0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views22 pages

Formation Evaluation: Dr. Adel M. Al-Matary

The document discusses the basics of logging interpretation for shaly sand formations. It covers calculating volume of shale, porosity from log readings using formulas or charts, shale-corrected and hydrocarbon-corrected porosity, determining water resistivity (Rw), using the Archie equation, qualitative log interpretation using measurements like SP and resistivity, lithology identification through tools like neutron-density crossplots, and zoning logs into intervals. The overall goal is to interpret well logs to determine properties like porosity, saturation, and lithology in order to evaluate formations for hydrocarbon potential.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views22 pages

Formation Evaluation: Dr. Adel M. Al-Matary

The document discusses the basics of logging interpretation for shaly sand formations. It covers calculating volume of shale, porosity from log readings using formulas or charts, shale-corrected and hydrocarbon-corrected porosity, determining water resistivity (Rw), using the Archie equation, qualitative log interpretation using measurements like SP and resistivity, lithology identification through tools like neutron-density crossplots, and zoning logs into intervals. The overall goal is to interpret well logs to determine properties like porosity, saturation, and lithology in order to evaluate formations for hydrocarbon potential.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

FORMATION EVALUATION

Schlumberger Private
Dr. Adel M. Al-Matary
Lecture 4

Schlumberger Private
Logging Interpretation Method -
Basic Approaches
Schlumberger Private

Quick look Log Interpretation with shaly sand formation

1
Objectives

 How to compute Volume of Shale?


 How to calculate porosity from log reading via formulae
or chartbook?

Schlumberger Private
 How to derive shale corrected porosity via formulae or
chartbook?
 How to perform hydrocarbon corrected porosity via
chartbook?
 How to get Rw?
 How to confirm Rw is correct?
 How to use Archie equation?

Schlumberger Private
Log Interpretation
 Interpretation is defined as the action of explaning the
meaning of something
 Log interpretation is the explanation of logs such as b,
GR, Resistivity, etc. in terms of well and reservior
Schlumberger Private

parameters, zones, porosity, oil saturation, etc.


 Log interpretation can provide answers to questions on:
 How much hydrocarbon is in these wells?
 Where is it?
 Is there communication between these reservoirs?
 What is the extent of this reservoir?

2
Log Interpretation (Cont.)
 Log interpretation can provide answers to questions on:
 How will it produce?
 Will it require enhanced recovery techniques?

Schlumberger Private
lithological
sandstone grades
to clay sediment

GAS

OIL
sandstone
WATER pinch out

Schlumberger Private
What Can the Log Measurements Provide?

 Log measurements give:


 Porosity: From porosity tools
 Water Saturation: From a combination of porosity / lithology tools
and Resistivity or Capture Cross-Section from the TDT tool
Schlumberger Private

 Thickness: From depth measurements


 Position: Markers-correlation
 Lithology: Reservoir/non-reservoir

3
Early Log Interpretation

 Early resistivity logs were used to find possible producing zones


 SP was used to define permeable beds, compute Rw and
determine shaliness
 Resistivity was used to determine “Porosity”

Schlumberger Private
 Archie developed the relationship between resistivity, porosity
and saturation

Schlumberger Private
WellSite Interpretation-Quicklook
 This is a schematic representation of the logging measurements
used and the petrophysical parameters determined for
answering the basic questions of wellsite interpretation

Density
Can ?  Neutron
Schlumberger Private

Sonic
1. Does the formation contain Hydrocarbon?

Clean? GR Rt
SP
2. Quantity Resistivity

3. Recoverable

(1-Sw) Rxo
f(Rt,)

4
Qualitative Interpretation
 This is a summary of phenomenological interpretation
Descriptor Measurement Functional Behavior

Clean/Shaly SP Vshale  SP 
GR Vshale  GR 

Schlumberger Private
Porosity() Density   b 
Neutron   n 
Sonic   t 
Hydrocarbon Rt Sw  Rt 
So  Rt 
   Rt 
Recoverable/ Rxo vs. Rt Rxo=Rt  no

Schlumberger Private
invasion
Moveable (shallow vs.
deep) Rxo/RtRmf/Rw 
Moved fluid

Modern Log Interpretation

 LQC
 Consult the field engineer/client and check the original hardcopy
 Environmental correction (GF: PrePlus)
 Data Editing and Crossplot (GF: WellEdit and UtilityPlots)
 Logs in open hole give:
Schlumberger Private

 Porosity
 Quantity, Type and Distribution
 Saturation
 Thickness
 Permeability
 Producibility
 Lithology
 Rick type, Shale content, Shale type and deposition
 Fluid Type
 Fluid Contact
 Etc.

5
Interpretation Procedure

Schlumberger Private

Schlumberger Private
Zoning
 Zoning is the first step in any interpretation procedure. During zoning, the logs
are split into intervals of:
 Porous and non-porous rock
 Permeable and non-permeable rock
 Shaly and clean rock
 Good hole conditions and bad hole conditions
Schlumberger Private

 Good logs and bad logs


 Zoning Tools:
 SP

 GR

 Caliper

 Neutron Density

 Resistivity

6
Lithology General

 The next major step in the


Simple
procedure is lithology
identification. Lithology data
gives information on porosity and

Schlumberger Private
other parameters
 This is an essential step as from
the lithology comes porosity and Dirty
other parameters
 Lithology of a formation can be:
 Odd minerals can also be
present, such as micas in
sandstones or anhydrites in
Complex

Schlumberger Private
carbonates which complicate the
problem further

Lithology Interpretation
 The lithology can be obtained in several ways:
 From the cuttings (depth problems)
 From local knowledge (good during development)
 From the known depositional environment (good in general basis)
Schlumberger Private

 From a log Quicklook (good starting point)


 From individual log readings (difficult if there are no areas of zero
porosity)
 From crossplots (the best method)

7
Lithology: Logging Tools
 All tools react to lithology – usually in conjuction with the
porosity
 Major lithology tools are:
 Neutron – reacts to fluid and matrix
 Density – reacts to matrix and fluid

Schlumberger Private
 Sonic – reacts to a mixture of matrix and fluid, complicated by
seeing only primary porosity
 NGT- identifies shale types and special minerals
 GLT/GRA – geochemical logging, identifies 10 elements:
 K,U,Th,Al,Si,Ca,S,Fe,Gd,Ti
 From these the exact mineralogy can be computed

Schlumberger Private
Crossplots

 A “two-dimensional” way of
looking at logs
 Combines properties from
both measurements, thus
Schlumberger Private

eliminating ambiguities
 The most common cross-
plot is the Density-Neutron
 Virtually any log can be
plotted against another

8
Crossplots
 A standard crossplot is a
frequency plot with points
plotted as their frequency
 A third dimension is added
in a z-axis plot which uses
something like colour

Schlumberger Private
classes or numbers to
include another
measurement

Schlumberger Private
Nuetron Density Cross Plots
 This crossplot has
b plotted against
the corrected
neutron porosity
 Fluid density in this
Schlumberger Private

plot is 1.0 g/cm3

9
Shale Volume: Vsh

(for paper log quicklook)

Schlumberger Private

Schlumberger Private
Shale Index: Gamma Ray
Schlumberger Private

(For paper log quicklook)

10
11
Schlumberger Private
Schlumberger Private Schlumberger Private

Shale Volume: Sonic


Shale Volume: SP
12
Schlumberger Private
Schlumberger Private Schlumberger Private

Shale Volume: Neutron-Density


Shale Volume: Neutron
Clean Sand Formation Porosity:
Density
ρb = (1-Φd) * ρma + Φd * ρf

Schlumberger Private
ρ
For ma:
Sandstone: 2.65 g/cc
Limestone : 2.71 g/cc
Dolomite : 2.87 g/cc

Schlumberger Private
Shaly Sand Formation Porosity:
Density

ρb = (1- Φ - Vsh) * ρma + Φ * ρf + Vsh * ρma


Schlumberger Private

(ρb – ρma) (ρsh – ρma)


Φ= --------------- - ---------------- * Vsh
(ρf – ρma) (ρf – ρma)

Φdcor = Φd – Φdsh * Vsh (for shale correction)

13
Clean Sand Formation Porosity:
Neutron Matrix Correction (Chart)
NPHI = (1-Φn) * NPHIma + Φn * NPHIf

Schlumberger Private
(NPHI – NPHIma)
Φn = ---------------- (Chart Por-13b page 3-10)

(NPHIf – NPHIma)

If NPHI is in LIMESTON Matrix, the log reading

Schlumberger Private
Is the neutron porosity.

Shaly Sand Formation Porosity

•Shale corrected Porosity:


Φdcor=Φ d –Φdsh * Vsh
Schlumberger Private

Φncor=Φ n –Φnsh * Vsh


•Shale corrected crossplot Porosity:
Φ1 from CP-9
•Hydrocarbon corrected porosity:
Φ2=Φ1+∆Φ (from CP-9)

14
Clean Sand Formation Porosity:
Sonic

∆T = (1-Φs) * ∆Tma + Φs * ∆Tf

Schlumberger Private
(∆T – ∆Tma)
Φs = ---------------- or
(∆Tf – ∆Tma)
For ∆Tma:
Sandstone: 55.5 – 51.3 us/ft
Limestone : 47.6 – 43.5 us/ft
Dolomite : 43.5 – 38.5 us/ft

Schlumberger Private
Shaly Sand Formation Porosity:
Sonic

∆T = (1-Φ-Vsh)*∆Tma + Φ*∆Tf+Vsh*∆T ma
Schlumberger Private

(∆T–∆Tma) (∆Tsh – ∆Tma)


Φ= ---------------- - -------------------*Vsh
(∆Tf – ∆Tma) (∆Tf – ∆Tma)

Φscor = Φs – Φssh * Vsh (for shale correction)

15
Basic Relationships

 Rw = resistivity of water in the pore space


 Define Ro = resistivity of a rock totally filled with water
 F: Formation Factor

Schlumberger Private
 At constant porosity F is constant
 As porosity increases, Ro decreases and F decreases
 Experiments have shown that F is inversly proportional to m
 m: is called the “ cementation exponent”
 a: is called the “lithology” constant

Schlumberger Private
Saturation Equation

 Saturation can be expressed as a ratio of the


resistivities

 Where n is the “saturation exponent”, an


empirical constant.
Schlumberger Private

 Substituting for Ro:

 Substituting for F:

 The Archie equation is hence very simple. It links

porosity and resistivity with the amount of water

present, Sw.

 Increasing porosity,, will reduce the saturation for

the same Rt.

 Increasing Rt for the same porosity will have the

same effect.

16
Invaded Zone Saturation
 The same method can be applied to the invaded zone. The porosity is identical, the
lithology is assumed to be the same, hence the constants a,n,m are the same
 The changes are the resistivities which are now Rxo and Rmf
 Rmf is measured usually on surface and Rxo is measured by the MSFL tool
 The equation is then:

Schlumberger Private

Schlumberger Private
Alternative Saturation Determination
 Dividing for Sxo and Sw, with n set to 2

 Observations suggest:
Schlumberger Private

 Hence

 Providing a quick look saturation answer when the porosity is not available

17
Archie Parameters

 Rw = resistivity of connate water


 m = “cementation factor”, set to 2 in the simple case
 n = “saturation exponent”, set to 2 in the simple case

Schlumberger Private
 a = constant, set to 1 in the simple case
 All the constants have to be set
 Two common sets of numbers for these constants are:
 In a simple carbonate, the parameters are simplified to:
 m=2, n=2, a =1
 In a sandstone they become:
 m=2.15, n=2, a =0.62

Schlumberger Private
Archie’s Equation

Empirical constant
(usually near unity) Resistivity of

a Rw formation water,
Schlumberger Private

-m
Sw

Water n m Cementation
exponent
saturation,
fraction
Saturation
exponent
Rt (usually near 2)

(also usually Resistivity of


near 2) Porosity, uninvaded
fraction formation, -m

18
Rw Determination
• Rw from SP

• Rw from porosity and resistivity (wet zone)

Rw=(Φ^m)*Rt

Schlumberger Private
• Rw from resistivity only (wet zone)

Rt*Rmf
Rw = --------------
Rxo
• Rw from client (water chemical analysis)

Schlumberger Private
All the Rw from different sources should be in consistent.

Rmf and Rw

•Rmf and Rw should be corrected by temperature (BHT).


Schlumberger Private

•Chart Gen-9

19
Clean Sand Formation Workflow
(Density-Neutron)

Φd Φn

Schlumberger Private
Crossplot porosity Φ1
Rw from SP or
Rw

Sw

Schlumberger Private
Shaly Sand Formation Workflow
(Density-Neutron)

Φdcor Φncor
CP-9 on page 4-34
Schlumberger Private

Shale corrected Φ1
Crossplot porosity
a*Rmf
Shr=1-Sxo Sxo^2= -----------------
CP-9 on page 4-34 Φ1^2*Rxo

∆Φ

a*Rw Φ2=Φ1+ ∆Φ Hydrocarbon corrected porosity


Sw^2= ------------
Φ2^2*Rt Sw Shale corrected saturation

20
Permeability
 Permeability is an inherent property of the reservoir

 It is a dynamic property associated with fluid movement

 It cannot be simply related to porosity, a low porosity carbinate may have a “high”
effective permeability due to extensive fractures

 Formulae linking permeability and porosity have been around for a long time

Schlumberger Private
 The first, in 1927, linked porosity and grain surface area:

K= **3/5*Sg**2*(1-)**2
Usually written:

K=A* **3/S**2
Where  is the porosity, S is the surface area of the grains and A an
empirical constant

Schlumberger Private
Permeability Equations
 The surface area of the grains is difficult to find from logs

 The equations linking permeability to porosity employed studies which linked the
surface area to the irreducible water saturation Swirr, such as:

K**(1/2)= **2.25/Swirr
Schlumberger Private

 Swirr is difficult to estimate from logs, except in a pay zone which is producing dry
hydrocarbon

 A more general equation using the volume of irreducible water (Bvwirr= *Swirr)
was revised:

K**(1/2)= 10000* **2*(t-Bvwirr)/BVwirr

21
Permeability Equation (continued)
 These equations are empirical and work well in some places
 Difficulties are:
 Shaly formation (more than 25%)
 Low permeability
 Finding the irreducible water parameter

Schlumberger Private
 It is also assumed that:
 The permeability is due to intergranular, primary porosity
 The formation is water wet
 The equations are usually only applicable to sandstones as carbonate
rocks have complex poro-perm systems

Schlumberger Private
Permeability and Logs
 Most tools react to permeability

 The SP is a permeability indicator, it would not exist if there was no permeability

 The separation of shallow, medium and deep resistivity curves indicates invasion,
which can only happen in permeable zones

 The microlog curves react to the presence of mud cake, which only occurs in front
Schlumberger Private

of permeable formations

 Some tools can be linked to the permeability in a direct fashion

 These are sonic (Stonley wave), Geochemical and RFT/MDT pressure tests and
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. None of these tools is a pure “permeability” tool.
Each measures a property that allows a computation of permeability

22

You might also like