PHILIPPINES

Former
Time & Place Effect/Observation Strategies Objective Situation Lesson Learned Conclusion Source
Earthquakes
The Failure Mechanisms
Identification and
Vulnerability The proposed method
Evaluation (FaMIVE) endeavors to assess the
method: Using a relatively To reduce the vulnerability vulnerability of buildings
Historic buildings are modest set of data which of cultural heritage subjected to multiple
vulnerable the can be inferred from on-site structures to multiple The vulnerability of To develop such a sources of hazard by
The M 7.2 natural hazards: (i) Assessment of the
performance observation and/or cultural heritage methodology for assessing means of state-of-the-art
28-30 June, earthquake in Bohol prioritizing of specific Multi-Hazard
condition of damage drawings, it enables the structures can be the impact of earthquakes, approaches; important
2016- Chania, (2013) and the structures based on hazard Vulnerability of
limitation or computation of the building damage easily to natural typhoons and floods on benefit of the procedure
Greece (1st strongest ever maps and historical Priority Cultural
significant damage response using limit state hazards including priority cultural heritage developed is its
ICONHIC) recorded Typhoon records; (ii) assessing their Heritage Structures in
associated to lower- analysis; it also has the vulnerability; (iii) earthquake, typhoon, buildings in the Philippines applicability to different
Haiyan. the Philippines
intensity flexibility of either recommending options to flood, etc.. is presented. heritage building
and shorter return determine collapse load mitigate the impacts on typologies, namely,
period hazard levels. factors only or also them. churches, towers, houses
equivalent capacity curves and convents.
and performance points by
intersection with demand
spectra.

Most of the surveyed

buildings were The soil profile of the
Comparing the structural
constructed after FRP wrapping can address site can be categorized The improvement of the
behavior before and after
The M 7.2 Bohol 2010, considerable deficiencies related to as very dense soil and performance of the
retrofitting indicated a
June 18-20, earthquake (2013), number were from inadequate shear and soft rock and according structure after INCREASING SEISMIC
considerable improvement
damaged more than the 1990s: as to seismic zonation of implementing FRP RESILIENCE OF
2018- Cagayan flexural capacity, as well in ductility and capacity of
73,000 structures, anticipated, signs of the code, (CdeO) is retrofitting, indicates PHILIPPINES’ SCHOOL
De Oro, as enhancing the -- the structure, while no
INFRASTRUCTURE
more than 14,500 decay and poor located in zone IV with lower vulnerability and
Philippines concrete compression alteration was observed in
were totally structural conditions faults that are capable damage ratio, which can THROUGH
strength and ultimate total mass and initial
destroyed, including were observed in the of producing large consequentially result in a STRUCTURAL
strain due to lack of stiffness of both buildings;
several schools. structures which magnitude events (Mw reduction of social and RETROFITTING
and also the applied of
have been confinement. ≥ 7.0) and have a high economic losses.
other methods (analytical).
constructed over rate of seismic activity.
long periods of time.
 PHILIPPINES
Former
Time & Place Effect/Observation Strategies Objective Situation Lesson Learned Conclusion Source
Earthquakes

The main novelty of the

proposed RVS form is in its
Most the vulnerable multi-level architecture
The M7.2 2013 Bohol The site (Iloilo City) is
buildings, cultural The promotion of which allows improving
earthquake or the listed under Seismic A multi-level risk and
heritage (CH) assets community awareness on the estimation of the
2013 Typhoon Zone 4 in the official resilience assessment The CHeRiSH Project:
are especially ad-hoc Rapid Visual Survey the vulnerability of CH structural fragility and risk
Haiyan, that Filipino seismic map of the framework for CH assets in Towards a Multilevel,
important because of (RVS) form for the multi- assets and the design of once new detailed
15- 19 Sept., cultural Heritage Philippines by the the Philippines developed Multi-hazard Risk
their high hazard data collection and disaster risk information is available.
2019 assets are Philippine Institute of by CHeRiSH project was a Assessment
historical/cultural risk prioritization of CH communication and Combining the two indices
particularly Volcanology and big helped and assessed Framework For
value, the lack of any assets, developed within emergency management allows one to define a
vulnerable to natural Seismology; and also the vulnerability of Cultural Heritage
hazard-resistant CHeRiSH. campaigns targeted at multi-hazard prioritization
hazards due to situated in Zone II of the cultural heritages in the Assets in the
design, and their cultural organizations and scheme for more detailed
ageing and type of Philippines Wind Zone Philippines. Philippines
material degradation local communities. structural analysis, and
construction. Map.
due to aging. retrofitting/strengthening
planning and conceptual
design.
 JAPAN
Former
Time & Place Effect/Observation Strategies Objective Situation Lesson Learned Conclusion Source
Earthquakes
Conventional methods of
strengthening existing
buildings; addition of
reinforced concrete shear
walls or steel bracing,
thickening existing walls,
shear reinforcement of
columns by jacketing
reinforced concrete, steel
plate or carbon fiber
sheet: (a) PITA Column
Method (Yahagi Corp.),
anchors are attached at
the existing columns and
Japanese retrofit
Offshore Tokachi beams and the reinforced
Severe damage were Japan is an earthquake methods showed the
Earthquake in plate is attached The advancement of seismic SURVEY OF RETROFIT
observed on many country like Philippines, various ways of
19-21 May 2016 1968; and the 1995 and covered with ------- retrofitting of existing METHODS OF RC
buildings designed by the and prone to increasing the lateral
Hanshin-Awaji Great concrete; (b) CESRet structures in Japan. BUILDINGS IN JAPAN
1981 code. earthquake occurred. performance of
Earthquake. Method (Yahagi Corp),
buildings and houses.
precast H-steel section is
attached to existing
column, beams or walls;
(c) Skills Meiko Inner
Column (SMIC) of Meiko
Corp., building frames
which has advantages over
braced system; (d) Seismic
isolation systems by
Shimizu Corp., the study,
analysis and design of
earthquake-resistant
buildings using seismic
isolators.
 Observation/s:
(i) The seismic evaluation
and
retrofitting of school
Many studies on passive
buildings almost been
control systems for the
completed, but many of NONLINEAR SEISMIC
seismic retrofitting of
condominiums that The simplified procedure RESPONSE OF A
existing RC buildings and Simplified procedure for
have been designed to the can satisfactorily SEVEN-STORY STEEL
The damper column, low- the seismic design of predicting the peak response
old seismic design code. estimate the peak REINFORCED
yield-strength steel is used new RC buildings, but it of a retrofitted building with
1995 Hyogo-Ken (ii) Applying buckling- response of a retrofitted CONCRETE
18-21 June 2018 for the shear panel, which -------- depends the type of a low-yield-strength-steel
Nanbu Earthquake restrained brace (BRB) to building CONDOMINIUM
absorbs the hysteresis building the retrofitting damper panel considering
the seismic retrofitting of model with damper RETROFITTED WITH
energy. method to use including the strain hardening
an existing condominium columns considering the LOW-YIELD-
condominiums, hotel, behavior.
may introduce strain hardening effect. STRENGTH-STEEL
etc. that it may
architectural problems, DAMPER COLUMNS
introduce architectural
may obstruct the view
problems.
from a window of the
living
Space unlike the damper
column.

February 26, 2018-

Nov 16-18, M7.5 earthquake
2018- Perth, struck Hela Province
W.A. in the Central
Highlands of Papua
New Guinea.