The document describes a case study of Singer Industries Limited. It details how Suresh Kumar, the production manager, was interrupted multiple times during an interview with an applicant, Ranga Rao, due to work issues.
1. Companies should implement policies to minimize interruptions during interviews such as scheduling interviews when the manager's time is free from other responsibilities.
2. Interviews should be conducted in environments designed for undivided focus on the candidate without distractions.
3. Managers should communicate unavailability for interviews ahead of time to avoid last minute scheduling that is likely to involve interruptions.
The document describes a case study of Singer Industries Limited. It details how Suresh Kumar, the production manager, was interrupted multiple times during an interview with an applicant, Ranga Rao, due to work issues.
1. Companies should implement policies to minimize interruptions during interviews such as scheduling interviews when the manager's time is free from other responsibilities.
2. Interviews should be conducted in environments designed for undivided focus on the candidate without distractions.
3. Managers should communicate unavailability for interviews ahead of time to avoid last minute scheduling that is likely to involve interruptions.
The document describes a case study of Singer Industries Limited. It details how Suresh Kumar, the production manager, was interrupted multiple times during an interview with an applicant, Ranga Rao, due to work issues.
1. Companies should implement policies to minimize interruptions during interviews such as scheduling interviews when the manager's time is free from other responsibilities.
2. Interviews should be conducted in environments designed for undivided focus on the candidate without distractions.
3. Managers should communicate unavailability for interviews ahead of time to avoid last minute scheduling that is likely to involve interruptions.
The document describes a case study of Singer Industries Limited. It details how Suresh Kumar, the production manager, was interrupted multiple times during an interview with an applicant, Ranga Rao, due to work issues.
1. Companies should implement policies to minimize interruptions during interviews such as scheduling interviews when the manager's time is free from other responsibilities.
2. Interviews should be conducted in environments designed for undivided focus on the candidate without distractions.
3. Managers should communicate unavailability for interviews ahead of time to avoid last minute scheduling that is likely to involve interruptions.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
CASE STUDY - UPTRON ELECTRONICS
LIMITED
Which Is More Important – Recruiting or Retaining
Uptron Electronics Limited, is a pioneering and internationally
reputed firm in the electronics industry. It is one of the largest firms in the country. It attracted employees from internationally reputed institute and industries by offering high salaries, perks, etc. It has advertized for the position of an electronic engineer recently. Nearly 150 candidates applied for the job Mr.Sashidhar, an electronics Engineering Graduate from the Indian Institute Of Technology with 5 years working experience in a medium sized electronics firm, was selected from among the 130 candidates who took tests and interview. The interview board recommended an enhancement in his salary by Rs 5,000 more than his present salary at his request. Mr Sashidhar was very happy to achieve this and he was congratulated by a number of people including his previous employer for his brilliant interview performance, and wished him good luck. Mr Sashidhar joined Uptyron Electronics Ltd., on 21st January, 2002, with greater enthusiasm. He also found his job to be quite comfortable and a challenging one and he felt it was prestigious to work with this company during the formative years of his career. He found his superiors as well as subordinates to be friendly and cooperative. But this climate did not live long. After one year of his service, he slowly learnt about a number of unpleasant stories about the company, management, the superior subordinate relations, rate of employee turnover, especially at higher level but he decided to stay on as he has promised several things to the management in the interview. He wanted to please and change the attitude of management through his diligent performance, firm commitment and dedication. He started maximizing his contributions and the management got the impression that Mr. Sashidhar had settled down and will remain in the company. After some time, the superiors started riding rough- shod over Mr Sashidhar. He was overloaded with multifarious jobs. His freedom in deciding and executing was cut down. He was ill-treated on a number of occasions before his subordinates. His colleagues also started assigning their responsibilities to Mr Sashidhar. Consequently, there were imbalances in his family life and organizational life. But he seemed to be calm and contented. Management felt that Mr Sashidhar had the potential to bear with many more organizational responsibilities. So, the general manager was quite surprised to see the resignation letter of Mr Sashidhar along with a cheque equivalent to a month’s salary one fine morning on 18th January, 2004. The General Manager failed to convince Mr Sashidhar to withdraw his resignation. The General Manager relieved him on 25th January, 2004. The General Manager wanted to appoint a committee to go into the matter immediately, but dropped the idea later.
1. What is wrong with the recruitment policy of the company?
Easily accepting the employees demand, initially in recruitment process. Offering high salaries with perks So as to attract the greater number of candidates to enhance the reputation of the company. They should have provided an orientation period. Personality test could have been conducted to know the ability of the employee to adjust with the work. Employees expectation from the organization should have been considered.
2. Why did Mr Sasidhar’s resignation surprised the G.M?
G.M surprised because he was a dedicated employee. Despite imbalances in his family, social and organizational life he seemed to be calm and contented. He never says ‘NO’ to any official work assigned to him by seniors and colleagues. Company policy states that employee serve a notice period before resigning. But Sasidhar directly came with the resignation forgoing his one-month salary which surprised G.M. 3. What prevented the G.M from appointing a committee?
The fear of facing their own flaws.
Company reputation will go down. He did not want to lose the employees who were behind the resignation. As they must have been working in the organization for past many years CASE STUDY – SINGER INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Suresh Kumar was production manager for Singer Industries
Limited; a Noida based electrical appliance company near Delhi. Suresh had to approve the hiring of new supervisors in the plant. The HR Manager performed the initial screening. On Friday afternoon, Suresh got a call from Anil Dhavan, Singer’s HR Director. “Suresh” Anil said, “I have just talked to a young engineering graduate from a regional engineering college who may be just who you are looking for to fill that supervisor job you asked me about. He has some good work experience in a multinational firm located in Pune, but at a lower salary level. He wants to come over to Noida where his parents live”. Suresh replied, well, Anilji, “I would take care of the boy”. Anil continued, “He is here right now in my office, I am sending him to you, if you are free”. Suresh hesitated a moment before replying, “Great Sir”, “I am certainly busy today but I can’t afford to displease you either. Sir, send him immediately.” A moment later, Ranga Rao, the new applicant arrived at Suresh’s office and introduced himself. “Come on in Mr. Rao”, said Suresh. “I’ll be right with you after I make a few urgent phone calls.” Fifteen minutes later, Suresh finished the calls and began interviewing Rao. Suresh was quite impressed. The merit certificates, the best suggestion award form previous multinational firm and Rao’s quick responses revealed the candidate’s potential. Meanwhile, Suresh’s door opened and a supervisor yelled, “We have a small problem on line number 5 and need your help “Sure”, Suresh replied, “Excuse me a minute, Rao.” Fifteen minutes later, Suresh returned and the dialogue continued for another few minutes before a series of phone calls again interrupted him. The same pattern of interruption continued for the next forty minutes. Rao looked at the watch embarrassingly and said, “I am sorry, Suresh, Sir, I have to go now. I have to catch the train to Pune at 9 P.M.” Sure thing, Rao,” Suresh said as the phone rang again.” Call me after a week”.
1. What specific policies might a company follow to avoid interviews