Plugging and Abandonment of Oil and Gas Wells: Paper #2-25

Working Document of the NPC North American Resource Development Study
Made Available September 15, 2011

Paper #2-25

PLUGGING AND ABANDONMENT OF

OIL AND GAS WELLS
Prepared by the Technology Subgroup
of the
Operations & Environment Task Group

On September 15, 2011, The National Petroleum Council (NPC) in approving its report,
Prudent Development: Realizing the Potential of North America’s Abundant Natural Gas
and Oil Resources, also approved the making available of certain materials used in the
study process, including detailed, specific subject matter papers prepared or used by
the study’s Task Groups and/or Subgroups. These Topic and White Papers were
working documents that were part of the analyses that led to development of the
summary results presented in the report’s Executive Summary and Chapters.

These Topic and White Papers represent the views and conclusions of the authors.
The National Petroleum Council has not endorsed or approved the statements and
conclusions contained in these documents, but approved the publication of these
materials as part of the study process.

The NPC believes that these papers will be of interest to the readers of the report and
will help them better understand the results. These materials are being made available
in the interest of transparency.

The attached paper is one of 57 such working documents used in the study analyses.
Also included is a roster of the Subgroup that developed or submitted this paper.
Appendix C of the final NPC report provides a complete list of the 57 Topic and White
Papers and an abstract for each. The full papers can be viewed and downloaded from
the report section of the NPC website (www.npc.org).
Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 1 of 21


Technology Subgroup
Chair
J. Daniel Arthur Managing Partner ALL Consulting
Assistant Chair
H. William Hochheiser Senior Energy and ALL Consulting
Environment Manager
Members
Mark D. Bottrell Manager – Field, Eastern Chesapeake Energy
Division Corporation
André Brown Associate W. L. Gore & Associates,
Inc.
John Candler Manager, Environmental M-I SWACO
Affairs
Lance Cole Operations Manager Petroleum Technology
Transfer Council
David DeLaO Manager, Drilling Chesapeake Energy
Engineering, Southern Corporation
Division
Larry W. Dillon Completions Manager, San ConocoPhillips
Juan Business Unit
Donald J. Drazan Chief – Technical State of New York
Assistance Section, Bureau
of Oil and Gas Permitting
and Management, Division
of Mineral Resources,
Department of
Environmental Conservation
Maurice B. Dusseault Professor of Geological University of Waterloo
Engineering, Department of
Earth & Environmental
Sciences
Catherine P. Foerster Commissioner Alaska Oil & Gas
Conservation Commission
Linda Goodwin President DOT Matrix Inc.
Edward Hanzlik Senior Consultant, Chevron Energy
Petroleum Engineering, Technology Company
Heavy Oil &
Unconventional Resources
Ron Hyden Technology Director, Halliburton Company
Production Enhancement


Jake Jacobs Environment, Health and Encana Oil & Gas (USA)
Safety Advisor Inc.
Valerie A. Jochen Technical Director, Schlumberger
Production Unconventional
Resources
Bethany A. Kurz Senior Research Manager, University of North Dakota
Energy & Environmental
Research Center
Matthew E. Mantell Senior Environmental Chesapeake Energy
Engineer Corporation
John P. Martin* Senior Project Manager, New York State Energy
Energy Resources R&D Research and Development
Authority
Dag Nummedal Director, Colorado Energy Colorado School of Mines
Research Institute
Jerry R. Simmons Executive Director National Association of
Royalty Owners
Steve Thomson Manager, DeSoto Water Southwestern Energy
Resources Company
Denise A. Tuck Global Manager, Chemical Halliburton Energy
Compliance, Health, Safety Services, Inc.
and Environment
Mike Uretsky Member, Board of Directors Northern Wayne Property
Executive Committee Owners Alliance
John A. Veil** Manager, Water Policy U.S. Department of Energy
Program, Argonne National
Laboratory
Donnie Wallis Manager – Regulatory Chesapeake Energy
Affairs, Air Programs and Corporation
Design
Chris R. Williams Group Lead, Special Encana Oil & Gas (USA)
Projects, Environment, Inc.
Health and Safety
Ad Hoc Member
Douglas W. Morris Director, Reserves and U.S. Department of Energy
Production Division, Energy
Information Administration
* Individual has since retired but was employed by the specified company while
participating in the study.
** Individual has since retired but was employed by the specified company while
participating in the study.


Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 5

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6
HISTORY OF WELL-PLUGGING PRACTICES AND REGULATIONS .................................. 6
WELL-PLUGGING METHODS AND MATERIALS .................................................................. 9
A. General Methods .................................................................................................................... 9
B. Cement ................................................................................................................................. 10
C. Bentonite and Drilling Mud ................................................................................................. 13
D. Mechanical Plugs ................................................................................................................. 13
RESEARCH ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS AND MATERIALS .......................................... 1
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF WELL PLUGGING......................................................... 16
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ADVANCES IN WELL-PLUGGING TECHNOLOGY ............. 17
BARRIERS TO PROGRESS ....................................................................................................... 18
FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................... 19
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 20


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Modern regulatory standards in all US jurisdictions require specific provisions for plugging and
documenting oil and natural gas wells before they are abandoned. Plugging and abandonment
(P&A) regulations vary to some degree among states but all state regulations prescribe the depth
intervals which must be cemented as well as the materials that are allowable in plugging
practices
The basic technologies associated with the plugging and abandoning of wells has not changed
significantly since the 1970s. Water-based slurries of cement and drilling mud are still the basic
materials used to plug most wells although progress has been made in use of additives to
customize the cements and muds for specific types of wells.
Recent shale-gas developments have rediscovered some P&A issues in the forms of older oil or
gas wells which never were adequately plugged but which now pose possible cross-
contamination or leakage risks. Furthermore, eventual retirement of uneconomical shale-gas
wells must address P&A practices that are specific to issues affecting gas wells and especially
horizontal gas wells.
The lack of progress in P&A practices is attributable to absence of a long-term vision, and
inattention to corresponding research, that recognizes the benefits of P&A to oil and gas
development projects. Specific findings are that:
• Benefits from reduced operational costs and/or increased production, especially in

redeveloped, older fields, generally has been underappreciated.
• By plugging wells correctly, future environmental issues, related to fluid or gas leakage,
can be avoided and thereby preserve savings otherwise eroded by remediation or
litigation costs.
• Research has lagged on materials and methods for plugging wells although advances in
technologies for drilling and completion should be applicable to practices in plugging and
abandonment.


INTRODUCTION
The plugging and abandoning (P&A) of oil and gas wells that are no longer economically viable
for production, or which have wellbore issues that require closure, has historically been
conducted as an afterthought in the oil and gas production business. Production wells that can no
longer be used must be plugged to prevent the oil and gas reservoir fluids from migrating uphole
over time and possibly contaminating other formations and or fresh water aquifers. A well is
plugged by setting mechanical or cement plugs in the wellbore at specific intervals to prevent
fluid flow. The plugging process usually requires a workover rig and cement pumped into the
wellbore. The plugging process can take two days to a week, depending on the number of plugs
to be set in the well. The P&A work takes capital to complete and provides no return on the
investment for the oil companies. Most wells are plugged at the lowest cost possible following
the minimum requirements set forth by the oil and gas regulating agencies.
As older oil and gas fields are re-entered to exploit bypassed reserves or to develop reserves
deemed uneconomical in the past, the plugged and abandoned wells within the fields become a
potential problem as new technologies are applied to old fields. In many of the older fields
previously abandoned, many of the wells were potentially left unplugged and their locations not
properly documented (Pennsylvania DEP, 2000). As these old fields are reentered to apply
newer technologies such as solvent or CO2 flooding, the reservoir pressure is increased due to the
injection of fluids for oil recovery. When this higher pressure is applied to unplugged or poorly
plugged wells, there is a chance that the formation fluids will bypass the plugging materials and
migrate uphole. This can cause problems with the fresh water aquifers in the area by allowing
gas, oil or salt water to contaminate the fresh water.
This paper presents an overview of the methods and materials used to plug and abandon wells
along with a discussion on the environmental and economic benefits of proper well plugging.
The discussion includes a synopsis of P&A research and the issues that impede the progress of
the research.
HISTORY OF WELL-PLUGGING PRACTICES AND REGULATIONS

When oil and gas drilling began in Pennsylvania in 1859, there was no regulation regarding the
treatment of a well at the end of its useful life (Pennsylvania DEP, 2000). Those early wells
could simply be abandoned as gaping holes in the ground. In the 1890s, when Pennsylvania
started regulating that wells should be plugged, the requirements were designed to protect the
production zones from flooding by fresh water (Pennsylvania DEP, 2000). Much of the
regulation of the oil and gas industry in the early days was driven by the need to protect the oil
and gas resources and not the environment. The promulgation of plugging and abandonment
regulations trailed behind advancements in drilling and production practices because the adverse
environmental and safety implications of improperly abandoned wells had not yet been revealed.
As more and more dry holes were abandoned, other states began recognizing the need to institute
a set of standards associated with plugging oil and gas wells.


For instance, in Texas, the first well was drilled in 1893 although it was not until 1919 that the
Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) gained authority to regulate well plugging (Texas RRC,
2000). By that time, thousands of wells had been drilled with little to no information recorded
on the location or construction of the wells. In 1919, Article 3 of the RRC regulations laid out
general requirements by stating that “dry or abandoned wells be plugged in such a way as to
confine oil, gas, and water in the strata in which they are found and prevent them from escaping
into other strata” (Texas RRC, 2000). Like most regulations at the time, the rules were designed
to protect the loss of oil and gas to other strata, not to protect the environment. As the oil and
gas industry progressed, the RRC continued to update their plugging regulations by issuing
specific cementing instructions in 1934 and then requiring the plugging of fresh water strata in
1957 (Texas RRC, 2000).
Plugging regulations in many other states progressed similarly, and as a consequence, thousands
of wells prior to the 1950s either were not plugged at all or plugged with very little cement in
them. Additionally, when cement was required, the regulations was so vague that wells were
plugged with brush, wood, rocks, paper and linen sacks, or a variety of other handy items that
would serve to hold a sack of cement (Ide et al., 2006). As states began to regulate the oil and
gas wells more closely starting in the 1950s, cement became a required material for sealing the
producing intervals and the top of the wellbore. Over time, plugging regulations have progressed
to describe the specific intervals at which cement should be placed and the types of materials
allowed between the cement plugs (Texas RRC, 2000; Ide et al., 2006).
The regulations for the oil industry started changing significantly in the 1970s when
environmental protection became a bigger driver in the regulation of the oil and gas industry.
Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) in 1974 which increased the
requirements for fresh water protection. As a result, many state regulations were updated to
include stricter requirements for protection of the fresh water zones and for minimizing the flow
of fluids between formations (GWPC, 2009). Currently, state regulations specify the intervals to
be cemented, such as above or through producing and water-bearing zones, inside and outside of
casing below fresh water aquifers, and at specified distances from the surface. Figure 1 provides
a comparison of the plugging requirements in different states with focus on key elements of
plugging the oil and gas strata, plugging the fresh water zone, and surface casing plugging.
As an example of how individual state regulations have evolved into specific details, California’s
plugging regulations require cement plugs to be placed at the following locations: a 200-foot
plug straddling the surface casing shoe, a plug across oil and gas bearing strata that extends 100
feet above the strata, a plug extending from 50 feet below to 50 feet above the base of water-
bearing strata, and a 50-foot plug at the surface of the wellbore (State of California, 2007).


Figure 1. Elements of State Well-Plugging Regulations

Source: Ground Water Protection Council
Additionally, most State regulations typically permit the placement of the following materials
within the wellbore: cement, drilling mud, gels, mechanical plugs, and other non-porous
materials such as clays. In recognition of its strength and low permeability, cement typically is
used to create a seal between formations or to seal off the surface of the wellbore. Other
materials which do not offer the same strength or durability as cement, including drilling mud,
gel, and clay, are used to fill in the spaces between cement plugs. Additionally, many states
allow the use of mechanical bridge plugs in lieu of a large cement plug since the bridge plug is
extremely strong and nearly completely impermeable. However, mechanical plugs are
susceptible to corrosion, and therefore the regulations typically require the bridge plugs to be
capped by a specified amount of cement.


WELL-PLUGGING METHODS AND MATERIALS

A. General Methods
The plugging methods employed on oil and Figure 2. Typical Bulk Cement Truck
gas wells have improved over time as
regulators required better well plugging
plans and as operators began to see the
benefits of sealing the abandoned wells
more securely. When cement was first
being used to plug wells, the cement tended
to not set up correctly and was often
contaminated by the drilling mud and
wellbore fluids. Through the
Source: Photo courtesy of Halliburton.
implementation of cementing standards by
the American Petroleum Institute (API) and more standardized plugging programs, the cement
plugs became more uniform (Ide et al., 2006).
When wells were plugged in the late 1800s and early 1900s, cement was often emplaced in the
well by pouring the cement from the surface. The wells were shallow and this method was
somewhat effective. As the wells became deeper, cement was pumped down tubing to place the
cement at the desired depth. To be able to pump cement down hole, oilfield cement companies
developed specialized equipment that could transport the dry cement to a well site and then blend
the cement mix while pumping it down the hole. Figure 2 shows a bulk cement truck that brings
the dry cement blend to a well site for pumping. The dry cement is pumped into a cement
pumping truck which adds the water at the desired blending rate and then pumps the liquid
cement down the well.
As operators started pumping cement downhole for cementing operations, they initially did not
understand the need for hole cleaning prior to cementing. Therefore, many of the early plugs did
not harden as desired. After the passage of the SDWA a new technique for placing cement in the
well was researched and improved, now being known as the displacement method or the balance
plug method (Ide et al., 2006). The displacement method minimizes the contamination of the
cement by use of a cement that has good hole-cleaning characteristics and can displace leftover
drilling mud. First, tubing is run into the well to the depth desired for the bottom of the cement
plug where the cement is then placed into the well by pumping down the tubing. The cement
goes out the bottom of the tubing and then flows back up the outside of the tubing. Second, after
the desired amount of cement is pumped, water is pumped behind the cement to displace the
cement in the tubing to a predetermined depth. At that point the tubing is pulled out of the well
and when done correctly, the cement in the tubing fills the space the tubing occupied in the well
which leaves a good solid section of clean cement. When using the displacement method,
operators can fairly accurately place the cement in the well at the desired depth and thereby
prevent flow in the wellbore from the targeted depth intervals.


The types of materials used for plugging abandoned wells have not changed significantly over
the last 100 years. While cement is the most common plugging material used to seal the
abandoned wells, drilling mud, bentonite and mechanical plugs also are used frequently in
conjunction with cement. In wells plugged prior to the more modern regulations and standards
set in the 1950s and onward, many wells were abandoned with plugs consisting of brush, wood,
paper sacks, linen or any other material that could be pushed into a well to form a basis for the
dumping of one or two sacks of cement to “plug” the well (Ide et al., 2006). While that use of
sundry materials was fairly common in the early days of the oil field, current procedures are
significantly more disciplined and have higher success ratios of providing seals adequate to
prevent future contamination issues.
B. Cement
A basic and widely used plugging material is formulated as a slurry of water and Portland
cement that is compositionally managed in terms of gallons (gal) of water or pounds (lb) of
additives per 94-lb sack (sk) of cement. Cement used in plugging of oil and gas wells has
improved significantly over the past few decades. The cement composition in the early days of
the oil industry is similar to what is used today, but today’s cement uses a number of additives
that enhance the sealing of the cement in the wellbore (Ide et al., 2006). With the advances in
well drilling technology and the types of wells being drilled and completed, the cementing
technology has improved to allow for cementing of horizontal wells, high-pressure wells, high-
temperature wells, low-temperature wells, CO2 wells, and other specialty applications. Those
same cement technologies can be used in the plugging of abandoned wells.
The American Petroleum Institute (API) first developed a classification system for oilfield
cements in 1952. The API cements are all Portland cement-based with similar ingredients but
are mixed in different proportions. The different classifications are ground to a different fineness
and have different water requirements for mixing (Petrochem, 2002). Table 1 summarizes the
different API classifications of cement.
When using the API cement for cementing a well or for plugging, various additives are blended
into the cement for specific purposes. Each cementing company uses additives and blends
cement based on the customer’s specific cementing plan. Most companies have proprietary
additives for specific applications along with the standard additives such as barite and bentonite.
Some of the additives commonly used are:
• Retarder. A retarder is added to slow down the setting time to allow for longer pump
times and/or the removal of the tubing used to place the cement.
• Accelerator. Accelerators are used to shorten the setting time. These are used in wells to
allow the cement to set up faster to prevent gas or fluid channeling, to prevent backflow
in the tubing and when plugging the additive can shorten the wait time between plugs.
• Pozmix. Pozmix™ (a Halliburton Co. product), which includes pozzaline (a mixture of
lime and volcanic ash), is added to Portland cement to achieve a more durable calcium


silicate cement mixture. The use of pozzaline also reduces the amount of Portland
cement in the mixture which reduces the overall cost of the cement.
• Lost Circulation Material. Selected materials are added to cement to reduce the loss of
cement to the formation prior to hardening. Materials such as walnut shells, cottonseed
hulls, fibers, flaked cellophane (including Flocele™, a Halliburton Co. product), diesel
oil, and other proprietary mixtures are used to reduce the loss of circulation.
• Density-Increasing or Weighting Additives. Materials are added to the cement to
increase its weight to combat higher formation pressures. Materials such as barite, sand,
and other proprietary mixtures are used as weighting materials.
• Light-Weight Additives. These materials are added to cement to reduce the cement
density and thereby lessen the chances of losing cement to high-permeability or low-
fracture-gradient formations. Materials such as Pozmix™, gel, foam, and other
proprietary mixtures are used to “lighten” cement mixtures.
• Water-Loss Additives. Water-loss additives are combined with the cement mixture to
reduce the rate of water loss from the cement mixture. By reducing water loss prior to
setting, the cement can harden properly and avoid premature drying which can reduce the
strength of the cement (Halliburton, 1981).

Table 1. API Cement Classifications
API Depths Water Slurry Description
Classification (Ft) Requirement Density
(gal / sk) (lb / gal)
Class A 0 to 6,000 5.2 15.6 Common or regular cement
Class B 0 to 6,000 5.2 15.6 Moderate to high sulfate resistance.
Class C 0 to 6,000 6.3 14.8 High-Early Cement. Fine grind,
good availability
Class D 6,000 to 10,000 4.3 Varies For Moderate Temperature and
Pressure. Coarse grind plus retarder
Class E 10,000 to 14,000 4.3 Varies High pressure, high temperature. All
depths with retarders
Class F 10,000 to 16,000 4.3 Varies Use for extremely high temperature
and pressure
Class G & H 0 to 8,000 G -5.0 G - 15.8 Basic cement. Used at all depths
H – 4.3 H – 16.4 with retarders.
Source: Halliburton Company, Halliburton Cementing Tables, Technical Data Oil Well Cements and
Cement Additives (Duncan, OK: Halliburton, 1981).


Specialty Cements. While most wells can be cemented with standard cements, there are
situations that can require a special cement blend to create the best seal in the well. Some of the
well types that require a specialized blend of cement include moderate to high-pressure gas
wells, horizontal wells, wells completed through salt zones, high temperature wells, and wells
that are very deep (below 15,000 ft.) (Salehi and Paiaman, 2009). Plugging such wells with
conventional systems can be done in many instances but there is a risk of channeling or mud
contamination from gas or fluids that can create a pathway for fluids to migrate out of the zones
being plugged. The following paragraphs discuss the types of wells and situations that require
specially cement blends.
• Moderate to high pressure gas wells. Cementing of natural gas wells to prevent the flow
of gas outside the casing has plagued the oil and gas industry for years. As the demand
for gas increases, this issue becomes larger as more wells are drilled and the gas
migration causes casing pressure problems and gas leaking into other formations and the
fresh water. The cements used for these wells require that the cement be designed to
reduce the gas migration while the cement is curing. Many cementing companies have
developed additives that can reduce the gas cutting through the cement.
• Horizontal wells. The horizontal orientations introduce different gravitational effects
compared with vertical wells. In a typical vertical well, where there is a large column of
cement, some migration of the solids downward or the water upward does not cause a
significant change in the cement properties. In a horizontal well, the solids migrating to
the bottom of the section and the water migrating to the top can provide areas of the well
that do not have a complete seal. If the water in the cement separates from the mixture
before the cement is set, it can migrate to the top of the wellbore and form a channel
along the top of the wellbore which can allow migration of formation fluids. If the solids
in the cement mixture settle to the bottom of the cement before the cement can harden,
the solids can cause the cement to not set up correctly and the weakened area along the
bottom of the wellbore can fail under pressure during stimulation activities (Salehi and
Paiaman, 2009).
• Salt zones. Salt mixed into cement functions as an accelerator of solidification. If a well
is drilled through a natural salt zone and the cement mixture is not adjusted for the salt,
the cement can set up prematurely. When cementing wells that have been drilled through
a salt layer, special precautions must be taken to prevent contamination of the cement by
the salt. Special additives must be used to prevent the premature setting of the cement
caused by salt entering the cement mixture as the mixture it is pumped past the natural
salt layer.
• Deep wells. Cementing of deep wells requires long pump times to get cement pumped to
the bottom of the well and displaced upward. With long pump times there is a chance
that the cement could harden prematurely and cause pumping problems. Special cement
retarders are used to allow for adequate pumping time to place the cement where desired.
In addition, with the long stands of pipe to pump through, friction becomes an issue and
friction reducers may be required to make pumping the cement easier.


C. Bentonite and Drilling Mud
In many of the wells currently being plugged, drilling mud and bentonite are still being used to
fill those portions of the well that are not cemented. Bentonite, which is a natural material rich in
swelling clays, is used commonly to form the base of most drilling muds. Bentonite powder is
mixed with water to form a fluid that has the ability to lift cuttings from a well and suspend them
at times when the mud pumps are shut down. Drilling mud has historically been used to plug
most wells in the United States. A review of historical well records will show that most wells
were filled with heavy mud, or drilling mud at the time of plugging. In California, records from
wells in Los Angeles County that were drilled and plugged in the 1930s through the 1950s in
many cases had a small cement plug at the top of the production zone and then were filled with
mud that ranged from 9.1 pounds per gallon (ppg) to over 12 ppg depending on the depth (State
of California, 2004).
The use of drilling mud for well plugging relies on the characteristics of mud weight and gel
strength to prevent upward flow of reservoir fluids. For upward flow of fluids to occur, the
formation fluids must overcome the downward pressure exerted by the weight and gel strength of
the mud column in the wellbore. The gel strength of mud is the resistance to shear that develops
when the mud is not moving. When mud is being pumped (moving) it has gel strength of less
than one pound per one-hundred square feet (1 lb/100 sq. ft) but once the mud stops moving the
gel strength increases by up to 100%. A study of the pressure effects of the static mud column in
abandoned wells, found that over time the gel effect is reduced slightly due to the mud drying
out, but that the gel strength should still be calculated at around 25 lb/100 sq. ft (Johnston and
Knape, 1986). Gel strength increases the pressure required to start fluid moving uphole in a
mud-filled well.
Bentonite plugging of wells is still used in some areas. In the Bakersfield and Coalinga Districts
of California bentonite is approved as an alternative to cement to plug wells. The bentonite must
be in a compressed form and can only be used in wells that are larger in diameter than 2-7/8
inches. The bentonite must be hydrated for 24 hours and, if the plug is to go across the fresh
water zone, the surface casing must be cemented through the fresh water interval. The rules state
that bentonite may not be used when there is a 500 pounds per square inch (psi) pressure
differential between zones of a wellbore (State of California, 2004).
Bentonite, when placed as a compressed solid and then hydrated, will form a dense and low-
permeability solid mass in the wellbore based on its character as a clay material that swells when
water is added. Bentonite clay is often used in surface applications where low-permeability clay
is needed to prevent migration of liquids such as the liner for a landfill or pond.
D. Mechanical Plugs
Mechanical plugs are used in some wells to reduce the amount of cement required to plug a well
or to provide additional protection from formation pressure in the well. Two types of mechanical
plugs utilized to plug and abandon wells are a bridge plug or a cement retainer. The choice of
which plug type to use is based on whether cement needs to be pumped below the plug to seal


the perforations (squeeze cementing). If cementing below the plug is not required, or if a
balanced cement plug was installed below the mechanical plug setting depth, a bridge plug can
be used. Mechanical plugs can be set in the well using workstring tubing, coiled tubing, or with
a wireline. When working in wells with pressure, the use of tubing and or coiled tubing is
typically required.
The mechanical plugs consist of four major parts: 1) the body of the plug which can be made of
steel, cast iron and composite material; 2) the slips which are metal parts that grab the casing to
hold the plug in place; 3) the packing material which is a rubber or nylon ring that is squeezed
outward when the plug is set in the well; and 4) the on/off tool that allows the plug to be set and
then released to pull the tubing or wireline out of the well after setting (Baker Hughes, 2011).
Setting the tool downhole is accomplished in a number of ways depending on the specific
manufacturer’s design. Typically the tool is lowered to the desired location and then rotated to
release the slips that will grab the casing to hold the plug. Then the plug is raised or lowered
(depending on the specific application) to expand the sealing element against the casing. Once
the desired tension on the tool is applied, either the tool is set and can be released, or, if required,
it is rotated to release a secondary set of slips that will keep the tool expanded and set prior to
release. In the case of a wireline set tool, some versions use explosives or hydraulic systems to
set the slips and packing element prior to release.
• Bridge Plugs. Bridge plugs are a mechanical plug that is used to provide a solid seal
within a wellbore for
plugging. Some Figure 3. Cast Iron Bridge Plug
bridge plugs are
designed to be easily
drillable in case the
well is desired to be
reentered at a later

date. Bridge plugs Source: Photo Courtesy of Baker Hughes.
are typically made of
cast iron with duel slips with a sealing element between the slips. The plug is designed to
be set in a wellbore and then have cement set on top to provide a complete seal of the
reservoir below. In cases where there is a potential for moderate or high pressure gas to
be flowing from the area below the setting depth, a bridge plug can be set to seal the
wellbore prior to cementing to reduce the chances of the pressurized water or gas to
contaminate the cement. Figure 3 shows a typical cast iron bridge plug used to plug and
abandon wells.
• Cement Retainer. A cement retainer is a mechanical plug that can be set above a zone to
be cemented. This type of plug is especially useful when plugging higher pressured
zones that need to be squeeze-cemented prior to plugging. Cement retainers are usually
built from drillable material so will yield to later re-entry of the reservoir as needed. The
cement retainer is set in the well in a method similar to that used for a bridge plug. Once
the tool is set in the well, cement can be pumped through the plug to squeeze cement
through the perforations or open-hole area below the retainer. Pressure can be applied to


the area below the retainer without a Figure 4. Cement Retainer
concern for cement traveling uphole
past the cement retainer. The
application of pressure to squeeze the
cement through the perforations
provides a good method of sealing the
well at plugging. Once the desired
Source: Diagram Courtesy of International Completion
amount of cement is squeezed below Solutions, LLC.
the retainer, the tubing is pulled
upward out of the retainer and a
mechanical flap closes the hole to effectively seal the cement below the cement retainer.
Cement is then typically placed on top of the cement retainer to provide a more complete
seal of the reservoir. Figure 4 shows a typical cement retainer.
RESEARCH ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS AND MATERIALS

The technology associated with the P&A of wells has not changed significantly for more than
100 years. Cement and drilling mud is still the basic material used to plug many of the wells
plugged by operators. While the plugging of wells has become more reliable over time due to
advances in cementing materials and volumes placed in a well, the overall methods for plugging
remain similar as to what was used during the early oilfield days.
The use of cement as a plugging material was the first major change in the plugging of wells,
followed by the requirement to place cement below and across the fresh water zones
(Pennsylvania DEP, 2000; Texas RRC, 2000). As regulations became more stringent, operators
were required to place cement plugs above the productive zones and below the fresh water zones.
Some areas began to allow the use of mechanical plugs to seal of portions of wells, but in most
cases cement was required to be placed on top of the mechanical plug if it was for permanent
abandonment (GWPC, 2009).
Most research into cements and tools for use in oil and gas wells historically has been associated
with the completion of the wells and not the plugging of the wells (Bruffatto et al., 2003). As
such, little actual research has been done on the materials and procedures for plugging oil and
gas wells.
A research project conducted in 2000-2001 looked into the use of fly ash as a cementing material
to plug wells in Oklahoma. The two-phase project gathered fly ash samples from five coal-fired
power plants in Oklahoma and tested each of them to determine if they could be used as a
plugging material for shallow wells (Shah and Sublette, 2004). First, each sample was tested in a
laboratory to determine the optimum grout formulation for plugging wells. Pumpability tests
were also conducted to verify that the grout formulations could be pumped through coiled tubing
and straight pipe. The results for Phase 1 showed that an optimum fly ash grout formulation
could be found and that it had a compressive strength of over 500 psi which meets the minimum


strength criteria for P&A. The pumpability test showed that the cement / fly-ash grout can be
pumped through coiled tubing which allows wells to be plugged without a conventional rig on
the site (Shah and Sublette, 2004).
Phase 2 of the study involved testing the fly ash grout in a test well situation to determine the
bond strength and gas permeability. This testing showed that the fly ash grout had low
permeability and adhesion properties and that the grout provided a good seal to the casing ,
meaning that the fly-ash grout should be effective in preventing fluids or gas from migrating
upward. Ultimately, the testing showed that the fly ash grout performed similarly to Class H
cement and could be used to plug wells at depths up to 6,000 feet (Shah and Sublette, 2004).
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF WELL PLUGGING

Unplugged or poorly plugged wells are an environmental hazard as they provide potential
conduits for fluids to migrate between formations and potentially into the fresh water zones.
Poorly plugged wells also might provide pathways for natural gas to seep to the surface and
potentially cause fire or be a health hazards. An abandoned well’s potential for causing a
potential hazard is largely dependent on the original use of the well. Oil wells that have been
pumped for years will typically be very low pressure and the risk of contamination is low while a
gas well that is flowing at a rate that is non-economical can still posses enough pressure to be a
risk to the environment.
As oil prices rise to high levels, many abandoned oil fields are re-entered with new technologies
meant to produce oil that was not economical to produce in years past. With the new activity in
the oilfield, any idle or unplugged wells not targeted for re-development must be plugged to
prevent the escape of gas and oil from the reservoir. In areas where CO2 is being injected as a
tertiary recovery project, well plugging becomes an issue due to the high pressure of the CO2
flood in the reservoir. Old wells that are not being used to inject or produce the oil must be
plugged in a manner that also protects the fresh water from the high formation pressures. The
ability of these plugs to seal the well from the migration of CO2 gas will protect the fresh water
sources from potentially becoming contaminated with CO2 or the produced fluids (Ide et al.,
2006). As old fields are revitalized, failure of older plugging jobs will be an issue due to the
increased pressure created during re-development of the reservoir (Ide, Friedmann, and Herzog,
2006). The risks presented by older P&A wells must be quantified by operators and the wells
properly monitored to reduce any impacts to the environment.
In areas where shale-gas reservoirs are being newly developed, plugging of older wells has
become an issue due to the potential for stray gas to migrate from the shale formation to other
formations that are open to the old wells in the area. The old wells can transmit gas from the
formation to the fresh water or even the surface, thereby posing an environmental risk to the
local area. Older wells are a risk if they are poorly plugged or not plugged across the shale
production zone. Even if the older well has casing, the casing might not be adequately cemented
across the shale production zones.


Even the newly developed shale-gas wells eventually will become uneconomical and must be
plugged. The P&A of those wells must be designed to minimize the future risk of gas migration
that might pose environmental hazards.
The proper plugging of wells provides a great environmental benefit by protecting the
environment from potential contamination from oil and gas. Properly plugged wells prevent the
movement of fluids between formations which reduces the chance of oil or gas getting into a
formation that may be connected through an old, unplugged well nearby. Properly plugged wells
also prevent contamination of the drinking water aquifers. In areas where groundwater use is
important, protecting those water sources from oil and gas wells must include well-planned and
implemented P&A programs for oil and gas wells.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ADVANCES IN WELL-PLUGGING

TECHNOLOGY
Well plugging is often seen by some operators as a cost that provides little benefit to the
company bottom line. While in some instances that may be true, properly plugged wells can
save the operators substantially through avoidance of lost production from fields that are
candidates for high-technology recovery projects (NETL, 2010). Properly plugged wells can
prevent cross-contamination from other zones in a production field. Proper well plugs can also
prevent the loss of pressure in pressure maintenance water floods and CO2 floods. Both of those
merits can result in higher oil and or gas production from the targeted reservoir.
Technological changes have been made in the areas of cementing and downhole equipment for
oil and gas well construction and production operations and at least some of those advancements
should be beneficial to P&A practices. With the development of deep high-pressure gas projects
and shale gas projects, the advances in well cementing technology, along with new mechanical
systems, can potentially be applied to plugging of gas wells. By advancing the technology of
plugging wells, the overall cost of plugging can decrease. In addition, the newer plugging
materials and methods can reduce the plugging failures along with the problems associated with
leaking well plugs.
For CO2 flood projects, the application of cement that can prevent the loss of CO2 and gas
pressure could potentially increase the ultimate recovery of oil while reducing the overall cost of
the CO2 project (NETL, 2010). Operators would spend less over the life of the project in CO2
purchases as well as less spent on remedial projects dealing with leaking wells.
With the current development of numerous shale-gas basins in the US, the eventual plugging of
all of those new gas wells is a concern. Most of those shale-gas wells are horizontal
completions, which can pose an issue for plugging operations due to gas channeling and solids
settling. If those wells are not plugged correctly, gas channeling can occur and the well could
become a potential liability from gas leaking into the upper fresh water zones. Improved P&A
practices in the shale-gas basin developments should allow more economical and sustainable
development of US gas production. It can also increase the density of the development as wells


can be installed closer together if the abandoned wells are properly plugged to withstand the
potential impact of fracturing treatments nearby.
BARRIERS TO PROGRESS
Some of the barriers to advancing the science of plugging and abandoning wells can be attributed
to the lack of research and the lack of a clear vision of the role that plugging and abandonment
can play in the production cycle of the oil field.
• Lack of Research. The science of well P&A has not been the focus of research in the
oilfield. Most relevant research is focused toward maximizing the production of oil and
gas or reducing the cost of finding and producing the oil and gas. P&A has typically
been seen as a waste of capital dollars and has only been done when required; then, the
work is done as cheaply as possible. Most operators have historically not see the benefit
of properly closing wells. As a result, there are many wells in the oil field that are poorly
plugged or have been left in an unplugged status for years. As operators have been
reentering old oil fields to apply new production technologies, these poorly abandoned
wells have become a liability. To continue the application of the newer production
technologies in the fields, these old wells are being reentered and replugged. As these
wells are being plugged, the newer, higher-tech plugging processes are not being used;
instead, the wells are being plugged using traditional methods. If operators had newer
methods and materials that would make the plugs stronger, less prone to contamination,
and less expensive to install, the new production technologies would be more cost-
effective and would reduce potential environmental issues.
• Lack of Long-term Vision. The long-term vision of P&A’s importance to the oil
production program is not readily seen in the oil and gas production arena. The
traditional view of P&A is that it is a necessary evil and should be done as cheaply as
possible. As a result, many wells are poorly plugged and over time these poor plugging
jobs may result in significant environmental problems. This is especially true in the gas
well area. Cementing of gas wells is a constant issue due to gas channeling. If operators
plan poorly for the cementing of a gas well and try to cut costs by using cheaper materials
and methods, those gas wells could potentially become a hazard due to gas leaking
through the plugs. Implementation of new regulations, training, or an industry outreach
program to bring the issue to the forefront could reduce the potential problems in the
future.


FINDINGS
The plugging and abandonment of oil and gas wells has not changed significantly over the past
100 years. There has been improvement in the quality of the materials and changes to the
methods used to plug wells, but there has not been a specific change that has elevated the
technology of plugging wells.
Most wells are still plugged with cement using methods and materials developed in the 1970s.
Cement additives have improved, but gas channeling and contaminated cement jobs are still
operational issues.
Plugging wells is still regarded by some operators as a requirement with little or no

corresponding benefit. Benefits from reduced operational costs and/or increased production,
especially in redeveloped, older fields, generally has been underappreciated. Accordingly, the
true benefits of quality plugging jobs has not been realized in most areas.
By plugging wells correctly, future environmental issues, related to fluid or gas leakage, can be
avoided and thereby preserve savings otherwise eroded by remediation or litigation costs.
Research has lagged on materials and methods for plugging wells although advances in
technologies for drilling and completion, taken in proper context, should be applicable to
practices in plugging and abandonment.
By doing research and educating operators to the benefits of proper well plugging, the science of
well plugging will be advanced and the environment will benefit from better protection.


REFERENCES
Baker Hughes (2011) Products and Services, Completions & Production, Wellbore Intervention.
Baker Hughes Incorporated. http://www.bakerhughes.com/products-and-
services/completions-and-productions/wellbore-intervention
Bruffatto, C., Cochran, J., Conn, L., El Zeghaty, S., Fraboulet, B., Griffin, T., James, S., Munk,
T., Justus, F., Levine, J., Montgomery, C., Murphy, D., Pfeiffer, J., Pornpoch, T., Power,
D., and Rishmani, L. (2003) From Mud to Cement – Building Gas Wells. Oilfield
Review, 15, No. 3: 62-76.
http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/resources/oilfield_review/ors03/aut03/p62_76.ashx
GWPC (2009) State Oil and Natural Gas Regulations Designed to Protect Water Resources.
Ground Water Protection Council , National Energy Technology Laboratory. May 2009,
pp. 26-27. http://www.gwpc.org/e-
library/documents/general/State%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Regulations%20Designed%
20to%20Protect%20Water%20Resources.pdf
Halliburton (1981) Halliburton Cementing Tables, Technical Data Oil Well Cements and
Cement Additives. Halliburton Company, Duncan OK, 1981.
Ide, S., Friedmann, S., and Herzog, H. (2006) CO2 Leakage through Existing Wells: Current
Technology and Regulations. 8th Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference, Trondjheim,
Norway, June 19-22, 2006.
Johnston, O. and Knape, B. (1986) Pressure Effect of the Static Mud Column in Abandoned
Wells. Texas Water Commission. September 1986.
NETL (2010) Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery: Untapped Domestic Energy Supply and
Long Term Carbon Storage Solution. National Energy Technology Laboratory
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-
gas/publications/EP/small_CO2_eor_primer.pdf
Pennsylvania DEP (2000) Pennsylvania’s Plan for Addressing Problem Abandoned Wells and
Orphaned Wells (DEP Document No. 550-0800-001), Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection - Bureau of Oil and Gas Management, April 2010. p. 4.
http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/Get/Version-48262/550-0800-001.pdf
Petrochem (2002) Cements – Manufacturing Process. Petrochem-USA Inc. www.petrochem-
usa.com/pdfs/manu_process.pdf
Texas RRC (2000) Well Plugging Primer. Railroad Commission of Texas. January 2000, p. 6.
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/forms/publications/plugprimer1.pdf
Salehi, R. and Paiaman, A. (2009) A Novel Cement Slurry Design Applicable to Horizontal
Well Conditions. Petroleum & Coal 51, No. 4: 270-72.
http://www.vurup.sk/pc/vol51_2009/issue4/pdf/pc_4_2009_mirzaei_045.pdf
Shah, S. and Sublette, K. (2004) Development of an Environmentally Friendly and Economical
Process for Plugging Abandoned Wells (EPA Grant No. R827015C024). University of
Oklahoma.


State of California (2007) California Code of Regulations, Title 14: Natural Resources, Division
2: Department of Conservation, Chapter 4: Development, Regulation, and Conservation
of Oil and Gas Resources, Article 3: Requirements, Section 1723: Plugging and
Abandonment (Publication No. PRC04). State of California. March 2007, p. 18
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/regulations/PRC04.pdf
State of California (2004) Bentonite Plugging Guidelines - Operational Field Rules. Department
of Conservation - Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, State of California,
November 15, 2004. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/Pages/bentoniteplugging.aspx


Plugging and Abandonment of Oil and Gas Wells: Paper #2-25

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plugging and Abandonment of Oil and Gas Wells: Paper #2-25

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plugging and Abandonment of Oil and Gas Wells: Paper #2-25

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of plugging and abandoning oil and gas wells?

What is the purpose of plugging and abandoning oil and gas wells?

What are some of the steps involved in plugging and abandoning a well?

What are some of the steps involved in plugging and abandoning a well?

Working Document of the NPC North American Resource Development Study

Made Available September 15, 2011

PLUGGING AND ABANDONMENT OF

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 1 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 2 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 3 of 21

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 5

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 4 of 21

• Benefits from reduced operational costs and/or increased production, especially in

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 5 of 21

HISTORY OF WELL-PLUGGING PRACTICES AND REGULATIONS

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 6 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 7 of 21

Figure 1. Elements of State Well-Plugging Regulations

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 8 of 21

WELL-PLUGGING METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 9 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 10 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 11 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 12 of 21

RESEARCH ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 15 of 21

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF WELL PLUGGING

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 16 of 21

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ADVANCES IN WELL-PLUGGING

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 17 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 18 of 21

Plugging wells is still regarded by some operators as a requirement with little or no

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 19 of 21

Plugging and Abandoning Oil and Gas Wells Page 21 of 21

You might also like