Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 173 views

    Checklist For Case Pres

    Uploaded by

    Bem Pladero
    This document contains criteria for rating a case presentation. It includes categories for evaluating the program, content of the case presentation, and teamwork/cooperation. Within the content section, criteria relate to explaining the patient's health history, pathophysiology, medications, nursing diagnosis, plan of care, and interventions. The teamwork section addresses member participation and defined roles. Ratings are on a scale of outstanding, very satisfactory, satisfactory, poor, and needs improvement. The sample ratings provided show high marks for explaining key case details and defining member roles.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Checklist For Case Pres

    Uploaded by

    Bem Pladero
    173 views3 pages
    This document contains criteria for rating a case presentation. It includes categories for evaluating the program, content of the case presentation, and teamwork/cooperation. Within the content section, criteria relate to explaining the patient's health history, pathophysiology, medications, nursing diagnosis, plan of care, and interventions. The teamwork section addresses member participation and defined roles. Ratings are on a scale of outstanding, very satisfactory, satisfactory, poor, and needs improvement. The sample ratings provided show high marks for explaining key case details and defining member roles.

    Original Title

    checklist for case pres

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains criteria for rating a case presentation. It includes categories for evaluating the program, content of the case presentation, and teamwork/cooperation. Within the content section, criteria relate to explaining the patient's health history, pathophysiology, medications, nursing diagnosis, plan of care, and interventions. The teamwork section addresses member participation and defined roles. Ratings are on a scale of outstanding, very satisfactory, satisfactory, poor, and needs improvement. The sample ratings provided show high marks for explaining key case details and defining member roles.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    173 views3 pages

    Checklist For Case Pres

    Uploaded by

    Bem Pladero
    This document contains criteria for rating a case presentation. It includes categories for evaluating the program, content of the case presentation, and teamwork/cooperation. Within the content section, criteria relate to explaining the patient's health history, pathophysiology, medications, nursing diagnosis, plan of care, and interventions. The teamwork section addresses member participation and defined roles. Ratings are on a scale of outstanding, very satisfactory, satisfactory, poor, and needs improvement. The sample ratings provided show high marks for explaining key case details and defining member roles.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Rubrics for rating case Presentation

    Criteria O VS S P NI
    Program
    1. Was able to present an artisitic backdraft for case
    presentation
    2. MC was able to lead the program properly and ensure
    that the flow of case presentation was organized.
    3. Prayers, video clips, intermission number, background
    music were all given accordingly.
    4. Technical aspect were well polished, with well
    rehearsed parts of the program.
    5. Creativity was applied.
    Content of the case presentation
    1. Complete health history was comprehensive and clearly
    explained.

    2. Statistical findings were included and it was well cited.


    3. Anatomy and physiology was explained in connection
    to the disease process.
    4. In the discussion of pathophysiology the signs and
    symptoms of the patient were explained.
    5. Medications were discussed highlighting the most
    important nursing considerations in relation to the clients
    condition and health history.
    6. Was able to rule out the immediate concern of the
    patient and prioritize nursing care plan according to the
    need of the client
    7. Was able to formulate appropriate nursing diagnosis
    according to the identified problems of the client.
    8. Was able to formulate plan of care addressing the
    needs of the client. Should be congruent to the
    assessment and nursing diagnosis.
    9. Were able to determine most applicable nursing
    interventions based on the hospital setting and overall
    condition of the client.
    10. was able to evaluate the findings.
    11. Infographics were included at the end of the
    presentation to summarize salient points to remember in
    disease/drugs/nursing intervention.
    Teamwork and cooperation
    1. Each team member were able to participate in the
    discussion.
    2. Roles are well defined and was able to enumerate the
    contribution of each member at the end of the program
    thru acknowledgement.
    3. Each team member was able to showcase their skills
    and talent.
    Criteria O VS S P NI
    Content of the case presentation
    1. Complete health history was comprehensive and
    clearly explained. 1
    3. Anatomy and physiology was explained in
    connection to the disease process. 1
    4. In the discussion of pathophysiology the signs and
    symptoms of the patient were explained. 1
    5. Medications were discussed highlighting the most
    important nursing considerations in relation to the
    clients condition and health history. 1
    6. Was able to rule out the immediate concern of the
    patient and prioritize nursing care plan according to
    the need of the client 1
    7. Was able to formulate appropriate nursing
    diagnosis according to the identified problems of the
    client. 1
    8. Was able to formulate plan of care addressing the
    needs of the client. Should be congruent to the
    assessment and nursing diagnosis. 1
    9. Were able to determine most applicable nursing
    interventions based on the hospital setting and overall
    condition of the client. 1
    10. was able to evaluate the findings. 1
    Teamwork and cooperation
    1. Each team member were able to participate in the
    discussion.
    2. Roles are well defined and was able to enumerate
    the contribution of each member for the case.
    2 5 2 0 0
    10 20 6 0 0
    65.4545454545455
    83
    12

    You might also like