Overbridges and Footbridges: Standard
Overbridges and Footbridges: Standard
Overbridges and Footbridges: Standard
0, 29/05/2020
T HR CI 12030 ST
Standard
Version 3.0
Issue date: 18 February 2020
Important message
This document is one of a set of standards developed solely and specifically for use on
Transport Assets (as defined in the Asset Standards Authority Charter). It is not suitable for any
other purpose.
The copyright and any other intellectual property in this document will at all times remain the
property of the State of New South Wales (Transport for NSW).
You must not use or adapt this document or rely upon it in any way unless you are providing
products or services to a NSW Government agency and that agency has expressly authorised
you in writing to do so. If this document forms part of a contract with, or is a condition of
approval by a NSW Government agency, use of the document is subject to the terms of the
contract or approval. To be clear, the content of this document is not licensed under any
Creative Commons Licence.
This document may contain third party material. The inclusion of third party material is for
illustrative purposes only and does not represent an endorsement by NSW Government of any
third party product or service.
If you use this document or rely upon it without authorisation under these terms, the State of
New South Wales (including Transport for NSW) and its personnel does not accept any liability
to you or any other person for any loss, damage, costs and expenses that you or anyone else
may suffer or incur from your use and reliance on the content contained in this document. Users
should exercise their own skill and care in the use of the document.
This document may not be current and is uncontrolled when printed or downloaded. Standards
may be accessed from the Transport for NSW website at www.transport.nsw.gov.au
Standard governance
Owner: Lead Civil Engineer, Asset Standards Authority
Authoriser: Chief Engineer, Asset Standards Authority
Approver: Executive Director, Asset Standards Authority on behalf of the ASA Configuration Control
Board
Document history
Version Summary of changes
1.0 First issue 13 April 2015
2.0 Second issue 29 June 2016
3.0 The changes to the previous version include: updates to referenced documents; removal of
requirements for safety refuges and handhold devices and no safe place signs – covered in T HR
CI 12073 ST Safe Places; removal of requirements for guard rails – covered in T HR CI 12071 ST
Guard Rails; addition of durability requirements; updates to collision protection requirements;
updates to environmental and sustainability requirements; updates to decommissioning and
disposal requirements; and rearrangement of the order of requirements.
Preface
The Asset Standards Authority (ASA) is a key strategic branch of Transport for NSW (TfNSW).
As the network design and standards authority for NSW Transport Assets, as specified in the
ASA Charter, the ASA identifies, selects, develops, publishes, maintains and controls a suite of
requirements documents on behalf of TfNSW, the asset owner.
The ASA deploys TfNSW requirements for asset and safety assurance by creating and
managing TfNSW's governance models, documents and processes. To achieve this, the ASA
focuses on four primary tasks:
• publishing and managing TfNSW's process and requirements documents including TfNSW
plans, standards, manuals and guides
• collaborating with the Transport cluster and industry through open engagement
The AEO framework authorises engineering organisations to supply and provide asset related
products and services to TfNSW. It works to assure the safety, quality and fitness for purpose of
those products and services over the asset's whole-of-life. AEOs are expected to demonstrate
how they have applied the requirements of ASA documents, including TfNSW plans, standards
and guides, when delivering assets and related services for TfNSW.
Compliance with ASA requirements by itself is not sufficient to ensure satisfactory outcomes for
NSW Transport Assets. The ASA expects that professional judgement be used by competent
personnel when using ASA requirements to produce those outcomes.
This standard is a third issue. The changes to the previous version include the following:
• removal of requirements for safety refuges and handhold devices and no safe place signs
– covered in T HR CI 12073 ST Safe Places
Table of contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 9
2. Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.1. Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.2. Application ............................................................................................................................................. 9
3. Reference documents ........................................................................................................................... 10
4. Terms and definitions ........................................................................................................................... 13
5. Risk and safety ...................................................................................................................................... 14
5.1. Risk assessment .................................................................................................................................. 15
5.2. Safe places .......................................................................................................................................... 16
5.3. Security ................................................................................................................................................ 16
6. Environment and sustainability ........................................................................................................... 16
6.1. Green infrastructure ............................................................................................................................. 16
6.2. Sustainability assurance requirements ................................................................................................ 16
6.3. Ambient environmental conditions ....................................................................................................... 17
6.4. Noise barriers ...................................................................................................................................... 17
7. Aesthetics............................................................................................................................................... 17
8. Heritage .................................................................................................................................................. 17
9. Design standards................................................................................................................................... 18
9.1. Matters for resolution for bridge design ............................................................................................... 19
9.2. RMS bridge and road standard arrangements .................................................................................... 19
9.3. RMS Bridge Technical Direction Manual ............................................................................................. 20
9.4. Importance level .................................................................................................................................. 20
10. Approved materials ............................................................................................................................... 20
10.1. Requirements for polycarbonate and polymethyl methacrylate materials ....................................... 21
10.2. Formwork ......................................................................................................................................... 21
10.3. Prohibited materials ......................................................................................................................... 21
10.4. New and infrequently used materials .............................................................................................. 22
11. Durability ................................................................................................................................................ 22
11.1. Design life ........................................................................................................................................ 22
11.2. Stray current and electrolysis .......................................................................................................... 22
11.3. Earthing and bonding ....................................................................................................................... 22
12. Clearances.............................................................................................................................................. 23
12.1. Clearance to electrical services ....................................................................................................... 23
12.2. Clearance over waterways .............................................................................................................. 23
13. Waterway and flood design .................................................................................................................. 23
14. Drainage ................................................................................................................................................. 24
15. Attachment of OHW ............................................................................................................................... 25
16. Bearings and deck joints ...................................................................................................................... 25
1. Introduction
An overbridge is a bridge carrying vehicular traffic over rail track. Overbridges may include
provisions for pedestrians, cyclists and light rail vehicles.
A footbridge is a bridge that carries pedestrian and cyclist traffic only. Footbridges may be
freestanding structures at stations, freestanding structures between stations, or integrated with
an overhead booking office, station concourse or retail outlets and may have stairs, ramps , lifts
or a combination of all three.
2. Purpose
This standard specifies the design, construction, refurbishment, upgrade, maintenance,
decommissioning and disposal requirements for overbridges in the metropolitan rail area and
footbridges in the metropolitan rail area and the country rail area.
2.1. Scope
This standard covers the requirements for the whole-of-life, from design through to
decommissioning, for the following structures:
• footbridges in the metropolitan rail area and the country rail area
This document provides guidance information in complying with the requirements for
refurbished and upgraded works of existing structures. It also provides guidance information on
aesthetic considerations in the design of overbridges and footbridges.
The requirements for bridges over the rail network that only carry light rail traffic are in
T LR CI 12500 ST Civil Infrastructure Design Standards.
This standard includes requirements for the capacity assessment of existing bridges.
2.2. Application
This standard applies to all organisations and individuals involved in the design of new
overbridges or footbridges and the refurbishment of existing overbridges or footbridges.
This standard applies to all overbridges in the metropolitan rail area and all footbridges in the
entire rail network.
In addition to the requirements of this standard, asset decisions take into account the life cycle
cost considerations specified in T MU AM 01001 ST Life Cycle Costing.
If when using this standard, it is considered that the intent of stated requirements is unclear, a
clarification should be sought from the Asset Standards Authority (ASA).
3. Reference documents
The following documents are cited in the text. For dated references, only the cited edition
applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document applies.
International standards
ISO 6603-1: 1985 Plastics - Determination of Puncture Impact Behaviour of Rigid Plastics -
Part 1: Non-Instrumented Impact Testing
Australian standards
AS 1530.4 Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures – Part 4:
Fire-resistance tests for elements of construction
AS/NZS 1734 Aluminium and aluminium alloys – Flat sheet, coiled sheet and plate
AS/NZS 1906.1 Retroreflective materials and devices for road traffic control purposes – Part 1:
Retroreflective sheeting
AS/NZS 3845.1 Road safety barrier systems and devices – Part 1: Road safety barrier systems
T HR CI 12020 ST Underbridges
Legislation
Australian Paint Approval Scheme (APAS) Permanent Graffiti Barrier (Specification 1441/1)
Austroads 2010, Guide to Road Design Part 6: Roadside Design, Safety and Barriers
Centre for Urban Design 2019, Bridge Aesthetics – Design guideline to improve the appearance
of bridges in NSW
Department of Planning and Environment 2017, Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and
Signage Guidelines – Assessing Development Applications Under SEPP 64
Highways Department Design Manual for Roads and Bridges BD 90/05 Design of FRP Bridges
and Highway Structures
John L. Clarke, 2014, Structural design of polymer composites: EUROCOMP design code and
handbook
Office of Environment and Heritage 2005, State Agency Heritage Guide – Management of
Heritage Assets by NSW Government Agencies
RISSB Code of Practice - Derailment containment and protection for rail underbridges
Roads and Maritime Services Bridge Policy Circular BPC 2003/02 Rev 1 Waterproofing
Membranes for Concrete Bridge Decks
Roads and Maritime Services Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2007/08 Rev 2, RMS 18.1106
Design of Replacement Traffic Barriers on Existing Bridges
Roads and Maritime Services Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2012/01 Provision of Safety
Screens on Bridges
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Policy Circular BPC 2002/05 Bridge Concept
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Policy Circular BPC 2005/09 Provision of Disabled Access
for Pedestrian Bridges
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2008/06 Joints in Precast Concrete
Barrier Elements on a Grade
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2008/08 Provision of Conduits in
Bridge Traffic Barriers
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2008/09 Link Slabs for Precast
Pretensioned Concrete Girder Bridges
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2008/15 Concrete Parapets on
Pedestrian Overbridges
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2010/03 Pretensioned bridge
members – concrete transfer strength requirements
Roads and Traffic Authority Bridge Technical Direction BTD 2017/01 Standard Bridge Drawings
country rail area that part of the NSW rail network (as defined in the Transport Administration
Act) not within the metropolitan rail area (Transport Administration Act)
dc direct current
HV high voltage
LV low voltage
main line main running lines, crossing loops, refuge loops and sidings with a maximum
permissible speed greater than 25 km/h
metropolitan rail area the rail freight network and the rail passenger network within the
metropolitan rail area bounded by Newcastle (in the north), Richmond (in the northwest),
Bowenfels (in the west), Macarthur (in the southwest) and Bomaderry (in the south), and all
connection lines and sidings within these areas, but excluding private sidings
rail corridor the land between the boundary fences over which a railway line passes or, where
there are no fences, the extent of land owned, leased or otherwise utilised by the rail
operator/state
RIM rail infrastructure manager; in relation to rail infrastructure of a railway, means the person
who has effective control and management of the rail infrastructure, whether or not the person -
(b) has a statutory or contractual right to use the rail infrastructure or to control, or provide,
access to it
(RIM approval or acceptance within this standard refers to written agreement by the Civil
discipline Head or equivalent position, of the RIM’s organisation)
The design of overbridges and footbridges shall take into account safety considerations for
construction, operational, maintenance and decommissioning workers as well as the users of
the structure.
The designer shall establish and implement a process that manages safety assurance across
the full life cycle of the structure. The design process system shall be developed in accordance
with T MU MD 20001 ST System Safety Standard for New or Altered Assets.
The design of overbridges and footbridges shall provide safe access for inspection and
maintenance. This may include items such as access steps, ladders, cages, walkways and
static line attachment points.
Risk assessments shall be site-specific. Risk assessments should consider at least the
following:
• type of structure, that is, the potential for collapse and damage to trains
• track components in the approach direction of travel, for example, catchpoints, facing and
trailing turnouts, slips, diamonds or scissor crossovers
• track geometry, that is, straight or curved track, steep or flat gradient
• track speed (and potential out of control train speed) at the location
• track type, that is, class, sleeper type and rail size
• construction
• maintainability
The risk assessment shall also include any other relevant site-specific criteria. The risk
assessment shall be used to determine the extent of mitigation required.
Additional information regarding derailment risk factors associated with rail infrastructure and
operations and risk management tools and techniques may be obtained from RISSB Code of
Practice - Derailment containment and protection for rail underbridges.
Risk assessments shall be submitted for acceptance by the rail infrastructure manager (RIM).
5.3. Security
Requirements for security and crime prevention strategies shall be determined in consultation
with the RIM, in accordance with T MU SY 20001 ST Surface Transport Fixed Infrastructure
Physical Security Standard.
Plant species used in landscaping the precinct around the overbridge or footbridge shall be
carefully selected to ensure that they do not accelerate the deterioration, or prevent the
examination, of an overbridge or footbridge.
Only low maintenance species with non-invasive root systems shall be planted on areas
retained adjacent to rail infrastructure.
Additional information on sustainability and climate change considerations is set out in AS 5100.
Noise barriers, where required, shall be integrated with protection screens and designed in
accordance with AS 5100, T HR CI 12070 ST Miscellaneous Structures and other requirements
specified in this standard.
7. Aesthetics
The final appearance and aesthetic qualities of a bridge shall be considered in the design
process.
Designs for bridge structures shall also be considered in relation to the environmental context.
Sensitive contextual design involves being responsive to a particular setting. Structures shall be
designed such that they make a positive visual contribution to their surroundings.
Refer to the Centre for Urban Design's Bridge Aesthetics - Design guideline to improve the
appearance of bridges in NSW for information on aesthetic treatment of overbridges and
footbridges.
8. Heritage
TfNSW is responsible for maintaining and appropriately managing heritage items under its
stewardship and control. The Heritage Act 1977 was enacted to protect, conserve and manage
environmental heritage, including items of archaeological significance. The provisions of the
Heritage Act 1977 shall be met when changes are proposed for items listed on the Office of
Environment and Heritage State Heritage Register. The principles and relevant guidelines
contained in the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage State Agency Heritage Guide –
Management of Heritage Assets by NSW Government Agencies shall be followed for heritage
items listed on the RailCorp Section 170 Heritage and Conservation Register.
Maintenance and design changes to heritage-listed overbridges and footbridges shall result in
minimal adverse visual and physical heritage impacts, and shall keep their setting and broader
landscape context in order to respect and maintain their heritage significance.
be taken into account at all design stages. Approaches to conservation, including appropriate
means of protecting significant fabric from damage and vandalism, may be required for bridges
(and remnant sections of bridges) that are no longer being used.
Whilst rail heritage listings typically comprise a station group or precinct, a number of
overbridges and footbridges are individually listed as individual items. For example, in station
precincts, overhead booking offices are often located adjacent to, or structurally integrated with,
overbridges or footbridges (common to many early steel girder footbridges), and so the
maintenance of these related elements shall be considered sympathetically.
9. Design standards
Overbridges and footbridges shall be designed in accordance with AS 5100 and the
requirements specified in this standard. Associated infrastructure, such as earthworks or
retaining walls, shall be designed in accordance with the relevant TfNSW standards associated
with these activities.
The design of an overbridge or footbridge shall comply with TfNSW requirements for the
following:
• service routes
• drainage
• geotechnical conditions
• architectural treatments
Where the designer proposes to adopt design methods, procedures and requirements that differ
from those in AS 5100, approval shall be obtained from the Lead Civil Engineer, ASA prior to
the commencement of the design.
Where a conflict exists between an Australian standard referenced directly in this standard (or
as an indirect reference through a referenced standard) and this standard, the requirements of
this standard shall take precedence.
Where overbridges and footbridges are located at stations, the following TfNSW stations and
buildings standards apply:
• for walkways and minor components: John L. Clarke, 2014, Structural design of polymer
composites: EUROCOMP design code and handbook
• for bridge components: guidance can be obtained from Highways Department Design
Manual for Roads and Bridges BD 90/05 Design of FRP Bridges and Highway Structures
Where a conflict exists between the standards referenced and this standard, clarification shall
be obtained from the Lead Civil Engineer, ASA.
Appendix A contains the list of matters for resolution mapped against the requirements in
relevant sections within this standard.
The use of non-standard RMS arrangements shall be justified in the bridge investigation and
design reports and submitted for approval by the RIM.
Where a conflict exists between the requirements of this standard and an RMS bridge technical
direction, the requirements of this standard shall take precedence.
The RMS bridge technical directions applicable to TfNSW overbridges and footbridges are listed
in Appendix B. The list is current at the date of publication of this standard.
The designer shall establish the currency of the list and determine whether new bridge technical
directions are relevant to the design of overbridges and footbridges.
The minimum importance level in accordance with AS/NZS 1170.0 Structural design actions –
Part 0: General principles for overbridges (including footbridges) shall be as given in Table 1.
In special circumstances such as for heritage reasons, masonry is approved for the
refurbishment of existing structures and for cladding of new structures.
Fibre composite and engineered timber products may be used for structural elements subject to
the approval of the Lead Civil Engineer, ASA for the following applications:
Plastic pipes for deck drainage shall be in accordance with RMS QA Specification R23 Plastic
Flexible Pipes.
• have a minimum design life of 20 years, with only minor reduction in light transmission
The use of polycarbonate and PMMA material is subject to acceptance by the RIM. See
Section 18 for further requirements.
10.2. Formwork
Permanent formwork located above 1500 V direct current (dc) overhead wiring (OHW)
equipment shall be comprised of non-corrosive and non-conductive materials in order to
eliminate the potential safety risk of deterioration and subsequent contact with the equipment.
Acceptable products for permanent formwork above electrified tracks include non-conductive
material such as fibrous cement sheet, reinforced concrete and fibreglass.
Steel decking permanent formwork shall only be used subject to the approval of the Lead Civil
Engineer, ASA.
The designer shall ensure that the manufacturer, constructor and maintainer of the product
understand any special requirements or practices relating to the use of the product in the rail
environment prior to release of the design documentation. The design documentation shall
include these special requirements.
11. Durability
The durability requirements shall be in accordance with T HR CI 12002 ST Durability
Requirements for Civil Infrastructure.
Requirements for any ongoing monitoring shall be specified in the durability plan and technical
maintenance plan (TMP).
The design for earthing and bonding of all overbridges and footbridges in the electrified area
shall comply with the requirements in TN 016: 2015 Overbridges and footbridges – Earthing and
bonding requirements.
Earthing and bonding requirements for low voltage shall be in accordance with
T HR EL 12004 ST Low Voltage Distribution and Installations Earthing.
12. Clearances
Horizontal and vertical clearances for new overbridge and footbridge spans in the rail corridor
shall comply with ESC 215 Transit Space.
Horizontal and vertical clearances of spans outside the rail corridor shall be determined in
accordance with AS 5100 and in consultation with the relevant authorities.
Clearance shall account for any planned future developments, as nominated by TfNSW.
The design and construction of overbridges and footbridges shall ensure that minimum
clearances to all electrical power lines and equipment comply with Australian standards, the
regulations of the relevant electrical authorities and TfNSW standards.
Where high voltage (HV) aerial lines are located above an overbridge or footbridge, appropriate
measures shall be taken to ensure the following:
• The buildings on the bridge shall not be located under the HV aerial line. Refer to
T HR EL 10001 ST HV Aerial Line Standards for Design and Construction for prohibited
configurations with buildings under HV aerial lines.
• The risk associated with transfer potential from fallen conductors is mitigated.
The deck structure in the vicinity of OHW shall be designed to provide an impenetrable barrier
to prevent persons from contacting OHW equipment, see Section 17.1 for requirements.
14. Drainage
Drainage systems for bridge superstructure and substructure shall be designed in accordance
with AS 5100. The drainage system shall achieve the following:
• surface drainage run-off water shall not discharge into the rail corridor
• have a serviceability limit state (SLS) flood design annual recurrence interval (ARI) of 50
years
• divert water away from bearings, and not allow to pond near bearings
• have a minimum pipe diameter of 150 mm for pipes in the bridge deck and comprised of
rigid type pipes
• allow for at least 10% blockage of scuppers and outlets within the bridge
• have a minimum pipe diameter of 225 mm for below ground pipes carrying surface run-off
• have a minimum gradient of 1 in 100 for pipes and concrete lined drainage paths
• subsurface drainage systems behind abutments and retaining walls for the control of
ground water are permitted to discharge into the rail corridor from designated weepholes
• have pipeline flushing points at the start, at abrupt changes of grade or alignment and at
intervals of not more than 10 m along the bridge
• accommodate long-term settlements and creep of the bridge, including minimum gradients
and falls
Terminating anchors shall not be attached to the side faces of overbridges and shall not be
attached to footbridges.
Where anchor plates are used to attach OHW to a bridge, the electrical requirements shall
comply with TN 016: 2015.
• For concrete bridges, stainless steel anchors shall be cast into the new bridge elements.
Anchors in existing concrete bridges shall be stainless steel chemical anchors designed
and installed in accordance with AS 5216 Design of post-installed and cast-in fastenings in
concrete.
• For attachment to steel girder bridges, bolting shall be in accordance with AS 5100.6 and
RMS specification B201.
Where simply supported girders are used, links slabs in the concrete deck over the supports to
eliminate transverse deck joints should be used.
Longitudinal deck joints are permitted between adjacent superstructures of a widened bridge
deck. The longitudinal deck joint shall satisfy the following requirements:
• The longitudinal deck joint shall be located within a raised median or outside any marked
traffic lane.
• The longitudinal joint shall have a durable cover to prevent debris from falling onto the
tracks below and prevent access to overhead wiring.
• Water shall not be permitted to enter into the rail corridor from the longitudinal joint.
• The longitudinal joint shall be maintainable from the road surface without the need to enter
into the rail corridor.
• Agreement from the road authority shall be obtained for the longitudinal deck joint
arrangement.
16.2. Bearings
Jacking locations for bearing replacement activities shall be provided on the superstructures
and substructure bearing shelf. Jacking locations and jacking loads shall be clearly shown on
design drawings.
17. Screens
Section 18.1 to Section 18.3 provide requirements for safety screens, protection screens, and
polycarbonate or PMMA screen infill material.
• Safety screens shall be used on all new overbridges and footbridges in the 1500 V dc area.
• Vertical safety screens shall be used where it is feasible and they may be integrated with a
protection screen.
• Vertical safety screens shall be designed for the same loads as for protection screens. See
Section 18.2 for protection screen requirements.
• Where a vertical safety screen on a new bridge is not feasible, a horizontal safety screen
may be used, subject to the approval of the Lead Civil Engineer, ASA.
• Horizontal safety screens may be used on existing bridges. The safety screens shall be
insulated from the bridge structure. The RIM shall assess the risk of security breaches and
trespassers gaining access to the horizontal safety screens and carry out mitigation as
required.
• Safety screens shall be provided on stepways, ramps and landings adjacent to 1500 V dc
OHW equipment and within the clearance requirements specified in T HR EL 08001 ST.
• The minimum design life of safety screens shall be in accordance with T HR CI 12002 ST,
except for polycarbonate or PMMA panel infill material. See Section 18.3 for design life
requirements for polycarbonate and PMMA materials.
Protection screens are required on all new overbridges and footbridges, and where nominated
by the RIM, on existing bridges.
Where the function of a vertical safety screen is incorporated into a protection screen, it shall
also prevent access to 1500 V dc OHW equipment.
• Protection screens shall be designed and configured in accordance with AS 5100.1 and
AS 5100.2.
• Protection screens adjacent to roadways shall be vertical. Where fitted onto an existing
bridge and clearance is required to allow for vehicle roll, the protection screen may be
sloped outwards. Justification for the provision of outward sloping protection screen shall
be provided in the design report.
• The designer shall carry out a risk assessment and provide details at the ends of protection
screens (for example, adjacent to the abutments), to prevent unauthorised access to the
outside of the bridge, the horizontal safety screens or to the live, exposed 1500 V dc OHW
equipment.
The designer shall consider the fire performance requirements of the materials chosen where
the protection screen also performs the function of pedestrian barriers.
The design requirements for polycarbonate or PMMA screen infill are as follows:
• the aspect ratio of the panels shall not exceed the manufacturer’s recommendations
The length of deflection walls, where used, shall be determined based on risk assessment
requirements and site conditions.
The collision load shall not be less than that specified in AS 5100.
• the transverse distance from the outside face of the platform wall (ignoring coping
overhang where present) to the nearest face of the pier or column is more than 1.7 m
• the transverse location of the face of a pier or column (with respect to the design centre-
line of track) is in accordance with ESC 215 (that is, 4.3 m or more from the design centre-
line of the adjacent track, for side platforms and island platforms)
• the longitudinal distance of a pier or column (with respect to track) is more than 20 m from
the end of a ramped platform (excluding the length of the ramp); or, is more than 4 m from
the end of a vertical (non-ramped) platform
• the length of the platform between the pier and the platform end is capable of resisting the
collision loads specified in clause 11.4.2 of AS 5100.2:2017
• the platform is isolated from transferring collision load onto the pier
Where the above conditions are not satisfied, localised platform strengthening around the
bridge support, to satisfy the requirements of clause 11.4.2 of AS 5100.2:2017 shall be carried
out.
Utilities owned by other organisations can include communications, water and sewerage, power
and gas.
The designer shall consult the relevant authorities and shall provide special ducts for existing
services and, where appropriate, future services. When required, services shall be segregated.
For example, signalling and power services shall be segregated.
The location and fixing of service ducts shall facilitate access to services for maintenance
activities without the interruption of rail or road operations. The location and fixing of service
ducts shall not obstruct access to the main structure for inspection and maintenance activities.
The preferred placement is that service ducts are housed within the structure, for example
within footways, rather than having exposed service ducts.
Services and utilities shall accommodate deck and joint movements and superstructure jacking
movements. See Section 17 for details on bearings and deck joints.
lighting structures shall be designed in accordance with the requirements in Section 21.1 to
Section 21.3.
The design life of road signs and lighting structures shall be in accordance with AS 5100.
The design wind speed for signs attached to overbridges shall be as specified in AS/NZS
1170.2 for a 1000 year average recurrence interval.
• advertising signs shall not be attached to the external faces, that is, facing towards the
track, of overbridges and footbridges
• the design loading for advertising signs shall be in accordance with the relevant Australian
standards
• existing bridges shall be assessed to determine if they have sufficient structural capacity to
carry the additional loads from proposed advertising signs
• advertising signs shall not adversely affect the structural integrity or durability of a bridge
• advertising signs shall not create an obstruction that causes water to pond or debris to
accumulate anywhere on an overbridge or footbridge
• access ladders for a sign shall not infringe the clear walking space of footbridges or
pedestrian walkways on overbridges
• signs and fixings shall not prevent access for inspection and maintenance of the overbridge
or footbridge including the part of the structure immediately behind the sign
Guidance on the advertising sign structures can be found in the NSW Planning and
Environment publication Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines –
Assessing Development Applications under SEPP 64.
• safety of bridge and rail corridor users, including members of public, staff and emergency
services personnel
• minimisation of interruption to railway operations and the roadway in the event of fire
(business continuity)
Fire resistance shall be provided to ensure that bridges maintain their structural stability in case
of a fire incident with consideration of the following:
• expected rail traffic mix, including the potential for diesel powered rolling stock and
dangerous goods which determines relevant fire hazard
• fire safety objectives as defined in the preceding paragraph, particularly asset protection
and rail line operational continuity in the event of a fire incident as well as the facilitation of
fire services intervention
Specific fire performance requirements for overbridges are in Section 28.7 and for footbridges in
Section 29.10.
22. Documentation
The design of all new overbridges and footbridges shall be fully documented and relevant
information retained by the RIM. Section 23.1 to Section 23.4 set out the required
documentation.
• bridge location and description including track and kilometrage and asset ID
• cost estimates and options evaluation including life cycle costing assessment
• design standards
• summary of design loads, member design actions and member design capacities
• fatigue design
• drainage design
• constructability issues
• durability plan
• TMPs
• technical specifications
• bridge (including line and kilometrage) and component identification and numbering in
accordance with ESC 300 Structures System
• any other information that is relevant to ensure that the new structure is constructed and
maintained in accordance with the design
• the construction hazards and risks on the general arrangement drawing in the form of
safety notes
• construction sequence
The technical specification for overbridge or footbridge construction shall be in accordance with
SPC 301.
RMS QA specifications are referenced in SPC 301. The designer shall supply all the relevant
design information required as input into the relevant appendices within the RMS specifications,
including any amendments required to specific clauses.
The design documentation shall reflect this requirement and shall include all project specific
requirements necessary for completeness of the technical specifications.
23. Painting
Protective paint coating of steelwork shall comply with the requirements of SPC 301.
Overbridges and footbridges shall not be painted using the safe working colours of red, orange
or green.
Painting of steel girders shall be undertaken only as part of an approved protective coating
system, or durability plan strategy.
Concrete or permanent formwork elements of the superstructure soffit or the adjacent high-level
substructure elements of an overbridge or footbridge shall only be painted as a durability
requirement.
The colour and surface finish of paint on concrete surfaces shall be approved by the RIM. The
colour shall be similar to the unpainted surface or be transparent. Dark paint colours do not
facilitate the periodic visual examination of a structure.
24. Construction
Overbridges and footbridges shall be constructed in accordance with the technical
specifications in SPC 301.
The design shall take into account construction constraints, particularly construction activities
during live road and rail operating conditions as well as any restrictions associated with
construction during track possession.
• Clearances shall take into account transit space requirements, safe working and
construction plant and equipment.
• Bearings, joints and adjacent structure elements shall be designed to provide sufficient
access and clearances for the inspection, maintenance and replacement of the bearings
and joints.
• Jacking points shall be provided on the superstructure and on the bearing shelf to facilitate
the replacement of bearings. Sufficient vertical clearance between the underside of the
superstructure and the bearing shelf shall be provided for proved jacking systems.
• Adequate clearance shall be provided to allow for inspection and maintenance under
normal train operations.
• Access shall be provided to all parts of the bridge including substructure and embankment
scour protection, for inspections and maintenance activities such as re-painting, in
accordance with specific requirements stated in the durability plan.
24.1. Earthworks
Earthworks associated with the approaches to overbridges and footbridges shall be constructed
in accordance with SPC 301.
Bird proof screening shall be provided around bearings, in consultation with the RIM.
24.4. Nameplates
Nameplates shall be provided on all new overbridges and footbridges and on bridges that
undergo major upgrade works.
The legend and location details of the nameplate shall comply with the following:
• the nameplate shall indicate the kilometrage of the bridge, the name of the constructing
authority (for example TfNSW) and the year of construction
• the nameplate shall be securely attached to a suitable location on the Down Sydney side of
the bridge (for example the bridge kerb or the end-post of the balustrade), facing the road
or footway
All other details for nameplates shall comply with RMS QA Specification B345 Supply of Bridge
Nameplates.
The name description shall be clearly stated in a conventional street type designation, for
example ‘Erskineville Road’.
24.5.1. Location
For single and double tracks, signage shall be installed to comply with the following:
• The location of the sign shall be on the left side of the track, as seen by the train driver as
the train approaches the structure, on bridge girder, deck or superstructure. The left edge
of street name signs shall be no more than 2000 mm from the centre of the track.
At locations with more than two tracks, the position of the sign shall be determined on a case-
by-case basis with due consideration of a train driver’s angle of vision, predominant track
usage, train direction and other site-specific factors.
• black lettering
• white background
• font type in accordance with AS 1744 Standard alphabets for road signs with medium
spacing
The material on the sign shall be retroreflective material in accordance with AS/NZS 1906.1:
Retroreflective materials and devices for road traffic control purposes – Part 1: Retroreflective
sheeting.
25. Maintenance
The design shall provide ease of access to, and sufficient clearance around components for
inspection and maintenance activities.
The designer shall carefully select components, materials and finishes that minimise
maintenance during the life of the structure. See Section 12 for durability requirements.
Anti-graffiti paints shall be used on bridges in all areas accessible by the public and within the
rail corridor where prone to vandalism, in consultation with the RIM.
Anti-graffiti coatings shall comply with Australian Paint Approval Scheme (APAS) Specification
1441 Permanent Graffiti Barrier.
Maintenance requirements shall be specified in the TMP for the structure. The requirements
shall include examination tasks and frequencies, damage limits and repair standards.
MN A 00100 Civil and Track Technical Maintenance and ESC 302 Structures Defect Limits
applies to most bridges. However, it may be necessary to document additional site-specific
maintenance requirements in a specific TMP.
The requirements and high-level processes for the development of TMPs are in
T MU AM 01003 ST Development of Technical Maintenance Plans.
Disposal is the process of removing an asset from the network, for example, demolition of an
overbridge followed by removal and recycling.
The decommissioning or disposal of a bridge is the final stage of the asset life cycle. Proper
planning of this part of the life cycle is an integral part of the strategic life cycle process.
The process to be undertaken for the disposal of an overbridge or footbridge shall be as follows:
• justification in the investigation report (safety, financial and so on) for disposal of the asset
After decommissioning and disposal, the asset database shall be updated by the RIM to reflect
network changes.
At least fifty per cent of construction and demolition waste by weight of the decommissioned
asset should be diverted from landfill.
• Overbridges not located at compliant platforms (see Section 19.3) shall comprise a clear
span between abutments. This requirement can only be satisfied by a single span bridge
without piers.
• Overbridges located at stations may have piers positioned on platforms, provided the
platform configuration requirements specified in Section 19.3 are satisfied.
• Piers supporting spans over the rail corridor, where approved, shall not be frangible.
• Abutments that comply with the requirements of this standard and AS 5100 are permitted
within the rail corridor.
• Span configuration shall include provision for future tracks as nominated by TfNSW.
Notes:
1 - Include loads such as heavy load platform (HLP) where nominated by the road
authority
2 - Include any special load requirements where nominated by the road owner agreed
by the RIM
• BEDC-3 for overbridges on public roads over sidings, subject to the agreement of the
relevant road authority
• BEDC-3 for overbridges on rail corridor access roads, private access roads, and over
sidings
• not less than half the collision load specified in Clause 11.4.2 of AS 5100.2:2017 shall be
applied
• the full collision load specified in Clause 11.4.3 of AS 5100.2:2017 shall be applied
• piers may be comprised of individual columns without a crash wall between the columns
• the load on each individual column shall not be less than half of the collision loads
specified in Clause 11.4.2 of AS 5100.2:2017, and the full load specified in Clause 11.4.3
of AS 5100.2:2017
Where the platform conditions specified in Section 19.3 are not satisfied, the pier shall be
designed for the full collision load and conditions specified in clause 11.4 of AS 5100.2:2017.
Traffic barrier profiles on bridges and end treatment of road barriers that are not in accordance
with RMS standard practice shall only be used with the approval of the Lead Civil Engineer,
ASA.
Road traffic barriers for overbridges above the rail corridor for new bridges shall be at least
medium performance level in accordance with AS 5100 and shall be subject to risk assessment
in accordance with AS 5100 to determine whether a special performance level is required.
Where a risk of vehicle incursion into the rail corridor from the road approaches to the bridge is
identified, a risk assessment shall be undertaken to determine the minimum type and length of
traffic barriers required to minimise the risk of vehicle incursion. Road approach barriers with a
higher performance requirement than standard may be necessary.
• for overbridges at non-station locations, specific fire requirements do not exist at the time of
publication of this standard
• for overbridges at stations on rail lines not served by freight rolling stock, the superstructure
span above track shall provide a level of fire resistance not less than 60/-/- (that is, 60
minutes structural adequacy with nil for insulation and integrity) when exposed to the
standard (cellulosic) fire curve specified in AS 1530.4 Methods for fire tests on building
materials, components and structures – Part 4: Fire-resistance tests for elements of
construction
• for overbridges at stations on rail lines served by freight rolling stock, the superstructure
span above track shall provide a level of fire resistance of not less than 90/-/- (that is, 90
minutes structural adequacy with nil for insulation and integrity) when exposed to the
standard (cellulosic) fire curve of AS 1530.4
• the designer shall obtain advice from the RIM regarding the lines served by freight rolling
stock
Unless otherwise noted, footbridges include shared path (combined pedestrian and cycleway)
bridges.
• Footbridges shall comprise a clear span between abutments, except as permitted in this
standard.
• Abutments that comply with the requirements of this standard and AS 5100 are permitted
within the rail corridor.
• Footbridges without abutments shall comprise a clear span between outer piers.
• Intermediate piers are permissible when they are located on platforms that have the
characteristics defined in Section 19.2.
• Frangible piers for footbridges shall not be used unless approved by the Lead Civil
Engineer, ASA.
• Span configuration shall include provision for future tracks as nominated by TfNSW.
• The width of footbridges shall be the greatest of the widths specified in AS 5100, the
TfNSW stations and buildings standards specified in Section 10, and project and
stakeholder requirements.
Footbridges located at stations shall be designed for the crowd loading in AS 5100.
• BEDC-4 for footbridge spans that cross over public roads, subject to agreement by the
road authority
• not less than the minimum collision load in clause 11.4.3 of AS 5100.2:2017 applied
Where the platform conditions in Section 19.3 are not satisfied, the footbridge pier shall be
designed for the full collision load and conditions in clause 11.4 of AS 5100.2:2017.
The minimum height of pedestrian barriers and cyclist barriers shall be in accordance with
AS 5100.
Structural elements connecting the lift structure to the bridge, such as landings and link slabs,
are not required to be designed for collision loads, and shall be designed so that collision load
on the lift structure is not transferred to the bridge.
28.7. Stepways
Riser and tread dimensions for footbridge stepways shall be 150 mm and 300 mm respectively.
Stepway risers shall be solid to prevent visibility from beneath the structure and to prevent items
falling through. Refer to the TfNSW stations and buildings standards specified in Section 10 for
other stepway requirements.
28.8. Ramps
Ramps shall comply with the requirements specified in the TfNSW stations and buildings
standards specified in Section 10.
Stepway and ramp structures shall be designed and detailed and positioned to prevent transfer
of train derailment collision loads to the superstructure and substructure of the bridge crossing
over the tracks.
Stepway and ramp structures may be supported by bridge piers that are designed for train
derailment collision loads in accordance with AS 5100 and this standard.
For footbridges at stations on rail lines not served by freight rolling stock the following shall
apply:
• the fire hazard properties for linings, materials and assemblies of station footbridges shall
comply with the Australian Building Codes Board National Construction Code, (NCC),
volume one Specification C1.10
• the floor of the footbridge superstructure span above the track shall provide either of the
following:
o a level of fire resistance not less than 30/30/30 when exposed to the standard
(cellulosic) fire curve of AS 1530.4
o be protected by a fire protective covering that complies with the requirements for fire
protective coverings defined in the NCC Specification C1
For footbridges at stations on rail lines served by freight rolling stock, both of the following shall
apply:
• the fire hazard properties for linings, materials and assemblies of station footbridges shall
comply with Specification C1.10 of the NCC
• the floor of the footbridge superstructure span above the track shall provide a level of fire
resistance not less than 60/30/30 when exposed to the standard (cellulosic) fire curve of
AS 1530.4
For footbridges at enclosed stations, a higher level of fire resistance to that defined in the
preceding lists may be required in order to support the fire safety and evacuation strategy.
The fire resistance requirements in the preceding lists apply to bridges which do not form part of
an egress path. Where a footbridge, footbridge supports, associated stairs, ramps and similar
structures form part of an egress path from a station or elsewhere the requirements of the NCC
apply. Reference shall be made to the TfNSW stations and buildings standards listed in
Section 10 for further requirements.
Any bridge intended to be in service for more than 24 months is considered a permanent bridge
and shall be designed in accordance with the requirements of this standard for permanent
bridges.
The risk assessment shall be in accordance with Section 5.1 of this standard and with
T MU MD 20002 ST and shall also consider any other relevant site-specific criteria.
The collision loading from AS 5100 applied to a support shall be determined from the risk
assessment category, and not less than shown in Table 3.
The use of lower order protection devices such as earth mounds, gabions and guard rails may
be used in the risk assessment to reduce the risk category. Approval shall be obtained from the
Lead Civil Engineer, ASA.
Repair methods and procedures in accordance with AS 5100.8: 2017 and TMC 302 Structures
Repair shall be specified by the designer in the design of refurbishment works.
Where repair methods are not adequately detailed in TMC 302, the designer shall develop and
document appropriate repair methods and materials.
The design life for the refurbishment works shall be the greater of the expected remaining life of
the bridge and 20 years.
The need to increase the capacity of elements that are not directly affected by the proposed
upgrade shall be assessed as part of the project development.
A capacity assessment of the bridge shall be undertaken as part of the upgrade investigation.
Requirements on major upgrades and the criteria for upgrading the entire bridge to the
requirements of this standard are in Section 30.3.
The design of new structural elements and the strengthening of existing structural elements
shall comply with AS 5100 and the requirements of this standard.
Where the upgrade of an overbridge or footbridge is proposed, the relevant road authority, RIM
and any other stakeholder shall be consulted in order to ascertain the proposed usage and
loading requirements for the structure. Asset decisions shall be made that take into account the
whole-of-life costs of the asset. For example, it may be more economical to replace a structure
than upgrade it.
For overbridges, the minimum design live load for new and strengthened structural elements
shall be not less than T44 traffic load as specified in Appendix C.
For footbridges, the minimum design live load for new and strengthened structural elements
shall be 5 kPa.
The design of modifications to an existing overbridge or footbridge shall take into account the
effects of the modifications on the existing structure as modifications may affect its stability,
capacity and serviceability.
Disability access legislation and policies can require the retrofitting of easy access provisions to
existing bridges. The new work shall be integrated into the existing structure. The new work
should consider aspects such as aesthetics, materials and thermal movements on the structure
overall.
Refurbishment and repair work of non-upgraded components should be undertaken prior to the
commencement of an upgrade, or carried out in conjunction with the upgrade works.
New safety screens may be either vertical or horizontal and shall be insulated from the bridge
structure. Screens and barriers shall comply with the design requirements in this standard.
The need to upgrade existing traffic barriers on a bridge shall be determined on a risk
assessment priority basis by the RIM. Refer to TMC 321 Overbridge Traffic Barrier
Replacement - Risk Ranking Model for site-specific risk factors and prioritisation methodology.
Where existing traffic barriers on an overbridge are to be upgraded, the traffic barrier
performance level shall be in accordance with AS 5100, except as otherwise permitted within
this standard.
At bridge locations that cannot economically sustain traffic barriers to the performance level
specified in AS 5100, a site-specific traffic barrier minimum performance level shall be
determined by taking into account the following risk assessment methods:
• the procedure contained in AS 5100.1:2017 which sets out the selection of an appropriate
road barrier performance level related to traffic conditions and the road environment
• the procedure provided in RMS BTD 2007/08 Rev 2, RMS18.1106 Design of Replacement
Traffic Barriers on Existing Bridges, which relates to the performance level of replacement
traffic barriers for existing bridges, taking into account site-specific risks
The methods used to determine the minimum site-specific traffic barrier performance level shall
be documented, together with cost estimates and construction methodology.
Where the minimum traffic barrier performance level required by the risk assessment cannot be
provided, alternative strategies for the containment of errant vehicles (for example, load
restrictions, speed reductions and advanced warnings signs) shall be considered and
developed in conjunction with the relevant road authority.
Where the proposed traffic barrier is of a lesser performance level than the minimum
performance level determined from the two methods described in the preceding list, the
proposed traffic barrier shall be submitted for approval by the Lead Civil Engineer, ASA.
Where the upgrade of an existing bridge includes new bridge barriers, the new bridge barriers
shall be provided for the full length of the bridge.
For bridges where the estimated cost of the upgrade work is greater than 35% of the
replacement cost of the existing structure with a new, compliant structure, the entire bridge shall
be upgraded to comply with the requirements of this standard.
For bridges where the estimated cost of upgrade works is less than 35% of the replacement
cost, upgrading of the entire structure is not required.
The complete replacement of the bridge may be a more sustainable option than upgrading the
existing structure.
For footbridges, the structure includes all associated ramps and stairways in addition to the
bridge.
Major upgrade does not include the removal of components that are not replaced, for example
ramps, stairways and redundant spans.
The installation of new structures adjacent to an existing structure, such as lifts, which does not
rely on that existing structure for support or does not provide support to that existing structure,
does not in itself require an upgrade to that existing structure. However, changes in usage of
the existing structure may require upgrading of the existing structure based on the estimated
cost.
Upgrade works adjacent to an existing structure shall take into account the need to develop or
replace the existing structures in the future.
The risk profile at an existing location may change due to infrastructure configuration or rail
operation changes, such as realignment of existing tracks closer to bridge piers, new tracks
constructed, increase in track speeds and train frequency.
For the purpose of this standard, an at-risk support is one that was not designed for collision
loads where an impact from a derailed train could cause removal of the support resulting in the
collapse of the superstructure. At-risk supports include steel trestles, slender columns and
slender rigid frame support legs, and supports with shallow or simple footings.
Where additional rail tracks are required to be installed, an existing overbridge or footbridge can
require modification or extension. For example, an existing abutment may be converted to a pier
with tracks on both sides. The risk of derailment collision from both sides of the pier shall be
taken into account.
If the risk at a particular bridge site increases as a result of proposed infrastructure change, the
level of risk mitigation and bridge protection required shall be determined by risk assessment.
The risk assessment shall be submitted for acceptance by the RIM.
Where it is determined that an existing bridge support is at risk, mitigation actions shall be
implemented so that the risk shall be reduced to so far as is reasonably practical (SFAIRP).
Where a lift shaft is constructed near an existing bridge pier and the location of the lift structure
increases the risk of damage to the pier in the event of a derailed train colliding with the lift
structure, the pier shall be protected in accordance with the mitigation actions determined by
risk assessment.
• BTD 2008/09 Link Slabs for Precast Pretensioned Concrete Girder Bridges