Education + Training: Emerald Article: Action Learning in Management Education
Education + Training: Emerald Article: Action Learning in Management Education
Article information:
To cite this document: Suzanne O'Hara, Trix Webber, Steve Reeve, (1996),"Action learning in management education", Education +
Training, Vol. 38 Iss: 8 pp. 16 - 21
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400919610146289
Downloaded on: 20-09-2012
References: This document contains references to 4 other documents
Citations: This document has been cited by 6 other documents
To copy this document: [email protected]
This document has been downloaded 610 times since 2005. *
Shana Wagger, Randi Park, Denise Ann Dowding Bedford, (2010),"Lessons learned in content architecture harmonization and metadata
models", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 62 Iss: 4 pp. 387 - 405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531011074645
Sakari Taipale, Kirsikka Selander, Timo Anttila, Jouko Nätti, (2011),"Work engagement in eight European countries: The role of
job demands, autonomy, and social support", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31 Iss: 7 pp. 486 - 504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443331111149905
For Authors:
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service.
Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in
business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as
well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is
a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
The following observation, made by a partici-
Action learning in pant on the final year of an MBA, encapsu-
lates what we are trying to achieve through the
management education use of action learning:
I can recognize within myself a confirming
process. One in which I have allowed myself to
set my own path and structure to meet the
learning objectives for the programme and
produce a valuable piece of work for my organi-
Suzanne O’Hara zation.
Trix Webber and Brighton’s action learning programmes aim to
Steve Reeve create autonomous learners and focus learn-
ing on work-based problems, while at the
same time remaining within the framework of
a Master’s level qualification.
The purpose in writing this paper is to
share the authors’ experiences with others.
The authors There are three aims: to provide a definition
Suzanne O’Hara, Trix Webber and Steve Reeve are at of the purpose and role of action learning in
the Centre for Management Development, Brighton management education; to give some exam-
University, Brighton, UK. ples of programmes in a University Business
School which has a strong commitment to
Abstract action learning; and to outline some of the
Provides a definition of the purpose and role of action benefits of this approach for individuals.
learning (AL) in management education. Gives examples
of programmes in a university business school strongly
History of action learning
committed to action learning and outlines some of the
benefits of this approach for individuals. Acknowledges Action learning was originally developed
that AL is less straightforward and more demanding than a during the 1940s by Revans[1], then director
traditional taught programme but potentially could of education to the National Coal Board, to
achieve a much wider range of learning outcomes. enable senior executives to steer the coal-
mining industry through a period of tumul-
tuous change in post-war Britain. The colliery
managers of Revans’ original project worked
collaboratively, meeting regularly. At the end
of three years, it was found that annual output
per person in the mines of these managers had
increased by over 30 per cent compared with a
national average too small to detect[1]. Simi-
larly impressive results were obtained in
subsequent projects in the health service
during the 1960s[1]. Thus action learning
established its value unambiguously as a
powerful management tool.
An understanding of the roots of action
learning is important if its full potential in
higher education is to be exploited. The trans-
ference of a problem-solving strategy for
managers in industry into a context where the
award of qualifications is a major aim, creates
certain tensions. Those of us who are commit-
ted to this approach, and have spent a number
of years working at developing programmes
which bring the energy and power of action
Education + Training
Volume 38 · Number 8 · 1996 · pp. 16–21 learning into qualification frameworks, believe
© MCB University Press · ISSN 0040-0912 that these challenges are worth meeting.
16
Purpose of action learning in Action learning approach/learning to
management education learn orientation
This involves using processes which encour-
The purpose and role of action learning in
age participants in learning how to learn
management education is perhaps best
The action learning set gives protection
defined by the expectations of the various
and safety for learners in their exploration of
stakeholders. The manager who enrols for a
course expects both a qualification and learn- the learning process. The bounded set envi-
ing which will be useful beyond the life of the ronment is a much more forgiving environ-
course. The sponsoring organization expects ment for learning than is usually encountered
increased managerial capability of a type within higher education. In an atmosphere of
which can be applied directly to organization- confidentiality, trust and mutual support
al issues, a good return on its investment. The there is mutual valuing of individuals and
Business School has the expectation of their experience. In addition, there is a sense
achieving its purpose. Typically, this encom- of purpose and vision, shared goals and com-
passes creating new and better ways of devel- mitment and the pooling of intellectual and
oping managers, contributing to business emotional energy.
success, awarding qualifications and guarding
standards of education. Higher education framework
The action learning approach, when part-
Action learning in an academic context nered with the traditional nature of higher
Figure 1 illustrates how action learning has education (the stock of knowledge, research
been integrated into the traditional framework and methodologies, creativity, conceptual
of higher education[2]. presentation, assessment processes) allows for
a potentially much more fulfilling and suc-
cessful experience for the learner. This is
especially so for adults coming from a work
context into the relatively alien territory of
academia. Action learning can be a particular-
Figure 1 Action learning in an academic context
ly successful way to engage with mainstream
academic study for experienced managers
Action learning approach with high levels of responsibility but long
Learning to learn orientation absence from higher education.
21