A Jeesh

A STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRUCTURED
TEACHING PROGRAMME ON LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE AND

ATTITUDE REGARDING IMMUNIZATION AMONG THE
MOTHERS OF UNDER FIVE CHILDREN IN SELECTED
RURAL AREA AT DINDUGAL.
Reg. No. 301518201
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU

DR.MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI,
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NURSING
OCTOBER 2017
Reg. No. 301518201
EXTERNAL EXAMINER INTERNAL EXAMINER
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU DR.MGR

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI,
OCTOBER 2017
CERTIFICATE
This bonafide work of 301518201, M.Sc Nursing II Year Student

from Jainee College of Nursing, Dindigul submitted in partial fulfillment
for the Degree of Master of Science in Nursing, Under the Tamilnadu
Dr.MGR Medical University, Chennai.
Prof. Mrs.K.Thilagavathi, M.Sc., (N) Ph.D.,

Principal,
Department of Psychiatric Nursing,
Jainee College of Nursing,
Dindugal.
Place:
Date:
APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ON ____________________

PROFESSOR IN NURSING
Research Advisor : _______________________________________

Prof.Mrs.Thilagavathi, M.Sc.,(N),(Ph.D)
Principal,
Dindugal .
Research Guide : ________________________________________

Mrs. Jeyasundari, M.Sc.,(N),(Ph.D),
Professor,
HOD of Child Health Nursing,
Dindugal.
Medical Expert : ________________________________________

Dr.Navamani Prabhakaran. M.D., DCH,
Paediatric Consultant,
Managing Director,
Navamani Nursing Home,
Madurai.
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU

DR.MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI,
OCTOBER 2017
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Gratitude can never be expressed in words but it is only a deep

perception, which makes the words to flow from one’s inner heart. Success of
an individual is only possible when we are being supported by others.
I express my sincere and heartfelt gratitude to God, the Almighty for

His abundant strength and blessings in making this study towards its successful
outcome.
I wish to express my sincere thanks to Mr.SUKUMAR Director Jainee

College of Nursing Dindugal, for his support, encouragement and providing
facilities for the successful completion of the study.
I express my sincere thanks to Prof.(Mrs.)THILAGAVATHI, M.Sc (N).,

Ph.D., Principal cum H.O.D of Psychiatric department for her valuable support
and encouragement throughout this study.
It’s Pleasure to express my sincere thanks and deep appreciation to my

esteemed guide Prof. (Mrs) JEYA SUNDARI M.Sc., (N).,Ph.D., Head of the
department of Child health nursing for her valuable support, unending words,
encouragement and guidance to carry out this dissertation and being my
inspiration.
I wish to acknowledge my sincere thanks to all FACULTY

MEMBERS of Jainee College of Nursing for their guidance and support.
I must record my grateful thanks to Dr.NAVAMANI

PRABHAKARAN, MD, DCH Consultant Padiatrician Navamani Nursing
Home for his kind validity and guidance throughout our study.
I profoundly owe my sincere thanks to Mr.MANI M.Sc., M.Phil.,

Professor of Bio- statistics for his immense help and guidance in statistical
analysis.
I thank the LIBRARIANS of Jainee College of Nursing for helping me
with the review and library facility throughout the study.
My Special thanks to Mr.PRESIDENT., Vakkampatti for granting

Permission to conduct my study.
I am grateful to all the experts who given me a valuable suggestions

contributed to the refinement of the data collection tool.
Mere words cannot express our heartfelt gratitude to our precious and
VALUABLE PARENTS from the moment we were born, till date, they were
always there for us to guide us and care for us at any time. We have no words
to express the spirit behind our progress, cherished love and warmth showered
on us. We are much delighted and proud to dedicate this study to our parents,
who have devoted their life for us and without them we cannot come to this
status in our life.
I extend my sincere thanks to all Village people who enthusiastically

participated in this study and co-operated with me in making this project a
successful one. My deep sense of thanks to my friends who helped me
throughout the project.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER CONTENT PAGE

I INTRODUCTION 1
Need for the study 3
Statement of the problem 7
Objectives 7
Hypotheses 7
Operational definitions 8
Assumption 8
Limitation 9
Projected outcome 9
Conceptual framework 10
II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 13
III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21
Research approach 21
Research design 21
Setting of the study 21
Population 22
Sample size and sampling technique 22
Variables 22
Criteria for sample selection 22
Description of the tool 23
Validity 23
Reliability 23
Pilot study 23
Procedure for data collection 24
Plan for data analysis 25
Protection of human rights 25
CHAPTER CONTENT PAGE
IV ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA 27
V DISCUSSION 52
VI SUMMARY, IMPLICATIONS, 57
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
Major findings of the study 57
Implications for nursing practice 58
Implications for nursing education 59
Implications for nursing administration 59
Implications for nursing research 59
Recommendations 60
Conclusion 60
REFERENCES 61
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TITLE PAGE
1 Frequency and percentage distribution of samples on

28
selected demographic variables
2 Distribution of samples according to the pre test
35
knowledge scores of mothers regarding immunization
3 Distribution of samples according to the posttest
37
knowledge scores of mothers regarding immunization.
4 Distribution of samples according to the pre test attitude
39
scores of mothers regarding immunization
5 Distribution of samples according to the post test
41
attitude scores of mothers regarding immunization
6 Comparison of the pretest and posttest knowledge score
43
on mothers regarding immunization.
7 Comparison of the pretest and posttest attitude score on
45
mothers regarding immunization.
8 Relationship between post test level of knowledge and
47
attitude among under five mothers.
9 Association between the post test knowledge scores on
mothers regarding immunization and demographic 48
variables
10 Association between the post test attitude scores on
mothers regarding immunization and demographic 50
variables
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE TITLE PAGE

1. Conceptual framework based on modified Ludwig von
12
bertanlanffy’s general system model
2. Schematic representation of the Research methodology 26
3. Distribution of samples according to the age of the
30
Mother
4. Distribution of samples according to the Religion 31
5. Distribution of samples according to the occupation of the
32
Mother
6. Distribution of samples according to the Education 33
7. Distribution of samples according to the source of
34
Information
8. Distribution of samples according to the pre test
36
9. Distribution of samples according to the post test
38
10. Distribution of samples according to the pretest attitude
40
scores of mothers regarding immunization.
11. Distribution of samples according to the post test attitude
42
scores of mothers regarding immunization.
12. Comparison of the pre test and post test knowledge scores
44
of mothers regarding immunization
13. Comparison of the pre test and post test attitude scores of
46
mothers regarding immunization
LIST OF APPENDIX
APPENDIX TITLE
I Letter seeking experts opinion for content validity
of tool content vanity
II Certificate of content validity
III Certificate of Tamil Editing
IV Certificate of English Editing
V List of experts opinion for content validity
VI Tools (English)
Part A. Demographic variables
Part B. Knowledge Questionnaire
Part C. Attitude scale
Part D. Answer Keys
VII Tool (Tamil)
CHAPTER – I
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER - I
INTRODUCTION
“What a child doesn’t receive, he can seldom later”
-James.
Vaccination is probably one of the most cost effective interventions to reduce

burden of childhood morbidity and mortality, provided used optimally and
judiciously. Currently it is estimated that immunization saves the life of 3 million
children a year but 2 million more lives could be saved by existing vaccines.
Vaccination is a cornerstone of public health, believed to save an estimated 2-3
million lives annually. Therefore, provision of childhood immunization continuous to
be an essential component in reducing morbidity and mortality worldwide. India is
one of the few courtiers where universal routine childhood immunization is provided
free of charge.
Immunization is defined as the process of inducing the immunity in an

individual against an infectious organism or agent, through the vaccination (Satish
Gupte 2002). In May 1974, the WHO officially launched a global immunization
programme known as Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI), to protect all the
children of the world against six vaccine preventable diseases namely- Diphtheria,
Whooping Cough, Tetanus, Polio, Tuberculosis and Measles by the year 2000.
InIndia, the EPI was launched on January 1978.(K. Park). In 1990, by United Nations
Integrated Children’sEmergency Fund (UNICEF), EPI was renamed into Universal
Child Immunization and it was launched inIndia on November 19, 1985 and was
dedicated to the memory of Smt. Indira Gandhi. (K. Park) An importantcontribution
of microbiology to medicine has been immunization. By this, many vaccine
preventable have been virtually eliminated. (C. P. Baveja, 2005).
Vaccine is an immunological substance designed to confer specific protection

against a given disease. It stimulates immune system (either humoral or cell mediated)
to generate specific protection against an infectious agent. Vaccine may be prepared
from live modified organisms, inactivated or killed organisms, toxoids, or
combination of these. Polio vaccine was invented by Jonas Edward Salk in 1952. The
1
immune system protects an individual against invasion by foreign bodies, specifically
microbial agents and their toxic products. (Ananthanarayan, 2004).
Today vaccination is very essential part of children health .Vaccination

programme is a key step for the preventive services of children. The field of
paediatric vaccination is growing and changing as new vaccines are becoming
available and previous diseases are being eradicated due to the complicity and
evolution of vaccine preventable diseases .A review of immunology and the principles
of vaccination provide background knowledge for information pertaining to disease
transmission and the current recommended vaccine schedule .The goal of vaccination
is to protect the population from disease and decrease the incidence of disease and
disease transmission.
Immunization is vital; it protects nearly 3/4th of children against major

childhood illness. There are several diseases, which can be easily prevented by timely
vaccination as a part of routine immunization. Every child has the right to benefit
from the appropriate traditional and new life saving vaccinations. All mothers wish
good health for their children. Health workers desire all children immunized against
vaccine preventable diseases. The government wants them protected from progressive
diseases. But many vaccines do not reach a majority of infants and children.
Decreased awareness, patient compliance and cost effectiveness play a major role in
limiting the success of vaccine.
Children are innocent, trusting and full of hope. Their childhood should be
joyful and loving. Their lives should mature gradually, as they gain new experiences.
Each child is a unique person, a person whose future will be affected for better or
worse by the influences that mould his or her life during the early years. One child
will grow up to become a joy to God and parents and a blessing to others. Another
will grow up and become a menace to society. Many others will live out their lives in
fairly good ways. The future of any society depends on its children. Parents are laying
the foundation for their child’s lives. So the parents have a very key role and
opportunity to help promote the health of the children. Children who receive their
immunizations on time are healthier children.
At birth, infants have protection against certain diseases because antibodies

have passed through the placenta from the mother to the unborn child. After birth,
2
breastfed babies get the continued benefits of additional antibodies in breast milk. But
in both cases, the protection is temporary. Immunization (vaccination) is a way of
creating immunity to certain diseases by using small amounts of a killed or weakened
microorganism that causes the particular disease. Microorganisms can be viruses,
such as the measles virus, or they can be bacteria, such as pneumococcus. Vaccines
stimulate the immune system to react as if there were a real infection; it fends off the
"infection" and remembers the organism so that it can fight it quickly should it enter
the body later.
Childhood immunization require collaboration with parents, who may be

anxious about immunization safety .Many parents are worried that some vaccines are
not safe and may harm their baby or young child .They may ask their doctors or
nurses to wait or even refuse to have the vaccines .So awareness of vaccines and its
effects to all the caregivers of children or parents is an important factor to improve the
health of the child. Inspite of any barriers or difficulties in providing immunizations,
bringing children up to date at every opportunity continuous to be essential both in
preventing morbidity and mortality and in promoting worldwide eradication of
vaccine preventable diseases. Protection from vaccine preventable diseases is one of
the most crucial rights of children. So the parents must have the primary responsibility
of getting their child fully immunized and the child must not be made to suffer if the
care givers are having lack of knowledge.
NEED FOR THE STUDY
“If you have knowledge, let others light their candles at it.”(Margaret Fuller)
The physical health of a child is important because it is associated with the

mental and social development of a children. Mothers are the first care providers of
their children, is needed to reduce the under five mortality rate. One of the ways to
achieve reduction of under five mortality is to educate the mothers on matters
pertaining to child care
Approximately 2.5 million children under five years of age die every years as
a result of disease that can be prevented by vaccination using currently available or
new vaccines. India houses a large chunk of these unimmunized children. According
3
to 2006 estimates, around 12 million children were not immunized; Utter Pradesh
with more than 3.0 million unimmunized children tops this list.
In India 22,616 cases of pertussis were reported in 2006. In developing

countries pertussis is a major cause of infant mortality. The reported incidence for
diphtheria has been 2472(partial) and 10,231 cases in the year 2006 and 2005
respectively. Measles is the leading cause of childhood death. Every year around 3
million cases of measles are seen and about 900,000 children die because of measles
around the world .In India every 500 children die because of measles .The most
worrying factor is that the vaccines coverage against measles in India is only 66% and
even below 50% in many states. There are 8.8 million estimated deaths in children
under 5 years of age in worldwide due to haemophilus influenza in 2008. The
estimated pneumococcal deaths in Indian children aged 1-5 month per 100 000 is
between 100 and <300. An estimated 527,000 children aged <5 years die from
rotavirus diarrhea each year, with >85% of these death occurring in low income
countries of Asia and Africa.
Singh (2012) conducted a study to determine the relationship between the

literacy status and immunization coverage on Bihar. The analysis revealed a fairly low
immunization coverage (<33%) for all vaccines and it was found that literacy status of
mothers had a significant influence on the immunization level. Lack of awareness and
motivation was cited as the main reason for non-immunization. Education of mothers
improves their knowledge which in turn changes their attitude.
Each year since 1990, immunization with routine vaccines has reached more
than 70 percent of children worldwide. At the UN General Assembly special session in
2002 the international community adopted the specific target of immunizing by 2010 at
least 90 percent of children’s in each country.
This area of study has been selected because even today the mortality of under
five children is high and it is mainly due to diseases that can be prevented. Hence, the
need was felt to identify the learning needs of mothers and educate them regarding
immunization by introducing structured teaching programme and promoting health of
under five children which in turn reduces mortality among under five children.
4
In India, Das, N. (2013) reported the immunization coverage has remained
high since 1990, but national coverage reports of 100% coverage, suggest problems
with the accuracy of those reports.4 Therefore, coverage surveys are routinely used to
evaluate coverage. Surveys through the 1990s have found that only about half of the
birth cohorts are fully immunized, with individual year estimates ranging from a fully
immunized rate of 3.5% to 68%. The Rapid Household District Surveys performed
in1998/9 and again in 2002/3 show that of the 236 districts that can be currently
compared, 174 (74%) showed a decrease in infant full immunization rates.
In 2007 the UNICEF reported that Immunization coverage rates were low and
complete immunization among children aged 12-23 months was dismal at 12%
• Around 42.0% of the children received BCG.
.Only a quarter of the children received measles vaccine (24.3%) and a similar
percentage received DPT 3 (23.7%).
• There was a considerable drop in the percentage of children who received

DPT1 (37.8%) and DPT3 (23.7%). This reflects a substantial percentage of drop-outs.
Similar trend could be seen in case of children who received Polio 1 (33%) and Polio
3 (22%).
• Vaccination card was available with only 38.6% of mothers whose child
received any immunization.7
Bonu, S. Rani, M. Baker, T.D. in 2003 reported multiple reasons were cited by the
women for poor immunization. These included long distance to the nearest public
health facility, after effects of vaccination like fever, swelling, and pain and strong
belief that polio vaccine can cause sterility in their children and lack of knowledge
about the vaccination and serious consequences of vaccine preventable diseases.
In 2006-2007 the UNICEF reported that measles vaccine coverage was 90.4%
and tetanus immunization. So far the new vaccination for hepatitis B and encephalitis
coverage was less reported. The lapse in vaccination coverage is due to lack of
knowledge about the vaccine preventable diseases and its complications
The inadequately immunized children are mostly in rural areas and in urban
slums and semi urban under privileged communities due to poor health delivery
5
facilities and non functional health care units. Failure to immunize is important not
only to the individual child, but it also has societal and global implications for
limiting the spread of disease. According to epidemiological data, there has been a
sharp decline in disease incidence following licensure and use of each vaccines
(National Associations of Paediatrics Nurse Associates and Practitioners, NAPNAP)
2000. It is critical that health care providers know and understand incidence and
squeal associated with these vaccine preventable diseases and are able to discuss the
benefits and risk with parents.
A study was conducted to investigate the knowledge of nursing mothers about

vaccines preventable diseases, their causes and benefit of childhood vaccination
among 69 nursing mother’s ages 21-50 years with secondary education to a self
administered questionnaire .Result showed that 78.57% of mothers had identified
poliomyelitis is a disease preventable by routine childhood immunization and 85.1%
knew the organism. Tetanus was identified by only 5.7% and not agreed that
vaccination was the best prevention against them.9
WHO estimate that haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) caused over 8 million
cases of serious disease and 376,000 deaths globally in the year 2000. Hib disease had
been shown to be a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in Indian children <5
years of age. Hospital based studies showed that Hib and pneumococcus were the
most common cause of childhood bacterial meningitis. Measles continued to be an
important cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in many states in India and
between 100,000 and 160,000 children die from measles. The extremely low rates of
routine immunization in large parts of the country remain a matter of serious concern
.Inadequate routine administration of polio vaccine in, UP, Bihar, West Bengal and
some other parts has been chiefly responsible for the delay in polio eradication from
India. Sporadic outbreaks of Diphtheria and Measles have been observed in different
parts in the Northern states. The gravity of the situation calls for a more vigorous
approach.
While working in the community the investigator found that there are so many
children missed the opportunities of vaccination due to the inadequate knowledge of
mothers and are in high risk for developing communicable diseases. So the
investigator thought that if the mothers are educated well the disease can be controlled
6
to some extent. Therefore the investigator decided to undertake the study to assess the
effectiveness of planned teaching programme for mothers in a selected community at
Dindugal.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
A study to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on level

of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among the mothers of under five
children in selected rural area at Dindugal.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
 To assess the Pretest level of knowledge and attitude regarding the

immunization among mothers of under five children as measured by
structured knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale.
 To assess the post test level knowledge and of attitude regarding
structured knowledge questionnaire attitude scale.
 To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching program on knowledge
and attitude regarding immunization among mothers of under five children in
term of gain in post test knowledge and attitude score.
 To find the co relation between the knowledge and attitude regarding
immunization among the mother of under five children.
 To find out the association between post test level of knowledge with their
selected demographic variables.
 To find out the association between post test level of attitude with their
HYPOTHESES
H1: The mean post test knowledge score is higher than the mean pre test
knowledge score regarding immunization among the mothers of under five
children.
H2: The mean post test attitude score is higher than the mean pre test attitude
score regarding immunization among the mothers of under five children.
7
H3: There will be significant relationship between knowledge and attitude
regarding immunization among the mothers of under five children.
H4: There will be no significant association between the post test knowledge
scores of mothers regarding immunization and selected demographic variables.
H5: There will be no significant association between the post test attitude scores
of mothers regarding immunization and selected demographic variables.
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
1. Assess: - In the present study it is the organized systematic and continuous process
of collecting data from mothers of under five children.
2. Effectiveness: - In this study effectiveness means “Improving the knowledge

regarding immunization for mothers of under five by structured teaching programme
which may result differences between pre and post test score”.
3. Structured teaching programme:- In the present study it refers to systematically

planned teaching programme designed to provide information regarding
immunization among mothers of under five children.
4. Knowledge: - It refers to correct response of the mothers of under five to

knowledge items on immunization as achieved by knowledge score.
5. Immunization: - It refers to the process of protecting under five children against

disease like diphtheria, polio, tetanus, whooping cough, tuberculosis and measles by
following the schedule prescribed by national immunization schedule.
6. Attitude- It refers to the thoughts of under five mothers regarding immunization.
7. Under five children: - In the present study under five is defined as one whose age
is below 5 years.
ASSUMPTION
 The post test score will be higher than the pre test score.
 Under five children’s mother will not have adequate knowledge and attitude
regarding immunization.
8
 Demographic variable of the sample may have an influence over knowledge
and attitude regarding immunization.
LIMITATION
 Who are willing to participate in the study.

 Duration of the data collection only six weeks.
 The study will be limited to mothers of under five children those who are
present at the time of data collection.
 The sample size is 30 mothers of under five children.
PROJECTED OUTCOMES
The study aims at determining the effectiveness of structured teaching

programme on immunization regarding knowledge and attitude of mothers
who have under five of children.
Health teaching can help to create awareness among the people regarding the
immunization and also motivates them to have vaccine.
The findings of this study will help the nursing personnel to take steps to improve the
knowledge of mothers regarding the immunization.
9
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
The conceptual framework is a group of related ideas, statements or concepts.

The term conceptual model is often used to inter change able with conceptual
framework and sometimes with grand theories that articulate a broad range of the
significant relationship among the concepts of a discipline kozeir Barbara 2005.
The conceptual framework for this study was derived from general system
model given by von Ludwig bertanlanffy 1968.According to this theory, a system is
asset of components or unites inter acting with each other with in a boundary that
filters the type and rate of exchange with the environment. All living systems are
open in that there is a continual exchange of matters, energy and information. In open
system there are varying degrees of interaction with the environment from which the
system receives input and gives back output in the form of matter energy and
information.
General system theory is useful in breaking the process in to sequential tasks

to ensure goal realization. Bertanlanffy explained that the system has 4 major aspects
1. Input
2. Throughput
3. Output
4. Feedback
INPUT
In this type of information, energy and material that enters the system from
environment, through its boundaries.
Assess the level of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among

mothers of under five children is done by using structured knowledge questionnaire
and attitude scale.
Here input indicates the structured teaching programme regarding

immunization among mothers who have under five children.
10
THROUGH PUT
Refers to a process that allows the input to be changed so that, it is useful to

the system.
In this study, through put is a process of transformation of knowledge and

attitude on immunization using flash cards among mothers who have under five
children.
OUT PUT
Output is any information that leaves the system and enters the environment
through the system boundaries.
Output denotes the improved level of knowledge and attitude after structured
teaching programme on immunization among mothers who have under five children.
In this study, output is assessed by the post test conducted among mothers
regarding immunization using the same structured questionnaire.
The improved score gained by the mothers during post test indicates the
effectiveness of structured teaching programme on immunization.
If the knowledge is inadequate, a feedback can be given by administering a

structured teaching regarding various aspects to mothers who have under five
children.
11
INPUT THROUGHPUT OUTPUT
ADEQUATE
DEMOGRAPHIC KNOWLEDGE
VARIABLES
POST TEST
 Age of the
PRE TEST Assessment of MODERATELY
mother ADEQUATE
knowledge on
Assessment of KNOWLEDGE
Structured immunization
 Religion knowledge and
teaching Process of assessed by
attitude on
programme on transmission of structured INADEQUATE
 Occupation immunization
immunization knowledge and knowledge KNOWLEDGE
by using
 Education of structured change of questionnaire
questionnaires attitude on
the mother and attitude immunization
scale. GOOD
 Source of Assessment of
attitude on
information immunization
on AVERAGE
immunization
by attitude scale
POOR
FEEDBACK AND REINFORCEMENT
FIG 1 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK BASED ON GENERAL SYSTEM THEORY MODEL (KOZIER BARBARA 2005)
12
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CHAPTER - II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Adeyinka (2009) A study was done for 328 mothers of children aged 12-35
months to identify the factors even in the presence of maternal illiteracy, educating
mothers about the vaccine excellent knowledge. Overall it was found that majority of
the mothers were having less knowledge regarding immunization.
Angelilio et al., (1999), several studies on the immunization status of children

have been published in various countries at different times, and comparisons with
these studies are interesting but must be made cautiously. They also stated that since
many factors may influence vaccination coverage, important differences should be
taken into account, such as prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases, availability of
vaccination centers, level of knowledge and information about vaccination, and
different methods used to measure immunization status
Corrigall J et al., (2008), School of Public Health, University of Cape Town,

study conducted to determine the routine immunization coverage rates in children
aged 12 - 23 months by cluster survey technique. A total of 3,705 caregivers of
children aged 12 - 23 months who had been living in the Western Cape for at least 6
months. Vaccination status (1 = fully vaccinated; 0 = partially vaccinated) as recorded
on a Road-to-Health card or by history. Reasons for not vaccinating were established
from a questionnaire. The immunization coverage was 76.8% for vaccines due by 9
months and 53.2% for those due by 18 months. The reasons given for not being
immunized were clinic-related factors (47%), lack of information (27%), caregiver
being unable to attend the clinic (23%), and lack of motivation (14%). Of the clinic
factors cited, the two commonest ones were missed opportunities (34%) and being
told by clinic staff to return another time (20%). The coverage indicates that a great
deal of good work is being done, the coverage is insufficient to prevent outbreaks of
measles and other common childhood conditions, including polio. The coverage is too
low to consider not running periodic mass campaigns for measles and polio. It will
need to be sustainably improved before introducing rubella vaccine as part of the
Expanded Programme on Immunizations (EPI) schedule by increasing the knowledge
of care givers.
13
Grais RF et al., (2007) investigate measles mortality in three recent epidemics
in Niamey (Niger), N'Djamena (Chad), and Adamawa State (Nigeria). The three
exhaustive household retrospective mortality surveys in one neighborhood of each of
the three affected areas: Bouzouki, Niamey, Niger (April 2004, n = 26,795); Moursal,
N'Djamena, Chad (June 2005, n = 21,812); and Dong District, Adamawa State,
Nigeria (April 2005, n = 16,249), where n is the total surveyed population in each of
the respective areas. Study populations included all persons resident for at least 2
weeks prior to the study, a duration encompassing the measles incubation period.
Heads of households provided information on measles cases, clinical outcomes up to
30 days after rash onset, and health-seeking behaviour during the epidemic. The result
concluded the main outcome measures were measles attack rates (ARs) and case
fatality ratios (CFRs) by age group, and descriptions of measles complications and
health-seeking behaviour. Measles attack rates were the highest in children under 5
year old (under 5 y): 17.1% in Bouzouki, 17.2% in Moursal, and 24.3% in Dong
District. Case fatality ratios in under 5-year-olds were 4.6%, 4.0%, and 10.8% in
Bouzouki, Moursal, and Dong District, respectively. Children in these countries still
face unacceptably high mortality from a completely preventable disease.
Ibrahim H et al., (2005), conducted the study on the knowledge and practice
of physicians and nurses with regard to immunization has been assessed. A self-
administered questionnaire with 50 statements related to knowledge and practice of
vaccination was distributed among workers in 50 MOH PHCs in Riyadh city. 506
questionnaires were returned, 479 were analyzed. A response rate of almost 70%. For
most of the statements cited a correct response of knowledge & practice was obtained
from more than 80% of the sample. However for few others, correct response has
dropped to 40% or less. Experience in dealing with vaccination, and a formal training
in vaccination were not significantly associated with the responses of both physicians
and nurses. In spite of the limitations of this study it could be fairly concluded that the
overall knowledge and practices of childhood immunizations among the primary care
providers surveyed was good. Significant gaps still exist. This highlights the need for
continuous training and supervision of health care providers dealing with children
immunization.
Kapoor (2010) had stated that although immunization is one of the most
effective, safest and efficient Public Health Interventions, and that its impact on
14
childhood morbidity and mortality has been great, its full potential was yet to be
reached. Through proven strategies, immunization has been made accessible to even
the most hard-to-reach and vulnerable populations since it involves clearly targeted
groups (WHO, 2013). When immunization rates are high, it is much less likely a
pathogen will be carried and transmitted from person to person. Declines in
vaccination rates allow diseases to emerge in the population again. A case in point is
the fact that Measles is now endemic in the United Kingdom, after vaccination rates
dropped below 80% (Awosika, 2012). In Nigeria in 2001, unfounded fears of the
polio vaccine led to a drop in vaccination rates and re-emergence of infection, and the
spread of polio to ten other countries (Awosika, 2012).
Kumar D et al (2008), Community based cross sectional study conducted in

India about the knowledge of ever-married women regarding maternal and child
health and to assess existing gap between awareness and practice levels of lactating
mothers among 283 ever-married women in the reproductive age. Low levels of
awareness and practice of TT immunization (74.2% awareness, 58.1% practice), five-
cleans (31.9% awareness and 14.4% practice), trained birth attendant (69.6%
awareness 39.1% practice), and post-natal care (75.4% awareness and 51.0% practice)
among lactating mothers. Knowledge regarding optimal infant and young child
feeding practices was very poor: initiation of breast-feeding within six hours (17.4%),
colostrum feeding (34.8%), exclusive breastfeeding (5.8%) and significant gaps
between knowledge and practice were observed. Highly significant difference
(P<0.001) between proportions of women aware of ICDS (59.4%) and of
beneficiaries (21.7%). High levels of awareness regarding reproductive health
parameters except for contraception: desire for two children (81.6%), legal ages at
marriages for girls (84.5%), desired birth interval of three or more years (71.7%). The
study concluded that wide gaps exist between awareness and practices related with
MCH including immunization of children due to non-adoption of knowledge into
actual practice, except some selected components lacking in both knowledge as well
as practice.
Lawrence GL, Et al (2003) from National Centre for Immunization Research

and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Sydney, New South
Wales (i) Assess under-reporting of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations to
the Australian Childhood Immunization Register (ACIR); (ii) estimate MMR
15
coverage among five-year-old children and the proportion immune to measles
infection; (iii) identify factors related to non-uptake of MMR vaccination. We
analyzed Australian Childhood Immunization Register data for a birth cohort of
approximately 64,000 children aged five years. The parents of a sample of 506
children with no Australian Childhood Immunization Register record for the second
MMR vaccination (MMR2), due at four years of age, were interviewed by telephone
to assess under-reporting to the Australian Childhood Immunization Register and
reasons for non-uptake of MMR vaccination. Results shows that parents reported that
22% (n = 111) of the surveyed 506 children had received MMR2 before their fifth
birthday, and 42% (n = 214) by approximately 5.5 years of age. After correcting for
this level of under-reporting to the Australian Childhood Immunization Register,
MMR2 coverage for the entire cohort at five years of age was 52.9% (95% CI 52.3-
53.4), and increased to 84.1% (95% CI 83.4-84.8) by approximately 5.5 years of age.
This was 4.3% and 8.2%, respectively, higher than Australian Childhood
Immunization Register coverage estimates at the two ages. Based on the corrected
MMR coverage estimates, 93% of the cohort was immune to measles due to
vaccination. The most common parent-reported reason for incomplete vaccination
was lack of knowledge about the MMR vaccination schedule. Measles elimination in
Australia will require continued effort in vaccination coverage and timeliness among
pre-school children. School-entry requirements are important for MMR2 uptake.
Strategies are needed to improve reporting to the Australian Childhood Immunization
Register for more accurate measurement of coverage.
Linkins RW et al., (2006):- Conducted study to assess the attitudes of parents

of vaccinated and unvaccinated children regarding; support for immunization
registries; laws authorizing registries and mandating provider reporting and financial
worth and responsibility of registry development and implementation methods; A case
control study of parents of 815 children exempt from school vaccination requirements
and 1630 fully vaccinated children was conducted. Surveys administered to the
parents, asked about views on registries and perceived utility and safety of vaccines.
Results; Surveys were completed by 56.1% of respondents, fewer than 10% of parents
were aware of immunization registries on their communities.
Mark C. et al., (2008).Department of Child Health and The ICMR Centre of

Advanced Research in Virology, Vellore conducted study to explore a hidden health
16
problem of vaccine preventable disease and the most common preventable cause of
death among our under fives. These facts, plus the availability of a safe and effective
vaccine make measles vaccination the highest priority in the control of communicable
disease in India. The use of the pulse vaccination strategy will result in better
coverage rates than the conventional strategy of immunization in fixed health centers.
India’s annual requirement of measles vaccine is 20 million doses. The study
concluded that to prevent mortality due to measles can be prevented by economy and
uninterrupted supply, measles vaccine must be manufactured in India without any
further delay.
Mathew JL, et al., (2002):- Conducted study on 500 children under the age of
5 years belonging to a low income group. All were attending the paediatrics out patient
department of a large teaching hospital in New Delhi, India. Only 25% were found to
have received complete primary immunization as per the National Immunization
schedule (bacilli calmette – Guerin at birth, 3 doses of diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus
and oral poliovirus vaccine at 6,10 and 14 weeks and measles at 9 months). The major
reasons for non-immunization of the children were migration to a native village
(26.4%), domestic problems (9.6%). The immunization centre was located too far from
their home (9.6%) and for child was unwell when the vaccination was due (9%). The
lack of awareness and fear of side effects constituted a small minority of reasons for
non-immunization.
Menzies R et al, (2008) from National Centre for Immunization Research and
Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Australia, the second report on vaccine
preventable diseases and vaccination coverage in Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people, brings together the relevant sources of routinely collected data on
vaccine preventable diseases--notifications, hospitalizations, deaths, and childhood
and adult vaccination coverage. As a result of continued improvements in the
collection of data on Indigenous status, this second report is considerably more
comprehensive, with data available from more jurisdictions, and more detailed
presentation, including time trends and vaccination coverage by jurisdiction.
Vaccination coverage data provide evidence of successful program delivery and
highlight some areas for improvement. For universally funded vaccines in children,
coverage is similar in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children by 24 months of age.
However, delayed vaccination is more common in Indigenous children, with 6%-8%
17
fewer children fully vaccinated at 12 months of age. More timely vaccination,
particularly within the first six months of life, is particularly important in reducing the
disproportionate burdens of disease due to pertussis and Haemophilus influenza type
b (Hib). The substantial impact of the national meningococcal C vaccination program
since 2003 is evident in this report, although the higher proportion of non-vaccine
preventable serotype B disease in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
underlines the need for a new vaccine to cover this serotype. Immunization programs
are an example of how preventive health programs in general can be enhanced to
close the gap in morbidity and mortality between Indigenous and non-Indigenous
Australians.
PARK K 2002: stated that the health problems in a country like India are
essentially linked to poverty and ove3r population which is turned lead to less
satisfactory health facilities, poor sanitary environmental conditions, and malnutrition.
India is still one among the country with high infant mortality rate (60 in 2000). Infant
mortality rate has declined slowly from 204/1000 live births by during 1911 by 1000
live births in the year 2000. India is a vast country with widely differing population.
Kerala one has low as 16/1000 live birth during the 1998.
Rahul Sharma, et al., (2008), on Do caretakers of children under five years

have sufficient knowledge regarding routine immunization (RI) to assess the
knowledge about routine immunization among Six hundred and eighty-two
caretakers of young children. caretakers accompanying children under 5 years to pulse
polio booths in November 2006. with pre-tested semi-open-ended questionnaire.
Statistical analysis: Proportions, Chi-square test. Results shows that the proportions of
respondents who had awareness about different aspects of routine immunization, such
as weekday of routine immunization (37.0%), age group for routine immunization
(49.1%), number of visits required in the first year of life (27.0%), were all low.
When asked to name the four diseases covered under the routine immunization
program in Delhi, only 268 (39.3%) could name at least three. The education level of
respondents was strongly associated with their knowledge about routine
immunization. Conclusion shows that the need of the hour is to make routine
immunization a 'felt need' of the community. Making caretakers more aware about
routine immunization is a vital step in achieving this goal.
18
Siddiqi et al., (2010) concluded that mothers‟ knowledge about Expanded
Program on immunization (EPI) vaccination in peri-urban Karachi was quite low and
not associated with their children’s EPI coverage. Mothers‟ educational status,
however, was significantly associated with child’s coverage. This finding depicted a
better health seeking behavior of a more educated mother.
Singh MC, et al., (1994):- Conducted study on one hundred and thirty
mothers in the age group (15-44) years and 142 children aged (12-59) months were
selected in Wardha district, out of this 100 mothers and 122 children could be
contacted for evaluation of immunization coverage and assessing maternal knowledge
and practice regarding immunization 52.5% children were fully immunized and 45.1%
were partially immunized. Vaccine coverage for B.C.G. and primary doses of
DPT/OPV was 95.9% and above 85% respectively. It was 57.4% for measles and
63.04% for booster dose was 36.96% mothers had a knowledge regarding need for
immunization but a poor knowledge regarding the diseases prevented and doses of the
vaccines.7
Smith P.J, et al., (2005):- Conducted study to obtain vaccination since 1994
the NIS has monitored progress toward the Healthy people 2000 and 2010 vaccination
goals. A mail survey to vaccination providers to obtain vaccination histories used to
estimate vaccination coverage rates. Results in 2001 among infants with completed
RDD interviews, 0.3 percent were entirely unvaccinated. Together, the new non
telephone adjustment and the refinement for unvaccinated infants yielded revised
estimates that were within 1.5 percentage points of the original estimate obtained using
the 1998-2001 methodology.
Stokley et al., (2001):- Study was conducted to estimate the vaccination

coverage level of children’s living in rural and urban areas to identify statistically
significant differences. Children’s aged 19-35 months participating on the 1999
National Immunization Survey were included in the study. Statistically significant
differences in vaccination coverage levels between the rural population and their urban
counterparts were determined for individual vaccines and vaccine series. Results;
overall 18% of the children included on the 1999 NIS lived in a rural area, 46% lived
in a sub urban area and 36% lived an urban area.
19
Topuzoglu et al., (2005):- Conducted study was conducted to determine the
coverage of the expanded programme of Immunization (EPI) of the ministry of Health
and the coverage of private vaccines in the umraniye Health District in order to
establish approaches for improving vaccination services. Thirty streets were selected at
random from each health care region, utilization of vaccination services and
vaccination status of children under the age of 5 years were determined by face to face
interviews Results, vaccination coverage was as follows. Hepatitis B third dose,
84.6%; BCG, 94.8%; DPT third dose, 90.1%; Oral polio virus (OPV) third dose,
90.0%; Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), 13.3%;, The full vaccination rates for
children under 5 years were 68.3%.
Wood JG, et al., (2008) from National Centre for Immunization Research and
Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases Sydney, Australia conducted study on
The second dose of MMR vaccine (MMR2) is scheduled at 4 years in Australia and
the USA but earlier in some European countries. We modeled the effect on measles
elimination status and population susceptibility of shifting delivery of MMR2 from 4
years to 18 months using relevant Australian data. Susceptibility in young children
was reduced but elimination was not sustainable past 2015 if 6% of vaccinated
seroconvert became susceptible after 10 years. One-dose MMR coverage of 96% or
greater maintained elimination more effectively than modeled changes in scheduling,
suggesting that maximizing one-dose MMR coverage should be the highest priority.
Zell E.R, et al., (2000):- Conducted study on National Immunization survey

(NIS) was designed to measure vaccination coverage estimates for the US, the 50
states. The NIS includes a random-digit-dialed telephone survey and a provider record
check study. Data are weighted to account for the sample design and to reduce non
response and non coverage biases in order to improve vaccination coverage estimates.
NIS estimates are highly comparable to vaccination estimates derived from the national
Health Interview survey. The NIS allows comparisons between states and urban areas
over time and if used to evaluate current and new vaccination strategies.
20
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER-III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The methodology of research indicates the general pattern together empirical

data for the problem under investigation.
This chapter comprises methodology for this study, the research approach
design for the study, setting, sample, technique of data collection, description of the
tool and pilot study.
RESEARCH APPROACH
The quantitative approach was used to determine the effectiveness of

structured teaching programme on knowledge and attitude regarding immunization on
among mothers of under five year children.
RESEARCH DESIGN
The research design used in this study was quasi experimental one group pre
test post test design is used to determine the effectiveness of structured teaching
programme on knowledge and attitude regarding immunization before and after the
structured teaching programme among mothers of under five children.
Diagrammatic representation of research design is as follows,
O1 X O2
O1 - Pre-test assessment on knowledge and attitude regarding immunization.

X - Intervention
O2 - Post-test assessment on knowledge and attitude regarding immunization.
SETTING OF THE STUDY
Setting is the physical location and condition in which data collection takes
place. (Polit and Hungler, 1999). The study was conducted selected community area
Vakkampatti nearby Dindugal. It is situated 3 km away from Jainee College of
nursing, Dindugal. There is a Sub centre available in Vakkampatti.
21
POPULATION
A population is the entire aggregation of cases in which a researcher is

interested. (Polit and Hungler, 1999). The target population of this study included the
mothers of under five living in selected community area at Dindugal
SAMPLE SIZE
This refers to the number of items to be selected from the universe to

constitute a sample. (C.R Kothari, 2004). Sample size of this study consists of 30
mothers of underfive children living in selected community area at Dindugal.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
Sampling is the process of selecting a portion of the population to represent

the entire population (Polit and Hungler, 1999). Purposive sampling technique was
used to select the sample. Sample were collected, who fulfill the sampling criteria are
included in this study.
VARIABLES
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE - Structured Teaching programme regarding

immunization is the independent variable of this study
DEPENDENT VARIABLE – Knowledge and attitude regarding immunization were

the dependent variables of this study.
CRITERIA FOR SAMPLE SELECTION
INCLUSION CRITERIA
 Mothers of underfive children living in Dindugal community area.

 Mothers those who are have first child in family
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
 Children who are not willing to participate in the study.

 Those who don’t understand Tamil and English.
22
DATA COLLECTION TOOL
The tool was developed by the investigator to assess the knowledge and
attitude of the mothers of under five children regarding immunization.
DESCRIPTION OF THE TOOLS
The tool consisted of three sections.
Section-A: Demographic variables of the mother
The demographic data consisted of baseline information of mothers of under

five children regarding their age, religion, education, occupation, source of
information about obligatory vaccination.
Section-B: It consists of knowledge questionnaire on immunization; number of items

was 30 questions. The total score for the entire item was 30.
Section-C: 3 point likert scale to assess the attitude of mother with under five
children. The number of item was 15. The total score for the entire item was 40.
Scoring Procedure
Knowledge
 10-20 - Inadequate knowledge
 11-20 – Moderate knowledge
 21-30 – Adequate knowledge
ATTITUDE
 Poor < 50 %
 Fair 50- 65 %
 Good > 65 %
TESTING OF THE TOOL
CONTENT VALIDITY
Four experts from the nursing field and one expert from the medical field
evaluated the tool for content validity based on their suggestion and
recommendations. Modification done and after establishing the validity of experts, the
23
tool was translated into Tamil and again translated into English to validate the
language.
RELIABILITY
The test retest was used to establish a reliability of structure questionnaire and
attitude scale. Reliability value r =0.7 was satisfactory.
PILOT STUDY
The pilot study was conducted in Attupatti community area. Six mothers were
selected who have under five children. The knowledge of immunization was assessed
by using structured knowledge questionnaire. The attitude was assessed by attitude
scale It was carried out the same way as a final study in order to test feasibility and
practicability.
Six mothers who met the inclusion criteria were selected by purposive
sampling method. Pre test was conducted by using structured knowledge
questionnaires and attitude scale on immunization. The structured teaching
programme was conducted on the study group by the same day followed by the pre
test. Then after one week of pre test, the post test was conducted for the same group
by using the same structured knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale.
The result was analysed based on the score obtained by the mothers, by using
descriptive and inferential statistics. The tool and the structured teaching programme
were found to be effective. The study conformed to be feasible.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE
The data was collected by using Knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale in
order to identify the knowledge and attitude of immunization among the mothers of
under five children in selected rural area at Dindugal. First week survey was
conducted to identify the under five children mothers in selected area. Each week 15
subjects was planned to conduct pre test and the structured intervention was given to
the mothers. After one week post test was conducted to the mothers 15/week.
24
PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS
After the data collection, it was organized tabulated, summarized and

analyzed. The data analysis was planned according to objective of the study, using the
descriptive and inferential statistic. The plan of data analysis was developed as
frequency and percentage, mean, standard deviation, chi-square test and paired‘t’ test
was used to evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching programme of
immunization.
PROTECTION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS
The research proposal was approved by the dissertation committee prior to

pilot study. Permission was obtained from the principal of the Jainee College of
nursing, head of the department of child health nursing and also oral consent was
taken from each participant before starting the data collection procedure. Assurance
was given to the subjects and confidence was maintained.
25
RESEARCH DESIGN
Quasi experimental design
TARGET POPULATION
Knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among under five
mothers in selected village at Dindigul district.
ACCESSIBLE POPULATION
Under five mothers in vakkampatti village at Dindigul district
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
Non probability purposive sampling technique
SAMPLE 30
Pre-test
Intervention (structured teaching

programme
Post-test
Data analysis
Descriptive and inferential statistics
Criterion measures
Assessment level of knowledge and attitude
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the Research methodology
26
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND

INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER – IV
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA
This chapter deals with the data collection in order determine the effectiveness
of structured teaching programme regarding the knowledge and attitude on
immunization among mothers of under five children.
According to the pilot statistical procedures enable researchers to Summaries,

organize, evaluate, Interpret and communicate numeric information.
The data were collected, analyzed and interpreted according to the objectives
of the study.
The objectives of the study
 To assess the pre test level of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization
among the mothers of underfive children as measured by structured
knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale.
 To assess the post test level of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization
among the mothers of underfive children as measured by structured
knowledge questionnaire attitude scale.
 To determine the effectiveness of structured teaching programme regarding
immunization among the mothers of underfive children in terms of gain in
post test knowledge and attitude score.
 To find the co relation between the knowledge and attitude regarding
immunization among the mothers of under five children.
 To find out the association between post test level of knowledge with their
 To find out the association between post test level of attitude with their
27
SECTION – I
Frequency and percentage distribution of samples on selected demographic

variables
Table I
n = 30
S.No Demographic Variables Frequency Percentage (%)

1. Age of the Mother
a. 18-23years 03 10
b. 24-28 years 15 50
c. 29-33 years 12 40
2. Religion
a. Hindu 17 56.66
b. Christian 08 26.66
c. Muslim 05 16.66
d. Others - -
3. Occupation
a. Not employed 4 13.33
b. Employed 26 86.66
4 Education
a. Illiterate 8 26.66
b. Primary education 9 30
c. Secondary education 5 16.66
d. Under graduate 5 16.66
e. Post graduate 3 10
5 Source of information
a. Television 5 16.66
b. Radio 8 26.66
c. Newspapers 4 13.33
d. Neighbor 5 16.66
e. Health center 6 20
f. Health card 2 6.66
28
The data presented in the above table shows, the number of sample was 10
(10%) in the age group of 18-23years, 15 (50%) mothers were in the age group of
24-28 years and 12 (10%) mothers were in the age group of 29-33 years.
Regarding religion 17 (56.66%) mothers were Hindu, 8 (26.66%) mothers

were Christians, and 5 (16.66%) mothers were Muslims.
Regarding occupation, 4 (13.33%) mothers were not employed, 26 (86.66%)

mothers were employed.
Regarding education 8 (26.66%) mothers were illiterate, 9(30%) mothers were

completed primary education, 5(16.66%) mothers were completed secondary
education, 5(16.66%) mothers were undergraduate and 3(10%) were post graduate.
Regarding the source of information 5(16.66%) mothers got information

through television, 8(26.66%) mothers got information through radio, 4 (13.33%)
mothers got information through neighbor, 6 (20%) mothers got information through
health cards.
29
Age
50%
50% 40%
45%
40%
35%
Percentage
30% 18-23 Yrs

25%
10% 24-28Yrs
20%
15% 29-33yrs
10%
5%
0%
18-23 Yrs 24-28Yrs 29-33yrs
Age
Fig.3 Distribution of samples according to the age of the Mother
30
Religion
56.66%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
Percentage
26.66% Hindhu
30.00% Christian
16.66%
Muslim
20.00%
0% Others
10.00%
0.00%
Hindhu Christian Muslim Others
Religion
Fig.4 Distribution of samples according to the Religion
31
Occupation
13.33%
Not Employed
Employed
86.66%
Fig.5 Distribution of samples according to the occupation of the Mother
32
Education
30%
30.00% 26.66%
25.00%
20.00% 16.66% 16.66%
percentage
15.00% Illiterate
10%
10.00% Primary education
5.00% Secondary education
0.00% Undergraduate
Postgraduate
Education
Fig.6 Distribution of samples according to the Education
33
Source of information
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
Percentage
Television
15.00% Radio
Newspaper
10.00%
Neighbor
5.00% Health center
0.00% Health card
Fig.7 Distribution of samples according to the source of Information
34
SECTION-II
DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLES ACCORDING TO THE PRE TEST

KNOWLEDGE SCORES OF MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION
TABLE-II
(n=30)
Level of Pretest
knowledge Frequency Percentage (%)
Adequate Knowledge 0 0
Moderately adequate knowledge 14 46.66%
Inadequate knowledge 16 53.33%
The table-II shows that the frequency and percentage distribution of samples
according to the pre test knowledge score of mothers regarding immunization. It
revealed that 16(53.33%) mothers had inadequate knowledge, and 14(46.66%)
mothers had moderately adequate knowledge about immunization.
35
Pre test
60.00% 53.33%
46.66%
50.00%
40.00%
percentage
Inadequate
30.00%
Moderate
20.00% Adequate
0%
10.00%
0.00%
Inadequate Moderate Adequate
Level of knowledge
Fig.8 Distribution of samples according to the pretest knowledge scores of

36
SECTION-III
DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLES ACCORDING TO THE POSTTEST

KNOWLEDGE SCORES OF MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION.
TABLE-III
(n= 30)
Level of Post test

knowledge Frequency Percentage (%)
Adequate Knowledge 4 13.33%

Moderately adequate knowledge 25 83.33%
Inadequate knowledge 1 3.33%
The table-III shows that the frequency and percentage distribution of samples
according to the posttest knowledge scores of mothers regarding immunization. It
revealed that 4 (13.33%) mothers had adequate knowledge, 25(83.33%) mothers had
moderately adequate knowledge,1(3.33%) about immunization.
37
Post test
83.33%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
Percentage
50.00% Inadequate
40.00% Moderate
30.00% Adequate
13%
3.33%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Inadequate Moderate Adequate
Level of Knowledge
Fig.9 Distribution of samples according to the post test knowledge scores of

38
SECTION-IV
DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLES ACCORDING TO THE PRE TEST

ATTITUDE SCORES OF MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION
TABLE-IV
(n=30)
Level of Pretest
Attitude Frequency Percentage (%)
Good 5 16.66%
Average 6 20%
Poor 19 63.33%
according to the pre test attitude score of mothers regarding immunization. It revealed
that 5(16.66%) mothers had good attitude, and 6(20%) mothers had average level of
attitude about immunization, 19(63.33%) mothers had poor attitude.
39
Pre test
70.00%
63.33%
60.00%
50.00%
Percentage
40.00%
Good
30.00% Average
20%
20.00% 16.66% Poor
10.00%
0.00%
Good Average Poor
Level of attitude
Fig.10 Distribution of samples according to the pretest attitude scores of mothers

40
SECTION-V
DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLES ACCORDING TO THE POST TEST

ATTITUDE SCORES OF MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION
TABLE-V
(n=30)
Level of Post test

Attitude Frequency Percentage (%)
Good 5 16.66%
Average 24 80%
Poor 1 3.33%
according to the pre test attitude score of mothers regarding immunization. It revealed
that 5(16.66%) mothers had good attitude, and 24(80%) mothers had average level of
attitude about immunization, 1(3.33%) mothers had poor attitude.
41
Post test
80%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
Percentage
Good
40.00%
16.66% Average
30.00% Poor
20.00% 3.33%
10.00%
0.00%
Good Average Poor
Level of attitude
Fig.11 Distribution of samples according to the post test attitude scores of

42
SECTION-VI
COMPARISON OF THE PRETEST AND POSTTEST KNOWLEDGE SCORE

ON MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION.
To test the statistical significant difference between the mean pretest and
posttest knowledge scores of the mothers regarding immunization, the following null
hypothesis was stated.
HYPOTHESIS-0
The mean post test knowledge score is higher than the mean pre test
knowledge score regarding immunization among the mothers of under five children.
Table-VI
‘t’ TEST
Knowledge score MEAN SD
VALUE
Pre test 11.16 3.42
7.65*
Post test 14.2 3.37
* Significant
The table IV shows that, mean post test knowledge score of the mothers
regarding immunization are significantly higher than their mean pre test knowledge
scores.
In order to find out the significant difference between the mean score of pre
and post test knowledge score of the mothers regarding immunization paired ‘t’ test
was computed. The calculated value is higher than the table value, the null hypothesis
was rejected and the research hypothesis was accepted. Hence the researcher
concluded that gain in knowledge is not by chance but by STP on immunization.
43
Level of knowledge
14.2
16
14 11.16
12
10
Mean
8 Standard deviation
6 3.42 3.37
4
0
Pre Test Post test
Fig.12 Comparison of the pre test and post test knowledge scores of mothers
regarding immunization
44
SECTION-VII
COMPARISON OF THE PRETEST AND POSTTEST ATTITUDE SCORE ON
MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION
To test the statistical significant difference between the mean pretest and post
test attitude scores of the mothers regarding immunization, the following null
hypothesis was stated.
HYPOTHESIS-0
The mean post test attitude score is higher than the mean pre test attitude score
regarding immunization among the mothers of under five children.
Table-VII
‘t’ TEST
Knowledge score MEAN SD
VALUE
Pre test 14.6 4.2
6.46*
Post test 17.4 3.25
* Significant
The table IV shows that, mean post test attitude score of the mothers regarding
immunization are significantly higher than their mean pre test attitude scores.
and post test attitude score of the mothers regarding immunization paired ‘t’ test was
computed. The calculated value is higher than the table value, the null hypothesis was
rejected and the research hypothesis was accepted. Hence the researcher concluded
that change of attitude e is not by chance but by STP on immunization.
45
Level of Attitude
17.4
18
14.6
16
14
12
10 Mean
Standard deviation
8
4.2 3.25
6
0
Pre Test Post test
Fig.13 Comparison of the pre test and post test attitude scores of mothers
regarding immunization
46
Table : VIII
Relationship between post test level of knowledge and attitude among under five
mothers.
Table “r” value

S. No Calculated ‘r’ value
1. -0.22 NS 0.381
NS- Not significant
The ‘r’ value of post test level of knowledge and attitude was -0.22, there was
a negative correlation between knowledge and attitude which was not significant.
47
SECTION VIII
TABLE. 9 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE POST TEST KNOWLEDGE

SCORES ON MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION AND
DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
To identify the association between the post test knowledge scores on

immunization of mothers and the selected demographic variables. The following null
hypothesis was stated
HYPOTHESIS I
There will be no significant association between the post test knowledge

scores of mothers regarding immunization and selected demographic variables.
Knowledge level Chi-

Demographic Frequency
In Moderately Square
Variable Numbers Adequate
adequate Adequate 2
Age of the mother
18-23 years 30 1 2 0
24-28 years - 14 1 11.50*
29-33 Years - 9 3
Occupation
Not Employed 30 1 2 1 7.58*
Employed - 23 3
Education
Illiterate 30 - 8 0
Primary education 1 5 3
Secondary - 5 - 8.70#
education
Under graduate - 4 1
Post graduate - 3 -
48
Religion
Hindu 30 1 14 2
Muslim - 7 1 0.99#
Christian - 4 1
Others
Television 30 - 4 1
Radio - 8 - 10.07#
News paper - 3 1
Neighbor - 3 2
Health center 1 5 -
Health card - 2 -
* Significant at 0.05 level
# Non significant at 0.05 level
The table shown above chi-square is carried to find out the association
between the knowledge on immunization of the mothers who have under five year
children and demographic variables
The result shows there is a significance association between age of the mother,
and occupation. But there was no association between religions, education, and source
of information.
49
SECTION IX
TABLE. 10 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE POST TEST ATTITUDE

SCORES ON MOTHERS REGARDING IMMUNIZATION AND
To identify the association between the post test attitude scores on

immunization of mothers and the selected demographic variables. The following null
hypothesis was stated
HYPOTHESIS I
There will be no significant association between the post test attitude scores of
mothers regarding immunization and selected demographic variables
Attitude level Chi-

Demographic Frequency
In Moderately Square
Variable Numbers Adequate
adequate Adequate 2
Age of the mother
18-23 years 30 1 1 1
24-28 years - 14 1 11.9*
29-33 Years - 11 1
Occupation
Not Employed 30 1 2 2 13.03*
Employed - 23 3
Education
Illiterate 30 1 6 1
Primary education - 9 - 7.98#
Secondary education - 4 1
Under graduate - 3 2
Post graduate - 3 -
Religion
Hindu 30 1 13 3
Muslim - 7 1 0.99#
Christian - 4 1
Others - - -
50
Television 30 - 4 1
Radio - 6 2 5.85#
News paper - 4 0
Neighbor - 4 1
Health center 1 4 1
Health card - 2 -
* Significant at 0.05 level
# Non significant at 0.05 level
The table shown above chi-square is carried to find out the association
between the attitude on immunization of the mothers who have under five year
children and demographic variables
The result shows there is a significance association between age of the mother,
and occupation. But there was no association between religions, education, and source
of information.
51
CHAPTER V
DISCUSSION
CHAPTER-V
DISCUSSION
The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching

programme on level of knowledge attitude regarding Immunization among Mothers
of under five children in selected area at Dindugal. This chapter discusses the major
findings of the study and reviews that in relation to the findings from the result of
previous history.
The subjects were assessed by the demographic data and knowledge

questionnaire and attitude scale. The investigator has to identify the effectiveness of
immunization among mothers who have below 5 years children has taken effort to
improve the knowledge and attitude of the mothers. Immunization teaching was
given by means of flash cards on immunization. After post test was conducted to find
the effectiveness of teaching.
Objectives of the study
 To assess the Pretest level of knowledge and attitude regarding the

structured knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale.
 To assess the post test level knowledge and of attitude regarding
structured knowledge questionnaire attitude scale.
 To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching program on knowledge
and attitude regarding immunization among mothers of under five children
in term of gain in post test knowledge and attitude score.
 To find the co relation between the knowledge and attitude regarding
immunization among the mother of under five children.
 To find out the association between post test level of knowledge with their
 To find out the association between post test level of attitude with their
52
The first objective was to assess the pretest score on knowledge and attitude
regarding the immunization among mothers of under five children.
The analysis (Table II) shows that 14 (46.66%) mothers had moderate
knowledge, 16 (53.33%) mothers had inadequate knowledge and no mothers had
adequate knowledge about immunization. In attitude 5(16.66%) mothers had good
attitude, and 6(20%) mothers had average level of attitude about immunization,
19(63.33%) mothers had poor attitude.
This can be explained by due to the lack of awareness about the immunization
the mothers were having inadequate knowledge and attitude.
Zagminas K, et al., (2007). also said that, the lack of provider recommendation
and lack of parental awareness of immunization were the two most significant factors
associated with failure to receive vaccine.
 The second objective was to assess the post test level knowledge and of
attitude regarding immunization among mothers of under five children as
measured by structured knowledge questionnaire attitude scale.
The data (Table III) shows 4(13.33%) mothers had adequate knowledge,
25(83.33%) mothers had moderate knowledge and one 1(3.33%) mother had
inadequate knowledge about immunization. Regarding attitude 5(16.66%) mothers
had good attitude, and 24(80%) mothers had average level of attitude about
immunization, 1(3.33%) mothers had poor attitude.
Allred NJ, et al., (2011) conducted a study to find the parents vaccine safety
concerns results from the national immunization survey. The parental structural
teaching module was administered. The mothers were given questions regarding
knowledge and attitudes toward vaccine safety and side effects, simultaneous vaccine
administration, and acceptance of new vaccines. Multivariate logistic regression
analyses examined associations between attitudes and up-to-date vaccination
coverage. The study results showed that after giving teaching module 93% of parents
rated vaccines as safe, 6% as neither safe nor unsafe, and 1% as unsafe.
53
 The third objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured
teaching program on knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among
mothers of under five children in term of gain in post test knowledge and
attitude score.
The analysis (Table IV) shows that the pretest knowledge mean score
regarding immunization was 11.1 and standard deviation was 3.56. In the post test
knowledge mean score was 21.5 and standard deviation was 3.18. Regarding pretest
attitude mean score regarding immunization was 14.6 and standard deviation was 4.2.
In the post test attitude mean score was 17.4 and standard deviation was 3.25.
H1 The mean post test knowledge score is higher than the mean pre test knowledge
score regarding immunization among the mothers of under five children.
In order to find out the significant difference between the means of pretest and
post test knowledge scores of the samples paired ‘T’ test was computed. Paired t test
value is 7.65. The calculated value is higher than the table value, hence the null
hypothesis was rejected and the research hypothesis was accepted. Hence the
researcher concluded that gain in knowledge is not by chance but by the structured
teaching programme on immunization.
and post test attitude score of the mothers regarding immunization paired‘t’ test was
computed. . Paired t test value is 6.46. The calculated value is higher than the table
value, the null hypothesis was rejected and the research hypothesis was accepted.
Hence the researcher concluded that change of attitude e is not by chance but by STP
on immunization.
This may be due to before giving structured teaching programme they have
very little knowledge and poor attitude about immunization and they gained more
knowledge and change of attitude after given the structured teaching programme
Vila –corcoles et al (2012) conducted a quasi experimental study regarding

immunization, there are 60 samples were selected. The study setting was Bouzouki,
Niamey, Niger and surrounding areas. The findings revealed that 45(75%) mothers
54
had adequate knowledge and change of attitude after the structured teaching
programme, the study was effective in terms to improve the knowledge of mothers.
The fourth objective was to find the co relation between the knowledge and
attitude regarding immunization among the mothers of under five children.
The ‘r’ value of post test level of knowledge and attitude was -0.22, there was
a negative correlation between knowledge and attitude which was not significant.
The fifth objective was to find out the association between post test level of
knowledge with their selected demographic variables.
Regarding knowledge the result shows there is a significance association

between age of the mother, and occupation. But there was no association between
religions, education, and source of information.
According to the researcher point of view, the age of mother increases the
mother’s knowledge regarding immunization. This may be one of the factors to have
association between ages of the mother with the knowledge of immunization.
According to the researcher point of view, occupation of the mother increases

the mother’s knowledge regarding immunization. This may be one of the factors to
have association between occupations of the mother with the knowledge of
immunization.
The further analysis shows that there was no significant association between
the level of post test knowledge score on mothers regarding immunization and
demographic variables such as religions, education, and source of information.
The fifth objective was to find out the association between post test level of
attitude with their selected demographic variables
Regarding attitude the result shows there is a significance association between

age of the mother, and occupation. But there was no association between religions,
education, and source of information.
According to the researcher point of view, the age of mother increases the
mother’s attitude regarding immunization. This may be one of the factors to have
association between ages of the mother with the attitude of immunization.
55
According to the researcher point of view, occupation of the mother increases
the mother’s attitude regarding immunization. This may be one of the factors to have
association between occupations of the mother with the attitude of immunization.
The further analysis shows that there was no significant association between
the level of post test attitude score on mothers regarding immunization and
demographic variables such as religions, education, and source of information.
56
CHAPTER 6
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION,
IMPLICATIONS,
RECOMMENDATIONS AND
LIMITATIONS
CHAPTER VI
SUMMARY, IMPLICATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,
AND CONCLUSION
This chapter deals with the summary of the study and conclusions. It clarifies
the implications for nursing practice and recommendations for further research in the
field.
SUMMARY
A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching

programme on immunization among mothers of children in selected area of Dindugal.
The research design of the study is quasi experimental research design with one group
pretest and posttest. Total 30 mothers were taken who have under 5 children,
purposive sampling technique was used to select the mothers. The conceptual model
of the study was general system model.
A structured knowledge questionnaire was prepared by the investigator,

consisting two sections.
SECTION 1: Demographic data
SECTION2: Structured Knowledge questionnaires and attitude scale regarding

immunization.
The gathered data was tabulated, grouped and analyzed. Descriptive and
inferential statistics i.e., frequency, percentage, paired’ test, chi-square test were used
for analysis.
MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
 Regarding Age of the mother, maximum 15 (50%) mothers were between the
ages of 24-28.
 Regarding Religion, maximum 17 (56.66%) mothers were Hindu.
 Regarding education of the mother, maximum 9(30%) mothers were completed
primary education, 8(26.66%) mothers had no formal education.
57
 Regarding source of information, maximum 8(26.66%) mothers were got the
information through the radio.
 In pre test, the majority of the mothers 16(53.33%) had inadequate knowledge
 In post test, the majority mothers 25(83.33%) had moderate knowledge
 In pre test, the majority of the mothers 19(63.33%) had poor attitude regarding
immunization.
 In post test, the majority mothers 24(80%) had average attitude regarding
immunization
 While comparing the pre test (mean score 11.16) knowledge score regarding
immunization most of the mothers were scored more in the post test (mean
score 14.2).
 While comparing the pre test (mean score 14.6) attitude score regarding
immunization most of the mothers were scored more in the post test (mean
score 17.4).
 There is significant association between knowledge and age of the mother and
occupation of the mother. But there was no association between religion,
education and source of information with the post test knowledge score.
 There is significant association between attitude and age of the mother and
occupation of the mother. But there was no association between religion,
education and source of information with the post test attitude score.
IMPLICATIONS
Nursing is a dynamic process, which involves quality-based practice, scientific

knowledge and dissemination of research knowledge in to practice. Nursing
professional find that the health promotion is very relevant useful in a variety of
settings. So the present study adds major implications in to various areas of nursing to
help mothers who have below 5 yrs children about immunization.
NURSING PRACTICE
WHO says nursing has wide scope in primary health area. Health care can not
provided by one agency. It is up to the individual to take care. A timely enlighten
bring numerical changes in health behavior
58
 Nurse can use the planed health education program to teach the mothers who
have under 5 children to provide adequate knowledge on immunization.
 Nurse can educate the mothers who have under 5 children about important of
immunization.
 Nurse can use the charts to provide further reference for mothers on
immunization.
 Measures can be taken to prevent disease through mass media.
NURSING EDUCATION
 Nurse educators should encourage the nursing students to conduct

immunization awareness programme in the community/ as well as in the
hospital.
 Nurse educator should motivate the learners to identify the problems and
reason for non acceptance of vaccine and find out the solution for the problem.
 The importance of immunization should be included in the nursing curriculum
which is considered as the optional vaccine.
NURSING ADMINISTRATION
 Nurse administrator can disseminate the research knowledge into practice, so

that the under five children can be benefited.
 Nurse administrator can conduct seminar / workshop on pneumococcal
vaccination for the nurses to improve the knowledge regarding pneumococcal
vaccination among mothers of under five children.
 Nursing administrator motivate the community health nurse to prepare
pamphlets / other A.V aids to impart knowledge regarding pneumococcal
vaccination in rural area.
NURSING RESEARCH
 The study can be a baseline for future studies to build upon.

 Future researcher study could be done to identify the factors influencing
adherence / non adherence of immunization.
 Extensive research can be conducted regarding immunization by using self
instructional module.
59
RECOMMENDATIONS
 A comparative study can be done between urban mothers and rural mothers
who have under 5 children.
 A similar study can be conducted with large samples.
 Study can be done using different methods of teaching.
 Future studies can be conducted on knowledge and factors influence non-
compliance of optional vaccine among mothers.
CONCLUSION
The structured teaching programme through flash cards found to be very

effective in improving the knowledge and attitude among mothers who have below 5
yrs children on immunization. The knowledge and attitude regarding immunization
was improved by health teaching through flash cards. Being as a nurses, our main
responsibility is try to make our India, free from communicable disease by providing
immunization for all under five children.
60
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
BOOKS
1. Abraham M Rudolp; (2006)”Rudolph’s Pediatrics”; USA; (20thedition);

page no:- 590
2. Agarwal.K.N, (2005) “Pediatrics and neonatology’’ Modern publishers (2nd
edition), Newdelhi; page no; 52-55
3. Dr Amarender reddy .K. (2005) ‘’Viral immunity health action’’. Page no;
7-8
4. Dr. Anant phadke (2005) ‘’New initiatives in the immunization
programme’’, Health action. Page no; 18-20
5. Dr. Naga Bhushana Rao potharaja & Dr. Ani kumar potharaja, (2005)
‘’pediatric immunity’’, Health action; page no ; 7-8
6. Dr. Sangam.P (2005) ’’Immunity and vaccines’’ Health action, page no;
4-6
7. Dr. saibaba.A (2005) ‘’Immunity children’’ Health action, page no; 14-18
8. Dr. Jim beattie & prof. Robert carachi, (2005) ‘’Practical pediatric
problems’’(1st edition) London Hodder Arnold. Page no; 243-247
9. Denise F. polit & Bernadette P. hungler (1999) ‘’Nursing research
principles and methods’’ (6th edition) Philadelphia; Lippincott. Page no;
215-218
10. Dr. Tiruthankar data, (1998) ‘’principles of pediatrics’’, (1st edition)
Calcutta; new central book agency. page no; 143-146
11. Ghai.OP, Piyash Gupta & paul.V.K (2006) ‘’Essential pediatrics’’ (6th
edition) newdelhi. Dr. Ghai publication. Page no; 214-215
12. Gurumani. N, (2005) ‘’an introduction to biostatistics’’ (2nd edition)
Chennai MJP publishers. Page no; 153-157
13. Hockenberry, Wilson, Winkelstein, Kline ;( 2005) ”Wong’s Nursing Care
Of Infants and Children” (7th edition); Elsevier publications; Page no: 529
14. Lewis ;( 2000)”Medical Surgical Nursing” (6th Edition) Mosby
Publications; page no: 598
15. Lippincott William; (1999)”Manual Of Nursing Practice’ Lippincott
William And Wilkin’s publications (8th edition); page no:-1351
61
16. Mrs.Prema (2006) ‘’ A study to assess the utilization of raichur district’’
Nightingale nursing times, A window for health action, page no; 12-16
17. Niranjan Shendurnikar & Mukesh Agerwal (2005) ‘’Immunization for
children’’ (2nd edition) Hydrabed paras medical publishers. Page no; 35-36
18. Sangamesh Nidaguni (2007) ‘’Universal immunization programe’’ Nurses
of India; page no; 3-6
19. Srivastava.R.N (2007) ‘’Make routine immunization’’ compulsory Indian
pediatrics. Page no; 10-13
20. Suraj Gupta (2001) ‘The short text book of pediatrics’’ (9th edition)
Newdelhi, Jaypee brothers. pageno; 24-27
21. Tarun Gera, et al., (2005) ‘’ Principles of practices of immunization’’ (1st
Edition) Newdelhi, perper publishers and distributors (p) ltd. Page no; 53-
58
22. Thompson et al: “Mosby’s Clinical Nursing”; (4thEdition) Mosby
Publications; page no: 1081
23. Utpalkant singh, et al., (2002) ‘’ Infections diseases and immunization;;
(1st edition) Newdelhi, Jaypee brother’s medical puplishers (p) ltd. Page no;
416-419
JOURNALS
1. Andree Hest et al;”(2000)”Efficacy of 7-valent Pneumococcal Vaccine

among Children Of Age Group 3-36 months’’U.S.A page no;7-8.
2. Bala Subramanian.K & Satvasekhar.P(2005) ‘’Child immunization
Coverage in Andhra Pradesh, health action; page no; 12-13
3. Coles CL et al ;( 2011)”Pneumococcal Nasopharngeal colonization in
Young South Indian infants”;Paediatrics Infectious Journal 2011; Page no:
289-295
4. Cherian Thomas WHO 2010;”Initiative of vaccine Research;
Immunization; vaccines and Biologicals”;; Avenue Appia; Switerzerland
page no; 8-10
5. Ercan TE et al., (2011);”To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Pneumococcal
Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Turkish Children’’ Turkey page no;6-7
62
6. Felicity T Cutts et al (2005);”Efficacy of Nine-valent PCV against
Pneumonia and Invasive Pneumococcal Diseases in Gambia”; Gambia
7. Frenck R Jr (2011); “Immunogenecity and Safety of 13-valent
Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine among Under five Children”; U.S.A
Page no-12-13
8. Global Health Observatory WHO (2011); “Causes Of Child Mortality For
The Year’’; Page no; 4-5
9. Hope L Johnson et al (2010):”Systematic Evaluation of Serotypes Causing
Invasive Pneumococcal Diseases among children underfive: The
Pneumococcal Global Serotype Project”; PLoS Medicine;
10. India UNICEF;”Progress for children report Dec 2007”;A statistical
Review; volume 6 page no; 6-7
11. Louis Neissen, Anne ten Hove, Hink Hilderink’ Kim Mulholland, Majid
zzati; Louis; Bulletin of the WHO (2009) “Comparative impact assessment
of child pneumonia Interventions;”; 87:472-480
12. Maria Pavia et al (2006);”Pediatrics: Efficacy of vaccination in children
Younger than 24 months”; Volume 123; page no: e1103-e111
13. Merk and Co.;” WHO (2008) ; CDC Advisory Pannel votes to update
Pneumococcal Vaccination recommendations”; Fierce Biotech; USA; Page
no; 23-24
14. Mimita Magendra Mimita Magendra (1999);”Awareness And perception of
Vaccination among parents”; 42nd National Immunization Conference”;
Malaysia
15. MY Sinchew(2011);”Call For Parents to Vaccinate Babies Against
Pneumococcal Meningitis-Malaysia;”Confederation of Meningitis
Organization INC; Malaysia;
16. Nathron Chaiyakunapurk et al., BMC medicine ( 2011);”Cost effectiveness
of Pediatric Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines: A Comparative assessment
of decision Making Tools volume 9; page no; 11-13
17. Orin S Levine, Thomas Cherian Indian Pediatrics (2007);”Pneumococcal
vaccination for India Children”; page no:-491-496
18. Reinert R et al (2010);”A Study to Assess the Pneumococcal Diseases
Caused by Serotype 19A in France”; page no;7-8
63
19. Szynczewska E,Chlebna-Sokol D;”Immunogenicity and Safety of
Heptavalent Conjugate Vaccine against Streptococcal Pneumoniae in
Polish Pre-term Infants”; NCBI; Polland; page no:-7107-7113
20. S.H Yeh (2010);”A Study to Assesss the Immunogenecity and Safety Of
PCV13 With PCV 7 in Infants and Toddlers”; American Academy Of
Pediatrics”; Philadelphia page no; 32-33
21. Ruckinger,M Van der Linder,A Siedler,R Von Kries (2011);”Potential
Benefit From currently available three pneumococcal Vaccines for
Children- Population- Based”;Thieme ejournals 2011; page no;61-64
22. WHO:’Pneumonia”; (October 2011); Geneva;fact sheet.
23. WHO (2009); ‘’ acute respiratory infections update september’’ initiative
for Vaccine research; geneva
WEBSITES
1. www. Cinhal.com
2. www. Pubmed.com
3. www.wikipedia.com
64
APPENDIX
APPENDIX-I
LETTER SEEKING EXPERT OPINION AND CONTENT
VALIDITY
FROM
Mr.AJEESH.R
MSC (N) II YEAR
Jainee College of nursing
Dindugal district
TO
Respected Madam\ sir

Sub: Requisition for expert opinion and content validity
I am Msc nursing II year. Student of Jainee College of Nursing, Dindugal, under
Dr.MGR Medical University, as a partial fulfillment of my MSC NURSING degree
program, I have chosen research problem on “ A study to assess the effectiveness of
structural teaching programme on level of knowledge and attitude regarding
immunization among the mothers of under five children in selected area at Dindugal”.
I am sending the tool for content validity and for your valuable expert opinion. Here
with I have enclosed the necessary documents.
Enclosure.
 Statement of problem,
 Objectives &Hypothesis of study
 Tools for data collection
 Brief note on the research methodology
 Certificate of content validity
Yours faithfully
Ajeesh.R
APPENDIX-II
CERTIFICATE OF CONTENT VALIDITY
This is certify that the tool prepared by Mr.Ajeesh for the conduction of the
research study 0n “A Study to assess the effectiveness of structural teaching
programme on level of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among
the mothers of underfive children in selected area at Dindugal” is valid. He can
proceed for data collection.
Signature of Validator
Name of the Validator
Designation
Date
CERTIFICATE OF CONTENT VALIDITY
This is certify that the tool prepared by Mr.Ajeesh for the conduction of the
research study 0n “A Study to assess the effectiveness of structural teaching
programme on level of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among
the mothers of underfive children in selected area at Dindugal” is valid. He can
proceed for data collection.
Signature of Validator
Name of the Validator
Designation
Date
APPENDIX-III
CERTIFICATE OF TAMIL EDITING
To whom so ever at may concern
This is certify that the dissertation “As study to assess the effectiveness of
immunization among the mothers of underfive children in selected rural area at
Dindigul” by Mr.Ajeesh M.Sc., (N) II Year Student of jainee College of Nursing was
edited for Tamil Language appropriateness by Miss.Kaniammal M.A., B.Ed.,
Signature
APPENDIX-IV
CERTIFICATE OF ENGLISH EDITING
To Whom so Ever at may Concern
This is to Certify that the dissertation “As study to assess the effectiveness of
immunization among the mothers of underfive children in selected rural area at
Dindigul” by Mr.Ajeesh M.Sc., (N) II Year Student of Jainee College of Nursing was
edited for English Language appropriateness by Mr.Sebastin M.A., M.Ed., Teacher
English working in Samanatham high School Madurai.
Signature
APPENDIX-V
LIST OF EXPERTS OPINION FOR CONTENT VALIDITY
1. Dr.Navamani Prabhakaran, M.D. DCH

Consultant Paediatrician,
Navamani Nursing Home,
Madurai.
2. Prof.Mrs.Malarvizhi M.Sc. (N),

Vice Principal,
Department of Child Health Nursing,
Shrinidhi College of Health Sciences and Research,
Sivagangai.
3. Mr.Abdus Sukkoor M.Sc. (N),(Ph.D)

Assistant Professor,
Shrinidhi College of Health Sciences and Research,
Sivagangai.
4. Mr.Mani Msc.,M. Phil

Statistician
5. Prof.Mrs.Jeyasundari M.Sc. (N), Ph.D.,

Dindugal.
APPENDIX-VI
PART –A
1. AGE
a) 18-23 years
b) 24-28 years
c) 29-33 years
2. Religion of the mother

a) Hindu
b) Christian
c) Muslim
d) Others
3. Occupation of the mother

a) Not employed
b) Employed
4. Education of the mother

a) Illiterate
b) Primary education
c) Secondary education
d) Under Graduate
e) Post graduate
5. Source of information about obligatory vaccination

a) Television
b) Radio
c) Newspapers
d) Neighbors
e) Health center
f) Health card.
PART - B
1. Immunization is
a) Introducing immunity to our body to produce specific protection against some of
the dangerous disease.
b) It stimulates the production of protective antibody
c) Any other
d) Do not know
2. Which of the following are effective are effective preventive interventions in

children underfive?
a) antibiotics of pneumonia
b) Immunization
c) promote treatment of malaria
d) exclusive breast feeding
3.Why is it important to take Immunization during childhood period?

a) For the protection of the child from tetanus
b) For the protection of the child from diphtheria
c) For the protection of the child from tuberculosis
d) For the protection of some communicable and non communicable diseases.
4.BCG vaccine should be given

a) At birth
b) 1-3 days
c) 3-28 days
d) After 23 days
5.What disease can be prevented by BCG?

a) Tuberculosis
b) Polio
c) Tetanus
d) Any other
6.Do you know the reaction which develops after BCG vaccination?
a) Fever
b) Scar formation
c) Abscess
d) Sbwelling
7.What will you do where there is reaction after BCG reaction?

a) Consult the doctor
b) Sel f medicines
c) Take the prescribed tablets
d) Others
8.Oral polio vaccine is given towards

a) Measles
b) Polio myelitis
c) Tuberculosis
d) Any other
9.How many doses of DPT should be given a one year child?

a) Less than 3 doses
b) 3 doses
c) More than 3 doses
d) Do not know
10.Interval between first three dose of DPT vaccination

a) 15 days
b) 30 days
c) 70 days
d) Any other
11. Do you know the reaction the child develops after DPT vaccination?
a) Fever
b) Allergic reaction
c) Paralysis
d) None
12.What will you when there is reaction after DPT reaction?
a) Consult the doctor/ Nurse/ health worker
b) Take the prescribed tablets
c) Self medicines
d) Native medicines
13.Diphtheria is caused by
a) Micro organism
b) Hereditary
c) Sin
d) Any other
14.Diphtheria can occur at the age of

a) 1-5 years
b) 5-10 years
c) 5 months
d) None
15.Why should you give measles vaccination only at the age of 9 months
a) Child cannot tolerate the measles vaccine
b) Child has natural antibodies acquired through the mother till ,8th month of period
c) Any other
d) Do not know
16. Why it is important to take tetanus toxoid injection during pregnancy

a) For the protection of the mother from tetanus
b) For the protection of the baby from tetanus
c) To prevent communicable diseases
d) Don’t know
17. How often should you take tetanus toxoid injection during pregnancy?
a) Only once
b) Twice
c) Three times
d) Any other
18. Cause of neonatal tetanus is?
a) Umbilical cord is cut down with unclean instruments
b) Umbilical stump is deceased with soil /cow dung
c) Any other
d) Less blood supply to the umbilical vessels
19.. Tetanus organism is spread through

a) Puncture wound
b) Surgery
c) Injection
d) Any other
20. Measles is caused by

a) Virus
b) God’s play
c) Heat
d) Any other
21. Zero dose of polio vaccine is given?

a) At birth
b) 3 days after birth
c) Up to 28 days after birth
d) 3 months
22.How many doses of OPV should be given up to one year child?

a) 3 doses
b) 4 doses
c) 5doses
d) Above 5doses
23. Which month OPV should be given?

a) At birth –zero dose OPV
b) 2 month-1st dose
c) 3 month-2nd dose
d) 4month-3rd dose
24.. Pulse polio vaccine is given towards?
a) Polio myelitis
b) Tuberculosis
c) Tetanus
d) Measles
25. The infant can be immunized simultaneously against disease like

a) Diphtheria
b) Pertusis
c) Tetanus
d) Tuberculosis
26. Diptheria affects the

a) Throat
b) Face
c) Conjunctiva
d) Skin
27. Whooping cough is a

a) Infections disease
b) Congenital disease
c) Hereditary disease
d) Do not know
28. Whooping cough affects the children

a) Below 5years
b) Above 5years
c) 7 years
d) Any other
29. Whooping cough is spread mainly by

a) Cough
b) Sneezes and talks
c) Direct contact
d) None
30. Tetanus organisms found in the intestine of the;
a) Cattle
b) Horses
c) Goat
d) All the above
PART- C
ATTITUDE SCALE REGARDING IMMUNIZATION
S.NO QUESTIONS DISAGREE UNCERTAIN AGREE

1. Vaccination is important
2. Vaccines have severe side effects
3. Vaccination is safe
4. Infants infected with the disease
which immunized against
5. Vaccination maintain child health
6. Vaccination side effects cause death
7. Vaccination is best for each infant
8. Vaccination is important for boys
than girls
9. Recommended others to vaccine
their children
10. Vaccination is harmful
11. Vaccination must give according to
schedule
12. Vaccination save the community
13. Effective in prevention of infectious
disease
14. Vaccines prevent mortality rate
15. Tetanus vaccine is important for
infant and mothers health
PART- D
ANSWER KEYS
1. A
2. B
3. D
4. A
5. A
6. B
7. A
8. B
9. B
10. B
11. A
12. A
13. A
14. A
15. B
16. B
17. B
18. A
19. A
20. A
21. A
22. B
23. A
24. A
25. C
26. A
27. A
28. A
29. B
30. D
APPENDIX-VII
Neha; jLg;G Kiw

Neha;jLg;G Kiw:
Neha; jLg;G Kiw vd;gJ xU Foe;ijapd; Neha; vjph;g;G
rf;jpia Jhz;Ltjw;Fk;> njhw;W Neha; kw;Wk; gpw Neha;fs; tuhky;
jLg;gjw;FhpaJ KiwNa Neha; jLg;GKiw vdg;gLk;.
Neha;jLg;G Kiwapd; Nehf;fk;:

 jtwhky; Neha;jLg;GKiw kUe;J nfhLg;gjd; %yk;
Foe;ijfSf;F %yk; Foe;ijfSf;F Vw;gLk; njhw;F
NehapypUe;J ghJfhf;fpwJ.
 Neha; jLg;GKiw xU kpf rpwe;j cly; MNuhf;fpaj;jpw;fhd
nfhLf;fg;gLk; Kiw.
 Neha;jLg;G Kiwia gpd;gw;Wtjd; %yk; gpwg;gpy; ,Ue;J
Vw;glf;$ba Neha;fs; kw;Wk; cly; Cdk; tuhky; jLf;f
cjTfpwJ.
 njhw;W Neha; tuhky; jLf;fpwJ
 Neha;fspypUe;J ghJfhf;f
 Neha; tuhky; jLf;f
 Foe;ij gUtk; Kjy; ve;jtpj Neha; tuhky; jLf;fpwJ
Neub jLg;ghw;wy;:
Neub jLg;ghw;wy; vd;gJ ek; clk;gpDs; cs;s Neha;
jLg;ghw;wy;
rf;jpiaj; Jhz;b Neha; njhw;wpy; ,Ue;J ghJfhf;fg;gLfpwJ.
,ay;ghd jLg;ghw;wy;:
,it kdpjd;> Neha; njhw;Wf;F cs;shFk;NghJ kdpj
clypypUe;J jw;fhypfkhf cw;gj;jpahff; $ba cly;Neha;
vjph;g;G MFk;. ,J jahh; epiyapy; cs;s cly;Neha; vjph;g;G
Mw;wy; Kfth; MFk;.
gprp[p thrpNd\d;: Ngrpy;y]; fhy;nkl;;b Faphpd;
gprp[p thf;rpd; vd;gJ thof;$ba jLg;G+rp. ,e;j tifahd
jLg;G+rp
fhrNeha; ghf;Bhpahtpy; ,Ue;J cUthf;fg;gLfpwJ.
,e;j tifahd thf;rpd; /jLg;G+rpia Foe;ij gpwe;jTld;
Njhy;Crpahf NghlNtz;Lk;.
,t;tifahd jLg;G+rpia $Ljy; fLg;G+rp Cl;lk;
NghlNtz;ba mtrpak; ,y;iy.
NkYk; ,t;tifahd jLg;G+rpahdJ ,uj;jg; Gw;WNeha; kw;Wk;
njhONeha; tuhky; jLf;fg;gLfpwJ.
,e;j tifahd jLg;ghw;wy; capuZ Neha;vjph;g;G Mw;wiy
cw;gj;jp nra;fpwJ.
Kj;jLg;G Crp : bgpb

njhz;il milg;ghd;> ff;Fthd;> nll;ld]; ,e;j tifahd
Neha;njhw;W Foe;ijfis kl;LNk mjpfk; ghjpf;ff;$ba Neha;
MFk;.
,it ngUk;ghYk; Jk;ky; kw;Wk; ,Uky; %ykhf
kw;wth;fSf;F guTfpwJ.
Kjy; Kj;jLg;G Crp Foe;ijg; gpwe;j 6tJ thuk;
nfhLf;fg;glNtz;Lk;.
Nll;ld]; jLg;G+rpia gs;spf;fhy gUtj;jpy; nfhLf;fg;gl
Ntz;Lk;.
,e;j tifahd jLg;G+rp jir Crpahf nfhLf;f
/Nghlg;gLfpwJ.
tha;top NghypNah jLg;G+rp (gptp) :

,e;j tifahd jLg;G+rp ,sk;gps;isthjk; tuhky;
jLg;gjw;fhf nfhLf;fg;gLfpwJ.
,t;tifahd jLg;G+rpia Kj;jLg;G+rp cld; nfhLf;fg;gl
Ntz;Lk;.
jl;lk;ik jLg;G+rp:
jl;lk;ik jLg;G+rp jl;lk;ik tuhky; jLg;gjw;fhf
nfhLf;fg;gLfpwJ.
,e;j jLg;G+rp Foe;ij gpwe;j 9tJ khjj;jpy;nfhLf;fg;gLfpwJ.
$Ljy; jLg;G+rp Cl;lk;/JizCrp nrYj;j mtrpak; ,y;iy.
Flw;fha;r;ry; jLg;G+rp (ilgha;L Ntf;rpd;)

Flw;fha;r;ry; jLg;G+rp nghJthf Foe;ij gpwe;j
xUtUlj;jpw;Fg; gpwF nfhLf;fg;gLfpwJ.
m) Nkhdh thyd;l vjph; Flw;fha;r;ry; jLg;G+rp
M) gpNtyd;l; vjph; Flw;fha;r;ry; jLg;G+rp
,) Nlg; thrpd; (jLg;G+rp) (ilg;gp md;L ghuh ilg;gp md;L
ghuhilg;gp ‘gp’
Neha;jLg;G+rp nfhLf;fg;gl;l gpd;G Neha;jLg;ghw;wy; mgptpUj;jp

nghJthf gj;J ehl;fs; Kjy; 21 ehl;fs; tiu nray;GhpfpwJ.
kw;Wk; %d;W tUl fhyj;jjpw;F ,e;j Neha; jhf;fhky;
ghJfhf;fg;gLfpwJ. mjd;gpd;G xt;nthU %d;W tUl ,ilntspapy;
,t;tifahd jLg;G+rpia NghlNtz;Lk;.
,e;j tif jLg;G+rpia 2-10bfphp ntg;gepiyapy; gjgLj;j
Ntz;Lk;.
1) Neha; jLg;G vd;gJ:
(m) Mgj;jhd Neha;f;F vjpuhf Fwpg;gpl;l Neha; vjph; nghUis
cUthf;f Njitahdtw;iw ek; clypDs; nrYj;JtJ
(M) Neha; jLg;G nghUis cUthf;f Jhz;LtJ.
(,) kw;w fhuzq;fSf;F – (fha;r;ry; [yNjh\k; tapw;Wg;Nghf;F)
2) fPo;fhz;gtw;Ws; 5 tajpw;F cl;gl;l Foe;ijfSf;F ve;nje;j

jLg;GKiw kw;Wk; nray;jpl;lq;fs; toq;fg;gLk;
(m) rspf;f;ha;r;r;ypd; Neha; fpUkp jLg;ghd;
(M) jLg;G+rp Kiw.
(,) nghJthd kNyhpah rpfpr;ir Kiw
(<) KOikahd jha;g;ghy;.
3) Foe;ij gUtj;jpy; Neha;j;jLg;G Vd; nfhLf;f Ntz;Lk;

(m) uz[d;dpapy; ,Ue;J Foe;ij ghJfhf;f
(M) njhz;il milg;ghdpy; ,Ue;J Foe;ijia ghJfhf;f
(,) fhrNehapy; ,Ue;J
(<) ,sk;gps;is thjk; Nehapy; ,Ue;J Foe;ijia ghJfhf;f
(c)NtW ufk; (jl;lk;ik> tapw;Wg;Nghf;F> fha;r;ry;)
4) gp.rp.[p Neha; jLg;G nfhLf;f Ntz;ba ghtk;

(m) gpwe;j cly; (M) 1-ypUe;J 3 ehl;fSf;Fs;
(,) 3-ypUe;J 28 ehl;fSf;Fs; (<) 28 ehl;fSf;F gpwF
(c) njhpahJ
5) gp.rp.[p thf;fpdhy; ve;j Nehia jLf;f KbAk;

(m) fhrNeha; (M) ,sk;gps;is thjk;
(,) ud[d;dp (<) kw;w Neha; (c) njhpahJ
6) gp.rp.[p Neha; jLg;Gf;Fg; gpd; Foe;ijfSf;F xt;thik

Vw;gLtJ njhpAkh?
(m) fha;r;ry; (M) Crp nrYj;jpa ,lj;jpy; tPf;fk;
(,) rPo; fl;b (<) kw;wit
7) gp.rp.[p Neha; jLg;Gf;Fg; gpd; xt;thik Vw;gl;lhy; vd;d
nra;tPh;fs;
(m) kUj;Jtiu MNyhrpg;Ngd; (M) nrhe;j rpfpr;ir mspg;Ngd;
(,) ghpe;Jiuf;fg;gl;l khj;jpiu nfhLg;Ngd; (<) kw;wit
8) NghypNah nrhl;L kUe;J vjw;fhf nfhLf;fgLfpwJ?

(m) jl;lik (M) ,sk;gps;is thjk; (,) fhrNeha;
(<) NtW fhuzq;fSf;F (c) njhpahJ
9) Foe;ijg;gUtj;jpy; xU taJf;Fs;shf vj;jid Nlh]; Kj;jLg;G

Crp Nghl Ntz;Lk;?
(m) 3 Nlh];f;F fPo; (M) 3 Nlh];
(,) 3 Nlh];f;F Nky; (<) njhpahJ
10) Kj;jLg;G Crp Kjy; %d;W Nlh];fSf;F ,ilapyhd fhyk;

(m) 15 ehl;fs; (M) 30 ehl;fs;
(,) 70 ehl;fs; (<) NgWfhy ,ilntsp
11) Kj;jLg;G Cf;Ftpg;ghd; Foe;ijf;F Vw;gLk; vjph;tpid

njhpAkh?
(m) fha;r;ry; (M) xt;thik vjph;tpd;
(,) kw;wit (<) njhpahj
12) Kj;jLg;G Cf;Ftpg;ghd; vjph;tpid Vw;gl;lhy; ePq;fs; vd;d

nra;tPh;fs;
(m) kUj;Jth;> nrtpypah;> eyg;gzpahsh; ,th;fis MNyhrpg;Ngd;
(M) ghpe;Jiuf;fg;gl;l khj;jpiufis nfhLg;Ngd;
(,) ifg;gf;Ftk; nra;Ntd; (<) ehl;L kUe;J nfhLg;Ngd;
13) njhz;il milg;ghd; Vw;glf;fhuzk;?

(m) Ez;Zaph; njhw;W (M) ghuk;ghpa Neha;
(,) kw;w fhuzk;
14) njhz;il milg;ghd; Foe;ijfis ghjpf;Fk; gUtk;
(m) 1ypUe;J 5taJ (M) 5ypUe;J 10 taJ tiu
(,) 5 khjk; (<) njhpahJ
15) jl;lk;ik jLg;G+rp Vd; 9 khjk; fspe;j gpwF

nfhLf;fg;gLfpd;wd?
(m) xd;gJ khjj;jpw;Fs; cl;gl;l gUtj;jpy; Foe;ijahy;
jl;lk;ik Neha; jLg;ig jhq;f KbahJ.
(M) 8 khj fhyk; tiu jha;gg ; hy; %yk; ,aw;ifahd Neha; vjph;
nghUs; Foe;ijf;F fpilf;fpwJ.
16) jha;ik mile;jth;fs; ud [d;dp jLg;G+rp Nghl;Lf; nfhs;tJ

Vd;?
(m) jha;f;F ud[d;dp tuhky; jLf;f
(M) gpwf;Fk; Foe;ijf;F ud [d;dp tuhky; ghJfhf;f
(,) kw;w njhw;W NehapypUe;J ghJfhf;f
(<) njhpahJ
17) jha;ik mile;jth;fs; fhyj;jpy; vj;jid Kiw ud[d;dp

jLg;G+rp Nghl;Lf; nfhs;s Ntz;Lk;
(m) xU Kiw (M) ,uz;L Kiw
(,) %d;W Kiw (<) gyKiw
18) rpRTf;F ud[d;dp Vw;glf; fhuzk;

(m) Rj;jkpy;yhj fUtpfshy; njhg;Gs; nfhb ntl;lg;gLtjhy;
(M) ntl;lg;gl;l njhg;Gs; nfhb rhzk; kw;Wk; kz;zhy;
fl;lg;gLthy; (,) NtWfhuzq;fshy; (<) njhpahJ
19) ud[d;dp guTk; tpjk;

(m) Jisf;fg;gl;l fhak; (M) mWRit rpfpr;ir
(,) Crp Nghl;L nfhs;tJ (<) kw;wf; fhuzq;fs;
(c) njhpahJ
20) jl;lk;ik Vw;glf; fhuzk;
(m) itu]; fpUkpfs; (M) flTspd; tpisahl;L
(,) R+l;bdhy; (<) kw;wf;fhuzq;fs; (c) njhpahJ
21) 0 Nlh]; NghypNah thf;rpd; nfhLf;fg;gLk; gUtk;

(m) gpwe;jTld; (M) gpwe;j 3 ehl;fs; (,) gpwe;j 28 ehl;fs; gpd;
(c) njhpahJ
22) Foe;ijapd; xU taJf;Fs; vj;jid Kiw xgptp nrhl;L

kUe;J nfhLf;f Ntz;Lk;?
(m) %d;W Kiw (M) ehd;F Kiw
(,) Ie;J Kiw (<) Ie;J Kiwf;F Nkw;gl;l
23) NfhypNah thf;rpd; ve;j khjk; nfhLf;fg;gLfpwJ?

(m) gpwe;jTld; 0 Nlh]; NghypNah thrpd;
(M) 2tJ khjk; = Kjy; Nlh];
(,) 3tJ khjk; = ,uz;lhtJ Nlh];
(<) 4tJ khjk; = 3tJ Nlh];
(c) kw;w tpilfs;
24) gy;]; NghypNah nfhLg;gjd; Nehf;fk;

(m) ,sk;gps;is thjk; Neha; jLf;f
(M) fhrNeha; jLf;f
(,) ud[d;dp Neha; jLf;f
(<) jl;lk;ik Neha; jLf;f
(c)njhpahJ
25) xNu Neuj;jpy; Foe;ijf;F ve;j Neha;f;nfy;yhk; Neha; jLg;G

nra;ayhk;?
(m) njhz;il milg;ghd; (M) ff;Fthd; (,) ud[d;dp
(<) fhrNeha; (c),sk;gps;is thjk; (C)njhpahJ
26) njhz;il milg;ghd; jhf;Fk; gFjp
(m) njhz;il (M) Kfk;
(,) ntz;tpop glyk; (<) fhrNeha;
27) ff;Fthd; ,Uky; vd;gJ

(m) xU njhw;W Neha; (M) gpwtp Neha;
(,) guk;giu Neha; (<) njhpahJ
28) ff;Fthd; ,Uky; ve;j taJ Foe;ijia ghjpf;fpwJ?

(m) Ie;J taJf;F Fiwthd (M) Ie;J taJf;F Nkw;gl;l
(,) VO taJ (<) NtW VjhtJ
29) Kf;fpakhf ff;Fthd; Neha; guTk; tpjk;

(m) ,Uky; (M) Jk;ky; kw;Wk; NgRjy;
(,) Neubj; njhlh;G (<) kw;wit
30) ud[d;dpiaNjhw;Wtpf;Fk; fpUkp ve;j tpyq;fpd; Flypy;

fhzg;gLfpwJ?
(m) fhy;eil (M) Fjpiu
(,) ML (<) Nky; fhz;git midj;Jk;
ATTITUDE SCALE REGARDING IMMUNIZATION
S.NO QUESTIONS DISAGREE UNCERTAIN AGREE
1. Vaccination is important
2. Vaccines have severe side effects
3. Vaccination is safe
4. Infants infected with the disease
which immunized against
5. Vaccination maintain child health
6. Vaccination side effects cause death
7. Vaccination is best for each infant
8. Vaccination is important for boys
than girls
9. Recommended others to vaccine
their children
10. Vaccination is harmful
11. Vaccination must give according to
schedule
12. Vaccination save the community
13. Effective in prevention of infectious
disease
14. Vaccines prevent mortality rate
15. Tetanus vaccine is important for
infant and mothers health

Vw;f
ATTITUDE kdg;ghd;ik Vw;fpNwd; epr;rakw;w
kWf;fpNwd;
1 jLg;G+rp kpf Kf;fpakhdJ
2 jLg;G+rp gf;ftpisTfis
nfhz;lJ
3 jLg;G+rp ghJfhg;ghdJ
4 jLg;G+rp Nghl;lgpd;G
Foe;ijfs; Nehahy;
ghjpf;fg;gLfpd;wdh;
5 jLg;G+rp Foe;ijfspd;
cly;eyj;ij guhkhpf;fpwJ
6 jLg;G+rpapd; gf;ftpisTfs;
,wg;gpw;F fhuzkhFk;
7 jLg;G+rp xt;nthU gr;rpsk;
Foe;ijfSf;Fk; cfe;jJ
8 jLg;G+rp NghLtij mLj;jth;
(kw;wth;) Foe;ijfSf;F
ghpe;Jiu nra;jy;
9 jLg;G+rp
ngz;Foe;ijfistpl
Mz;Foe;ijfSf;F kpfTk;
Kf;fpakhdJ
10 jLg;G+rp Mgj;jhdJ
11 jLg;G+rpia ml;ltiz
Kiwg;gb toq;f Ntz;Lk;
12 jLg;G+rp NghLtJ r%fj;ij
ghJfhf;fpwJ
13 guTk; Neha;fis jLf;Fk;
typik jLg;G+rpf;F
,Uf;fpwJ
14 ,wg;G tpfpjj;ijj; jLg;G+rp
jLf;fpwJ
15 Foe;ij kw;Wk; jha;khh;fspd;
cly;eyj;jpw;F ff;Fthd;
,Uky; jLg;G+rp kpfTk;
Kf;fpakhdJ
PHOTOGRAPHY

A Jeesh

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Jeesh

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Jeesh

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRUCTURED

TEACHING PROGRAMME ON LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE AND

Reg. No. 301518201

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU

Reg. No. 301518201

EXTERNAL EXAMINER INTERNAL EXAMINER

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU DR.MGR

This bonafide work of 301518201, M.Sc Nursing II Year Student

Prof. Mrs.K.Thilagavathi, M.Sc., (N) Ph.D.,

APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ON ____________________

Research Advisor : _______________________________________

Research Guide : ________________________________________

Medical Expert : ________________________________________

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU

Gratitude can never be expressed in words but it is only a deep

I express my sincere and heartfelt gratitude to God, the Almighty for

I wish to express my sincere thanks to Mr.SUKUMAR Director Jainee

I express my sincere thanks to Prof.(Mrs.)THILAGAVATHI, M.Sc (N).,

It’s Pleasure to express my sincere thanks and deep appreciation to my

I wish to acknowledge my sincere thanks to all FACULTY

I must record my grateful thanks to Dr.NAVAMANI

I profoundly owe my sincere thanks to Mr.MANI M.Sc., M.Phil.,

My Special thanks to Mr.PRESIDENT., Vakkampatti for granting

I am grateful to all the experts who given me a valuable suggestions

I extend my sincere thanks to all Village people who enthusiastically

CHAPTER CONTENT PAGE

TABLE TITLE PAGE

1 Frequency and percentage distribution of samples on

FIGURE TITLE PAGE

“What a child doesn’t receive, he can seldom later”

Vaccination is probably one of the most cost effective interventions to reduce

Immunization is defined as the process of inducing the immunity in an

Vaccine is an immunological substance designed to confer specific protection

Today vaccination is very essential part of children health .Vaccination

Immunization is vital; it protects nearly 3/4th of children against major

At birth, infants have protection against certain diseases because antibodies

Childhood immunization require collaboration with parents, who may be

NEED FOR THE STUDY

The physical health of a child is important because it is associated with the

In India 22,616 cases of pertussis were reported in 2006. In developing

Singh (2012) conducted a study to determine the relationship between the

• Around 42.0% of the children received BCG.

• There was a considerable drop in the percentage of children who received

A study was conducted to investigate the knowledge of nursing mothers about

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

A study to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on level

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

 To assess the Pretest level of knowledge and attitude regarding the

2. Effectiveness: - In this study effectiveness means “Improving the knowledge

3. Structured teaching programme:- In the present study it refers to systematically

4. Knowledge: - It refers to correct response of the mothers of under five to

5. Immunization: - It refers to the process of protecting under five children against

6. Attitude- It refers to the thoughts of under five mothers regarding immunization.

 Who are willing to participate in the study.

The study aims at determining the effectiveness of structured teaching

The conceptual framework is a group of related ideas, statements or concepts.

General system theory is useful in breaking the process in to sequential tasks

Assess the level of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among

Here input indicates the structured teaching programme regarding