Scribd
Upload
23 views1 page

Sub Issues

The document discusses whether a respondent violated a trade agreement and lists several ways the respondent allegedly violated standards of fair treatment, most-favored-nation treatment, and national treatment. It also mentions responsibility of states for wrongful acts under international law.

Uploaded by

Arushi Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views1 page

Sub Issues

The document discusses whether a respondent violated a trade agreement and lists several ways the respondent allegedly violated standards of fair treatment, most-favored-nation treatment, and national treatment. It also mentions responsibility of states for wrongful acts under international law.

Uploaded by

Arushi Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Sub issues

3 whether respondent (Mekar) has violated Article 9.9 CEPTA?

Respondent treated arbitraly since the start.


Respondent made deliberate efforts to impede Vemma’s efforts
Respondent had ill intentions

Respond3ent have violated fet stabdrds


Violated mfn
Violated national treatments.
Full protection and security.

*judiciary

Arciva articles of responsibility of states for wrong ful acts, draft treaty, a country will be
responsible if the act is attributable and is violation of international

Act is attributable..not applicable but when we need show corruption esp w govt
State has commited an internationally wrongful act.

You might also like