Chapter 13-B (Week 9) Special Allowable Itemized Deductions & Net Operating Loss Carry-Over (Nolco)
Chapter 13-B (Week 9) Special Allowable Itemized Deductions & Net Operating Loss Carry-Over (Nolco)
This chapter covers special itemized deductions and the net operating loss carry over.
Illustration
Don Mariano transferred a commercial lot and a P1M stock investment in irrevocable trust in
favor of his son, Ritchie. The trust earned the following income in 2014:
In accordance with the trust indenture, the trustee distributed half of the gross rentals and the
entire dividends to Ritchie
Special deduction
The special deduction is P600,000, the half of the gross rentals given to Ritchie. The
distribution of the P36,000 dividend to Ritchie shall not be deductible as this is not included in
the gross income of the trust for purposes of the regular income tax.
The net additions, if any, required by law to be made within the year to the reserve funds and
the sums, other than dividends, paid within the year on policy and annuity contracts may be
deducted from the gross income of insurance companies.
Under current regulations, the transfer to the reserve fund shall be deductible in the year it
was actually paid and not in the year it was determined. Also in consonance with the tax
benefit rule, the release of the reserve is treated as an income in the year of release.
Illustration
The following relates to the performance of an insurance company:
Required: Determine the special deductions and the net income assuming that the required
transfers to the reserve funds were made in the same year.
Solution:
The net which will be paid to or released from the reserve fund is computed as follows:
To simplify our illustration, let us assume that the contributions to the reserve were paid in the
same year they were determined.
The net income of the insurance company shall be computed as follow:
Note: The release of reserve from the reserve fund is included in gross income
A REIT is a publicly listed corporation established principally for the purpose of owning income-
generating real estate assets. A REIT is legally mandated to distribute 90% of its distributable
income as dividends to shareholders
Under RA 9856, the dividend distributions of REITs are treated as special deductions against
gross income.
For purposes of computing the taxable net income of REITs, dividends distributed by them
from their distributed income after the close of a taxable year and on or before the last day of
the fifth month following the close of the taxable year shall be considered as paid on the last
day of such taxable year.
Under RA 9520, cooperatives are required to maintain reserves for their protection and
stability. Cooperatives are exempt from income tax, but are subject to tax on their income
from unrelated activities. The amount transferred by the cooperative to the reserve fund our
of the net surplus from unrelated activities is an item of deduction in the computation of the
taxable net income of the cooperative.
Illustration:
Lowland Coop summarized the following income and expenses from this exempt related
activities and taxable unrelated activities:
Related Unrelated
Activities Activities Total
In compliance with the cooperative Development Act, Lowland Coop appropriates 10% of
profit to the reserve fund, plus additional 40% to other required and optional funds.
T he amount of special deduction and the taxable net income of the cooperative shall be
computed as:
Note: Only the appropriation for the reserve fund is deductible as a special expense. The 4%
appropriations for other cooperative funds are not deductible.
Under RA 9257, a senior citizens or elderly is entitled to 20% discount in certain establishments
such as hotels and similar lodging establishments, restaurants, recreational centers and other
places of culture, leisure and amusements, hospital, drugstores, and services such as medical,
dental, domestic air, sea and land transport, and funeral or burial service providers.
The discount granted to senior citizens by covered establishments and services providers are
allowed as special deductions against gross income.
Illustration 1
Goodhealth Drugstore Inc. recorded a P 1,200,000 total deductive expense and the following
sales:
Customer
Regular Senior citizens
Gross sales P 5,000,000 P 1,200,000
Cost of sales 3,000,000 800,000
Goodhealth adopts a policy of giving senior citizens a 25% discount. Consequently, it granted
P300,000 total senior citizens’ discount during the period.
Note:
1. The gross sales to senior citizens must be reported gross of the senior citizens’ discount
while the discount is presented as a separate expense.
2. The claimable senior citizens discount shall not exceed 20% of the gross sales from senior
citizens. Hence, the deductible amount is P240, 000 not P300,000.
Illustration 2
Tasty Restaurant Corporation provides a 20% discount to senior citizens. It recorders the
following receipts during the year:
Customers
The specials deduction for senior citizens’ discount and the net income of Tasty Restaurant
shall be computed as:
Note:
1. Receipts pertain to cash collections which are inherently net of any discount provided.
Hence, the receipts from senior citizens must be grossed-up.
2. The discounts must not be deducted out of net receipts.
A person with disability pertains to an individual suffering from restriction or different abilities
as a result of mental, physical, or sensory impairment or performs an activity in a manner or
within the range considered normal for human beings.
Disability pertains to physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more
psychological, physiological, or anatomical functions of an individual or activities of such
individuals.
The discounts to persons with disability shall be allowed as special deductions under the same
terms and conditions as those for senior citizens.
The poverty line or poverty threshold pertains to the amount of income sufficient to meet
basic food and non-food needs such as clothing, housing, transportation, and health among
others. The senior citizens shall submit to his employer as sworn certification that his annual
taxable income does not exceed the poverty level.
Illustration
Assume a taxpayer employs both regular and senior citizens employees and paid the following
compensation during the year:
The 15% additional deduction is definitely not an actual expense, but is allowed by law merely
as an incentive for employers who consider senior citizens for employment. The regular
salaries will be presented as part of regular allowable itemized deductions. The 15$ additional
deduction shall be presents as special allowable itemized deduction.
Senior citizens who are above the poverty level may avail of incentives under the Minimum
Wage law if they qualify as minimum wage earners.
Private entities that employ disabled persons who meet the required skills or qualification,
either as regular employees, apprentices or learners, shall be entitled to an additional
deduction, from their gross income, equivalent to twenty-five percent (25%) of the total
amount paid salaries and wages to disabled persons:
The actual salaries shall be presents as part of regular expense while the 25% additional
salaries expense shall be presented as special itemized allowable deductions.
Under RA 7277, private entities that improve or modify their physical facilities in order to
provide reasonable accommodation for disabled persons shall also be entitled to an additional
deduction from their income equivalent to fifty percent (50%) of the direct costs of the
improvements or modifications.
ADDITIONAL TRAINING EXPENSE UNDER THE JEWELRY INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF
1998
Under RA 8502 and its implementing rules and regulations, a qualified jewelry enterprise duly
registered and accredited with the Board of Investment (BOI) is entitled to additional
deductions from taxable income of 50% of the expense incurred in training schemes approved
by technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA). The same shall be
deductible during the year the expenses were incurred.
Under the Adopt-a-School Program, private entities are allowed to assist a public school in
particular aspects of their educational program within an agreed period of time.
The adopting private entity which may be an individual in business or practice of profession, a
partnership, or a corporation shall team up with the DepED, CHED, or TESDA toward providing
much needed assistance and service to public schools.
The assistance may be an aid, contribution or donation in cash or in kind but not limited to
infrastructure, physical facilities, real estate property , training and skills development,
learning, support, reading materials, computer and science laboratories, health and nutrition
packages, and assistive learning devices for student with special needs.
Any government school in all levels may participate in the program. Priorities shall be given to
schools located in the poorest provinces, low income municipalities, and other local
government units experiencing severe classroom shortages, insufficient budget, or having
numerous poor but high performing learners.
Aside from the usual regular deductible contribution expense, an adopting entity shall be
allowed an additional deduction from gross income equivalent to 50% of the contribution of
the adopting entity for the “Adopt-A-School Program.”
1. Memorandum of Agreement
An adopting private entity shall be into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the head of
the public school. The minimum of 2 years pre-terminable only when the adopting private
entity is dissolved prior to the end of such period or when terminated for failure to possess the
qualification as such.
2. Supporting evidence
The adopting entity must maintain sufficient evidence of the amount of assistance incurred,
establish the connection of the expense to the adopting entity’s participation in the program,
and maintain proof of acknowledgement of receipt by the public school recipient of the
donation.
Illustration
In 2016, Robotics Inc. entered into a memorandum of agreement with two schools to adopt
them as part of its corporate social responsibility:
An adopt-A-Child program was designated by the NEDA as a priority program in the 2016
National Priority Plan.
Robotics Inc. shall claim the following contributions expense as part of regular itemized
allowable deductions:
Robotics Inc shall likewise claim the following additional contribution expense as special
itemized allowable deductions:
Note: Only donations to public schools are allowed the additional deduction.
1. Cash assistance, contributions or donations shall be based on the actual amount appearing
in the official receipt issued by the done.
2. Assistance other than money
a. Personal property - acquisition cost of assistance or contribution
b. Consumable goods – acquisition cost or value at date of donation whichever is lower
c. Service – the value of services rendered by the donor and the service provider and the
public school as fixed in the MOA or the actual expense incurred by the donor,
whichever is lower
d. Real property – fair value (higher of zonal value or assessed value) at the time of
contribution or the depreciated cost of the property whichever is lower
Illustration 1
In 2016, Banawe Realty Corporation participated in the “Adopt-a-School Program” by
contributing its service to a public school in La Trinidad, Benguet. The agreed value fixed in the
MOA for the construction of the public school building was P1,000,000. However, Banawe
Realty was able to complete the same at a total cost of P800,000.
Note: The lower of the actual cost of services and the agreed value shall be considered.
Assume that the “Adopt-a-School Program” is no longer a priority program in 2015, and
Banawe Realty has P9,000,000 net incomes before the contribution. Banawe Realty shall be
allowed to deduct the following:
Contribution expense subject to limit P 800,000
Contribution limit: 5% x P9,000,000 450,000
Regular itemized contribution expense P 450,000
Special itemized contribution expense (P800K x 50%) 400,000
Note:
1. For corporations, contributions to the government in non-priority activities are subject to a
limit of 5% of the net income before the contribution.
2. The basis of the additional incentive is the actual donation as valued under RR10-2003, not
the amount of the regular allowable itemized contribution expense.
Illustration 2
Victory Bus Line contributed a lot and a bus to its adopted public school. The lot shall be used
by the public school for building expansion and the bus as a school bus. The “Adopt-a-School
Program” is a national priority program during the year.
The following relates to the lot and the bus:
Appraisal value of lot P 5,000,000
Zonal value of the lot 3,600,000
Assessed value of the lot 2,500,000
Acquisition cost of the lot 3,000,000
Acquisition cost of the bus 2,400,000
Depreciated cost of the bus 1,500,000
Depreciated appraised cost of bus 2,000,000
The contribution expense deductible as part of regular itemized allowable deductions shall be
computed as follows:
Contribution
Expense
The contribution expense deductible as part of special itemized allowable deductions shall be
computed as follows:
The P150,000 cost of compliance shall be claimed as part of regular itemized deductions. An
additional expense for the same amount shall be claimed under special itemized allowable
deductions.
Illustration 2
Baguio Medical Center (BMC), a private hospital, previously set up a milk storage facility and a
milk bank. The total annual costs of the two facilities were:
Storage Milk
Facility Bank Total
Supplies P 100,000 P 120,000 P 220,000
Staff salaries 210,000 90,000 300,000
Maintenance 50,000 70,000 120,000
Total P 360,000 P 280,000 P 640,000
Less: Fees collected from patients 190,000
Excess expense P 90,000
The milk bank was operated as an integral part of the hospital, but is operated as non-profit.
BMC charges minor fees and subsidizes the facility excess expense.
BCM may claim the following expense as part of regular –itemized allowable deductions:
BMC shall also claim an additional deduction for the same amount as special itemized
allowable deductions.
Illustration 3
Tabuk Provincial hospital, a state hospital, set up a milk storage facility at total costs of
P1,120,000.
Answer:
Nil. Tabuk Provincial Hospital cannot claim deductions since it is non-taxable. However,
government facilities, establishment, and institutions will receive additional appropriation
equivalent to the savings they made derive as a result of complying with Ra 10028.
These savings may come from reduced costs due to absenteeism, increased productivity,
reduced illness of babies, and reduced cost of procurement, sterilization, and management of
infant formula paraphernalia.
Lawyers or professional partnership rendering actual free legal services shall secure a
certification from the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO), the Department of Justice (DOJ), or
association accredited by the Supreme Court indicating that the said legal services to be
provided are within the services defined by the Supreme Court and that the agencies cannot
provide the legal services to be provided by the legal counsel.
The association and/or organization duly accredited by the Supreme Court shall issue then
necessary certification for the number of hours actually provided by the lawyer or partnership.
For the purpose of this incentive, the free legal services must be exclusive of the 60-hour
mandatory free legal assistance rendered to indigent clients as mandatorily required under the
Rule on Mandatory Legal Aid Services for Practicing Lawyers.
Illustration 1
A general professional partnership of lawyers had the following data during the year.
The special deduction for free legal services shall be determined as follows:
Note: The interest income on notes is an item of gross income subject to regular income tax,
but is excluded as it is not derived from the actual performance of the legal profession.
The net income of the general professional partnership shall be computed as follows:
Gross receipts P 4,000,000
Direct cost of services 1,700,000
Gross income from operations P 2,300,000
Other gross income 200,000
Total gross income P 2,500,000
Less:
Regular itemized deductions P 1,200,000
Special itemized deductions
Free legal service expense 230,000 1,430,000
Net income P 1,070,000
Illustration 2
Atty. Sabado rendered the following services during the year:
In addition, business enterprise providing manpower training and special studies to rank-and-
file employees as accredited by the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority are
also entitled to 50% additional deductions of the total grant for local training and special
studies.
However, the deduction incentives will not be allowed on bonuses accruing during the
pendency of a strike or lockout arising from any violations of the productivity incentive
program.
Illustration
To improve productivity, Cogon Company negotiated with its factory employees a productivity
incentive program wherein the employees shall receive a productivity bonus equivalent to 40%
of production cost saving which shall be measured by an independent expert.
Aside from deducting the above employee benefit expenses, the employer shall be entitled to
the following special deduction incentives:
Note to readers
The deduction incentives discussed in the following section are some of the more common
incentives to taxpayers. There are other deduction incentives granted by special laws to
various taxpayers across different industries. The list shown in this chapter is merely intended
as illustrative to show the practical application of deduction incentives in income taxation.
Net operating loss (NOL) pertains to the excess of allowable deductions over the gross income
from business or exercise of a profession during a taxable year.
Net operating loss carry-over (NOLCO) pertains to the amount of net operating loss that is
allowed by the laws to be carried over as deduction against available net income in the
following three years.
It must be noted that deduction incentive under special laws are not actual costs; hence, they
are excluded in the amount of the net operating loss carry-over. Moreover, deduction
incentives are legally allowed only as deduction incentives are not warranted. The NOLCO of
prior years shall be excluded in the measurement of the NOLCO of the current year to avoid
breaching the three-year prescriptive period rule.
It must be noted that a net operating loss is technically different with a NOLCO. A net
operating loss may occur, but may not be carried over, hence, no NOLCO. However, a NOLCO
cannot exist without a prior year net operating loss.
The Rationale of NOLCO
NOLCO is intended to allow the taxpayer to recoup his losses before taxation go full swing.
Without NOLCO, income taxation would result in taxation of recoveries of lost capital.
Illustration:
Assume the following operating (losses) or profits of the taxpayer:
There is no tax in Year 1 through Year 3 because there is a loss. However, to tax the very
minimal profit of Year 4 would be too discouraging for taxpayers to engage in business. Hence,
the law allows operating losses to be carried over as deductions subject to certain conditions.
This is essential to allow the taxpayer to recoup his losses before being fully taxed.
Treatment of NOLCO
Net operating loss carry-over (NOLCO) is treated as a separate item of deduction in the next
three (3) consecutive taxable years to the extent of the available net income in those periods.
Illustration
A corporate taxpayer reported the following net income and loss from business:
Note: Any unused NOLCO after the three year prescriptive period will expire and will not be
creditable in future periods.
Mr. Tan’s business gross income and business expense were as follows:
2013 2014 2015
Gross business income P 400,000 P 700,000 P 1,500,000
Less: Business expense 650,000 800,000 1,000,000
Net income (NOLCO) (P 250,00) (P 100,000) P 500,000
Solution:
2013 2014 2015
Net income (NOLCO) (P 250,000) (P 100,000) P 500,000
2013 NOLCO applications 100,000 ( 100,000)
Net income P - P 400,000
Note:
1. The P250,000 net operating loss occurred in a year when the taxpayer was tax exempt. This
operating loss cannot be carried over as NOLCO.
2. The P100,000 net operating loss occurred in a year when the taxpayer was taxable. This
operating loss can be carried over as NOLCO. Hence, this is carried over as deductions in 2015.
Required: Compute the 2015 and 2016 taxable net income of Trinoma Corp.
Solution:
2014 2015 2016
Net income (NOLCO) (P 250,000) P 150,000 P 500,000
2014 NOLCO application 150,000 ( 150,000)
( 100,000) ( 0)
Note: NOLCO carry-over is allowed in 2015 since there is no substantial change in ownership
but not allowed in 2016 since there is change in at least 75% in the ownership of the business.
Note: The 2014 NOL cannot over since there is a substantial change is ownership is 2015.
When there is a substantial change in the ownership of the business, NOLCO is no longer
allowed because the owners for whom the loss recoupment is intended are no longer in the
business. In other words, NOLCO is a privilege that is not transferable.
Due to the foregoing rules, it must be emphasized again that the occurrence of a net operating
loss in prior years does not automatically mean that there is a NOLCO.
Illustration 1
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Gross income P 400 P 320 P 480 P 400 P 500
Less: Deduction 500 450 450 340 340
Net income ( 100) (P 130) P 30 P 60 P 160
In 2013
The taxable net income is nil. No deduction can be made against a subsequent net operating
loss since this will roll over the NOLCO through integration in the net operating loss of the
following year. This will effectively breach the three-year prescriptive period rule.
In 2014
The taxable net income is nil. The 2012 NOLCO application and the remaining NOLCO prior
year balance as December 31, 2014 are:
2012 2013 2014
Net income (P 100) (P 130) P 30
2012 NOLCO application 30 ( 0)
Net income (NOLCO balance) (P 70) (P 130) P 0
Note: Deduction for NOLCO can be made only to the extent of available net income in the tree
following years.
In 2015
The taxable net income is nil. The 2012 NOLCO application and the ending NOLCO prior year
balance of December 31, 2015 are:
2012 2013 2014 2015
Net income (NOLCO) (P 70) (P 130) P 0 P 60
2012 NOLCO application 60 ( 60)
Net income (NOLCO balance) (P 10) (P 130) P 0 P 0
Note: The P10 excess 2012 NOLCO balance already expired because this is the third year. The
same can no longer be used as an item of deduction in future year.
In 2016
The taxable income is P30.
2013 2014 2015 2016
Net income (NOLCO) (P 130) P 0 P 0 P 160
2013 NOLCO application 130 ( 130)
Net income (NOLCO) P 0 P 0 P 0 P 30
Illustration 2
A domestic operations reported the following results of operations from years 2011 through
2016:
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Gross income P 410 P 300 P 500 P 400 P 600 P 900
Less: Deduction 500 500 450 360 450 500
NI/(NOLCO) ( 90) ( 200) P 50 P 60 P 150 P 400
The taxable net income of the corporation from years 2011 throughout 2016 shall be
computed as follows:
Illustration
As individual taxpayer complied the following income, expense and personal exemptions.
2013 2014 2015 2016
Compensation income P 20,000 P 220,000 P 80,000 P 75,000
Business gross income 470,000 400,000 500,000 500,000
Deductions 500,000 420,000 420,000 340,000
Personal exemptions 50,000 50,000 100,000 125,000
Required: Determine the annual taxable income.
Solution:
2013 2014 2015 2016
Compensation income P 20,000 P 220,000 P 80,000 P 75,000
Less: Personal exemptions 50,000 50,000 100,000 125,000
Taxable comp. income (P 30,000) P 170,000 (P 20,000) (P 50,000)
- - P 30,000 P 160,000
Net Capital Carry-Over cannot be claimed simultaneously with NOLCO. Is accordance with the
income tax benefits rule, no capital loss carry-over is allowed when the year’s operation
resulted in a net operating loss (Le. Limit 1 is zero)
Merger and Consolidation
Merger occurs when one business is merged with another business. Consolidation occurs when
several business merge to form a new larger business. The acquired business is referred to as
“assignor” or “transferor” and the purchaser as the “transferee” or
“Assignor” and the purchaser as the “transferee” or “assignee”. In assignor is called the
“acquire” while the purchaser is called “acquirer”.
However, under BIR Ruling 214-2012, the BIR ruled that NOLCO is not one of the assets of the
absorbed corporation that can be transferred and absorbed by the surviving corporation,
nothing that is privilege or deduction that can be availed only by the absorbed corporation.
Under Sec. 34 (D) (3) of the NIRC, NOLCO is not allowed as deduction when there is a
substantial change in the ownership of the business. It is clear that the privilege loss was
incurred while denying it to the new group of owner who subsequently acquired substantial
interest in the business. Thus, NOLCO is needed not a transferrable right, privilege, or
interest.
BIR Ruling 214-2012 was rendered in the context of an exempt merger where the context of an
exempt merger where the combining companies are owned by the same shareholders’ group.
However, it is expected to be emphasized finally that an acquirer cannot claim the NOLCO of
the acquired business.
CHAPTER 14
This chapter focuses on the regular income taxation of individual taxpayers and provides an
integration of all income tax rules relevant to individual taxpayers. It discusses the rules on
personal exemption and the procedures for filling of individual income tax returns.
After this chapter, readers are expected to demonstrate mastery on the following.
The progressive income tax for individuals covers all individuals subject to tax on taxable
income, such as following:
1. Citizens
a. Resident citizens
b. Non-resident citizens
2. Aliens
a. Residents Alien
b. Non-residents alien engaged in business
3. Taxable estate
4. Taxable trust
THE REGULAR TAX MODELS FOR INDIVIDUALS
If taxable
Income is over But not over Basic Tax Plus % Of excess over
P 0.00 P 10,000.00 P 0 5% P 0.00
10,000.00 30,000.00 500 10% 10,000.00
30,000.00 70,000.00 2,500 15% 30,000.00
70,000.00 140,000.00 8,500 20% 70,000.00
140,000.00 250,000.00 22,500 25% 140,000.00
250,000.00 500,000.00 50,000 30% 250,000.00
500,000.00 125,000 32% 500,000.00
PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS
Personal exemptions are the theoretical personal, living, and family expenses allowed to be
deducted from the gross or net income of an individual taxpayer. These are arbitrary amounts
which have been calculated by our lawmakers to be roughly equivalent to the minimum of
subsistence, taking into consideration the personal status and qualified dependents of the
taxpayer. (Pansacola vs.CIR, G.R 159991)
A head of the family is an unmarried or legally separated man or woman with one or both
parents, or with one or more brothers or sisters, or with one or more legitimate, recognized
natural or legally adopted child, senior citizens or persons with disability dependent upon him
for either their chief support.
Requisites of Claimable Dependents:
1. A legitimate, legally adopted, recognized natural or illegitimate child including:
2. Living with the taxpayer and dependent upon him for chief support
3. Not more than 21 years old, unmarried, and not gainfully employed
4. Regardless of age, if incapable of self-support because of mental or physical defect
The term “chief support” means not just partial but principal or main support. The taxpayers
must be providing more than 50% of the child’s need for subsistence.
The phrase “living with the taxpayer” is merely a collaborating test of dependency and does not
presuppose physical togetherness. For instance, a child living with his grandparents and not
with his parents may mean he may not be actually dependent on his parents. This criterion is
deemed satisfied if chief support is proven. Hence, a dependent who is studying and living
abroad is still claimable as additional personal exemption.
A Foster Child is child placed under planned temporary substitute parental care (foster care) by
a person duly licensed by the DSWD to provide foster care (foster parent) pursuant to the
Foster Care Act of 2012.
Persons with disability (PWD)
Disabled Persons are those suffering from restriction of different abilities, as a result of a
mental, physical or sensory impairment, to perform an activity in the manner or within the
range considered normal for a human being.
Disability shall mean a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more
psychological, physiological or anatomical function of an individual or activities of such
individual, a record of such an impairment; or being regarded as having such an impairment.
Under RA 10754, disabled persons who are within fourth civil degree of consanguinity or
affinity to the taxpayer, regardless of age, who are not gainfully employed and chiefly
dependent upon the taxpayers as now claimable as additional exemptions. Previously, a
benefactor of a PWD is entitled to additional exemption only if he or she is parent of the PWD.
Hence, where one of the spouses is unemployed or is a non-resident citizen deriving income
from foreign sources, the employed spouse or the resident spouse within the Philippines as the
case may be, shall be automatically entitled to claim the additional exemptions for the children.
Also, when one of the spouses is deriving income from pure passive sources subject to final tax,
the spouse with income subject to regular tax shall be the claimant of the additional personal
exemptions.
ILLUSTRATION 1
Ms. Lovely Landy is single with five dependent children.
She shall be allowed the following personal exemption:
Mr. and Mrs. Aparri can claim the following personal exemptions:
Illustration 3
Ms. Dona supports the following dependents:
Ms. Dona will be allowed basic personal exemption plus aP50,000 additional exemptions (i.e.,
Karen and Romeo). Romeo is a PWD within fourth degree of consanguinity.
Illustration 4
Mr. Wong, a Chinese national, is employed as manager in the ROHQ of a multinational
company established in the Philippines. He has three minor dependent children.
Mr. Wong cannot claim any personal exemption because he is a special alien.
Legally separated spouses
In case of legally separated spouses, additional exemption may be claimed by the spouses
having custody of the children, provided that the total amount of additional exemptions that
may be claimed by both shall not exceed the maximum additional exemptions allowed.
Considering the inconsistency, we shall follow the regulations until amended by the BIR,
repealed by subsequent legislation or reversed by the court. It should be clarified at this point
that persons with disability can be claimed as additional dependent but not senior citizens.
Senior citizens may be claimed only as additional dependent if they qualify also as person with
disability.
Name Status
John 18 years old, college student, got married on March 4, 2013
Kevin 20 years old, became employed since December 26, 2012
Methuselah 21 years old, adopted child, graduating college student
Alexander 23 years old, died from a stray bullet on New Year’s Eve
Only John and Mathusalem are claimable, Methuselah just became more than 21 years old
during the year. He is still claimable under the rules. Note that Kevin is employed throughout the
years 2013 since he got employed last year. The death of Alexander is not a change in personal
exemption as it a loss of a non-claimable dependents.
The 21-years old rule
It is by universal traditional that we count age by years. Never did we count age by fractions
such as 21-92 years old. A dependent that is 21 years old and 11 months old is still 21 years old.
The phrase “more than 21 years old” should means 22 years old. However, the regulation is
very strict. Once a dependent becomes 21 years old during the years, he is considered more
than 21 years old but still claimable under the rules of change in status. A dependent who
became 22 years old during the years is no longer claimable unless he is mentally or physically
incapacitated.
In case of the death of a taxpayer, there shall be allowed as deductions for the taxable period in
which falls the date of his death, amounts accrued up to the date of his death if not otherwise
properly allowable in respect of such period or a prior period. (Sec. 45, NIRC)
Illustration
Mr. Mabait died on August 30, 2014. He was survived by his wife and his two children. Before
his death, he had a P400, 000 business net income. His estate underwent judicial proceeding.
From August 31, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the business posted P200, 000 net incomes.
The income of Mr. Mabait from January 1 to August 30, 2014 will be reported in an income tax
return under his name. His personal exemption and taxable income shall be as follow:
The accounting period of the deceased shall be terminated at the date of the death. Net
income will be cut off for tax reporting as of that date; however, the claimable personal
exemption of the decedent shall be determined as if he died at year-end.
The income of Mr. Mabait after his death will be reported by his state. The personal exemption
and taxable income of the estate shall be:
If the estate of Mr. Mabait is settled extra-judicially, his heirs will repot their share in the P200,
000 net incomes in their individual tax returns.
Illustration
Mr. Bansai is an NRA-ETB with four qualified dependents. His country allows marries individuals
basic personal exemptions equivalent to P40, 000 and P20, 000 additional exemptions per
dependent not exceeding five.
Mr. Bansai can only claim a basic personal exemption of P40, 000 as allowed in his country
which is lower than the P50, 000 basic personal exemption allowed in the Philippines.
Interestingly however, a closer examination of section 3D (D) of the NIRC reveals a different
story:
(D) Personal Exemption Allowable to Non=resident Alien Individual- A non-resident alien
individual engaged in trade or business or in the exercise of a profession in the Philippines shall
be entitled to personal exemption in the amount equal to the exemptions allowed in the
income tax law in the country of which he is a subject- or citizen, to citizens of the Philippines
not residing in such country, not to exceed the amount fixed in this section as exemption for
citizens or resident of the Philippines. XXX” (Emphasis and underscoring supplied)
Section 35 of the NIRC entitled “Allowance of Personal Exemption for Individual Taxpayer”
includes the following subsections:
Sec. 35 of the NIRC used term “personal exemption” to include a basic personal exemption and
an additional exemption. Basic personal exemption and additional personal exemption are not
separate concepts. Since the “personal exemption” referred to under Sec. 35 (D) pertains to one
and the same thing. It should be construed to include a basic personal exemption and an
additional personal exemption and an additional exemption, subject to reciprocity.
Illustration
Mr. Andrew, NRA-ETB has seven dependents in the Philippines. His country allowed basic
personal exemption of P80,000 and additional exemption equivalent to P30,000 per dependent
not exceeding six.
Pursuant to the NIRC, the allowable personal exemption should be P150, 000. But under the
regulations, the allowable personal exemption is only P50,000.
Note to Readers
While RR2-98 seems to have altered the provision of the law, it shall be followed unless
subsequently revised, amended or set aside. The power to interpret the provisions of the NICR
and other tax laws is under the exclusive and original jurisdiction of the CIR, subject to review
by the Secretary of Finance. Revenue regulations and rulings are presumed valid interpretations
of the law unless challenged and reversed before the courts. To this date, no court decision has
ever set aside the treatment specified by RR2-98.
Total family income includes primary and other income from sources received by all members
of the nuclear family, .ie,.father, mother, unmarried children living together as one household,
or a single parent with children. A single person living alone is considered as a nuclear family.
Illustrative 1
Ms. Beauty single, got employed in August 2016 with a monthly salary of P20,000. She paid
P400 monthly premium on health insurance expense or a total of P2,000 in 201.
Ms. Beauty can claim a deduction for premium for health insurance since her income in 2016 did
not exceed the annual threshold. The deductible amount shall be P1,000 computed as
P200/month x 5 months or P1,000.
Illustration 2
Mr. Perez is unmarried with an annual income of P248, 000, net of P4, 000 premium payments
on hospitalization insurance.
Mr. Perez cannot premium for health and hospitalization insurance as his real income (248,000
+P4,000) already exceeds the income threshold.
Illustration 3
Mr. and Mrs. Antique, both engaged in business, have three dependents. The spouses have a
combined income of P240,000 during the year. Mrs. Antique paid P3, 000 annual premiums for
health insurance.
None of the spouses can claim deduction for premium or hospitalization insurance. Mr. Antique
is the proper claimant of additional exemption. He could not be allowed to claim PHHI because
he did not pay for the same.
Assuming that Mr. Antique waived his right to claim additional personal exemptions in favor of
Mrs. Antique, Mrs. Antique will claim the additional exemption including the PHHI, but only in
the amount of P2,400.
Illustration 4
Mr. and Mrs. Bohol have two dependent children. They have the following compensation
income and payments for premium on health and hospitalization insurance;
An estate under extra-judicial settlement is not a taxpayer. The income of the estate is taxable
to the heirs.
Taxable Trusts
A revocable trust is not a taxpayer and is treated as a pass through entity whose income is
taxable to the grantor- trust or.
An irrevocable trust is a separate and distinct taxable entity (BIR Ruling 003-035 July 22,2005).
A taxable trust is treated as an individual taxpayer and is allowed P20, 000 personal
exemptions.
Income taxable to an estate or trust under the NIRC
1. Income accumulated in trust for the benefit of unborn unascertained person or persons with
contingent interests and income accumulated or held for future distribution under the terms of
the will or trust.
2. Income which is to be distributed currently by the fiduciary to the beneficiaries and income
collected by a guardian of an infant which is to be held or distributed as the court may direct
3. Income received by states of deceased persons during the period of administration or
settlement of the estate
4. Income which, in the discretion of the fiduciary, may be either distributed to the beneficiaries
or accumulated.
Illustration: Estate
The estate of Mr. Barbel has P800, 000 gross incomes before business expenses of P200,000.
The estate administrator distributed P300,000 to the heirs in accordance with the will of Mr.
Barbel.
Gross P 800,000
Regular allowable deduction P 200,000
Special allowable deductions
Income Distribution to heirs 300,000 500,000
Net income P 300,000
Net income P 300,000
Less: Personal exemptions 20,000
Taxable income P 280,000
Note:
1. It must be recalled that income distribution from the estate is a special deduction against the
gross of the estate.
2. The heirs shall include the P300,000 income distribution in their taxable income.
Illustration: Trust
Mr. Batman designed in irrevocable trust a property in favor of Robin and appointed Superman
as trustee. The property earned P500,000 incomes before expenses of P200,000 and trust fees
of P50,000. In accordance with the trust indenture, Superman distributed P100,000 to Robin.
Note: Robin will report P100,000 income distribution in his taxable income. Superman will
report the P50,000 trust fees in his gross income.
Multiple irrevocable trusts designated by the same grantor for the benefit of the same
beneficiary shall be consolidated for purposes of income tax.
The consolidation of irrevocable trusts is necessary to eliminate tax savings which the grantor
may derive by deliberately splitting the corpus of the trusts into several trusts.
Illustration 1
Don Ambrocio designated three trusts all in favor of his daughter, Cindy:
Operating Distribution
Trust Designation Trustee income to Cindy
Trust 1 Irrevocable AJ P 200,000 P 20,000
Trust 2 Irrevocable BJ 300,000 30,000
Trust 3 Revocable CJ 200,000 40,000
The trustees of Trust 1 and Trust 2 shall prepare tax returns covering the income of the
property held under their control as follows:
Trust 1 Trust 2
Operating income P 200,000 P 300,000
Less: Special itemized deduction
Income distribution to beneficiary 20,000 30,000
Net income P 180,000 P 270,000
Net income P 180,000 P 270,000
Less: Personal exemptions 20,000 20,000
Taxable income P 160,000 P 250,000
For purpose of income taxation, the income of Trust 1 and Trust 2 will be consolidated as
follows:
Consolidated
Trust 1 Trust 2 Trust
Net income P 180,000 P 270,000 P 450,000
Less: Personal exemptions 20,000
Adjusted taxable income P 430,000
The additional tax payable resulting from the consolidation of two irrevocable trust will be
apportioned to Trust 1 and Trust 2 based on the following procedure:
Trust 3 is not taxable as it is revocable. The entire P200,000 income of Trust 3 including the
P40,000 income distribution to Cindy will be included in the taxable income of Don Ambrocio.
The Trust 1 and Trust 2 earned P200,000 and P300,000 during the year. Both trust made
distributions to their perspective beneficiaries amounting to P50,000 and P100,000,
respectively
The two trusts will not be consolidated because they involve separate beneficiaries. However,
the grantor shall include in his taxable income any income pertaining to that part of the corpus
over which the grantor has reserved power to revoke. Any income of trust reserved for the
benefit of the grantor shall likewise be included in the taxable income of the grantor.
Trust 1 Trust 2
Operating income P 200,000 P 300,000
Less: Special regular itemized deductions
Income pertaining to grantor *50,000 30,000
Distribution to beneficiaries 50,000 100,000
Net income P 100,000 P 170,000
Less: Personal exemptions 20,000 20,000
Taxable income P 80,000 P 150,000
Note:
1. The grantor has reserved power to revoke one quarter of the corpus in Trust 1.
2. The P50,000 income pertaining to such part, computed as (P200,000 x 1/4), shall be
taxable upon the grantor.
3. The P30,000 income which shall be reserved for the payment of the life insurance of the
grantor shall be likewise taxable to the grantor.
1. Non-resident aliens not engaged in trade or business – subject to a 25% final tax on gross
income.
2. Special-aliens subject to 15% tax on gross income on all remunerations and emoluments
from their employers.
Illustration 1
Mr. Bombay, an unmarried alien, arrived in the Philippines on November 1, 2014. He lent
money to a local businessman earning him P200,000 interest income until December 31, 2014.
The income tax of Mr. Bombay shall be computed as P200,000 x 25% = P50,000. The same
should be withheld by the debtor who shall remit the same to the government. Mr. Bombay will
not be allowed to claim personal exemption because NRA-NETBs are subject to 25% final tax on
gross income.
Note that the test for the purpose of taxpayer classification is the length of residency, not the
actual engagement in business.
Illustration 2
Mr. Jolo is a married Filipino citizen with four dependent children. He is employed by an
offshore banking unit of a multinational company in the Philippines and derives annual
compensation income of P1,000,000.
Mr. Jolo’s income tax will be computed as P1,000,000 x 15% = P150,000. He will not be allowed
to claim personal exemptions because he is subject to final 15% tax on gross income.
Illustration 3
Mr. Patikul, single Filipino citizen with one dependent child, is a managerial employee in the
Regional Are Headquarters of PH Care International, a multinational corporation. He earned
P800,000 annual compensation.
Mr. Patikul shall be subject to the progressive income tax. Recall that a Filipino employee must
have at least P975,000 annual compensation income to be qualified as a special alien.
Under this condition, the tax withheld by the employer becomes effectively final for the year.
This is referred to as the substituted filing system.
Employees who do not meet the conditions of the substituted filing system shall file the annual
or final adjustment return not later than April 15 of the following year. The CWT withheld by
the employer shall be credited against the annual income tax due of the employee.
The filing of a consolidated, annual or adjustment return is required under each of the following
circumstances:
At the year-end of 2016, Zeus should file a consolidated return covering 2016 and pay the
corresponding tax as follows:
The same consolidation procedures in the annual return shall be applied to other cases of receipt
of other income subject to regular income tax.
Individual taxpayers engaged in business or practice of profession shall file, in addition to the
annual income tax return (BIR Form 1701), three quarterly income tax returns (BIR Form
1701Q) on or before the following dates.
Illustration
Mr. Henry, a self-employed taxpayer with a personal exemption of P50,000, has the following
quarterly gross income and deductions:
Required: Determine his quarterly and annual income tax due and payable.
Solution:
The quarterly net income of individuals shall be determined on a cumulative basis, but without
deduction for personal exemptions. The personal exemptions are taken only in the annual
return.
Income tax due per tax table P 14,500 P 42,500 P 71,000 P 98,000
Less: Tax credits
CWT this quarter P 2,000 P 10,000 P 8,000 P 14,000
CWT prior quarter 0 2,000 12,000 20,000
Total credits P 2,000 P 12,000 P 20,000 P 34,000
P 12,500 P 30,500 P 51,000 P 64,000
Note:
1. The quarterly income tax due is determined from the cumulative net income of individuals
from the individual tax table.
2. Personal exemption is deducted only in the annual income tax return.
Solution:
The quarterly income tax due of a mixed income earner is determined out of his business or
professional net income only excluding the quarterly compensation income. Similarly, the
personal exemption of the taxpayer shall be ignored in the quarterly tax return. The
compensation income is integrated only in the annual income tax return.
The taxable income of Mr. Henry shall be consolidated and shall be presented in the annual
income tax return as follows:
The annual income tax due and payable shall be computed as follows:
Note:
1. The tax credits are the sum of all quarterly withholding or estimated payments during the
year.
2. The withholding tax on compensation and the creditable withholding tax on gross business
income and merely advances to the annual income tax due.
3. Since the income tax of individuals is determined through a progressive tax, consolidation
of regular income is necessary to properly reflect the tax.
1. Individuals and estates or trusts not engaged in business or those earning pure
compensation income, with sole earnings subject to final tax or whose sole income is exempt –
through BIR Form 1705 to be filed on or before May 15 of the following year.
2. Self-employed individuals, estates, and trusts engaged in business – through BIR Form
1701AIF to accompany the annual income tax return.
3. Corporations and partnerships in general – through BIR Form 1702AIF to accompany the
annual income tax return.
Pursuant to RNC No. 6-2001, corporations, companies, or persons whose gross quarterly sales,
earnings, receipts, or output exceed P 150,000.00 may file their annual income tax returns
accompanied by balance sheets, profit and loss statements, schedules listing income-producing
properties and the corresponding income therefrom, and other relevant statements duly
certified by an independent CPA in lieu of BIR Forms 1701AIF and 1702AIF.
The return shall be filed and the tax paid on or before the 15 th day of April of each year
covering the income for the preceding year with:
a. Any authorized agent banks (AAB) located within the jurisdiction of the Revenue District
Officer (RDO) where the taxpayer is registered.
b. Revenue Collection Officer (RCO) under the jurisdiction of the RDO where the taxpayer is
registered, if there is no AAB
In case of “no payment returns,” the same shall be filed with the RDO where the taxpayer is
registered or has his legal residence or place of business in the Philippines or with the
concerned RCO under the same RDO.
A “No payment return” pertains to tax returns without tax payable such as those with negative
or zero taxable income, those with exempt or no operation during with the period, those with
tax creditable or refundable, or those with balance payable only on the second instalment.
If any instalment is not paid on or before the date fixed for its payment, the whole amount of
the tax unpaid becomes due and payable together with the delinquency penalties.
Illustration 1
An in individual taxpayer availing of the installment payment of his income tax had a tax due of
P10,000 in 2013. He made quarterly estimated tax payments of P2,400 and was withheld with
P2,000 in creditable withholding taxes.
The first installmet which shall be due upon filing of the annual income tax return on or before
April 15, 2014 shall be:
The second installment which shall be due on or before July 15, 2014 shall be:
Illustration 2
An individual taxpayer availing of the installment payment of his 2013 income tax had a tax due
of P7,000 and was subjected to creditable withholding tax of P4,000
The first installment is nil. The taxpayer shall file a return, but with no payment.
The second installment due on or before July 15, 2014 shall be: