Operations Management, Reshaped by Robotic Automation
Operations Management, Reshaped by Robotic Automation
Operations management,
reshaped by robotic
automation
Today’s automation shows huge promise for saving time, money,
and human effort. For operations centers, is it now just a matter of
“ready, set, automate”?
© Getty Images
December 2019
Few technologies rival the latest advances in operations centers in hopes of radically
automation in their anticipated ability to enhance accelerating the automation of operational
organizations’ performance, regardless of industry. processes, while also cutting costs.
The potential adoption rate is stunning by any
measure: the McKinsey Global Institute estimates What RPA offers operations centers
that, using demonstrated technologies, more In most industries, operations centers have used
than 81 percent of predictable physical work, 69 traditional forms of automation for many years.
percent of data processing, and 64 percent of data- But these came with serious limitations. For
collection activities could feasibly be automated. example, custom software managed interfaces
with multiple backend systems, but these
These three categories describe much of the work implementations took several years to complete,
handled in operations centers, which we define as and were expensive and quite rigid.
organizations that manage equipment and services
remotely, or that manage human forces in the By contrast, new automation techniques, such
field (field forces). Examples include telecom and as RPA and cognitive technologies, are having
electrical utility network-operations centers (NOCs), transformative impact. By automating manual
IT operations centers, remote resolution centers, and repetitive tasks, successful operations
contact and call centers, and dispatch centers. centers are reducing costs by 30 to 60 percent
while increasing delivery quality.
Indeed, the early stages of automation have already
begun. Our colleagues’ late-2018 automation survey We see three fundamental differences between
found that three-quarters of respondents had either RPA and traditional automation technologies:
embarked on an automation journey, or would do
so in the coming year (exhibit). And in our recent 1. Accelerated implementation. Like traditional
studies supporting the introduction of automation automation techniques, RPA achieves high
technology to operations centers, we’ve witnessed impact by both lowering costs and increasing
first-hand the extent to which automation can the quality of manual tasks—but it does so
transform the technological paradigm of front-office much faster. Many of the improvements
operations management. that may have required months, or even
years, to achieve can be replicated with
RPA technologies in a matter of weeks. This
The automation journey rapid timeline results from RPA’s low barriers
Robotic process automation (RPA) has been a to entry and out-of-the-box controls. For
particular focus of attention, having been widely example, a telco wholesaler used automation
adopted in organizational support functions— to reduce cycle times in one of its back-end
initially in shared-service centers (SSCs) that processes by 99 percent. This automation
had taken much of the responsibility for many solution took two developers just four days to
companies’ HR, finance, procurement, and IT implement.
functions. These environments were ripe for the
introduction of RPA because many processes were 2. Low barriers to entry. Traditional
standardized; RPA could therefore be applied to automation technologies require multiple
reduce costs (which had been rising) and improve technology stakeholders, developer
accuracy. teams, user-experience designers, and
system instructors. In contrast, RPA can be
RPA technologies have significantly improved in overlaid on an existing IT infrastructure. It
recent years, providing the high levels of quality and is developed by mirroring the user’s inputs,
stability required for sensitive, customer-related while customization requires only a minimal
processes in operations centers. Following the programming background. Consequently,
successful implementation in SSCs, organizations training RPA developers typically takes just
started expanding the application of RPA to two to four weeks, compared with more than
No plans to automate
Fully automated
at least 1 function
or business unit "
Plan to start in
coming year
SOURCE: “The automation imperative,” McKinsey & Company Operations, September 2018, McKinsey.com
a year for software engineers. An industrial- there are a few common activities where we have
services company needed only about a month seen RPA add significant value.
to train more than 20 remote-center engineers
on RPA, combining a one-week training course Network monitoring. By correlating network events,
with three weeks of teaming the trainees with RPA can generate alarms for multiple standardized
experienced RPA developers. (pre-defined) issues.
3. Enhanced control. RPA applications come Remote troubleshooting and resolution. RPA
with out-of-the-box monitoring, reporting, and can support issue tracking, data gathering, ticket
system controls in place. Standard RPA controls analysis, and remote reset. Intelligent incident-
include scheduling customization, queue management systems can detect similar issues
creation, email notifications, and response- and resolve them—such as at a telco that uses RPA
triggered actions. The same level of controls and to improve its responses to network-equipment
monitoring for software automation must often failures. The RPA bot executes steps according to
be developed from scratch. a codified troubleshooting guide, leaving human
agents to resolve only those issues not yet fully
What’s best to automate? documented.
Although RPA’s value proposition is attractive
relative to traditional technologies, companies must Automated dispatching. Companies can use
stay focused on feasibility. Within operations centers, automation to dispatch jobs from operations centers
Ian Didion is a senior digital analyst in McKinsey’s New York office, where Kobi Masri is a consultant; Pablo Hernandez is a
partner in the Madrid office; and Avani Kaushik is a digital expert in the Southern California office.