Change and Continuity in the Minangkabau Matrilineal System

Author(s): Tsuyoshi Kato

Source: Indonesia, No. 25 (Apr., 1978), pp. 1-16
Published by: Cornell University Press; Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell
University
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3350964
Accessed: 28-11-2019 01:12 UTC

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms

Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell University, Cornell University Press

are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Indonesia

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN THE MINANGKABAU
MATRILINEAL SYSTEM

Tsuyoshi Kato

It is said that in Minangkabau society in ancient times, property

was given to one's children instead of to one's kemanakan (one's
sororal nieces and nephews).1 One day, Datuk Katumanggungan and Datuk
Perpatih nan Sebatang, the two founders of the Minangkabau adat, wished
to go to Aceh. After they sailed out from the port of Tiku/Pariaman
on the west coast, the sea suddenly ebbed, for that was the divine
decree of God. As a consequence, their ship ran aground on the sand.
The two datuk gathered all their children and kemanakan together and
said, "Hai, children and kemanakan, let us tow this ship, because it
has run aground on the sand." Their children answered, "We are afraid
that we will be run over by the ship." Their kemanakan replied, "If
that is the wish of our elders, let us tow the ship. It does not
matter even if we are run over by the ship and killed in the process,
for it is the ship of our elders that has run aground." All the kema-
nakan then got off onto the sand and pulled the ship. With the assis-
tance of the spirits, the ship floated again of itself and moved to
the middle of the sea. Later, following the advice of Cati Bilang
Pandai, their able servant, the two datuk decreed that from that time
on all the property was to be given, not to the children, but to the
kemanakan as a reward of their services. In this way, according to
the tambo (traditional "historiography"), did the matrilineal system
in Minangkabau society originate.

The Minangkabau of West Sumatra are probably one of the largest

matrilineal societies in the world. Aside from the relative rarity of
the matrilineal system itself, Minangkabau matriliny has been of spe-
cial interest to scholars because of its combination there with patri-
lineally-oriented Islam; "how such a [matrilineal] system could work
in conjunction with the patrilineal Islamic legal framework has excited
a good deal of speculation."2

The seeming contradiction and conflict between adat and Islam has
in fact induced many scholars to maintain that matriliny in West Suma-
tra declined as the Islamization of Minangkabau society progressed.3
Two powerful Islamic reformist movements in Minangkabau's recent his-
tory--the Padri zealots in the early nineteenth century and the Kaum

'The following story is drawn from Datoe' Sanggoeno Di Radjo, Kitab Tjoerai
Paparan 'Adat Lembaga 'Alam Minangkabau (Bukittinggi: Snelpersdrukkerij "Agam,"
1919), pp. 95-96.
2Hildred Geertz, "Indonesian Cultures and Communities," in Ruth T. McVey, ed.,
Indonesia, rev. ed. (New Haven: HRAF, 1967), p. 80.
3Although the process of West Sumatra's Islamization is not clear in detail,
the society seems to have been largely converted by the seventeenth century.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
2

Muda (Young Group) movement early in the twentieth--and their conse-

quences (Dutch political control, penetration of a money economy, edu-
cational progress, and increasing population mobility), have generally
been perceived as the causes of this purported decline. As early as
the middle of the nineteenth century, Francis, a Dutch official in
West Sumatra, commented on the "bastardization" of the Minangkabau
matrilineal system.4 Since then, similar remarks have repeatedly been
made by a succession of scholars, including Willinck, Joustra,
Schrieke,5 and de Moubray.6 Most recently Maretin7 has insisted that
the Minangkabau matrilineal system is being replaced by a more patri-
lineally oriented system. Given the changes experienced by Minangkabau
society over the last 150 years (including those changes referred to
above), his analysis at first may seem plausible.

Till now, unfortunately, there has been too little material pub-
lished on the contemporary Minangkabau matrilineal system either to
substantiate or to refute this diagnosis.8 But I hope here to provide
just such material.9 As I hope to demonstrate, matrilineal adat in
West Sumatra is far from disappearing, Accommodation to changing cir-
cumstance is certainly observable; but the Minangkabau matrilineal
system has, contrary to many predictions, managed to survive in health.

The Traditional Minangkabau Matrilineal System

There are four readily identifiable characteristics of the tradi-
tional Minangkabau system:10

4E. Francis, "Korte Beschrijving van het Nederlandsch Grondgebied ter Westkust
Sumatra 1837," Tijdschrift voor Neerland's Indi', 2, 1 (1839), p. 111.
5See the discussion of their comments on the Minangkabau matrilineal system in
Hans-Dieter Evers, "Changing Patterns of Minangkabau Urban Landownership," Bijdragen
tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde, 131 (1975), p. 87.
6G. A. de Moubray, Matriarchy in the Malay Peninsula and Neighbouring Countries
(London: Routledge and Sons, 1931).
7J. V. Maretin, "Disappearance of Matriclan Survivals in Minangkabau Family and
Marriage," Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde, 117 (1961), pp. 168-95.
8Two exceptions are Evers, "Changing Patterns," and J. S. Kahn, "'Tradition,'
Matriliny and Change among the Minangkabau of Indonesia," Bijdragen tot de taal-,
land- en voZkenkunde, 132 (1976), pp. 64-95.
9Field research was conducted in West Sumatra between January 1972 and May
1974, supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (#GS-30173) and a
Humanities and Social Sciences Program Fellowship from Cornell University.
1OIn the following description of traditional Minangkabau society and its matri-
lineal system, I will make frequent use of the tambo. The tambo, originally trans-
mitted orally, but later written down in Arabic letters, is an assortment of origin
stories and traditional rules and regulations (hukum adat). The society which the
tambo describes is an ideal world; the rules and regulations it propagates are codes
of ideal relations and proper conduct. The world of the tambo is nonhistoric, yet
at the same time panhistoric; it is not grounded in any historic point in time, yet
it is a master plan of how the Minangkabau society should always be. Thus the tambo
is something against which Minangkabau society may be judged at any particular time.
At the same time, as some reports from the mid-nineteenth century up to the early

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 3

1) Descent and descent-group formation are organized according to

the female line. Each village (nagari) consists of several ideally
exogamous matriclans, or suku,11 which have distinct names, such as
Melayu, Piliang, and Caniago. Except for the special case of "adop-
tion,"12 one takes the suku name of one's mother and remains with the
same suku for life. A suku itself is usually divided into several
matrilineages (payung).

2) A matrilineage is a corporate descent group with a ceremonially

instituted male head called the penghulu. He is distinguished by a
special title, e.g., Datuk Radjo Adie, which belongs to and stands for
his lineage. To address a penghulu by other than his datuk title is a
great offense to his lineage members. A lineage possesses communally
owned properties, including agricultural land, houses, fish ponds,
heirlooms, and miscellaneous adat titles.13 In principle, ancestral
property (harta pusaka) is inalienable'" and there is no individually

twentieth century show, this master plan was evidently not altogether a dream world.
(Many of these reports are referred to in P. E. de Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and
Negri Sembilan: Socio-Political Structure in Indonesia [The Hague: Nijhoff, 1952].)
"1Although various scholars and various regions in West Sumatra seem to iden-
tify different levels and units of matrilineal groupings within the nagari, I will
here discuss only the three levels and units of matrilineal groupings which are
essential to the understanding of any nagari in Minangkabau society, i.e., in de-
scending order, suku, payung, and paruik. To define these terms simply, a suku is a
group of related lineages who share a common, unknown ancestress; a payung is a group
of related adat houses (adat houses will be explained shortly) under the supervision
of a lineage head (penghulu); and a paruik is a group of related people generally
living in one adat house. It must be kept in mind that these particular Minangkabau
terms may also be used in various regions to denote other units and levels of group-
ings than those discussed here. (On the different meanings attached to these terms,
see De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, pp. 49-55.) But since I am
mainly concerned here with understanding the general organization of matrilineal
groupings, I shall not refer to exceptions and deviations from the model under con-
sideration. In the subsequent discussion, the English terms clan, lineage, and sub-
lineage are interchangeably used, respectively, for suku, payung, and paruik.
12Adoption, which requires a proper ceremony, usually takes place when an out-
sider wishes to become a nagari member. (See Dawis Datoek Madjolelo and Ahmad Mar-
zoeki, Tuanku Imam Bondjol: Perintis Djalan ke Kemerdekaan[Jakarta: Djambatan, 1951],
p. 5.) Theoretically, the some 100 suku found in West Sumatra are categorized into
four major groups, i.e., Koto, Piliang, Bodi, and Caniago. If the outsider's origi-
nal suku also exists in the nagari, he seeks affiliation with this suku. Where "his"
suku is not available, he is adopted by the suku closest in ancestral relation. (See
Rasjid Manggis M. Datuk Radjo Panghoeloe, Minangkabau: Sedjarah Ringkas dan Adatnja
[Padang: Sri Dharma, 1971], p. 54.) Adoption for the sake of avoiding lineage ex-
tinction does not seem to exist. (Herman Sihombing, "Pembinaan Hukum Waris dan Hukum
Tanah di Minangkabau," in Mochtar Naim, ed., Menggali Hukum Tanah dan Hukum Waris
Minangkabau [Padang: Center for Minangkabau Studies, 1968], p. 73.)
13All males are supposed to inherit a lineage adat title upon marriage.
14According to adat law, ancestral property may be disposed of under the fol-
lowing conditions, "provided that no other financial resources are available and there
is unanimous agreement among the lineage members: (1) to repair or rebuild an adat
house; (2) to finance the inauguration ceremony of a newly appointed penghulu; (3) to
marry off a girl of the lineage; and (4) to provide for the funeral of a lineage
member.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
4

owned property, particularly property of an immovable nature. A line-

age is further divided into several sublineages (paruik). These also
have their properly recognized male heads (tungganai rumah). Ancestral
properties, or, more accurately, rights to their use (ganggam bauntuak),
are assigned to sublineages for the benefit of their respective members.

3) The residential pattern is duolocal. After marriage, a husband

moves to or near the house of his wife and stays there at night. But
he continues to belong to his mother's house and frequently goes back
there during the daytime.

4) Authority within a lineage or a sublineage is in the hands of

the mamak, not of the father. Mamak literally means maternal uncle,
but the term can also refer to classificatory maternal uncles such as
penghulu and tungganai rumah. The kin term which complements mamak is
kemanakan: it indicates a male ego's sister's children and classifica-
tory kin of the same order.

These general characterizations will become clearer if we look at

how family life was actually organized in traditional Minangkabau
society. Since daily family life was centered around a rumah gadang
(lit. a large house),15 it is appropriate to begin with a description
of this communal dwelling.

An adat house is a rectangular-shaped wooden structure, with its

roof curved like buffalo horns. The house is supported by numerous
pillars made of ironwood (kayu besi) "which [can] stand for one hundred
years."'16 The traditional roofing material is palm-fiber, but corru-
gated iron had already been adopted by many villagers as early as 1907,
according to one travel account.17 The front side of the house faces
east"8 and is often decorated with colorful carvings, usually of plant
motifs. Chickens, goats, and other domestic animals are kept under
the raised house floor.

As shown in the accompanying diagram,19 the adat house consists

of two parts. The front half is an open space. It functions as living
room, dining room, sleeping quarters for children and occasional guests,
and a hall for ceremonies and lineage meetings. In contrast, the back
half is partitioned off into smaller compartments. These are the
sleeping quarters for female members of the house, especially married
or marriageable females, and for their smaller children. Each sleeping
compartment, called bilik, is about three meters wide and four meters
long. The number of bilik in an adat house varies according to the

15Rumah gadang is also called rumah adat (adat house), and this latter term
will be used from here on.

16Muhammad Radjab, Semasa Ketjil Dikampung (1913-1928): Autob

Anak Minangkabau (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1950), p. 4.
17Kenji Kiyono, Sumatora Kenkyi? (Tokyo: Kawade Shob6, 1943), p. 283.
18Rasjid Manggis, Minangkabau, p. 22. However, Muhammad Radjab claims that the
house may face either east or west. See his Sistem Kekerabatan di Minangkabau
(Padang: Center for Minangkabau Studies, 1969), p. 21.
"9The chart is drawn from the description of Radjab, Sistem Kekerabatan, pp.
22-23. There may be some variation, such as in the position of the ladders and the
location of the kitchen.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 5

Plan of Adat House

Front Ladder

Back
Kitchen

wealth and the proliferation of the sublineage. The largest adat house
still standing in West Sumatra measures 120 meters by 15 meters and
contains 20 bilik.20 The average, however, seems to be around seven
bilik per adat house.21

The adat house was the basic economic unit and the major focus of
everyday life in traditional Minangkabau society. In all likelihood,
ganggam bauntuak were given to each adat house.22 As we have seen,
ganggam bauntuak is the right to make use of ancestral land and to en-
joy its produce; it is not, however, a right of ownership and its divi-
sion is not an ultimate division--there is no right of disposition.23
Life in an adat house was strongly communal. Most probably, members
of the same house cultivated the agricultural land allotted to them
together. All produce, mainly rice, was stored in granaries which
were shaped like adat houses and were located in front of the house.
A proper adat house would have had three rice granaries: one for the
daily use of house members, one for feeding guests and passersby, and
another for ceremonies and special necessities.2" The communal and
corporate nature of traditional life is reflected in a famous Minang-
kabau adat aphorism:

Sharing slights, sharing shames,

Sharing burial sites, sharing graveyards,
If going up a mountain, climbing together,
If going down a ravine, descending together,
Jingling together like iron,
Chirping together like chickens,

20"Rumah Gadang di Sulit Air," Aneka Minang, 5 (n.d.), p. 9. As far as I know,

there has never been a house as large as this outside Nagari Sulit Air.
21Umar Junus, "Kebudajaan Minangkabau," in Koentjaraningrat, ed., Manusia dan
Kebudajaan di Indonesia (Jakarta: Djambatan, 1971), p. 248.
22De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, p. 55.
23Rasjid Manggis, Minangkabau, p. 57.
24A. Adnan Sutan Mangkuto, "Masjarakat Adat dan Lembaga Minangkabau" (mimeo-
graphed, n.d.), p. 47.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
6

If there is good news, sent for,

If there is bad news, coming to help.2s

After reaching marriageable age or upon marriage, a woman was

given a bilik in the house. If there was not enough room, it was her
mamak's responsibility either to enlarge the house or to build an addi-
tional adat house for her.26 It was in the bilik that she received
her husband at night.

A husband was called (urang) sumando by his wife's family. Su-

mando is said to originate from the word sando, "to pledge,"27 thus an
urang sumando was a person pledged by his suku to that of his wife.
He was sometimes likened to a bull buffalo borrowed for impregnation,28
and, in many ways, he was not much more than that to his wife's rela-
tives. Usually he visited his wife at night and left her house in the
morning.29 It was considered acutely embarrassing for both parties if
sumando and tungganai met each other in the house. When land was still
relatively abundant, the sumando most probably worked on the sawah
(wet-rice land) of his own adat house, in addition to cultivating swid-
dens or upland fields. But as the population became denser and land
scarcer, he may have worked on the land of his house or that of his
wife's house, depending on the availability of land.

Except for occasional gift-giving on such occasions as the bathing

ceremony (turun mandi),30 circumcision, and marriage, a sumando's eco-
nomic responsibility towards his wife and children was minimal.31 The
latter were supported by their matrilineage under the supervision of a
tungganai.32 Structurally, the basic building block of Minangkabau
matriliny was a samandai, meaning "people of one mother," i.e., a
mother and her unmarried children. The position of the sumando was
not recognized in this "block." Upon the divorce or death of the
wife/mother, the children remained at their mother's house and regular
personal relationships between father and children ceased to be main-
tained;33 however, the father, or rather the father's sublineage (bako),

25In Minangkabau: Sahino, samalu, sapandam, sapakuburan,

Kok ka bukik samo-samo mandaki,
Kok ka lurah samo-samo manurun,
Ba dantjiang bak basi,
Batjiok bak ajam,
Kaba baiak ba-imbauan,
Kaba buruak bahambauan.

26De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, p. 11.

27Radjab, Sistem Kekerabatan, p. 51.
28According to Willinck, an urang sumando was like a borrowed animal which ini-
tially tends to run away from its new home. See G. D. Willinck, Het Rechtsleven bij
de Minangkabausche Maleiers (Leiden: Brill, 1909), pp. 525-26.
29De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, pp. 10-11.
30This is a ceremony for the first bathing of a newborn baby.
31A. W. P. Verkerk Pistorius, StudiB'n over de Inlandsche Huishouding in de
Padangsche Boventanden (Zlat-Bommel: Noman en Zoon, 1871), p. 43.
32Ibid., p. 45.
33Junus, "Kebudajaan Minangkabau," p. 253.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 7

still continued a ceremonial gift-giving relationship with the children

(anak pisang) .34

The precarious position of the husband/father is expressed in a

Minangkabau saying: "The urang sumando is like a horsefly on the tail
of a buffalo, or like ashes on a burned tree trunk. [When a little
wind blows, it is gone]."35 Even after marriage, the husband continued
to belong to the house of his mother. His primary allegiance and re-
sponsibility were directed to this group. If he became seriously ill
at his wife's house, he would be taken back to the house of his mother
for care.36 When he died, he was usually buried at the graveyard of
his mother's paruik.37 It seems that the sumando's rather marginal
position in his wife's paruik must have been congruent with the pattern
of communal, extended-family living within the adat house under the
authority of the tungganai.

In contrast to the sumando's relatively weak position vis-a-vis

his children, the most important structural relationship in the Minang-
kabau matrilineal system was (and is) the one between mamak and kemana-
kan. After reviewing various Minangkabau kinship terms, Josselin de
Jong expressed his surprise that: "The most striking fact that emerges
from these tables [of kinship terms] is that the kinship terminology
so little reflects the very definite matriliny, and almost keeps an even
bilateral balance."38 In other words, maternal kin--presumably more
important because of matriliny--are not distinguished terminologically
from paternal kin. The major distinctions are found between father
(bapak) and mother's brother (mamak), and between child (anak) and
sister's child (kemanakan).39

But in fact, rather than reflecting the lack of "very definite

matriliny" as Josselin de Jong suggests, the existence of these dis-
tinctions in kinship terminology seems to underline the central impor-
tance of the mamak-kemanakan relation, whether blood-related or classi-
ficatory, in the structural arrangement of the Minangkabau matrilineal
system. The mutual obligations and duties of mamak and kemanakan are
regulated by the adat.'o The mamak is the guardian of his kemanakan
and is responsible for their well-being; it is they who will continue
the lineage. The mamak is endowed with authority as tungganai or peng-
hulu, and is expected to protect and to increase the matriliny's com-
munal wealth. The essence of Minangkabau matriliny is above all con-
centrated in the two-generation relationship of mamak and kemanakan.

"3De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, p. 64.

35Zahara Daulay, "Minangkabau: A Preliminary Study of the Culture and People"
(M.A. thesis, Cornell University, 1960), p. 87.
36Radjab, Semasa Ketjil Dikampung, p. 100.
37Edwin M. Loeb, Sumatra: Its History and People (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford Univer-
sity Press, 1972 [originally published in 1935]), p. 118.
38De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, p. 44.
39The latter distinction applies only to male speakers. For a woman, no termi-
nological distinction is made between her child and her sister's child, for they
essentially come from the same womb: both are called anak. A brother's child, how-
ever, is anak pisang to his sister.
40For details, see Chairul Anwar, Hukum-Hukum Adat di Indonesia: Menindjau
Alamn Minangkabau (Jakarta: Segara, 1967), pp. 80-85.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
8

All in all, the position of the male in traditional Minangkabau

society is a strange one in our eyes. He did not own any property,
although he might manage it for his sisters and their children. He
did not really have a house or a place he could call his own. While
still little (probably beginning some time after the age of six or
seven), boys slept in the surau (prayer house) where at night they
learned how to recite the Koran.41 It was considered shameful for a
boy to sleep in his mother's house--if he continued to do so, he was
ridiculed by his friends,42 particularly if there was a marriageable
or married sister at home. Though they would return to their mother's
houses for meals, boys continued to stay at the surau until they were
married. From the day of his departure to a surau, a male ceased to
be physically "in" the adat house, even if he still belonged to it.
(The adat house was referred to by the name of a female house member,
not by the name of a mamak.43) It remained to him a rumah tunjuk,
i.e., a house he could point to as his house of origin; but the house
itself was for his mother and sister.44 In old age, should a man's
wife have already died, or should he be divorced, he had once again to
live in a surau.45 After marriage, he was only a visiting guest at
his wife's house. There are many indications that even in his house
of origin, internal, day-to-day affairs were in the hands of the women
rather than in those of the mamak.46 This relative lack of roots must
have been all the more the case for those mamak who did not have any
position as tungganai, penghulu, or other adat functionary. The men's
world in traditional Minangkabau society thus consisted of the surau
(prayer house), the mosque, the lapau (coffee house), the balai (coun-
cil hall) and the dangau,47 all of which appeared peripheral and tempo-
rary by comparison with the solidity and security of the adat house.

Society in Transition
The Dutch first came to West Sumatra in the early seventeenth
century. Their primary interest was in the pepper produced in the
southern part of the region (e.g., Menjuta). Their influence, however,
was largely confined to several port towns. The penetration of Dutch
sovereignty into the interior of West Sumatra was delayed another two
centuries. The Padri wars, initiated by a militant reformist movement
in the early nineteenth century and eventually developing into civil
war, brought direct Dutch intervention to the whole of West Sumatra.

41Radjab, Semasa Ketjil Dikampung, p. 21; Harsja Bachtiar, "Negeri Taram: A

Minangkabau Village Community," in Koentjaraningrat, ed., Villages in Indonesia
(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967), p. 359.
42Ahmad Datuk Batuah, with the assistance of A. Datuk Madjoindo, Tambo Minan
kabau dan Adatnja (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1956), p. 148.
43H. Mansur Datuk Nagari Basa, "Hukum Waris dan Tanah dan Peradilan Agama," in
Menggali Hukum Tanah, p. 131.
44Hamka [Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah], "Adat Minangkabau dan Harta Pusa-
kanja," in Menggali Hukum Tanah, p. 30.
s4Radjab, Semasa Ketjil Dikampung, p. 21; Hamka, "Adat Minangkabau," p. 37.
46Daulay, "Minangkabau," pp. 64-65; Loeb, Sumatra, p. 106; Rasjid Manggis,
Minangkabau, pp. 56, 64; Bachtiar, "Negeri Taram," p. 368.
47A dangau is a small hut built at the edge of a field to shelter those guard-
ing the crops.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 9

The consolidation of Dutch control resulted in two important

changes in Minangkabau society relevant to the present discussion.
One was rapid population growth, and the other was the proliferation
of a money economy. As in Java, the population in West Sumatra grew
rapidly under the Pax Nederlandica. Although reliable figures for the
nineteenth century are difficult to obtain, one estimate indicates
that the population of West Sumatra nearly tripled between 1852 and
1930, from 690,000 to 1,900,000.48
The rapid advance of the money economy was no less impressive.
Cash crops, e.g., coffee, rubber, and various spices, were introduced.
Handicrafts, probably hitherto mainly for home consumption, became
commercialized enterprises. Itinerant petty traders, middlemen, and
pedati49 drivers, all natives, began to play such an important role in
the economy that the Dutch authorities were seriously alarmed that they
would cut into the profits of the government.5s The expansion of the
colonial bureaucracy created salaried indigenous people, such as school
teachers and lower government officials. The introduction of a mone-
tary tax in the early twentieth century accelerated this trend still
further.51

The impact of these changes on the matrilineal system is not too

difficult to understand. As the population grew, ancestral property
became increasingly inadequate to support all the members of an adat
house. By the middle of the nineteenth century, overcrowded villages
in the interior had nearly exhausted their frontiers for agricultural
expansion. Trapped as they were within the boundaries of the nagari,
villagers found that the money economy opportunely presented them with
attractive alternatives. For the money economy created sources of
livelihood not restricted by regulations on ancestral property; "self-
earned" property (harta pencarian) usually came in the form of cash
earned from office work or from commercial or artisanal activities.

Change and Continuity in the

Minangkabau Matrilineal System
One clear change in the Minangkabau family system resulting from
the factors listed above has been that conjugal and father-child ties
assumed increasing importance. As ancestral property became inade-
quate, wives began to rely on the self-earned property of their hus-
bands as supplementary sources of livelihood. The primary economic
unit in society was now more likely to be the conjugal nuclear family
than the samandai or paruik. The husband began to reside permanently
in the house of his wife. The "sumando batandang" (visiting husband)

"sElizabeth E. Graves, "The Ever-Victorious Buffalo: How the Minangkabau o

Indonesia Solved Their 'Colonial Question'" (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wis-
consin, 1971), p. 24; Volkstelling 1930, 4 (Batavia: Departement van Economische
Zaken, 1933), p. 114.
"9A buffalo-drawn cart for the transportation of goods.
50Graves, "The Ever-Victorious Buffalo," pp. 204-6.
51B. Schrieke, "The Causes and Effects of Communism on the West Coast of Suma-
tra," in his Indonesian Sociological Studies: Selected Writings of B. Schrieke, Part
I (The Hague: van Hoeve, 1955), pp. 95-99.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
10

was gradually transformed into the "sumando menetap" (living-in hus-

band).52 This physical proximity was essential to the psychological
proximity required for stabilizing the conjugal nuclear family. Re-
flecting the closer ties developing within the nuclear family, men
increasingly transferred their harta pencarian to their children by
means of hibah (gift),53 lest it fall into the hands of their kemana-
kan upon their deaths. This practice became particularly popular in
the early twentieth century;54 today it is the general custom that
harta pencarian is inherited by a man's children.

While harta pencarian was the basis for the emergence of the
nuclear family as the primary economic unit, the increasing popularity
of relatively small non-adat houses was the physical basis for accom-
modating the nuclear family as a residential unit. Today, the adat
house, which symbolized the Minangkabau matrilineal system, is no
longer common. According to a survey I conducted in four villages
near Bukittinggi, around the turn of the century 70 percent of village
dwellings were adat houses; the figure now is only 13 percent. Modern-
style and single-household houses are massively predominant.

The shift to a more closely knit conjugal tie is reflected in the

decline of polygamy and divorce rates. According to the 1930 Dutch
census, West Sumatra had the highest numbers of male and female di-
vorcees per 100 adult persons in the entire Netherlands East Indies:
9.8 and 14.2, respectively. The second highest figure for males was
7.2 (Sumatra's East Coast) and for females 10.2 (West Java). Likewise,
men in West Sumatra were most frequently polygamous: 8.7 persons per
100 married men, compared to the second highest figure of 7.7 for
"Timor en onderhoorigheden."s55

According to my survey, however, while 78 percent of the fathers

of the 395 respondents in the four villages that I studied had had the
experience of polygamy, the figure was only 38 percent for the respon-
dents themselves. A similar decrease was observable in divorce.s5

The decline in both was partly the result of attacks, beginning

in the early twentieth century, by Islamic reformists and Western-
educated intellectuals.57 The Kaum Muda, seriously concerned with the

52Iskandar Kemal, Sekitar Pemerintahan Nagari Minangkabau dan Perkem

(Padang: Pertjetakan Daerah Sumatera Barat, 1964), pp. 222-23.
53The Arabic term for the gift of one's property to a designated person while
one is still alive. Gifts given under hibah cannot be contested by one's heirs.
54De Josselin de Jong, Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan, pp. 115-16.
ssVolkstelling 1930, 8, pp. 104, 106.
56Since my survey used differing methods to investigate divorce rates, it is
not possible to give comparative divorce rates between the 395 respondents and their
fathers. However, I roughly estimate that the divorce rate is 22 percent among the
present generation and 47 percent among the previous generation. For more details,
see Tsuyoshi Kato, "Social Change in a Centrifugal Society: The Minangkabau of West
Sumatra" (Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1977), pp. 233-34. The wide discrep-
ancy between the 1930 census and my survey results is due to the face that the former
only refers to current civil status while the latter refers both to current status
and past experiences.
57Anwar, Hukum-Hukum Adat di Indonesia, p. 113.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 11

education and emancipation of women, admonished men not to divorce

their wives lightly and stressed the strict conditions for polygamy
(e.g., equal treatment of wives) required by true Islamic teachings.
The opinions of Western-educated intellectuals on marriage were most
eloquently expressed in the popular novels written by Minangkabau
authors in the 1920s and 1930s. The main themes of these novels were
the importance of love, the value of the conjugal tie, the undesirabil-
ity of the practice of urang jemputan (by which a man was "paid" to
marry a girl), the father's economic responsibility towards his wife
and children, and sympathy for women's plight in contemporary society.58

Despite these changes, which seem to indicate the increasing im-

portance of the nuclear family as an economic, residential, and psycho-
logical unit within the Minangkabau matrilineal system, many of the
latter's features have remained relatively unchanged. This case can
be best understood if we refer to the four main characteristics of the
Minangkabau matrilineal system mentioned earlier, namely, (1) descent
and descent group formation are organized according to the female line;
(2) a matrilineage is a corporate descent group; (3) the residential
pattern is duolocal; and (4) authority is in the hands of the mamak.

Of these characteristics, the first has basically survived un-

changed. Suku and matrilineage still exist and function in society.
A person's suku name is still an important part of his or her identity
whether in the village or in wider circles. People are still often
addressed or referred to in the village by their matrilineally derived
adat titles or by their suku names. Beyond the village, various gov-
ernment documents in West Sumatra require identification by suku name
together with personal name. Some form of suku exogamy is still
strictly observed.

As for the other three characteristics of Minangkabau matriliny,

there have been considerable changes, as described above. However, a
closer scrutiny of these changes reveals, as I will try to show, that
they do not necessarily jeopardize the matrilineal system itself.

With regard to the matrilineage surviving as a corporate group,

we may note that ancestral property remains extremely important. Al-
though such property, and above all land, is now likely to be "divided"
among nuclear families, it is "inherited" in a pattern that is essen-
tially unchanged: it is transmitted according to the female line and
is in principle inalienable from the matrilineage or sublineage. At
the same time, the increase in self-earned property has added complex-
ity to "inheritance" practices. It has been already pointed out that,
in contrast to ancestral property, self-earned property can be and is
inherited by a man's children instead of by his kemanakan. However,
this discretion in the disposition of self-earned property is strictly
confined to a single generation. The reason for this is interesting.
As we have seen, Minangkabau adat basically distinguishes between two
types of property, ancestral and self-earned. Ancestral property be-
longs to the lineage and is handed down according to matrilineal prin-
ciples over generations (turun temurun); self-earned property is
acquired by a man's own effort and thus may be given to a person or
persons of his choice. Such a classification (and conceptualization)

seFor example, see Marah Rusli, Sitti Nurbaja: Kasih Tak Sampai (Jakart
Pustaka, 1965 [originally published in 1922]).

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
12

does not recognize an idea of a type of property which may be inherited

from generation to generation with each generation having discretionary
disposal rights over it. Self-earned property, especially nonmobile
property such as houses and land, reverts to the status of ancestral
property in two or three generations even where it is initially be-
queathed to a man's children. Not only is the general status of self-
earned property generation-bound, but nonmobile self-earned property
tends to be bequeathed to daughters in preference to sons,59 and from
them to their daughters and so on according to the matrilineal princi-
ple. Self-earned property inherited by sons rather than by daughters
is also likely to be given to daughters alone in the grandchildren's
generation (counted from the original owner of the property) and from
then on to their daughters following the female line. It is evident,
then, that, so long as these principles are retained, sizeable amounts
and proportions of self-earned property cannot be accumulated in the
patriline over generations. Even in Padang, the provincial capital
and the largest urban center in the province, the proportion of regis-
tered individual land--the approximately 40 percent of the total land
in the city formerly under Dutch ownership and now controlled by Chi-
nese--has remained virtually stable for the last fifty years. The
remaining 60 percent is unregistered; these lands seem to remain locked
into the cycle of self-earned to ancestral land.60

Coupled with the increasing importance of self-earned property,

the practice of bequeathing such property to children has misled some
scholars into either pointing out or predicting the dissolution of
ancestral property, and thus the dissolution of matrilineage, and even
of the Minangkabau matrilineal system itself. None of this, in fact,
is actually happening. The corporate nature of ancestral property,
albeit in a more flexible form, is still very strong.

As suggested earlier, residential arrangements are now more prop-

erly identified as uxorilocal than duolocal. A husband may still visit
his mother's house rather regularly (e.g., once a week), particularly
if his wife's house is nearby, in order to keep informed of the situa-
tion at his natal home. Nevertheless, with his time mostly spent at
his wife's house, his life (though not kin affiliation) belongs there
rather than to his mother's. The pervasiveness of uxorilocal residency
is clear from my survey in the four villages near Bukittinggi. Among
395 houses, there were only five cases where a wife had moved to the
house of her husband. These rare cases were generally explained in
terms of expediency.

Although the shift from duolocal to uxorilocal residence has al-

tered the nature of a man's relation to the matrikin of his wife (as
will be explained below), this shift does not in itself necessarily
mean that Minangkabau society has become less matrilineal.61 In uxori-

59Kahn, "'Tradition,' Matriliny, and Change," p. 73.

60Evers, "Changing Patterns." Since Evers cites only two cases of diachronic
data, further study is necessary to substantiate this contention.
61According to David Aberle's study, uxorilocal or matrilocal residence is
modal (49 percent) for his sample of 84 matrilineal societies from different parts
of the world; only 4 percent are duolocal. David F. Aberle, "Matrilineal Descent in
Cross-Cultural Perspective," in David M. Schneider and Kathleen Gough, eds., Matri-
lineal Kinship (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961), p. 667.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 13

local residence patterns, as in duolocal, women still remain with their

matrilineal relatives after their marriage. Not only are households
still basically formed around women and the network of their matrikin,
but the ideology (and the practice) that the house essentially belongs
to the lineage of its females remains strong. Thus the custom of boys
sleeping in surau (and now sometimes in coffee shops and in empty
houses) is still commonly practiced.

One concomitant of uxorilocal residency is the increasing involve-

ment of the husband with the matrikin of his wife. Previously, a man's
socioeconomic obligations to his children, let alone to his wife's
relatives, were very limited (e.g., intermittent gift-giving on cere-
monial occasions). Uxorilocal residency was both a cause and a conse-
quence of closer ties between a man and his wife and children. It
also entailed more frequent contact between a man and his wife's kins-
men and the former's growing involvement in the welfare of the latter.
Nowadays, it is very common for a husband, especially if he has his
own sources of income, to be expected to make some kind of economic
contribution to his wife's matrikin (e.g., helping to send his wife's
nephew to school). Tanner is even of the opinion that the focus of a
man's involvement is increasingly shifting from the matrifamily of
orientation to the matrifamily of procreation.62 This contention may
be a little exaggerated, but there is no doubt that a man's socio-
economic obligations are no longer directed solely to his own matri-
lineage; that of his wife can also become very demanding.

In addition to the confusion over ancestral and self-earned prop-

erty, much of the misunderstanding about the present Minangkabau matri-
lineal system concerns the sphere of authority. Some people argue
that since the solidarity of the nuclear family is strong and since
the father, not the mamak, takes care of the children, the matrilineal
system must have been replaced by a patrilineal or bilateral system.
This interpretation is clearly inaccurate. For here the distinction
between authority within the domestic group and authority within the
descent group is crucial.63 The descent group we are concerned with
is a group defined by the matrilineal principle, corporate property,
and an appointed leadership; the domestic group, on the other hand, is
a household which handles the care of children.

Previously, both the domestic group and the descent group were
formally under the authority of one person, the tungganai; in practice,
it is probably more accurate to say that the domestic group was to a
great extent under the authority of the oldest woman in the adat
house.64 Today the father and the mother are primarily responsible,
although it is not unusual for them to be assisted by the mamak65 in

62Nancy Tanner, "Minangkabau Disputes" (Ph.D. dissertation, University of

California at Berkeley, 1971), p. 34.
63For more details see David M. Schneider, "Introduction: The Distinctive
Features of Matrilineal Descent Groups," in Matrilineal Kinship.
64See footnote 46.

65For example, according to Naim's research, about 50 percent of some 150 peng-
hulu surveyed answered that they were currently taking care of their kemanakan.
Mochtar Naim, Penghulu di Minangkabau, University of Singapore, Department of Socio
ogy Working Papers, No. 14 (Singapore, 1973), p. 16.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
14

looking after the material welfare of their children. The mamak is by

no means completely left out of the domestic group sphere. He is kept
informed of what is happening to his kemanakan: their educational
plans, their occupational plans, and their plans for migration, not to
mention marriage.

In the sphere of the descent group, all adat matters which deal
with the lineage as a corporate group are the concern of the mamak.
Decisions related to ancestral properties and the conduct of lineage
members are made by the matrilineage as a whole under the guidance of
the mamak. Examples of such decisions concern disputes over ancestral
property and titles, infringements of adat customs, and misbehavior by
lineage members. A husband may be consulted in these matters, but
final authority is unquestionably in the hands of the mamak.

The mamak still plays an important role in the marriage arrange-

ments of his kemanakan. Even if he is not directly involved in seeking
a prospective spouse, it is customary to ask the permission of the
mamak before marriage. Courtesy aside, this custom has its practical
aspects. All adat ceremonies are arranged by the mamak--the protocol,
the exchange of speeches, and so forth. Marriage is usually celebrated
by two rituals, the adat wedding ceremony and the nikah wedding cere-
mony. The former symbolizes Minangkabau matriliny and the role of the
mamak, while the latter symbolizes Islamic law and the role of the
father--for in Islamic law, the father of the bride is the principal
witness to the marriage. The adat wedding ceremony is preceded by the
nikah, but without the former the marriage is not considered legiti-
mate.66 The mamak's consent to the marriage is thus crucial, for
without it no speaker will appear for the adat ceremony and, as a con-
sequence, it will not take place.

Naturally, these two spheres of authority are not always clear

cut. (When I was conducting interviews in the villages, I would ask
for the "head of the family" (kepala keluarga) at the houses I visited.
In turn, I was often asked by the husband, now staying at his wife's
house most of the time, which head of the family I meant, the sumando
or the mamak.) Sometimes an attempt is made by one side to venture
into the other's sphere, yet people are always clearly aware of the
conceptual distinction.67

Conclusion

In sum, there have certainly been significant changes in the

Minangkabau matrilineal system. The increasing importance of the
nuclear family as an economic and residential unit is undeniable.

66The adat ceremony is far the more expensive of the two. Thus it can happen
that the adat ceremony is postponed for some time after the nikah rite until it is
economically feasible. Even in these instances, it is rare, particularly in the
village, for consummation of the marriage to take place before the adat ceremony is
carried out.

67It may be helpful to conceive of domestic group authority and descent group
authority as parts of a continuum rather than as discrete categories. At opposite
ends of the continuum the preeminence of the mamak or the father is relatively clear.
But as one approaches the middle of the continuum, the distinction becomes blurred
and potential conflicts between mamak and father may emerge.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 15

Concurrently, the bonds between husband and wife, and between father
and children have obviously been growing. Yet it is premature to sug-
gest the disappearance of the matrilineal system itself.

It is true that some educated Minangkabau men in the cities now

pass on part of their names to their children as the "family name."
However, the principle of matrilineal descent reckoning is still prac-
ticed in West Sumatra, and suku affiliation still plays an important
role in terms of establishing a person's identity and determining the
range of possible marriage partners. Property is now given to children
instead of kemanakan, but only self-earned property. Residential
arrangements are now more uxorilocal than duolocal. But these changes
do not seriously jeopardize the matrilineal system. The father wields
strong influence over the lives of his children, but only in the sphere
of the domestic group; the mamak still dominates the sphere of the de-
scent group. If we observe the balance struck between change and con-
tinuity in the Minangkabau matrilineal system, we are likely to be
impressed by how successfully the system has managed to survive by
accommodating to changing times and circumstances.

This accommodation is all the more remarkable when we consider

the extent of the transformations the Minangkabau village has experi-
enced since the turn of the century. In the villages that I studied,
only 13 percent of the male population attended any kind of formal
school at the turn of the century. Now, over 95 percent do so, and 33
percent of them go on to senior high school or further. Around the
turn of the century, 27 percent of the males had had the experience of
out-migration, while among the present generation, the figure is 89
percent. Seventy-four percent of the males at the turn of the century
were engaged primarily in agriculture; only 15 percent among the pres-
ent generation are so occupied.68

Despite these notable changes, the Minangkabau matrilineal system

continues to maintain its basic features. The theme of the "disinte-
gration of Minangkabau matrilineal system" has had a long history,
starting with Francis in the early nineteenth century. But as a well-
known Minangkabau saying goes:

Old adat, ancient heritage,

Neither rots in the rain,
Nor cracks in the sun.69

It is easy to point out the continuity of the Minangkabau matri-

lineal system; it is a different matter to answer the questions of why
and how the system has been able to survive so far. I have addressed
myself to this question elsewhere.70 I believe that the famed merantau
(out-migration) activities of the Minangkabau are closely connected
with their society's dynamism, i.e., a curious mixture of flexibility
and conservatism.

68These figures include both villagers and current migrants from the four vil-
lages surveyed.
69In Minangkabau: Adat lamo, pusako usang,
Indak lapuak dek udjan,
Indak lekang dek paneh.
7oKato, "Social Change in a Centrifugal Society.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
16

Historically, one can discern three stages of Minangkabau merantau

activities. In the earliest era, the population moved in segmental
groups from the darek (interior) to the rantau (outer areas) in search
of virgin lands because of population pressure in the interior. As
the frontier was pushed further and further away from the interior,
and as the outer areas became relatively crowded, a new mode of indi-
vidualistic merantau became more important than village segmentation.
Since the end of the nineteenth century, commercial activities have
flourished in many parts of Sumatra--plantations in East Sumatra, rub-
ber in Central Sumatra, and oil in South Sumatra. It was into these
areas that "superfluous" Minangkabau males made the long migration in
search of wealth. (Previously, such individual migration was seasonal
and of a short duration, and families were generally left behind in
the village). After World War II, merantau has become a movement of
(nuclear) families rather than of individuals. Migrants tend to stay
away from villages for longer periods and return only rarely. Meran-
tau Cino or migration like the Chinese (many of whom never went back
to China from Southeast Asia) is more prevalent. Energetic and pro-
gressive people tend to leave the villages, while the less energetic
and less progressive stay on.

I will not go into the details of my argument here. It is suffi-

cient to point out that merantau and the persistence of matriliny are
integral parts of the historical process in Minangkabau society.
Matrilineal adat remains strong and survives, albeit with accommoda-
tions, because of merantau. It is as if by dispersing populations in
different fashions, merantau at each historical stage provided the
means for successfully maintaining Minangkabau matriliny.

This content downloaded from 140.213.91.57 on Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:12:35 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms