Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

OROMIA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY

LOT-1

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project

Engineering Design, Geotechnical, & Geology Studies Final
Report

OROMIA WATER WORK DESIGN & SUPERVISION

ENTERPRISE

TEL.: +251 11 439-21-62/24-70

FAX: 25111 439-20-08
E-mail: [email protected]

February, 2014
Addis Ababa

i
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Cont Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................................. II
LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................................... III
LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................................................................... IV
PART I: -GEOLOGY & GEOTECHNICAL STUDY REPORT ........................................................................................ V
1 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................1
1.2 OBJECTIVE .......................................................................................................................................................1
1.3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................1
1.3.1 Preliminary study ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3.2 Geo-traverse (field study) ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.4 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE ..............................................................................................................................2
1.4.1 Topography .............................................................................................................................................. 2
1.4.2 Drainage .................................................................................................................................................. 3
1.5 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION ...............................................................................................................................3
1.5.1 Regional geology of the area ................................................................................................................... 3
1.5.2 Local geology of the area......................................................................................................................... 3
1.6 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL ..................................................................................................................................6
1.6.1 Rock for masonry works ........................................................................................................................... 6
1.6.2 Sand ......................................................................................................................................................... 6
1.6.3 Water ....................................................................................................................................................... 6
1.7 RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................6
PART II: - ENGINEERING DESIGN .......................................................................................................................... 8
2 HEAD WORK .................................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1 2.1 DIVERSION WEIR.....................................................................................................................................8
1.1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 8
1.1.2 Objective of the Project............................................................................................................................ 9
1.1.3 Shape of the weir crest .......................................................................................................................... 10
1.1.4 Length of the weir .................................................................................................................................. 10
2.2 2.2 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF THE WEIR .................................................................................................................10
1.1.5 Estimation of the water depth ............................................................................................................... 11
1.1.6 Fixing weir crest level ............................................................................................................................. 13
1.1.7 Flow depth over the weir crest .............................................................................................................. 14
1.1.8 Stilling Basin........................................................................................................................................... 15
1.1.9 Determination of the bed level of the stilling basin ............................................................................... 16
1.1.10 Depth of Scour ....................................................................................................................................... 18
1.1.11 Basic Section of the weir Body ............................................................................................................... 19
1.1.12 Length of the apron floor ....................................................................................................................... 20
1.1.13 Free Board.............................................................................................................................................. 21
1.1.14 Design of scouring sluice ........................................................................................................................ 22
1.1.15 Design of Intake ..................................................................................................................................... 23
1.1.16 Stability Analysis for the weir body (For Dynamic and Static Cases) ..................................................... 25
1.1.17 Design of Retaining Walls ...................................................................................................................... 29
1.1.18 Left & Right Side River Bank Protection embankments ......................................................................... 36
3 IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DESIGN ............................................................................................... 38

ii
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

3.1 3.1 CANAL SYSTEM .....................................................................................................................................38

3.1.1 Description of Water Distribution System.............................................................................................. 38
3.1.2 Canal Alignment (Canal Layout) ............................................................................................................ 39
3.2 3.2 DESIGN OF CANALS ....................................................................................................................................39
3.1.3 Main Canal ............................................................................................................................................. 43
3.1.4 Secondary Canal (SC1) ........................................................................................................................... 44
3.1.5 Secondary Canal (SC2) ........................................................................................................................... 44
3.1.6 Tertiary Canal ........................................................................................................................................ 45
3.1.7 Longitudinal Section of Canals ............................................................................................................... 45
3.3 3.3 CANAL STRUCTURES .............................................................................................................................46
3.1.8 Design of Night Storage Reservoir ......................................................................................................... 46
3.1.8.1 Basic Design Data .................................................................................................................................. 46
3.1.8.2 Inlet or Chute Design.............................................................................................................................. 49
3.1.8.3 Outlet works Intake facilities ................................................................................................................. 51
3.1.8.4 Design of spillway .................................................................................................................................. 52
3.1.9 Drainage Culverts .................................................................................................................................. 54
3.1.10 Pipe Crossing Culverts ............................................................................................................................ 57
3.1.11 Division Box ............................................................................................................................................ 60
3.1.12 Turnout .................................................................................................................................................. 62
3.1.13 REFERENCE............................................................................................................................................. 66
4 ANNEX - I: - PROJECT COST ESTIMATION AND ............................................................................................. 67
5 BILLOFF QUANTITY ...................................................................................................................................... 67
6 ANNEX - II: PROJECT DURATION AND WORK PLAN .................................................................................... 101
7 ANNEX - III: LIST OF DRAWINGS ................................................................................................................. 103

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE ....................................................................................................................................11
TABLE 2 DISCHARGE OF THE RIVER .......................................................................................................................................12
TABLE 3 DEPTH OF WATER OVER THE WEIR CREST ....................................................................................................................15
TABLE 4 PRE-CONJUGATE DEPTH .........................................................................................................................................17
TABLE 5 WEIR BODY STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR DYNAMIC CASE ....................................................................................................26
TABLE 6 WEIR BODY STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR STATIC CASE .......................................................................................................27
TABLE 7 U/S RETAINING WALL STABILITY ANALYSIS TESTING AT JUNCTION ..................................................................................30
TABLE 8 U/S RETAINING WALL STABILITY ANALYSIS TESTING AT FOUNDATION LEVEL .....................................................................32
TABLE 9 D/S RETAINING WALL STABILITY ANALYSIS TESTING AT JUNCTION ..................................................................................34
TABLE 10 D/S RETAINING WALL STABILITY ANALYSIS TESTING AT FOUNDATION LEVEL ...................................................................35
TABLE 11 AVAILABLE DISCHARGE ESTIMATION BASED ON 5DAYS AMC TIME SERIES ANALYSIS ..........................................................43
TABLE 12 DESIGN PARAMETERS OF MAIN CANAL ...................................................................................................................43
TABLE 13 DESIGN PARAMETERS OF SECONDARY CANAL ONE.....................................................................................................44
TABLE 14 DESIGN PARAMETERS OF SECONDARY CANAL TWO ....................................................................................................44
TABLE 15 DESIGN PARAMETERS OF TERTIARY CANAL...............................................................................................................45
TABLE 16 POND STORAGE CAPACITY ....................................................................................................................................48
TABLE 17 LOCATION OF CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON MAIN CANAL ...................................................................................55
TABLE 18 HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CANALS AT THE PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT SITES .......................................................58
TABLE 19 CANAL ELEVATION AT EACH SECTION ......................................................................................................................60
TABLE 20 HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CANALS AT PROPOSED DIVISION BOX SITES ............................................................61
TABLE 21 IRRIGATION OUTLET ON MAIN CANAL (MC) ............................................................................................................63

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

iii
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

TABLE 22 IRRIGATION OUTLET ON SECONDARY CANAL 1 (SC1) .................................................................................................64

TABLE 23 IRRIGATION OUTLET ON SECONDARY CANAL 2(SC2) ..................................................................................................65
TABLE 24 IRRIGATION OUTLET ON TERTIARY CANAL (TC) .........................................................................................................65

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM) AND CROSS-SECTION OF THE AREA ...........................................................................2
FIGURE 2 DRAINAGE IN THE AREA ..........................................................................................................................................3
FIGURE 3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF THE AREA............................................................................................................................4
FIGURE 4 GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION OF ALELTU TIKO HEAD WORK SITE ....................................................................5
FIGURE 5 RIVER CROSS SECTION AT HEAD WORK SITE..............................................................................................................12
FIGURE 6 STAGE DISCHARGE CURVE......................................................................................................................................12
FIGURE 7 FLOW DEPTHS OVER THE CREST ..............................................................................................................................14
FIGURE 8 ENERGY PROFILE OF THE WEIR ...............................................................................................................................18
FIGURE 9 SECTION OF WEIR BODY .......................................................................................................................................20
FIGURE 10 THICKNESS OF THE DOWNSTREAM APRON FLOOR....................................................................................................21
FIGURE 11 INTAKE AND SLUICE GATE ....................................................................................................................................23
FIGURE 12 INTAKE STRUCTURE............................................................................................................................................25
FIGURE 13 STABILITY ANALYSES FOR THE WEIR BODY ...............................................................................................................25
FIGURE 14 STABILITY ANALYSES FOR U/S RETAINING WALLS AT JUNCTION ...................................................................................30
FIGURE 15 STABILITY ANALYSES FOR U/S RETAINING WALLS AT FOUNDATION LEVEL ......................................................................32
FIGURE 16 STABILITY ANALYSES FOR D/S RETAINING WALLS AT JUNCTION ...................................................................................34
FIGURE 17 STABILITY ANALYSES FOR D/S RETAINING WALLS AT FOUNDATION LEVEL ......................................................................35
FIGURE 18 CROSS SECTION THE RIVER ALONG THE WEIR AXIS. ..................................................................................................37
FIGURE 19 SECTION VIEW OF THE WEIR AT RIGHT SIDE OF THE RIVER BANK ...................................................................................37
FIGURE 20 SECTION VIEW OF THE WEIR AT LEFT SIDE OF THE RIVER BANK .....................................................................................37
FIGURE 21 HEAD WORK PLAN ............................................................................................................................................38
FIGURE 22 GENERAL LAYOUT OF ALELTU TIKO IRRIGATION PROJECT ...........................................................................................41
FIGURE 23 SECTIONS OF CANALS .........................................................................................................................................43
FIGURE 24 PLAN OF NIGHT STORAGE ...................................................................................................................................48
FIGURE 25 POND OUTLET ..................................................................................................................................................52
FIGURE 26 ENERGY PROFILE OVER THE SPILLWAY ...................................................................................................................54
FIGURE 27 LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF DRAINAGE CULVERT .....................................................................................................56
FIGURE 28 LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF PIPE CULVERT .............................................................................................................59
FIGURE 29 LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF DIVISION BOX .............................................................................................................61
FIGURE 30 LAYOUT OF TURNOUT .........................................................................................................................................63

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

iv
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PART I: -GEOLOGY & GEOTECHNICAL STUDY REPORT

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

v
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

1 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
1.1 General description of the study area

The study area is found in Hidabo-Abote district, North Showa zone of the Oromia regional state which is
10km far from Ejere town and 34km, 159km far from the Zonal capital Fiche and the metropolis Addis
Ababa respectively. The project area has a geographical location of 36p X-04 45 907m and Y-10 90 896m
and Z-2387m.a.s.l.

1.2 Objective

❖ To know the Geology ,Engineering geology and Hydro-geologic characteristic of the Catchment
❖ To identify water quality problems (if there is)
❖ To know the foundation material and recommend its depth by doing test pit along the axis of the
head work site
❖ To describe the lateral and vertical rock and soil stability of the river bank including their
engineering behavior
❖ To identify the geology along the main canal rout and recommend majors that should be taken
❖ To investigate and recommend the location of natural construction material (Rock for masonry ,
Coarse aggregate, Sand ,Clay for lining and fill and also Water) both in quality and quantity

1.3 Methodology

In this Geotechnical investigation two phases of study has been carried out:-

❖ Data collection and analysis in the office (desk study or preliminary study), and
❖ Field investigation and subsequent analysis of the collected data.

1.3.1 Preliminary study

• Through assessment of the existing pertinent published and unpublished reports. These
includes data’s collected from Topographic maps , Regional geology of the area from
Geological map of Ethiopia ,Hydrogeology of the area from Hydro geologic map of Ethiopia
and feasibility study documents conducted near to this area has been referred .After finishing
works that should be done on desk we have preceded to the next step which is field work.
1.3.2 Geo-traverse (field study)
❖ Field investigation along the axis of the head work and along the main canal by digging a
test pit ranging from 1m to 3m depth and the cross-sectional profile has been done

1
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

❖ Geology and engineering geological mapping of materials have been conducted along the
main left and right bank irrigation cannels and command area.
❖ Assessment of the Geomorphologic features having importance in the movement and
localization of surface water
1.4 Topography and drainage

1.4.1 Topography
The elevation of the area ranges from 2250m-3000m which has undulating topography and in some places
especially in the low land of the area the topography is plain. The figure below show the altitude of the area

Figure 1 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and Cross-section of the area

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

2
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

1.4.2 Drainage
Most the streams in this area are perennial and some are seasonal but all of them drain into Abay River
having dendritic drainage pattern.

Figure 2 Drainage in the area

1.5 Geological investigation

1.5.1 Regional geology of the area

The regional geology of the study area is part of the Northern Ethiopian plateau which is contains all the
three major geological terrains of Ethiopia which are characterized by the following rock units of
proterozoic crystalline basement consisting of various high grade gneiss and schist, meta-
volcanicanosedimentary rocks, and associated syn to post tectonic plutonic rocks, Late Paleozoic to
Mesozoic marine and continental sedimentary rocks and Cenozoic, basic and felsic volcanic and associated
sedimentary rocks or in other word Mesozoic – Cenozoic sedimentary rocks, proterozic crystalline
basement rock and tertiary- Quaternary volcanic and sedimentary rock units.

1.5.2 Local geology of the area

As it has been mentioned above the local geology of the area is part of the Abay formation (middle Abay
tillite exposures) which is part of the northern Ethiopian plateau. From the outcrops and exposures the types

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

3
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

of rock found in the area are Sandstone, Sandy Lst, Gypsum and alternating shale and limestone and some
tertiary volcanic rocks that formed the northern Ethiopian plateau.

LEGEND

Amba-ardam formation
Sandstone, conglomerate and shale

Aiba-basalt (flood basalt

with rare basic tuff)

Antalo-formation Limestone

Figure 3 Regional Geology of the Area

1.5.1.1 Geology of the head work site

At the head work site the rock exposed on the surface is scoracious basalt which is massive and not easy
to dig it with auger bit or any other digging material but it is in favour of our the masonry work, so based
on the above condition the expected foundation material is scoracious basalt and it depth doesn’t exceed
0.5 m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

4
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Figure 4 Geological Cross Section of Aleltu Tiko Head Work Site

1.5.1.2 Geology along the main canal

As it has been tried to explain in the above local geology of the area section most of the area is covered
volcanic rocks overlain by thick clay soil. From the result of the test pits done along the main canal the
following recommendation has been made

❖ From 0m-201m along the main canal the canal should be lined due to the nature of the river bank
(Points taken for observation 1) location x=04 45 885m y=10 90 971m z=2386m and 2) x=0445
841 10 91 059m z=2383m)
❖ In between 201m-821m the test pit shows

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

5
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Test pit #1 location36p X = 04 45 475 m, Y = 10 91 440 m and Z = 2360 m. a.s.l

Clay soil mixed with Gravel

0.1m

0.6m Clay soil (Reddish in color)

From this result the nature of the soil is clayey so the canal can be earthen canal. An outcrop of highly
weathered basaltic rock has been observed in b/n the distance 1.8km-1.81km along the main canal for about
100ms which forces us to lien our canal location x = 04 45 402 y = 10 92 688m z = 2330m.a.s.l.

1.6 Construction material

1.6.1 Rock for masonry works

Rock is available around the project (Head work site) with an average distance of 1km radius around the
area.

Location 36p X = 04 46 845 m, Y = 10 91 349 m and Z = 2600 m

1.6.2 Sand
There are two options to find good quality sand for both concrete work and also for plastering purpose

Option #1 Sire morose

This area is found near to Ejere town at an average distance of 3km in the Keble called Sire morose,
having a geographic location of X=04 46 614m Y 10 93 446m and 2425m.a.s.l

Option #2 Laga bonsa

This quarry is also found around d Ejere town at a distance of about 15km ,having a geographical location
of 36p x = 04 44 372 y = 10 95 356m and z = 2218m.a.s.l (priority should be given to this site for sand
needed for concrete work)

1.6.3 Water
Water is available from the river itself at a negligible distance

1.7 Recommendation and conclusion

From the test pits and other geological, hydro geological and geomorphologic investigations done on the
target area most of the engineering works that could be done on the area could be done without any
problems. In addition to the above mentioned reasons availability of natural construction materials near to
the project area could give a great contribution for the accomplishment of the project. Generally based on

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

6
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

those results a conclusion has been made that the project is feasible for construction in geotechnical top of
view.

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

7
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PART II: - ENGINEERING DESIGN

2 HEAD WORK
2.1 2.1 DIVERSION WEIR

1.1.1 Introduction
Aleltu Tiko small scale irrigation project is aimed at ensuring food self sufficiency as well as
alleviating poverty by making use of surface water (Aleltu Tiko river). The project is intended to

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

8
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

irrigate 65 ha of land. Major activities during the execution of the project will be the construction
of head work, irrigation canals, drainage canals, and different irrigation and drainage structures.

1.1.2 Objective of the Project

The main objective of the head work is to provide sufficient irrigation water at upstream side of
the weir during the period of low flow. And the work, which are constructed at the head of the

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

9
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

canal, in order to divert the river water towards the canal, so as to ensure a regulated continuous
supply of silt-free water with a certain minimum head in to the canal.

1.1.3 Shape of the weir crest

Weirs differ in type and shape, but designed and constructed to serve the same purposes. The
following points are considered to determine the type and shape of the weir suited to this specific
site.

❖ A weir with a shape that cannot easily be constructed by local manpower should not be
considered.

❖ The availability of the skilled manpower for implementing it.

❖ The skill of the local builders, to perform as per design and specification.

❖ Taking into account the cited points and other factors, broad crest stone masonry weir type
with 1:1 slope of downstream face is adopted. The stone masonry embedded in cement
mortar will be constructed on the mass concrete (plum concrete).

1.1.4 Length of the weir

The length of water way should be adequate to pass the design flood safely. For alluvial river it is
usually determined from the Lacey wetted perimeter (p).

The wetted perimeter (p) is given by

P = 4.75√Q

Where Q = 35 design discharge (m3/s)

P = 4.75√35 = 28.10 m

But, the length of the weir as these empirical formulae is very huge, so considering the physical
condition of the weir site, the peak flow discharge which pass through the channel and as the most
economical section to the project 7.00 m width is taken.

2.2 2.2 Hydraulic Design of the Weir

A diversion weir raises the water level on its upstream side to create the head necessary to divert
the flow through the canal intake. So the following data have been obtained from the topo map
and the previous design document.
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
10
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Design considerations:

Design flood = 35m3/s

Maximum flood level = 2381.45masl

Minimum river bed level = 2380.72masl

Under sluice bed level = 2381.70masl

Afflux = 1.00 m and Retrogression = 0.5m,

Safe exit gradient for course sand (1/5 to 1/6)

1.1.5 Estimation of the water depth

After the design peak discharge is calculated, it is obvious to find the T.W.D. which will be used
for deciding the bottom elevation of the downstream floor.

Table 1 Average River Bed Slope

No Station Distance Elevation Cumulative Area

(m) (m) height (m) At (m2)
0 0.00 0.00 2380.98 0.00 0.00
1 100.00 100.00 2381.42 0.44 22.00
2 200.00 100.00 2382.48 1.50 97.00
3 300.00 100.00 2384.13 3.15 232.50
4 400.00 100.00 2390.18 9.20 617.50
Total 400.00 969.00

Cumulative Height, H = E ln – E lo

Area, A n = [(H n + H n-1)/2)] x L n

Average Height, H avg. = 2 A / L

Average Height, H avg. = 4.845 m

Average Slope, I avg. = H avg. / L

Average Slope, I avg. = 0.0121125m/m take 0.012 m/m

Roughness Coefficient of the River bed = 0.035

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
11
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Table 2 Discharge of the River

Elevation Bed Water Area Wetted Hydraulic Slope Roughness Velocity Discharge
El.(m) Width
(m) dDepth
(m) A(m2) Perimeter
P (m) Radius
R (m) I avg. Coefficient
n V Q
2380.72 7.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 (m/m)
0.0121 0.035 (m/Sec)
0.00 (m3/Sec)
0.00
2381.22 7.00 0.50 3.75 8.41 0.58 0.0121 0.035 1.83 6.88
2381.45 7.00 1.32 10.97 10.73 1.01 0.0121 0.035 3.19 35.00
2381.72 7.00 1.50 12.75 11.24 1.09 0.0121 0.035 3.42 43.60

From the Manning formula V = 1/n*R2/3*I1/2, Q = V*A

Figure 5 River Cross Section at Head work Site

Figure 6 Stage discharge curve

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

12
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

From Water depth - Discharge curve, T.W.D equivalent to the flood discharge is found to be
1.32m.

1.1.6 Fixing weir crest level

At the location of the selected weir site, the minimum river bed level is approximately 2380.72
above mean sea level. The weir crest elevation is fixed with reference of this river bed elevation
considering the following factors.

❖ The crest level should be set at desired height or level to be able to obtain the required
driving head to safely deliver the designed discharge to main canal.

❖ The weir crest should be set to allow a safely passage of maximum flood discharge within
designed weir crest length.

❖ The bed level of the under sluice should be below sill level of canal head regulator.

❖ The main canal at the head reach should not be too deep in order to avoid large excavation
work, to minimize construction cost and to reduce maintenance and side slopes stability
problems.

Height of weir was calculated based on flowing data

. Average level of the highest field = 2375.90m

. Water depth required = 0.30 m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
13
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

. Head loss across the field = 0.00m

. Head loss at the turnout = 0.05m

. Slope of canal * Distance from the weir = 5.67m

. Head loss across head regulator = 0.00m

. Crest level of the weir = 2381.92m i.e.

Crest Height = Crest level - Upstream river bed level = 1.20m

1.1.7 Flow depth over the weir crest

Flow depth over the weir crest was computed by the following empirical formula.

Q = CL (He) 3/2

He = (Q/CL) 2/3

Where,

Q = peak flood discharge in m3/s = 35 m3/s

L = length of weir crest in m = 7.00 m

He = over flow depth including approaching velocity head in m

C = discharge coefficient which varies = 1.70

2/3
 35 
He =   = 2.05m
 1.70  7 

Figure 7 Flow depths over the crest

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
14
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Approaching velocity

Q
Va = 2 g ( He − h) and, Va =
( P + h) L

Q
= 2 g ( H e − h)
( P + h) L

Where,

h = depth of water over the weir crest in m

V a= approaching velocity in meter and, h = H – V a2 / 2g

V a2/2g = H - h = 2.05 - h

But, V a = ((Q/L (h + p)

((Q2/ [L (h + p)] 2 * 1/2g = 2.05-h

The Value of h can be calculated by trial and error method as follows.

Table 3 depth of water over the weir crest

h Left Side right Side Remar k
1.00 0.50 1.05
1.20 0.39 0.85
1.40 0.32 0.65
1.80 0.22 0.25
1.83 0.22 0.22 ok

Therefore h = 1.83 m

1.1.8 Stilling Basin

a. Energy method

i. Velocity head in the approach channel

hvo = H - h =0.22m

ii. Hydraulic Jump

1. In case of earth foundation.

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

15
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

River bed Elevation = 2380.72

D/S Water level =2382.04

Weir crest level =2381.92

Height of the crest, P =0.60 (silt Height = 0.60 m assumed)

1.1.9 Determination of the bed level of the stilling basin

By Trial and Error Method

It is necessary to fined the jump height and to adjust the bottom level of the basin so that the water
surface level of the jump is a little higher than the D/S water surface level - say 20 ~
40cm.Therefore, the floor level of the stilling basin must be found by trial and error method.

Assuming the floor level is 0.50 m lower than the river bed. Say -0.50m

Assumed EL.1 = EL.3 - 0.50

Assumed EL.1 =2380.22m

H = E0 = E1

Z = EL.0 - Assumed EL.1

Z =1.70m

E0 = H + Z

E0 = 3.75m

q = Q/b

Where, q - Unit peak discharge (m3/sec/m)

Q - Peak discharge (m3/sec) =35.00 m3/sec

b - Weir Length (m) = 7.00m

q =5.00m3/sec/m

From the energy rule E0 =E1 =d1 + hv1

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

16
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Where, d1 -Critical depth (m)

hv1 - critical velocity head (m)

Hence, E1 = d1 + hv1 = (d1 + v12/2g)*1/2g

E1 = d1 + hv1 = (d1 +q2/2gd12)

Z = E0 +E1 Therefore, d1 +q2/2gd12

d1 +q2/2gd12 = 3.75m, using trial and error method the value of d1 are shown as below.

Table 4 Pre-conjugate depth

d1 d1 + q2/2gd12 = 3.75 Remark

0.65 3.67
0.64 3.75 ok
0.63 3.84

So from this result d1 = 0.64 m

Critical velocity, V1 = q/d1 = 7.81m/sec

Fraud number, Fr = V1/√ (gd1) =3.12

Post conjugate depth, d2

d2 = d1/2[(√1+8Fr2) -1] =1.84m

If the water surface of the jump is assumed to be 0.20 m higher the downstream water level.

EL.1 = (WL.3 + 0.20) - d2

EL.1 = 2379.08m < assumed EL.1 =2380.22m

Therefore, the bottom level of the stilling basin will be EL.1 =2379.92m

The length of the stilling basin is:-

L = 4*d2 =7.36m take 7.50m

The result of the calculation can be shown as below:-

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

17
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Figure 8 Energy Profile of the weir

By Conventional Method

Using Conventional method length and depth of the stilling basin will be determined as follow

L=3(h F) ^0.5

d = 0.5(h F) ^0.5 and F/2≥d≥F/3 Where:-

L- Length of the basin (horizontal length of the downstream slope of the weir plus the length of
the downstream apron floor) m

d - Depth of the basin (m)

h- Overflow depth (m)

F- (U/S Water Level + Velocity Head)-(D/S Water Level)

h =1.83m

F =1.71m

L = L' = 3(h F) ^0.5= 5.31m take 5.50m

d = 0.5(h F) ^0.5= 0.88m take 0.50m

Therefore, the stilling basin is so designed as to equipped with the floor length of 5.50 m and the
depth of d = 0.50 m and the transition length of L' = 5.50 m.

1.1.10 Depth of Scour

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

18
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Properly designed the stilling basin dissipates the great majority of the turbulent energy in the
flow. At the outflow from the basin there remains a certain proportion of energy in the flow that
scours the d/s of the basin. The scour holes so formed may progress towards the structure and
results in structural failure. Such failures can be prevented by providing piles or cut- off at u/s and
d/s ends of the impervious floor, much below the calculated scour level. The depth of scour
can be calculated using Lacey's equation.

Hydraulic mean depth, R = 1.35*(q^2/f) ^0.333 Where,

R - Hydraulic mean depth

q - Discharge per meter length

f - Lacey's silt factor, for medium sand f = 1

Hydraulic mean depth, R =3.94m

Let us provide u/s cut-off at depth of 1.25R (i.e.4.93 m from the top of u/s water level.

Bottom level of u/s cut-off = u/s HFL - 1.25R = 2378.66m

Let us, therefore, provide the u/s cut-off up to a bottom level of 2380.72m, i.e. 2.06m take 1.00m
u/s cut-off

Let us provide d/s cut-off at depth of 1.50R below the d/s water level (which is 2381.45m with
retrogression).

Hence, the R.L. of bottom of d/s cut-off = 2375.54m

Let us, therefore, provide the d/s cut-off up to a bottom level of 2380.72m, i.e. 5.18m take 1.00m
d/s cut-off

1.1.11 Basic Section of the weir Body

Assume that the depth of the stilling basin is 0.50 m with the bottom elevation of 2380.22m.
Hence, the proposed gravity weir will be designed to resist, with sufficient factor of safety, the

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

19
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

three tendencies to destruction; overturning, sliding and overstressing. The basic section of the
weir can be determined using Bligh’s method as follows.

Top width, B = He/√r

Top width, B = 1.58m take1.00m

Bottom width, L = He + p/√r-1

Bottom width, L =2.71m take 3.20m

1.00

1.20

3.20

Figure 9 Section of Weir Body

Therefore, the downstream slope of the weir section is 1 horizontal to 1 vertical

1.1.12 Length of the apron floor

Maximum Head on the structures

. For Dynamic Case

H max = Headwater - TWL, H max =1.71m

. For Static Case

H max = Weir Crest - River Bed Level

H max =1.20m

Therefore, it is necessary select the maximum head differential which usually occurs at the time
of flood often called as dynamic case. In this case the maximum differential H max is 1.71 m for

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

20
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

dynamic case and 1.20 m for static case. Therefore, Lane's method and H max = 1.71 m will be
taken to check whether the length of the apron is sufficient.

L ≥ CH, Foundation material = Hard Pan Lane Creep Ratio, C =1.60

CH = 5.57m

Weighted creep length

L c = ∑L v + 1/3*∑L h ≥ CH

L c = ∑L v + 1/3*∑L h = 5.57m

Weighted Creep Ratio = L/H max

Weighted Creep Ratio = 3.25

According to Lane recommended ratios, this structure would be safe from piping on either Medium
Gravel. The base material of the river consists of hard rock. Therefore, the length of the apron is
sufficient to prevent the piping.

hvo=0.22

2.05 1.83
hv2
Eo 1.00 hv1
E1
0.60
Z E2 d2=1.84 TWL=1.32
0.60
d1=0.64
1.00 1.00
0.50
0.30
2.20 0.50 0.50

5.20 4.00

Figure 10 Thickness of the Downstream Apron Floor

1.1.13 Free Board

Sufficient freeboard should be provided for u/s and d/s wing walls in order to protect the walls and
embankments from being overtopping by surges, splash and spray, and wave action setup by the

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

21
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

turbulence of hydraulic jump and not to allow high flood water to bypass the diversion weir. The
following empirical formulae are used to determine the freeboard.

D/S Freeboard = 0.1(V1 + d2)

D/S Freeboard = 0.97m

However adopt 0.50 m for u/s and d/s wing walls.

Top elevation of the u/s retaining walls = TWL+FB = 2384.25m

Top elevation of the d/s retaining walls = TWL+FB = 2382.54m

1.1.14 Design of scouring sluice

Helps to allow the removal of silt deposited near the intake pipe. This is designed to ensure
sufficient scouring capacity least to dispose off about 10.5% of the peak flood i.e. 3.5m3/s, this
value is at least greater than 2 times the intake capacity.

Using a broad crested weir formula, Q = C d* L* H d 3/2 Where,

Q = discharge through the under sluice = 3.5 m3/s

C d, coefficient of discharge = 1.7

Length of under sluice section,

H d = water depth above the crest of the under sluice during high flood = 2.81m

(h + H d) where, h is weir height and hd is design head

Hence L= Q/c d (H d) 3/2 = 0.44 m

Use L = 1.00 m (practical length has to be used)

The gate of a sluice can be a thick say 6mm sheet metal or other similar material.

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

22
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Figure 11 Intake and sluice gate

1.1.15 Design of Intake

Circular intake

Intake capacity, Q (m3/s) = 0.10m3/sec

Length of RCC pipe, L (m) = 10.7m

Pipe Diameter, Ø (m) = 0.50 m

Roughness Coefficient, n = 0.014

Intake lose, h = (v2/2g) (FT)

Where FT = Entry + Exit +Friction loses = 0.5+1.0+Fl

And Fl = (f x L)/ Ø p, Where f = 124.6n2 /Ø p 1/3

Hence, using a 100% full pipe of diameter, the intake loss, h is calculated.

The size of the pipe is increased for ease of access during cleaning.

f = 124.6(0.014)2/ (Ø p) 1/3 =0.031 m

Fl = f*L/Ø p = 0.66m

FT= 0.5+1.0+F1 =2.16m

A = 3.14 *Øp^2/4 =0.20m2

V = Q/A =0.51m/s

Therefore, Total Head Loss, H = (V2/2g)* (f T) =0.03m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
23
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

If 10% extra head is included, the total head becomes,

Ht = 1.1*H =0.03m

Therefore, the elevation of downstream water level is

D/s W.L = u/s W.L - Ht = 2382.17m

D/s G.L = d/s W.L - d1 = 2381.91m

Check: Using orifice formula

Q intake = C*A*(2gh) 1/2,

Where, C =0.73for submerged flow

h =0.03m

Q intake =0.11m3/sec

0.11m3/s > 0.1m3/s, OK!

Level of river bed = 2380.72 m

Weir Height, P =1.20 m

Level of intake at the intake gate = 2381.32m

Sill height, H = 0.60m

Crest level = river bed level + weir height = 2381.92m

Top level of intake pipe = river bed level + sill height + pipe diameter

Top level of intake pipe = 2381.82m

Since the top level of intake pipe 2381.82 m <= the crest level of the weir Steel bar mesh is used
at the inlet of the pipe to protect debris and other foreign materials. The design & drawings of
intake gate is used that of IDD standard gate design and drawings.

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

24
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

10.70

0.30
1.86

0.40
1.20

1.75

2.75
2.65

3.65

Figure 12 Intake Structure

1.1.16 Stability Analysis for the weir body (For Dynamic and Static Cases)

Dynamic Case

Figure 13 Stability analyses for the weir body

Where,

d3, Tail Water Depth = 1.32 m

B, Weir Base width = 2.20 m

H d, Head over the crest = 1.83 m

h, Weir Height = 1.20 m

b, Weir Top width = 1.00 m

Pd - Water pressure at downstream side of the weir toe

P u1 and 2 - Water pressure at upstream side of the weir toe

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

25
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

P u - Up lift pressure

P 1 and 2 - Contact pressure of Foundation

C - Specific weight of concrete = 2.30 t/m3

m - Specific weight of masonry = 2.00 t/m3

w - Specific weight of Water = 1.00 t/m3

Table 5 weir body Stability Analysis for dynamic case

Magnitude of Force (t) Moment about toe (t.m)
Forces
Forces

Anti clock wise (+ve)

Designation if any

Downstream(-ve)

Clock wise (-ve)

Downward(+ve)

Lever arm in m
Upstream(+ve)
Upward(-ve)

Horizontal
Vertical

Toward

Toward

Name of force

Weight of Weir Body W1 3.86 0.75 2.90

W2 2.32 2.97 6.87
Weight of Water Ww' 0.87 0.80 0.70
Ww 1.83 0.5 0.92
Horizontal Hydrostatic Pu1 0.72 1.29 0.93
Pressure Pu2 3.03 0.66 2.00
Pd 0.87 0.44 0.38
Uplift Pressure U1 1.32 1.1 1.45
U2 1.10 1.47 1.61
Sum Vert. Forces SV 6.46
Sum Horizontal Forces SH 2.88
Sum Mom(-) SM- 5.99
Sum Mom(+) SM+ 11.76

Summary

Stability against over turning

SM+/SM- >= 1.5,

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
26
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

1.96 >= 1.5 ok

Stability against sliding

SH/SV< 0.75

0.45 < 0.75 ok

Stability against over stress

X= SM/SV

0.89< 2/3*B = 1.47m ok

B/2 = 1.10m

B/6 = 0.37m

e = (B/2) –x

e = 0.21

Since e < a, 0.21<0.37m

Stability against compression

d C toe= (SV/B)/ (1+6e/B) = 4.59t/m2

Since the allowable compressive strength of masonry extends up to 100 t/m2. Therefore, the
calculated value of compressive strength that is 4.59t/m2 is safe.

-The Contact pressure on foundation

P1= (SV)/ {(1+6e)/B)} =10.09t/m

P2= (SV)/{(1-6e)/B)} = 2.82 t/m

-The foundation reaction

R1= (B/2)*(P1-P2) = 8.00t/m

R2= (B)*(P2) =6.21t/m

Static Case

Table 6 Weir body Stability Analysis for static case

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

27
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Magnitude of Force (t) Moment about toe

Designation if any
(t.m)

Horizontal Forces
Vertical Forces

Anti clock wise

Downstream(-ve)

Clock wise (-ve)

Downward(+ve)

Lever arm in m
Upstream(+ve)
Upward(-ve)

Toward

Toward

(+ve)
Name of force

Weight of Weir Body W1 3.86 0.75 2.90

W2 2.32 2.10 4.86
Horizontal Hydrostatic Pressure Pu1 0.72 0.66 0.48
Uplift Pressure U1 0.60 1.1 0.66
Sum Vert. Forces SV 5.58
Sum Horizontal Forces SH 0.72
Sum Mom(-) SM- 1.14
Sum Mom(+) SM+ 7.76

Summary

Stability against over turning

SM+/SM- >= 1.5,

6.83 >= 1.5 ok

Stability against sliding

SH/SV< 0.75

0.13 < 0.75 ok

Stability against over stress

X= SM/SV = 1.19 < 2/3*B = 1.47m ok

B/2= 1.10m

B/6= 0.37m

e= (B/2) –x = -0.09

Since e < a -0.09<0.37m

Stability against compression

d C toe= (SV/B)/ (1+6e/B) =1.93t/m2

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

28
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Since the allowable compressive strength of masonry extends up to 100 t/m2. Therefore, the
calculated value of compressive strength that is 1.93t/m2 is safe.

-The Contact pressure on foundation

P1= (SV)/ {(1+6e)/B)} =4.24t/m

P2= (SV)/ {(1-6e)/B)} =6.91t/m

-The foundation reaction

R1= (B/2)*(P1-P2) =-2.94t/m

R2= (B)*(P2) =15.21t/m

1.1.17 Design of Retaining Walls

Upstream Wing Wall (both sides)

The height of the top level of the wing wall is fixed considering the weir height, head over the weir
and some free board.

The base of the abutment shall be kept 1.00 m below the bed level of the river

The thickness of the foundation concrete = 0.50 m

The EL of junction of concrete and masonry 2380.72m

The EL of base of concrete = 2380.22m

Top of the abutment = Top of the wearing coat = 2385.04m

Height of the abutment up to the junction = 4.32(H) say 4.50m

Assuming the base width = 0.75*H =3.375 say 3.50m

Assuming f = 30

C=0

Density of stone masonry = 2000kg/m3

Density of saturated earth = 1800kg/m3

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

29
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Testing At Junction

DRAWDOWN CONDITION
Coefficient. Of Earth Pressure 0.333
Unit Weight Of Surcharge(t/m^3) 1.800
0.000 Equivalent Surcharge (m) 1.000
10
0.000 5 Unit Weight (t/m^3) 1.800

Water Level 6 7
4.500 Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.000 Water Level 15
(Above Junction Level) 11 12 16
8 9 (Above Junction Level)
0.000 1 2 3 17
20 4 2.250 18
0.000 Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.400 19
3.000
0.000 0.500 0.000

- 13
14

Figure 14 Stability analyses for U/S Retaining walls at junction

Table 7 U/S Retaining Wall Stability Analysis testing at junction

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

30
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Vertical Horizontal Lever Arm Mv Mh

Item No. (t) (t) (m) (t-m) (t-m) Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 Front face of wall is vertical
2 4.500 0.250 1.125
3 13.500 1.500 20.250 Back face is inclined
4 0.000 1.750 0.000 Testing is done at Junction Level
5 0.000 2.000 0.000 Back inclination starts just at top
6 3.038 1.500 4.556 Back face is inclined
7 6.075 2.750 16.706
8 3.038 3.000 9.113 Back face is inclined
9 0.000 3.500 0.000
10 5.400 2.000 10.800 Equivalent surcharge effect
11 0.000 0.000 0.000
12 0.000 0.000 0.000
13 0.000 1.750 0.000 15% Uplift is Considered
14 -0.591 2.333 -1.378 15% Uplift is Considered
15 2.700 2.250 6.075 Equivalent surcharge effect
16 1.519 3.000 4.556
17 3.038 1.125 3.417
18 0.675 0.750 0.506
19 2.531 0.750 1.898
20 0.000 0.000 0.000
SUM 34.959 10.463 61.172 16.453
X-bar(m)= 1.279 Data For Testing Interface Results
e(m)= 0.471 (MASONARY-FOUNDATION) (Based on Option-1 or Option-2)
f1(t/m^2)= 18.051 Option-1 C(t/m^2)= 10.500 F.O.S.(sliding)= 7.096
f2(t/m^2)= 1.926 Phi(deg)= 47.000
F.O.S.(overturning)= 3.718 Option-2 "f"= 0.700 F.O.S.(sliding)= 2.339

f = Foundation Pressure on both side is Positive

Max Pressure = 18.05 safe

Min Pressure = 1.926 safe

F.O.S against overturning = 3.718 safe

F.O.S against sliding = 2.339 safe

Testing at Foundation level

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

31
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

DRAWDOWN CONDITION
Coefficient. Of Earth Pressure 0.333333
Unit Weight Of Surcharge(t/m^3) 1.800
Equivalent Surcharge (m) 1.000

0.000 Unit Weight (t/m^3) 1.800

Water Level 0.000 5 10

Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.000 6 7 Water Level 15
(Above Foundation Level)
4.500 (Above Foundation Level) 16
11 12
20 8 9 17
0.000 1 2 3 2.750
4 18
0.500 Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.400 19
3.000
- 0.500 0.500 0.500

13
14

Figure 15 Stability analyses for U/S Retaining walls at Foundation level

Table 8 U/S Retaining Wall Stability Analysis testing at foundation level

Vertical Horizontal Lever Arm Mv Mh
Item No. (t) (t) (m) (t-m) (t-m) Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0.000 0.500 0.000 Front face of wall is vertical
2 4.500 0.750 3.375
3 13.500 2.000 27.000 Back face is inclined
4 5.400 2.250 12.150 Testing is done at Foundation Level
5 0.000 2.750 0.000 Back inclination starts just at top
6 3.038 2.000 6.075 Back face is inclined
7 8.100 3.500 28.350
8 3.038 3.500 10.631 Back face is inclined
9 2.025 4.250 8.606
10 6.300 2.750 17.325 Equivalent surcharge effect
11 0.000 0.000 0.000
12 0.000 0.000 0.000
13 0.000 2.250 0.000 Uplift Effect
14 -6.188 3.000 -18.563 Uplift Effect
15 3.000 2.500 7.500 Equivalent surcharge effect
16 1.519 3.500 5.316
17 3.713 1.375 5.105
18 1.008 0.917 0.924
19 3.781 0.917 3.466
20 0.000 0.000 0.000
SUM 39.713 13.021 94.950 22.311
X-bar(m)= 1.829 Data For Testing Interface Results
e(m)= 0.421 (FOUNDATION-SOIL) (Based on Option-1 or Option-2)
f1(t/m^2)= 13.777 Option-1 C(t/m^2)= 10.500F.O.S.(sliding)= 6.899
f2(t/m^2)= 3.873 Phi(deg)= 47.000
F.O.S.(overturning)= 4.256 Option-2 "f"= 0.700 F.O.S.(sliding)= 2.135

f = Foundation Pressure on both side is Positive

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
32
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Max Pressure = 13.777 safe

Min Pressure = 3.873 safe
F.O.S against overturning = 4.256 safe
F.O.S against sliding = 2.135 safe

Downstream Wing Wall (both sides)

The base of the abutment shall be kept 1.73 m below the bed level of the river

The thickness of the foundation concrete = 0.50 m

The EL of junction of concrete and masonry = 2379.72m

The EL of base of concrete = 2379.22m

Top of the abutment = Top of the wearing coat = 2382.54masl

Height of the abutment up to the junction = 2.82 (H)

Assuming the base width = 0.75*H = 2.115 say 2.20m

Assuming f = 30 and C = 0

Density of stone masonry = 2000 kg/m3

Density of saturated earth = 1800 kg/m3

Testing At Junction

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

33
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

DRAWDOWN CONDITION
Coefficient. Of Earth Pressure 0.333
Unit Weight Of Surcharge(t/m^3) 1.800
Equivalent Surcharge (m) 1.000

0.000 Unit Weight (t/m^3) 1.800

Water Level 0.000 5 10

Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.000 Water Level
(Above Junction Level) 6 7
2.820 (Above Junction Level)15
0.000 11 12 16
20 8 9
1 2 3 17
4 1.41 18
0.000 Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.400 19
1.700
- 0.000 0.500 0.000

13
14

Figure 16 Stability analyses for D/S Retaining walls at Junction

Table 9 D/S Retaining Wall Stability Analysis testing at junction
Vertical Horizontal Lever Arm Mv Mh
Item No. (t) (t) (m) (t-m) (t-m) Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 Front face of wall is vertical
2 2.820 0.250 0.705
3 4.794 1.067 5.114 Back face is inclined
4 0.000 1.100 0.000 Testing is done at Junction Level
5 0.000 1.350 0.000 Back inclination starts just at top
6 1.079 1.067 1.151 Back face is inclined
7 2.157 1.775 3.829
8 1.079 1.917 2.067 Back face is inclined
9 0.000 2.200 0.000
10 3.060 1.350 4.131 Equivalent surcharge effect
11 0.000 0.000 0.000
12 0.000 0.000 0.000
13 0.000 1.100 0.000 15% Uplift is Considered
14 -0.233 1.467 -0.341 15% Uplift is Considered
15 1.692 1.410 2.386 Equivalent surcharge effect
16 0.596 1.880 1.121
17 1.193 0.705 0.841
18 0.265 0.470 0.125
19 0.994 0.470 0.467
20 0.000 0.000 0.000
SUM 14.756 4.740 16.656 4.940
X-bar(m)= 0.794 Data For Testing Interface Results
e(m)= 0.306 (MASONARY-FOUNDATION) (Based on Option-1 or Option-2)
f1(t/m^2)= 12.305 Option-1 C(t/m^2)= 10.500
F.O.S.(sliding)= 8.211
f2(t/m^2)= 1.109 Phi(deg)= 47.000
F.O.S.(overturning)= 3.372 Option-2 "f"= 0.700
F.O.S.(sliding)= 2.179

f = Foundation Pressure on both side is Positive

Max Pressure = 12.305 safe
Min Pressure = 1.109 safe

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

34
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

F.O.S against overturning = 3.372 safe

F.O.S against sliding = 2.179 safe

Testing at Foundation level

DRAWDOWN CONDITION
Coefficient. Of Earth Pressure 0.333333
Unit Weight Of Surcharge(t/m^3) 1.800
Equivalent Surcharge (m) 1.000

0.000 Unit Weight (t/m^3) 1.800

Water Level 0.000 5 10

Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.000 Water Level 15
(Above Junction Level) 6 7
2.820 12 (Above Junction Level)
0.000 11 1 2 3 16
8 9
20 17
4 1.910 18
Unit Weight (t/m^3)= 2.400 19
1.700
- 0.500 0.500 0.500

13
14

Figure 17 Stability analyses for D/S Retaining walls at Foundation level

Table 10 D/S Retaining Wall Stability Analysis testing at foundation level
Vertical Horizontal Lever Arm Mv Mh
Item No. (t) (t) (m) (t-m) (t-m) Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0.000 0.500 0.000 Front face of wall is vertical
2 2.820 0.750 2.115
3 4.794 1.567 7.511 Back face is inclined
4 0.000 1.600 0.000 Testing is done at Junction Level
5 0.000 2.100 0.000 Back inclination starts just at top
6 0.449 1.366 0.614 Back face is inclined
7 2.705 2.374 6.423
8 1.979 2.316 4.584 Back face is inclined
9 1.719 2.950 5.071
10 3.960 2.100 8.316 Equivalent surcharge effect
11 0.000 0.000 0.000
12 0.000 0.000 0.000
13 0.000 1.600 0.000 15% Uplift is Considered
14 -0.315 2.133 -0.672 15% Uplift is Considered
15 1.692 1.410 2.386 Equivalent surcharge effect
16 0.248 2.213 0.550
17 1.043 0.955 0.996
18 0.486 0.637 0.310
19 1.824 0.637 1.161
20 0.000 0.000 0.000
SUM 18.111 5.294 33.961 5.403
X-bar(m)= 1.577 Data For Testing Interface Results
e(m)= 0.023 (MASONARY-FOUNDATION) (Based on Option-1 or Option-2)
f1(t/m^2)= 5.906 Option-1 C(t/m^2)= 10.500
F.O.S.(sliding)= 10.016
f2(t/m^2)= 5.414 Phi(deg)= 47.000
F.O.S.(overturning)= 6.286 Option-2 "f"= 0.700
F.O.S.(sliding)= 2.395

f = Foundation Pressure on both side is Positive

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

35
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Max Pressure = 1.577 safe

Min Pressure = 0.023 safe
F.O.S against overturning = 5.906 safe
F.O.S against sliding = 2.395 safe

1.1.18 Left & Right Side River Bank Protection embankments

Due to provision of weir across the river, water level will rise on the upstream side of the structure.
The structure is designed and provided in restricted width of river. Raised water level may cause
out flanking of riverbanks near structure if the banks are not above afflux level. To prevent out
flanking, earthen protection embankments on flanks of weir are provided. The protection
embankments are provided from abutment of weir structure and extended up to the point where
required ground elevation corresponding with the top embankment elevation joins on the bank.
The top level of both the embankments is kept at an elevation of 2385.04 m above mean sea level.
The length of the right and left embankments are 6 and 4meter respectively. The maximum height
is about 3.00 meter above ground level and provided with 2 meter top width and 1:2 side slopes

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

36
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

on u/s and 1:1.5 on d/s. Cut off trench with 1.1 meter depth, 3 meter bottom width and 1:1 side
slope is proposed in order to prevent under seepage under the embankment.

0.50

2.33

0.50
0.20 1.00
0.50 0.60 0.50
1.00
0.50

0.50 2.65 2.65

2.00

7.00

Figure 18 Cross Section the river along the Weir Axis.

1.90

0.00

1.82 1.82
Z 2.31
0.60

1.00 1.00
0.50
0.30
2.20 0.50 0.50

5.20 4.00

Figure 19 Section view of the weir at right side of the river bank

1.82 1.82
2.32 1.20

1.00 1.00
0.50
0.30
0.50 0.50 2.20

4.00 5.20

Figure 20 Section view of the weir at left side of the river bank
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
37
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

3.90 12.23

4.37
3.50

0.70
0.30
2.50
1.75 1.75
1.00 1.40
5.35
2.20

1.70

1.35
1.60
0.70

6.50
5.35

6.50

0.60
Figure 21 Head Work Plan

3 IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DESIGN

3.1 3.1 CANAL SYSTEM

3.1.1 Description of Water Distribution System

The diverted water from the Aleltu Tiko River is to be distributed to the farm through a network
of canals by gravity flow. The physical purpose of irrigation is to satisfy the demands of crop water
requirement by increasing the moisture content of the soil in the root zone of the crop. For this
canal distribution system should be planned to convey the required amount of water from the outlet
as described above. In the case of the ‘ALELTU TIQO' irrigation scheme since gravity led
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
38
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

irrigation practice is designed and furrow irrigation method is selected. Each command area with
small channels (furrow) water reaches over the soil surface.

3.1.2 Canal Alignment (Canal Layout)

The Aleltu Tiko site has sufficient and suitable irrigable area on right sides of the river (see Fig.
22 the layout of the command area). The command area of this Irrigation project is50ha and
stretched along the right side of the main river. The proposed canal system of the scheme consists
of on main canal (MC-2834.44m long), two secondary canals (SC1- 1558m, SC2-986m long and
TC-320m long). SC1 branch from the main canal at chainage 0+980 with Grid Coordinates of
445446.46, 1091656.42 to irrigate 20.6ha of land, SC2 branch from the main canal at chainage
1+670 with Grid Coordinates of 445420.29, 1092290.12 to irrigate 971ha of land. And TC from
SC2 at chainage 0+670 with Grid Coordinates 445039.97, 1092806.39 branched out to irrigate
4.67ha of land. From MC, SC1and SC2, one Tertiary more than 75 turnouts are proposed. Along
the whole canal system there are 4 major drain crossings which require Drainage Culverts design
and more than 3 minor crossings which require culvert crossing. As the canal system passes
through villages and social infrastructures, more than3 road and footpath crossings are required.

Canal layout is marked on the field and profile is taken for each rout of all secondary and tertiary
canals. The following points are considered while preparing the canal layout:

❖ The layout is done based on block areas to be irrigated by taking drains and ridges into
consideration.

❖ Deep cutting and high banking is tried to be avoided

❖ The alignment of secondary canal follows almost on the periphery of the command area as
a contour canal.

3.2 3.2 Design of Canals

Canal design is used to decide the parameters like the depth of flow, bed width, flow velocity, etc.
These depend on design discharge, bed slope, and coefficient of roughness and side slope of canals
if the cross section is trapezoidal and Rectangular. Design discharge is the maximum discharge

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

39
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

that the canal is required to carry in any year .It depends on irrigation intensity, cropping pattern,
size of command area, duty and time factor.

Design Discharge Determination

Duty, q = 2 lit/sec/ha
Command Area, A = 50 ha
Design Discharge, Q d = 0.1m3/sec

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

40
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

444562 444762 444962 445162 445362 445562 445762 445962

1093241

1093241
TCA-7 End of the Project
0.66 ha No.141+14.44m
No.141
TO-26
No.140
End of the Project
End of the Project
No.16 TCA-6 No.139
No.49+6m TO-7
TO-18
No.49 0.44 ha
No.15 No.138
TO-25
No.48
1093041

1093041
No.14 No.137
End of the Project
No.77+18m No.47 TO-6 TCA-5
TO-27 No.13 0.60 ha No.136
TO-17
No.77 No.46
No.12
No.135
No.45 TO-24
No.76
No.11
No.134
No.75 No.44TO-5
TO-26 TO-16 No.10
No.133
No.43
No.74 No.9
No.132
No.42
No.73 No.8
TO-4 TO-23
No.131

No.72 TO-15
No.41 No.7 No.130
TO-25
No.40
No.71 No.6 No.129

No.39 TO-22
No.70 TO-3 No.128
No.5
TO-14
No.38
No.69
TO-24 No.127
No.4
1092841

1092841
No.37 Gully
No.68 No.126
Ch.2+520
No.3 TO-21

No.36 TO-2
No.67 No.125
No.2
TO-13
TO-23 No.35
No.66 No.124
No.1
No.34 No.123
No.65 TO-1
No.0 TO-20
No.33 No.122
No.64
TO-22
TO-12
No.32
No.63 No.121

No.62 No.31 No.120

No.61 SC2A-11 No.30 TO-19

No.119
TO-21
0.34 ha TO-11 No.29
No.60 No.118
No.28
No.59 No.117
No.27
SC2A-10
TO-10 No.26 TO-18
No.58
TO-20 No.116
SC1A-20 0.42 ha
1092641

1092641
0.68 ha No.25
No.57 No.115

No.24
No.56 No.114
TO-9
TO-19 No.23 No.113
No.55
SC1A-19 No.112
0.68 ha No.22 No.111
No.54

No.110
No.53 No.21
No.105No.106
TO-18 TO-8 No.102No.103 No.107
No.104 No.109
No.52 No.101 CD3
SC1A-18 No.20
No.100 No.108 Stream 3
0.69 ha
No.51 No.19
No.99
No.50 No.18
TO-17 TO-7 No.98
No.17
No.49
SC1A-17 No.16 No.97
0.74 ha No.48 No.15
No.96
TO-6
No.47 No.14
No.95
1092441

1092441
SC1A-16 No.13
No.46
0.94 ha No.94
No.12
No.45
TO-5
No.11 No.93
TO-15No.44
No.10
TO-4 No.92
No.43
No.9
No.91
No.42 NSR2 No.8

TO-14 No.90
No.7
No.41
No.6 No.89
No.40 TO-3
No.88
No.5
No.39
TO-13 No.4 No.87
SC1A-13 No.38 No.3 No.86
0.84 ha TO-2
No.37 No.2 No.85

No.36 No.1 No.84

DB-2
No.83+5
1092241

No.35 TO-1

1092241
No.82
No.34

No.81
TO-11
No.33
SC1A-11 TO-17
No.80
0.87 ha No.32
No.79
No.31

TO-10 No.78
No.30 TO-16
No.77
No.29

No.76
No.28
TO-9
No.27 No.75
TO-15

No.26 MA-15 No.74

0.90 ha
No.25 No.73
TO-8
1092041

No.24
TO-14
No.72

1092041
No.23
No.71
TO-7No.22
SC1A-7 No.70
No.21
0.84 ha TO-13
No.69
No.20
MA-13
TO-6 No.68
No.19 0.87 ha CD2

No.67
No.18
TO-12
No.66
No.17 Stream 2
TO-5 No.65
No.16
No.64

No.63
1091841

No.62
TO-4 TO-11
No.13 No.61

1091841
No.12 No.60

No.59
TO-3 No.11
TO-10
No.10 No.58

No.57

TO-2 No.8 No.56

No.55
No.7

TO-9
No.54
No.6
TO-1
No.53
No.5

SC-I No.52
No.4 Downst
ream
outlet
structure

No.3
1091641

No.51
No.2
NSR1 Upstream

No.50

1091641
inlet
structure

No.1 DB-1
No.49
No.0
No.48

No.47

No.46

No.45

No.44

No.43
No.42 No.41 No.40 No.39 No.38
No.37
No.36
No.35
FD
No.34

TO-8 No.33
1091441

No.32

1091441
No.31
MA-7 TO-7
0.55 ha No.30
CD1

Stream 1
FC No.29
SC2A - Unit Area on Secondary Canal 2
SC1A - Unit Area on Secondary Canal 1

SC - Secondary Canal

5m Countor Interval
CD - Cross Drainage
TCA - Unit Area on Tertiary Canal

MA - Unit Area on Main Canal

FR - Field Road
FD - Field Drain
FC - Field Canal
TC - Tertiary Canal

MAR - Main Access Road

MC - Main Canal

DB - Division Box
TO - Turn Out

LEGEND
NSR - Night Storage Resorvior

MA-6 No.28
0.48 ha TO-6
No.27

No.26

No.25
TO-5

FR No.24

No.23

TO-4No.22
1091241

No.21
1091241

MA-3 No.20
0.30ha
TO-3
St.No.19+5
No.19
TO-3

No.18

No.17

TO-2
No.16

No.15

No.14
TO-1

No.13

No.12
1091041

No.11
1091041

No.10

No.9

No.8

No.7

No.6

No.5

No.4

No.3
MAR

No.2
MC

No.1

No.0
Hea
dW
1090841

1090841
ork

444562 444762 444962 445162 445362 445562 445762 445962

Figure 22 General Layout of Aleltu Tiko irrigation project

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

41
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

As the hydrology study result the base flow of Aleltu Tiko River in the dry season from December
up to May is 22.15 lit/sec and minimum flow in wet season from June up to November is 78.35
lit/sec respectively. However the area which is could be irrigate by these two discharges are also
20ha and 50ha in these respective seasons, So to assure the required demand of the project without
any interruption, there are two ponds or storage Reservoirs are provided across secondary canals.
The river flow discharge throughout the year during wet and dry seasons are estimated based on
5days AMC time series analysis as the following table below, so that the main canal flow capacity
is designed for rectangular and trapezoidal section from the beginning up to end of the project to
carries the entire irrigation water required (0.1 m3/sec) for 50 ha of the command area. Releasing
10% of the base flow of the river to the downstream eco-system, the main canal takes 90% of the

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

42
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

base flow, and the design of Secondary and Tertiary canals are follows the same procedures of
canal design and listed below.

Table 11 Available discharge estimation based on 5days AMC time series analysis
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Mean runoff(mm) 0.35 0.47 3.551 2.991 3.398 11.274 33.024 23.387 6.129 2.716 3.905 1.37
Volume(m3) 22400 30080 227282.72 191431 217465.16 721511.87 2113566 1496777.2 392252.73 173838.1 249920 87680
Days in the month 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
Q, Discharge(m3/s 0.0084 0.0084 0.0124 0.0739 0.0812 0.2784 0.7891 0.5588 0.1513 0.0649 0.0964 0.0327
Min.spring Q(m3/s) 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215 0.02215
Total Q available(li/sec) 30.51 30.51 107.01 96.00 103.34 300.51 811.27 580.98 173.48 87.05 118.57 54.89
Q for D/s Users (10% ) 3.05 3.05 10.70 9.60 10.33 30.05 81.13 58.10 17.35 8.71 11.86 5.49
Q available (li/sec) 27.46 27.46 96.31 86.4 93.01 270.46 730.14 522.88 156.13 78.35 106.71 49.4

From Dec. up to May is Dry Season

From June Up to end of November is Wet Season

3.1.3 Main Canal

Design Discharge Determination

Duty, q = 2.00 lit/sec/ha

Command Area, A = 50ha

Design Discharge, Qd = 0.1m3/sec

Figure 23 Sections of Canals

Table 12 Design Parameters of Main Canal

Canal Design For Trapezoidal For Rectangular

Canal bed width, b 0.30 m 0.30 m
Water Depth, d 0.24 m 0.26 m
Canal Side Slope, m 1.00 m/m m/m
Water area, A 0.13 m2 0.08 m2
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
43
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Wetted Perimeters, P 0.98 m 0.82 m

Hydraulic Radius, R 0.26 m 0.21 m
Roughness Coefficient, n 0.025 0.016
Canal bed slope, I 0.005 m/m 0.010 m/m
Flow Velocity, V 0.77 m/s 1.30 m/s
Flow Discharge, Q 0.10 m3/s 0.10 m3/s

3.1.4 Secondary Canal (SC1)

Command Area = 21.51ha

Duty, q = 2.00 lit/sec/ha

Design Discharge, Qd = q*CA= 43.02lit/sec, say 0.043m3/sec

Table 13 Design Parameters of Secondary Canal one

For Trapezoidal For Rectangular

Canal Design Section Section
Canal bed width, b 0.30 m 0.30 m
Water Depth, d 0.20 m 0.06 m
Canal Side Slope, m 1.00 m/m 0.00 m/m
Water area, A 0.10 m2 0.02 m2
Wetted Perimeter, P 0.87 m 0.42 m
Hydraulic Radius, R 0.24 m 0.12 m
Roughness Coefficient, n 0.025 0.016
Canal bed slope, I 0.002 m/m 0.100 m/m
Flow Velocity, V 0.43 m/s 2.41 m/s
Flow Discharge, Q 0.043 m3/s 0.043 m3/s

3.1.5 Secondary Canal (SC2)

Command Area = 9.71ha

Duty, q = 2.00 lit/sec/ha

Design Discharge, Qd = q*CA =19.42lit/sec, say 0.02m3/sec

Table 14 Design Parameters of Secondary Canal two

For Trapezoidal
Section For Rectangular Section
Canal Design
Canal bed width, b 0.30 m 0.30 m
Water Depth, d 0.15 m 0.04 m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

44
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Canal Side Slope, m 1.00 m/m m/m

Water area, A 0.07 m2 0.01 m2
Wetted Perimeter, P 0.72 m 0.38 m
Hydraulic Radius, R 0.21 m 0.10 m
Roughness Coefficient, n 0.025 0.016
Canal bed slope, I 0.002 m/m 0.080 m/m
Flow Velocity, V 0.37 m/s 1.76 m/s
Flow Discharge, Q 0.02 m3/s 0.02 m3/s

3.1.6 Tertiary Canal

Command Area = 4.67ha

Duty, q = 2.00 lit/sec/ha

Design Discharge, Qd = q*CA= 9.34 lit/sec/ha, say 0.01m3/s

Table 15 Design Parameters of Tertiary Canal

Canal Design Rectangular Section

Canal bed width, b 0.30 m
Water Depth, d 0.02 m
Canal Side Slope, m m/m
Water area, A 0.01 m2
Wetted Perimeter, P 0.34 m
Hydraulic Radius, R 0.07 m
Roughness Coefficient, n 0.016
Canal bed slope, I 0.080 m/m
Flow Velocity, V 1.20 m/s
Flow Discharge, Q 0.01 m3/s

3.1.7 Longitudinal Section of Canals

The longitudinal section along the canals is prepared with levels at intervals based on the natural
topographic changes indicating the following details:

❖ Chain age
❖ Existing ground level (OGL)
❖ Canal bed level (CBL)
❖ Full supply level (FSL)
❖ Canal top level (CTL)
❖ Bed slope, Bed width (S, B)
❖ Discharge, velocity (Q, V)

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

45
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

❖ Location of turnouts and other related structures

The longitudinal profile of the main, secondary, and tertiary canals is shown in the drawings with
canal section details.

3.3 3.3 CANAL STRUCTURES

There are many canal structures are on the main, secondary and tertiary canals such as:-

❖ Two Night storage Reservoirs

❖ Four Drainage culverts
❖ Three foot paths (Pipe Culverts)
❖ Three Division Boxes
❖ Seventy six Turnouts

And there design is prepared based on the canals design parameters which they are sited and
their hydraulic characteristics, the detail working drawings each structures are attached with this
engineering design report.

3.1.8 Design of Night Storage Reservoir

Assuming all secondary canals get half discharge from night storage. There for, dimension of
night storage is fixed only for half discharge required for each SC.

3.1.8.1 Basic Design Data

Inflow, Q mc = 0.054m3/s
Area to Irrigate = 25.00 ha
Water Duty, q = 2.00lit/sec/ha
Irrigation Time, T = 12 hr
Storing Time Ts = 12hr
Pond Center OGL = 2364.50 m
Pond Center DBL = 2363.22m
Side slopes: inside = 1:3 and outside = 1:2
Top embankment width, W =3.00m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

46
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

stored in 12hrs V
Design discharge

Volume of water

Total discharge
Water Depth D
Side slope m

Total Volume
Canal name

Q ( m3/s)
Item .No

(m3)

(m)
Bw Two Aw BL TL AL

1 SC1 0.043 2332.80 3.00 2.50 19.00 26.50 22.75 38.00 45.50 41.75 2374.53 0.04
2 SC2 0.030 1296.00 3.00 2.50 13.50 21.00 17.25 27.00 34.50 30.75 1326.09 0.03

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

47
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Table 16 Pond Storage Capacity

Geometrical Capacity (Gross) is determined Using Frustum Formula where h, water Depth in the
Pond, B1 & B2 are top and bottom areas of the Pond.
GCG = * (B1 + B2 ) + ( B1 * B2 ) 0.5
h
3
Shape of the pond is frustum with square top & bottom.

Figure 24 Plan of Night storage

Top Width, T = 48.00 m

Bottom Width, B = 30.00 m

Top area, B1 = 2304.00 m2

Bottom area, B2 = 400.00 m2

Water depth in the Pond, h = 2.50m

Free Board, Fb = 0.50 m

Total Depth of the pond, D = 3.00m

Geometrical Capacity (Gross) = 3213.33 m3 Using Frustum Formula where h, water Depth in the
Pond, B1 & B2 are top and bottom areas of the Pond.

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

48
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Dead Storage = 642.67m3 20% of gross storage

Depth of Dead storage = 0.50 m

Live Storage = 2570.67m3, the net water used for irrigation

3.1.8.2 Inlet or Chute Design

a) Critical flow hydraulics

Design discharge, Q d = 0.043m3/sec

Bed width, b = 0.30m

Water depth, d = 0.27 m

Roughness coefficient, n =0.014

Bed slope, s = 0.1m/m

Velocity of flow, V = 2.97m/sec

OGL = 2365.75m

U/S D.B.L = 2365.6 m

D/S D.B.L = 2362.75 m

Width of Notch, b c = 0.30m

Unit discharge, q = 0.18m3/sec/m

Critical depth, dc = 0.15m

Critical Velocity, V c = 1.21 m/sec

Velocity Head, h v c = 0.07m

Water area, Ac = 0.04 m2

Wetted Perimeter, Pc = 0.60 m

Hydraulic Radius, R = 0.07m

Water Surface slope, I c = 0.009m/m

b) Energy at section C

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

49
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

∆Z = 2.85m

E c = 3.07m

c) Energy at section 1

Designation Result of Calculation

Trial number 1 2 3 4
Assumed depth, d1 0.14 0.05 0.04
b1 = bc 0.30 0.30 0.30
A1 = b1*d1 0.04 0.02 0.01
V1 = Q/A1 1.33 3.60 4.60
hv1 = V2 1 /2*g 0.09 0.66 1.08
P1 = b1 + 2* d1 0.57 0.40 0.38
R1 = A1/P1 0.07 0.04 0.03
I1 = ((n*V1 )/R2/3 )^2 0.012 0.203 0.426
Im=(Ic+I1)/2 0.010 0.106 0.217
hf1=Im*L 0.094 0.953 1.956
E1=d1+hv1+hf1 0.32 1.66 3.07
E1=Ec to small ok

d) Conjugate depth after jump

Fraud number, Fr = 7.42

Conjugate depth, d2 = 0.39m

e) Stilling basin

1. Length, L = 1.57m

2. Width, B = 0.43m

3. Bottom elevation, EL. C

V2 = q/d2 = 0.46m/s

hv2 = V22/2g = 0.01m

E2 = d2 +hv2 = 0.40m

d3 = 0.09m

hv3 = 0.21m

E3 = d3 + hv3 = 0.30 m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

50
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

a = E2 - E3 = 0.10m use 0.15 m

El. C = El.3 - a = 2361.15m

3.1.8.3 Outlet works Intake facilities

Circular intake

Intake capacity, Q (m3/s) = 0.054m3/sec

Length of RCC pipe, L (m) = 5.00m

Pipe Diameter, Ø (m) = 0.30 m

Roughness Coefficient, n = 0.014

Intake lose, h = (v2/2g) (FT)

Where FT = Entry + Exit +Friction loses = 0.5+1.0+Fl

And Fl = (f x L)/ Ø p, Where f = 124.6n2 /Ø p 1/3

Hence, using a 100% full pipe of diameter, the intake loss, h is calculated.

The size of the pipe is increased for ease of access during cleaning.

f = 124.6(0.014)2/ (Ø p) 1/3 = 0.036m

Fl = f*L/Øp = 0.61m

FT= 0.5+1.0+F1 = 2.11m

A = 3.14 *Øp^2/4 = 0.07m2

V = Q/A = 0.76m/s

Therefore, Total Head Loss, H = (V2/2g)* (f T) = 0.06m

If 10% extra head is included, the total head becomes,

Ht = 1.1*H = 0.07m

Therefore, the elevation of downstream water level is

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

51
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

D/s W.L = u/s W.L - Ht =

D/s G.L = d/s W.L - d1 =

Geomembrane lining
extends for 1m width over
all Bank top and burried in Compacted fill
soil to 20cm depth Ø30cm concrete pipe
BTL = 2366.72m

MSL = 2366.42m
FSL = 2366.22m + 2364.72m 10cm thick lean concrete
bedding

20.00

Geomembrane lining

DSL = 2363.72m U/S El. = 2363.72

0.5% slope--? D/S El. = 2363.70
% slope--?
DBL = 2363.22m

Section Z-Z

Figure 25 Pond Outlet

3.1.8.4 Design of spillway

Providing inclined drop spillway to be built at the abutment of the embankment. And assuming
the design discharge, bed width and water depth is the same as the entrance for control section.
After the pond is filled up to the maximum pond level the peak discharge that out flow from the
pond is the same discharge that inflow in to the pond. is 0.054m3/sec. So the flow depth in the

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

52
 Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

approach canal is 0.09 m. the peak discharge routing will also be neglected. Therefore the capacity
of the spillway should be designed to pass the peak flow discharge of 0.043m3/sec.

a) Determination of the width of inlet section

L = Q/1.7*H3/2 = 1.1765 m say1.00 m

Then the critical depth dc for flow at the control section is:-

U/S Spillway Crest Level =2 364.8m

q = Q/B = 0.043m3/s/m

dc = [q2/g]1/3 = 0.067m

F = 1.000m

F/dc = 14.94347273 say 15.00

Vc = q/dc = 0.807m/sec

hvc = Vc2/2g = 0.033 m

The value of d2/d1 and d1/dc corresponding to the values of F/dc can be read in Appendix B-1

d1 / dc = 0.165 and

d2 / d1 =2.053

d1 = 0.165*dc =0.011 m

d2 = 2.053*d1 =0.023 m

V1 = q/d1 =4.89m/sec

hv1 = V12/2g =1.22m

V2 = q/d2 =2.38m/sec

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

53
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

hv2 = V22/2g =0.29m

El. A = U/S crest level + (dc + hvc) =2364.90m

El. C = El. A - (d1 + hv1) =2363.67m

El. C = El. A - (d2 + hv2 + F) =2363.59m

By comparing the above two values of El. C the lower bottom elevation of 2363.59m will be
selected.

b) Stilling basin
Length, L =0.11m is very small so is given 0.50m

Figure 26 Energy Profile over the Spillway

3.1.9 Drainage Culverts

There are three stream crossings which the canal alignment crosses at chainage 0 + 600, 1 + 360
and 2 + 180 that needs cross drainage structures to pass the irrigation water through main canal
over the natural drain, such that the drainage water runs below the canal either freely or under
siphoning pressure. Hence, the HFL of the Drain is sufficiently below the bottom of the canal, so
that the drainage water flows under gravity, the structure is known as an aqueduct. However, when

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

54
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

the HFL of the drain is higher than the canal bed and the water passes through the aqueduct barrels
under symphonic action, the structure is known as siphon aqueduct.

a. Given Data

1. Hydraulic calculation

i. Canal

Table 17 Location of Cross Drainage Structures on Main Canal

Grid Coordinate Elevation
Of
Chainage

Diameter
Structure

Remark
Canal
Type

OGL
X Y

DBL

BTL
Pipe

FSL
(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)
0+600 445733.28 1091453.17 CD - 1 0.60 2370.94 2372.39 2372.67 2372.87 Stream 1
1+360 445518.10 1092004.03 CD - 2 0.60 2360.18 2359.37 2359.65 2359.85 Stream 2
Canal
Main

2+180 445484.93 1092582.23 CD - 3 0.60 2330.91 2329.73 2330.01 2330.21 Stream 3

ii. Drain

Stream Bed Level = 2370.94 m

Assumed Stream High Flood Level = 2371.44 m

High Flood Level of the Stream = 2371.44 m

High Flood Depth of the Stream = 0.50 m

Deference between Drain bed and canal bed = 1.45 m

Difference between Drain bed and canal FSL = 1.73 m

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

55
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Drainage bed is lower than canal bed; drain bed is lower than FSL canal. So that, the bed level of
the canal is above the HFL of the drain, the aqueduct will be provided.

0.30 d 0.30

d1 Diam.
d2 d1

0.30 L1 t1 L t2 L2 0.30

Figure 27 Longitudinal Section of Drainage Culvert

Data:

Catchment Area, Ac = 2.00Km2

Specific Discharge, q = 0.50 m3/sec/Km2

Design Discharge, Q d = 1.00 m3/sec

Area, A o = Q d/Vo

Velocity of flow V o = 1.50 m/sec is assumed.

Area, A o = 0.67 m2

Diameter of pipe, D = √ (1.485*A o)

Diameter of pipe, D = 0.99m use 1.00m

Area of pipe, A = 0.6736D2

Area of pipe, A= 0.6736 m2

Hydraulic radius, R = 0.3042D

Hydraulic radius, R = 0.3042m.

Velocity, V = Q/A

Velocity, V = 1.4846 m/sec.

Slope, I = [(n V)/R2/3]2

Where, n Roughness Coefficient = 0.014

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
56
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Slope, I = 0.0021

Difference in elevation between u/s and d/s elevation

H = I*L

Where, Length of the Pipe = 10 m

H = 0.021m

Water depth in the pipe, d = 0.8D

Water depth in the pipe, d = 0.80 m

3.1.10 Pipe Crossing Culverts

Road (Foot Path) Crossing

There are three major footpath and three road crossings at the canal system of the Aleltu Tiko
irrigation scheme. The two road crossings are across Main canal at a chainage of 0 + 000 when the
secondary canal 1 & 2 branch from the Main canal and the remaining one when Tertiary canal
branch from SC2 at chainage 0 + 670. The width, (w) of the road depends on the width of existing
footpath width (local foot path width), which is used to cross cattle from one area to another, the

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

57
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

average width of crossing is 3.00m. Concrete pipe diameter, Ø 0.60m and 1m long, are provided
for the five meter wide, (L) roads at each road crossing.

Hydraulic calculation

Given Data

Table 18 Hydraulic Characteristics of the canals at the proposed pipe culvert sites
Chainage Type Of Discharge Width b(m) Depth d(m) Side slope Velocity Bed slope I Roughnes
0+983 Canal
MC Q(m 3
0.102 /s) 0.30 0.24 m
- V(m/s)
1.41 0.012 s
0.016
1+700 MC 0.102 0.30 0.26 - 1.32 0.010 0.016
0+670 SC2 0.03 0.30 0.05 - 1.71 0.060 0.016

b – Flow Hydraulics of barrel.

Assuming the Diameter of pipe → D = 0.60 m

Roughness Coefficient, n = 0.014

H = 0.80 D = 0.48

r = 0.30m

H/r = 1.60

From IDD (Design Manual) to uniform flow in circular section flowing partially Full.

α = A/r2 = 2.694 → A = 2.694*r2 = 0.2425 m2

P/r = 4.428 → P = 4.428*r = 1.3284 m

β = R/r = 0.608 → R = 0.608*r = 0.1824 m

V2 =Q/A = 1.77 m/sec

hv2 = V22/2g = 0.16 m

I2 = [n v/R2/3]2 = 0.0060

Difference in Elevation between Elev. B and Elev. C

h f = L*I2

Pipe Length, L = 10 m

h f = 0.060

C. Water surface change at the U/S and D/S of the culvert

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
58
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

I. Drop of water surface at the Inlet of the culvert

∆h1 = 1.5 [V22-V12/2g] = 0.20 m

II Rise of water surface at the D/S of canal section

∆h2 = 0.3 [V22-V12/2g] = 0.04 m

d. Elevation

1. Invert Elevation at u/s canal = 2368.62 m

2. Water surface Elevation at u/s canal = [I.E. at u/s canal] +d1 = 2369.13 m

3. Water surface at the culvert Inlet = [W.S.E. at u/s canal] - ∆h1 = 2368.94 m

4. Invert Elevation at the culvert Inlet = [W.S. at the C. Inlet] d2 = 2368.46 m

5. Invert Elevation at the culvert outlet = [I.E. at the C. Inlet] – h f = 2368.40 m

6. Water surface Elevation at the culvert outlet = [I.E. at the culvert out let] + d2 = 2368.88 m

7. Water surface Elevation at the D/S canal = [W.S.E. at the Culvert outlet] + ∆h2 = 2368.92m

8. Invert Elevation at the D/S canal = [W.S.E. at the D/S canal] – d1 = 2368.41m

e. Total Head Loss

HT = 1.2 [V22 – V12/2g] + h f

HT = 0.22 m

Cheek water surface difference U/S and D/S Canal.

∆Z = [W.S.E. at u/s canal] – [W.S.E. at D/S canal]

∆Z = 0.22 m …Ok

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

59
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

0.30
0.30

d1 Diam.
d2 d1

0.30 L1 t1 L t2 L2 0.30

Figure 28 Longitudinal Section of Pipe Culvert

f. Canal Elevation at each section

Table 19 Canal Elevation at each section

Water Elevation of
Section Location Change in Water Level
Depth (m) Canal Bed Water
Surface
A U/S Canal 0.51 - - 2368.62 2369.13
B Barred 0.48 Drop 0.20 2368.46 2368.94
C “ 0.48 Drop 0.06 2368.40 2368.88
D D/S canal 0.51 Rise 0.04 2368.41 2368.92

Structural Design

Data

Depth of Soil, H = 1.00m

Unit weight of Soil,  s = 1.90 ton/m3

Load of Vehicle, P v = 5.60 ton

3.1.11 Division Box

Division structures are provided at the canal system, which are used to divide the flow from the
main canal between two secondary canals and from these secondary canals to other traditional
tertiary canals. The division boxes are designed to divert flow to each canal on proportional bases
during the maximum flow and on rotational bases during the low flow (when the flow is less than
the design flow of the canal). There are three Division boxes which are provided at Station No.49,
No.83+5 on main canal and Station No.33+10 on secondary canal 2, (SC2) to divert flow to each
canal on proportional bases during the maximum flow and on rotational bases during the low flow
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
60
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

(when the flow is less than the design flow of the canal). The width of each outlet is generally
proportional to the diversion of water to be made. In lined canal, a full gate opening at the intake
to the box is made covering approximately the same area as the canal section, since the canal

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

61
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

design to carry water at relatively high velocity. In case of earthen canals gate openings can be
dimensioned by assuming a velocity of about 1.5m/s in the opening section.

Fb
Fb

d1 d
d

0.60

Figure 29 Longitudinal Section of Division Box

Table 20 Hydraulic Characteristics of the canals at proposed Division Box sites

Design parameters Parent canal Off taking Off taking Off taking
(MC) canal (SC1) canal (SC2) canal (TC)
Design discharge, Q d (m3/s) 0.43 0.03 0.02 0.01
Actual flow, Q a (m3/s) 0.43 0.03 0.02 0.01
Manning’s roughness, n 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014
Canal bed slope, S 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Canal bed width, B (m) 0.60 0.25 0.25 0.20
Canal flow depth, d (m) 0.51 0.185 0.15 0.16
Canal side slope, m 0 (Vertical) 0 (vertical) 0 (vertical) 0 (vertical)
Flow velocity, V (m/s) 0.76 0.40 0.36 0.25
Canal bed level (m.a.s.l) 2368.624* 2368.51
Full supply level, FSL (m.a.s.l) 2368.904* 2368.69

The general weir equation is used to design the division boxes:

Q = CLH3/2 , Where, Q - Discharge (m3/sec)

C - Discharge coefficient = 1.70

L- Crest length (m)

H - Water depth on the crest (m)

From the broad crested weir formula, the head over crest can be fixed as follows:

h2 = (Q/C*B2)2/3

Let the throat width B2 is equals to 0.25 m from the broad crested weir formula, the head over
crest can be fixed as follows:

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

62
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Sill height (above bed), h s = U/S FSL - Driving head

Sill height (above bed), h s = 0.33m say 0.30m

Thickness of sill, t = 2/3*height of sill

Thickness of sill, t = 0.22m 0.30

Throat length, L d = 3*water depth d/s (d2)

Throat length, L d = 0.56 m say 0.60m

3.1.12 Turnout
The turnouts are designed to divert flow to each field canal on proportional bases during the maximum flow
and on rotational bases during the low flow (when the flow is less than the design flow of the canal). As it
has already mentioned before, since field canals are not provided, simple turnouts at the main,
secondary and tertiary canals, which directly take flow to the fields are provided. These turnouts
are provided on the main, secondary canals based on the available command area and topography.
At every 50 -100m distance between two field canals, one turn out is provided. The water surface
level in tertiary canals at off take points of canals is maintained 10 to 15cm higher than the existing
ground levels in the irrigable area for siphoning. The flow at each turn out (to each field canal) is

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

63
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

controlled by gate operation. There are 76 numbers of turnouts and they are designed proportionally
according to discharges in both parent and off take canals as follows.

1.00 C+0.30 1.30

Figure 30 Layout of turnout

Plan of Turnout

Available data:-

Using orifice formula Q = C d. A.√ (2gHL)

Where, Q - Full Supply Discharge (m3/sec)

Discharge Coefficient, C d = 0.73 for submerged flow

HL – working head or loss of head between u/s and d/s = 0.05 m

A - Area of pipe = πd2/4

g = 9.81

Table 21 Irrigation outlet on Main Canal (MC)

Farm
Kind Water Discharge Pipe Driving
Turnout Grid Coordinate Station unit Area
No of Duty Required Diameter Head
area
canal
No x y No A (Ha) (m3/s/ha) m3/sec (m) (m)
1 TO-1 445825.96 1091155.71 280 MA –1 0.23 0.0005 0.032 0.05
2 TO-2 445805.21 1091199.75 329 MA –2 0.16 0.0003 0.027 0.05
Main Canal

3 TO-3 445795.69 1091255.38 385 MA –3 0.30 0.0006 0.037 0.05

0.002
4 TO-4 445787.96 1091311.96 442 MA –4 0.40 0.0008 0.042 0.05
5 TO-5 445770.70 1091364.44 497 MA –5 0.44 0.0009 0.044 0.05
6 TO-6 445741.94 1091412.00 553 MA –6 0.48 0.0010 0.046 0.05

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

64
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

7 TO-7 445729.80 1091466.28 609 MA –7 0.55 0.0011 0.050 0.05

8 TO-8 445704.53 1091515.62 664 MA –8 0.59 0.0012 0.051 0.05
9 TO-9 445416.83 1091758.19 1080 MA –12 0.33 0.0007 0.038 0.05
10 TO-10 445451.75 1091832.39 1162 MA –13 0.36 0.0007 0.040 0.05
11 TO-11 445469.85 1091894.69 1227 MA –14 0.60 0.0012 0.052 0.05
12 TO-12 445513.01 1091971.78 1315 MA –15 0.81 0.0016 0.060 0.05
13 TO-13 445520.03 1092034.32 1378 MA –16 0.87 0.0017 0.062 0.05
14 TO-14 445507.71 1092088.47 1434 MA –17 0.85 0.0017 0.062 0.05
15 TO-15 445494.85 1092143.01 1490 MA –18 0.90 0.0018 0.064 0.05
16 TO-16 445476.69 1092195.30 1545 MA –19 0.95 0.0019 0.065 0.05
17 TO-17 445449.17 1092243.14 1600 MA –20 0.91 0.0018 0.064 0.05
18 TO-18 445369.83 1092746.46 2380 MA –21 0.18 0.0004 0.028 0.05
19 TO-19 445365.82 1092804.39 2438 MA –22 0.16 0.0003 0.027 0.05
20 TO-20 445369.34 1092865.47 2499 MA –23 0.28 0.0006 0.035 0.05
21 TO-21 445348.14 1092916.22 2554 MA –24 0.31 0.0006 0.037 0.05
22 TO-22 445325.50 1092966.37 2609 MA –25 0.37 0.0007 0.041 0.05
23 TO-23 445332.07 1093028.72 2672 MA –26 0.49 0.0010 0.047 0.05
24 TO-24 445332.69 1093088.39 2732 MA –27 1.10 0.0022 0.070 0.05
25 TO-25 445339.40 1093133.60 2777 MA –28 1.80 0.0036 0.090 0.05
Table 22 Irrigation outlet on Secondary Canal 1 (SC1)

Kind Farm unit Water Discharge Pipe Driving

Turnout Grid Coordinate Station Area
No of area Duty Required Diameter Head
canal No x y No A (Ha) (m3/s/ha) m3/sec (m) (m)
1 TO-1 445367.66 1091737.65 113 SC1A-1 0.38 0.002 0.0008 0.041 0.05
2 TO-2 445345.56 1091788.37 169 SC1A-2 0.39 0.002 0.0008 0.042 0.05
3 TO-3 445338.53 1091838.60 219 SC1A-3 0.64 0.002 0.0013 0.054 0.05
4 TO-4 445332.82 1091896.50 278 SC1A-4 0.84 0.002 0.0017 0.061 0.05
5 TO-5 445323.07 1091952.03 334 SC1A-5 0.97 0.002 0.0019 0.066 0.05
6 TO-6 445310.70 1092006.47 390 SC1A-6 0.94 0.002 0.0019 0.065 0.05
7 TO-7 445290.01 1092057.43 445 SC1A-7 0.84 0.002 0.0017 0.061 0.05
8 TO-8 445261.75 1092105.23 500 SC1A-8 0.76 0.002 0.0015 0.058 0.05
9 TO-9 445233.93 1092153.22 556 SC1A-9 0.67 0.002 0.0013 0.055 0.05
10 TO-10 445208.12 1092202.04 611 SC1A-10 0.69 0.002 0.0014 0.056 0.05
Secondary Canal 1

11 TO-11 445184.77 1092251.89 666 SC1A-11 0.91 0.002 0.0018 0.064 0.05
12 TO-12 445161.43 1092301.75 721 SC1A-12 0.84 0.002 0.0017 0.061 0.05
13 TO-13 445133.75 1092349.79 776 SC1A-13 0.94 0.002 0.0019 0.065 0.05
14 TO-14 445105.94 1092397.78 832 SC1A-14 0.95 0.002 0.0019 0.065 0.05
15 TO-15 445078.13 1092445.77 887 SC1A-15 0.98 0.002 0.0020 0.066 0.05
16 TO-16 445050.32 1092493.76 943 SC1A-16 0.94 0.002 0.0019 0.065 0.05
17 TO-17 445024.15 1092542.43 998 SC1A-17 0.74 0.002 0.0015 0.058 0.05
18 TO-18 444998.66 1092591.39 1053 SC1A-18 0.69 0.002 0.0014 0.056 0.05
19 TO-19 444973.17 1092640.35 1109 SC1A-19 0.68 0.002 0.0014 0.055 0.05
20 TO-20 444947.69 1092689.31 1164 SC1A-20 0.68 0.002 0.0014 0.055 0.05
21 TO-21 444924.55 1092739.25 1219 SC1A-21 0.86 0.002 0.0017 0.062 0.05
22 TO-22 444902.70 1092789.73 1274 SC1A-22 0.82 0.002 0.0016 0.061 0.05
23 TO-23 444883.44 1092841.29 1329 SC1A-23 0.8 0.002 0.0016 0.060 0.05
24 TO-24 444865.08 1092893.22 1384 SC1A-24 0.8 0.002 0.0016 0.060 0.05
25 TO-25 444848.95 1092946.09 1439 SC1A-25 0.73 0.002 0.0015 0.057 0.05

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

65
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

26 TO-26 444844.61 1093003.88 1497 SC1A-26 0.63 0.002 0.0013 0.053 0.05
27 TO-27 444841.19 1093062.06 1555 SC1A-27 0.49 0.002 0.0010 0.047 0.05

Table 23 Irrigation outlet on Secondary Canal 2(SC2)

Kind Turno Farm unit Water Discharge Pipe Driving

Grid Coordinate Station Area
No of ut area Duty Required Diameter Head
canal No x y No A (Ha) (m3/s/ha) m3/sec (m) (m)
1 TO-1 445420.23 1092290.66 0 SC2A –1 0.89 0.0018 0.063 0.05
2 TO-2 445377.49 1092332.41 60 SC2A –2 0.78 0.0016 0.059 0.05
3 TO-3 445334.74 1092374.16 120 SC2A –3 0.69 0.0014 0.056 0.05
4 TO-4 445294.18 1092416.10 178 SC2A –4 0.61 0.0012 0.052 0.05
5 TO-5 445251.30 1092459.20 239 SC2A –5 0.56 0.0011 0.050 0.05
6 TO-6 445212.04 1092502.91 297 SC2A –6 0.46 0.0009 0.045 0.05
7 TO-7 445161.67 1092540.74 360 SC2A –7 0.4 0.0008 0.042 0.05
Secondary Canal 2

8 TO-8 445140.66 1092591.11 415 SC2A –8 0.47 0.0009 0.046 0.05

9 TO-9 445132.51 1092647.31 472 SC2A –9 0.49 0.0010 0.047 0.05
0.002
10 TO-10 445095.67 1092691.52 529 SC2A –10 0.42 0.0008 0.043 0.05
11 TO-11 445052.75 1092733.20 589 SC2A –11 0.34 0.0007 0.039 0.05
12 TO-12 445037.55 1092786.46 645 SC2A –12 0.47 0.0009 0.046 0.05
13 TO-13 445044.30 1092848.89 707 SC2A –13 0.56 0.0011 0.050 0.05
14 TO-14 445026.58 1092900.32 762 SC2A –14 0.55 0.0011 0.050 0.05
15 TO-15 445007.96 1092953.54 818 SC2A –15 0.54 0.0011 0.049 0.05
16 TO-16 444986.98 1093003.76 873 SC2A –16 0.45 0.0009 0.045 0.05
17 TO-17 444968.18 1093055.51 928 SC2A –17 0.41 0.0008 0.043 0.05
18 TO-18 444948.80 1093107.02 983 SC2A –18 0.62 0.0012 0.053 0.05

Table 24 Irrigation outlet on Tertiary Canal (TC)

Kind Farm Water Discharge Pipe Driving

Turnout Grid Coordinate Station Area
No of unit area Duty Required Diameter Head
canal No x y No A (Ha) (m3/s/ha) m3/sec (m) (m)
1 TO-1 445046.21 1092808.03 0 TCA –1 0.68 0.0014 0.055 0.05
2 TO-2 445053.34 1092852.66 45 TCA –2 0.76 0.0015 0.058 0.05
Tertiary Canal

3 TO-3 445033.62 1092904.03 100 TCA –3 0.75 0.0015 0.058 0.05

4 TO-4 445014.13 1092955.49 155 TCA –4 0.78 0.002 0.0016 0.059 0.05
5 TO-5 444994.49 1093007.35 211 TCA –5 0.6 0.0012 0.052 0.05
6 TO-6 444974.90 1093060.29 267 TCA –6 0.44 0.0009 0.044 0.05
7 TO-7 444955.37 1093109.77 320 TCA –7 0.66 0.0013 0.054 0.05

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

66
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

3.1.13 REFERENCE
1. Farmers and Administrational Institutions in the nearby of the site.

2. Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulic structures by S.K.Garg

3. Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulics structure by S.R. Saharabuthe, 1994

4. Guide lines to design irrigation infrastructure by P.N.RAO (Indian Expert)

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

67
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

4 ANNEX - I: - PROJECT COST ESTIMATION AND

5 BILLOFF QUANTITY

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

68
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Excavation and Earthwork

COST BREAK DOWN

FORM HOURLY OUT PUT= 600
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY (
Dozer ) 0.8
PROJECT Aleltu EQUIPMENT OUT PUT ( Dozer
Tiko ) 480
WORK ITEM Site Clearing to remove top
soil
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK
ITEM 1m2

LABOR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPMENT COST (1.03)
Unit Indexed Total
Type of Price Total Hourly Hourly Type of
Material Unit Qty * Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost Equipment No UF Rental Hourly Cost
Service
DL 6 1 7.16 42.98 vehicle 1 100% 150.00 150.00

Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Dozer 1 100% 2,660.00 2660.00

Con. Engineer 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 0.00

Project Manger 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Total (1.01) Total (1.02) 163.76 Total (1.03) 2810.00

Total
of (
Total of (1.02) 0.34 1.03) = 5.854
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit C = Equipment Unit

Cost 0 B = Man Power Unit Cost 0.34 Cost 5.85

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 6.20

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 2.17

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 69

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Tota
l
Cost 8.36

HOURLY OUT
PUT= 87.5
EQUIPMENT
EFFICIENCY ( Dozer ) 0.8
PROJECT EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (
Aleltu Tiko Dozer ) 70
WORK ITEM Bulk excavation in ordinary soil depth not exceed 1.5m
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM
1m3

LABOR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Type of Hourly
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost Equipment No UF Rental Cost
Service
DL 1 1 7.16 7.16 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50

Forman 1 0.5 88.40 44.20 Dozer 1 100% 2,660.00 2660.00

Con. Engineer 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 0.00

SITE Manager 1 0.00 0.00
Ass. Surveyors 4 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) Total (1.02) 83.75 Total (1.03) 2682.50

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 1.20 1.03) = 38.32
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit
Cost B = Man Power Unit Cost 1.20 C = Equipment Unit Cost 38.32

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 39.52

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 13.83

Total
Cost 53.35

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 70

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 71

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PUT= 65
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY
( Excavator ) 0.8
PROJECT Aleltu EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (
Tiko Excavator ) 52
WORK ITEM SOIL EXCAVATION
(CANAL)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM
1m3

MATERIAL EQUIPMENT
COST (1.01) LABOR COST (1.02) COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Hourly Hourly
Type of Unit Total Equipment Hourly
Cost Cost
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost
DL 2 1 7.16 14.33 Excavator 1 100% 1,688.00 1688.00
Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Service vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50
Con. Engineer 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00
Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) Total (1.02) 135.11 Total (1.03) 1710.50

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 2.59827 1.03) = 32.89
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit
Cost 0 B = Man Power Unit Cost 2.59826675 C = Equipment Unit Cost 32.89

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 35.4924975

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 12.42
Total
Cost 47.91
HOURLY OUT
PUT 4.00
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (hand compactor)

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 72

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PUT= 25
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY
( Cmpr ) 0.8
PROJECT Aleltu EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (
Tiko Comp ) 20
WORK ITEM Backfill CLAY & Compaction
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
MATERIAL EQUIPMENT
COST (1.01) LABOR COST (1.02) COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Hourly Hourly
Type of Unit Total Hourly Equipment
Cost Cost
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No Cost No UF Rental Hourly Cost
Excavated
material m3 1.05 - 0.00 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 service vehicle 1.00 100% 150.00 150.00

0.00 D/L 10 1 7.16 71.64 compactor 1.00 20% 700.00 140.00

0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 Loader 2.00 15% 1,150.00 345.00

0.00 Surveyor 0.00 Dozer 1.00 10% 2,660.00 266.00

Site Manager 0.00 Dump Truck 1.00 100% 950.00 950.00

Total (1.01) 0.00 Total (1.02) 170.32 Total (1.03) 1851.00

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 8.52 1.03) = 92.55
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit
Cost 0.00 B = Man Power Unit Cost 8.52 C = Equipment Unit Cost 92.55
Direct Cost = A+B+C= 101.07

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 35.37

Total
Cost 136.44

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 73

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

COST BREAK DOWN HOURLY OUT

FORM PUT= 26
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY (
Dozer ) 0.8
PROJECT Aleltu EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (
Tiko Dozer ) 20.8
WORK ITEM Soft rock excavation
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM
3
1m

LABOR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost

DL 4 1 7.16 28.65 Excavator 1 100% 1,688.00 1688.00

Service
Forman 1 0.5 88.40 44.20 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50

Con. Engineer 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 0.00

Site Manager 1 0.00 0.00

- 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) Total (1.02) 105.24 Total (1.03) 1710.50
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 5.05946 1.03) = 82.23558
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit
Cost 0 B = Man Power Unit Cost 5.06 C = Equipment Unit Cost 82.24

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 87.30

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 30.55

Total
Cost 117.85

COST BREAK DOWN HOURLY OUT

FORM PUT= 10
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY (
Jackhammer ) 0.8

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 74

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PROJECT EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (

Aleltu Tiko Jackhammer ) 8
WORK ITEM Hard rock excavation
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM
3
1m

LABOR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost

DL 2 1 7.16 14.33 Service vehicle 1 100% 150.00 150.00

Exc. with Jack
Forman 1 0.5 88.40 44.20 Hummer 1 100% 1,915.00 1915.00

Con. Engineer 1 0.1 102.81 10.28

Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10

Site Manager 1 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) Total (1.02) 90.91 Total (1.03) 2065.00
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 11.36 1.03) = 258.125
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 0 B = Man Power Unit Cost 11.36 C = Equipment Unit Cost 258.13

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 269.49

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 94.32

Total
Cost 363.81

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 75

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PUT= 65
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY (
Excavator ) 0.8
PROJECT Aleltu EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (
Tiko Excavator ) 52
WORK ITEM Trench excavation in ordinary soil depth not exceed 1.5m
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM
1m3

LABOR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost

DL 4 1 7.16 28.65 1 0.00

Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Excavator 1 100% 1,688.00 1688.00

Service
Con. Engineer 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 vehicle 1 20% 150.00 30.00

Surveyor 1 0.5 88.40 44.20 0.00

0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) Total (1.02) 171.54 Total (1.03) 1718.00
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 3.2988 1.03) = 33.03846
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit
Cost B = Man Power Unit Cost 3.30 C = Equipment Unit Cost 33.04

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 36.34

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 12.72

Total
Cost 49.06

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 76

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PUT 2.50
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT (Man Power)

PROJECT Aleltu
Tiko
WORK ITEM Hard coring
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m2
MATERIAL COST (1.01) LABOUR COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Type of Unit Total Type of Hourly
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Wage Hourly Cost Equipment No UF Rental Cost
Service
Stone m3 0.3125 72.59 22.68 D/Laborer 6 1 7.16 42.98 vehicle 1 20% 150.00 30.00

0.00 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Simple Tools 1 100% 10.00 10.00

0.00 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 0.00

Construction
0.00 .Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

0.00 Surveyor 1 0.5 88.40 44.20 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Total (1.01) 22.68 Total (1.02) 207.36 Total (1.03) 40.00

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 82.94 1.03) = 16.00
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 22.68 B = Man Power Unit Cost 82.94 C = Equipment Unit Cost 16.00

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 121.63

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%)
= 42.57
Total
Cost 164.19

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 77

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PUT= 75
EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY (
Dozer ) 0.8
PROJECT Aleltu EQUIPMENT OUT PUT ( Dozer
WSSF Irr. Pr
Tiko ) 60
WORK ITEM Protection
Dyke/m3
MATERIAL COST (1.01) LABOUR COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
PROJECT Unit Qty Unit Total Trade No UF Hourly Hourly No UF Rental Hourly
Equipment
Price* Cost Cost Cost Cost
Selected
m3 1 0.00 Forman 1 1 88.40 -
Material 88.40
Construction
0.00 10.28 Dozer 1
.Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 1.00 2,660.00 2,660.00
0.00 Surveyor 1 0.5 44.20 Loader 1
88.40 1.00 1,150.00 1,150.00
Shower
0.00 0.00 1
Truck 1.00 502.00 502.00
0.00 Truck 1 580.00
1.00 580.00
0.00 -
0.00 compactor 1 700.00
0.80 560.00
-
Total (1.01) 0.00 Total (1.02) 142.88 Total (1.03)
5,452.00
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 2.38138 90.87
1.03) =
Hourly Out
Hourly Out Put
Put
A = Material Unit Cost B = Man Power Unit Cost C = Equipment Unit Cost 90.87
2.38
Direct Cost = A+B+C=
93.25
Profit 15% & Over Head 20% =
(35%) = 32.64
Total
Cost 125.88

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 78

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT PUT= 30

EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY ( Welding
Machine ) 0.85
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT ( Welding
WSSF Irr. Pr
PROJECT Aleltu Tiko Machine) 25.5
WORK ITEM Geomembrane and geo-net lining (main canal)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM ________________________
LABOUR COST
MATERIAL COST (1.01) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
(1.02)
Indexed Total
Type of Type of Hourly
Unit Qty Trade No UF Hourly Hourly No UF Rental
Material Unit Total Equipment Cost
Cost Cost
Price* Cost
Simple
Geomembrane m2 1.1 72 79.20 Welder 1 1 21.49 0 1.00 5.26
21.49 Tools -
Welding
Geonet m2 0.24 30 7.20 Ass. welder 2 1 21.49 1 1.00 70.00
10.75 Machine 70.00
Nilon rope m 3 1 3.00 D.L 4 1 28.65
7.16
Stone m3 0.2 72.59 14.52 Forman 1 0.5 44.20
88.40
0.00 surveyor 0 0.5 0.00
88.40
0.00 Construction Eng. 10.28
1 0.1 102.81

Total (1.01) 103.92 Total (1.02) 126.12 Total (1.03)

70.00
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 4.94581 2.75
1.03) =
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit Cost 103.9175 B = Man Power Unit Cost C = Equipment Unit Cost 2.75
4.95
Direct Cost = A+B+C=
111.61
Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%)
= 39.06
Total
Cost 150.67

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 79

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Masonry

HOURLY OUT
PUT 0.35
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT
_______________
PROJECT Aleltu Tiko
WORK ITEM Below Ground masonry wall (with mortar ratio 1:4)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
MATERIAL COST LABOR COST EQUIPMENT COST
(1.01) (1.02) (1.03)
Indexed Total
Hourly Hourly Type of Equipment
Unit Total Hourly
Cost Cost
Type of Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost

Stone m3 1.3 72.59 94.36 Forman 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 Simple tools 1.00 100% 10 10.00

Sand m3 0.242 143.50 34.73 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Shower Truck 1 0.2 502.00 100.40

Cement qt 0.857 265.00 227.11 D. Laborer 2 1 7.16 14.33 Service vehicle 1 0.2 150.00 30.00
water m3 0.1 4.00 0.40 Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 0.00

0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

0.00 Site Manager 1 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
Total (1.01) 356.60 Total (1.02) 90.30 Total (1.03) 140.40
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 258.00 1.03) = 401.14
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 356.60 B = Man Power Unit Cost 258.00 C = Equipment Unit Cost 401.14
Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1015.74
Profit 15% & Over Head 20% =
(35%) = 355.51
Total
Cost 1371.25

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 80

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PUT 0.30
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT
_______________
PROJECT Aleltu Tiko
WORK ITEM Above Ground masonry wall (with mortar ratio 1:4)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
MATERIAL COST LABOR COST EQUIPMENT COST
(1.01) (1.02) (1.03)
Indexed Total
Unit Total Hourly Hourly Type of Equipment Hourly
Type of Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost

Stone m3 1.3 72.59 94.36 Forman 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 Simple tools 1.00 100% 10 10.00

Sand m3 0.242 143.50 34.73 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Shower Truck 1 0.2 502.00 100.40

Cement qt 0.857 265.00 227.11 D .Laborer 2 1 7.16 14.33 Service vehicle 1 0.2 150.00 30.00
3
water m 0.1 4.00 0.40 Surveyor 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 0.00
Construction
0.00 Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00
0.00 Site Manager 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
Total (1.01) 356.60 Total (1.02) 90.30 Total (1.03) 140.40
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 301.00 1.03) = 468.00
0.6 Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 356.60 B = Man Power Unit Cost 301.00 C = Equipment Unit Cost 468.00
Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1125.60
Profit 15% & Over Head 20% =
(35%) = 393.96
Total
Cost 1519.55

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 81

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Formwork

PROJECT Aleltu Tiko

PROJECT: FORM WORK LABOUR HOURLY OUTPUT: 1 m2/hr.
WORK ITEM: Form work for elevation column, for subfloor beam and roof beam. EQUIPEMENT:
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM : 1 m2 RESULT: 200.77 Birr/m2

Material Cost (1:01) Labor (1:02) Equipment Cost (1:03)

Cost per ** Indexed Hourly Type of Hourly Hourly
Type of Material Unit Qty * Rate Unit Labor by Grade No. UF Hourly Cost Cost Equipment No. UF Rental Cost

2.5cm thick timber M2 1.05 81.21 85.2705 D/L 6 1 7.16 42.98 Tool 1 1 1.25 1.25

Strut 60 mm. dia. M 15.00 5.00 75 Foreman 1 0.2 88.40 17.68 Service vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50

Nails Kg 0.30 20.00 5.9985 Carpenter 1 1 21.49 21.49 1 0% - 0.00

Mould Oil Lit. 0.06 7.20 0.432 Carpenter helper 2 1 10.75 21.49 0
Construction
Eng. 1 0.1 33.42 3.34 0
0 0.00 0

Total (1:-01) 166.70 Total (1:02) 106.99 Total (1:03) 23.75

A= Materials Unit
Cost 166.7 Birr/m2 B= Manpower Unit Cost 106.985 Birr/m2 C=Equipment Unit Cost 23.75 Birr/m2
Total of (1:02) Total of (1:03)
Hourly Output: Hourly output:
Direct Cost of Work Item = A+B+C = 297.44 Birr/m2
Over head cost : 15% 44.62 Birr/m2
Profit Cost: 20% 59.49 Birr/m2
Total Unit Cost : 401.54 Birr/m2
200.77 Birr/m2

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 82

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Reinforcement

HOURLY
PROJECT Aleltu Tiko OUT PUT 15.00
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT
WORK ITEM Re-Bar work ( ≥ 12 mm) _______________
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1kg
MATERIAL LABOR EQUIPMENT
COST (1.01) COST (1.02) COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Hourly Hourly
Unit Total Equipment Hourly
Cost Cost
Type of Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost
Reinforcement
bar kg 1.1 24.74 27.21 Forman 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 Simple tools 1.00 100% 4 4.00
Tying wire kg 0.05 23.20 1.16 Bar Bender 1 1 21.49 21.49 0.00
0.00 D/L 2 1 7.16 14.33 0.00

0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00
Total (1.01) 28.37 Total (1.02) 68.20 Total (1.03) 4.00
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 4.55 1.03) = 0.27
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit Cost 28.37 B = Man Power Unit Cost 4.55 C = Equipment Unit Cost 0.27
Direct Cost = A+B+C= 33.19

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 11.62

Total
Cost 44.80

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 83

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Concrete Works

PROJECT Aleltu HOURLY OUT

Tiko PUT 3.00
WORK ITEM Lean concrete (
C-5) EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT (2m3 Mixer)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m2
EQUIPEMENT COST
LABOUR COST (1.02)
MATERIAL COST (1.01) (1.03)
Indexed Total
Hourly Hourly Type of Equipment
Type of Unit Total Hourly
Cost Cost
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost

Cement qt 1.50 265.00 397.50 D/L 5 1 7.16 35.82 Service vehicle 1 25% 150.00 37.50

Sand m3 0.48 143.50 68.88 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Stationary Mixer 2 60% 250.00 300.00

Aggregate m3 0.72 379.20 273.02 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Vibrator 0.00

Construction
Water m3 0.20 5 1.00 Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 Simple Tools 1 100% 10.00 10.00

Surveyor 1 0.2 88.40 17.68 Shower Truck 1 10% 502.00 50.20

0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) 740.40 Total (1.02) 173.67 Total (1.03) 397.70
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 57.8905 1.03) = 132.5667
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit
Cost 740.40 B = Man Power Unit Cost 57.89 C = Equipment Unit Cost 132.57

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 930.86 46.54

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% =
(35%) = 325.80 11.64

Total Cost 1,256.66 58.18 per m2

HOURLY OUT
PUT 3.50
EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT (1.8m3 Mixer)

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 84

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PROJECT Aleltu
Tiko
WORK ITEM C-10 Lean
concrete
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
LABOUR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost
Service
Cement qt 2.40 265.00 636.00 D/L 6 1 7.16 42.98 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50
Stationary
Sand m3 0.52 143.50 74.62 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Mixer 3 100% 250.00 750.00

Aggregate m3 1.03 379.20 390.58 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Vibrator 0.00

Simple
Water m3 0.20 5 1.00 Carpenter 0 0.2 21.49 0.00 Tools 5 100% 1.00 5.00
Shower
Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 Truck 1 10% 502.00 50.20

Surveyor 1 0.2 88.40 17.68 Loader 1 0.1 1,150.00 115.00

0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
Total (1.02) 137.85 0.00
0.00 0.00
Total (1.01) 1102.20 Total (1.03) 942.70
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 39.3867 1.03) = 269.3429
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit
Cost 1,102.20 B = Man Power Unit Cost 39.39 C = Equipment Unit Cost 269.34

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1,410.93

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 493.82

Total
Cost 1,904.75

PROJECT Aleltu HOURLY OUT

Tiko PUT 3.50
EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT (1.8m^3 Mixer
WORK ITEM Reinforced concrete C-15 )
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 85

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

LABOUR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost
Service
Cement qt 2.8 265.00 742.00 D/L 6 1 7.16 42.98 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50
Service
Sand m3 0.45 143.50 64.58 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 vehicle 3 100% 250.00 750.00

Aggregate m3 0.9 379.20 341.28 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Vibrator 3 100% 20.00 60.00
Simple
Water m3 0.2 5.00 1.00 Bar Bender 0 0.25 21.49 0.00 Tools 3 100% 1.00 3.00
Shower
0.00 Construction Engineer 1 0.1 0.00 Truck 1 10% 502.00 50.20

0.00 0.00 Loader 1 0.1 1,150.00 115.00

0.00 Surveyor 1 0.2 88.40 17.68 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (1.01) 1148.86 Total (1.02) 170.55 Total (1.03) 1000.70

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 48.73 1.03) = 285.91
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 1148.86 B = Man Power Unit Cost 48.73 C = Equipment Unit Cost 285.91

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1,483.50

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 519.22

Total
Cost 2,002.72

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 86

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PROJECT Aleltu HOURLY OUT

Tiko PUT 3.00
EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT (1.8m^3 Mixer
WORK ITEM C-20 Reinforced concrete )
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
LABOUR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Hourly Hourly
Type of Unit Total Equipment Hourly
Cost Cost
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost
Service
Cement qt 3.2 265.00 848.00 D/L 6 1 7.16 42.98 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.56
Stationary
Sand m3 0.51 143.50 73.19 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Mixer 3 100% 250.00 750.00

Aggregate m3 0.77 379.20 291.98 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Vibrator 3 100% 20.00 60.00
Simple
Water m3 0.20 5 1.00 M. operator 0.00 Tools 5 100% 1.00 5.00
Shower
0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 Truck 1 10% 502.00 50.20

0.00 Surveyor 1 0.15 88.40 13.26 Loader 1 0.25 1,150.00 287.50

0.00 0.00

Total (1.01) 1214.17 Total (1.02) 176.42 Total (1.03) 1175.26

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 58.81 1.03) = 391.75
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 1214.17 B = Man Power Unit Cost 58.81 C = Equipment Unit Cost 391.75

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1,664.73

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 582.65

Total
Cost 2,247.38

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 87

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PROJECT Aleltu HOURLY OUT

Tiko PUT 3.00
EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT
WORK ITEM C-25 Reinforced concrete (1;2;4) (1.8m^3 Mixer )
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
LABOUR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost
Service
Cement qt 3.6 265.00 954.00 D/L 6 1 7.16 42.98 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50
Stationary
Sand m3 0.52 143.50 74.62 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Mixer 3 1 250 750.00

Aggregate m3 0.78 379.20 295.78 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Vibrator 3 100% 20.00 60.00
Simple
Water m3 0.20 5 1.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 Tools 5 100% 1.00 5.00
Shower
0.00 0.00 Truck 1 10% 502.00 50.20

0.00 Surveyor 1 0.15 88.40 13.26 Loader 1 0.25 1,150.00 287.50

0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (1.01) 1325.40 Total (1.02) 176.42 Total (1.03) 1175.20

Total of (
Total of (1.02) 58.81 1.03) = 391.73
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit
Cost 1325.40 B = Man Power Unit Cost 58.81 C = Equipment Unit Cost 391.73

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1,775.93

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 621.58

Total
Cost 2,397.51
`

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 88

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PROJECT Aleltu HOURLY OUT

Tiko PUT 3.00
EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT
WORK ITEM C-30 Reinforced concrete (1.8m^3 Mixer )
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m3
LABOUR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Hourly Hourly
Type of Unit Total Equipment Hourly
Cost Cost
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost
Service
Cement qt 4 265.00 1060.00 D/L 8 1 7.16 57.31 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50
Stationary
Sand m3 0.51 143.50 73.19 Forman 1 1 88.40 88.40 Mixer 3 1 250 750.00

Aggregate m3 0.71 379.20 269.23 Mason 1 1 21.49 21.49 Vibrator 3 100% 20.00 60.00
Simple
Water m3 0.20 5 1.00 M. operator 1 0.00 Tools 5 100% 1.00 5.00
Shower
0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 Truck 1 10% 502.00 50.20

0.00 Surveyor 1 0.15 88.40 13.26 Loader 1 0.25 1,150.00 287.50

3.85 0.00 0.00
161.7 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (1.01) 1403.42 Total (1.02) 190.74 Total (1.03) 1175.20

Total of
Total of (1.02) 63.58 ( 1.03) = 391.73
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put
A = Material Unit C = Equipment Unit
Cost 1403.42 B = Man Power Unit Cost 63.58 Cost 391.73

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 1,858.73

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 650.56

Total
Cost 2,509.29

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 89

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Plastering and Pointing

HOURLY OUT
PROJECT Aleltu Tiko PUT 2.47
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT
WORK ITEM Stone pointing _______________
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m2
MATERIAL COST LABOR COST EQUIPMENT COST
(1.01) (1.02) (1.03)
Indexed Total
Hourly Hourly Type of Equipment
Unit Total Hourly
Cost Cost
Type of Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF No UF Rental Cost

0.00 Forman 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 Tool 1.00 100% 6.25 6.25

Sand m3 0.001 143.50 0.14 Plasterer 1 1 21.49 21.49 Service vehicle 1.00 75% 150 112.50
Cement qt 0.01 265.00 2.65 Laborer 2 1 7.16 14.33 0.00
water m3 4.00 0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) 2.79 Total (1.02) 57.92 Total (1.03) 118.75
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 23.45 1.03) = 48.08
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 2.79 B = Man Power Unit Cost 23.45 C = Equipment Unit Cost 48.08
Direct Cost = A+B+C= 74.32
Profit 15% & Over Head 20% =
(35%) = 26.01
Total
Cost 100.33

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 90

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

PROJECT Aleltu HOURLY

Tiko OUT PUT 2.56
WORK ITEM Three coats of Plastering EQUIPEMENT OUT PUT
(1:3) _______________
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m2
LABOUR
MATERIAL COST (1.01) COST (1.02) EQUIPEMENT COST (1.03)
Indexed Total
Type of
Type of Unit Total Hourly Hourly Hourly
Equipment
Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost
Simple
Sand m3 0.01 143.50 2.01 D/L 6 1 7.16 42.98 Tools 1 100% 1.00 1.00
Service
Cement qt 0.0665 265.00 17.62 Forman 1 0.5 88.40 44.20 vehicle 1 15% 150.00 22.50

Water lit 4 4.00 16.00 Plasterer 1 1 21.49 21.49 0.00

0.00 Construction Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) 35.63 Total (1.02) 118.95 Total (1.03) 23.50
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 46.47 1.03) = 9.18
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 35.63 B = Man Power Unit Cost 46.47 C = Equipment Unit Cost 9.18

Direct Cost = A+B+C= 91.28

Profit 15% & Over Head 20% = (35%) = 31.95

Total
Cost 123.23

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 91

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

HOURLY OUT
PROJECT Aleltu Tiko PUT 1.75
EQUIPMENT OUT PUT
WORK ITEM Screeding (1:2) _______________
TOTAL QUANTITY OF WORK ITEM 1m2
MATERIAL COST LABOR COST EQUIPMENT COST
(1.01) (1.02) (1.03)
Indexed Total
Unit Total Hourly Hourly Type of Equipment Hourly
Type of Material Unit Qty Price* Cost Trade No UF Cost Cost No UF Rental Cost

0.00 Forman 1 0.25 88.40 22.10 Simple tools 1.00 100% 15 15.00
Sand m3 0.03 143.50 4.31 Plasterer 1 1 21.49 21.49 0.00
Cement qt 0.28 265.00 74.20 Laborer 2 1 7.16 14.33 0.00
Construction
water m3 4.00 0.00 Eng. 1 0.1 102.81 10.28 0.00
Site Manager 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total (1.01) 78.51 Total (1.02) 68.20 Total (1.03) 15.00
Total of (
Total of (1.02) 38.97 1.03) = 8.57
Hourly Out Put Hourly Out Put

A = Material Unit Cost 78.51 B = Man Power Unit Cost 38.97 C = Equipment Unit Cost 8.57
Direct Cost = A+B+C= 126.05
Profit 15% & Over Head 20% =
(35%) = 44.12
Total
Cost 170.16

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 92

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Bill of Quantities & Specification for Aleltu Tiko S.S.I.P.

Item
No. Description of work Unit Qty Unit cost Total cost
1 Access Road Construction
Access Road Maintenance cutting .
1.1 to an average depth of 0.2m,
with 6m width km 10.00 5,000.00 50,000.00
Field Road construction cutting
1.2 to an average depth of 0.15m,
with 6m width. km 5.40 2,500.00 13,500.00

1.a Total Carried Summary Birr 63,500.00

2 Preparatory Work for Camp construction
2.1 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 1 75,000.00 75,000.00
Engineering surveying and preparation of as built
2.2 drawings LS 1 85,000.00 85,000.00
2.a Total Carried Summary Birr 160,000.00
2.3 Camp (Staff residence, office, Café, Kitchen, Store,
Toilet & Shower)
2.3.1 Residential rooms & office
2.3.1.1 Earth Work
2.3.1.1a Clearing of site to remove top soil to a depth of 200
m2 769.12
mm. 92.00 8.36
2.3.1.1b Excavation for stone masonry foundation; 0.5m width
and 0.4 m depth m3 1,305.37
27.24 47.92
2.3.1.1c Cart away and deposit excavated surplus material to a
distance not exceeding 1km m3 43.89 1,853.91
42.24
2.3.1.1d Provide and fill hard core with hard basaltic or
equivalent stone, well compacted and blinded with m2 167.00 8,717.40
crushed stone to a finished thickness of 25 cm 52.20

2.3.1.1e Total Carried Summary Birr 12,645.80

2.3.1.2 Concrete and Block Work
Supply and raise 500mm thick and 200mm high
2.3.1.2a trachitic or equivalent stone masonry foundation wall m3 1,381.84 8,926.69
below ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 6.46
Supply and raise 500mm thick and 200mm high
2.3.1.2b trachitic or equivalent stone masonry foundation wall m3 1,530.15 9,884.77
above ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 6.46
2.3.1.2c Mass concrete fill on floor slab (100mm) C-15
m3 12,336.76
6.16 2,002.72
2.3.1.2d Total Carried Summary Birr 31,148.21
2.3.1.3 Carpentry and Walling -
Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus wall
2.3.1.3a post of length 3 m with span length of 1.2m No 3,300.00
66.00 50.00
Supply and fix purlin in Eucalyptus wood size 50 x
2.3.1.3b 70 mm nailed into eucalyptus truss m 58,600.00
586.00 100.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
2.3.1.3c galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin m2 48,477.00
149.16 325.00

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

93
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

with dome headed galvanized nails (purlin and ridge

cover measured separately)

2.3.1.3d Chip wood wall ceiling

m2 46,051.20
255.84 180.00
2.3.1.3e Supply and fix 4x5 mm ceiling buttons
m 16,050.00
214.00 75.00
2.3.1.3f Total Carried Summary Birr 172,478.20
2.3.1.4 Carpentry and Roofing -
Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus roof
truss of length 3m span price shall include the
2.3.1.4a No 4,200.00
application of three coats and external anti-termite 21.00 200.00
treatment as per the drawing
Supply and fix purlin in eucalyptus wood size 50 x
2.3.1.4b 70 mm nailed into eucalyptus truss including three m 8,100.00
coats of anti - termite external treatment 81.00 100.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin
2.3.1.4c m2 32,337.50
with dome headed galvanized nails (purlin and ridge 99.50 325.00
cover measured separately)
2.3.1.4d Supply and fix CIS windows size 1x1.2m
No 3,500.00
7.00 500.00
2.3.1.4e Supply and fix CIS doors size 1.0x2.10m
No 6,000.00
6.00 1,000.00
2.3.1.4f Total Carried Summary Birr 54,137.50
2.3.1.5 Finishing -
2.3.1.5a Floor screed in cement mortar 20 mm thick (1:3
m2 13,442.64
mortar) 79.00 170.16
2.3.1.5b Total Carried Summary Birr 13,442.64
2.3.2 Store
2.3.2.1 Earth Work
Clearing of site to remove top soil to a depth of 200
2.3.2.1a m2 300.96
mm 36.00 8.36
Excavation for stone masonry foundation; 0.5m width
2.3.2.1b and 0.4 m depth m3 47.91 187.81
3.92
Cart away and deposit excavated surplus material to a
2.3.2.1c distance not exceeding 1km. m3 43.89 206.46
4.70
Provide and fill hard core with hard basaltic or
2.3.2.1d equivalent stone, well compacted and blinded with m2 166.74 4,168.50
crushed stone to a finished thickness of 25 cm 25.00

2.3.2.1e Total Carried Summary Birr 4,863.73

2.3.2.2 Concrete and Block Work
Supply and raise 500mm thick and 200mm high
2.3.2.2a trachitic or equivalent stone masonry foundation wall m3 1,381.84 3,040.05
below ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 2.20
Supply and raise 500mm thick and 200mm high
2.3.2.2b trachitic or equivalent stone masonry foundation wall m3 1,381.84 3,040.05
above ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 2.20
2.3.2.2c Mass concrete fill on floor slab (100mm), C-15
m3 5,006.80
2.50 2,002.72
2.3.2.2d Total Carried Summary Birr 11,086.90

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

94
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

2.3.2.3 Carpentry and Walling

Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus wall
2.3.2.3a post of length 3 m span No 4,000.00
20.00 200.00
Supply and fix wall cover in G-35 mm corrugated
2.3.2.3b galvanized iron sheet fixed into eucalyptus wood m2 28,000.00
purlin with dome headed galvanized nails 80.00 350.00

2.3.2.3c Total Carried Summary Birr 32,000.00

2.3.2.4 Carpentry and Roofing
Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus roof
2.3.2.4a No 1,500.00
truss 5.00 300.00
Supply and fix purlin in zigba wood size 50 x 70 mm
2.3.2.4b nailed into eucalyptus truss m 4,200.00
56.00 75.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
2.3.2.4c galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin m2 15,925.00
with dome headed galvanized nails 49.00 325.00
2.3.2.4d Supply and fix CIS windows size 1x1.2m
No 500.00
1.00 500.00
2.3.2.4e Supply and fix CIS doors size 2.0x2.10m
No 1,000.00
1.00 1,000.00
2.3.2.4f Total Carried Summary Birr 23,125.00
2.3.3 Cafe , Kitchen and Workers living room
2.3.3.1 Earth Work
Clearing of site to remove top soil to a depth of 200
2.3.3.1a m2 192.28
mm 23.00 8.36
Excavation for stone masonry foundation; 0.5m width
2.3.3.1b and .4 m depth m3 47.91 104.25
2.18
Cart away and deposit excavated surplus material to a
2.3.3.1c distance not exceeding 1km. m3 43.89 297.40
6.78
Provide and fill hard core with hard basaltic or
2.3.3.1d equivalent stone, well compacted and blinded with m2 166.74 2,084.25
crushed stone to a finished thickness of 25 cm 12.50

2.3.3.1e Total Carried Summary Birr 2,678.18

2.3.3.2 Concrete and Block Work
Supply and raise 500 mm thick and 200mm high
2.3.3.2a trachitic or equivalent stone masonry foundation wall m3 1,381.84 751.72
below ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 0.54
Supply and raise 500 mm thick and 200mm high
2.3.3.2b trachitic or equivalent stone masonry foundation wall m3 1,381.84 746.19
above ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 0.54
2.3.3.2c Mass concrete fill on floor slab (100mm), C-15
m3 2,503.40
1.25 2,002.72
2.3.3.2d Total Carried Summary Birr 4,001.31
2.3.3.3 Carpentry and Walling
Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus wall
2.3.3.3a post of length 3 m span price shall include the No 4,600.00
external anti-termite treatment as per the drawing 23.00 200.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin
2.3.3.3b m2 18,200.00
with dome headed galvanized nails (purlin and ridge 56.00 325.00
cover measured separately)

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

95
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Total Carried Summary Birr 22,800.00

2.3.3.4 Carpentry and Roofing
Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus roof
truss of length 3m span price shall include the
2.3.3.4a No 1,500.00
application of three coats and external anti-termite 5.00 300.00
treatment as per the drawing
Supply and fix purlin in zigba wood size 50 x 70 mm
2.3.3.4b nailed into eucalyptus truss including three coats of m 2,400.00
anti - termite external treatment 32.00 75.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin
2.3.3.4c m2 9,100.00
with dome headed galvanized nails (purlin and ridge 28.00 325.00
cover measured separately)
2.3.3.4d Supply and fix CIS windows size 1x1.2m
No 500.00
1.00 500.00
2.3.3.4e Supply and fix CIS doors size 1.0x2.10m
No 3,000.00
3.00 1,000.00
2.3.3.4f Total Carried Summary Birr 16,500.00
2.3.3.5 Finishing
Floor screed in cement mortar 20 mm thick, (1:3
2.6.5.1a m2 2,041.92
mortar) 12.00 170.16
2.6.5.1.b Total Carried Summary Birr 2,041.92
2.3.4 Shower and Toilet
2.3.4.1 Earth Work
Clearing of site to remove top soil to a depth of 200
2.3.4.1a m2 200.64
mm 24.00 8.36
Excavation for stone masonry foundation; 0.5m width
2.3.4.1b and .4 m depth m3 47.91 1,437.30
30.00
Cart away and deposit excavated surplus material to a
2.3.4.1c distance not exceeding 1km. m3 43.89 1,527.37
34.80
2.3.4.1d Total Carried Summary Birr 3,165.31
2.3.4.2 Concrete and Block Work
Supply and raise 500mm thick high trachitic or
2.3.4.2a equivalent stone masonry foundation wall below m3 1,381.84 27,636.80
ground level bedded in cement mortar mix 1:3 20.00
Slab for the toilet including reinforcement bar , form
2.3.4.2b work and concrete C-20 with 150mm thick LS 2,247.38
1.00 2,247.38
Mass concrete fill on floor slab (200mm) for shower,
2.3.4.2c m3 3,604.90
C-15 1.80 2,002.72
2.3.4.2d Total Carried Summary Birr 33,489.08
2.3.4.3 Carpentry and Walling
Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus wall
2.3.4.3a post of length 3.5 m span price shall include the No 3,200.00
external anti-termite treatment as per the drawing 16.00 200.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin
2.3.4.3b m2 16,900.00
with dome headed galvanized nails (purlin and ridge 52.00 325.00
cover measured separately)
2.3.4.3c Total Carried Summary Birr 20,100.00
2.3.4.4 Carpentry and Roofing

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

96
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Supply, assemble and fix in position eucalyptus roof

2.3.4.4a truss price shall include the application of three coats No 1,500.00
and external anti-termite treatment as per the drawing 5.00 300.00
Supply and fix purlin in zigba wood size 50 x 70 mm
2.3.4.4b nailed into eucalyptus truss including three coats of m 1,575.00
anti - termite external treatment 21.00 75.00
Supply and fix roof cover in G-35 mm corrugated
galvanized iron sheet fixed into zigba wood purlin
2.3.4.4c m2 5,850.00
with dome headed galvanized nails (purlin and ridge 18.00 325.00
cover measured separately)
2.3.4.4d Supply and fix CIS doors size 1.0x2.10m
No 4,000.00
4.00 1,000.00
Fence work with 1.5m spacing rotated by barbed wire
2.3.4.4e fixed 2m height eucalyptus post LS 45,000.00
1.00 45,000.00
2.3.4.4f Total Carried Summary Birr 57,925.00
Grand Total Birr 517,628.77
3 Head Work
3.1 Left & Right Side Retaining Walls
3.1.1 Soil excavation 80% m3 89.20 47.91 4,273.57
3.1.3 Hard Rock excavation 20% m3 22.30 363.81 8,112.96
3.1.4 Masonry work m3 140.95 1,456.00 205,223.20
3.1.5 Concrete works m3 66.96 2,002.72 134,092.12
3.1.6 Plastering work m2 166.57 123.23 20,526.83
3.1.7 Back Fill & Compaction m3 22.30 136.44 3,042.61
3.1.8 Total Carried Summary Birr 375,271.29
3.2 Weir & Stilling Basin Including Piles
3.2.1 Soil excavation 20% m3 12.88 47.91 617.08
3.2.3 Hard Rock excavation 80% m3 51.52 363.81 18,743.49
3.2.4 Masonry work m3 13.44 1,456.00 19,568.64
3.2.5 Concrete works m3 36.93 2,002.72 73,960.45
3.2.6 Plastering work m2 29.40 123.23 3,622.96
Total Carried Summary Birr 116,512.62
3.3 Divide wall
3.3.1 Masonry work m3 2.65 1,456.00 3,854.76
3.3.2 Concrete work for Upper Concrete Plate m3 0.12 2,002.72 240.33
3.3.3 Reinforcement Iron Bars
3.3.5 Dia. 10mm kg 23.30 12.50 2,871.26
3.3.6 Plastering work m2 1.12 123.23 138.02
3.3.7 Total Carried Summary Birr 7,104.36
3.4 Intake & Under sluice Gates 2.00
3.4.1 Soil excavation 80% m3 6.00 47.91 287.46
3.4.2 Hard Rock excavation 20% m3 2.40 363.81 873.14
3.4.3 Concrete work m3 5.00 2,002.72 10,013.60
3.4.4 30 cm Ø Pipe Placing Pcs 10.00 450.00 4,500.00
3.4.5 Back Fill & Compaction m3 0.96 136.44 130.98
Fix Intake gate 0.60mX0.60m with 6mm thick sheet
3.4.6 pcs 1.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
plate
Fix under sluice gate 1m X 1m with 6mm thick sheet
3.4.7 pcs 1.00 15,000.00 15,000.00
plate

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

97
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

3.4.8 Total Carried Summary Birr 40,805.19

4 Main Canal & Related Structures
4.1 Main Canal Km 2.83
4.1.1 Lined m 2,595.00
4.1.1.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 1634.50 47.91 78,308.76
4.1.1.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 700.50 117.85 82,553.78
4.1.1.5 Masonry Work m3 850.50 1,456.00 1,238,328.00
4.1.1.6 Concrete Work m3 155.67 2,002.72 311,756.21
4.1.1.7 Plastering work m2 1,020.60 123.23 125,768.54
4.1.1.8 Total Carried Summary Birr 1,836,715.30
4.1.2 Unlined /Earthen Canal Km 0.24
4.1.2.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 194.40 47.91 9,313.70
4.1.2.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 64.80 117.85 7,636.68
4.1.2.4 Backfill & Compaction m3 54.00 136.44 7,367.76
4.1.2.5 Total Carried Summary Birr 24,318.14
4.1.3 Division boxes Pcs 3.00
4.1.3.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 7.29 47.91 349.26
4.1.3.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 2.43 117.85 286.38
4.1.3.4 Masonry Work m3 7.59 1,456.00 11,046.67
4.1.3.5 concrete m3 0.76 2,002.72 1,514.06
4.1.3.6 Plastering m2 28.35 123.23 3,493.57
4.1.3.7 Total Carried Summary Birr 16,689.94
4.1.4 Drainage Culvert Pcs 4.00
4.1.4.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 40.32 47.91 1,931.73
4.1.4.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 17.28 117.85 2,036.45
4.1.4.4 Backfill & Compaction m3 25.92 136.44 3,536.52
4.1.4.6 Masonry Work m3 10.12 1,456.00 14,728.90
4.1.4.7 Concrete Work m3 5.04 2,002.72 10,093.71
4.1.4.8 Plastering m2 50.40 123.23 6,210.79
4.1.4.9 Pipe Placing Dia.600mm. Pcs 24.00 550.00 13,200.00
4.1.4.10 Total Carried Summary Birr 51,738.10
4.1.5 Pipe Culvert on Main Canal Pcs 3.00
4.1.5.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 15.12 47.91 724.40
4.1.5.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 6.48 117.85 763.67
4.1.5.4 Backfill & Compaction m3 19.44 136.44 2,652.39
4.1.5.6 Masonry Work m3 7.587 1,456.00 11,046.67
4.1.5.7 Concrete Work m3 3.78 2,002.72 7,570.28
4.1.5.8 Pipe Placing Dia.300mm. pcs 18.00 -
4.1.5.9 Plastering m2 37.80 123.23 4,658.09
4.1.5.10 Total Carried Summary Birr 27,415.51
4.1.6 Turnouts Pcs 26.00
4.1.6.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 65.52 47.91 3,139.06
4.1.6.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 28.08 117.85 3,309.23
4.1.6.3 Masonry Work m3 43.84 1,456.00 63,825.22
4.1.6.4 Concrete Work m3 16.38 2,002.72 32,804.55
4.1.6.5 Pipe Placing Dia.100mm. pcs 52.00 250.00 13,000.00
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
98
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

4.1.6.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 116,078.06

5 Secondary Canal 1, & Related Structures
5.1 Secondary Canal 1, (SC-1) Km 1.558
5.1.1 Lined Km 1.08
5.1.1.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 679.14 47.91 32,537.60
5.1.1.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 291.06 117.85 34,301.42
5.1.1.5 Masonry Work m3 373.92 1,456.00 544,427.52
5.1.1.6 Concrete Work m3 64.68 2,002.72 129,535.93
5.1.1.7 Plastering work m2 1,185.80 123.23 146,126.13
5.1.1.8 Total Carried Summary Birr 886,928.60
5.1.2 Unlined /Earthen Canal Km 0.48
5.1.2.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 302.40 47.91 14,487.98
5.1.2.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 129.60 117.85 15,273.36
5.1.2.3 Backfill & Compaction m3 108.00 136.44 14,735.52
5.1.2.4 Total Carried Summary Birr 44,496.86
5.1.3 Pond/NSR-1 Pcs 1.00
5.1.3.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 411.97 47.91 19,737.36
5.1.3.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 176.56 117.85 20,807.30
5.1.3.3 Backfill & Compaction m3 1,373.23 136.44 187,362.82
5.1.3.4 Overlay Geo-Membrain m2 2,037.25 152.30 310,273.69
5.1.3.5 Total Carried Summary Birr 538,181.18
5.1.4 In late Structure/Chute Pcs 1.00
5.1.4.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 16.76 47.91 802.82
5.1.4.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 7.18 117.85 846.34
5.1.4.3 Masonry Work m3 13.39 1,456.00 19,495.84
5.1.4.4 Concrete Work m3 1.20 2,002.72 2,403.26
5.1.4.5 Plastering m2 29.40 123.23 3,622.96
5.1.4.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 27,171.22
5.1.5 Out late Structure Pcs 1.00
5.1.5.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 7.35 47.91 352.14
5.1.5.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 3.15 117.85 371.23
5.1.5.3 Masonry Work m3 8.58 1,456.00 12,492.48
5.1.5.4 Lean Concrete m3 0.29 2,002.72 580.79
5.1.5.5 Ø300mm Pipe Placing Pcs 5.00 450.00 2,250.00
5.1.5.6 Reinforced Concrete Work m3 0.32 2,002.72 647.68
5.1.5.7 Ø10mm bar Kg 30.99 12.50 387.35
5.1.5.8 Intake Gate Fixing Pcs 1.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
5.1.5.9 Total Carried Summary Birr 27,081.66
5.1.6 Spillway Pcs 1.00
5.1.6.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 3.78 47.91 181.10
5.1.6.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 1.62 117.85 190.92
5.1.6.3 Masonry Work m3 3.37 1,456.00 4,909.63
5.1.6.4 Concrete Work m3 0.34 2,002.72 672.91
5.1.6.5 Plastering m2 8.40 123.23 1,035.13
5.1.6.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 6,989.69
5.1.7 Turnouts Pcs 27.00
5.1.7.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 68.04 47.91 3,259.80
5.1.7.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 29.16 117.85 3,436.51
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
99
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

5.1.7.3 Masonry Work m3 45.52 1,456.00 66,280.03

5.1.7.4 Concrete Work m3 17.01 2,002.72 34,066.27
5.1.7.5 Pipe Placing Dia.100mm. pcs 54.00 250.00 13,500.00
5.1.7.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 120,542.60
6 Secondary Canal 2, & Related Structures
6.1 Secondary Canal 2, (SC2) Km 0.986
6.1.1 Lined Km 0.786
6.1.1.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 495.18 47.91 23,724.07
6.1.1.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 212.22 117.85 25,010.13
6.1.1.3 Masonry Work m3 236.64 1,456.00 344,547.84
6.1.1.4 Concrete Work m3 47.16 2,002.72 94,448.28
6.1.1.5 Plastering work m2 864.60 123.23 106,544.66
6.1.1.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 594,274.97
6.1.2 Unlined /Earthen Canal Km 0.20
6.1.2.1 Soil excavation 70% 126.00 47.91 6,036.66
6.1.2.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% 54.00 117.85 6,363.90
6.1.2.3 Backfill & Compaction 45.00 136.44 6,139.80
6.1.2.4 Total Carried Summary Birr 18,540.36
6.1.3 Pond/NSR-2 Pcs 1.00
6.1.3.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 233.18 47.91 11,171.59
6.1.3.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 99.93 117.85 11,777.19
6.1.3.3 Backfill & Compaction m3 777.26 136.44 106,049.70
6.1.3.4 Overlay Geo-Membrain m2 1,571.01 152.30 239,264.52
6.1.3.5 Total Carried Summary Birr 368,263.00
6.1.4 In late Structure/Chute pcs 1.00
6.1.4.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 12.97 47.91 621.35
6.1.4.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 4.79 117.85 564.22
6.1.4.3 Masonry Work m3 13.39 1,456.00 19,495.84
6.1.4.4 Concrete Work m3 1.20 2,002.72 2,403.26
6.1.4.5 Plastering m2 29.40 123.23 3,622.96
6.1.4.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 26,707.64
6.1.5 Out late Structure Pcs 1.00
6.1.5.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 7.35 47.91 352.14
6.1.5.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 3.15 117.85 371.23
6.1.5.3 Masonry Work m3 8.58 1,456.00 12,492.48
6.1.5.4 Lean Concrete m3 0.29 2,002.72 580.79
6.1.5.5 Ø300mm Pipe Placing Pcs 5.00 450.00 2,250.00
6.1.5.6 Reinforced Concrete Work m3 0.32 2,002.72 647.68
6.1.5.7 Ø10mm bar Kg 30.99 12.50 387.35
6.1.5.8 Intake Gate Fixing Pcs 1.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
6.1.5.9 Total Carried Summary Birr 27,081.66
6.1.6 Spillway Pcs 1.00
6.1.6.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 3.78 47.91 181.10
6.1.6.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 1.62 117.85 190.92
6.1.6.3 Masonry Work m3 3.37 1,456.00 4,909.63
6.1.6.4 Concrete Work m3 0.34 2,002.72 672.91
6.1.6.5 Plastering m2 8.40 123.23 1,035.13
6.1.6.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 6,989.69
Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise
100
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

6.1.7 Turnouts Pcs 18.00

6.1.7.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 45.36 47.91 2,173.20
6.1.7.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 19.44 117.85 2,291.00
6.1.7.3 Masonry Work m3 30.35 1,456.00 44,186.69
6.1.7.4 Concrete Work m3 11.34 2,002.72 22,710.84
6.1.7.5 Pipe Placing Dia.100mm. pcs 37.38 250.00 9,346.15
6.1.7.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 80,707.89
7 Tertiary Canal & Related Structures
7.1 Tertiary Canal (TC) Km 0.32
7.1.1 Lined Km 0.32
7.1.1.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 201.60 47.91 9,658.66
7.1.1.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 86.40 117.85 10,182.24
7.1.1.3 Masonry Work m3 96.00 1,456.00 139,776.00
7.1.1.4 Concrete Work m3 19.20 2,002.72 38,452.22
7.1.1.5 Plastering work m2 352.00 123.23 43,376.96
7.1.1.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 241,446.08
7.1.2 Turnouts Pcs 7.00
7.1.2.1 Soil excavation 70% m3 17.64 47.91 845.13
7.1.2.2 Soft Rock Excavation 30% m3 7.56 117.85 890.95
7.1.2.3 Masonry Work m3 11.80 1,456.00 17,183.71
7.1.2.4 Concrete Work m3 4.41 2,002.72 8,832.00
7.1.2.5 Pipe Placing Dia.100mm. pcs 14.00 250.00 3,500.00
7.1.2.6 Total Carried Summary Birr 31,251.79
8 Total Project Cost Birr 6,400,432.19
9 Overhead cost =5% of Total Project Cost Birr 320,021.61
11 Total Carried Summary Birr Birr 6,720,453.80
For Supervision Cost = 5% of final Total Summary
12 Birr 336,022.69
Birr
14 Final Total Carried Summary Birr Birr 7,056,476.49
15 Vat 15% Birr 1,058,471.47
17 Grand Total Birr 8,114,947.96

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

101
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

6 ANNEX - II: PROJECT DURATION AND WORK PLAN

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

102
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

Construction Work Schedule

Fiscal Year
Bill No. Activities QUARTER-1 QUARTER-2 QUARTER-3 QUARTER-4
1 Access Road Construction
2 Preparatory Work for Camp construction
3 Head Work
4 Main Canal & Related Structures
5 Secondary Canal 1, & Related Structures
6 Secondary Canal 2, & Related Structures

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise 103

Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

7 ANNEX - III: LIST OF DRAWINGS

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

104
Aleltu Tiko Small-Scale Irrigation Project Engineering & Geology Study Final Report

List of Drawing

Drawing No of
S. No. Description Drawing title No sheets
Residence and Office 00-1 1
Kitchen, Cafe & Workers
0 Camp(ATC 00) Living Room 00-2 1
Store, Toilet & Shower
Room 00-3 1
Aleltu Tiko Head Work 01-1 1
1 Head Work (ATHW-1-01) Plan & Sections 01-2 1
Irrigation Distribution System Lay Command Area System
2 02-1 1
out (ATSLO-2-02) Layout
3 Canal Profile
03-1 1
03-2 2
Longitudinal Cross Section 03-3 3
3.1 Main Canal (ATMC-3-03)
of Main Canal 03-4 4
03-5 5
03-6 6
04-1 1
Longitudinal Cross Section 04-2 2
3.2 Secondary Canal 1(ATSC1-4-04)
of Secondary Canal 1 04-3 3
04-4 4
Longitudinal Cross Section 05-1 1
3.3 Secondary Canal 2(ATSC2-5-05)
of Secondary Canal 2 05-2 2
Longitudinal Cross Section
3.4 Tertiary Canal(ATTC-6-06) 06-1 1
of Tertiary Canal
4 Related Structures
NSR1 Plan & Sections
4.1 Pond/Night Storage Reservoir 1 with all Appurtenant 04-5 1
Structures
NSR2 Plan & Sections
4.2 Pond/Night Storage Reservoir 2 with all Appurtenant 05-3 1
Structures
Drainage Culvert Plan &
4.3 Drainage Culvert 07-1 1
Section
Road Crossing/Pipe
4.4 Road Crossing/Pipe Culvert 08-1 1
Culvert Plan & Section
Division Boxes Plan &
4.5 Division Boxes 09-1 1
Section
4.6 Turnouts Turnout Plan & Section 010-1 1
5 Total 25

Oromia Water Work Design & Supervision Enterprise

105