Separation of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Use of Ionic Liquid-Aided Capillary Electrophoresis
Separation of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Use of Ionic Liquid-Aided Capillary Electrophoresis
Separation of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Use of Ionic Liquid-Aided Capillary Electrophoresis
This paper presents a simple, highly efficient method for In addition to difficulties in their synthesis, the poor dispers-
analyzing single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) bundles ibility of CNTs makes their characterization and processing
based on (1) ultrasound-assisted solubilization/disper- difficult. Specifically, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs)
sion of SWNTs in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimida- exist as heavily entangled aggregates of ropes or bundles4
zolium tetrafluoroborate, (2) encapsulation of the nano- containing hundreds of closely packed CNTs. Interactions between
tubes in sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles, and (3) analysis CNTs result mainly from van der Waals attractions with intertube
by capillary electrophoresis. The process by which SWNTs contact energies of 0.5 eV/nm. For many industrial applications,
disperse in the ionic liquid was studied by Raman using uniformly dispersed CNTs is crucial with a view to ensuring
spectroscopy. No degradation of SWNTs was observed an appropriate final dispersion state of particles in the end product
under mild sonication conditions. The shape and position and, together with the particular characteristics of the CNTs, the
changes observed in the Raman spectral bands for the desired properties.
nanotubes are ascribed to debundling and interaction with Successfully integrating CNTs into nanostructured materials
the ionic liquid. Separation of solubilized SWNTs was
typically meets with major challenges including the mass produc-
accomplished by using a 50 mM formic acid solution at
tion and purification of high-purity CNTs and ensuring uniform
pH 2.0 as background electrolyte and a potential of -10
dispersion and preferential alignment. This has raised the need
kV. Under these conditions, separation was completed
for fast, powerful methods for CNT characterization. Available
within only 4 min. Eighteen peaks for SWNTs were
methods for purity assessment and characterization of CNTs rely
identified in the analysis of commercial SWNT bundles.
on thermal gravimetric analysis,5,6 Raman spectroscopy,7-9 X-ray
The two types of bundles studied exhibited distinct, highly
characteristic electrophoretic profiles which could be used diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy,10,11 transmission electron micros-
to control SWNTs purity. copy (TEM),12 scanning electron microscopy (SEM),13 atomic
force microscopy (AFM),14 UV-vis-near-IR spectroscopy,15,16 and
Ever since their discovery, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have
(4) Thess, A.; Lee, R.; Nikolaev, P.; Dai, H.; Petit, P.; Robert, J.; Xu, C.; Lee, Y.
aroused enormous interest among researchers on account of their
H.; Kim, S. G.; Rinzler, A. G.; Colbert, D. T.; Scuseria, G. E.; Tománek, D.;
peculiar electronic and mechanical properties and also their high Fischer, J. E.; Smalley, R. E. Science 1996, 273, 483-487.
chemical stability.1 In fact, CNTs possess a unique body of (5) Dillon, A. C.; Gennet, T.; Jones, K. M.; Alleman, J. L.; Parilla, P. A.; Heben,
M. J. Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 1354-1358.
properties that make them ideal candidates for a wide range of
(6) Chiang, I. W.; Brinson, B. E.; Smalley, R. E.; Margrave, J. L.; Hauge, R. H.
potential nanotechnology and material science applications.2 The J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 1157-1161.
exact properties of CNTs are highly sensitive to their degree of (7) Gibson, R. F.; Ayorinde, E. O.; Wen, Y. F. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67,
1-28.
graphitization and diameter (or chirality) and also to whether they
(8) Sato-Berru, R. Y.; Basiuk, E. V.; Saniger, J. M. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006,
are prepared in single-wall or multiwall form.1 In fact, the synthetic 37, 1302-1306.
method used dictates CNT properties such as the distribution of (9) Arepalli, S.; Nikolaev, P.; Gorelik, O.; Hadjiev, V.; Holmes, W.; Files, B.;
Yowell, L. Carbon 2004, 42, 1783-1791.
diameters and lengths, degree of entanglement, defects, chirality,
(10) Zhu, W.; Miser, D.; Chan, W.; Hajaligol, M. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2003, 82,
and crystallinity,3 as well as the overall quality of the product. 638-647.
However, careful analytical characterization is required in order (11) Rinzler, A. G.; Liu, J.; Dai, H.; Nikolaev, P.; Huffman, C. B.; Rodrı́guez-Macı́as,
F. J.; Boul, P. J.; Lu, A. H.; Heymann, D.; Colbert, D. T.; Lee, R. S.; Fischer,
to ensure efficient use of this new type of material.
J. E.; Rao, A. M.; Eklund, P. C.; Smalley, R. E. Appl. Phys. A 1998, 67,
29-37.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone and Fax: +34 957 (12) Liu, P.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y. Phys. Lett. 2003, 313, 302-306.
218616. E-mail: [email protected]. (13) Chiang, I. W.; Brinson, B. E.; Huang, A. Y.; Willis, P. A.; Bronikowski, M.
†
Present address: Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, Uni- J.; Margrave, J. L.; Smalley, R. E.; Hauge, R. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001,
versity of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas s/n, E-23071, Jaén, Spain. 105, 8297-8301.
‡
Present address: Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna (14) Bhushan, B.; Kasai, T.; Nguyen, C. V.; Meyyappan, M. Microsyst. Technol.
University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164AC, A-1060, Wien, Austria. 2004, 8-9, 633-639.
(1) Dai, H. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 218-241. (15) Kuhlmann, U.; Jantoljak, H.; Pfander, M.; Bernier, P.; Journet, C.; Thomsen,
(2) Baughman, R. H.; Zazhidov, A. A.; de Heer, W. A. Science 2002, 297, 787- C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 294, 237-240.
792. (16) Kuzmany, H.; Burger, B.; Thess, A.; Smalley, R. Carbon 1998, 36, 709-
(3) Ajayan, P. M. Chem. Rev. 1999, 19, 1787-1799. 712.
2672 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 80, No. 8, April 15, 2008 10.1021/ac701788r CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/15/2008
scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STM).17 Although these tech- of ionic liquids.26 Also, ionic liquids containing CNTs at concentra-
niques are effective for the rapid detection of impurities, they can tions above 0.5-1 wt % are known to form gels that can be used
only provide global information for CNTs. Common technology to produce new soft materials.27 Such gels have already been used
can therefore hardly allow mixtures consisting of very similar in analytical chemistry to develop electrochemical sensors and
CNTs such as newly synthesized SWNT bundles to be discrimi- biosensors.28-31 Also, ionic liquids have been used as solvents in
nated. In fact, spectroscopic techniques provide inadequate the functionalization of SWNTs.32
resolution for this purpose and microscopic techniques have In the present work, we used Raman spectroscopy to charac-
limited precision (less than 1 nm) in measurements smaller than terize SWNT dispersions in an ionic liquid. Although some Raman
100 nm.18 spectra for SWNTs in ionic liquids have previously been reported,
The tendency of CNTs to form aggregates or bundles poses a they were obtained from SWNT gels of room-temperature ionic
major problem in obtaining discriminative information with a view liquids (RTILs) where the nanotubes were at much higher
to their characterization. Nanotubes can be dispersed mechanically concentrations than in our dispersions; also, the focus was placed
or by altering their surface energy with a physical (noncovalent) on first-order Raman spectra alone.26
or chemical (covalent) treatment. Analytically, mechanical disper- In addition, we propose a simple capillary electrophoresis
sion methods and noncovalent treatments are the most attractive method for characterizing SWNTs in bundles. The method is
as they preserve the initial structure of the CNTs. Mechanical based on the dispersion/solubilization of SWNTs in the ionic liquid
methods such as ultrasonication and high shear mixing are 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, encapsulation of the
effective in separating CNT bundles and aggregates but have the SWNTs within a surfactant micelle, and subsequent analysis by
serious drawback that they can fragment nanotubes as well.19 capillary electrophoresis. To the best of our knowledge, this is
Noncovalent surface treatments based on surfactants and polymers the first time that CNTs have been solubilized and dispersed in
have been widely used in the preparation of both aqueous and an ionic liquid for their characterization.
organic solutions.20,21 Nanotube dispersions have to date been
analyzed by size exclusion chromatography,22 field flow fraction- EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
ation,23 and capillary electrophoresis.24,25
Chemicals. The ionic liquid used was 1-butyl-3-methylimida-
The ionic liquids have been widely used in chemistry for
zolium tetrafluoroborate (bmimBF4), which was purchased from
synthesis, but they have also been used in separations, spectros-
Solvent Innovation GmbH (Köln, Germany) and used as received.
copy, electrochemistry, and mass spectrometry.33 Water-im-
The SWNTs were of two different types. Both were supplied by
miscible ionic liquids have been even used for the extraction of
Sigma-Aldrich, in diameters of 0.7-1.2 nm (SWNT-1) or 1.2-1.5
gold nanoparticles from aqueous matrixes. Concretely, 1-butyl-3-
nm (SWNT-2) and lengths from 2 to 20 µm (purity 50-70% by
methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate has been used to quan-
volume). Formic acid, which was used to prepare the electro-
titatively extract gold nanoparticles and gold nanorods from
phoretic solutions, was also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
aqueous solutions.34 The sizes and shapes of the nanoparticles
Sodium hydroxide was obtained from Prolabo (France); HPLC-
and nanorods were not affected by the phase transfer. In this work,
grade methanol and hydrochloric acid were supplied by Panreac
we used an ionic liquid to disperse CNTs more efficiently than
(Barcelona, Spain); sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was purchased
do surfactant and polymers. Carbon nanotubes have been shown
from Sigma-Aldrich (Barcelona, Spain). Finally, purified water (18
to interact with imidazolium ions, which are major building blocks
mΩ) was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q water purification
(17) Hassanien, A.; Tokumoto, M. Carbon 2004, 42, 2649-2653. system.
(18) Graham, D. Analyst 2007, 132, 95-96. Equipment. Carbon nanotubes were dispersed and solubilized
(19) Lu, K. L.; Lago, R. M.; Chen, Y. K.; Green, M. L. H.; Harris, P. J. F.; Tsang,
in the ionic liquid by using a UP400S ultrasound processor from
S. C. Carbon 1996, 34, 814-816.
(20) Jiang, L.; Gao, L.; Sun, J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 260, 89-94. Hielscher Ultrasonic GmbH (Teltow, Germany). The maximum
(21) Gong, X.; Liu, J.; Baskaran, S.; Voise, R. D.; Young, J. S. Chem. Mater. 2000, acoustic power density was 460 W/cm2, and the maximum
12, 1049-1052.
amplitude was 210 µm.
(22) Duesberg, G. S.; Muster, J.; Krstic, V.; Burghard, M.; Roth, S. Appl. Phys. A
1998, A67, 117-119. Dispersed nanotubes were analyzed by using an Agilent HP3D
(23) Chen, B.; Selegue, J. P. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 4774-4780. capillary electrophoresis system equipped with a diode array
(24) Suárez, B.; Simonet, B. M.; Cárdenas, S.; Valcárcel, M. J. Chromatogr., A
2006, 1128, 282-289.
detector (Waldbronn, Germany). A fused-silica capillary 30 cm
(25) Doorn, S. K.; Fields, R. E.; Hu, H.; Hamon, M. A.; Haddon, R. C.; Selegue, long × 75 µm i.d. was used for separation. New capillaries were
J. P.; Majidi, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3169-3174. sequentially conditioned by flushing at 2 bar with 1 M HCl, 0.1
(26) Fukushima, T.; Kosaka, A.; Ishimura, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Takigawa, T.; Ishii,
N.; Aida, T. Science 2003, 300, 2072-2074.
M NaOH, and Milli-Q water for 5 min each. Before each run, the
(27) Fukushima, T.; Aida, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 5048-5058. capillary in use was flushed at 2 bar with 0.1 M NaOH for 3 min,
(28) Tao, W.; Pan, D.; Liu, Q.; Yao, S.; Nie, Z.; Han, B. Electroanalysis 2006, 17, then with Milli-Q water for 1 min, and finally, running buffer for
1681-1686.
(29) Maleki, N.; Safari, A.; Tajabadi, F. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3820-3826.
6 min. After each run, the capillary was flushed at 2 bar with
(30) Yu, B.; Zhou, F.; Liu, G.; Liang, Y.; Huck, W. T. S.; Liu, W. Chem. Commun. Milli-Q water for 2 min, methanol for 5 min, and Milli-Q water for
2006, 2356-2358. 2 min.
(31) Du, P.; Liu, S.; Wu, P.; Cai, C. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 6534-6547.
(32) Price, B. K.; Hudson, J. L.; Tour, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14867- The separation background electrolyte (BGE) consisted of 50
14870. mM formic acid at pH 2.0. The applied voltage used for electro-
(33) Anderson, J. L.; Armstrong, D. W.; Wei, G. T. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2893- phoretic separation was -10 kV, and the temperature 20 °C.
2902.
(34) Wei, G. T.; Yang, Z.; Lee, C. Y.; Yang, H. Y.; Wang, C. R. C. J. Am. Chem. Samples were introduced by sequential hydrodynamic injection:
Soc. 2004, 126, 5036-5037. 5-fold diluted BGE at 50 mbar for 30 s first and then the sample
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 80, No. 8, April 15, 2008 2673
at the same pressure but for 15 s. Electropherograms were
recorded at a detection wavelength of 240 nm.
Finally, Raman spectra for solid and solubilized/dispersed
SWNTs were recorded on a Renishaw (in Via Reflex) spectrometer
equipped with a Peltier-cooled CCD detector coupled to a Leika
microscope. The 520.7 cm-1 peak for a silicon standard was
employed for calibration. A 785 nm diode laser with a maximum
power of 300 mW was used as excitation source. Spectra were
recorded by using a ×20 lens and gathered for 60 s (three
accumulations, 20 s each).
Nanotube Solubilization/Dispersion Procedure. Single-
walled nanotube dispersions were prepared by placing 1 mg of
each type of nanotube in a glass beaker containing 2.7 g of
bmimBF4 and inserting an ultrasound probe with a power density
of 63 W/cm2 for 5 min. The concentrated dispersion thus obtained Figure 1. Raman spectra for commercial solid SWNT-1 (black line)
was diluted at convenience with ionic liquid and resonicated in and solid SWNT-2 (red line) as obtained with a 785 nm laser at 1.5
order to prepare more dilute samples by 10-fold dilution with a mW.
100 mM SDS aqueous solution and sonication as described above.
The final solution was directly introduced into the electrophoretic
distinguishable owing to the low transmittance of the available
capillary for analysis.
experimental setup below 200 cm-1.
In order to identify potential effects of sonication, both types
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
of SWNTs were dispersed in bmimBF4, using variable power
The principal aim of this work was to separate SWNTs of very
densities, numbers of cycles, and times. Thus, the power density
similar shape and dimensions. To this end, we used commercially
was varied from 46 to 460 W/cm2, the number of cycles from 0.2
available SWNT bundles of a high quality as target analytes in
to 1 (a cycle of 0.2 means power discharge for 0.2 s and a pause
order to demonstrate the high efficiency of ionic liquid-aided
of 0.4 s), and times from 2 to 40 min. Following sonication, SWNTs
capillary electrophoresis. This section describes and discusses the
in the resulting dispersions were separated by centrifugation at
solubility-dispersibility tests conducted on the CNTs in the ionic
4000 rpm, washed with methanol three times to remove the ionic
liquid and also the optimization of the capillary electrophoresis
liquid, and dried under a nitrogen stream. The remaining SWNT
(CE) separation procedure.
solids were analyzed by Raman spectroscopy.
Dispersion/Solubilization of SWNTs in the Ionic Liquid.
The Raman spectra for the sonicated SWNTs always exhibited
Preliminary experiments conducted in our laboratory exposed a
an increased G/D ratio. The D-band is associated with disordered
high capacity of ionic liquids (ILs) to disperse and solubilize
sp3-hybridized carbon present as impurities and SWNT defects.37
SWNTs. As stated above, SWNTs exist as ropes and bundles
The G/D ratio, which increases with increasing graphite crystallite
which are heavily entangled with one other and form aggregates
size,9,36,38 is a measure of purity. We thus ascribed the increased
or agglomerates. We chose to use an imidazolium-based ionic
G/D ratio obtained to the sample treatment removing carbon-
liquid to disperse SWNTs with a view to their chemical charac-
aceous impurities from the CNT surface.
terization. However, inspection of the resulting IL-SWNTs
With the use of harsh sonication conditions, a slight upper
samples under an optical microscope revealed the presence of
shift in the bands up to 7 cm-1 was observed (see Figure 2). These
micrometer-sized aggregates. Therefore, effective dispersion
shifts, which could be attributed to degradation of SWNTs, were
required the assistance of ultrasound. Also, because ultrasound
higher in SWNT-1 than in SWNT-2. This effect was not observed
can damage CNTs,19 the SWNTs were dispersed in an ionic liquid
under milder sonication conditions, so in order to avoid degrada-
(bmimBF4) in order to preserve their integrity and prevent
tion 63 W/cm2 was used to prepare the IL-SWNT dispersions.
aggregation.
As confirmed by microscopic inspection, 5 min was long enough
Raman spectroscopy has been used to assess the integrity of
to obtain appropriate dispersions.
SWNTs in bmimBF4 and to provide information about the
A typical Raman spectrum of the so-obtained dispersions is
interaction between the CNTs and the ionic liquid.
shown in Figure 3 together with the pure ionic liquid spectrum.
Figure 1 depicts the Raman spectra obtained for the bundled
Despite the contribution of the ionic liquid to the spectrum, it is
SWNTs studied. The spectra exhibit the typical bands of SWNTs,
still possible to distinguish the characteristic features of the
namely,8,9,36 the G-band (1592 cm-1), which comprises several
SWNTs. The Raman bands of the SWNT can be better observed
tangential modes due to stretching vibrations in SWNT sidewall
in the difference spectrum, which was calculated following
C-C bonds, the D-band (ca. 1290 cm-1), which is assigned to
baseline correction and normalization to the 2974 cm-1 band for
disordered carbon, and its second-order harmonic (the G′-band,
the ionic liquid.
ca. 2575 cm-1). The low-frequency radial breathing mode (RBM)
typically observed in the region of 100-300 cm-1 was barely (37) Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Jorio, A.; Souza Filho, A. G.; Pimenta,
M. A.; Saito, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1070-1078.
(35) O’Connell, M. J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Huffman, C. B.; Moore, V. C.; Strano, M. (38) Laspade, P.; Marchand, A.; Couzi, M.; Cruege, F. Carbon 1984, 22, 375-
S.; Haroz, E. H. Science 2002, 297, 593-596. 385.
(36) Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Joria, A.; Souza Filho, A. G.; Saito, R. (39) Kahn, D.; Lu, J. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 6535-6540.
Carbon 2002, 40, 2043-2061. (40) Henrard, L.; Popov, V.; Rubio, A. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 205403/1-10.
in characteristic strands. This aggregation made the identification aggregation of CNTs during the preparation of the sample in the
of the CNT size distribution not possible. The electron microscopic grid. The microscopic examination of the CNT surface did not
analysis of the dispersions showed the presence of bigger strands reveal the presence of detectable superficial defects produced by
than those depicted in Figure 6. This was attributed to the the ultrasonic radiation.
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 80, No. 8, April 15, 2008 2677
such impurities were not observed in the electron microscopic
evaluation of the dispersion. It can thus be affirmed that the peaks
observed were due to SWNTs and not to the presence of other
impurities. The individual identification of the peaks was discarded
because the CE-Raman coupling does not provide sufficient
sensitivity due to the small sample volume introduced into the
capillary and the short time available for measurement (note the
small width of the peaks).
By using the recommended procedure, the reproducibility of
the method was tested by dispersing/solubilizing six times the
same solid sample. Then, each solution was analyzed three times
by CE. The RSD of the migration times ranged between 4.8% and
6.2%, a result which points out the usefulness of the proposed
dispersion procedure.
The separation of SWNT samples directly dispersed in SDS
Figure 6. TEM image of a strand of SWNTs. The sample was first under the above-described electrophoretic conditions (i.e., with
dispersed in the ionic liquid, then filtered and washed with methanol, no prior dispersion in the ionic liquid) produced an electrophero-
and finally examined by TEM. gram with a poor resolution of the peaks (see Figure 5C). Such
a poor separation efficiency can be ascribed to the unavoidable
presence of aggregates when only SDS is used to disperse the
Commercially available SWNTs have some impurities (see SWNT bundles. In comparison with previous work,24 these
Figure 6), but the high dilution of the sample resulted in a conditions are not the best with a view to ensuring appropriate
negligible concentration of impurities in the dispersions. In fact, dispersion of CNTs with SDS. However, even under the best
Figure 7. Electropherograms used to analyze (A) SWNT-2 and (B) bundles of the same material following ultrasonic degradation.