Speed Control of Induction Motors: Synchronous Speed Ns 120 F/P
Speed Control of Induction Motors: Synchronous Speed Ns 120 F/P
At normal speeds, close to synchronism, the term (s X2) is small and hence negligible
w.r.t. R
𝑹′
𝟑 𝑬′𝟐𝟐 𝟐 𝟑 𝒔𝑬′𝟐𝟐 𝑹′𝟐 𝒔𝑬′𝟐𝟐 𝑹′𝟐
𝑇= 𝒔 = =𝒌
𝝎𝒔 (𝑹 𝟐 )𝟐 + (𝑿 )𝟐 𝝎𝒔 (𝑹 𝟐 )𝟐 + (𝒔𝑿 𝟐 )𝟐 (𝑹 𝟐 )𝟐 + (𝒔𝑿 𝟐 )𝟐
𝒔 𝟐
T ∝ s/R2. For small values of s
or T ∝ s if R2 is constant
Hence, for low values of slip, the torque/slip curve is approximately a straight line. As
slip increases (for increasing load on the motor), the torque also increases and becomes
maximum when s = R2/X2. This torque is known as ‘pull-out’ or ‘breakdown’ torque
Tb or stalling torque.
As the slip further increases (i.e. motor speed falls) with further increase in motor load,
then R2 becomes negligible as compared to (sX2.). Therefore, for large values of slip
T ∝ s/(sX2)2 ∝ 1/s For large values of s
Rotor resistance R2 is constant and if slip s is small then sX2 is so small that it can be
neglected. Therefore, T ∝ s(E2)2 where E2 is rotor induced emf and E2 ∝ V
And hence T ∝ V2, thus if supplied voltage is decreased, torque decreases and hence the
speed decreases.
This method is the easiest and cheapest, still rarely used because-
A large change in supply voltage is required for relatively small change in speed.
This large change in voltage will result in a large change in the flux density
thereby seriously disturbing the magnetic conditions of the motor.
b) Changing the Applied Frequency
This method is also used very rarely.
The synchronous speed of an induction motor is given by Ns = 120 f/P.
Clearly, the synchronous speed (and hence the running speed) of an induction motor
can be changed by changing the supply frequency f.
This method is applicable to slip-ring motors alone, the motor speed is controlled by
introducing an external resistance in the rotor circuit.
It has been shown in that near synchronous speed (i.e. for very small slip value),
𝑅′
3 𝐸′ 3 𝑠𝐸′ 𝑅′ 𝑠𝐸′ 𝑅′
𝑇= 𝑠 = = 𝑘
𝜔 (𝑹 𝟐 )𝟐 + (𝑿 )𝟐 𝜔 (𝑹 𝟐 )𝟐 + (𝒔𝑿 𝟐 )𝟐 (𝑹 𝟐 )𝟐 + (𝒔𝑿 𝟐 )𝟐
𝒔 𝟐
At normal speeds, close to synchronism, the term (s X2) is small and hence negligible
w.r.t. R
T ∝ s/R2. For small values of s
or T ∝ s if R2 is constant
Hence, for low values of slip, the torque/slip curve is approximately a straight line. As
slip increases (for increasing load on the motor), the torque also increases and becomes
maximum when s = R2/X2. This torque is known as ‘pull-out’ or ‘breakdown’ torque
Tb or stalling torque.
As the slip further increases (i.e. motor speed falls) with further increase in motor load,
then R2 becomes negligible as compared to (sX2.). Therefore, for large values of slip
T ∝ s/(sX2)2 ∝ 1/s For large values of s
It is obvious that for a given torque, slip can be increased i.e. speed can be decreased
by increasing the rotor resistance R2.
One serious disadvantage of this method is that with increase in rotor resistance, I2R losses
also increase which decrease the operating efficiency of the motor. In fact, the loss is
directly proportional to the reduction in the speed.
The second disadvantage is the dependence of speed, on load as well.
Because of the wastefulness of this method, it is used where speed changes are needed for
short periods only.
Example The rotor of a 4-pole, 50-Hz slip-ring induction motor has a resistance of 0.30 Ω per
phase and runs at 1440 rpm at full load. Calculate the external resistance per phase which
must be added to lower the speed to 1320 rpm, the torque being the same as before.
Solution
The motor torque is given by
At normal speeds, close to synchronism, the term (s X2) is small and hence negligible w.r.t. R
In the first case, T1 = Ks1/R2; in the second case, T2 = Ks2 / (R2 + r)
where r is the external resistance per phase, added to the rotor circuit
Since T1 = T2 ∴ K s1/R2 = K s2 / (R2 + r)
(R2 + r) / R2 = s2 / s1
Now, Ns = 120 × 50/4 = 1500 rpm; N1 = 1440 rpm; N2 = 1320 rpm
∴s1 = (1500 − 1440)/1500 = 0.04; s2 = (1500 − 1320)/1500 = 0.12
∴ r = 0.6 Ω