0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views

The Two-Body Problem: Classical Dynamics Michaelmas 2014

1) The two-body problem is reduced from 6 degrees of freedom (positions of two particles) to 3 degrees (relative position vector), then to 2 degrees (relative position and angle in plane), and finally to 1 degree (relative position) using conservation laws. 2) Conservation of linear momentum allows working in the center of mass frame, reducing degrees of freedom. Conservation of angular momentum then restricts motion to a plane. 3) The problem is further reduced to a 1-dimensional problem by introducing an effective potential incorporating the angular momentum, allowing solution via energy conservation.

Uploaded by

ram kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views

The Two-Body Problem: Classical Dynamics Michaelmas 2014

1) The two-body problem is reduced from 6 degrees of freedom (positions of two particles) to 3 degrees (relative position vector), then to 2 degrees (relative position and angle in plane), and finally to 1 degree (relative position) using conservation laws. 2) Conservation of linear momentum allows working in the center of mass frame, reducing degrees of freedom. Conservation of angular momentum then restricts motion to a plane. 3) The problem is further reduced to a 1-dimensional problem by introducing an effective potential incorporating the angular momentum, allowing solution via energy conservation.

Uploaded by

ram kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Classical Dynamics Michaelmas 2014

Questions and corrections are welcome: write to Berry Groisman on bg268@

The Two-Body problem


Consider two particles with masses m1 and m2 interacting through central force. Their Lagrangian is

m1 ṙ12 m2 ṙ22
L= + − V (r), (1)
2 2
where r1 and r2 are the position vectors of the particles with respect to a chosen reference frame (assume
fixed origin), and

r = r1 − r2 (2)
is the relative position vector.
Let us split the total kinetic energy into the term associated with motion of the centre of mass (CoM) and
the term associated with the motion of the particles relative to each other.
Let us work through the algebra. Start with substituting for r1 and r2 from (2) into the definition of the
CoM, R, to obtain
m2 m1
R = r1 − r = r2 + r. (3)
m1 + m2 m1 + m2
Thus,
m2 m1
ṙ1 = Ṙ + ṙ, ṙ2 = Ṙ − ṙ. (4)
m1 + m2 m1 + m2
Hence, L can be rewritten as

1 µṙ 2
L= (m1 + m2 )Ṙ2 + − V (r), (5)
2 2
where µ = m1 m2 /(m1 + m2 ) is the reduced mass.

Now consider symmetries. First, homogeneity of space implies conservation of the total linear momentum,
that is Ṙ is constant - the CoM moves with constant velocity. Of course, we can deduce this by observing
that R is ignorable/cyclic coordinate in the Lagrangian. (In one of the example questions in 1A Dynamics
and Relativity you have shown this from the second Newton’s law).

Let us work in the reference frame of the CoM. We can write


µṙ 2
L= − V (r). (6)
2
Thus, is we effectively reduced the 2-body problem to a 1-body problem.
Second symmetry, isotropy of space, implies that the vector of the angular momentum (with respect to
the CoM), LCoM = r × p, is conserved. Here p is the momentum conjugate to r, which can be calculated
in a standard way
∂L
p= = µṙ. (7)
∂ ṙ

1
1
Notice that this formally looks as if we are dealing with a single object of mass µ.

We proceed with a standard argument (which had been used quite often in 1A Dynamics&Relativity) that
since L is perpendicular to r and ṙ the motion is confined to the plane perpendicular to L. We now can
introduce polar coordinates (r, ϕ) in this plane and rewrite
µ 2
(ṙ + r2 ϕ̇2 ) − V (r).
L= (8)
2
We analyse this form of the Lagrangian in a familiar way. First, observe that ϕ is ignorable, hence
∂L
= µr2 ϕ̇ = l, (9)
∂ ϕ̇
where l ≡ |L|, which simply confirms conservation of the magnitude of the angular momentum.
Euler-Lagrange equation for r gives
∂V
µr̈ − µrϕ̇2 +
= 0. (10)
∂r
We introduced the effective potential and rewrite the above expression as
∂Veff
µr̈ = − , (11)
∂r
where

l2
Veff (r) = V (r) + . (12)
2µr2
Thus, we have reduced the problem to 1 variable. Do you notice the similarity with the approach we
took in Section 2.6 (lectures 7-8) where we dealt with the bead on rotating hoop and the spherical pendulum?

As before the alternative would be to work with conservation of energy. This follows from the third symmetry,
i.e no explicit time dependence of L - time translation invariance. This implies that total energy,

µṙ2
E= + Veff (r), (13)
2
is conserved.

So far we have not made any explicit assumption about the force, apart from the fact that it is central.
For gravitational force (and attractive Coulomb force) we write V (r) = −k/r, where k > 0. Hence we obtain
an explicit form of the effective potential

l2 k
Veff (r) = − . (14)
2µr2 r
We can now analyse different types of orbits, e.g. closed (circular/elliptic) and open (parabolic and hyper-
bolic) and derive Kepler’s Laws.

Let us summarize the main spirit of the above analysis. We started with 6 degrees of freedom (r1 , r2 ).
Considering motion relative to the CoM reduced this to 3 degrees of freedom, (r). Isotropy of space reduced
this to 2 degrees of freedom, (r, ϕ), and then to one, (r). Then, the problem with 1 degree of freedom can
be solved using time translational invariance (conservation of E).
1 see Appendix in the end of the handout.

2
1 Appendix
In fact, we can obtain the same expression for the total angular momentum of the system about the centre
of mass, LCoM = µr × ṙ, from basic definitions. It is simple to show that L, the total angular momentum
of the system about the chosen fixed origin, and LCoM , are related by

LCoM = L − R × P , (15)
where P is the total linear momentum of the system. You might remember proving this in Example Sheet
3, 1A Dynamics& Relativity. To do this write LCoM = m1 (r1 − R) × (ṙ1 − Ṙ) + m2 (r2 − R) × (ṙ2 − Ṙ)
and expand cancelling two terms.
Now let us write (15) explicitly and simplify:
m1 r1 + m2 r2
LCoM = m1 r1 × ṙ1 + m2 r2 × ṙ2 − × (m1 ṙ1 + m2 ṙ2 ) = ... = µr × ṙ. (16)
m1 + m2

You might also like