Session 6 - Jacobs Trewitt - Siracusa PPT July 2021

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26

INVESTIGATION OF

INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

Dr. Dov Jacobs, Strategic International Legal


Consulting
Philip Trewhitt, Institute for International
Criminal Investigations, The Hague
• General problems faced by international investigations
– The defence perspective
• Quality of international investigations
– The need for evidence v the effect on survivors
– Standards of proof: human rights v criminal investigation
• Investigation and prosecution
– Investigators v prosecutors
– The problem of fabricated evidence
• Lubanga criticism of investigators & prosecutors
– Types of evidence
– Proving liability

2
The problem

“…international crimes
investigation is “far bigger
and far more difficult of
solution than anyone had
anticipated.”
Brig. Telford Taylor

Final report to the Secretary of


the Army on the Nuremberg war
crimes trials (1949)

3
Differences compared to national
investigations:
No.2 – Things to prove

• Dead bodies =
– Domestic murder
– Arbitrary deprivation of life (Art 6 ICCPR)
• State involvement
– War crime
• Armed conflict, perpetrator knowledge
– Crime Against Humanity
• Attack; widespread or systematic
• against a civilian population
– Genocide
• Against a specific group
• Intent to destroy

• Modes of liability
4
Differences of national v international
investigations:
No.1 – availability of evidence
Limited forensic capacity; old,
Scale of crimes
contaminated
crime scenes

Limited technology

Documents: vague orders


– “Take necessary measures”
– ‘working towards the Fuhrer’

Aug 22 - ‘the most


stringent measures’

5
Differences compared to national
investigations: No.3 –
Politics and Resources
• Perpetrators may be in powerful positions in relation
to investigators e.g. armed militias
• Difficult security conditions
• Political interference & consequences
– peace processes
• Limited logistics
• Limited powers
– Subpoena power uncertain/non-existent
– Arrest powers uncertain/non-existent
– Search powers uncertain/non-existent
• CONSEQUENCE: Heavy reliance on other
people/agencies
6
Your office

7
Challenges

• CT and

8
What are the crimes?

Staff

Universe of crimes

9
Documents - logistics

10
Physical evidence: To take or
not to take

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA


11
Yarmouk

12
• Experience & Challenges of Defence
Investigations
– Dov Jacobs

13
• Quality of international investigations
– The need for evidence v the effect on survivors
• Philip Trewhitt
– Standards of proof: human rights v criminal investigation
• Dov Jacobs

14
Yazidi case studies
44.6% feeling
Women IDPs who extremely 98.5%
experienced 2014 excluded by PTSD
killings: families/
community

97.9%
PTSD
88.1% Women/girls
depression
formerly
49.2% extreme enslaved
• Aggravating factors worry about
perceptions of
– length of captivity others
– number of traumatic events
– being sold for sex
– compounding social factors in IDP camps -poverty and unemployment

15
16
Rohingya crisis

• fixers drawn from the same small pool.


– advertised their services on Twitter
– approach foreigners at Cox’s Bazar airport
• Camp 13, known locally as Thangkhali
– home to ‘widows’ lane’
– particular victims designated as being ‘high
impact’
– Affected willingness to testify later
– Murad Code
17
• Investigation and prosecution (Dov Jacobs)

– Investigators v prosecutors
– The problem of fabricated evidence
o Lubanga criticism of investigators & prosecutors
o Types of evidence
o Proving liability

18
IICI Supplement to the International Protocol on the Documentation
and Investigation of Sexual Violence in Conflict: Iraq 2018

19
Consequences

20
Judgement in trial of Thomas
Lubanga:

• evidence of 10/11 alleged former child soldiers


dismissed
– intermediaries may have coached witnesses to give false
testimony.
– “real possibility that victims … (at the instigation or with
the encouragement of [intermediary] stole the identities of
[victims] in order to obtain the benefits they expected to
receive as victims participating in these proceedings.”
– intermediaries “may have persuaded, encouraged, or
assisted witnesses to give false evidence.”

21
Lubanga judgement

“The prosecution should not have delegated its


investigative responsibilities to the intermediaries
(…) notwithstanding the extensive security
difficulties it faced. A series of witnesses have
been called during this trial whose evidence, as a
result of the essentially unsupervised actions of
three of the principle intermediaries, cannot safely
be relied on…evidence was, at least in part,
inaccurate or dishonest. The prosecution’s
negligence ….” [ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, para 482]
22
Battle of Danny Boy Iraq 2004:
al-Sweady Inquiry

“the vast majority of the allegations made against the British military…were wholly and
entirely without merit or justification. Very many of those baseless allegations were the
product of deliberate and calculated lies on the part of those who made them and who
then gave evidence to this Inquiry in order to support and perpetuate them. some of
these witnesses told deliberate and calculated lies to this Inquiry…the most serious
allegations…have been found to be wholly without foundation and entirely the product of
deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility.

23
ISIS in Aleppo - Boring administration

• Real name: Abd-al-Rahman al-Marabi


• Current nickname: Abu-Khattab
• Number of female slaves: -
• Name of a brother who knows your
family and your home: Abu-Hasan al-
Hadrami
• His location and type of work: Al Bab
• Name of another brother who knows
your family and your home: Abu-
Sulayman al-Hadrami
• His location and type of work: Mosul,
[Iraq] – VBIED
• Emir of the training session: Abu-Basir
al-Masri [Egypt]

24
Comfort women

25
“From the Creator's maxims on
captivity and enslavement…”

26

You might also like