grkg / Humankybernetik

Band 55 · Heft 2 (2014)

Akademia Libroservo / IfK

Unity of Objectivism and Subjectivism

Anton P. ŽELEZNIKAR, Ljubljana (SLO)
1. Introduction
This sort of informational investigation concerns the everyday life by the use of an eth-
nic language, namely, the physical thing presentation being seen before the eyes, on
the one side, and the inner phenomenon of the thing belonging to the spiritual world
within human mind, on the other side. Usually, an individual mind isn’t clearly aware
of the difference existing between the objective, thing-concerning world, and the sub-
jective, consciously inner spiritual sphere of presentation. Bear & Mitterauer (2013)
presented the problem by the case of the German words “Apfel” and “apfel”. The first
one lies before us on the table, the second one exists as a presentation deep in the mind.
Certainly, the principle of objectivism and subjectivism is in force for all other kinds
of information, concerning spheres of senses, like seeing, hearing, touching, smelling,
tasting and other sorts of the perceivable. Objectivism and subjectivism concern an
object or thing meaningly in a twofold way, the outer and the inner, the realistic and the
abstract, the materialistic and the idealistic, the sensual and the spiritual1 .
2. Capturing the Problem Graphically and Informationally
The problem lies in the unity as a conglomerate or alloy of graphs belonging to the
objectivism and the subjectivism. Within the conscious system they are inseparable,
overlapping meaningly each other, however, linguistically distinguishable as a thing
being as such and its spiritual presentation. The difference seems to be as the empirical
against the abstract or against the theoretical. The thing as an object of the traditional
(Newtonian) physics is put against the thing as a particle phenomenon in quantum me-
chanics. The quale as a sense experience stands against the thing presentation of the
theoretical mind being something else. Even two different meanings for the one and
the other come out of that situation, they are connected mutually through the objective
and the subjective graph which usually have some common named nodes.
In Fig. 1, a graph presentation of the white informational-conscious oval against the
gray environment oval is given. Some informational operands are introduced with the
following meaning: ai is a named operand, where i = 1, 2, . . . , n < ∞ marks the i’s
and, by that, the number of ai ’s constructive potential infiniteness. In this case, ai marks
the entire objective meaning, the objective informon, that has to be distinguished from
the subjective meaning, the subjective informon, denoted by a✿✿i. A detailed meaning of
objective and subjective terms, occurring in the article, is given transparently in Tab. 1.
Some terms of the Tab. 1 can now be discussed to the necessary depth. The general
distinguishing between objective and subjective operands is possible on the formalised
level by the use of \underline and \overline LATEX commands for the objective case,

1
For instance, a wooden idol was replaced by the spiritual one when the tribe was on flight before enemies.
52 Anton P. Železnikar

rreal ⌈ai ⌉, iideal ⌈ai ⌉,

n
rma
tio ai ; ai ai ssense ⌈ai ⌉, qquale ⌈ai ⌉,
o
, i inf mmaterialistic⌈ai⌉, sspiritual ⌈ai⌉,
G⌈S⌈Φ⌈( z; z ; (z✿; z))⌉⌉⌉

Φ⌈( ai; ai ; (a✿✿i ; ai ))⌉,

ion

oobjectivistic ⌈ai ⌉, ssubjectivistic ⌈ai ⌉,

cat

i = 1, 2, . . . , n < ∞
uni

✿✿
ccivilization, ccomm

tterrestial ⌈ai⌉, ccosmic ⌈ai ⌉,

pphysical ⌈ai ⌉, qquantum-mechanical ⌈ai⌉,

ppractical ⌈ai⌉, ttheoretical ⌈ai ⌉,

eempirical ⌈ai⌉, mmathematical ⌈ai ⌉,
re
,

ttechnological ⌈ai⌉, ssymbolical ⌈ai ⌉,

ultu
cc

eexperiential ⌈ai ⌉, pphilosophical ⌈ai ⌉,

t,

n
me
env
ir on ✿✿
(a✿✿i ; ai ) a✿✿i ···
e

c Anton P. Železnikar, Aug 2, 2013

Figure 1: The meaning of several expressions concerning entities of the objective-subjective domain
within the informational consciousness. Some conceptually new expressions arise from pure mathemat-
ical forms, as seen from objective and subjective operands concerning ai in the right column of the gray
oval.

and, \uwave and \owave commands for the subjective case. Formally, also mixed
commands upon an operand are possible, delivering subjective-objective and vice versa
cases, as seen explicitly in the lower part of Tab. 1. In the lower part of the table there
are the mixed forms of the subjective meaning of the objective meaning of ai and the
objective meaning of the subjective meaning of ai . That means, for instance, that the
objective meaning of ai can be investigated through the subjective meaning of ai and
vice versa. In reality, such an investigation, consideration and use happen consciously,
intentionally and, even, unconsciously. This approves the nature of the unity of the
objective and the subjective and their dismemberment looks like a psychopathic state
called schizophrenia. In politics, those psychopathic phenomena are known and de-
scribed within the science of political ponerology (Łobaczewski 2009, 2011). Their
development was enabled and forced especially within communist regimes in East-
ern Europe and Balkans and, e.g., in Slovenia remaining as a human, population and
antidemocratic oppression until this very day. Evil is still demonstrated instead of Em-
pathy.

3. A verbal comparison of the objective and subjective area (mind)

Following the suggestions in (B EAR , W. & B.J. M ITTERAUER 2013), in English Tab. 2
interesting comparisons between the objective and the subjective phrases can be intro-
duced. As one can see, in the left vertical column of the table, three major areas for
the horizontal fields appears, named as Integration of emerging objective and subjec-
 Unity of Objectivism and Subjectivism 53

Mathematically expressed components of the unified objective-subjective informa-

tional space are the following:

ai named objective-subjective entity, e.g., a labelled node of

the graph
ai objective informon, the meaning of an objectively named entity ai
a:i subjective informon, the meaning of a ::::::::::
subjectively named entity ai
ai objective entropon, a set of operand and operator phrases for
the objectively named entity ai
::
ai subjective entropon, a set of operand and operator phrases
::::::::
  for the subjectively named entity ai
ai ; ai objective informational space of the named entity ai
 
::
ai ; ai subjective informational space of the named entity ai
:    ::::::::
::
ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai uniform objective-subjective informational space
  
::
 
ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai ; objective informational space
     of the
uniform objective-
     subjective space ai ; ai ; ai ; ai
::
:: :
ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai

  
::
 
ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai ;
 ::::::::::::::::  subjective informational
 space
  of the uniform objective-
 :::::::::::::::
     subjective space ai ; ai ; ai ; ::
ai
 a ; a ; a ; ::  :
i i i ai
:

 
ai
ai subjective meaning of the objective meaning of ai
:: ::::
 
ai
::

a:i objective meaning of the subjective meaning of ai
    uniform informational space of subjective meaning of the ob-
ai ; a:i jective meaning of ai and objective meaning of the subjective
:::: meaning of ai
:::   uniform entropon (informational system of operand and opera-
:
ai ; ai tor phrases) of the subjective meaning of the objective meaning
of ai and the objective meaning of the subjective meaning of ai

Table 1: The meaning of several expressions concerning entities of the objective-subjective domain
within the informational consciousness. Some conceptually new expressions arise from pure mathemat-
ical forms, as seen from explanations in the right column of the table.

tive experience in the left upmost position, The meaning integration of the objective
and subjective in the middle position and The abyss between the objectivism and the
subjectivism in the lower position.
54 Anton P. Železnikar

The Objective The Subjective

Objectivism Subjectivism
Materialism Idealism
The abyss between the objectiv-

The physical, time-space, the real The quantum-mechanical, wave, the

ism and the subjectivism

spiritual
The concrete The abstract
Practice Theory, philosophy
Brain: neuronal network Brain: glial network
Synapses: neurotransmitters Synapses: astrocytes, oligodendrocytes
The terrestrial, the nowadays The universal, the space-like
Intelligence the leftist one, Invention, super-conscious phenomena,
the reactionary transcendentalism, art
Information as the various, Various, any forms of meaning, un-
as any physical changes derstanding of all phenomenal
Easiness of the every-day life Intuitive challenges
Objective use of ethnic Subjective use of ethnic and
the objective and subjective
The meaning integration of

and alternative languages alternative languages

Linguistic and other forms Intention, intuition, ambition,
of behavior motivation
Cognition, emotions Spiritual sphere, mind homeostasis
The evident, the showing, The symbolic, the mathematical,
the transparent the formalized
Tactic Strategy
Syntax, grammar The meaning with parenthesis pairs,
stylistics, linguistic codes, ciphering
Phenomenalism as Informational nature of the world
a primitive logic
Integration of emerging object-

and the universe

ive and subjective experience

Traditional logic Informational logic of consciousness

Scattering, ignorance Concentration, the creative interest
Naivety, credulity Imagination, inspiration, brilliance
Lazy easiness of the mind The conscious, meaning perplexity
Straightness, single- Parallel, reflexive organization of
mindedness informational consciousness
Doctrine, discipline, tight Creative freedom, new science, new
scientific rigor, tenets technological development
Experience like the naked Spiritual understanding of experi-
rational mind, e.g., cogito, ence, integration with the quantum
ergo sum (Descartes) mechanical, e.g., I am, as I understand
c
Anton P. Železnikar, June 24, 2013

Table 2: The clearly presented table shows how the objective and the subjective can be categorized
vertically and then the meaning contents can be put in the columns, following the article of Bear &
Mittenauer 2013, and the author’s suggestions.
 Unity of Objectivism and Subjectivism 55

Input information

neuroreceptors
Astrocyte

Astrocyte (glia)
Nonactivity: nonproduction of neurotransmitters (schizophrenia)
Subactivity: subproduction of neurotransmitters (depression)
neurotransmitters
Presynapsis

Superactivity: superproduction of neurotransmitters (mania)

Presynapsis
.. ..
. .
neurotransmitters

neuroreceptors

neurotransmitters
Presynapsis

Presynapsis

.. .. Negative feed-back impact ..

. . of an astrocyte — delaying, .

Astrocyte
reducing, inhibiting:
delayed (depression)
reduced (mania)
uninterrupted (schizophrenia)
neuroreceptors
Postsynapsis

Postsynapsis
.. Delayed information transfer (depression)
. Accelerated information transfer (mania)
Uninterrupted information transfer (schizophrenia)

c Anton P. Železnikar, July 16, 2009 Output information

Figure 2: The tripartite graph of a synapsis, with an astrocyte feed-back connection to the presynapsis,
that impacts the transfer of neurotransmitters to neuroreceptors of postsynapsis, according to Araque,
Parpura, Sanzgiri & Haydon 1999, Mitterauer 2009, and author’s grahical interpretation.

In the first vertical section of Tab. 2, Materialism and Idealism seem to be clear
opponents of the meaning. Materialism represents The physical, time-space, the real
while The quantum-mechanical, wave, the spiritual is on the side of Idealism. The
concrete and Practice are near to materialism, while The abstract and Theory, philoso-
phy remain close to idealism. How does the objective and the subjective mirrors in the
brain, a biological tissue, where is the seat of consciousness? The neuronal network
is informing in parallel together with the glial network, the first being oriented objec-
tively and the second subjectively. For instance, Fig. 2 shows, how a glia cell (astrocyte,
oligodendrocyte) within a synapsis in a neuronal network can influence different states
of mental disorders, being conditioned in the brain by “subjectively” informing glial
network. The regulation of neurotransmitter transfer through a synapsis can essentially
impact several kinds of such and other mental disorders. Objectively, The terrestrial,
56 Anton P. Železnikar

the nowadays stands against The universal, the space-like, subjectively. Intelligence,
especially, the leftist one, being the only state of truth objectively, can’t be equal to,
underestimates Invention, super-conscious phenomena, the reactionary transcenden-
talism, art, as seen from Tab. 2. Information as the various, as any physical changes
seems to be the only objective manner of cognition and doesn’t recognize Various, any
forms of meaning, understanding of all phenomenal as a necessary subjective activity
of the brain. In this way, Easiness of the every-day life neglects urgent Intuitive chal-
lenges produced as necessities of a biologic, economic, financial and politic survival.
In the middle of Tab. 2 entities take the place constituting The meaning integra-
tion of the objective and subjective. Objective use of ethnic and alternative languages
seems quite natural, logical and the only significant, but the Subjective use of ethnic
and alternative languages reveals actual values of spirit, perplexedly influencing the
entire objective area and calling for its critical renewal. Linguistic and other forms of
behavior in everyday life seem to be logical and indisputable, but Intention, intuition,
ambition, motivation might look to be subjective or even transcendental. Cognition,
emotions in the table are considered from time immemorial as objective. On the other
side Spiritual sphere, mind homeostasis lie certainly in the subjective sphere. The evi-
dent, the showing, the transparent is situated before the human eyes, but The symbolic,
the mathematical, the formalized belong to the abstract world. Tactic is an evident,
public intentional measure, a subcomponent of strategy while Strategy is understood
to be a hidden, only partly known system of measures, with a long-term planed, a
well weighted and a well designed a system leading to important goals. Syntax, gram-
mar is always on the side of the objectively determined rules, but The meaning with
parenthesis pairs, stylistics, linguistic codes, ciphering of languages remain spiritually,
individually and subjectively nontransparent, non public.
Integration of emerging objective and subjective experience is representing the last
section of entities in Tab. 2. Evidently, Phenomenalism as a primitive logic in philos-
ophy opposes Informational nature of the world and the universe as the most general
concept imaginable. Traditional logic, including mathematical, predicative, philosoph-
ical logic, is a sub-domain of Informational logic of consciousness, that analyses even
the logical values as possible and relevant entities of being true or false. Scattering,
ignorance are the opposite of Concentration, the creative interest, which requires par-
ticular sensibility, intuitive attention and certain isolation from the outer world. The
lightness of Naivety, credulity can’t be compared with the directed effort of Imagina-
tion, inspiration, brilliance, as distinctive creative striving to excellence. Lazy easi-
ness of the mind corresponds to the everyday attunement of looseness while The con-
scious, meaning perplexity calls one’s attention to something, examining it. Straight-
ness, single-mindedness informs unidirectionally, learned- and stiff-mindedly; on the
other hand, Parallel, reflexive organization of informational consciousness uses also
sophisticated methodological means for meaning determination of something. Doc-
trine, discipline, tight scientific rigor seems to be regular manners in science, with the
aim to stay within the norms of recognized research at any price, but Creative free-
dom, new science, new technological development requires a specific spirit to stay at
the top of global development and keep the advantage in welfare and civilized surviv-
ing. Experience like the naked rational mind, e.g., cogito, ergo sum (Descartes) is not
anymore the leading premiss of the contemporary world, but Spiritual understanding of
 Unity of Objectivism and Subjectivism 57

experience, integration with the quantum mechanical, e.g., I am, as I understand must
be considered technologically and philosophically to react according to the global and
individual sense.
4. Formalisation of the subjective and the objective within the informational
consciousness
According to the graphical formula in Fig. 3 (Železnikar 2013), the formula with the
additional conditions can be written down as a multi-complete graphical informational
consciousness system of primitive transitions (in fact, operators |=), GdΦ(z; z)e, in the
form
 
•••

 
 
 
•••

ai aj ••• ; i, j = 1, 2, . . . , n∞ < ∞; i 6= j

 
 
•••

 

with z ∈ {a1 , a2 , . . . , an∞ }. Thus,

 
•••

 
 
 
•••

z ai ••• ; i = 1, 2, . . . , n∞ < ∞

 
 
•••

 

models the currently unrolling (arising) conscious system, with entirely potentially in-
volving all the nodes (operands) appearing in the system. If one postulates that the
subjective is belonging to z and comes out of it, marked by the operator class |=sub , then
the objective will belong to some environmental cases of ai , marked by the operator
class |=obj , delivering a kind of objective information, in fact, data, expressing an objec-
tive state of situation. Thus, in general, the operator marked graph system,
 
|= sub
•••

 
b
su
|=

 
b

|= sub
su
|=

 
b

••• z ai ∞
|=obj

|=sub ; i = 1, 2, . . . , n∞ <
su

|=obj
|=

•••
 
 
j
ob
|=

 |= obj 
•••

j
ob

 
|=

|= obj

will mirror the problem, how the objective and the subjective can only act as a unity
within a consciousness system. The case with a publicist consciousness, that is for-
mally, ppublicist consciousness , instead with z and applying ai
oobjective message shows evidently
how an objectively marked path to the publicist’s consciousness (z) will be subjec-
tivised, since the informational paths leading out of z can operate merely in a subjective
way.
58 Anton P. Železnikar

Let’s see how the upper first, the second and the third graph can be expressed by the
formalised informational forms. For the first graph the primitive transition system is
  
ai |= ai ; ai |= aj ; aj |= ai ; aj |= aj ;
ai |= ai ; ai |= aj ; aj |= ai ; aj |= aj ;  
. . . ;  
  
 ai |= ai ; ai |= aj ; aj |= ai ; aj |= aj ;; i, j = 1, 2, . . . , n∞ < ∞; i 6= j.
 | {z } | {z } | {z } | {z }  
  
ai |= ai - ai |= aj - aj |= ai - aj |= aj -
mutiplex mutiplex mutiplex mutiplex

Here we see, how the operational parallelism comes into the foreground realising the
so-called multi-completeness of the graph. The second graph delivers the formula sys-
tem   
z |= z; z |= ai ; ai |= z; ai |= ai ;
z |= z; z |= ai ; ai |= z; ai |= ai ; 
 ; i = 1, 2, . . . , n∞.
. . . ;  
z |= z; z |= ai ; ai |= z; ai |= ai ;
The third graph,
  
z |=sub z; z |=sub ai ; ai |=obj z; ai |=obj ai ;
z |=sub z; z |=sub ai ; ai |=obj z; ai |=obj ai ; 
 ; i = 1, 2, . . . , n∞,
. . . ;  
z |=sub z; z |=sub ai ; ai |=obj z; ai |=obj ai ;

shows evidently, how an objective or an objectivised entity will be subjectivised, for

instance, by examples of informational formulas, e.g. (look for evidence at the third
graph expression),
(((ai |=obj ai ) |=obj z) |=objsub z) |=objsub ak ,
((ak |=obj ak ) |=obj (z |=objsub z) |=objsub ai ,
etc. As we see, informing between ai and ak via z results in objective-subjective in-
forming, where the initial objective (data-like circular, the thing per se) informing of ai
and ak is subjectivised by the mediation of z. And, informing preserves the quantum-
mechanical principle that the observing and the observed entity are mutually dependent.
Observing has evidently the property of being consciousness-like to some extent.
5. The objective and the subjective in language
There is concluded that the objective expresses something close to the farmer’s mind,
which must deal with reality and, that the subjective expresses or rests in certain non-
understanding being inclined also to rhetorical effects (Smith 2001, pp. 73–82). In
German philosophy, for example, some philosophers are realistic and others idealistic,
almost untranslatable to other languages. Here, German philosophy introduces com-
plex, also richly hyphenated substantives together with innovative verb phrases. Smith
(pp. 78–79) argues how just “top” German philosophers, through the history, misuse
German language practising the extreme subjectivism to attain extraordinary effects,
as non-understanding, nonintertranslatability, stylistic excesses, development of the
 Unity of Objectivism and Subjectivism 59

abstract ethnic language, nationalistic attunement with Hegelianism, Neokantianism,

Lebensphilosophy, phenomenology, Heideggerianism, Marxism, and postmodernism.
On the other side, more objective German philosophers stay on positions where nor-
mal, scientific standards of clarity and cross-territorial intertranslatability prevail (e.g.,
Humboldt, Herbart, Helmholtz, Hertz, Hilbert, coming to philosophy from some extra-
philosophic disciplines). Leibniz wrote in Latin and French where German-like stylistic
and meaningly disputed excesses are not known or even possible.

To explain the problem of nontranslatability, Heidegger’s very artificial concepts in

German can be showed. But, they may be untranslatable merely to an English reader,
even the English translation of Sein und Zeit was carefully prepared by the elabora-
tion of the German-English and the English-German dictionary before the translation.
There have been not such dilemmas in translating Heidegger in other languages, e.g. to
the Croatian and to the Slovenian. In contrary, these languages have been meaningly
enriched not only in the usage of philosophical terminology. To reproach an ethnic lan-
guage the development of specific qualities would mean to depress its developmental
possibilities together with the development of consciousness, with exploring its infor-
mational contents to advance the meaning in German or in other languages. Moderate
nationalism is certainly a subjective, emotional property, however it is the carrier of
positive values like patriotism, home love, faithfulness of being born into a language or
a nation, etc.
6. Conclusion
Comparing the objective meaning and the subjective meaning in the form of informons
(complex meaning of something in objective and subjective sense) and entropons (set
of phrases constituting the meaning of something in objective and subjective sense)
concerning operand ai , look at Tab. 1, that is, an objective informon with a subjective
one, and an objective entropon with a subjective one, a clear distinction of the objec-
tive and subjective meaning is formally expressible. An ethnic language is developing
through the expansion of meaning into new domains, being philosophical, technologi-
cal, scientific and otherwise innovative. Usually, the objective gets new impulses in the
subjective and, with their interviewing, concerning new concepts, they become trans-
parent and understood as something relevant for human knowledge and also for the
survival.
References
A RAQUE , A., V. PARPURA , R.P. S ANZGIRI & P.G. H AYDON. 1999. Tripartite Synapses: Glia, the Unacknowledged Part-
ner. Trends in Neuroscience 22:208–215.
B EAR , W. & B.J. M ITTERAUER 2013. Vorschlag zum näheren Anpassen der deutschen schriftlichen Sprache an die wis-
senschaftlichen Fortschritte des letzten Jahrhunderts. grkg Humankybernetik 44:2:85–94.
Ł OBACZEWSKI , A. M. 2012. Politische Ponerologie. Eine Wissenschaft über das Wesen des Bösen und ihre Anwendung
für politische Zwecke. Zweite korrigierte deutsche Auflage. Les Editions Pilule Rouge.
Ł OBACZEWSKI , A.M. 2009. Political Ponerology. A science on the nature of evil adjusted to political purposes. Third
Edition. Translated by A. Chciuk-Celt. Red Pill Press. Grande Praire, AB, Canada. Available at Les Editions Pilule Rouge.
M ITTERAUER , B. 2009. Architektonische Psychopatologie. grkg Humankybernetik 50:2:99–106.
S MITH , B. 2001. On Forms of Communication in Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philos-
ophy. Vol. 12:73–82. Intercultural Philosophy. Eds. S. Dawson & T. Iwasawa. Philosophy Documentation Center. Bowling
Green State University. Bowling Green, OH.
Ž ELEZNIKAR , A.P. 2013. Informational methodology for the definition of meaning. grkg Humankybernetik 45:3:119–128.

Received 2014–1–22.
Address of the author: Prof. Dr. Anton P. Železnikar, Volaričeva ulica 8, SI-1111 Ljubljana, Slovenia, EU
(anton [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
60 Anton P. Železnikar

Einheit des Objektivismus und Subjektivismus

Kurzfassung. Objektivismus und Subjektivismus betreffen ein Objekt oder eine Sache bedeutungsvoll in zweifacher
Weise, der äußeren und der inneren, der realistischen und der abstrakten, der materialistischen und der idealistis-
chen, der sinnlichen und der geistlichen. Das Problem liegt in der Einheit als ein Konglomerat oder Legierung von
Bedeutungsgraphen, die zum Objektivismus und Subjektivismus angehören. Innerhalb des Bewusstseinssystems
sind sie untrennbar miteinander verbunden, überlappend bedeutungsvoll ein miteinander, jedoch sprachlich un-
terscheidbar als ein Ding an sich und seine spirituelle Präsentation. Der Unterschied scheint als das Empirische
gegen das Abstrakte oder gegen das Theoretische zu sein. Das Ding als Objekt der traditionellen Physik (Newton)
ist gegen die Sache als Teilchen, als Erscheinung in der Quantenmechanik gesetzt. Dem englischen “quale” als
Sinneserfahrung steht gegen die Sache als Präsentation im theoretischen Geist als etwas anderes entgegen.
In Abb. 1 ist die Bedeutung von verschiedenen Ausdrücken von Entitäten des objektiv-subjektiven Bereichs im
Informationsbewusstsein dargestellt. Einige konzeptionell neue Ausdrücke entstehen aus reinen mathematischen,
informationsformalisierten Formen, wie aus den objektiv-subjektiv bedeutungsgegengesetzten Operanden in der
rechten Spalte des grauen Ovals herausgeht. Als Lebensfaktoren, wie uUmwelt , kKultur , zZivilisation , kKommunikation ,
iInformation (links im grauen Oval), wirken diese auf die Entstehung der Operanden in der rechten Spalte, die zuletzt
mit den informationellen Operatoren im weißen Oval miteinander im Bewusstseinesystem verbunden sind. Die
schwarzen und die weißen Pfeile in Abb. 1 verbinden kreisförmig und durchflechtend alle Entitäten des Graphen
und machen damit das Bewusstseinssystem objektiv-subjektiv einheitlich.
In Tab. 1 wird die informationelle Formalisierung im objektiv-subjektiven Sinne eingeführt und es werden
einzelne und zusammengesetzte Ausdrücke gezeigt mit den entsprechenden englischen Erklärungen. Wie es
aus den rein formalisierten Formen herausgeht, kann man nun von objektiven und subjektiven Informonen (Be-
::
deutungskomplexen), ai und a i , und von objektiven und subjektiven Entroponen, ai und ai , Wörterbüchern von
✿✿
substantivischen und verbalen Phrasen reden. Da im Bewusstseinssystem das Objektive und das Subjektive
::
einheitlich gefasst wird, kann man den subjektiven Informationsraum, (a i ; ai ), analog zu dem objektiven Infor-
::

mationsraum, (ai ; ai ), formalistisch einführen. Damit bietet sich die Konstruktion des einheitlichen objektiven-
::
subjektiven Informationsraum, ((ai ; ai ); (a
::
i ; ai )), im Rahmen welchen sich ein komplettes Geflecht von auftre-
tenden und potenziellen substantivischen und potenziellen verbalen Phrasen aufbauen kann. Aus der Tabelle
       
::
 
::
ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai ; ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai ;
 :::::::::::::::: 
nehmen wir noch komplexere Formen, 
   

 und  :::::::::::::::, die den objektiven infor-
    
::
ai ; ai ; a:i ; ai  a ; a ; a ; :: 
i i i ai
:

mationellen Raum des einheitlichen objektiven-subjektiven Raum und den subjektiven informationellen Raum des
einheitlichen objektiven-subjektiven Raum darstellen. Aus der Tabelle nehmen wir nur noch zwei Kurzfassungen,
ai , und ai , die die subjektive Bedeutung von der objektiven Bedeutung von ai und die objektive Bedeutung von
::
::

der subjektiven Bedeutung von ai vertreten. Sie lösen nun die Frage auf, was bedeutet eigentlich etwas Objektives
subjektiv zu verstehen und auch etwas Subjektives objektiv zu verstehen. Mit dem Setzen von Klammern kann
man beliebig tief in die Struktur des Objektiv-Subjektiven greifen und damit das Objektiv-Subjektive verflechten.
So kann man die Frage des Bewusstseins gar nicht so hinweg von der Frage der Außenwelt trennen.
Tab. 2 ist selbsterläuternd und bringt eigentlich den Vorschlag von Bear und Mitterauer (2013) in einer leichter
übersehenden Form. Abb. 2 überzeugt uns, dass der Hirn als eine biophysische Substanz noch viele geheimnis-
volle Phänomene birgt, die im Bereich des Bewusstseins sich als Geistesstörungen auswirken. Hier bindet sich
das materiell Objektive direkt an das geistlich Subjektive an. Im Kapitel 4 ist die Formalisierung des Objektiven
und des Subjektiven im informationellen Bewusstsein dargestellt. Z. B. die benannte Graphenausdrückung der
Form
  (siehe Železnikar 2013) zeigt direkt, wie die
|= sub subjektiven und objektiven Benennungen der
•••

  Operatoren, |=sub und |=obj , zuletzt zirkulär

b
su
|=

 
b

b
|= su
su

 verflochten sind und damit das ganze Be-

|=


b

••• z a 
|=obj

|=sub |=obj • • • ; i = 1, 2, . . . , n < ∞

su

 wusstseinssystem betreffen. z bezeichnet

|=

 i ∞
 
j
ob

 die Entität Bewusstsein und ai noch im Be-

|=

 |= obj
•••

j
ob

  wusstseinsgraphen anwesende und auch

|=

|= obj
potenzielle Entitäten, mit i = 1, 2, . . . , n∞ < ∞.
Im diesen Sinn resultiert das Informieren zwi-
schen ai und ak via z als ein objektives-subjektives Informieren, wobei wird das anfängliche, objektive, kreis-
förmige Dateninformieren, das Ding an sich, subjektivisiert mittels z-Vermittlung. Dies erklären eindeutig die
Formeln (((ai |=obj ai ) |=obj z) |=objsub z) |=objsub ak und ((ak |=obj ak ) |=obj (z |=objsub z) |=objsub ai . Es wird
der Schluss gezogen, dass das Objektive etwas in der Nähe des Bauernverstands zum Ausdruck bringen soll, der
mit der Realität umgehen muss und dass der subjektive Ausdruck im bestimmten Missverständnis ruht, das in die
rhetorische Effekte geneigt ist (Smith 2001, S. 73-82, besonders in der deutschen Philosophie).