Reaction or Reflection Paper No. 9
Reaction or Reflection Paper No. 9
Reaction or Reflection Paper No. 9
Introduction
globalization commonly found in academic literature, with the two others being
Now, however, we are at risk of having a backlash against globalization and all
the opportunities that increasing economic freedom has provided us with over
the past decades. There is a new anxiety running through Western societies that
challenges previous perceptions about freer trade as a win-win for every country.
There is rather a proliferating suspicion that globalization may have been great
for some countries, but not for others, and that it is affluent countries in the West
investigate and account for not only economic activities and their impact but also
the institutions and the rules (or “the system”) that govern and should govern
science and technology. The rate of globalization has also increased under the
framework of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the World Trade
Organization, in which countries gradually cut down trade barriers and opened
up their current accounts and capital accounts. This recent boom has been
through foreign direct investment, lowering costs of doing business, the reduction
globalization were disrupted by World War I. Most of the global economic powers
Globalization did not fully resume until the 1970s, when governments began to
led to the rapid expansion of global trade. Three suggested factors accelerated
1956 invention of containerized shipping, along with increases in ship sizes, were
a major part of the reduction in shipping costs. Globalization has made it easier
for new companies to start competing with old incumbents. The trade sector has
increased the number of people that it employs, both through exports and
economies, giving consumers more “bang for the buck”. Many goods that
previously were affordable to only the few – e.g. a mobile phone or sewing
Recommendations
There are many different ways to examine how globalization has improved
businesses, living standards and the performance of the entire economy. Let us
start, however, with a quick primer on trade and what economists mean when
they are talking about globalization. There are several explanations to the
remarkable growth of trade over time, but one obvious factor behind it has been
firms and their business development. In a way, the growth of exports is just
another way of saying that firms have gradually sold more to foreign customers
or that foreign customers have played an increasingly important role for the total
And one difference is obvious: if a company only has market access to the
inhabitants in its home country (in Ericsson’s case, ten million Swedes) it has to
build another type of business than if it has access to the global market. What is
more, market size is of particular importance for those companies that produce
goods and services that are innovative and have a high intensity of R&D or
capital expenditures. If their potential customer base is small, it means that every
unit of sales has to recoup a larger share of the investments the firm made in
developing and producing a product. The flip side of the coin, however, is that the
Conclusion
commentary, it helped to put a higher premium on human capital and giving firms
new chances to employ the staff they need to compete successfully. It is for this
reason that the age of globalization experienced a growth in global trade that,
If companies had to rely on just domestic markets for their sales and
inputs, they would not have been able to innovate and develop products in the
way they actually have over the past 30 years. It would have been too costly, and
– most likely – they would have to produce in ways that, compared with today,
would have made the quality of products substantially lower. It is often forgotten
products with low quality. And that did not happen by chance; it was rather the
Workers have benefitted substantially from the way that globalization increased
the premium for scale and specialization. There is a general pattern in the world
economy that open economies are much better for workers than less open
economies (see Box 4). And the improvements made in open economies partly
comes from the fact that the new production they generate depends more on
human capital. Workers that have more and better education, and that is better at
employment conditions.