Nature of Learning
Nature of Learning
Learning is one of the fundamental behaviour processes, involves both the development
and the modification of thoughts and behaviours
Other concepts and aspects of organizational behaviour 9 for example motivation that
will be discussed in later chapters can be fully explained with the use of learning
principles
New employees will bring with them a set of previously leaned ways of behaving. They
are then expected to learn additional information than applies to their jobs.
Established employees continue to develop their job related skills and abilities
The process is also very complex. For example, an employee who has already learned
one way to perform a job may have trouble learning a second albeit better way
NATURE OF LEARNING
1
In order to say that learning has occurred a change or modification of behaviour must
be evident
Thus, while learning is a process that we cannot observe directly, we ca infer that
learning has occurred when we can observe a fairly permanent change in behaviour
Classical conditioning
Observational learning
Operant or instructional conditioning
Classical conditioning
When presented with meat powder ( unconditioned stimulus) - the dog secreted
saliva (unconditioned response)
When he merely rang a bell (neutral stimulus) the dog did not salivate
When meat was accompanied with the ringing of the bell several times, then
Pavlov rang the bell without presenting the meat, the dog salivated to the bell
alone
2
In classical conditioning, an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) or stimulus that has
the capacity to reliably evoke a naturally occurring reflexive or unconditioned
responses (UR) – is paired c
Many jobs require conditioned responses. For example driving a folk lift or a
trailer calls for reflexive behaviour
The driver’s ability to apply the brakes quickly and or otherwise react
appropriately depends on conditioned response to previous neutral stimuli
such as warning lights on the truck.
OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING
Observational learning occurs when a person witnesses the behaviour of another and
vicariously experiences the consequences of the other person’s actions.
When tasks are fairly simple, observational learning can be immediate and complete;
numerous trials and rehearsals are unnecessary.
3
In addition to informal observational learning, employees sometimes undergo formal
training programmes that rely on the same process like on the job training. Training
manuals and lectures are based on the premises that trainees will absorb, retain and
enact preferred forms of conduct on their jobs. Role plays and also case studies are
used with the aim that trainees and observers will imitate the desirable forms of
behaviour portrayed in the case and the role play
Operant conditioning
He felt that more complex, but common human behaviour cannot be explained
by classical conditioning alone.
He noted that the greater part of the behaviour of an organism was under control
of stimuli which were effective only because they were correlated with reinforcing
consequences
Through his research thus , skinner posited that behaviour was a function of
consequences, not the classical conditioning eliciting stimuli
He felt that most human behaviour affects, or operates on, the environment to
receive a desirable consequences
4
Operant conditioning is concerned primarily with learning that occurs as a
consequence of behaviour, or R-S.
Classical Operant
5
Much of human behaviour in organisations is instrumental, in the sense that people act
on their surrounding as wells as deliberately move into and out of different situations. In
other words, the behaviour of employees is often instrumental in bringing about desired
outcomes. When desired outcomes is obtained, the likelihood of that behaviour
recurring is enhanced
This principle is summarise in Thorndike law of Effect, which states that responses that
are followed
Thorndike’ s law of effect ( sometimes called the law of behaviour) stated that “
of several responses made to the same situation, those which are accompanied
or closely followed by satisfaction (reinforcement) … will be more likely to recur;
those that are closely followed by discomfort ( punishment)… will be less likely to
recur
More loosely stated, the law proposes that that behaviour that produces pleasant
outcomes is more likely to recur, while behaviour that produces unpleasant outcomes is
less likely to recur
Desirable and reinforcing, consequences will increase the strength of the preceding
behaviour and increase its probability of being repeated in future
6
Undesirable, or punishing, consequences will decrease the strength of the preceding
behaviour and decrease the probability of being repeated in the future
Both positive and negative reinforcement can increase the strength and frequency of
the behaviour that follows. However these two types of reinforcement will create a work
environment with different characteristics and behaviour dynamics
A reward on the other hand is simply something that the person who presents it
deem to be desirable
7
Something is reinforcing if it strengthens the behaviour preceding it and induces
repetition
For example, people with inaccurate self efficacy beliefs many not be affected
by the consequences of their actions. Those with inaccurate or false self
efficacy beliefs who experience performance failures time after time will not
learn from their mistakes or respond to the manages comments on how to
correct the problem. They have high self-efficacy (they believe that their
behaviours are appropriate to successfully accomplish the task0 but they are
wrong
8
As shaping progresses, the reward is gradually withheld until a larger portion of
the complete task is performed. Many times, the desired workers behaviour
involves a set of responses so complex such that complete of correct behavior
is not likely to occur all at once.
To achieve this, the manager must first increase the strength of the desired
responses to the point where it will not disappear if reinforcement is not provided.
9
reinforcement scheme is more resistance to extinction than behaviour learned
under a continuous reinforcement scheme
3. Schedule of reinforcement
1. Fixed intervals
2. Variable intervals
3. Fixed ration
4. Variable ratio
Interval schedules reinforce behaviours on the basis of time elapses and ratio
schedules are based on the number of time the behaviour is performed. In a fixed
schedule, the amount of time or number of behaviour is specified in advance, while in
variable schedule the amount of times or numbers of behaviours varies
A fixed variable schedule reinforces individual for their response after a predetermined
period of time has elapsed
Performance beyond the minimum however does not lead to greater rewards
10
Nevertheless most organisations rely on such a schedule when they compensate
employees on a weekly or hourly basis and ignore performance as long as it meets
minimal standards
Research shows that responses learned under fixed interval schedules of reinforcement
diminish or extinguish very rapidly when rewards are withheld
An example of such as scheme is when a top level manager announced but fairly
regularly twice-monthly visits to a loading dock. Although the employees cannot say
precisely when the manager will visit, they can nonetheless assume on an average, the
manager will make an inspection every tow weeks or so. Because the controlling
influence of the evaluative experience, it is possible that performance will drop
somewhat after reinforcement is administered
Thus, on the average, performance is high but tends to be variable. In such a scheme,
employees are likely to exert effort in spurts in order to obtain a specified level of output
11
Variable ratio schedule
Manager commonly praise their employees via a variable ratio schedule. Thus
employees can rarely be certain beforehand when their actions will receive reward
Hammer and Hammer have outlined a number of rules for application of the principles
of reinforcement (operant condition). If a manager follows these rules in dealing with
subordinates, then performance should be enhanced. These are:
Many managers try to teat all subordinates alike. Although this sounds noble, it tends to
encourage mediocrity.
When all employees receive equal rewards, superior performers begin to feel that their
efforts are unappreciated, while the poor performers recognize that they will not be
penalized for minimum effort
In response, over time, most above average performers will drop their performance to
the minimal level. A few superior performers may of course persist, but most will lower
their effort to the level that will equal their rewards
12
When rewards commensurate with performance, however, subordinates receive a quite
different message – superior performers get the signal that their efforts are values, and
potentially high performance are encouraged to try harder
Provide feedback
PUNISHMENT
13
Differences between Positive, negative reinforcers, and punishment
On the other hand, a worker is negatively reinforced for getting busy when the
supervisor walks through the area. Getting busy terminates being ‘chewed out”
by the supervisor
14
Thus taking away certain organizational privileges from a manager who has poor
performance record could be thought to be punishment
Role of punishment
Punishment can also be used as a means of altering behaviour just as reward can be
used for the same
Rewards Punishment
Bonuses Reprimand
Promotions Oral warning
Pay increases Ostracism
Vacation time Criticism form superiors
Time off Suspension
Use of company car Citations
Awards Disciplinary hearing
Praise and recognition Written warning
Increase in formal responsibility Pay cuts
Increase in departmental budget Demotions
Sense of accomplishment Reduced authority
Self recognition Undesired transfers
promotions
15
Punishment is an undesirable event that follows behaviour and it intends to eliminate.
Unless punishment is severe, the behaviour will reappear very quickly, but
the more severe the punishment, the greater the side effects such as hate
or revenge
Alternatives to punishment
16
behaviour generates for employees is often not too difficult. In some
instances, the reward may actually be the satisfaction of knowing that a peer
or supervisor has been annoyed. extinction in such cases might consist of
ignoring their irksome behaviour, thereby reducing the probability that it will
occur
3. Ignoring the behaviour all together is also a strategy. a problem may arise
and instead of the manager taking action, he/she postpones taking action
deliberately
In many cases none of the above alternatives may be feasible or it may be too costly
or physically impossible to change a situation to prevent undesirable behaviour
17
punishment as a result is informative in that the recipient can sense the
connection between behaviour and punishment
18
ROLE OF ORGANISATIONAL REWARD SYSTEMS
Money as a reinforcer
Base pay
19
The only reinforcing function provided here the employee walking up to the cash
office or banks to pick their pay checks and rarely do employee see it as a
motivator to improve performance
Merit pay
Money, if well administered can act as a reinforcer – it has a positive effect on
employees behaviour
However, its shortcomings will be seen if not well implemented such asr:
1. poor measurement of performance
2. lack of acceptance of supervisory feedback
3. limited desirability of merit increases that are too small
4. Lack of linkages between merit pay and performance
5. Potential unintended consequences such as focusing on merit related
activities and behaviours
Some compensation practitioners argue that merit pay only makes employees
unhappy because they view it as unfair way to reward for past performances instead
of being geared towards improving future performance
A laboratory study of merit pay led to the following conclusions:
1. Unless a merit pay raise is at least 6 to 7 percent of base pay, it will not
produce the desired effect on employee behaviour
2. Beyond a certain point, increases in merit-rise size are unlikely to improve
performance
3. When merit pay raises are too small, employee morale will suffer
4. Cost of living adjustments, seniority adjustments, and other non-merit
components of a raise should be clearly separated from the merit component
5. Smaller percentage raises given to employees at the higher ends of base-
pay ranges are demotivating
In other words therefore, both the traditional base and merit-pay plans have a
problem
The new pay plan
20
This seem to overcome a lot of problems associated with the traditional base pay
and the merit pay as a means of rewarding employees
It is said to increase performance by up to 100 per cent in terms of net returns to the
organisation - i.e. for every one dollar pay out, the gain was more than $2
21
Performance feedback – nonverbal and verbal performance information, written
reports, performance appraisals, performance charts and graphs,
Social recognition and attention – friendly greeting, soliciting for suggestions,
compliments of work progress, smile, verbal/non verbal recognition or praise
22