Project 1 - Radio Link Failure Prediction
Project 1 - Radio Link Failure Prediction
January 2021
Background
Site7
Site6
Site1
Site3 Site2
IP/MPLS Network
Site4
Site5 Site4
Rain, snow, wind, fog, and other weather-related
phenomena affects the performance of radio links
2
Network resiliency against
weather-based disruptions
The impact of weather conditions on wireless channel
quality, is modeled with a specific emphasis on the
structural impact of winds on cellular towers.
Source: M. Tornatore et al., "A survey on network resiliency methodologies against weather-based disruptions," 2016 8th International
Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM), Halmstad, 2016, pp. 23-34, doi: 10.1109/RNDM.2016.7608264. 3
Problem
Given the region-wise, historical data sets on radio
link (RL) performance and weather forecast predict
the RL failures to assess risks.
4
Datasets (1/2)
• Training data includes pre-processed and anonymised RL KPIs from
the networks and time-aligned weather data.
• RL data
– KPI data includes date/time, frequency band, link length, error and failure
statistics, availability ratio, stability score, capacity, modulation (128QAM,
256QAM, 512QAM, …)
• Weather data
– Forecast data includes status, temperatures, humidity, wind speed and
direction for the following 5 days (Recorded twice a day)
– Measurement data includes temperatures, humidity, wind speed and
direction, precipitation and overcast (Recorded hourly)
• Distances
– A matrix that gives distance for weather stations and RL sites
5
Datasets (2/2)
6
Evaluation criteria
• Students must use the provided data set to train a machine
learning algorithm.
• The output of the ML algorithm should be able to predict the
performance obtained in a new network deployment.
• The choice of the ML approach is decided by each group.
• The test dataset will be provided to the students to evaluate the
performance of the proposed algorithms.
• The evaluation of the proposed algorithms will be based on the
average squared-root error obtained along with all the predictions
compared to the actual result in each type of deployment.
7
Thank you
Contact: [email protected]