The document discusses three models of decision making: 1) The classical or rational model which assumes managers are fully rational and have complete information. 2) Herbert Simon's bounded rationality model which recognizes limitations in rationality and information. Managers satisfice rather than optimize. 3) The administrative model also assumes bounded rationality and satisficing behavior from managers with imperfect information. The document also outlines some common errors in decision making like indecisiveness, postponing decisions, and failing to properly analyze information sources.
The document discusses three models of decision making: 1) The classical or rational model which assumes managers are fully rational and have complete information. 2) Herbert Simon's bounded rationality model which recognizes limitations in rationality and information. Managers satisfice rather than optimize. 3) The administrative model also assumes bounded rationality and satisficing behavior from managers with imperfect information. The document also outlines some common errors in decision making like indecisiveness, postponing decisions, and failing to properly analyze information sources.
Classical, Administrative and Herbert Simon's Models.
1. The Rational/Classical Model:
The rational model is the first attempt to know the decision-making-process. It is considered by some as the classical approach to understand the decision-making process. A classical decision model is a prescriptive approach that guides management on how it should make a decision. It rests on the assumption that managers are logical and rational and that they make decisions that are in the best interest of the organization.
Features of Classical Model:
1. Decision-makers have complete information about the decision situation and possible alternatives, 2. They can effectively eliminate uncertainty to achieve a decision condition of certainty, 3. They evaluate all aspects of the decision situation logically and rationally. 4. Problems & Objectives are clear. 5. People agree on criteria and weights. 6. All alternatives are known. 7. All consequences can be anticipated. 8. Decision makes are rational. i. They are not biased in recognizing problems. ii. They are capable of processing ail relevant information iii. They anticipate present and future consequences of decisions. iv. They search for all alternatives that maximizes the desired results. 2. Bounded Rationality Model or Administrative Man Model: Decision-making involve the achievement of a goal. Rationality demands that the decision- maker should properly understand the alternative courses of action for reaching the goals. He should also have full information and the ability to analyze properly various alternative courses of action in the light of goals sought. There should also be a desire to select the best solutions by selecting the alternative which will satisfy the goal achievement. Herbert A. Simon defines rationality in terms of objective and intelligent action. It is characterised by behavioural nexus between ends and means. If appropriate means are chosen to reach desired ends the decision is rational. Bounded Rationality model is based on the concept developed by Herbert Simon. This model does not assume individual rationality in the decision process. Instead, it assumes that people, while they may seek the best solution, normally settle for much less, because the decisions they confront typically demand greater information, time, processing capabilities than they possess. They settle for “bounded rationality or limited rationality in decisions. This model is based on certain basic concepts. a. Sequential Attention to alternative solution: Normally it is the tendency for people to examine possible solution one at a time instead of identifying all possible solutions and stop searching once an acceptable (though not necessarily the best) solution is found. b. Heuristic: These are the assumptions that guide the search for alternatives into areas that have a high probability for yielding success. c. Satisficing: Herbert Simon called this “satisficing” that is picking a course of action that is satisfactory or “good enough” under the circumstances. It is the tendency for decision makers to accept the first alternative that meets their minimally acceptable requirements rather than pushing them further for an alternative that produces the best results. The Administrative model holds that managers: (i) Have incomplete and imperfect information, (ii) Are constrained by bounded rationality, and (iii) Tend to satisfies when making decisions. Some Common Errors in Decision-Making: Since the importance of the right decision cannot be overestimated enough for the quality of the decisions can make the difference between success and failure. Therefore, it is imperative that all factors affecting the decision be properly looked into and fully investigated. In addition to technical and operational factors which can be quantified and analyzed, other factors such as personal values, personality traits, psychological assessment, perception of the environment, intuitional and judgemental capabilities and emotional interference must also be understood and credited. Some of the errors are: a. Indecisiveness: Decision-making is full of responsibility. The fear of its outcome can make some people timid about taking a decision. This timidity may result in taking a long time for making a decision and the opportunity may be lost. This trait is a personality trait and must be looked into seriously. The managers must be very quick in deciding. b. Postponing the decision until the last moment: This is a common feature which results in decision-making under pressure of time which generally eliminates the possibility of thorough analysis of the problem which is time consuming as well as the establishment and comparison of all alternatives. Many students, who postpone studying until near their final exams, usually do not do well in the exams. c. A failure to isolate the root cause of the problem: It is a common practice to cure the symptoms rather than the causes. For example, a headache may be on account of some deep- rooted emotional problem. A medicine for the headache would not cure the problem. It is necessary to separate the symptoms and their causes. d. A failure to assess the reliability of informational sources: Very often, we take it for granted that the other person’s opinion is very reliable and trustworthy and we do not check for the accuracy of the information ourselves. e. The method for analysing the information may not be the sound one: Since most decisions and especially the non-programmed ones have to be based upon a lot of information and factors, the procedure to identify, isolate and select the useful information must be sound and dependable. Usually, it is not operationally feasible to objectively analyse more than five or six pieces of information at a time. f. Do implement the decision and follow through: Making a decision is not the end of the process, rather it is a beginning. Implementation of the decision and the results obtained are the true barometer of the quality of the decision. Duties must be assigned, deadlines must be set, evaluation process must be established and contingency plans must be prepared in advance. The decisions must be implemented whole heartedly to get the best results.