Production of Aluminide Layers On AISI 304 Stainless Steel at Low Temperatures Using The Slurry Process
Production of Aluminide Layers On AISI 304 Stainless Steel at Low Temperatures Using The Slurry Process
Production of Aluminide Layers On AISI 304 Stainless Steel at Low Temperatures Using The Slurry Process
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04748-3 1059-9495/$19.00
Intermetallic compounds, such as iron aluminides exhibit excellent oxidation and corrosion resistance, as
well as metallurgical bonding with excellent adhesion to the substrate. In this work, aluminizing treatments
were carried out using the dipping into slurry process to produce iron aluminide coatings on stainless steel
substrates. In this process, AISI 304 stainless steel samples were immersed in a slurry consisting of poly-
vinyl butyral, ethyl alcohol and a powder composed of Al, AlCl3 and Al2O3, dried and then placed in sealed
crucibles without further protection. These samples were treated at temperatures of 500 and 650 °C for 2,
4, 6 and 8 h and then air-cooled. Flat and homogeneous layers were obtained over the substrate with
increased thickness observed with increasing temperature and treatment time. Considering that the tra-
ditional treatments of aluminization by the pack process are carried out at temperatures close to 900 °C
and use larger amounts of material, the low temperature treatments used in this work offer potential cost
savings.
Fig. 2 Micrograph of the layers of aluminides produced at 500 °C by (a) 2, (b) 4, (c) 6 and (d) 8 h in AISI 304 stainless steel
3. Results and Discussion suggested that the nickel content may favor the formation of
austenitic vacancies that improve the quality of the diffusional
3.1 Layer Morphology and XRD Analyses layer and help to promote Al diffusion.
Layers of aluminides produced at 650 °C with varying
The layers obtained in the aluminized substrates at 500 °C treatment times are shown in Fig. 3.
varying the treatment time are shown in Fig. 2. In the substrates treated at 650 °C, layers were formed with
The aluminide layers presented good thickness regularity, the same characteristics observed in the treatment carried out at
with well-defined interfaces with the substrates. In this 500 °C, that is, with a compact structure and a well-defined
treatment, the entire surface of each material was completely interface with the substrate. The formation mechanism is
covered by the layers, which was expected for this type of steel initially given by the adsorption of the active Al atoms on the
which was studied by Monteiro et al. (Ref 14). Monteiro et al. surface of the substrate, thereby diffusing toward the crystalline
structure of the metal, forming a solid solution. As the Al layer. This contributes to an improvement in oxidation
content increases to a certain concentration in that region, the resistance and avoids early spallation of the oxidized layer
aluminide layers begin to take shape on the surface of the (Ref 17, 20). Bates et al. (Ref 21) varied the amount of
substrate (Ref 15). In general, as expected, the thicknesses of aluminum in the powder composition to aluminize a martensitic
the layers increased considerably due to the increase in ferritic steel. In the mixture containing up to 20 wt.% Al in the
treatment time and temperature, in which the high Cr content master alloy, an aluminide layer containing only FeAl was
had no negative effect on the total substrate coverage by the formed. While in the mixture containing 25 wt.% Al in the
aluminides, since this element appears to decrease the capacity master alloy, a layer of FeAl and a thin outer layer of Fe2Al5
of substrates covered by aluminides (Ref 14, 15). Sun et al. were formed.
(Ref 15) produced layers of aluminides combining the slurry
process and alumina powder, in which case the researchers 3.2 Study of Growth Kinetics of Iron Aluminide Layers
observed the presence of pits in the layers formed as the
The variation of the thicknesses of the layers produced as a
treatment time increased, the same defects observed in the
function of the different treatment times at the two working
layers produced in this work.
temperatures is shown in Fig. 5.
X-ray diffraction analysis was performed on the aluminide
In the studies of Xiang and Datta (Ref 22) on the kinetics of
layer, and their diffractogram is shown in Fig. 4.
aluminization on steel alloys, the authors observed that the
In the x-ray diffraction pattern of the aluminized sample, the
process time influences the thickness of the layers and does not
formation of layers with FeAl is observed (Ref 16). These
produce additional phases. As time increases, the supply of Al
results are in accordance with coatings produced with low-
as the diffusional product from the slurry does not decrease
activity aluminum slurries, which the slurry composition,
rapidly during the process. Even though it has a high chemical
mainly the aluminum quantity of the slurry can avoid the
reactivity and the atmosphere of the furnace is not controlled,
formation of Al-rich aluminide (Ref 17). The diffraction peaks
Al is not rapidly lost during the treatment time and is even more
indicate preferred crystal growth orientation in the planes (101)
effective in the production of aluminide layers during longer
and (211) at 2h incidence angles equal to 44.17° and 81.54°,
times, regardless of the temperature applied.
respectively. In addition, peaks of lower intensities indicate the
It will be seen that the thicknesses of the layers increased
presence of Fe, Cr and Ni from the substrate at 2h incidence
with increasing treatment temperatures, but only the rate of
angles equal to 42.62°, 67.44°, 74.68° and 90.72° (Ref 18, 19).
growth of the layer changed, not its formation mechanism (Ref
Low-activity slurries contain up to 50 wt.% of aluminum in its
22). This behavior is the same as seen when treatment time
composition. In low-activity coatings, due to the reduced
rises; the Al concentration remained constant and only the
aluminum supply, the aluminide layer growth is outward,
coating thickness is increased. Xiang and Datta (Ref 22)
resulting in larger aluminide grains, thus having fewer grain
evaluated that the increase in the temperature from 500 to
boundaries, making difficult the diffusion of substrate elements,
650 °C can increase the penetration of the Al into a metallic
as chromium, titanium, tungsten, molybdenum, among others.
substrate approximately 10 to 35 lm. Even though the
Because of this, there is no formation of precipitates in the outer
aluminization kinetics theory for different metal substrates is
Fig. 5 Layer thickness as a function of time for treatment temperatures of (a) 500 °C and (b) 650 °C
well developed and grounded, most studies concerned the related to activation energy (Q) and the temperature in kelvin
powder pack process using high process temperatures. There- (T) using the Arrhenius equation as follows in Eq 2 (Ref 23-25)
fore, the basic theory for the slurry process at low temperatures
Q
still lacks development and foundation. The continuation of this K ¼ K0 exp : ðEq 2Þ
research should focus on applying practical and simplified RT
experiments in combination with thermodynamic theory to In this Eq 2, K0 is the pre-exponential constant and R is the
study the kinetics of aluminide formation in metallic substrates. gas constant. From there the Eq 3 can be expressed as follows:
In this work, we use theoretical calculations to study the
kinetics of aluminides layers formation by the slurry process, Q
lnK ¼ ðlnK0 Þ : ðEq 3Þ
using a parabolic law on the basis of classical kinetic theory as RT
follows in Eq 1 (Ref 22)
From Eq 3, the graph of ln K versus the inverse of the
l 2 ¼ K t; ðEq 1Þ treatment temperature can be obtained and afterward calcula-
tions K0 and Q are made. The graph of variation in the
where l, K and t are the thickness (cm), diffusion coefficient thicknesses of the layers produced as a function of the two
(cm2/s) and time (s), respectively. The coefficient K can be working temperatures (500 and 650 °C) are shown in Fig. 6.
Acknowledgments
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de
Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nı́vel Superior—Brazil
(CAPES)—Finance Code 001. The authors would also like to
Fig. 6 Curves of the square of the thickness of the layer as a thank the CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
function of temperature for the different treatment times Cientı́fico e Tecnológico) Finance code 305.294/2015-6
and University of São Paulo (USP).
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflict
of interest.
References
1. V.A. Ravi, T.K. Nguyen, and J.C. Nava, Aluminizing of Steel to
Improve High Temperature Corrosion Resistance, Thermochemical
Surface Engineering of Steels, E.J. Mittemeijer, M.A. Somers, Eds.,
Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, 2015, p 751–767. https://doi.org/10.
1533/9780857096524.5.751
2. X. Xiang, X. Wang, G. Zhang, T. Tang, and X. Lai, Preparation
Technique and Alloying Effect of Aluminide Coatings as Tritium
Permeation Barriers: A Review, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 40, p
3697–3707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.052
3. Z. Zhan, Z. Liu, J. Liu, L. Li, Z. Li, and P. Liao, Microstructure and
Fig. 7 ln K as a function of the inverse of the temperature (K1) High-Temperature Corrosion Behaviors of Aluminide Coatings by
Low-Temperature Pack Aluminizing Process, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010,
256, p 3874–3879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.043
4. Q. Xue, C.Y. Sun, J.Y. Yu, L. Huang, J. Wei, and J. Zhang,
The diffusion coefficient K was determined by the slope of Microstructure Evolution of a Zn-Al Coating Co-deposited on Low-
the lines in Fig. 6, in which these lines were obtained by means Carbon Steel by Pack Cementation, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 699, p
of linear regression. These calculated values are 2.87 9 1014 1012–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.291
and 6.576 9 1014 m2/s for the temperatures of 773 K 5. H. Sidhom, T. Amadou, H. Sahlaoui, and C. Braham, Quantitative
Evaluation of Aged AISI, 316L Stainless Steel Sensitization to
(500 °C) and 923 K (650 °C), respectively. Afterward, the Intergranular Corrosion: Comparison Between Microstructural Elec-
values of ln K were calculated and plotted as a function of the trochemical and Analytical Methods, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2007, 38,
inverse of the kelvin temperature (K1) in Fig. 7. p 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9114-9
From the graph, the slope is equal to Q/R. The calcula- 6. S. Majumbar, B. Paul, V. Kain, and G.K. Dey, Formation of Al2O3/Fe-
tions give Q = 34.5 kJ/mol and using this value and the Al Layers on SS 316 Surface by Pack Aluminizing and Heat
Treatment, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2017, 190, p 31–37. https://doi.org/
diffusion coefficients K determined from Fig. 6 in Eq 2, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.01.002
the value for K0 was obtained (K0 = 6.09 9 10 12 m2/s). This 7. S. Guo, Z.B. Wang, L.M. Wang, and K. Lu, Lower-Temperature
gives the final equation relating layer thickness (l) with Aluminizing Behaviors of a Ferritic–Martensitic Steel Processed by
treatment time (t) and absolute temperature (T): Means of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Surf. Coat. Tech-
nol., 2014, 258, p 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.09.
34:5 kJ
l 2 ¼ 6:09 1012 te RT : ðEq 4Þ 005
8. R. Sakidja, J.H. Perepezko, and P. Calhoun, Synthesis, Thermody-
namic Stability and Diffusion Mechanism of Al5Fe2-Based Coatings,
Oxid. Met., 2014, 81, p 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-013-
9463-2
4. Conclusions 9. Y. Wang, J. Wang, H. Hu, J. Meng, and X. Zhao, Effect of Y2O3
Content in the Pack Mixtures on the Cyclic-Oxidation of Y2O3-
Modified Low Temperature Aluminide Coatings on 309 Stainless Steel,
In this work, layers of aluminides were obtained on Vacuum, 2018, 158, p 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.
substrates of stainless steel AISI 304 by the sludge process at 09.047
low temperatures, in which regular, compact aluminide layers 10. E.A. Basuki, D.S. Hajar, F. Rahman, and D. Prajitno, Cyclic Oxidation
of Aluminide Coated Two Phase a2-Ti3Al/c-TiAl Alloys at 1000 °C,
were obtained with well-defined interfaces with the substrate.