Discovery Learning Method
Discovery Learning Method
Now imagine this: elementary students walk into a classroom and see
a basic skeleton with a models of the heart, lungs, kidneys, stomach,
and intestines laying on a table in the center of the room. Students
gather around in a circle, see the model organs, giggle, and begin to
guess the name of each body part, its function, and, through trial and
error, figure out where each organ fits in the model.
Both lessons have been used by teachers, but one lesson has
students actively involved, curious, and engaged. The other relies on
direct instruction, rote memorization, and knowing information “for the
test.” One lesson is memorable for students. The other relies on a
student memorizing information. Which lesson will have a lasting
impression?
The Discovery Learning Method may have a specific end result, but
the focus is on the steps and the critical thinking involved in getting
there. Teachers have to observe the process, not just grade a written
paper at the end of the experience.
Educational Psychologist Jean Piaget viewed children as little
philosophers and scientists building their own theories of knowledge.
The book Hands-On Science Teaching best summarizes this:
Conclusion
Overall, the Discovery Method is highly supported by educational
psychologists. They agree with Kant, Piaget, Vygotsky and Bruner as
well as educational philosopher Dewey that learning is based on
knowing and doing. If a teacher takes into consideration that a child
already has some prior knowledge, then that teacher will be able to
show students how their lives are connected to the content without
having to work to create that connection.