Scribd
Upload
3K views8 pages

Hypothesis Testing Random Motors

The document presents mileage and top speed data for 20 Rocinante 36 cars and 20 Marengo 32 cars. A two-tailed t-test was conducted to analyze if the sample means for mileage and top speed were statistically different than the hypothesized population means specified by the chief engineer. The t-test results failed to reject the null hypothesis for both mileage and top speed, as the p-values were greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence to reject the chief engineer's claims about the specifications of the Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32 models.

Uploaded by

ravithejahr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views8 pages

Hypothesis Testing Random Motors

The document presents mileage and top speed data for 20 Rocinante 36 cars and 20 Marengo 32 cars. A two-tailed t-test was conducted to analyze if the sample means for mileage and top speed were statistically different than the hypothesized population means specified by the chief engineer. The t-test results failed to reject the null hypothesis for both mileage and top speed, as the p-values were greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence to reject the chief engineer's claims about the specifications of the Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32 models.

Uploaded by

ravithejahr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Rocinante 36 Marengo 32

Top Top
Mileage speed Mileage speed
Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) d
1 21.2 151.9 1 15.04 211.3 0
2 21.79 147.6 2 15.41 207 0
3 21.87 145.6 3 15.43 206.2 0 1
4 22.71 136.1 4 15.92 213.4 0
5 22.52 139.7 5 15.2 204.2 0
6 21.41 146.1 6 15.22 208.7 0 2
7 22.71 139.6 7 14.6 200 0
8 21.71 143 8 14.41 210.9 0
9 19.95 136.4 9 14.79 208.5 0
10 20.65 146.6 10 14.81 214.2 0
11 22.86 139.9 11 15.61 215.8 0 3
12 21.12 136.6 12 15.76 215.8 0
13 22.8 148.5 13 14.97 215.2 0
14 20.89 143.4 14 14.71 218.7 0
15 22.49 134.2 15 15.55 208 0
16 20.94 140.5 16 15.19 212.2 0
17 20.37 137.8 17 15.36 219.7 0
18 22.72 135.1 18 15.93 216.4 0 4
19 20.54 138.8 19 14.54 205.8 0
20 21.14 132 20 14.76 209 0

5
6
7

10
Rocinante 36
Hypothesis
Mileage Top Speed
Ho = 22km/liter Ho = 140 km/hr
Ha # 22km/liter Ha # 140km/hr

This is 2 Tail test

Data Collection Mileage Top Speed


Hypothesised Mean 22 140
Sample Mean 21.6195 140.97
Sample standard deviation 0.92729076232579 5.39815758043
Alpha ⍺ ( Significance level) 0.05 0.05
Sample size 20 20
Degree of freedom 19 19

Sample size < 30 : We apply T test


T Statistic & P Value Mileage Top Speed
Standard error (t test) 0.20734851794681 1.20706473031
T Stat (t) -1.8350746065984 0.803602305364
P value ( Link) 0.0822 0.4316

If p-value < ⍺ → Reject the null hypothesis.


Rule If p-value ≥ ⍺ → Fail to reject the null hypothes
Observation We fail to reject null hypothesis for all 4 hypothesis as P value for all 4 hypothesis is higher th
Conclusion There is no sufficient evidence to reject claim made by chief engineer on specfication of both

Type 1 Error If we assume Null hypothesis is TRUE claim and we reject null hypothesis, chances are that w

If we assume Null hypothesis is FALSE claim and we failed to reject null hypothesis we will ha
Type 2 Error as per specification.

Type 2 error is very expensive for company- failed to reject cars which are sold under specifi
Conclusion all vehicles from customers
If p-value < ⍺ → Reject the null hypothesis.
-value ≥ ⍺ → Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
esis as P value for all 4 hypothesis is higher than significancevalue of 0.05
ade by chief engineer on specfication of both Rocnante 36 and Marengo 32

we reject null hypothesis, chances are that we reject cars which are as per specification.

we failed to reject null hypothesis we will have chances of selling car models which are not

ed to reject cars which are sold under specification would cost very high due to recalling of
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Mileage (km/ltr) d
Mean 21.6195 0
Variance 0.859868 0
Observations 20 3
Hypothesized Mean Difference 22
Verification using data package

df 19
t Stat -1.835075
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0411
t Critical one-tail 1.729133
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0822
t Critical two-tail 2.093024

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Top speed (km/hr) d


Mean 140.97 0
Variance 29.14011 0

Observations 20 3
Hypothesized Mean Difference 140
df 19
t Stat 0.803602
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.215783
t Critical one-tail 1.729133
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.431566

t Critical two-tail 2.093024


Rocinante 36 Marengo 32
Top Top
Mileage speed Mileage speed
Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) d
1 21.2 151.9 1 15.04 211.3 0
2 21.79 147.6 2 15.41 207 0
3 21.87 145.6 3 15.43 206.2 0
4 22.71 136.1 4 15.92 213.4 0
5 22.52 139.7 5 15.2 204.2 0
6 21.41 146.1 6 15.22 208.7 0
7 22.71 139.6 7 14.6 200 0
8 21.71 143 8 14.41 210.9 0
9 19.95 136.4 9 14.79 208.5 0
10 20.65 146.6 10 14.81 214.2 0
11 22.86 139.9 11 15.61 215.8 0
12 21.12 136.6 12 15.76 215.8 0
13 22.8 148.5 13 14.97 215.2 0
14 20.89 143.4 14 14.71 218.7 0
15 22.49 134.2 15 15.55 208 0
16 20.94 140.5 16 15.19 212.2 0
17 20.37 137.8 17 15.36 219.7 0
18 22.72 135.1 18 15.93 216.4 0
19 20.54 138.8 19 14.54 205.8 0
20 21.14 132 20 14.76 209 0

5
6
7

10
1

If p-value < ⍺ → Reject the null hypothesis.


Rule If p-value ≥ ⍺ → Fail to reject the null hypothes
Observation We fail to reject null hypothesis for all 4 hypothesis as P value for all 4 hypothesis is higher th
Conclusion There is no sufficient evidence to reject claim made by chief engineer on specfication of both

Type 1 Error If we assume Null hypothesis is TRUE claim and we reject null hypothesis, chances are that w

If we assume Null hypothesis is FALSE claim and we failed to reject null hypothesis we will ha
Type 2 Error as per specification.

Type 2 error is very expensive for company- failed to reject cars which are sold under specifi
Conclusion all vehicles from customers
Marengo 32
Hypothesis
Mileage Top Speed
Ho = 15km/liter Ho = 210 km/hr
Ha # 15km/liter Ha # 210 km/hr

This is 2 Tail test

Data Collection Mileage Top Speed


Hypothesised Mean 15 210
Sample Mean 15.1605 211.05
Sample standard deviation 0.45880250309 5.146332368018
Alpha ⍺ ( Significance level) 0.05 0.05
Sample size 20 20
Degree of freedom 19 19

Sample size < 30 : We apply T test


T Statistic & P Value Mileage Top Speed
Standard error (t test) 0.102591358516 1.150754900969
T Stat (t) 1.564459251949 0.912444517173
P value ( Link) 0.1342 0.373

If p-value < ⍺ → Reject the null hypothesis.


-value ≥ ⍺ → Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
esis as P value for all 4 hypothesis is higher than significancevalue of 0.05
ade by chief engineer on specfication of both Rocnante 36 and Marengo 32

we reject null hypothesis, chances are that we reject cars which are as per specification.

we failed to reject null hypothesis we will have chances of selling car models which are not

ed to reject cars which are sold under specification would cost very high due to recalling of
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Mileage (km/ltr) d
Mean 15.1605 0
Variance 0.2105 0
Observations 20 3
Hypothesized Mean Difference 15
df 19
t Stat 1.564459
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.067106
t Critical one-tail 1.729133
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.134213
t Critical two-tail 2.093024

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Top speed (km/hr) d


Mean 211.05 0
erification using data package

Variance 26.48474 0
Observations 20 3
Hypothesized Mean Difference 210
df 19
t Stat 0.912445
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.186484
t Critical one-tail 1.729133

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.372968

t Critical two-tail 2.093024

You might also like