Baron, G Ungemach - 1981 - European Geothermal Drilling Experience - Problem Areas and Case Studies

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 24

EUROPEAN GEOTHERMAL DRILLING EXPERIENCE-

PROBLEM AREAS AND CASE STUDIES

0. Baron and P. Ungemach


Commisslon of The European Communities

Belglum

ABSTRACT

Geothermal d r i l l i n g h a s long been restricted i n Western Europe t o t h e


sole d r y s t e a m f i e l d of L a r d e r e l l o i n I t a l y . I n t h e l a s t f e w y e a r s , a
wider e x p e r i e n c e i s b u i l d i n g up a s a consequence of i n t e n s i f i e d explo-
r a t i o n and development programs c a r r i e d o u t for e v a l u a t i o n and produc-
t i o n of both l o w - and high-enthalpy geothermal resources. A sample Of
some 40 boreholes i n d i c a t e s the following problem areas.
1. Low-Enthalpy D r i l l i n 9
Due t o s i m i l a r s e t t i n g s - - h o t water system flowing i n sedimentary u n i t s
a t t e m p e r a t u r e s and d e p t h s r a n g i n g f r o m 40" t o 140°C (104" t o 284°F)
and from 1,000 t o 3,500 metres ( 3 , 2 8 1 t o 11,484 f e e t ) , r e s p e c t i v e l y - -
t h e technology h e r e i s s t r o n g l y dependent on o i l and g a s d r i l l i n g
practice. S t i l l , s p e c i f i c problems remain i n t h e areas o f m u l t i p l e -
r e s e r v o i r r e c o n n a i s s a n c e and w e l l completion a t p r o d u c t i o n and r e i n -
j e c t i o n l e v e l s , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n poorly consolidated fluvio-deltaic
sequences l e a d i n g t o sand c o n t r o l and s w e l l i n g c l a y problems. Exper-
t i s e needs t o be developed t o minimize c o s t s , s e c u r e h i g h p r o d u c t i o n
c a p a c i t i e s , l o n g l i f e t i m e s , and minimum maintenance c o m p a t i b l e w i t h
t h e economics and t h e l a c k of s u i t a b l e workover f a c i l i t i e s .
2. High-Enthalpy D r i l l i n g
E x p l o r a t o r y d r i l l i n g i s c u r r e n t l y combining w i l d c a t t i n g and d e e p e r
i n v e s t i g a t i o n s of known f i e l d s . Lost c i r c u l a t i o n , d r i l l s t r i n g corro-
s i o n , t u b u l a r s , mud, cementing, and d e v i a t i o n c o n t r o l a r e t h e m o s t
f r e q u e n t l y encountered d i f f i c u l t i e s w h i l e d r i l l i n g i n h o s t i l e water-
dominated environments. Formation t e m p e r a t u r e s i n excess o f 300°C
(572°F) are o f t e n t h e r u l e , and r e c e n t d r i l l i n g conducted i n v o l c a n i c
areas have h i t f l u i d s approaching s u p e r c r i t i c a l s t a t e . Whenever these
problems do n o t remain under c o n t r o l , t h e y r e s u l t i n r i g standby and
e x t r a costs which e v e r e l y p e n a l i z e an i n d u s t r y which n e e d s s h a r p
improvements t o be l l y r e l i a b l e and cost e f f e c t i v e .
Geothermal w e l l s t i m u l a t i o n i s t h e r e f o r e a f i e l d of growing i n t e r e s t ,
b u t it lacks adequate procedures.
C u r r e n t geothermal d r i l l i n g p r a c t i c e i n Europe i s i l l u s t r a t e d by three
t y p i c a l case s t u d i e s .

5-1
DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an


agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States
Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal
liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process
disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately
owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,
process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or
otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any
agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein
do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States
Government or any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER

Portions of this document may be illegible in


electronic image products. Images are produced
from the best available original document.
Ib!TRODUCTION

P r i o r t o 1974 geothermal energy (GE) was more o r l e s s regarded b y European (EC) cii
S t a t e s an e x o t i c c u r i o s i t y o f m a r g i n a l impact although, n o t m e n t i o n i n g Roman ages,
a t l e a s t two c o u n t r i e s h a d - l o n g been i n v o l v e d i n geothermal m a t t e r s -
Italy in
power g e n e r a t i o n from d r y steam sources (Larderello, 19041 and France i n d i r e c t use
of low e n t h a l p y a q u i f e r s (Melun 1'Almont d i s t r i c t h e a t i n g doublet, 1969).

I n t h e 1960's ENEL, t h e i t a l i a n power agency, who had b u i l t up i t s d r i l l i n g


and p r o d u c t i o n experience on t h e L a r d e r e l l o f i e l d f l e x t e n d e d e x p l o r a t i o n t o o t h e r
areas o f Tuscany and N o r t h e r n Latium. T h i s l e d t o t h e d i s c o v e r y o f t h e T r a v a l e and
Monte Amiata d r y steam and t h e Cesano p r e s s u r i z e d water systems,

Since then, and as a consequence o f t h e energy p r i c e c r i s i s , EC c o u n t r i e s


r e v i s i t e d GE and a pronounced involvement c o u l d be noticed. I n p a r t i c u l a r a R & D
programme i n GE, common t o n i n e member Statesa, was launched i n 1975 by t h e
Commission o f t h e European Communities (CEC) a d r e s s i n g a l l aspects o f geothermal
research, from e x p l o r a t i o n t o production, i n which w i l d c a t t i n g t o o k a n i m p o r t a n t
part ( 8 ) .

I n s p i t e of a v e r y r e c e n t a c t i v i t y i n d r i l l i n g f o r low grade heat and i n


a c t i v e v o l c a n i c areas, t h e european geothermal w e l l r e c o r d i s n o t n e g l i g i b l e as .
shown i n Table 1. I t p r o v i d e s a l r e a d y a s u i t a b l e data base f o r r e v i e w i n g m a j o r
problem areas, a s s o c i a t e d w i t h e x p l o r a t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n d r i l l i n g , w i t h r e s p e c t t o
(i) d r i l l i n g and c o m p l e t i o n technology, (ii) environmental c o n s t r a i n t s and (iii)
economics.

For t h e sake o f s i m p l i f i c a t i o n , d r i l l i n g i s d i v i d e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e e n t h a l p y
o f t h e geothermal f l u i d , as d r i l l i n g o f h i g h and low e n t h a l p y w e l l s adresses i n
f a c t c o n t r a s t e d g e o l o g i c a l and t h e r m a l environments and d i f f e r e n t usage and
economics.

Three case studies, s e l e c t e d among deep e x p l o r a t i o n p r o j e c t s supported b y t h e


CEC, w i l l i l l u s t r a t e t h e p r a c t i c a l problems encountered i n geothermal d r i l l i n a .

GEOTHERMAL EP!VIRONMENTS

The g e o l o g i c a l s t r u c t u r e o f Europe and consequently i t s geothermal environments


a r e commanded by t h e geodynamic e v o l u t i o n o f t h e Eurasian P l a t e . I t d i s p l a y s a
v a r i e t y o f geodynamic s e t t i n g s , most p l a t e t e c t o n i c a t t r i b u t e s b e i n g p r e s e n t except
t h e oceanic c r u s t . Western Europe a t l a r g e i s an area o f o l d and r i g i d c o n t i n e n t a t
c r u s t c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y c r y s t a l l j n e massifs, i n t r a c r a t o n i c and foredeep b a s i n s and
c o n t i n e n t a l r i f t i n g . A younger c r u s t s t r e t c h e s over t h e Mediterranean area, where
-
t h e A f r i c a n and E u r a s i a n P l a t e s c o l l i d e , e x h i b i t i n g t y p i c a l f e a t u r e s subduction,
m a r g i n a l basins, i s l a n d a r c s and e x t e n s i o n a l h o r s t and graben systems.

-aBelgium, Denmark, Federal Republ c of Germany, France, I r e l a n d , I t a l y , Luxembourg,


The Nether lands, U n i t e d Kingdom. Greece w i l l j o i n t h e EC i n 1981.

5-2
~~

I
i
I
i

These environments a r e i r r e g u i a r l y d i s t r i b u t e d though. An important conse-


quence i s t h a t t h e m a j o r i t y of E€ S t a t e s a r e faced w i t h t h e s o l e low e n t h a l p y o u t -
look, h i g h e n t h a l p y sources b e i n g l i m i t e d t o C e n t r a l and Southern I t a l y and t o
Lia s t e r n Greece.

Fig. 1 displays, a t a broad scale, t h e EC geothermal resource s t a t u s w i t h


i n d i c a t i o n o f t h e areas where a commercial development can be r e l i a b l y envisaged.
Three main systems can be characterized, r e s p e c t i v e l y :

- low e n t h a l p y resources which prove t o be p r o l i f i c and dependable i n foredeep


and i n t r a c r a t o n i c b a s i n s wherever they develop r e g i o n a l a q u i f e r u n i t s . Such l a r g e
sedimentary m u l t i - a q u i f e r systems a r e found i n France ( A q u i t a i n e and P a r i s Basins),
I t a l y (Po Valley), U n i t e d Kingdom (Wessex, East Y o r k s h i r e and N o r t h e r n I r e l a n d
Basins), Germany (Southern Molassic A l p i n e foredeep and N o r t h e r n Munsterland),
H o l l a n d and Denmark. .

- c o n t i n e n t a l r i f t i n g and central, recent but e x t i n c t volcanism which stand


h a l f way between h i g h and low enthalpy resources. Here,an a s s o c i a t i o n o f o f t e n h i g h
temperatures (100 t o 16OOC) and o f complex r e s e r v o i r and heat source c o n d i t i o n s
renders e x p l o r a t i o n d e l i c a t e . R i f t v a l l e y s (Limagne, Rhone V a l l e y and Rhine Graben)
e x h i b i t i n t e n s e compartmenting r e q u i r i n g s o p h i s t i c a t e d seismics, s t r u c t u r a l a n a l y s i s
and t e c t o n i c s as t o i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f a c t i v e f a u l t i n g and p o r o s i t y p a t t e r n s .

-
h i g h e n t h a l y r e s e r v o i r s p l a c e d along t h e mediterranean b e l t , c h i e f l y t h e
Tuscanian d i s t e n s i v e t e c t o n i c system, t h e Northern Latium and Campanian p l i o -
quaternary volcanism and t h e subduction magmatism o f t h e E o l i a n Arc.

DRILLING DATA EASE

i Over 800 r e l l s have been d r i l l e d i n Western Europe f o r geothermal purposes,


s i n c e t h e e a r l y 1900's, w i t h a success r a t i o o f 56 % c l o s e t o t h e w o r l d average.
Note,in T a b l e 1,that f o r t h e L a r d e r e l l o f i e l d t h e success r a t i o i s decreasing i n
t h e p a s t f o u r years w i t h i n c r e a s i n g d r i l l i n g depths. Cow e n t h a l p y d r i l l i n g , which
o f t e n c o n s i s t s o f d r i l l i n g a w e l l pair, t h e so c a l l e d geothermal doublet, f o r
c o n s e r v a t i v e and environmental reasons i s s t i l l i n i t s e a r l y development stage.
F u t u r e developments - about 400 w e l l s scheduled i n t h e n e x t f i v e years, should t h e
i
r i g and manpower be a v a i l a b l e - should markedly improve t h i s r a t i o . Two areas o f
t h e EC a r e already,or l i k e l y t o be, i n t e n s e l y d r i l l e d . One i s t h e L a r d e r e l l o f i e l d
w i t h t h e h i g h w e l l c o n c e n t r a t i o n d e p i c t e d i n Fig. 2. I t i s obvious t h a t e f f e c t i v e
w e l l s t i m u l a t i o n techniques would s i g n i f i c a n t l y improve t h e economics o f t h e
e x p l o i t a t i o n o f t h i s f r a c t u r e dominated f i e l d . The second i s t h e P a r i s o u t s k i r t s ,
showri i n Fig. 3, where some 60 planned d o u b l e t s emphasize d r i l l i n g , work over
and r e l a t e d environmental i m p l i c a t i o n s i n urban areas.

I LI
5-3
LOW ENTHALPY DRILLING " ,

Most o f t h e o i l and gas d r i l l i n g background i s t r a n s f e r a b l e t o h o t water


L
d r i l l i n g which r e q u i r e s a s i m i l a r technology owing t o a s i m i l a r environment -
a q u i f e r s f l o w i n g i n sedimentary rocks a t depths and temperatures v a r y i n g from 40
t o 1 4 O O C and 1000 t o 3500 m r e s p e c t i v e l y . S t i l l , t h e r e a r e a few s t r i k i n g d i f f e -
rences i n t h e areas o f w e l l completion, reconnaisance, d r i l l i n g f l u i d s , environ-
mental c o n s t r a i n t s and,of course,economics.

Basically,low grade heat b e i n g o f low market v a l u e i s n o t y e t t r a n s p o r t a b l e


economically over d i s t a n c e s g r e a t e r t h a n 5 km. D r i l l i n g costs,elsewhere,are high
(see Table 2) - t w i c e t h e N o r t h American f i g u r e s- because o f a shortage o f i n l a n d
r i g s and o f t h e c o m p e t i t i o n w i t h hydrocarbon e x p l o r a t i o n programmes. I n 1981, a
c o s t o f 2 m i l l i o n US g f o r a 2000 m deep w e l l tends t o become t h e r u l e a l l over
western Europe. As a r e s u l t (i) h i g h w e l l p r o d u c t i v e capacities,say 100 m3/h o r
15,000 b b l / d f o r a commercial b o l e b y 1980 standards a r e r e q u i r e d t o ensure a
decent r e t u r n on investment; which (ii) i m p l i e s s i g n i f i c a n t he3t loads in
t h e v i c i n i t y o f t h e w e l l source - t e n t h s o f thousands Gcal/year - which (iii)
bounds develgpment t o d i s t r i c t h e a t i n g o f l a r g e c i t i e s .

Well Completion
---------------
A major d i f f i c u l t y i n geothermal energy i s t h e adequate cementing o f columns
i n c l u d i n g l i n e r hangers, a problem w i t h which one has t o l i v e .

Most carbonate geothermal r e s e r v o i r s a r e produced (and i n j e c t e d ) i n open h o l e


- Dogger i n t h e P a r i s Basin, carboniferous k a r s t i f i e d limestone i n Belgium and
createceous d o l o m i t e i n A q u i t a i n e -
and exhibit,due t o t h e i r f r a c t u r e dominated
porosities, h i g h y i e l d s .

T r i a s s i c c l a s t i c d e p o s i t s (sandstone and interbedded c l a y ) a r e l e s s dependable


r e s e r v o i r s because o f random p o r o s i t y t r e n d s (compaction, diagenesis) and r e q u i r e
s u i t a b l e w e l l completion. The rule,below 1500 m,is t o a v o i d t h e placement o f a
g r a v e l pack which i s considered a t o o r i s k y operation. A good substitute,already
experienced i n underground gas storage,is t o s e t down h o l e w i r e wrapped screens o f
e i t h e r o i l and gas o r superweld t y p e ( 1. A c l a s s i c a l design would be a 0 6" 518
s t a i n l e s s 316L superweld s c r e e $ w i t h a 0.8 mm slot,on a w e l l p r o d u c i n g from a sand
and sandstone m a t r i x . No sand c o n t r o l problems have y e t appeared.

R e i n j e c t e d f l u i d s being cooled f o r m a t i o n f l u i d s , c i r c u l a t e d under pressure,


f l u i d c o m p a t i b i l i t y , s w e l l i n g c l a y and p r e c i p i t a t i o n problems a r e minimum t o date.

M u l t i A q u i f e r Reconnaissance
............................
I n t h e c e n t e r o f t h e P a r i s B a s i n c o e x i s t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f producing e i t h e r
t h e Dogger o r t h e T r i a s r e s e r v o i r s . The Dogger i s a r e l i a b l e open h o l e producer but
i s c o o l e r whereas t h e T r i a s i s h o t t e r but random as t o p o r o s i t i e s and moreover i t
r e q u i r e s a completion. Only d i r e c t assessment b y t e s t i n g can o p t i m i z e t h i s balance.
There a r e t h r e e p o s s i b l e s t r a t e g i e s :

i. Target r e s e r v o i r : T r i a s Produced r e s e r v o i r : T r i a s
ii. Target r e s e r v o i r : Dogger Produced r e s e r v o i r : Dogger
iii. Target r e s e r v o i r : T r i a s Produced r e s e r v o i r : Dogger

5-4
-P r o d u c t i o n o f t h e Dogger by r e l e a s i n g t h e "Ken Flow" through p e r f o r a t i o n s o r
t h e b 8" 112 open h o l e a f t e r p u l l i n g o u t t h e 0 7" l i n e r .
-The 0 9" 5 / 8 becomes t h e r e i n j e c t i o n column.
-D r i l l i n g o f t h e p r o d u c t i o n borehole, o b j e c t i v e Dogger.

O i l Based Muds
_-------------
I n general, r e l u c t a n c e i s f r e q u e n t l y n o t i c e d among p r o f e s s i o n a l s towards u s i n g
o i l base muds d e s p i t e t h e i r many advantages,principally because o f environmental
( d i s p o s a l and f i r e ) and economical considerations.

I n one case use o f these muds i s r e p o r t e d s a t i s f a c t o r y ( 9 ) d u r i n g most o f t h e


d r i l l i n g sequence. The s i t e c o n s t r a i n t s were such -urban area, l i t t l e a v a i l a b l e
space, t a r g e t f o r m a t i o n d i s t a n t from t h e d r i l l i n g p l a t f o r m -
t h a t i t was necessary
t o d r i l l i n a 0 8" 1 / 2 diameter a t a 400 d r i f t angle w i t h l i g h t muds ( d e n s i t y o f
1.04 - 1.051, no r e s e r v e p i t and no p o l l u t i o n o f t h e environment.

O i l based mud were found t o b e s t meet these o b j e c t i v e s by t h e i r a b i l i t y t o


(i) secure f a s t d r i l l i n g r a t e s by m i n i m i z i n g f r i c t i o n and s t i c k i n g r i s k s a s s o c i a t e d
w i t h s l a n t d r i l l i n g , (ii)l i m i t f o r m a t i o n damage and (iii) avoid hydration o f marls
and r e l a t e d s w e l l i n g and caving problems.

The i m p l i c a t i o n s were t h r e e f o l @ (i)


t o keep d e n s i t y under c o n t r o l by a v o i d i n g
discharge, C i i ) t o l i m i t mud losses when removing s o l i d s and (iii) t o reduce
s i g n i f i c a n t l y t r e a t e d and waste volumes. T h i s emphasizes s o l i d treatment. A r a t h e r
standard mud c l e a n i n g d e v i c e was added t o t h e mud c i r c u i t sketched i n Fig. 7.
w
5-5
I t enabled t o remove 54 % of t h e s o l i d s and t o recover 89 % o f t h e emulsion o f t h e
d e s i l t e r heavy e f f l u e n t s . D r i l l i n g c o u l d be completed i n 20 days from 200 t o 1330 m(
w i t h l e s s than 5 % r e d r i l l i n g time, and below t h e p r o j e c t e d budget. D e n s i t y was
always kept a t 1.05, w i t h a t o t a l mud volume o f 200 m3 and a percentage o f remova-
b l e d r i l l e d s o l i d s equal t o 67 %. Moreover no p o l l u t i o n is reported.

Noise
-----
Conventional, non e l e c t r i c , petroleum r i g s used i n geothermal d r i l l i n g can
generate n o i s e up t o €5 dbA whereas l e g a l environmental regulations set t h e l i m i t s
i n urban areas, w i t h heavy t r a f f i c , t o 45 ?. 15 = 60 dbA and 45 + 5 = 50 dbA d u r i n g
day and n i g h t t i m e . Excess n o i s e margins are o f 5 and 3 dbA r e s p e c t i v e l y .

Waiting f o r e l e c t r i c i t y d r i v e n r i g s , temporary measures can achieve t h e


o b j e c t i v e o f d r i l l i n g a t t o l e r a b l e n o i s e l e v e l s . They consist, among others,of :

-suppressing generator sets,replaced by connections t o t h e grid,


-o r i e n t i n g t h e d r i l l i n g p l a t f o r m and n o i s y engines according t o t h e d i r e c t i o n
o f dominant winds,
-s e t t i n g m u f f l e r s and hoods on engines,
-b u i l d i n g a n t i - n o i s e walls, b a t t e r s or wooden screens,
-a v o i d i n g n o i s y o p e r a t i o n s a t n i g h t : stem manoeuvers, cementing, logging.

They r e s u l t i n a d d i t i o n a l c o s t s estimated a t 100,000 US S..

O i l and gas d r i l l i n g p r a c t i c e versus geothermal r e s e r v o i r e v a l u a t i o n


--------------------___________c________-------------~--------------

The f o l l o w i n g case study (6) may w e l l i l l u s t r a t e t h e problems l i k e l y t o be


encountered when a p p l y i n g s t r a i g h t forward petroleum r o u t i n e t o geothermal explora-
tion.

Type o f w e l l : w i l d c a t .
O b j e c t i v e : e v a l u a t i o n o f h o t water b e a r i n g formations i n f e r r e d i n T r i a s s i c
f l u v i o c o n t i n e n t a l deposits; r e s e r v o i r rocks = sand, sandstone, interbedded clay.
P r e d i c t e d down h o l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s : TD = 3000 m, BHT = 130-150OC, p r e s s u r e =
hydrostatic.
L o c a t i o n : populated suburban d i s t r i c t , optimized by a v i b r o s e i s m i c survey.
Regional background knowledge : p r e v i o u s hydrocarbon e x p l o r a t i o n and produc-
t i o n d r i l l i n g s , some 20 km apart, and playback o f a continuous seismic coverage
enable t h e geology o f p o s t i r i a s s i c t e r r a i n s t o be r e l i a b l y assessed.
Technical column : 0 13" 3/8 casing (1200 m), 0 9" 5/8 l i n e r (1100-1900 m),
0 7" l i n e r (1800-2600 m) - Reservoir ; e i t h e r open hole, w i r e wrapped screen
(b 4" 1 / 2 1 o r s l o t t e d l i n e r ( 0 4" 1/21.
Mud programme : b e n t o n i t i c , b e n t o n i t i c + l i g n o s u l f o n a t e and baryte, s a t u r a t e d
brine.

The outcome was t h e f o l l o w i n g :

P r e d i c t e d and a c t u a l f i g u r e s stand i n r a t h e r c l o s e agreement as t o TD (3200 m),


temperature ( 1 4 O O C ) and f o r m a t i o n pressure. Reservoir t o p i s h i t a t 2700 m and a
n e t pay o f 150 m i s assessed from t h e CNL-BHC p o r o s i t y cross p l o t ( c u t - o f f
p o r o s i t y : 8 %).

5-6
!
Major events : incomplete cementing o f t h e 13" 3 / 8 -9" 5 / 8 l i n e r hanger. A t
2000 m a mini e r u p t i o n o f o i l and d i s s o l v e d gas i s c o n t r o l l e d b y t h e crew. I t causes
l a s t r e n g h t e n i n g o f s a f e t y r e g u l a t i o n s : w e l l head change and a n t i - e x p l o s i v e m o d i f i -
i c a t i o n s brought t o t h e r i g . D r i l l i n g resumes w i t h a b e n t o n i t e l i g n o s u l f o n a t e mud o f
t
d e n s i t y 1.13 a t r e s e r v o i r t o p (1.08 f o r h o l e c o n t r o l and c u t t i n g recovery, 0.05 f o r
5 bars/1000 m over pressure c o n t r o l ) . T o t a l l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n a t 2850 m. Mud losses :
185 m3. A f t e r c o n t r o l , d r i l l i n g progresses t o TD w i t h a b e n t o n i t i c mud ( d : 1.03 -
1.04). Mud losses : 290 m3. An a c i d f r a c j o b i s performed and a 600 m 0 4" 1 / 2
I

s l o t t e d l i n e r s e t down h o l e b e f o r e move-out. Number o f cores : t h r e e ( t o p -


i
reservoir - basement). Number o f casing DST's : 3 ( f i r s t : dry, second : productive;
t h i r d over t o t a l open h o l e s e c t i o n : l e s s productive).
i
D i a g n o s t i c : r e s e r v o i r plugged by a bentonic mud i n a h o t (14OOC) a q u i f e r
environment; u n s u f f i c i e n t r e s e r v o i r reconnaissance; no f u r t h e r r e s e r v o i r i n v e s t i g a -
t i o n s p o s s i b l e (flowmeter, s i d e w a l l c o r i n g ) owing t o a nonremovable s l o t t e d l i n e r .
F a i l u r e reasons a r e t h r e e f o l d : blow o u t fears, inadequate mud, budget l i m i t a t i o n s .
The f i r s t caused denser d r i l l i n g f l u i d s and exaggerated h o l e control, t h e second
r e s u l t e d i n f o r m a t i o n damage, t h e t h i r d i n a funnel shaped columr),the cheapest mud
formula and t o o f a s t d r i l l i n g r a t e s a t r e s e r v o i r l e v e l .

Consequences : s i d e t r a c k from r e s e r v o i r top, w i t h s a l t w a t e r as a d r i l l i n g


f l u i d and a m o d i f i e d h o l e geometry (7" casing t i e d back t o t h e former 7" -
9" 5/23
l i n e r hanger). Subsequent e x t r a c o s t s a r e estimated a t 1.2 m i l l i o n US 8 .

H I G H ENTHALPY DRILLING

Genera 1
-------
For many years h i g h enthalpy d r i l l i n g - w a s bound t o Tuscan d r y steam f i e l d s
and i t i s o n l y r e c e n t l y t h a t more d i v e r s i f i e d s e t t i n g s have e n t e r e d t h e geothermal
d r i l l i n g and p r o d u c t i o n p i c t u r e . O f t h e 814 w e l l s d r i l l e d a t temperatures above
1 5 O O C about 30, d r i l l e d i n t h e p a s t decade, d e a l t w i t h water dominated systems.
Relevant environments can e x h i b i t f o r m a t i o n temperatures i n excess of 4OOOC and a
bottom h o l e t e m p e r a t u r e o f 300OC i s a q u i t e common f i g u r e . CO c o n t e n t s a s h i g h as
2
80 % a r e sometimes n o t i c e d i n t h e e a r l y producing stage ( T o r r e ALfina). R e s e r v o i r
rocks include : q u a r t z i t e , p h y l l i t e and a n h y d r i t e (Larderello, Travale, Monte
Amiata, P i a n Castagnaio) - Carbonate (limestone and d o l o m i t e ) rocks (Larderello,
Travale, T o r r e A l f i n a , Cesano, L a t e r a l - a l k a l i n e t u f f a c e o u s p r o d u c t s (Mofete,
San V i t o ) - micaschists, c r y s t a l l i n e and metamorphic rocks (Milos). But i n g e n e r a l
i t i s l e s s t h e n a t u r e o f t h e rock t h a n i t s f r a c t u r e d p o r o s i t y , t h e dominant f e a t u r e
o f geothermal r e s e r v o i r s , which i s a problem. Hard and a b r a s i v e rocks a r e d r i l l e d
a t e s w i t h conventional t o o l s . Lengths f 75, 100 and even 125 m d r i l l e d
w i t h t h e same t o o l a r e n o t uncommon i n geotherma b i t records. I t i s more a m a t t e r
o f t o o l t o f o r m a t i o n adequacy t h a n o f adequate t o o l a v a i l a b i l i t y .

Fractures, e s p e c i a l l y when massive as i n t h e L a r d e r e l l o f i e l d , a s s o c i a t e d w i t h


h i g h temperatures cause t h e major problems as t o l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n c o n t r o l , cementing
jobsand s e t t i n g o f m u l t i p l e c a s i n g s T h e s e d i f f i c u l t i e s a r e t h e major reasons t o
t h e t w o f o l d i n c r e a s e o f geothermal d r i l l i n g c o s t s as compared t o e q u i v a l e n t o i l and
gas operations. S t a t i s t i c s , c a r r i e d out on a sample o f 20 w e l l s d r i l l e d a t depths
o f 1000 t o 1500 m w i t h s i m i l a r technologies show (Munier Jolain, p e r s o n a l communi-

iucation, 19801, f o r hydrocarbon versus geothermal : t o t a l d u r a t i o n (days) 30/50,


e f f e c t i v e d r i l l i n g t i m e (%I 35/20, t o o l l i f e t i m e i d e n t i c a l , c o n t r o l (losses, cement-
ing. ..) and i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n (%I 13/30. LJ
Although l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n s a r e n o t t o be overlooked (see example f u r t h e r ) t h e y
a r e u s u a l l y k e p t under c o n t r o l by cement p l u g s -
up t o 17 a r e r e p o r t e d o n a j o b a t
120 m depth. So cementing i s t h e major p u z z l e e s p e c i a l l y when c o n s i d e r i n g t h a t
squeeze and stage cementing a r e r u l e d o u t i n geothermal wells. A r u l e f r e q u e n t l y
adopted c o n s i s t s o f p l a c i n g t h r e e successive columns (17" 112 13" 3 / 8- 9" 518 - -
7") continuously, cemented b u t n o t f i e c e s s a r i l y over t h e e n t i r e length, w i t h expansion
s p o o l s a t w e l l head. S l o t t e d l i n e r s a r e more a makeshift t h a n a need. A standard
cement u t i l i z e d i n t h e EC i s t h e I t a l c e m e n t i (ieotherm Class G cement, based o n
40 % S i l i c a f l o w e r which copes M i t h temperatures o f 3OOOC u s i n g adequate a d d i t i v e s
and r e t a r d e r s ( 4 ) .

A t y p i c a l h i g h temperature w e l l i s shown i n Fig., 8 .


Here a t L a t e r a (7) i n a
volcano sedimentary context, EhiEL u t i l i z e d a mud based o n a s e p i o l i t e - b e n t o n i t e -
chromo-lignite formula w i t h XP20 Resinex r e s i n a d d i t i v e s and p o l y a c r y l a t e s . Other
mud formulae used i n I t a l y a r e ( 4 ) : asbestos-fiber muds p r e t r e a t e d w i t h chromo-
l i g n i t e s and non-ionic surfactants; b e n t o n i t i c muds w i t h FCL/CL s t a b i l i z e d b y
Synergetic Polymer Blend; b e n t o n i t i c muds w i t h h i g h ferro-chromo-lignosulfonate/
chromo-Lignite contents, p r o t e c t e d and s t a b i l i z e d by a s p h a l t i c o i l d i s p e r s e d
products.

I t can be seen i n Fig. 8 t h a t a s i g n i f i c a n t s e t o f c o n v e n t i o n a l w i r e l i n e


l o g s were r a n down hole. I n general h i g h temperature do n o t cause major problems
p r o v i d e d t h e r e i s adequate cooling. Some l o g g i n g companies c l a i m temperature t o l e -
rance up t o 26OOC f o r main t o o l s but these l i m i t s were n o t checked i n h o l e i n EC
wells. As t o bottom h o l e measurements Ameradas and p r e f e r a b l y K u s t e r mechanical
devices m o d i f i e d f o r h i g h temperature service,are found t h e most r e l i a b l e and have
been used up t o 370OC o v e r s e v e r a l hours. S i n g l e shot i n s t r u m e n t s mounted o n t h e r -
mal s h i e l d s have proved e f f e c t i v e a t 4OOOC and 1.5 hours, ( 4 ) . Open h o l e packers
have f a i l e d a f t e r 12 hours o p e r a t i n g i n a 2OOOC environment i n t h e Phlegreaen
f i e l d s . Down h o l e h i g h temperature hardware i s being developed w i t h t h e support o f
t h e EC i n t h e f o l l o w i n g areas : pressure and temperature gauge (3OO0C, 500 bars),
flowmeter-caliper (240OC, 250 bars), f l u i d sampler (24OoC, 250 bars). Research i s
a l s o conducted f o r t h e design o f an i n h o l e o p t i c a l f i b e r p r i n c i p l e f o r power and
s i g n a l t r a n s m i s s i o n A l o g g i n g f a c i l i t y w i t h a 4000 m T e f l o n i n s u l a t e d c a b l e i s
currently operating i n I t a l y .

I n Europe a h i g h enthalpy w e l l i s considered commercial f o r a n e t p r o d u c t i v e


c a p a c i t y o f 1.5 MW .
Costs o f geothermal w e l l s sunk a t depths o f 2 000 and 2 500 m
average 1.9 and 2.8 m i l l i o n US 8 r e s p e c t i v e l y . S l i m h o l e ( p r o j e c t e d n o t a c t u a l )
costs f o r s i m i l a r depths amount t o 500,000 and 650,000 US 8 . Environmental cons-
t r a i n t s may add 30 % t o t h e b i l l (Campi F l e g r e i ) .

According t o j o i n t AGIP and ENEL c a l c u l a t i o n s (Ceron, p e r s o n a l communication,


1979) t h e s t r u c t u r e of geothermal m i n i n g costs i s d i v i d e d a s f o l l o w s (50 % versus
70 % success r a t i o s i n percentage of t o t a l m i n i n g c o s t ) : s u r f a c e e x p l o r a t i o n
(1.5/2), deep d r i l l i n g (77.5/70), r e s e r v o i r engineering (9.5/14), production
engineering (9.51131, d i s p o s a l (9/11).

5-8
S l i m hole w i l d c a t t i n g

New tendancies a r e shaping i n h i g h enthalpy e x p l o r a t i o n d r i l l i n g . S l i m h o l e


w i l d c a t s p r o g r e s s i v e l y r e p l a c e t h e so c a l l e d shallow g r a d i e n t holes u t i l i s e d i n t h e
p a s t f o r heat f l o w mapping purposes. These s l i m holes, d r i l l e d e s s e n t i a l l y on geo-
p h y s i c a l i n d i c e s down t o depths of 2000 m w i t h a 0 6" t e r m i n a l open h o l e diameter,
a r e shown t o be t h r e e t i m e s cheaper t h a n an o r d i n a r y e x p l o r a t o r y borehole. They a r e
n o t designed as p r o d u c t i o n w e l l s and t h e i r use i s t h e r e f o r e r e s t r i c t e d t o g e o l o g i c a l
reconnajssance, pressure - temperature measurements and r e s e r v o i r e v a l u a t i o n . As a
r e s u l t , s l i m h o l e w i l d c a t t i n g should enable,(i) t o speed up e x p l o r a t i o n , (ii) t o cut
down e x p l o r a t i o n costs, (iii)t o c a l i b r a t e geophysics and d e r i v e r e l e v a n t conceptual
models and, therefore,(iv) t o reduce speculations. S l i m holes a r e c u r r e n t l y b e i n g
d r i l l e d o r planned i n t h e near f u t u r e o n t h e f o l l o w i n g prospects : Somma Vesuvius
(Ottaviano permit, Campania, I t a l y ) , S a b a t t i n i and C i m i n i (Northern Latium, I t a l y )
and Mont Dore (Massif Central, France) ( 8 ) .

Deep d r i l l i n g case s t u d i e s

I n known and r e c e n t l y discovered fields,deep d r i l l i n g (below 3000 m) aimed a t


i n v e s t i g a t i n g t h e e n t i r e r e s e r v o i r sequences,is becoming systematic. T h i s procedure,
although i t poses severe problems associated w i t h h i g h e r temperatures and d r i l l i n g
through successive producing layers; i s necessary w i t h respect t o o p t i m i s a t i o n o f
f u t u r e p r o d u c t i o n and r e s e r v o i r management. I t i s a l s o t h e b e s t p o s s i b l e s u b s t i t u t e
o f p a s t m i n i n g p r a c t i c e o f t a k i n g t h e b e s t p a r t o f shallower producing horizons.
a

Two w e l l s d r i l l e d r e c e n t l y i n I t a l y defended t h i s concept.

A f i r s t one was d r i l l e d a t Sasso i n order t o e x p l o r e t h e deeper p a r t s and


l o c a t e t h e water phase o f t h e tong e x p l o i t e d L a r d e r e l l o d r y steam system which i s
p r e s e n t l y b e i n g produced i n t h e upper carbonate r e s e r v o i r f o r m a t i o n s (see l o g i n
Fig. 9 1. Target depths of 4500 m were estimated, based on t h e f o l l o w i n g arguments,
(i) t h e presence o f a regional, continuous and e n e r g i c seismic r e f l e c t o r and,(ii;
source temperature o f 3 5 O O C i n f e r r e d from gas geochemistry which a t t r i b u t e d a deep
o r i g i n t o 50 % o f t h e gasses trapped i n t h e upper f i e l d . As a whole t h i s p r o j e c t
ought t o be regarded as a combined e x p l o r a t i o n and d r i l l i n g technology research
venture.

t h e second w e l l has j u s t been completed a t San ita, i n Campi Flegrei,a pressu-


r i z e d water system developing i n an a c t i v e vo o n t e x t (see map i n Fig. 11)(5).
Here t h e o b j e c t i v e was t o step out o f t h e Mof ock, a t present i n t h e e v a l u a t i o n
stage,and t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e adjacent and lower compartment c l o s e t o a normal f a u l t
t r e n d i n g r a d i a l l y t o t h e P o z z u o l i caldera. A depth o f 3000 m was assianed t o t h e San
V i t o h o l e a g a i n s t 2000 m f deepest w e l l i

The Sasso 22 deep d r i l l i n g


-----------_-----_-______L

stinguished, name

o f t h e upper producing r v o i r s which ended a f t e r one


t i n g and cementing o f t h e 0 9" 5/8 casing. T h i s phase i s dominated
by l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n (see Fig. 9 1.

6d
5-9
- second,
t h e d r i l l i n g below 3000 m, i n a harsh environment as t o rocks and
temperatures. I t i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n , t o o l deviation, d r i l l p i p e
corrosion, breakage, f i s h i n g and s i d e t r a c k i n g (see.Fig. IO). I t l a s t e d e l e v e n
LJ
months.

I f phase one c o u l d w e t 1 be regarded as one eyed, phase two was d e f i n i t e l y


blind. To our knowledge,very few wells,if any,have e x h i b i t e d so many d i f f i c u l t i e s
and hardware f a i l u r e s a t t h e same t i m e (2).

S t a r t i n g from 608 m t h e h o l e was d r i l l e d i n t o t a l l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n u s i n g p l a i n


water as a d r i l l i n g f l u i d w i t h viscous p l u g s pumped i n a t each stem move. L o s t
c i r c u l a t i o n i s caused by l a r g e f r a c t u r e s and c a v i t i e s and cannot be c o n t r o l l e d
n e i t h e r by chemical - -
p l u g g i n g agents nor mechanical - bento b l o c k- means.
Consequently,no r e t u r n c i r c u l a t i o n being possible,the c u t t i n g s a r e n o t recovered
and l i t t l e s t i f f e n i n g i s a p p l i e d t o t h e d r i l l i n g s t r i n g . As a m a t t e r o f f a c t no
s t a b i l i z e r s c o u l d be used. S t i l 1 , t o o l blocking, stuck d r i l l c o l l a r s and breakage o f
bottom h o l e assemblies were sometimes n o t i c e d b u t remained under c o n t r o l . I n p a r t i -
c u l a r t t h e i n j e c t i o n o f c o l d water and i t s subsequent shrinkage proved e f f e c t i v e i n
g e t t i n g unstuck.

Cementing, w i t h stinger, o f t h e 9" 5/8 casing c o u l d n o t be achieved over t h e


r e q u i r e d length, r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e o f t e n ambiguous i n d i c a t i o n o f t h e CBL,'owing t o
t h e presence o f s e v e r a l f i s s u r e d absorbing horizons. So, p e r f o r a t i n g and squeeze
were necessary.

Otherwise,the b i t r e c o r d proved s a t i s f a c t o r y w i t h average 50 hours and 95


meters f i g u r e s and t h e f o l l o w i n g w i r e l i n e logs c o u l d be r u n : HRT BHC GR - - -
DLL -
BHC - LS -
C and flowmeter.

Below t h e 9" 5 / 8 casing shoe t h e presence, i n a d d i t i o n t o i m p o r t a n t l o s t


c i r c u l a t i o n s h i t a t 3000 m, o f h a r d and h i g h l y heterogeneous metamorphic rocks -
gneisses and a m p h i b o l i t e s - caused t h e d e v i a t i o n s and severe dog l e g s d i s p l a y e d i n
Fig. 10. I n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h h i g h temperatures, c o r r o s i o n was another puzzle. '

Breakage o f d r i l l p i p e o f t e n occured and even s e v e r a l r i n g elements o f t h e a n n u l a r


BOP were found down hole. Frequent f i s h i n g jobs took p l a c e which, owing t o bottom
h o l e temperatures i n excess of 350OC, could n o t c a l l upon e x p l o s i v e and h y d r a u l i c
(back off, bumper sub,etdrecovery techniques. When f i s h i n g f a i l e d and d e v i a t i o n
d r i f t s showed e x c e s s i v e s i d e t r a c k i n g was t h e r u l e . P l a c i n g of cement plugs, t o
keep t h e whipstock s t a t i o n a r y , n o t being possible, s h o r t c u t s . w e r e r e q u i r e d t o s i d e
t r a c k w i t h o u t r e e n t e r i n g t h e hole. A f t e r a f i r s t f a i l u r e t o d e v i a t e from t h e f i r s t
s i d e t r a c k (see Fig. 101, a second whipstock based on a c o n v e n t i o n a l .design was
manufactured by a s e r v i c e company. A f t e r p o s i t i o n i n g down h o l e a t a p e r m i l l opened
a one meter long guide h o l e f o r t h e b i t . Therbcombinations o f i n s e r t b i t s and o f
v a r i o u s bottom h o l e assemblies enabled t o pass t h e f i s h and c o n t i n u e d r i l l i n g u n t i l
a depth o f 4094 m was reached t h u s e s t a b l i s h i n g a new r e c o r d i n geothermal d r i l l i n g .

Finally,the p e r s i s t a n c e o f t h i s h o s t i l e environment caused t h e w e l l t o be


abandoned soan a f t e r a t h i r d s i d e t r a c k had been attempted. The 9" 5/8 casing was
i n so bad shape a f t e r many s t r i n g manoeuvres and shocks i n an empty space (down
t o 2200 m) t h a t t h e w e l l had t o be plugged. Further analyses o f samples o f t u b u l a r s .
recovered down h o l e proved t h a t s t r e s s c o r r o s i o n had been aggravated b y t h e use o f
steam condensates, from t h e nearby geothermal power plant,as a d r i l l i n g f l u i d .

kid

5-10
However, t h e outcome o f t h i s deep d r i l l i n g venture was n o t n e g l i g i b l e . From a
geothermal s t a n d p o i n t i t proved a t a second r e s e r v o i r was developing down t o a
u d e p t h o f 3800 m. Over one m i l l i o 3 o f water were i n j e c t e d which demonstrated t h e
h i g h a b s o r p t i o n c a p a c i t y o f t h e f r a c t u r e d basement rocks. Core analyses l e d a l s o t o
a r e f i n e d s c e n a r i o o f t h e temperature h i s t o r y o f t h e Tuscan geothermal f i e l d . Para-
genesis study showed, i n p a r t i c u l a r , a h i g h temperature event a s s o c i a t e d w i t h ana-
t e c t i c magmatism f o l l o w e d by a r e c e n t hydrothermal a c t i v i t y . As f a r as d r i l l i n g
technology i s concerned, t h e major conclusions can be summarized as f o l l o w s :

- d e v i a t i o n c o n t r o l i s a b s o l u t e l y v i t a l i n these environments. I n no way a r e


h i g h temperatures an o b s t a c l e t o standard s i n g l e shot o p e r a t i n g p r o v i d e d t h e i n -
j e c t e d water c o o l s down t h e h o l e t o t h e r e q u i r e d l e v e l .

- i t i s recommended t h a t future j o b s i n s i s i i l a r c o n d i t i o n s make use o f non


s t a b i l i s e d heavy d r i l l . c o l l a r s (Uranium, Tungsten) t o prevent excessive d e v i a t i o n s .

- s i d e t r a c k i n g over 350OC cannot r e l y on cement plugs, n e i t h e r on diamond


b i t which t o t a l l y f a i l e d nor on turbines.

-
new s p e c i f i c a t i o n s as t o tubular, w e l l heads, BOP'S and p a r t i c u l a r i t y s e a l
requirements and i n s p e c t i o n a r e u r g e n t l y needed f o r h i g h temperature operation.

- chemical composition and a g r e s s i v i t y o f i n j e c t e d waters should be c a r e f u l l y


t e s t e d w i t h respect t o s t r e s s corrosion.

I n c i d e n t a l l y t h i s d r i l l i n g t r i g g e r e d two research p r o j e c t s , adressing,(i)


t h e design and t e s t i n g of a mechanical device t o beat l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n i n e x t e n s i -
v e l y f r a c t u r e d media and,(ii) -
t h e implementation o f l i g h t weight ( d .C 1.5) geo-
t herma 1 cement s l u r r i e s .

The San V i t o W e l l (1)


--------_--_-----
T h i s e x p l o r a t o r y h o l e d r i l l e d by AGIP, operator o f an EMEL-AGIP j o i n t venture,
w i t h an I D E C O super 711 r i g , i s a good example o f t h e problems encountered w h i l e
d r i l l i n g i n a v e r y h i g h temperature v o l c a n i c environment, which r e q u i r e d two major
instrumentations.

D r i l l i n g o f t h e upper ;!OOO meters proved r e l a t i easy as i t b e n e f i t e d from


t h e experience a c q u i r e d w h i l e d r i l l i n g t h e t h r e e p r e v i o u s w e l l s a t Mofete (see
l o c a t i o n i n Fig. 111,sunk a t s i m i l a r depths. I n p a r t i c u l a r , i t can be n o t i c e d from
Fig. 12 t h a t a s u b s t a n t i a l s e t o f w i r e l i n e logs c o u l d be run down t o 2200 m, by

A f i r s t f i s h i n g j o b was attempted a t a depth o f 2330 m (see Fig. 13) t o reco-


ver t h e bottom h o l e as bly. A f t e r s e v e r a l unsuccessful t r i a l s t h e f i s h i s aban-
doned down hole.

The w e l l i s then s i d e t r a c e open h o l e section,just below t h e 9" S / 8


casing shoe (Fig. 13). D r i l l i n g n t i n u e s down t o 2488 m.. Here,further t o t h e stop-
p i n g o f c i r c u l a t i o n , t h e mud i s g e l l e d and coagulates. The r e l e a s e o f t h e assembly
i s attempted by sending a 0 1" 112 s c a l l o p gun down t h e s t r i n g t o p e r f o r a t e and
r e e s t a b l i s h c i r c u l a t i o n . I t f a i l s because t h e h i g h temperatures b u i l d i n g up i n h o l e
decompose t h e e x p l o s i v e charge. A second t r i a l w i t h a c o i l e d t u b i n g (0 22 mm) a l s o

ufaiLs=
5-11
Again,the bottom h o l e assembly i s l e f t down h o l e and a back-off i s planned i n a
shallower h o r i z o n (2013 m, some 30 m above t h e 9" 5/8 casing shoe) where lower
f o r m a t i o n temperature c o u l d secure t h e operation. The j o b succeeds and t h e assembly
LJ
i s released b u t 395 m of 0 6" 3 / 4 d r i l l c o l l a r s remain a t bottom hole.

A second s i d e t r a c k i s completedby m i l l i n g t h e 9" 5 / 8 casing,over a l e n g t h o f


25 m (between 2025 and 2050 m, Fig. 1 2 1 , u t i l i s i n g a p o s i t i v e displacement motor and
a l o 30" bent sub. A f t e r 5 days of o p e r a t i o n d r i l l i n g resumes and progresses down
t o 2500 m where t h e 7" s l o t t e d l i n e r i s set. D r i l l i n g continues i n 0 6" t o 3045 m
(TD). A d e v i a t i o n o f 50 i s measured, t h e r e t u r n mud temperature b e i n g s t a b i l i s e d a t
1oooc .
Bottom h o l e temperatures were recorded on an Amerada gauge a t 2500 m and
reached 301OC a f t e r 43 hours. A t t o t a l depth, a f t e r one week, BHT c o u l d n o t be
measured anymore w i t h standard equipment and a temperature o f 419OC was i n f e r r e d from
t h e m e l t i n g o f a z i n c sample.

The w e l l was then k i l l e d a f t e r a s h o r t p r o d u c t i o n t e s t showed r a p i d i n c r e a s e s


i n temperature a t t h e w e l l head, n o t r a t e d f o r temperatures i n excess o f 300OC.
A new w e l l head i s being designed t o cope w i t h temperatures o f 400% and pressures
of 220 bars and a l s o t h e presence o f COz. Environmental c o n s i d e r a t i o n s the well -
i s d r i l l e d i n an a c t i v e v o l c a n i c and occasionaly densely p o p u l a t e d area - require
d r a s t i c s a f e t y and m o n i t o r i n g r e g u l a t i o n s b e f o r e any p r o d u c t i o n t e s t be undertaken.
There a r e a l s o s t r o n g e x p e c t a t i o n s t h a t t h e geothermal f l u i d i s i n a s u p e r c r i t i c a l
s t a t e which has obvious i m p l i c a t i o n s on b o t h p r o d u c t i o n and r e s e r v o i r physics.

Experience gained d u r i n g d r i l l i n g can be summarized as f o l l o w s :

-
i mud can be used as a d r i l l i n g f l u i d p r o v i d e d i t i s designed f o r h i g h
temperature usage.

-
ii a t San Vito, muds contained a t t a p u l g i t e ( o r s e p i o l i t d suspended i n a polymer
s o l u t i o n w i t h K C l as a s w e l l i n g i n h i b i t o r i n a t u f f a c e o u s a l k a l i n e r o c k context.

-
iii mud d e n s i t y ought t o be increased and kept as c l o s e as p o s s i b l e t o t h e
1.35 target, t a k i n g i n t o account losses.

iv -
keeping t h e mud below 100°C, and p r e f e r a b l y around 90OC,is e s s e n t i a l . I t
i s achieved by r a p i d c i r c u l a t i o n and by a c o o l i n g f a c i l i t y (tower) a t surface.

v - l o s t c i r c u l a t i o n s , a f t e r deduction o f evaporation losses o c c u r i n g i n t h e


c o o l i n g tower, must be c a r e f u l l y monitored anclwhenever t h e y exceed t h e 2 m3/h
t h r e s h o l a a cement p l u g i s t o be s e t down hole.

vi - i t i s necessary, by a l l a v a i l a b l e means, t o s h o r t e n i n t e r r u p t i o n s o f
c i r c u l a t i o n and t o c a r r y o u t p a r t i a l c i r c u l a t i o n d u r i n g manoeuvers.

vii - u t i l i s a t i o n o f jars, bumper subs and f l o a t v a l v e s above t h e t o o l a r e


s t r o n g l y recommanded t o a v o i d s t i c k i n g .

viii - stabilised r o t a r y bottom h o l e assemblies a r e necessary.

ix - p e r i o d i c a l cleaning o f d r i l l p i p e i s mandatory t o o p t i m i z e c i r c u l a t i o n . LJ

5-12
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
W T h i s work forms p a r t o f t h e f i r s t and second R 8 D programmes on a l t e r n a t i v e
energy sources (subprogramme Geothermal Energy) sponsored by t h e Commission o f t h e
European Communi.ties, D i r e c t o r a t e G e n e r a l . f o r Research, Science and Education.

The a u t h o r s a r e indebted t o t h e Geothermal d i v i s i o n s o f EF!EL (UNG), A G I P SpA.,


BRGM, Geoservices H y d r o l o g i e and E l f - A q u i t a i n e and i n p a r t i c u l a r t o M r Messeti,
Concas, Gimenez, Leandri, Munier J o l a i n and V a t h a i r e f o r s t i m u l a t i n g d i s c u s s i o n s
on v a r i o u s aspects o f geothermal d r i l l i n g and production.

REFERENCES

'AGXP S.p.A., 1980. Mofete 1 and 2 wells. F i n a l Report, San Donato Milanese,
30 June, 1980. EC c o n t r a c t GE 01/79, 23 p., 15 fig., 9 tab.

2Baron, G., 1980. Commentaires sur l e Forage Geothermique Sasso 22 d'Explora-


t i o n Profonde du Champ de L a r d e r e l l o . Contrat CEE 627-78 EGI. Rapports de M i s s i o n s
du 18-19/4/79 e t du 27/02/80 (Unpublished).

3 B e r t i n i , G,. G i a n e l l i , G., Giovannoni, A., Puxeddu, M., Stefani, G.C. and


Squarci, P., 1980. Deep E x p l o r a t i o n o f t h e L a r d e r e l l o F i e l d . The Sasso 22 D r i l l i n g
Venture. I n : A.S. S t r u b and P. Ungemach (Fditors), Advances i n European Geothermal
Research, R e i d e l Pub. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 303-311.

4Cataldi, C,. 1980. High Temperature D r i l l i n g and Hardware. A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o


t h e Hot Dry Rock Working Party. Commission o f t h e European Communities. Brussels,
22 May, 1980 (Unpublished).

5Cioppi, D., Ghelardoni, R. Pauci, G., Sommaruga, C. and Verdiani, G,. 1980.
Demonstration P r o j e c t . E v a l u a t i o n o f t h e Mofete High Enthalpy R e s e r v o i r (Phlegreaen
Fields). I n : A.S. Strub and P. Ungemach (Editors), Advances i n European Geothermal
Research, R e i d e l Pub. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 291-302.

6Elf-Aquitaine, 1980. Rapport Technique de F i n de Sondage de Cronenbourg ( W e l l


Completion Report). Permis de Strasbourg Geothermie. M i s s i o n France, S e r v i c e Forage
MF/PRO No 80.678. Boussens, 10 October, 1980. EC c o n t r a c t 626-79-EGF.

7ENEL ( U n i t 2 N a t i o n a l e Geotermica), 1980. L a t e r a 1 E x p l o r a t o r y W e l l (Northern


Latiurn). F i n a l Report, Pisa, A p r i l , 1980. EC c o n t r a c t 571-78-1-EGI. 13 p., 7 fig.,
8 tab., 2 ann. (Well Completion Report).
8
Ungemach, P., 1980. From E x p l o r a t i o n t o P r o d u c t i o n t h e Geothermal Case, An
I n s i g h t t o t h e F i r s t R & D Programme o f t h e European Community. Paper p r e s e n t e d a t
t h e 7 t h annual meeting of t h e European Geophysical Society, Budapest, 24-29 August,
. 1980. I n press.
9
Vathaire, J.C., Garcia, C. and Bouvier, A,, 1979. Nouveaux Developpements en
MatiCre de Traitement des S o l i d e s des F l u i d e s de Forage. Forages, Revue de 1' A.E.
M.S. -I.F.P., 85 : 49-67.

5-13
... . . ~ - ... . . . -. ..- ~ . ~ . . .. 1 , .. .-.. -.

Table 2
Table 1 I

T y p i c a l cost f i g u r e s o f a geothermal
EC Geothermal Well Record
d i s t r i c t h e a t i n g scheme

Geothermal F i e l d s Number o f Wells Success Ratic


x Characteristics :
d r i 1l e d productive -
t a l depth : 125 m3lh
1800 m (2 v e r t i c a l holes)
Temperature above 15OoC :
aoduction r a t e :
,ttom h o l e temperature : 94 oc
-I-t LaL aal yrr dd ee rr eelllloo (1904-1976) 513 338 66 rat l o a d :
i l savings :
2000 e q u i v a l e n t dwellings,
2500 TOE'S y e a r l y
each 185 m3 ' .

-- Monte (1976-1978)
Amiata, P i a n Castagnaio
66
63
39
33
38
20
50
60
51
, t a l c o s t (1981) : 6 m i l l i o n US S

-- Travale, Radicondoli
T o r r e A l f i n a , Cesano, Vico, L a t e r a 19
7
10
5
53
71
- Vulcano, Sciacca, Mofete, San V i t o
Viterbo, Campi Flegrei, I s c h i a (1940-1960) 105 5 5 Breakdown o f c o s t s :

Greece
cost (1,000 us $1 x
-
- Milos 2 2 100
rilling 1380 23
T o t a l High Enthalpy 814 45 1 55
roducts, services 450 7.5

mer 150 2.5


Temperature below 150°C(*)
ubulars, w e l l heads, p r i m a r y c i r c u i t p i p i n g 1140 19
France
- P a r i s Basin 18 17 94
- Aquitaine 7 6 86 umping (production, reinjection, feed) 240 4
- Limagne 1 0 0
- Rhine Graben 1 1 100 rocess engineering 360 6

o t a l s u b s o i l investment 3720 62
Germany
- Rhine Graben 1 0 0
u r f a c e equipment
(*) 360 6
Denmark tiping 1440 24
- Danish B a s i n 1 0 0

Belgium
- Hainault 2 2 100
: o n s u l t i n g fees -
480 -8

Total 6000 100


Italy
- Po V a l l e y 1 0 0

U n i t e d Kingdom Ratios :
- Wessex B a s i n
_c_

1 1 100
sayback t i m e : 13 years
?ate o f r e t u r n : 8.5 X
T o t a l Lou Enthalpy 33 27 82
- Grand T o t a l 847 478 56
(*I T i t a n e p l a t e heat exchanger and degassing unit
(*I i n c l u d i n g r e i n j e c t i o n w e l l s and w i l d c a t s

6
Legend

1
o w ma m a moa-

P a r i s Basin
-
2
- __
Aquitaine Basin
3 Bas-Qhhe Langucdoc
.I PO V a l l e y
5 Wcssex Basin
6 East Yoikshire Basin
.7 Northern I r e l a n d Basins
8 Alpine Forcdecp
9 Northern Germany,
Munstcr land, Net her land’ Basins
0 Danish Embayme&
1 Limagnc
2 Rhane R i f t V a l l e y ’
3 Rhinc Graben
4 Campldana Crdben
6 Centrat Turerny
Northern Latium
7
* tampania
E o l i a n Arc

Figure 1 - An o u t l i n e o f EC geothermalresource status.


Reservoir temperature range a t depths varying from 1 t o 3.5 km
( a f t e r Sommaruga and Haenel)

5-15
i
3 0
c,c,
L
0 0
QaJ
act
I
M
Q,
L
3
. .
tJ,
.I-
LL
.
n
v)
0 aJ
L
0 % 3
.
f c,
Q m
m L
E aJ
Q
C E
.
0 0,
e
a
0

. 0
*E .
c)
j0 .
e
N
0,
0
..
I I

Silex chalk

Grey c h a l k U P P E R

v
C R E T A C E o u

so0
I
CENOMANIAN I
I
Marly chalk

L O Y E R
C R E T A C E O U

PURBLCKIAN
PORTLANDIAN A l t t r M t i n 9 1i m e s t o n e
marts a n d s a n d s t o n e
KIMMERIDGIAN

4--
I 71
.? 1y

-=
. ....,.:.,
-:.---;---=E..
-0 8 a..O O--.,
, A;r.-r:
-6:.
* -rr.t..
ar.

L<
- OXfOPDIAtl

CALLOVI AN
SATHONIAN
IMJOCIAN
io1 AALEMIAN
L i m y s e r i e uith
interbedded marl

Black marl

Marts: O o l i t i c reference
G r a v e t l y and o o l i t i c l i m e s t o n e

Zoogenic m a r l
M A L M

O O G G E R

L I A S
SINERUR IAN
-__ -
HETTANCIAN A l t e r n a t i n g m a r l and d o l o m i t e
-._ -
RHETIC Clayey sandstone
T R I A S
Fine g r a i n e d s a n d s t o n e a d

-conglorerate

Schist C A L L O f O I C
-... -I II

v1
I
Fig. 4 - MD ruilltli i na gq uand
i f e r reconnaissance.
w e l l design
Fig. 5 - Synthetic lithostratigraphic log i n the
centre of t h e P a r i s Basin
P
4 ( a f t e r Geoservices Hydrologie)
ralld pumpln9 t o waste
cuttlnpr cleaner c i r c u l a t ion fluids

t touardr
sepa r a t o r
d s d l i n g on i n c l l n e d concrete p 3 t
concrete s l a b
I I

B e n t o n i t i c mud
O i l based mud

Fig. 6 - Borehole geometry. Comparison between Fig. 7 - S i m p l i f i e d mud c i r c u i t ( a f t e r Vathaire e t a l l


two geothermal w e l l bores d r i l l e d w i t h
a c o n v e n t i o n a l b e n t o n i t i c an4 o i l based
muds ( a f t e r Geoservices Hydrologie)
c
n
4.

‘p
oa
. , . ...
0
II '
4
2

1000 "

13'

2000 "

3000 _.

4000 .'

1) Fmcenic Ligurian Nappe:flysch sequence of shaley and sandy sedi-


ments. 2)Oligocenic sandstone( 'macigno') .3)Stratified cherty lime-
stone.4)Massive limestone. 5)Marly dolostone. 6)Carbonate and anhy-
drite (Eurano Formation). 3) to 6) are of Mesozoic age. 2)to 6)
belong to the Tuscan Nappe. 7) Trias,sic slightly metamorphic quartz
pebble conglomerate and coarse quartz-arenite (basal levels of the
.
%can Verrucano) 8)Quartzite ,phyllite,metagreywacke,metabsite of
Lower Paleozoic'Filladi inferiori'Group. 9)Garnet-bearing plagio-
clase micaschist (Lower Paleozoic-Pre-Cambr ian?) 1O)Fine-grained.
-
meisses and thin interbedded amphibolite levels (Lower Paleozoic-
Pre-Cambrian?) .
Recessed sonic log on th right refers to the interval 1600-2900 m
of the basement. 11) Higher permeability horizons.

Fig. 9 - Well Sasso 22. L i t h o s t r a t i g r a p h i c , sonic and t e m p e r a t u r e l o g s


( a f t e r ENEL)
i
n f
c
5-21
P
S
L'
0
L
n
Q
6
w
Ea
"I
:
5-22
. .

You might also like