Scribd
Upload
30 views2 pages

Things To Consider: The Problem, The Objectives, The Design (Diagrams)

This document outlines the criteria and grading for a group project, including documentation (35%), subject knowledge (30%), supporting material (10%), teamwork (10%), presentation (5%), and readiness (10%). It also includes a section for individual performance reviews grading communication skills, work organization, effectiveness, and total. The criteria focus on clear writing, logical organization, research depth, collaboration, and preparedness for presenting the project.

Uploaded by

Judielyn Cualbar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views2 pages

Things To Consider: The Problem, The Objectives, The Design (Diagrams)

This document outlines the criteria and grading for a group project, including documentation (35%), subject knowledge (30%), supporting material (10%), teamwork (10%), presentation (5%), and readiness (10%). It also includes a section for individual performance reviews grading communication skills, work organization, effectiveness, and total. The criteria focus on clear writing, logical organization, research depth, collaboration, and preparedness for presenting the project.

Uploaded by

Judielyn Cualbar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PROJECT TITLE:________________________________________________________________

Members (Team Leader/Analyst)


(Designer)
(Document Writer)
(Researcher)

CRITERIA Description GRADE

The deliverable was well organized and clearly written. The underlying logic was
clearly articulated and easy to follow. Words were chosen that precisely expressed
the intended meaning and supported reader comprehension. Diagrams or analyses
DOCUMENTATION enhanced and clarified presentation of ideas. Sentences were grammatical and free
from errors.
(35%)

Things to consider: The problem, the objectives, the design (diagrams)

SUBJECT The deliverable demonstrated knowledge of the project content by integrating major
and minor concepts into the response. The deliverable also demonstrated
KNOWLEDGE
evidence of extensive research effort and a depth of thinking about the topic.
(30%)

All relevant information was obtained and information sources were valid.
SUPPORTING
Analysis and design considerations were well supported by the information.
MATERIAL

(10%)
Things to consider: Actual forms, interview/survey forms

TEAMWORK The team worked well together to achieve objectives. Each member contributed in
a valuable way to the project. All data sources indicated a high level of mutual
(10%) respect and collaboration.

PRESENTATION (5%) The overall presentation is organized. Each member looked neat and formal. The
team’s communication skills are excellent as well.

READINESS (10%) Overall, the team is ready for the defense.

TOTAL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE

Directions: The Panelist gives comments on how each member of the group performed
during the defense. Write the number that corresponds to the presenter’s performance. Use
the legend below.
4 – Excellent 3 – Exceeds Expectations 2 – Meets Expectations
1 – Meets Expectations Sometimes 0 – Does not Meet Expectations
Name

Name

Name
Name

Name

Criteria

I. Communication Skills
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation (pleasantness of voice)
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
II. Work Organization
5. Preparedness
6. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
7. Participation in the defense
III. Effectiveness
8. Ability to answer questions
9. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
IV. Total

You might also like