Budget, Budgeting, and Variance Analysis: What Is A Budget?
Budget, Budgeting, and Variance Analysis: What Is A Budget?
Budget, Budgeting, and Variance Analysis: What Is A Budget?
In large entities, the Budget Office Director and staff work with individual managers and others seeking funding approval. As a
result, budget proposals conform to local policies. And, the entire proposal package aligns with group objectives.
A budget is a primary tool in business for planning, tracking, and controlling spending.
What Is a Budget?
In business, a budget is a plan for an organization's outgoing expenses and incoming revenues for a specific
time span.
Sections below further define and explain budget and budgeting. Budget examples appear in context with
related terms from the fields of budgeting, accounting, and business analysis. The following budget issues
receive particular focus:
Defining budgeting terms, including variance, OPEX, CAPEX, Zero-based budgeting, static and
flexible budgets.
Budget planning and the budget cycle.
Capital Budgeting and Capital Planning.
Operating Budget, Budget Hierarchy.
Cash budgets
Budget Variance Analysis
Static and Flexible Budgeting
Zero-based budgeting and incremental budgeting.
Contents
What is a budget?
The meaning of budget, budgeting, and budget variance.
What is a budget hierarchy? Which budgets have a hierarchical structure?
Capital budgets vs. operating budgets: What are the differences?
The meaning and purpose of the capital budget CAPEX. What do CAPEX budgets include?
The meaning and purpose of the operating budget OPEX. What do OPEX budgets?
What is a cash budget? Cash budgeting illustrated with examples.
How do the budgetary planning and the budget cycle work? .
What is zero-based budging? How does it compare to incremental budgeting?
What is budget variance analysis? How does variance analysis work with flexible budgeting?
Related Topics
In its leanest form, a budget is a plan or forecast written as a list. The list shows spending items and incoming
revenue items for a specific timespan. The purpose of the budgeting process is to provide a budget figure
for each budgeted item.
As time passes, actual spending and revenues enter the list to compare with original budget figures. Where
budget and actual figures differ, the difference is called a variance.
A firm's operating budget, for instance, may forecast spending for "Employee Training." The annual spending
figure is set first, for high-level planning. Later, the firm will break down the yearly figure into monthly or
quarterly data.
Suppose that two quarters into the budget cycle, the item "Employee Training" looks something like Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 1. Employee training is a single budget item for one firm. The budget initially shows only budget spending for each
quarter. At quarter's end, however, actual spending figures appear beside the budget figures. Budget variance is the difference
between these two figures.
Most budget analysts calculate variance by subtracting the budget figure from the actual spending figure. They
publish both numbers because both are helpful, later, for variance analysis.
Note, by the way, this example uses a convention common in finance, budgeting, and accounting. Here, figures
in parentheses are negative values.
Note also that analysts use two different and opposite sign conventions for showing variances.
Firstly, the example above uses the first convention. The example shows variance as
actual spending less the budget figure.
As a result, a variance greater than zero spending is over budget while a negative figure means spending
is under budget.
Secondly, note that some people instead show variance as the budget value less the actual figure.
Businesspeople use both conventions, and neither is incorrect. What matters is that everyone in the firm uses
the same practice, consistently.
In the real business world, small differences between actual and budget figures are normal
and expected. Given a significant variance, however, leaders want to know, exactly why actual results are so
far off target. The answer to the "Why" question may be transparent, or it may call for serious variance analysis.
In any case, they can respond with one or both of these actions:
Adjust the forecast to reflect the new reality.
This response is known as flexible budgeting.
Control actual spending in the future, to bring the annual variance closer to zero.
Page Top
Contents
The two top-level budgets together essentially cover spending for the entire firm. Other, budgets may exist for
areas such as investments, contingencies, or sinking funds, but these usually are quite small relative to the
capital and operating budgets.
Exhibit 2. Part of one firm's budget hierarchy. Funding requests for the next budgeting cycle usually at the bottom. Requests
pass from the bottom up through the tiers, where they aggregate at the highest level. Budget Office staff and senior leaders
then make spending decisions for the top layer and then move downward.
Page Top
Contents
Two major kinds of plans usually stand at the top of the budget hierarchy. One is the budget for capital
expenses or CAPEX. The second is the budget for operating expense or OPEX. Note that CAPEX and OPEX
do not overlap. They handle entirely different spending items. Moreover, firms create capital and operating
budgets through various processes, involving different managers.
In brief, those who submit funding requests are asking their employers to spend. Proposal writers serve their
interests, therefore, by learning thoroughly how the entity plans and decides how to use funds. For more on
anticipating spending decision criteria, see Business Case Analysis.
Whether an expense item is CAPEX or OPEX depends on the nature of the purchase and how owners use it.
And, the country's tax laws may also help determine what a capital item is and what it is not.
Most entities want to achieve consistency in accounting and conformance with tax laws. For this reason, many
define specific criteria that qualify spending items as "capital." One firm might, for instance, require a useful life
of at least one year and a purchase price over $1,000. Some may also need capital acquisitions to support the
firm's regular line of business. In any case, only expenditures meeting the capital criteria qualify as CAPEX.
Those that do not are, as a result, OPEX spending.
Page Top
Contents
Capital budgets forecast spending for capital expenditures (CAPEX), usually means acquiring capital assets.
Additions that meet the entity's criteria for "capital" items are almost always long lasting, expensive items,
which contribute to the value of Balance sheet assets.
In large entities, capital budget planning is usually the responsibility of a Budget Office. Or, in some settings,
the Budget Office and a Capital Review Committee share that responsibility. These groups establish criteria
for prioritizing proposals and for setting a capital spending limit, the capital budget ceiling. Funds designated
for the capital budget are called, not surprisingly, capital funds.
Capital expenses (CAPEX) cover purchases that meet company and government criteria as capital assets.
Consequently, capital purchases may include items such as these:
Vehicles
Aircraft
Railroad cars
Buildings
Store furnishings
Office furniture
Laboratory equipment
Medical equipment
Construction equipment
Factory machines
Office equipment
IT Systems
Railroad rails
With a capital spending ceiling in place, the Capital Review Committee is ready to accept capital proposals.
Committees usually invite submissions from the entire entity. And, increasingly, reviewers require them to
include business case support. The business case is necessary because capital reviewers approve funding
only if confident on three points:
Firstly, the proposal is justified in financial terms.
Secondly, the proposal comes with acceptable risk levels.
Thirdly, the proposal aligns with strategic objectives.
It is also usual for the sum of funding requests to exceed the capital spending ceiling. As a result, proposals
must compete for funding. Reviewers will then use business case results to help prioritize funding requests.
Proposals typically receive funding authorization in order of priority. Approval starts with the highest priority
proposal and continues until the total reaches the capital spending ceiling.
Capital review committees usually establish and publish their criteria for prioritizing proposals and making
funding decisions. Not surprisingly, they typically choose standards that address the three areas mentioned
above, financial justification, risk, and strategic alignment. Proposal authors, therefore, know while writing their
proposals, which points will decide the proposal's fate.
Essential criteria for evaluating proposals may, therefore, include the following:
When evaluating capital investment proposals, companies also consider risks. Riskrefers firstly to the level
of uncertainty in forecast returns. Secondly, the term also refers to risk factors that could lower returns, raise
costs, or disrupt the investment schedule.
Companies also evaluate capital funding requests for strategic consistency (strategic alignment). They ask,
in other words, how outcomes align with strategic objectives.
Competitive capital reviews, incidentally, usually have an entity-wide scope. CAPEX proposals frequently
compete for high-priority status against others from across the entire entity. By contrast, requests for OPEX
funding typically compete only against others in the same budgetary unit (e.g., Marketing Advertising Budget).
In brief, those who propose or request capital funding should be sure they understand fully:
Local criteria for prioritizing capital spending proposals.
Calendar dates of the current and next capital planning and spending cycles.
The current capital spending ceiling.
On the Income statement, capital items are not entirely "expensed" in one year.
Instead, capital acquisitions impact the Income statement and Balance sheet by
creating depreciation expense.
o Depreciation itself is a non-cash expense. Nevertheless, depreciation is charged against
sales revenues to help calculate "bottom line" profits.
o This non-cash expense does have one impact on real cash flow. For entities that pay income
taxes, depreciation lowers reported income. This impact, in turn, reduces the firm's tax liability.
Depreciation expense, in other words, bring tax savings.
o Depreciation also impacts the value of the entity's asset base on the Balance sheet. Each
year of an asset's depreciation life, its book value decreases by the depreciation expense.
Tax authorities determine which expenditures for a business start-up, for instance, qualify as capital
costs.
Entities usually report costs of services as OPEX, not CAPEX. In the United States and a few other
countries, however, services costs are sometimes "bundled" into the full capital costs of acquiring assets.
For example, a substantial capital project may result in a capital asset such as an IT system. Here,
Services such as systems integration consulting, are viewed as legitimate capital costs.
Page Top
Contents
Entities usually develop the operating budget using a process different from the CAPEX budgeting process. In
some organizations, all managers above a certain level participate in the process. Budget figures for operating
expenses, once set, usually do not change during the period. (Exceptions include emergency reductions
following unexpectedly poor sales results or other disasters). In other words, OPEX budgets are usually static
budgets, not flexible budgets.
Executive salaries
Contractor labor
Employee overhead
Office supplies
Telephone charges
Utility costs
Employee travel
Employee training
Insurance costs
Railroad rails
OPEX spending impacts the Income statement directly. It does not affect the Balance sheet.
For the Income statement, operating expense items are fully expensed in the year they occur. OPEX
spending "goes straight to the bottom line," impacting the earnings report only in the same reporting
period.
Spending on operating expenses does not bring depreciation expense.
Operating expenses as a budgeting term vs. operating expenses as an Income statement category
Note that there is also a significant Income statement category called "Operating Expenses." This name,
therefore, has one meaning for budgeting and a slightly different interpretation for Income statement reporting.
Income statement Operating Expense items appear below the Gross Profit line and therefore have
no impact on reported gross profits or gross margin.
When used in the budgetary sense, however, the term operating expense can include expense items
above the gross profit line. Direct labor wages in product manufacturing, for instance, appear above gross
profit, as part of Cost of Goods Sold.
Page Top
Contents
A cash budget is a tool for planning and controlling near-term cash inflows and outflows. In business, cash
budgets are like the check register that individuals use to manage a personal checking account. The cash
budget and the check register both record incoming and outgoing transactions, as they occur. As a result, the
owner can see the level of cash immediately on hand.
Cash budgets typically have a series of months in view, although they can also show cash revenues and
spending for weeks, quarters, or years. In all cases, however, the cash budget shows actual cash flows, only,
in the period they occur. This usage contrasts with the system of accrual accounting which most companies
use for financial reporting. Accrual systems report receivables and liabilities for the period they happen, but
cash flows that follow may occur in another period.
A small firm's monthly cash budget may look like the example in Exhibit 3:
Exhibit 3. One firm's cash budget for two months. The cash budget shows actual cash inflows and outflows in the period they
occur. Revenues and expenses do not appear here until their cash flows occur. The same firm may use accrual accounting for
financial reporting, as well, but leaders probably refer first to this cash budget when dealing with cash flow issues.
The example cash flow budget shows the budget as it stands in mid-February. Figures for January are now
history and will not change. "Actual" data for February are current as of mid-month, but these may change by
the end of the month.
In Exhibit 3, the variance is the actual figure less the forecast figure. With this convention, a "variance" higher
than 0 means that actual cash flow exceeded forecast. And, a variance of less than 0 shows that actual
spending was under the budget.
Notice especially in the example the actual cash on hand balance at the end of January. Here, Cash income
less cash expenses = $131,614. The final actual cash balance for January carries over to February as actual
starting cash for that month.
When large variances appear between forecast and actual inflows or outflows, the cash budget helps identify
the source of the deviations. In the example above, the overall negative cash flow variance for January was not
due to overspending in that month. Instead, the variation is there because product and service sales revenues
fell below forecast. For future months, the manager has two kinds of responses available:
Take action to increase incoming revenue.
Lower the forecast revenues and spending figures.
Page Top
Contents
Entities usually develop and use budgets on a periodic basis at fixed intervals. The norm in private industry is
to produce a budget for each fiscal year. Some government groups also prepare annual plans, but two-year
(biennial) budgets are also typical in government.
Once the budget cycle is underway, the usual practice is to leave budget forecasts intact (static). Management
in some instances adjusts these projections in "real time," but such changes are exceptions to the standard
rule. Usually, entities change predictions only in response to exceptional events or circumstances.
In the period between issuance of one budget and the next, planning-related decisions and activities are
referred to as the budget cycle or process. In large entities, the process extends typically across months, if
not the entire period between budgets.
For those involved in budgeting, the process calls for many specific steps and requirements to meet. Not
surprisingly, the nature and timing of these vary widely among entities. Most large organizations, in fact, publish
a description of their process, calendar, and approval requirements on their internal network. This information is
sometimes open to the public, and occasionally accessible only to employees with authorized access to it. In
any case, those setting out to prepare a funding request for the first time usually begin by accessing this
source.
Although specific steps and timing vary from entity to entity, the budgeting process everywhere almost always
includes steps for:
Assessing variances between actual and budgeted figures in the previous period's plan.
Identifying and then prioritizing business needs and objectives for the forthcoming period.
Forecasting and evaluating the following:
o Incoming revenues.
o Current trends or changes that have implications for spending or revenue inflows. Particular
attention may focus on new mandates to reduce spending or changes in staffing levels or changes in
business volume.
o Risks or emergencies that could impact incoming funds or spending needs. The budget, in
other words, may need to anticipate events such as labor action, competitor action, or natural
disasters.
Ensuring that :
o Individual funding proposals in the complete plan are consistent in format. As a result
competing requests are subject to fair comparison.
o Funding proposals align with strategic objectives.
o Procedures and methods are in place for implementing monitoring the plan.
Packaging and communicating funding requests to those responsible for reviewing and approving
budget proposals.
In large entities, the responsibility for driving and managing the budgeting process belongs to a Budget
Office. This office works directly with managers, department heads, and others, to help shape their funding
proposals. And, It works at the same time with senior managers, legislative bodies, and senior officials who
approve spending. The result is that all budget proposals conform to local policies and rules and that the entire
proposal package is reasonable and aligned with entity objectives.
Page Top
Contents
Advocates of zero-based planning favor the approach because it focuses on demonstrating needs and
resources. And, zero-based budgeting is blind to historical spending levels. As a result, arguably, resource
allocation is more efficient. The zero base approach can be very successful, for instance, in finding and
trimming inflated budgets. It can be helpful for exposing budgets that include obsolete or wasteful operations.
Zero-based budgeting also helps avoid a practice for which the incremental approach is notorious. This
practice usually occurs just as the budget period nears an end. Some managers seem to spend solely for the
sake of using up their budgets. In such cases, they empty the budget, whether that spending is necessary or
not. This practice no doubt reflects a belief they must spend all of this period's plan, or else receive less next
period. In some entities, experience confirms this belief. In brief, this kind of period-end spending is a serious
risk under incremental budgeting. Under zero-based budgeting, however, this tactic would be pointless.
In a large entity, however, the zero-based approach may call for very substantial research and analysis to
justify every funding request—an investment in time and organizational resources that is not, in its own right,
justified. Under the Incremental approach, formal justification (for example, business case analysis) is usually
required only for capital spending proposals or for significant spending increases in operating expense
categories.
Page Top
Contents
A variance (a difference between actual and forecast figures) is a signal that revenues or spending did not go
according to plan. If the variation represents overspending, moreover, it is warning there may be problems
paying future expenses. Variance analysis attempts to find the reasons that actual figures were over or under
forecast so that either
Corrective action can be taken to reduce variances in the future, (an exercise in static budgeting).
Budget authorities can adjust budgets for future spending as necessary (the practice of flexible
budgeting).
Confusion sometimes arises in variance analysis because two different conventions for calculations commonly
used.
Convention 1
This convention appears in this encyclopedia and is the preferred approach in many entities. Under this
approach, a variance greater than zero always means actual spending was higher than the budgeted
amount.
Convention 2
Some entities (such as the Project Management Institute), however, recommend using the above rule for
revenue, but reversing the order for expense items:
Under Convention 2, variances above zero are always "good things" (more revenue or less spending than
expected), and negative variances are always "bad things."
Indeed, anyone involved in planning and analyzing spending needs to know which convention applies in their
organization.
In many companies, variance analysis becomes especially important in planning for two areas:
Direct and indirect manufacturing costs.
Sales revenues and sales costs.
Revenues and expenses in these areas are often difficult to predict accurately. Variance analysis for these
areas is, in fact, a complex and challenging topic for cost accountants. The simple example below is meant
only to illustrate the nature of the task.
Variance analysis typically begins with variance reports at the end of each month, quarter, or year, showing the
difference between actual spending and forecasted spending. As an example, consider a small manufacturing
firm's quarterly variance report for one plan item, "Manufacturing overhead." Exhibit 4 shows how the variance
report might appear.
Note for instance that the variance report shows that Manufacturing overhead is $76,400 over plan for the
quarter. The variance is 7.4% of the budgeted figure:
Exhibit 4. Managers will probably call for variance analysis when a significant budget item turns out
substantially over budget. In this case, to understand why quarterly spending on hourly wages is 9.6% over
budget, variance analysis will have to consider the interrelationships among all budget items in
"Manufacturing Overhead."The investigation will also have to determine whether or not increased income
compensates the unexpected spending on wages.
Note for instance that the variance report shows that Manufacturing overhead is $76,400 over plan for the
quarter. The variance is 7.4% of the budgeted figure. TheManufacturing overhead variance is a substantial
percentage of a significant budget item. Leaders will undoubtedly want to know the reason or reasons for
the variation, and then what can be done to prevent recurrence in the next quarters.
Variance Analysis Step 2: Identify Components of Cost Items and Their Variances.
The next step in variance analysis is to identify the components of the cost item (manufacturing overhead), and
sources of variance within them.
The table above lists six line item components. Note that some of these are fixed costs, and others are variable
costs. Fixed costs are (in principle) should not depend on manufacturing volume and should be more
predictable than variable costs. Nevertheless, management salaries (a "fixed" cost ) were $2,000 over
forecast. The analyst will want to find the reason for the unexpected variance for management salaries.
In the table above, two variable cost components of Manufacturing overhead costs stand out with large
striking variances. The large-variance elements are Hourly wage costs (9.6% over plan) and utility
costs(24.2% over budget). Of these, the hourly wage variance draws attention first because it represents a
substantial part of the overall Manufacturing overhead variance.
Hourly wages are a variable cost item because they depend on manufacturing volume (units
manufactured). Note, however, that two other variable factors also contribute to total hourly wage costs. That
is, labor hours per unit, and labor expense (here, dollars per hour) are themselves both variable costs.
Hourly wage cost = (Units manufactured) * (Labor hours per unit ) * (Labor cost per hour)
Exhibit 5 shows how actual figures for these factors compare with the forecast:
Exhibit 5. A budget item with an overspending variance is not necessarily an adverse outcome. In this
case, the hourly wage variance results from unusually high work volume. Overspending on this item could
mean that the firm produced and sold more products than expected.
To account for the actual labor cost, first, add 100% to each variance figure.
Units variance is therefore 105% of forecast.
Hours per unit variance is therefore 90% of forecast.
Labor cost per hour variance is therefore 116% of forecast.
These percentages, multiplied together, account for the actual labor cost:
Leaders can use the "Actual hourly labor cost" formula above to try out different proposal figures and
variances, to see the impact on actual cost.
Also, the substantial variance for utility costs (24.2% over plan) bears looking into in the same way. The
percentage is significant, even though the actual spending figures are small relative to the wage cost variance.
The same analysis here, however, is more complicated. Utility costs represent several items, such as phone,
water, and electricity. Each of these, in turn, involves the product of variances in price, efficiency, and usage.
The former option (adjusting the plan) is called flexible budgeting. The latter option is an instance of static
budgeting.
Most large entities permit at least a limited degree of flexibility planning. Most managers responsible for lower
level budgets (e.g., for a department budget or an operational area such as "Advertising") can adjust their own
plans "in real time" by moving planned levels from one category to another. Note, however, that movements
from "capital spending" authorizations to "operating expense" is not always easily accomplished.
However, if a manager needs to increase his or her overall spending total above plan, which usually requires
the use of a process called "emergency funding" or "request for non-budgeted funds." Such requests go to the
next higher management level. The higher level may designate funds specifically set aside for such
contingencies. Or, if the requester can demonstrate need, these funds may have to come from current assets,
such as cash on hand or the sale of stock the firm owns for investment purposes.