligible
British National (Overseas) passport holders in Hong Kong. In addition, both the UK and Hong Kong governments have suspended
their extradition treaties with each other.
China's expanding data privacy and cybersecurity laws could pose potential challenges to intra-Group data sharing, especially within
the Greater Bay Area ('GBA'). China's draft Personal Information Protection Law and Data Security Law, if passed in their current
forms, could increase financial institutions' compliance burdens in respect of cross-border transfers of personal information. In Hong
Kong, there is also an increasing focus by regulators on the use of big data and artificial intelligence. Use of personal data through
digital platforms for GBA initiatives may need to take into account these evolving data privacy and cybersecurity obligations.
Most developed markets, including Hong Kong, are expected to recover from the Covid-19 crisis. However, permanent business
closures and job losses in some sectors may prevent several developed markets from achieving pre-crisis growth rates or activity levels
in the near term.
The contraction in the global economy during 2020 has had varying effects on our customers, with some of them experiencing financial
difficulties. This has resulted in an increase in expected credit losses ('ECL') and risk-weighted assets ('RWAs') as explained further in
Credit Risk section and Capital Management section.
Central banks have reduced interest rates in most financial markets due to the adverse impact on the timelines and the path for
economic recovery from the Covid-19 outbreak, which has in turn increased the likelihood of negative interest rates. This raises a
number of risks and concerns, such as the readiness of our systems and processes to accommodate zero or negative rates, the resulting
impacts on customers, regulatory constraints and the financial implications given the significant impact that prolonged low interest rates
have had, and may continue to have, on our net interest income. For some products, we have floored deposit rates at zero or made
decisions not to charge negative rates. This, alongside loans repriced at lower rates, will result in our commercial margins being
compressed, which is expected to be reflected in our profitability. The pricing of this risk will need to be carefully considered. These
factors may challenge the long-term profitability of the banking sector, including ourselves.
We continually monitor the geopolitical developments and actively manage our credit portfolio through thematic reviews, internal stress
tests, etc. We will continue to support our customers and manage risk and exposures as appropriate.
37
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
IBOR transition
Interbank offered rates ('IBORs') are used to set interest rates on hundreds of trillions of US dollars of different types of financial
transactions and are used extensively for valuation purposes, risk measurement and performance benchmarking.
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority ('FCA') announced in July 2017 that it will no longer persuade or require banks to submit rates
for the London interbank offered rate ('LIBOR') after 2021. In addition, the 2016 EU Benchmark Regulation, which defines the
minimum reliability standards for interest rate benchmarks, has resulted in other regulatory bodies’ reassessment of benchmarks. As a
result, national working groups are actively discussing the mechanisms for an orderly transition of the five LIBOR currencies, the Euro
Overnight Index Average ('EONIA'), and the Singapore interbank offered rate ('SIBOR') to their chosen replacement rates.
As our IBOR transition programme progresses into the execution phase, resilience and operational risks, are heightened due to an
expected increase in the number of new near risk-free rate ('RFR') products being rolled out, compressed timelines for transition of
legacy IBOR contracts and the extensive systems and process changes required to facilitate both new products and transition. This is
being exacerbated by the current interest rate environment where low LIBOR rates, in comparison with replacement RFR, could affect
decisions to transition contracts early, further compressing transition timelines. Regulatory compliance, legal and conduct risks may
also increase as a result of both the continued sale of products referencing IBORs, as well as the sale of new products referencing RFRs
due to the lack of established market conventions.
Financial risks resulting from the discontinuation of IBORs and the development of RFR market liquidity will also affect the Group
throughout transition. The differences in IBOR and RFR interest rates will create a basis risk that we need to actively manage through
appropriate financial hedging. As contracts are transitioned from IBORs to RFRs, there is a risk that the associated financial hedges
will not be aligned.
The continued orderly transition from IBORs continues to be the programme's key objective throughout 2021 and can be broadly
grouped into two streams of work: development of alternative rate product capabilities, and the transition of legacy contracts.
While IBOR sales do continue for a number of product lines, IBOR exposures that have post-2021 maturities are expected to be reduced
as a result of transacting new activities in alternative RFR products as market liquidity builds.
For the derivatives exposures, the adoption of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association ('ISDA') protocol, which comes into
effect in the first quarter of 2021, and the successful changes made by clearing house to discount derivatives using in SOFR and Euro
Short-Term Rate ('€STR') reduce the risk of a disorderly transition of the derivative market.
For the Group’s loan book, our businesses have developed commercial strategies that include active client engagement and
communication, providing detailed information on RFR products to assist our clients to transition to a suitable alternative rate or
replacement RFR product before IBOR cessation.
38
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Mitigating actions
• We have put in place the IBOR transition programme to facilitate an orderly transition to replacement rates for our business and
our clients, which is overseen by the Chief Risk Officer;
• We have and continue to carry out extensive training, communication and client engagement to facilitate appropriate selection of
products, with dedicated teams in place to support the development of, and transition to, alternative rate and replacement RFR
products;
• We are implementing IT and operational change to enable a longer transition window;
• We have met 2020 regulatory expectations for implementing relevant contractual language changes for loan products;
• We are targeting regulatory set and industry agreed milestones for the cessation of new standard LIBOR trades (sterling LIBOR in
the first quarter of 2021, other LIBORs in the second quarter of 2021) leading to a reduction in the Group's IBOR portfolio;
• We have assessed, monitored and are dynamically managing risks, and implemented specific mitigating controls as required;
• We continue to engage with regulatory and industry bodies actively to mitigate risks relating to hedge accounting changes, multiple
loan conventions, and those contracts that have no appropriate replacements or no likelihood of renegotiation to transition ('tough
legacy').
Under these amendments, changes made to a financial instrument that are economically equivalent and required by interest rate
benchmark reform do not result in the derecognition or a change in the carrying amount of the financial instrument, but instead require
the effective interest rate to be updated to reflect the change in the interest rate benchmark. In addition, hedge accounting will not be
discontinued solely because of the replacement of the interest rate benchmark if the hedge meets other hedge accounting criteria.
These amendments apply from 1 January 2021 with early adoption permitted. The Group has adopted the amendments from 1 January
2020.
Financial instruments yet to transition
to alternative benchmarks, by main
(audited) benchmark
At 31 December 2020 USD GBP
LIBOR LIBOR Others1
1
Comprises financial instruments referencing other significant benchmark rates yet to transition to alternative benchmarks (JPY
LIBOR and SIBOR)
2
Gross carrying amount excluding allowances for expected credit losses.
The amounts in the above table relate to the Group's main operating entities and provide an indication of the extent of the Group's
exposure to the IBOR benchmarks which are due to be replaced. Amounts are in respect of financial instruments that:
• contractually reference an interest rate benchmark that is planned to transition to an alternative benchmark;
• have a contractually maturity date after 31 December 2021, the date by which LIBOR is expected to cease; and
• are recognised on the Group's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The administrator of LIBOR, IBA, has announced a proposal to extend the publication date of most USD LIBOR tenors until 30 June
2023. Publication of one week and two month tenors will cease after 31 December 2021. This proposal, if endorsed, would reduce the
amounts presented in the above table as some financial instruments included will reach their contractual maturity date prior to 30 June
2023.
39
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The Covid-19 outbreak and its effect on the global economy have impacted our customers and our performance, and the future effects
of the outbreak remain uncertain. The outbreak necessitated governments to respond at unprecedented levels to protect public health,
local economies and livelihoods. It has affected countries at different times and to varying degrees as it has developed. The varying
government support measures and restrictions in response have added challenges, given the rapid pace of change and significant
operational demands. The speed at which countries and territories will be able to unwind the government support measures and
restrictions and return to pre-Covid-19 economic levels will vary based on the levels of infection, local governmental decisions and
access to and ability to roll out vaccines. There remains a risk of subsequent waves of infection. Renewed outbreaks emphasise the
ongoing threat of Covid-19 even in countries that have recorded lower than average cases so far.
Government restrictions imposed around the world to limit the spread of Covid-19 resulted in a sharp contraction in global economic
activity during 2020. At the same time, governments also took steps designed to soften the extent of the damage to investment, trade and
labour markets. The rapidly increasing trend of local confirmed Covid-19 cases in Hong Kong since November 2020 would likely hit
the pace of business recovery in Hong Kong as the Government has further tightened and prolonged the social distancing measures.
Gradual recovery in economic activity is expected in 2021, but this is contingent on the successful containment of the virus and the
evolution of other top risks, including social unrest in Hong Kong and tensions between the US and China. It also relies on the
willingness and ability of households and businesses to return towards pre-crisis spending levels.
Hong Kong Government has deployed extensive measures to support households and corporates. Measures implemented by
Government have included income support to households and funding support to businesses. Some of these measures are being
extended.
Apart from Government relief measures, we have initiated market-specific measures to support our personal and business customers
through these challenging times, including principal moratorium, payment holidays, the waiver of certain fees and charges, etc. for
businesses facing market uncertainty and short-term cash flow issue and for individuals facing salary reduction. These measures have
been well received and we remain responsive to our customers' changing needs.
The rapid introduction and varying nature of the Government support schemes, as well as customer expectations, can lead to risks as the
Group implements large-scale changes in a short period of time. This has led to increased operational risks, including complex conduct
considerations, increased reputational risk and increased risk of fraud. These risks are likely to be heightened further as and when those
Government support schemes are unwound.
At 31 December 2020, our CET1 ratio was 16.8%, compared with 16.9% at 31 December 2019, and our liquidity coverage ratio
('LCR') was 230.4%. Our capital, funding and liquidity position is expected to help us to continue supporting our customers throughout
the Covid-19 outbreak.
The Covid-19 outbreak has led to a weakening in GDP in Hong Kong, a key input used for calculating ECL, and there remains the risk
of more adverse economic scenarios given its ongoing impact. Furthermore, ECL will also increase from other parts of our business
impacted by the disruption to supply chains. The impact will vary by sectors of the economy. The impact of the outbreak on the long-
term prospects of businesses in these sectors is uncertain and may lead to significant ECL charges on specific exposures, which may not
be fully captured in ECL estimates. In addition, in times of crisis, fraudulent activity is often more prevalent, leading to potentially
significant ECL charges or operational losses.
40
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
As a result of Covid-19, business continuity plans have been successfully implemented and the majority of service level agreements
have been maintained. We have not experienced any major impacts to the supply chains from our third-party service providers due to
Covid-19. The risk of damage or theft to our physical assets or criminal injury to our employees remains unchanged, with no significant
incidents impacting our buildings or staff. Exceptional handling to ensure the continuity of critical customer services are being
documented through governance.
There remain significant uncertainties in assessing the duration of the Covid-19 outbreak and its impact. The actions taken by the
various governments and central banks, in particular in Hong Kong, mainland China, the US and the UK, provide an indication of the
potential severity of the downturn and post-recovery environment, which from a commercial, regulatory and risk perspective could be
significantly different to past crises and persist for a prolonged period. A prolonged period of significantly reduced economic activity as
a result of the impact of the outbreak would have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, prospects,
liquidity, capital position and credit ratings. We continue to monitor the situation closely, and given the novel or prolonged nature of the
outbreak, additional mitigating actions may be required.
41
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Market risk
Market risk is the risk that Exposure to market risk is separated into Market risk is:
movements in market factors, two portfolios: trading and non-trading. - measured using sensitivities, value at risk ('VaR') and
such as foreign exchange Market risk exposures arising from our stress testing, giving a detailed picture of potential
rates, interest rates, credit insurance operations are discussed in gains and losses for a range of market movements and
spreads, equity prices and 'Insurance manufacturing operation risk' scenarios, as well as tail risks over specified time
commodity prices, will reduce section. horizons;
our income or the value of our - monitored using VaR, stress testing and other
portfolios. measures; and
- managed using risk limits approved by Chief Risk
Officer. These limits are allocated across the Group's
legal entities and business lines.
Resilience risk
Resilience risk is the risk that Resilience risk arises from failures or Resilience risk is:
we are unable to provide inadequacies in processes, people, - measured through a range of metrics with defined
critical services to our systems or external events. maximum acceptable impact tolerances, and against
customers, affiliates and our agreed risk appetite;
counterparties as a result of
sustained and significant - monitored through oversight of enterprise processes,
operational disruption. risks, controls and strategic change programmes; and
42
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Model risk
Model risk is the potential for Model risk arises in both financial and Model risk is:
adverse consequences from non-financial contexts whenever - measured by reference to model performance tracking
business decisions informed business decision making includes and the output of detailed technical reviews, with key
by models, which can be reliance on models. metrics including model review statuses and findings;
exacerbated by errors in
methodology, design or the - monitored against model risk appetite statements,
way they are used. insight from the independent review function,
feedback from internal and external audits, and
regulatory reviews; and
- managed by creating and communicating appropriate
policies, procedures and guidance, training colleagues
in their application, and supervising their adoption to
ensure operational effectiveness.
43
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiary is separately regulated from our banking operations. Risks in the insurance entities are
managed using methodologies and processes appropriate to insurance manufacturing operations, but remain subject to oversight at
Group level. Our insurance operations are also subject to some of the same risks as our banking operations, which are covered by the
Group’s respective risk management processes.
Insurance risk
Insurance risk is the risk that, The cost of claims and benefits can be Insurance risk is:
over time, the cost of influenced by many factors, including - measured in terms of life insurance liabilities and
acquiring and administering mortality and morbidity experience, as economic capital allocated to insurance underwriting
an insurance contract, and well as lapse and surrender rates. risk;
paying claims and benefits
may exceed the total amount - monitored through a framework of approved limits
of premiums received and and delegated authorities; and
investment income.
- managed through a robust risk control framework
which outlines clear and consistent policies, principles
and guidance. This includes using product design,
underwriting, reinsurance and claims-handling
procedures.
Financial risk
Our ability to effectively Exposure to financial risks arises from: Financial risk is:
match the liabilities arising - market risk of changes in the fair - measured separately for each type of risk:
under insurance contracts with values of financial assets or their - market risk is measured in terms of economic capital,
the asset portfolios that back future cash flows; internal metrics and fluctuations in key financial
them is contingent on the - credit risk; and variables;
management of financial risks - liquidity risk of entities being unable - credit risk is measured in terms of economic capital
and the extent to which these to make payments to policyholders as and the amount that could be lost if a counterparty
risks are borne by the they fall due. fails to make repayments; and
policyholders. - liquidity risk is measured in terms of internal metrics
including stressed operational cash flow projections;
44
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following information describes the Group's management and control of risks, in particular, those associated with its use of financial instruments
('financial risks'). Major types of risks to which the Group is exposed include credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk and insurance risk.
Overview
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty fails to meet an obligation under a contract. Credit risk arises principally from
direct lending, trade finance and leasing business, but also from other products such as guarantees and credit derivatives.
Due to the unique market conditions in the Covid-19 outbreak, we expanded operational practices to provide short-term support to customers under
the current policy framework.
Implementation
A centralised impairment engine performs the expected credit loss ('ECL') calculation using data, which is subject to a number of validation
checks and enhancements, from a variety of client, finance and risk systems. Where possible, these checks and processes are performed in a
globally consistent and centralised manner.
Governance
Management review forums are established in order to review and approve the impairment results. Management review forums have
representatives from Credit Risk and Finance. The approvals are reported up to the Impairment Committee for final approval of the Group’s ECL
for the period. Required members of the Impairment Committee are the heads of Wholesale Credit, Market Risk, and Wealth and Personal
Banking Risk, as well as the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer.
45
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The five credit quality classifications each encompass a range of granular internal credit rating grades assigned to wholesale and retail lending
businesses, and the external ratings attributed by external agencies to debt securities.
For debt securities and certain other financial instruments, external ratings have been aligned to the five quality classifications based upon the
mapping of related customer risk rating ('CRR') to external credit rating.
Wholesale lending
The CRR 10-grade scale summarises a more granular underlying 23-grade scale of obligor probability of default ('PD'). All corporate customers are
rated using the 10- or 23-grade scale, depending on the degree of sophistication of the Basel approach adopted for the exposure.
Each CRR band is associated with an external rating grade by reference to long-run default rates for that grade, represented by the average of issuer-
weighted historical default rates. This mapping between internal and external ratings is indicative and may vary over time.
Retail lending
Retail lending credit quality is based on a 12-month probability-weighted PD.
Strong BBB and above A- and above CRR 1 to CRR 2 0-0.169 Band 1 and 2 0-0.500
Good BBB- to BB BBB+ to BBB- CRR3 0.170-0.740 Band 3 0.501-1.500
Satisfactory BB- to B and BB+ to B and CRR 4 to CRR 5 0.741-4.914 Band 4 and 5 1.501-20.000
unrated unrated
Sub-standard B- to C B- to C CRR 6 to CRR 8 4.915-99.999 Band 6 20.001-99.999
Credit-impaired Default Default CRR 9 to CRR 10 100 Band 7 100
1
Customer risk rating ('CRR').
2
12-month point-in-time ('PIT') probability-weighted probability of default ('PD').
46
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
A loan is classed as 'renegotiated' when we modify the contractual payment terms on concessionary terms because we have significant concerns
about the borrowers’ ability to meet contractual payments when due.
Non-payment-related concessions (e.g. covenant waivers), while potential indicators of impairment, do not trigger identification as renegotiated
loans.
Loans that have been identified as renegotiated retain this designation until maturity or derecognition.
For details of our policy on derecognised renegotiated loans, see note 2(j) on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Wholesale renegotiated loans are classified as credit-impaired until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of
non-payment of future cash flows, observed over a minimum one-year period, and there are no other indicators of impairment. Personal renegotiated
loans are deemed to remain credit-impaired until repayment or derecognition.
Impairment assessment
(audited)
For details of our impairment policies on loans and advances and financial investments, see note 2(j) on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Unsecured personal facilities, including credit cards, are generally written off at 180 days contractually delinquent. Write-off periods may be earlier,
e.g. bankruptcy.
For secured facilities, write-off should occur upon repossession of collateral, receipt of proceeds via settlement, or determination that recovery of the
collateral will not be pursued.
Any secured assets maintained on the balance sheet beyond 60 months of consecutive delinquency-driven default require additional monitoring and
review to assess the prospect of recovery.
47
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following tables analyse the financial instruments to which the impairment requirements of HKFRS 9 are applied and the related allowance for
ECL.
5
Summary of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are applied
Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost: 949,954 (5,180) 946,443 (3,513)
Placings with and advances to banks at amortised cost 44,357 - 65,808 (1)
Other financial assets measured at amortised costs: 188,872 (187) 164,157 (88)
– cash and balances at central banks 11,226 - 13,038 -
– reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading 13,360 - 6,659 -
– financial investments 134,997 (173) 117,935 (80)
– other assets 2 29,289 (14) 26,525 (8)
Total gross carrying amount on balance sheet 1,183,183 (5,367) 1,176,408 (3,602)
Loans and other credit related commitments 356,776 (163) 347,921 (145)
Financial guarantee and similar contracts 3,024 (18) 3,825 (7)
Total nominal amount off balance sheet 3 359,800 (181) 351,746 (152)
Total 1,542,983 (5,548) 1,528,154 (3,754)
Memorandum Memorandum
Allowance for Allowance for
Fair value
ECL ECL Fair value ECL
1
For retail unsecured revolving facilities, e.g. overdrafts and credit cards, the total ECL is recognised against the financial asset unless the total ECL
exceeds the gross carrying amount of the financial asset, in which case the ECL is recognised against the loan commitments.
2
Includes only those financial instruments which are subject to the impairment requirements of HKFRS 9. 'Other assets' as presented within the
Consolidated Balance Sheet includes both financial and non-financial assets.
3
The figure does not include some loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts not subject to impairment requirements under HKFRS 9. As
such, the amount does not agree with the figure shown in note 45 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, which represents the maximum amount at
risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default.
4
Debt instruments measured at FVOCI continue to be measured at fair value with the allowance for ECL as a memorandum item. Change in ECL is
recognised in 'Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges' in Consolidated Income Statement.
5
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
48
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following table provides an overview of the Group's credit risk by stage and the associated ECL coverage. The financial assets recorded in each stage have the following characteristics:
Stage 1: These financial assets are unimpaired and without significant increase in credit risk on which a 12-month allowance for ECL is recognised.
Stage 2: A significant increase in credit risk has been experienced on these financial assets since initial recognition for which a lifetime ECL is recognised.
Stage 3: There is objective evidence of impairment and the financial assets are therefore considered to be in default or otherwise credit-impaired on which a lifetime ECL is recognised.
POCI: Financial assets that are purchased or originated at a deep discount are seen to reflect the incurred credit losses on which a lifetime ECL is recognised.
Summary of credit risk (excluding debt instruments measured at FVOCI) by stage distribution and ECL coverage
(audited)
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI2 Total Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI Total Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI Total
At 31 December 2020 1,397,352 139,907 5,723 1 1,542,983 (1,554) (1,950) (2,044) - (5,548) 0.11% 1.39% 35.72% 0.00% 0.36%
1
Represents the maximum amount at risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default.
2
Purchased or originated credit-impaired ('POCI').
Unless identified at an earlier stage, all financial assets are deemed to have suffered a significant increase in credit risk when they are 30 days past due ('DPD') and are transferred from stage 1 to stage 2. The
disclosure below presents the aging of stage 2 loans and advances to customers by those less than 30 and greater than 30 days past due and therefore presents those amounts classified as stage 2 due to aging (30 days
past due) and those identified at an earlier stage (less than 30 days past due).
Stage 2 days past due analysis for loans and advances to customers At 31 December 2020
1
Days past due ('DPD').
49
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Summary of credit risk (excluding debt instruments measured at FVOCI) by stage distribution and ECL coverage (continued)
(audited)
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI2 Total Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI Total Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI Total
Re-presented 3
Loans and advances to
customers at amortised cost: 831,840 112,530 2,073 - 946,443 (942) (1,757) (814) - (3,513) 0.11% 1.56% 39.27% N/A 0.37%
- personal 329,640 12,405 697 - 342,742 (359) (884) (148) - (1,391) 0.11% 7.13% 21.23% N/A 0.41%
- corporate and commercial 486,565 94,182 1,376 - 582,123 (528) (842) (666) - (2,036) 0.11% 0.89% 48.40% N/A 0.35%
- non-bank financial institutions 15,635 5,943 - - 21,578 (55) (31) - - (86) 0.35% 0.52% N/A N/A 0.40%
Placings with and advances to
banks at amortised cost 65,808 - - - 65,808 (1) - - - (1) 0.00% N/A N/A N/A 0.00%
Other financial assets
measured at amortised cost 161,244 2,913 - - 164,157 (53) (35) - - (88) 0.03% 1.20% N/A N/A 0.05%
Loans and other
credit-related commitments 342,693 5,228 - - 347,921 (68) (77) - - (145) 0.02% 1.47% N/A N/A 0.04%
- personal 239,003 - - - 239,003 - - - - - 0.00% N/A N/A N/A 0.00%
- corporate and commercial 93,492 4,693 - - 98,185 (67) (77) - - (144) 0.07% 1.64% N/A N/A 0.15%
- non-bank financial institutions 10,198 535 - - 10,733 (1) - - - (1) 0.01% 0.00% N/A N/A 0.01%
Financial guarantee and
similar contracts: 3,282 543 - - 3,825 (3) (4) - - (7) 0.09% 0.74% N/A N/A 0.18%
- personal 7 - - - 7 - - - - - 0.00% N/A N/A N/A 0.00%
- corporate and commercial 3,265 539 - - 3,804 (3) (4) - - (7) 0.09% 0.74% N/A N/A 0.18%
- non-bank financial institutions 10 4 - - 14 - - - - - 0.00% 0.00% N/A N/A 0.00%
At 31 December 2019 1,404,867 121,214 2,073 - 1,528,154 (1,067) (1,873) (814) - (3,754) 0.08% 1.55% 39.27% N/A 0.25%
1
Represents the maximum amount at risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default.
2
Purchased or originated credit-impaired ('POCI').
3
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
Unless identified at an earlier stage, all financial assets are deemed to have suffered a significant increase in credit risk when they are 30 days past due ('DPD') and are transferred from stage 1 to stage 2. The
disclosure below presents the aging of stage 2 loans and advances to customers by those less than 30 and greater than 30 days past due and therefore presents those amounts classified as stage 2 due to aging (30 days
past due) and those identified at an earlier stage (less than 30 days past due).
Stage 2 days past due analysis for loans and advances to customers At 31 December 2019
1
Days past due ('DPD').
50
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
(i) Maximum exposure to credit risk before collateral held or other credit enhancements
(audited)
Our credit exposure is spread across a broad range of asset classes, including derivatives, trading assets, loans and advances to customers,
loans and advances to banks and financial investments.
The following table presents the maximum exposure to credit risk from balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments, before
taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements (unless such credit enhancements meet accounting offsetting
requirements). For financial assets recognised on the balance sheet, the maximum exposure to credit risk equals their carrying amount; for
financial guarantees and similar contracts granted, it is the maximum amount that we would have to pay if the guarantees were called upon.
For loan commitments and other credit-related commitments, it is generally the full amount of the committed facilities.
2020 2019
1
Performance and other guarantees were included.
The recognition and measurement of ECL involves the use of significant judgement and estimation. We form multiple economic scenarios
based on economic forecasts, apply these assumptions to credit risk models to estimate future credit losses, and probability-weight the
results to determine an unbiased ECL estimate.
Methodology
Four economic scenarios have been used to capture the exceptional nature of the current economic environment and to articulate
management’s view of the range of potential outcomes. Scenarios produced to calculate ECL are aligned to the Group’s Top and Emerging
Risks. Three of these scenarios are drawn from consensus forecasts and distributional estimates. These include a central scenario,
representing a most likely outcome, a downside and an upside scenario that represent meaningfully different outcomes from the central. The
central scenario is created using the average of a panel of external forecasters ('the consensus') while consensus upside and downside
scenarios are created with reference to distributions for selected markets that capture forecasters' views of the entire range of outcomes.
Management have chosen to use a fourth scenario to represent their view of severe downside risks. The use of an additional scenario is in
line with the HSBC’s forward economic guidance ('FEG') methodology and has been regularly used over the course of 2020. Management
may include additional scenarios if they feel that the consensus scenarios do not adequately capture the Top and Emerging Risks. Unlike the
consensus scenarios, these additional scenarios are driven by narrative assumptions, could be country-specific and may result in shocks that
drive economic activity permanently away from trend.
51
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The world economy experienced a deep economic shock in 2020. As Covid-19 spread globally, governments in many of our markets
sought to limit the human impact by imposing significant restrictions on mobility, in turn driving the deep falls in activity that were
observed in the first half of the year. Restrictions were eased as cases declined in response to the initial measures which in turn supported an
initial rebound in economic activity by 3Q 2020. This increase in mobility unfortunately led to renewed transmission of the virus in several
countries, such that by year end, infection rates, hospitalisations and deaths had reached dangerously high levels, placing an enormous
burden on health-care systems and leading governments to re-impose restrictions on mobility and causing economic activity to decline once
more.
Economic forecasts are subject to a high degree of uncertainty in the current environment. Limitations of forecasts and economic models
require a greater reliance on management judgement in addressing both the error inherent in economic forecasts and in assessing associated
ECL outcomes. The scenarios used to calculate ECL in the Annual Report 2020 are described below.
Despite the sharp contraction in activity, government fiscal support in advanced economies played a crucial role in averting significant
financial distress. At the same time, the HKMA included implementing emergency support measures for funding markets, and either
restarting or increasing quantitative easing programs in order to support economies and the financial system. The Government is expected to
continue to ensure that households and firms receive an appropriate level of financial support until restrictions on economic activity and
mobility can be materially eased. Such support will ensure that labour and housing markets do not experience abrupt, negative corrections
and will also limit the extent of long term structural damage to economies.
Differences across markets in the speed and scale of economic recovery in the Central scenario reflect timing differences in the progression
of the Covid-19 outbreak, national level differences in restrictions imposed, the coverage achieved by vaccination programmes and the scale
of support measures.
• The West Texas Intermediate oil price is forecast to average US$43 per barrel over the projection period.
52
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and the probabilities assigned in the consensus Central scenario.
Central scenario
Mainland
Hong Kong China
% %
GDP growth rate
2020: Annual average growth rate (6.4) 2.0
2021: Annual average growth rate 4.3 7.8
2022: Annual average growth rate 2.9 5.3
2023: Annual average growth rate 2.6 5.2
5 years average (2021-2025) 2.9 5.6
Unemployment rate
2020: Annual average rate 5.8 3.9
2021: Annual average rate 5.0 4.1
2022: Annual average rate 3.9 4.2
2023: Annual average rate 3.8 4.1
5 years average (2021-2025) 4.0 4.0
House price growth
2020: Annual average growth rate (0.8) 2.3
2021: Annual average growth rate (2.2) 4.7
2022: Annual average growth rate 2.4 5.7
2023: Annual average growth rate 5.2 5.0
5 years average (2021-2025) 2.3 4.7
53
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and the probabilities assigned in the consensus Upside scenario.
Note: Extreme point in the consensus Upside is ‘best outcome’ in the scenario, i.e. highest GDP growth, lowest unemployment rate
etc. in first two years of the scenario (2021-2022).
Downside scenarios
2021 is expected to be a year of economic recovery, but the progression and management of the pandemic presents a key risk to global
growth. A new and more contagious strain of the virus increased the transmission rate in Hong Kong and resulted in stringent restrictions to
mobility towards the year end. Further risks to international travel also arise.
A number of vaccines have been developed and approved for use at a rapid pace and plans to inoculate significant proportions of national
populations in 2021 across many of our key markets are a clear positive for economic recovery. While we expect vaccination programmes to
be successful, governments and healthcare authorities face country specific challenges that could affect the speed and spread of vaccinations.
These challenges include the logistics of inoculating a significant proportion of national populations within a limited time-frame and the
public acceptance of vaccines. On a global level, supply challenges could affect the pace of roll out and the efficacy of vaccines is yet to be
determined. Expansionary fiscal policy in advanced economies in 2020 was supported by accommodative actions taken by Central Banks.
This fiscal-monetary nexus has provided households and firms with significant support. An inability or unwillingness to continue with such
support or the untimely withdrawal of support present a downside risk to growth.
While Covid-19 and related risks dominate the economic outlook, geo-political risks also present a threat. These risks include:
• The potential for increased tensions between the US and Mainland China: the outcome of the 2020 Presidential election in the US signals
a more orderly conduct of relations between the US and Mainland China in the future but long term differences between the two nations
remain, which could affect sentiment and restrict global economic activity.
• Social and political unrest in Hong Kong: mobility restrictions to combat the spread of Covid-19 and the passage of the National Security
Law in 2020 significantly reduced the scale of protests. As Covid-19 diminishes as a threat, such unrest has the potential to return.
54
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
In the consensus Downside scenario, economic recovery is considerably weaker compared to the Central scenario. GDP growth remains
weak, unemployment rates stay elevated and asset and commodity prices fall before gradually recovering towards their long-run trends. The
scenario is consistent with the key downside risks articulated above. Further outbreaks of Covid-19, coupled with delays in vaccination
programmes lead to longer lasting restrictions on economic activity. Other global risks also increase and drive increased risk-aversion in
asset markets.
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and the probabilities assigned in the consensus Downside scenario.
Note: Extreme point in the consensus Downside is 'worst outcome' in the scenario, i.e. lowest GDP growth, highest unemployment
rate etc. in first two years of the scenario (2021-2022).
An additional Downside scenario which features a global recession, has been created to reflect management’s view of severe risks.
Infections rise in 2021 and setbacks to vaccine programmes imply that successful roll out of vaccines only occurs towards the end of
2021 and it takes until the end of 2022 for the pandemic to come to an end. Governments and Central Banks are unable to significantly
increase fiscal and monetary programmes which results in abrupt corrections in labour and asset markets.
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and the probabilities assigned in the additional Downside scenario.
Note: Extreme point in the additional Downside is 'worst outcome' in the scenario, i.e. lowest GDP growth, highest unemployment
rate etc, in first two years of the scenario (2021-2022).
In considering economic uncertainty and assigning probabilities to scenarios, management has considered both global and country-specific
factors. This has led management to assigning scenario probabilities that are tailored to its view of uncertainty in individual markets.
To inform it's view, management has considered trends in the progression and response to the virus in individual countries, the expected
reach and efficacy of vaccine roll-outs over the course of 2021, the size and effectiveness of future government support schemes and the
connectivity with other countries. Management has also been guided by the actual response to the Covid-19 outbreak and by the economic
experience across countries in 2020. China’s visible success at containing the virus and its repeated rapid response to localised outbreaks,
coupled with government support programmes and clear signs of economic recovery, have led management to conclude that the economic
outlook for mainland China is the least volatile out of all our top markets.
The weights assigned for mainland China reflect this outlook with a probability of 80% for the Central scenario and a total of 10% across the
two downside scenarios.
Uncertainty related to the continued impact of the pandemic and the ability of governments to control its spread via restrictions and
vaccinations over the course of 2021 also play a prominent role in assigning scenario weights. The weights assigned to Hong Kong remain
unchanged at 70% for the Central scenario while a total of 25% across the two downside scenarios.
55
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The calculation of ECL under HKFRS 9 involves significant judgements, assumptions and estimates, as set out in the Annual Report
and Accounts 2020 under 'Critical accounting estimates and judgements'. The level of estimation uncertainty and judgement has
increased since 31 December 2019 as a result of the economic effects of the Covid-19 outbreak, including significant judgements
relating to:
• the selection and weighting of economic scenarios, given rapidly changing economic conditions in an unprecedented manner,
uncertainty as to the effect of government and central bank support measures designed to alleviate adverse economic impacts, and a
wider distribution of economic forecasts than before the pandemic. The key judgements are the length of time over which the
economic effects of the pandemic will occur, the speed and shape of recovery. The main factors include the effectiveness of
pandemic containment measures, the pace of roll-out and effectiveness of vaccines, and the emergence of new variants of the virus,
plus a range of geopolitical uncertainties, which together represent a very high degree of estimation uncertainty, particularly in
assessing Downside scenarios;
• estimating the economic effects of those scenarios on ECL, where there is no observable historical trend that can be reflected in the
models that will accurately represent the effects of the economic changes of the severity and speed brought about by the Covid-19
outbreak. Modelled assumptions and linkages between economic factors and credit losses may underestimate or overestimate ECL
in these conditions, and there is significant uncertainty in the estimation of parameters such as collateral values and loss severity;
and
• the identification of customers experiencing significant increases in credit risk and credit impairment, particularly where those
customers have accepted payment deferrals and other reliefs designed to address short-term liquidity issues, or have extended those
deferrals, given limitations in the available credit information on these customers. The use of segmentation techniques for
indicators of significant increases in credit risk involves significant estimation uncertainty.
We have developed a globally consistent methodology for the application of FEG into the calculation of ECL by incorporating FEG
into the estimation of the term structure of PD and LGD. For PDs, we consider the correlation of FEG to default rates for a particular
industry in a country. For LGD calculations, we consider the correlation of FEG to collateral values and realisation rates for a
particular country and industry. PDs and LGDs are estimated for the entire term structure of each instrument.
For impaired loans, ECL is individually assessed based on the likelihood of recovery of that case using discounted cash flow analysis
taking into account of the situation of the borrower, the value/quality of the collateral pledged and other recovery actions with
consideration of the forward economic guidance. The assessment result is an unbiased and probability-weighted amount determined by
evaluating a range of possible outcomes.
We followed the HSBC global consistent methodology to develop and implement a set of HKFRS 9 models for incorporating forecasts
of economic conditions into ECL estimates. The impact of economic scenarios on PD is modelled at a portfolio level. Historical
relationships between observed default rates and macroeconomic variables are integrated into HKFRS 9 ECL estimates by leveraging
economic response models. The impact of these scenarios on PD is modelled over a period equal to the remaining maturity of
underlying asset or assets. The impact on LGD is modelled for mortgage portfolios by forecasting future loan-to-value ('LTV') profiles
for the remaining maturity of the asset by leveraging national level forecasts of the house price index and applying the corresponding
LGD expectation.
These models are based largely on historic observations and correlations with default rates. Management judgemental are described
below.
56
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The most severe projections at 31 December 2020 of macroeconomic variables are outside the historical observations on which
HKFRS 9 models have been built and calibrated to operate. Moreover, the complexities of governmental support programmes, the
impacts on customer behaviours and the unpredictable pathways of the pandemic have never been modelled. Consequently, the
HKFRS 9 models, in some cases, generate outputs that appear overly sensitive when compared with other economic and credit
metrics. Governmental support programmes and customer payment reliefs have dislocated the correlation between economic
conditions and defaults on which models are based. Management judgemental adjustments are required to ensure that an appropriate
amount of ECL impairment is recognised.
We have internal governance in place to regularly monitor management judgemental adjustments and, where possible, to reduce the
reliance on these through model recalibration or redevelopment, as appropriate. During 2020, the composition of modelled ECL and
management judgemental adjustments changed significantly, reflecting the path of the pandemic containment efforts and government
support measures, and this is expected to continue to be case until economic conditions improve. Wider-ranging model changes will
take time to develop and need more real data on which models can be developed. Models will be revisited over time once the full
impacts of Covid-19 are observed. Therefore, we anticipate significant management judgemental adjustments for the foreseeable
future.
Management judgemental adjustments made in estimating the reported ECL at 31 December 2020 are set out in the following table.
The table includes adjustments in relation to data and model limitations resulting from the pandemic, and as a result of the regular
process of model development and implementation. It shows the adjustments applicable to the scenario-weighted ECL numbers.
Adjustments in relation to Downside scenarios are more significant, as results are subject to greater uncertainty.
1
Management judgemental adjustments presented in the table reflect Increases or (Decreases) to ECL, respectively.
2
Low-risk counterparties for Retail is comprised of adjustments relating to WPB Insurance only.
57
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
During 2020, management judgemental adjustments reflected the volatile economic conditions associated with the Covid-19
pandemic. The composition of modelled ECL and management judgemental adjustments changed significantly over 2020 as certain
economic measures, such as GDP growth rate, passed the expected low point in a number of key markets and returned towards those
reflected in modelled relationships, subject to continued uncertainty in the recovery paths of different economies.
ECL Wholesale adjustments were undertaken in the fourth quarter of 2020 totalling an increase of HK$0.7bn, versus a decrease in
second quarter of 2020 of HK$1.9bn. This change came mainly through the improvement in FEG and implementation of model
enhancements in Hong Kong and mainland China to address previous model limitations relating to PD projections under extreme
scenarios. The effect of these model changes was a significant reduction in ECL in the alternative downside scenario.
Adjustments to corporate exposures principally reflect the outcome of management judgments for high-risk and vulnerable sectors in
our key markets, supported by credit experts input, quantitative analyses and benchmarks. Considerations include potential default
suppression in some sectors due to government intervention and late-breaking (idiosyncratic) developments.
In Retail, adjustments under low-risk counterparties are from modelled numbers on the insurance portfolio as a result of the overall
credit expert best estimates ('CEBE') process.
At 31 December 2020, Retail management judgemental adjustments led to an ECL increase of HK$0.8bn, primarily from additional
ECL of HK$0.5bn to reflect adjustments to the timing of default which has been delayed by government support and customer relief
measures on potential defaults. Retail lending adjustments of HK$0.2bn address impact from high-risk and vulnerable segments.
The retail model default suppression adjustment was applied as defaults remain temporarily suppressed due to government support and
customer relief programmes which have supported stabilised portfolio performance. Retail models are reliant on the assumption that as
macroeconomic conditions deteriorate, defaults will crystallise. This adjustment aligns the increase in default due to change in
economic conditions to the period of time when defaults are expected to be observed. The retail model default suppression adjustment
will be monitored and updated prospectively to ensure appropriate alignment with expected performance taking into consideration the
levels and timing of government support and customer relief programmes.
58
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Management considered the sensitivity of the ECL outcome against the economic forecasts as part of the ECL governance process by
recalculating the ECL under each scenario described above for selected portfolios, applying a 100% weighting to each scenario in turn.
The weighting is reflected in both the determination of a significant increase in credit risk and the measurement of the resulting ECL.
The ECL calculated for the Upside and Downside scenarios should not be taken to represent the upper and lower limits of possible
ECL outcomes. The impact of defaults that might occur in the future under different economic scenarios is captured by recalculating
ECL for loans in stages 1 and 2 at the balance sheet date. The population of stage 3 loans (in default) at the balance sheet date is
unchanged in these sensitivity calculations. Stage 3 ECL would only be sensitive to changes in forecasts of future economic conditions
if the loss-given default ('LGD') of a particular portfolio was sensitive to these changes.
There is a particularly high degree of estimation uncertainty in numbers representing tail risk scenarios when assigned a 100%
weighting.
For wholesale credit risk exposures, the sensitivity analysis excludes ECL and financial instruments related to defaulted obligors
because the measurement of ECL is relatively more sensitive to credit factors specific to the obligor than future economic scenarios.
Therefore, it is impracticable to separate the effect of macroeconomic factors in individual assessments.
For retail credit risk exposures, the sensitivity analysis includes ECL for loans and advances to customers related to defaulted obligors.
This is because the retail ECL for secured mortgage portfolios including loans in all stages is sensitive to macroeconomic variables.
The wholesale and retail sensitivity analysis is stated inclusive of post-model adjustments, as appropriate to each scenario. The results
tables exclude portfolios held by insurance business and small portfolios. In both the wholesale and retail analysis, the comparative
period results for alternative Downside scenarios are not directly comparable to the current period, because they reflect different risk
profiles relative with the Consensus scenarios for the period end.
Wholesale analysis
59
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
1
Excludes ECL and financial instruments on defaulted obligors because the measure of ECL is relatively more sensitive to credit
factors specific to the obligor than future economic scenarios.
2
Includes off-balance sheet financial instruments that are subject to significant measurement uncertainty.
3 ECL sensitivity is calculated by applying a 100% weighting to each scenario described above, and then applying judgemental
overlays where determined appropriate.
Retail analysis
The geographies below were selected based on contribution to overall ECL within our retail lending business.
Mainland
Hong Kong China
ECL of loans and advances to customers2 31 December 2020
Reported ECL 1,440 49
Consensus scenarios
Central scenario 1,396 49
Upside scenario 1,339 48
Downside scenario 1,517 50
Alternative scenario 2,030 65
1
HKFRS 9 ECL sensitivity to future economic conditions
Mainland
Hong Kong China
ECL of loans and advances to customers2 31 December 2019
Reported ECL 1,340 16
Consensus scenarios
Central scenario 1,116 16
Upside scenario 1,063 16
Downside scenario 1,156 16
Alternative scenarios
AD1 2,073 17
AD2 2,110 N/A
1
ECL sensitivities exclude portfolios utilising less complex modelling approaches.
2
ECL sensitivity includes only on-balance sheet financial instruments to which HKFRS 9 impairment requirements are applied.
60
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
(iii) Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers
The following disclosure provides a reconciliation by stage of the Group’s gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for placings with and advances to banks and loans and
advances to customers, including loan commitments and financial guarantees. Movements are calculated on a year-to-date basis and therefore reflect the opening and closing
position of the financial instrument.
The transfers of financial instruments represents the impact of stage transfers upon the gross carrying/nominal amount and associated allowance for ECL.
The net remeasurement of ECL arising from stage transfers represents the increase or decrease due to these transfers, for example, moving from a 12-month (stage 1) to a
lifetime (stage 2) ECL measurement basis. Net remeasurement excludes the underlying CRR/PD movements of the financial instruments transferring stage. This is captured,
along with other credit quality movements in the 'changes in risk parameters - credit quality' line item.
Changes in 'New financial assets originated and purchased', 'assets derecognised (including final repayments)' and 'changes to risk parameters – further lending/repayments'
represent the impact from volume movements within the Group’s lending portfolio.
Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers, including loan commitments and
financial guarantees2
(audited)
Non credit - impaired Credit - impaired Total
At 1 January 2020 1,243,623 (1,014) 118,301 (1,838) 2,073 (814) - - 1,363,997 (3,666)
Transfers of financial instruments:
- transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 (71,117) 118 71,117 (118) - - - - - -
- transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 33,455 (480) (33,455) 480 - - - - - -
- transfers to Stage 3 (1,607) 2 (1,443) 52 3,050 (54) - - - -
- transfers from Stage 3 - - 31 - (31) - - - - -
Net remeasurement of ECL
arising from transfer of stage - 219 - (101) - (3) - - - 115
New financial assets originated and
purchased 186,164 (342) 7,988 (177) 563 (329) 2 - 194,717 (848)
Assets derecognised (including final
repayments) (111,033) 74 (21,136) 253 (357) 109 - - (132,526) 436
Changes to risk parameters -
further lending/(repayment) (73,811) 117 (6,336) 135 1,463 (399) (1) - (78,685) (147)
Changes in risk parameters -
credit quality - (255) - (1,610) - (1,645) - - - (3,510)
Changes to model used for
ECL calculation - 140 - 1,028 - - - - - 1,168
Assets written off - - - - (1,091) 1,091 - - (1,091) 1,091
Foreign exchange and others 7,334 - 312 - 53 - - - 7,699 -
At 31 December 2020 1,213,008 (1,421) 135,379 (1,896) 5,723 (2,044) 1 - 1,354,111 (5,361)
Total
Change in ECL in income statement (charge)/release for the year (2,786)
Add: Recoveries 104
Add/(less): Others 43
Total ECL (charge)/release for the year (2,639)
1
Purchased or originated credit-impaired ('POCI') represented distressed restructuring .
2
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
3
For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss allowance. As such, the gross
carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as it excludes fair value gains and losses.
61
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
(iii) Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers (continued)
Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers, including loan commitments and
financial guarantees2 (continued)
(audited)
Non credit -impaired Credit - impaired Total
1
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 POCI
Gross Gross Gross Gross Gross
carrying/ carrying/ carrying/ carrying/ carrying/
nominal Allowance nominal Allowance nominal Allowance nominal Allowance nominal Allowance
amount for ECL amount for ECL amount for ECL amount for ECL amount for ECL
Re-presented
At 1 January 2019 1,219,376 (777) 53,786 (1,000) 2,154 (959) 6 - 1,275,322 (2,736)
Transfers of financial instruments:
- transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 (83,702) 94 83,702 (94) - - - - - -
- transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 18,965 (250) (18,965) 250 - - - - - -
- transfers to Stage 3 (300) - (130) 6 430 (6) - - - -
- transfers from Stage 3 5 - 10 (1) (15) 1 - - - -
Net remeasurement of ECL
arising from transfer of stage - 151 - (276) - (3) - - - (128)
New financial assets originated and
purchased 208,472 (273) 22,627 (235) 135 (74) - - 231,234 (582)
Assets derecognised (including final
repayments) (150,907) 71 (13,601) 172 (148) 70 (6) - (164,662) 313
Changes to risk parameters -
further lending/(repayment) 33,682 78 (8,887) (17) 467 15 - - 25,262 76
Changes in risk parameters -
credit quality - (131) - (457) - (797) - - - (1,385)
Changes to model used for
ECL calculation - 23 - (186) - - - - - (163)
Assets written off - - - - (939) 939 - - (939) 939
Foreign exchange and others (1,968) - (241) - (11) - - - (2,220) -
At 31 December 2019 1,243,623 (1,014) 118,301 (1,838) 2,073 (814) - - 1,363,997 (3,666)
Total
Change in ECL in income statement (charge)/release for the year (1,869)
Add: Recoveries 106
Add/(less): Others (17)
Total ECL (charge)/release for the year (1,780)
1
Purchased or originated credit-impaired ('POCI') represented distressed restructuring .
2
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
3
For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss allowance. As such, the gross
carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as it excludes fair value gains and losses.
62
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
We assess the credit quality of all financial instruments that are subject to credit risk. The credit quality of financial instruments is a point-in-time
assessment of the probability of default of financial instruments, whereas HKFRS 9 stages 1 and 2 are determined based on relative deterioration of
credit quality since initial recognition. Accordingly, for non-credit impaired financial instruments, there is no direct relationship between the credit
quality assessments and HKFRS 9 stages 1 and 2, though typically the lowered credit quality bands exhibit a higher proportion in stage 2.
3
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality at 31 December 2020
1
For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss allowance. As
such, the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as it excludes fair value
gains and losses.
2
Figures do not include commitments and financial guarantee contracts not subject to impairment requirements under HKFRS 9. As such, the amounts do not
agree with the figures shown in note 45 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
63
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
3
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality at 31 December 2019
1
For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss allowance. As
such, the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as it excludes fair value
gains and losses.
2
Figures do not include commitments and financial guarantee contracts not subject to impairment requirements under HKFRS 9. As such, the amounts do not
agree with the figures shown in note 45 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
64
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
1
For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss
allowance. As such, the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the Consolidated Balance Sheet
as it excludes fair value gains and losses.
2
Figures do not include commitments and financial guarantee contracts not subject to impairment requirements under HKFRS 9. As such, the
amounts do not agree with the figures shown in note 45 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
65
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Distribution of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are applied, by credit quality and stage distribution at 31
December 2019 3
1
For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss
allowance. As such, the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the Consolidated Balance Sheet
as it excludes fair value gains and losses.
2
Figures do not include commitments and financial guarantee contracts not subject to impairment requirements under HKFRS 9. As such, the
amounts do not agree with the figures shown in note 45 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
66
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
We determine that a financial instrument is credit-impaired and in stage 3 by considering relevant objective evidence, primarily whether:
• contractual payments of either principal or interest are past due for more than 90 days;
• there are other indications that the borrower is unlikely to pay, such as when a concession has been granted to the borrower for economic or legal
reasons relating to the borrower’s financial condition; and
• the loan is otherwise considered to be in default. If such unlikeliness to pay is not identified at an earlier stage, it is deemed to occur when an
exposure is 90 days past due, even where regulatory rules permit default to be defined based on 180 days past due. Therefore, the definitions of
credit-impaired and default are aligned as far as possible so that stage 3 represents all loans that are considered defaulted or otherwise credit-
impaired.
At 31 December 2020
Personal lending
Number of customers granted mortgages payment holidays Thousands 0.57
Drawn loan value of customers granted mortgage payment holidays HK$m 1,739
Total mortgages HK$m 284,111
Payment holidays as a proportion of total mortgages % 0.6
Number of customers granted other personal lending payment holidays Thousands 0.24
Drawn loan value of customers granted other personal lending payment holidays HK$m 537
Total other personal lending HK$m 68,454
Payment holidays as a proportion of total other personal lending % 0.8
Wholesale lending
Number of customers under customer relief schemes Thousands 0.22
Drawn loan value of customers under customer relief schemes HK$m 13,658
Total wholesale loans and advances to customers HK$m 597,389
Customer relief as a proportion of total wholesale loans and advances to customers % 2.3
Total customer relief as a proportion of total loans and advances to customers % 1.7
67
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The initial granting of customer relief does not automatically trigger a migration to stage 2 or 3. However, information provided by payment deferrals is
considered in the context of other reasonable and supportable information, as part of the overall assessment for significant increase in credit risk and for
credit impairment, to identify loans for which lifetime ECL is appropriate. An extension in payment deferral does not automatically result in stage 2 or
stage 3. The key accounting and credit risk judgement to ascertain whether a significant increase in credit risk has occurred is whether the economic
effects of Covid-19 on the customer are likely to be temporary over the lifetime of the loan, and do not indicate that a concession is being made in
respect of financial difficulty that would be consistent with stage 3.
The prescribed eligibility criteria (which include parameters for CRR, favourable past due history and no Worry-Watch-Monitor classification etc.) are
to ensure that these measures are extended only to the 'good book', clients are not already showing any signs of stress and that these arrangements are
more proactive and flexible approaches to commercial restructuring as opposed to forbearance/ renegotiated loans/ distressed restructuring.
A supplemental industry-wide relief programme initiated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ('HKMA') for eligible corporates with turnover not
exceeding HK$800m and other prescribed criteria was launched in May 2020. The Pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme ('PPPHS')
entailed essentially a up to 90-day tenor extension for trade facilities and up to 6-month principal payment holiday for other loans. On 2 September
2020, the HKMA announced that this scheme has been extended for a further six months to April 2021;
A special 100% Loan Guarantee under the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme ('SFGS100') was launched in April 20. The guarantee covers a
maximum tenor of 3 years and maximum loan size of HK$4m, and involved transfer of title of the loan to the Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation
('HKMCI'), a quasi-government agency. In September 2020, the HKMCI has further enhanced the maximum loan amount to HK$5m and loan tenor
to 5 years.
Retail
The HKMA in early February 2020 encouraged Authorised Institutions to adopt a sympathetic stance in dealing with customers facing financial stress
due to the Covid-19 and, to the extent prudent risk management principles permit, consider requests from these borrowers for temporary relief
arrangements favourably. The Bank introduced a suite of comprehensive relief measures to ease the financial burden and short term cash flow pressures
on personal customers created by the spread of Covid-19. This exemplifies the Bank’s commitment to support the local community during these tough
times.
Personal Instalment Relief Loan of up to HK$30,000 with a maximum tenor of 24 months for existing customers employed in the affected industries
(e.g. tourism, entertainment, catering and retail industries). The choice of repayment period is from 6 months to 24 months.
68
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Although collateral can be an important mitigant of credit risk, it is the Group’s practice to lend on the basis of the customer’s ability to meet
their obligations out of their cash flow resources rather than rely on the value of security offered. Depending on the customer’s standing and the
type of product, facilities may be provided unsecured. However, for certain lending decisions a charge over collateral is usually obtained, and is
important for the credit decision and pricing, and it is the Bank’s practice to obtain that collateral and sell it in the event of default as a source of
repayment.
Such collateral has a significant financial effect in mitigating our exposure to credit risk and the objective of the disclosure below is to quantify
these forms. We may also manage our risk by employing other types of collateral and credit risk enhancements, such as second charges, other
liens and unsupported guarantees, but the valuation of such mitigants is less certain and their financial effect has not been quantified in the
loans shown below.
We have quantified below the value of fixed charges we hold over a specific asset (or assets) of a borrower for which we have a practical ability
and history of enforcing in satisfying a debt in the event of a borrower failing to meet their contractual obligations and where the asset is cash or
can be realised in the form of cash by sale in an established market.
Personal lending
(audited)
For personal lending, the collateral held has been analysed below separately for residential mortgages and other personal lending due to the
different nature of collateral held on the portfolios.
Residential mortgages
(audited)
The following table shows residential mortgage lending including off-balance sheet loan commitments by level of collateralisation.
At 31 December 2020 At 31 December 2019
Gross carrying/ ECL coverage Gross carrying/ ECL coverage
nominal amount ECL % nominal amount ECL %
Stage 1
Fully collateralised 281,826 (1) 0.00 266,916 (2) 0.00
LTV ratio:
– Less than 70% 238,721 (1) 0.00 240,893 (1) 0.00
– 71% to 90% 31,581 (0) 0.00 18,900 (0) 0.00
– 91% to 100% 11,524 (0) 0.00 7,123 (0) 0.00
Partially collateralised (A) 77 (0) 0.00 265 (0) 0.00
Total 281,903 (1) 0.00 267,181 (2) 0.00
– Collateral value on A 73 262
Stage 2
Fully collateralised 5,010 (0) 0.00 5,856 (1) 0.02
LTV ratio:
– Less than 70% 4,698 (0) 0.00 5,641 (1) 0.00
– 71% to 90% 257 (0) 0.00 178 (0) 0.00
– 91% to 100% 55 (0) 0.00 37 - -
Partially collateralised (B) 1 - - - - -
Total 5,011 (0) 0.00 5,856 (1) 0.02
– Collateral value on B 1 -
Stage 3
Fully collateralised 481 (45) 9.36 275 (11) 4.00
LTV ratio:
– Less than 70% 467 (45) 9.64 271 (11) 4.07
– 71% to 90% 14 (0) 0.14 4 - -
– 91% to 100% - - - - - -
Partially collateralised (C) 5 - - - - -
Total 486 (45) 9.27 275 (11) 4.00
– Collateral value on C 5 -
POCI
Fully collateralised - - - - - -
LTV ratio:
– Less than 70% - - - - - -
– 71% to 90% - - - - - -
– 91% to 100% - - - - - -
Partially collateralised (D) - - - - - -
Total - - - - - -
– Collateral value on D - -
287,400 (46) 0.02 273,312 (14) 0.01
The collateral included in the table above consists of fixed first charges on residential real estate.
69
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The loan-to-value ('LTV') ratio in the table above is calculated as the gross on-balance sheet carrying amount of the loan and any off-balance
sheet loan commitment at the balance sheet date as a percentage of the current value of collateral. The current value of collateral is determined
through a combination of professional valuations, physical inspections or house price indices. Valuations are updated on a regular basis and
more frequently when market conditions or portfolio performance are subject to significant change or where a loan is identified and assessed as
impaired. The collateral valuation excludes any adjustments for obtaining and selling the collateral.
The following table shows commercial real estate lending including off-balance sheet loan commitments by level of collateralisation.
Stage 2
Not collateralised 3,864 (4) 0.10 3,239 (44) 1.37
Fully collateralised 24,248 (210) 0.87 10,641 (145) 1.35
Partially collateralised (B) 1,081 (14) 1.30 327 (0) 0.14
Total 29,193 (228) 0.78 14,207 (189) 1.33
– Collateral value on B 889 191
Stage 3
Not collateralised - - - - - -
Fully collateralised 129 (18) 13.95 113 (3) 2.79
Partially collateralised (C) - - - - - -
Total 129 (18) 13.95 113 (3) 2.79
– Collateral value on C - -
POCI
Not collateralised - - - - - -
Fully collateralised - - - - - -
Partially collateralised (D) - - - - - -
Total - - - - - -
– Collateral value on D - -
The collateral included in the table above consists of fixed first charges on real estate and charges over cash for the commercial real estate
sector. The table includes lending to major property developers which is typically secured by guarantees or is unsecured.
70
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Commercial real estate lending includes the financing of corporate, institutional and high net worth customers who are investing primarily in
income-producing assets and, to a lesser extent, in their construction and development.
The following table shows corporate, commercial and financial (non-bank) lending including off-balance sheet loan commitments by level of
collateralisation.1
At 31 December 2020 At 31 December 2019
Re-presented
Gross carrying/ ECL coverage Gross carrying/ ECL coverage
nominal amount ECL % nominal amount ECL %
Stage 1
Not collateralised 266,101 (371) 0.14 283,389 (259) 0.09
Fully collateralised 139,653 (252) 0.18 133,854 (172) 0.13
Partially collateralised (A) 46,560 (69) 0.15 57,068 (50) 0.09
Total 452,314 (692) 0.15 474,311 (481) 0.10
– Collateral value on A 20,574 27,318
Stage 2
Not collateralised 36,635 (198) 0.54 40,475 (292) 0.72
Fully collateralised 55,445 (512) 0.92 53,689 (406) 0.76
Partially collateralised (B) 15,051 (207) 1.38 10,251 (63) 0.61
Total 107,131 (917) 0.86 104,415 (761) 0.73
– Collateral value on B 7,724 4,423
Stage 3
Not collateralised 1,903 (1,342) 70.52 703 (581) 82.76
Fully collateralised 945 (37) 3.92 445 (48) 10.81
Partially collateralised (C) 1,763 (428) 24.28 116 (33) 28.47
Total 4,611 (1,807) 39.19 1,264 (662) 52.43
– Collateral value on C 1,084 61
POCI
Not collateralised 1 - - - - -
Fully collateralised - - - - - -
Partially collateralised (D) - - - - - -
Total 1 - - - - -
– Collateral value on D - -
564,057 (3,416) 0.61 579,990 (1,904) 0.33
1
In 2020, the Group changed its presentation to include balances with HSBC Group companies. Comparatives have been re-presented
accordingly.
The collateral used in the assessment of the above primarily includes first legal charges over real estate and charges over cash in the commercial
and industrial sector and charges over cash and marketable financial instruments in the financial sector.
It should be noted that the table above excludes other types of collateral which are commonly taken for corporate and commercial lending such
as unsupported guarantees and floating charges over the assets of a customer’s business. While such mitigants have value, often providing
rights in insolvency, their assignable value is insufficiently certain. They are assigned no value for disclosure purposes.
As with commercial real estate the value of real estate collateral included in the table above is generally determined through a combination of
professional and internal valuations and physical inspection. The frequency of revaluation is undertaken on a similar basis to commercial real
estate loans and advances; however, for financing activities in corporate and commercial lending that are not predominantly commercial real
estate-oriented, collateral value is not as strongly correlated to principal repayment performance. Collateral values will generally be refreshed
when an obligor’s general credit performance deteriorates and it is necessary to assess the likely performance of secondary sources of repayment
should reliance upon them prove necessary. For the purposes of the table above, cash is valued at its nominal value and marketable securities at
their fair value.
71
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Placings with and advances to banks are typically unsecured. At 31 December 2020, HK$44,357m (2019: HK$65,807m) of placings with and
advances to banks rated CRR 1 to 5, including loan commitments, are uncollateralised.
Derivatives
(audited)
The ISDA Master Agreement is our preferred agreement for documenting derivatives activity. It provides the contractual framework within
which dealing activity across a full range of over-the-counter ('OTC') products is conducted, and contractually binds both parties to apply close-
out netting across all outstanding transactions covered by an agreement if either party defaults or another pre-agreed termination event occurs. It
is common, and the Group’s preferred practice, for the parties to execute a Credit Support Annex ('CSA') in conjunction with the ISDA Master
Agreement. Under a CSA, collateral is passed between the parties to mitigate the counterparty risk inherent in outstanding positions. The
majority of our CSAs are with financial institutional clients. Please refer to note 47 'Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities' for
further details.
In addition to collateralised lending described above, other credit enhancements are employed and methods used to mitigate credit risk arising
from financial assets. These are described in more detail below.
Government, bank and other financial institution-issued securities may benefit from additional credit enhancement, notably through government
guarantees that reference these assets. Corporate-issued debt securities are primarily unsecured. Debt securities issued by banks and financial
institutions include asset-backed securities ('ABS') and similar instruments, which are supported by underlying pools of financial assets. Credit
risk associated with ABS is reduced through the purchase of credit default swap ('CDS') protection.
The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk includes financial guarantees and similar arrangements that it issues or enters into, and loan
commitments to which it is irrevocably committed. Depending on the terms of the arrangement, the Group may have recourse to additional
credit mitigation in the event that a guarantee is called upon or a loan commitment is drawn and subsequently defaults. The risks and exposures
from these are captured and managed in accordance with the Group’s overall credit risk management policies and procedures.
The Group obtained assets by taking possession of collateral held as security, or calling other credit enhancement. The nature of these assets
held as at 31 December 2020 are residential properties and commercial properties with carrying amount of HK$24m and HK$4m respectively
(2019: residential properties of HK$19m).
72
#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Overview
Liquidity risk is the risk that we do not have sufficient financial resources to meet our obligations as they fall due or that we can only do so at an excessive
cost. Liquidity risk arises from mismatches in the timing of cash flows. Funding risk is the risk that funding considered to be sustainable, and therefore
used to fund assets, is not sustainable over time. Funding risk arises when illiquid asset positions cannot be funded at the expected terms and when
required.
We manage liquidity and funding risk at an operating entity level to ensure that obligations can be met in the jurisdiction where they fall due, generally
without reliance on other parts of the Group. Operating entities are required to meet internal minimum requirements and any applicable regulatory
requirements at all times. These requirements are set against the Group’s implementation of the liquidity coverage ratio ('LCR') and the net stable funding
ratio ('NSFR'). Each entity is required to undertake a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the contractual and behavioural profile of its assets and
liabilities when setting internal limits in order to reflect their expected behaviour under idiosyncratic, market-wide and combined stress scenarios.
All operating entities are required to prepare an internal liquidity adequacy assessment ('ILAA') document at appropriate frequency. The final objective of
the ILAA, approved by the relevant Board of Directors, is to verify that the entity and subsidiaries maintain liquidity resources which are adequate in both
amount and quality at all times, there is no significant risk that its liabilities cannot be met as they fall due, and a prudent funding profile is maintained.
The Board is ultimately responsible for determining the types and magnitude of liquidity risk that the Group is able to take and ensuring that there is an
appropriate organisation structure for managing this risk. Under authorities delegated by the Executive Committee, the Group ALCO is responsible for
managing all Asset, Liability and Capital Management issues including liquidity and funding risk management.
The Group ALCO delegates to the Group Tactical Asset and Liability Management Committee ('TALCO') the task of reviewing various analysis of the
Group pertaining to liquidity and funding.
Compliance with liquidity and funding requirements is monitored by the ALCO and is reported to the RMM, Executive Committee, RC and the Board of
Directors on a regular basis. This process includes:
- maintaining compliance with relevant regulatory requirements of the reporting entity;
- projecting cash flows under various stress scenarios and considering the level of liquid assets necessary in relation thereto;
- monitoring liquidity and funding ratios against internal and regulatory requirements;
- monitoring depositor concentration in order to avoid undue reliance on large individual depositors and ensuring a satisfactory overall funding mix; and
- maintaining liquidity contingency plans. These plans identify early indicators of stress conditions and describe actions to be taken in the event of
difficulties arising from systemic or other crises, while minimising adverse long-term implications for the business.
73
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Governance
ALCM teams apply the LFRF at both an individual entity and Group level, and are responsible for the implementation of Group-wide and local regulatory
policy at a legal entity level. Markets Treasury has responsibility for cash and liquidity management.
Liquidity Risk Management ('LRM') carry out independent review, challenge and assurance of the appropriateness of the risk management activities
undertaken by ALCM and Markets Treasury. Their work includes setting control standards, advising on policy implementation, and reviewing and
challenging of reporting.
Internal Audit provide independent assurance that risk is managed effectively.
Funding and liquidity plans form part of the annual operating plan that is approved by the Board. The critical Board risk appetite measures are the LCR and
NSFR. An appropriate funding and liquidity profile is managed through a wider set of measures:
The LCR aims to ensure that a bank has sufficient unencumbered high-quality liquid assets ('HQLA') to meet its liquidity needs in a 30-calendar-day
liquidity stress scenario.
At 31 December 2020, all the Group’s principal operating entities were well above regulatory minimums and above the internally expected levels
established by the Board.
The Group uses the NSFR as a basis for ensuring operating entities raise sufficient stable funding to support their business activities. The NSFR requires
institutions to maintain minimum amount of stable funding based on assumptions of asset liquidity.
At 31 December 2020, all the Group’s principal operating entities were above the internally expected levels established by the Board.
The LCR and NSFR metrics assume a stressed outflow based on a portfolio of depositors within each deposit segment. The validity of these assumptions is
challenged if the portfolio of depositors is not large enough to avoid depositor concentration. Operating entities are exposed to term refinancing
concentration risk if the current maturity profile results in future maturities being overly concentrated in any defined period.
At 31 December 2020, all the Group’s principal operating entities were above the internally expected levels established by the Board.
Sources of funding
(unaudited)
Our primary sources of funding are customer deposits. We issue wholesale securities to supplement our customer deposits and change the currency mix or
maturity profile of our liabilities.
The LFRF requires all operating entities to monitor material single currency LCR. Limits are set to ensure that outflows can be met, given assumptions on
stressed capacity in the FX swap markets.
Under the terms of our current collateral obligations under derivative contracts (which are ISDA compliant CSA contracts), the additional collateral
required to post in the event of one-notch and two-notch downgrade in credit ratings is immaterial.
74
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The Group is required to calculate its LCR and NSFR on a consolidated basis in accordance with rule 11(1) of The Banking (Liquidity) Rules ('BLR'). The
Group is required to maintain both LCR and NSFR of not less than 100%.
Quarter ended
31 Dec 2020 30 Sep 2020 30 Jun 2020 31 Mar 2020 31 Dec 2019 30 Sep 2019 30 Jun 2019 31 Mar 2019
Average LCR 207.8% 199.4% 198.0% 181.6% 201.8% 210.5% 198.5% 210.8%
The liquidity position of the Group remained strong and stable in 2020. The average LCR ranged from 181.6% to 207.8% for the reportable quarters. The
LCR at 31 December 2020 was 230.4% (205.9% at 31 December 2019).
The composition of the Group's high quality liquid assets ('HQLA') as defined under Schedule 2 of the BLR is shown as below. The majority of the HQLA
held by the Group are Level 1 assets which consist mainly of government debt securities.
31 Dec 2020 30 Sep 2020 30 Jun 2020 31 Mar 2020 31 Dec 2019 30 Sep 2019 30 Jun 2019 31 Mar 2019
Level 1 assets 384,837 356,059 315,876 297,826 309,019 319,073 305,849 309,073
Level 2A assets 14,498 15,031 15,415 15,056 14,257 12,230 12,539 11,577
Level 2B assets 2,563 2,092 1,795 1,224 758 557 550 548
Total 401,898 373,182 333,086 314,106 324,034 331,860 318,938 321,198
31 Dec 2020 30 Sep 2020 30 Jun 2020 31 Mar 2020 31 Dec 2019 30 Sep 2019 30 Jun 2019 31 Mar 2019
The funding position of the Group remained strong and stable in 2020. The NSFR was 152.9% for the quarter ended 31 December 2020, highlighting a
surplus of available stable funding relative to the required stable funding requirement.
To comply with the Banking (Disclosure) Rules, the details of liquidity information can be found in the Regulatory Disclosures section of our website
www.hangseng.com.
75
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Analysis of cash flows payable under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities
(audited)
Over 1 Over 3 Over
month months 1 year Over
Within 1 but within but within but within 5
month 3 months 1 year 5 years years Total
At 31 December 2020
At 31 December 2019
The balances in the above tables incorporates all cash flows relating to principal and future coupon payments on an undiscounted basis (except for trading
liabilities and trading derivatives). Trading liabilities and trading derivatives have been included in the 'Within one month' time bucket as trading liabilities
are typically held for short periods of time. The undiscounted cash flows payable under hedging derivative liabilities are classified according to their
contractual maturity. Investment contract liabilities have been included in financial liabilities designated at fair value, whereby the policyholders have the
option to surrender or transfer at any time, and are reported in the 'Over five years' time bucket. A maturity analysis prepared on the basis of the earliest
possible contractual repayment date (assuming that all surrender and transfer options are exercised) would result in all investment contracts being
presented as falling due within one year or less. The undiscounted cash flows potentially payable under loan commitments and financial guarantee
contracts are classified on the basis of the earliest date they can be called. Cash flows payable in respect of customer accounts are primarily contractually
repayable on demand or at short notice.
76
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Overview
Market risk is the risk that movements in market factors, including foreign exchange rates and commodity prices, interest
rates, credit spreads and equity prices, will reduce our income or the value of our portfolios.
Exposure to market risk is separated into two portfolios: trading portfolios and non-trading portfolios.
Where appropriate, the Group applies similar risk management policies and measurement techniques to both trading and
non-trading portfolios. The Group’s objective is to manage and control market risk exposures in order to optimise return
on risk while maintaining a market profile consistent with the established risk appetite.
Each major operating entity has an independent market risk management and control function which is responsible for
measuring market risk exposures in accordance with the policies defined by Group Risk, and monitoring and reporting
these exposures against the prescribed limits on a daily basis. Each operating entity is required to assess the market risks
arising on each product in its business and to transfer them to either its Global Markets for management, or to separate
books managed under the supervision of the Asset and Liability Management Committee ('ALCO').
The Traded Risk function enforces the controls around trading in permissible instruments approved for each site as well
as new product approval procedures. Trading Risk also restricts trading in the more complex derivatives products to
offices with appropriate levels of product expertise and robust control systems.
77
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Sensitivity analysis
(unaudited)
Sensitivity analysis measures the impact of individual market factor movements on specific instruments or portfolios
including interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. The Group uses sensitivity measures to monitor the
market risk positions within each risk type. Granular sensitivity limits are set primarily for trading desks with
consideration of market liquidity, customer demand and capital constraints, among other factors.
VaR is a technique for estimating potential losses on risk positions as a result of movements in market rates and prices
over a specified time horizon and to a given level of confidence. The use of VaR is integrated into market risk
management and calculated for all trading positions regardless of how the Group capitalises them. In addition, the Group
calculates VaR for non-trading portfolios to have a complete picture of risk. Where VaR is not calculated explicitly, the
Group uses alternative tools as summarised in the 'Stress testing' section below.
Standard VaR is calculated at a 99% confidence level for a one-day holding period while Stressed VaR uses a 10-day
holding period and a 99% confidence interval based on a continuous one-year historical significant stress period. The
VaR models used by the Group are predominantly based on historical simulation which incorporate the following
features:
• historical market rates and prices are calculated with reference to foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, interest
rates, equity prices and the associated volatilities;
• potential market movements which are calculated with reference to data from the past two years; and
• Standard VaR is calculated to a 99% confidence level and using a one-day holding period.
The models also incorporate the effect of the option features on the underlying exposures. The nature of the VaR models
means that an increase in observed market volatility will lead to an increase in VaR without any changes in the
underlying positions.
Although a valuable guide to risk, VaR should always be viewed in the context of its limitations. For example:
• the use of historical data as a proxy for estimating future market moves may not encompass all potential market
events, particularly those that are extreme in nature;
• the use of a one-day holding period for risk management purposes of trading and non-trading books assumes that this
short period is sufficient to hedge or liquidate all positions;
• the use of a 99% confidence level, by definition does not take into account losses that might occur beyond this level
of confidence; and
• VaR is calculated on the basis of exposures outstanding at the close of business and therefore does not reflect intra-
day exposures.
78
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Risk factors are reviewed on a regular basis and either incorporated directly in the VaR models, where possible, or
quantified through either the VaR-based RNIV approach or a stress test approach within the RNIV framework.
Stress testing
(audited)
Stress testing is an important tool that is integrated into the Group’s market risk management framework to evaluate the
potential impact on portfolio values of more extreme, although plausible, events or movements in a set of financial
variables. In such abnormal scenarios, losses can be much greater than those predicted by VaR modelling.
Stress testing is implemented at legal entity and overall Group levels. A scoring framework is in place for management to
effectively assess the severity of the potential stress losses and the likelihood of occurrence of the stress scenarios. The
risk appetite around potential stress losses for the Group is set and monitored against referral limits.
Market risk reverse stress tests are designed to identify vulnerabilities in our portfolios by looking for scenarios that lead
to loss levels considered severe for the relevant portfolio. These scenarios may be quite local or idiosyncratic in nature,
and complement the systematic top-down stress testing.
Stress testing and reverse stress testing provide senior management with insights regarding the 'tail risk' beyond VaR, for
which risk appetite is limited.
Trading portfolios
Trading portfolios comprise positions held for client servicing and market-making, with the intention of short-term resale
and/or to hedge risks resulting from such positions.
79
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
We managed market risk prudently during 2020. Sensitivity exposures remained within appetite as the business pursued
its core market-making activity in support of our customers during the outbreak. We also managed our portfolios to
protect the business from potential future deterioration in credit conditions. Market risk continued to be managed using a
complementary set of exposure measures and limits, including stress and scenario analysis.
Trading portfolios
(audited)
Value at risk of the trading portfolios
The Trading VaR at 31 December 2020 increased when compared against 31 December 2019 due to the increase in
interest rate trading positions. In average terms, the VaR level was also higher in 2020.
The daily levels of total trading VaR over the last year are set out in the graph below.
80
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The Group’s trading VaR for the year is shown in the table below.
Minimum Maximum
At 31 December during during Average
2019 the year the year for the year
VaR
Trading 32 14 37 25
Foreign exchange trading 23 7 35 18
Interest rate trading 20 11 30 20
Portfolio diversification (11) - - (13)
1 Trading portfolios comprise positions arising from the market-making and warehousing of customer-derived
positions.
2 Portfolio diversification is the market risk dispersion effect of holding a portfolio containing different risk types. It
represents the reduction in unsystematic market risk that occurs when combining a number of different risk types,
for example, interest rate and foreign exchange, together in one portfolio. It is measured as the difference between
the sum of the VaR by individual risk type and the combined total VaR. A negative number represents the benefit of
portfolio diversification. As the maximum and minimum occur on different days for different risk types, it is not
meaningful to calculate a portfolio diversification benefit for these measures.
Backtesting
(unaudited)
In 2020, there were one profit exception and one loss exception at the Group consolidated level.
The graph below shows the daily trading VaR against actual and hypothetical profit and loss for the Group during 2020.
81
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Backtesting (continued)
(unaudited)
The Group routinely validates the accuracy of the VaR models by back-testing both actual and hypothetical profit and
loss against the trading VaR numbers. Hypothetical profit and loss excludes non-modelled items such as fees,
commissions and revenues of intra-day transactions.
The actual number of profits or losses in excess of VaR over this period can be used to gauge how well the models are
performing. A VaR model is deemed satisfactory if it experiences less than five profit or loss exceptions in a 250-day
period.
Non-trading portfolios
(unaudited)
Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book ('IRRBB') is the risk of an adverse impact to earnings or capital due to changes in
market interest rates that affect the bank's banking book positions. The risk arises from timing mismatches in the repricing
of non-traded assets and liabilities and is the potential adverse impact of changes in interest rates on earnings and capital.
In its management of the risk, the Group aims to mitigate the impact of future interest rate movements which could reduce
future net interest income or its net worth, while balancing the cost of hedging activities to the current revenue stream.
Monitoring the sensitivity of projected net interest income and of the present value of expected net cash flows under
varying interest rate scenarios is a key part of this.
In order to manage structural interest rate risk, non-traded assets and liabilities are transferred to Markets Treasury based
on their re-pricing and maturity characteristics. For assets and liabilities with no defined maturity or re-pricing
characteristics, behaviouralisation is used to assess the interest rate risk profile. Markets Treasury manages the banking
book interest rate positions transferred to it within approved limits. ALCO is responsible for monitoring and reviewing its
overall structural interest rate risk position. Interest rate behaviouralisation policies have to be formulated in line with the
Group’s behaviouralisation policies and approved at least annually by ALCO.
A principal part of the Group’s management of non-traded interest rate risk is to monitor the sensitivity of projected net
interest income at least quarterly under varying interest rate scenarios (simulation modelling), where all other economic
variables are held constant. This monitoring is undertaken at bank level by ALCO, where the Group forecasts both one-
year and five-year NII sensitivities across a range of interest rate scenarios.
Sensitivity of net interest income reflects the Group’s sensitivity of earnings due to changes in market interest rates. The
Group forecasts net interest income sensitivities across a range of interest rate scenarios based on a static balance sheet
assumption.
The table below sets out the effect on future net interest income of 100 basis points parallel rises or falls in all yield
curves at the beginning of year from 1 January 2021 and 25 basis points parallel rises or falls in all yield curves at the
beginning of year from 1 January 2021.
Assuming no management actions and all other non-interest rate risk variables remain constant, such a series of parallel
rises in all yield curves would increase projected net interest income for the year ending 31 December 2021 by
HK$4,159m for 100 basis points case and by HK$1,041m for 25 basis points case, while such a series of parallel falls in
all-in yield curves would decrease projected net interest income by HK$3,136m for 100 basis points case and by
HK$1,262m for 25 basis points case.
82
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The interest rate sensitivities set out in the table above represent the effect of the movements in projected yield curves
based on a constant balance sheet size and structure. This effect, however, does not incorporate actions which would
probably be taken by Markets Treasury or in the business units to mitigate the effect of interest rate risk. In reality,
Markets Treasury proactively seeks to change the interest rate risk profile to optimise net revenues. The net interest
income sensitivity calculations assume that interest rates of all maturities move by the same amount in the 'up-shock'
scenario. Rates are not assumed to become negative in the 'down-shock' scenario unless the central bank rate is already
negative and then not assumed to go further negative, which may, in certain currencies, effectively result in non-parallel
shock. In addition, the net interest income sensitivity calculations take into account of the effect on net interest income of
anticipated differences in changes between interbank interest rates and interest rates over which the entity has discretion
in terms of the timing and extent of rate changes.
Key assumptions used in the measurement of interest rate sensitivities include business line interest rate pass-on
assumptions, re-investment of maturing assets and refinancing of liabilities at market rates per shock scenario and
prepayment risk. Markets Treasury is modelled based on no management actions i.e. the risk profile at the month end is
assumed to remain constant throughout the forecast horizon. The projections make other assumptions, including that
contractually fixed term positions run to maturity, managed rate products and non-interest bearing balances, such as
interest-free current accounts, are subject to interest rate risk behaviouralisation.
The Group's EVE sensitivity is prepared in accordance with the HKMA 'Return of Interest Rate Risk Exposure -
(MA(BS)12A)'. For details of the Group's EVE sensitivity, please refer to the Banking Disclosure Statement that will be
available in the 'Regulatory Disclosures' section of the Bank's website.
83
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Sensitivity of reserves
The Group measures the potential downside risk to the CET1 ratio due to interest rate and credit spread risk in the Hold
to Collect and Sell ('HTC&S') portfolio by the portfolio's stressed VaR, using 99% confidence level and an assumed
holding period of one quarter. At 31 December 2020, the stressed VaR of the portfolio was HK$1,281m.
The Group monitors the sensitivity of reported cash flow hedge reserves to interest rate movements on a quarterly basis
by assessing the expected reduction in valuation of cash flow hedge due to parallel movements of plus or minus 100bps
in all yield curves. These particular exposures form only a part of the Group's overall interest rate risk exposures.
The following table describes the sensitivity of reported cash flow hedge reserves to the stipulated movements in yield
curves. The sensitivities are indicative and based on simplified scenarios.
+ 100 basis points parallel move in all yield curves (51) (76) (51)
As a percentage of shareholders’ equity at 31 December 2020 (%) (0.03) (0.04) (0.03)
+ 100 basis points parallel move in all yield curves (76) (118) (76)
As a percentage of shareholders’ equity at 31 December 2019 (%) (0.04) (0.07) (0.04)
- 100 basis points parallel move in all yield curves 182 224 180
As a percentage of shareholders’ equity at 31 December 2019 (%) 0.10 0.13 0.10
The Group’s structural foreign exchange exposure, monitored using sensitivity analysis, represents the Group’s foreign
currency investments in subsidiaries, branches and associates, and the fair value of the Group’s long-term foreign
currency equity investments, the functional currencies of which are currencies other than the HK dollar. An entity’s
functional currency is normally that of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. The Group’s
structural foreign exchange exposures are managed by the Group’s ALCO with the primary objective of ensuring, where
practical, that the Group’s and the Bank’s capital ratios are largely protected from the effect of changes in exchange rates.
The Group’s foreign exchange exposures are prepared in accordance with the HKMA 'Return of Foreign Currency
Position -(MA(BS)6)'.
For details of the Group's non-structural and structural foreign currency positions, please refer to the Banking Disclosure
Statement that is available in the 'Regulatory Disclosures' section of the Bank's website.
Equities exposures
(audited)
The Group's equities exposures in 2020 and 2019 are reported as 'Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss', 'Financial investments' and 'Trading assets' in the financial statements.
These are subject to trading limit and risk management control procedures and other market risk regime.
84
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Overview
Resilience risk is the risk that we are unable to provide critical services to our customers, affiliates and counterparties, as a
result of sustained and significant operational disruption. Resilience risk arises from failures or inadequacies in processes,
people,systems or external events.
85
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Overview
Regulatory compliance risk is the risk that we fail to observe the letter and spirit of all relevant laws, codes, rules,
regulations and standards of good market practice, and incur fines and penalties and suffer damage to our business as a
consequence.
The Regulatory Compliance function provides independent, objective oversight and challenge and promotes a compliance
oriented culture, supporting the business in delivering fair outcomes for customers, maintaining the integrity of financial
markets and achieving the Group’s strategic objectives.
Conduct of business
In 2020, we continued to take steps to raise our standards relating to conduct, which included:
- delivering further mandatory conduct training to all employees;
- incorporating the assessment of expected values and behaviours as key determinants in recruitment, performance
appraisal and remuneration processes;
- improving our market surveillance capability;
- introducing policies and procedures to strengthen support for potentially vulnerable customers;
- enhancing the quality and depth of conduct management information and how it is used across the Bank;
- implementing an assessment process to check the effectiveness of our conduct initiatives across the Bank; and
- assessing conduct standards and practices within our key third party suppliers and distributors.
# 86
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Overview
Financial crime risk is the risk that we knowingly or unknowingly help parties to commit or to further potentially illegal activity through
the Bank, including money laundering, fraud, bribery and corruption, tax evasion, sanctions breaches, and terrorist and proliferation
financing. Financial crime risk arises from day-to-day banking operations.
We consistently review the effectiveness of our financial crime risk management framework, which includes consideration of geopolitical
and wider economic factors. The sanctions regulatory environment has remained changeable and uncertain during the course of 2020 due
to the ongoing geopolitical tensions between the US and China, and the increasing divergence in sanctions policies between the US and
the EU on Iran and Russia. We comply with all applicable sanctions regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and continue to
monitor the geopolitical landscape for ongoing developments. We also continued to progress several key financial crime risk management
initiatives, including:
• We continued to strengthen our anti-fraud capabilities, focusing on threats posed by new and existing technologies, and have delivered
a comprehensive fraud training programme across the bank.
• We continued to invest in the use of artificial intelligence ('AI') and advanced analytics techniques to manage financial crime risk, and
we published our principles for the ethical use of Big Data and AI.
• We continued to work on strengthening our ability to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. In particular, we focused on the
use of technology to enhance our risk management processes whilse minimising the impact to the customer. We also continued to
develop our approach of intelligence led financial crime risk management, in part, through enhancements to our automated transaction
monitoring systems.
We are committed to working in partnership with the wider industry and the public sector in managing financial crime risk, protecting the
integrity of the financial system, and helping to protect the communities we serve. We are a strong advocate of public-private partnerships
and participate in a number of information-sharing initiatives around the world.
The Group have been an advocate for a more effective international framework for managing financial crime risk, whether through
engaging directly with intergovernmental bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force, the global money laundering and terrorist
financing watchdog, or via our key role in industry groups such as the Wolfsberg Group and the Institute of International Finance.
87#
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Overview
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from business decisions informed by models, which can be exacerbated
by errors in methodology, design or the way they are used. Model risk arises in both financial and non-financial contexts
whenever business decision making includes reliance on models.
We reviewed the model governance arrangements overseeing model risk, resulting in a range of enhancements to the
underlying structure to improve effectiveness and increase business engagement.
We worked with the businesses and functions to develop the Model Risk Control Assessments based on the new model risk
controls in the Risk Control Library.
The consequences of Covid-19 on HKFRS 9 model performance and reliability has resulted in enhanced monitoring of
those models and related model adjustments. Dramatic changes to model inputs such as GDP and unemployment rates have
made the model results less reliable. As a result, greater reliance has been placed on management underlays/overlays based
on business judgement to derive expected credit losses.
We regularly review our model risk management policies and procedures, and require the first line of defence to
demonstrate comprehensive and effective model risk controls.
We report on model risk to RMM on a regular basis. We also review the effectiveness of our model oversight structure to
ensure appropriate understanding and ownership of model risk is embedded in the businesses and functions.
88
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The majority of the risk in the insurance business derives from manufacturing activities and can be categorised as insurance risk and financial
risk. Financial risks include market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. Insurance risk is the risk, other than financial risk, of loss transferred
from the holder of the insurance contract to the insurer.
We operate an integrated bancassurance model which provides insurance products principally for customers with whom we have a banking
relationship. The insurance contracts we sell relate to the underlying needs of our banking customers, which we can identify from our point-of-
sale contacts and customer knowledge. The majority of sales are of savings and investment products.
By focusing largely on personal and SME lines of business we are able to optimise volumes and diversify individual insurance risks.
We choose to manufacture these insurance products in a Group subsidiary based on an assessment of operational scale and risk appetite.
Manufacturing insurance allows us to retain the risks and rewards associated with writing insurance contracts by keeping part of the
underwriting profit and investment income within the Group. It also reduces distribution costs for our products by using our established branch
network and direct channels, and enables us to control the quality of the sale process and the products themselves to ensure our customers
receive products which address their specific needs at the best value.
Where we do not have the risk appetite or operational scale to be an effective insurance manufacturer, we engage with a handful of leading
external insurance companies in order to provide insurance products to our customers through our banking network and direct channels. These
arrangements are generally structured with our exclusive strategic partners and earn the Group a combination of commissions, fees and a share
of profits. We distribute insurance products in Hong Kong, China and Macau.
Insurance products are sold through all global businesses, but predominantly by WPB and CMB through our branches and direct channels.
Governance
Insurance risks are managed to a defined risk appetite, which is aligned to the Group's risk appetite and enterprise risk management framework
(including the three lines of defence model). The Insurance Risk Management Meeting oversees the control framework and is accountable to
the Group Risk Management Meeting on risk matters relating to insurance business.
The monitoring of the risks within the insurance operations is carried out by the Insurance Risk teams. Specific risk functions, including
wholesale credit & market risk, operational risk, information security risk and financial crime compliance, support Insurance Risk teams in
their respective areas of expertise.
Measurement
The risk profile of our insurance manufacturing businesses is measured using an economic capital ('EC') approach. Assets and liabilities are
measured on a market value basis and a capital requirement is defined to ensure that there is a less than 1 in 200 chance of insolvency over a
one year time horizon, given the risks that the businesses are exposed to. The methodology for the economic capital calculation is largely
aligned to the pan-European Solvency II insurance capital regulation. The EC coverage ratio (economic net asset value divided by the
economic capital requirement) is a key risk appetite measure. Management has set out the risk appetite and tolerance level in which
management actions are required. In addition to EC, the regulatory solvency ratio is also a metric used to manage risk appetite on an entity
basis.
89
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following table shows the composition of assets and liabilities by contract type.
2020
Financial assets:
- financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss 199 20,419 - 20,618
- derivative financial instruments - 439 - 439
- financial investments - 116,983 6,177 123,160
- other financial assets 39 8,122 263 8,424
Total financial assets 238 145,963 6,440 152,641
Reinsurance assets - 5,714 - 5,714
Present value of in-force
long-term insurance contracts - - 22,551 22,551
Other assets - 6,203 1,313 7,516
Total assets 238 157,880 30,304 188,422
2019
Financial assets:
- financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss 198 18,350 - 18,548
- derivative financial instruments - 357 - 357
- financial investments - 99,723 6,792 106,515
- other financial assets 10 6,093 622 6,725
Total financial assets 208 124,523 7,414 132,145
Reinsurance assets - 8,791 - 8,791
Present value of in-force
long-term insurance contracts - - 20,469 20,469
Other assets - 6,378 1,555 7,933
Total assets 208 139,692 29,438 169,338
1
Comprises life insurance contracts and investment contracts
2
Comprises shareholder assets and liabilities
90
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Stress testing forms a key part of the risk management framework for the insurance business. We participate in regulatory stress tests, including
the Bank of England stress test of the banking system, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority stress test, and Hong Kong Insurance Authority
stress test. These have highlighted that a key risk scenario for the insurance business is a prolonged low interest rate environment. In order to
mitigate the impact of this scenario, the insurance subsidiary has a range of strategies that could be employed including the hedging of
investment risk, repricing current products to reflect lower interest rates, improving risk diversification, moving towards less capital intensive
products.
The key risks for the insurance operations are market risks (in particular interest rate and equity), credit risks and liquidity risks, followed by
insurance underwriting risk and operational risks.
Market risk is the risk of changes in market factors affecting the Group’s capital or profit. Market factors include interest rates, equity and
growth assets, spread risk and foreign exchange rates.
Our exposure varies depending on the type of contract issued. Our most significant life insurance products are insurance contracts with
discretionary participating features ('DPF') issued in Hong Kong. These products typically include some form of capital guarantee or
guaranteed return, on the sums invested by the policyholders, to which discretionary bonuses are added if allowed by the overall performance
of the funds. These funds are primarily invested in bonds with a proportion allocated to other asset classes, to provide customers with the
potential for enhanced returns.
DPF products expose the Group to the risk of variation in asset returns, which will impact our participation in the investment performance. In
addition, in some scenarios the asset returns can become insufficient to cover the policyholders' financial guarantees, in which case the shortfall
has to be met by the Group. Allowances are made against the cost of such guarantees, calculated by stochastic modelling.
For unit-linked contracts, market risk is substantially borne by the policyholders, but some market risk exposure typically remains as fees
earned are related to the market value of the linked assets.
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiary has market risk mandates which specify the investment instruments in which they are permitted to
invest and the maximum quantum of market risk which they may retain. They manage market risk by using, amongst others, some or all of the
techniques listed below, depending on the nature of the contracts written:
- for products with DPF, adjusting dividends to manage the liabilities to policyholders. The effect is that a significant portion of the market
risk is borne by the policyholders;
- asset and liability matching where asset portfolios are structured to support projected liability cash flows. The Group manages its assets using
an approach that considers asset quality, diversification, cash flow matching, liquidity, volatility and target investment return. It is not always
possible to match asset and liability durations due to uncertainty over the receipt of all future premiums and the timing of claims; and also
because the forecast payment dates of liabilities may exceed the duration of the longest dated investments available. We use models to assess
the effect of a range of future scenarios on the values of financial assets and associated liabilities, and ALCO reviews and decides on
appropriate asset holdings and investment strategy in supporting liabilities;
- using derivatives to protect against adverse market movements or better support liability cash flows;
- for new products with investment guarantees, considering the cost when determining the level of premiums or the price structure;
- periodically reviewing products identified as higher risk, which contain investment guarantees and embedded optionality features linked to
savings and investment products for active management;
- designing new products to mitigate market risk, such as changing the investment return sharing portion between policyholders and the
shareholder, using Terminal Bonus feature instead of annual dividend, lower the level of guaranteed returns, etc;
- exiting, to the extent possible, investment portfolios whose risk is considered unacceptable; and
91
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following table illustrates the effects of selected interest rate, equity price and foreign exchange rate scenarios on our profit for the year and
the total shareholders' equity of our insurance operation.
2020 2019
Impact on profit after tax Impact on profit after tax and
and shareholders' equity shareholders' equity
Where appropriate, the effects of the sensitivity tests on profit after tax and total equity incorporate the impact of the stress on the PVIF. The
relationship between the profit and total equity and the risk factors is non-linear and nonsymmetrical, therefore the results disclosed should not
be extrapolated to measure sensitivities to different levels of stress. The sensitivities reflect the established risk sharing mechanism with
policyholders for participating products, and are stated before allowance for management actions which may mitigate the effect of changes in
the market environment. The sensitivities presented do not allow for adverse changes in policyholder behaviour that may arise in response to
changes in market rates.
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty fails to meet their obligation under a contract. It arises in two main areas
for our insurance manufacturing subsidiary:
- risk associated with credit spread volatility and default by debt security counterparties after investing premiums to generate a return for
policyholders and shareholders; and
- risk of default by reinsurance counterparties and non-reimbursement for claims made after ceding insurance risk.
The amounts outstanding at the balance sheet date in respect of these items are mainly reflected as 'financial investments' and 'reinsurance
assets' in the table of 'Balance sheet of insurance manufacturing subsidiary by type of contract' under 'Insurance manufacturing operation risk'
section.
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiary is responsible for the credit risk, quality and performance of their investment portfolios. Our
assessment of the creditworthiness of issuers and counterparties is based primarily upon internationally recognised credit ratings and other
publicly available information. Investment credit exposures are monitored against limits by our insurance manufacturing subsidiary. Stress
testing is performed on the investment credit exposures using credit spread sensitivities and default probabilities is included in the stress and
scenario testing as described above.
We use tools to manage and monitor credit risk. These include a credit report which contains a watch-list of investments with current credit
concerns to identify investments which may be at risk of future impairment or where high concentrations to counterparties are present in the
investment portfolio.
Impairment is calculated in three stages and financial assets are allocated into one of the three stages where the transfer mechanism depends on
whether there is a significant increase in credit risk between its initial recognition and the relevant reporting period. After the allocation, the
measurement of ECL, which is the product of PD, LGD and EAD, will reflect the risk of default occurring over the remaining life of the
instruments. Note 2(j) of the financial statements set out the details on related accounting policy.
Credit risk on assets supporting unit-linked liabilities is predominantly borne by the policyholders; therefore our exposure is primarily assets
related to liabilities under non-linked insurance and investment contracts and shareholders’ funds.
The credit quality of the reinsurers' share of liabilities under insurance contracts is assessed as 'strong' (as defined on 'Credit quality
classification' under 'Credit risk' section), with 0% of the exposure being past due nor impaired (2019: 0%). The credit quality of financial
assets is included under the Credit Risk section. The risk associated with credit spread volatility is to a large extent migrated by holding debt
securities to maturity, and sharing a degree of credit spread experience with policyholders.
92
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Liquidity risk is the risk that an insurance operation, though solvent, either does not have sufficient financial resources available
to meet its obligations when they fall due, or can secure them only at excessive cost.
Risk is managed by cashflow matching and maintaining sufficient cash resources; investing in high-credit-quality investments
with deep and liquid markets, monitoring investment concentrations and restricting them where appropriate and establishing
committed contingency borrowing facilities.
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiary is required to complete quarterly liquidity risk reports and an annual review of the
liquidity risks to which they are exposed.
The following table shows the expected undiscounted cash flows for insurance contract liabilities at 31 December 2020.
2020
2019
The remaining contractual maturity of investment contract liabilities is included in the table on note 21 of the financial
statements.
Insurance risk
Insurance risk is the risk of loss through adverse experience, in either timing or amount, of insurance underwriting parameters
(non-economic assumptions). These parameters include mortality, morbidity, longevity, lapses and unit costs. The principal risk
we face is that, over time, the cost of the contract, including claims and benefits may exceed the total amount of premiums and
investment income received. The table of 'Balance sheet of insurance manufacturing subsidiary by type of contract' under
'Insurance manufacturing operation risk' section analyses our life insurance risk exposures by type of contract under 'liabilities
under insurance contracts'.
The Group's insurance manufacturing subsidiary primarily uses the following techniques to manage and mitigate insurance risk:
- a formalised product approval process covering product design, pricing and overall proposition management (for example,
management of lapses by introducing surrender charges);
- underwriting policy;
- claims management processes; and
- reinsurance which cedes risks above our acceptable thresholds to an external reinsurer thereby limiting our exposure.
93
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The following table shows the sensitivity of profit and total equity to reasonably possible changes in non-economic assumptions:
2020 2019
Effect on profit after tax and total equity at 31 Dec
10 per cent increase in mortality and/or morbidity rates (100) (57)
10 per cent decrease in mortality and/or morbidity rates 99 57
10 per cent increase in lapse rates (92) (68)
10 per cent decrease in lapse rates 100 75
10 per cent increase in expense rates (63) (52)
10 per cent decrease in expense rates 63 53
Mortality and morbidity risk is typically associated with life insurance contracts. The effect on profit of an increase in mortality
or morbidity depends on the type of business being written.
Sensitivity to lapse rates depends on the type of contracts being written. In general, for life insurance contracts a policy lapse has
two offsetting effects on profits, which are the loss of future income on the lapsed policy and the existence of surrender charge
recouped at policy lapse. The net impact depends on the relative size of these two effects which varies with the type of contracts.
Expense rate risk is the exposure to a change in the cost of administering insurance contracts. To the extent that increased
expenses cannot be passed on to policyholders, an increase in expense rates will have a negative effect on our profits.
In calculating PVIF, expected cash flows are projected after adjusting for a variety of assumptions made by insurance operation
to reflect local market conditions and management’s judgement of future trends, and after applying risk margins to reflect any
uncertainty in the underlying assumptions. Variations in actual experience and changes to assumptions can contribute to volatility
in the results of the insurance business.
Actuarial Control Committee meets on a quarterly basis to review and approve assumptions proposed for use in the determination
of the PVIF. All changes to non-economic assumptions, economic assumptions that are not observable and model methodology
must be approved by the Actuarial Control Committee.
Economic assumptions are either set in a way that is consistent with observable market values or, in certain markets is made of
long-term economic assumptions. Setting such assumptions involves the projection of long-term interest rates and the time
horizon over which observable market rates trend towards these long-term assumptions. The assumptions are informed by
relevant historical data and by research and analysis performed by internal and external experts, including regulatory bodies. The
valuation of PVIF will be sensitive to any changes in these long-term assumptions in the same way that it is sensitive to observed
market movements, and the impact of such changes is included in the sensitivities presented below.
The Group sets the risk discount rate applied to the PVIF calculation by starting from a risk-free rate curve and adding explicit
allowances for risks not reflected in the best estimate cash flow modelling. Where shareholders provide options and guarantees to
policyholders the cost of these options and guarantees is an explicit reduction to PVIF.
Economic assumptions
The following table shows the impact on the PVIF at balance sheet date of reasonably possible changes in the main economic and
business assumptions:
2020 2019
94
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
Non-economic assumptions
PVIF are determined by reference to non-economic assumptions, including mortality and/or morbidity, lapse rates and expense
rates. The following table illustrates the impact on the PVIF of the changes in key variables:
2020 2019
The impact on PVIF shown above is illustrative only and employ simplified scenarios. It should be noted that the effects may not
be linear and therefore the results cannot be extrapolated. The sensitivities reflect the established risk sharing mechanism with
policyholders for participating products, but do not incorporate other actions that could be taken by management to mitigate
effects nor do they take into account the consequential changes in policyholders' behaviour.
The process used to determine the assumptions is intended to result in stable and prudent estimates of future outcome. This is
achieved by adopting relatively conservative assumptions which can withstand a reasonable range of fluctuation of actual
experience. Annual review of the relevant experience is performed to assess the adequacy of margin between the assumptions
adopted and the best estimate of future outcome. The assumptions that are considered include expenses and the probability of
claims. Discount rate is determined by the risk free rate for both historical and new reinvestment rates.
For non-linked life business, the policy reserve is generally calculated on a modified net premium basis. The net premium is the
level of premium payable over the premium payment period whose discounted value at the outset of the policy would be
sufficient to exactly cover the discounted value of the original guaranteed benefits at maturity or at death if earlier. The net
premium is then modified to allow for deferral of acquisition costs. The policy reserve is then calculated by subtracting the
present value of future modified net premiums from the present value of the benefits guaranteed at maturity or death up to the
balance sheet date, subject to a floor of the cash value. The modified net premium basis makes no allowance for voluntary
discontinuance by policyholders as this would generally result in a reduced level of policy reserve.
For linked life business, the policy reserve is generally determined as the total account balance of all in-force policies with an
additional provision for the unexpired insurance risk.
Assumptions
The principal assumptions underlying the calculation of the policy reserve are:
(i) Mortality
A base mortality table which is most appropriate for each type of contract is selected. An adjustment is included to reflect the
Group’s own experience with an annual investigation performed to ascertain the appropriateness of overall assumption.
(ii) Morbidity
The morbidity incidence rates, which mainly cover major illness and disability, are generally derived from the reinsurance costs
which also form the pricing basis. A loading is generally added as a provision for adverse deviation. An annual investigation is
performed to ascertain the appropriateness with the Group’s insurance subsidiary’s actual experience.
Rate of interest
2020 2019
Under the modified net premium method, the long-term business provision is sensitive to the interest rate used when discounting.
95
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Risk (continued)
The Group’s insurance subsidiary re-runs its valuation models on various bases. An analysis of sensitivity around various
scenarios provides an insight to the key risks which the Group’s insurance subsidiary is exposed to. The table presented below
demonstrates the sensitivity of insured liability estimates to particular movements in assumptions used in the estimation process.
Certain variables can be expected to impact on life insurance liabilities more than others, and consequently a greater degree of
sensitivity to these variables may be expected.
The following table illustrates the impact on the policy reserves of the changes in key variables:
2020 2019
Change Impact on the policy reserves Impact on the policy reserves
in variable
%
Discount rate +1 (6,269) (4,987)
Discount rate -1 18,541 17,061
Mortality/Morbidity +10 497 274
Mortality/Morbidity -10 (417) (177)
The analysis above has been prepared for a change in variable with all other assumptions remaining constant and ignores changes
in values of the related assets.
For the sensitivity in discount rate, an absolute +/-1% of the discount rate is used. For the Mortality/ Morbidity sensitivity, a
relative +/-10% (i.e. multiply the assumption by 110% or 90%) is used.
96
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
(Figures expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars unless otherwise indicated)
Capital Management
(audited)
The Group’s objective for managing capital is to maintain a strong capital base to support the development of its business and to
meet regulatory capital requirements at all times. The Group recognises the impact of different level of equity capital on shareholder
returns and seeks to maintain a prudent balance between advantages and flexibility provided by a strong capital position and higher
returns on equity through greater leverage.
An annual Group capital plan is prepared and approved by the Board with the objectives of maintaining an optimal amount of
capital and a suitable mix between different components of capital. The Group manages its own capital within the context of the
approved annual capital plan, which determines the level of risk-weighted asset ('RWA') growth as well as the optimal amount and
components of capital required to support planned business growth. As part of the Group’s capital management policy, subsidiary
with capital generated in excess of planned requirement will return to the Bank, normally by way of dividends. The Group also
raised subordinated debt in accordance with HSBC Group’s guidelines regarding market and investor concentration, cost, market
conditions, timing and maturity profile.
The Bank is primarily a provider of equity capital to its subsidiaries. These investments are substantially funded by the Bank’s own
capital and profit. The Bank seeks to maintain a prudent balance between the composition of its capital and that of its investment in
subsidiaries.
The principal forms of capital are included in the following balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheet: share capital, retained
profits, other equity instruments and other reserves. Capital also includes impairment allowances and regulatory reserve for general
banking risks as allowed under Banking (Capital) Rules.
The HKMA supervises the Group on a consolidated and solo-consolidated basis and, as such, receives information on the capital
adequacy of, and sets capital requirements for, the Group as a whole. Individual banking subsidiaries are directly regulated by their
local banking supervisors, who set and monitor their capital adequacy requirements. Certain non-banking financial subsidiaries are
also subject to the supervision and capital requirements of local regulatory authorities.
The Group uses the advanced internal ratings-based approach ('IRB') to calculate its credit risk for the majority of its non-
securitisation exposures. For counterparty credit risk, the Group uses the current exposure method to calculate its default risk
exposures. For market risk, the Group uses an internal models approach to calculate its general market risk for the risk categories of
interest rate and foreign exchange (including gold) exposures and the standardised (market risk) approach for calculating other
market risk positions. For operational risk, the Group uses the standardised (operational risk) approach to calculate its operational
risk.
During the year, the Group has complied with all of the externally imposed capital requirements by the HKMA.
Basel III
(unaudited)
The Basel III capital rules set out the minimum CET1 capital requirement of 4.5% and total capital requirement of 8%.
The Banking (Capital) (Amendment) Rules 2014 came into effect on 1 January 2015 to implement the Basel III capital buffer
requirements in Hong Kong. The requirements were phased-in from 2016 to 2019, in line with the Basel phase-in arrangements, and
reached full implementation in 2019. At 31 December 2020, the capital buffers applicable to the Group include the Capital
Conservation Buffer ('CCB'), the Countercyclical Capital Buffer ('CCyB') and the Higher Loss Absorbency ('HLA') requirements
for Domestic Systemically Important Banks ('D-SIB'). The CCB is designed to ensure banks build up capital outside periods of
stress at 2.5%. The CCyB is set on an individual country basis and is built up during periods of excess credit growth to protect
against future losses. On 16 March 2020, the HKMA reduced the CCyB for Hong Kong to 1.0% from 2.0% with immediate effect.
On 30 December 2020, the HKMA maintained the D-SIB designation as well as HLA requirement at 1% for the Group.
97
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
The HKMA has classified the Bank as a material subsidiary of HSBC’s Asian resolution group in 2019 and required the Bank to
comply with internal loss-absorbing capacity requirements under the Financial Institutions (Resolution) (Loss-absorbing Capacity
Requirements – Banking Sector) Rules, with phased implementation periods starting from 1 July 2019.
Leverage ratio
(unaudited)
The leverage ratio was introduced into the Basel III framework as a non-risk-based backstop limit, to supplement risk-based capital
requirements. It aims to constrain the build-up of excess leverage in the banking sector, introducing additional safeguards against
model risk and measurement errors. The ratio is a volume-based measure calculated as Basel III tier 1 capital divided by total on-
and off-balance sheet exposures. The minimum leverage ratio requirement in Hong Kong is 3%.
Capital base
(unaudited)
The following tables show the capital base, RWAs and capital ratios as contained in the 'Capital Adequacy Ratio' return required to
be submitted to the HKMA by the Bank on consolidated basis as specified by the HKMA under the requirements of section 3C(1)
of the Banking (Capital) Rules. The basis is different from that for accounting purposes. Further information on the regulatory
consolidation basis is set out in the Banking Disclosure Statement that is available in the Regulatory Disclosures section of our
website www.hangseng.com.
The Bank and its subsidiaries maintain a regulatory reserve to satisfy the provisions of the Banking Ordinance and local regulatory
requirements for prudential supervision purposes. At 31 December 2020, the effect of this requirement is to restrict the amount of
reserves which can be distributed to shareholders by HK$1,323m (2019: HK$3,509m).
We closely monitor and consider future regulatory change and continue to evaluate the impact upon our capital requirements of
regulatory developments. This includes the Basel III reforms package, over which there remains a significant degree of uncertainty
due to the number of national discretions within Basel’s reforms. It remains premature to provide details of an impact although we
currently anticipate the potential for an increase for RWAs.
98
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
The following table sets out the composition of the Group’s capital base under Basel III at 31 December 2020 and 31 December
2019. A more detailed breakdown of the capital position and a full reconciliation between the Group’s accounting and regulatory
balance sheets can be viewed in the Banking Disclosure Statement in the Regulatory Disclosures section of our website
www.hangseng.com.
2020 2019
Common Equity Tier 1 ('CET1') Capital
Shareholders’ equity 145,915 143,026
- Shareholders’ equity per Consolidated Balance Sheet 183,100 178,810
- Additional Tier 1 ('AT1') perpetual capital instruments (11,744) (11,744)
- Unconsolidated subsidiaries (25,441) (24,040)
Non-controlling interests - -
- Non-controlling interests per Consolidated Balance Sheet 95 107
- Non-controlling interests in unconsolidated subsidiaries (95) (107)
AT1 Capital
Total AT1 capital before and after regulatory deductions 11,744 11,744
- Perpetual capital instruments 11,744 11,744
1 Includes the revaluation surplus on investment properties which is reported as part of retained profits and related adjustments made in
accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules issued by the HKMA.
99
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
The capital ratios on consolidated basis calculated in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules are as follows:
2020 2019
In addition, the capital ratios of all tiers as of 31 December 2020 would be reduced by approximately 0.8 percentage point after the
prospective fourth interim dividend payment for 2020. The following table shows the pro-forma basis position of the capital ratios
after the prospective interim dividend.
Pro-forma Pro-forma
2020 2019
Leverage ratio
(unaudited)
2020 2019
Detailed breakdown of the Group's leverage exposure measure and a summary comparison table reconciling the assets of the
Group’s accounting balance sheet with the leverage exposure measure using the standard templates as specified by the HKMA can
be viewed in the Banking Disclosure Statement in the Regulatory Disclosures section of our website www.hangseng.com.
100
Management Discussion and Analysis (continued)
Dividend policy
Objective
The Bank's medium to long term dividend objective is to maintain steady dividends in light of profitability, regulatory requirements,
growth opportunities and the operating environment. Its roadmap is designed to generate increasing shareholders' value through strategic
business growth. The Bank would balance solid yields with the longer-term reward of sustained share price appreciation.
Considerations
The declaration of dividends is made at the discretion of the Board, which will take into account all relevant factors including the
following:
• regulatory requirements;
• financial results;
• level of distributable reserves;
• general business conditions and strategies;
• strategic business plan and capital plan;
• statutory and regulatory restrictions on dividend payment;
• any other factors the Board may deem relevant.
Other financial information required under the Banking (Disclosure) Rules and Financial Institutions (Resolution) (Loss-absorbing
Capacity Requirements – Banking Sector) Rules can be viewed in the Banking Disclosure Statement that is available in the
Regulatory Disclosures section of our website www.hangseng.com.
101
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT
Hang Seng Bank Limited (the “Bank”) is committed to maintaining and upholding high standards of
corporate governance with a view to safeguarding the interests of shareholders, customers, employees
and other stakeholders. The Bank has followed the module on “Corporate Governance of Locally
Incorporated Authorised Institutions” (“CG-1”) under the Supervisory Policy Manual (“SPM”) issued
by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (“HKMA”). The Bank has also fully complied with all the code
provisions and most of the recommended best practices set out in the Corporate Governance Code
contained in Appendix 14 of the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited (“HKEx”) (the “Listing Rules”) throughout 2020.
Further, to ensure that it is in line with international and local corporate governance best practices, the
Bank constantly reviews and enhances its corporate governance framework by making reference to
market trend as well as guidelines and requirements issued by regulatory authorities. The Bank has also
implemented the “Subsidiary Accountability Framework” initiative introduced by the HSBC Group to
simplify the subsidiary oversight framework, and strengthen and enhance corporate governance; and
continued to embed “Ways of Working” Governance into Board and Board Committee governance to
enhance meeting effectiveness. Lastly, a comprehensive Subsidiary Governance Review was initiated
by the HSBC Group in 2020 for sharing of best governance practices, with full support of the Board.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board has collective responsibilities for promoting the long-term sustainability and success of the
Bank by providing entrepreneurial leadership within a framework of prudent and effective controls. In
doing so, the Board commits to high standards of integrity and ethics.
According to the Board’s terms of reference, specific matters reserved for the Board’s consideration and
decision include:
- appointment and oversight of senior management, and succession plans for the Board and senior
management
102
- policies, practices and disclosure on corporate governance and remuneration
The roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive of the Bank are complementary, but importantly, they
are distinct and separate with a clear and well established division of responsibilities. Details of their
respective roles are set out in the Board’s terms of reference.
The Chairman of the Board, who is an Independent Non-executive Director (“INED”), is responsible
for the leadership and effective running of the Board and for ensuring that decisions of the Board are
taken on a sound and well-informed basis and in the best interest of the Bank. In addition, as the
Chairman of the Board, he is also responsible for ensuring that all Directors are properly briefed on all
issues currently on hand and receive adequate, accurate and reliable information in a timely manner.
The Chairman possesses the requisite experience, competencies and personal qualities to fulfill these
responsibilities.
The Chief Executive, who is an Executive Director (“ED”), is responsible for implementing the strategy
and policy as established by the Board. The Chief Executive is also responsible for the management and
day-to-day running of the Bank’s business and operations, as well as leading and chairing the Executive
Committee.
Board Composition
As at the date of this Annual Report, the Board comprises 12 Directors, of whom two are EDs and 10
are Non-executive Directors (“NEDs”). Among the 10 NEDs, six are INEDs. There is a strong
independent element on the Board, to ensure the independence and objectivity of the Board’s decision-
making process as well as the thoroughness and impartiality of the Board’s oversight of the Management.
The Board possesses, both as individual Directors and collectively, appropriate experience,
competencies and personal qualities, including professionalism and integrity, to discharge its
responsibilities adequately and effectively. In addition, the Board collectively has adequate knowledge
and expertise relevant to each of the material business activities that the Bank pursues and the associated
risks in order to ensure effective governance and oversight.
Members of the Board, who come from a variety of different backgrounds, have a diverse range of
business, banking and professional expertise. Biographical details of the Directors, together with
information relating to the relationship among them, are set out in the section “Biographical Details of
Directors and Senior Management” in this Annual Report.
The Bank remains committed to meritocracy in the Boardroom, which requires a diverse and inclusive
culture where Directors believe that their views are heard, their concerns are attended to and they serve
in an environment where bias, discrimination and harassment on any matter are not tolerated. The Board
has adopted a Board Diversity Policy which has been made available on the Bank’s website
(www.hangseng.com) for better transparency and governance. Board appointments are based on merit
and candidates are considered against objective criteria, having due regard for the benefits of diversity
on the Board including, but not limited to, gender, age, cultural and educational background, ethnicity,
professional experience, skills, knowledge and length of service. The Board considers that its diversity,
including gender diversity, is a vital asset to the business.
103
The Board has also adopted a Nomination Policy which has been made available on the Bank’s website
(www.hangseng.com) to emphasise the Bank’s commitment on transparent nomination process in the
selection of candidates for Board appointment.
An analysis of the Board’s current composition is set out in the following chart:
No. of Directors
14
12
ED (2) Above 70 years old
(2)
56-90% (3) Over 20 years (3)
10
Female (5)
8 NED (4)
11-20 years (2)
61-70 years old
(6)
Chinese
6 (12)
100% (9)
The Bank has maintained on its website (www.hangseng.com) and on the website of HKEx
(www.hkexnews.hk) an updated list of its Directors identifying their roles and functions and whether
they are INEDs. INEDs are also identified as such in all corporate communications that disclose the
names of the Bank’s Directors.
Further, the Bank has received from each of the INEDs an annual confirmation of his/her independence.
The independence of the INEDs has been assessed in accordance with the guidelines set out in Rule
3.13 of the Listing Rules, and the SPM CG-1 issued by HKMA. Following such assessment, the Board
has affirmed that all the INEDs continue to be independent.
Board Process
Board meetings are held about six times a year and no less than once every quarter. Additional Board
meetings, or meetings of a Board committee established by the Board to consider specific matters, can
be convened, when necessary.
104
Schedule for the regular Board meetings in each year, together with the standing agenda for such
meetings, are made available to all Directors before the end of the preceding year. In addition, notice of
meetings will be given to all Directors at least 14 days before each regular meeting.
Other than regular meetings, the Chairman also meets with NEDs without the presence of EDs at the
end of each regular Board meeting, to facilitate an open and frank discussion among the NEDs on issues
relating to the Bank.
The Board meets with the representatives of HKMA annually to maintain a regular dialogue with the
regulator where HKMA shares with the Board their overall supervisory assessment of the Bank and key
supervisory focuses on the banking industry in general.
Meeting agenda for regular meetings are set after consultation with the Chairman and the Chief
Executive. All Directors are given an opportunity to include matters in the agenda.
Throughout 2020, the Bank has also continued to embed HSBC Group’s “Ways of Working”
Governance in Board and Board Committee governance to enhance meeting effectiveness. The new
methods of meeting management introduced by this meeting approach has proved to achieve a step
change in the quality and consistency of reporting. Better planning and inputs to meetings lead to better
discussions, and more agile and well-informed decision making, resulting in a more effective use of the
Board and Management time.
In addition, HSBC Group has initiated a comprehensive Subsidiary Governance Review of the Bank in
2020 for sharing of best governance practices, with the full support of the Bank’s Board of Directors.
The three themes of the Subsidiary Governance Review covered tenure and succession of Directors,
management and Board relationship and reporting quality, and the time spent by the Board on
considering strategy and top talents. The findings and recommendations from the Subsidiary
Governance Review were reported to the Board in November 2020. Highlights of the actions arising
from the Subsidiary Governance Review include succession planning for the Board and the
establishment of a robust and on-going board succession process; enhancement of quality, frequency
and timeliness of reporting to the Board to ensure that Management provides insightful and balanced
information and allows the Board sufficient opportunity to engage before decisions are required;
refreshing the NED training experience; and more closed NED session and strategy session.
Directors make their best efforts to contribute to the formulation of strategy, policies and decision-
making by attending the Board meetings in person or via telephone or video-conferencing facilities.
During 2020 and for the sake of health and safety under the prevailing pandemic, the Board and Board
Committees had mostly met by zoom conferencing facilities, with meeting papers uploaded onto an
electronic board portal.
Minutes of Board meetings with details of the matters discussed by the Board and decisions made,
including any concerns or views of the Directors, are kept by the Company Secretary and are open for
inspection by Directors.
In addition to the regular financial and business performance reports submitted to the Board at its regular
meetings, the Board also receives financial and business updates with information on the Bank’s latest
financial performance and material variance from the Bank’s annual operating plan during those months
where no Board meetings are held. Directors can therefore have a balanced and comprehensive
assessment of the Bank’s performance, business operations, financial position and prospects throughout
the year.
The Board reviews and evaluates its work process and effectiveness annually, with a view to identifying
areas for improvement and further enhancement. The Board also regularly reviews the time commitment
required from NEDs.
105
All Directors have access to the EDs as and when they consider necessary. They also have access to the
Company Secretary who is responsible for ensuring that Board procedures, and related rules and
regulations, are followed.
Under the Articles of Association of the Bank, a Director shall not vote or be counted in the quorum in
respect of any contract, arrangement, transaction or other proposal in which he/she or his/her associate(s),
is/are materially interested.
The Board has adopted a Policy on Conflicts of Interest. The Policy identifies the relationships, services,
activities or transactions in respect of which conflicts of interest may arise and sets out measures for
prevention or management of such conflicts. The Policy also contains an objective compliance process
for implementing the Policy, which includes notification by a Director of conflicts or potential conflicts,
and a review/approval process. In addition, the Policy also sets out provisions of the Board’s approach
to dealing with any non-compliance with the Policy.
The Board has been applying technology designed specifically around the Board to help the Directors
manage their time more efficiently, while staying connected to the Board and other Directors in order
to discharge their responsibilities effectively and securely.
During 2020, the Board held nine meetings (including one meeting with HKMA) and the important
matters discussed at Board meetings included:
106
Risk Management Governance
- risk appetite statement and framework for - HSBC Subsidiary Accountability
2020, with quarterly risk appetite profile Framework
update and semi-annual review of the risk
appetite statement - findings and recommendations from the
- risk management framework and risk Subsidiary Governance Review and update
governance structure on implementation progress
107
- annual review of the implementation of - succession planning for the Board and Senior
corporate values and business principles Management
Pursuant to the Bank’s Nomination Policy, the Bank uses a formal, considered and transparent procedure
for the appointment of new Directors. With the adoption of the Bank’s Nomination Policy, greater
demand has been imposed on the Board and/or the Nomination Committee on the independence and
board diversity, amongst other corporate governance issues for better board effectiveness and diversity.
Before a prospective Director’s name is formally proposed, opinions of the existing Directors (including
the INEDs) will be solicited. The proposed appointment will first be reviewed by the Nomination
Committee, taking into account the balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the Board. Upon
recommendation of the Nomination Committee, the proposed appointment will then be reviewed and,
if thought fit, approved by the Board after due deliberation. If necessary, the Bank may also engage
external search firm to assist in the sourcing and identification of appropriate candidates for Board
appointments.
Pursuant to Group policy, the Bank will conduct enhanced vetting for non-employee NEDs before
his/her appointment and thereafter once every three years, as one of the measures to verify the continual
fitness and propriety of the NEDs.
In accordance with the requirement under the Banking Ordinance, approval from HKMA will be
obtained for appointment of new Directors.
The Bank issues appointment letters to each NED, setting out the terms and conditions of their
appointment, including the time commitment expected of them. Additional time commitment is
necessary if the NEDs also serve on committee(s) of the Board.
All new Directors are subject to election by shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting (“AGM”)
after their appointments have become effective. Further, the Bank’s Articles of Association provide that
all Directors shall be subject to retirement by rotation at least once every three years. Retiring Directors
are eligible for re-election at AGMs of the Bank.
According to the policy on the term of appointment of NEDs, term of appointment of each NED is three
years except that where a NED has served on the Board for more than nine years, then his/her term of
appointment is one year. In renewing the term of appointment of each NED, the Board reviews whether
such NED remains qualified for his/her position.
Responsibilities of Directors
Directors have full and timely access to all relevant information about the Bank so that they can
discharge their duties and responsibilities as Directors. In particular, through regular Board meetings
and receipt of regular financial and business updates, all Directors are kept abreast of the conduct,
business activities and development, as well as regulatory updates applicable to the Bank.
108
There are established procedures for Directors to seek independent professional advice on matters
relating to the Bank where appropriate. All costs associated with obtaining such advice will be borne by
the Bank. In addition, each Director has separate and independent access to the Bank’s Management.
The Bank has adopted a Code for Securities Transactions by Directors on terms no less exacting than
the required standards set out in the Model Code for Securities Transactions by Directors of Listed
Issuers (set out in Appendix 10 to the Listing Rules) with periodic review. Specific enquiries have been
made with all Directors who have confirmed that they have complied with the Bank’s Code for
Securities Transactions by Directors throughout the year 2020.
Directors’ interests in securities of the Bank and HSBC Group as at 31 December 2020 have been
disclosed in the Report of the Directors set out in this Annual Report.
Appropriate Directors’ liability insurance cover has also been arranged to indemnify the Directors
against liabilities arising out of the discharge of their duties and responsibilities as the Bank’s Directors.
The coverage and the sum insured under the policy are reviewed annually. Further, the Bank’s Articles
of Association provide that Directors are entitled to be indemnified out of the Bank’s assets against
claims from third parties in respect of certain liabilities.
Induction programmes on the following key areas will be arranged for newly appointed Directors so
that they can discharge their responsibilities to the Bank properly and effectively:
Further, all Directors are provided with briefings and trainings on an on-going basis as necessary to
ensure that they have a proper understanding of the Bank’s operations and business, and are fully aware
of their responsibilities under the applicable laws, rules and regulations. Such briefings and trainings are
provided at the Bank’s expense. The Bank maintains proper records of the briefings and trainings
provided to and received by its Directors.
In addition, all Directors are provided with a “Memorandum of Directors”, which sets out the scope and
nature of Directors’ duties and liabilities, particulars of Group policies and local regulatory and statutory
requirements of which the Directors must be aware. Such memorandum is updated from time to time so
as to reflect the latest internal policies/guidelines, regulatory/statutory requirements, and best practices.
During the year, Directors received briefings and trainings on the following topics:
- New connected lending requirements under the Banking (Exposure Limits) Rules
- Data privacy workshop
- Impact of climate change on financial institutions
- Update on cyber security risk
- Insights on ESG and guideline on ESG reporting
- Update on interbank offered rate transition and reform
- Notifiable transactions and connected transaction rules
- Values and conduct
- Insider risk
- Competition law
109
To summarise, Directors received briefings and trainings on the following key areas to update and
develop their skills and knowledge during the year:
Training Areas
Directors Governance Regulatory Business/ Risk and Digital and
matters matters Management Control Technology
INEDs
Dr Raymond K F Ch'ien
Dr John C C Chan
Ms L Y Chiang
Ms Irene Y L Lee
Dr Eric K C Li
Mr Michael W K Wu
NEDs
Ms Kathleen C H Gan
Dr Vincent H S Lo
Mr Kenneth S Y Ng
Mr Peter T S Wong
EDs
Ms Louisa Cheang
Ms Margaret W H Kwan
110
DELEGATION BY THE BOARD
Board Committees
The Board has set up five Committees, namely, Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Risk
Committee, Remuneration Committee and Nomination Committee, to assist it in carrying out its
responsibilities.
Board
Executive Committee Audit Committee Risk Committee Remuneration Committee Nomination Committee
Ms Louisa Cheang Dr Eric K C Li* Ms Irene Y L Lee* Dr John C C Chan* Dr Raymond K F Ch’ien*
(Chairman) (Chairman) (Chairman) (Chairman) (Chairman)
Mrs Eunice Chan Ms L Y Chiang* Dr Eric K C Li* Ms L Y Chiang* Dr John C C Chan*
Ms Crystal P S Cheung Ms Irene Y L Lee* Mr Kenneth S Y Ng# Dr Raymond K F Ch’ien* Ms Louisa Cheang
Ms Rose M Cho Note 1 Mr Michael W K Wu* Ms Irene Y L Lee* Note 3
Ms Liz T L Chow Mr Peter T S Wong#
Ms Margaret W H Kwan Mr Michael W K Wu*
Mr Donald Y S Lam
Mr Gilbert M L Lee
Mr Andrew W L Leung
Mr Godwin C C Li
Mr Ryan Y S Song
Mr Christopher H K Tsang Note 2
Ms Elaine Y N Wang
Ms May M K Wong
Mr Chee Leong Yeo
* INEDs
# NEDs
Note 1
Ms Rose M Cho was appointed as Executive Committee member with effect from 16 January 2021.
Note 2
Mr Christopher H K Tsang was appointed as Executive Committee member with effect from 1 May 2020.
Note 3
Ms Irene Y L Lee was appointed as Nomination Committee member with effect from 28 December 2020.
Each of these Committees has specific written terms of reference, which set out in detail their respective
authorities and responsibilities. Each Committee reviews its terms of reference and effectiveness
annually. The terms of reference of all the Non-executive Board Committees have been made available
on the Bank’s website (www.hangseng.com).
All Committees adopt the same governance processes as the Board as far as possible and report back to
the Board on their decisions and recommendations on a regular basis.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee meets approximately nine times a year and operates as a general management
committee under the direct authority of the Board. It exercises the powers, authorities and discretions as
delegated by the Board in so far as they concern the management and day-to-day running of the Bank
in accordance with its terms of reference and such other policies and directives as the Board may
determine from time to time. The Executive Committee also sub-delegates credit, investment and capital
expenditure authorities to its members and the Bank’s senior executives.
111
To further enhance the Bank’s risk management framework and in line with best practices, the Bank has
set up a Risk Management Meeting, a risk meeting of the Executive Committee, to provide
recommendations and advice to the Bank’s Chief Risk Officer on enterprise-wide management of all
risks, policies and guidelines for the management of risk within the Group. Risk Management Meetings
are held not less than ten times each year. Minutes of Risk Management Meetings are provided to the
Executive Committee and the Risk Committee for review and oversight purpose.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee meets at least four times a year with the Bank’s executives including the Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Head of Audit, and representatives from the Bank’s external
auditor. The Committee reviews, among other things, the Bank’s financial reporting, the nature and
scope of audit reviews, the effectiveness of the systems of internal control and compliance relating to
financial reporting, and the operation and effectiveness of whistleblowing policies and procedures. The
Audit Committee is also responsible for making recommendations to the Board on the appointment, re-
appointment, removal and remuneration of the Bank’s external auditor. In addition, the Bank has
adopted HSBC Group’s HSBC Confidential whereby all staff members may report incidents of
improprieties on a strictly confidential and secured basis so that the same can be timely and thoroughly
investigated and appropriate actions can be taken promptly.
The Audit Committee reports to the Board following each Audit Committee meeting, drawing the
Board’s attention to significant issues or matters of which the Board should be aware, identifying any
matters in respect of which it considers that action or improvement is needed, and making relevant
recommendations.
During the year, the Audit Committee held four meetings and the major work performed by the
Committee was as follows:
- reviewed the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2019 and the related documents,
and internal control recommendations and audit issues noted by the Bank’s external auditor
- reviewed the interim financial statements for the six months ended 30 June 2020 and the related
documents, and the issues noted by the Bank’s external auditor
- reviewed and approved the quarterly banking disclosure statements for reporting periods ended
31 December 2019, 31 March 2020, 30 June 2020 and 30 September 2020
- reviewed the annual operating plan and capital plan for year 2020 and the revised internal capital
targets for 2020 and onwards
- reviewed the financial reporting risk update, which included the effectiveness of the Bank’s
internal control systems relating to financial reporting and the Bank’s financial and accounting
policies and practices, as well as the revised accounting standards and prospective changes to
accounting standards
- reviewed the significant policies and plans including, but not limited to, the Bank’s Recovery Plan
- reviewed the internal audit reports and discussed the same with the Management and Head of
Audit
- adopted the revised Internal Audit Plan and Internal Audit Charter for 2020, and reviewed the
resources arrangements, audit statistics, internal audit reports and key themes, and the progress
for the draft Annual Audit Planning for 2021
112
- reviewed the update on Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) implementation, internal control system
assessment and accounting reconciliations control certificates as of 31 December 2019 and 30
June 2020
- reviewed the adequacies of resources, qualifications and experience of staff of the Accounting and
Financial Reporting function and Internal Audit function, and their training programmes and
budgets
- reviewed the re-appointment, remuneration and engagement letter of the Bank’s external auditor,
its independence and objectivity, and the effectiveness of the audit process
- reviewed the report on whistleblowing cases in 2020 and the operation and effectiveness of the
whistleblowing arrangements
- reviewed the Audit Committee’s independence and effectiveness in discharging its role and
responsibilities, and its terms of reference
- approved the Audit Committee Certificate of the Bank and its subsidiaries
- endorsed the appointment of Audit Committee members of the Bank and its subsidiary
- reviewed the composition of the Audit Committees of the Bank and its subsidiaries
- escalated significant issues to the Audit Committee of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited
The Audit Committee also meets at least twice annually with the representatives of the Bank’s Head of
Audit and external auditor without the presence of the Management in accordance with its terms of
reference.
Risk Committee
The Risk Committee meets at least four times a year with the Bank’s executives including the Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Head of Audit, Head of Regulatory Compliance, Head of
Financial Crime Compliance, and representatives from the Bank’s external auditor. The Committee is
responsible for, among other things, the Bank’s high level risk related matters, risk appetite and tolerance,
risks associated with proposed strategic acquisitions or disposals, risk management reports from the
Management, effectiveness of the risk management framework and systems of internal control and
compliance (other than that regarding financial reporting), and appointment and removal of the Chief
Risk Officer.
Pursuant to HKMA’s Circular on “Bank Culture Reform”, the Board has also delegated to the Risk
Committee to encompass culture-related responsibilities. Such responsibilities include actions to
approve, review and assess, at least annually, the adequacy of any relevant statement which sets out the
Bank’s culture and behavioural standards.
The Risk Committee reports to the Board following each Risk Committee meeting, drawing the Board’s
attention to significant issues or matters of which the Board should be aware, identifying any matters in
respect of which it considers that action or improvement is needed, and making relevant
recommendations.
113
During the year, the Risk Committee held four meetings and the major work performed by the
Committee was as follows:
- reviewed the regular risk reports submitted by the Management including, but not limited to, risk
management framework, risk governance structure, internal control system assessment, risk
appetite statement and framework and profile update, risk profile papers (including risk maps and
top and emerging risks), regulatory compliance reports, annual plan and progress update relating
to financial crime compliance and regulatory compliance, and summary of HKMA’s regulatory
on-site examinations
- reviewed the enterprise wide risk assessment report, internal capital adequacy assessment process,
and endorsed the individual liquidity adequacy assessment process, credit approval authority
limits, and other significant policies and plans including, but not limited to, the Bank’s Recovery
Plan, Corporate Lending Policy, Contingency Funding Plan, Liquidity Management Policy,
Connected Lending Policy, Capital Management Policy, Large Credit Exposure Policy, Retail
Credit Risk Policy, New Product Approval Policy, Strategic Risk Management Policy, Third Party
Risk Policy, 2020 and 2021 Traded Risk Limits, Traded Risk Limit Amendment Policy,
Reputational Risk Management Policy, Model Risk Management Policy, HSBC Operational Risk
Management Framework, and Outsourcing Management Framework
- approved the annual plan of the Risk function for 2020 including risk priorities for 2020
- reviewed the report on the alignment of risk and remuneration, and outcome of incentivising
compliance for performance year 2019 variable pay
- reviewed the revised Internal Audit Plan and the Internal Audit Charter for 2020, and the resources
arrangements, audit statistics, internal audit reports and key themes, and the progress for the draft
Annual Audit Planning for 2021
- reviewed the adequacy of resources, qualifications and experience of staff of the Risk and
Compliance function, and their training programmes and budgets
- reviewed the report on whistle-blowing cases in 2020 and the operation and effectiveness of the
whistleblowing arrangements
- reviewed the update of cyber security risk and cyber resilience assessment framework, including
the target cyber resilience maturity
- reviewed the operational resilience programme, implementation status of BCBS 239 compliance,
development of data strategy, proactive country analytics investigations, and model risk
management
- reviewed the Risk Committee’s independence and effectiveness in discharging its role and
responsibilities, and its terms of reference
- approved the Risk Committee Certificate of the Bank and its subsidiaries
- reviewed the composition of the Risk Committees of the Bank and its subsidiaries
- reviewed the information cascaded from and escalated significant issues to the Risk Committee
114
of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
The Risk Committee also meets at least twice annually with the Bank’s Chief Risk Officer, Head of
Audit, and external auditor separately without the presence of the Management in accordance with its
terms of reference.
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee meets at least twice a year to consider and provide advice to the Board
on the remuneration policy and structure in order to underpin the Bank’s people strategy. Pursuant to
delegation by the Board, the Committee also considers and proposes for the Board’s approval the
remuneration packages of all EDs, senior management, key personnel and head of control functions. In
addition, it reviews at least annually and independently of the Management, the adequacy and
effectiveness of the Bank’s remuneration policy and its implementation, to ensure that the Bank’s
remuneration practices are consistent with relevant regulatory requirements and promotes effective risk
management.
In determining the bank-wide remuneration policy, the Remuneration Committee will take into account
the Bank’s business objective, people strategy, short-term and long-term performance, business and
economic conditions, market practices, conduct, compliance and risk control, in order to ensure that the
remuneration aligns with business and individual performance, promotes effective risk management,
facilitates retention of quality personnel and is competitive in the market. The Committee may invite
any Director, executive, consultant or other relevant party to provide advice in this respect, if necessary.
In 2020, the Committee has engaged an external consultant to undertake an independent review of the
Bank’s remuneration policy and its implementation for year 2020.
The Remuneration Committee reports to the Board following each Committee meeting, and draws to
the Board’s attention any significant issues, identify any action or improvement required, and makes
relevant recommendations.
During 2020, the Remuneration Committee held three meetings and the major work performed by the
Committee was as follows :
- endorsed the remuneration packages of Executive Directors, senior management, key personnel
and Heads of Control Functions of the Bank
- endorsed the proposed variable pay for 2019 and pay review proposal for 2020, and the update on
2020 performance and pay review process and changes to performance management
- endorsed the fees payable to Non-executive Directors and Committee Chairmen/Members of the
Bank and its subsidiaries
- reviewed the report on the alignment of risk and remuneration, and outcome of incentivising
compliance for performance year 2019 variable pay
reviewed and endorsed the revised remuneration policy for the Board’s approval
- approved the appointment of independent reviewer for the annual review of the Bank’s
remuneration policy and its implementation
- reviewed the outcome of the independent review by an external reviewer of the Bank’s
remuneration policy and remuneration system, and the adequacy and effectiveness of its
implementation
- reviewed the Remuneration Committee’s effectiveness in discharging its role and responsibilities,
and endorsed its revised terms of reference for the Board’s approval
115
- approved the Remuneration Committee Certificate of the Bank and its subsidiaries
- endorsed the remuneration packages for senior management and recommended to the Board for
approval
- reviewed the composition of the Remuneration Committees of the Bank and its subsidiary
- reviewed the information cascaded from and escalated significant issues to the Remuneration
Committee of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee meets at least twice a year. It leads the process for Board appointments and
identifies and nominates candidates for appointment to the Board, for the Board’s approval. Since 2019,
the Bank has adopted its Nomination Policy to ensure that proper selection and nomination processes
are in place for Board appointments. The Nomination Committee shall consider the candidates based on
merit having regard to the experience, skills, expertise as well as the overall Board diversity and shall
undertake adequate due diligence in respect of the candidates and make recommendations for the
Board’s consideration and, if thought fit, approval. If necessary, the Bank may also engage external
search firm to assist in the sourcing and identification of appropriate candidates for Board appointments.
The Nomination Policy is also available on the website of the Bank (www.hangseng.com). The Bank
will from time to time review the Nomination Policy and monitor its implementation to ensure its
compliance with regulatory requirements and good corporate governance practices.
The Committee also considers, among other things, the structure, size and composition of the Board and
Non-executive Board Committees, independence of INEDs, re-election of Directors, term of
appointment of NEDs, time commitment required from NEDs, appointment to Board Committees, and
approves the appointment to the position of “manager” as defined under the Banking Ordinance.
The Nomination Committee reports to the Board following each Committee meeting, drawing the
Board’s attention to significant issues or matters of which the Board should be aware, identifying any
matters in respect of which it considers that action or improvement is needed, and making relevant
recommendations.
During the year, the Nomination Committee held three meetings and the major work performed by the
Committee was as follows:
- reviewed the structure, size and composition of the Board and Non-executive Board Committees
- approved the role profile of the Chairman of the Board, and endorsed and recommended for the
Board’s approval the proposed new Chairman of the Board and changes to Board Committee
composition
- reviewed the succession planning for the Board and senior management
116
- reviewed the time commitment required from NEDs
- reviewed the Nomination Committee’s effectiveness in discharging its role and responsibilities,
and its terms of reference
117
Attendance Records
The attendance records of Board and Board Committee meetings held in 2020 are as follows:
Meetings held in 2020
Executive Audit Risk Remuneration Nomination
AGM Board Committee Committee Committee Committee Committee
Number of Meetings 1 9 11 4 4 3 3
Directors
Dr Raymond K F Ch’ien* 1/1 9/9 - - - 3/3 3/3
(Chairman)
Ms Louisa Cheang 1/1 9/9 10/11 - - - 3/3
(Vice-Chairman and
Chief Executive)
Dr John C C Chan* 1/1 9/9 - - - 3/3 3/3
Mr Nixon L S Chan# Note 4 1/1 2/2 - - - - -
*
Ms L Y Chiang 1/1 9/9 - 4/4 - 3/3 -
#
Ms Kathleen C H Gan 1/1 7/9 - - - - -
Ms Margaret W H Kwan 1/1 9/9 10/11 - - - -
* Note 5
Ms Irene Y L Lee 1/1 8/9 - 4/4 4/4 - -
Dr Eric K C Li* 1/1 9/9 - 4/4 4/4 - -
#
Dr Vincent H S Lo 1/1 9/9 - - - - -
#
Mr Kenneth S Y Ng 1/1 9/9 - - 4/4 - -
#
Mr Peter T S Wong 1/1 5/9 - - - - 2/3
*
Mr Michael W K Wu 1/1 9/9 - - 4/4 - 3/3
Senior Management
Mrs Eunice Chan - - 10/11 - - - -
Ms Ivy S P Chan Note 6
- - 6/6 - - - -
Ms Crystal P S Cheung - - 10/11 - - - -
Ms Liz T L Chow - - 10/11 - - - -
Mr Donald Y S Lam - - 11/11 - - - -
Mr Gilbert M L Lee - - 10/11 - - - -
Mr Andrew W L Leung - - 11/11 - - - -
Mr Godwin C C Li - - 11/11 - - - -
Mr Ryan Y S Song - - 9/11 - - - -
Mr Christopher H K Tsang Note7 - - 7/7
Ms Elaine Y N Wang - - 11/11 - - - -
Ms Daphne W K Wat Note8
- - 11/11 - - - -
Ms May M K Wong - - 11/11 - - - -
Mr Yeo Chee Leong Note 9 - - 11/11 - - - -
Ms Katie K C Yip Note 10 - - 3/4 - - - -
Average Attendance Rate 100% 94% 95% 100% 100% 100% 93%
* INEDs
# NEDs
118
Note 4
Mr Nixon L S Chan stepped down from the Board with effect from 22 May 2020.
Note 5
Ms Irene Y L Lee was appointed as Nomination Committee member with effect from 28 December 2020.
Note 6
Ms Ivy S P Chan ceased to be Executive Committee member with effect from 1 July 2020.
Note 7
Mr Christopher H K Tsang was appointed as Executive Committee member with effect from 1 May 2020.
Note 8
Ms Daphne W K Wat ceased to be Executive Committee member with effect from 16 January 2021.
Note 9
Mr Yeo Chee Leong was appointed as Executive Committee member with effect from 1 January 2020.
Note 10
Ms Katie K C Yip ceased to be Executive Committee member with effect from 1 May 2020.
The Bank’s remuneration policy is to reward competitively the achievement of long-term sustainable
performance, and attract and motivate the very best people, regardless of gender, ethnicity, age,
disability or any other factor unrelated to performance or experience with the Bank. The Bank also
recognises the right behaviours that are aligned to Group values and the long-term interests of the
stakeholders of the Bank.
Remuneration of Directors
The level of fees paid to NEDs is determined with reference to the Directors’ responsibilities and
commitment, and fees paid by comparable institutions.
As regards EDs, the following factors are considered when determining their remuneration packages:
- business objectives
- general business and economic conditions
- changes in appropriate markets such as supply/demand fluctuations and changes in competitive
conditions
- individual performance and contributions to the Bank
- right behaviours aligned with the Group values, culture and conduct expectation
- retention consideration and individual potential
The current scale of Director’s fees, and fees for chairmen and members of the Non-executive Board
Committees, namely, Audit Committee, Risk Committee, Remuneration Committee and Nomination
Committee, are set out below:
(HK$) (HK$)
Board of Directors Note 11
Remuneration Committee/ Nomination Committee
Chairman 860,000 Chairman 100,000
Non-executive Directors 660,000 Members 70,000
Audit Committee / Risk Committee
Chairman 400,000
Members 230,000
Note 11
In line with the remuneration policy of HSBC Group, no Director’s fee is payable to those Directors who are full time
employees of the Bank and its subsidiaries.
Information relating to the remuneration of Directors on a named basis for the year ended 31 December
2020 is set out in Note 14 to the Bank’s 2020 Financial Statements.
119
Remuneration of Senior Management and Key Personnel
There are 17 Senior Management members Note 12 and eight Key Personnel Note 13 in 2020. The aggregate
amount of remuneration Note 14 of the Senior Management and Key Personnel during the year, split into
fixed and variable remuneration, is set out below:
Note 12 Senior Management refers to those executives who are (a) EDs of the Bank; (b) Alternate Chief Executives of the
Bank; (c) Members of the Executive Committee of the Bank; and (d) Head(s) of the Bank’s principal
subsidiary/subsidiaries with offshore operations and with total assets representing more than 5% of the Bank’s total
assets.
Note 13 Key Personnel refers to employees classified as “Identified Staff and Material Risk Takers” (collectively referred as
“Material Risk Takers” or “MRTs”) under the UK Prudential Regulation Authority Remuneration Rules.
Note 14 Remuneration refers to all remuneration payable to employees during the year with reference to their tenure as Senior
Management and Key Personnel. The forms of variable remuneration and the proportion deferred are based on the
seniority, role and responsibilities of employees and their level of total variable compensation. As the total number
of Senior Management and Key Personnel involved is relatively small, to avoid individual figures being deduced
from the disclosure, aggregate figures are disclosed in this section.
Note 15 Number of employees disclosed above includes leavers who may have zero variable pay.
Note 16 No deferred variable remuneration had been reduced through performance adjustments in 2020 and 2019.
The aggregate amount of special payments of the Senior Management and Key Personnel awarded during
the year is set out below:
120
The aggregate amount of deferred and retained variable remuneration of Senior Management and Key
Personnel is set out below:
2020 2019
Deferred and retained remuneration Cash Shares Cash Shares
(HK$ ’000)
1 Total amount of outstanding deferred 25,404 27,811 19,423 34,359
remuneration Note 17 & 19
2 Of which: Total amount of outstanding deferred 25,404 27,811 19,423 34,359
and retained remuneration exposed to ex post
explicit and/or implicit adjustment
3 Total amount of amendment during the year due - (13,649) - (2,397)
to ex post implicit adjustments Note 20
4 Total amount of deferred remuneration paid out 6,484 22,116 6,376 20,070
in the financial year Note 18 & 19
Note 17 Outstanding, unvested, deferred remuneration is exposed to ex post explicit adjustments via malus.
Note 18 Paid and vested variable pay made to Material Risk Takers is subject to clawback.
Note 19 There is no reduction of deferred remuneration and retained remuneration due to ex post explicit adjustments during
2020 and 2019 via the application of malus and/or clawback.
Note 20 Outstanding, unvested, deferred shares are exposed to ex post implicit adjustments. The total value of these shares
was calculated based on the closing market share price of HSBC Holding plc (London) as at 31 December of the
respective financial years. HSBC’s share price was 36.0% lower as at 31 December 2020 when compared to that of
31 December 2019.
Other relevant remuneration disclosures are set out in Notes 14, 15 and 50(b) to the Bank’s 2020
Financial Statements.
Financial Reporting
The Board aims at making a balanced, clear and comprehensive assessment of the Bank’s performance,
position and prospects. An annual operating plan is reviewed and approved by the Board on an annual
basis. Reports on financial results, business performance and variances against the approved annual
operating plan are made available to the Board for review and monitoring on a monthly basis.
Strategic planning cycles are generally from three to five years. The Bank’s strategic plan for 2018 -
2020 was approved by the Board in November 2017. Progress of the implementation of the key
initiatives in the strategic plan is reported to and reviewed by the Board and Executive Committee on a
quarterly basis.
The annual and interim results of the Bank are announced in a timely manner within two months after
the end of the relevant year or period. Further, the Bank also publishes the Banking Disclosure
Statement on a quarterly basis pursuant to HKMA’s requirements, which provides additional financial
information to the public.
The Directors acknowledge their responsibilities for preparing the accounts of the Bank. As at 31
December 2020, the Directors were not aware of any material uncertainties relating to events or
conditions which may cast significant doubt upon the Bank’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Accordingly, the Bank’s Directors have prepared the financial statements of the Bank on a going-
concern basis.
121
The responsibilities of the external auditor with respect to financial reporting are set out in the
“Independent Auditor’s Report” attached to the Bank’s 2020 Financial Statements.
Internal Controls
The Board is responsible for internal control of the Bank and its subsidiaries and for reviewing its
effectiveness.
The Bank’s internal control system comprises a well-established organisational structure and
comprehensive policies and standards. Areas of responsibilities for each business and functional unit
are clearly defined to ensure effective checks and balances.
Procedures have been designed for safeguarding assets against unauthorised use or disposition; for
maintaining proper accounting records; and for ensuring the reliability of financial information used
within the business or for publication. The procedures provide reasonable but not absolute assurance
against material errors, losses or fraud. Procedures have also been designed to ensure compliance with
applicable laws, rules and regulations.
Systems and procedures are in place in the Bank to identify, control and report on the major types of
risks the Bank encounters. Business and functional units are responsible for the assessment of individual
types of risk arising under their areas of responsibilities, the management of the risks in accordance with
risk management procedures and the reporting on risk management. The Bank maintains an effective
risk management framework through the setting up of specialised management committees for the
oversight and monitoring of major risk areas and the establishment of risk management departments
under the relevant control functions of the Bank. Relevant risk management reports are submitted to
Asset and Liability Management Committee, Risk Management Meeting, Financial Crime Risk
Management Committee, Regulatory Compliance Risk Management Committee, Executive Committee,
and Risk Committee, and ultimately to the Board for oversight and monitoring of the respective types
of risk. The Bank’s risk management policies and major control limits are approved by the Board or its
delegated committees, and are monitored and reviewed regularly according to established policies and
procedures.
More detailed discussion on the policies and procedures for management of each of the major types of
risk the Bank encounters is set out in the sections “Risk Management” and “Capital Management” of
the “Management Discussion and Analysis” in this Annual Report.
Annual Assessment
A review of the effectiveness of the Bank’s internal control system covering all material controls,
including financial, operational, compliance, and risk management controls, is conducted annually. The
review at the end of 2020 was conducted with reference to the COSO (The Committee of Sponsoring
Organisations of the Treadway Commission) internal control framework, which assesses the Bank’s
internal control system against the five elements of control environment, risk assessment, control
activities, information and communication, and monitoring. The review results have been reported to
the Audit Committee, Risk Committee and the Board. The Board is satisfied that such system is effective
and adequate. In addition, the Bank, through the Audit Committee, has also reviewed the adequacy of
resources, qualifications and experience of staff of the Accounting and Financial Reporting functions,
and their training programmes and budget.
122
Framework for Disclosure of Inside Information
The Bank has put in place a robust framework for the disclosure of inside information in compliance
with the Securities and Futures Ordinance. The framework sets out the procedures and internal controls
for the handling and dissemination of inside information in a timely manner so as to allow all the
stakeholders to apprehend the latest position of the Bank and its subsidiaries. The framework and its
effectiveness are subject to review on a regular basis according to established procedures.
Internal Audit
The primary role of the Internal Audit function is to help the Board and the Management to protect the
assets, reputation and sustainability of the Bank. The Internal Audit function provides independent and
objective assurance as to whether the design and operational effectiveness of the Bank’s framework of
risk management, control and governance processes, as designed and represented by the Management,
is adequate.
The Bank has adopted a risk management and internal control structure, referred to as the “Three Lines
of Defence”, to ensure it achieves its commercial aims while meeting regulatory and legal requirements,
and its responsibilities to shareholders, customers and staff. The Internal Audit function’s role as the
third line of defence is independent of the first and second lines of defence. The Bank’s Head of Audit
reports to the Chairman and the Audit Committee.
An Internal Audit Charter is reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee periodically which has
detailed the purpose, organisation, authority, independence and objectivity, accountabilities and scope
of work, and standards of audit practices to govern the work of the Internal Audit function. Further, the
Internal Audit function also maintains a quality assurance and improvement programme that covers all
aspects of internal audit activity, including conformance with The Institute of Internal Auditors' (IIA)
Standards, applicable regulatory guidance and internal audit policies and procedures.
Results of audit work together with an assessment of the overall risk management and control framework
are reported to the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee as appropriate. The Internal Audit function
also reviews the Management’s action plans in relation to audit findings and verifies the adequacy and
effectiveness of the mitigating controls before formally closing the issue.
External Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers is the Bank’s external auditor. The Audit Committee is responsible for making
recommendations to the Board on the appointment, re-appointment, removal and remuneration of the
external auditor. The external auditor’s independence and objectivity, and the effectiveness of the audit
process are also reviewed and monitored by the Audit Committee on a regular basis.
During 2020, fees paid to the Bank’s external auditor for audit services amounted to HK$26.5 million,
compared with HK$23.5 million in 2019. For non-audit services, the fees paid to the Bank’s external
auditor amounted to HK$10.5 million, compared with HK$9.7 million in 2019. In 2020, the non-audit
service assignments covered by these fees included HKD$10.5 million for other assurance services.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the Board in meeting its responsibilities for ensuring effective systems of
internal control and compliance relating to financial reporting, and in meeting its financial reporting
obligations, as well as overseeing the implementation and effectiveness of whistleblowing policies and
arrangements.
123
Risk Committee
The Risk Committee assists the Board in meeting its responsibilities for ensuring effective systems of
risk management, internal control and compliance (other than that relating to financial reporting), in
meeting its risk governance obligations. The Risk Committee also advises and assists in the Board’s
review of the effectiveness of culture enhancement initiatives.
Effective Communication
The Bank attaches great importance to communication with shareholders. To this end, a number of
means are used to promote greater understanding and dialogue with the investment community. The
Bank holds group meetings with analysts in connection with the Bank’s annual and interim results. The
results announcements are also broadcast live via webcast. Apart from the above, designated senior
executives maintain regular dialogue with institutional investors and analysts to keep them abreast of
the Bank’s development, subject to compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. Including the
two results announcements, around a hundred meetings with analysts and fund managers were held in
2020. In addition, the Bank’s Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive, and Chief Financial Officer also
made presentations and held group meetings with investors at investor forums.
Further, the Bank’s website (www.hangseng.com) offers timely access to the Bank’s financial
information, announcements, circulars to shareholders and information on the Bank’s corporate
governance structure and practices. For efficient communication with shareholders and in the interest of
environmental preservation, shareholders are encouraged to browse the Bank’s corporate
communications on the Bank’s website, in the place of receiving printed copies of the same.
The AGM provides a useful forum for shareholders to exchange views with the Board. The Bank’s
Chairman, EDs, Chairmen of the Board Committees and NEDs are available at the AGM to answer
questions from shareholders about the business and performance of the Bank. In addition, the Bank’s
external auditor is also invited to attend the AGM to answer questions about the conduct of the audit,
and the preparation and contents of the auditor’s report. Separate resolutions are proposed at general
meetings for each substantial issue, including the re-election and election (as the case may be) of
individual Directors. For AGM held physically, an explanation of the detailed procedures of conducting
a poll will be provided to shareholders at the AGM, to ensure that shareholders are familiar with such
procedures.
The Bank’s last AGM was held on Friday, 22 May 2020 (“2020 AGM”) at Hang Seng Bank
Headquarters. In the interest of safety and wellbeing of the Bank’s shareholders, staff and other
members of the community amid the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank has adopted special
arrangements for the 2020 AGM, in order to minimise attendance in person, while still enabling
shareholders to vote and ask questions. The 2020 AGM was held with the minimum number of persons
present as is legally required to form a quorate meeting. The quorum was formed by directors and other
senior staff members who were shareholders. Shareholders were, however, able to view and listen to
the 2020 AGM through a live webcast of the AGM which could be accessed by going to the webcast link
provided on any browser enabled device. All resolutions at the AGM were decided on a poll.
Shareholders were still able to vote by doing so in advance of the AGM by appointing the chairman of
the AGM as their proxy to exercise their voting right in accordance with their instructions. Shareholders
were also enabled to express their views both before the AGM by submitting their questions to a
designated email account and during the AGM through the webcast link provided. All the resolutions
proposed at that meeting were approved by poll. Details of the poll results are available under the
section “Investor Relations” of the Bank’s website (www.hangseng.com).
124
The next AGM will be held in the second quarter of 2021, the notice of which will be sent to shareholders
at least 20 clear business days before the said meeting. Shareholders may refer to the section “Corporate
Information and Calendar” in this Annual Report for information on other important dates for
shareholders in year 2021.
Shareholder(s) holding not less than five percent of the total voting rights of all the members having a
right to vote may request to call an Extraordinary General Meeting of the Bank.
The requisition (a) must state the general nature of the business to be dealt with at the meeting, (b) must
be signed by the requisitionist(s), and (c) may either be deposited at the Bank’s registered office at 83
Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong in hard copy form or sent by email to
[email protected]. If the resolution is to be proposed as a special resolution, the requisition
should include the text of the resolution and specify the intention to propose the resolution as a special
resolution. The requisition may consist of several documents in like form, each signed by one or more
requisitionist(s).
The requisition must also state (a) the name(s) of the requisitionist(s), (b) the contact details of the
requisitionist(s), and (c) the number of ordinary shares of the Bank held by the requisitionist(s).
The Directors must proceed to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting within 21 days from the date
of receipt of the requisition. Such meeting should be held on a date not more than 28 days after the date
on which the notice convening the meeting is given.
If the Directors fail to convene the Extraordinary General Meeting as aforesaid, the requisitionist(s), or
any of them representing more than one-half of the total voting rights of all of them, may themselves
convene the meeting. Any meeting so convened shall not be held after the expiration of three months
from the date of the deposit of the requisition.
A meeting so convened by the requisitionist(s) shall be convened in the same manner, as nearly as
possible, as that in which meetings are to be convened by the Directors.
Any reasonable expenses incurred by the requisitionist(s) by reason of the failure of the Directors to
convene a meeting shall be reimbursed to the requisitionist(s) by the Bank.
Shareholders representing at least 2.5 percent of the total voting rights of all the members having a right
to vote, or, at least 50 shareholders who have a relevant right to vote, may:
For further details on shareholder qualifications, and the procedures and timeline, in connection with
the above, shareholders are kindly requested to refer to Sections 580 and 615 of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap 622, Laws of Hong Kong).
Further, a shareholder may propose a person other than a retiring Director of the Bank for election as a
Director of the Bank at a general meeting. For such purpose, the shareholder must send to the Bank’s
registered address (for the attention of the Bank’s Company Secretary) a written notice which identifies
the candidate and includes a notice in writing by that candidate of his/her willingness to be so elected.
Such notice must be sent within the seven-day period commencing on the day after the despatch of the
notice of the meeting, or such other period as may be determined by the Directors from time to time,
125
and ending no later than seven days prior to the date appointed for such meeting. Procedures for
shareholders to propose candidates for election as Director of the Bank are also available on the website
of the Bank (www.hangseng.com).
Shareholders may send their enquiries requiring the Board’s attention to the Bank’s Company Secretary
at the Bank’s registered address. Questions about the procedures for convening or putting forward
proposals at an AGM or Extraordinary General Meeting may also be put to the Company Secretary by
the same means.
The Bank has established a Shareholders Communication Policy to set out the Bank’s processes to
provide shareholders and the investment community with ready, equal and timely information on the
Bank for them to make informed assessments of the Bank’s strategy, operations and financial
performance, and to engage actively with the Bank. The said policy is available on the Bank’s website
(www.hangseng.com).
Dividend Policy
The Bank has formulated a Dividend Policy to set out the Bank’s medium to long term dividend
objective to maintain steady dividends in light of profitability, regulatory requirements, growth
opportunities and the operating environment. Its roadmap is designed to generate increasing
shareholders’ value through strategic business growth. The Bank would balance solid yields with the
longer-term reward of sustained share price appreciation. When declaring dividends, the Bank will, in
general, take into consideration factors including regulatory requirements, financial results, level of
distributable reserves, general business conditions and strategies, strategic business plan and capital plan,
statutory and regulatory restrictions on dividend payment, and any other factors the Board may deem
relevant. More detailed disclosure on the Bank’s Dividend Policy is set out in the section “Capital
Management” in this Annual Report.
The Bank’s material related party transactions are set out in Note 50 to the 2020 Financial Statements.
These transactions include those that the Bank has entered into with its immediate holding company and
its subsidiaries as well as its fellow subsidiary companies in the ordinary course of its interbank activities,
including the acceptance and placement of interbank deposits, corresponding banking transactions, off-
balance sheet transactions, and the provision of other banking and financial services.
The Bank uses the information technology services of, and shares an automated teller machine network
with, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, its immediate holding company. The
Bank also shares information technology and certain processing services with fellow subsidiaries. In
2020, the Bank’s share of the costs included HK$1,075 million for system development, HK$658
million for data processing, and HK$584 million for administrative services.
126
The Bank maintains a staff retirement benefit scheme for which a fellow subsidiary company acts as
trustee and the Bank’s immediate holding company act as administrator. As part of its ordinary course
of business with other financial institutions, the Bank also distributes retail investment funds for a fellow
subsidiary with a fee income of HK$35 million and markets Mandatory Provident Fund for its
immediate holding company during the year 2020 with a fee income of HK$137 million.
These transactions were entered into by the Bank in the ordinary and usual course of business on normal
commercial terms, and in relation to those which constituted connected transactions under the Listing
Rules, they also complied with applicable requirements under the Listing Rules. The Bank regards its
usage of the information technology services of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited (amount of information technology services cost incurred for 2020: HK$515 million) as
contracts of significance for 2020.
On 21 June 2019, Hang Seng Insurance Company Limited (“HSIC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Bank, renewed or amended and entered into the following agreements:
(i) A new management services agreement (“New Management Services Agreement”) with HSBC
Life (International) Limited (“INHK”) for a term of three years following the expiry of a previous
management services agreement on 21 June 2019.
Pursuant to the New Management Services Agreement, INHK, directly or through one or more of
its affiliates, provides certain management services to HSIC. Subsequently, the New Management
Services Agreement was amended and restated to effect minor amendments to the scope of
services provided by INHK with effect from 1 September 2019. INHK charges HSIC a fee for
the provision of the services on a fully absorbed cost basis plus a mark-up of 6%. These charges,
which are subject to an annual cap, were determined following negotiation on an arm’s length
basis and in accordance with the policy of the HSBC Group, which took into account the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development transfer pricing guidelines.
(ii) A new investment management agreement (“New Investment Management Agreement”) with
HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited (“AMHK”) for a term of three years
following the expiry of a previous investment management agreement on 21 June 2019.
Pursuant to the New Investment Management Agreement, AMHK acted as investment manager
in respect of certain of HSIC’s assets held from time to time. AMHK delegated to HSBC
Alternative Investments Limited (“HAIL”) the management of part of such assets by way of a
bespoke portfolio in accordance with a new specific management mandate (“New Specific
Management Mandate”) entered into between HSIC, AMHK and HAIL on 21 June 2019. On 23
December 2020, certain minor amendments were made to the New Specific Management Mandate
to expand the investment scope of alternative credits and specify that AMHK shall assist HAIL
by providing client servicing to HSIC on behalf of HAIL.
HSIC has agreed to pay AMHK, on a quarterly basis, a fee of between 0.05% and 0.5% per annum
of the mean value of the assets under management. Under the New Specific Management Mandate,
HSIC has also agreed to pay HAIL a fee of between 0.35% and 0.5% per annum before the
aforesaid amendments to the New Specific Management Mandate; or a fee of between 0.22% and
0.35% per annum after the aforesaid amendments, both of the aggregate value of assets under
management in a bespoke portfolio, together with a performance fee of 10% per annum payable
in certain circumstances in respect of the amount by which the return of such portfolio exceeded
a benchmark return of 8% (before the aforesaid amendments) or 5% (after the aforesaid
amendments) annually. The above fees, which are subject to an annual cap, were determined on
an arm’s length basis.
127
(iii) A new fund monitoring agreement (“New Fund Monitoring Agreement”) with HAIL for a term
of three years commencing from 22 June 2019 which superseded a previous fund monitoring
agreement entered into between HSIC and HAIL on 12 December 2016.
The New Fund Monitoring Agreement sets out the terms upon which HAIL has agreed to provide
services to HSIC in connection with the monitoring of the portfolios of certain funds into which
HSIC has invested and monitoring their respective fund managers. HSIC has agreed to pay HAIL
an annual amount equivalent to 0.04% per annum of the value of funds invested by HSIC in the
specified portfolio which are the subject of the monitoring services. The above fee, which is
subject to an annual cap, was determined on an arm’s length basis.
(iv) On 21 June 2016, HSIC entered into a private equity investment management agreement (“PE
Investment Management Agreement”) with HAIL for a term of 11 years, pursuant to which HAIL
acts as investment manager in respect of certain private equity fund investments made by HAIL
on behalf of HSIC.
Certain minor amendments had been made to the PE Investment Management Agreement on 4
May 2018, 10 May 2018, and 21 June 2019, and the PE Investment Management Agreement was
amended and restated to remove the retainer fee and increase the management fee cap.
HSIC has agreed to pay HAIL between 0.35% and 0.75% per annum of the aggregate value of
assets under management as an annual management fee on an aggregate basis, and in order to
ensure full alignment of interests between the two parties, a performance fee of 15% carried
interest if certain hurdle rates of return are achieved for HSIC in respect of the investments made
in each year of the investment period under the PE Investment Management Agreement. The
above fees, which are subject to certain fee caps, were determined on an arm’s length basis.
Pursuant to Rule 14A.52 of the Listing Rules, the term of an agreement for a continuing connected
transaction of a listed company must not exceed three years except in special circumstances. As
the term of the PE Investment Management Agreement is 11 years, the Bank, in compliance with
Rule 14A.52 of the Listing Rules, appointed an independent financial adviser to explain why the
PE Investment Management Agreement requires a term that is longer than three years and to
confirm that it is normal business practice for investment management agreements relating to
private equity investments to be of such duration. The explanation and confirmation by the
independent financial adviser were set out in the Bank’s announcement on 21 June 2016.
The New Fund Monitoring Agreement, on a standalone basis, is a “de minimis” continuing connected
transaction under Chapter 14A of the Listing Rules and is fully exempt from any reporting,
announcement, shareholders’ approval and annual review requirements under the Listing Rules.
However, the Bank considers that due to the similarity of the services provided under the New Fund
Monitoring Agreement, the New Investment Management Agreement, the New Specific Management
Mandate and the PE Investment Management Agreement, the fees payable by HSIC under these
agreements should be aggregated for the purposes of calculating the applicable percentage ratios under
the Listing Rules. As one or more of the applicable percentage ratios in respect of the annual caps for
the New Investment Management Agreement, the New Specific Management Mandate and the New
Fund Monitoring Agreement and the fee caps for the PE Investment Management Agreement, on an
aggregated basis, exceed 0.1% but are all less than 5%, these agreements are therefore only subject to
the reporting, announcement and annual review requirements under the Listing Rules.
Details of the terms of the New Management Services Agreement, the New Investment Management
Agreement, the New Specific Management Mandate, the PE Investment Management Agreement and
the New Fund Monitoring Agreement, and the relevant annual caps and fee caps were announced by the
Bank on 21 June 2019.
128
INHK, AMHK and HAIL are all indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of HSBC Group, the ultimate
controlling shareholder of the Bank, and therefore are connected persons of the Bank. Accordingly, all
of the aforesaid agreements constitute continuing connected transactions of the Bank. The Bank has
complied with the disclosure requirements in accordance with Chapter 14A of the Listing Rules.
For the year ended 31 December 2020, the aggregate amount paid and payable under the New
Management Services Agreement was approximately HK$41 million, whereas the aggregate amount
paid and payable under the New Investment Management Agreement and the New Specific
Management Mandate was approximately HK$36 million, both of which were within the annual caps
for the year ended 31 December 2020 of HK$227 million and HK$100 million respectively. The
management fee of approximately US$3,029,739 (equivalent to HK$23,485,416) was paid and payable
under the PE Investment Management Agreement for the year ended 31 December 2020, which was
within the annual cap on management fee of US$8,000,000 (approximately HK$62,400,000). No
performance fee was payable under the PE Investment Management Agreement for 2020. Further, for
the year ended 31 December 2020, the aggregate amount paid and payable under the New Fund
Monitoring Agreement was approximately US$46,469 (equivalent to HK$360,204), which was within
the annual cap of US$75,000 (equivalent to HK$585,000).
In respect of all the aforesaid agreements which constitute the Bank’s continuing connected transactions,
all the INEDs of the Bank have reviewed the said transactions and confirmed that the said transactions
have been entered into:
(a) in the ordinary and usual course of business of the Bank and its subsidiaries;
(b) on normal commercial terms or better; and
(c) in accordance with the relevant agreements governing the same on terms that are fair and
reasonable and in the interests of the shareholders of the Bank as a whole.
Further, the Bank engaged its external auditor to report on the continuing connected transactions of the
Bank and its subsidiaries in accordance with Hong Kong Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000
(Revised) “Assurance Engagements Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information”
and with reference to Practice Note 740 “Auditor’s Letter on Continuing Connected Transactions under
the Hong Kong Listing Rules” issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The
Directors confirmed that the external auditor has issued an unqualified letter containing their findings
and conclusions in respect of the continuing connected transactions set out in the preceding paragraphs
in accordance with Rule 14A.56 of the Listing Rules. A copy of the auditor’s letter has been provided
by the Bank to The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.
CULTURE
The Bank has a set of clear business principles and corporate values to guide the Bank in the decisions
it takes and how it operates. “Courageous Integrity” is the guiding principle for staff to speak up and to
do the right thing with no compromises to the Bank’s ethical standard and integrity. The Bank strives
for an inclusive culture that enables employees to fulfil their potentials. Leaders and managers are
expected to bring to life the corporate values of “Dependable, Open and Connected” in everyday work.
Three values-aligned behaviours (Accountability, Good Judgement and Speaking Up) underpin
effective financial crime risk management culture and good conduct outcomes. Ongoing management
effort is made to embed the corporate values and good conduct through (a) tone from the top; (b)
strengthening people management capability to build desired culture; and (c) incentivising and
showcasing desired behaviours.
129
A behavioural led culture change programme “RIGHT Together” was launched in 2019. The Bank
continues to embed culture actions with five behavioural focus in line with its corporate values and
business principles to enable the Bank to “Serving Customers RIGHT and Serving the RIGHT
Customers” for sustainable business growth.
To ensure the Bank operates to the highest standards of ethical conduct and professional competence,
all staff are required to strictly follow the Staff Code of Conduct. With reference to applicable regulatory
guidelines and other industry best practices, the Code sets out the ethical standard and values that all
staff will adhere to and covers various legal, regulatory and ethical issues. Topics including, but not
limited to, conduct in obtaining/granting business and business facilitation, use of information, personal
account dealings, conflicts of interest, expectations for personal relationship in the workplace, outside
activities, diversity and inclusion, alcohol and drugs, and behaviour expectations at work related
(including corporate and social) events are covered in the Code. The Code has also been updated in 2020
to encompass management accountability expectations for people managers.
The Bank uses various communication channels to periodically remind staff of the requirement to adhere
to the rules and ethical standards set out in the Code.
The Bank has established policies and procedures to manage actual or potential conflicts of interest of
its staff. Robust organisational structure has been designed to ensure adequate segregation of duties and
avoid conflicts of interest. Staff working in sensitive or high-risk areas are required to adhere to job-
specific as well as staff dealing rules and undergo training on the avoidance of conflicts of interest in
carrying out their duties.
HUMAN RESOURCES
The human resources policies of the Bank are designed to attract high calibre talents at all levels of the
Bank, develop and motivate them to excel in their careers, and uphold the Bank’s corporate values and
culture of service excellence.
Employee Statistics
As at 31 December 2020, the Bank’s total headcount was 9,563 representing a decrease of 768*, or -
7.4%, compared with a year earlier. The total headcount comprised 3,285 executives (46% are male and
54% are female), 4,188 officers (39% are male and 61% are female) and 2,090 clerical and non-clerical
staff (33% are male and 67% are female).
*Talents are the most important asset of the Bank. The emphasis for 2020 was to promote internal job
moves and serve internal development opportunities for staff. With continued adoption of technology
and process efficiency, productivity of staff has also been enhanced.
Employee Remuneration
The Bank aims to attract, motivate and retain the best people. The Bank’s reward strategy supports this
objective through rewarding those who are committed to a long-term career with the Bank with
demonstrated sustainable performance, strong alignment to corporate values and adherence to risk and
compliance standards.
130
The Remuneration Committee oversees the Bank’s overall remuneration strategy and ensures all the
reward policies are carefully considered in the context of business objective, people strategy,
commercial competitiveness, alignment of risk and reward and regulatory guidance. The fundamental
principles, philosophies and processes are documented in the Bank’s remuneration policy.
The Bank adopts a Total Compensation approach. In determining the total remuneration for employees,
fixed and discretionary variable pay are considered and differentiated by performance and adherence to
corporate values. The Bank will make reference to individual’s responsibility, capability and risk profile
of the job to ensure appropriate balance between the fixed pay and variable pay.
Fixed pay is determined by taking into account relevant level and composition of pay in the markets in
which the Bank operates. Salaries are reviewed in the context of business performance, individual
potential and performance, market practice, internal relativities and regulatory requirements.
Bank-wide variable pay budgets are determined based on the Bank’s business performance, people
strategy, risk appetite statement and risk metrics including conduct risks. The variable pay budget is
shaped by risk considerations and the Bank’s performance is sustainable in the long-term. The ex-ante
risk adjustment of remuneration within the Bank is achieved in the way that the Risk Committee of the
Bank will advise the Board and/or the Remuneration Committee, as appropriate, on the alignment of
risk appetite with performance objectives set in the context of variable incentive and on whether any
adjustments for risk need to be applied when considering performance objectives and actual
performance. In addition, the overall variable pay funding proposal is refined with reference to the
advice of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer in respect of the Bank’s financial position and
performance against its risk appetite profile.
Variable pay plans takes into account a combination of corporate and/or business results as well as the
individual’s performance. They reward financial quantitative measures and non-financial qualitative
measures including adherence to corporate values, management of risks, service standards, ethical
behaviour and responsible selling. To embed a values-led, high performance culture, the variable pay
plans are designed to recognise and reward positive behaviours while discourage negative behaviours
that put the Bank under unnecessary financial, regulatory or reputational risk with the application of
consequence management, malus and clawback policies.
Variable pay consists of deferred and non-deferred components in the forms of cash and share award.
The Bank adopts a progressive deferral mechanism with higher deferral rates and different forms of
deferral by reference to (a) the employee’s seniority, role, responsibilities and the potential risks that
their activities may create for the Bank; and (b) the total amount of variable remuneration exceeding the
prescribed thresholds. The deferred award has a vesting period of three to seven years and is subject to
malus and clawback.
The principles of the remuneration policy are applicable to the Bank and its subsidiaries, subject to the
local legislative requirements and market practices, and are proportionate to the scope and complexity
of the local business.
Employee Engagement
The Bank aims to create a work environment that promotes employee engagement, champions diversity
and a culture of inclusivity, and empowers our people to perform at their best by providing training and
performance coaching, career development opportunities and support for employee well-being.
Information on the Bank’s direction and strategies, policy updates and employment matters is conveyed
to employees through business briefings, town hall meetings, intranet posts, morning broadcasts,
circulars, e-mails and the Bank’s social communication mobile app for staff. Launched in January 2019,
the mobile app is an important new channel for fostering an open and dynamic culture in which
131
employees feel empowered and inspired to engage in two-way communication with senior management
and colleagues at all levels.
The Bank also encourages employees to provide suggestions, comments and feedback through employee
surveys, exchange sessions and thematic focus groups. The Bank continuously monitors the sentiments
and behaviours of staff with the aim of developing training, communication and staff engagement plans
that reinforce a positive corporate culture and values.
To gain a deeper understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on staff, the Bank conducted
three company-wide employee surveys in 2020. A “pulse check” survey in May was designed to gather
information and feedback on the physical, mental and financial well-being of employees, while two
regular employee surveys, conducted in the first and second halves of the year, focused on staff
engagement, and confidence and trust in the Bank’s strategy, culture and leadership. Responses to the
surveys support the Bank’s observations that employees are demonstrating high levels of resilience and
adaptability in the very challenging operating environment.
To cope with the “new normal” created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank has implemented a wide
range of supportive and wellness promotion initiatives, including flexible working arrangements,
technology enhancements, and process re-designs to enable remote working. Overall, these initiatives
have been positively received by staff. Employees generally show positive engagement and confidence
in the strategy and future of the Bank. The survey findings also show that employees feel comfortable
to speak up without fear. This reflects the Bank’s efforts to highlight the importance and positive impact
of embracing a “speak-up” culture in the workplace. The Bank will continue to facilitate and promote
new ways of working, innovations and enhanced technology in its ongoing mission to become a more
efficient and agile organisation.
The Bank is committed to the development of competence and ethical behaviour of staff members with
due regard to the principles set out in HKMA’s SPM CG-6 on “Competence and Ethical Behaviour”.
The Bank has established policies and procedures for monitoring, developing and maintaining the
competence level and ethical behaviour of staff members. These include clear guidance as set out in
various policy manuals, robust performance management system, training and development solutions
provided on a regular and need basis.
The Bank offers online portal with access to learning resources on wide-ranging banking, technical and
management subjects, e-Learning, Classroom Training and Virtual Training Class, to support staff
learning and development. In order to fully develop staff competence and potential and to help them
quickly integrate into the Bank, new joiners are provided with a comprehensive induction programme
of the Bank’s history, vision, culture, values, risk management and corporate governance. To equip staff
members with necessary skills and knowledge to meet future challenges and professional requirements,
especially those who are involved in regulated businesses and activities, the Bank offers a wide range
of training and development programmes in the areas of relationship management, sales, products,
operations, compliance, credit and risk. Apart from these programmes, the Bank has a series of anti-
money laundering, conduct, anti-bribery and corruption training programmes to strengthen the financial
crime risk management culture. On average, the Bank’s staff members in Hong Kong undertook 3.8
days of learning and development programme in 2020.The Bank also offers education subsidy to support
staff to pursue professional or academic qualifications and/ or acquire job-related knowledge.
The Bank invests in the development of its leadership pipeline and supports the personal growth of staff
by providing a broad range of leadership and management development solutions. To ensure
sustainability, the Bank has strategies, measures and analytics to plan and manage succession to
leadership roles, and to prepare high-potential talents for their succession to critical roles.
Businesses/functions supported by the Human Resources take actions to accelerate the development of
successors and high potential talents through feedback and coaching, planned job moves for
132
development including cross fertilisation between businesses/functions, and implementing individual
development plans.
The Bank pursues external recruitment of fresh graduates, experienced professionals and functional
specialists to support execution of business strategy. New hires are offered well-structured on-boarding
and development programmes. At the same time, the Bank promotes opportunities for internal mobility
and career development for internal staff. The Bank sponsors co-ops and internships to build pipeline
for future hires. Trainee programmes in select business areas are in place to develop professional
competence and to build future talents for key roles. People managers focus on staff engagement and
retention through their roles in everyday performance management and development coaching of their
staff, offer of career advancement opportunities and market competitive remuneration.
The Bank sponsors intake through the FinTech Internship programme co-launched by HKMA and the
Applied Science and Technology Research Institute in previous years. In 2020, the Bank has participated
in the HKMA Banking Talent Programme to offer 6 month internships to fresh graduates, and offer 12-
month employment contracts to experienced hires under the “HKMA Financial Industry Recruitment
Scheme for Tomorrow”.
Global and local socio-economic dynamics are undergoing transformation in response to the COVID-
19 pandemic. The Bank has been taking a proactive approach to managing Environmental, Social and
Governance (ESG) issues, facilitating the Bank’s ability to keep pace with the fast-changing operating
landscape.
In 2020, the Bank further stepped up its focus on ESG by establishing a high-level ESG Steering
Committee chaired by the Bank’s Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive to oversee ESG strategy and
strengthen its ESG governance structure. The Steering Committee is supported by four Working Groups
(ESG Strategy, Environmental, Corporate Social Responsibility and ESG Disclosure), each led by a
member of the Bank’s Executive Committee.
Reflecting the Bank’s determination to be the leading organisation for ESG in the local banking industry,
the Bank is the first home-grown bank in Hong Kong to sign up as a supporter of the Task Force on
Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD).
Starting from 2021, the Bank’s ESG strategy will enhance focus in the following areas:
- Environmental: To be a domestic leader in reducing environmental impact from our daily
operations, and offering customers a wider range of green and sustainable finance solutions;
- Social: To commit to enable young generations to reach their full potentials by offering tailored
banking services, developing their future skills, and nurturing a workplace that promotes their
wellbeing and professional development;
- Governance: To fully comply with the rules and regulations including climate-related risk
management and ESG reporting disclosure.
For more details of the Bank’s ESG vision, initiatives and performance, please refer to its 2020
Environmental, Social and Governance Report.
133
Environment
As the first local bank to sign up as a supporter of TCFD and to attain ISO 14001 certification for all its
offices and branches, the Bank strives to lead by example in actions to transition to a lower-carbon
economy. Guided by its Environmental Policy, the Bank is committed to conducting its activities in an
environmentally responsible manner and developing a range of management practices to promote
sustainable development.
In 2020, the newly established Environmental Working Group took over the work of the previous
Environmental Management Committee. Chaired by the Bank’s Chief Operating Officer, this Working
Group is responsible for maintaining and monitoring the environmental management system to ensure
it supports continuous enhancement of the environmental performance from the Bank’s operations.
The Bank has been undertaking a Bank-wide office enhancement programme that includes initiatives to
make its workplaces more energy efficient and sustainable which make reference to internationally
recognised standards.
One of the Bank’s new ESG ambitions is for its operations to be “carbon neutral” by 2030. In support
of this goal, the Bank has established targets to reduce electricity consumption and Scope 2 Greenhouse
Gas Emissions, and will source some of its electricity from renewable energy schemes organised by
local electricity providers. The Bank has further set up other specific environmental targets that are
designed to minimise the negative environmental impacts arising from its Hong Kong operations:
When compared to its performance in 2019, the Bank has reduced greenhouse gas emissions from
energy use by 6.48%, electricity consumption by 4.97% and general office waste to be disposed to
landfill by 16.06% in 2020. This is considered to be a combined result of the environmental reduction
initiatives implemented by various business units and the COVID-19 impact of more employees
working remotely from home and conducting virtual meetings in the Bank’s Hong Kong operations.
It is worthy to note that the recent installation of chilled ceiling air conditioning systems in the Bank’s
three largest office premises has improved energy efficiency of air-conditioning systems by 25%.
Furthermore, in recognition of its support for the development of renewable energy in Hong Kong, the
Bank received the “Renewable Energy Contribution Award” in CLP’s Smart Energy Award 2020.
The Bank’s operations comply with all applicable environmental regulations and guidelines in Hong
Kong, such as the Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap. 354). In 2020, no cases of non-compliance with
environmental laws or regulations were reported.
134
Community
The Bank is a long-time advocate of helping to create a civic culture that supports sustainable positive
development of the society. The Bank’s community investment strategy is designed around the four
pillars of “Future Skills”, “Promoting Sustainable Finance and Financial Literacy”, “Addressing Climate
Change” and “Care for the Community”. Together, they illustrate the Bank’s approach in addressing the
needs of the community. The “Addressing Climate Change” pillar was added as a key focus in 2020 to
better respond to this pressing global issue and to align with the Bank’s environmental management
approach. As a responsible corporate citizen, the Bank believes that all enterprises, regardless of industry
and size, have an obligation to invest efforts to mitigate climate-related risks and to help protect society
against the adverse effects of climate change.
Support for young people continued to be a key priority for the Bank in 2020. Amongst its many
initiatives, it is providing members of the young generation, regardless of their socioeconomic
background, with future skills learning opportunities to help equip them with the ability to adapt and
thrive in a fast-changing environment.
In response to the COVID-19-related school closures, the Bank offered timely assistance to young
students in need. It co-led establishment of the “Hang Seng Academic Assistance Programme” with St.
James’ Settlement, which also involved participation from seven other charitable organisations and 13
primary schools. The Programme provided tutoring and other academic support to disadvantaged
primary and lower secondary school students whose schooling had been interrupted. More than 4,600
underprivileged students benefitted from tutoring and counselling. The day-care services offered to
families enabled parents to continue working while their children were out of school. The Programme
also donated laptops, schoolbags and provided food subsidies to students.
The COVID-19 pandemic along with subsequent social distancing requirements and safeguards had a
significant impact on delivery of the Bank’s community investment programmes and activities during
the year. With the safety and good health of everyone in Hong Kong as its top priority, the Bank took
an agile and flexible approach to finding ways to continue to support the community by refining existing
initiatives and developing new ones. It collaborated with NGOs to understand the needs of different
groups and successfully carried out many of its community programmes via a mix of online and offline
channels. Some activities were conducted online in the form of virtual classes and workshops. The Bank
also mobilised its employee volunteers to make phone calls to the elderly to provide emotional support
and offer advice on hygiene and other pandemic-related protective measures.
During the year the Bank invested more than HK$30 million in its community investment programmes,
bringing the total amount in the past 10 years to HK$282 million.
The Bank commits to ensure a best in class occupational health and safety workplace environment. To
achieve this, the Bank developed a BS OHSAS 18001:2007 Occupational Health and Safety
Management System (“OHSMS”), with an aim to minimise the occupational health and safety
associated risk to staff, customers and contractors with its business activities within the Bank’s premises.
In 2020, the Bank successfully upgraded its BS OHSAS 18001:2007 certification to the newly launched
ISO 45001 OHSMS.
The Bank’s proactive strategies are aimed at enhancing the health and safety, wellbeing of the Bank
staff to achieve desired outcomes. The Bank commits to:
providing and maintaining a safety-first workplace culture where the Bank takes care of each
other and provides a best in class “activity based” work environment where safety is prioritised;
135
taking all reasonably practicable measures to eliminate or minimise risks to the physical and
mental health, safety and wellbeing of the Bank staff and others using the hierarchy of controls;
providing effective information, wellbeing programs and training for the Bank staff;
fostering a collaborative and cooperative relationship with the Bank staff and other stakeholders
through effective consultation regarding health, safety and wellbeing activities at work;
encouraging effective early intervention practices to better identify risk and minimise the impact
on the physical and mental health of the Bank staff;
supporting the rehabilitation of the Bank staff following an injury or illness, enabling a safe and
productive return to work; and
Each of the Bank staff contributes to building and maintaining a physical and mentally healthy work
environment by caring for one another and always putting safety first. Each of the Bank staff also plays
an important role in engaging in meaningful, respectful and open consultation about health and safety
matters to achieve the Bank’s strategic outcomes. The Bank acknowledges its staff shared duties under
the Bank’s Health & Safety Policies, which are committed to consulting, cooperating and coordinating
health and safety activities to achieve positive safety outcomes for the Bank staff.
It is also fundamental that all employees recognise and accept that they have a responsibility to work
safely, to maintain a safe workplace and to report unsafe conditions and practices immediately. The
Bank staff are also required to comply with the Occupational Health and Safety Act that applies to the
work being performed as well as all safe policies and practices established by the Bank. The Bank
believes that all accidents and illnesses can and should be prevented through continuous commitment,
communication and acts of safety of the Bank staff, in addition to living up the strong safety culture
within the Bank.
The Bank implements a Contingency Plan for Communicable Disease, which sets out the actions to be
taken by various units in response to the occurrence of a serious communicable disease. In addition, the
Bank keeps an adequate stock of hygiene consumables, such as cleaning products, face masks, and etc,
to cater for the needs of its staff in response to an outbreak of influenza pandemic. The Bank staff are
also well trained to raise the overall safety risk awareness through the Bank-wide intranet of the
importance of personal hygiene and health, and the contingency measures, in order to enable the Bank
services to the community during an outbreak of a serious communicable disease.
In 2020, the Bank implemented a Health & Wellbeing Program, which included a series of wellbeing
activities and a mental health month. The Program also consisted of a series of workshops to help the
Bank staff better understand the importance of work life balance, encourage them to adopt and maintain
a health and balanced lifestyle, and to stay positive to maintaining a well-managed stress level.
For more details of the Bank’s ESG vision, initiatives and performance in 2020, please refer to its 2020
Environmental, Social and Governance Report to be made available on the Bank’s website
(www.hangseng.com) by June 2021.
136
OTHER INFORMATION
Organisational Structure
Under the Bank’s current organisational structure, the Bank’s businesses and functions are set out as
follows:
Businesses
Wealth and Personal Banking
Commercial Banking
Global Banking
Global Markets
Functions
Audit
Communications
Corporate Governance & Secretariat
Corporate Sustainability
Financial Control
Financial Crime Compliance
Human Resources
Legal
Marketing
Regulatory Compliance
Risk
Digital Business Services
Strategic Planning and Corporate Development
137
BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors
Aged 69
Qualifications
Doctoral Degree in Economics – University of Pennsylvania, USA
138
Major awards
Chevalier de l’Ordre du Merite Agricole of France (2008)
Gold Bauhinia Star (1999)
Commander in the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (1994)
Aged 57
Qualifications
Bachelor of Social Sciences – The University of Hong Kong
Honorary Certified Financial Management Planner – The Hong Kong Institute of Bankers
Major Awards
Chapter Honoree of Beta Gamma Sigma – The University of Hong Kong Chapter (2018)
139
Dr John CHAN Cho Chak GBS, JP
Independent Non-executive Director
Aged 77
Qualifications
Degree of Doctor of Social Sciences (honoris causa) – Lingnan University; The University of Hong
Kong; The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Degree of Doctor of Business Administration (honoris causa) – International Management Centres
Diploma in Management Studies – The University of Hong Kong
Honours Degree in English Literature – The University of Hong Kong
Major awards
Gold Bauhinia Star (1999)
140
Ms CHIANG Lai Yuen JP
Independent Non-executive Director
Aged 55
Qualifications
Bachelor Degree of Arts – Wellesley College, USA
Major awards
"Young Industrialist Awards of Hong Kong" by the Federation of Hong Kong Industries (2004)
Aged 46
141
Past major appointments
HSBC Asia Holdings Limited – Director (2018 – 2020)
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited –
Alternate Chief Executive (2016 – 2020)
Chief Financial Officer, Asia Pacific (2015 – 2019)
Global Chief Financial Officer, Global Commercial Banking (2010 – 2015)
Global Chief Risk Officer, Global Commercial Banking (2011 – 2014)
HSBC Asia Pacific Holdings (UK) Limited – Director (2015 – 2019)
HSBC Insurance (Asia) Limited – Director (2015 – 2019)
HSBC Insurance (Asia-Pacific) Holdings Limited – Director (2016 – 2019)
HSBC Life (International) Limited – Director (2015 – 2019)
HSBC Securities Investments (Asia) Limited – Director (2015 – 2019)
HSBC North America Holdings Inc –
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer – North America Finance (2008 – 2010)
Qualifications
Bachelor’s Degree (Honors) in Business – Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Henry Crown Fellow – The Aspen Institute, USA
Aged 61
Qualifications
Bachelor of Social Sciences in Business Studies – The University of Hong Kong
142
Ms Irene LEE Yun Lien
Independent Non-executive Director
Aged 67
Qualifications
Bachelor of Arts Degree – Smith College, USA
Barrister-at-Law in England and Wales
Member – The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn, UK
143
Dr Eric LI Ka Cheung GBS, OBE, JP
Independent Non-executive Director
Aged 67
144
Meadville Holdings Limited –
Independent Non-executive Director; Chairman of Remuneration Committee (2007 – 2010)
The International Federation of Accountants – Board Member (2004 – 2006)
The Legislative Council of Hong Kong –
Member (1991 – 2004)
Chairman of Public Accounts Committee (1995 – 2004)
Qualifications
BA (Economics) Honours Degree – University of Manchester, UK
Fellow – Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Hon Doctor of Laws – University of Manchester, UK
Hon Doctor of Social Sciences – Hong Kong Baptist University
Hon Doctor of Social Sciences – The Education University of Hong Kong
Hon Fellow – The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hon Fellow – The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Major awards
Gold Bauhinia Star (2003)
Officer of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (1996)
145
Dr Vincent LO Hong Sui GBM, JP
Non-executive Director
Aged 72
Qualifications
Doctorate in Business Administration (honoris causa) –
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Doctor of Business (honoris causa) – The University of New South Wales, Australia
Major awards
Grand Bauhinia Medal (2017)
Lifetime Achievement Award for Leadership in Property Sector by the 4th World Chinese Economic
Forum (2012)
“Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year 2009” in the China Real Estate Sector (2009)
Ernst & Young China Entrepreneur Of The Year 2009 (2009)
Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres by the French Government (2005)
Director of the Year in the category of Listed Company Executive Directors by The Hong Kong Institute
of Directors in 2002 (2002)
Businessman of the Year award in the Hong Kong Business Awards 2001 (2001)
Gold Bauhinia Star (1998)
146
Mr Kenneth NG Sing Yip
Non-executive Director
Aged 70
Qualifications
Bachelor’s Degree and Master’s Degree in Laws (L.L.B. and L.L.M.) – University of London, UK
Bachelor’s Degree in Laws (L.L.B.) – Beijing University, PRC
147
Mr Peter WONG Tung Shun GBS, JP
Non-executive Director
Aged 69
148
Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research –
Member of the Board of Directors (2010 – 2011)
HSBC Bank Australia Limited – Non-executive Director (2010 – 2011)
^ Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited – Member of Risk Management Committee (2010)
Hong Kong Trade Development Council –
Chairman of Financial Services Advisory Committee (2006 – 2010)
Hong Kong Monetary Authority – Member of Banking Advisory Committee (2005 – 2010)
The Hong Kong Association of Banks – Chairman (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2009)
Qualifications
Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science; MBA in Marketing and Finance; MSc in Computer Science –
Indiana University, USA
Fellow – The Hong Kong Management Association
Honorary Fellow – The Hong Kong Institute of Bankers
Major awards
Gold Bauhinia Star (2020)
Aged 50
Qualifications
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Economics – Brown University, USA
Major awards
“Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of The Year 2012 China” – Category Winner (Services) and Country
Winner (Hong Kong / Macau Regions) (2012)
Executive Award of the DHL / SCMP Hong Kong Business Awards (2008)
^ The securities of these companies are listed on a securities market in Hong Kong or overseas.
149
Notes:
1 New appointments or cessation of appointments since the date of the Bank’s 2020 Interim Report.
2 The interests of Directors in shares of the Bank, if any, within the meaning of Part XV of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (“SFO”) as at 31 December 2020 are disclosed in the section
“Directors’ and Alternate Chief Executives’ Interests” of the Report of the Directors attached to the
Bank’s 2020 Annual Report.
3 Some Directors (as disclosed in the section “Biographical Details of Directors and Senior
Management – Board of Directors” of the Bank’s 2020 Annual Report) are also Directors of HSBC
Holdings plc (“HSBC”) and/or its subsidiaries. HSBC, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, has
an interest in the shares of the Bank under the provisions of Divisions 2 and 3 of Part XV of the
SFO, the details of which are disclosed in the section “Substantial Interests in Share Capital” of the
Report of the Directors attached to the Bank’s 2020 Annual Report.
4 Save as disclosed in the section “Biographical Details of Directors and Senior Management – Board
of Directors” of the Bank’s 2020 Annual Report, the Directors (a) have not held any directorships
in other publicly listed companies, whether in Hong Kong or overseas, during the last 3 years; (b)
do not hold any other positions in the Bank and its subsidiaries; and (c) do not have any other
relationships with any Directors, senior management or substantial or controlling shareholders of
the Bank, except that Mr Michael W K Wu’s spouse is the niece of Dr Vincent H S Lo, a Non-
executive Director of the Bank.
5 All Directors (except those Directors who are full time employees of the Bank or its subsidiaries)
will receive Directors’ fees in the amounts approved from time to time by shareholders at the
Annual General Meetings of the Bank. The current amounts of Directors’ fees have been
determined with reference to market rates, directors’ workload and required commitment. A
Director will also receive a fee for duties assigned to and services provided by him/her as Chairman
or member of various Committees of the Bank. Such fees have been determined with reference to
the remuneration policy of the Bank.
6 No Directors’ fees are payable to those Directors who are full time employees of the Bank or its
subsidiaries. The salary packages of such Directors have been determined with reference to the
remuneration policy of the Bank. Such Directors are also entitled to discretionary bonus.
7 The details of the emoluments of the Directors on a named basis are disclosed in Note 14 of the
Bank’s Financial Statements as contained in the Bank’s 2020 Annual Report.
8 None of the Directors, except Ms Margaret W H Kwan, has signed service contract with the Bank.
The term of appointment of Non-executive Directors (including Independent Non-executive
Directors) is three years except that where a Non-executive Director (or an Independent Non-
executive Director) has served on the Board for more than nine years, then his/her term of
appointment is one year.
9 Biographical details of Directors of the Bank are also available on the website of the Bank at
www.hangseng.com.
150
BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
Senior Management
Aged 58
Qualifications
Bachelor of Arts (Major in Economics) – University of Brandon, Canada
151
Ms Crystal CHEUNG Pui Sze
Head of Financial Crime Compliance
Aged 41
Qualifications
Bachelor of Economics and Finance – The University of Hong Kong
Fellow – The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, UK
Member of Associate Anti-Money Laundering Professional – Hong Kong Institute of Bankers
152
Ms Rose CHO Mui
Head of Global Banking
Aged 49
Qualifications
Master of Business Administration – The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Bachelor of Business Administration (Honors) in Business Studies –
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
153
Ms Liz CHOW Tan Ling
Head of Global Markets
Aged 47
Qualifications
Bachelor of Business Administration – The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Bachelor of Laws – University of London, UK
154
Mr Donald LAM Yin Shing
Head of Commercial Banking
Aged 57
Qualifications
Certified Banker – The Hong Kong Institute of Bankers
Chartered Banker – Chartered Banker Institute, UK
Bachelor of Social Science (1st Class Honor) – The University of Hong Kong
Master of Business Administration – The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Master of Science in e-Commerce – The Chinese University of Hong Kong
155
Mr Gilbert LEE Man Lung
Head of Strategy & Planning and Chief of Staff to CE
Aged 43
Qualifications
Chartered Financial Analyst
Associate – Life Management Institute
Associate – The Hong Kong Institute of Directors
Master of Business Administration – INSEAD, France
Master of Science in Business Economics – The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Bachelor of Finance – The University of Hong Kong
Fellow of Asia Pacific Leadership Programme – East-West Centre, The University of Hawaii, USA
156
Mr Andrew LEUNG Wing Lok
Chief Financial Officer
Aged 58
Joined the Bank in July 1997 (left in 2006) and rejoined in July 2009
Qualifications
Associate – The Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries
Associate – The Chartered Governance Institute, UK (formerly known as The Institute of Chartered
Secretaries and Administrators)
Bachelor of PRC Law – Peking University, PRC
Bachelor of Social Sciences (Major in Management) – The University of Hong Kong
Chartered Professional Accountant, Canada (CPA (Canada), CMA)
Fellow – The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, UK
Fellow – The Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Master of Science, Data processing – University of Ulster, UK
Master of Science in Electronic Commerce and Internet Computing – The University of Hong Kong
157
Mr Godwin LI Chi Chung
Company Secretary and General Counsel
Aged 56
Qualifications
Bachelor of Laws – The University of Hong Kong
158
Mr Ryan SONG Yue Sheng
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive of Hang Seng Bank (China) Limited
Aged 47
Qualifications
Master of Business Administration – China Europe International Business School
159
Mr Christopher TSANG Hing Keung
Head of Regulatory Compliance
Aged 54
Qualifications
Master of Science in Banking – City University of Hong Kong
Master of Business Administration – University of Toronto, Canada
Bachelor of Arts in Translation – The University of Hong Kong
160
Ms Elaine WANG Yee Ning
Head of Human Resources
Aged 59
Qualifications
Master of Health Services Management – The University of New South Wales, Australia
Bachelor of Applied Science – The University of Sydney, Australia
161
Ms WONG May Kay
Head of Communications and Corporate Sustainability
Aged 58
Qualifications
Bachelor of Journalism – Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
162
Mr YEO Chee Leong
Chief Risk Officer
Aged 51
Qualifications
Bachelor of Business – Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Master of Applied Finance – Macquarie University, Australia
Note:
Definition of senior management is set out in the “Corporate Governance Report” section in this
Annual Report.
163
REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS
The Directors have pleasure in presenting their report together with the audited financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2020.
The Directors declared and paid the first to third interim dividends of HK$2.70 (2019: HK$4.20) per
share totalling HK$5,161m (2019: HK$8,031m) during the year. The Directors also declared the
fourth interim dividend of HK$2.80 per share totalling HK$5,353m (2019: HK$4.00 per share
totalling HK$7,647m), which will be paid on 25 March 2021.
Major Customers
The Directors believe that the five largest customers of the Bank accounted for less than 30% of the
total interest income and other operating income of the Bank for the year.
Subsidiaries
Particulars of the Bank’s principal subsidiaries as at 31 December 2020 are set out in note 30 to the
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020.
Share Capital
Details of share capital of the Bank during the year are set out in note 43 to the financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2020.
Equity-linked Agreements
For the year ended 31 December 2020, the Bank has not entered into any equity-linked agreement.
Reserves
Distributable reserve of the Bank as at 31 December 2020, calculated under Part 6 of the Hong Kong
Companies Ordinance, amounted to HK$99,841m (2019: HK$94,427m). Movements in other reserves
are set out in the consolidated statement of changes in equity of this Annual Report.
164
Donations
Charitable donations made by the Bank and its subsidiaries during the year amounted to HK$29m. For
further details of the Bank’s corporate social responsibility activities and expenditures, please refer to
the section “Environmental, Social and Governance” in the “Corporate Governance Report” of this
Annual Report.
Directors
The Directors of the Bank, who were in office on the date of this report, were Dr Raymond K F
Ch’ien, Ms Louisa Cheang, Dr John C C Chan, Ms L Y Chiang, Ms Kathleen C H Gan, Ms Margaret W
H Kwan, Ms Irene Y L Lee, Dr Eric K C Li, Dr Vincent H S Lo, Mr Kenneth S Y Ng, Mr Peter T S
Wong and Mr Michael W K Wu.
Mr Nixon L S Chan retired from the Board with effect from the conclusion of the Bank’s 2020
Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) held on 22 May 2020.
All the Directors, who were in office on the date of this report, had served on the Board of the Bank
throughout the year.
As announced by the Bank on 4 January 2021, Dr Raymond K F Ch’ien will retire as Director of the
Bank and will cease to be the Chairman of the Board with effect from the conclusion of the Bank’s
2021 AGM (“2021 AGM”) to be held in Q2 2021, in order to devote more time to his other
commitments and areas of interest. The Board has resolved to appoint Ms Irene Y L Lee, currently an
Independent Non-executive Director of the Bank, to succeed Dr Ch’ien as the Chairman of the Board
with effect from the conclusion of the 2021 AGM. Notice of the 2021 AGM will be sent to
shareholders at least 20 clear business days before the AGM.
The Directors who are required to retire by rotation pursuant to the Bank’s Articles of Association at
the 2021 AGM are : Ms Louisa Cheang, Ms Margaret W H Kwan, Ms Irene Y L Lee and Mr Peter T
S Wong.
No Director proposed for re-election at the 2021 AGM has a service contract with the Bank which is
not determinable by the Bank within one year without payment of compensation (other than statutory
compensation).
The biographical details of the Directors of the Bank are set out in the section “Biographical Details
of Directors and Senior Management” of this Annual Report.
Directors of Subsidiaries
The names of all Directors who have served on the boards of the Bank’s subsidiaries during the
period from 1 January 2020 to the date of this report (unless otherwise stated) are provided in the
section “Directors of Subsidiaries” of this Annual Report.
165
Directors’ and Alternate Chief Executives’ Interests
As at 31 December 2020, the interests of the Directors and Alternate Chief Executives in the shares,
underlying shares of equity derivatives and debentures of the Bank and its associated corporations (all
within the meaning of Part XV of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (“SFO”)) disclosed in
accordance with the Listing Rules were detailed below.
Interests in shares
Total
Interests
as % of
the
Family relevant
Personal Interests Corporate shares in
Interests (interests Interests issue/
(held as of spouse (interests of issued
beneficial or child controlled Other Total share
owner) under 18) corporation) Interests Interests capital
Alternate Chief
Executives:
Mrs Eunice L C Y Chan 24,432 - - 12,571(2) 37,003 0.00
Mr Donald Y S Lam 171,126 - - 28,747(2) 199,873 0.00
Mr Andrew W L Leung 12,866 - - 20,296(2) 33,162 0.00
Notes:
(1) 1,000 shares in the Bank and 4,371 shares in HSBC Holdings plc were jointly held by Dr John C
C Chan and his wife.
(2) These included interests in conditional awards of ordinary shares of US$0.50 each in HSBC
Holdings plc under the HSBC Share Plans made in favour of Directors and Alternate Chief
Executives.
166
Conditional Awards of Shares
During the year, the Directors and Alternate Chief Executives as set out below were eligible to be
granted conditional awards over ordinary shares of US$0.50 each in HSBC Holdings plc by that
company (being the ultimate holding company of the Bank) under various HSBC Share Plans. The
details of the interests of the Directors and Alternate Chief Executives in the conditional awards of
ordinary shares in HSBC Holdings plc under the HSBC Share Plans, as at 31 December 2020, were as
follows:
Directors:
Ms Louisa Cheang 190,431 130,028 106,576 213,883
Ms Kathleen C H Gan 55,573 76,899 54,620 77,852
Ms Margaret W H Kwan 20,104 30,073 26,634 23,543
Mr Peter T S Wong 441,157 309,853 244,063 506,947
Alternate Chief
Executives:
Mrs Eunice L C Y Chan 12,228 6,660 6,317 12,571
Mr Donald Y S Lam 23,905 28,997 24,155 28,747
Mr Andrew W L Leung 20,824 9,247 9,775 20,296
During the year, Ms Kathleen C H Gan, Mrs Eunice L C Y Chan and Mr Donald Y S Lam also
acquired and were awarded ordinary shares of HSBC Holdings plc under the HSBC International
Employee Share Purchase Plan. Their interests in ordinary shares of HSBC Holdings plc under this
plan have been included in their “Personal Interests” disclosed in the table under “Interests in shares”.
All the interests stated above represented long positions. As at 31 December 2020, no short positions
were recorded in the Register of Directors’ and Alternate Chief Executives’ Interests and Short
Positions required to be kept under section 352 of the SFO.
Save as disclosed in the preceding paragraphs, neither the Bank nor any of its holding companies or
its subsidiaries or fellow subsidiaries was a party to any arrangement to enable the Directors of the
Bank to acquire benefits by means of the acquisition of shares in or debentures of the Bank or any
other body corporate as at the end of the year or at any time during the year.
No right to subscribe for equity or debt securities of the Bank has been granted by the Bank to, nor
have any such rights been exercised by, any person during the year ended 31 December 2020.
167
Management Contracts
Save for service contracts, no other contracts, relating to the management and/or administration of the
whole or any substantial part of the business of the Bank were entered into or subsisting during the
year.
Ms Louisa Cheang is a Group General Manager of HSBC Holdings plc and was a Director of The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited for the period up to 10 August 2020.
Ms Kathleen C H Gan is a Group General Manager and Head of Finance of HSBC Holdings plc. She
is also the Supervisor of HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary
of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited.
Mr Peter T S Wong is a Group Managing Director and a member of Group Executive Committee of
HSBC Holdings plc. He is also the Deputy Chairman, Chief Executive and Executive Director of The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited; and Chairman and Non-executive Director of
HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited.
HSBC Holdings plc, through its subsidiaries and associated undertakings, including The Hongkong
and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, the immediate holding company of the Bank, is engaged
in providing a comprehensive range of banking, insurance and related financial services.
The entities in which the Directors have declared interests are managed by separate boards of
directors and management, which are accountable to their respective shareholders.
The Board of the Bank includes six Independent Non-executive Directors whose views carry
significant weight in the Board’s decisions. The Audit Committee (comprising of three Independent
Non-executive Directors) and Risk Committee (comprising of three Independent Non-executive
Directors and one Non-executive Director) of the Bank meet regularly to assist the Board of Directors
in reviewing the financial performance, internal control and risk management systems of the Bank and
its subsidiaries. The Bank is, therefore, capable of carrying on its businesses in the best interests of all
shareholders as a whole and has put in place adequate mechanisms to ensure that the Directors
discharge their duties vis-a-vis all shareholders, including in respect of the Bank’s dealings with the
businesses in which Directors have declared interests.
Directors’ Emoluments
The emoluments of the Directors of the Bank on a named basis are set out in note 14 to the financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 2020.
Indemnity Provision
Details of the Bank’s permitted indemnity provision are set out in the section “Corporate Governance
Report” of this Annual Report.
168
Substantial Interests in Share Capital
The register maintained by the Bank pursuant to the SFO recorded that, as at 31 December 2020, the
following corporations had interests or short positions in the shares or underlying shares (as defined
in the SFO) in the Bank set opposite their respective names:
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited is a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC
Asia Holdings Limited, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc.
Accordingly, the interests of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited are recorded
as the interests of HSBC Asia Holdings Limited and HSBC Holdings plc.
The Directors regard HSBC Holdings plc to be the beneficial owner of 1,188,057,371 ordinary shares
in the Bank (62.14%).
All the interests stated above represented long positions. As at 31 December 2020, no short positions
were recorded in the Register of Interests in Shares and Short Positions required to be kept under
section 336 of the SFO.
Public Float
As at the date of this report, the Bank has maintained the prescribed public float under the Listing
Rules, based on the information that is publicly available to the Bank and within the knowledge of the
Directors of the Bank.
Auditor
The financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020 have been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers who will retire and, being eligible, offer themselves for re-appointment. A
resolution for the re-appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as auditor of the Bank will be proposed
at the 2021 AGM.
Raymond Ch’ien
Chairman
Hong Kong, 23 February 2021
169
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
for the year ended 31 December 2020
(Expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars)
2020 2019
note
(Figures in HK$)
Earnings per share - basic and diluted 18 8.36 12.77
The notes on pages 176 to 242 form part of these Financial Statements.
170
#
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the year ended 31 December 2020
(Expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars)
2020 2019
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to the Consolidated Income Statement:
Change in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value
upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk
- before deferred taxes (1) (7)
- deferred taxes - 2
Premises:
- unrealised surplus/(deficit) on revaluation of premises (1,542) 888
- deferred taxes 252 (150)
- exchange difference 19 (7)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 1,079 2,376
Total comprehensive income for the year 17,749 27,198
1
Include mainly exchange difference arising from cancellation of additional tier 1 ('AT1') capital instrument during 2019.
The notes on pages 176 to 242 form part of these Financial Statements.
171
#
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
at 31 December 2020
(Expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars)
2020 2019
note
ASSETS
Cash and balances at central banks 22 11,226 13,038
Trading assets 23 37,117 47,357
Derivative financial instruments 24 17,181 7,338
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss 25 20,695 18,771
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading 13,360 6,659
Placings with and advances to banks 26 44,357 65,807
Loans and advances to customers 27 944,774 942,930
Financial investments 28 554,720 461,704
Interest in associates 31 2,358 2,520
Investment properties 32 9,415 10,121
Premises, plant and equipment 32 30,925 32,362
Intangible assets 33 24,733 21,954
Other assets 34 48,926 46,430
Total assets 1,759,787 1,676,991
Equity
Share capital 43 9,658 9,658
Retained profits 137,580 133,734
Other equity instruments 44 11,744 11,744
Other reserves 24,118 23,674
Total shareholders' equity 183,100 178,810
Non-controlling interests 95 107
Total equity 183,195 178,917
The notes on pages 176 to 242 form part of these Financial Statements.
172
#
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
for the year ended 31 December 2020
(Expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars)
Other reserves
Financial
Other Premises assets at Cash flow Foreign Total Non-
Share equity Retained revaluation FVOCI hedge exchange shareholders' controlling Total
capital instruments profits1 reserve reserve reserve reserve Others 2
equity interests equity
At 1 January 2020 9,658 11,744 133,734 19,889 3,296 16 (196) 669 178,810 107 178,917
Profit for the year - - 16,687 - - - - - 16,687 (17) 16,670
Other comprehensive income (net of tax) - - (8) (1,271) 1,261 244 854 (1) 1,079 - 1,079
Debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income - - - - 91 - - - 91 - 91
Equity instruments designated at fair value through
other comprehensive income - - - - 1,170 - - - 1,170 - 1,170
Cash flow hedges - - - - - 244 - - 244 - 244
Change in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value
upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk - - - - - - - (1) (1) - (1)
Property revaluation - - - (1,271) - - - - (1,271) - (1,271)
Actuarial losses on defined benefit plans - - (8) - - - - - (8) - (8)
Exchange differences and others - - - - - - 854 - 854 - 854
-
Total comprehensive income for the year - - 16,679 (1,271) 1,261 244 854 (1) 17,766 (17) 17,749
3
Dividends paid - - (12,808) - - - - - (12,808) - (12,808)
Coupons paid on AT1 capital instruments - - (700) - - - - - (700) - (700)
Movement in respect of share-based payment arrangements - - 17 - - - - 15 32 - 32
Others - - - - - - - - - 5 5
Transfers - - 658 (658) - - - - - - -
At 31 December 2020 9,658 11,744 137,580 17,960 4,557 260 658 683 183,100 95 183,195
At 1 January 2019 9,658 6,981 123,350 19,822 1,570 (11) 42 670 162,082 25 162,107
Profit for the year - - 24,840 - - - - - 24,840 (18) 24,822
Other comprehensive income (net of tax) - - 135 731 1,726 27 (238) (5) 2,376 - 2,376
Debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income - - - - (11) - - - (11) - (11)
Equity instruments designated at fair value through
other comprehensive income - - - - 1,737 - - - 1,737 - 1,737
Cash flow hedges - - - - - 27 - - 27 - 27
Change in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value
upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk - - - - - - - (5) (5) - (5)
Property revaluation - - - 731 - - - - 731 - 731
Actuarial gains on defined benefit plans - - 211 - - - - - 211 - 211
Exchange differences and others - - (76) - - - (238) - (314) - (314)
-
Total comprehensive income for the year - - 24,975 731 1,726 27 (238) (5) 27,216 (18) 27,198
Cancellation and repayment of AT1 capital instrument - (6,981) - - - - - - (6,981) - (6,981)
Issue of new AT1 capital instruments - 11,744 - - - - - - 11,744 - 11,744
Dividends paid - - (14,914) - - - - - (14,914) - (14,914)
Coupons paid on AT1 capital instruments - - (342) - - - - - (342) - (342)
Movement in respect of share-based payment arrangements - - 1 - - - - 4 5 - 5
Others - - - - - - - - - 100 100
Transfers - - 664 (664) - - - - - - -
At 31 December 2019 9,658 11,744 133,734 19,889 3,296 16 (196) 669 178,810 107 178,917
1 Retained profits are the cumulative net earnings of the Group that have not been paid out as dividends, but retained to be reinvested in the business. To satisfy the provisions of the Hong Kong Banking Ordinance and local regulatory requirements for prudential supervision
purposes, the Group has earmarked a 'regulatory reserve' from retained profits. Movements in the reserve are made directly through retained earnings. As at 31 December 2020, the effect of this requirement is to restrict the amount of reserves which can be distributed by the
Group to shareholders by HK$1,323m (2019: HK$3,509m).
2 Other reserves comprise share-based payment reserve and own credit risk reserve. The share-based payment reserve is used to record the amount relating to share awards and options granted to employees of the Group by the ultimate holding company. The own credit risk
reserve is for the change in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk.
3 Dividends paid represented the payment of fourth interim dividend of 2019 and the first three interim dividends of 2020 amounted to HK$7,647m and HK$5,161m respectively.
173
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
for the year ended 31 December 2020
(Expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars)
2020 2019
174
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
for the year ended 31 December 2020
(Expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars)
2020 2019
1 At 31 December 2020, the amount of cash and cash equivalents that was not available for use by the Group was HK$28,169m
(2019: HK$11,112m), of which HK$11,011m (2019: HK$7,616m) related to mandatory deposits at central banks.
175
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December 2020
(Figures expressed in millions of Hong Kong dollars unless otherwise indicated)
1. Basis of preparation
(a) Compliance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Hang Seng Bank Limited
(‘the Bank’) and its subsidiaries (‘the Group’) made up to 31 December 2020. The consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with all applicable Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards (‘HKFRS’), the provisions of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance and
accounting principles generally accepted in Hong Kong. HKFRS comprises Hong Kong Financial
Reporting Standards, Hong Kong Accounting Standards (‘HKAS’), and interpretations issued by the
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (‘HKICPA’). In addition, these financial
statements comply with the applicable disclosure provisions of the Rules Governing the Listing of
Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. A summary of the significant accounting
policies adopted by the Group is set out in note 2.
Under these amendments, changes made to a financial instrument that are economically equivalent and
required by interest rate benchmark reform do not result in the derecognition or a change in the carrying
amount of the financial instrument, but instead require the effective interest rate to be updated to reflect
the change in the interest rate benchmark. In addition, hedge accounting will not be discontinued solely
because of the replacement of the interest rate benchmark if the hedge meets other hedge accounting
criteria.
These amendments apply from 1 January 2021 with early adoption permitted. The Group has adopted
these amendments from 1 January 2020 and has made the additional disclosure as required in the
amendments. Further information is included in the ‘Areas of special interest’ section.
Disclosure under HKFRS 4 ‘Insurance Contracts’ and HKFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’
concerning the nature and extent of risks relating to insurance contracts and financial instruments under
Insurance Risk and Credit Risk respectively in ‘Risk’ section.
In accordance with the Group’s policy to provide disclosures that help stakeholders to understand the
Group’s performance, financial position and changes thereto, the information provided in the Notes to the
Financial Statements and the Risk disclosures in the MD&A goes beyond the minimum levels required by
accounting standards, statutory and regulatory requirements.
176
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Where an entity is governed by voting rights, the Group would consolidate when it holds, directly or
indirectly, the necessary voting rights to pass resolutions by the governing body. In all other cases, the
assessment of control is more complex and requires judgement of other factors, including having exposure
to variability of returns, power over relevant activities or holding the power as agent or principal.
The consolidated financial statements also include the attributable share of the results and reserves of
associates based on the financial statements prepared at dates not earlier than three months prior to 31
December 2020.
HKFRS 17 ‘Insurance contracts’ was issued in January 2018 with amendments to the standard issued in
October 2020. The standard sets out the requirements that an entity should apply in accounting for insurance
contracts it issues and reinsurance contracts it holds. Following the amendments, HKFRS 17 is effective
from 1 January 2023. The Group is in the process of implementing HKFRS 17. Industry practice and
interpretation of the standard is still developing and there may be changes to implementation decisions as
practice evolves, therefore the likely impact of its implementation remains uncertain. However, the estimated
impact compared with the Group’s current accounting policy for insurance contracts, which is set out in
policy 2(t) below:
Under HKFRS 17, there will be no PVIF asset recognised; rather the estimated future profit will be
included in the measurement of the Insurance contract liability as the contractual service margin (‘CSM’)
and gradually recognised in revenue as services are provided over the duration of the insurance contract.
The PVIF asset will be eliminated to equity on transition, together with other adjustments to assets and
liabilities to reflect HKFRS 17 measurement requirements and any consequential amendments to
financial assets in the scope of HKFRS 9;
HKFRS 17 requires increased use of current market values in the measurement of insurance liabilities.
Depending on the measurement model, changes in market conditions for certain products (measured
under the General Measurement Approach) are immediately recognised in profit or loss, whilst for other
products (measured under the Variable Fee Approach) they will be included in the measurement of CSM;
In accordance with HKFRS 17, directly attributable costs will be included in the results of insurance
services as profit is recognised over the duration of the insurance contracts and costs that are not directly
attributable will remain in operating expenses. This may result in a reduction in operating expenses
compared to the current accounting policy.
177
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through
the expected life of the financial instrument or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying
amount of the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the Group
estimates cash flows considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument but excluding future credit
losses. The calculation includes all amounts paid or received by the Group that are an integral part of the
effective interest rate of a financial instrument, including transaction costs and all other premiums or
discounts.
income earned on the execution of a significant act is recognised as revenue when the act is completed
(for example, fees arising from negotiating, or participating in the negotiation of, a transaction for a third
party); and
income earned from the provision of services is recognised as revenue when the services are provided (for
example, asset management services).
(c) Net income from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses measured at fair value
Net income from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses measured at fair value comprises of income
in respect of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value and derivatives managed in conjunction
with the above which can be separately identifiable from other trading derivatives.
178
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The fair value of financial instruments is generally measured on an individual basis. However, in cases where
the Group manages a group of financial assets and liabilities according to its net market or credit risk
exposure, the Group measures the fair value of the group of financial instruments on a net basis but presents
the underlying financial assets and liabilities separately in the financial statements, unless they satisfy the
HKFRS offsetting criteria.
The main assumptions and estimates which management consider when applying a model with valuation
techniques are:
the likelihood and expected timing of future cash flows on the instrument. Judgement may be required to
assess the counterparty’s ability to service the instrument in accordance with its contractual terms. Future
cash flows may be sensitive to changes in market rates;
selecting appropriate discount rate for the instrument. Judgement is required to assess what a market
participant would regard as the appropriate spread of the rate for an instrument over the appropriate risk-
free rate; and
judgement to determine what model to use to calculate fair value in areas where the choice of valuation
model is particularly subjective, for example, when valuing complex derivatives.
179
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Group may commit to underwrite loans on fixed contractual terms for specified periods of time. When
the loan arising from the lending commitment is expected to be held for trading, the commitment to lend is
recorded as a derivative. When the Group intends to hold the loan, the loan commitment is included in the
impairment calculations set out below.
(f) Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (‘FVOCI’)
Financial assets held for a business model that is achieved by both selling and collecting contractual cash
flows and that contain contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely
payments of principal and interest are measured at FVOCI. These comprise primarily debt securities. They
are recognised on the trade date when the Group enters into contractual arrangements to purchase and are
normally derecognised when they are either sold or redeemed. They are subsequently remeasured at fair
value and changes therein (except for those relating to impairment, interest income and foreign currency
exchange gains and losses) are recognised in other comprehensive income until the assets are sold. Upon
disposal, the cumulative gains or losses in other comprehensive income are recognised in the income
statement as ‘Gains less losses from financial investments’. Financial assets measured at FVOCI are
included in the impairment calculations set out below and impairment is recognised in profit or loss.
(g) Equity securities measured at fair value with fair value movement presented in OCI
The equity securities for which fair value movements are shown in OCI are for business facilitation and other
similar investments where the Group holds the investments other than to generate a capital return. Gains or
losses on derecognition of these equity securities are not transferred to profit or loss. Otherwise equity
securities are measured at fair value through profit or loss (except for dividend income which is recognised
in profit or loss).
180
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Designated financial assets are recognised when the Group enters into contracts with counterparties, which
is generally on trade date, and are normally derecognized when the rights to the cash flows expire or are
transferred. Designated financial liabilities are recognised when the Group enters into contracts with
counterparties, which is generally on settlement date, and are normally derecognised when extinguished.
Subsequent changes in fair value are recognised in the income statement in ‘Net income from financial
instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss’.
Under the above criterion, the main classes of financial instruments designated at fair value by the Group
are:
(i) Derivatives
Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from the price of underlying item such as equities,
interest rates or other indices. Derivatives are recognised initially and are subsequently measured at fair value.
Derivatives are classified as assets when their fair value is positive or as liabilities when their fair value is
negative. This includes embedded derivatives in financial liabilities which are bifurcated from the host
contract when they meet the definition of a derivative on a stand-alone basis.
Where the derivatives are managed with debt securities issued by the Group that are designated at fair value,
the contractual interest is shown in ‘Interest expense’ together with the interest payable on the issued debt.
Hedge accounting
The Group designates certain derivatives as either (i) hedges of the change in fair value of recognised assets
or liabilities or firm commitments (‘fair value hedge’); or (ii) hedges of highly probable future cash flows
attributable to a recognised asset or liability, or a forecast transaction (‘cash flow hedge’).
At the inception of a hedging relationship, the Group documents the relationship between the hedging
instruments and the hedged items, its risk management objective and its strategy for undertaking the hedge.
The Group requires a documented assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether
or not the hedging instruments, are highly effective in offsetting the changes attributable to the hedged risks
in the fair values or cash flows of the hedged items.
181
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
If the hedging relationship no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the hedge accounting is
discontinued. The cumulative adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item is amortised to the income
statement based on a recalculated effective interest rate over the residual period to maturity, unless the
hedged item has been derecognised.
The accumulated gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income are recycled to the income
statement in the periods in which the hedged item will affect profit or loss.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge
accounting, any cumulative gain or loss at that time remains in equity until the forecast transaction is
ultimately recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur,
the cumulative gain or loss that was recognised in other comprehensive income is immediately reclassified
to the income statement.
The documentation of each hedging relationship sets out how the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed and
the method adopted by the Group to assess hedge effectiveness depends on its risk management strategy.
For fair value hedge relationships, the Group utilises the cumulative dollar offset method or regression as
effectiveness testing methodology. For cash flow hedge relationships, the Group utilises the change in
variable cash flow method, capacity test or the cumulative dollar offset method using the hypothetical
derivative approach.
For prospective effectiveness, the hedging instrument is expected to be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the period for which the
hedge is designated. For retrospective effectiveness, the change in fair value or cash flows must offset each
other in the range of 80% to 125%. Hedge ineffectiveness is recognised in the income statement in ‘Net
income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss’.
182
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Credit-impaired (stage 3)
The Group determines that a financial instrument is credit-impaired and in stage 3 by considering relevant
objective evidence, primarily whether:
contractual payments of either principal or interest are 90 days past due or above;
there are other indications that the borrower is unlikely to pay such as that a concession has been granted
to the borrower for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s financial condition; or
the loan is otherwise considered to be in default.
If such unlikeliness to pay is not identified at an earlier stage, it is deemed to occur when an exposure is 90
days past due.
Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate to the amortised cost amount, i.e. gross
carrying amount less ECL allowance.
Write-off
Financial assets (and the related impairment allowances) are normally written off, either partially or in full,
when there is no realistic prospect of recovery. Where loans are secured, this is generally after receipt of any
proceeds from the realisation of collateral. In circumstances where the net realisable value of any collateral
has been determined and there is no reasonable expectation of further recovery, write-off may be earlier.
Renegotiation
Loans are identified as renegotiated and classified as credit-impaired when the contractual payment terms
are modified due to significant credit distress of the borrower. Renegotiated loans remain classified as credit-
impaired until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of non-payment
of future cash flows and retain the designation of renegotiated until maturity or derecognition.
A loan that is renegotiated is derecognised if the existing agreement is cancelled and a new agreement is
made on substantially different terms or if the terms of an existing agreement are modified such that the
renegotiated loan is a substantially different financial instrument. Any new loans that arise following
derecognition events in these circumstances are considered to be POCI and will continue to be disclosed as
renegotiated loans.
Other than originated credit-impaired loans, all other modified loans could be transferred out of stage 3 if
they no longer exhibit any evidence of being credit-impaired. In the case of renegotiated loans under
wholesale portfolios, there should be sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of
non-payment of future cash flows, over the minimum observation period, and there are no other indicators
of impairment. These loans could be transferred to stage 1 or 2 based on the mechanism as described below
by comparing the risk of default occurring at the reporting date (based on the modified contractual terms)
and the risk of a default occurring at initial recognition (based on the original, unmodified contractual terms).
Any amount written off as a result of the modification of contractual terms would not be reversed. While for
retail portfolios, renegotiated loans remain in stage 3 for their renegotiated lifetime.
183
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
For wholesale portfolios, the quantitative comparison assesses default risk using a lifetime probability of
default which encompasses a wide range of information including the obligor’s customer risk rating (‘CRR’),
macroeconomic condition forecasts and credit transition probabilities. Significant increase in credit risk is
measured by comparing the average probability of default (‘PD’) for the remaining term estimated at
origination with the equivalent estimation at reporting date (or that the origination PD has doubled in the
case of origination CRR greater than 3.3). The significance of changes in PD was informed by expert credit
risk judgment, referenced to historical credit migrations and to relative changes in external market rates. The
quantitative measure of significance varies depending on the credit quality at origination as follows:
For loans originated prior to the implementation of HKFRS 9, the origination PD does not include
adjustments to reflect expectations of future macroeconomic conditions since these are not available without
the use of hindsight. In the absence of this data, origination PD must be approximated assuming through-
the-cycle (‘TTC’) PDs and TTC migration probabilities, consistent with the instrument’s underlying
modelling approach and the CRR at origination. For these loans, the quantitative comparison is
supplemented with additional CRR deterioration based thresholds as set out in the table below:
184
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
For retail portfolios, default risk is assessed using a reporting date PD derived from credit history which
incorporate all available information about the customer. This PD is adjusted for the effect of macroeconomic
forecasts and is considered to be a reasonable approximation of a lifetime PD measure. Retail exposures are
divided into account level and homogeneous segment level measurement. Within each portfolio, the stage 2
accounts are defined as accounts with 12-month PD greater than the average 12-month PD of loans in that
portfolio 12 months before they become 30 days past due.
Measurement of ECL
The assessment of credit risk, and the estimation of ECL, are unbiased and probability-weighted, and
incorporate all available information which is relevant to the assessment including information about past
events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events and economic conditions
at the reporting date. In addition, the estimation of ECL should take into account the time value of money.
In general, the Group calculates ECL using three main components, PD, a loss given default (‘LGD’) and
the exposure at default (‘EAD’).
The 12-month ECL is calculated by multiplying the 12-month PD, LGD and EAD. Lifetime ECL is
calculated using the lifetime PD instead. The 12-month and lifetime PDs represent the probability of default
occurring over the next 12 months and the remaining maturity of the instrument respectively.
185
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Group leverages the Basel framework where possible, with recalibration to meet the differing HKFRS
9 requirements as follows:
While 12-month PDs are recalibrated from Basel models where possible, the lifetime PDs are determined
by projecting the 12-month PD using a term structure. For the wholesale methodology, the lifetime PD also
takes into account credit migration, i.e. a customer migrating through the CRR bands over its life.
The ECL for wholesale stage 3 is determined on an individual basis using a discounted cash flow (‘DCF’)
methodology. The expected future cash flows are based on the credit risk officer’s estimates as at the
reporting date, reflecting reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections of future recoveries and
expected future receipts of interest. Collateral is taken into account if it is likely that the recovery of the
outstanding amount will include realisation of collateral based on its estimated fair value of collateral at the
time of expected realisation, less costs for obtaining and selling the collateral. The cash flows are discounted
at a reasonable approximation of the original effective interest rate. For significant cases, cash flows under
four different scenarios are probability-weighted by reference to the three economic scenarios applied more
generally by the Group and the judgement of the credit risk officer in relation to the likelihood of the workout
strategy succeeding or receivership being required. For less significant cases, the effect of different economic
scenarios and work-out strategies is approximated and applied as an adjustment to the most likely outcome.
186
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The PD, LGD and EAD models which support these determinations are reviewed regularly in light of
differences between loss estimates and actual loss experience, but given that HKFRS 9 requirements have
only just been applied, there has been little time available to make these comparisons. Therefore, the
underlying models and their calibration, including how they react to forward-looking economic conditions,
remain subject to review and refinement. This is particularly relevant for lifetime PDs, which have not been
previously used in regulatory modelling and for the incorporation of ‘Upside scenarios’ which have not been
subject to experience gained through stress testing.
The exercise of judgement in making estimations requires the use of assumptions which are highly subjective
and very sensitive to the risk factors, in particular to changes in economic and credit conditions across a
large number of geographical areas. Many of the factors have a high degree of interdependency and there is
no single factor to which loan impairment allowances as a whole are sensitive. Therefore, sensitivities are
considered in relation to key portfolios which are particularly sensitive to a few factors and the results should
be further extrapolated. Risk Management section (a) ‘Credit Risk’ under MD&A sets out the assumptions
underlying the Central scenario and information about how scenarios are developed in relation to the Group’s
top and emerging risks and its judgements, informed by consensus forecasts of professional industry
forecasters. The adjustment from the ECL determined by using the Central scenario alone, which is used to
calculate an unbiased expected loss, provides an indication of the overall sensitivity of ECL to different
economic assumptions.
187
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Securities lending and borrowing transactions are generally secured, with collateral taking the form of
securities or cash advanced or received. The transfer of securities to counterparties under these agreements
is not normally reflected on the balance sheet. Cash collateral advanced or received is recorded as an asset
or a liability respectively.
The Group’s investments in subsidiaries and associates are stated at cost less any impairment losses.
Investment in associates is recognised using the equity method. Under this method, such investments are
initially stated at cost, including attributable goodwill, and are adjusted thereafter for the post-acquisition
change in the Group’s share of net assets less any impairment losses. An impairment loss recognised in prior
periods shall be reversed through the income statement if, and only if, there has been a change in the estimates
used to determine the recoverable amount of the investment since the last impairment loss was recognised.
The Group previously elected to apply HKAS 40 ‘Investment Properties’ to account for all its leasehold
properties that were held for investment purposes.
leasehold land and buildings where the fair value of the land cannot be reliably separated from the value
of the building at inception of the lease and the premises are not clearly held under an operating lease; and
leasehold land and buildings where the value of the land can be reliably separated from the value of the
building at inception of the lease and the term of the lease is not less than 50 years.
188
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Depreciation is calculated to write off the valuation of the land and buildings over their estimated useful
lives as follows:
leasehold land is depreciated over the unexpired terms of the leases; and
buildings and improvements thereto are depreciated at the greater of 2% per annum on the straight-line
basis or over the unexpired terms of the leases or over the remaining estimated useful lives of the buildings.
On revaluation of the land and buildings, depreciation accumulated during the year will be eliminated.
Depreciation charged on revaluation surplus of the land and buildings is transferred from ‘Premises
revaluation reserve’ to ‘Retained profits’.
On disposal of the land and buildings, the profit and loss is calculated as the difference between the net sales
proceeds and the net carrying amount and recognised in the income statement. Surpluses relating to the land
and buildings disposed of included in the ‘Premises revaluation reserve’ are transferred as movements in
reserves to ‘Retained profits’.
The land owned by Hong Kong Government permits its use under leasehold arrangements. Similar
arrangements exist in mainland China. The Group accounts for its interests in own use of the leasehold land
as owned assets.
Plant and equipment are subject to review for impairment if there are events or changes in circumstances
that indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
189
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
At the date of disposal of a business, attributable goodwill is included in the Group’s share of net assets in
the calculation of the gain or loss on disposal.
- The PVIF is stated at a valuation determined at the reporting date by using the methodology as described
in note 2(t).
- Computer software acquired is stated at cost less amortisation and impairment allowances. Amortisation
of computer software is charged to the income statement over its estimated useful life. Costs incurred in
the development phase of a project to produce application software for internal use are capitalised and
amortised over the software’s estimated useful life, usually five years.
Intangible assets that have an indefinite estimated useful life or are not yet ready for use are tested for
impairment annually. Intangible assets that have a finite estimated useful life, except for the PVIF, are stated
at cost less amortisation and accumulated impairment losses and are amortised over their estimated useful
lives. Estimated useful life is the lower of legal duration and expected economic life. Intangible assets are
subject to impairment review if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable profits for the year, using tax rates enacted or
substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Current tax assets and liabilities are settled on an individual taxable entity basis.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from deductible and taxable temporary differences respectively, being
the differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purpose and
their tax bases. Deferred tax assets also arise from unused tax losses and unused tax credits. Deferred tax
assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available, against which
deductible temporary differences can be utilised at each reporting date.
Deferred tax is calculated using the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which the assets will
be realised or the liabilities settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are offset when they arise in the same tax reporting group and relate to income taxes levied by
the same taxation authority, and when a legal right to offset exists in the entity.
190
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(ii) The Group provides retirement benefits for staff members and operates defined benefit and defined
contribution schemes and participates in mandatory provident fund schemes in accordance with the relevant
laws and regulations.
Payments to defined contribution plans and state-managed retirement benefit plans, where the Group’s
obligations under the plans are equivalent to a defined contribution plan, are charged as an expense as they
incur.
The costs recognised for funding defined benefit plans are determined using the projected unit credit method,
with annual actuarial valuations performed on each plan. The net charge to the income statement mainly
comprises the service cost and the net interest on the net defined benefit liability and is presented in operating
expenses. Service cost comprises current service cost, past service cost, and gain or loss on settlement.
The net defined benefit asset or liability recognised in the balance sheet represents the difference between
the fair value of plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligations. In the case of a defined
benefit asset, it is limited to the present value of available refunds and reductions in future contributions to
the plan.
(r) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle
a present legal or constructive obligation arising from past events and a reliable estimate can be made as to
the amount of the obligation. Contingent liabilities, which include certain guarantees and letters of credit
pledged as collateral security, are possible obligations that arise from past events whose existence will be
confirmed only by the occurrence, or non-occurrence, of one or more uncertain future events not wholly
within the control of the Group; or are present obligations that have arisen from past events but are not
recognised because it is not probable that settlement will require the outflow of economic benefits, or because
the amount of the obligations cannot be reliably measured. Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the
financial statements but are disclosed unless the probability of settlement is remote.
Financial guarantee liabilities are initially recognised at their fair value, and subsequently carried at the
higher of:
- the amount determined in accordance with the expected credit loss model under HKFRS 9 ‘Financial
Instruments’ and
- the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, the cumulative amount of income recognised in
accordance with the principles of HKFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’.
191
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
A contract issued by the Group that transfers financial risk, without significant insurance risk, is classified
as an investment contract, and is accounted for as a financial instrument. The financial assets held by the
Group for the purpose of meeting liabilities under insurance and investment contracts are classified and
accounted for based on their classifications as set out in notes 2(e) to 2(i)
Reinsurance premiums, netted by the reinsurers’ share of provision for unearned premiums, are accounted
for in the same reporting period as the premiums for the direct insurance contracts to which they relate.
The PVIF is determined by discounting future earnings expected to emerge from business currently in force,
using appropriate assumptions in assessing factors such as future mortality and morbidity, lapse rates, levels
of expenses and a risk discount rate that reflects the risk premium attributable to the respective long-term
insurance business. The valuation has also included explicit risk margins for non-economic risks in the
projection assumptions, and explicit allowances for financial options and guarantees using stochastic
methods. Risk discount rates are set on an active basis with reference to market risk free yields and
incorporate the explicit margins and allowances for certain risks and uncertainties in place of implicit
adjustments. Movements in the PVIF are included in other operating income on a pre-tax basis. The PVIF
is reported under ‘Intangible assets’ in the balance sheet.
Liabilities under unit-linked life insurance contracts are at least equivalent to the surrender or transfer value
which is calculated by reference to the value of the relevant underlying funds or indices.
A liability adequacy test is carried out on insurance liabilities to ensure that the carrying amount of the
liabilities is sufficient in the light of current estimates of future cash flows. When performing the liability
adequacy test, all expected cash flows are discounted and compared with the carrying value of the liability.
When a shortfall is identified it is charged immediately to the income statement.
192
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Insurance liabilities
The estimation of insurance liabilities involves selecting statistical models and making assumptions about
future events which need to be frequently calibrated against experience and forecasts. The sensitivity of
insurance liabilities to potential changes in key assumptions is set out in the MD&A.
Investment management fee receivables are recognised in the income statement over the period of the
provision of the investment management services, in ‘Net fee income’.
The results of branches, subsidiaries and associates not reporting in Hong Kong dollars are translated into
Hong Kong dollars at the average rates of exchange for the reporting period. Exchange differences arising
from the re-translation of opening foreign currency net investments and the related cost of hedging, if any,
and exchange differences arising from re-translation of the result for the reporting period from the average
rate to the exchange rate ruling at the period-end, are recognised in other comprehensive income and
accumulated separately in equity in the foreign exchange reserve.
Exchange differences on a monetary item that is part of a net investment in a foreign operation are recognised
in the income statement of separate subsidiary’s financial statements. In the consolidated financial statements,
the corresponding exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated
separately in equity in the foreign exchange reserve. On disposal of a foreign operation, exchange differences
relating thereto previously recognised in reserves are recognised in the income statement.
193
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
HKFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ requires segmental disclosure to be based on the way that the Group's chief
operating decision maker regards and manages the Group, with the amounts reported for each reportable
segment being the measures reported to the Group's chief operating decision maker for the purpose of
assessing segmental performance and making decision about operating matters.
194
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
of which:
- interest expense from subordinated liabilities 515 420
Wealth Global
2020 and Personal Commercial Banking
Banking Banking and Markets Other Total
- securities broking and
related services 1,933 205 17 - 2,155
- retail investment funds 1,291 22 - - 1,313
- insurance 446 75 70 - 591
- account services 251 133 7 - 391
- remittances 65 187 36 - 288
- cards 1,175 1,142 48 - 2,365
- credit facilities 22 433 143 - 598
- trade services - 334 31 - 365
- other 131 110 39 242 522
Fee income 5,314 2,641 391 242 8,588
Fee expense (1,100) (1,045) (90) 14 (2,221)
4,214 1,596 301 256 6,367
2019
195
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2020 2019
of which:
Net fee income on financial assets that are not at fair value through profit or loss
(other than amounts included in determining the effective interest rate) 1,743 2,270
- fee income 3,711 4,624
- fee expense (1,968) (2,354)
Net fee income on trust and other fiduciary activities where the Group holds or
invests assets on behalf of its customers 982 794
- fee income 1,069 884
- fee expense (87) (90)
5 Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss
2020 2019
2020 2019
Net losses from disposal of debt securities measured at amortised cost (13) (4)
Net gains from disposal of debt securities measured at
fair value through other comprehensive income 3 26
(10) 22
7 Dividend income
2020 2019
Dividend income:
- listed investments 144 130
- unlisted investments 13 13
157 143
196
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2019
Gross insurance premium income 16,903 3 16,906
Reinsurers’ share of gross insurance premium income (1,254) - (1,254)
Net insurance premium income 15,649 3 15,652
10 Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders
2019
197
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
12 Operating expenses
2020 2019
Employee compensation and benefits:
- salaries and other costs* 5,613 5,744
- retirement benefit costs
-- defined benefit scheme (note 48(a)) 180 192
-- defined contribution scheme (note 48(b)) 309 293
6,102 6,229
(b) The numbers of the five highest paid individuals with emoluments within the following bands are:
2020 2019
Number of Number of
HK$ Individuals Individuals
5,500,001 - 6,000,000 1 -
6,000,001 - 6,500,000 - 1
6,500,001 - 7,000,000 1 -
7,000,001 - 7,500,000 1 1
7,500,001 - 8,000,000 - 1
13,000,001 - 13,500,000 1 -
16,000,001 - 16,500,000 - 1
24,500,001 - 25,000,000 1 -
26,000,001 - 26,500,000 - 1
5 5
The emoluments of the five highest paid individuals set out above include the emoluments of two (2019: two) Executive Directors
which are included in note 14. There is no Non-executive Director included in the table above (2019: Nil).
198
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
14 Directors’ remunerations
The emoluments of the Directors of the Bank disclosed pursuant to section 383 of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance (Cap.622) and the Companies (Disclosure of Information about
Benefits of Directors) Regulation were set out below:
Emoluments
Salaries, Contribution
allowances to retirement Variable bonus (5)
and benefits benefit Cash Shares Total Total
(6) (4)
Fees in kind schemes Deferred Non-deferred Deferred Non-deferred 2020 2019
'000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000
Executive Directors
Ms Louisa Cheang, Chief Executive (1) - 11,570 685 3,632 2,422 4,212 2,422 24,943 26,135
(1)
Ms Margaret W H Kwan - 3,604 18 576 863 636 863 6,560 7,621
Non-Executive Directors
Dr Raymond K F Ch'ien (3) 1,030 - - - - - - 1,030 800
(3)
Dr John C C Chan 830 - - - - - - 830 650
Mr Nixon Chan 275 - - - - - - 275 500
(Resigned on 22 May 2020)
Ms L Y Chiang (3) 960 - - - - - - 960 740
Mr Kenneth S Y Ng 890 - - - - - - 890 680
(3)
Ms Irene Y L Lee 1,296 - - - - - - 1,296 970
(2)
Ms Sarah C Legg - - - - - - - - 83
(Resigned on 1 Mar 2019)
Dr Eric K C Li (3) 1,290 - - - - - - 1,290 970
Dr Vincent H S Lo 660 - - - - - - 660 500
(2)
Mr Peter T S Wong 730 - - - - - - 730 560
(3)
Mr Michael W K Wu 960 - - - - - - 960 740
(2)
Ms Kathleen C H Gan 660 - - - - - - 660 321
Notes :
(1) In line with the HSBC Group’s remuneration policy, no Director's fees were paid to those Directors who were full time employees of the Bank or its subsidiaries.
(2) Fees receivable as a Director of Hang Seng Bank Limited were surrendered to The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited in accordance with the HSBC Group's
internal policy.
(4) The Bank made contributions during 2020 into the retirement benefit schemes of which the Bank’s Directors are among their members. The aggregate amount of pensions received
by the past Directors of the Bank under the relevant pension schemes amounted to HK$1.674m in 2020.
(5) The amount of variable bonus (deferred and non-deferred) comprises the cash and the estimated purchase cost of the award of HSBC Holdings plc Restricted Share.
(6) Benefits in kind mainly include estimated money value of other non-cash benefits: accommodation, car, insurance premium.
(7) Remunerations/emoluments for Executive Directors are for services in connection with management of the affairs of the Hang Seng Bank and its subsidiary undertakings.
199
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
15 Auditors’ remuneration
2020 2019
2020 2019
17 Tax expense
2020 2019
The current tax provision is based on the estimated assessable profit for 2020, and is determined for the Bank and its subsidiaries
operating in the Hong Kong SAR by using the Hong Kong profits tax rate of 16.5 per cent (2019: 16.5 per cent). For subsidiaries
and branches operating in other jurisdictions, the appropriate tax rates prevailing in the relevant countries are used. Deferred tax is
calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised.
(b) Reconciliation between taxation charge and accounting profit at applicable tax rates:
2020 2019
Notional tax on profit before tax, calculated at Hong Kong tax rate of 16.5%
(2019: 16.5%) 3,203 4,754
Tax effect of:
- different tax rates in other countries/areas 68 70
- non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses (289) (591)
- share of losses/(profits) of associates 12 (28)
- others (250) (214)
Actual charge for taxation 2,744 3,991
200
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is based on earnings of HK$15,987m in 2020 (2019: HK$24,421m), adjusted
for the AT1 capital instrument related deductions and on the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue of 1,911,842,736
shares (unchanged from 2019).
19 Dividends/Distributions
2020 2019
The fourth interim dividend is proposed after the balance sheet date, and has not been recognised as a liability at the balance sheet
date.
(b) Dividends attributable to the previous year, approved and paid during the year:
2020 2019
Fourth interim dividend in respect of
the previous year, approved and paid during the year,
of HK$4.00 per share (2019: HK$3.60 per share) 7,647 6,883
US$900 million Fixed to floating rate perpetual capital instrument (coupon rate at 6.03 per cent
and then three-month US dollar LIBOR plus 4.02 per cent from the first call date) 2 421 110
US$600 million Fixed to floating rate perpetual capital instrument (coupon rate at 6.0 per cent
and then three-month US dollar LIBOR plus 4.06 per cent from the first call date) 2 279 -
700 342
1
This subordinated loan was early repaid in 2019 and distributions were made on repayment.
2
These subordinated loans were issued in 2019.
201
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
20 Segmental analysis
Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard 8 ('HKFRS 8') requires segmental disclosure to be based on the way that the Group’s chief
operating decision maker regards and manages the Group, with the amounts reported for each reportable segment being the measures
reported to the Group’s chief operating decision maker for the purpose of assessing segmental performance and making decisions
about operating matters. To align with the internal reporting information, the Group has presented the following four reportable
segments.
- Wealth and Personal Banking (formerly ‘Retail Banking and Wealth Management’) offers a broad range of products and
services to meet the personal banking, consumer lending and wealth management needs of individual customers. Personal banking
products typically include current and savings accounts, time deposits, mortgages and personal loans, credit cards, insurance and
wealth management;
- Commercial Banking offers a comprehensive suite of products and services to corporate, commercial and small and medium-
sized enterprises ('SME') customers – including corporate lending, trade and receivable finance, payments and cash management,
treasury and foreign exchange, general insurance, key-person insurance, investment services and corporate wealth management;
- Global Banking and Markets provides tailored financial solutions to major corporate and institutional clients. Undertaking a
long-term relationships management approach, its services include general banking, corporate lending, interest rates, foreign
exchange, money markets, structured products and derivatives, etc. Global Banking and Markets also manages the funding and
liquidity positions of the Bank and other market risk positions arising from banking activities;
- Other mainly represents the Bank’s holdings of premises, investment properties, equity shares and subordinated debt funding as
well as central support and functional costs with associated recoveries.
For the purpose of segmental analysis, the allocation of revenue reflects the benefits of capital and other funding resources
allocated to the business segments by way of internal capital allocation and fund transfer-pricing mechanisms. Cost of central
support services and functions are allocated to business segments based on cost drivers which reflect or correlate with the use of
services. Bank-owned premises are reported under the “Other” segment. When these premises are utilised by business segments,
notional rent will be charged to the relevant business segments with reference to market rates.
202
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Wealth Global
and Personal Commercial Banking
Banking Banking and Markets Other Total
2020
* Depreciation/amortisation included
in operating expenses (23) (8) (3) (2,349) (2,383)
At 31 December 2020
203
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Wealth Global
and Personal Commercial Banking
Banking Banking and Markets Other Total
2019
* Depreciation/amortisation included
in operating expenses (25) (4) (2) (2,105) (2,136)
At 31 December 2019
204
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The geographical regions in this analysis are classified by the location of the principal operations of the subsidiary companies or, in the
case of the Bank itself, by the location of the branches responsible for reporting the results or advancing the funds. Consolidation
adjustments made in preparing the Group’s financial statements upon consolidation are included in the 'Inter-region elimination'.
Inter-
Mainland region
Hong Kong China Others elimination Total
At 31 December 2020
At 31 December 2019
* Non-current assets consist of investment properties, premises, plant and equipment, intangible assets and right-of-use assets.
205
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table provides an analysis of consolidated total assets and liabilities by residual contractual maturity at the balance sheet date. These balances are included in the
maturity analysis as follows:
- Trading assets and liabilities (including trading derivatives but excluding reverse repos, repos and debt securities in issue) are included in the 'Not more than 1 month' time bucket,
because trading balances are typically held for short periods of time.
- Financial assets and liabilities with no contractual maturity (such as equity securities) are included in the 'Over 5 years' time bucket. Undated or perpetual instruments are classified
based on the contractual notice period which the counterparty of the instrument is entitled to give. Where there is no contractual notice period, undated or perpetual contracts are
included in the 'Over 5 years' time bucket.
- Non-financial assets and liabilities with no contractual maturity are included in the 'Over 5 years' time bucket.
- Liabilities under insurance contracts are included as 'Non-financial liabilities' and reported in the 'Over 5 years' time bucket. Liabilities under investment contracts are classified in
accordance with their remaining contractual maturity. Undated investment contracts are included in the 'Over 5 years' time bucket, however, such contracts are subject to surrender
and transfer options by the policyholders.
2020
Assets
Liabilities
Deposits from banks 11,272 - 1,671 - - - - - 12,943
Current, savings and
other deposit accounts 1,086,162 97,481 17,417 5,077 2,513 562 260 - 1,209,472
Repurchase agreements - non-trading 4,177 - 1,020 450 - 623 - - 6,270
Trading liabilities 30,937 - - - - - - - 30,937
Derivative financial instruments 18,828 134 305 42 99 463 988 2 20,861
Financial liabilities
designated at fair value 12,934 9,741 5,783 2,281 1,027 348 - 416 32,530
Certificates of deposit
and other debt securities in issue 3,253 20,369 30,624 141 7,413 700 - - 62,500
1
Subordinated liabilities - - - - - - 6,240 13,241 19,481
Accruals and other financial liabilities 18,258 6,239 2,973 442 328 555 909 262 29,966
Financial liabilities 1,185,821 133,964 59,793 8,433 11,380 3,251 8,397 13,921 1,424,960
1 The maturity for subordinated liabilities is based on the earliest date on which the Group is required to pay, i.e. the callable date.
206
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2019
Assets
Liabilities
Deposits from banks 2,491 - - - - - - - 2,491
Current, savings and
other deposit accounts 990,689 144,226 59,235 4,390 4,442 387 89 - 1,203,458
Repurchase agreements - non-trading 1,878 - - - - - - - 1,878
Trading liabilities 37,976 - - - - - - - 37,976
Derivative financial instruments 6,792 8 8 8 34 122 426 64 7,462
Financial liabilities
designated at fair value 13,399 7,354 4,130 863 1,008 2,400 - 426 29,580
Certificates of deposit
and other debt securities in issue 664 5,346 4,116 3,022 3,342 - 700 - 17,190
Subordinated liabilities - - - - - - - 19,494 19,494
Accruals and other financial liabilities 22,591 6,223 2,764 518 520 371 498 250 33,735
Financial liabilities 1,076,480 163,157 70,253 8,801 9,346 3,280 1,713 20,234 1,353,264
207
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2020 2019
23 Trading assets
2020 2019
Use of derivatives
The Group transacts derivatives for three primary purposes: to create risk management solutions for clients, to manage the portfolio risk arising from client business,
and to manage and hedge the Group’s own risks. Derivatives (except for derivatives which are designated as effective hedging instruments) are held for trading.
Within the held for trading classification are two types of derivative instruments: those used in sales and trading activities, and those used for risk management
purposes but which for various reasons do not meet the qualifying criteria for hedge accounting. The second category includes derivatives managed in conjunction
with financial instruments designated at fair value. These activities are described more fully below.
The Group’s derivative activities give rise to significant open positions in portfolios of derivatives. These positions are managed constantly to ensure that they remain
within acceptable risk levels. When entering into derivative transactions, the Group employs the same credit risk management framework to assess and approve
potential credit exposures that it uses for traditional lending.
The following table shows the notional contract amounts and fair value of assets and liabilities by each class of derivatives.
Exchange rate 1,010,478 29,851 1,040,329 11,833 14 11,847 13,791 704 14,495
Interest rate 532,761 62,932 595,693 4,653 164 4,817 4,663 1,351 6,014
Equity and other 33,863 - 33,863 517 - 517 352 - 352
At 31 December 2020 1,577,102 92,783 1,669,885 17,003 178 17,181 18,806 2,055 20,861
Exchange rate 883,348 14,949 898,297 4,869 267 5,136 4,821 60 4,881
Interest rate 462,424 56,197 518,621 1,603 135 1,738 1,581 625 2,206
Equity and other 33,145 - 33,145 464 - 464 375 - 375
At 31 December 2019 1,378,917 71,146 1,450,063 6,936 402 7,338 6,777 685 7,462
Trading derivatives
Most of the Group’s trading derivative transactions relate to sales and trading activities. Sales activities include the structuring and marketing of derivative products to
customers to enable them to take, transfer, modify or reduce current or expected risks. Trading activities in derivatives include market-making and risk management.
Market-making entails quoting bid and offer prices to other market participants for the purpose of generating revenues based on spread and volume. Risk management
activity is undertaken to manage the risk arising from client transactions, with the principal purpose of retaining client margin. Other derivatives classified as held for
trading include non-qualifying hedging derivatives.
Any initial gain or loss on financial instruments where the valuation is dependent on unobservable parameters is deferred over the life of the contract or until the
instrument is redeemed, transferred or sold or the fair value becomes observable. All derivatives that are part of qualifying hedging relationships have valuations
based on observable market parameters.
208
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Group applies hedge accounting to manage the following risks: interest rate, foreign exchange and net investment in foreign operations. The Group uses
derivatives (principally interest rate and currency swaps) for hedging purposes in the management of its own asset and liability portfolios and structural positions.
This enables the Group to optimise the overall costs to the Group of accessing debt capital markets, and to mitigate the market risk which would otherwise arise from
structural imbalances in the maturity and other profiles of its assets and liabilities. The accounting treatment of hedging transactions varies according to the nature of
the instrument hedged and the type of hedging transaction. Derivatives may qualify as hedges for accounting purposes if they are fair value hedges, cash flow hedges,
or hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
The Group enters into fixed-for-floating-interest-rate swaps to manage the exposure to changes in fair value due to movements in market interest rates on certain
fixed rate financial instruments which are not measured at fair value through profit or loss, including debt securities held and issued.
Sources of hedge ineffectiveness may arise from basis risk including but not limited to the discount rates used for calculating the fair value of derivatives, hedges
using instruments with a non-zero fair value and notional and timing differences between the hedged items and hedging instruments.
For some debt securities held, the Group manages interest rate risk in a dynamic risk management strategy. The assets in scope of this strategy are high quality
fixed-rate debt securities, which may be sold to meet liquidity and funding requirements.
The Group’s cash flow hedging instruments consist principally of interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps that are used to manage the variability in future
interest cash flows of non-trading financial assets and liabilities, arising due to changes in market interest rates and foreign currency basis.
The Group applies macro cash flow hedging for interest rate risk exposures on portfolios of replenishing current and forecasted issuances of non-trading assets
and liabilities that bear interest at variable rates, including rolling such instruments. The amounts and timing of future cash flows, representing both principal and
interest flows, are projected for each portfolio of financial assets and liabilities on the basis of their contractual terms and other relevant factors, including
estimates of prepayments and defaults. The aggregate cash flows representing both principal balances and interest cash flows across all portfolios are used to
determine the effectiveness and ineffectiveness. Macro cash flow hedges are considered to be dynamic hedges.
The Group also hedges the variability in future cash-flows on foreign-denominated financial assets and liabilities arising due to changes in foreign exchange
market rates with cross currency swaps; these are considered non-dynamic hedges.
At 31 December 2020, HK$46,175m (2019: HK$47,028m) of the notional amounts of interest rate derivatives designated in hedge accounting relationships
represent the extent of the risk exposure managed by the Group that is directly affected by market-wide IBOR reform. The Group has also designated hedge
accounting relationships which involve cross currency swaps, although the amount is not significant.
Risks and governance regarding the impact of the market-wide benchmarks reform is set out in the Management Discussion and Analysis of the 2020 Annual
Report.
209
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
25 Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
2020 2019
Debt securities 2 2
Equity shares 4,253 6,916
Investment funds 15,158 10,442
Other 1,282 1,411
20,695 18,771
2020 2019
of which:
Placings with and advances to central banks 13,216 7,616
There were no overdue advances, impaired advances and rescheduled advances to banks at 31 December 2020 (2019: Nil).
% %
Expected credit losses as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers 0.55 0.37
2020 2019
% %
Gross impaired loans and advances as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers 0.60 0.22
210
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Loans and advances to customers include net investments in equipment leased to customers under finance leases and hire purchase
contracts having the characteristics of finance leases. The contracts usually run for an initial period of 5 to 25 years, with an option for
acquiring by the lessee the leased asset at nominal value at the end of the lease period. The total minimum lease payments receivable
and their present value at the year-end are as follows:
Present
value of Interest Total
minimum income minimum
lease relating lease
payments to future payments
receivable periods receivable
2020
Amounts receivable:
- within one year 357 139 496
- one to two years 382 121 503
- two to three years 380 122 502
- three to four years 377 123 500
- four to five years 359 117 476
- after five years 5,863 912 6,775
7,718 1,534 9,252
Expected credit losses (94)
Net investments in finance leases and hire purchase contracts 7,624
2019
Amounts receivable:
- within one year 356 152 508
- one to two years 358 130 488
- two to three years 363 132 495
- three to four years 359 133 492
- four to five years 356 134 490
- after five years 5,675 1,017 6,692
7,467 1,698 9,165
Expected credit losses (60)
Net investments in finance leases and hire purchase contracts 7,407
211
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
28 Financial investments
2020 2019
Financial investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income:
- treasury bills 268,031 212,041
- debt securities 144,814 125,927
- equity shares 7,051 5,881
419,896 343,849
Debt instruments measured at amortised cost:
- treasury bills 3,667 500
- debt securities 131,330 117,435
Less: Expected credit losses (173) (80)
134,824 117,855
554,720 461,704
There was no overdue debt securities at 31 December 2020 (2019: Nil). The Group did not hold any asset-backed securities, mortgage-
backed securities and collateralised debt obligations in 2020 and 2019.
There was no financial investments determined to be impaired at 31 December 2020 (2019: Nil).
Assets pledged
2020 2019
The table above shows assets where a charge has been granted to secure liabilities on a legal and contractual basis. These transactions
are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to collateralised transactions including sale and repurchase agreements and
securities lending, derivative margining, and include assets pledged to cover short positions and to facilitate settlement processes with
clearing houses.
Assets transferred
Transferred financial assets not qualifying for full derecognition and associated financial liabilities
2020 2019
Carrying amount of Carrying amount of
Transferred Associated Transferred Associated
assets liabilities assets liabilities
The financial assets shown above include amounts transferred to third parties that do not qualify for derecognition, notably debt
securities held by counterparties as collateral under repurchase agreements and debt securities lent under securities lending
agreements. As the substance of these transactions is secured borrowings, the collateral assets continue to be recognised in full and the
related liabilities, reflecting the Group’s obligation to repurchase the transferred assets for a fixed price at a future date, are also
recognised on the balance sheet. As a result of these transactions, the Group is unable to use, sell or pledge the transferred assets for
the duration of the transactions. The Group remains exposed to interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk on these pledged
instruments. The counterparty’s recourse is not limited to the transferred assets.
212
#
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Collateral received
Assets accepted as collateral related primarily to standard securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements and derivative margining. These transactions are conducted under
terms that are usual and customary to standard securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements and derivative margining.
Fair value of collateral permitted to sell or repledge in the absence of default 13,440 5,659
Fair value of collateral actually sold or repledged 101 -
30 Subsidiaries
The following list contains only the particulars of subsidiaries which principally affected the results, assets or liabilities of the Group as at 31 December 2020. The class of shares
held is ordinary.
Place of
incorporation & Percentage of
Name of company operation Principal activities Issued equity capital shareholding
Hang Seng Bank (China) Limited 1 People’s Republic Banking RMB8,317,500,000 100%
of China
Hang Seng Insurance Company Limited Hong Kong SAR Retirement benefits and HK$6,426,184,570 100%
life assurance
Hang Seng Investment Hong Kong SAR Fund management HK$10,000,000 100%
Management Limited
Hang Seng Securities Limited Hong Kong SAR Stockbroking HK$26,000,000 100%
Yan Nin Development Company Limited Hong Kong SAR Investment holding HK$100,000 100%
Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited Hong Kong SAR Index compilation and HK$10,000 100%
licensing
High Time Investments Limited Hong Kong SAR Investment holding HK$2,250,010,000 100%
Hang Seng Qianhai Fund Management People’s Republic Fund raising, fund sales and RMB500,000,000 70%
Company Limited 2 of China asset management
1
Represents a wholly foreign owned limited liability company registered under the PRC laws.
2
Represents a foreign-majority-owned contractual joint venture registered under the PRC laws.
All the above companies are unlisted. All principal subsidiaries are held directly by the Bank except for Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited. The principal places of operation
are the same as the places of incorporation.
Some of the principal subsidiaries are regulated banking and insurance entities and as such, are required to maintain certain minimum levels of capital and liquid assets to support
their operations. The effect of these regulatory requirements is to limit the extent to which the subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Bank in the form of repayment of certain
shareholder loans or cash dividends.
31 Interest in associates
2020 2019
Unlisted
The interests in Barrowgate Limited and GZHS Research Co., Ltd. ('GZHS') are owned by the subsidiaries of the Bank.
The above two associates are accounted for using the equity method in the Consolidated Financial Statements as at 31 December 2020 and 2019.
For the year ended 31 December 2020, the financial results of GZHS was included in the Consolidated Financial Statements based on financial statements drawn up to 30
September 2020, but taking into account any changes in the subsequent period from 1 October 2020 to 31 December 2020 that would materially affect the results. The Group has
taken advantage of the provision contained in HKAS 28 'Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures' whereby it is permitted to include the attributable share of associates’
results based on accounts drawn up to a non-coterminous period end where the difference must be no greater than three months.
Revenue
Less
Assets Liabilities Equity Revenue Expenses Expenses
2020
100 per cent 10,564 996 9,568 (254) 51 (305)
The Group’s effective interest 2,604 246 2,358 (62) 13 (75)
2019
100 per cent 11,256 1,025 10,231 891 206 685
The Group’s effective interest 2,773 253 2,520 221 53 168
At 31 December 2020, the investment in associates were tested for impairment by estimating the recoverable amount of the investment based on 'Value in use'. No impairment
loss was recognised since the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount (2019: Nil).
213
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1
Includes leasehold land and building assets for which the rights of use are considered sufficient to constitute control and for which there
are insignificant lease liabilities. They are therefore presented as owned assets.
Cost or valuation:
At 1 January 29,498 10,121 5,919 45,538
Additions 84 21 1,017 1,122
Disposals and write-offs - - (2,974) (2,974)
Elimination of accumulated depreciation on
revalued premises (1,033) - - (1,033)
Deficit on revaluation:
- debited to premises revaluation reserve (1,542) - - (1,542)
- debited to income statement - (892) - (892)
Transfer (165) 165 - -
Exchange adjustments and other 56 - 20 76
At 31 December 26,898 9,415 3,982 40,295
Accumulated depreciation:
At 1 January - - (4,514) (4,514)
Charge for the year (note 12) (1,033) - (458) (1,491)
Attributable to assets sold or written off - - 2,957 2,957
Elimination of accumulated depreciation on
revalued premises 1,033 - - 1,033
Exchange adjustments and other - - (23) (23)
At 31 December - - (2,038) (2,038)
Representing:
- measure at cost - - 1,944 1,944
- measure at valuation 26,898 9,415 - 36,313
26,898 9,415 1,944 38,257
2019
Cost or valuation:
At 1 January 29,344 10,108 5,368 44,820
Additions 215 31 665 911
Disposals and write-offs - - (106) (106)
Elimination of accumulated depreciation on
revalued premises (1,032) - - (1,032)
Surplus on revaluation:
- credited to premises revaluation reserve 888 - - 888
- credited to income statement - 80 - 80
Transfer 98 (98) - -
Exchange adjustments and other (15) - (8) (23)
At 31 December 29,498 10,121 5,919 45,538
Accumulated depreciation:
At 1 January - - (4,202) (4,202)
Charge for the year (note 12) (1,032) - (412) (1,444)
Attributable to assets sold or written off - - 99 99
Elimination of accumulated depreciation on
revalued premises 1,032 - - 1,032
Exchange adjustments and other - - 1 1
At 31 December - - (4,514) (4,514)
Representing:
- measure at cost - - 1,405 1,405
- measure at valuation 29,498 10,121 - 39,619
29,498 10,121 1,405 41,024
214
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(c) The carrying amount of all premises which have been stated in the balance sheet would have been as follows had they been stated at cost
less accumulated depreciation:
2020 2019
(d) The Group leases out investment properties under operating leases. The leases typically run for an initial period of 2 to 3 years, and may
contain an option to renew the lease after that date at which time all terms are renegotiated. None of the leases includes contingent rentals.
2020 2019
The Group’s total future minimum lease payments receivable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
2020 2019
The Group’s premises and investment properties were revalued by Cushman & Wakefield Limited ('C&W'), an independent professional
valuer, at 30 October 2020, and were updated by C&W for any material changes in the valuation as at 31 December 2020. It was
confirmed that there was no material change in value since 30 October 2020. The valuations were carried out by qualified persons who
are members of the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors. The basis of valuations of premises and investment properties were market value
which is consistent with the definition of fair value under HKFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement' and take into account the highest and best
use of the property from the perspective of market participants.
The level into which a fair value measurement is classified for properties is determined with reference to the observability and
significance of the inputs used in the valuation technique as follows:
Level 1: Fair value measured using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2: Fair value measured using observable inputs and not using significant unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs are inputs for
which market data are not available.
The resultant values of both investment properties and properties held for own use for the Group were Level 3 in the fair value
hierarchy as defined in HKFRS 13 'Fair value measurement'. During the year ended 31 December 2020, there were no transfers into or
out of Level 3 (2019: Nil).
215
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The fair value of tenanted investment properties is determined using Investment Approach on the basis of capitalisation of net incomes
with due allowance for outgoings and reversionary income potential.
The fair values of the majorities of properties owned and occupied by the Group or vacant investment properties in Hong Kong and the PRC
are determined using Direct Comparison Approach assuming sale with immediate vacant possession and by making reference to comparable
sales evidence.
For properties with development potentials, their values are on redevelopment basis and reported upon the assessment on the basis that
each of these properties will be developed to its full potential and completed to a good standard. The fair values are determined using
Direct Comparison Approach by making reference to comparable sales transactions as available in the relevant market and have also
taken into account the development costs that will be expended to complete the development.
Reconciliation of the movement between opening and closing balances of Level 3 properties measured at fair value using a valuation
technique with significant unobservable inputs is under note 32(a). The following table details the gains or losses recognised in profit or
loss in relation to the Level 3 premises and investment properties:
Investment
2020 Premises properties
2019
Valuation Unobservable
technique(s) input(s) Range
2020 2019
Investment properties Investment approach Market yields 2.35% to 4.95% 2.4% to 4.95%
(reversionary yield)
The fair value measurement for tenanted investment properties is positively correlated to the market rental but inversely correlated to
the market yields. The valuations for premises held for own use or vacant investment properties take into account the characteristic of
the properties which included the location, size, shape, view, floor level, year of completion and other factors collectively. Higher
premium for properties with better characteristics will result in a higher fair value measurement.
33 Intangible assets
2020 2019
216
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2020 2019
The sensitivity of PVIF valuation to changes in individual assumptions at the balance sheet dates is shown in the Management Discussion
and Analysis.
(b) Goodwill
2020 2019
Goodwill arising from acquisition of the remaining 50 per cent of Hang Seng Life Limited from HSBC Insurance (Asia-Pacific) Holdings
Limited amounted to HK$329m is allocated to cash-generating units of Life Insurance - Hang Seng Insurance Company Limited ('HSIC')
for the purpose of impairment testing.
During 2020, there was no impairment of goodwill (2019: Nil). Impairment testing in respect of goodwill is performed annually by
comparing the recoverable amount of cash generating unit based on appraisal value with the carrying amount of its net assets, including
attributable goodwill.
The appraisal value comprises HSIC’s net assets (other than value of business acquired and goodwill), the PVIF and the expected value of
future business as at 31 December 2020. The PVIF is determined by discounting future earnings expected from the current business,
taking into account factors such as future mortality, lapse rates, levels of expenses and risk discount rate. The above details are shown in
note 33(a) and the Management Discussion and Analysis of the Annual Report 2020.
2020 2019
Cost:
At 1 January 2,363 1,754
Additions 988 823
Amounts written off (89) (211)
Exchange and others 15 (3)
At 31 December 3,277 2,363
Accumulated amortisation:
At 1 January (1,207) (1,242)
Charge for the year (note 12) (297) (164)
Impairment - (10)
Amounts written off 87 211
Exchange and others (7) (2)
At 31 December (1,424) (1,207)
217
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
34 Other assets
2020 2019
Other accounts included 'Assets held for sale' of HK$28m (2019: HK$19m). It also included 'Retirement benefit assets' of HK$7m (2019:
HK$26m).
There was no accumulated loss recognised directly in equity relating to assets held for sale for 2020 and 2019. There was no significant
impaired, overdue or rescheduled other assets at the year-end of 2020 and 2019.
By type:
- demand and current accounts 137,050 99,431
- savings accounts 825,547 670,573
- time and other deposits 273,715 457,952
1,236,312 1,227,956
36 Trading liabilities
2020 2019
At 31 December 2020, the accumulated loss in fair value attributable to changes in own credit risk for financial liabilities designated at fair
value was HK$6m (2019: accumulated loss HK$5m).
By type:
- certificates of deposit in issue 64,016 19,204
- other debt securities in issue 3,755 2,639
67,771 21,843
39 Other liabilities
2020 2019
218
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Reinsurers'
Gross share1 Net
2020
Non-linked
At 1 January 132,051 (8,503) 123,548
Claims and benefits paid (11,770) 1,900 (9,870)
Increase in liabilities to policyholders 17,583 661 18,244
Foreign exchange and other movements 4,747 471 5,218
At 31 December 142,611 (5,471) 137,140
Unit-linked
At 1 January 69 - 69
Claims and benefits paid (10) - (10)
Increase in liabilities to policyholders 10 - 10
At 31 December 69 - 69
2019
Non-linked
At 1 January 120,134 (8,788) 111,346
Claims and benefits paid (12,386) 2,138 (10,248)
Increase in liabilities to policyholders 21,153 (1,339) 19,814
Foreign exchange and other movements 3,150 (514) 2,636
At 31 December 132,051 (8,503) 123,548
Unit-linked
At 1 January 61 - 61
Claims and benefits paid (5) - (5)
Increase in liabilities to policyholders 13 - 13
At 31 December 69 - 69
1 Amounts recoverable from reinsurance of liabilities under insurance contracts are included in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet in 'Other assets'.
(a) Current tax and deferred tax are represented in the balance sheet:
2020 2019
219
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The major components of deferred tax (assets)/liabilities recognised in the balance sheet and the movements during the year are as follows:
The amounts of unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognised in the balance sheet are HK$480m (2019: HK$780m). Of these
amounts, HK$213m (2019: HK$241m) have no expiry date and the remaining will expire within 5 years.
There was no other temporary difference for which no deferred tax asset is recognised in the balance sheet as at 31 December 2020 (2019: Nil).
There were no deferred tax liabilities not recognised as at 31 December 2020 (2019: Nil).
220
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
42 Subordinated liabilities
2020 2019
Nominal value Description
HK$5,460 million Floating rate subordinated loan due May 2028, callable from 20271 5,460 5,460
2
HK$4,680 million Floating rate subordinated loan due June 2029, callable from 2028 4,680 4,680
3
HK$6,240 million Floating rate subordinated loan due June 2026, callable from 2025 6,240 6,240
4
US$400 million Floating rate subordinated loan due June 2030, callable from 2029 3,101 3,114
19,481 19,494
Representing:
- measured at amortised cost 19,481 19,494
1 Interest rate at three-month HK dollar HIBOR plus 1.425 per cent per annum, payable quarterly, to the maturity date.
2 Interest rate at three-month HK dollar HIBOR plus 1.564 per cent per annum, payable quarterly, to the maturity date.
3 Interest rate at three-month HK dollar HIBOR plus 1.342 per cent per annum, payable quarterly, to the maturity date.
4 Interest rate at three-month US dollar LIBOR plus 1.789 per cent per annum, payable quarterly, to the maturity date.
The Bank has not had any defaults of principal, interest or other breaches with respect to its debt instruments during 2020 (2019: nil).
43 Share capital
2020 2019
No. of shares HK$ No. of shares HK$
Ordinary shares, issued and fully paid
At 1 January and 31 December 1,911,842,736 9,658 1,911,842,736 9,658
US$900 million Fixed to floating rate perpetual capital instrument callable from September 20241 7,044 7,044
2
US$600 million Fixed to floating rate perpetual capital instrument callable from June 2024 4,700 4,700
11,744 11,744
1 Coupon rate is 6.03% and then three-month US dollar LIBOR plus 4.02 per cent from the first call date.
2 Coupon rate is 6.00% and then three-month US dollar LIBOR plus 4.06 per cent from the first call date.
The additional tier 1 capital instruments, which are qualified as loss-absorbing capacity, are perpetual and subordinated. The coupon payments of these capital
instruments may be cancelled at the sole discretion of the Bank. The capital instruments will be written down at the point of non-viability on the occurrence of a
trigger event as defined in the Banking (Capital) Rules. They rank higher than ordinary shares in the event of a winding-up.
221
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Commitments 3
Documentary credits and short-term trade-related transactions 3,248 2,570
Forward asset purchases and forward forward deposits placed 7,432 4,356
Undrawn formal standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments to lend 488,813 491,744
499,493 498,670
1
Financial guarantees are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss incurred because a specified debtor
fails to make payment when due in accordance with the original or modified terms of a debt instrument. The amounts in the above table are nominal
principal amounts.
2
Performance and other guarantees include re-insurance letters of credit related to particular transactions, trade-related letters of credit issued without
provision for the issuing entity to retain title to the underlying shipment, performance bonds, bid bonds, standby letters of credit and other transaction-
related guarantees.
3
Includes HK$356,776m of commitments at 31 December 2020 (2019: HK$347,921m) to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are applied
where the Group has become party to an irrevocable commitment.
The above table discloses the nominal principal amounts of commitments (excluding capital commitments), guarantees and other contingent liabilities, which
represents the amounts at risk should contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default. As a significant portion of guarantees and commitments is expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total of the nominal principal amounts is not representative of future liquidity requirements.
It also reflects the Group’s maximum exposure under a large number of individual guarantee undertakings. The risks and exposures from guarantees are
captured and managed in accordance with the Group’s overall credit risk management policies and procedures. Guarantees are subject to an annual credit
review process.
(b) Contingencies
There is no material litigation expected to result in a significant adverse effect on the financial position of the Group, either collectively or individually.
Management believes that adequate provisions have been made in respect of such litigation.
46 Other commitments
Capital commitments
At 31 December 2020, capital commitments, mainly related to the commitment for renovation of branches and offices, were HK$916m (2019: HK$851m).
222
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to
settle on a net basis, or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously ('the offset criteria').
The 'Amounts not set off in the balance sheet' include transactions where:
- the counterparty has an offsetting exposure with the Group and a master netting or similar arrangement is in place with a right of set off only in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy, or the
offset criteria are otherwise not satisfied; and
- in the case of derivatives and reverse repurchase/repurchase, stock borrowing/lending and similar arrangements, cash and non-cash collaterals has been received and pledged.
Restated
Derivatives 6,568 - 6,568 (5,254) (378) (656) 280 770 7,338
Reverse repos, stock borrowing and
similar agreements classified as: 5,673 - 5,673 - (5,671) (2) - 986 6,659
- trading assets - - - - - - - - -
- non-trading assets 5,673 - 5,673 - (5,671) (2) - 986 6,659
Other assets 2,079 (1,625) 454 - - - 454 - 454
2
At 31 December 2019 14,320 (1,625) 12,695 (5,254) (6,049) (658) 734 1,756 14,451
Financial liabilities 3
Derivatives 18,048 - 18,048 (10,779) (658) (5,149) 1,462 2,813 20,861
Repos, stock lending and
similar agreements classified as: 2,193 - 2,193 - (2,193) - - 4,077 6,270
- trading liabilities - - - - - - - - -
- non-trading liabilities 2,193 - 2,193 - (2,193) - - 4,077 6,270
Other liabilities 3,563 (3,351) 212 - - - 212 - 212
3
At 31 December 2020 23,804 (3,351) 20,453 (10,779) (2,851) (5,149) 1,674 6,890 27,343
Restated
Derivatives 6,618 - 6,618 (5,254) (447) (917) - 844 7,462
Repos, stock lending and
similar agreements classified as: - - - - - - - 1,878 1,878
- trading liabilities - - - - - - - - -
- non-trading liabilities - - - - - - - 1,878 1,878
Other liabilities 1,629 (1,625) 4 - - - 4 - 4
3
At 31 December 2019 8,247 (1,625) 6,622 (5,254) (447) (917) 4 2,722 9,344
1
These exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Bank may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.
2
Amounts presented in the balance sheet included balances due from HSBC entities of HK$9,733m (2019: HK$6,520m).
3
Amounts presented in the balance sheet included balances due to HSBC entities of HK$8,334m (2019: HK$2,073m).
223 #
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Group operates two defined benefit schemes, the Hang Seng Bank Limited Defined Benefit Scheme ('HSBDBS'), which is the
principal scheme which covers about 18 per cent of the Group’s employees, and the Hang Seng Bank Limited Pension Scheme
('HSBPS'). HSBDBS was closed to new entrants with effect from 1 April 1999, and HSBPS was closed to new entrants with effect
from 31 December 1986. Since the defined benefit section of the HSBDBS is a final salary lump sum scheme, its exposure to
longevity risk and interest rate risk is limited.
These schemes are registered under Occupational Retirement Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 426 of the law of Hong Kong) ('the
Ordinance'). The trustee assumes the overall responsibility for the HSBDBS but a management committee has also been established
to broaden the governance. Its assets are held separately from the assets of the Group. The trustees are required by the Trust Deed to
act in the best interest of the scheme participants.
HSBDBS is predominantly a funded scheme with assets which are held in trust funds separate from the Group. The actuarial funding
valuation of the HSBDBS is reviewed at least on a triennial basis in accordance with local regulations. The actuarial assumptions
used to conduct the actuarial funding valuation of the HSBDBS vary according to the economic conditions.
The investment strategy of the HSBDBS is to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets, both Index ETFs/funds and bonds, with low
investment and liquidity risk. Each investment manager has been assigned an investment mandate with the target asset allocation.
The target asset allocations for the portfolio are as follows: Bonds (0 - 62%) and Index ETFs/funds (0 - 38%).
(i) Cumulative actuarial gains/(losses) recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of defined benefit schemes
2020 2019
(ii) Movements in the scheme assets and present value of the defined benefit obligations
Present Net
value of defined
Fair value defined benefit
of benefit (liability)/
scheme assets obligations asset
Interest income/(cost) on the defined benefit scheme asset/(liability) (note 12) 77 (87) (10)
Others - - -
Administrative costs and taxes paid by scheme (note 12) (7) - (7)
The Group expects to make HK$109m of contributions to defined benefit schemes during 2021 (2019: expected contributions for
2020 was HK$118m).
224
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(ii) Movements in the scheme assets and present value of the defined benefit obligations (continued)
Present Net
value of defined
Fair value defined benefit
of benefit (liability)/
scheme assets obligations asset
Interest income/(cost) on the defined benefit scheme asset/(liability) (note 12) 82 (96) (14)
Others - - -
Administrative costs and taxes paid by scheme (note 12) (8) - (8)
Benefits expected to be paid from the HSBDBS and HSBPS to retirees over each of the next five years, and in aggregate for the five
years thereafter, are as follows:
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026-2030
The duration of the principal scheme HSBDBS is 6.1 years (2019: 6.1 years) under the disclosure assumptions adopted.
225
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Quoted Of which
market placed with
price in the Group
active and HSBC
Value market Group
2020
Fair value of scheme assets
- Index ETFs/Funds 2,014 2,014 -
- Bonds 2,595 2,595 -
- Other* 70 70 32
4,679 4,679 32
2019
Fair value of scheme assets
- Index ETFs/Funds 1,722 1,722 -
- Bonds 2,724 2,724 -
- Other* 121 121 63
4,567 4,567 63
These schemes are funded defined benefit schemes and are administered by trustees with assets held separately from those of the
Group. The latest annual actuarial valuations at 31 December 2020 were performed by Mandy Chan, Fellow of the Society of
Actuaries of the United States, of Mercer (Hong Kong) Limited, using the Attained Age Method.
The Ordinance requires that registered retirement benefit schemes shall at all time be fully funded to meet its aggregate vested
liability (i.e. on a wind-up basis) in accordance with the recommendations contained in an actuarial certificate supplied under the
Ordinance. Any shortfall must be made up within the specified time under the Ordinance. Any deficits to meet the aggregate past
service liability (i.e. on an on-going basis) can however be eliminated over a period of time in accordance with the funding
recommendations of an actuary.
On an on-going basis, the value of the principal scheme assets of HSBDBS represented 102 per cent (2019: 102 per cent) of the
benefits accrued to scheme members, after allowing for expected future increases in salaries, and the resulting surplus amounted to
HK$88m (surplus in 2019: HK$87m). On a wind-up basis, the actuarial value of the HSBDBS assets represented 109 per cent (2019:
104 per cent) of the members’ vested benefits, based on salaries at that date, and the resulting surplus amounted to HK$360m
(surplus in 2019: HK$155m).
The determinations for actuarial funding valuation purposes are based on different methods and assumptions from those used for
financial reporting purposes, and as a result should neither be compared nor related to other determinations included in these
financial statements.
226
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The present value of the principal scheme’s obligation was a final lump sum salary and payment of HK$5,150m (2019:
HK$5,077m). The principal actuarial assumptions used to calculate the Group’s obligations for the HSBDBS for each year, and used
as the basis for measuring the expenses in relation to the scheme, were as follows:
HSBDBS
%
2020
Discount rate 0.45
Expected rate of salary increases 2.00
of which:
- 2021 2.00
- thereafter 4.00
2019
Discount rate 1.75
Expected rate of salary increases 4.00
of which:
- 2020 4.00
- thereafter 4.00
The Group determines the discount rates to be applied to its obligations in consultation with the schemes’ actuaries, on the basis of
current average yields of high quality (AA rated or equivalent) debt instruments, with maturities consistent with those of the defined
benefit obligations. Where there is not a deep market in corporate bonds, government bond yields have been used, and this is the case
for HSBDBS. The yield curve has been extrapolated where the term of the liabilities is longer than the duration of available bonds
and the discount rate used then takes into account the term of the liabilities and the shape of the yield curve.
The discount rate and rate of salary increase are sensitive to changes in market conditions arising during the reporting year. The
following table shows the effect of changes in these on the HSBDBS:
The effect of changes in key assumptions:
HSBDBS
2020 2019
Discount rate
- change in retirement benefit obligation at year end from a 25bps increase (78) (76)
- change in retirement benefit obligation at year end from a 25bps decrease 81 78
The principal defined contribution scheme for Group employees joining on or after 1 April 1999 is the HSBC Group Hong Kong
Local Staff Defined Contribution Scheme. The Bank and relevant Group entities also participate in mandatory provident fund
schemes ('MPF schemes') registered under the Hong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund Ordinance, which are also defined
contribution schemes.
Contributions made in accordance with the relevant scheme rules to these defined contribution schemes (including MPF schemes)
are charged to the income statement as below:
2020 2019
Under the schemes, the Group’s contributions are reduced by contributions forfeited by those employees who leave the schemes prior
to the contributions vesting fully. The forfeited contributions utilised during the year or available at the year-end to reduce future
contributions is HK$0.03m (2019: HK$0.04m).
227
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
49 Share-based payments
The Group participated in various share compensation plans as listed in the following tables that are operated by the HSBC Group for
acquiring of HSBC Holdings plc shares. These are to be settled by the delivery of shares of HSBC Holdings plc.
Award Policy
Deferred - Vesting of awards generally subject to continued employment with the Group
Share Awards - Vesting often staggered over a period ranging from three to seven years
- Vested shares may be subject to a retention requirement post-vesting
- Awards are generally subject to the rules of Share Plan and any performance conditions
- Awards granted from 2010 onwards are subject to a malus provision prior to vesting
- Awards granted to material risk takers from 2015 onwards are subject to clawback post-vesting
2020 2019
Number Number
('000) ('000)
The closing price of the HSBC Holdings plc share at 31 December 2020 was £3.79 (2019: £5.92).
The weighted average remaining vesting period as at 31 December 2020 was 0.59 years (2019: 0.60 years).
The fair values of share options at the date of grant of the options are calculated using a Black-Scholes model. The fair value of a
share award is based on the share price at the date of the grant.
2020 2019
The above charge was computed from the fair values of the share-based payment transaction when contracted, that arose under
employee share awards made in accordance with HSBC’s reward structures.
228
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(a) Immediate holding company and its subsidiaries and fellow subsidiaries
The Group entered into transactions with its immediate holding company and its subsidiaries as well as its fellow subsidiaries in the
ordinary course of business, mainly including lending activities, the acceptance and placement of interbank deposits, correspondent
banking transactions, off-balance sheet transactions and the provision of other banking and financial services. The activities were on
substantially the same terms, including interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with third party counterparties.
The Group used the IT service of, and shared an automated teller machine network with, its immediate holding company. The Group also
shares the costs of certain IT projects with and used certain processing services of fellow subsidiaries.
The Group maintained a staff retirement benefit scheme for which fellow subsidiary companies act as trustee and custodian and the
Group’s immediate holding company acts as administrator.
A fellow subsidiary company was appointed as fund manager to manage the Group’s life insurance investment portfolios. There was an
arrangement whereby a fellow subsidiary provided certain management services to the Group's insurance subsidiary. The fees on these
transactions are determined on an arm’s length basis.
The Bank acted as agent for promoting Mandatory Provident Fund products administered by its immediate holding company and
distributed retail investment funds for a fellow subsidiary company.
During 2020, the Bank has paid coupons on AT1 capital instruments of HK$700m to its immediate holding company (2019: HK$342m).
The aggregate amount of income and expenses arising from these transactions during the year, the balances of amounts due to and from
the relevant related parties, and the total contract amount of off-balance sheet transactions at the year-end are as follows:
Immediate holding
company and its
subsidiaries Fellow subsidiaries
* 2020 operating expenses included payment of HK$721m (2019: HK$593m) of software costs which were capitalised as intangible
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Group.
229
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of the Group and Bank. It includes members of the Board of Directors and Executive
Committee of the Bank. During the year, the members of the Bank's Executive Committee remained unchanged at
15. The amount of remuneration paid to key management personnel was pro-rata from the date of being appointed as
Directors of the Bank or members of Executive Committee, if any. The aggregate amount of remuneration of the key
management personnel during the year are as follows:
2020 2019
During the year, the Group provided credit facilities to and accepted deposits from key management personnel of the
Bank and its holding companies, their close family members and companies controlled or significantly influenced by
them. The credit facilities extended and deposit taken were provided in the ordinary course of business and on
substantially the same terms as for comparable transactions with persons of a similar standing or, where applicable,
with other employees.
Material transactions conducted with key management personnel of the Bank and its holding companies and parties
related to them are as follows:
2020 2019
For the year
Interest income 740 410
Interest expense 85 123
Fees and commission income 15 10
Maximum aggregate amount of loans and advances 45,274 18,627
At the year-end
Loans and advances 41,894 17,419
Deposits 11,640 7,926
Guarantees issued 558 349
Undrawn commitments 4,789 1,363
Change in expected credit losses recognised for the year and impairment allowances against balances outstanding at
the end of the year as required under HKFRS 9, in respect of Key Management Personnel were insignificant in both
years.
The Group adheres to Part 8 of Banking (Exposure Limits) Rules made under Section 81A of Banking Ordinance
regarding exposures to connected parties; this includes exposures to key management personnel, their relatives and
companies that may be directly or indirectly influenced or controlled by such individuals.
230
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Particulars of loans to directors disclosed pursuant to section 17 of the Companies (Disclosure of Information about
Benefits of Directors) Regulations for the year ended 31 December 2020 are shown as below.
2020 2019
Highest
balance Highest
during the Balance at 31 balance Balance at 31
year December during the year December
- Loans and advances 17,511 14,387 16,497 15,359
- Guarantees issued 431 237 348 345
The above relevant transactions in 2020 and 2019 were all transacted by the Bank.
No transaction, arrangement or contract (that is significant in relation to the Bank’s business), to which the Bank or
any of its holding companies or any of its subsidiaries or fellow subsidiaries was a party and in which a Director of the
Bank had, directly or indirectly, a material interest, subsisted as at the end of the year or at any time during the year.
(f) Associates
The Group provides certain banking and financial services to associates, including loans, overdrafts, interest and non-
interest bearing deposits and current accounts. Details of interests in associates can be found in note 31. Transactions
and balances during the year with associates were as follows:
2020 2019
Highest
balance Highest
during the Balance at 31 balance Balance at 31
year December during the year December
#
Amounts due from associates 6,973 247 6,782 2,116
#
Amounts due to associates 2,361 1,061 2,811 396
#
Representing associates in HSBC Group
The disclosure of the year-end balance and the highest amounts outstanding during the year is considered to be the
most meaningful information to represent the amount of transactions and outstanding balances during the year.
The transactions resulting in outstanding balances arose in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with third party counterparties.
The Group participates in various share option and share plans operated by HSBC Holdings plc whereby share options
or shares of HSBC Holdings plc are granted to employees of the Group. As disclosed in note 49, the Group recognises
an expense in respect of these share options and share awards. The cost borne by the ultimate holding company in
respect of these share options and share awards is treated as a capital contribution and is recorded under 'Other
reserves'. The balance of this reserve as at 31 December 2020 amounted to HK$688m comprising HK$668m relating
to share option schemes and HK$20m relating to share award schemes (2019: HK$673m comprising HK$668m
relating to share option schemes and HK$5m relating to share award schemes).
231
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Control framework
Fair values are subject to a control framework designed to ensure that they are either determined or validated by a function
independent of the risk-taker.
Where fair values are determined by reference to externally quoted prices or observable pricing inputs to models, independent price
determination or validation is utilised. For inactive markets, the Group sources alternative market information, with greater weight
given to information that is considered to be more relevant and reliable. Examples of the factors considered are price observability,
instrument comparability, consistency of data sources, underlying data accuracy and timing of prices.
For fair values determined using valuation models, the control framework includes development or validation by independent
support functions of the model logic, inputs, model outputs and adjustments. Valuation models are subject to a process of due
diligence before becoming operational and are calibrated against external market data on an ongoing basis.
Changes in fair value are generally subject to a profit and loss analysis process and are disaggregated into high-level categories
including portfolio changes, market movements and other fair value adjustments.
The majority of financial instruments measured at fair value are in Global Banking and Markets ('GBM'). GBM’s fair value
governance structure comprises its Finance function and Valuation Committee. Finance is responsible for establishing procedures
governing valuation and ensuring fair values are in compliance with accounting standards. The fair values are reviewed by the
Group's Valuation Committees, which consist of independent support functions.
Structured notes issued and certain other hybrid instruments are included within 'Financial liabilities designated at fair value' and
are measured at fair value. The credit spread applied to these instruments is derived from the spreads at which the Group issues
structured notes.
Gains and losses arising from changes in the credit spread of liabilities issued by the Group reverse over the contractual life of the
debt, provided that the debt is not repaid at a premium or a discount.
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined according to the following hierarchy:
- Level 1 – valuation technique using quoted market price: financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments in
active markets that the Group can access at the measurement date.
- Level 2 – valuation technique using observable inputs: financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models
where all significant inputs are observable.
- Level 3 – valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs: financial instruments valued using valuation techniques
where one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
232
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The accounting policies, control framework and hierarchy used to determine fair values in 2020 are consistent with those applied for the
Annual Report 2019. The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments carried at fair value and bases of valuation:
Liabilities
Trading liabilities 30,937 - - 30,937 - 30,937
Derivative financial instruments 8 14,712 - 14,720 6,141 20,861
Financial liabilities designated at fair value - 26,828 5,702 32,530 - 32,530
2019
Assets
Trading assets 43,731 3,626 - 47,357 - 47,357
Derivative financial instruments 307 5,255 3 5,565 1,773 7,338
Financial assets designated and
otherwise mandatorily measured at
fair value through profit or loss 10,607 2,655 5,509 18,771 - 18,771
Financial investments 287,807 53,863 2,179 343,849 - 343,849
Liabilities
Trading liabilities 37,976 - - 37,976 - 37,976
Derivative financial instruments 23 5,366 - 5,389 2,073 7,462
Financial liabilities designated at fair value - 21,839 7,741 29,580 - 29,580
* Included structured instruments and derivative contracts transacted with HSBC entities which are mainly classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy.
2020
Transfer from Level 1 to Level 2 8,214 251 - - - - -
Transfer from Level 2 to Level 1 12,011 664 - - - - -
2019
Transfer from Level 1 to Level 2 - - - - - - -
Transfer from Level 2 to Level 1 - - 1,268 - - - -
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to occur at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Transfers into and out
of levels of the fair value hierarchy are primarily attributable to observability of valuation inputs and price transparency.
233
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Fair value adjustments are adopted when the Group determines there are additional factors considered by market participants that
are not incorporated within the valuation model. Movements in the level of fair value adjustments do not necessarily result in the
recognition of profits or losses within the income statement, such as when models are enhanced and therefore fair value
adjustments may no longer be required.
Bid-offer
HKFRS 13 requires use of the price within the bid-offer spread that is most representative of fair value. Valuation models will
typically generate mid-market values. The bid-offer adjustment reflects the extent to which bid-offer costs would be incurred if
substantially all residual net portfolio market risks were closed using available hedging instruments or by disposing of, or
unwinding the position.
Uncertainty
Certain model inputs may be less readily determinable from market data, and/or the choice of model itself may be more subjective.
In these circumstances, an adjustment may be necessary to reflect the likelihood that market participants would adopt more
conservative values for uncertain parameters and/or model assumptions, than those used in the Group’s valuation model.
The DVA is an adjustment to the valuation of OTC derivative contracts to reflect the possibility that the Group may default, and
that the Group may not pay the full market value of the transactions.
The Group calculates a separate CVA and DVA for each legal entity, and for each counterparty to which the entity has exposure.
With the exception of central clearing parties, all third-party counterparties are included in the CVA and DVA calculations, and
these adjustments are not netted across Group entities.
The Group calculates the CVA by applying the probability of default ('PD') of the counterparty, conditional on the non-default of
the Group, to the Group’s expected positive exposure to the counterparty and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the
event of default. Conversely, the Group calculates the DVA by applying the PD of the Group, conditional on the non-default of the
counterparty, to the expected positive exposure of the counterparty to the Group and multiplying the result by the loss expected in
the event of default. Both calculations are performed over the life of the potential exposure.
For most products the Group uses a simulation methodology, which incorporates a range of potential exposures over the life of the
portfolio, to calculate the expected positive exposure to a counterparty. The simulation methodology includes credit mitigants,
such as counterparty netting agreements and collateral agreements with the counterparty.
The methodologies do not, in general, account for 'wrong-way risk' which arises when the underlying value of the derivative prior
to any CVA is positively correlated to the PD of the counterparty. When there is significant wrong-way risk, a trade-specific
approach is applied to reflect this risk in the valuation.
Model limitation
Models used for portfolio valuation purposes may be based upon a simplifying set of assumptions that do not capture all material
market characteristics. In these circumstances, model limitation adjustments are adopted.
234
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Financial instruments measured at fair value using a valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs - Level 3
Assets Liabilities
Financial assets
designated and
otherwise
mandatorily
measured Financial
at fair value liabilities
Financial Trading through Trading designated
investments assets profit or loss Derivatives liabilities at fair value Derivatives
2020
Private equity 2,907 - 8,933 - - - -
Structured notes - - - - - 5,702 -
Derivatives - - - 3 - - -
2,907 - 8,933 3 - 5,702 -
2019
Private equity 2,179 - 5,509 - - - -
Structured notes - - - - - 7,741 -
Derivatives - - - 3 - - -
2,179 - 5,509 3 - 7,741 -
Assets Liabilities
Financial assets
designated and
otherwise
mandatorily
measured Financial
at fair value liabilities
Financial Trading through Trading designated
investments assets profit or loss Derivatives liabilities at fair value Derivatives
235
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Assets Liabilities
Financial assets
designated and
otherwise
mandatorily
measured Financial
at fair value liabilities
Financial Trading through Trading designated
Investments Assets profit or loss Derivatives Liabilities at fair value Derivatives
In 2020, the transfer out of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities were predominantly resulted from change in observability in equity volatility. The
transfer out/in of Level 3 financial liabilities designated at fair value reflected the change in observability of FX and equity volatility.
The key unobservable inputs to Level 3 financial instruments include volatility and correlation for structured notes and deposits valued using option
models, bid quotes for corporate bonds valued using approaches that take into account of market comparables, and multiple items for private equity and
strategic investments. In the absence of an active market, the fair value of private equity and strategic investments is estimated on the basis of an analysis of
the investee’s financial position and results, risk profile, prospects and other factors, as well as by reference to market valuations for similar entities quoted
in an active market, or the price at which similar companies have changed ownership. The change in fair values due to changes in reasonably possible
alternative assumptions for these unobservable inputs is not significant.
Favourable and unfavourable changes are determined on the basis of sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis aims to measure a range of fair values
consistent with the application of a 95% confidence interval. Methodologies take account of the nature of the valuation technique employed, the availability
and reliability of observable proxies and historical data. When the available data is not amenable to statistical analysis, the quantification of uncertainty is
judgemental, but remains guided by the 95% confidence interval. The sensitivity of Level 3 fair values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions is not
significant.
236
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Sensitivity of Level 3 fair values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions by instrument type
Reflected in other
Reflected in profit or loss comprehensive income
Favourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable
changes changes changes changes
2020
Private equity 447 (447) 145 (145)
Derivatives - - - -
447 (447) 145 (145)
2019
Private equity 275 (275) 140 (140)
Derivatives 1 (1) - -
276 (276) 140 (140)
When the fair value of a financial instrument is affected by more than one unobservable assumptions, the above table reflects the most favourable or the
most unfavourable change from varying the assumptions individually.
Assets
Private equity 11,840 Net asset value N/A N/A
Liabilities
Structured notes 5,702 Option model Equity Volatility 6.89% - 30.67%
FX Volatility 6.05% - 22.68%
Assets
Private equity 7,688 Net asset value N/A N/A
Market-comparable Earnings Multiple 27 - 40
approach P/B ratios 0.45 - 1.63
Liquidity Discount 10% - 60%
Liabilities
Structured notes 7,741 Option model Equity Volatility 11.23% - 18.22%
FX Volatility 1.13% - 16.92%
237
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table provides an analysis of the fair value of financial instruments not measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For
all other instruments, the fair value is equal to the carrying value.
With
Quoted Using significant
market observable unobservable
Carrying price inputs inputs Fair
amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 value
2020
Financial Assets
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading 13,360 - 13,354 - 13,354
Placings with and advances to banks 44,357 - 44,325 - 44,325
Loans and advances to customers 944,774 - - 936,466 936,466
Financial investments – at amortised cost 134,824 21,986 124,289 - 146,275
Financial Liabilities
Deposits from banks 12,943 - 12,943 - 12,943
Current, savings and other deposit accounts 1,209,472 - 1,209,501 - 1,209,501
Repurchase agreements – non-trading 6,270 - 6,270 - 6,270
Certificates of deposit and other debt securities in issue 62,500 - 62,539 - 62,539
Subordinated liabilities 19,481 - 20,092 - 20,092
2019
Financial Assets
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading 6,659 - 6,659 - 6,659
Placings with and advances to banks 65,807 - 65,739 - 65,739
Loans and advances to customers 942,930 - - 940,506 940,506
Financial investments – at amortised cost 117,855 15,418 106,569 - 121,987
Financial Liabilities
Deposits from banks 2,491 - 2,491 - 2,491
Current, savings and other deposit accounts 1,203,458 - 1,203,538 - 1,203,538
Repurchase agreements – non-trading 1,878 - 1,878 - 1,878
Certificates of deposit and other debt securities in issue 17,190 - 17,178 - 17,178
Subordinated liabilities 19,494 - 20,333 - 20,333
238
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(b) Fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value (continued)
Other financial instruments not carried at fair value are typically short-term in nature or reprice to current market rates frequently. Accordingly, their
carrying amounts are reasonable approximations of their fair values.
The calculation of fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value is described below.
The calculation of fair value incorporates the Group’s estimate of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It does not reflect the economic benefits and costs that the Group expects to
flow from the instruments’ cash flows over their expected future lives.
Fair values approximate carrying amounts as their balances are generally short dated.
To determine the fair value of loans and advances to banks and customers, loans are segregated, as far as possible, into portfolios of similar
characteristics. Fair values are based on observable market transactions, when available. When they are unavailable, fair values are estimated using
valuation models incorporating a range of input assumptions. These assumptions may include: value estimates from third-party brokers reflecting over-the-
counter trading activity; forward-looking discounted cash flow models, taking account of expected customer prepayment rates, using assumptions that the
Group believes are consistent with those that would be used by market participants in valuing such loans; new business rates estimates for similar loans;
and trading inputs from other market participants including observed primary and secondary trades. The fair value of loans reflects expected credit losses
at the balance sheet date and estimates of market participants’ expectations of credit losses over the life of the loans, and the fair value effect of repricing
between origination and the balance sheet date. For credit impaired loans, fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows over the time period
they are expected to be recovered.
Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows, applying current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value of a
deposit repayable on demand is assumed to be the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date.
Fair values are determined using quoted market prices at the balance sheet date where available, or by reference to quoted market prices for similar
instruments.
The fair values in this note are stated at a specific date and may be significantly different from the amounts which will actually be paid on the maturity or
settlement dates of the instruments. In many cases, it would not be possible to realise immediately the estimated fair values given the size of the portfolios
measured. Accordingly, these fair values do not represent the value of these financial instruments to the Group as a going concern.
The Group enters into transactions with unconsolidated structured entities in the normal course of business through the holding of collective investment funds
established by HSBC Group and third parties. The majority of these funds held related to the insurance business. At 31 December 2020, the Group’s interests
in unconsolidated structured entities were recognised in financial assets mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss of HK$15,158m and trading
assets of HK$45m (2019: financial assets mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss of HK$10,442m and trading assets of HK$11m). These
collective investment funds include investment in unit trusts, private equity funds, hedge funds and infrastructure funds which provide the Group with a
variety of investment opportunities through managed investment strategies.
Owing to the passive nature of these investments, the maximum exposure to loss from these interests is limited to the associated equity price risk and the
capital commitments. The maximum exposure to loss, which represents the maximum loss that the Group could be required to report as a result of its
involvement with these collective investment funds regardless of the probability of the loss being incurred, is equivalent to the carrying amount of these
investments and the outstanding capital commitments of HK$7,427m (2019: HK$4,350m) to invest in several alternative investment funds for funding future
alternative invesments in global companies under respective investment mandates.
53 Comparative figures
Certain comparative figures in the Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform with current year's presentation.
The immediate and ultimate holding companies of the Bank are The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong) and
HSBC Holdings plc (incorporated in England) respectively.
239
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ASSETS
Cash and balances at central banks 9,745 11,725
Trading assets 35,590 46,786
Derivative financial instruments 14,358 6,566
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured
at fair value through profit or loss 77 177
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading 13,360 5,673
Placings with and advances to banks 28,635 53,350
Loans and advances to customers 866,379 870,343
Amounts due from subsidiaries 37,826 16,742
Financial investments 389,060 331,133
Investments in subsidiaries 20,166 20,166
Investment properties 4,014 4,313
Premises, plant and equipment 24,942 26,060
Intangible assets 1,718 1,041
Other assets 31,654 26,702
Total assets 1,477,524 1,420,777
Equity
Share capital 9,658 9,658
Retained profits 106,200 103,517
Other equity instruments 11,744 11,744
Other reserves 19,551 19,657
Shareholders' equity 147,153 144,576
Total equity and liabilities 1,477,524 1,420,777
240
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Other reserves
Financial
Other Premises assets at Cash flow Foreign
Share equity Retained revaluation FVOCI hedge exchange Total
capital instruments profits1 reserve reserve reserve reserve Others 2
equity
At 1 January 2019 9,658 6,981 96,887 15,931 1,223 (11) 21 669 131,359
Profit for the year - - 21,188 - - - - - 21,188
Other comprehensive income (net of tax) - - 140 580 1,779 27 (5) (4) 2,517
Debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income - - - - 24 - - - 24
Equity instruments designated at fair value through
other comprehensive income - - - - 1,755 - - - 1,755
Cash flow hedges - - - - - 27 - - 27
Change in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value
upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk - - - - - - - (4) (4)
Property revaluation - - - 580 - - - - 580
Actuarial gains on defined benefit plans - - 211 - - - - - 211
Exchange differences and others - - (71) - - - (5) - (76)
Total comprehensive income for the year - - 21,328 580 1,779 27 (5) (4) 23,705
Cancellation and repayment of AT1 capital instrument - (6,981) - - - - - - (6,981)
Issue of new AT1 capital instruments - 11,744 - - - - - - 11,744
Dividends paid - - (14,914) - - - - - (14,914)
Coupons paid on AT1 capital instruments - - (342) - - - - - (342)
Movement in respect of share-based payment arrangements - - 1 - - - - 4 5
Transfers - - 557 (557) - - - - -
At 31 December 2019 9,658 11,744 103,517 15,954 3,002 16 16 669 144,576
1 Retained profits are the cumulative net earnings of the Bank that have not been paid out as dividends, but retained to be reinvested in the business. To satisfy the provisions of the Hong Kong Banking Ordinance and local regulatory requirements for prudential supervision purposes,
the Bank has earmarked a 'regulatory reserve' from retained profits. Movements in the reserve are made directly through retained earnings. As at 31 December 2020, the effect of this requirement is to restrict the amount of reserves which can be distributed by the Bank to shareholders
by HK$1,332m (2019: HK$3,421m).
2 Other reserves comprise share-based payment reserve and own credit risk reserve. The share-based payment reserve is used to record the amount relating to share awards and options granted to employees of the Group by the ultimate holding company. The own credit risk reserve is
for the change in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk.
3 Dividends paid in 2020 represented the payment of fourth interim dividend of 2019 and the first three interim dividends of 2020 amounted to HK$7,647m and HK$5,161m respectively.
241
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Bank statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2020 (continued)
The Bank and its banking subsidiaries operate under regulatory jurisdictions which require the maintenance of minimum capital
adequacy ratios and which could therefore potentially restrict the amount of realised profits which can be distributed to shareholders.
At 31 December 2020, the aggregate amount of reserves available for distribution to equity shareholders of the Bank as calculated
under the provision of Part 6 of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) amounted to HK$99,841m (2019: HK$94,427m).
After considering regulatory capital requirement and business development needs, an amount of HK$5,353m (2019: HK$7,647m)
has been declared as the proposed fourth interim dividend in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2020. The difference
between the aggregate distributable reserves of HK$99,841m and the Bank’s retained profit of HK$106,200m as reported above
mainly represents the exclusion of unrealised revaluation gain on investment properties and the regulatory reserve of the Bank.
The financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 23 February 2021.
242 #
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Members of Hang Seng Bank Limited
(incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability)
Opinion
The consolidated financial statements of Hang Seng Bank Limited (the “Bank”) and its subsidiaries (together, the
“Group”) set out on pages 170 to 242, which comprise:
Our opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position
of the Group as at 31 December 2020, and of its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows
for the year then ended in accordance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (“HKFRSs”) issued by the
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“HKICPA”) and have been properly prepared in compliance
with the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Hong Kong Standards on Auditing (“HKSAs”) issued by the HKICPA.
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of
the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We are independent of the Group in accordance with the HKICPA’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
(“the Code”), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our
audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide
a separate opinion on these matters.
243
Key Audit Matters (continued)
Nature of the Key Audit Matter Matters discussed with the Audit
Committee
At 31 December 2020, the Group recorded an expected We discussed the appropriateness of the
credit loss (“ECL”) provision on loans and advances to methodologies, their application, significant
customers of HK$5,180m. assumptions, significant data and disclosures
with the Audit Committee, giving consideration
The determination of the ECL provision requires the use of to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and
complex credit risk methodologies based on the Group’s continued geopolitical tensions between the US
historic experience of the correlations between defaults and and China. We further discussed the governance
losses, borrower creditworthiness and economic conditions, and controls over ECL, with a focus on the impact
which can result in limitations in their reliability to from the COVID-19 pandemic.
appropriately estimate ECL. Significant judgement and
subjectivity are involved in determining whether these In relation to the methodologies, we focused our
methodologies and their application in models remain discussions on:
appropriate and in determining the quantum of any
methodology application and model
management judgemental adjustments required to account
validation, including where models were
for late breaking events, model deficiencies and expert credit
changed during the year; and
judgement applied following management review and
the identification and assessment of model
challenge.
limitations and resulting management
Significant judgement is also required to determine judgemental adjustments made to derive the
assumptions, which involve subjectivity and estimation ECL, in particular for approaches adopted in
uncertainty. The significant assumptions include those with response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
greater levels of management judgement and for which
variations have the most significant impact on ECL. In relation to significant assumptions and data,
Specifically, these include likelihoods of economic scenarios, we focused on those which are most sensitive
any alternative and additional scenarios used, customer risk including:
ratings and probabilities of default, and the prospects of
the severity and likelihood of economic
future recoverability of credit impaired wholesale exposures.
scenarios and the probabilities assigned to
Likewise, there is inherent uncertainty with the consensus
those scenarios;
economic forecasts data from external economists.
the determination and migration of
customer risk ratings; and
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and continued
geopolitical tensions between the US and China increase the assumptions around the future
inherent risk and estimation uncertainty involved in recoverability of significant credit impaired
determining the ECL provision and the level of credit risk wholesale exposures.
associated with the Group’s customers. The speed and
severity of the economic shock caused specifically by the We further discussed the associated disclosures
COVID-19 pandemic and consequent government and in the Annual Report 2020, in particular the
regulator responses may have altered the correlations impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
between losses, borrower creditworthiness and economic determining ECL and continued geopolitical
conditions, as well as impacted economic factors such as tensions between the US and China, and the
GDP and unemployment, and consequently the extent and resulting estimation uncertainty.
timing of customer defaults. This broadens the range of
possible outcomes in estimating ECLs, which increases the
judgement required in assessing the appropriateness of
existing methodologies and economic forecasts data from
external economists, and in determining assumptions. ECLs
have been adjusted through management judgemental
adjustments to reflect these limitations. In addition, certain
changes to models used for the ECL determination have
been made during 2020.
244
Key Audit Matters (continued)
We tested controls in place over the methodologies, their application, significant assumptions and data used to
determine the ECL provision. Specifically, these included controls over:
We performed substantive audit procedures over the compliance of ECL methodologies with the requirements
of HKFRS 9. We engaged professionals with experience in ECL modelling to assess the appropriateness of
changes to models during the year, and for a sample of those models, we independently reperformed the
modelling for certain aspects of the ECL calculation. We also assessed the appropriateness of methodologies and
related models that did not change during the year, giving specific considerations to the COVID-19 pandemic
and whether management judgemental adjustments were needed. Where management judgemental adjustments
were made, we assessed ECL determined and the analysis supporting them.
We further performed the following to assess the significant assumptions, data and disclosures:
• We challenged the Bank’s basis for determining significant assumptions and, where relevant, their
interrelationships;
• We involved our economic experts in assessing the reasonableness of the severity and likelihood of the
Group’s economic scenarios. These assessments considered the sensitivity of the ECL provision to variations
in the severity and likelihood of different economic scenarios;
• We tested a sample of customer risk ratings assigned to wholesale exposures;
• We have independently assessed other significant assumptions and obtained relevant corroborating
evidence. We further considered whether the judgments made in selecting the significant assumptions
would give rise to indicators of possible management bias;
• We performed various substantive audit procedures over critical data used in the determination of ECL to
ensure these are relevant and reliable; and
• We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in relation to expected credit losses on loans and advances to
customers made in the Annual Report 2020 in the context of the applicable financial reporting framework.
245
Key Audit Matters (continued)
Nature of the Key Audit Matter Matters discussed with the Audit
Committee
The Group has operations across a few locations The significance of IT access management to our
supporting a wide range of products and services, resulting audit was discussed at Audit Committee meetings
in an IT environment that is large, complex and during the year. We further presented identified
increasingly reliant on third parties. The Group’s financial control observations related to IT access
reporting processes rely upon a significant element of this management and discussed our related audit
IT environment, both within the Group’s operations and response.
financial reporting.
IT access management controls in place were tested for systems and data relevant to financial reporting that we
relied upon as part of our audit. Specifically, these included controls over:
We also independently assessed controls related to password policies and system configurations, and performed
substantive audit procedures in relation to access right removal, privileged access, IT user information and
segregation of duties.
• Where inappropriate access was identified, we understood and assessed the nature of the access, and when
required, obtained additional evidence on the appropriateness of activities performed; and
• Where necessary, we identified and tested compensating business controls and performed other audit
procedures that addressed the risk that inappropriate changes were made to systems and data.
246
Key Audit Matters (continued)
The present value of in-force long-term insurance business (“PVIF”) and liabilities under non-
linked life insurance contracts
Nature of the Key Audit Matter Matters discussed with the Audit
Committee
As at 31 December, the Group has recorded an asset for PVIF We discussed the appropriateness of the
of HK$22,551m and liabilities under non-linked life methodologies, their application, significant
insurance contracts of HK$142,611m. assumptions and disclosures with the Audit
Committee. In relation to assumptions, we
The determination of these balances requires the use of focused on those for which variations had the
complex actuarial methodologies that are applied in models most significant impact on the valuation of PVIF
and involves significant judgement about future outcomes. and the liabilities under non-linked life insurance
Specifically, significant judgement is required in deriving carrying values, including economic assumptions
the economic assumptions, and assumptions related to and assumptions related to longevity, mortality,
longevity, mortality, persistency and expenses. These persistency and expenses.
assumptions are subject to estimation uncertainty, and
movements in certain of these assumptions can have a
material impact on the PVIF asset and the liabilities under
non-linked life insurance contracts.
We tested controls in place over the determination of PVIF asset and the liabilities under non-linked life
insurance contracts. Specifically, these included controls over:
• policy data reconciliations from the policyholder administration system to the actuarial valuation system;
• assumptions setting;
• review and determination of valuation methodologies and corresponding models;
• restriction of user access to the models; and
• production and approval of the actuarial results.
With the assistance of our actuarial experts, we performed the following audit procedures to assess the
methodologies used, their application, significant assumptions, data and disclosures:
• We assessed the appropriateness of the methodologies used, their application and the mathematical
accuracy of the calculations;
• We challenged the Group’s basis for determining significant assumptions and, where relevant, their
interrelationships. We have independently assessed these assumptions and obtained relevant corroborating
evidence. We further considered whether the judgements made in selecting the significant assumptions
would give rise to indicators of possible management bias;
• We performed substantive audit procedures over critical data used in the determination of these balances to
ensure these are relevant and reliable; and
• We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in relation to the asset for PVIF and the liabilities under non-
linked life insurance contracts made in the Annual Report 2020 in the context of the applicable financial
reporting framework.
- Management Discussion and Analysis – Risk, (h) Insurance manufacturing operation risk, page 90
- Note 2 on the consolidated financial statements: Significant accounting policies, (t) Insurance contracts,
pages 192 - 193
- Note 33 on the consolidated financial statements: Intangible assets, pages 216 - 217
- Note 40 on the consolidated financial statements: Liabilities under insurance contracts, page 219
247
Other Information
The directors of the Bank are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises all of the
information included in the Annual Report other than the consolidated financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon, which we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report, and the Banking Disclosure Statement for the
year ended 31 December 2020, which is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not and will
not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon, apart from the specific information presented therein that is
identified as being an integral part of the consolidated financial statements and, therefore, covered by our audit
opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other
information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent
with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be
materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s
report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that
fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
When we read the Banking Disclosure Statement for the year ended 31 December 2020, if we conclude that there is
a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to the Audit Committee and take
appropriate action considering our legal rights and obligations.
Responsibilities of Directors and the Audit Committee for the Consolidated Financial Statements
The directors of the Bank are responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that give a
true and fair view in accordance with HKFRSs issued by the HKICPA and the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance,
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern
basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes
our opinion. We report our opinion solely to you, as a body, in accordance with Section 405 of the Hong Kong
Companies Ordinance and for no other purpose. We do not assume responsibility towards or accept liability to any
other person for the contents of this report.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with
HKSAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and
are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
248
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
As part of an audit in accordance with HKSAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional
scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
- Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that
is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material
misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion,
forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
- Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Group’s internal control.
- Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and
related disclosures made by the directors.
- Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on
the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast
significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material
uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions
are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern.
- Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the
disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and
events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
- Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business
activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible
for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit
opinion.
We communicate with the Audit Committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during
our audit.
We also provide the Audit Committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably
be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards
applied.
From the matters communicated with the Audit Committee, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key
audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure
about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated
in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public
interest benefits of such communication.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Mr. Tam Man Kit, James.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Certified Public Accountants
Geographical Distribution
Hong Kong 17,253 98.50 1,909.00 99.85
Malaysia 48 0.27 0.32 0.02
Canada 42 0.24 0.14 0.01
Singapore 38 0.22 1.75 0.09
Macau 28 0.16 0.13 0.01
United Kingdom 28 0.16 0.03 0.00
Australia 25 0.14 0.08 0.00
United States of America 24 0.14 0.13 0.01
Others 30 0.17 0.26 0.01
17,516 100.00 1,911.84 100.00
25 0
SUBSIDIARIES *
251
DIRECTORS OF SUBSIDIARIES
The names of Directors who have served on the Boards of the Bank’s subsidiaries during the period
from 1 January 2020 to the date of Report of the Directors of this Annual Report (unless otherwise stated)
are set out below:
252
CORPORATE INFORMATION AND CALENDAR
CORPORATE INFORMATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Chairman
Raymond K F Ch’ien GBS, CBE, JP
Vice-Chairman
Louisa Cheang
Directors
John C C Chan GBS, JP
L Y Chiang JP
Kathleen C H Gan
Margaret W H Kwan
Irene Y L Lee
Eric K C Li GBS, OBE, JP
Vincent H S Lo GBM, JP
Kenneth S Y Ng
Peter T S Wong GBS, JP
Michael W K Wu
Secretary
C C Li
REGISTERED OFFICE
83 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong
Website: www.hangseng.com
Email: [email protected]
STOCK CODE
The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited: 11
253
REGISTRAR
Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited
Shops 1712-1716, 17th Floor, Hopewell Centre
183 Queen’s Road East, Wanchai, Hong Kong
DEPOSITARY *
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services
PO Box 505000
Louisville, KY 40233-5000, USA
Website: www.mybnymdr.com
Email: [email protected]
* The Bank offers investors in the United States a Sponsored Level-1 American Depositary Receipts
Programme through The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.
This Annual Report 2020 in both English and Chinese is now available in printed form and on the Bank’s
website (www.hangseng.com) and the website of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
(“HKEx”) (www.hkexnews.hk).
Shareholders who:
A) browse this Annual Report 2020 on the Bank’s website and wish to receive a printed copy; or
B) receive this Annual Report 2020 in either English or Chinese and wish to receive a printed copy in
the other language version,
may send a request form, which can be obtained from the Bank’s Registrar or downloaded from the
Bank’s website (www.hangseng.com) or HKEx’s website (www.hkexnews.hk), to the Bank’s Registrar:
If shareholders who have chosen (or are deemed to have chosen) to read this Annual Report 2020 on the
Bank’s website, have difficulty in reading or gaining access to this Annual Report 2020 via the Bank’s
website for any reason, the Bank will promptly send this Annual Report 2020 in printed form free of
charge upon the shareholders’ request.
Shareholders may change their choice of means of receipt or language of the Bank’s future corporate
communications at any time, free of charge, by giving the Bank c/o the Bank’s Registrar reasonable
notice in writing or by email to [email protected].
254
CALENDAR
255