Customer Satisfaction in Bank
Customer Satisfaction in Bank
Customer Satisfaction in Bank
Supervisor
Prof. Otto Andersen
It is a great pleasure for us to prepare this thesis report entitled "An Empirical Study Of Service
Quality Dimensions On Customer Satisfaction And Customer Loyalty In Nepalese
Commercial Banking Sector " as a partial fulfillment of Master’s degree program.
First and foremost, we would like to express our gratitude to thesis supervisor Prof. Otto
Andersen for his cooperation, guidance, motivation and valuable suggestion throughout study
period.
We remain deeply obliged to all the respondents as well as staffs of Global IME, Kumari, Standard
Charter, NABIL as well as other banks of Kathmandu, Nepal for providing necessary information
for this thesis.
We are very grateful to our parents , sisters, brothers, relatives and colleagues for their support,
cooperation and encouragement while preparing this report.
Finally, we would like to acknowledge our teachers, university staffs, above mentioned persons
and whomsoever have helped us directly or indirectly till date.
i
Abstract
The main purpose behind of this study is to find out the major factors that have impact in customer
satisfaction and customer loyalty in case of commercial banks of Nepal. The thesis tries to explore
whether there exists any relationship between service quality dimensions, customer satisfaction
and customer loyalty depending upon various situational factors. Various concepts such as
consumer buying behavior, buyer’s decision process, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty,
service quality, SERVQUAL model have been discussed along with relevant relationship between
them in the literature review and based upon it, a conceptual model had been formulated stating
the five different hypotheses (one of the hypothesis has been divided into two sub-hypothesis).
In order to collect data for analysis, 375 completely filled questionnaires were collected within one
month. The participants were asked to fill up the questionnaire form with face to face interaction.
All these forms were collected from various commercial banks in Kathmandu, Nepal. In order to
analyze the data, Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used and analytical
techniques like factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, descriptive analysis were used along
with Sobel test for mediation analysis.
After testing the hypotheses using various techniques, it was found that service quality dimensions
such as tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, empathy and assurance had significant positive
impact on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Similarly, one of the situational factors
stated as years of relationship had significant positive relationship with customer satisfaction while
another situational factor stated as frequency of visiting bank had a significant negative
relationship with customer satisfaction. In the same way, in case of mediating factor, tangibility
and frequency of visiting bank do not have significant relationship while reliability,
responsiveness, years of relationship and empathy and assurance have significant positive
relationship. However, it should be noted that some of the independent and mediating variable are
overlapped. In case of control variable, only respondent age had positive significant impact on
customer loyalty while other variable like education level, income and gender are not significantly
related with customer loyalty.
This research is useful for commercial banks so that they can improve service quality to the
customers and thus maintain customer satisfaction and loyalty. Similarly, the policy makers can
make future plans in banking sector based upon the information provided by the customers while
ii
doing this research. In the same way, it can also contribute to other sectors by providing baseline
information regarding service quality in Nepalese banking sector.
Key words: Customer satisfaction, Service quality dimensions, Customer loyalty, SERVQUAL,
Linear regression, Situational factors, Factor analysis, Commercial banks, Buyer’s decision,
Mediating factors, SOBEL test
iii
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................... i
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi
List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii
List of Abbrevirations ................................................................................................................ viii
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Title of the Dissertation ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Background of Study ............................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Nepal as Research Location .................................................................................................. 2
1.4 Banking Sector in Nepal ....................................................................................................... 2
1.5 Motivation for the Research and Research Objectives ......................................................... 3
1.6 Problem Statement ................................................................................................................ 4
1.7 Research Objectives .............................................................................................................. 5
1.8 Research Question ................................................................................................................ 5
1.9 Significance of the Study ...................................................................................................... 6
1.10 Organization of the Thesis .................................................................................................. 7
LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FREMEWORK............................................... 8
2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Consumer Buying Behavior .................................................................................................. 8
2.3 Buyer Decision Process ........................................................................................................ 9
2.4 Differences Between Manufactured Goods and Services ................................................... 10
2.5 Impact of Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty on Service Sector ....................... 10
2.5.1 Customer Satisfaction .................................................................................................. 11
2.5.2 Customer Satisfaction in Banking Sector .................................................................... 12
2.6 Service Quality.................................................................................................................... 12
2.6.1 SERVQUAL Model (Theoretical Framework) ........................................................... 13
2.6.2 SERVQUAL Dimensions in Banking Sector .............................................................. 13
2.7 Customer Loyalty................................................................................................................ 14
2.8 Relationship Between Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty ..... 15
2.8.1 Product and Service Features ....................................................................................... 16
2.8.2 Price ............................................................................................................................. 17
2.8.3 Situational Factors ....................................................................................................... 17
2.8.4 Personal Factors ........................................................................................................... 17
2.9 Relationship Between Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in
Banking Sector .......................................................................................................................... 18
2.10 Relationship of Theories with Buyer Decision Making Process ...................................... 18
2.11 General Overview of Previous Studies ............................................................................. 19
2.12 Identification of Independent Variables............................................................................ 23
2.13 Identification of Dependent Variables .............................................................................. 23
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS .............................................................. 25
3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 25
3.2 Control Variables for Regression........................................................................................ 25
3.3 Hypothesis........................................................................................................................... 28
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................. 29
iv
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 29
4.2 Data Collection and Empirical Context .............................................................................. 29
4.3 Data Collection Methods and Tools ................................................................................... 30
4.4 Measurement of Variables .................................................................................................. 31
4.5 Reliability Analysis and Factor on Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Loyalty and
Customer Satisfaction ............................................................................................................... 34
4.6 Factor Analysis for Service Quality dimensions, Customer Satisfaction and Customer
Loyalty ...................................................................................................................................... 36
4.7 Service Quality Dimensions (SQD) .................................................................................... 36
4.8 Customer Satisfaction ......................................................................................................... 39
4.9 Customer Loyalty................................................................................................................ 39
4.10 Statistical Methods ............................................................................................................ 39
4.10.1 Correlation ................................................................................................................. 40
4.10.2 Multicollinearity ........................................................................................................ 41
RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 42
5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 42
5.2 Descriptive Statistics ........................................................................................................... 42
5.3 Descriptive Statistics of Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Loyalty and Customer
Satisfaction ................................................................................................................................ 43
5.4 Level of Satisfaction Among the Customers ...................................................................... 44
5.5 Controlling Effect ............................................................................................................... 45
5.7 Mediation Effects ................................................................................................................ 47
5.8 Test of Hypothesis .............................................................................................................. 48
DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 52
6.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 52
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 57
7.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 57
7.2 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 57
7.3 Contribution of the study .................................................................................................... 58
7.4 Implication of the Study...................................................................................................... 58
7.5 Limitation of the Study ....................................................................................................... 59
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 60
Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 65
Appendix 1: Reflective Note ................................................................................................... 65
Appendix 2: Survey Questionnaire .......................................................................................... 67
Appendix 3: Correlation with Customer Satisfaction ............................................................... 71
Appendix 4: Correlation with Customer Loyalty ..................................................................... 72
Appendix 5: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Situational Factors .... 73
Appendix 6: Regression Analysis on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty with
Control Effect............................................................................................................................ 74
Appendix 7: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Customer Loyalty ..... 76
v
List of Tables
Table 1: Summary of Previous Studies ......................................................................................... 20
Table 2 : Variable and References ................................................................................................ 26
Table 3: Variable Measure and Sources ....................................................................................... 32
Table 4: Reliability and Factor Analysis of all Independent and Dependent Variables ............... 35
Table 5: KMO for Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty 36
Table 6: Rotated Component Matrixa for Service Quality Dimensions ...................................... 38
Table 7: Rotated Component Matrixa for Customer Satisfaction ............................................... 39
Table 8: Rotated Component Matrix for Customer Loyalty ........................................................ 39
Table 9: Socio Demographic Profile of Respondents .................................................................. 42
Table 10: Situational Factors of Respondents ............................................................................. 43
Table 11: Descriptive Statistics of Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Loyalty and Customer
Satisfaction .................................................................................................................................... 44
Table 12: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Situational Factor .............. 45
Table 13: Regression Analysis on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty with Control
Effect ............................................................................................................................................. 45
Table 14: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Customer Loyalty .............. 46
Table 15: Sobel Test Result for Mediation Test ........................................................................... 49
Table 16: Model Summary ........................................................................................................... 55
vi
List of Figures
Figure 1: Buyer Decision Process ................................................................................................... 9
Figure 2: Customer Perceptions of Quality and Customer Satisfaction ....................................... 16
Figure 3 : Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................ 27
Figure 4: Sobel’s Tests of Mediation ............................................................................................ 48
Figure 5: Revised Conceptual Framework ................................................................................... 56
vii
List of Abbrevirations
AD........................................Anno Domini
AMOS..................................Analysis of a Moment Structures
ANOVA...............................Analysis of Variance
ATM....................................Automatic Teller Machine
FDI.......................................Foreign Direct Investment
GDP.....................................Gross Domestic Product
KMO....................................Kaiser Meyer-Olken
NRB.....................................Nepal Rastra Bank
SD........................................Standard Devation
SERVQUAL........................Service Quality
SPSS....................................Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
SQD.....................................Service Quality Dimensions
VIF.......................................Variance Inflation Factors
viii
INTRODUCTION
1
in banking sector (Siddiqi, 2011). In Jordan and Hong Kong, service quality dimensions have
positive effect on customer satisfaction while looking at banking sector. Similarly, in Jordan
researchers found that service quality dimension is important instrument to measure quality of
services in banking sector (Al-Azzam, 2015). All in all; service quality, customer satisfaction, and
loyalty have been emphasized by all banking sector all over the world including Nepal.
2
The banking sector is emerging. Various types of banks such as development banks, commercial
banks, financial banks are established. Centre bank(NRB) always plays a vital role for developing
banks in Nepal. NRB reforms various policies as well as government encourages private sector
and foreigners for the investment in banking sector. Similarly, NRB has classified banking
institutions into four categories “A”, “B”, “C”, “D” based on minimum paid up capital. “A”, “B”,
“C”, “D” refer to commercial banks, development banks, financial institutions and micro finance
development banks respectively. Here, this research focus only on commercial banks in Nepal.
There are all together 30 commercial banks in Nepal offering different banking services to the
country people (Sharesansar, 2016). In past two decades, many banks were established in Nepal
as the government encouraged the foreign banks to start their operation by creating flexible
privatization policy and free economy. So, in recent years, banking sector of Nepal has been
converted in too much agile, competitive and profitable industry. Different foreign banks have
emerged recently which have further increased competition.
Therefore, in order to get competitive edge and to attract more customers, banks are focusing on
providing better services to the customers that will lead to customer satisfaction and loyalty.
3
quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty making these the dominant reasons that they
achieve less competitive advantages in market. Therefore, identifying customer satisfaction
factors, service quality, and creating loyalty is the hardest task in service sector like banking in
Nepal. Only few studies have been conducted to investigate these factors in Nepalese banking
sector. However, questions about the major factors affecting customer satisfaction, level of
customer loyalty, and factors associated with customer loyalty in Nepalese commercial banks
remained unanswered. Furthermore, proposed study will investigate the mediator role of customer
satisfaction on service quality and customer loyalty in Nepalese banking sector, as well as provide
a comprehensive framework for service quality dimension with respect to customer satisfaction
and customer loyalty.
Likewise, it also provides innovative ways to improve service quality to customers and revises the
current services provided by the banks, if necessary. The agencies and planners can get data and
information on customer satisfaction which will help them to improve their services. These
findings may help planners, policy makers and researchers to identify the banking activities and to
know the existing impact of bank in the study area. The study can also help providing benchmark
information to future researchers.
4
The basic problems faced by Nepalese banking sector are lack of qualified and well trained human
resources leading to a low quality of bank services as well as traditional structure and outdated
technology creating obstacles while delivering quality services to the customer.
By considering this reasons, nowadays many banks are working hard to resolve these problems.
In this research, study factors including service quality dimensions, customer satisfaction and
loyalty are assumed from past literature.
To encapsulate, this research is attempting to find out whether there exists any relationship
between service quality dimension, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in case of Nepalese
banking customers. Also, banking sector in developing countries like Nepal is facing the challenge
of creating quality services, satisfying customer and customer loyalty because skilled human
resources are lacking and banking culture lacks structure. Consequently, banking sector in Nepal
requires further research, innovation and development activities so as to satisfy customer and
create loyalty.
5
What are the factors associated with customer loyalty in Nepalese commercial banks?
This research starts with detail inspection of the literature by developing five hypotheses for
testing. The hypothesis hold the crucial relationship articulated in existing theory, as well as
supporting the research question.
6
1.10 Organization of the Thesis
7
LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FREMEWORK
2.1 Introduction
This section presents literatures which are relevant to this research such as consumer buying
behavior, service quality dimension, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty and will provide
a theoretical framework as well.
8
4. Variety-seeking buying behavior: In this type, the consumer behavior is described by
low involvement in purchases with noteworthy perceived brand differences (Kotler &
Armstrong, 2012, p. 151)
9
2.4 Differences Between Manufactured Goods and Services
Similarly, the buying practice of services are different from manufactured goods because services
are intangible in nature. Therefore, it is very difficult to evaluate services before they are
consumed. But in case of manufactured goods it is possible to evaluate the goods before purchase.
Likewise, while consuming by consumer, processing variable are significantly different in service
as compared to manufactured goods (Shanker, 2002, p. 53). It is also believed that unique quality
of services such as intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity, and perishability makes consumer
more difficult to evaluate services rather than manufactured goods (Parasuraman et al., 1985).
Basically, four differences between manufactured goods and services are identify by various
studies done on consumer services (Jackson et al., 1995) which are as follows:
Services are highly intangible in nature which means that service cannot be stored. Pricing
service is also difficult. So, these factor totally differentiate services from manufacturing
goods because manufactured goods are tangible in nature.
Since services are inseparable in nature, they are consumed at the same time when they
are produced so, it gives straight impact on services provider but in case of manufactured
goods this is not possible (Parasuraman et al., 1985) as customer participation will also
affect the service consumed. However, in case of goods, production and consumption can
done in two different point of time.
Heterogeneity nature of service quality also differs service from goods since goods are
standardized in nature. But many uncontrollable factors play a vital role in determining
service quality. There are the chances of occurance that whatever were planned and
promoted will not be delivered in case of service delivery.
Since service cannot be returned or resold and there are difficulties in coordinating demand
and supply. Also, they are perishable in nature. However, goods can be stored, returned,
resold and it is possible to forecast demand and supply based on market situation (Wilson
et al., 2012).
10
gaining customer satisfaction is very important because it is very important drive to achieve
customer loyalty, increasing goodwill and creating positive word of mouth (Bearden & Teel,
1983). All in all, customer satisfaction has a positive impact on service sector.
Customer loyalty plays a vital role in the success of any service sector because loyal customers are
the true assets of the organization. It is also believed that improvement in service quality will boost
customer loyalty. Wallin Andreassen, (1994) argued that customer loyalty is originated through
reputation and image of service sector. He also advocated that corporate image and corporate
financial performance are linked with each other. Likewise, Loureiro & Kastenholz, (2011)
examined that company image has a positive effect on customer loyalty especially in service
sector. To encapsulate, customer loyalty has a positive influence in service sector.
11
and technique to satisfy their customer such as e-banking, ATM machine. Hence, competitiveness
and convenience are the two major features which have impact on levels of customer satisfaction
in any banking sector (Parasuraman et al., 1988). Therefore, measuring satisfaction will help to
identify the status of the organization regarding customer satisfaction (Badara et al., 2013). In this
competitive world, customer needs have to be addressed properly by different service sectors. In
such case many service providers are shifting their focus from product to customer. Patterson &
Spreng (1997) stated that satisfaction plays vital role in attracting customer. Customer satisfaction
has a great importance in the service sectors especially in banking field because customer
satisfaction is directly linked with loyalty and goodwill of the organization (Ravichandran et al.,
2010). Also, research performed by Mahamad & Ramayah (2010) and Caruana (2002) revealed
that customer satisfaction can be considered as mediator between service quality and loyalty.
12
1. Technical-quality: which measure outcome of service performance
2. Functional-quality: shows subjective perceptions of customer interaction with service
provider.
Grönroos compares two dimension with expectations of customer (Gronroos, 1990). Likewise
Parasuraman et al. (1985) defines service quality as degree of inconsistency among customer’s
normative prospects for services and their opinions of service performed. Similarly meeting the
needs and expectations of the customer defines quality of service (Smith, 1998). Also service
quality is evaluated through ten service quality dimension proposed by Parasuraman et al. (1985)
But later on Parasuraman et al. (1985 ) reduce these ten dimensions into five dimensions so as to
measure perceived value on customer, which is also known as SERVQUAL Model.
1. Tangibility: which includes exterior of physical facilities, equipment, written sign and
signal, personnel.
2. Reliability: Focuses on how service promises are delivered.
3. Responsiveness: Focuses on how organization are willing to help customer and offer
prompt services.
4. Assurance: Focuses on inspiring trust and confidence in employee while delivering
services.
5. Empathy: Focuses on providing individual attention, and caring to the customer by
providing customized services, because each and every customer is unique. (Wilson et al.,
2012).
True loyalty
Latent loyalty
Spurious loyalty
No loyalty
Later on, Garland & Gendall (2004) experienced the context of Dick & Basu and established their
own codification. Similarly, Rauyruen & Miller (2007) specified that customer loyalty can be
determined on the basis of behavioral, attitudinal and composite factor of the customer.
Repurchasing pattern is represented by behavior loyalty, positive word of mouth represents
14
attitudinal loyalty and composite loyalty represents both loyalties. Therefore, customer loyalty can
be explained as committed customer’s activity of purchasing again and again and patronize again
and again to a preferable product in future. Hence, loyalty improves the financial position of the
organization. Oliver Richard (1997) discovered that customer loyalty helps firm to increase their
profit. Customer loyalty is one of the thriving and valuable sources which helps in future planning
of the organization because loyal customers will create superior value as well as relationship
marketing acts as a key component to create customer loyalty. So many service organizations have
started to implement customer loyalty programs.
15
Figure 2: Customer Perceptions of Quality and Customer Satisfaction
The given figure illustrates the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction,
which leads to customer loyalty. From the above figure, it is crystal clear that service quality is
determined on the basis of customer’s perception of service quality dimensions such as reliability,
assurance, responsiveness, empathy and tangibility. So service quality is based on evaluation of
these dimension. Whereas, satisfaction is comprehensive in nature and factors such as product
quality, price, service quality and other situational and personal factors have a great impact.
Therefore, service quality and satisfaction are correlated to each other, which leads to customer
loyalty (Wilson et al., 2012).
16
perception of customer. Several scholars also conducted various studies which address the
importance of product along with services (Kandampully & Suhartanto, 2000). Hence, higher the
quality of goods, higher will be the service quality.
2.8.2 Price
Quality of service can be determined on the basis of price of the product and services. Usually
customers believe that higher the prices of product or services, higher will be the service quality
and vice versa. So, customer use price as a basis to judge quality.
17
are likely to spend more and vice versa. Kotler et al. (1999) described that personality also
influences an individual buying decision making.
18
experience was negative, then customers will be dissatisfied with the decision made by them and
will consider switching the services.
While making buying decision, customers focus more on features and benefits of the product and
services. Therefore, these benefits and features are considered to be important determinants of
customer loyalty in banking sectors. It means that service quality leads to customer satisfaction
and satisfied customer tend to be loyal. Thus, customer loyalty influences buyers decision making
process. Likewise, positive outcomes of buyers decision making process will create customer
satisfaction, improved sales, increased goodwill and brand images (Onditi, 2013). Similarly,
loyalty program also influences the buyer decision process because the loyalty program such as
offering various benefits for customers also encourage customers to create long term profitable
relationship with service provider. Hence, customers will regularly visit service provider.
19
Table 1: Summary of Previous Studies
Badara et al. Customer Service Quality 240 questionnaires 1.Tangibility, Relibility has no AMOS, Descriptive
(2013) Satisfaction and (Tangibility, were distributed significant effect on customer Statistics and
customer loyalty Reliability, among which 209 loyalty and customer composite reliability
Responsiveness, questionnaires is satisfaction in Islamic bank in analysis.
Assurance, convenience and Nigeria.
Empathy, respondents were the 2.Responsiveness has no
compliance) Nigerian students in significant effect on customer
University Utara loyalty but has significant effect
Malaysia. in customer satisfaction.
3.Assurance has significant
effect on customer loyalty but
has no significant effect in
customer satisfaction
4. Empathy, compliance has no
significant effect on customer
loyalty and customer
satisfaction
5. No positive relationship
between customer satisfaction
and customer loyalty in Islamic
bank in Nigeria
20
Table 1: Summary of Previous Studies (Continued…)
Mahamad & Customer Service Quality 147 questionnaires 1.Perceived service quality is Descriptive statistics,
Ramayah (2010) Satisfaction and (Reliability, were collected and positively associated with Regression analysis,
customer loyalty Responsiveness, analyzed. customer satisfaction and ANOVA Test
Assurance, customer loyalty.
Empathy, 2.Customer satisfaction and
Tangibles) customer loyalty are positively
associated.
3.Customer satisfaction
mediates the relationship
between perceived service
quality and customer loyalty.
M. M. Khan & Customer Service Quality 225 questionnaires 1.Service quality have Descriptive statistics,
Fasih (2014) Satisfaction and (Tangibles, were collected and significant and positive one sample t-test,
customer loyalty Reliability, analyzed relationship with customer correlation and
Assurance, satisfaction and customer regression
Empathy) loyalty.
Siddiqi Customer Service Quality 100 questionnaires 1.Service Quality has positive SPSS technique
(2011) Satisfaction and (Tangibles, were collected and association with customer Descriptive Statistics,
customer loyalty Responsiveness, analyzed in the retail satisfaction. Pearson Correlation
Reliability, banking in 2.Customer satisfaction and
Assurance, Bangladesh. loyalty are positively related.
Empathy)
Al-Azzam Customer Service Quality 400 questionnaires 1.Service Quality is positively SPSS Technique
(2015) Satisfaction (Tangibles, were collected and associated with customer Reliability Analysis,
Responsiveness, analyzed satisfaction. Multiple Regressions,
Reliability, Correlation of
Empathy, Analysis
Security)
Lau et al. (2013) Customer Service Quality 119 questionnaires 1.Customer satisfaction was Descriptive Statistics,
Satisfaction and (Tangibles, were collected and positively influence by service Multiple Regression
customer loyalty Responsiveness, analyzed quality.
Reliability, 2.Customer loyalty has a
Assurance, positive influence on customer
Empathy) satisfaction.
21
Table 1: Summary of Previous Studies (Continued…)
Kheng et al. Customer Service Quality 238 questionnaires 1.Tangibles, Responsiveness Reliability Coefficient,
(2010) Satisfaction and (Tangibles, were collected and have no significant effect on Mean and Standard
customer loyalty Responsiveness, analyzed customer loyalty and customer Deviation (SD) for the
Reliability, satisfaction. major variables,
Assurance, 2.Reliability and customer Multiple Regressions
Empathy) loyalty are positive effected
22
2.12 Identification of Independent Variables
From the above literature review, several variables were taken into consideration in different
conditions. Based on those, service quality dimensions (Tangibility, Reliability, Responsiveness,
Assurance and Empathy) and situational factor are selected for the purpose of this study.
23
1. Customer Loyalty: Several studies have highlighted the impact of customer loyalty in
banking sector. Seven out of ten studies used customer loyalty as a dependent variable.
Customer loyalty can be considered as an attitudinal tendency as well as behavioral
tendency where the customer favors one brand over others. Such favoritism over one brand
is because the performance of it stands as per expectations. So, they have positive attitude
towards the product which turns in to brand loyalty after continuous improvement.
Similarly, Caruana (2002); Siddiqi (2011); Gorondutse & Hilman (2014) also use customer
loyalty as dependent variable in their research.
2. Customer Satisfaction: Customer satisfaction is defined as “the individual’s perception
of the performance of the products or services in relation to his or her expectations”
(Schiffman & Kanuk, 2004, p. 14). Following the examples shown with regards to Nigeria
and Iran in 2.5.2, we can say that all studies focus on customer satisfaction as a key
determinant that influences the service quality and customer loyalty. Similarly, Mahamad
& Ramayah (2010); Gorondutse & Hilman (2014) use customer satisfaction as mediating
variable in their research.
24
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS
3.1 Introduction
This section present overall conceptual framework and hypothesis along with defining conceptual
framework briefly. Relationship between independent, control and dependent variable will define
clearly and impact of mediate variables with independent variable will be defined.
A conceptual framework acts as a blue print that shows the relationship among the concepts.
Conceptual framework clarifies the underlying process, which is used to guide this study. On the
basis of nature and scope of this study, conceptual framework was created. As well as it was
developed on the basis of available literature and theoretical issues.
After going through previous available literature, the dependent variable tested by Caruana (2002);
Siddiqi (2011); Gorondutse & Hilman (2014) independent variable tested by Kheng et al. (2010);
Gorondutse & Hilman (2014); Dewan & Mahajan (2014); Mahamad & Ramayah (2010);
Parasuraman et al. (1991) and mediating variable tested by Mahamad & Ramayah (2010) were
taken into consideration in this thesis writing process. This thesis will try to find out which factor
(service quality dimensions) have a positive impact on customer satisfaction (mediating variable)
and customer loyalty (dependent variable) in banking sector of Nepal.
25
Table 2 : Variable and References
Variables References
Dependent Variable: Customer Loyalty Caruana (2002); Siddiqi (2011); Gorondutse &
Hilman (2014)
Independent Variable: Service Quality Kheng et al., (2010); Gorondutse & Hilman
Dimensions and Situational Factors (2014); Dewan & Mahajan (2014); Mahamad &
Ramayah (2010); Parasuraman et al. (1991)
Mediating Variable: Customer Satisfaction Mahamad & Ramayah (2010); Gorondutse &
Hilman (2014)
26
Conceptual Framework
27
3.3 Hypothesis
It is a tentative assumption the validity of which remains to be tested. If the customers agree that
they are satisfied and give the reasons for satisfaction as service quality, service quality dimension
has significant relationship with customer satisfaction. Similarly, conclusions can be drawn for
customer loyalty, satisfaction, service quality dimensions and other situational factors. Based on
framework and objectives of research, the present study seeks to test the following hypothesis:
H1: There is a positive relationship between service quality dimensions and customer
satisfaction in Nepalese commercial Banks.
H3: There is a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in
the Nepalese commercial banks.
H5a: Situational factor (Frequency of visiting) has a positive impact on customer satisfaction.
H5b: Situational factor (Years of Relationship) has a positive impact on customer
satisfaction.
Frequency of visiting
Customer Satisfaction
Years of relationship
28
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4.1 Introduction
This section discusses about research methodology and includes detail discussion about research
procedure, design and data collection methods which we selected for this research.
29
Sampling Frame
After defining the population, the next step is to identify the sample frame. Sampling frame is the
process of listing the elements so as to draw actual sample. For this thesis, list of commercial banks
in Nepal was obtained.
Sampling Procedure
Non- Probability sampling methods was used for data collection. Under this sampling procedure,
convenience sampling procedure is appropriate for this research. Convenience sampling method
depends on the data collected from the population who are willing to participate in the study. In
this sampling method primary data that are available first are used without any modification. This
approach of sampling focus on getting participant wherever you find them and wherever is
convenient. In order to get initial primary data concerning specific issues such as customer in
relation to service quality, this approach is used. In exploration stages of the research, this sampling
technique is effective and in order to collect the basically data structural questionnaires are
developed.
Sampling Size
Several factors such as money, time, statistical methods, population size and so on depends upon
the question of sample size. For this thesis, as per the research convenience, 375 sample were
taken.
Nature of Instruments
Structural questionnaires were developed. The questionnaire consists of four parts.
First part consists of demographic factor and situational factor
Second part consists of service quality dimensions
Third part consists of customer loyalty.
Final part consists of customer satisfaction.
30
The questioners were distributed and collected during office working days. Among 375, 325
questioners were filled and collected in the banks and remaining 50 were distributed to the
employees of the different who were working in Customer service department and this employee
give questionaries’ to the customers directly.
31
Table 3: Variable Measure and Sources
1. Bank have up to date equipment which is sufficient and obvious for customers’
usage.
2. Customers feel comfortable while using bank physical facilities
3. Sufficient Employee are committed to provide customers banking services.
4. Bank’s physical facilities and material associated with service are visually
pleasing
5. The bank can deliver the service as promised to the customers with in a given
time.
6. The bank can provide secure and accurate service to customers
7. The bank can honor their promises.
8. When customer are facing problem, bank show genuine interest in handling
customer problems
9. Bank employees will provide customers precise personal services.
10. Bank employees will provide prompt service to customer
11. Bank employees are willing to help customers.
12. Bank employees are never too busy to respond customer request
13. Customers will feels safe during the transaction process.
14. Bank employees behavior will increase customer’s confident and trust in quality
services.
15. Bank employees will be regularly courteous with customer queries.
16. Bank employees have a knowledge to answer your questions
17. Bank employees will provide customized services to their customers.
18. Bank employees have the enthusiasm to understand the customer specific needs.
19. Bank employees consider customer needs in the first place.
20. Bank opening hours is appropriate to the customers
32
Table 3: Variable Measure and Sources (Continued…)
Customer Satisfaction (1= Strongly disagree to 5=Strongly agree) (Mols, 1998) Mahamad & Ramayah (2010);
Gorondutse & Hilman (2014)
1. I am very satisfied with the services offered by this bank.
2. Bank comes up to my beliefs of a good bank.
3. Overall, I have a good and positive impression towards this bank.
4. Employee are highly motivated to solve customer problems
Customer Loyalty (1= Strongly disagree to 5=Strongly agree) (Mols, 1998) Caruana (2002); Siddiqi (2011);
Gorondutse & Hilman (2014)
1. I speak Positive things about my bank to other people.
2. I would suggested my bank to those who search for my advice about such
matter.
3. I will continue to use this bank services
4. I only pay my attention to this bank
33
4.5 Reliability Analysis and Factor on Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Loyalty
and Customer Satisfaction
Reliability simply refers to the capability of the questionnaire to constantly measure the data across
different population and at different time period. Cronbach’s alpha is one of the most popular
methods of testing reliability. The value of Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0 to 1. Where 0 refers
to completely unreliable test and 1 refers to reliable test.
Factor Analysis is the set of statistical measures that analyze the correlations between variables by
setting common dimension known as factors. So as to reduce number of dimensions of independent
variables and to identify definite, factor analysis is used in this thesis. Basically, exploratory or
confirmatory perspective are chosen to achieve factor analysis purpose. Similarly, KMO (Kaiser
Meyer-Olken) measure is used while doing Factor analysis. KMO evaluates and examines the
suitability of the samples and creates relevance factor. KMO values between 0.5 to 0.7 are
considered to be moderate, 0.7 to 0.8 are considered to be good, 0.8 to 0.9 are considered to be
excellent and the values less than 0.5 indicate that more data are required for the accurate
prediction. The following table shows the test result of reliability, KMO and factor loading for
independent and dependent variables.
34
Table 4: Reliability and Factor Analysis of all Independent and Dependent Variables
35
The table 4 explains about factor analysis and reliability test for all service quality dimensions as
well as customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. For tangible variable, the KMO value is 0.771,
reliability KMO is 0.791, responsiveness KMO is 0.50, assurance and empathy KMO is 0.877
whereas customer loyalty KMO is 0.724, and customer satisfaction KMO is 0.780 respectively.
Generally, KMO value should be greater than 0.5, higher value than 0.5 is better.
4.6 Factor Analysis for Service Quality dimensions, Customer Satisfaction and
Customer Loyalty
Reliability Cronbach’s alpha was used to check internal consistency of the measurement tools.
Reliability test for all variable was performed so as to check the reliability of the variables. The
variable value higher than 0.5 are considered for further analysis.
Table 5: KMO for Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Satisfaction and Customer
Loyalty
36
services”, “ Bank employees are willing to help customers”, “ Bank employees are never too busy
to respond customer request”. After the factor analysis, one item “Bank employees will provide
customer precise personal services” was extracted under reliability dimension. This leaves
responsiveness with three items. Originally there were four items in reliability: “The bank can
deliver the services as promised to the customer with in a given time”, The bank can provide secure
and accurate services to the customer”, “The bank can honor their promises “, “When customers
are facing problem, bank show genuine interest in handling customer problems”. After the factor
analysis, one item “When customer are facing problem, bank show genuine interest in handling
customer problems” was extracted under responsiveness. All the items in tangibility dimension are
the same as the original items. Initially there were four items in each assurance and empathy. After
the factor analysis one item form empathy was removed “Bank opening hours is appropriate to the
customer” and seven items all turned up under one component hence we combined assurance and
empathy due to that overlap. This kind of situation (overlapping factors) was found in some
previous studies conducted by Činjarević et al. (2010)in banking sector of of Bosnia and
Herzegovina. Some of the items overlapped and the three dimension of service quality
responsiveness, assurance and empathy were combined and create new dimensions known as
Customer orientation. Likewise, in previous research conducted by Dhar & Kushwah, (2009)
regarding private and public bank in India, they have also combined the two dimension of service
quality( assurance and empathy) into one due to overlap. Similarly, in the prior article conducted
by Huseyin et al. (2005) in Greek Cypriot bank, it is concluded that responsiveness and empathy
items were loaded in the same and four dimensions were formed. This types of similar situation
were found in our thesis too.Varimax with Kaiser Normalization rotation method was used to
illustrate this interpretation.
37
Table 6: Rotated Component Matrixa for Service Quality Dimensions
38
4.8 Customer Satisfaction
For customer satisfaction the KMO measure of sampling adequacy is 0.78 which also falls into the
ranges of moderate, which means that data are accurate to perform factor analysis. While running
factor analysis, all the multi- item concept for customer satisfaction are extracted in one factor.
Here all the items extracted in factor one truly defines customer satisfaction.
Factor 1
1.I would suggest my bank to those who search for my advice about such matter 0.791
2.I will continue to use this bank services 0.834
3.I speak positive things about my bank to other people 0.800
4.I only pay my attention to this bank 0.723
Extraction Methods: Principal Component Analysis
Rotation Methods: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization
Factor 1
1.I speak Positive things about my bank to other people. 0.813
2.I would suggest my bank to those who search for my advice about such matter 0.782
3.I will continue to use this bank services 0.867
4.I only pay my attention to this bank 0.521
Extraction Methods: Principal Component Analysis
Rotation Methods: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization
39
and loyalty in Nepalese commercial bank. Here, customer satisfaction acts as a mediating variables
and customer loyalty is considered to be dependent variable.
4.10.1 Correlation
Correlation is the basic step in regression analysis. Based on multi-item concepts, correlation also
calculates and confirms relationship. It also confirms the direct relationship and validation. The
Correlation coefficient, R shows the degree of relationship between two different types of
variables. It ranges from -1 to +1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative relationship which means
the decreasing linear relationship that is when one variable increases the another variable will
decrease and 1 indicate a perfect positive correlation which means that increase in one variable
will result from increase in another variable respectively.
40
Customer Loyalty : In appendix 4, the correlation of eleven variables which are age, gender,
education level, income, frequency of visiting banks, years of relationship, tangibility, reliability,
responsiveness, empathy and assurance, customer satisfaction are summarized. The relationships
between dependent variable customer loyalty with all independent variables are investigated by
Pearson correlation coefficient.
First of all, the table represents four control variables among which respondent age with r=0.102*
has a positive low correlation with customer satisfaction where as other are not correlated with the
dependent variable customer loyalty.
Secondly, the table shows the two situational factors among which years of relationship is
positively correlated with r=0.112*.
Thirdly, the variable related to the service quality dimensions such as empathy and assurance,
reliability, tangibility and responsiveness shows the high positive relationship with customer
loyalty with r=0.491**,r=0.400**,r=0.340**and, r=0.150** respectively.
In addition, customer satisfaction is highly and positively correlated with customer loyalty with
r=0.739**. This indicates that higher the customer satisfactions higher will be the service quality.
Finally, on the basis of Pearson correlation, it can be concluded that respondent’s age, years of
relationship, empathy and assurance, reliability, tangibility, responsiveness, and customer
satisfaction have significant positive relation to customer loyalty.
4.10.2 Multicollinearity
Collinearity is occurred in such situation where two or more predictor variables has a higher
correlation. So, the problem may be faced while drawing conclusion because of high correlation.
In SPSS, test between variables are done by using tolerance values and variance inflation factors.
It means that variance inflation factor(VIF) values below 5 are acceptable. Similarly, tolerance
value should be higher than 0.1 It is crystal clear that multicollinearity problem does not exist in
this research because the value of tolerance is higher than 0.3 and variance inflation factors value
is also less than 5. So it is possible for us to perform regression analysis.
41
RESULTS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents finding of the study which were obtained from the analysis of the data. Data
were analyzed by using SPSS software. The total respondents were 375 customers of commercial
banks of Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were presented in tables according to nature of variables as
follows.
42
Out of the 375 respondents, 59.7%(224) were male and 40.3%(151) were female respectively. This
shows that male customers are higher than female customers in commercial banks in Nepal.
Likewise, following table demonstrates that majority of respondents belongs to age group 20-29
years i.e 47.2 %( 177) and minority i.e 5.3 %( 20) belongs to age group less than 20 years.
Similarly, the table below reflects the income of respondents per month in Nepalese currency i.e
NRs. Among 375 respondents, the highest monthly income ranges from Rs 20000-29999 and
lowest monthly income was found less than Rs 10000.
In the same way, given table states the educational level of respondents, out of 375 respondents,
34.7% (130) were graduated and 0.5 %( 2) had passed primary level.
The above table represent the situational factor of respondents selected for the study. From above
table it can be concluded that highest proportion of respondents visiting bank was found monthly
i.e 40.4% (150) and 8.8% (33) respondents visited bank 3-5 times a week.
Similarly, the table 10 also illustrates, years of relationship between respondents and banks.
Among 375 respondents, 39.2 % (147) respondents have been using bank services form 2-5 years
and 6.4% (24) respondents have been using banking services less than 1 year respectively
43
Table 11: Descriptive Statistics of Service Quality Dimensions, Customer Loyalty and
Customer Satisfaction
Here the mean value of all variable ranges between 3.3947 to 3.4673 respectively and standard
deviation ranges from 0.66240 to 0.83488 respectively. Service quality empathy and assurance has
a highest mean value of 3.4697 along with standard deviation 0.66240 in given table.
44
Table 12: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Situational Factor
Table 13: Regression Analysis on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty with
Control Effect
45
satisfaction and control variable as an independent variable. Here model 2 education level, income
and customer satisfaction are significant at P – value 0.016, 0.039 and 0.00 respectively.
Table 14: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Customer Loyalty
46
5.7 Mediation Effects
Variable (M) acts as a mediator when it influences the independent variable (x) for any given
dependent variable (Y). Framework for mediator variable can be shown as follows:
M
a b
c’
X Y
In the above framework c represents the total effect of X on Y, c’ is known as a direct effect.
Furthermore, effect of X on M is a, but the effect of M on Y is b.
If c’ is zero in that case, there will be complete mediation which means that X has no longer effect
on Y when controlling for M. And in the case where c’<c, then partial mediation takes place but
c’is still non zero.
Baron & Kenny (1986) and Judd & Kenny (1981) used common procedure to establish mediation
effect which is discussed in four steps as follows
Step 1: A simple least square regression analysis was conducted with X predicting Y to test for
path c alone
Step 2: A simple least square regression analysis was conducted with X predicting M to test for
path a,
Step 3: A simple least square regression analysis was conducted with M predicting Y to test the
significance of path b alone,
Step 4: Conducting a multiple regression analysis with X and M predicting Y. Here effect of X
controlling for M should be zero. Same equation was used to estimate effect in both step 3 and 4.
All in all, if c’ =0 there will be complete mediation; if not there is a partial mediation.
To examine the effect of mediating customer satisfaction on a given relationship between
dependent and independent variables, customer loyalty and service quality dimensions situational
factor; we follow the Sobel’s test of mediation.
47
Sobel’s test of mediation was developed by Sobel (1982). It is use to test the direct significance of
a b against the normal Z distribution, with Sa and Sb as standard error (Wu & Zumbo, 2007). This
means that result of indirect effect, ab is divided by standard error. Mathematically, Sobel test can
be expressed as
where a= raw regression coefficient, association between independent variable and mediator. Sa =
standard error of a, b= raw coefficient, association between mediator and dependent variable, Sb=
standard error of b. In order to get the values of these firstly, we have to perform regression
analysis with the independent variable predicting the mediator which gives the value of a and Sa
(Soper, 2006 ). Secondly, we have to perform regression analysis with the independent variable
and mediating variable predicting the dependent variable which gives the value of b and Sb. Also,
the value of Sa and Sb should not be negative.
In order to get the value, we use Sobel test calculator that is available online in this website:
http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm in this research.
48
p<0.01, Responsiveness with β =0.279, t=8.310 & p<0.01,) is positively significantly associated
with customer satisfaction. This means that service quality plays vital role in creating customer
satisfaction in service sector. Hence, given hypothesis is supported.
H2: Customer satisfaction mediates the relationship between service quality dimensions,
situational factors and customer loyalty.
In order to examine the effect of mediation in relationship between independent and dependent
variable. Here raw regression coefficient a for Tangibility, Reliability, Responsiveness, Empathy
and Assurance, Frequency of visiting bank and Years of relationship are (a=0.340, a=0.400,
a=0.150, a=0.491, a= -0.005 and a=0.125) and the standard error of a is defined as Sa with values
of 0.49 for Tangibility, 0.047 for Reliability, 0.051 for Responsiveness, 0.045 for Empathy and
Assurance, 0.43 for frequency of visiting banks and 0.058 for Years of relationship respectively.
Similarly, raw coefficient association between mediator and dependent variable b are
0.709,0.688,0.755,0.651,0.739,and 0.739 for each variables. likewise, standard error of b is
defined as Sb and the value for each items for Sb are 0.037, 0.037, 0.036,0.038,0.035 and 0.035.
We use Sobel’s test calculator. On the basic of Sobel’s test, following result are drawn:
From the above table, it is concluded that P-value of Tangibility and Frequency of visiting banks
are not statistically significant because their P-values are higher than 0.01. If p<.05 then it is a
mediator. But in our case it is higher than 0.05. So it fails to reject the null hypothesis. Hence it is
concluded that customer satisfaction does not mediate between tangibility and customer loyalty as
well as between Frequency of visiting banks and customer loyalty. However, the other variables
are statistically significant with P- value less than 0.05 which means that it rejects null hypothesis
and supports our hypothesis. Hence, the given hypothesis is partially supported since customer
49
satisfaction does not mediate between one variable of service quality dimensions and situational
factor with customer loyalty.
H3: There is a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in
the Nepalese commercial banks.
To examine the relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty, a regression
analysis is carried out with customer satisfaction as independent variable whereas customer loyalty
as dependent variable. The result of regression between customer satisfaction and loyalty is
displayed above in table 13 which shows the significant positive relationship between the two
variables. Here the beta is 0.745, t-value is 21.61 with P<0.01 which is statistically significant of
test results. Therefore, above hypothesis was supported.
H5a: Situational factor (Frequency of visiting) has a positive impact on customer satisfaction.
The regression analysis is used to test the relation between situational factor with two variables:
frequency of year visits and years of relationship and customer satisfaction respectively.
From the table 12, we conclude that the situational factor frequency of visit has negative relation
with customer satisfaction with β= -0.011 t= -0.387 &p>0.01. whereas another situational factor
years of relationship has significantly positively relationship with customer satisfaction in the
meantime its P value is 0.001 which is statistically significant of test results as well as β=0.122
t=3.260. Hence, H5a is not accepted.
50
H5b: Situational factor (Years of relationship) has a positive impact on customer satisfaction.
Similarly, in table 12, it is shown that situational factor years of relationship has significantly
positively relationship with customer satisfaction. In the meantime its P value is 0.001 which is
statistically significant of test results as well as β=0.122 t=3.260. Therefore, the given hypothesis
H5b is supported.
51
DISCUSSION
6.1 Introduction
In this chapter, research result will be discussed with respect to previous literature and theories
and compression will be made to find similarities between current results.
The statistical results of questionnaire and hypothesis testing show that independent variables such
as service quality dimensions have an impact on dependent variable customer loyalty and
mediating variable customer satisfaction. Moreover, we discuss service quality dimensions and
situational factors as independent variables and its impact on customer satisfaction, the mediating
variable and customer loyalty as a dependent variable. All the service quality dimensions such as
reliability, tangibility, responsiveness, assurance and empathy had significant positive impact on
customer loyalty. In case of situational factor, only one variable (years of relationship) has
significant positive relationship with customer satisfaction out of two variables. Similarly,
customer satisfaction mediates the relationship between independent variable service quality
dimensions, situational factors and customer loyalty. The main aim of this research is to explore
the level of satisfaction for quality of service provided by Nepalese commercial banks among their
customers, level of loyalty among Nepalese commercial bank users and factors associated with
customer loyalty and satisfaction in the Nepalese commercial banks among their customers.
H1: There is a positive relationship between service quality dimensions and customer
satisfaction in Nepalese commercial banks.
Service quality dimension such as tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy
have a significant relationship with customer satisfaction. This indicates that higher the service
quality, greater the customer satisfaction. Usually in service sector, customer satisfaction is
determined with the help of service quality dimensions. This finding was supported by previous
literatures of Mahamad & Ramayah (2010); Siddiqi (2011); Al-Azzam (2015); Lau et al. (2013).
Furthermore, earlier studies conducted by M.M. Khan & Fasih (2014) also support these findings.
However, the research conducted by Kheng et al. (2010) stated that only two dimensions of service
quality (Empathy and Assurance) are positively related with customer satisfaction. Therefore, for
52
this research, the results with respect to Nepalese commercial banks supported that service quality
dimensions were the vital factors for customer satisfaction.
H2: There is a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in
Nepalese commercial banks.
The second hypothesis states that customer satisfaction acts as a vital variable to create loyalty in
service sector like banks in Nepal. The research result concluded that customer satisfaction had a
significant positive relationship with customer loyalty. This finding was also supported by earlier
studies of Zafar et al. (2012); Lau et al. (2013); M.M. Khan & Fasih (2014). Similarly, the research
conducted by Siddiqi (2011) in retail banking in Bangladesh also support this result. It stated that
customer satisfaction and customer loyalty are positively related with each other. This means that
higher the customer satisfaction, greater will be loyalty. However, prior study by (Badara et al.,
2013) stated that there is no positive significant relationship between customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty in Nigerian Islamic banks. Nevertheless, it is concluded that satisfied customers
are loyal with the services they received from commercial banks in Nepal.
H3: Customer satisfaction mediates the relationship between service quality dimensions,
situational factors and customer loyalty.
The third hypothesis explains the mediating relationship between service quality dimensions and
customer loyalty. The results supported that customer satisfaction mediated the relationship
between services quality dimensions and customer loyalty. Prior study by Mahamad &Ramayah
(2010) also mentioned that customer satisfaction mediated the relationship between perceived
services quality and customer loyalty. Similarly, another prior research by Kheng et al. (2010) also
supported the above mentioned hypothesis. The research findings also concluded that in Nepalese
commercial banks customer satisfaction mediated between service quality dimensions, situational
factors and customer loyalty respectively.
53
H4: Service Quality Dimensions has a positive effect on customer loyalty.
The hypothesis four clarifies the relationship between various service quality dimensions and
customer loyalty. The results indicate that all the service quality dimensions have positive
significant relationship with customer satisfaction. This finding was supported by previous
research done by M.M. Khan & Fasih (2014); Mahamad &Ramayah (2010). On the other hand,
prior research conducted by Kheng et al. (2010) stated that out of five service quality dimensions,
only two dimensions: assurance and empathy, have a positive effect on customer loyalty
respectively. All in all, in Nepalese commercial banking sector, service quality dimensions such
as tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy played vital role in creating
customer loyalty. Therefore, many commercial banks in Nepal put their effort to improve service
quality dimension so as to attract more customer and create loyalty.
H5a: Situational factor (Frequency of visiting) has a positive impact on customer satisfaction.
H5b: Situational factor (Years of Relationship) has a positive impact on customer
satisfaction.
The fifth hypothesis describes the impact of situational factor on customer satisfaction. The result
in this research concluded that out of two situational factors, one factor has a positive impact on
customer satisfaction where as another factor has a negative relationship with customer
satisfaction.
This means that in case of H5a, the situational factor frequency of visit has a negative relationship
with customer satisfaction. But in case of H5b, situational factor years of relationship has positive
relationship with customer satisfaction which indicated that those customers who had a long
relationship with bank were satisfied with the services provided by banks in Nepal. However, prior
research conducted by Dewan & Mahajan (2014) in public sector banks in India concluded that
years of relationship with banks has no positive effect on customer satisfaction whereas frequency
of visiting has a moderating effect on customer satisfaction. On the contrary, only satisfied
customers are willing to keep long term relationship with commercial banks in Nepal.
54
Table 16: Model Summary
55
Figure 5: Revised Conceptual Framework
Control Variable
56
CONCLUSION
7.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the research findings and conclusion, implication of research and limitation
of the study.
7.2 Conclusion
The main purpose of conducting this research was to identify the important factors of customer
satisfaction and customer loyalty in the context of Nepalese commercial banks. Many similar
researches have been conducted in different setting like European, America, African countries and
in few Asian countries, but only few data are available for Nepal. Furthermore, banking sector in
Nepal is emerging. It plays vital role in the economic development of the country.
This research observed prior literature and established a base for examining customer loyalty and
customer satisfaction. The hypotheses presented in this research are tested and findings are
presented. The presented findings revealed that service quality dimensions such as tangibility,
reliability, responsiveness, empathy and assurance have a significant impact on customer loyalty
and customer satisfaction. Additionally, study also indicate that situational factors have also
impact on customer satisfaction. Likewise, customer satisfaction mediates the relationship
between service quality dimensions, situational factors and customer loyalty. Finally, it also
examines control variables such as gender, age, income, and education level. Here, gender and
education level and income has insignificant effect on the given factor customer loyalty. Similarly,
age has a partial significant effect on the given factor.
All in all, the objective of this research was to identify the major factors that have an impact in
customer satisfactions and customer loyalty. In this regard, finding exhibit that service quality
dimensions such as tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, empathy and assurance are the most
important factors that have an impact on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty respectively.
57
7.3 Contribution of the study
For Commercial Banks: This research is new as the combined research with regards to customer
satisfaction, service quality and customer loyalty is not found in context of Nepal. It focuses on
customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in commercial banks of Nepal. This research also
suggests innovative ways to improve service quality to customers and revise the current services
provided by the banks, if necessary.
For Policymakers : It also provides agencies and planners information on customer satisfaction
and loyalty which helps them to make future plans and policy in banking sector in Nepal as well
as in various services sector as per need.
For Society and Others: It also contributed to other service sector in context of Nepal and other
similar countries like Nepal. The research will helps for new researcher by providing base line
information regarding service quality of Nepalese banking sector.
Finally, the findings of this research contribute to the understanding of customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty with respect to service quality dimensions in the context of Nepalese commercial
banks.
58
7.5 Limitation of the Study
This research has some limitations which can be addressed in future research. First of all, it focuses
on commercial banking sector only; so limitation from generalization takes places. In future , the
research should focus on other financial sector as well as service sector such as tourism, retail,
hotels, transportation and many more. Secondly, this research is based on quantitative methods, so
in future, researcher can use qualitative methods to understand customer satisfaction and loyalty
in Nepalese commercial banks. During data collection the questionnaires should be developed in
both English as well as in native language in understandable and simple words. Similarly, only
SERVQUAL dimension are used in this research but in future it would be interesting if others
dimensions are also added. Likewise, it would be interesting if different situational and control
variables are used in future research. Also, the researcher focused upon the customers of
Kathmandu as here are the most customers of banks. In the future when customers are more evenly
dispersed, then it would be better to collect data from various places.
59
REFERENCES
Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Usman, A., Shaukat, M. Z., Ahmad, N., & Iqbal, H. (2010). Impact of
Service Quality on Customers' Satisfaction: Empirical evidence from telecom sector of
Pakistan. Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business, 1(12), 98.
Al-Azzam, A. F. M. (2015). The Impact of Service Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction:
A Field Study of Arab Bank in Irbid City, Jordan. European Journal of Business and
Management, 7(15).
Assael, H. (1995). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action: South-Western College Pub.
Badara, M. a. S., Mat, N. K. N., Mujtaba, A. M., Al-Refai, A. N., Badara, A. M., & Abubakar, F.
M. (2013). Direct effect of service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty in Nigerian Islamic bank. Management, 3(1), 6-11.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of
personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and
complaint reports. Journal of marketing Research, 21-28.
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing
favorable and unfavorable incidents. The Journal of Marketing, 71-84.
Boonlertvanich, K. (2011). Effect of customer perceived value on satisfaction and customer loyalty
in banking service: The moderating effect of mainbank status. International Journal of
Business Research, 11(6), 40-54.
Boundless. (2015). Boundless Marketing. Factors Influencing Experience, Involvement, and
Satisfaction. Retrieved 21/012/2015, from
https://www.boundless.com/marketing/textbooks/boundless-marketing-
textbook/consumer-marketing-4/consumer-experience-43/factors-influencing-experience-
involvement-and-satisfaction-218-4858/
Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of
customer satisfaction. European journal of marketing, 36(7/8), 811-828.
Chimoriya, B. (2015). Service Sector industries in Nepal with Examples. Retrieved 09/01/2016,
from http://www.wisenepali.com/2015/01/service-sector-industries-in-nepal-with.html
60
Činjarević, M., Tatić, K., & Avdić, A. (2010). An integrated model of price, service quality,
satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical research in the banking sector of Bosnia and
Herzegovina. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 23(4), 142-161.
Countrymeters. (2015). Nepal Population. Retrieved 14/01/2016, from
http://countrymeters.info/en/Nepal
Dhar, D., & Kushwah, S. V. (2009). Service quality expectations and perceptions of public and
private sector banks in India: A comparative study. Retrieved February, 22, 2014.
Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework.
Journal of the academy of marketing science, 22(2), 99-113.
Engel, J. F., Miniard, P. W., & Blackwell, R. D. (1993). Consumer behavior Fort Worth, Tex
Dryden Press.
Garland, R., & Gendall, P. (2004). Testing Dick and Basu's customer loyalty model. Australasian
Marketing Journal (AMJ), 12(3), 81-87.
Geographia. (2005). An Introduction to Nepal. Retrieved 15/01/2016, from
http://www.geographia.com/nepal/
Gorondutse, A. H., & Hilman, H. (2014). Mediation effect of customer satisfaction on the
relationships between service quality and customer loyalty in the Nigerian foods and
beverages industry: Sobel test approach. International Journal of Management Science and
Engineering Management, 9(1), 1-8.
Gronroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing: Managing the moments of truth in
service competition: Lexington books.
Heskett, J. L., Saeere, W. E., & Schlesinger, J. L. A. (1997). The Service Profit Chain: How
Leading Companies Link Profit and Growth to Loyalty, Satisfaction, and Value. New York
: Free Press.
Huseyin, A., Salime, M. S., & Salih Turan, K. (2005). Customer service quality in the Greek
Cypriot banking industry. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(1), 41-
56. doi:10.1108/09604520510575254
Jackson, R. W., Neidell, L. A., & Lunsford, D. A. (1995). An empirical investigation of the
differences in goods and services as perceived by organizational buyers. Industrial
Marketing Management, 24(2), 99-108.
61
Johnston, R. (1997). Identifying the critical determinants of service quality in retail banking:
importance and effect. International Journal of bank marketing, 15(4), 111-116.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis estimating mediation in treatment
evaluations. Evaluation review, 5(5), 602-619.
Kandampully, J., & Suhartanto, D. (2000). Customer loyalty in the hotel industry: the role of
customer satisfaction and image. International journal of contemporary hospitality
management, 12(6), 346-351.
Khan, M. (2006). Consumer Behaviour and Advertising Management: New Age International Pvt.
Ltd., Publishers.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of marketing. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2011). Marketing Management (14 ed.): Prentice Hall.
La Roche, M. (2005). Cultural Perspectives on Services Marketing (Vol. 19): Emerald Group
Publishing.
Lau, M. M., Cheung, R., Lam, A. Y., & Chu, Y. T. (2013). Measuring service quality in the
banking industry: a Hong Kong based study. Contemporary Management Research, 9(3),
263.
Lewis, B. R., & Soureli, M. (2006). The antecedents of consumer loyalty in retail banking. Journal
of consumer Behaviour, 5(1), 15-31.
Loureiro, S. M. C., & Kastenholz, E. (2011). Corporate reputation, satisfaction, delight, and loyalty
towards rural lodging units in Portugal. International Journal of Hospitality Management,
30(3), 575-583.
Mahamad, O., & Ramayah, T. (2010). Service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty: A test of
mediation. International business research, 3(4), 72.
McDougall, G., & Levesque, T. (1992). The measurement of service quality: some methodology
issues. 2ème Séminaire International de Recherche en management des activités de
service, 411-430.
Michael, S., Gary, B., & Soren, A. (1999). Consumer behaviour: a European perspective. New
Yersey, ZDA: Prentice Hall Inc.
Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior:
Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of marketing
Research, 38(1), 131-142.
62
Oliver Richard, L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York ˈ
NY: Irwin-McGraw-Hill.
Oly Ndubisi, N. (2004). Understanding the salience of cultural dimensions on relationship
marketing, it's underpinnings and aftermaths. Cross Cultural Management: An
International Journal, 11(3), 70-89.
Onditi, A. A. (2013). Relationship between Customer Personality, Service Features and Customer
Loyalty in the Banking Sector: A Survey of Banks in Homabay County, Kenya.
International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(15).
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality
and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
doi:10.2307/1251430
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for
Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
Patterson, P. G., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modelling the relationship between perceived value,
satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: an
empirical examination. International Journal of service Industry management, 8(5), 414-
434.
Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty.
Journal of business research, 60(1), 21-31.
Ravichandran, K., PRABAKARAN, S., & Kumar, S. A. (2010). Application of Servqual model
on measuring service quality: A Bayesian approach. Enterprise Risk Management, 2(1).
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2004). Consumer behaviour 8 th ed: New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Shanker, R. (2002). Services Marketing: The Indian Perspective : Text and Readings: Excel
Books.
Sharesansar. (2016). Banking History in Nepal: When were the commercial banks established in
Nepal ? Retrieved 9/02/2016, from http://www.sharesansar.com/banking-history-in-
nepal-when-were-the-commercial-banks-established-in-nepal/
Siddiqi, K. O. (2011). Interrelations between service quality attributes, customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty in the retail banking sector in Bangladesh. International Journal of
Business and Management, 6(3), 12.
63
Smith, S. (1998). How to create a plan to deliver great customer service. Best Practices in
Customer Service. New York, NY: AMACOM.
Soper., D. D. (2006 ). Calculator: Sobel Test for the Significance of Mediation. Retrieved
15/05/2016, from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=31
Tam, J. L. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: an integrative model.
Journal of marketing management, 20(7-8), 897-917.
Uncles, M. D., Dowling, G. R., & Hammond, K. (2003). Customer loyalty and customer loyalty
programs. Journal of consumer marketing, 20(4), 294-316.
Veloutsou, C., Daskou, S., & Daskou, A. (2004). Are the determinants of bank loyalty brand
specific? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 9(2), 113-125.
Wallin Andreassen, T. (1994). Satisfaction, loyalty and reputation as indicators of customer
orientation in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(2),
16-34.
Wilson, A., Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2012). Services marketing:
Integrating customer focus across the firm: McGraw Hill.
Wu, A. D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators. Social
Indicators Research, 87(3), 367-392. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1
Zafar, M., Zaheer, A., & ur Rehman, K. (2011). Impact of online service quality on customer
satisfaction in banking sector of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 5(30),
11786.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web
sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the academy of marketing science,
30(4), 362-375.
64
Appendices
65
environmental factors. All the technological factors such as introduction of ATM machines,
electronic cards, internet banking by Nepalese banks are the contribution from international
scenario. Not only this, being the member of World Trade Organization as well as South Asian
Association for Regional Cooperation, the banking sector is now prone to various international
factors.
Innovation is not a new term in service sector as the banks try to remain near to their customers by
introducing various innovative ideas. This research suggest that customer satisfaction and loyalty
can be increased by providing innovative service to the customers. Finding market gap is one of
the important activities with regards to innovation. In case of commercial banks in Nepal, the
market is saturated, so the banks need to innovate by exploiting existing market gaps. This can be
done by understanding the nature of existing market, the grievances of the customers which defines
in what ways they could not get quality services so that the banks can find ways that would address
their needs promptly. Also, they can find the unique attributes that helps to drive the core value
proposition. For instance; launching different saving accounts to address the necessity of
customers from any walk of life, lowering the interest rate in borrowing and making paper work
easier, so that people can perform banking transaction with less hassle; can be some innovative
ideas for Nepalese commercial banks.
With regards to the responsibility, the commercial banks in Nepal can apply corporate social
responsibility (CSR) as a tool of commutative advantage in order to influence the customer
satisfaction as well as the customer loyalty. One way to do this can be finding out where the
existing customers are more in number in certain area and performing socio- economically
beneficial activities (for example: sponsoring the health camping) so that it stimulates the
satisfaction level and customer loyalty indirectly but effectively. However, this may also lead to
the one big ethical dilemma; should CSR activities be carried out where necessary or should it be
carried out where the number of the customer is high. Also, majority of banks are concentrated in
major cities only, leaving the customers from rural areas to be fully or partially cut off from
enjoying complete banking services. It is the responsibility of the banks to attract the potential
customers from rural areas also. Similarly, with Nepalese adult literacy rate being 65.7 percent,
there are many customers who are illiterate. There is a big challenge as well as responsibility for
the banks to provide user friendly service to these customers and ensure satisfaction and loyalty
from them.
66
Appendix 2: Survey Questionnaire
Note: Given information will be used for research purpose only and will not be disclosed to
anybody.
Part 1
Tick (√) mark the appropriate option
Demographic or Personal factor (Mahamad &Ramayah, 2010)
1. Gender: 1. Male 2. Female
2. Education Level
1. Primary 2.Secondary 3.Higher Secondary 4.Undergraduate 5.Graduate
6. Post Graduate 7.Doctorate
3. Name of your bank: ……...…………...…………
4. Age
1. Less than 20 years
2. 20-29years
3. 30-39years
4. 40-49 years
5. 50years and Above
67
Part 2
Situational Factors (Dewan & Mahajan, 2014)
1. Frequency of visiting a bank
1. 3-5 times a week.
2. Once a week
3. Once in every two week
4. Monthly
5. More seldom than once a monthly.
2. How long have you been customer of this bank? (Years of relationship with banks).
1. Less than 1 years
2. 1-2 years
3. 2-5 years
4. More than 5 years
Part 3
Please read each question carefully and select your level of agreement for the following statement.
And tick (√) mark the appropriate number from 1 to 5. Each testimonial is measured by 5- point
Likert scale: 1= Strongly disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Neutral; 4= Agree; 5=Strongly agree
A. Service Quality Dimension(SERVQUAL) LEVEL OF
AGREEMENT
Tangibility 1 2 3 4 5
1. Bank have up to date equipment which is sufficient and obvious for
customers’ usage.
2. Customers feel comfortable while using bank physical facilities
3. Sufficient Employee are committed to provide customers banking
services.
4. Bank’s physical facilities and material associated with service are
visually pleasing
68
Reliability
5. The bank can deliver the service as promised to the customers with in a
given time.
6. The bank can provide secure and accurate service to customers
69
Part 4
Please read each question carefully and select your level of agreement for the following statement.
And Tick (√) mark the appropriate number from 1 to 5. Each testimonial is measured by 5- point
Likert scale: 1= Strongly disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Neutral; 4= Agree; 5=Strongly agree
B. Customer Loyalty LEVEL OF
AGREEMENT
1 2 3 4 5
1. I speak Positive things about my bank to other people.
2. I would suggested my bank to those who search for my advice about such
matter.
3. I will continue to use this bank services
4. I only pay my attention to this bank
Adapted from: (Mols,1998)
Part 5
Please read each question carefully and select your level of agreement for the following statement.
And Tick (√) mark the appropriate number from 1 to 5. Each testimonial is measured by 5- point
Likert scale: 1= Strongly disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Neutral; 4= Agree; 5=Strongly agree
Adapted from: (Mols, 1998)
70
Appendix 3: Correlation with Customer Satisfaction
Frequency of visiting
bank -.089 -.042 -.130* .024 1
71
Appendix 4: Correlation with Customer Loyalty
Education Incom
Gender of level of e Per Frequenc Empath
the the Month y of Years of y and Customer Custom
responden responden Responden s in visiting relationshi assuranc Reliabilit TangibilityResponsivene Satisfactio er
ts ts ts Age NRs bank p e y e ss n Loyalty
Gender of the
respondents 1
Education
level of the -.044 1
respondents
Respondents
.087 .321** 1
Age
Income Per
Months in .013 .533** .450** 1
NRs
Frequency of
visiting bank .000 -.011 .087 -.104* 1
Years of
relationship .057 .204** .405** .332** -.018 1
Empathy and
assurance -.035 .061 .017 .021 .024 -.040 1
Reliability -.026 .040 .036 .095 -.042 .085 .000 1
Tangibility .047 .065 .160** .039 -.089 .097 .000 .000 1
Responsivene
.014 -.076 .046 .029 -.130* -.024 .000 .000 .000 1
ss
Customer
Satisfaction -.022 -.005 .140** .071 -.088 .151** .465** .394** .363** .278** 1
Customer
-.030 .051 .102* .019 -.067 .112* .491** .400** .340** .150** .739** 1
Loyalty
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
72
Appendix 5: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Situational Factors
Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the Change Statistics
Model R R Square Square Estimate R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
a
1 .770 .592 .586 .64367558 .592 89.115 6 368 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), Responsiveness, Tangibility, Reliability, Empathy and assurance, Years of relationship, Frequency of visiting bank
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 221.531 6 36.922 89.115 .000b
Residual 152.469 368 .414
Total 374.000 374
a. Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction
b. Predictors: (Constant), Responsiveness, Tangibility, Reliability, Empathy and assurance, Years of relationship, Frequency of visiting bank
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval for Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients B Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound Tolerance VIF
1(Constant) -.335 .152 -2.205 .028-.635 -.036
Frequency of visiting
-.011 .028 -.013 -.387 .699-.065 .044 .973 1.028
bank
Years of relationship .122 .038 .110 3.260 .001.049 .196 .981 1.019
Empathy and assurance .469 .033 .469 14.084.000.404 .535 .998 1.002
Reliability .384 .033 .384 11.486.000.318 .450 .991 1.009
Tangibility .352 .034 .352 10.471.000.286 .418 .983 1.018
Responsiveness .279 .034 .279 8.310 .000.213 .345 .982 1.018
a. Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction
73
Appendix 6: Regression Analysis on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty with Control Effect
Model Summary
Change Statistics
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .119a .014 .003 .99825225 .014 1.328 4 370 .259
2 b
.745 .555 .549 .67189563 .540 447.730 1 369 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents, Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age, Education level of the respondents
b. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents, Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age, Education level of the respondents, Customer
Satisfaction
ANOVAa
c. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents, Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age, Education level of the respondents, Customer
Satisfactio
74
Coefficientsa
Respondents Age .115 .057 .117 2.004 .046 .002 .228 .781 1.281
Income Per Months in NRs -.035 .042 -.055 -.846 .398 -.117 .047 .630 1.588
Gender of the respondents -.076 .106 -.037 -.716 .475 -.284 .132 .987 1.014
2 (Constant) -.253 .196 -1.291 .197 -.638 .132
Education level of the
respondents .093 .038 .100 2.420 .016 .017 .169 .701 1.426
Respondents Age .008 .039 .008 .193 .847 -.069 .084 .768 1.303
Income Per Months in NRs -.058 .028 -.091 -2.069 .039 -.113 -.003 .629 1.591
Gender of the respondents -.017 .071 -.008 -.233 .816 -.157 .124 .985 1.015
Customer Satisfactio .745 .035 .745 21.160 .000 .675 .814 .975 1.026
a. Dependent Variable: Customer Loyalty
75
Appendix 7: Regression Analysis on Service Quality Dimensions and Customer Loyalty
Model Summary
Change Statistics
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .119a .014 .003 .99825225 .014 1.328 4 370 .259
2 b
.738 .544 .534 .68253653 .530 106.366 4 366 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents , Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age , Education level of the respondents
b. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents , Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age , Education level of the respondents , Empathy
and assurance , Reliability, Responsiveness, Tangibility
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 5.292 4 1.323 1.328 .259b
Residual 368.708 370 .997
Total 374.000 374
2 Regression 203.497 8 25.437 54.603 .000c
Residual 170.503 366 .466
Total 374.000 374
a. Dependent Variable: Customer Loyalty
b. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents , Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age , Education level of the respondents
c. Predictors: (Constant), Gender of the respondents , Income Per Months in NRs, Respondents Age , Education level of the respondents ,
Empathy and assurance , Reliability, Responsiveness, Tangibility
76
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients 95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) -.273 .291 -.940 .348 -.845 .299
Education level of the respondents .038 .057 .041 .673 .501 -.074 .150
Respondents Age .115 .057 .117 2.004 .046 .002 .228
Income Per Months in NRs -.035 .042 -.055 -.846 .398 -.117 .047
Gender of the respondents -.076 .106 -.037 -.716 .475 -.284 .132
2 (Constant) .008 .201 .039 .969 -.386 .402
Education level of the respondents .019 .039 .020 .482 .630 -.058 .096
Respondents Age .049 .040 .050 1.238 .216 -.029 .127
Income Per Months in NRs -.051 .029 -.080 -1.785 .075 -.107 .005
Gender of the respondents -.045 .072 -.022 -.627 .531 -.188 .097
Empathy and assurance .490 .035 .490 13.839 .000 .420 .559
Reliability .404 .035 .404 11.387 .000 .334 .474
Tangibility .335 .036 .335 9.361 .000 .265 .406
Responsiveness .152 .036 .152 4.284 .000 .082 .222
a. Dependent Variable: Customer Loyalty
77