Petroleum Refining, Volume 1 - Crude Oil, Petroleum Products, Process Flowsheet
Petroleum Refining, Volume 1 - Crude Oil, Petroleum Products, Process Flowsheet
Petroleum Refining, Volume 1 - Crude Oil, Petroleum Products, Process Flowsheet
PETROLEUM REFINING
CRUDE OIL
PETROLEUM
PRODUCTS
Volume 1 PROCESS
FLOWSHEETS
Edited by
Jean-Pierre Wauquier
lnstitut Fraqais du P6trole
Jean-Claude Roussel
Raymond Boulet
Crude oils have physical and chemical characteristics that vary widely
from one production field to another and even within the same field.
The roughest form of characterization, but nevertheless one that has great
economic consequence, is th e classification of "light" and "heavy" crude.
Because crude oil is composed essentially of hydrocarbon molecules, its
specific gravity varies inversely with its H/C atomic ratio. Specific gravities
for various crude oils will range from 0.7 to 1.0: they are often expressed in
degrees API' (American Petroleum Institute) which will vary between 70 and
5. As we will see, it is clear that this variable gravity reflects compositions of
chemical families that are very different from each other.
Figure 1.1 illustrates the diversity of products derived from petroleum
classified according to their distillation ranges and number of carbon atoms.
From one crude to another, the proportions of the recovered fractions vary
widely. A good illustration is t h e gasoline fraction (one of t h e most
economically attractive); a crude from Qatar gives about 37 per cent by
volume whereas a Boscan crude oil only yields 4.5%.
All these differences influence the conditions of production, transport,
storage and refining adapted to the crude and its derived products: hence the
necessity for knowing the composition as precisely as possible.
6a)
50
500
35
400 25
20
300
14
200
10
100 7
6
0 4
3
- 100
1
f C \ C
Cyclopentane CSHIO I I 70.1 49.3 0.750
c-c
c/ c\ C / c
Methylcyclopentane C6H12 I I 84.2 71.8 0.753
c-c
f C \ C
Cyclohexane C6H12 I I 84.2 80.7 0.783
C\c/C
c c
c/ \c’
Methylcyclohexane C,H,, I I 98.2 100.9 0.774
The general formula for cycloparaffins having a single ring is C,H2,. There
also exist cycloparaffins with two, three, or four, etc. rings attached. Hence
decalin has two rings attached to each other and the general formula is CH
, .,
In cycloparaffins having four and five rings, one finds hydrocarbons having
retained in part the structure of living matter at the petroleum’s origin
(steranes and hopanes). They serve as biochemical markers.
I I
H H
The structural formula is often represented by:
The hydrogen atom attached to each carbon atom in the hexagon has
been omitted by convention.
The general formula is the following:
CnH2n-6
Hydrogen atoms can be substituted in the following ways:
Either by alkyl groups which are designated by the letter R, which is
equivalent to Cn9H2n9+l,to give alkyl-aromatics. The prefixes ortho, meta
a n d para a r e used to s h o w positions of s u b s t i t u t e s o n t h e ring.
Therefore, C8Hl, or dimethyl benzenes (xylenes), are represented in the
following manner:
H H H
I I I
H\C//C\C/ CH3 H-y// C \c, CH3 H\C//C,C/ CH3
I I II I II
II
H/C+c/C\CH3 '\
H/ \c /'\H CH3/'+C/'\H
I I I
H CH3 H
orthoxylene metaxylene paraxylene
Or by other aromatics.
In this instance a second aromatic ring can be substituted for two
adjacent hydrogen atoms giving condensed polynuclear aromatics, for
example:
H H H H H
H H H H H
naphthalene anthracene
H
phenanthrene
Or by a naphthenic ring which can also be substituted for two adjacent
hydrogen atoms forming a naphthene aromatic such as tetralin or
tetrahydronaphthalene.
Hq H
H2 H
Benzene ‘SH6
0 78.1 80.1 0.884
Ethylbenzene C8Hlo
O/c-c 106.2 136.2 0.871
‘\ac
o-xylene
‘SHlO
-J C/
Table
1.3 Physical constants oF selected aromatics*.
* The hydrogen atoms have been omitted for the sake of simplification.
1.1.1.4 Unsaturated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons or Olefins or Alkenes
In this group certain carbon atoms are linked only to three atoms, which
implies the existence of one or more double bonds between carbon atoms.
Taking into account the double bond, an olefin situation is encountered
that is much more complex than that of the preceding families. For example,
the C,H, butene isomers have many arrangements:
1-butene CH,= CH- CH2- CH3
cis 2-butene CH3-C=C-CH3
I I
H H
H
I
trans 2-butene CH,- C= C - CH,
I
H
CH3 \
isobutene C=CH2
CH, '
The terms cis and trans signify, respectively, that the two hydrogen atoms
a r e on t h e same side o r on t h e opposite side with respect t o t h e
perpendicular plane of the double bond.
There are little or no olefins in crude oil or "straight run" (direct from
crude distillation) products but they are found in refining products,
particularly in the fractions coming from conversion of heavy fractions
whether o r not these processes are thermal o r catalytic. The first few
compounds of this family are very important raw materials for t h e
petrochemical industry: e.g., ethylene, propylene, and butenes.
Table 1.4 gives the physical properties of selected olefins.
Isobutene I 1 c4H8
c-c=c
I
C
1 56.1 -6.9 I
I
0.601
I I I
H H H
benzothiophene dibenzothiophene
A knowledge of these compounds is important because they often have
undesirable attributes, e.g., unpleasant odor, the SO, formed by combustion,
catalyst poisoning. There are a number of refining processes t o eliminate
sulfur compounds.
Oxygen Compounds
Crude oils generally contain less oxygen than sulfur (Table 1.5). Even
though it is not abundant, oxygen can play a consequential role; in particular,
it is responsible for petroleum acidity. Oxygen is found in the following
compounds:
Phenols formed by the substitution of a hydrogen atom by a hydroxyl
group, OH, in an aromatic ring:
H
I
I
H
Furanes and benzofuranes in which an oxygenated ring is condensed
into one or more aromatic rings.
Example: dibenzofurane
H H
I I
I I
H H
Carboxylic acids: R- COOH
where R is an alkyl radical, an aromatic ring, or a saturated ring. In this
case, they are naphthenic acids for which the carboxylic group Is
bonded to either a cyclopentane or cyclohexane molecule. Abundant in
certain crude oils, naphthenic acids cause corrosion problems.
Esters: R- COO- R'
where R and R are alkyl radicals or aromatics.
Nitrogen Compounds
In crude oil, nitrogen is found mostly in fractions boiling over 250°C and is
particularly concentrated in resins and asphaltenes. Nitrogen takes the
following forms:
In saturated or aromatic amides:
/
-C-N,
II
0
As amines:
R-NH,, R-NH-R or R-N-R"
I
R'
As carbazoles, where a ring containing nitrogen is condensed with one
or more aromatic rings, forming neutral compounds.
For example, the compound dibenzopyrrole:
H H
I I
I I I
H H H
1.2.1 Asphaltenes
Asphaltenes are obtained in the laboratory by precipitation in normal
heptane. Refer to the separation flow diagram in Figure 1.2. They comprise an
accumulation of condensed polynuclear aromatic layers linked by saturated
chains. A folding of the construction shows the aromatic layers to be in piles,
whose cohesion is attributed t o T electrons from double bonds of the
benzene ring. These are shiny black solids whose molecular weight can vary
from lo00 to 100,OOO.
The portion that is soluble in normal heptane is given the term maltenes.
According t o t h e nature of t h e solvent employed, t h e yields and
constitutions of t h e asphaltenes a re different. In t h e United States,
asphaltenes are obtained by precipitation from normal pentane.
In industry, the elimination of asphaltenes from oil involves using propane
or butane. The utilization of a lighter paraffin results in the heavier paraffins
precipitating along with the asphaltenes thereby diminishing their aromatic
character. The oil removed from i t s asphaltene fraction is known as
deasphalted oil or DAO. The precipitated portion is called asphalt.
Asphaltenes have high concentrations of heteroelements: sulfur, nitrogen,
nickel and vanadium. Their content varies widely in petroleum oils Pable 1.5).
They cause a number of problems throughout the petroleum industry.
In oil bearing formations, the presence of polar chemical functions of
asphaltenes probably makes the rock wettable to hydrocarbons and limits
their production. It also happens that during production, asphaltenes
precipitate, blocking the tubing. The asphaltenes are partly responsible for
the high viscosity and specific gravity of heavy crudes, leading to transport
problems.
The refining industry generally seeks either to eliminate asphaltenes or to
convert them to lighter materials because the presence of heteroelements
cause pollution problems, e.g., sulfur and nitrogen, catalyst poisoning, and
corrosion (formation of metal vanadates during combustion).
All the problems briefly described above justify the large effort t o
characterize asphaltenes by techniques seldom found elsewhere in the
petroleum industry. One of these is to analyze asphaltenes by steric exclusion
chromatography, a widespread technique for studying polymers. In this
method, the components are eluted by a solvent travelling through a column
having microporous packing. According t o whether the particles t o be
separated have larger or smaller sizes than those of the micropores, they can
or can not penetrate into the micropores, leading to a process of separation by
size (in reality, by hydrodynamic volume), the largest particles are the first to
appear. This chromatographic method is then utilized t o characterize
asphaltenes by determining their mass distribution, the system generally being
calibrated using polymer standards. One observes that during the visbreaking
process, the size and the polydispersity of asphaltenes is greatly reduced.
Because they contain many islets of condensed aromatics, the carbon-rich
asphaltenes can begin to acquire the spatial organization of graphite layers.
n-Heptanwil mix
(30 volumes to 1 volume)
insoluble soluble
Maltenes
1.2.2 Resins
If maltenes are subjected t o liquid chromatography (see 2.1.2.4) the
components eluted by the more polar solvents are called resins. Their
composition, once again, depends on the procedure used.
Resins are generally molecules having aromatic characteristics and
contain heteroatoms (N, 0, S,occasionally Ni and V);their molecular weight
ranges from 500 to 1OOO.
In English language publications, resins are frequently called "polar
compounds" or "N,S,0 compounds".
Fractionation and Elemental Analysis
of Crude Oils and Petroleum Cuts
Jean-Claude Roussel
Raymond Bou let
Crude oils form a continuum of chemical species from gas to the heaviest
components made up of asphaltenes; it is evidently out of the question, given
the complexity of the mixtures, to analyze them completely. In this chapter
we will introduce the techniques of fractionation used in the characterization
of petroleum as well as the techniques of elemental analysis applied to the
fractions obtained.
Be c a us e of th eir d iv ersity a n d complexity as well as t h e gradual
internationalization of the different standards, it has proven necessary to
standardize the methods of sample preservation, handling, fractionation, and
analysis throughout the chain of separation and treatment. All these stages
a r e t h e object of precise protocols established by official national and
international organizations. They describe in as minute detail as possible the
procedures employed not only for each analysis but very often giving
different procedures for the same analysis in different matrices. These are the
standards or standardized methods discussed in Chapter 7.
99.0
Table
I 70
80
131.0
151.5
90 167.5
2.1
95 177.5
EP 183.5
Typical results for
an AsTMD 86 % distillate 97.8
distillation of a % residue 0.8
gasoline. % losses 1.4
Heavy Fractions
As stated above for the TBP distillation, petroleum cannot be heated
above 340°C without its molecules starting t o crack. Because of this,
analytical distillation of heavy fractions is done according to the ASTM D 1160
method for petroleum materials that can be partially or completely vaporized
at a maximum temperature of 400°C at pressures from 50 to 1 mm of mercury
(6.55 to 0.133 kPa).
The sample is distilled at predetermined and precisely controlled
temperatures under conditions that give a fractionation equivalent to about
one theoretical plate.
The results are presented as a distillation curve showing the boiling
temperature (corrected to atmospheric pressure) as a function of the distilled
volume.
lnjectar
Column
Electrode
Flame
Temperature-progrm’med
oven
Akr
Hydrogen
Burner
Figure
Schematic illustration OF gas phase chromatograph with Flame ionization
detection (HDJ
400
300
200
100
00 5 10 15 20 25 30-
Retention time, minutes
Signal intensity
IF
zI Simulated distillation of a imcuum gasail.
or for a very quick estimation of the yields of the light fractions from
conversion processes.
Finally, other methods are used to obtain simulated distillation by gas
phase chromatography for atmospheric or vacuum residues. For these cases,
some of the sample components can not elute and an internal standard is
added t o t h e sample in order t o obtain this quantity with precision.
An example of the good correlation between TBP and simulated distillation is
given in Figure 2.4, where it is shown that 71% of a Kuwait crude distils below
535°C.
Recently, chromatographs and their associated columns have been able to
elute components with boiling points up to 700°C under atmospheric
pressure.
Backflushing techniques, well-known t o analysts, are also extremely
valuable tools.
Weight %
A
0
Temperature, "C
-
Figure
2.4 Distillation curves For a Kuwait crude oil.
Oil
+ DMSO
Cyclohexanecontaining
Water containing the DMSO the polynuclear aromatics
Analysis by
Gravtmetry
Spectrometry
Liquid chromatography
2.1.2.2 Precipitation
This technique is used to quantify one or more components in a mixture,
i.e.. extracting them from mixtures to facilitate their final analysis. An example
is that for the asphaltenes, already described in the definition of these
components in article 1.2.1.
2.1.2.3 Subtractive Method, for a Chemical Family
These methods are grouped as either physical or chemical processes.
For physical processes, two examples are the elimination of normal
paraffins from a mixture by their adsorption on 5 A molecular sieves or by
their selective formation of solids with urea (clathrates)
For chemical processes, some examples are the elimination of aromatics
by sulfonation, the elimination of olefins by bromine addition on the double
bond (bromine number), the elimination of conjugated diolefins as in the case
of the maleic anhydride value (MAW, and the extraction of bases or acids by
contact with aqueous acidic or basic solutions.
2.2.2 Sampling
The complexity of petroleum products raises the question of sample
validity; is the sample representative of the total flow? The problem becomes
that much more difficult when dealing with samples of heavy materials or
samples coming from separations. The diverse chemical families in a
petroleum cut can have very different physical characteristics and the
homogeneous nature of the cut is often due to the delicate equilibrium
between its components. The equilibrium can be upset by extraction or by
addition of certain materials as in the case of the precipitation of asphaltenes
by light paraffins.
Before withdrawing a sample it is necessary to agitate it, even if it is a gas,
and eventually heat the sample being careful to stay below temperatures
which could cause evaporation of the lighter components.
If agitation and heating are not practical as in the cases of large volumes, it
is better to withdraw samples from various levels in order to get an average
sample.
The procedures are described in the standards ASTM D 270, D 4057 and
NF M 07401.
C H N
Range, weight % 0.2 - 100 0.2 - 100 0.2 - 100
Error ? 0.2 5 0.1 2 0.1
-
Table
2.2 Elemental analysis of carbon, hydrogen, and
nihogen.
Method 1
I
ASTM I
I
NF I
I
Range I
I
Material
Coulometry M 07-052 100 ppm - 100% All
Microcoulom. D 3120 3 -100 ppm 26' < BP < 274°C
Wickbold D2774 T60-142 1 ppm - 5% All
QB
P
Induction furnace D 1552
~~
Lamp
~
D 1266 I
M 07-025 0.05 - 100%
1 M07-031 I 0.01 - 0.4% I
BP > 175°C
I
u Quartztube I I T60-108 I 0.05 - 100% I BP> 175°C I
Bomb I D 129 1 T60-109 I 0.1 - 100% I Non-volatile I
uv fluorescence I I M 07-059 10.5 ppm - a few %I Liquid I
Hydrogenolysis D 4045 0.02 - 10 ppm 30"< BP < 371°C
Nondisp. XF D4294 M07-053 0.01 - 5%
SO, -
the temperature attained during combustion because the reaction:
+ 1/2 0, SO,AH; = -95,s U/mol.
does not favor conversion to SO, at high temperatures. Above 1200°C. only
SO, is stable. The table below gives equilibrium constants from the equation:
PSO"
Detector
Secondary X-rays
Collimator
I 1
F"6" Concept OF analysis by X-my fluorescence.
34 Chapterz. FFi4CTKMIATICNAND ELEMENTAL
ANAlyslS OF CRUDE OILS AND PmKxEUM CUTS
Sample beam
Acetylene
Sample
X-ray fluomence
The detectable limits are given for samples such as they are introduced into the
apparatus; they should be previously diluted in order to be nebulized. It thereby is
useful to apply a dilution coefficient, usually at least 10. The dilution depends on the
sample viscosity.
** After mineralization.
Table
2.4 Metal analysis in petroleum cuts.
Taking into account the range of wavelength and the intensity of emission
beams, certain elements cannot be determined by atomic absorption, such as
C,H,0, N,S, and the halogens.
2.2.6.3 Using Argon Plasma Atomic Emisrlon for Analysis of Metals
The sample should be liquid or in solution. It is pumped and nebulized in
an argon atmosphere, then sent through a plasma torch: that is, in an
environment where the material is strongly ionized resulting from the
electromagnetic radiation produced by an induction coil. Refer to the
schematic diagram in Figure 2.8.
Induction coil
Argon plasma
Auxiliary argon
Plasma
torch
Nebulizer
Mwurement electranrcs
computer
Data input
ww Dissolved sample
The choice between X-ray fluorescence and the two other methods will be
guided by the concentration levels and by the duration of the analytical
procedure; X-ray fluorescence is usually less sensitive than atomic
absorption, but, at least for petroleum products, it requires less preparation
after obtaining the calibration curve. Table 2.4 shows the detectable limits
and accuracies of the three methods given above for the most commonly
analyzed metals in petroleum products. For atomic absorption and plasma,
t h e figures a r e given for analysis in a n organic medium without
mineralization.
Characterization of Crude O i l s
and Petroleum Fractions
Jean-Claude Roussel
Raymond Boulet
From these observations, the characterization factor Kuop (or K,) was
defined for pure components using only their boiling points and their
densities:
(1.8 T)"
%of= s
T being the boiling temperature (Kelvin) and S being the standard specific
gravity (15.S°C/15.S0C). Referto Chapter 4.
42 cmtw 3. C w c m m OF CRUDE
OILSAND P m ~ x f lFl ~m c m
- Table
3.3 The ndMmethod (Wuithier, 1972).
As a consequence, other than its use in the ndM method, the refractive
index is very often used ln process operations because it can indicate
small differences in product quality that would be missed by other
measurements. The only restriction is that t h e color of the sample
should be less than 5 on the ASTM D 1500scale.
Molecular weight: for a mixture of components such as one would
encounter in petroleum cuts, the molecular weight is:
M= -&4
.z "t
Standard tests
standard tests Liquid chromatography
IndMdwrl analysis %S
Simulated distillation
s.A.ARA. C, H.N,0.S
Ni. V
Mdecdar weight
NMU 'H. '%
SEC
m
C,H C,H,S C. H, N, 0,S
NhfR 'H,'% NMR 'H,'% NL, V
w HPL€ Molecularweight
IR NMR 'H,'%
w IU
Table
Sepamtions and analyses for a uacuum residue.
Magnetic DeviationMass Spectrometry
A schematic diagram of the apparatus is shown in Figure 3.2. The
molecules are introduced under a partial vacuum of torr' into a buffer
chamber that communicates via molecular slipstream with the source itself at
to torr in order to ensure a constant concentration in the source at
all times during the analysis.
Inside t h e source t h e molecules a r e subjected t o an electron
bombardment that ionizes them with a positive charge and fragments them.
In the most conventional analyses, the electrons are accelerated to 70 eV.
The source is brought to a positive potential (V) of several kilovolts and
the ions are extracted by a plate at ground potential. They acquire kinetic
energy and thus velocity according to their mass and charge. They enter a
magnetic field whose direction is perpendicular to their trajectory. Under the
effect of the field, Bo, the trajectory is curved by Lorentz forces that produce
a centripetal acceleration perpendicular to both the field and the velocity.
Dispersing device
Inlet (magnetic field)
Ion
source
Extraction,
acceleration
Slits
Detector
IF
rI Concept of magnetic dumtion mass spechvmeter.
The variation of B,, causes all ions to pass sequentially in front of the exit
slit behind which is positioned the photomultiplier detector. The pressure in
the apparatus is held at torr in order to achieve mean free paths of ions
sufficiently high that all ions emitted from the source are collected.
Example:
For a substance, A, whose partial pressure is pa, the values (intensities) of
ions 57 and 43, for example are given as:
h43 = k1 Pa h57 = k, Pa
Knowing k, and k, by studying reference components, it becomes possible
to calculate pa from the measurements of ion intensities found on the mass
spectrum.
In t h e case of mixtures, especially t h o s e of petroleum, a variety of
compounds can give ions having the same mass; the mass spectrum is then
the sum of the spectra of each component:
h43 = Z k l i p i h57 = C k 2 i P i
To obtain the different values of pi, it is only necessary to produce as many
independent equations as there are components in the mixture and, if the
mixture h a s n components, to solve a system of n equations having n
unknowns. Individual analysis is now possible for mixtures having a few
components but even gasoline has more than 200! It soon becomes unrealistic
to have all the sensitivity coefficients necessary for analysis: in this case, 2W2.
However, a c o n s i d e r a b l e a m o u n t of work was d o n e by American
petroleum companies from 1940 to 1960, who obtained very narrow range
petroleum cuts and identified the chemical families present in each of them.
They noted that each chemical family gave preferential fragmentation
patterns allowing them to be identified. Therefore, paraffins of the general
formula C,,HZn+, led essentially to CnH2n+l+ fragments; a r o m a t i c
hydrocarbons having the formula C,,H2,-6 produced mainly CnH2,,-6+ and
CnH2n-7+ fragments, and so on.
The resulting mass spectrometry analysis is an analysis by chemical
families of the form C,,H2,,-=. Using this approach, petroleum laboratories
found matrices of sensitivity coefficients for each chemical family and even in
certain cases by average carbon number within the chemical family. Thus an
entire series of methods was created (see Table 3.6), establishing mass
spectrometry as one of the foremost analytical tools for petroleum.
Note that the matrices of coefficients could be simplified if the mass
spectrometer resolution were better. Consider four hydrocarbons having the
s a m e molecular weight integer of 226: t h e paraffin CI6Hs4(l), t h e
alkylnaphthalene Cl,H,,(2), t h e indenopyrene C1,$1,(3) a n d t h e alkyl
dibenzothiophene C15H14S(4), for which the exact molecular weights are,
respectively: 226.266 226.172; 226.078 and 226.081.
All have molecular weights of 226 to the nearest integer (C = 12, H = 1,
S = 32), but the exact molecular weights differ slightly. A resolution of 2500 is
necessary to separate molecules 1 , 2 and 3 but 75,000 is required to separate
molecule 4 from molecule 3 which explains why high resolution mass
spectrometers are sought.
50 chapter 3. OF CWLX OILSAND P m n x ~ F
CHARACTERIZA~ u ~R A C ~
Number of Number of
Reference
carbon atom chemlcal families
IP-210 c6-c12 ASTM D 2789 6
180-350 ClO-C20 ASTM D 2425 12 incl. 2 sulfur fam.
2W700 '12*55 Fisher (1974) 24
-550 arom.fract. 'ld45 IFP (unpublished) 21 by carbon
350550 satur. fract. C,d, ASTM D 2786 7
350-550 arom.fract. 1SX45 ASTM D 3239 21
(low resolution)
- Table
3.6 Nonexhaustive summaty of analytical methods using mass spechometry
r
45 50 55 so"
Figure
3.3 Correlation between measured cetane number and that calculated by mass
I I spectmmeity.
w ~ p t ~ cHAF14cmm
3 . OF C ~ l r OILS
o ~ AW P ~ K X E UFM w m 53
UV source
Sample
Entry slit
...U"
Outlet slit Detector
Absorbance
-
Figure
3.5 Wspectrum for a gas oil.
Using this concept, Burdett developed a method in 1955 to obtain the
concentrations in mone, di- and polynuclear aromatics in gas oils from the
absorbances measured at 197,220 and 260 nm, with the condition that sulfur
content be less than 1%. Knowledge of the average molecular weight enables
the calculation of weight per cent from mole per cent. As with all methods
based on statistical sampling from a population, this method is applicable
only in the region used in the study; extrapolation is not advised and usually
leads to erroneous results.
The specific nature of UV absorption for certain structures when
combined with the high sensitivity of the method enables trace quantities
(= 1 ppm) of molecules in a matrix transparent to UV beams to be analyzed.
Benzene in cyclohexane is an example.
.='z
bond whose force constant is k,the vibration frequency u will be as follows:
2ll
m2
where p is the reduced mass equal to: '
ml+"2
Although a diatomic molecule can produce only one vibration, this number
increases with the number of atoms making up the molecule. For a molecule of
N atoms, 3N-6 vibrations are possible. That corresponds to 3 N degrees of
freedom from which a re subtracted 3 translational movements and
3 rotational movements for the overall molecule for which the energy is not
quantified and corresponds to thermal energy. In reality, this number is most
often reduced because of symmetry. Additionally, for a vibration to be active
in the infrared, it must be accompanied by a variation in the molecule's dipole
moment.
For the two modes of vibration for C02:
o=c=o o=c=o
d l 4
only mode 2 (non-symmetrical) allows absorption to take place. Mode 1 is
said to be inactive.
Nevertheless, a molecule possesses sufficient vibrations so that all its
frequencies taken together can be used to characterize it. In this sense the
infrared spectrum is generally considered to be a molecule's "fingerprint."
Mirror. Mirror
Sample
Rotating sector
Entry Source
Slits Reference
To the detector
Detal of rotating sector
where:
V = wave number in cm-'
A = wavelength in pm
Y = frequency in Hertz (cycles per second)
c = speed of light in a vacuum in pm/s
(the frequency in Hz would be hard to work with because the 1R region is
around 30 lo1*Hz). Thus the middle infrared, of interest to us here, ranges
from 4000 to 400 cm-l (corresponding to wavelengths from 2.5 to 25 pm).
With these units, the molecular vibration of CO at 2350 cm-' enables the
calculation of a force constant for the oscillator to be made:
k = 18 x N/m.
Qualitative Analysis by Infrared Absorption Spectrometry
Strictly speaking, a group of atoms cannot be isolated from the rest of the
molecule. However, with a few exceptions, the same chemical group always
absorbs energy in the same 1R spectral region. For instance the vibrations
from the C- H bonds of a methyl group cause absorption of infrared
radiation at 2960,1450,1390cm-l.
The OH vibrator absorbs at 3600 and 1620 cm-l, the benzene ring at 1600,
1500 cm-' and, depending on the position of its substitution groups, between
1200 and 1000 and between 900 and 600 cm-l, etc.
These characteristic absorption regions called group frequencies allow
the analyst to detect the different elemental patterns and from them to
reconstruct the molecule either by deduction or by comparison with library
reference spectra. The libraries contain several hundred thousand spectra.
Quantitative Analysis Using Infrared Spectrometry
Using fo( V ) , the incident radiation energy for wave number V and I( C),
the radiation energy after passing through the sample at the same wave
number, the following are defined:
Transmittance: T; = -
( expressed as %
lo( a
Transmittance is measured as shown in Figure 3.7.
I,( 6)
Absorbance: A; = - log T; = log
I( V )
60 E CRUDE
cww 3. C H A F ~ ~ C TOF W Z AOILS
~ AND PETAOWMF ~ p l c m
100%
I I
0% I
- Figure
3.7 Measuring transmittance.
1 1
Figure
3.8 Inhred spectrum d a petroleum cut.
The naphthenic carbon percentage is the difference between 100 and the
sum of the above concentrations.
This method is applicable for mineral oil fractions whose molecular weight
is between 290 and 500 and for C, < 60% and 40% < C , < 70%. The analysis is
fast, approximately 10 minutes, and the correlation with other methods is
satisfactory.
Adaptations of this method have been proposed in order to take into
account the band displacement due either to substitution on the aromatic
ring, or t o chains of different lengths. The variations consist, instead of
measuring the absorbance at maximum absorption, of an integration of the
absorbance curve over a specified range (Oelert's method, 1971). More exact,
this method is used less often mainly because the Brandes method is simpler
to use.
Starting from these methods, as we will see further on, nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR)of carbon has provided an absolute percentage of aromatic,
paraffinic, and naphthenic carbons.
Previous Page
Other correlations between NMR and infrared have been studied because
the latter technique is less cumbersome than NMR. Correlations are obtained
not just on the two absorption bands but on the whole of the 1R spectrum
after reduction of the spectrum into its principal components.
(b) Monitoring the Oxidation ofa Motor Lubricating Oil during Opemtion
Oxidation of a motor lubricating oil is manifested by the presence of
oxygenated functional groups: in particular, esters or acids. Formation of
compounds containing t h e s e groups can b e followed by infrared
spectrometry by observing the characteristic absorption measurements for
carbonyl groups C = 0, between 1700 and 1800 cm-l, precisely where non-
oxidized hydrocarbons d o not show absorption. Following the trend is
usually the best that can be done because measuring the exact concentration
is difficult. In fact, an average absorptivity a( V ) for all the esters and/or acids
cannot be evaluated because they can be quite different from one molecule to
another. Exact quantitative analysis is not possible.
Radio frequency
BeM
Sample Radlofrequency:u
Resonancewhen: A& = hv
I I
Figure
3.9 Schematic view showing the principle of nuclear magnetic resonance.
Measurement of the energy difference is achieved by a resonance method.
The population of nuclei in a given state is governed by the Boltzman
distribution that leads to an excess of nuclei in the state of lowest energy and
confers t o the lattice a magnetization, M,, parallel t o B,. The distribution
(hence the magnetization) can be changed by applying to the sample a
radiation whose frequency is in resonance with the spin system.
In an NMR spectrometer, the sample
placed in an homogeneous magnetic field RerrOMIlCe
Nucleus
is surrounded by a coil carrying an kquency
alternating electric current of variable
frequency Y of a few hundred MHz and 'H 400.13
therefore emitting photons having an I9F 376
energy hu. When the frequency Y is such 3lP 162
that this energy is equal to that separating
t h e nuclear energy s t a t e s , t h e '3c 100.6
magnetization is changed bringing about a BSi 79.46
variation of current in t h e coil. This - -
variation is used to detect the resonance Tab'e
Resonance frequencies in
and thus characterize the nuclei species. 3.9 MHz in a 9.4 tesla field.
Table 3.9 gives the resonance frequencies
in a 9.4 tesla magnetic field.
This could provide method to distinguish between the different types of
nuclei but it is of minor interest to the physical chemist. On the other hand, if
the experiment is conducted using spectrometers with strong, very uniform
magnetic fields, and if the spectrometer is equipped with a very precise
frequency synthesizer, it is possible t o detect frequency differences for a
given isotope. These differences are on the order of lo-', with respect
t o t h e nominal frequency and a r e due t o t h e chemical environment
surrounding the nucleus. They are called chemical shifts and are expressed in
parts per million, ppm, of the base frequency given by the resonance of a
reference material. There are two ways to find the resonance, by exciting in
succession the different types of nuclei; continuous waue NMR, by exciting all
the nuclei of an isotope at the same time and extracting the resonances of
each chemical species from the signal obtained; by pulsed NMR, often called
"Fourier transform NMR".
Continuous Wave NMR
The sample is placed in a constant magnetic field, B,, and the variation in
frequency throughout the domain being explored excites one by one the
different resonances. The scan lasts a few minutes. Inversely, one can
maintain a constant frequency and cause the magnetic field to vary.
Impulse NMR
The sample is again subjected to a constant magnetic field but all the
nuclei are excited by a very short radio frequency pulse. The frequency Y
(e.g., 400 MHz for a proton at 9.4 tesla) is applied over a period of several
microseconds. lmmediately after the pulse, the excited system's return to
equilibrium is observed by recording the variation of magnetic field with time.
The Fourier transform of this signal gives the variation as a function of the
frequency which constitutes the NMR spectrum. The advantage of this
second method is in the speed of data collection; a few microseconds for
excitation, a few seconds, usually less than five, for acquisition. The time
factor is very important in NMR because it allows accumulation of a signal
which, except in the case of proton NMR, is generally weak. Note that adding
n identical spectra multiplies the signal-to-noise ratio by fi.
As in the case of infrared, progress in computing and the development of
powerful algorithms for Fourier transforms has made the development of
pulse NMR possible.
Although continuous wave NMR is sufficient for naturally abundant nuclei
with strong magnetic moments such as hydrogen, fluorine and phosphorous,
the study of low abundance nuclei and/or weak magnetic moments such as
carbon 13 or silicon 29 requires pulse NMR.
Hydrogen NMR
With respect to a reference compound, tetra-methyl silane (TMS), to which
the chemical displacement of 0 ppm is attributed arbitrarily, the chemical
shifts obtained for hydrogen cover a region of about 15 ppm; going from an
alkane CH, (0.9 ppm) to acidic hydrogen (H+ -15 ppm), passing through
olefinic CH (- 5 ppm) and the aromatic CH (about 7-8 ppm).
NMR is principally a structural analysis method, the chemical displacement
enabling the various protons of a molecule t o be identified. Moreover, the
signals can be finely structured so that the different groups identified can be
classed and the structure can be easily described. This supplemental
information is given by the influence, on the nucleus being examined, of the
magnetic fields of neighboring protons constituting so many magnetic dipoles.
Thus the signal for the methyl group on ethyl benzene:
H
will be split into three because of the different distributions that the two
protons of neighboring CH, can have. The methylene group signal itself will
be split into four. The multiplicity of the fine structure, due t o magnetic
moment coupling called spin-spin coupling provides information as to the
number of neighboring protons. The distance (expressed in Hz and called the
coupling constant) separating the spectral lines of this structure, gives
information on the spatial geometry of the molecule.
In straight-run petroleum products which do not usually contain olefins,
four types of hydrogen can be easily differentiated as seen in the spectrum in
Figure 3.10:
(a) Hydrogens attached to carbons on aromatic rings (Ha).
(b) Hydrogens attached to carbons in the a position on the rings (H,).
(c) Hydrogens attached to methyl groups (CH,) located in the y position
and beyond relative to the aromatic rings (H,).
(d) All other hydrogens, i.e., the CH, CH, of chains in the /3 position and
beyond, and the CH, hydrogens in the /3 position (Hs).
An important advantage of NMR over other spectral analysis methods
comes from the signal’s area being directly proportional to the number of
protons. Therefore, in a spectrum, the area percentages for the different
signals are related to the percentages of atoms. From that, it is easy to obtain
the percentage of hydrogen for each of the above species. Furthermore, using
the hypothesis that the average number of hydrogen atoms attached to the
carbon atoms is two and using the results from elemental analysis of carbon
and hydrogen, it is possible to deduce the following parameters:
The aromaticity factor (ratio of the number of aromatic carbons to the
total number of carbons), identical to that given by the ndM method or
the Brandes method in the infrared region.
The parameter giving the ratio of the number of effectively substituted
aromatic carbon atoms to the number of substitutable carbons giving a
Solvent
9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 ppm
Carbon NMR
Carbon 12, the most abundant naturally occurring isotope, has zero spin
and thus cannot be studied by NMR.On the other hand, its isotope carbon 13
has an extra neutron and can be: its low natural occurrence (1.1%)
nevertheless makes the task somewhat difficult. Only pulsed NMR can be
utilized.
13CNMR has several advantages over that of hydrogen:
The range of chemical displacement is much wider (200 ppm as opposed
to 15).
For hydrocarbon studies, analyses can be made without prior
assumptions, since the carbons not carrying protons can be excited
directly, this of course not being the case for hydrogen (e.g., quaternary
carbons in alkanes, substituted carbons in aromatic rings).
Additionally, more sophisticated pulse sequences (the procedure is
called spectral editing) enable one to obtain spectra, after addition or
subtraction, where only the following are present (see, for example
Bouquet, 1986):
- only CH, and CH
- only CH,
- only quaternary carbons.
The changes of three types of carbon atoms can be monitored during
processing with this method:
(a) Aromatic CH groups.
(b) Aromatic carbons substituted by an alkyl chain.
68 chapter 3. CHAFV\CTEAIZATICHI OILSAND PEIROWMFwcnaus
OF CRUDE
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 (
Types of aromatic
carbons differentiated by
carbon NMR (a, b, c are
defined in the text and are
reported in Figure 3.12).
CH3 (c)
chaptt~3.C n w c r ~ m m
OF CRUOE Fmcms
OILSAND PETROLEUM 69
CDCI,
(solvent)
Chains CH, on
CH, aromatic
ring
b a and c Two carbon
chains CH,
CH3 at
the end
x 10 Three carbon of
chains CH, a chain
It must be emphasized that NMR is first and foremost a tool for structural
analysis and, in addition to the petroleum analyses described above, the
technique (phosphorus NMR and sometimes nitrogen NMR) is abundantly
used in all petrochemical synthesis operations.
Carbon NMR is also applied using the same principles as those for
hydrogen to measure the cetane indices for diesel fuels.
I Sample Feed 1 Feed 2
hIllatk! carboru,
Condensed quaternary C 5.2 3.2
Branched quaternary C 10.1 8.6
CH 9.5 9.7
Total aromatic C 24.8 21.6
C/H of aromatic C 2.611 2.222
Ring condensation index 2.1 1.6
Ring substitution index 0.515 0.471
!saturated carbons
Quaternary C 4 0.7
CH ~~
8.8 12.9
, CH2 49.6 54.3
CH3 12.8 10.5
Total saturated carbon 75.2 78.4
Table
3' lo Structural patterns by l3C NMR.
20 min 10 min
Figure
3.13 Typical chmmatogmm obtained with a sebaconitrile column (mixture of refe-
rence containing LPC components].
3.3.2 Analysis of Hydroclrbons Contained in a Gasoline
by Gas Phase Chromatography
The resolution of capillary columns enables the separation of all principal
components of a straight-run gasoline. The most frequently used stationary
phases are siliconebased, giving an order of hydrocarbon elution times close
to the order of increasing boiling point.
Gas chromatography is not an identification method; the components must
be identified after their separation by capillary column. This is done by coupling
to the column a mass spectrometer by which the components can be identified
with the aid of spectra libraries. However the analysis takes a long time (a
gasoline contains about two hundred components) so it is not practical to repeat
it regularly. Furthermore, analysts have developed techniques for identifying
components based on indices relating their retention times to those of normal
paraffins (Kovats (1959) or Van den Dool(l963) indices). Using these indices and
owing to the stability and reproducibility achieved in chromatographic ovens,
automatic identification of chromatograms is now possible.
The analyst now has available the complete details of the chemical
composition of a gasoline; all components are identified and quantified. From
these analyses, the sample's physical properties can be calculated by using
linear or non-linear models: density, vapor pressure, calorific value, octane
numbers, carbon and hydrogen content.
It should be noted there is a cloud on this bright horizon; the best capillary
columns, in spite of having the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of
theoretical plates, lack sufficient. resolving power to separate olefins having
more than eight carbon atoms. Beyond that, the number of possible olefin
isomers increases rapidly owing to combinations of double bond position,
branching, and cis-trans isomers. This results in an unresolved
chromatographic region encountered mainly in heavy gasolines from catalytic
cracking and thermal conversion such as coking and visbreaking.
4.48
3.76
3.04
2.32
Chromatogram baseline
1.61
143.00 143.31 143.62 143.93 144.25 144.56 144.87 145.18 145.50 min
Enlargement of 314a showing the zone b r the normal pamfin of 18 carbon atoms and the integmtion either accordng to AB or
according to the base line.
76 chapter 3. A ~ OILS
C ~ C T E WOFZCRUE AND PITGOLEUMF w m
We have seen that it is the peak area which represents the concentration
of a component. It is clear that this area will be overstated with respect to the
base line or understated if the integration is calculated using the line AB,
known as valley-to-valley integration. The limitation of this technique
becomes apparent and it is difficult to overcome even with the use of very
high resolution columns. In fact, integration limited to the line AB provides an
acceptable result. This has been verified after having selectively extracted the
normal paraffins by passage through 5 A molecular sieves followed by a
chromatographic analysis of this extract.
I I
3.15 a Sulhr profile for a coker gas oil (1380 ppm S).
Figure
I
BTH: Benzothiophenes
DBTH: Dibenzothiophenes
78 -3. C H A R ~ C T E W ZOFA CWE
~ OILSAND P m a m F R A C ~ S
The collector contains an electrically-heated rubidium salt used as the
thermionic source. During the elution of a molecule of a nitrogen compound,
the nitrogen is ionized and the collection of these ions produces the signal.
The detector is very sensitive but its efficiency is variable subject to the type
of nitrogen molecule, making quantification somewhat delicate.
Figure 3.16 illustrates the chromatogram with NPD detection of basic
nitrogen compounds extracted from a catalyticallycracked gas oil (LCO). The
interest of this example is identical t o that of t h e preceding one:
interpretation of catalytic cracking reactions; study of the behavior of
different species during a subsequent denitrification hydrotreatment;
correlations between the content of certain nitrogen components and certain
characteristics of LCO such as color and stability during storage.
1 aniline
2to 3 C1 anilines
4to 7 C2 anilines
8 to 10 C3 anilines
11 indole
12 to 14 C4 anilines
15 to 17 C1 indoles
18 to 23 C2 indoles
24 to 31 C3 indoles
32 to 38 C4 indoles
39 carbazole
40 1-M carbazole
41 3-Mcarbazole
42 2-M carbazole
43 4-Mcarbazole
44 to 51 C2 carbazoles
52 to 61 C3 carbazoles
35.96
1
2
3
: Saturates
: Monoaromatics
: Diaromatics
w
4 : Triaromatics P
R
27.78 Kf?
19.59
11.41
I
!i
P
3.23
0.00 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 15.00 17.50 20.00 min
I 3.17
Figure I
Chmmatogmtn of a diesel motor fuel.
Liquid chromatography is preceded by a precipitation of the asphaltenes,
then the maltenes are subjected to chromatography. Although the separation
between saturated hydrocarbons and aromatics presents very few problems,
this is not the case with the separation between aromatics and resins. In fact,
resins themselves are very aromatic and are distinguished more by their high
heteroatom content (this justifies the terms, 'polar compounds" or "N,S, 0
compounds", also used to designate resins).
Chromatograms do not give a sharp differentiation between aromatics and
resins.
The yield of each of these fractions will depend on their retention volume
which in turn will depend on the adsorbent selected and the eluting force of
the solvents.
Because this separation is not subject to precise standards today, the
resulting wide variations make comparisons between laboratories risky.
Nevertheless, within the same work group, once the chromatographic
procedures are established, SARA analyses are very often performed t o
characterize heavy feedstocks or to follow their conversion.
Without going into details of t h e chromatographic method, a SAR
separation (asphaltenes having been eliminated) can be performed in a
mixed column of silica followed by alumina. The saturated hydrocarbons are
eluted by heptane, the aromatics by a 2:l volume mixture of heptane and
toluene, and the resins by a 1:l:l mixture of dichloromethane, toluene and
methanol.
Hen ri Pa radowski
a. Principal Characteristics
We will limit the principal characteristics to the following items:
name
chemical formula
normal boiling point
standard specific gravity or density at a given temperature
liquid viscosity at two temperatures
molecular weight.
b. Critical Constants
critical temperature
critical pressure
critical compressibility factor.
c. Special CoetRcients
These a r e necessary for precise determination of certain physical
properties; they include following items:
acentric factor
coefficients for calculating the enthalpy, entropy, and specific heat of an
ideal gas
latent heat of vaporization at the normal boiling point
melting point temperature
latent heat of fusion
liquid conductivity at two temperatures.
1.013M
P, =
( 0 . 3 4 + x d PCi) 2
where
P, = critical pressure [bar1
M = molecular weight [kg/kmOll
dP,,= increments; see Table 4.1
The average error is about 2%for the critical temperatures and pressures.
The error increases with molecular weight and can reach 5%.
w=”(’)(logP,-
7 1-x 1.0057)
Tb
where x = -
Tc
and
Tb = normal boiling point
T, = critical temperature
log = common logarithm (base 10)
P, = critical pressure
90 chapttw4. M~nicmrn THE CALCULATION P m m
OF H k t a w a x m PHYS~CAL
The critical compressibility factor is estimated using the Lee and Kesler
equation (1975):
zC= 0.291 L 0 . 0 8 ~
where
zc = critical compressibility factor
o = acentric factor
logp=B ---
i: :.i l4.71
I -CH3 I 2.54741 I 8.96971 I -0.35656 I 0.04750 I
- CH2 - 1.65098 8.94042 -0.50094 I 0.01086
= CH, 2.20382 7.68240 -0.39925 I 0.00816
>CH- -14.74459 14.29512 -1.17850 0.03354
>C< -24.40148 18.64041 -1.76105 0.05286
- CH = CH, 1.16050 14.47173 -0.80268 0.01728
>C=CH2 -1.74640 16.26165 -1.16469 0.03082
c i s - CH = CH - 3.92427 12.51482 -0.73196 0.01610 ~
1 I
Table
4.2 Coefficients OF Rihani's and Doraiswamy 's method (1965) For calculating
enthalpy, entmpy, and the Cp For an ideal gas.
Note: (a) signiFies aliphatic.
Group pai
-H 15.5
- CH, 55.5
- CH2 - 40.0
>CH- 24.5
>c< 9.0
= CH, 59.1
= CH - 42.2
=c< 26.7
=c=
l ~tinga
C o r r e ~ tfor ~
= CH 65.1
EC- 49.6 C, rings
Phenyl 189.6 C, rings
- Table 1
4.3 Croup contributions for estimating the pamchor by Quayle's method (1953).
92 chs(ottw4. M~nroosK X ) MECALCUMTK)N
OF H
- PHYSICAL
PFlapwTEs
B = Ba + 2 dB, N = N, + dlv,
when the number of carbon atoms, N, 5 2 0
To = 28.86 + 37.439 N - 1.3547 N 2 + 0.0207 N 3
Ba = 24.79 + 66.885 N - 1.3173 N 2 + 0.00377 N 3
and when N, > 20:
To = 238.59 + 8.164 N Ba = 530.59 + 13.74 N
where
N, = number of carbon atoms
dlvi = group contributions for calculating N,see Table 4.4
dB, = group contributions for calculating B, see Table 4.4
T = temperature [KI
L
./ =viscosity [mPa.s]
The average error with this method is about 20%.
croup Mi Mi
lsoparaffins 1.389 - 0.238 N, 15.5100
Linear olefins - 0.152 - 0.042 N, - 44.9400 + 5.41 N
I Linear diolefins I - 0.304 - 0.084 N, I - 44.94 + 5.41 N I
I Non linear olefins I 1.237 - 0.280 N, I - 36.0100 + 5.41 N I
Non linear diolefins 1.085 - 0.322 N, - 36.0100 + 5.41 N
Alkyl cyclopentanes N, < 16 0.205 + 0.069 N, - 45.9600 + 2.224 N
Alkyl cyclopentanes N, > 16 3.971 - 0.172 N, - 339.6700 + 23.135 N
Alkyl cyclohexanes N, < 16 1.480 - 272.8500 + 25.041 N
Alkyl cyclohexanes N, > 16 I 6.571 - 0.311 N, I - 272.8500 + 25.041 N
Alkvl benzenes N,< 16 1 0.600 1 - 140.0400 + 13.869 N
Alkyl benzenes N, > 16 3.055 - 0.161 N, 140.0400 + 13.869 N
Orthemethyl group 0.510 54.8400
Meta-methyl group 0.110 27.2500
Para-methyl group - 0.040 - 17.8700
Polyphenyls - 5.340 + 0.815 N, - 188.4000 - 9.558 N
d
Table
4.4 Croup contributions For calculating the liquid uiscosily.
Superfluous Usage
Using t h e principle of corresponding states for t h e following
characteristics avoids the use of the contributing groups’ method:
latent heat of vaporization
vapor pressure.
These properties are calculated directly from the critical constants.
Usage not Recommended
The method of contributing groups does not apply with sufficient
accuracy for the following calculations:
latent heat of fusion
melting point.
~-
1 0 g u= ~ 0.463634-
~ 0.166532A + 5.13447- 10-4 A 2 - 8.48995. 1 0 - 3 k p
10l2 17.3354
+- (1 - 0.80882s + 0.022269) [4.14]
Tb3
where
M = molecular weight
Tb = normal boiling point
S = standard specific gravity
Riazi’s method applies to fractions whose specific gravities are less than
0.97 and whose boiling points are less than 840 K. The Lee and Kesler method
is applicable for fractions having molecular weights between 60 and 650.
The average error for both methods is around 5%.
The molecular weight can tie also estimated for petroleum fractions whose
boiling point is not known precisely starting with a relation using the
viscosities at 100 and 210°F
(1,1228s- 1.2435) 3.4758 - 3.0385) s-0.6665 (4.151
M = 223.56 4*0
where
M = molecular weight [kg/kmoll
vloo = kinematic viscosity at 100°F (37.8”C) [mm2/sl
vzlO= kinematic viscosity at 210°F (98.9”C) [mm2/s]
S = standard specific gravity
The average error is about 10%.
4.1.2.5 The Watron Characterization Factor for Petroletun Fraction8
This factor is expressed by the following relationship:
(1.8Tb)'
K w = s 14.81
where
Tb = normal boiling point [KI
S = standard specific gravity
K, = Watson characterization factor
This factor is t h e intermediate parameter employed in numerous
calculational methods. For petroleum cuts obtained by distillation from the
same crude oil, the Watson factor K, is generally constant when the boiling
points are above 200°C.
The K, values for hydrocarbons of different chemical families (see
Chapter 3) are as follows:
paraffins show aK,of about 13
naphthenes have a K, of about 12
aromatics show a K, of about 10.
a. Pseuddritical Temmrature
T = 189.8 + 4506S+ Tb(0.4244+ 0.1174s)+ (14,410 - 100,688s) [4.16]
Tb
where
T, = pseudocritical temperature [KI
S = standard specific gravity
Tb = normal boiling point [KI
The average error is about 10 K.
b. Pseudocritical Pressure
0.0566 4.12164
Tb 0.436392 +
+
In P' = 5.68925 - -- ~
S S
where
11.819
S
+ 1.53015
s2 1 - 10 Tb 2.45055+-
3( 9.3 [4.17]
c. Acentric Factor
When the reduced boiling point is greater than 0.8, it is not recommended
to use the conventional formula [4.3]. The acentric factor should be estimated
by the following relation:
(1.408 - 0.01063%)
w = - 7.904 + 0.1352%- 0.0074654+ 8.359 Tbr+ [4.18]
Tbr
where
w = acentric factor
Tbr = reduced boiling point temperature
K, = Watson characterization factor
Simulated
----------
distillation 760 mmHg
-]_;I
Eq.14.191
I
V
Results converted
to 760 mmHg
-- 760mmHg --* Set of components
weighted composition
by Eq. 4.20
*FlFl
I I
I
Jiq.14.21 Eq. (4.241 1
v !
Eq.14.221
Conducted at 10 mmHg ---------- 10 mmHg properties
Gross results
A
Figure
4.1 Converting distillation results.
Transformation equations are as follows:
Transformation of ASTM D 86 results into a n atmospheric TBP,
equation [4.19].
Transformation of TBP results at 10 mmHg into an atmospheric TBP,
equation [4.241,
Transformation of simulated distillations, D 3710 and D 2887 results into
an ASTM D 86, equation [4.23].
Transformation of ASTM D 1160 results into a TBP at 10 mmHg, equation
[4.221.
Transformation of an ASTM D 1160 at 760 mmHg data into ASTM D 1160
results at 10 mmHg, equation [4.21].
Coefficient
volume
I 0 I 0.9177 I 1.0019 I 36.5 I 14 I
10 0.5564 1.o900 54.0 33 ~
Pertains to the weight per cent for the D 2887 simulated distillation results and the
volume per cent for the D 86 simulated distillation.
Daubert (1994) recommends a new method based on the following
equations:
TI;, = €4 * (T~Q)" [4.19b]
T j o = T;, - AT3 AT3 = T50 - T30
Ti0 = Tjo - ATi AT2 = TN - Ti0
T'. = T'10 - A T 1 AT1 = Ti0 - Ti
Ti0 = T'M + AT5 AT5 = T70 - T;,
T'W = Ti0 + AT; AT6 = TW - T70
T i = T b + AT\ A.T7 = Tj - TW
AT; = E ~( A. T ~ ) E
where
T) = D 86 temperature at initial point [OF]
T i = D 86 temperature at final point [OF]
T; = D 86 temperature at n % volume distilled [OF]
T, = D 2887 temperature at n % weight distilled [OF]
Ei and Fi are coefficients given in Table 4.7
The average error is about 4°C except for the initial and final points where
it attains 12°C.
4.2.2.2 C o n c e p t of Weighting
Generally the properties of mixtures in the ideal gas state and saturated
liquids are calculated by weighting the properties of components at the same
temperature and in the same state. Weighting in these cases is most often
linear with respect to composition:
where
f = a function of the property $
= property of a mixture as an ideal gas or as saturated liquid at
temperature T
$0 = property of t h e component i in the ideal gas state o r a s t h e
I
saturated liquid at temperature T
xi = mole fraction of component i
where
T = temperature [Kl
Tc = critical temperature [KI
Pc = critical pressure [bar1
R = ideal gas constant [0.08314 m3.bar/( K-kmol)]
T,. = reduced temperature
V,. = reduced volume
V = molar volume at the given conditions [m3/kmol]
w = acentric factor
+b = property
4,. = reduced property *
xc = reduction group having the same dimensions as the property
For non-polar components like hydrocarbons, the results are very
satisfactory for calculations of vapor pressure, density, enthalpy, and specific
heat and reasonably close for viscosity and conductivity provided that V, is
greater than 0.10.
This concept can be extended to mixtures if the pseudwritical constants
of the mixture and a mixture reduction group are defined. This gives the
following:
VP
T =-
T V =- ‘rn
,.rn T rm RT
‘rn ‘rn
where
TCm = pseudo-critical temperature of the mixture [KI
PCm = pseudo-critical pressure of the mixture [bar1
= reduction group for the property +b,
Xcrn
for example ( R . TCm)for enthalpy
T‘m = pseudo-reduced temperature of the mixture
Vrrn = pseudo-reduced volume of the mixture
4.2.3.2 P8eUdwdtkd Con8tmt8 for Mh-8
These should form a uniform group. Among several that have been
proposed, we will use only those of Lee and Kesler (1975).
where
V = pseudocritical molar volume of the mixture [m3/kmol]
Cm
V = critical molar volume of the component i [m3/kmo1]
Ci
xi = mole fraction of component i
The critical molar volume is defined using t h e acentric factor by the
following relations:
z RT
v =- ‘i ‘i [4.28]
ci PCi *
zCi = 0.291 -*0.08 w i [4.29]
where
oi= acentric factor of the component i
Tci = critical temperature of the component i [KI
Pc, = critical pressure of the component i [bar1
zci = critical compressibility factor of the component i
T = [4.30]
‘m 4v
cm
.$,=I:(x.VCi1I3T;I2)
I
where
V = pseudocritical molar volume of the mixture [m3/kmol]
Cm
V = critical molar volume of the component i
Ci
[m3/kmol]
xi = mole fraction of component i
Tcm= pseudocritical temperature of the mixture IKI
Tc, = critical temperature of the component i [KI
c. Calculation of the Acentric Factor of a Mixture
The acentric factor of a mixture is calculated as follows:
= 2 (xiwi) [4.31]
where
of the mixture
w,,, = acentric factor
wi = acentric factor of component i
xi = mole fraction of component i
d. Calculation of the Pseudocritical CompressibilityFactor of a Mixture
The pseudocritical compressibility factor is obtained directly from the
acentric factor using the expression:
zCm = 0.291 - 0.08 om [4.291
where
Pcm = pseudocritical pressure of the mixture [bar1
R = ideal gas constant [0.08314 m3-bar/(K.kmol)]
where
P, = saturation pressure for the mixture [bar1
PCm = pseudocritical pressure for the mixture [bar1
f( T,,,
om)= Lee and Kesler function used for
15.6875
InP = 15.2518- ____ - 13.47211n T + 0.43577T6
I' T 'm 'm
'm
The saturation pressure, Ps,is different from the bubble point pressure
(see. Vidal, 1973) a n d h a s n o physical reality; it merely s e r v e s as a n
intermediate calculation.
where
T = reduced temperature of the mixture
'm
T = temperature [KI
Tcm = pseudocritical temperature of the mixture [KI
P = pseudocritical pressure of the mixture[bar)
Cm
R = ideal gas constant [0.08314 bar.m3/(kmol.K)]
ps = density at saturation pressure [kgm31
'Ra, = parameter of Rackett's method, determined
for each component, i
= Rackett's parameter for the mixture
M,,, = molecular weight for the mixture [kg/kmOll
The error is about 3%when the zRai
are known with accuracy.
For petroleum fractions, the zRavalues should be calculated starting with
the standard specific gravity according to the relation:
[4.35)
where
q=
(
1 + 1-- 2;7r
1
[4.36]
= - 1.52816 = - 0.81446
a2 = 1.43907 a4 = 0.90454
bl = - 0.296123 b3 = 0.386914
b2 = - 0.0427258 b4 = - 0.0480645
where
Trm = reduced temperature of the mixture
VSi = molar volume characteristic for the component i [m3/km01]
V,, = molar volume characteristic for the mixture [m3/kmo1]
M, = molecular weight of the mixture [kg/kmOll
ps = density of the mixture at the saturation pressure [~m31
om = acentric factor of the mixture
The average error for this method is about 2%.
The molar volume characteristics, VJi, for petroleum fractions and
hydrocarbons can be obtained from the known density at temperature TI:
[4.37]
where
V = molar volume characteristic of the component i
Si
[m3/kmol]
Mi = molecular weight of the component i [kg/kmOll
p:,, = density of component i at temperature Tl
and saturation pressure 1 ~ ~ 3 1
mi = acentric factor of the component i
V = value of the function Vr for component i at temperature Tl
Ti
C = 0.0861488 + 0.0344483 om
4
[4.39]
The two reference fluids are methane (wl = 0) and n-octane (9= 0.3978).
Each fluid is described by a BWR equation of state whose coefficients are
adjusted to obtain simultaneously: the vapor pressure, enthalples of liquid
and gas as well as the compressibilities. The compressibility z of any fluid is
calculated using the equation below:
z = 21 + 2.5138 w ( ~ -
2 21) (4.401
The compressibility factors zi are obtained after solving the following
equations in Vrifor i = 1 and i = 2:
Equation [4.41]has, for T, < 1, at least two solutions for Vri; the smallest
value corresponds to the liquid and the largest to the gas.
When the liquid compressibility, zl, has been obtained; the density is
calculated as follows:
PM
P/ = - [4.42]
z,RT
where
P = pressure [bar1
M = molecular weight [kg/kmOll
R = ideal gas constant [0.08314bar-m3/(K-kmol)]
T = temperature [KI
pI = liquid density [ ~ ~ 3 1
This equation has the following limits:
0.3 < T,< 4 and P, < 10
The accuracy is around 10% for densities of liquids.
where
CPIm = Cpl of the mixture in the liquid state at Tand P [kJ/(lcg.K)]
cP&Pm = Cm of the mixture in the ideal gas state at T [kJ/@g.K)l
M,,, = molecular weight of the mixture [kg/kmOll
dCp, = reduced correction for Cpl,function of T,, P and om
rm
R = ideal gas constant [8.314 kJ/(km~l-K)]
The term dCp, is calculated by the following expressions:
dCp, = dC’, + 2.5138 om(dCPr2- dCpr,) [4.461
where
dCp,, = C’ reduced correction calculated for reference fluid 1 (methane)
dCpr2= Cp reduced correction calculated for reference fluid 2 (nqctane)
0
u 0
E4-
Y
[
t-"
8
8
rr)
8
N
8
w
h
Y
2
\
P4- i
N 3
*r
0
This expression is also written as:
dCp, = dCp,., + u dCprb and dCprb= 2.5138 (dCPr2- dCp,.)
When the reduced temperature is less than 0.85, dC depends very little
on pressure. Table 4.8 gives values for C and for enthagy correction factors
calculated by the Lee and Kesler method?
In practice, dCpr can be calculated by finite difference starting from
reduced corrections for enthalpies by a relation of the following type:
1 yFI Reduced corrections forCpIand enthalpy H, at zero pressure Tor 0.3 c Trm<0.85.
[4.49]
The average error is about 7 kl/kg. This model is valid only for:
0.3 < T*, < 4 and Prm< 10
where
p, = viscosity of the liquid [mPas]
T = temperature t KI
B = viscosity coefficient t KI
To = viscosity coefficient t KI
The coefficients B and To a r e obtained either by smoothing t h e
experimental viscosity data, o r by Van Velzen’s method of contributing
groups (see article 4.1.1.2).
They can also be calculated from the kinematic viscosities at 100 and
210°F.After having calculated the densities, p1and p2, one obtains:
v1 P1 v2 P2
PI=- and p2=-
1000 1000
where
p l , p2 = absolute viscosities [ mPas]
vl, v2 = kinematic viscosities [mm2/s1
p,, p2 = densities [kum31
Coefficients B and To are obtained by the following relations:
p1
B = 1892.9log -
p2 [4.56]
e. Mixtures of ViscousHydrocarbons
Usually it is not easy t o predict the viscosity of a mixture of viscous
components. Certain binary systems, such as methanol and water, have
viscosities much greater than either compound.
For hydrocarbons, three weighting methods are known to give satisfactory
results:
conventional weighting:
pm = [x(xi py3)]3 (4.611
Mehrotra method:
2 [xiq
log(pi + 0.811
log(p, + 0.8) = M'/2 [4.621
m
ASTM method:
[4.63]
where
xi = mole fraction of component i
xwi = weight fraction of component i
Mi = molecular weight of the component i
M, = molecular weight of the mixture
p, = absolute viscosity of the mixture
Next Page
chapter4. M ~ n i o c H)R
s THE CALCULAJDV
OF Hvzxmwm PHYSICAL
PRopERnEs 131
hexane mPa.s
-+3%
3.078 3.078 3.078 3.078 769.7
0.2 2.240 2.183 2.424 2.270
0.4 1.510 1.481 1.823 1.592
0.6 0.991 0.949 1.270 1.042 725.9
0.8 I 0.584 0.562 0.763 0.603 698.9
1.o 0.298 0.298 0.298 0.298
where
P =pressure [bar1
P, = saturation pressure [bar1
p = viscosity at pressure P [mPas]
y = viscosity at saturation pressure [mPas]
The average error of this method is about 10%.The method is applicable
only for pressures less than 1000 bar.
Previous Page
g. ViscosityIndex
T h e viscosity index is a n empirical number, determined from t h e
kinematic viscosities at 40 and 100°C; it indicates the variation in viscosity
with temperature.
The exact calculation of the index is given in the ASTM D 2270 standard.
The kinematic viscosity at 40°C (U)of an oil whose viscosity index (VI) is
being calculated is compared with those of two reference oils for which the
viscosity indices are 0 and 100 respectively, and which have at 100°C the
same kinematic viscosity as that of the oil being examined:
where
M = viscosity index
U = kinematic viscosity at 40°C of the oil being tested [mm2/s1
L = kinematic viscosity at 40°C of the reference oil of index 0 [mm2/s]
H = kinematic viscosity at 40°C of the reference oil of index 100
[mm2/s]
[4.67]
where
Al = thermal conductivity of the liquid at
temperature T [W/(m.K>I
All = thermal conductivity of the liquid at
temperature TI IW/(m*K>l
A12 = thermal conductivity of the liquid at
temperature T2 [W/(m.K)I
T, T I ,T2 = temperatures [KI
Usually, Tl is taken as the triple point and T2 as the normal boiling point.
The average error is about 5%.
When only o n e conductivity A,, is known a t t e m p e r a t u r e T,,t h e
conductivity can be estimated using the following relation:
(1 -0.7T)
[4.68 J
(
A - A ‘1 1 -0.7T TI
T1 T
T = - and T = -
‘I T, ‘ T
where
T,., T = reduced temperatures
*l
T = temperature [KI
T, = critical temperature [KI
T, = temperature at which the conductivity is known [KI
A11 - known conductivity at T, [W/(m.K)I
The conductivity of hydrocarbons and petroleum fractions at 20"C, can be
estimated by the relations:
for n-paraffins: All = 0.18s [4.69]
for cyclic hydrocarbons: All = 0.4 S
where
All = conductivity of the liquid at 20°C [W/(mK)I
M = molecular weight [kg/kmOll
S = standard specific gravity
The formula for cyclic hydrocarbons has been established from data on
hydrocarbons whose molecular weights are lower than 140 and must not be
used for higher molecular weights.
The average error for these methods is about 10% at 20°C and about 15%
at other temperatures.
where
V = molar volume of component i [m3/km01]
li
xui = volume fraction of component i
xi = mole fraction of component i
Ali = conductivity of the component i in the liquid state [W/(m.K)1
A,, = conductivity of the mixture in the liquid state W/(m.K) 1
n = number of components in the mixture
The method has an average error of 5% for all mixtures of hydrocarbons
whose conductivities of its components are known.
2.054 T'.,
5 = 17.77 + 0.065 P ri
- 7.764 ",.-
where
AI2 = conductivity of a liquid at pressure P2 [W/(m.K) I
A,, = conductivity of a liquid at pressure PI [W/(m*K)I
T,.= reduced temperature
P = reduced pressures
ri
The effects of pressure are especially sensitive at high temperatures. The
analytical expression [4.71] given by t h e API is limited t o reduced
temperatures less than 0.8. Its average error is about 5%.
where
JA = the molar flux of component A [kmol/(m2.s)]
D, = diffusivity [m2/sl
CA = concentration of component A [kmol/m3]
F A
- = concentration gradient of component A
dx with respect t o the Ox axis [kmol/m4]
The value of coefficient D, depends on the composition. As the mole
fraction of component A approaches 0, DAB, approaches D i B the diffusion
coefficient of component A in the solvent B at infinite dilution. The coefficient
D L can be estimated by the Wilke and Chang (1955) method:
[4.73]
where
DoAB = diffusivity of A in solvent B at infinite dilution [m2/s]
T = temperature [KI
MB = molecular weight of solvent B [kg/kmOll
/.L~ = dynamic viscosity of solvent B [ mPas)
V, = molar volume of solute A [m3/kmo1]
= association coefficient of solvent B
The authors recommend the following values for association coefficients:
water 2.6
methanol 1.9
ethanol 1.5.
For hydrocarbon solvents the association coefficient Is equal to 1.
This method should not be used when water is the solute.
[4.76]
where
cpsrn = Cp of
the gas mixture at Tet P [kJ/figK)I
= Cp of the mixture in the ideal gas state at T [kJ/(kgK)]
‘Wrn
R = ideal gas constant [8.314kJ/(k~n~l-K)]
dCpr = reduced correction for Cp, a function of
Trrnand Prmand of the acentric factor om
M, = molecular weight of the mixture [kg/kmOll
a. Specific Heats of Pure Hydroccrrbons in the Ideal Gas State
The Cpe is expressed as the derivative of the enthalpy with respect to
temperature at constant pressure. For an ideal gas it is a total derivative:
The enthalpy of pure hydrocarbons in the ideal gas state has been fitted to
a fifth order polynomial equation of temperature. The corresponding Cp is a
polynomial of the fourth order:
Hw = 2.325 (A + BT+ CT2+ DT3 + ET4+ fT5) [4.77]
= 4.185 (B + 2CT + 3DT2 + 4ET3+ 5 R 4 ) [4.78]
cPHep
T = 1.8 T‘
where
Hep = specific enthalpy of the ideal gas [Wkgl
Cm = specific heat of the ideal gas [kJ/(kg.K)1
A, B, C,D, E, F = coefficients of the polynomial expression
T' = temperature [KI
The coefficients A, B, C,D, E and F have been tabulated in the API
technical data book for a great number of hydrocarbons. See Appendix 1.
S
D = --
( 1.6946 + 0.0844 a)
3
if l o < % < 12.8 and 0.7<S<0.885
(S-0.885)(S-0.7). 10
if not, then a = 0,
where
Kw = Watson characterization factor
S = standard specific gravity
This relation should be used preferentially when the reduced temperature
for the fraction under consideration is greater than 0.8.
When the reduced temperature is less than 0.8, it is better to estimate the
Cpgpstarting from the Cp, of the fraction in the liquid state by the following
relationship:
R
cP*
= CPl --dC
M Pr [ 4 . ~
where
Cm = specific heat of the ideal gas [kJ/(kgK)I
Cpr = specific heat of the liquid [ kJ/(kgK)I
R = ideal gas constant [8.314 kJ/(kmolK)]
M = molecular weight [kg/kmoll
dCprl= reduced correction for Cp calculated at T,
and Prs for liquid methane
dCpr, = reduced correction for Cp calculated at T,
and P for liquid n e t a n e
1'
dCp, = reduced correction for Cpof the Lee Kesler
model for the liquid
P, = saturation pressure for the petroleum fraction at T [bar]
Pc = pseudocritical pressure for the petroleum fraction [bar]
where
Cw = specific heat of the gas at T and P [kJ/(kgK) 1
'C = specific heat of the ideal gas at T [Wh3-K)I
R = ideal gas constant [8.314 kJ/(km0149]
M = molecular weight [kg/kmOll
dC,' = reduced Cp correction calculated fromthe Lee and Kesler model
From a practical point of view, as for liquids, it is possible to calculate dCp,
using finite differences by applying the relation [4.47].
4.4.1.3 Specific Enthalpy of a Oor
The specific enthalpy of a gas is calculated using the principle of
corresponding states. The enthalpy of a gas mixture is equal to the sum of the
ideal gas enthalpy and a correction term:
[4.82]
where
Hgm = specific enthalpy of the gas mixture at Tand P “/kg1
= specific enthalpy of the mixture in the ideal gas
HBpm
state at T [Wkgl
TCm = pseudocritical temperature of the mixture [KI
M,,, = molecular weight of the mixture [kg/kmolI
dH, = reduced enthalpy correction, a function of T,,,
P‘m and of the mixture’s acentric factor om
The constant k is such that the these two expressions are identical at
T, = 0.8; this results in the following relation:
HBp = H& + HI - Hi + - dHia [4.831
where
HBp = enthalpy of the ideal gas at T, < 0.8 [Wkgl
H i p = enthalpy of the ideal gas at T,= 0.8 determined
by the equations (4.771 and [4.79] [Wkgl
H, = enthalpy of the liquid at T,< 0.8 determined
by the equation [4.49] [Wkgl
Hi = enthalpy of the liquid at T, = 0.8 determined
by the equation [4.49] [Wal
dH@ = enthalpy correction between the liquid and
ideal gas calculated at T,< 0.8 and P‘, [Wkgl
dH;Bp = enthalpy correction between the liquid and
ideal gas calculated at T,. = 0.8 and PrS [Wkgl
The enthalpy correction is expressed as:
RT
(jH =- CJ
[4.841
@ 9 (w,
W,.= W,., + 2.5138 o Wr2- Wr1)
where
4
Mj = molecular weight of the petroleum fractionf [kg/kmolI
R = ideal gas constant [8.314 W/(kmol.K)]
Tcf = pseudocritical temperature of the fraction f [KI
oj = acentric factor of the fractionf
Wri= reduced correction calculated by the equations of the Lee and Kesler
model, given in. 4.3.1.3.b (i = 1 for methane and i = 2 for n-octane)
For mixtures, the enthalpy of an ideal gas is expressed as:
Hwm = 2 (X,,Hgp,) [4.85]
where
= enthalpie of the mixture in the ideal gas state [kJ/kgl
= enthalpie of the component i in the ideal gas state [kJ/kg]
= weight fraction of the component i
xwi
b. Enthalpy of a Real Gas
The enthalpy of a gas mixture is obtained by equation [4.82]. The
correction dH, is calculated by the Lee and Kesler model described in
4.3.1.3.b.
The terms dHrl and dHr2 are determined after having calculated the
reduced volumes Vrl and Vr2and compressibilities z1 and z2 of gases 1 and 2
at T,.and P,..
This method has an average error of 5 kJ/kg except in the critical region
where the deviations can be up to 30 W/kg.
The relation applies t o mixtures of non-polar components such as
hydrocarbons in this range:
0.3 < T,.< 4 and P,. < 10.
where
= viscosity of the gas at T and P [mPas]
pg
pw
= viscosity of the ideal gas at T [mPas]
p,, = scaling coefficient for viscosity [mPas]
f ( p , ) = function of the reduced density
Ag = conductivity of the gas [W/(m.K)I
ABp = conductivity of the ideal gas [W/(m*K)I
A,, = scaling coefficient for conductivity [W/(m.K)I
g(p,) = function of the reduced density
It is necessary to determine first the properties of each component in the
ideal gas state, next to weight these values in order to obtain the property of
the mixture in the ideal gas state.
where
= viscosity of the mixture in the ideal gas state [mPas]
= viscosity of the componenti in the ideal gas state [mPas]
b
i
xi = mole fraction of component i
Mi = molecular weight of the component i [kg/kmol]
R = number of components
This method is applicable for all gas mixtures. The average error being
about 3%.
pam = Z (pa,xi)
where
= viscosity of the gas at
T and P [mPas]
'%m
= viscosity of the ideal gas at T [mPas ]
' a m
= viscosity coefficient of the component i, adjusted
pai
from experimental values, in general equal to 1
= viscosity coefficient of the mixture
[4.921
A . . = -1- q j i 1 + G
B..
I
2
v 4 5
c..= sii
1 +- c;= 1 +-STi
v T
where
S
rl ..=m
(:;)(;r(;)
Si=1.5Tbi
B..= - -
In P
n
L
Freezing
7
Solid
I
\ Sublimation
1Y
I
GWl
I
I
I I ~
Phase
diagmm Triple
For a pure point
compound.
At the triple point, the free energies of each phase are equal:
Gg = C,= C,
The liquid -vapor equilibria, along the vaporization curve is expressed as:
Gg = GI < C,
Likewise, the liquid-solid equilibria along the fusion curve is:
GI = C, < Cg
And the gas-solid equilibria has this formula:
Cg = C, < GI
where
GI = molar free energy of the liquid [kJ/kmOll
Cg = molar free energy of the gas [kJ/kmOll
C, = molar free energy of the solid [U/kmOll
The determination of equilibria is done theoretically via the calculation of
free energies. In practice, the concept of fugacity is used for which the unit of
measurement is the bar. The equation linking the fugacity to the free energy is
written as follows: 2
J
RTln-=C -Go
PO
f=POexp -
(G;;o)
where
R = ideal gas constant [8.314 kJ/(kmolK)]
T = temperature [KI
f = fugacity [bar1
C = molar free energy at Tand P [ W h o 11
G o = molar free energy of the ideal gas at Tand P o [kJ/kmol]
PO = reference pressure [bar1
The equilibrium relations are written as below:
at the triple point: f, = fg = f,
in vaporization: f l = fg < f,
in freezing: f I = f, < fg
in sublimation: fg = f, < f l
where
f l = fugacity ofthe liquid
fg = fugacity of the gas
f, = fugacity of the solid
150 chapter 4. OF H
Mmroos fcm VIE CALCULATION m PHYSICAL
PRopERnEs
1 In dzB
point curve Liquid
CT
Bubble point curve
Gas
- I
Figure
4.7 Liquid and vapor phase envelope for a hydmcarbon mixture.
C critical point CB: Cricondenbar CT.:Cricondentherm
where
Ggi = partial free energy of component i in the gas
phase at temperature T and pressure P t kJ/kmOll
G, = free energy of the liquid at Tand P [kJ/kmOll
GI, = partial free energy of component i in the liquid
phase at T and P t kJ/kmOll
Gg = free energy of the gas phase at Tand P t WkmOll
T = temperature tK1
P = pression [bar1
nj = quantity of species j different from i [kmoll
ni = quantity of species i [kmoll
Utilizing the concept of partial fugacity whichis defined by the relation:
[4.951
where
7ri = vapor pressure of component i at T [bar1
dlSi= fugacity coefficient of component i as saturated
liquid at temperature T and pressure vi
Vli = molar volume of component i as liquid at T[m3/kmol]
P = pressure exerted on the liquid [bar1
T = temperature [KI
R = ideal gas constant [0.08314 bar.m3/(K.kmol)]
The vapor pressure will be calculated according to one of the methods
described later.
The molar volume of the liquid is easily estimated by one of the equations
given in article 4.3.1.1.
The fugacity coefficient of component i at saturation is obtained after the
calculation of the vapor fugacity at saturation, by the relation:
f
[4.98]
'i
where
Uai = internal molar energy of component i at 25°C
and in the ideal gas state [ kJ/kmol]
U,, = internal molar energy of component i at 25°C
and in the liquid state [WkmOll
Vb = molar volume of the component i as liquid at 25°C [m3/kmol]
= solubility parameter at 25°C [(~~3)1/21
The values of common hydrocarbon solubility parameters vary between
300 and 600 (kJ/m3)1/2. Several tables are available where the solubility
parameters are shown as ( c a l / ~ m ~ ) 'To
/ ~ .convert these values, it is necessary
to multiply by 64.69. Thus a solubility parameter value of 10 ( c a l / ~ m ~ )is '/~
equal to 646.9 (k.J/m3)'I2.
This method applies only t o liquids whose constituents have reduced
temperatures less than 1. The average error 1s about 10%;the most important
differences are observed in mixtures of components belonging to different
chemical families.
b, = 2 bi xi
i= 1
‘i ‘i
where
z = compressibility factor
R = ideal gas constant [0.08314 m3.bar/(K.kmol)]
T = temperature [KI
P = pressure . [bar1
V = molar volume of the mixture [m3/1uno1]
Tci = critical temperature of the component i [K]
Pci = critical pressure of the component i [bar1
mi = constant ajustable for each component i
ku = constant ajustable for each binary {i,)]
The Soave equation of state, which is a third order equation for V, and
which can be put in the form: V 3 + a V 2 + pV + y = 0, has, according to the
value of its discriminant, one or three solutions.
When there are three solutions, the smallest in value corresponds to the
liquid phase and the highest value corresponds to the vapor phase.
Fugacity is expressed as a function of the molar volume, the temperature,
the parameters for pure substances aiand b , and the binary interaction
coefficients ku:
RT In
n
(V- A)
I?“[
+-- bi RT ti In -- b,(V+
am bi
bm)
where
f = fugacity of component i of the phase in question [bar]
V = molar volume of the phase being considered [m3/kmol]
Soave also proposed a formula to calculate the constant, mi, as a function
of the.acentric factor:
mi = 0.48508 + 1.55171 mi - 0.15613 mi2 [4.100]
mi = acentric factor of the component i
In practice, however, it is recommended to adjust the coefficient mi in
order to obtain either the experimental vapor pressure curve or the normal
boiling point. The function f(T,.) proposed by Soave can be improved if
accurate experimental values for vapor pressure are available or if it is
desired that the Soave equation produce values estimated by another
correlation.
The constants k i . enable the improved representation of binary equilibria
and should be carefully determined starting from experimental results. The
API Technical Data Book has published the values of constants kii for a
number of binary systems. The use of these binary interaction coefficients is
necessary for obtaining accurate calculation results for mixtures containing
light components such as:
methane
hydrogen
H2S
CO,.
The use of kii is equally necessary for binary systems where the relative
volatility is needed with an error of better than 10%.
Table
4.1 1 Comparison of calculated m p r pressures for n-hexane.
b. Determination of the Vapor Pressure by the Lee and Kesler Method
When the critical constants for a pure substance or the pseudocritical
constants for a petroleum fraction are known, the vapor pressure for
hydrocarbons and petroleum fractions can be calculated using the Lee and
Kesler equations:
w = P, exp (f(Tr9 0)) [4.33]
f(T,, w ) = In fro + w In f r ,
6.09648
l n f = 5.92714- ~ - 1.288621n T + 0.169347q6
0
‘ T
15.6875
l n f = 15.2518- ____ - 13.4721In T,+ 0.43577T6
I‘ T
where
T, = reduced temperature
w = acentric factor
P, = reduced pressure
f, = critical pressure [bar1
w = vapor pressure [bar1
T, = critical temperature [KI
T = temperature [KI
This method is based on the expression proposed by Lee and Kesler in
1975. It applies mainly to light hydrocarbons. The average error is around 2%
when the calculated vapor pressure is greater than 0.1 bar.
For heavy hydrocarbons, it is preferable to use the Maxwell and Bonnel
method described below.
lb -4
--5.16.10
r
Tb*
1
X=
748.1 - 0.386 Tb
ax-b
log T = -- 2.8750
cX-d
The values coefficients a,b, c and d depend on X:
X < 0.0013 a = 2770.085 b = 6.412631 c = 36 d = 0.989679
0.0013 < X < 0.0022 a = 2663.129 b = 5.994296 c = 95.76 d = 0.972546
X > 0.0022 a = 3000.538 b = 6.761560 c = 43 d = 0.987672
where
K, = Watson characterization factor
Tb = normal boiling point [KI
T = vapor pressure [bar1
This method is applicable to heavy fractions whose boiling point is greater
than 200°C. The average error is around 10%for pressures between 0.001 and
10 bar.
Table
4.13 Relation between the true vapor pressure at 37.8% and the "Reid"vapor
pressure. R = True vapor pressure/ "Reid"vapor pressure.
where
Pb = bubble pressure of the mixture at T,
M, = molecular weight of the vapor at the bubble point
Tr = flash point temperature
The relation developed by the API can also be used:
where
Tlo = temperature at the 10%volume distilled point from ASTM D 86 [K]
The average error for these two methods is about 5°C.
The flash points obtained experimentally according t o the different
procedures differ slightly. The present estimation refers to the flash point
called the "closed cup" method.
The calculation of the flash curve is achieved using the models given earlier.
The flash curve at atmospheric pressure can be estimated using the
results of the ASTM D 86 distillation by a correlation proposed by the API. For
the same volume fraction distilled one has the following relation:
T' = a T b S [4.1031
where
T' = temperature of the flash curve [KI
T = temperature of the ASTM D 86 test [KI
S = standard specific gravity of the petroleum cut
a, b, c = coefficients given in Table 4.15, which also supplies an example
The average accuracy of this method is mediocre since the deviations can
be greater than 10°C.
The curve obtained can be transformed into a curve at a different pressure
by the equations of Maxwell and Bonnel (see article 4.5.3.2.c).
4.16b Coefficients for conuerting a TBP curue into an ASTM D 86 curve and an
example applied to a petroleum cut (Daubert's method).
[4.1061
where
Pa = parachor [1@ (mN/m)U4 (m3/kmol)]
M = molecular weight [kg/kmolI
p, = density of the liquid wm31
pe = density of the gas [kg/m3]
u = interfacial tension [mN/mI
This method has an average accuracy of about 5% and applies only to
reduced temperatures less than 0.9. The parachor can be estimated by the
method described in 4.1.1.2.c.
b. Estimation of the Interfacial Tension of Petroleum Fractions
The interfacial tension of a petroleum fraction at 20°C can be estimated by
the following formula, cited by the API:
(
673.7 1 --2;I15)1.232
Uf= [4.107]
KW
where
uf = the interfacial tension of a petroleum fractionfat 20°C [mN/m]
K, = Watson characterization factor
TCI = pseudocritical temperature of the fraction f IKI
The error of this method is about 10%. The interfacial tension obtained is
used in calculating the parachor by equation [4.106].
c. Estimation ofthe Interfacial Tension of Mixturns
For mixtures, the concept of weighting is employed:
[4.108]
where
om = interfacial tension of the mixture [mN/ml
Pai = parachor of component i
xi = mole fraction of component i in the liquid phase
yi = mole fraction of component i in the gas phase
pl = density of the liquid [wm31
= density of the gas [kg/m31
pg
MI = molecular weight of the liquid [kg/kmol I
Mg = molecular weight of the gas [ kg/kmOll
168 chapt~
4. FOR mE CALCULAKW
METHODS PHWAL
OF H v o ~ o c ~ ~ em PRopERnEs
where
( :i
logx = 0.0016 - - ( 4 2 0 0 ~+ 1050) [4.109]
-
Benzene 400 700 1400
Toluene 130 200 450
Ethvlhm7ent= 5s 110 SSn
Xylene 38 60 150
n-Propylbenzene 18 20 33
Naphthalene 50 400
0
x I. = x I. - [4.110]
f1Si
where
xi = molar solubility of component i in the aqueous phase [ppm]
xp = molar solubility of pure component i in the
aqueous phase [PPml
f li = partial fugacity of component i in the mixture of
hydrocarbons in the liquid phase at T and P [bar1
f Is, = fugacity of pure component i, at T and at saturation
pressure P, [bar1
The xp can be interpolated using Table 4.18 and the fugacities calculated
by the Soave model.
170 FOR THE CALCUMTKW
c ~ w 4 ME~HODS
. OF H-ON PHW PRopERnEs
[4.112]
wj,
= H! - H;
dCp, = Cpr, - cps,
where
R = ideal gas constant [8,314 kJ /(km~l.K)]
T = temperature [KI
TT = temperature of the triple point [KI
j 1, = partial fugacity of component i in the liquid
phase at T et P [bar1
fy 1
= total fugacity of pure component i liquid at T and P [bar]
dHjl = enthalpy of fusion at the triple point of component i [kJ/kmol]
dC = the difference of specific heats for component i
PI
between the liquid and the solid [kJ/@moWI
HP = enthalpy of pure liquid component i
at the triple point [ kJ/kmol]
H; = enthalpy of pure solid component i
at the triple point [ kJ/kmol]
Cpr, = average specific heat of the pure liquid between
the triple point and temperature in question, T [kJ/@moWl
Cps, = average specific heat of the pure solid
component i between the triple point and
temperature in question, T kJ/OUnoW1
The properties of the solids most commonly encountered are tabulated.
An important problem arises for petroleum fractions because data for the
freezing point and enthalpy of fusion are very scarce. The MEK (methyl ethyl
ketone) process utilizes the solvent’s property that increases the partial
fugacity of t h e paraffins in t h e liquid p h a s e a n d t h u s favors their
crystallization. The calculations for crystallization a r e sensitive and it is
usually necessary to revert to experimental measurement.
where
S = standard specific gravity
M = molecular weight [kg/kmol]
vloo = kinematic viscosity at 100°F [mm2/s]
TEc = pour point temperature [KI
Average error is about 5°C. The method should not be used for pour
points less than 60°C.
I Type I I I 11 I
I Nitrogen I ** I I * I I
I Methane I ** I I * I * I
I Ethane I I ** I I * I
**
~~
Propane
i-Riitane I I I **
I Ethylene I ** I * I * I * I
I ProDvlene I I I I ** I
I C0.l I ** I * I I I
** *
U
4.20 Common compounds that Form type I and I . hydmtes.
** Caoities occupied in First priority * Cavities occupied in second priorily
174 FOR THE C A L C U I OF
chapt~4.METHOLS A ~HYDROCARBON
PWSCAL P m n l E s
[4.114]
K;
P
5(T)=-exp[ai(T- To)]exp
where
yi = mole fraction of component i in the gas phase
KY,ai = parameters of the simplified model (see Table 4.21)
P = pressure [bar1
T,, = temperature of hydrate formation KI
pii = binary interaction parameter of the simplified model
TO = reference temperature = 273.15 KI
R = number of components capable of forming
hydrates present in the mixture
i, j = components in the mixture capable of forming hydrates
Table
Parameters o f the simplified model for calculating hydrate formation
tempemtures.
The average error of this simplified method is about 3°C and can reach
5°C. Table 4.22 shows an application of this method calculating the
temperature of hydrate formation of a refinery gas at 14 bar. Table 4.23 gives
an example applied to natural gas at 80 bar. Note that the presence of H S
increases the hydrate formation temperature.
I I I I
1Table 1
Example calculation of the hydmte formation tempemture for an Fcc gas at
14 bar abs. Result: Th = 16.4"C.
Component yi Ki yi 1 Ki
Methane 0.680 4.570 0.1488
Ethane 0.030 2.159 0.0 139
Propane 0.020 12.500 0.0016
i-Butane 0.010 12.500 O.OOO8
Ethylene 0.000 2.198 O.oo00
Propylene 0.000 12.500 O.oo00
' Nitrogen 0.010 - 20.042 0.0005
co2 0.100 10.241 0.0098
H2-5 0.150 0.182 0.8247
Other 0.000 O.oo00
~
-
Total
Table
1.ooo 1.0000
The equivalence ratio refers to the more "noble" reactant, that is, the fuel,
and the mixture is rich or lean according to whether the fuel is in excess or
deficient with respect to the stoichiometry.
In a general manner, diesel engines, jet engines, and domestic or industrial
burners operate with lean mixtures and their performance is relatively
insensitive to the equivalence ratio. On the other hand, gasoline engines
require a fuel-air ratio close to the stoichiometric. Indeed, a t m r i c h mixture
leads to an excessive exhaust pollution from CO emissions and unburned
hydrocarbons whereas a too-lean mixture produces unstable combustion
(reduced driveability and misfiring).
The relation defining the equivalence ratio shows that for a given mechanical
setting of the motor (mce and mae fixed), the equivalence ratio varies with the
stoichiometric ratio. It is recommended to have a relatively narrow margin of
variation for the composition of gasolines in order not to miss the optimum
adjustment zone. The forgoing considerations also explain that fuels too rich in
oxygen are not interchangeable with conventional fuels for a given automotive
fleet. This is the reason for the European Directive of 5 December 1985
establishing the maximum oxygen content of 2.5% for gasoline.
W H 18
M=-.-
100 2
Taking i n t o a c c o u n t t h e m a s s e n t h a l p y of vaporization a t 25°C.
(AH = 2443 kJ/kg),
NHV, = GHV, - 220 WH
where NHV, and GHV, are expressed in kJ/kg.
The error attributed to t h e determination of t h e NHV, (calorimetric
measurement, determination of hydrogen content, and final calculation) is
satisfactory with a repeatability of 0.3% and a reproducibility of 0.4%.
For pure organic materials, it is also possible to calculate the heating value
starting from the heats of formation found in tables of thermodynamic data.
The NHV is obtained using the general relation of thermochemistry applicable
to “standard” conditions of pressure and temperature (1 bar and 25°C).
- w = I:
(AH;,T ) - (AH;,T ) I:
combustion products reactants
where
AHO effect of t h e
= c h a n g e in m a s s e n t h a l p y o r t h e r m a l
combustion combustion reaction, equal in absolute value but of
opposite sign as the NHV,
(AH;, T ) = sum of the mass enthalpy changes of formation for the
products products
I:(m;,T ) = sum of the mass enthalpy changes of formation for the
reactants reactants
Table 5.1 gives a sample calculation of the NHV, for toluene, starting from
the molar enthalpies of formation of the reactants and products and the
enthalpies of changes in state as the case requires.
This calculational method is nevertheless only of limited interest and
concerns only certain pure organic products for which direct measurement of
the NHV, is difficult owing to a variety of reasons such as cost and availability.
There also exist relatively simple correlations between the heating value
of motor fuels and certain characteristics such as density and composition by
chemical family supplied by H A analysis. Refer to Chapter 3.
As an example, we cite two formulas proposed by Sirtori et al. (1974):
NHV, = 4.18 (106.38 PAR + 105.76 OL + 95.55 ARO)
and
NHV, = 4.18 (10,672.05 p - 8.003 ARO)
where NHV, and NHV, are the mass and volume net heating values in W/kg
and kJ/l, PAR, OL and ARO a r e the paraffin, olefin and aromatic contents
resulting from the FIA analysis and p is the density &/I) at 15°C.
182 cwtw 5. Cti4~4c~wsm FW ENERGY
OF P ~ X X E UPROWCTS
M USE
Table
(average values).
50,000
45,000
40,OOO
35,000
30,000
25.000 -
Figure
5.1 Net heating value (weight), NHV,,,, and net heating value (volume) NHV,,, of
hydrocarbons. Subscripts p, 0, a = pamffins, olefins, aromatics.
certain special motor fuels such as the alcohols. The mass enthalpy of
vaporization of methanol at 25°C (1100 kJ/kg) reaches 5.5% of its NHV in the
liquid state. A previously vaporized methanol in the inlet of the motor, for
example, due to an exchange of sensible heat with the exhaust, constitutes an
elegant and efficient method of increasing the performance of this type of
motor fuel.
186 ch40ter5. CffAmcrEwsncsOF PETROLEUM
P ~ TmSENERGYUSE
d. Specific Energy
In t h e applications where the compactness of t h e energy conversion
system is the determining factor as in the case of engines, it is important to
know the quantity of energy contained in a given volume of t h e fuel-air
mixture to be burned. This information is used t o establish the ultimate
relations between the nature of the motor fuel and the power developed by
the motor; it is of prime consideration in the development of fuels for racing
cars.
If one imagines that the fuel is used in the liquid state in the form of
droplets -as in the case of fuel injection- the specific energy of the motor
fuel (SE) is expressed in kilojoules per kilogram of air utilized, under
predetermined conditions of equivalence ratio (stoichiometry for example).
The SE is none other than the NHV,/r quotient where r represents the
previously defined stoichiometric ratio.
Table 5.4 gives the specific energies of selected organic liquid compounds.
Compared with the isooctane chosen as the base reference, the variations
from one compound to another are relatively small, on the order of 1 to 5%,
with the exception of some particular chemical structures such as those of
the short chain nitroparaffins (nitromethane, nitroethane, nitropropane) that
a r e found to be "energetic". That is why nitromethane, for example, is
recommended for very small motors such as model airplanes: it was also
used in the past for competitive auto racing, for example in the Formula 1 at
Le Mans before being forbidden for safety reasons.
Specific energy
Compound
kJ/lrg of air Relative value
-
lsooctane 2932 1.000
Decane 2940 1.003
Hexane 2938 1.002
Butane 2961 1.010
Cyclohexane 2942 1.003
lNexene
Benzene
Toluene
3008
3032
3011
. 1.026
1.OM
1.027
o and m-Xylene 3000 1.023
Methanol 3086 1.054
I Ethanol
Table
5.4 Specificenergy For selected organic compounds.
For fuels occurring naturally in the gaseous state such as methane and
LPG,or used in this form as in the case of total vaporization ahead of the
engine's combustion chambers, the available energy per unit volume of the
gaseous fuel mixture no longer depends only on the NHV/r ratio but also on
the molecular weight of the motor fuel. In this case one observes a significant
loss, compared with isooctane, that is a function of the material's volatility
(9.4% with methane, 3.8%with ethane, 2% with butane). The alcohols likewise
show a small loss (1.2% for methanol), while the nitroparaffins bring, once
again in this scenario, a considerable gain.
a. Density of Casolines
Density is generally measured at 15°C using a hydrometer in accordance
with the NF T 60-101method: it is expressed in kg/l with an error of 0.0002 to
0.0005 according to which category of hydrometer is utilized. However, in
practice only three decimal places are usually retained.
The density varies with the temperature according to the relationship:
PT = pi5 -k (7'- 15)
where T represents the temperature in "C,pT and p15 the density at T C and
15°C respectively; k is a numerical coefficient that, for gasolines, is close to
0.00085. Thus when the temperature increases from 15°C t o 25°C for
example, p decreases by 0.008, about 1%.
Although they are small in absolute value, these fluctuations must be
taken into account in the various commercial transactions related to storage
and distribution of gasoline.
The French specifications set for each category of motor fuel (regular
gasoline, conventional premium gasoline with or without lead) the lower and
upper limits t o follow for the density at 15°C (see Table 5.5); the acceptable
margin for variation is about 0.030 kg/l with the possibility for overlapping
zones from one product t o another, theoretically allowed but seldom
occurring. Regular gasolines are almost always lighter than conventional
premium gasolines, which are themselves less dense than unleaded premium
gasoline. For overall calculations, the average values of 0.720, 0.750 and
0.760 kg/l, respectively, can be used for each type of gasoline.
Maintaining a certain density range within the same category of motor fuel
is required for satisfactory operation of the vehicle. Indeed the automobile
manufacturers take this into account in the development of motor fuel feed
systems and consequently select the flows for different mechanical parts.
Afterwards, in actual operation, a too-high change in density between
different motor fuels could disrupt t h e settings by changing t h e fuel
equivalence ratio.
Several p a r a m e t e r s c o m e i n t o t h e relation between density a n d
equivalence ratio. Generally, the variations act in the following sense: a t o e
dense motor fuel results in too lean a mixture causing a potential unstable
operation; a motor fuel that is too light causes a rich mixture that generates
greater pollution from unburned material. These problems a r e usually
minimized by the widespread use of closed loop fuel-air ratio control systems
installed on new vehicles with catalytic converters.
1 I
Table
5.5 Density specifications forgasolines in France.
* As of 1993, France has chosen classes 1 , 3 and 6, according to the following periods
of the year:
from 20 June to 9 September: class 1
from 10 April to 19 June: class 3
from 10 September to 31 October: class 3
from 1 November to 9 April: class 6.
** Fuel volatility index M = RVP + 7 E70.
190 chapter 5. CMCTEFIS~OF PEKXEUMP~0wcr.sm~ ENERGYUSE
different according to the season. Indeed the volatility of the motor fuel should
be sufficient in cold weather to ensure the quick starting and satisfactory
warm-up of the vehicle. Conversely, during warm operation, it is best to limit
the volatility to avoid certain incidents such as a reduced driveability, stalling
due to vapor locking in the fuel system, difficulty o r failure to start after
stopping in summer while parking or at expressway toll booths.
Current requirements for vehicles are more pronounced for warm
conditions than for cold for many reasons e.g., improved aerodynamics,
transversal placement of the motor, generally higher temperatures under the
hood, such that the automobile manufacturers prefer a reduction, rather than
increase in RVP.
To these technological constraints are added an increasing preoccupation
with limiting t h e evaporation losses that a r e a n important s o u r c e of
atmospheric pollution (Mc Arragher et al., 1990).
Finally, the present (and increasing) trend is to a reduction of gasoline
vapor pressures. This does not please the refiners who see themselves as
having to limit the addition of light fractions to the gasoline pool. Note that an
addition of 1% by weight of a C, cut (butanes, butenes) brings about an
average increase in RVP of 50 mbar. lncorporating alcohols such as methanol,
and ethanol also causes a noticeable increase in RVP (about 150 mbar for
additions of methanol in excess of 1%, 50 mbar for the same quantity of
ethanol). In order to meet volatility specifications, it follows that fuels
containing alcohol must have limits on their light hydrocarbon contents.
We believe t o have shown here that the RVP of gasoline is a primary
characteristic for quality resulting from a delicate compromise between the
demands for vehicle performance, optimization of refinery operations and
environmental protection.
The volatility of the fuel is expressed then by the temperature levels for
which t h e V/L ratio is equal t o certain particular values: for example
V/L = 12, V/L = 20, V/L = 36. T h e r e a r e c o r r e l a t i o n s between t h e
t e m p e r a t u r e s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e s e vaporization r a t i o s a n d t h e
conventional volatility parameters such as the RVP and the distillation curve.
Consider, for example, the following relations:
T(V/L)12= 88.5 - 0.19 E70 - 42.5 RVP
T (v,Lpo= 90.6 - 0.25 E70 - 39.2 RVP
T (v/L)36 = 94.7 - 0.36 E70 - 32.3 RVP
where Trv/Lixdesignate the temperature, in “C at which V/L = x.
E70 and RVP are expressed as per cent distilled and bar, respectively.
Concerning the vapor pressure more specifically, the current tendency is
to substitute gradually more modern and meaningful techniques for the RVP.
In fact, the RVP is not the true vapor pressure of the motor fuel, in the sense
that it covers the contribution of gases dissolved in the fuel and desorbed
during t h e i n c r e a s e in t e m p e r a t u r e from 0°C t o 3 7 3 ° C . T h e m o r e
sophisticated instruments, described by Grabner’s method and ASTM D 4953,
avoid this unwanted phenomenon and give the true vapor pressure (TVP) at
various temperatures. The graph in Figure 5.2 gives correlations for TVP and
RVP.
a. Knocking Phenomenon
In induced ignition engines, still called “explosion” or “ s p a r k , several
types of combustion are possible.
The normal process is a rapid-but-smooth combustion of the fuel-air
mixture in the engine due to the propagation of a flame front emanating from
the spark created between the electrodes of the spark plug.
One undesirable phenomenon is knocking. It is caused by a sudden and
massive auteignition of a part of the fuel not yet burned and brought to the
elevated temperature and pressure by movement of the piston and by the
release of energy coming from the flame front. The result is a local pressure
increase followed by vibrations in the gas phase which are attenuated once
the pressure is equalized in all parts of the combustion chamber. This is
accompanied by a characteristic noise similar to a series of metallic clicking
o r knocking s o u n d s which explains t h e origin of t h e term. T h e basic
corresponding frequency is about 5000 to 8000 Hz.
Temperature
Slope *
- - 0.55
9.0 -_
10 --om
l1
yLO.70
12 --
13 --0.80
Reid Vapor Pressure 14 :-0.90
at 100°F
l16
5 I- 1.0
17 I-
1.1
:! :- 1.3
20 i- 1.4
* Slope of the ASTM curve 1- 1.5
(losses included)
1 1.2
-
T150 T5in "C by % distilled
1-
1- 2.0
30 --
1-z
Figtire
-
Correlation between Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP] and True Vapor Pressure
(7-m
194 chapt~5.CHAR~CTERISTICS
OF P ~ ~ G ~ PROOUCTS USE
E U M FOR ENERGY
Pressure
Auto-inflammation
Normal combustion
B
BG
During the determination of the RON, the CFR engine operates at 600 rpm
with a timing advance set at 13"TDC and with no fuel mixture preheating. The
MON by contrast operates at 900 rpm, with an advance from 14 t o 26"
depending on compression ratio and a fuel mixture temperature of 149°C.
The measurement error for conventional motor fuels is around 0.3 points
and 0.7 points for the RON and the MON respectively. The RON is the
characteristic more often used and more widespread than t h e MON;
moreover, when t h e octane number is used without reference either
procedure, it is taken to be the RON.
A gasoline's MON is always lower than its RON: their difference, an
average of 10 to 12 points, is called the sensitivity, S.This is an indication of a
fuel's "sensitivity" to a modification of the experimental conditions and more
-
c. Required Levels Specifications
Table 5.9 shows the octane specifications for the different types of fuels
distributed in France.
Required values
Type of product RON MON
Mill. I Max. Min.
Rermlar gasoline 89 92 -
I Premium gasoline with lead 1 9 7 1 - l s s l
Eurosuper 95 85
Superplus' 98 88
Table
5.9 Specificationsfor octane numbers of motor fuels in Fmnce.
For regular gasoline, the specification concerns only the RON which
should be between 89 and 92. This is a product on the way to extinction in
France, for in 1993, it had only about 0.3% of the total gasoline market. This is
a recent trend; in 1980, for example, the share of regular gasoline was 17% of
the total French market. The only western European country where regular
gasoline is still used to a large extent is Germany with a 30%share of the total
market in 1993.
The conventional leaded premium gasoline is characterized by minimum
RON and MON values of 97 and 86, respectively. In 1993, it was the principal
product in the gasoline pool in France having 60% of the sales, but its share is
diminishing and, in 2000, it will play mostly a minor role.
The unleaded premium fuels appeared in Europe and France in 1988. In
1993, t h e y r e p r e s e n t e d 40% of t h e French a n d 47% of t h e European
Community markets. They are divided into three types.
The Eurosuper as defined by the European Directive of 16 December
1985, offering a minimum RON of 95 and a minimum MON of 85. Found
throughout the European countries, it still is fairly scarce in France with
10% of the total demand for unleaded fuels.
* These are not official specifications, but rather "Quality"levels specified by French
automobile manufacturers.
198 ctqoter 5. CHARACTEAIS~CS PROWCTS
OF PETROLEUM FOR ENERGY
USE
The Superplus with its RON and MON greater than or equal to 98 and 88
respectively. T h e s e t w o values d o n o t c o r r e s p o n d to official
specifications but to “quality” specification sheets drawn up by French
auto manufacturers. Strictly according to the rules, Superplus is only a
variety of a “top quality” Eurosuper.
In every part of the world, the same type of classification as above is found
for fuels: premium or regular, with or without lead. The octane numbers can
b e different from o n e country t o another depending on t h e extent of
development of their car populations and the capabilities of their local
refining industries. The elimination of lead is becoming the rule wherever
t h e r e a r e large automobile populations a n d s e v e r e anti-pollution
requirements. Thus the United States, Japan and Canada no longer distribute
leaded fuels.
In the United States, the different categories of motor fuels are not defined
as they are in Europe by minimum RON and MON values, but by a combination
of the two numbers: more exactly by the relation ( MoN). There are
thus three kinds of motor fuels: regular, intermediate, premium with average
values of 87,90 and 93 for + MoN, respectively.
2
The fact that the sensitivity is often close to 10, makes it rather easy to
calculate the individual values of RON and MON.
100
50
50 100 1
J L
Figure
5.4 Octane numbers of different chemical families of hydrocarbons.
double bond towards the center of the molecule tends to improve the RON, at
least for the first members of the series. Olefin MONs are always lower than
their RON by an average of 10 t o 15 points, explained by a high activation
energy in the kinetic process of auto-ignition. In practice, the commercial
motor fuel MONs always correlates strongly with the olefin content.
Naphthenes always have higher octane numbers -RON and MON- than
their non-cyclic homologs; for example, the RON of n-hexane is 24.8 while
cyclohexane attains 83.
The aromatic RONs are always greater than 100 (up to 115-120); these
values are only orders of magnitude considering the poor accuracy in
measuring octane number in this range. Aromatic MONs are usually high,
greater than 100, but lower than their RONs by around 10 points. It is almost
impossible to discern the major octane number differences among the
components found in gasoline: benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene,
cumene. As a matter of fact, all have excellent behavior in this area.
Outside of hydrocarbons, certain organic oxygenated compounds such as
the alcohols and ethers are henceforth utilized in the formulation of gasolines.
These are mostly methanol, ethanol, propanols and butanols, as well as
methyl and ethyl ethers obtained from C, and C, olefins:
methyltertiarybutylether (MTBE) ethyltertiarybutylether (ETBE),
tertiaryamylmethylether (TAME). All these compounds -alcohols and
ethers- are characterized by very high RONs, up to 120-130 for methanol and
ethanol. The MONs are also much higher than 100, but the sensitivity (RON-
MON) is high, on the order of 15 to 20 points. These are generalized estimates;
in reality the CFR engine procedures are not adapted at characterizing such
substances that are quite different from conventional hydrocarbons with
regards to certain properties such as heat of vaporization and heating value.
Usually, it is more important to know the behavior of these components in a
mixture than in their pure state. lncorporating them into gasoline always
results in substantial gains in octane number (Unzelman, 1989).
The preceding information indicates the paths to follow in order to obtain
stocks of high octane number by refining. The orientation must be towards
streams rich in aromatics (reformate) and in isoparaffins (isomerization,
alkylation). The olefins present essentially in cracked gasolines can be used
only with moderation, considering their low MONs, even if their RONs are
attractive.
Table 5.10 gives octane number examples for some conventional refinery
stocks. These are given as orders of magnitude because the properties can
vary according to process severity and the specified distillation range.
Figure 5.5 can be used to place the different product streams with respect
to the objectives required for commercial octane numbers for Eurosuper and
Superplus. It is clearly evident that the preparation of Superplus (RON 98,
MON 88) will require careful screening of its components.
-
h. Formulation of Motor Fuels Blending Index
Formulation consists of mixing the effluent streams coming from the
different refining units in order t o obtain products conforming t o the
specifications. It is also at this point that additives are added, the reasons for
which and whose action will be described later. One can easily see that as far
as octane numbers are concerned, or for that matter any other parameter, the
characteristics of a mixture are not always identical to those predicted by a
linear addition. To take into account the deviation from ideality, the concept
of blending index M,as defined below, is introduced.
Table
5.10 Octane numbers (RON and MON) o f some conventional refinery streams
(orders of magnitude).
110
105
Heavy
+ Methanol
c
reformate __
100
95
90
,- MTBE, TAME
t ?
Very low pressure
reformate
85
80
75
70
k
Light gasoline
65
20 40 60 80,
Aromatics, wt %
- Figure ’
5.5 Motor Octane Number (MON) as a function of aromatics content for stocks
h m differentrefiningprocesses.
w~pters.C m c m m OF PETROLEUM FOR ENERGY
PROO~ECTS USE 205
RON MON
Methanol 125135 100-105
MTBE 113-117 95101
Ethanol 120-130 98-103
ETBE 118122 100-102
Tertiarybutyl alcohol (TBA) 105-110 95-100
TAME 110-114 96100
- Table
5.1 1 Blending values of some alcohols and ethers.
Modern methods for formulating motor fuels rely on chemical analysis and
composition-octane number correlations. A technique proposed by BP
Corporation @scales et al., 1989) consists of predicting the octane numbers
of gasolines based on their infrared spectra. The method has the advantage of
being very fast, taking about one minute. It has been shown to be very useful
for adjusting a formulation by slight changes in a composition-type and is
applied as a first priority in real refinery situations at a given site.
More general t e c h n i q u e s covering a wider range employ g a s
chromatography (Durand e t al., 1987). This enables identification and
analysis of the nearly 200 gasoline components whose octane numbers are
known.
From these data, a first approach is to develop linear models using a
relation of the following type:
ON = 2 (ONppi+ K i ) Ci
in which ON is the octane number (RON or MON) of the gasoline, ONwi the
octane number of the pure component i, Ciits weight per cent concentration,
and Ki a coefficient representing a deviation from ideality -plus or minus-
taking into account its behavior in the mixture.
In these calculations, the terms Ki are identical for t h e components
belonging to the same hydrocarbon family with the same degree of branching
and t h e s a m e number of c a r b o n atoms. Chromatographic analyzers
a s s o c i a t e d with a program for determining t h e o c t a n e n u m b e r are
commercialized. A good example is Chromoctan&, built under license by IF"
and distributed by the company, Vinci-Technologie. This on-line instrument
determines the octane numbers of reformates automatically.
To predict t h e octane numbers of more complex mixtures, non-linear
models are necessary; t h e behavior of a component i in these mixtures
depends on its hydrocarbon environment.
206 chapter5 CWCTERSKS OF PETROLEUM
P ~ TFOSE N ~USE
Y
3 0.7
1
3
7 0.5
V
s
1E 0
-0.3
0
5
8 -0.5
E
a -0.7 . I I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of samples
5 0.7
-
U
(4
a
Y
8 0.5
5 -0.3
E
- Number of samples
;:' 1
1- Comparison of measured and calculated octane number.
j. Unleaded Fuels
The lead alkyls and scavengers contained in fuels cause rapid poisoning of
exhaust gas catalytic converters. They are tolerated only in trace quantities in
fuels for vehicles having that equipment. The officially allowed content is
0.013 g Pb/l, but the contents observed in actual practice are less than
0.005 g Pb/l.
80
Light SR gasoline Reformate
51% paraffins 54% aromatics
40% isoparaffins 16% paraffins
7 5 I '
70 7 % naphthenes 28% isoparaffins
2% naphthenes
65 u
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
g
MON
1/
Total FCC gasoline Alkylate
90
80
/J 36% isoparaffins
4% paraffins
8% naphthenes
29% aromatics
20% olefins
90
80
95% iSoparaK1ns
4% paraffins
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
-S W l
1 'r1
g Pbll g pbll g pb/l
40
Ltadedpremium
0.15 g %/I
20
Highly leaded premium
0.4 g PbP
0
1986 I989 1992 1995 1998 ann&
I I
rrgurr
5.8 Trends in consumption for various gasolines in Europe.
I Stock
Cornpodtion range, vol. %
Super with 0.15 g Pb/l 1 Euroouper I !Supeq~Iw
c, cut 2-4 2-4 2-4
Straight run gasoline 5-10 08 0-5
FCC gasoline 2040 15-35 1@25
Reformate 30-60 35-60 4580
lsomerate 0-5 0-5 08
Alkylate 0-10 0-15 0-20
I I 5.12
Tab'e
Typical compositions of gasolines acconiing to blending stock origin.
* Before lead addition.
5.1.3 Diesel Fuel Characteristics Imposed
by its Combustion Behavior
This fuel is used for the diesel engines in passenger cars and in utility
vehicles ranging from light delivery vans to heavy'trucks carrying 38 tons.
Such diversity of application can complicate the search for quality criteria,
but in each situation, it will be the most demanding type of application, very
often a s it would be, the private automobile that determines the fuel
specifications. Note that other types of non-highway diesel engines -fishing
-
boats, construction equipment, farm tractors, and large ships use motor
fuels distinctly different from diesel fuel such as marine diesel, homeheating
oil, and heavy fuel oil. Certain characteristics specified or recommended for
these products take into account that they are ultimately going to be used for
a diesel-type of combustion.
a. Density‘
The density should be between 0.820 and 0.860 kg/l according to the
European specifications (EN 590).
Imposing a minimum density is justified by the need to obtain sufficient
maximum power for the engine, by means of an injection pump whose flow Is
controlled by regulating the volume.
Moreover, a limit to maximum density is set in order t o avoid smoke
formation at full load, due to an increase in average equivalence ratio in the
combustion chamber.
b. Distillation Curve *
The necessity of carrying out injection a t high pressure and t h e
atomization into fine droplets using an injector imposes very precise volatility
characteristics for the diesel fuel. French and European specifications have
established two criteria for minimum and maximum volatility; therefore, the
distilled fraction in volume % should be:
less than 65% for a temperature of 250°C
greater than 85% for a temperature of 350°C
greater than 95% for a temperature of 370°C.
Specifications for density, distillation curve and viscosity shown above are for
products distributed in "temperate" climates. Other limits are required for "arctic"
At lower temperatures, the crystals increase in size, and form networks
that trap the liquid and hinder its ability to flow. The pour point is attained
which can, depending on the diesel fuel, vary between -15 and -30°C. This
characteristic (NF T 60-105) is determined, like the cloud point, with a very
rudimentary device (maintaining a test tube in the horizontal position without
apparent movement of the diesel fuel inside).
The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) is the minimum temperature at which
a given volume of diesel fuel passes through a well defined filter in a limited
time interval (NF M 07-042 and EN 116 standards). For conventional diesel
fuels in winter, the CFPP is usually between - 15 and -25°C.
The experimental conditions used to determine the CFPP d o not exactly
reflect those observed in vehicles; the differences are due to the spaces in the
filter mesh which are much larger in the laboratory filter, the back-pressure
and the cooling rate. Also, research is continuing on procedures that are
more representative of the actual behavior of diesel fuel in a vehicle and
which correlate better with the temperature said to be "operability", the
threshold value for the incident. In 1993, the CEN looked at two new methods,
one called SFPP proposed by Exxon Chemicals (David et al., 1993), the other
called ACELFl and recommended by Agip, Elf and Fina (Hamon et al., 1993).
In Europe, the classification of diesel fuels according to cold behavior is
shown in Tables 5.13 and 5.14. The products are divided into ten classes, six
for "temperate" climates, four for "arctic" zones.
Each country adopts such and such a class as a function of its climatic
conditions. France h a s chosen classes B, E, and F, respectively for t h e
summer, winter, and "cold wave" periods. T h e first i s from 1 May to
31 October, the second is from 1 November to 30 April, while the third has
not been set officially. The petroleum companies thereby take advantage of
the opportunity to promote their special brands.
The means available to the refiner to improve the cold characteristics are
as follows:
reduction of the distillation end point, taking into account the often
present n-paraffins in the heaviest fractions of the diesel fuel
reduction of the initial point, implying a more pronounced overlap with
the kerosene cut
selection of fractions being more naphthenic and aromatic than
paraffinic: in this case, the crude oil origin exerts considerable influence.
One remaining possibility that is less costly from an energy point of view
but needs to be carefully controlled is to incorporate additives called flow
improvers. These materials favor the dispersion of the paraffin crystals and in
doing so prevent them from forming the large networks which cause the filter
plugging. The conventional flow improvers essentially change the CFPP and
pour point, but not the cloud point. They are usually copolymers, produced,
for example, from ethylene and vinyl acetate monomers:
[*..CH-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH *..I
I I I
0 0 0
I I I
c=o c=o c=o
I I I
CH3 CH3 CH3
Figure 5.9 shows an example of the efficiency of these products. The
reductions of CFPP and pour point can easily attain 6 t o 12°C for
concentrations between 200 and 600 ppm by weight. The treatment cost is
relatively low, on the order of a few hundredths of a Franc per liter of diesel
fuel. In practice, a diesel fuel containing a flow improver is recognized by the
large difference (more than lOOC) between the cloud point and the CFPP.
Finally, we can mention the existence of additives acting specifically on
the cloud point. These are polymers containing chemical groups resembling
paraffins in order to associate with the paraffins and solubilizing functions to
keep the associations in solution. The gains are more modest than those
described above being on the order of 2 to 4°C for concentrations between
250 and 1000 ppm. These are, however, appreciable effects for the refiner,
'considering t h e difficulty encountered in meeting t h e cloud point
specification.
Temperature, "C I
Cloud
L* pc
A
A
I
- I(
-
L
- 21 L
point
A diesel fuel has a cetane number X,if it behaves like a binary mixture of
X% (by volume) ncetane and of (100 - X ) % a-methylnaphthalene.
In practice, the reference base is usually taken not as a-methylnaphthalene
but as heptamethylnonane (HMN), a branched isomer of ncetane. The HMN
has a cetane number of 15. In a binary system containing Y% of ncetane, the
cetane number CN will be, by definition:
CN = Y + 0.15 (100 - Y)
The standard measurement of cetane number is conducted on a CFR
engine similar to that used for determining octane numbers, but obviously
having a diesel-type of combustion chamber. For the diesel fuel being tested,
the engine's compression ratio is varied so that auto-ignition, as shown on a
diagram of pressure vs. crankshaft angle, "CA, is reproduced exactly at TDC
(Top Dead Center) while the injection of fuel takes place at 13"CAbefore TDC.
The measured compression ratio is in turn bracketed by two measured values
at the same conditions of combustion, with primary reference mixtures
whose cetane numbers differ by no more than 5 points. The cetane number of
the diesel fuel is then calculated by linear interpolation. The procedure is not
very precise with possible deviations for the same sample on the order of one
point in repeatability and two points in reproducibility.
-
b. Cetane Number Engine Requirements
The European specifications require a minimum cetane number of 49 for
the temperate climatic zones and the French automotive manufacturers
require at least 50 in their own specifications. The products distributed in
France and Europe are usually in the 48-55 range. Nevertheless, in most
Scandinavian countries, the cetane number is lower and can attain 45-46. This
situation is taken into account in the specifications for the "arctic" zone
(Table 5.14). In the United States and Canada, the cetane numbers for diesel
fuels are most often less than 50.
The cetane number does not play the same essential role as does the
octane number in the optimization of engines and motor fuels. In particular, it
does not have a direct influence on the engine efficiency. However, a cetane
number less than t h e required level could lead to operating problems:
difficulties in starting, louder noise especially during idling while cold, and
higher s m o k e emissions u p o n s t a r t i n g (refer to Figure 5.10). T h e s e
tendencies, incidentally, are more pronounced in passenger cars than in
heavy trucks. It is highly desirable to produce a diesel fuel with sufficiently
high cetane number in order to maintain or improve the diesel engine's image
for the customers. We will show eventually that obtaining a low level of
pollution can not be done without an adequate diesel fuel cetane number.
I - - - cetane number: +I
. .A
\
\
\
30 \ \- \
\
\
*\. \
\
20 \. \
\. \
\
10
- Figure
5-10 Influence of diesel fuel cetane number on exhaust smoke during cold starting.
Direct injection turbodiesel engine (heavy due vehicle).
The most common formula was developed by the Ethyl Corporation
(ASTM D 976) and is expressed by the relation:
CCI = 454.74 - 1641.416 p + 774.74 2 - 0.554 (T50)
+ 97.083 (log T50)2
where
CCI = calculated cetane index
p = density at 15°C in kg/l
Tso = temperature, "C,corresponding to the ASTM D 86 50% distilled
point.
The differences between the measured cetane numbers and the cetane
indices calculated by the above formula are relatively small for cetane indices
between 40 and 55. Nevertheless, for diesel fuels containing a pro-cetane
additive, the CCI will be much less than the actual value (refer to paragraph a).
Another characteristic used for some time to measure the propensity of a
diesel fuel for auto-ignition, is the Diesel Index .)I@ This is defined by the
relation:
(PA) * API
DI =
100
which is a function of API gravity and aniline point, AP. Remember that the
aniline point is the temperature in "F at which equal volumes of aniline and
diesel fuel are completely miscible.
Some empirical formulas have been devised to link the cetane index to the
Diesel Index 0.1.)or even directly to the aniline point. We will cite two such
formulas here in order to illustrate their comparative values:
Cetane index = 0.72 D.I. + 10
Cetane index = AP - 15.5
with AP in "C.
Other techniques for predicting the cetane number rely on chemical
analysis (Glavinceski et al., 1984) (Pande e t al., 1990). Gas p h a s e
chromatography can be used, as can NMR or even mass Spectrometry (refer
to3.2.1.l.band 3.2.2.2).
In gas chromatography, the columns employed do not give a complete
s e p a r a t i o n of t h e diesel c u t . T h e r e a r e a large n u m b e r of unknown
components starting from C12-C13'In spite of this problem, it is possible to
extract enough information in order to estimate the final cetane number and
the cetane profile along the distillation curve. Figure 5.1 1 gives an example for
a straight-run diesel fuel.
The spectroscopic methods, NMR and mass spectrometry for predicting
cetane numbers have been established from correlations of a large number of
samples. The NMR of carbon 13 or proton (see Chapter 3) can be employed.
In terms of ease of operation, analysis time (15 minutes), accuracy of
prediction (1.4 points average deviation from the measured number), it is
proton NMR which seems to be most advantageous. Figure 3.1 1 shows a very
good correlation between the calculated and measured values for cetane
numbers ranging between 20 and 60.
With regard to mass spectrometry, accuracy is not as high with an average
error of 2.8 points, but on the other hand, the sample required is very small,
being around 2 ~ 1 .
Cetane number
J
Figure
5.1 1 Cetane profile of a straight run diesel fuel.
0-
0.05 0.10 0.15 o.2or
Volume per cent of DII3
ji&Ll
U5-12 Effectivenessof DII3 additive in improving the cetane number.
Source: (Urnelman, 1984).
- 18 -20 - 18
40 28 70
I I
Table
5.15 Ejramples ofstocks used in formulatingdiesel hels.
* The results given here are on a labomtory basis. During formulation in the refinery, the cold chamcteristics are much less satisfactorywith a
penally ofaround 6°C Tor cases where it is desired to keep the same yield ftvm the crude oil.
Sourre: El[ Total.
Previous Page
case (1) 0
H2 pressure, bar 40 60
T. "C 360 360 360 380 380
LHSV, m3/m3h 1 2 1 2
I I
Hydrogen consumption,
m3/m3 180 230
weight % 1.8 2.3
HDS, % I 93.0 I 96.4 98.3
HDN, % I 75.0 1 98.3 99.5 I 99.5 I 99.5
-
Cetane number 22 24 27.5 29 40
Composition by (1) 0 0 (9 0
spectrometry
Paraffins,weight % 10.5 12.5 12.3 11.0 8.0
Naphthenes, weight % 9.5 12.5 22.3 35.0 66.0
Aromatics, weight % 80.0 75.0 65.4 54.0 26
of which: Monoaromatics 55 55 55.2 45.7 23
Poiynuclear aromatics 12 6.0 4.6 4.9 1.7
I I I I I I
Table
5.16 Gas oils from FCC (LCO).
I I Effectof operating conditions on.hydmlreated gas oil chamcteristics.
Finally, other new processes can supply stocks for the diesel fuel pool.
Oligomerization of light olefins followed by hydrogenation gives products
having cetane numbers between 40 and 50, with neither sulfur nor aromatics.
With regard to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis followed by hydroisomerization,
totally paraffinic compounds result with high cetane numbers from 65 to 75,
with good cold characteristics when the is@to n-paraffin ratio is optimized.
i
Figure
Luminometer index
for the combustion
flame ofa jet fuel as
a function of its -68 64 60 56 52 48 44
uolumemc content Luminometer index
in aromatics. I
228 chiqottw5. OF P ~ K X E UPMm r s FOR E N ~ USE
CNARACTEWSTICS Y
- Figure
5.14 Solubiliw of water in jet fuels as a function of temperature (Jet A is a variant
of Jet Al, used in the LlSA for domestic flights.Jet A has a hezing point 3°C
When the temperature decreases, water becomes less soluble (see Figure 5.15)
and deposits as fine droplets that begin to freeze as the temperature reaches
0°C. To prevent this occurrence, it is possible to use anti-freeze additives that
absorb t h e water and lower t h e freezing point. These products, used at
maximum levels of 1500 ppm, are ethers-alcohols: for example, 2-methoxy
ethanol:
CH3- 0- CH2- CH2- OH
or p 2-methoxy ethoxy ethanol:
CH~-O~CH~-CH~-O-CH~-CH~-OH
I Characteristics
product
Characteristics
Meel fuel I Homeheatingoil
Density wi 0.824 0.860
~inematicviscosity at 20"c mm*/s 3.47 6.20
Sulfur weight % 0.206 0.300
Cloud Doint "C -8 +3
CFPP "C I -23 I -3
Pour point "C I -27 I -21
Distillation IP
EP 'E 1 364 I 185
374
Cetane number 50.5 48.0
NWw Wkg 42,825 42,220
~ NW" kJ/1 35,285 36,310
Composition Carbon weight % 86.0 87.2
Hydrogen ' weight % 13.35 12.7
lo00
750
500
400
300
200
110
100
80
60
40
20
15
14
12
10
9
8
7
6
40 50 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Temperature, "C
U
5-15 Kinematic viscosity diagram for N0.2 heavy hels, from an experimental study
of BNHt (Bureau de Normalisationdu P6hvle. 1978).
--
Figure
5.16 Weighted indices of heauy fuels as a function of the weight percents of
asphaltenes and Conmdson Carbon.
e. Presence and Effectof Contaminants in Heavy Fuels
Emission problems of SO, and NO,, linked to the presence of sulfur and
nitrogen in heavy fuels will be examined later.
Other heavy fuel contaminants are metals (vanadium, nickel, sodium)
coming from the crude oil itself or metallic salts (aluminum silicates) coming
from catalysts in conversion steps. The aluminum silicates should not exceed
300 ppm (30 ppm of aluminum), for these materials exert a strong abrasive
action on the engine cylinders and injection systems. They can however be
eliminated partially by centrifuging and filtration.
Vanadium present in the crude oil is concentrated in the heavy fuels
where levels of 200-300 ppm a r e possible. During combustion, this metal
forms salt complexes with sodium, also present in trace quantities, which can
be very corrosive when they deposit as liquids. To control this problem, it is
sometimes necessary to design engine cooling systems that reduce the
temperature of the exhaust valve seats, keeping it below the melting point of
t h e vanadium and sodium salts. In industrial furnaces, combustion is
frequently carried out with low excess air which leads to a higher vanadium
salt melting point. That is usually adequate for avoiding corrosion.
Kinematic viscosity
at ~ O O T mm*/s
Density
kg/l
Conradson carbon
weight %
Asphaltenes
weight %
Sulfur weight %
Nitrogen PPm
Metals PPm
I
U5.2 1 Typical chamcteristics of some refinery stocks used in the production of heavy
fuels.
I
Injector cleanliness
Admission valve
cleanliness
1 CFC
CECF05T92 1 Mercedes
M 102 E
I 200
6o I
Combustion chamber CEC PF 28 Renault F2N 400
cleanliness
The tendency to separate is expressed most often by the cloud point, the
temperature at which the fuel-alcohol mixture loses its clarity, the first
symptom of insolubility. Figure 5.17 gives an example of how the cloud-point
temperature changes with the water content for different mixtures of
gasoline and methanol. It appears that for a total water content of 500 ppm,
that which can be easily observed considering the hydroscopic character of
methanol, instability arrives when the temperature approaches 0°C. This
situation is unacceptable and is the reason that incorporating methanol in a
fuel implies that it be accompanied by a cosolvent. One of the most effective
in this domain is tertiary butyl alcohol, TBA. Thus a mixture of 3%methanol
and 2% TBA has been used for several years in Germany without noticeable
incident.
When ethanol is present, the risk of separation is much less than with
methanol. Nevertheless, the ethanol should be relatively anhydrous (less
than 3000 ppm water); moreover, if a fuel containing ethanol comes in contact
with a water layer, a migration of ethanol toward the water is observed
creating a fuel quality problem manifested by lower octane number and an
environmental quality problem in that the water will need to be treated.
Distribution of ethanol-based fuels requires extra precaution t o ensure
dryness in distribution systems.
A Cloud point, O F
70
60
50
40
30
Aromatics 25 vol %
Olefins 9~01%
20
Methanol content
0 5wt%
101 0 10wt%
15wt%
0
I
- 10
- 20
0
I
I
!
0.05
-I
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Figure
5.17 Stability ofa rnethanol4iel mixture uersus water content.
Hydrocarbon losses through evaporation are ineviti,.i in spite of a the
preventive steps that are or will be employed. Vapor recovery systems are
obligatory in all fuel storage operations and service station systems
(“Stage 1”). These measures will soon extend to filling vehicle fuel tanks
(“Stage 2”). Furthermore, new gasoline automobiles throughout Europe will
be equipped with fuel tank vapor traps beginning the 1 January 1993. They
are activated carbon canisters that trap and store the volatile hydrocarbons
when the vehicle is stationary. When the vehicle is moving, the canisters are
swept with air and the vapors are recovered as fuel. However this technique
is not completely effective and needs to be complemented by very strict
control of the fuel’s vapor pressure; a study conducted in the United States
shows that for vehicles equipped with canisters, a reduction of 1 psi
(69 mbar) in the vapor pressure causes a 46% reduction in evaporation for
stationary cold vehicles and a 9% reduction for vehicles still stationary but
after a period of warm operation.
Among the compounds susceptible to evaporation, particular attention is
focused on benzene. In the two conditions indicated above, for equal benzene
contents in the fuel (1.5% volume), the benzene evaporative losses are
reduced by 21% and 11%, respectively, when the vapor pressure decreases by
1 psi, that is, 69 mbar.
These data, given for illustrative purposes, show that even for the coming
years the refiner will be pressed to reduce the gasoline vapor pressure as
much as possible.
300
200
100
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Needle lift, m m
’Figure
5.18 Flow measurements for diesel injectors under a pressure drop of 0.6 bar.
Residual flow, 96
40
35
30
25
20
15
0
Without additive 250 ppm 350 ppm 500 ppm 750 ppm
Figure
It should be noted finally that adding gasoline to diesel fuel which was
sometimes recommended in the past to improve cold behavior conflicts with
the flash point specifications and presents a serious safety problem owing to
t h e presence of a flammable mixture in the fuel tank airspace. Adding a
kerosene that begins t o boil at 150°C does not have the same disadvantage
from this point of view.
!
- 10
- 15
I
- Figure
5.20 Influence of sulhr content in gasoline ( h r n 500 to 50 pprn) in the reduction
of pollutant emissions.
0.1c
0.12
0.08
0.10
0.06 0.08
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.02 . / I I
I
41
I I , 0.02
0.00 b 0.00
-
- Figure
5.21 Effect of sulfur content of diesel he1 on particulate emissions according to
different tests.
Desulfurization will become mandatory when oxidizing catalysts are
installed on the exhaust systems of diesel engines. At high temperatures this
catalyst accelerates the oxidation of SO, to SO, and causes an increase in the
weight of particulate emissions if the diesel fuel has not been desulfurfzed. As
an illustrative example, Figure 5.22 shows that starting from a catalyst
temperature of 400"C, the quantity of particulates increases very rapidly with
the sulfur content.
- Figure
5-23 Catalytic converter efficiency as a function of the sulfur content in the diesel
fuel and the ternpemture.
s
5.24 Emission limits of sulfur dioxide forheating oils (heavy fuels essentially).
JOCE N" L336/9 OF 7.12.88.
258 OF P ~ K X E UPROWCTS
c t 1 4 1 ~ 5 CHAR~CJERISWS
. M USE
FOR ENERGY
acceleration for which the catalyst is not wholly effective. It is then necessary
t o find t h e fuel characteristics that can minimize the emissions; we will
consider here three themes that are currently under serious study.
a. "Conventional"Pollutants
These are carbon monoxide, CO, unburned hydrocarbons (HC), and the
nitrogen oxides, NO,. In the U.S.A., a program called Auto/Oil (Burns et al.,
1992), conducted by automotive manufacturers and petroleum companies,
examined the effect of overall parameters of fuel composition on evaporative
emissions and in t h e exhaust gases. T h e variables examined were t h e
aromatics content between 20 and 45%, the olefins content between 5 and
20%, the MTBE content between 0 and 15% and finally the distillation end
point between 138 and 182°C (more exactly, the 95% distilled point).
Table 5.23 gives the results obtained on the American automotive fleet.
The pollutant emissions attributable to one or another of the parameters
stated above does not generally exceed 10 t o 15%. However, certain
tendencies merit attention; for example, the presence in the fuel of an oxygen
compound like MTBE contributes t o reducing the CO and hydrocarbon
emissions; a reduction in the aromatics content goes equally in the same
direction. This work has led t o the concept of "reformulated fuel" in the
United States, that is presenting physicalchemical characteristics adapted to
minimizing the pollutant emissions. We will go more deeply into the idea of
reformulated fuel in the following pages.
Table
5.23 Influence of the chemical composition of the Fuel on pollutant emissions from
vehicles in the US (auto/oil pmgram).
6. Specific Pollutants
Outside of carbon monoxide for which the toxicity is already well-known,
five types of organic chemical compounds capable of being emitted by
vehicles will be the focus of our particular attention; these are benzene, 1-3
butadiene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons, PNA, taken as a whole. Among the latter, two, like benzo [a]
pyrene, are viewed as carcinogens. Benzene is considered here not as a
motor fuel component emitted by evaporation, but because of its presence in
exhaust gas (see Figure 5.25).
Table 5.24 shows that these specific pollutants are present only in small
proportions (about 8%) of the total organic compounds emitted by the motor,
but they are particularly feared because of their incontestable toxicity.
Prominent among them is benzene.
The action taken to reduce the level of these toxic products is to modify
the formulation of the fuel. Table 5.25 gives some general trends brought to
light during the Auto/Oil American program: the reduction already cited in
the CO emissions by employing oxygenated fuels, decreasing benzene
emissions with low aromatic fuels or by having a low distillation end point,
the relationship with olefins in the fuel and the formation of butadiene in the
I Type of pollutant
I weisnt % of volatile organic compoun&
contained in exhaust gas
Benzene 6.2% 1.om
Butadiene 0.5% 5.290
Formaldehyde 0.9% 0.243
Acetaldehyde 0.5% 0.043
Table
5.24 Evaluation of the concentrations of four toxic pollutants in exhaust gas (order
of magnitude).
U
Table
5.26 Reactivities compared for selected organic compounds with respect to ozone
formation.
benzene, alcohols and ethers have very little reactivity as far as ozone
formation is concerned.
To estimate the effect of automobile traffic and motor fuels on ozone
formation, it is necessary to know the composition of exhaust gas in detail.
Figure 5.26 gives an example of a gas phase chromatographic analysis of a
conventional unleaded motor fuel.
For each type of component, its relative reactivity in ozone formation was
taken into account which makes it possible to characterize by weighting the
behavior of the overall motor fuel under the given experimental conditions.
The overall reactivity is in fact governed by a limited number of substances:
ethylene, isobutene, butadiene, toluene, xylenes, formaldehyde, and
acetaldehyde. The fuels of most interest for reducing ozone formation are
those which contribute towards minimizing emissions of the above substances.
1+
I Ethylene 519
Propylene 647
Acetylene 36
I +
I lsobutene 412
c4 63
Eurwuper gasoline
imtane 69
Engine speed: 1500 rpm
+ Equivalence ratio: 1.OO
Benzene 27 Sample point upstream .
of catalytic converter
1 Toluene 186
* Relative reactivity factor
Total reactivity: 2.66 g OJg HC
I +
m + p Xylenes 549
&
Figure
Example of an analysis of exhaust gas by gas phase chmmatogmphy and
5.26
relative reactivity of efnuents with respect to tmpospheric ozone formation.
d. "Reformulated Gasolines
Gasolines said t o b e reformulated a r e designed with all aspects of
environmental protection being considered: reducing evaporative losses and
conventional exhaust system pollutants, extremely low emissions of toxic
substances, the lowest reactivity regarding ozone formation. The general
action paths a r e known: reduction of volatility, lowering t h e levels of
aromatics, olefins, sulfur, reducing the distillation end point, addition of
oxygenates. Table 5.27 gives a n example of a reformulated gasoline's
characteristics suggested in 1992 by the Arc0 Company in the United States.
Claims for the pollution improvements are also noted. This is an extreme
example of that which would be expected as a result of drastic modification of
motor fuel. However, in the United States, local pollution problems observed
in a number of urban population centers have already launched safeguarding
measures applicable to fuel compositions. These include:
obligatory addition of oxygenates to a total oxygen concentration level
of 2.7% for "non-attainment" regions (those having excessively high CO
levels)
reduction of aromatics to 25%, accompanied by other moves to reduce
volatile h y d r o c a r b o n emissions a n d t h e resulting formation of
tropospheric ozone.
* 1 psi = 69 mbar.
** THC = total hydrocarbons NMHC = non-methanehydrocarbons.
In Europe and elsewhere in the world, the trend towards reformulated
gasoline has scarcely begun; it is very likely, however, that it will be felt
around the beginning of 2000, with more or less profound impact on the
refining industry.
---Table
5.28 Effect of hydmtmatment on the chamcteristics ofgas oil.
Tables 5.29 and 5.30 show an example of the effects of hydrotreated diesel
fuels on a diesel passenger car already having a low level of pollution owing
to technical modifications such as sophisticated injection and optimized
combustion. In the standard European driving cycle (ECE + EUDC), between
A 0.68 1.17 0.48 I 0.168
A+ 0.56 1.06 0.37 0.147
A+ + 0.52 1.14 0.40 0.151
A+++ 0.39 1.00 1 0.34 0.126
A++++ 0.30 0.93 0.29 0.112
Table
5.29 Influence of hydmtreating a diesel fuel on particulate emissions.
the diesel fuel extremes, particulate emission reductions of 25% are observed;
the CO and hydrocarbon emission reductions of 30 and 40% respectively are
also very significant. On the other hand, the diesel fuel composition exerts
very little effect on nitrogen oxide emissions. Figure 5.27 gives a satisfactory
correlation between emissions of CO,HC and particulates, and the cetane
number.
In the future, European and worldwide refining should evolve toward the
production of relatively hlgh cetane number diesel fuels either by more or
less deeper hydrotreating or by judicious choice of base stocks. However, it is
not planned to achieve levels of 60 for the near future as sometimes required
by the automotive manufacturers.
Finally it is likely that attention will b e focused on emissions of
polynuclear aromatics (PNA) in diesel fuels. Currently t h e analytical
techniques for these materials in exhaust systems are not very accurate and
will need appreciable improvement. In conventional diesel fuels, emissions of
PNA thought to be carcinogenic do not exceed however, a few micrograms
per km, that is a car will have to be driven for several years and cover at least
100,OOO km to emit one gram of benzopyrene for example! These already very
low levels can be divided by four if deeply hydrotreated diesel fuels are used.
1.o * KolC
* Maudi
0.9
0.8 Nigeria
* Mava
0.7
* Suez
0.6 Iran
Libya
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sulfur content,96
Bernard Thiault
Demand for non-fuel petroleum products increases from year to year. For
example, in France, their share of the total petroleum market rose from 9% to
15.7% between 1973 and 1992.
Non-fuel petroleum products cover an extremely wide range and a r e
distinguished as much by their nature and physical aspects as by their types
of application.
We will examine the most important of these products in this chapter:
solvents (6.1)
naphthas (6.2)
lubricants (6.3)
waxes and paraffins (6.4)
asphalts (bitumen) (6.5)
other products (6.6)
kdty ins
, Claseification kg/lo 15°C range,
I (approximate) "C
~ Spirit A 0.675 40- 100 Rubber-based adhesives
cleaning fluids, degreasing fluids
Fat extraction, vegetable oil mills,
tallow manufacture
, Spirit C 0.700 70- 100 Fat extraction, vegetable oil mills,
rubber industry, heating
Spirit D 0.710 -
95 103 Dehydration of alcohol
Spirit E 0.730 -
100 130 Rubber industry, cleaning fluids,
degreasing fluids
Spirit F 0.740 100- 160 Rubber Industry, cleaning fluids,
degreasing fluids
Spirit C 0.645 -
30 75 Petroleum gas equipment,
I 2 10%at 70
- - /-
L
Spirit H
Table
5 0.765
6. WhiteSpirits
White-spirits are solvents that are slightly heavier than SBP's and have
boiling ranges between 135 and 205°C.A "dearomatized" grade exists. These
solvents are used essentially as paint thinners although their low aromatic
content makes them unsuitable for lacquers, cellulosic paints and resins.
c. Lamp Oils
Dearomatized or not, lamp oils correspond to petroleum cuts between Clo
and C14. Their distillation curves (less than 90% at 210°C.65% o r more at
250°C.80% or more at 285°C) give them relatively heavy solvent properties.
They are used particularly for lighting or for emergency signal lamps. These
materials are similar to "kerosene soloents", whose distillation curves a re
between 160 and 300°C and which include solvents for printing inks.
-
d. h r e Aromatics Benzene, Toluene and Xylenes
Benzene, toluene and xylenes are used either as solvents or as basic
intermediates for the chemical and petrochemical industries.
Independently from the uses reviewed here, a few other applications of
petroleum solvents are given below:
solvents for glues and adhesives
vehicles for insecticides, fungicides and pesticides
components for reaction media such as those for polymerization.
a. Volatility
Volatility is one of the most important properties of a hydrocarbon
solvent. Volatility has a direct relation to the time it takes to evaporate the
solvent and, therefore, to the drying time for the dissolved product. The
desired value of volatility varies greatly with the nature of the dissolved
product and its application temperature. Therefore, whether it be an ink that
needs to dry at ambient temperature, sometimes very fast, or whether it be
an extraction solvent, the volatility needs are not the same.
Volatility is generally characterized by a distillation curve (the quantity
distilled as a function of temperature). Often, only the initial and final boiling
points are taken into account along with, possibly, a few intermediary points.
Another measurement characterizing volatility is that of vapor pressure.
b. Solvent Power
Solvent power characterizes the miscibility of solute and solvent. This
concept covers two types of uses: dissolving a solid or reducing the viscosity
of a liquid. The solvent power should be as high as possible. However, a
solvent used as an extractant should also be selective, i.e., extract certain
substances preferentially from the feed being treated.
There are several criteria used to define solvent power. Chemical analysis
is ideal because it can indicate the proportion of hydrocarbons known to be
good solvents: in particular, the aromatics.
Nevertheless, this type of analysis, usually done by chromatography, is
not always justified when taking into account the operator's time. Other
quicker analyses are used such as "FlA" (fluorescent Indicator Analysis) (see
paragraph 3.3.5). which give approximate but usually acceptable proportions
of saturated, olefinic, and aromatic hydrocarbons. Another way t o
characterize the aromatic content is to use the solvent's "aniline point" the
lowest temperature at which equal volumes of the solvent and pure aniline
are miscible.
c. DegreeofAtrity
The required degree of purity varies with the application but t h e
requirements in this domain are sometimes very important. Several tests are
employed in the petroleum industry.
If sulfur is a contaminant, its content can be measured, but it may suffice
to characterize its effects by the copper strip corrosion test, or by the "doctor
test".
The tendency for a solvent t o form deposits by polymerization of
impurities such as olefins is measured by the test for "potential gums". Olefin
content can also be represented by the "bromine index", which is a measure
of the degree of unsaturation (see paragraph 3.4.1).
The solvent can contain traces of acidic or basic compounds which are
measured by titration.
Finally, color is always examined since the solvent should be colorless
when pure. Traces of heavy aromatics give the solvent a yellow tint.
d. Odor
Odor is of prime importance because a petroleum solvent is often used in
closed rooms; moreover, the idea of odor is tied instinctively in the public
image t o toxicity. Odor is a function of the solvent's composition and
volatility. Generally, the paraffin hydrocarbons are less odorous while the
aromatics are more so.
There is n o reliable standard method t o characterize odor and
specifications often indicate merely "a not-unpleasant odor".
Viscosity,
mm2ls
s m d . r 0 IV8J - &dnrmThpRrr
%mdumnnaaur
Dhi*l*.lPmrml*I
R n r d d p a b u * o d k ~ PRUau.1 R r h r d n d F RRR
Lk94 Innxl+T.m&Aknlr
IFr1 Viscosity/tempemhrrechar?oFJ. Gmff (ASTM D 2270-86 viscosify index). New SAE classification.
- Organic polyesters, obtained either from a diacid and a mono-
alcohol, or from poly-alcohols and a monoacid, or from dialcohols
and a diacid. This class represented 29% of the synthetic base market
in France in 1992.
- Polyalkylene glycols, particularly p o l y p ro p y l en e glycols,
represent 17% of French market in 1992.
- Phosphoric esters, not common as bases, but used as additives.
- Special products: silicones, silicates, polyphenylethers, used rarely
and for very specialized applications because they are expensive
materials.
The properties of bases a r e modified by additives t o meet t h e
specifications. The principal classes of additives are (see chapter 9) as
follows:
VI additives t o improve t h e viscosity index: polymethacrylates,
polyacrylates, olefin polymers.
Additives to lower the pour point: polyacrylates.
Detergent and dispersant additives: sulfonates, thiophosphonates,
phenates, salicylates more or less overbased, succinimides.
Anti-wear and extreme pressure additives: phosphoric esters,
dithiophosphates, sulfurcontaining products such as fatty esters and
sulfided terpenes or chlorinated products such as chlorinated paraffins.
Additives for lubrication under extreme conditions: fatty esters, fatty
acids, etc.
Antioxidant and deactivation additives: substituted phenols,
dithiophosphates, dithiocarbamates, alkylated aromatic amines.
Corrosion inhibitors: partial esters of succinic acid, fatty acids,
sulfonates, phenates, amine phosphates.
Anti-foaming agents: polydimethylsiloxanes, fluorosilicones, acrylates.
During the formulation of an oil, blending of all these components gives an
extremely wide variety of products described in t h e classification.
Nevertheless, the lubricating greases make up a special product category
among them.
c. Lubricating Creases
A grease is by definition a semi-solid material obtained by dispersing a
gelling agent in a liquid lubricant. A multitude of gelling agents blended with a
large variety of liquid lubricants (mineral or synthetic) can be used; this
accounts for the large number of greases.
The selection of gelling agents and liquid lubricants is conducted
according to the requirements for a specific use:
high or low temperature properties
mechanical stability (resistance to shearing and centrifugation)
resistance to water.
These properties are mainly associated with the gelling agent and liquid
lubricant.
Other properties such as:
oxidation resistance
corrosion protection
wear and seizing protection
are mainly associated with specialized additives.
The most common liquid lubricants are: mineral oils (usually naphthenic),
esters (either diesters or complex esters), polyalpha olefins and polyalkylene
glycols.
Using one or another type depends on the desired properties for the
grease, in particular the high or low temperature properties.
There are numerous possible gelling agents:
inorganic gelling agents
organic gelling agents (soaps or others).
The great number of possible associations between the types of liquid
lubricants and gelling agents results in many different categories of greases:
1 Table
6.3 Chamcteristics of Motor Oils.
a. Viscosity
This is the essential characteristic for every lubricant. The kinematic
viscosity is most often measured by recording the time needed for the oil to
flow down a calibrated capillary tube. The viscosity varies with the pressure
but the influence of temperature is much greater; it decreases rapidly with an
increase in temperature and there is abundant literature concerning the
equations and graphs relating these two parameters. One can cite in
particular the ASTM D 341 standard.
b. Viscosity Index 0
The VI is a number that results from a calculation involving the viscosities
at 40°C and 100°C. It characterizes the capacity of the lubricant to maintain a
constant viscosity through a large range in temperature. This property can be
improved by additives.
c. Pour Point
The pour point is the lowest temperature at which an oil can still pour
while it is cooled, without agitation, under standardized conditions. The pour
point of paraffinic bases is linked to the crystallization of n-paraffins. The
pour point of naphthenic bases is related to a significant viscosity increase at
low temperatures. This property can be improved by additives.
d. Aniline Point
This value characterizes the level of aromatics in non-formulated oils; the
aniline point is higher for low aromatic contents.
e. Volatility
Volatility can be characterized either indirectly, by measurement of the
flash point (the temperature to which the oil must be heated for inflammation
of its vapor to become possible) or by direct measurement, following the
Noack method.
I Life span 1
Detergent and dispersive powers
Filterability
Resistance to oxidation
II
Volume reduction in service Thermal stability
Resistance to oxidation, deaeration
Controlling emissions of gas and fog Low volatility
Shop environment Odor
Skin toxicity Low polynuciear aromatic (PNA) content
Gasket compatibility Adapted composition, low aggressivity
Environment Absence of toxic compounds such as
--
Table
polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs)
h. Antiaxidant Properties
There are available standard accelerated oxidation tests that consist of
passing air or oxygen through an oil at elevated temperature. The test is
conducted with or without the presence of catalysts or water.
i. Performance Properties
Performance can be illustrated for example by the time necessary for
deaeration or de-emulsification of oils, anti-rust properties, copper strip
corrosion test, the flash point in closed or open cup, the cloud and pour
points, the foaming characteristics, etc.
b. Mechanical Properties
The mechanical properties of waxes and solid paraffins a r e of
considerable importance for most applications and numerous tests have been
developed for characterizing the hardness, the brittleness, and resistance to
rupture.
The most widespread test is the penetration of a needle or cone.
c. Properties of Food-GmdeParamns
These properties concern paraffins that are part of food packaging
materials. Their potential toxicity could be attributable to aromatic residues.
The latter are thereby characterized directly or indirectly by:
analyzing the ultraviolet absorption spectra in the spectral zone
corresponding to aromatics
determining the level of "carbonizable materials"; that is, observing the
paraffin's change in color by treating it with concentrated sulfuric acid.
a. Needle Penetrability
Penetrability is the depth, expressed in tenths of a millimeter, a standard
steel needle penetrates into a bitumen sample at 25°C. The needle carries a
weight of 100 g and the test is applied for five seconds. The corresponding
test method is relatively difficult to carry out and is defined in France by the
standard NF T 66404, and in the USA by the method ASTM D 583. Penetration
is related to the viscosity.
b. Softening Point
The softening point is the temperature at which a bitumen becomes soft
under standard conditions. The measurement uses the "ring and ball" method
which is standardized in France (NF T 66408) and in the USA (ASTM D 36). A
steel ball of precisely defined dimensions and weight is placed on the bitumen
sample that is surrounded by a metal ring also precisely defined. The
assembly is heated gradually. When the bitumen sample becomes soft enough
for the ball to pass through and travel a vertical distance of 2,s cm, the
corresponding temperature is called the softening point. This measurement is
also related to the viscosity.
c. Density
Density is measured by a pycnometer (NF T 66407, ASTM D 70).
d. Fraass Brittle Point
This test attempts t o characterize the brittleness of bitumen at low
temperatures. It consists of measuring the temperature at which fissures
appear on a bitumen film spread on a blade as it is repeatedly flexed. This test
is delicate and of questionable reliability, but it is currently the only one that
allows the elastic behavior of bitumen on decreasing temperature to be
characterized. It is standardized in France (T 66-026).
F. Solubility
This measurement provides a definition of the bitumen content in bitumen
materials a s t h e portion soluble in carbon disulfide (in France, in
trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride or tetrachloroethylene). The method
is defined by AFNOR NF T 66-012 or IP 47, or ASTM D 4 (the latter is not
equivalent to the others).
8. Ductility
Ductility is the elongation, at the moment of failure, of a standard bitumen
briquette that is stretched at a predetermined speed and temperature.
References are the NF T 66-006, ASTM D 113, IP 32 methods.
h. Volatility
Volatility can be characterized in different ways:
Flash point (cutbacks, fluxed bitumen). Standards NF T 66-009 and IP 113
Loss of weight on heating. NF T 66-011 and ASTM D 6. The loss of weight
on heating can also be measured during the RTFOT test.
Bernard Thiault
. -
I @IFENWADWI&B> I I I289
Diene content as equivalent to
1.3 butadiene (NF EN 27941) 5 0.5% mole
U
Motor octane number (MON) (MON 5 95 in customs specification)
Table
I
I NF EN 25163 I
Cetane number
(NF M 07-035/B0 5165) 2 49
Cetane index (lS0 4264) 2 46
Conradson carbon (on the residue
of 10 vol % distillation )
(NF T 60-1 16/ISO 10,370)
Flash point (NF EN 22719) I
Additives Authorized by the DHYCA
(Ministry of Industry)
Cold filter plugging point (CFPP) from 1/11 to 30/04 : -15°C
(NF EN 116/M 07-042) from 1/05 to 31/10 : 0°C
Severe cold : = -20°C
4 h a t 50°C : s 1
I
Thermal stability (JflOT)
(NF M 07-051/ASTM D 3241/1P 323) APof filter I25,O mmHg
Tube grading (visual) 53
Color deDosit Nil
Existent gum content (NF EN 26246/ASTM D 381/IP 131) 5 7 mg/100 ml
Water tolerance (ASTM D1094/IP 289)
Interface grading s l b
SeDaration grading 5 2
WSlM (WaterSepamtion Index Modified) 2 85 or
(M 07-050/ASTM D 2550/ASTM D 3948)
Conductivity (ASTM D 2624/1P 274)
1Table I I
Specifications and test methods For jet fuel. The specificationsofjet fuels are
set at the international level and are written into the "AviationFuel Quality
Requirements forJointly Opemted Systems".
chareetetlstlcs Speci6cations
Definition Mixture of hydrocarbons of mineral
or svnthetic origin
Color Red
Viscosity at 20°C (NF T 60-100) s 9.5mm*/s
Sulfur content (NF EN 24260) 5 0.3 weight %
Distiilation (NF M 07402)
(in voi % including losses) < 65%at 250°C
Flash point (NF T 60-103) 2 55°C
-
Table
7.7 Specifications and test methods for home-heating oil (in France, MID) (see
AFNOR information document M 15-008).
Table 7.8, which gathers the French government specifications and test
methods concerning hydrocarbon solvents, is divided into three parts:
Table 7.8a: Special Boiling Point Spirits
Table 7.8b: White Spirits
Table 7 . 8 ~ Lamp
: Oils
CharacteWca
Definition Mixture of hydrocarbons of mineral
or synthetic origin
Color Colorless
Density at 15°C (NF T 60-101) SBP A : 675 kg/m3 approx.
SBP B : 675 kg/m3 approx.
SBP C : 700 kg/m3 approx.
SBP D : 710 kg/m3 approx.
SBP E : 730 kg/m3 approx.
SBP F : 740 kg/m3 approx.
SBP C : 645 kg/m3 approx.
SBP H : s 765 kg/m3
I CharacteWca I swcificatlom I
I Vapor pressure at 37.8"~(NF EN 12) SBP H : I70 kPa
II
Sulfur content (NF EN 24260)
Copper strip corrosion
CNF M 07-015) 3 h at 50°C
Existent gum content (NF EN 26246)
5
1 : I 0.20 weight %
Table
7.ga Special Boilins Point Spirits (SBP's) (see AFNOR information document M 15-
002 for SBP H).
Definition Mixture of hydrocarbons of mineral
or synthetic origin
Color (NF M 07-003) 2 22
~ ~ ~~~~
Table
7-10 Specificationsand test methods For heavy fuel oil (in Fmnce, FOL).
The French specificationsdistinguish two grades: FOL No. I and the heavier
Distillation (NF M 07-002) 5 65%at 250°C
vol. % (including losses) I 85% at 350°C
Congealing temperature
(NF T 60-128) 230°C , 2 30°C 2 30°C = 30°C I
Density at 70°C
(NF T 60-101) I I I
< 942 kg/m3 < 942 kg/m3 < 942 kg/m3 < 942 kg/m3 I I
Cone penetrability at 25°C
worked (NF T 60-132)
non-worked (NF T 60-119)
Oil content in weight %
(NF T 60-120)
1 < 350
< 80
< 3.5
1 < 350
<80
2 3.5
1 < 350
<80 I I < 350
<80
Color >3 53
Viscosity at 100°C(or at
congealing temperature +1o"C) < 9 mm2/s < 9 mm2/s 9 IY s 46 9 IY 5 46
Pseudo-viscosity NF T 66-005
Relative density (specific gravity) at 25°C NF T 66-007
Distillation NF T 66-003
Penetrability at 25°C on distillation residue NF T 66-004
Flash point NF T 66-009
There are no specifications, but there are two French standards grouping the
chamcteristics of bitumen and cutbacks.
Characteristics of food-grade white oils
Density at 15°C NF T 60-101, NF T 6M72
Kinematic viscosity NF T 6MOO
Pour point NF T 60-105
Flash point, Cleveland NF EN 22592
Neutralization index NF T W112
Saybolt color NF M 07403
Aromatics UV absorption
(French pharmacopoeia or ASTM D 2269)
Carbonizable material French pharmacopoeia
Evaluation of Crude O i l s
Sami C. Chatila
Crude oils appear as liquids of varying viscosities. Their color can range
from green (crude from Moonie, Australia) t o dark brown (crude from
Chawar, Saudi Arabia). They can have an odor of hydrogen sulfide, turpentine
or simply hydrocarbon.
Their chemical compositions are very complex and depend essentially on
their age, that is, the phase of development of the kerogene, regardless of the
origin of the crude (Speight, 1991) (see Chapter 1).
Knowledge of a crude oil's overall physical and chemical characteristics
will determine what kind of initial treatment -associated gas separation and
stabilization at the field of production - transport, storage, and of course,
price.
A detailed study of the properties of the potential products is of prime
technical and economic importance, because it allows the refiner to have a
choice in selecting feedstocks for his different units for separation,
transformation and conversion, to set their operating conditions, in order to
satisfy the needs of the marketplace in the best ways possible.
During loading and unloading of crude oil tankers, the specific gravity of
the crude is measured t o confirm it meets the specifications for the case
where payment is made on a barrel basis, or when the volume is converted
into weight if the transaction is based on a price per ton (Hayward et al., 1980).
Within the same geographical region, the crude specific gravity varies
from one reservoir to another. In Saudi Arabia, for example, the crude from
the Ghawar field has an average standard specific gravity on the order of
0.850 (34" API) while the specific gravity of the crude from the nearby
Safaniyah field is 0.893 (27" API).
Within the same reservoir, we also observe variations of specific gravity
from one well to another: for example, 0.848 (38.4" APT) and 0.861 (32.8" API)
in the Chawar field.
The specific gravities of crudes fall generally between 0.800 and 1.OOO as
shown in Table 8.1, even though crudes having specific gravities outside this
range exist: 0.787 (48.2' API) for crudes in Barrow South, Alaska, USA and
Santa Rosa, Venezuela and 1.028 (6' API) for the crude from Bradley Canyon,
California, USA.
Generally, the crude oils are classed according to specific gravity in four
main categories:
light crudes sp. gr. d y c 0.825
medium crudes 0.825 < sp. gr. d y < 0.875
heavy crudes 0.875 < sp. gr. d y < 1.000
extra-heavy crudes sp. gr. d15
4
> 1.000
Table 8.1 gives the average specific gravities of some typical crude oils.
1 ?: 1
I
u
Table
Pour points for selected crudes.
8.1.3 Viscosity of Crude Oils
The measurement of a crude oil's viscosity at different temperatures is
particularly important for the calculation of pressure drop in pipelines and
refinery piping systems, as well as for the specification of pumps and
exchangers.
The change in viscosity with temperature is not the same for all crudes.
The viscosity of a paraffinic crude increases rapidly with decreasing
temperature; on the other hand, for the naphthenic crudes, the increase in
viscosity is more gradual.
The viscosity is determined by measuring the time it takes for a crude to
flow through a capillary tube of a given length at a precise temperature. This
is called the kinematic viscosity, expressed in mm2/s. It is defined by the
standards, NF T 60-100 or ASTM D 445. Viscosity can also be determined by
measuring the time it takes for the oil to flow through a calibrated orifice:
standard ASTM D 88.It is expressed in Saybolt seconds (SSU).
Some conversion tables for the different units are used and standardized
(ASTM D 2161).
Certain calibrated orifice instruments (Engler-type) provide viscosity
measurements at temperature lower than pour point. This is possible
because the apparatus agitates the material to the point where large crystals
are prevented from forming; whereas in other methods, the sample pour
point is measured without agitation.
This is, for example, the case for crude from Dahra (Libya) which, with a
pour point of -1"C, gives a viscosity of 2.4"E or 16 mm2/s at O'C, or the crude
from Coulomnes (France) whose viscosity is close to 20"E at 0°C whereas its
pour point is + 12°C.
Table 8.3 gives the viscosity of some crude oils at 20°C.
the Reid vapor pressure being expressed in psi, (pounds per square inch)*.
To reduce these losses, the crude oils are stored in floating roof tanks.
The measurement of vapor pressure is defined by t h e standards
NF M 07-007 and ASTM D 323, flash points by the standards NF M 07-011 and
ASTM D 56. (see Chapter 7).
Table 8.4 gives the vapor pressures and the flash points of some crude
oils.
* For purposes of information one can compare these levels with those of plants (0.1 to
0.4%), mollusks (0.4%) and the human body (0.14%), but the highest levels are
observed in marine algae (13% in Macrocytis pyrifera), and in the tissues of certain
bacteria which can even contain elemental sulfur (25% in Eeg;giotoaAlbea tissues).
(Sicily): 7.8%, which are too high to be able to say with certainty that sulfur
comes only from organic material alone.
c. The Thiols
Of the general formula, R - S - H,where R represents an aliphatic or cyclic
radical, the thiols -also known as mercaptans - are acidic in behavior
owing to their S - H functional group; they are corrosive and malodorous.
Their concentration in crude oils is very low if not zero, but they are created
from other sulfur compounds during refining operations and show up in the
light cuts, as illustrated in Table 8.6.
Table 8.7 gives some of the mercaptans identified in crude oils.
Nature of cut
(temperahue interval, "C)
%mercrrptrrnauUur
I
CH3
Cyclohexanethiol CH2 159 Gasoline
Ck2
I '7H2
CQ2 p 2
CH
I
- Table S-H
d. TheSulRdes
The sulfides are chemically neutral; they can have a linear o r ring
structure. For molecules of equal carbon number, their boiling points are
higher than those of mercaptans; they constitute the majority of sulfur
containing hydrocarbons in the middle distillates (kerosene and gas oil).
Table 8.8 gives some examples of sulfides identified in crude oils.
324 chapter a. EVALWT~ON
OF CWE OILS
e. The Disulfides
These compounds are difficult to separate and, consequently, few have
been identified:
Dimethyl disulfide (2,3 dithiobutane)
CH3 - S - S - CH3
Diethyl disulfide (2.3 dithiohexane)
CH3 - CH, - S - S -CH, - CH,
It is only recently that the more complex substances like trinaphtheno-
diphenyldisulfide have been able to be identified.
-c A H 3
I Gasoline
and
C\s/C\ CH3
Benzothiophene C 219.9 Kerosene
c//\c-c
I II II
c,,c/c,s /c
Dibenzothiophene
@
C
\c - c / C*c 300 cas oil
I II II I
c,,c/c\s /c\c//c
Table
8.9 Thiophene derimtives identified in crude oils.
U8.1 1 Nitrogen and sulhir contents and their N/S mtios in selected crudes.
Table
8.13 Bottom sediments and water content of some crude oils.
t % hydrolyzed
100
80
60
40
20
Figure
8.1 Hydrolysis of chlorides contained in the crude as a function of tempemhne
-
(salt content = 35 ppm wight test dumtion = constant).
Crude oU name Counbydortgin mll KOH/g
Hassi Messaoud Algeria 0
Arabian Light Saudt Arabia 0.07
Nigerlan Nigeria 0.15
Agha Jari Iran 0.22
Bachaquero Venezuela 2.9
A FigUrr
8.2 Distribution oF the acid content as a function of the specific gmviry of
successice distillation hctions.
The majority of acids contained in the diesel cuts are cyclic and come from
cyclopentane or cyclohexane. They are better known as naphthenic acids.
p 3
6
c’ ‘c
CH3
‘c’
c
‘c
I I I I
CLC/C C - C, ,COOH
I CH2
COOH
p. Methylcyclohexane Methyl -
carboxylic acid 3 cyclopentylacetic acid
The presence of these acids in crude oils and petroleum cuts causes
problems for the refiner because they form stable emulsions with caustic
solutions during desalting or in lubricating oil production; very corrosive at
high temperatures (350-400”C), they attack ordinary carbon steel, which
necessitates the use of alloy piping materials.
-
8.2 TBP Crude Oil Distillation Analysis of F’ractions
The TBP (True Boiling Point) distillation gives an almost exact picture of a
crude petroleum by measuring the boiling points of the components making
up the crude; whence its name.
Crude petroleum is fractionated into around fifty cuts having a very
narrow distillation intervals which allows them to be considered as ficticious
pure hydrocarbons whose boiling points are equal to the arithmetic average
of the initial and final boiling points, T, = (Ti+ Tj)/2, the other physical
characteristics being average properties measured for each cut.
The different cuts obtained are collected; their initial and final distillation
temperatures are recorded along with their weights and specific gravities.
Other physical characteristics are measured: for the light fractions octane
number, vapor pressure, molecular weight, PONA, weight per cent sulfur, etc.,
and, for the heavy fractions, the aniline point, specific gravity, viscosity,
sulfur content, and asphaltene content, etc.
The determination of properties for each cut enables curves to be
obtained for yields and properties as well as curves for iso-properties that are
useful in the economic analyses of crude oils.
It is possible t o calculate the properties of wider cuts given the
characteristics of the smaller fractions when these properties are additive in
volume, weight or moles. Only the specific gravity, vapor pressure, sulfur
content, and aromatics content give this advantage. All others, such as
viscosity, flash point, pour point, need to be measured. In this case it is
preferable to proceed with a TBP distillation of the wider cuts that correspond
with those in an actual refinery whose properties have been measured.
The most commonly referenced so-called wide cuts are the following:
Gas c3 - c4
I
70 - 140°C
Heavy gasoline 80- 180°C
100 - 180°C
160 - 260°C
Kerosene
I 180 - 260°C
Gas oil
Residue
Ii 260 - 325°C
260 - 360°C
260 - 370°C
160 - 360'C
T > 325°C
T > 360°C
T > 370°C
All the analytical results are represented as curves that enable easy and
rational utilization.
In certain cases, the curves, T = f (% distilled) or specific gravity =
f ( % distilled) curves show Irregularities in light cuts that are rich in
-
aromatics (Figure 8.3 Saharan Crude). Moving toward the heavy cuts, the
curves become smoother because the number of isomers becomes very large
and their boiling points and specific gravities are very close in value.
Certain curves, T = f ( % distilled), level off at high temperatures due to the
change in pressure and to t h e utilization of ch art s for converting
temperatures under reduced pressure t o equivalent temperatures under
atmospheric pressure.
Currently the charts used most often for this purpose are those published
by the MI. (Maxwell and Bonnel charts) from the Technical Data Book (see
Chapter 4).
1
1oC 1.600
- Figure
) 20 -
Weight per cent
8.3 Initial portion OF the TBP curve OF a Saharan crude oil (Note the
discontinuities due to the presence OF aromatics: benzene B. toluene T,
450
400
370
350
300
250
200
180
250
100
80
50
20
-I
Figure
8.4 TBP distillation of an Arnbian Light crude oil.
The graph gives the yields that the refiner would obtain at the outlet of the
atmospheric distillation unit allowing him to set the unit’s operating
conditions in accordance with the desired production objectives.
-
8.3.1.2 proptw Yidd Curve8
These curves are drawn for all properties having for the ordinate axis an
appropriate scale of the property, and for the abscissa the yield in volume or
weight.
Generally, these curves give the properties of "gasolines" and residues.
In order to draw the property-yield curves for "gasolines", it suffices to
choose the initial point, which could be C, or 20"C, the end point being
variable and situated between the end point of the heaviest gasoline cut
which can be produced (200-220°C) and about 350°C.
In order to draw the property-yield curves for residues, the end point is
set, the initial point is variable and can be as low as 300°C.
It is advisable to provide re-sectioning between these two types of curves
so that the properties of any cut can be deduced.
These curves are given in Figures 8.5 and 8.6 for gasolines, 8.7,8.8, and 8.9
for residues.
Each point corresponding t o t h e ordinate axis is t h e value of t h e
cumulative property of the cut. The C5-EP properties of "gasoline" cuts or
IP-EP properties of "residue" cuts are obtained directly from the curves,
while properties of other c u t s are calculated either directly for t h e
properties that are additive by volume, weight o r moles, o r by using
blending indices.
8.3.1.3 IWmpCrty -8
This type of curve can be utilized for intermediate cuts between 250 and
400°C. They show the value of the property of a cut as a function of its initial
point and its end point.
Unlike the property-yield curves, calculations are not necessary for
determining the properties of a cut.
Figure 8.10 shows the aniline points and the pour points for intermediate
cuts from an Arabian Light crude.
P
3
.5!
*
0
.B
P-
o"
1
I
I I I
Cg+gasoline yield, volume per cent
,8
.6
0.8 .4
0.7 .2
0.6 .o
0.5 8
0.4 6
Debutanued gasoline cuts
fromAmbian Light crude. 0.3 4
Reid Vaporh u m as a
function of C,+ yield,
weight %.
0.2 2
Aromatics content as a Cg+gasoline yield, weight per cent
function of C, + yield
volume %.
10 20 30 40
h
t
v1
N
3
rr)
3
End point,
weight %
40 50 60
Figure
U
8.10 tsepmperty curves forAmbian Light.
Pour point, "Cand Aniline point,
the cut.
O F as a hnction of initial and end points of
P
h)
Bernard Sillion
9.1.IDetergent Additives
A primary class of additives is that of the detergents. We will examine in
turn the role they play in motor fuels and the chemical structures that are
necessary.
9.1.1.1 R ~ l of
c Dctwmt A d d i m (Ranney, 1974)
The first detergents for gasoline were used in order to avoid engine
stalling during start-ups in cold and humid weather. Evaporation of gasoline
in fuel admission systems caused condensation and crystallization of water
on the still cold engine walls during the start-up.
Plugging due to ice, although causing power loss or even motor seizing,
was reversible; however the development of recycled crankcase gas resulted
in irreversible solid organic deposits on the walls of the system, especially in
the carburetor.
The introduction of low quantities of surfactants (SO to 125 ppm) helps
solve these two problems. The surfactant molecule has a lipophilic organic
tail and a polar head that is adsorbed selectively on the metal walls of the
admission system. These products have a double action:
on clean and new systems, they coat the metal wall with an organic layer
that helps prevent crystals of ice and organic deposits from adhering
on systems that have already been contaminated, they dissolve the
organic deposits.
Today the surfactants are required to have an ability to clean hot parts of
the admission system as far as the valve seats.
Concerning detergent additives, the anfi-ORt additives are particularly
noteworthy.
The Octane Requirement Increase, OW,is a phenomenon manifested by
the appearance of knocking and is due t o the increase in engine'octane
demand with time. This phenomenon is correlated with the increase of solid
deposits in the combustion chamber. Although the causes have not been
determined with certainty, some companies have patented additives which
modify the deposits. The effec? is to limit the increase in octane demand (Bert
et al., 1983;Chevron, 1988;Nelson et al., 1989).
a. hpyienedfamfneamfdeo
Cl7HD -CO - NH -(CHZ)~ -NHz
CI+D -CO - NH -(CH2)3 -NH -CO - Cl7HD
b. LkdvatIce8 d p o l ~ 8 o b u t e n8ucclnlc
e anhydride
1. Cationic polymerization
-
I 2. Action of malelc anhydride
0
0 I
2.1 PIB + 0
$
( ene- synthesis p I B 4 '
0
0
Polyisobutenylruccinic anhydride (PBSA)
0
additives for motor fuels and the disuccinimides are dispersant additives
used in lubricating oils.
The third family (c. in Figure 9.1) less widespread, derived from the
alkylphenols, offers as with the succinimides several possibilities of
modification to the ratio of hydrophilic and lipophilic groups. Mannich's
reaction of the alkyl-phenols also provides additives for lubricating oils.
Figure
Chemical Families typical of surfactants that are eFFective in engine
admission systems.
PIB
0
c. lkrluative8 ofpolypmpylphenolrr
Action of mines and formaldehyde (Mannich reaction)
OH + NH + HCHO
I
R2
9.1.2.1 Role of Additives for Improviiy
thcOctaneNumbcr
The octane number is a measure of a fuel's ability to resist auto-ignition
during the compression phase prior to ignition.
Additives function by reacting with hydrocarbon partial oxidation
products by stopping the oxidation chain reaction that would otherwise drive
the combustion.
In relatively small doses (see Chapter 5), additives made it possible for the
refiner to gain several points in octane number and thereby to allow the
premium gasoline to meet specifications.
Cycllc imlnes
R
\
N -CH2 -CH2- CH2 - NH2
R’ -
N alkylpropanediamine
I
CH, - CH, -NH2
- Figure
9.2 Examples of biocide agents used as motor he1 additives.
--
C1,Ha 0 0 Cetylvinylether-vinylpyrrolldonecopolymer
Figurr
9.3 Examples OF antistatic he1 additives.
L
Figure
9.4 Examples of hydrocarbon viscosity improver additives.
0- R 0-R 0-R
R = C, to C,alkyl chain Poiymaleate
Copoiymethacrylate
-
Figure .
9.5 Examples of viscosity additiws containing esters.
R @gR I..-Tjn
Poiyalkyinaphthalene 0-R
(Reaction of a chlorinated Polyalkyimethacrylates
paraffin on naphthalene)
Figure
9.6 Examples of pour point depressants for lubricating oils.
358 MR M o m FUELSAND L w w v r s
cmtc~9. A m w ~
These products have molecular weights between 2000 and 10,000, well
below those of additives improving the viscosity index (100,000). They are
added in very small concentrations (0.01 to 0.3 weight percent) and at these
concentrations they can lower the pour point 30°C.
Figure
9.7 Eramples of antioxidant additiues hi lubricating oils.
Polar medlum
P Hydrophilic part
Oleophilic part
Interface
011
-3
9.8 Principle d surfactantstructures in a lubricating oil.
In the case of lubricant detergents, the hydrophilic or polar part is a
metallic salt (calcium, magnesium) and at the center of the micelle it is
possible to store a reserve of a metal base (lime or magnesia); the detergent
will be able therefore to neutralize the acids produced by oxidation of the oil
as soon as they are created.
The basicity of a detergent is an essential additive characteristic. It is
expressed as Total Basic Number (T.B.N.) (ASTM D 664).
The second detergent function is to prevent formation of varnishes that
come from polymerization of deposits on hot surfaces of the cylinder and the
piston. Finally, by adsorption on metallic surfaces, these compounds have
anticorrosion effects.
In the case of lubricant dispersants, the polar part is organic (amine,
polyamine, heterocyclic nitrogen compounds, polyglycol).
Dispersants are particularly important when engines operate below their
normal operating temperature (as is t h e case of a short urban trip).
Dispersants act by keeping oxidation products in suspension.
Detergent and dispersant additives are used in concentrations between 5
and 15 weight per cent.
a. Lubricant Detergents
The two principal raw material classes used to make detergents are
sulfonic acids and phenols.
Sulfonic acids can come from the sulfonation of oil cuts from white oil
production by sulfuric acid treatment. Sodium salts of alkylaromatic sulfonic
acids are compounds whose aliphatic chains contain around 20 carbon
atoms. The aromatic ring compounds a r e mixtures of benzene and
naphthalene rings.
These sodium sulfonates or so-called natural sulfonates are transformed
into simple or "overbase" calcium or magnesium sulfonates (Satriana, 1982).
The second source of sulfonic acid uses the following reaction scheme:
alkylation of benzene by a propylene oligomer then sulfonation of the
alkylbenzene.
The technique of neutralization and the production of superbase systems
from synthetic sulfonates are similar t o those employed for the natural
sulfonates.
In using the alkylphenols, it is possible to obtain three types of detergents:
the alelphenols themselves transformed as salts of calcium, the alkylphenol-
sulfides conferring antioxidant properties and finally the alkylphenol-sulfides
transformed by action of CO, into alkylsalicylate-sulfides (Figure 9.9).
Calcium alkylsulfonate
O-Ca- 0
J
Figure
9.9 Simplified shuchrres of detergent additives for lubricating oils.
b. Lubricant Dispersants
The organophilic part of commercial dispersants is obtained by cationic
oligomerization of isobutylene.
The polyisobutylenes (PIB) having molecular weights ranging from loo0 to
2000 are substituted by maleic anhydride, and the polyisobutylene succinic
anhydride (PIBSA) formed is neutralized by a polyethylene-polyamine as
indicated in Figure 9.10.
Figure.
9.10 Struchms of commercial detergent additives for lubricating oils.
0- R z
/ 'ZH5
Z = - NH- CH2- CH, -N
' C2H5
Diethylaminoethyle
= c = O Pyrrolidone
= F'yt-idine
I
Figure
9.1 1 Ewamples of polymethactylate dispetaants.
/ \
RZ - 0 s-x X = H. 112 Zn
Figure
9-12 Examples of dithiophosphoric derivatives used as anti-wear and exheme
pressure additives.
9.3.6 Conclusion
The increase in the oilchange interval has already been a strong incentive
for improving lubricant formulations. The increase in engine operating
temperatures and the development of catalytic converters are without doubt
two orientations that will have consequences on lubricant additives.
Reducing ash content and increasing anti-oxidant and dispersant
efficiencies are among the goals needed to improve the quality of future
lubricants.
0
Introduction to Refining
Owing to its flexibility, the refining industry is able to meet the changes in
demand and quality:
Early 1970's: simple refinery (motor fuels, heavy fuels)
End of the 1980's: first stage in the introduction of heavy ends' conversion
For the long term, 2010-2020: refinery complex meeting environmental
regulations and ensuring total conversion of the heavy ends
To adapt to this trend, refining calls on a great variety of processes. The
most important are as follows:
Separation Processes that split a feed into simpler or narrower fractions.
Conversion Processes that generate new molecules having properties
adapted to the product's end use.
Finishing Processes that eliminate (most often by hydrogenation)
undesirable compounds.
Environmental Protection Processes that treat the refinery gases (fuel
and tail gas), stack gas, and water effluents.
10.2 Separation Processes
The main separation processes are:
distillation
absorption
extraction
crystallization
adsorption.
The foremost separation process is crude distillation and in second place,
if deeper conversion is envisaged, solvent extraction (deasphalting).
+ Middle distillate
Secondary
distillation _I) Heavy distillate 1 VD
-
h
Deasphalting
A
- hasphalted oil
4 Asphalt
DAO
- Figure
’
Table 10.3 provides, for a typical crude, the yields and average properties
of the various cuts obtained from a conventional distillation operation.
U10.3 Material balance and properties of the main Fractions resulting hvm primary
and secondary Fractionation of a 50/50 volume % mixture of Ambian Light
and heavy cmde oil (specific graviry di5 = 0.875).
the solvent used increases. The use of heavy solvent results in hard asphalt
being produced whose ultimate utilization is combustion in power plants, or
partial oxidation (production of city gas, hydrogen, methanol, etc.).
Table 10.4 gives the yields and product properties resulting from the
deasphalting of a typical crude, depending on the solvent used. Figure 10.1
shows the position of the deasphalting unit in the refining flowsheet.
solvent Butane Pentane Heavy Arabian
propane VR feed 538"C+
Deasphalted oil
Yield, wt. % 32 50 66 -
Density 0.945 0.963 0.985 1.048
Sulfur, wt. % 3.8 4.45 4.9 5.78
Nitrogen, ppm 1000 2000 2100 3500
Ni + V, ppm 6 24 67 290
Conr. Carb.,wt. % 2.3 5.2 11 23
C7 Insol., wt. % < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 12.6
Visc. at 100% m d / s 60 100 250 4500
mmt
Yield, wt. % 68 50 34
Density 1.105 1.15 1.197
Sulfur, wt. % 6.71 7.1 1 7.5
Nitrogen, wt. % 0.47 0.50 0.62
Ni + V, ppm 422 556 720
Softening Pt, "C 60 110 150
Visc. at 300°C mm2/s - 40 500
Visc. at 200°C mm2/s 50 - 6.104
jxKp---
U10.4 Effectof the solvent on the yields and product properties resulting h m a
deasphalting opemtion.
nC4 2.50 I
c5+ I
85.50 98.0
b. Isomerization
As a complementary process to reforming, isomerization converts normal
paraffins to iso-parafflns, either to prepare streams for other conversions:
nC4 --+iC4 destined for alkylation; or to increase the motor and research
octane numbers of light components in the gasoline pool, i.e., the C5 or c 5 4 6
fractions from primary distillation of the crude, o r light gasoline from
conversion processes, having low octane numbers.
Ultimate products are the iso-paraffins: isopentane and the c6 isomers,
mainly 22 and 23 dimethylbutane.
Isomerization can be done in a single pass o r with recycle of t h e
unconverted fraction.
Figure 10.2 shows the locations of reforming and isomerization units in
refinery configurations.
LPG
Fuel gas
Isomerate
Reformate
Hydrogen
Iu- -. I
II
a. Alkylation
Alkylation is a process that produces high octane number (RON and MON)
components from light olefins (C3=, C4=, C5=) by addition of isobutane.
The highly exothermic reaction is catalyzed by strong acids: sulfuric,
hydrofluoric.
The feedstock usually comes from catalytic cracking, sometimes from
steam cracking. The reaction products are c7-c8 isoparaffins. The by-
products are the C 3 4 4 n-paraffins which do not react.
Table 10.6 gives yields and properties of alkylate for a typical feedstock.
Compound
c3-
iC4
FeedstocL,
weight %
0.80
39.98
Autyl.te,
weight %
-
0.04
mc,
weight %
0.40
-
weieht
ASTMD86,OC
I Sp.gr.d',5 0.710 I IP I 32
RON 97.6 10 vol. % 72
MON 94.4 30 vol. % 100
I RW bar I 0.4 I 50 vol. % 106
70 vol. % 110
EP 198
I I 10.6 npical feedstock, yields and product properties from an alkylation unit.
Performance:
hbutene convendon to MTBE 96 to 98%
to ETBE 92 to 95%
Table
10.7
I
0.55
I 0.4
I
I
Cs Olefins
c. Synthesis of Ethers h o r n
TAME (Tertiary amylmethylether)
One can react methanol with the tertiary olefins having five carbon atoms
(isoamylenes). This process increases the octane number of FCC olefinic C5
fractions, in order to reduce the concentration of olefins and to increase
gasoline production.
Table 10.8 shows a typical feedstock composition and the average
properties of crude or pure TAME.
This process can also be associated with an alkylation process.
PERFORMANCE
Conversion of boamylenes to TAME: 70%
Propertla of crude mixture of TAME
+ residual Cs cut at 4%methanol
Sp. gr. di5 0.69
RVP,bar 0.9
RON clear 94-94s
MON clear 84-84.5
Properties of pure TAME
Sp. gr. d y 0.75
Boiling point, 'C 86.3
u
~~
92
Net heating value, M/kg
RON
36,575
115
MON clear 82.5
4 MON 102
Blending RVP, bar 0.1
Figure 10.3 shows the position of MTBE, ETBE, TAME and alkylation units
in a refining flowsheet with the objective of upgrading light olefins originating
from catalytic cracking. Sweetening and selective hydrogenation will be seen
in 10.3.3.2.
d. Ollgomerization @imerization)
In refining, t h e oligomerization process produces gasoline from C3
fractions containing approximately 75% propylene or fuel-gas containing
ethylene and propylene.
This process thus enables gasoline production to be increased if the
propylene can not be used for petrochemical manufacture. It recovers
ethylene economically from fuel-gas.
Feedstocks come mainly from catalytic cracking. The catalyst system is
sensitive to contaminants such as dienes and acetylenes or polar compounds
such as water, oxygenates, basic nitrogen, organic sulfur, and chlorinated
compounds, which usually require upstream treatment.
Table 10.9 provides some general data concerning this process.
Table 10.10 is a n evaluation of t h e improvement resulting from t h e
addition of alkylate and ethers to an FCC gasoline. ,
I Feedstocks
I I
Cryogenic recovery
before oligomerization
Ethylene
Propylene
Convemion, wt. %
-
I 95%
100%
Ethylene 99
Propylene 90-95 95
PrOdUCtS Dimer 71% c5+ 83.7%
LPG (C3> 29% LPG 16.3%
I - Table
RVP, bar
I 0.48
I 0.4
I
0 MTBE
H,
FH2H-P
or ETBE
1
Selective Alkylate
Debutanizer
nation
Non-extractive @
sweetening - Depentanizer
Cetane number 42
Ash, wt. % 0.25
Carbone Conr., wt. % 28
Ni + V,ppm 350
Stability (ASTM D 1661) 1 2
7
Table
10.11 Typical composition of a visbreaking feedstock.
Performance and product properties.
Primary
distillation
Gas + LPG
Gasoline
Visbreaking
Gas oil
AR Industrial fuel oil
VR
- Visbreaking
10.4 Refining flowchart with two visbreaking units, one for atmospheric residue,
the other for vacuum residue.
b. Coking
The coking process produces electrode quality coke from vacuum residues
of good quality (low metal and sulfur contents) or coke for fuel in the case of
heavy crude or vacuum residue conversion having high impurity levels.
Available processes are:
delayed coking to produce either electrode quality coke, or coke for fuel
fluid coking producing only t h e coke destined for combustion o r
gasification (Cavanaugh et al., 1978).
Liquid products from coking are very unstable (high diene contents), very
olefinic, and highly contaminated by sulfur and nitrogen. The production of
gas is considerable.
Liquid products must undergo hydrogen processing before joining
equivalent crude oil fractions and continuing the normal process property
improvement steps.
Table 10.12 contains some general data on coking processes and the
resulting products.
Figure 10.5 indicates the position of a coking unit in a refining flowsheet.
Delayed I Fluid
I -
H9S I 1.1 I 0.7 1
Cl'c4 11.1 11.6
Light gasoline 4.3 3.7
Heavy gasoline 6.1 5.0
Diesel oil 32.4 21.5
VD 12.0 29.7
Coke 33.0 27.8
Total 100.0 100.0
Net coke 33.0 20.0
Sulfur wt. % 3.7 4. I
a coking feedstock.
Yields and product properties.
Atmospheric Secondary
residuetdistillation '
A b Middle and
AR
heavy
distillates
b Refinery
fuel gas
b LFG
Vacuum
residue Gasoline to
VR Hydrotreatment +orisomerization
I reforming
I
pretreater
- Coking -
Hydrotreatment +Gas oil
Coke
Figure
10.5 Refinery flowchart with a coking unit.
c. Steam Cmcking
Properly speaking, steam cracking is not a refining process. A key
petrochemical process, it has the purpose of producing ethylene, propylene,
butadiene, butenes and aromatics (BTX) mainly from light fractions of crude
oil (LPG, naphthas), but also from heavy fractions hydrotreated or not
(paraffinic vacuum distillates, residue from hydrocracking HDC).
The conversion takes place at high temperature (820-850"C) and very
short residence time (hundredth of seconds) in the presence of steam. The
by-products are hydrogen, methane and a highly aromatic residual fuel-oil.
Table 10.13 provides some characteristic data relative t o the steam
cracking process.
*
48’640 + 4737s - 4568
BMCl= - (Smith, 1940)
VABP
where VABP = Volume average boiling point [K] (see Chapter 3)
S = Standard specific gravity (see Chapter 4)
The basic conversion produces essentially carbon monoxide (CO) and
hydrogen.
Variations of the process enable production of the following:
high purity hydrogen
methanol, ammonia
methane or low heating value gas.
Table 10.14 provides some essential information concerning t h e
production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of a VR. By-products are carbon
dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.
LPG
Sp. gr. di5 0.563 0.563 0.563
RSH, ppm 275 35 70
COS, ppm 5 5 5
Total sulfur, ppm 400 50 100
Gasoline
Sp. gr. d y 0.763 0.752 0.750
Sulfur, wt. % 0.13 0.004 0.010
of which RSH, ppm 350 10 25
RON clear 93.2 92.9 93.9
MON clear 80.4 80.1 81.0
RVP, bar 0.33 0.35 0.35
P, wt. % 26 28 27
0, wt. % 40 41 43
N, wt. % 5 5 5
Awt. % 29 26 25
KO
Sp. gr. d: 0.961 0.942 0.941
Sulfur, wt. % 3.08 0.16 0.33
Nitrogen, ppm 350 100 350
1 Table 1
vpical Fcc feedstockcomposition.
Yields and product properties (to be continued).
Products properties VD VD Atm. residue
hydrotreated hydrotreated
LCO
Cetane number 18.3 23.3 23.3
Visc. at lWC, m d / s 1.22 1.14 1.14
Visc. at 50% mm2/s 2.79 2.53 2.53
Cloud point, 'C -11 -9 -9
Sluny
Sp. gr. di5 1.096 1.067 1.067
Sulfur, wt. % 5.16 0.26 0.6
Visc. at lWC, mm2/s 9.2 8.3 17.2
Conr. carb., wt. %
Catalyst content, ppm
- Table
I-.
11.2
= 1000
10,4
lo00 - 16
lo00
Figure 10.6 shows the position of an FCC and its related units in a refining
flowsheet.
n Stack
Electrostatic precipitation
(finesseparation)
~ .~
r
Vacuum
distillate
VD
Residue
VR
FCC
I '
-
&-
-
Sweetening
Sweetening
Gasoline
*L c o
b Slurry
Figure
10.6 Catalytic cracking complex.
Figure 10.7 presents the case of an FCC feedstock comprising a mixture of
vacuum distillate and light atmospheric residue, and the case of an FCC
feedstock composed of vacuum distillate and DAO, as well as the constraints
of such configurations.
*.*.......
t +LPG
-VD +
FCC
Gasoline
AR
-
~ Vacuum 7.
' :
I
1 I-1.11.
:--..'
I.
distillation I .
'----% HDS
'-- --+-- - ' Slurry
LCO
H2 -------*
Stack gas
Feed: vacuum distillate
and deasphalted oil
. LPG
Gasoline
A
v
Slurry
Asphalt
CNde_ , Atmospheric
r Stack gas
distillation
A
Gas
Crude Atmospheric
distillation Stack gas
RCC
---+ Gasoline
Vacuum
-
distillation -VD LCO
JI
- Figure L
10.8 FCC (RCC) unit treating either an AR or a mixtun? OF VDAR.
390 mpw 10. Immrnt76qw
'Fde Atmospheric
HzS 4- gas
r
distillation
A Gasoline
LPG
Gasoline
"4-fl distillation H
; 5p Slurry
LPG
Gasoline
VR
- Figure
10.9 Fcc (RCC) unit preceded by a desulhrization unit.
b. Steam Reforming
Steam reforming is, along with catalytic reforming, a process that can
produce the additional hydrogen needed for upgrading and converting the
heavy fractions of crude oil.
Feedstocks are natural gas, refinery fuel gas, LPG and paraffinic naphthas.
After elimination of CO2, the last traces of contaminants are converted to
methane (methanation) or eliminated by adsorption on molecular sieves @A
process).
The reactions take place at high temperature in the presence of catalyst
and steam.
The hydrogen product obtained has a purity between 97 and 99.9
volume %. The balance is methane, and the by-product of the process is C02.
c. Hydroconversion
Among hydroconversion processes we will distinguish
processes that transform vacuum distillates partially or totally into
lighter products:
- hydrocracking, total or partial
- hydrorefining
limited conversion processes for atmospheric and vacuum residues that
prepare feedstocks for more elaborate conversions, e.g., catalytic
cracking, coking (Mariette et al., 1988).
In two stages with recycle to the second stage, the conversion per pass
is approximately 50 wt. % and t h e selectivity t o middle distillates is
maximal: 75 to 80 wt. %. However, the investment is clearly higher and is
justified only when feedstocks are difficult to convert and that their content
in nitrogen is high. Figure 10.11 r e p r e s e n t s two variants of t h e
hydrocracking process.
The hydrocracking process is characterized by a very low gas production
and a low LPC yield especially when operated for maximum distillates. By-
products in this operating mode are:
light gasoline of excellent quality: RON 78 to 81
heavy gasoline, a very good feedstock for catalytic reforming.
With regard to the unconverted residue, the V1 after dewaxing is 120 to 135
and the BMCI is between 10 and 15, which makes it an excellent feed for
steam cracking units.
Table 10.16 gives a typical feedstock composition, as well as yields and
product properties.
AD V X J I U ~ VD R&ing
i
Cracking
+Gasoline
distillation __+ section section + --.) Kerosene
a
I
a
I
t
+Gasoil
I
I
I
VR I
-t
Gasoline
AR Vacuum VD Refining +
II).distillation cracking Kerosene
section A
Gas oil
VR
-.--*- * pw3
Cracking +
section
1 I
10.1 1
r'pre
Refinery flowchart with a hydmmcking unit
394 chspter 10. Inmrowcm m REF~WW;
Ught ganoline
2- I
TBP cut, 'C c5-85 C5-85 C5-85
Sp. gr. d y 0.667 0.665 0.668
Sulfur, ppm <1 <1 <1
Nitrogen, ppm c 1 <1 <1
RON 80 80 80
MON 78 78 78
P/N/A, vol. % 7812111 79/20/1 7712112
1-Gi-l
Typical feedstock composition, yields and product properties for a
hydmmcking unit (to be continued).
chpw 10. InmKxxlcm m R m f f i 395
M U C t S
Properties
Heavy gasoline
TBP cut, "C 85-132 85-150 15-132 85-150 85-132 85-150
Sp. gr. di5 0.742 0.751 0.740 0.749 0.744 0.755
Sulfur, ppm <1 <1 <1
Nitrogen, ppm <1 <1 <1
PJNJA, vol. %. 45J50J5 40J55J5 16J48J6 42J52J6 44J5QJ6 39J55J6
Kerosene
TBP cut, "C 132-260 150-260 32-260 150-260 132-260 150-260
Sp. gr. d y 0.798 0.803 0.795 0.801 0.800 0.807
Sulfur, ppm < 20 < 20 < 20
Smoke point, mm 30 29 31 30 29 27
Pour point, "C < -60 < -60 < -60
Flash point, "C 240 > 55 240 >55 240 >55
Aromatics, wt. % 10 11 6 7 12 13
Diesel oil
TBP cut, "C 260-380 260380 26&380
Sp. gr. di5 0.820 0.820 0.825
Sulfur, ppm < 20 < 20 < 20
Nitrogen, ppm <2 <2 <2
Cloud point, "C -6 -3 -6
Pour point, "C - 12 -9 - 12
Cetane number 65 65 62
Coronene, ppm 5 20
Pyrene, ppm 300
Ovalene. ppm <1
Aromatic carbons
by NMR,wt. % c 1
2
Table
10.16 Typical feedstock composition, yields and product properties For a
hydmmcking unit (continued and end).
Vacuum distillate Deasphalted oil
F~dStOCkS
0 mo)
Sp. gr. di5 0.926 0.925
Visc. at 50°C mmz/s 46.1 884
Visc. at l W C ,mmz/s 8.4 41.6
Sulfur, wt. % 2.6 2.0
Nitrogen, ppm 1500 650
Conr. carb., wt. % 0.3 1.5
C7 insol., ppm 100 200
IP 310 463
50 vol. % 451 586
EP 580 -
Yield8 vD1 vD2 DAO
HzS + NH3 2.9 2.9 2.2
CI-CI 1.3 2.5 1.7
Light gasoline 4.4 8.3 5.0
Heavy gasoline 7.5 12.4 8.2
Kerosene 21.5 34.0 24.3
Diesel oil I 25.6 I 24.3 I 19.4 I
Lubricant base 39.0 18.0 41.0
--
TOW 102.2 102.4 101.8
Table
10.17 Typical feedstock composition, yields and product properties for a
hydmrefiniw unit (to be continued).
VDl VD2 DAO
Light gasoline
Sp. gr. di5 0.670 0.669 0.665
Sulfur, ppm < 10 < 10 < 10
RON 79 80 80
PfNfA, wt. % 65131I4 7012713 79119f2
Heavy geeoline
Sp. gr. di5 0.742 0.740 0.745
Sulfur, ppm < 10 <5 < 10
PfNfA, wt. % 24166110 2916417 35/6114
Kerosene
Sp. gr. di5 0.811 0.798 0.796
Sulfur, ppm < 10 <5 < 10
Smoke point, mm 25 27 29
Aromatics, wt. % 12 10 6
Diesel oil
Sp. gr. di5 0.842 0.823 0.820
Sulfur, ppm < 10 <5 < 10
Aromatics (M.S.), wt. % 5 3 2
Cetane number 61 63 64
I 380°C+oily residue I
Yield after dewaxing, wt. % 30 13.5 30.8
Sp. gr. di5 0.854 0.833 0.866
Visc. at 100°C, mmzfs 5.5 4.5 13.8
Viscosity index (V.I.) 119 127 112
- 18 - 18 - 18
1 E1
Pour point, "C
Noack volatility, % < 20 < 20
Figures 10.12 and 10.13 show, respectively, a flow diagram for lubricant oil
production by hydrorefining and an integrated lubricating oil production unit
using both extraction and hydrorefining.
D, 1_1) Gasoline
’ Vacuum
distillation , D2 b Hydrorefining Kerosene
1_1) Gasoil
90-100
High
v1
bases
105-125
3. Mild Hydrocracking
Mild hydrocracking prepares the feedstock for catalytic cracking or for the
conventional lubricant production scheme.
The feedstocks can be vacuum distillate and deasphalted oils (DAO).
Conversion is approximately 15-20% in the HDS mode and 2535% in the
hydrocracking mode.
Table 10.18 presents some useful data on the mild hydrocracking process
and resulting products.
538+
< I
Sp. gr. dt5 0.935 0.985
I Viscosity at ~ O O O C mm2/s 1 I
~~~~
, 10 250 I
I Conr. Carb., wt. % I 1.2 I 11 I
I < 0.02 I < 0.05 I
Yields, weight % HDS HDC HDS
H2S + NH3 2.90 3.00 5.23
Cl'c4 1.10 1 .50 1.20
Light gasoline 0.35 0.80 0.40
Heavy gasoline 0.75 1.60 0.90
Diesel oil 15.00 25.60 12.00
375+residue 80.70 68.45 81.92
Total 100.80 100.95 101.65
Diesel oil
Sp. gr. d y 0.865 0.860 0.860
Sulfur, ppm 300 200 400
Cetane number 42 43 43
Figure 10.14 gives the position of this process in the refinery flowscheme.
ARDS signifies hydroconversion of atmospheric residue
VRDS signifies hydroconversion of vacuum residue.
treatment
Gasoline
=AR
Hydroconversion r b Gasoil
-
rorVR
L
11-11... 1-m-m-
Vacuum distillate
A t
b ARorVR
Water treatment 1
+ H,S + NH, to Claw plant
Water to biotreatment
- Figure
10.14 Residue hydmonuersion flowhart.
Chemical H2
consumption, wt. % 0.40 0.50 1.35
~~~
For gas oil from catalytic cracking (LCO), reducing the aromatics content
to 20 wt. % results in a chemical hydrogen consumption of 3.4 wt % and a
cetane number of 40.
Claw Process
The Claus process converts the H2S to sulfur by controlled combustion of
the acid gas and Claus reaction on a catalyst.
The sulfur vapor is condensed and recovered in the liquid or solid form.
Yields are from 90 to 97%.
Tail gas containing traces of S02, H2S, COS and CS2 are usually sent to a
finishing processing before being incinerated.
The overall yield of the operation is 99.5 to 99.8 wt % depending on the
type of finishing process employed.
m treatment
z Sulfur
A
+Desalting
1 b Wastewater to biotreatment
- Figure'
10.15 Treatingstackgases and waste water.
Sweetening
I w
Kerosene
Primary
distillation
Hydrotreatment
Zrude
Diesel fuel/
home heating oil
+
- Figure
10.16 Refining flowchartin the period 1950-1970.
10.4.2 The Refining Flow Diagram of the 19808
Following the energy crisis of the 1970s, the introduction of catalytic
cracking and visbreaking allowed refiners to ‘meet the growing demand for
gasoline and distillates while minimizing crude oil imports and reducing
industrial fuel-oil production. The demand for the latter is decreasing because
it is being superseded by other energy sources such as nuclear and coal.
During the 1970s, the following units were added:
secondary, or vacuum, distillation
catalytic cracking
visbreaking.
Residual fueldl represented more than 20 to 25% of the crude and the
content in pollutants (sulfur, nitrogen, metals) increased.
This flowsheet can not meet newly required environmental regulations:
elimination of lead in gasoline
lowering the sulfur content in diesel and domestic heating oil
reduction of SO, emissions.
Figure 10.17 presents a refinery flow diagram of the 1980s.
A Propane
LPG
I A I, Butane
A' Pretreatment
Primary
distillation
I
Y
' :
' II
Gasoline
Kerosene
Diesel
Crude fuel/
A
- I -
A -
* distillation
secondarv
-
4
Visbreaking
I V V , Fueloil
F Gasoline
b Kerosene
Primary
distillatioi Diesel
Crude fuel/
b home
heating
oil
Y
Secondary
-
distillation
I I I I I
I 1 1
I v v b Fuel oil
Refiningflowchatiofthe 1990s.
10.4.4 The Refining Configuration
Beyond the Year 2OOO
(Heinrich et al., 1991) (Convers et al., 1992)
Refining after year 2000 will be characterized by heavy residue conversion
and the reduction in aromatics content.
Heavy residue conversion is linked to the demand for high quality diesel
motor fuel (aromatics content s lo%,cetane number a 55) as well as to the
demand for production of light fuel-oil having very low sulfur, nitrogen and
metal contents.
Hydrocracking is a major process for the production of diesel motor fuel;
catalytic cracking is its counterpart for the gasoline production.
The question then lies in the selection of more appropriate feedstocks for
these two processes. The cost of hydrocracking leads to selecting feedstocks
that are the easiest t o convert; as for catalytic cracking, its flexibility and
extensive capabilities lead to selection of heavier feedstocks.
These respective choices are dictated by our current knowledge, the state
of the art in research and the projection of specifications in the future.
The needs for hydrogen being considerably accentuated, the introduction
of partial oxidation of at least a part of the ultimate residues is foreseen, in
spite of its high cost.
Intermediate feedstock preparation processes such as direct
hydroconversion of vacuum residues, solvent deasphalting, improved coking
will also make their appearance.
Furthermore, the major problem of reducing aromatics is focused around
gasoline production. Catalytic reforming could decrease in capacity and
severity. Catalytic cracking will have to be oriented towards light olefins
production. Etherification, alkylation and oligomerization units will undergo
capacity increases.
New processes such as isomerization and t h e dehydrogenation of
n-butane will make their appearance.
Figure 10.19 shows one of the possible configurations for a refinery of the
year 2000.
The refining configuration for the future and its evolution are largely
dependent on the cost of crude oil; t h e increase in demand for white
products; the shrinking market for fuel-oil; gasoline: diesel motor fuel ratio;
final product specifications; and the margin that the refiner can expect, taking
into account the enormous investments he must agree to make.
Table 10.22 indicates the historical trend in refining costs over the years.
2
h)
b Gasoline
b Kerosene
Diesel
b fuel/
home
heating
oil
LOW
sulfur
b or
Oxygen -+I oxidation 1 I
r
refinery
fuel
Symbols
A degrees API -
A absorbance -
A Angstrom (10-10 m)
r, R radius
S entropy, molar entropy
S weight % sulfur
S standard specific gravity, d 60°F
60"F
T temperature
T transmittance
t time
U internal energy, molar internal energy
V potential
V volume
V molar volume
W weight content
X mole fraction in liquid phase
x, Y, 2 Cartesian coordinates
Y mole fraction in vapor phase
Z atomic number
z compressibility factor
z mole fraction in feed
z Rackett's parameter (see Ru index)
Y activity coefficient
6 solubility parameter
h electrical conductivity
h thermal conductivity
CL reduced mass = (m1.m2)/(rnl+ rn2)
CL dynamic or absolute viscosity
CL prefix for micro
V kinematic viscosity
V frequency
-
V wave number
rr vapor pressure bar, Pa
P density kg/m3
u interfacial tension N/m
9 equivalence ratio (fuel mixture) -
4 fugacity coefficient
w acentric factor
Indices
A relative to component A
A aromatic
b bubble, at the boiling point
B relative to component B
C critical, pseudocritical
e estimated
e relative to the flash point
e effective
f relative to a petroleum fraction
f formation
f fusion
g gas
gP ideal gas
h hydrates
H hydrogen
HC hydrocarbon
i initial
i relating to a component i
i relating to a component j # i
1 liquid
m mixture
m molar
m mass
N naphthenic
n degree of polymerization
P relative to pressure (partial or total), at constant pressure
P paraffinic
r reaction
R in rings (carbon)
Ra Rackett
ref reference
r reduced
s at saturation pressure
S solid
T at temperature T
T at the triple point
V vapor, vaporization
V volume
W weight, mass
4 water at 4°C
15 at 15°C
298 at 298 K
100 at 100°F
210 at 210°F
-
v for the wave number defined (see symbol V )
+ higher than, in the case of a hydrocarbon chain (e.g., C,+ signifying
all hydrocarbons having 5 or more carbon atoms)
Superscripts
3.1416
product operator
summation operator
difference operator
differential operator
partial differential operator
integral operator
exponential
division sign
multiplication sign
logarithm base 10, common logarithm
Naperian logarithm, natural logarithm
belongs to
about equal to
proportional to
equal to or less than
equal to or greater than
different from or unequal to
equal
plus
minus
atmosphere (1 atm = 101,325 Pa)
absolute (pressure)
relative (pressure)
The series "Petroleum Refining" will comprise five volumes covering the
following aspects of the petroleum refining industry:
Crude oil. Petroleum products. Process flowsheets.
Separation processes.
Conversion processes.
Materials and equipment.
Refinery operations and management.
The series is designed for the engineers and technicians who will be
operating the refineries at the beginning of the next century. By that time,
solutions will necessarily have been found for a number of problems:
increasingly s e v e r e p r o d u c t specifications a n d , m o r e especially,
environmental protection. The series will provide those in t h e refining
industry with the essentials of petroleum refining as well as information on
the special technologies they will be using.
A group of eminent specialists was placed in charge of writing the series,
with those involved being listed at the beginning of each relevant volume. We
would like t o thank all of them for their dynamic and even enthusiastic
approach to this project.
The series is the long-awaited revision of the two-volume "Le pCtrole.
Raffinage et CCnie Chimique" that was first published in 1965 under the
direction of Pierre Wuithier. Revision of the original work, which was a highly
successful publication, had been under consideration for several years.
Jacqueline Funck, then Director of Information and Documentation at the
Institut FmnCais du PChole, was instrumental in this endeavor.
In 1990, at t h e request of t h e Director of t h e Center for Refining,
Petrochemistry and Engineering at the &ole Nationale Su@tieure du P&mleet
des Moteurs, the late Jean Durandet initiated the conceptual foundations for
the new series that he was unable t o complete. We would like to pay a tribute
t o him here.
Jean-Pierre Wauquier has accepted t o take over for us as editor of the first
two volumes. Pierre Leprince, followed by other well known figures will then
carry on and complete this comprehensive series.
Michel VERWAERDE
Director of Publications
lnstitut Francais du Petrole
References
Abbott, M.M., T.G. Kaufmann and L. Domash (1971), "A correlation for
predicting liquid viscosities of petroleum fractions". Can. J. Chem. Eng.,
VOl. 49,p. 379.
Anon. (1983), "Assessment of t h e energy balances a n d economic
consequences of the reduction and elimination of lead in gasoline". Working
Group ERGA (Evolutions of Regulations, Global Approach). CONCA WE,
La Haye.
Anon. (1983), Handbook of aviation fuel properties. Coordinating Research
Council, report No. 530,Atlanta, CA.Distributed by SAE,Inc., Warrendale, PA.
Bauer, C.R. and J.F. Middleton (1953), "Enthalpy of petroleum fractions".
Petroleum Refiner, Vol. 1, p. 1 1 1.
Benson, J.D. et al. (1991), "Effects of gasoline sulfur level on mass exhaust
emissions". SAE paper No. 91-2323,International Fuels and lubricants meeting,
Toronto, Ontario.
Bert, J.A., J.A. Gething, T.J. Hansel, H.K. Newhall, R.J. Peyla and D.A. Voss
(1983), "A gasoline additive concentrate removes combustion chamber
deposits and reduces vehicle octane requirement". SAE paper No. 83-1709,
Fuels and Lubricants meeting, San Francisco, CA.
Biedermann, J.M., J.-P. PCries and J. Bousquet (1987), "SOLVAHLB: an
attractive way t o provide conversion units with high quality feedstocks".
National Petroleum Refiners Association (NPRA) paper No. AM-87-41, Annual
meeting, San Antonio, TX.
Billon, A., J. Bousquet and J. Rossarie (1988), "HYVAHLB F and T processes
for high conversion and d e e p refining of residues". National Petroleum
Refiners Association (NPRA) paper No. AM-88-62,Annual meeting, San Antonio,
TX.
Bouquet, M. and A. Bailleul(1986), "Routine method for quantitative carbon
13 NMR spectra editing and providing structural patterns. Application t o
every kind of petroleum fraction including residues and asphaltenes". Fuel,
Vol. 65, p. 1240.
Brandes, G. "Die Strukturgruppenanalyse von Erdiilfraktionen mit Hilfe der
ultrarot spektroskopie". BrennstoffChemie, Vol. 37, No. 17-18, p. 263.
Brandes, G. (1958), "Die Strukturgruppenanalyse von Erdiilfraktionen". Erdol
und Kohle, 11 Jahr, Vol. 10, p. 700.
Briant, J., J. Denis and G. Parc (1985), hpri&t&srht?ologigues des lubrifiants.
Editions Technip, Paris.
Bromley, L.A. and C.R. Wilke (1951), "Viscosity behavior of gases". Ind. Eng.
Chem., Vol. 43, No. 7, p. 1641.
Brown, J.K. and W.R. Ladner Jr (1960), "Distribution in coallike materials by
high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy". Fuel, Vol. 39, p. 87.
Burdett, R.A., L.W. Taylor and L.C. Jones Jr (1955). "Determination of
aromatic hydrocarbons in lubricating oil fractions by far UV absorption
spectroscopy", p. 30. In Molecular Spectroscopy Report Conf Institute of
Petroleum, London.
Burns V.R., M.C. ingham and H.M. Doherty (1992), Auto/Oil air guality
improvement research pmgram. Special.publication 920, SAE, Inc., Warrendale,
PA, p. 468.
Cavanaugh, T.A., D.E. Blaser and R.A. Busch (1978), "Fluid coking/Flexi-
coking, a flexible process for upgrading heavy crudes". Japanese Petroleum
Institute (JPI) Conference,Tokyo.
Chevron (1988), US Pat. 4 753 611.
Clark, G.H. (1988), Industrial and marine Fuels. Butterworths, London.
Convers, A. and M. Valais (1992), World refining trends and prospects.
Publications of Indian Institute of Petroleum, Dehra Dun.
Coley, T.R. (1989). "Diesel fuel additives influencing flow and storage
properties". In Gasoline and diesel Fuel additives (Owen, K. Ed.). John Wiley.
Cox, F.W. (1979). Physical properties o f gasoline-alcohol blends. US
Department of Energy, Bartlesville, OK.
Damin, B., A. Faure, J. Denis, B. Sillion, P. Claudy and J.M. LetoffC (1986),
"New additives for diesel fuels: cloud point depressents". SAE paper
No. 86-1527, International fuels and lubricants meeting and exposition,
Philadelphia, PA.
David, P., (3.1. Brown and E.W. Lehman (1993), "SFPP - A new laboratory test
for assessment of low temperature operability of modern diesel fuels". CEC
4th International Symposium, Birmingham.
Dean, D.E. and L.I. Stiel (1965). "The viscosity of nonpolar gas mixtures at
moderate and high pressures". AIChU, Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 526.
Descales, B., D. Lambert and A. Martens (1989), "DCtermination d e s
nombres d'octane RON et MON des essences par la technique proche
infrarouge". Pe'trole et Techniques (Revue de 1'Association Francaise des
Techniciens du Pe'trole),'No. 349.
Devos, A., C. Heinrich, P. Truffinet and F. Villette (1990), "La longue route
vers la conversion profonde". P&trole et Techniques (Revue de 1!Association
FranCaise des Techniciens du P&trole),No. 357, p. 27.
Durand, J.P., Y. Boscher a n d N. Petroff (1987), "Automatic g a s
chromatographic determination of gasoline components. Applicatlon to
octane number determination". Journal of chmmatogmphy, No. 395, p. 229.
Edmister, W.C. and D.H. Pollock (1948), "Phase relations for petroleum
fractions". Chem. Erg. Pmg.,Vol. 44, No. 12, p. 905.
Edmister, W.C. a n d K.K. Okamoto (1959), "Applied h y d r o c a r b o n
thermodynamics. Part 12: equilibrium flash vaporization correlations for
petroleum fractions". Petroleum Refiner,Vol. 38, No. 8, p. 117.
Edmister, W.C. a n d K.K. Okamoto (1959), "Applied h y d r o c a r b o n
thermodynamics. Part 13: equilibrium flash vaporization for heavy oils under
subatmospheric pressures". Petroleum Refiner,Vol. 38, No. 9, p. 271.
Eyzat, P. and J. Trapy (1982), "CaractCrisation de I'accroissement d e s
Cchanges thermiques dans les moteurs B allumage command6 fonctionnant
avec cliquetis". CR Acad. Sc., Paris, t. 295.
Feugier, A. and C. Martin (1985), "Influence d e la nature des fuels lourds sur
la qualit6 de leur combustion". Rev. Inst. Franc. du Pgmle, Vol. 40, No. 4, p. 787.
Fisher, I.P. and P. Fisher (1974), "Analysis of high boiling petroleum streams
by high resolution mass spectrometry". Talanta, Vol. 21, p. 867.
Fiskaa, C., K. Langnes, 0. Toff and C. Ostvold (1985), "Some aspects on
utilizing modern marine Diesel fuels". Cong*s international sur les machines h
combustion interne {CIMC), Oslo.
Fuller, E.N., P.D. Schettler and J.C. Ciddings (1966), "A new method for
predic9on of binary gas phase diffusion coefficients". fnd. Eng. Chem.,Vol. 58,
No. 5, p. 19.
Cirard, C., J.C. Cuibet, A. Billon and X. Montagne (1993), "La dbsulfuration
du gazole. Aspects technicoCconomiques. Impacts s u r I'environnement".
CorgrGs international de la Socie'te' des Ing&nieunde I'Automobile (SM) "Moteur
diesel: actualite' - potentialit&",Lyon.
Clavincevski, B., O.L. Culder and L. Cardner (1984). "Cetane number
estimation of diesel fuels from carbon type structural composition". SAE
paper No. 84-1341, International fuels and lubricants meeting, Baltimore, MD.
Goodacre, C. (1958), "Les antidbtonants, en particulier le plomb tbtrahthyle.
Son passb, son prbent, son avenir". Co@s de la Soci&e? des I@nieurs de
1 'Automobile,Paris.
. Groff, J. (1961), ABCdu gmissage. Editions Technip, Paris.
Cuibet, J.C. and B. Martin (1987). Carbumnts and moteurs. Editions Technip,
Paris.
Hall, D.W. and L.M. Gibbs (1976), "Carburetor deposits are clean throttle
bodies enough?". SAE paper No. 76-0752, Automobile Engineering Meeting,
Dearborn, MI.
Hamon, D. and B. Damin (1993), "New diesel low temperature operability.
ACELFI filtration test". CEC 4th International Symposium, Birmingham.
Hankinson, R.W. and G.H. Thompson (1979), "A new correlation for
saturated densities of liquids and their mixtures". AIChEJ, Vol. 25, No. 4,
p. 653.
Hayward, P., L. Bekourian, E. Meheust, E. Lesimple, H. Benighi and
A. Nouven (1980), "La reconnaissance quantitative et qualitative des
cargaisons de pCtrole brut". Pdtrole et Techniques (Revue de 1 'Association
Fmnpise des Techniciens du P&mle), No. 269, p. 17.
Heinrich, C., M. Valais, M. Passot and B. Chapotel (1991), "Mutations of
world refining: challenge and answers". 13th World Petroleum Congress,
Buenos Ares, Vol. 3, p. 189-198.
Heinrich, G., R. Bonnifay, J.-L. Mauleon, M. Demar and M.A. Silverman
(1993), "Advances in FCC design, Parts I and 11". Refining process services
Seminar, Amsterdam.
Hennico, A., A. Billon, P.-H. Bigeard and J.-P. PCrib (1993), "IFP'snew flexible
hydrocracking process combines maximum conversion with production of high
viscosity, high VI lube stocks". Rev. Inst. FmnC. du Pkhde, Vol. 48, No. 2, p. 127.
Hibbard, R.R. and R.L. Schalla (1952), "Solubility of water in hydrocarbons".
RM E 52D24, US4 Nat. Ado. Comm. Aeron.
Hildebrand, J.H. and R.L. Scott (1950), The solubility of non electrolytes,
3rd edition. Reinhold Pub. Corp., New York.
Hildebrand, J.H. and R.L. Scott (1962). Regular solutions. Prentice Hall,
Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.
Hublin, M. and J.C. Criesemann (1993), "Le CPL un carburant propre pour
des automobiles propres". Cat d'Aujourd'hui.
IFP (1989). "Gasoline production in the next decade: new trends". Booklet
from Direction Industrielle de
1 'InstitutFmngais du Pdtrole, symposium Venezia.
Johnson, R.L. and H.G. Crayson (1961), "Enthalpy of petroleum fractions".
Pehdeum Refiner, Vol. 40, No. 2, p. 123.
Kabadi, V.N. and R.P. Danner (1985), "A modified SRK equation of state for
water-hydrocarbon phase equilibria". Ind. Eng. Chem. k .Lks. Deu., Vol. 24,
No. 3,p. 537.
Kesler, M.C. and B.I. Lee (1976), "Improve prediction of enthalpy of
fractions". Hydrocarbon Processing, Vol. 55,No. 3,p. 153.
Kouzel, B. (1965), "How pressure affects liquid viscosity". Hydrocarbon
Process. Petrol. Refiner, Vol. 44,No. 3,p. 120.
Kovats, E. and A. Wehrli (1959), "Gaschromatography characterization of
organic compounds. 111. Calculation of the retention indexes of aliphatic,
alicyclic and aromatic compounds". Helv. Chim. Acta, Vol. 42,p. 2709.
Le Breton, M.D. (1984), "Hot and cold fuel volatility indexes of french cars. A
cooperative study by the CFC volatility group". SAE paper No. 84-1386,
International fuels and lubricants meeting, Baltimore, MD.
Lee, B.I. and M.C. Kesler (1975), "A generalized thermodynamic correlation
based on three-parameter corresponding states". AICW, Vol. 21,No. 3,p. 510.
Lefebvre, C. (1978). Chimie des hydmcarbures. Editions Technip, Paris.
Lenoir, J.M. (1957). "Effect of pressure on thermal conductivity of liquids".
Petroleum Refiner, Vol. 36,No. 8, p. 162.
Letsou, A. and L.1. Stiel (1973). "Viscosity of saturated nonpolar liquids at
elevated pressures". AIChU, Vol. 19,No. 2,p. 409.
Li, C.C. (1976), "Thermal conductivity of liquid mixtures". AICW, Vol. 22,
No.5,p. 927.
Lindsay, A.L. and L.A. Bromley (1950). "Thermal conductivity of gas
mixtures". Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol. 42,No. 8,p. 1508.
Lowi, A. and W.P.L. Carter (1990), "A method for evaluating the atmosphere
ozone impact of actual vehicle emissions". SAE paper No. 90-0710,
International congress and exposition, Detroit, MI.
Lubrizol(1980), US Pat. 4 191 659.
Lydersen, A.L. (1955), "Estimation of critical properties of organic
compounds by the method of group contributions". Univ. Wisconsin Coll.,Eng.
Exp. Stn. report No. 4, Madison, Wl.
Maier, C.E., P.-H. Bigeard, A. Billon and P. Dufresne (1988), "Boost middle
distillate yield and quality with a new generation of hydrocracking catalyst".
NPRA paper No. AM-8876, Annual meeting, San Antonio, TX.
Mariette, L., A. Billon and T. Descouri5re.s (1988). "HyvahlO process for high
conversion of resids". Japanese Pemleum Institute Conference,Tokyo.
Martin, B. and P.-H. Bigeard (1992). "Hydrotreatment of diesel fuels -its
impact on light- duty diesel engine pollutants". SAE paper No. 92-2268,
Infernationalfuels and lubricants meeting, San Francisco, CA.
Maxwell, J.B. and L.S. Bonnel (1955). Vapor pressure charts for petroleum
engineers. Esso Research and Engineering Co., NJ.
Mc Arragher, J.S. and al. (1990), "The effects of temperature and fuel
volatility on evaporative emissions from european cars". I. Mech. Eng.,
No. 3941028, London.
Mehrotra, A.K. (1990), "Development of mixing rules for predicting the
viscosity of bitumen and its fractions blended with toluene". Can. J. Chem.
Eng., Vol. 68, p. 839.
Misic, D. and C. Thodos (1961), "The thermal conductivity of hydrocarbon
gases at normal pressures". A I C N , Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 264.
Mobil Oil Corp. (1980). US Pat. 4 208 292.
Montagne, X., D. Herrier and J . 4 . Guibet (1987), "Fouling of automotive
diesel injectors. Test procedure, influence of composition of diesel oil and
additives". SAE paper No. 87-2118, International fuels and lubricants meeting,
Toronto, Ontario.
Nelson, O.L.,R.W. Krumm, R.S. Fein, D.D. Fuller, C.K. Rightmire and
C.E. Ducker (1989), "A broad spectrum, non metallic additive for gasoline and
diesel fuels: performance in gasoline engines". SAE paper No. 89-0214, Inf.
Congress, Detroit, MI.
Nelson, W.L.(1958). Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 4th edition. Mc Craw-
Hill.
Odgers, J. and D. Kretschmer (1980, Gas turbine fuels and their influence on
combustion. Abacus Press, Cambridge, USA.
Oelert, H.H. (1971) "Entwicklung und Anwendung einer auf IR-NMR
Spektroskopie und elemental Analyse beruhenden Strukturgruppenanalyse
fiir hiihersiedende Kohlenwasserstoffgemische und Mineraliilanteile". 2.Anal.
Chem., Vol. 255, p. 177.
Pande, S.G. and D.R. Hardy (1990), "A practical evaluation of published
cetane indices". Fuel, Vol. 69.
Parrish, W.R. and J.M. Prausnitz (1972), "Dissociation pressures of gas
hydrates formed by gas mixtures". Ind. Eng. Chem. k. Des. Deo., Vol. 11,
No. 1, p. 26.
Peng, D.Y. and D.B. Robinson (1976), "A new two-constant equation of
state". Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund, Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 59.
P4ri&s,J.P., A. Quignard, C. Farjon and M. Laborde (1988), "Les prockdb
ASVAHL thermiques et catalytiques sous pression d'hydroghe pour la
conversion des bruts lourds et des residus de bruts classiques". Rev. Inst.
Fmnc. du P&vle, Vol. 43, No. 6, p. 847.
Pitzer, K.S. and al. (1955), "The volumetric and thermodynamic properties
of fluids. 1: theoretical basis and virial coefficients". J. Am. Ch. Soc..Vol. 77,
No. 13, p. 3427.
REFEROVCES459
0
-
Nonnal
point
K
20.3
standard
w==
Ip.vity
Molecular
=Wt
kg/lmol
2.016
Liquid
vbcodty
at 100°F
WZ/S
-tY
at 210°F
W*/S
critical
K
33.0
critical
-
P
bar
12.9
NZ 0 77.4 28.013 126.2 33.9
co 1 81.7 28.010 132.9 35.0
-
H2O
-
Tpble
Al.1 Rincipal chamcteristics ofcommon light components.
Temperature
=2
4 77.37
4 243.37
239.72 I
373.15- I
I 1
A1.2 Additional chamcteristics OF common light components.
A B C D E F
Ne -10' .lo7 - 10" .1015
Table
A1 -3 Coefficientsfor calculation of the enthalpy of an ideal gas (equation 4.77) for common light components.
~
- Table
A1.4 Calculational Coefficientsrelated to a change of state of common light components.
Boiling Standard Molecular Uquid Uquid critical critical
N, point wdfk =4m *ty viscosity temperature presmm
rnvw at IOO'F at 210°F
K Lg/Lmol mmqs mm2/s K bar
Methane 1 111.63 16.043 190.56 45.96
Ethylene 2 169.44 28.054 282.36 50.33
Ethane 2 184.54 0.3560 30.070 ~~ ~~~
305.33 48.72 ~
Coeflcients for calculation of the enthalpy of an ideal gas (equation 4.77) Tor common light hydrocarbons.
soave Solubility Tempemture hterfadaI LeeKeder
N, mcoeffident parameter at 25°C T3 tension at T3 acenhic
W/m9'fl "C mN/m factor
Methane 1 0.485801 367.4 - 161 13.34 0.0103
Ethylene 2 0.61 1674 393.3 - 104 16.41 0.0883
Ethane 2 0.62741 7 391.4 -89 15.98 0.0984
Acetylene 12 0.785634 594.9 -84 19.38 0.2008
Propylene 3 0.699302 408.4 20 6.88 0.1448
Prome 3 0.711519 414.0 20 7.02 0.1529
Propyne 3 0.806292 581.6 20 11.51 0.2148
Propadiene 3 0.692237 443.1 20 9.50 0.1399
iso-Butane 4 0.760275 397.4 20 9.81 0.1853
n-Butane 4 0.783557 426.6 20 11.87 0.2007
1 Butene 4 0.770672 432.1 20 12.12 0.1919
isdutene 4 0.776179 431.9 20 11.69 0.1956
cis2Butene 4 0.788141 465.5 20 13.99 0.2035
trans2Butene 4 0.804933 449.3 20 12.72 0.2148
1 3 Butadlene 4 0.772083 493.3 20 13.41 0.1927
1 Butyne 4 0.8535&1 523.5 20 17.06 0.2469
Vinylacetylene 4 0.684767 538.7 20 17.79 0.1352
5i2
A 1.8 Calculational coeficients related to a change of state of common light hydnxarbons.
P
N
P
I-
I 1
Table1
A 1.18 Additional characteristics of naphthenes.
A B C D E F
Nc - 104 -107 * 10" -1015
Cyclopentane 5 229.11130 -0.174553 4.878999 -0.790213 -0.259001 1.873384
Methylcyclopentane 6 203.57300 -0.163500 5.315238 - 1.239759 1.465505 -0.497681
Cyclohexane 6 209.80430 I
-0.149848 I
4.572747 I
-0.387392 I
-1.791242 I
3.793529
~~
I I
A1.21 Bincipal chamcteristia of oleKns.
I
A123 Coefficientsforcalculation ofthe enthalpy of an ideal gas (equation 4.77) for olefins.
Soave Solubility Temperature Interfacial Lee Kesler
N, m coeflident parameter at 25°C T3 tension at T3 BcenhiC
w m 3 ~ "C mN/m factor
1 Pentene I5 I 0.833312 I 461.8 I 20 I 15.46 I 0.2346
cis 2 Pentene 5 0.846912 479.4 20 16.80 0.2430
trans 2 Pentene 5 0.842268 473.3 20 16.41 0.2404
~~
2 Methvl 1 butene
~
5 0.828945 464.7 20 15.40 0.2317
2 Methyl 2 butene 5 0.895769 482.2 20 17.06 0.2766
Cyclopentene 5 0.77382 1 542.6 20 21.51 0.1936
2 Methvl 1 3 butadiene 5 0.740378 484.9 20 16.38 0.1722
1 I I I I
~~
Table
A1.24 Calculational coefficientsrelated to a change of stare of olefins.
14
f
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
exylene
mXylene
pxylene
Styrene
Isopropylbenzene
n-Propylbenzene
1 2 4 Trimethylbenzene
1 3 5 Trimethylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
Naphtalene
U
A 1-25 Principal chamcteristics of ammatics.
Triple point Heat of Heat of Uquid Uquid Temperature Temperature
N, temperature fusion vaporization conductivity conductivity TI T2
at TI at T2
K W/ks w4l w I (m.W w I (m.W K K
Benzene 6 278.7 126.3 393.4 0.1503 0.1266 278.68 353.24
Toluene 7 178.2 72.0 364.4 0.1617 0.1126 178.18 383.78
Ethylbenzene 8 178.2 86.5 338.1 0.1588 0.1033 178.15 409.35
0-Xylene 8 248.0 128.1 348.4 0.1429 0. io39 247.98 417.58
m-Xylene 8 225.3 109.0 342.1 0.1474 0.1034 225.30 412.27
pXylene 8 286.4 161.2 337.3 0.1325 0.1030 286.41 411.51
Styrene 8 242.5 105.1 351.5 0.1488 0.1101 242.54 418.31
lsopropylbenzene 9 177.1 61.O 316.6 0.1494 0.0964 177.14 425.56
n-Propylbenzene 9 173.6 77.1 319.0 0.1525 0.0993 173.55 432.39
1 2 4 Trimethylbenzene 9 229.3 109.8 325.1 0.1439 0.0990 229.38 442.53
1 3 5 Trlmethylbenzene 9 228.5 79.2 325.7 0.1513 0.1037 228.46 437.89
kutylbenzene 10- 185.2 83.6 300.7 0.1510 0.0922 185.30 456.45
Naphtalene 10 353.4 148.1 338.7 0.1332 0.1278 353.43 491.14
-r
Table
A1-26 Additional chamcteristics of ammatics.
Benzene 6 225.05180 -0.122662 4.310824 - 1.138140 1.494985 -0.564766
Toluene 7 206.73640 -0.101151 4.225723 -1.061438 1.337653 -0.484075
Ethylbenzene 8 193.42630 -0.093633 4.390639 - 1.1262% 1.458215 -0.543200
eXylene 8 186.29360 -0.014950 3.342431 -0.484082 -0.460172 1.705569
I m-xylene 18I 184.78120 I -0.03OO90 I 3.300522 I -0.394355 1 -0.8211& ~~
7 -2.1732431-
pxylene 8 194.82020 -0.068902 3.995003 -0.924756 1.059785 -0.345267
Styrene 8 0 -0.076968 4.070007 -0.974180 0.5913 15 1.389206
!%lave Solubility Temperature Interfacial Lee K d e r
N, m weffident pnrameter at 25°C T3 tension at T3 acenttlc
(W/mW "C mN/m tador
Benzene 6 0.801679 591.5 20 28.21 0.21 18
Toluene 7 0.879203 580.2 20 27.93 0.2646
Ethvlbenzene 8 0.937342 570.6 20 28.59 Q 0.3055
I exylene 18 I 0.948748 I 583.4 I 20 I 29.60 I 0.3126 I
mXylene 8 0.970967 572.0 20 28.26 0.3282
D-Xvlene 8 0.962623 564.2 20 27.92 0.3227
I Styrene I8I 0.922175 I 604.9 I 20 I 30.85 I 0.2942 I
Isopropylbenzene 91 0.972845 553.8 20 27.69 0.3296
n-Protwlbenzene 91 0.998748 563.1 20 28.43 0.3478
I 12 4 TrimethylbenzeneI 9 I 1.045328 I 567.5 I 20 I 29.19 I 0.3802-----1
13 5 Trimethylbenzene 9 1.077131 567.0 20 28.05 0.4026
Mutylbenzene 10 1.067972 551.8 20 28.63 0.3968
I Naphtalene I10 I 0.936404 I 606.8 I 80 I 34.22 I 0.3041 I
Table
Al.28 Calculationalcoeficientswlated m a change of state OF ammati&.
Appendix
2
Principal Standard Test Methods
for Petroleum Products
Alphabetical List
Prindple
Phase separationtemperature
IS0 2977 of a hydrocarbon/
ASTMD611 aniline mixture
Rust spots on bearing
(nreases) after test
Antirust properties NF T 60-151 Spots on a test tube after
(inhibited mineral oils) IS0 7120 agitation with oil + water
ASTM D 665
Apparent viscosity NF T 60-139 Forced passage of the grease
(greases) ASTM D 1092 in a capillary tube
Aromatics ASTM D 2269 UV absorption
Ash content EN 7 (M07-045) Weight of residue from total
IS0 6245 combustion
ASTM D 482
Asphaltenes NFT60-115 Precipitation
1P 143
Benzene content EN 238 (M 07462) Gas chromatography
ASTM D 2267
Carbonizablesubstances NF T 60-134 Coloration after treatment in
(paraffin) ASTM D 612 concentrated sulfuric acid
Cetane index ASTM D 4737 Correlation between density
IS0 4264 and distillation
Cetane number NF M 07-035 Combustion in a variable
IS0 5165 compression ratio motor
ASTM D 613
Chlorides
Cloud point
I NF M 07-023
NF T 60-105
Volumetric analysis of an
aqueous extract
Observation during gradual
IS0 3016 cooling
ASTM D 2500
Color NF T 60-104 Comparison with colored
IS0 2049 glass standard references
ASTM D 1500
Cone penetration NFT60-119 Penetration of weighted cone
(waxes) ISO/DIS 3986
ASTM D 937
Cone penetration NF T 60-132 Penetration of weighted cone
(greases) IS0 2137
ASTM D 217
Congealing temperature NF T 60-128 Observation during cooling
(waxes) IS0 2207
ASTM D 938
m D X 2 447
NF EN 22592
As above, closed cup
(modified Abel)
As above, open cup
IS0 2592
ASTM D 92
-
Flash point Luchaire T 60-103 Cyclic approaches of a flame
over a heated closed cup
Flash point - NF EN 22719 Cyclic approaches of a flame
Pensky-Martens IS0 2719 above a heated closed cup
ASTM D 93
Freezing point NF M 07-048 Temperature of disappearance
1SO 3013 of cloud on reheating
ASTM D 2386
Foaming characteristics NF T 60-129 Air sparging and measurement
of lubricating oils lSO/DIS 6247 of foam after standing
ASTM D 892
Gas bubble separation NF T 60-149 Time for air liberation after
time of petroleum oils ASTM D 3427 supersaturation
Total sulfur
I NF M 07-059
NF T 60-109
Combustion and analysis by
W fluorescence
Oxidation in pressurized
bomb and gravimetric analysis
Vanadium content NF M 07-027 Dissolving ash in acid and
ASTM D 1548 colorimetric analysis
Vapor pressure of LPG NF M 41-010 Pressure in a sample bomb
IS0 4256 held at predetermined
ASTM D 1267 temperature
Viscosity - Brookfield NF T 60-152 Rotation of a bob in a sample
ASTM D 2983
Viscosity index NF T 60-136 Calculation based on
IS0 2909 kinematic viscosity
ASTM D 2270
Volatility of LPC NF M 41-012 Measurement of residue
ISO/DIS 6620 temperature after 95%
ASTM D 1837 evaporation
Water (content) NF T 60-113 Azeotropic distillation
IS0 3733
ASTM D 95
Water (content) NF T 60-154 Karl Fischer Method
ISO/DiS 6296 (electrometric, after
ASTM D 1744 addition of KF reagent)
Water in propane NF M 41-004 Change in color of cobalt
bromide
Water and sediments NF M 07-020 Mix with toluene and
IS0 3734 centrifugation