MRT Line 6: Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project
MRT Line 6: Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project
MRT Line 6: Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project
MRT LINE 6
CONTRACT PACKAGE NO. CP-07
Procurement Of E&M Systems comprising of Track Works, Electrification System (Power
Supply, Catenary, SCADA and Energy Storage System), Lifts and Escalators, Signalling System,
Telecommunication System, Automatic Fare Collection System and Platform Screen Doors for
MRT Line 6
REVISION HISTORY
Revision Details
Revision No. Revision Date Approved by
Clause No. Revision
Sowmya Sahil
Majumder/ Jasrotia/ Satish Page of
00B 21/03/2020
Pushkar Sowmya Kumar Pages
Sinha Majumder
Name Sign Name Sign Name Sign
2 of 28
Rev Date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by
DESIGN CERTIFICATE
Design Stage: Conceptual Design / Preliminary Design / Site Design / Completion (As-Built Document)
Documents for which a Notice of No Objection has previously been issued and which are of relevance to this
Submission are listed in Section B below.
DESIGNER'S STATEMENT
We certify that the design of the Works, as shown and described in the drawings and documents listed in
Section A below,
(a) has been designed by us and complies with the Employers Requirements and all other requirements of the
Contract;
(b) has been confirmed as a complete, adequate and valid of the design through an in-house design and QA
check
(c) includes all necessary and required approvals (e.g. from Local Authorities or agencies etc.) relating to the
design and copies of such approvals are annexed in Section C below;
(d) all effects of the design comprising the submission on, or from, the design of adjacent or other parts of the
Works and Interfacing Contracts have been fully taken into account in the design.
CONTRACTORS CERTIFICATION
This Certifies that all design has been performed utilising the skill and care to be expected of a professionally
qualified and competent designer, experienced in work of similar nature and scope. This further certifies that all
works relating to the preparation, review, checking and certification of design has been verified by us.
Position/Designation: Manager
Section A
Drawings:
NA
Documents:
Others:
N/A
Section B
Comprises the following:
Drawings:
Documents:
NA
Others:
N/A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PREAMBLE .............................................................................................................. 8
2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATION ....................................................................... 8
DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 8
ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 8
3 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 8
INTERNATIONALS AND EUROPEANS ........................................................................................................ 8
OTHER REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 8
4 ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................................ 9
ENVIRONMENT AND LOADING CASES ...................................................................................................... 9
CONDITIONS FOR CALCULATIONS ............................................................................................................ 9
5 SAFETY FACTORS AND CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE ...................................... 9
LOAD COMBINATIONS USED .................................................................................................................... 9
6 USED VALUES ....................................................................................................... 12
OCS CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................................... 12
WEIGHTS ................................................................................................................................................ 12
WIND LOAD ............................................................................................................................................ 12
7 SITUATION ............................................................................................................. 13
LAYOUT PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... 13
CROSS SECTIONS .................................................................................................................................... 14
LOADING INPUT SHEET FOR STAAD ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 15
DROP ARM MODEL ................................................................................................................................. 16
PORTAL CASE NO 1019-1018 DROP ARM LOADING CASES .................................................................... 18
STABLING & WORKSHOP DROP ARM LOADING CASES .......................................................................... 18
SUPERMAST LOADING CASES ................................................................................................................. 19
MEMBER VALIDATION ............................................................................................................................ 20
ANCHOR BASE PLATE VERIFICATION ...................................................................................................... 26
8 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ...................................................................................... 26
9 CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS VERSION ............................................................... 27
10 STAAD INPUT ANNEXURE ................................................................................... 28
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Definitions ................................................................................................................................. 8
Table 2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 8
Table 3. Load Combinations for ULS SET A ............................................................................................. 9
Table 4. Load Combinations for ULS SET B ........................................................................................... 10
Table 5. Load Combinations for ULS SET C ........................................................................................... 10
Table 6. Load Combinations for SLS CHARACTERISTIC COMBINATION ................................................ 10
Table 7. Load Combinations for SLS FREQUENT COMBINATION .......................................................... 10
Table 8. Load Combinations for SLS QUASI PERMANENT COMBINATION ........................................... 11
Table 9. Summary of partial factors for actions (EN 50119) ................................................................ 11
Table 10. PORTAL CASE NO 1019-1018 DROP ARM LOADING CASES .................................................... 18
Table 11. Stabling & workshop drop arm loading cases ......................................................................... 18
Table 12. Super mast Loading Cases ....................................................................................................... 19
Table 13. 3 CANTILEVERS DROP ARM MEMBER UTILISATION RATIO..................................................... 20
Table 14. 2 CANTILEVERS DROP ARM MEMBER UTILISATION RATIO..................................................... 21
Table 15. SINGLE CANTILEVER DROP ARM MEMBER UTILISATION RATIO ............................................. 22
Table 16. BFB SINGLE CANTILEVER DROP ARM MEMBER UTILISATION RATIO ...................................... 23
Table 17. RSJ BACK TO BACK CANTILEVER DROP ARM MEMBER UTILISATION RATIO........................... 24
Table 18. SUPERMAST MEMBER UTILISATION RATIO ............................................................................ 25
LIST OF FIGURES
Portal 1019-1018 ........................................................................................................................ 13
Portal 1019-1018 ........................................................................................................................ 14
CHS DROP ARM MODEL SHOWING LOAD AXIS .......................................................................... 16
BFB DROP ARM MODEL .............................................................................................................. 16
RSJ DROP ARM MODEL ............................................................................................................... 17
SUPERMAST MODEL ................................................................................................................... 17
3 CANTILEVERS DROP ARM MODEL MEMBER SIZES .................................................................. 20
2 CANTILEVERS DROP ARM MODEL MEMBER SIZES .................................................................. 21
SINGLE CANTILEVER DROP ARM MODEL MEMBER SIZES ........................................................... 22
BFB SINGLE CANTILEVER DROP ARM MODEL MEMBER SIZES .................................................... 23
RSJ BACK TO BACK CANTILEVER DROP ARM MODEL MEMBER SIZES ........................................ 24
SUPERMAST MODEL MEMBER SIZES .......................................................................................... 25
Anchor Base Plate vérification .................................................................................................... 26
1 PREAMBLE
This technical document presents the design for all Drop Arms, Anchor base plate and Super
Mast for DMRT line 6.
TERM DEFINITION
Electric conductor of an overhead contact line with which the
Contact Wire
current collectors make contact.
Catenary/Feeder Electric conductor of an overhead contact line which supports
messenger Wire the contact wire using droppers.
Mast Single OCS Structure used to support OCS wires of Single track
OCS Structure with two uprights connected via boom used
Portal
to support OCS wires of multiple tracks
The distance between two overhead contact line supports
Span
or suspensions.
ABBREVIATIONS
Table 2. Abbreviations
ABBREVIATION DEFINITION
d displacement
d/a Horizontal cable deviation (equal to the tangent of the angle)
L Span length
T Conductor Tension
smax Maximum stress
Wind Ʇ Wind blowing in the perpendicular direction to the track
Wind // Wind blowing in the parallel direction to the track
3 REFERENCES
INTERNATIONALS AND EUROPEANS
• BS EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014. Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures - Part 1 - 1: General
rules and rules for buildings.
• BS EN 1993-1-8:2005/AC:2009. Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures - Part 1 - 8: Design
of joints.
• EN 50119: 2009+A1 :2013 Railway applications Fixed installations Electric traction
overhead contact lines
• IS 1161-2014 For Member Size Specifications of Circular Hollow Sections
• IS 2004 : 1991(R2018) For Steel grades of BFB and RSJ sections used. Class 2A used here.
• IS 808 : 1989 (R2014) For Member Sizes of BFB and RSJ sections.
OTHER REFERENCES
• Contract Document: DMRT Line 6, CP-07, Volume 3-2of 5, part 2: Electrification System
4 ASSUMPTIONS
ENVIRONMENT AND LOADING CASES
All loads are computed as per contract CP-07, Volume 3-2 of 5, Part 2, Clause 2.6.
All calculations are performed under following loading cases:
▪ Weights and self-weights;
▪ Tensions in OCS wires;
▪ Wind ⊥ to track;
▪ Wind // to track.
Load combinations applied in Dhaka are cases A, B and E (EN50119), declined as follows:
▪ Case A: Weights and self-weights + Tensions in OCS wires;
▪ Case B1: Weights and self-weights + Tensions in wires + Wind ⊥ to track;
▪ Case B2: Weights and self-weights + Tensions in wires - Wind ⊥ to track;
▪ Case B3: Weights and self-weights + Tensions in wires + Wind // to track;
▪ Case E: Weights and self-weights + Tensions in wires, in construction stage.
6 USED VALUES
OCS CHARACTERISTICS
The following values are considered for the calculation of tension length of OCS conductors,
in consistency with Particular Specifications, addendums to bidding documents and contact,
catenary/feeder messenger wire characteristics as stated in Preliminary Design Report for
OCS:
▪ Contact wire for Depot Entry/Exit Lines (FMS):
o Cu-Sn (High conductivity) 170mm² (1.514kg/m);
o External diameter: 15.49mm;
o Contact wire tension of 14.7kN (1500kgf);
▪ Catenary wire for Depot Entry/Exit Lines (FMS):
o Cu-Sn (High conductivity) 356mm² stranded conductors (3.231kg/m);
o External diameter: 24.5mm;
o Catenary/Feeder messenger wire tension of 19.6kN (2000kgf) in each conductor;
▪ Contact wire for depot (SCS):
o Cu-Sn (High conductivity) 110mm² (0.988kg/m);
o External diameter: 12.34mm;
o Contact wire tension of 9.81kN (1000kgf);
▪ Catenary wire for depot (SCS):
o Cu-Sn (High conductivity) 90mm² stranded conductors (0.810kg/m);
o External diameter: 12.30mm;
o Catenary/Feeder messenger wire tension of 9.81kN (1000kgf) in each conductor;
▪ OPC wire:
o Type of OPC wire: ACSR conductor, consisting of 7 steel wires each of 2.5mm diameter
and 12 aluminum wires also of 2.5mm diameter each, with a nominal cross section of
93.3mm²;
o External diameter: 12.5mm;
o OPC tension of 250kgf for depot @ 35°C and 300kgf for main line @ 35°C
WEIGHTS
▪ FMS OCS weight is: 1.05 x (1.514kg/m + 3.231kg/m) = 4.982kg/m (including 5% for
droppers)
▪ SCS OCS weight is: 1.05 x (0.988kg/m + 0.810kg/m) = 1.888kg/m (including 5% for
droppers)
▪ Cantilever elements unit weights (according to STK handbook):
o Cantilever assembly: Actual weight as per size of members
o OPC weight is: 0.437kg/m
o Weight of man: 60kg
WIND LOAD
6.3.1 DYNAMIC WIND PRESSURE
Dynamic wind pressure, qk= 2,040Pa as per contract CP-07, Volume 3-2 of 5, Part 2, Clause
2.6, qk = 2,040N/m2 (208 kgf/m2).
6.3.2 WIND LOAD ON CABLES
Wind load on unit length of wire, wc = qk*Gc*Cc*diameter of wire (EN 50119 clause 6.2.4.3).
The following factors are used for calculation in reference to EN 50119:
▪ Structural response factor, Gc is 0.75;
▪ Drag factor, Cc is 1.
7 SITUATION
LAYOUT PLAN
The layout plan at different locations is presented hereafter.
Portal 1019-1018
CROSS SECTIONS
Portal 1019-1018
Vst1 Vst2 Vst3 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V9 V10 V11 RT1 RT2 RT3 RT4 RT5 RT6 RT7 RT8 RT9 RT10 RT11 RT12 RT13 RT14 WL1 WL2 WL3 WL4 WL5 WL6 WL7 WL8 WL9 WL10 WL11 WL12 WL13 WL14
LL (kN)
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (KN) (KN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN)
Notes:
SUPERMAST MODEL
MEMBER VALIDATION
7.8.1 DROP ARM WITH 3 CANTILEVERS
CASE 1 : 36 Degree
Size of Anchor Base Plate
Width, b = 525 mm
Length, L = 525 mm
Inclined Load = 48.45 KN
Inclination = 36 degree
Vertical Load, V = 28.48 KN
Distance of Bolt from
plate edge = 175 mm
Bending moment, M = 4.98 KNm
fy of Steel = 355 Mpa
Section Modulus, Z = 78750 mm3
Working Stress (M/Z) = 63.3 Mpa
Allowable Stress = 234.3 Mpa
Treqd= sqrt(6M/(bX0.66fy))
Treqd = 15.59 mm
Tprov = 30 mm
OK
CASE 2 : 43 Degree
Size of Anchor Base Plate
Width, b = 525 mm
Length, L = 525 mm
Inclined Load = 20.09 KN
Inclination = 43 degree
Vertical Load, V = 13.70 KN
Distance of Bolt from
plate edge = 175 mm
Bending moment, M = 2.40 KNm
fy of Steel = 355 Mpa
Section Modulus, Z = 78750 mm3
Working Stress (M/Z) = 30.4 Mpa
Allowable Stress = 234.3 Mpa
Treqd= sqrt(6M/(bX0.66fy))
Treqd = 10.81 mm
Tprov = 30 mm
OK
8 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Summary of results is given below:
1. For Locations with Triple Cantilevers on DA. DA size is 168.3 x 8 CHS as per IS 1161:2014.
2. For Locations with Twin Cantilevers on DA. DA size is 165.1 x 5.4 CHS as per IS
1161:2014.
3. For Locations with Single Cantilevers on DA. DA size is 165.1 x 5.4 CHS as per IS
1161:2014.
4. For Stabling & Workshop locations with Single Cantilever arrangement on BFB DA the
standard sizes as per RDSO specifications have been used and verified for Dhaka loading
conditions.
5. For Stabling & Workshop locations with Back to Back Cantilever arrangement on RSJ DA
the standard sizes as per RDSO specifications have been used and verified for Dhaka
loading conditions.
Regarding sag for maximum span of 40m in depot & at ambient temperature i.e. 45°C and
other higher temperature ranges is give below:
Now, as the height of OPC at support is 7900mm minimum and considering a maximum sag
of 613mm, the height of OPC at mid-span will be 7287mm. As the maximum height of
messenger wire is 5810mm at support and at mid span it will be less than 5810mm. Hence
the clearance between OPC and messenger wire under worst condition will always be more
than 1477mm, which is much safer than the actual requirement.
As the heights of OPC are high and spans on main line also vary while transitions from tangent
to curves resulting in high radial loads. Also, at OPC termination locations and subsequent
locations the variation of OPC height is high. SYSTRA recommends reducing the OPC tension
on mainline also from 500kgf to 300kgf. As a reference, 300kgf is the nominal tension followed
in International Projects like UK Network Rail where the maximum span is 63m and 320kgf is
the nominal tension followed in latest Indian Metro Projects like Nagpur and Pune Metro etc.,
where the maximum span is 54m.
After reducing the tension in OPC from 500kgf to 300kgf and corresponding radial loads in
mainline. The actual utilisation ratio has been reduced from 0.756 to 0.637.
Regarding sag for maximum span of 36m in mainline & at ambient temperature i.e. 45°C and
other higher temperature ranges is give below:
Now, as the height of OPC at support is 7350mm minimum (except at OPC anchors and
stations) and considering a maximum sag of 489mm, the height of OPC at mid-span will be
6861mm. As the maximum height of messenger wire is 5800mm at support and at mid span
it will be less than 5800mm. Hence the clearance between OPC and messenger wire under
worst condition will always be more than 1061mm, which is much safer than the actual
requirement.
At OPC anchor locations the OPC height is 6700mm minimum and messenger wire height is
5800mm. Hence, the clearance between OPC and messenger wire will always be more than
900mm, which is much safer than the actual requirement.
In view, of above CP07 requested Engineer to review the proposal and accord necessary
approval for 250kgf for depot and 300kgf tension in mainline as per the international practice.