The Two-Body Problem: Classical Dynamics Michaelmas 2014
The Two-Body Problem: Classical Dynamics Michaelmas 2014
m1 ṙ12 m2 ṙ22
L= + − V (r), (1)
2 2
where r1 and r2 are the position vectors of the particles with respect to a chosen reference frame (assume
fixed origin), and
r = r1 − r2 (2)
is the relative position vector.
Let us split the total kinetic energy into the term associated with motion of the centre of mass (CoM) and
the term associated with the motion of the particles relative to each other.
Let us work through the algebra. Start with substituting for r1 and r2 from (2) into the definition of the
CoM, R, to obtain
m2 m1
R = r1 − r = r2 + r. (3)
m1 + m2 m1 + m2
Thus,
m2 m1
ṙ1 = Ṙ + ṙ, ṙ2 = Ṙ − ṙ. (4)
m1 + m2 m1 + m2
Hence, L can be rewritten as
1 µṙ 2
L= (m1 + m2 )Ṙ2 + − V (r), (5)
2 2
where µ = m1 m2 /(m1 + m2 ) is the reduced mass.
Now consider symmetries. First, homogeneity of space implies conservation of the total linear momentum,
that is Ṙ is constant - the CoM moves with constant velocity. Of course, we can deduce this by observing
that R is ignorable/cyclic coordinate in the Lagrangian. (In one of the example questions in 1A Dynamics
and Relativity you have shown this from the second Newton’s law).
1
1
Notice that this formally looks as if we are dealing with a single object of mass µ.
We proceed with a standard argument (which had been used quite often in 1A Dynamics&Relativity) that
since L is perpendicular to r and ṙ the motion is confined to the plane perpendicular to L. We now can
introduce polar coordinates (r, ϕ) in this plane and rewrite
µ 2
(ṙ + r2 ϕ̇2 ) − V (r).
L= (8)
2
We analyse this form of the Lagrangian in a familiar way. First, observe that ϕ is ignorable, hence
∂L
= µr2 ϕ̇ = l, (9)
∂ ϕ̇
where l ≡ |L|, which simply confirms conservation of the magnitude of the angular momentum.
Euler-Lagrange equation for r gives
∂V
µr̈ − µrϕ̇2 +
= 0. (10)
∂r
We introduced the effective potential and rewrite the above expression as
∂Veff
µr̈ = − , (11)
∂r
where
l2
Veff (r) = V (r) + . (12)
2µr2
Thus, we have reduced the problem to 1 variable. Do you notice the similarity with the approach we
took in Section 2.6 (lectures 7-8) where we dealt with the bead on rotating hoop and the spherical pendulum?
As before the alternative would be to work with conservation of energy. This follows from the third symmetry,
i.e no explicit time dependence of L - time translation invariance. This implies that total energy,
µṙ2
E= + Veff (r), (13)
2
is conserved.
So far we have not made any explicit assumption about the force, apart from the fact that it is central.
For gravitational force (and attractive Coulomb force) we write V (r) = −k/r, where k > 0. Hence we obtain
an explicit form of the effective potential
l2 k
Veff (r) = − . (14)
2µr2 r
We can now analyse different types of orbits, e.g. closed (circular/elliptic) and open (parabolic and hyper-
bolic) and derive Kepler’s Laws.
Let us summarize the main spirit of the above analysis. We started with 6 degrees of freedom (r1 , r2 ).
Considering motion relative to the CoM reduced this to 3 degrees of freedom, (r). Isotropy of space reduced
this to 2 degrees of freedom, (r, ϕ), and then to one, (r). Then, the problem with 1 degree of freedom can
be solved using time translational invariance (conservation of E).
1 see Appendix in the end of the handout.
2
1 Appendix
In fact, we can obtain the same expression for the total angular momentum of the system about the centre
of mass, LCoM = µr × ṙ, from basic definitions. It is simple to show that L, the total angular momentum
of the system about the chosen fixed origin, and LCoM , are related by
LCoM = L − R × P , (15)
where P is the total linear momentum of the system. You might remember proving this in Example Sheet
3, 1A Dynamics& Relativity. To do this write LCoM = m1 (r1 − R) × (ṙ1 − Ṙ) + m2 (r2 − R) × (ṙ2 − Ṙ)
and expand cancelling two terms.
Now let us write (15) explicitly and simplify:
m1 r1 + m2 r2
LCoM = m1 r1 × ṙ1 + m2 r2 × ṙ2 − × (m1 ṙ1 + m2 ṙ2 ) = ... = µr × ṙ. (16)
m1 + m2