0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views

Assignment # 1 - : (Total Marks: 100, Weight: 5%)

The document describes an assignment to design an entity relationship diagram (ERD) reflecting the data in an invoice. It lists the objectives of understanding how to design ERDs and defines the key elements that must be included in the assignment: entities, attributes, unique identifiers, relationships (optionality and cardinality), and foreign keys. It provides a rubric evaluating the ERD design on entities, attributes, and relationships modeled and how correctly they are captured, named, and structured in the ERD.

Uploaded by

prabh kaur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views

Assignment # 1 - : (Total Marks: 100, Weight: 5%)

The document describes an assignment to design an entity relationship diagram (ERD) reflecting the data in an invoice. It lists the objectives of understanding how to design ERDs and defines the key elements that must be included in the assignment: entities, attributes, unique identifiers, relationships (optionality and cardinality), and foreign keys. It provides a rubric evaluating the ERD design on entities, attributes, and relationships modeled and how correctly they are captured, named, and structured in the ERD.

Uploaded by

prabh kaur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Database Design & SQL CSD 2206

Assignment # 1 - Group Work


(Total Marks: 100, Weight: 5%)
Objectives:
To understand and be able design entity relationship diagrams
Assignment Question:
The figure below shows an invoice. Design an ERD reflecting the data contained in this invoice.
You will need to define:
 Entities
 Attributes
 Unique identifiers
 Relationship (optionality and cardinality)
 Foreign key
Database Design & SQL CSD 2206
Database Design & SQL CSD 2206

Rubric:

Excellent (100%) Proficient Needs Not Evident (0-


80%-90% Improvement 20%)
(70%)
ER-Model  90-100% of the entities  80-89% of the entities  70-79% of the  0-69% of the entities
Entities were captured were captured entities were were captured.
 90-100% of the  80-89% of the identified captured.  0-69% of the
identified entities used entities used correct  70-79% of the identified entities
correct naming naming conventions. identified entities used correct naming
conventions.  There was no confusion used correct naming conventions.
 There was no confusion between attributes and conventions.  There was confusion
between attributes and entities  There was no between attributes
entities. confusion between and entities.
attributes and
entities.
ER-Model  90-100% of the entities  80-89% of the entities  70-79% of the  0-69% of the entities
Attributes modeled, contained the modeled contained the entities modeled modeled contained
appropriate attributes. appropriate attributes. contained the the appropriate
 90-100% of the  80-89% of the attributes appropriate attributes.
attributes listed used listed used the correct attributes.  0-69% of the
the correct naming naming conventions.  70-79% of the attributes listed used
conventions.  The Unique Identifier attributes listed used the correct naming
 The Unique Identifier where indicated was the correct naming conventions.
where indicated was clearly labeled. conventions.  The Unique Identifier
clearly labeled  The Unique where indicated was
Identifier where not clearly labeled
indicated was clearly
labeled.
ER-Model 90-100% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the 0-69% of relationships
Relationshi relationships have the relationships have the relationships have the have the appropriate
ps appropriate name, appropriate name, appropriate name, name, direction,
direction, optionality, and direction, optionality, and direction, optionality, optionality and/or
degree/cardinality. degree/cardinality and degree/cardinality.
degree/cardinality.

You might also like