Module 4 - Topic 1 - Topic Notes
Module 4 - Topic 1 - Topic Notes
Topic Notes
By Craig Deegan
RMIT University
Accounting in Organisations and Society
Module 4: Social and environmental accounting
Accounting in Organisations and Society
Disclaimer
1. RMIT, its directors, author(s), or any other persons involved in the preparation of this
publication expressly disclaim all and any contractual, tortious, or other form of liability to any
person (purchaser of this publication or not) in respect of the publication and any
consequences arising from its use, including any omission made, by any person in reliance
upon the whole or any part of the contents of this publication.
2. RMIT expressly disclaims all and any liability to any person in respect of anything and of the
consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance, whether
whole or partial, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this subject material.
3. No person should act on the basis of the material contained in the publication without
considering and taking professional advice.
Table of Contents
Lecture overview ..................................................................................................................... 1
The why/who/what/how?......................................................................................................... 1
Accountability .......................................................................................................................... 3
Social accounting .................................................................................................................... 3
Environmental accounting....................................................................................................... 6
Corporate social responsibility reporting ................................................................................. 8
Sustainability reporting............................................................................................................ 9
The global reporting initiative ................................................................................................ 10
Examples of innovative reporting .......................................................................................... 11
Corporate responsibilities: The cause of climate change ..................................................... 13
Management use of social and environmental information .................................................. 14
Personal social responsibility ................................................................................................ 15
References............................................................................................................................ 16
Lecture overview
Understand and appreciate the various issues associated with social and environmental
accounting, including:
• Why we might report social and environmental information.
– The why question will be answered by considering alternative perceptions about the
role of ‘accounting’ and about the accountability and social responsibility of business.
Suggested Reading
Deegan Craig 2014, Chapter 9: Extended Systems of Accounting - the
Incorporation of Social and Environmental Factors within External
Reporting in Financial Accounting Theory (pp. 378-425). Sydney:
Mcgraw-Hill.
The why/who/what/how?
1. Why report social and environmental information?
As we have emphasised, there are various aspects of organisational performance which
might broadly be considered to be financial (or economic), social, and environmental.
Financial reporting, as covered in the previous Module, generally does not provide
insights into the social and environmental performance of an organisation. So we need
alternative frameworks.
Being part of a broader social system, it is generally accepted that organisations do have
a responsibility (and associated accountability) for their social and environmental
performance.
A failure to report could undermine the ‘legitimacy’ of the organisation.
For internal management purposes, managers will need to have information about
various aspects of an organisation’s social and environmental performance.
Various stakeholders external to the organisation will also expect to receive information
about the social and environmental performance of an organisation. This might impact
various decisions they make, such as whether they will invest in the organisation, buy
the organisation’s products, work for the organisation, lobby government against the
organisation, and so forth.
In a sense, the reporting could be part of a process to ‘manage’ various stakeholders.
2. To whom are we reporting?
From the above we can see that there are many different stakeholders who might have
an interest in an organisation’s social and environmental performance – managers,
investors, employees, employee unions, customers, government, news media, social
and environmental groups, and so on. Some form of ‘stakeholder mapping’ exercise
would be required. Managers need to make judgements about to whom they owe a
responsibility/accountability to and whether it includes both those stakeholders who can
impact the organisation (those with power) as well as those that are impacted by the
organisation.
3. What are we reporting?
Because organisations can have a multitude of various social and environmental impacts,
some prioritisation needs to be given to identifying, managing, and reporting specific
aspects of the organisation’s social and environmental performance. Much of the
information being reported will be influenced by the responsibilities and accountabilities
that are accepted by managers. Stakeholder engagement exercises will also identify
some information that stakeholders need/expect.
For example, because water might be scarce we might report water use and water
saving initiatives (this would be environmental information).
Because of concerns about climate change, an energy intensive organisation might
disclose information about its carbon emissions and plans to reduce such emissions (this
would be environmental information).
Because of concerns about treatment of employees in our supply chain, we might
provide information derived from factory audits about the safety of the buildings, the
health and safety policies in place, or use of child labour (this would be social
information).
4. How/where are we reporting?
This form of reporting is largely voluntary and therefore there is much variation in
reporting by those organisations that elect to publicly report. There are a number of
reporting frameworks (most notably, that of the Global Reporting Initiative) available to
use and the reporting is typically made available on organisational websites.
Accountability
As we learned in earlier Modules:
• An organisation’s perspective about its accountability will directly impact on what
information (accounts) it provides.
• If an organisation considers it only has a responsibility for its financial performance, then
it will tend to fixate on financial accounts/financial accounting.
• By contrast, if an organisation believes it has an accountability for its social and
environmental performance, then it will provide social and environmental
accounts/reports as well.
A return to our definition of ‘accountability’ would be useful at this point:
Reflection
So what do we think? If you were the manager of an organisation would
you accept responsibility for:
• Its social performance?
• Its environmental performance?
• Why?
PLEASE NOTE: Our perspectives on this will be based on our own system of values.
Within our group there will be differences of opinion.
If we accept that an organisation has a responsibility for its social and environmental
performance, then we would accept that it has an associated accountability.
If it has accountability, then it shall provide:
• Social accounts
• Environmental accounts
We will explore what these accounts might look like shortly.
Social accounting
Rana Plaza Garment Case
As illustrated in Module 1, Topic 2, Rana Plaza garment was a clothing factory in
Bangladesh that produced clothes for many western companies. On 24 April 2013, the
factory’s multi-story building collapsed, which led to 1,129 people dead and more than 2,000
people injured (Edward, 2013a). Survivors said that the visible cracks on the building were
found in the morning prior to the working hours, and managers of factory forced staff to
return to the building and continue their production despite there being an evacuation order
from the local police (Edwards, 2013b). The tragedy could have been prevented if workers’
safety was considered seriously. Many western companies believed it was not their
responsibility to ensure the working condition of workers, as it is the responsibility of their
clothing suppliers. Six months after this tragedy, only one company, who sourced clothes
from this factory, paid compensation to the victims (Edward, 2013a).
Watch the YouTube video below for more facts about Bangladesh Factory Collapse:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISj8BECf40Q
Reflection
• Who is responsible for this disaster?
• Why are they responsible?
• What sort of monitoring should they perform?
• Following the Rana Plaza disaster what forms of disclosure/accounts
would you expect, and from whom?
• Who would be interested in these accounts?
• Is providing such ‘accounts’ actually ‘accounting’ as we might now
consider it?
Benetton was one company linked to Rana Plaza. The followings are disclosures on
Benetton’s website as accessed March 2017 (Benetton 2017)
http://assets.benettongroup.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/04/CRONISTORIA_RANA_PLAZA_en.pdf
A few hours after the event, and following an initial check, Benetton erroneously affirmed
that it did not have any supplier relationship – either direct or indirect - with the factories
based in Rana Plaza: that supplier did not, in fact, appear on any corporate list.
Benetton’s supply chain is complex: the company operates in multiple countries and works
with hundreds of suppliers who, when necessary, may also outsource their work.
Reconstructing an accurate timeline of the facts, and clarifying the company’s position, took
a number of days.
On completing all the checks, Benetton then immediately corrected its position and
confirmed the existence of previous orders that a particular Indian supplier had, in turn,
subcontracted to Rana Plaza.
The amount produced for Benetton represented 1.8% of the total production at Rana Plaza
during the last 12 months, with 98.2% of production being carried out for other brands, some
of which had a fixed presence at Rana Plaza. In total, Benetton represents less than 0.4% of
Bangladesh’s textiles sector.
Reflection
• Is the above disclosure a social disclosure?
• ‘Why’ do you think the company made the above disclosure?
Disclosure 2:
BENETTON’S COMMITMENT
Benetton quickly moved into action in the immediate aftermath of the Rana Plaza tragedy by
promoting the Bangladesh Accord On Fire and Building Safety, of which we were one of the
first five signatories. This is an initiative to contribute to the improvement of overall safety
conditions for workers in the Bangladesh. Benetton has since unilaterally decided—in what
is probably a world first—to progressively apply the same principles to producers in other
world markets.
Furthermore, in May 2013 - with no multi-stakeholder initiative as yet in place - Benetton
launched its own programme, donating USD 500,000 to support 280 Rana Plaza victims and
their families. The program was carried out in partnership with BRAC, the primary NGO
based in Bangladesh.
In January 2014 the Rana Plaza Trust Fund was established, with the goal of raising $30
million as part of a programme of compensation for the victims of the collapse. Benetton
always supported this initiative and repeatedly requested sufficient clarity over the
mechanisms that regulate contributions and determine the indemnity to the victims, as well
as transparency concerning the contributions provided.
In the absence of such elements, Benetton entrusted one of the world's most important,
independent auditors (PwC) to quantify the level of contributions, and also asked WRAP (an
NGO specialising in human rights within supply chains) to apply their ethical principles to the
report. On receipt of the evaluation, Benetton decided to double the recommended
contribution amount, thus donating USD 1.1 million to the Rana Plaza Trust Fund, and
bringing the total amount set aside to support the victims and their families to USD 1.6
million. If all the other brands involved had applied the criteria adopted by Benetton, the fund
would have raised USD $60 million.
Reflection
• Is the above a form of social accounting?
• As a stakeholder in the clothing industry (you buy clothes) are you
satisfied with this disclosure?
• What other disclosures would you want Benetton to make?
Environmental accounting
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill (also known as BP oil spill) Case
As illustrated in Module 1 Topic 2, on 20 April 2010, while drilling an uncontrollable blowout
caused an explosion on the rig that killed 11 crewmen and ignited a fireball visible from
64 km away. The fire was inextinguishable and, two days later, on 22 April, the Horizon sank,
leaving the well gushing oil on the seabed and causing the largest ever oil spill in US waters.
It was reported by BBC news (2011) that the influence on the benthos, such as corals, sea
fans were destructive, and the majority of them were essentially killed. The more critical
issue is that no alive detrital feeders, such as sea cucumber and brittle starts, were found.
Watch the video below for more information about the impact of Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FizAf88Py-Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEWMqK5H4Z0
Reflection
• Who is responsible for this disaster?
• Why are they responsible?
• Does this mean they are ‘accountable’?
• Following the disaster what forms of disclosure/accounts would you
expect from BP?
• Who would be interested in these accounts?
Review BP’s 2010 Sustainability Report (BP 2010) The first 13 pages provide an
overview on BP’s accountability and its actions in regards to Deepwater.
http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/sustainability/group-
reports/bp_sustainability_review_2010.pdf
Discussion
Why do you think the company made such disclosures?
Environmental reporting provides information about an organisation impacts upon living and
non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems.
• It could include information about:
– Materials used.
– Effluents and waste generated.
– Energy consumed.
– Emissions (including CO2) generated.
– Water consumed.
– Waste water generated and impacts of this waste water.
– Impacts (positive and negative) upon biodiversity.
– Compliance with environmental regulations.
YouTube Resource:
Alex Edmans, Professor of Finance in London Business School talks
about the long-term impacts of social responsibility and challenges the
idea that caring for society is at the expense of profit.
He argues that better social and environmental performance indeed can
bring more profit to organisation. Profit is actually a by-product of an
organisation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5KZhm19EO0
• CSR reporting provides information about how an organisation has addressed its social
responsibilities.
Again, this makes more sense if the organisation has identified the extent of
responsibilities it has accepted. Reporting would then indicate how these responsibilities
have been addressed (which, as we know, is the cornerstone of ‘accountability’).
• Therefore, social reporting and environmental reporting would be considered to be
components of CSR reporting.
Sustainability reporting
• Sustainability reporting is really just another form of CSR reporting, but relates to the
idea of ‘sustainable development’
Sustainable development is commonly defined as the development that meets the needs
of the present world without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs (World Commission on Environment and Development – The Brundtland
Report, 1987).
• ‘Sustainability reporting’ provides insights into how organisations are performing in
relation to the goal of ‘sustainable development’.
• There is much variation in the nature of ‘sustainability reporting’ and again it needs to be
appreciated that (arguably wrongly) the term sustainability reporting is often used
interchangeably with the term CSR reporting. According to the Global Reporting Initiative
(www.globalreporting.org):
Sustainability reporting can help organisations to measure, understand and communicate
their economic, environmental, social and governance performance, and then set goals, and
manage more effectively. A sustainability report is the key platform for communicating
sustainability performance and impacts – whether positive or negative. Sustainability
reporting can be considered as synonymous with other terms for non-financial reporting;
triple bottom line reporting, corporate social responsibility reporting, and more.
Discussion
• How would we identify organisations we think would actually be
‘sustainable’?
• With current business models do we think ‘sustainable development’
is realistically possible?
Web Resources
The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015, which
shows the trends and some of the challenge of CSR reporting.
https://home.kpmg.com/au/en/home/insights/2015/11/corporate-
responsibility-reporting-survey-2015.html
This video introduces the challenge of sustainability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePeYRg8x-4w
Example
The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015, which
shows the trends and some of the challenge of CSR reporting.
https://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/img/ad_content/2015_IKEA_sustainabili
ty_report.PDF
https://www.globalreporting.org/standards
Web Resources
This is the video to introduce what is the GRI Sustainability Reporting
Standards.
The GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards: The Future of Reporting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGqE4OO0_7g
Example
Puma’s (sportswear company) Environmental Profit & Loss:
http://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/environment/environmental-
profit-and-loss-account
Web resource
The Sustainable Business Toolkit provides step-by-step method how to
measure your carbon emissions.
https://www.sustainablebusinesstoolkit.com/how-to-measure-a-carbon-
footprint/
YouTube resources
The YouTube videos below are the explanation of climate change.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv7OHfpIRfU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifrHogDujXw
Discussion
Assume that you are a senior manager in a clothing company that
sources clothes from suppliers that are located in a developing country.
You realise that an important issue of concern is the health, safety and
equitable treatment of people working in factories in developing countries.
• What information do you think the manager should collect?
• Is the information in financial nature?
• How would the information be measured and used?
• Would you consider this information ‘accounting’ information? Why?
• Should the information about the measurements and its related
management strategy be reported to external stakeholders?
• Whilst an organisation would typically want to generate financial profits, it also has to
consider the ‘other’ costs and benefits it creates that are not captured in measures such
as financial profits.
• For example, the organisation might be in an environment that has little water, and
hence it might take various measurements of:
– Fresh water used
– Amount of water that is recycled
– Amount of waste water generated
• It can then use this information to set targets for future improvement, to benchmark its
performance against other organisations and to provide information to external users so
as to demonstrate accountability for its water use.
• If you don’t manage the use of certain scarce resources (such as water), and if local
communities need such resources as well then obvious problems will arise for local
communities and ultimately for an organisation.
– For example, in 2014 Coca-Cola is forced to close its bottling plant in northen India.
The local communities protested that it extracting too much groundwater, which
cause water shortage and polluting the environment with toxic effluents. As a result,
Coca-Cola has been ordered to stop operating (Theguardian, 2014).
• It can be seen that manage social and environmental performance is a very important
part of corporate governance.
Web Resources
Why sustainability reporting is moving its way to the forefront of the ASX?
http://www.businessreviewaustralia.com/leadership/1953/Why-
sustainability-reporting-is-moving-its-way-to-the-forefront-of-the-ASX
Indian officials order Coca-Cola plant to close for using too much water.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jun/18/indian-officals-
coca-cola-plant-water-mehdiganj
• PLEASE don’t simply accept assumptions that all behaviour can be explained through
the lens of the ‘rational economic person’ (a person that places wealth creation above
everything else and one of the cornerstones of much economic theory). If we accept that
everybody is simply driven by wealth maximisation (as many of our economics and
finance lecturers might try to convince us), then any thoughts that the planet can be
sustainable can only logically become an illusion.
• Just as we might say that businesses have accountability to their stakeholders we could
also perhaps say that we should be accountable to ourselves for our own actions.
• That is, we must accept an accountability for our own actions and test ourselves in terms
of whether our actions are actually consistent with our own values or ‘ethics’
– What do we think about this idea?
• So, are our own actions (and related impacts both positive and negative) consistent with
the ‘values’ we have embraced both privately and publicly?
– E.g., if we are worried about overuse of plastics and the fact that many turn up in
landfill, or the ocean, why do we continue to buy water in bottles? Stop it!!
References
References
AFP 2014, Indian officials order Coca-Cola plant to close for using too much
water, theguardian, 19 Jun, viewed on 22 April 2017,
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jun/18/indian-officals-coca-
cola-plant-water-mehdiganj>
Benetton 2017, The Rana Plaza Tragedy: the facts and Benetton’s
commitment, viewed on 27 March 2017,
<http://assets.benettongroup.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/04/CRONISTORIA_RANA_PLAZA_en.pdf>
CrnaLisica 2010, BP Oil Spill Gulf OF Mexico 2010 Footage and Images, 6
June, YouTube video, viewed on 22 April 2017,
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEWMqK5H4Z0>
Gupta, S 2016, Deepwater Horizon oil spill, YouTube video, 2 May, viewed
on 22 April 2017, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FizAf88Py-Q>
Kering 2015, Environmental Profit and Loss 2015 Group Results, viewed on
22 April 2017,
<http://www.kering.com/sites/default/files/kering_group_2015_environmental
pl_0.pdf>
Pierce, F 2016, Why sustainability reporting is moving its way to the forefront
of the ASX? Businessreviewaustralia, 12 Jan, viewed on 22 April 2017,
<http://www.businessreviewaustralia.com/leadership/1953/Why-
sustainability-reporting-is-moving-its-way-to-the-forefront-of-the-ASX>