Module 3: Ipl R.A. 8293 Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines
The document summarizes key aspects of patent law in the Philippines according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (RA 8293). It defines a patent as an exclusive right granted by the government to an inventor for an invention (product, process, or improvement) for a period of 20 years. Key requirements for a patent include that the invention is novel, involves an inventive step, and is industrially applicable. The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines registers patents and provides legal protection.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
326 views17 pages
Module 3: Ipl R.A. 8293 Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines
The document summarizes key aspects of patent law in the Philippines according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (RA 8293). It defines a patent as an exclusive right granted by the government to an inventor for an invention (product, process, or improvement) for a period of 20 years. Key requirements for a patent include that the invention is novel, involves an inventive step, and is industrially applicable. The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines registers patents and provides legal protection.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17
MODULE 3: IPL ** Which agency of the government issues the
R.A. 8293 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CODE OF THE patent rights?
PHILIPPINES June 6, 1997 - Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines A. THE LAW ON PATENTS ** What does this right give to the inventor/creator? What is the important aspect of 1. Patent defined the patent right? - An exclusive right granted to the inventor - The inventor is being granted an “exclusive over an invention, to sell, use and make the right”, which means that he has also the same whether for commerce or industry. right to exclude others from making, using, - A patent is an exclusive right granted for an or selling the product, otherwise you can invention, which is a product or a process file a suit “infringement” against those who that provides, in general, a new way of copy or mimic the invention. doing something, or offers a new technical 2. Mode of creation of right solution to a problem. To get a patent, - The creation of right is made through technical information about the invention application of patent to the Bureau of must be disclosed to the public in a patent Patents. application. (WIPO) - There are three types of patents you can ** Register the same with IPO to be protected by apply for: patentable inventions, industrial the law. design, and utility model. 3. Term of patent a. Patentable Invention – Any - SEC. 54. Term of Patent. - The term of a technical solution of a problem in any field patent shall be twenty (20) years from the of human activity which is new, involves an filing date of the application. **providing an inventive step, and is industrially applicable inventor significant commercial gain. For shall be patentable. It may be, or may relate the pirated creations, whatever profit that to, a product, or process, or an they have acquired by reason of selling such improvement of any of the foregoing. (Sec. fake goods, you can demand from them 7, R.A. No. 165a) damages because of “loss of income b. Industrial Design - Any composition opportunity”. (Sec. 21, R.A. No. 165a) of lines or colors or any three-dimensional a. The term of a patent shall be twenty form, whether or not associated with lines (20) years from the filing date of the or colors; provided that such composition or application. form gives a special appearance to and can b. The term of a utility model is seven serve as pattern for an industrial product or (7) years, without any possibility of renewal. handicraft. c. The term of an industrial design is c. Utility Model - any model of five (5) years from the filing date of the implements or tools or any industrial application. It may be renewed for not more product, or of part of the same which is of than two (2) consecutive periods of five (5) practical utility by reason of its form, years each, by paying the renewal fee. configuration or composition. Under section 109.3 of RA 8293, otherwise 4. Requisites of Patentable inventions known as the Intellectual Property Code (IP - SEC. 21. Patentable Inventions. - Any Code) of the Philippines, a utility model can technical solution of a problem in any field no longer be renewed. It can only be of human activity which is new, involves an registered for a period of seven (7) years inventive step and is industrially applicable after date of filing of the application, shall be patentable. It may be, or may without any possibility of renewal. relate to, a product, or process, or an improvement of any of the foregoing. (Sec. ** By definition in IPL, patent is a right granted for 7, R.A. No.165a) a product/process or an improvement of a i. Novelty – An invention is considered product/process issued by the government. new if it does not form part of a prior art. Prior art shall consist of: (a) Everything which has been skilled in the art at the time of the filing made available to the public date or priority date of the application anywhere in the world, before the claiming the invention. filing date or the priority date of the In the case of drugs and medicines, there is application claiming the invention; no inventive step if the invention results and from the mere discovery of a new form or (b) The whole contents of an new property of a known substance which application for a patent, utility does not result in the enhancement of the model, or industrial design known efficacy of that substance, or the registration, published in mere discovery of any new property or new accordance with this Act, filed or use for a known substance, or the mere use effective in the Philippines, with a of a known process unless such known filing or priority date that is earlier process results in a new product that than the filing or priority date of the employs at least one new reactant. application: Provided, That the - iii. Industrial Applicability – An application which has validly invention that can be produced and used in claimed the filing date of an earlier any industry shall be industrially application under Section 31 of this applicable. Act, shall be prior art with effect as 5. Non-patentable inventions of the filing date of such earlier - SEC. 22. Non-Patentable Inventions. - The application: Provided further, That following shall be excluded from patent the applicant or the inventor protection: identified in both applications are - 22.1. Discoveries, scientific theories and not one and the same. (Sec. 9, R.A. mathematical methods, and in the case of No. 165a) cdt drugs and medicines, the mere discovery of - Non-Prejudicial Disclosure. a new form or new property of a known (a) The disclosure of information substance which does not result in the contained in the application during the enhancement of the known efficacy of that twelve (12) months preceding the filing date substance, or the mere discovery of any or the priority date of the application shall new property or new use for a known not prejudice the applicant on the ground of substance, or the mere use of a known lack of novelty if such disclosure was made process unless such known process results in by: a new product that employs at least one (1) The inventor; new reactant. (2) A patent office and the For the purpose of this clause, salts, esters, information was contained (a) in ethers, polymorphs, metabolites, pure form, another application filed by the particle size, isomers, mixtures of isomers, inventor and should not have been complexes, combinations, and other disclosed by the office, or (b) in an derivatives of a known substance shall be application filed without the considered to be the same substance, unless knowledge or consent of the they differ significantly in properties with inventor by a third party which regard to efficacy; obtained the information directly or - 22.2. Schemes, rules and methods of indirectly from the inventor; or performing mental acts, playing games or (3) A third party which obtained doing business, and programs for the information directly or indirectly computers; from the inventor. - 22.3 Methods for treatment of the human (b) For the purposes of Subsection 25.1, or animal body by surgery or therapy and "inventor" also means any person who, at diagnostic methods practiced on the human the filing date of application, had the right or animal body. This provision shall not to the patent. (n) apply to products and composition for use - ii. Inventive Step – An invention in any of these methods; involves an inventive step if, having regard - 22.4. Plant varieties or animal breeds or to a prior art, it is not obvious to a person essentially biological process for the production of plants or animals. This 8. Right to a patent provision shall not apply to micro-organisms - SEC. 28. Right to a Patent. - The right to a and non-biological and microbiological patent belongs to the inventor, his heirs, or processes. assigns. When two (2) or more persons have Provisions under this subsection shall not jointly made an invention, the right to a preclude Congress to consider the patent shall belong to them jointly (co- enactment of a law providing sui generis ownership). (Sec. 10, R.A. No. 165a) protection of plant varieties and animal 9. Invention created pursuant to a commission breeds and a system of community - SEC. 30. Inventions Created Pursuant to a intellectual rights protection; Commission. - 22.5. Aesthetic creations; and - 30.1. The person who commissions the work - 22.6. Anything which is contrary to public shall own the patent, unless otherwise order or morality. (Sec. 8, R.A. No. 165a) provided in the contract. ** Why are these non-patentable? - 30.2. In case the employee made the - These are generic. invention in the course of his employment contract, the patent shall belong to: 6. First to file rule (a) The employee, if the inventive activity is - SEC. 29. First to File Rule. - If two (2) or not a part of his regular duties even if more persons have made the invention the employee uses the time, facilities separately and independently of each other, and materials of the employer. the right to the patent shall belong to the (b) The employer, if the invention is the person who filed an application for such result of the performance of his invention, or where two or more regularly-assigned duties, unless there is applications are filed for the same an agreement, express or implied, to the invention, to the applicant who has the contrary. (n) earliest filing date or, the earliest priority date. (3rd sentence, Sec. 10, R.A. No. 165a.) 10. Patent infringement - SEC. 76. Civil Action for Infringement. **Prior tempore, potior jure. He who is before in - 76.1. The making, using, offering for sale, time, is preferred in right. selling, or importing a patented product or 7. Right of priority a product obtained directly or indirectly - SEC. 31. Right of Priority. - An application from a patented process, or the use of a for patent filed by any person who has patented process without the authorization previously applied for the same invention in of the patentee constitutes patent another country which by treaty, infringement. Provided, That, this shall not convention, or law affords similar privileges apply to instances covered by Sections 72.1 to Filipino citizens (rule on reciprocity – if a and 72.4 (Limitations of Patent Rights); foreign country grants the same privileges Section 74 (Use of Invention by to Filipinos, the same privilege will be Government); Section 93.6 (Compulsory accorded to that at the citizen of the foreign Licensing); and Section 93-A (Procedures on country by reason of our membership of Issuance of a Special Compulsory License state.), shall be considered as filed as of the under the TRIPS Agreement) of this Code. date of filing the foreign application: - Patent infringement is ordinarily Provided, That: understood to mean as the unauthorized (a) the local application expressly replication or use of a patented invention or claims priority; process. (b) it is filed within twelve (12) months from the date the earliest foreign application was filed; and (c) a certified copy of the foreign application together with an English translation is filed within six (6) months from the date of filing in the Philippines. (Sec. 15, R.A. No. 165a) - 76.2. Any patentee, or anyone possessing - In cases of literal infringement, every any right, title or interest in and to the limitation recited in a patent claim is found patented invention, whose rights have been in the infringing device (or process). The infringed, may bring a civil action before a infringing product literally has every feature court of competent jurisdiction, to recover that is in the claims of the patent. It is very from the infringer such damages sustained infrequent that an infringer will thereby, plus attorney’s fees and other unabashedly and directly copy and sell the expenses of litigation, and to secure an exact same product as the patent holder - injunction for the protection of his rights. although copycat cases do occur, especially - 76.3. If the damages are inadequate or when the infringer is someone in another cannot be readily ascertained with country. More often, when infringement reasonable certainty, the court may award disputes involving literal infringement by way of damages a sum equivalent to escalate to the level of litigation, there is reasonable royalty. usually some other underlying issue or - 76.4. The court may, according to the potential defense to the infringement circumstances of the case, award damages allegations. For instance, the accused in a sum above the amount found as actual infringer might raise the defense that they damages sustained: Provided, That the have licensed the right to make or sell the award does not exceed three (3) times the product from the patent holder, or that the amount of such actual damages. patent in question is invalid. - 76.5. The court may, in its discretion, order - Literal infringement: that the infringing goods, materials and i. exists when every limitation recited implements predominantly used in the in a patent claim is found in the infringement be disposed of outside the infringing device (or process). channels of commerce or destroyed, ii. means that each and every element without compensation; and recited in a claim has identical - 76.6. Anyone who actively induces the correspondence in the allegedly infringement of a patent or provides the infringing device or process. infringer with a component of a patented iii. a claim is literally infringed if the product or of a product produced because accused product or process includes of a patented process knowing it to be all elements or limitations of the especially adopted for infringing the claim. patented invention and not suitable for b. Doctrine of equivalents infringement substantial non-infringing use shall be liable - One of the principal concerns with relying as a contributory infringer and shall be on the literal language of the claims in a jointly and severally liable with the patent is that, even though you avoid literal infringer. (Sec. 42, R.A. No. 165a) infringement, you may still infringe the patent under the "doctrine of equivalents." ** What can the court award to the one who The "doctrine of equivalents" is a judicially would file a case for infringement of patent? What created doctrine having a three part will be the right of the person whose patent has "function/way/result" substantial identity been infringed? test embodying the following steps: - Money for the actual damages by injury 1. Determine whether the accused device caused to the owner of the patent. or process achieves substantially the same 11. Tests of patent infringement result as the claimed invention. If it does - To determine the presence of infringement, literal not, the infringement inquiry ends. infringement must be proven. If literal infringement 2. Determine whether the accused device exists, the defendant is liable. If there is no literal or process performs substantially the same infringement, the doctrine of equivalents will apply. function as the claimed invention. If it does not, the infringement inquiry ends. a. Literal Infringement 3. Determine whether the accused device - The term "literal infringement" means that or process operates in substantially the each and every element recited in a claim same way as the claimed invention. If it has identical correspondence in the does not, the infringement inquiry ends. allegedly infringing device or process. ** Invention / Prior invention by incorporating its innovative concept in “substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result and function.” - The doctrine of equivalents provides that an infringement also takes place when a device appropriates a prior invention by incorporating its innovative concept and, although with some modification and change, performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result. - The allegations are that the accused infringing product doesn’t necessarily meet every limitation in the claims contained in the issued patent, but the accused infringing product is an equivalent of the patented product. Under the doctrine of equivalents, if the two products are substantially the same, work in the same way and accomplish the same result, then the two products are equivalents of each other for the purposes of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. - While the doctrine of equivalents may seem straight forward, in application this is hardly ever the case. What is and is not equivalent often comes down to a battle of the experts, with each side of the litigation strongly arguing for their position. You will need experienced patent litigation lawyers on your side to help champion your patent infringement claims. - For the purpose of determining the extent of protection conferred by the patent, due account shall be taken of elements which are equivalent to the elements expressed in the claims, so that a claim shall be considered to cover not only all the elements as expressed therein, but also equivalents. B. THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS, organizations engaged in trade or AND TRADE NAMES commerce. 2. Mode of creation of right 1. Definition of Terms - Valid Registration of right to the Bureau of a. Trademark Trademarks. - Includes any word, name, symbol, emblem, - The rights in a mark shall be acquired sign or device or any combination thereof through registration made validly in adopted and used by a manufacturer or accordance with the provisions of this law. merchant to identify his goods and ** distinguish them from those manufactured, sold or dealt in by others. 3. Non-registrable marks - means any visible sign capable of - A mark cannot be registered if it: distinguishing the goods (trademark) of an a) Consists of immoral, deceptive or enterprise and shall include a stamped or scandalous matter, or matter which marked container of goods; (Sec. 38, R.A. may disparage or falsely suggest a No. 166a) connection with persons, living or b. Service mark dead, institutions, beliefs, or - A mark used in the sale or advertising of national symbols, or bring them into services to identify the services of one contempt or disrepute; person and distinguish them from the b) Consists of the flag or coat of arms services of others and includes without or other insignia of the Philippines or limitation the marks, names, symbols, titles, any of its political subdivisions, or of designations, slogans, character names, any foreign nation, or any and distinctive features of radio or other simulation thereof; advertising. c) Consists of a name, portrait or - 121.1. means any visible sign capable of signature identifying a particular distinguishing the services (service mark) of living individual except by his written an enterprise and shall include a stamped consent, or the name, signature, or or marked container of goods; (Sec. 38, R.A. portrait of a deceased President of No. 166a) the Philippines, during the life of his c. Collective mark widow, if any, except by written - 121.2. "Collective mark" means any visible consent of the widow; sign designated as such in the application d) Is identical with a registered mark for registration and capable of belonging to a different proprietor distinguishing the origin or any other or a mark with an earlier filing or common characteristic, including the priority date, in respect of: cd quality of goods or services of different i. The same goods or services, enterprises which use the sign under the or control of the registered owner of the ii. Closely related goods or collective mark; (Sec. 40, R.A. No. 166a) services, or d. Tradename iii. If it nearly resembles such a - 121.3. "Trade name" means the name or mark as to be likely to designation identifying or distinguishing an deceive or cause confusion; enterprise; (Sec. 38, R.A. No. 166a) e) Is identical with, or confusingly - Includes individual names and surnames, similar to, or constitutes a firm names, tradenames, devices or words translation of a mark which is used by manufacturers, industrialists, considered by the competent merchants, agriculturists, and others to authority of the Philippines to be identify their business, vocations or well-known internationally and in occupations; the names or titles lawfully the Philippines, whether or not it is adopted and used by natural or juridical registered here, as being already the persons, unions, and any manufacturing, mark of a person other than the industrial, commercial, agricultural or other applicant for registration, and used for identical or similar goods or themselves or factors that affect services: Provided, That in their intrinsic value; determining whether a mark is well- l) Consists of color alone, unless known, account shall be taken of the defined by a given form; or knowledge of the relevant sector of m) Is contrary to public order or the public, rather than of the public morality. at large, including knowledge in the - As regards signs or devices mentioned in Philippines which has been obtained paragraphs (j), (k), and (l), nothing shall as a result of the promotion of the prevent the registration of any such sign or mark; device which has become distinctive in f) Is identical with, or confusingly relation to the goods for which registration similar to, or constitutes a is requested as a result of the use that have translation of a mark considered been made of it in commerce in the well-known in accordance with the Philippines. The Office may accept as prima preceding paragraph, which is facie evidence that the mark has become registered in the Philippines with distinctive, as used in connection with the respect to goods or services which applicant's goods or services in commerce, are not similar to those with respect proof of substantially exclusive and to which registration is applied for: continuous use thereof by the applicant in Provided, That use of the mark in commerce in the Philippines for five (5) relation to those goods or services years before the date on which the claim of would indicate a connection distinctiveness is made. between those goods or services, - The nature of the goods to which the mark and the owner of the registered is applied will not constitute an obstacle to mark: Provided further, That the registration. (Sec. 4, R.A. No. 166a) interests of the owner of the 4. Term of trademark registered mark are likely to be - SEC. 145. Duration. - A certificate of damaged by such use; registration shall remain in force for ten g) Is likely to mislead the public, (10) years: Provided, That the registrant particularly as to the nature, quality, shall file a declaration of actual use and characteristics or geographical evidence to that effect, or shall show valid origin of the goods or services; reasons based on the existence of obstacles h) Consists exclusively of signs that are to such use, as prescribed by the generic for the goods or services Regulations, within one (1) year from the that they seek to identify; fifth anniversary of the date of the i) Consists exclusively of signs or of registration of the mark. Otherwise, the indications that have become mark shall be removed from the Register by customary or usual to designate the the Office. (Sec. 12, R.A. No. 166a) goods or services in everyday - SEC. 146. Renewal. - 146.1. A certificate of language or in bona fide and registration may be renewed for periods of established trade practice; ten (10) years at its expiration upon j) Consists exclusively of signs or of payment of the prescribed fee and upon indications that may serve in trade filing of a request. The request shall contain to designate the kind, quality, the following indications: quantity, intended purpose, value, (a) An indication that renewal is sought; geographical origin, time or (b) The name and address of the registrant production of the goods or rendering or his successor-in-interest, hereafter of the services, or other referred to as the "right holder"; characteristics of the goods or (c) The registration number of the services; registration concerned; k) Consists of shapes that may be (d) The filing date of the application which necessitated by technical factors or resulted in the registration concerned to be by the nature of the goods renewed; (e) Where the right holder has a about the source of the goods and/or representative, the name and address of services. that representative; - Infringement of trademark is a form of (f) The names of the recorded goods or unfair competition (Clarke vs. Manila Candy services for which the renewal is requested Co., 36 Phil. 100, 106). Sec. 22 of Republic or the names of the recorded goods or Act No. 166, otherwise known as the services for which the renewal is not Trademark Law, defines what constitutes requested, grouped according to the classes infringement: of the Nice Classification to which that - Sec. 22. Infringement, what constitutes. — group of goods or services belongs and Any person who shall use, without the presented in the order of the classes of the consent of the registrant, any reproduction, said Classification; and counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of (g) A signature by the right holder or his any registered mark or trade-name in representative. connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertising of any goods, business or 5. Trademark infringement services on or in connection with which such - (Section 155) Any person who shall, without use is likely to cause confusion or mistake or the consent of the owner of the registered to deceive purchasers or others as to the mark: source or origin of such goods or services, or - 155.1. Use in commerce any reproduction, identity of such business; or reproduce, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a counterfeit, copy or colorably imitate any registered mark or the same container or a such mark or trade-name and apply such dominant feature thereof in connection reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages, advertising of any goods or services wrappers, receptacles or advertisements including other preparatory steps necessary intended to be used upon or in connection to carry out the sale of any goods or with such goods, business or services, shall services on or in connection with which be liable to a civil action by the registrant such use is likely to cause confusion, or to for any or all of the remedies herein cause mistake, or to deceive; or provided. (Emphasis supplied.) - 155.2. Reproduce, counterfeit, copy or - This definition implies that only registered colorably imitate a registered mark or a trade marks, trade names and service dominant feature thereof and apply such marks are protected against infringement reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable or unauthorized use by another or others. imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages, The use of someone else's registered wrappers, receptacles or advertisements trademark, trade name or service mark is intended to be used in commerce upon or unauthorized, hence, actionable, if it is done in connection with the sale, offering for "without the consent of the registrant." sale, distribution, or advertising of goods or (Ibid.) services on or in connection with which - Trademark infringement is the such use is likely to cause confusion, or to unauthorized use in commerce of a cause mistake, or to deceive, shall be liable registered trademark or a copy or colorable in a civil action for infringement by the imitation thereof, which results in the registrant for the remedies hereinafter set likelihood of confusion among the forth: Provided, That the infringement takes consuming public. place at the moment any of the acts stated - The elements of trademark infringement in Subsection 155.1 or this subsection are are: committed regardless of whether there is (1) a registered trademark in the actual sale of goods or services using the Philippines, infringing material. (Sec. 22, R.A. No 166a) (2) plaintiff’s ownership of said mark, and - The unauthorized use of a trademark or (3) use of the trademark or imitation service mark on or in connection with goods thereof by a third person, which results in and/or services in a manner that is likely to likelihood of confusion. cause confusion, deception, or mistake 6. Tests of trademark infringement - The holistic test requires the court to a. Dominancy test consider the entirety of the marks as - The Supreme Court describes the applied to the products, including the labels dominancy test as follows: and packaging, in determining confusing The dominancy test focuses on 'the similarity. similarity of the prevalent or dominant 7. Differences between trademark features of the competing trademarks that infringement and unfair competition might cause confusion, mistake, and a. Trademark infringement defined deception in the mind of the purchasing - It is the unauthorized use in commerce of a public. Duplication or imitation is not registered trademark or a copy or colorable necessary; neither is it required that the imitation thereof, which results in the mark sought to be registered suggests an likelihood of confusion among the effort to imitate. Given more consideration consuming public. The elements of are the aural and visual impressions created trademark infringement are: (1) a by the marks on the buyers of goods, giving registered trademark in the Philippines, (2) little weight to factors like prices, quality, plaintiff’s ownership of said mark, and (3) sales outlets, and market segments. use of the trademark or imitation thereof by - It has been consistently held that the a third person, which results in likelihood of question of infringement of a trademark is confusion. to be determined by the test of dominancy. - SECTION 155. Infringement. Any person Similarity in size, form and color, while who shall, without the consent of the owner relevant, is not conclusive. If the competing of the registered mark: trademark contains the main or essential or a. Use in commerce any reproduction, dominant features of another, and counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a confusion and deception is likely to result, registered mark or the same container or a infringement takes place. Duplication or dominant feature thereof in connection imitation is not necessary; nor it is with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, necessary that the infringing label should advertising of any goods or services suggest an effort to imitate. [C. Neilman including other preparatory steps necessary Brewing Co. vs. Independent Brewing Co., to carry out the sale of any goods or 191 F., 489, 495, citing Eagle White Lead services on or in connection with which such Co., vs. Pflugh (CC) 180 Fed. 579]. The use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause question at issue in cases of infringement of mistake, or to deceive; or trademarks is whether the use of the marks b. Reproduce, counterfeit, copy or involved would be likely to cause confusion colorably imitate a registered mark or a or mistakes in the mind of the public or dominant feature thereof and apply such deceive purchasers. (Auburn Rubber reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable Corporation vs. Honover Rubber Co., 107 F. imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages, 2d 588; . . . .) (Emphasis supplied.) wrappers, receptacles or advertisements - The dominancy test focuses on the similarity intended to be used in commerce upon or in of the prevalent features of the competing connection with the sale, offering for sale, trademarks that might cause confusion. distribution, or advertising of goods or b. Holistic test services on or in connection with which such - The holistic or totality test necessitates a use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause 'consideration of the entirety of the marks mistake, or to deceive, shall be liable in a as applied to the products, including the civil action for infringement by the labels and packaging, in determining registrant for the remedies hereinafter set confusing similarity. The discerning eye of forth: Provided, That the infringement takes the observer must focus not only on the place at the moment any of the acts stated predominant words, but also on the other in Subsection 155.1 (a) or this subsection features appearing on both labels so that are committed regardless of whether there the observer may draw conclusion on is actual sale of goods or services using the whether one is confusingly similar to the infringing material. (Sec. 22, R.A. No 166a) other. b. Unfair competition - From jurisprudence, unfair competition has any other feature of their appearance, been defined as the passing off (or palming which would be likely to influence off) or attempting to pass off upon the purchasers to believe that the goods public of the goods or business of one offered are those of a manufacturer or person as the goods or business of another dealer, other than the actual with the end and probable effect of manufacturer or dealer, or who deceiving the public. The essential elements otherwise clothes the goods with such of unfair competition are (1) confusing appearance as shall deceive the public similarity in the general appearance of the and defraud another of his legitimate goods; and (2) intent to deceive the public trade, or any subsequent vendor of such and defraud a competitor. goods or any agent of any vendor - Unfair competition is a form of copying and engaged in selling such goods with a like making false statements by one who passes purpose; off his own goods for those of another that (b) Any person who by any artifice, or has an established goodwill. The copying device, or who employs any other and or passing off may include copying of means calculated to induce the false the trademark or giving one’s own goods belief that such person is offering the the general appearance of another, which services of another who has identified causes likelihood of confusion. The elements such services in the mind of the public; of unfair competition are: (1) confusing or similarity in the appearance of the goods (c) Any person who shall make any false involved, and (2) intent to deceive the public statement in the course of trade or who and defraud a competitor. shall commit any other act contrary to - Unfair competition is the employment of good faith of a nature calculated to deception or any other means contrary to discredit the goods, business or services good faith by which a person shall pass off of another. the goods manufactured by him or in which - 168.4. The remedies provided by Sections he deals, or his business, or services, for 156, 157 and 161 shall apply mutatis those of another who has already mutandis. (Sec. 29, R.A. No. 166a) established goodwill for his similar goods, c. Trademark infringement vs. unfair business or services, or any acts calculated competition to produce the same result. (Sec. 29, (1) Infringement of trademark is the Republic Act No. 166, as amended.) unauthorized use of a trademark, whereas - 168.2. Any person who shall employ unfair competition is the passing off of one's deception or any other means contrary to goods as those of another. good faith by which he shall pass off the (2) In infringement of trademark fraudulent goods manufactured by him or in which he intent is unnecessary whereas in unfair deals, or his business, or services for those competition fraudulent intent is essential. of the one having established such goodwill, (3) In infringement of trademark the prior or who shall commit any acts calculated to registration of the trademark is a produce said result, shall be guilty of unfair prerequisite to the action, whereas in unfair competition, and shall be subject to an competition registration is not necessary. action therefor. - Put simply, trademark infringement focuses - 168.3. In particular, and without in any way on the plaintiff’s rights in a source- limiting the scope of protection against identifying symbol; unfair competition unfair competition, the following shall be focuses on the marketplace effects of deemed guilty of unfair competition: defendant’s conduct. Trademark (a) Any person, who is selling his goods and infringement aims to assure that a mark gives them the general appearance of owner’s exclusive rights are protected; goods of another manufacturer or unfair competition aims to assure that dealer, either as to the goods consumers are not deceived or confused themselves or in the wrapping of the and that sellers are not placed at risk of packages in which they are contained, harm from that deception or confusion. or the devices or words thereon, or in ** Can there be trademark infringement without unfair competition? - Yes. It boils down to ownership of the trademark as the issue. There can be trademark infringement without unfair competition, such as when the infringer discloses on the labels containing the mark that he manufactures the goods, thus preventing the public from being deceived that the goods originate from the trademark owner (manufactured by). In a distributor scenario, this is not unfair competition and trademark infringement because this information (manufactured by and distributed by) prevents the public form being deceived that the goods originate from the trademark owner. There is this exclusively distributed by/manufactured for. So there is no unfair competition and there is no case of confusion arising therefrom because the same manufacturing products are sold only the ownership of the trademark is at issue. There is no issue of confusion because it was disclosed, only the ownership of the trademark is at issue in infringement of trademark, unlike in unfair competition. C. THE LAW ON COPYRIGHT lithography or other works of art; models or designs for works of art; (h) Original ornamental designs or models 1. Copyright defined for articles of manufacture, whether or not - Protects original works of authorship registrable as an industrial design, and including literary, dramatic, musical, and other works of applied art; artistic works, such as poetry, novels, (i) Illustrations, maps, plans, sketches, movies, songs, computer software, and charts and three-dimensional works relative architecture. to geography, topography, architecture or - Copyright (or author’s right) is a legal term science; used to describe the rights that creators (j) Drawings or plastic works of a scientific have over their literary and artistic works. or technical character; Works covered by copyright range from (k) Photographic works including works books, music, paintings, sculpture, and produced by a process analogous to films, to computer programs, databases, photography; lantern slides; advertisements, maps, and technical (l) Audiovisual works and cinematographic drawings. (WIPO) works and works produced by a process - Copyright is the legal protection extended analogous to cinematography or any to the owner of the rights in an original process for making audio-visual recordings; work. “Original work” refers to every (m) Pictorial illustrations and production in the literary, scientific and advertisements; artistic domain. (n) Computer programs; and - Copyright laws grant authors, artists and (o) Other literary, scholarly, scientific and other creators automatic protection for artistic works. their literary and artistic creations, from the - 172.2. Works are protected by the sole fact moment they create it. of their creation, irrespective of their mode ** Under the IPL, it is the legal protection or form of expression, as well as of their extended to the owner of the rights in an original content, quality and purpose. (Sec. 2, P.D. work. No. 49a) 2. Original work defined 3. Mode of creation of right - SEC. 172. Literary and Artistic Works. - a. Registration by the owner of the 172.1 Literary and artistic works, work or his/her assignees or successors-in- hereinafter referred to as "works", are interest has the right to apply for a original intellectual creations in the literary copyright registration. and artistic domain protected from the b. Copyrightable works are protected moment of their creation and shall include from the moment of their creation. in particular: ** Independent creation in a form of expression. (a) Books, pamphlets, articles and other Works are protected by the sole fact of their writings; creation (mode of creation). (b) Periodicals and newspapers; (c) Lectures, sermons, addresses, 4. Term of copyright dissertations prepared for oral delivery, Type Term whether or not reduced in writing or other 1. Copyright In the Philippines, material form; protection copyright protection for (d) Letters; artistic, literary and (e) Dramatic or dramatico-musical derivative works lasts compositions; choreographic works or during the lifetime of the author plus 50 years entertainment in dumb shows; after the author’s death. (f) Musical compositions, with or without This term of protection words; also applies to (g) Works of drawing, painting, posthumous works. In architecture, sculpture, engraving, the case of joint authorship, the - The author has the exclusive right to carry economic rights shall be out, authorize or prevent the: protected during the i. Reproduction of the work or lifetime of the last substantial portion of the work; surviving author plus 50 ii. Dramatization, translation, years after such adaptation, abridgment, author’s death. arrangement or other 2. Works with Copyright protection transformation of the work; anonymous shall last for 50 years iii. The first public distribution of owner/creato from the date on which r the work was first the original and each copy of the lawfully published. If the work by sale or other forms of work was not published, transfer of ownership; it shall be protected for iv. Rental of the original or a 50 years counted from copy of an audio-visual or the creation of the cinematographic work, a work work. embodied in a sound recording, a 3. Works of Shall be protected for 25 computer program, a compilation of applied art years from the date of data and other materials or a its creation. musical work in graphic form, 4. Audio-visual Shall be protected for 50 irrespective of the ownership of the works years from the date of original or the copy which is the publication. If it is subject of the rental; unpublished, it is v. Public display of the original protected for 50 years from the date of or a copy of the work; creation. vi. Public performance of the 5. Performers Performances not work; and and incorporated in vii. Other communication to the producers of recordings shall be public of the work. sound protected for 50 years - It refers to the exclusive right of the right recordings from the end of the year holder to authorize or prohibit the in which the reproduction, distribution, exportation or performance took place. importation, or other exploitative activities, Sound or image and such as rental and lending, public sound recordings and performance, communication to the public performances and adaptation in cases of copyrighted incorporated therein work or use and storage in cases of shall be protected for 50 years from the end of trademarks, of the by IPR protected the year in which the creation by third parties, which have not recording took place. previously obtained a license, within the 6. Protection for Broadcasts shall be borders of the states in which the broadcasts protected for 20 years intellectual property right has been granted from the date the or obtained. broadcast took place. b. Moral rights - Calculation of Term. — The term of - Moral rights confer the following on the protection subsequent to the death of the author of a work: author provided in the preceding Section i. To require that the shall run from the date of his death or of authorship of the works be publication, but such terms shall always be attributed to him, in particular; the deemed to begin on the first day of January right that his name, as far as of the year following the event which gave practicable, be indicated in a rise to them. (Sec. 25, P.D. No. 49) prominent way on the copies, and in connection with the public use of his 5. Two rights under copyright a. Economic rights work; ii. To make any alterations of d. If the work was commissioned, the one his work prior to, or to withhold it who commissioned the work jointly from publication; owns it with the author/creator – but iii. To object to any distortion, the copyright of the work remains with mutilation or other modification of, author/creator, unless otherwise agreed or other derogatory action in upon; relation to, his work which would be e. In the case of audio-visual work, the prejudicial to his honor or copyright belongs to the producer, the reputation; and author of the scenario, the music iv. To restrain the use of his composer, the film director, and the name with respect to any work not author of the work adapted. However, of his own creation or in a distorted unless otherwise agreed upon among version of his work. the creators, the producer has the right - Moral rights protect those non-economic to exercise copyright to the extent interests. Moral rights are only available for required for the exhibition of the work in literary, dramatic, musical and artistic any manner, except for the right to works and film, as well as some collect license fees for the performance performances. Unlike economic rights, of musical compositions, with or without moral rights cannot be sold or otherwise words, which are incorporated into the transferred. However, the rights holder can work. choose to waive these rights. f. With respect to letters, the copyright belongs to the writer subject to the ** Economic rights allow right owners to derive following: financial reward from the use of their works by i. Letters and other private others. Moral rights allow authors and creators to communications in writing are take certain actions to preserve and protect their owned by the person to whom they link with their work. are addressed and delivered, but the 6. Ownership of copyright same cannot be published or The owners of original literary and artistic disseminated without the consent of works are: the writer or his heirs. a. The author of the work; ii. However, the court may authorize b. If the work is of joint ownership: the publication or dissemination if i. The co-authors are the original the public goods or the interest of owners and in the absence of justice so requires. agreement, their rights shall be - Anonymous and Pseudonymous Works - governed by the rules on co- For purposes of this Act, the publishers shall ownership. be deemed to represent the authors of ii. The author of each part is the owner articles and other writings published of such part he/she created, if the without the names of the authors or under work consists of parts that can be pseudonyms, unless the contrary appears, used separately and the author of or the pseudonyms or adopted name leaves each part can be identified. no doubts as to the author’s identity, or if c. If the work is created in the course of the author of the anonymous works employment: discloses his identity. (Sec. 7, P.D. 49) i. Employee is the owner, if the work 7. Infringement of copyright created is not part of employee’s - Under Philippine law, copyright infringement regular duties even if he uses the occurs when there is a violation of any of the time, facilities and materials of the exclusive economic or moral rights granted to the employer; copyright owner. It may also consist in aiding or ii. Employer is the owner, if the work abetting such infringement. The IP Code also created is the result of the provides for the liability of a person who at the performance of employee’s time when copyright subsists in a work has in his regularly-assigned duties, unless possession an article which he knows, or ought to otherwise agreed upon. know, to be an infringing copy of the work for the 8. Works that can be protected by copyrights following purposes: (copyrightable works) (a) selling or letting for hire, or by way of Literary and Artistic Works trade offering or exposing for sale or hire, - Original intellectual creations in the literary and the article; artistic domain protected from the moment of their (b) distributing the article for the purpose of creation and shall include in particular: trade, or for any other purpose to an extent a. Books, pamphlets, articles and other that will prejudice the rights of the writings; copyright owner in the work; or b. Periodicals and newspapers; (c) trade exhibit of the article in public. c. Lectures, sermons, addresses, dissertations Remedies available to an owner of a copyright prepared for oral delivery, whether or not against an infringer reduced in writing or other material form; - The copyright owner can file a criminal, civil or d. Letters; administrative action for copyright infringement. A e. Dramatic or dramatico-musical criminal case for copyright infringement must be compositions; choreographic works or filed in the court situated in the place where the entertainment in dumb shows; violation occurred. The administrative suit is filed at f. Musical compositions, with or without the Bureau of Legal Affairs at the Intellectual words; Property Office of the Philippines. A civil g. Works of drawing, painting, architecture, infringement lawsuit is filed in the appropriate sculpture, engraving, lithography or other court located at the place where the defendant works of art; models or designs for works of resides/is located, or where the plaintiff resides/is art; located, at the option of the plaintiff. h. Original ornamental designs or models for Penalties provided by Philippine law for copyright articles of manufacture, whether or not infringement registrable as an industrial design, and - Under Philippine law, copyright infringement is other works of applied art; punishable by the following: i. Illustrations, maps, plans, sketches, charts 1. Imprisonment of between 1 to 3 years and a and three-dimensional works relative to fine of between 50,000 to 150,000 pesos for geography, topography, architecture or the first offense. science; 2. Imprisonment of 3 years and 1 day to six j. Drawings or plastic works of a scientific or years plus a fine of between 150,000 to technical character; 500,000 pesos for the second offense. k. Photographic works including works 3. Imprisonment of 6 years and 1 day to 9 produced by a process analogous to years plus a fine ranging from 500,000 to photography; lantern slides; 1,500,000 pesos for the third and l. Audiovisual works and cinematographic subsequent offenses. works and works produced by a process - The offending party may also be ordered to pay analogous to cinematography or any civil damages. process for making audio-visual recordings; - Injunction and destruction of the infringing goods m. Pictorial illustrations and advertisements; or products can also be obtained, as well as seizure n. Computer programs; and and impounding of any article which may serve as o. Other literary, scholarly, scientific and evidence in the court proceedings. artistic works. - Works are protected by the sole fact of their ** Infringing a copy of the work for the purpose of creation, irrespective of their mode or form of selling, the moment that a person uses the work of expression, as well as of their content, quality and another and cashing it on it, is unjust enrichment. purpose. (Sec. 2, P.D. No. 49a) cda (A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at another's expense Derivative Works without making restitution for the reasonable value The following derivative works shall also be of any property, services, or other benefits that protected by copyright: have been unfairly received and retained.) a. Dramatizations, translations, adaptations, abridgments, arrangements, and other alterations of literary or artistic works; and b. Collections of literary, scholarly or artistic text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, works, and compilations of data and other as well as any official translation thereof. (n) materials which are original by reason of Works of the Government the selection or coordination or - No copyright shall subsist in any work of the arrangement of their contents. (Sec. 2, [P] Government of the Philippines. However, prior and [Q], P.D. No. 49) approval of the government agency or office - The works referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of wherein the work is created shall be necessary for Subsection 173.1 shall be protected as new works: exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or Provided however, That such new work shall not office may, among other things, impose as a affect the force of any subsisting copyright upon condition the payment of royalties. No prior the original works employed or any part thereof, or approval or conditions shall be required for the use be construed to imply any right to such use of the for any purpose of statutes, rules and regulations, original works, or to secure or extend copyright in and speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and such original works. (Sec. 8, P.D. 49; Art. 10, TRIPS) dissertations, pronounced, read or rendered in courts of justice, before administrative agencies, in Published Edition of Work deliberative assemblies and in meetings of public - In addition to the right to publish granted by the character. (Sec. 9, first par., P.D. No. 49) author, his heirs, or assigns, the publisher shall - The author of speeches, lectures, sermons, have a copyright consisting merely of the right of addresses, and dissertations mentioned in the reproduction of the typographical arrangement of preceding paragraphs shall have the exclusive right the published edition of the work. (n) of making a collection of his works. (n) 9. Works that are not protected by copyrights - Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the (non-copyrightable works) Government is not precluded from receiving and Copyright protection does not cover: holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, a. Idea, procedure, system method or bequest or otherwise; nor shall publication or operation, concept, principle, discovery or republication by the Government in a public mere data as such, even if they are document of any work in which copyright is expressed, explained, illustrated or subsisting be taken to cause any abridgment or embodied in a work; annulment of the copyright or to authorize any use b. News of the day and other miscellaneous or appropriation of such work without the consent facts having the character of mere items of of the copyright owner. (Sec. 9, third par., P.D. No. press information; 49) c. Official text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, as well as any official 10. Doctrine of fair works - The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, translation thereof; comment, news, reporting, teaching including d. Work of the Philippine Government, unless multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, there was a prior approval by the research and similar purposes is not an appropriate government agency; and infringement of copyright. e. Statutes, rules and regulations, and - Decompilation, which is the reproduction of the speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and code and translation of the forms of the computer dissertations, pronounced, read or rendered programs to achieve the inter-operability of an in courts of justice, before administrative independently created computer program with agencies, in deliberative assemblies and in other programs, may also constitute fair use. meetings of public character. - To determine whether use of a work constitutes Unprotected Subject Matter fair use, the following factors are considered: - Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 172 1. The purpose and character of the use, and 173, no protection shall extend, under this law, including whether such use is of a to any idea, procedure, system, method or commercial nature or is for non-profit operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere educational purposes; data as such, even if they are expressed, explained, 2. The nature of the copyrighted work; illustrated or embodied in a work; news of the day 3. The amount and substantiality of the and other miscellaneous facts having the character portion used in relation to the copyrighted of mere items of press information; or any official work as a whole; and 4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. ** Fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and transformative purpose. ** Ex. When you gave a criticism or comment regarding Reader’s Digest and you reproduced it. Can this be considered as infringement of the copyright? Do you need to request permission from the copyright owner? - No. ** Doctrine of Fair Use is the defense against a copyright claim. Fair use has been defined as a privilege to use the copyrighted material in a reasonable manner without the consent of the copyright owner or as copying the theme or ideas rather than their expression.
KingCast Mortgage Movies v Betty Lou McKenna First Amended Complaint After Delaware Judge Robert B. Young Ignored Delaware AG Opinion and Pomykacz v. Borouth of W. Wildwood to Slam Indie Journo for Running Video of Public Official