Project Report PDF
Project Report PDF
1 | Page
1. INTRODUCTION TO MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT
1.1 Definition:
1. To reduce the minimum idle time due to shortage of materials and spare
parts.
2. To offer maximum service and satisfaction to customers.
3. To minimize as much as possible capital investment and cost of storage.
4. To maintain reasonable safety stock.
5. To maintain necessary inventory records.
2 | Page
production centers. The amount of transportation inventory depends on the time
consumed in transportation and the nature of demand.
Lot size Inventories: Generally, the rate of consumption is different from the
rate of production or purchasing. Therefore, the items are produced in larger
quantities which result in lot size, also known as cycle inventories.
Purchase/ Item cost: It refers to the cost associated with an item, whether it is
manufactured or purchased. The purchase price will be considered when
discounts are allowed for any purchase above a certain quantity.
Ordering/set-up cost: These costs include the fixed cost associated with
obtaining the goods through placing of an order and purchasing, manufacturing
or setting up machinery before starting the production.
If P is the purchase price of an item, I is the stock holding cost per unit time as a
fraction of stock value, then the holding cost C = IP
3 | Page
Shortage cost or stock out cost: The penalty costs that are incurred as a result
of running out of stock on shortage are known as shortage or stock out cost.
These are denoted by the SI unit of goods for a specified period. If the unfilled
demand for the goods can be satisfied at a later date (backlog case), these costs
are assumed to vary directly with the shortage quantity and the delay in time. If
the unfilled demand is lost (no backlog case), shortage cost becomes
proportional to the shortage quantity.
Static inventory models: It is applicable in cases where only one order can be
placed to meet the demand. Repeat orders are either impossible or too
expensive.
Examples: perishable goods like bread, vegetables etc., seasonal products like
umbrellas, raincoats, sweaters, coolers, crackers etc.
Dynamic inventory models: It is applicable for items where repeat orders can
be placed to replenish stock. These are further classified as
a) Deterministic models:
1. Purchasing models with and without shortages.
2. Manufacturing model with and without shortages.
b) Probabilistic models
4 | Page
2. FORECASTING
Comments:
1. In most cases, this method is applied to forecast for only one period into
the future.
2. The forecaster must wait until demand entries are available for making
the first forecast.
5 | Page
ii) Weighted moving average:
1 120
2 130
3 110 118
6 | Page
For example, W1= 0.2, W2= 0.3, W3= 0.5
Where
⚫ Ft+1= Ft + Tt
7 | Page
⚫ α ∧β are smoothing constants. The trend adjustment T t utilizes a second
smoothing coefficient, β .
=(D1+D2+….Dn)/n
={M1(1)+M1(2)+…..+M1(2n-1)}/n
t(Ft+Z)=2M1(t)-M2(t)+(2Z/(n-1))[M1(t)-M2(t)]
Demand Forecasts: The demand forecast gives the expected level of demand
for goods or services. This is the basic input for business planning and control.
Hence, the decisions for all the functions of any corporate house are influenced
by the demand forecast.
Marketing:
9 | Page
● Forecast of market shares
● Forecasting trend in prices
Production:
Forecast of
● Materials requirements
● Trends in material and labour cost
● Maintenance requirements
● Plant capacity
Finance:
Forecast of
● Cash flows
● Rates of expenses
● Revenues
Personal:
Forecast of
MAD = ∑ ¿ Dt−Ft ∨¿
i=1
¿
❑
10 | Page
Dt= Actual demand for the period t
MSE = ∑ ( Dt−Ft ) 2
i=1
❑
MFE = ∑ ( Dt −Ft )
i=1
❑
11 | Page
3. LITERATURE REVIEW
12 | Page
2. Analysis of different inventory control techniques: a case study
in a retail shop: by S .K. Biswas, C .L. karmarkar
The inventory of materials constitutes the most significant part of current
assets and working capital in any organization. A small saving in inventory will
mirror a crucial edge in the benefit of organization. This model uses ABC
analysis which is widely used inventory categorization techniques for managing
stock the material that should be managed. This technique is based on Pareto
principle and works in dividing items into three categories A, B and C in order
of the level of significance. "A" denotes items that are very expensive and
require tight control, "B" items are important and require moderate control, "C"
items are less important as compared to A and B. The main objective of this
classification scheme is to draw managers' attention on the critical few (A-
items) and not on the trivial many (C-items). Annual consumption for different
items is considered in this analysis.
13 | Page
that as the ordering cost increases the number of inventory cycles decreases.
The point, at which optimal solution is obtained, is the point where the ordering
cost is equal to the sum of holding and deterioration cost, which is aligned to the
EOQ model result, where optimal order quantity is obtained at the point where
ordering cost is equal to holding cost for the cycle.
2. Wallace T. & Stahl B., (2005), ‘Sales & Operation Planning- The Next
Generation’, pp.6
14 | Page
S&OP is a tool to balance demand and supply at the volume level. It deals with
rates of sales and production, aggregate inventories and backlogs. It is typically
expressed in product families or other aggregate groupings; it answers the
question ‘how much’. At the mix level the matter is about which individual
products run first, second, third and which customer orders will ship when. It
answers the question ‘which ones’ giving the details.Another important mission
for S&OP is to tie together the company’s operational plans with its financial
plans. The financial plans represent, critically essential evident, to deliver X
amount of revenue and profit dollars for a specific period of the year. These
commitments are made to some very important people such as the corporate
office, the board of the directors, the Wall Street and ultimately to owners of the
business: the stockholders.
15 | Page
4. PROBLEM DEFINITION AND DEVELOPMENT
Survey has been done and data required for the study is collected and the
below mentioned methodologies are applied for the data, for the calculation of
the outputs.
The High, Medium & Low (HML) analysis is similar to ABC analysis
except the difference is that instead of Annual consumption value used in ABC
classification cost per unit criterion is used in HML analysis. The items under
this classification scheme are arranged in descending orders of their unit price.
The classification of the items based on unit price is decided completely by the
management. It helps managers to make decisions on buying policies which
means H & M items should not be ordered more than required quantity. The
frequency of stock checking is also initiated by this method. Most valuable
items require frequent stock checking.
Necessary data for this study were collected from S D Eye Hospital
Mehdipatnam (Govt of Telangana). The proposed methodology was applied on
16 | Page
the medicines divided into three groups (general, lifesaving and emergency
medicines).
Holding Ordering
Demand cost per cost per
Item per year Unit cost year order EOQ TCv TC t n Category
HPMC 0.3% 20000 149.6 0.188 30 2523.12 30.188 2992030 0.126 7.926 H
HPMC 0.7%
(Lubricating
eye drops) 30000 122.4 0.154 25 3118.67 25.154 3672025 0.104 9.619 H
Framycetin
skin cream 600 80.25 0.101 20 1532.11 20.101 48170.1 0.812 0.391 M
Hyaluronida
se injection 3000 77.2 0.097 15 961.89 15.097 231615.1 0.32 3.11886 M
Aluminium
hydroxide 800 35.2 0.044 10 600.62 10.044 28170.04 0.75 1.331 L
17 | Page
Dextrose
Injection 200 16.58 0.02 90 1312.7 90.020 3406.02 6.5636 0.152 L
Dexamethasone 150 20741.33 26.134 260 54.63 286.134 3111485.634 0.364 2.74 H
Sevoflurane 100 4383.75 5.525 200 185.09 205.52 438580.523 0.85 1.17 M
Travoprost Eye Drops 1500 457.74 0.576 150 883.3 150.57 686760.576 0.588 1.698 L
Latanoprost Solution 600 180.08 0.226 70 608.44 70.226 108118.226 1.014 0.986 L
3050.5
Ophthalmic solution 6000 122.81 0.154 120 5 120.157 736980.154 0.508 1.96 L
Q = Dt
Q* = √ ❑
18 | Page
Q∗¿
Optimal length of inventory replenishment cycle = t* = D ¿
D
Optimal no.of ordered to be placed in the given period =N* = Q∗¿ ¿
I(t)=−β/α+Ce−αt, 0≤t≤ T (2)
At time t=0, when the order is received i.e. cycle starts, I(0)=Q (Quantity
Ordered) and Equation (3) gives the ordered quantity as
19 | Page
Q=β/α(eαT−1) ( 4)
The ordered quantity depends upon the demand, cycle time and the rate of
deterioration. To determine the optimal order quantity known Q (Economic
Order quantity), we have to derive the total variable cost equation for the
proposed model first and also check the feasibility of the derived model.
Since the total demand during cycle period T is βT, and the quantity ordered is
Q, so anything less than Q which is not used is the deteriorated products. Hence,
the amount of materials which deteriorates during one cycle is
TD=Q−βT=β/α(eαT−1)−βT (5)
1) The ordering cost of the materials is fixed at S dollars/order for the proposed
financial year. It consists of the cost of procurement and inbound logistics costs.
D=c[β/α(eαT−1)−βT] (6)
H=h∫0TI(t)
Which, upon simplification, yields
H=βh/α2(eαT−1−αT) ( 7)
Total variable cost function for one cycle is given by the sum of all the three
costs, i.e. ordering cost, deterioration cost and holding cost which is given by
Equations (5), (6) and (7). It is defined as variable cost as it changes with the
ordering quantity and the demand.
TVC=A+D+H
It consists of two components, one is ordering cost and the other is carrying
cost, carrying cost consists of holding and deterioration cost in this model. If the
items considered are non-perishable items then the total variable cost will
consist of only two costs, i.e. ordering cost and holding cost, which are the costs
considered in the classical EOQ model. Hence the above model will represent
20 | Page
the classical EOQ model, where EOQ will be given by the point where the
holding cost and the ordering cost per cycle are equal.
TVC=S+cβ/α(eαT−1−αT)+hβ/α2(eαT−1−αT) ( 8)
Considering there are n cycles in a year, then the Total Variable Cost per
annum, TC, is simply given by
TC=S/T+cβ/αT(eαT−1−αT)+hβ/α2T(eαT−1−αT) (9)
This study aim is to derive the optimal order quantity (EOQ) which results in
the minimum inventory cost. Once we obtain the cycle time, we can easily
derive the economic order quantity and the number of cycles required per
annum. To obtain that we have to do the analysis of the total variable cost per
annum.
The total variable cost is given by Equation (9), which consists of the
exponential function of αT that can be expanded in powers of αT. As α is the
deterioration rate, it is assumed to be very small and in most of the practical
cases α is assumed to be less than 10%. Hence, the higher power of will be very
small converging towards zero, therefore neglecting higher powers of α, the
total variable cost equation is given by
TC=S/T+cβ(αT/2+α2T2/6)+hβ(T/2+αT2/6+α2T3/24)
Taking the first order derivative of the total cost equation with respect to the
cycle time, T, we obtain
dTC/dT=−S/T2+cβ(α/2+α2T/3)+hβ(1/2+αT/3+α2T2/8)
Taking the second order derivative of the total cost equation with respect to the
cycle time, T, we obtain
d2TC/dT2=2S/T3+cβ(α2/3)+hβ(α/3+α2T/4)
which is convex, hence the optimal solution exists for the proposed model.
Considering the principal of maxima and minima and putting the first
derivative of the total variable cost equation equal to zero, which gives the point
of minima. Putting the value in the second derivative would give the positive
value as all the variables considered in the equation are positive. Hence, it is
proved the point obtained is a point of minima.
The above model can be converted into the classical EOQ (Economic
order quantity) model if nonperishable items are considered. Otherwise, also it
21 | Page
follows the classical EOQ principle which states that the optimal order quantity
is obtained when ordering cost is equal to the carrying cost.
On the simplification of first order derivative obtained above, the following
equation is derived
3βhα2T4+8βα(h+cα)T3+12β(h+cα)T2−24S=0
which is a bi-quadratic equation and can be solved for the given values of the
constraints to get the optimal cycle time. Hence, the economic order quantity
(EOQ) can be obtained using Equation (4).
The following notations are used in developing the model for deteriorating
items having constant demand and deterioration rate.
α : Deterioration rate,
Q : Ordered quantity
Holding Ordering
Demand Unit cost per cost per Det
Item per year cost year order rate Time t Q TCv TC n
299306
HPMC 0.3% 20000 149.6 0.188 30 0.005 0.056 1120 1060.2 0 17.85
HPMC 0.7%
(Lubricating eye 367307
drops) 30000 122.4 0.154 25 0.005 0.0516 1548 1077.6 8 19.37
Framycetin skin 439.86
cream 600 80.25 0.115 20 0.005 0.0462 27.72 4 48589.9 21.64
Hyaluronidase 403.99
injection 3000 77.2 0.0972 15 0.005 0.04 120 8 232004 25
Aluminium 309.62
hydroxide 800 35.2 0.0452 10 0.005 0.0326 26.08 2 28469.6 30.67
22 | Page
Calculation for Life Saving Medicines:
Ordering
Demand Holding cost cost per
Item per year Unit cost per year order det rate Time t Q TCv TC N
Ranibizumab
Injection 1000 19604.48 24.701 350 0.005 0.0755 155.14 9269.17 19613749.18 6.445
Amphotericin
Injection 10 126 0.158 200 0.005 7.03 71.54 56.49 1316.499 0.139
Insulin Injection 500 59.05 0.073 180 0.005 1.39 690 258.248 29783.241 0.721
Mannitol
Injection 1500 17.57 0.0282 150 0.005 1.3454 2022 222.72 26577.725 0.743
Dextrose
Injection 200 16.58 0.0208 90 0.005 2.93 588 61.276 3377.2743 0.3404
Holding Ordering
Demand cost per cost per Det
Item per year Unit cost year order rate Time t Q TCv TC n
Dexamethason
e 150 20741.33 26.134 260 0.005 0.1633 24.489 3182.81 3114382.319 6.125
Sevoflurane 100 4383.75 5.523 200 0.005 0.3815 38 1048.040 439423.0407 2.631
Travoprost Eye
Drops 1500 457.74 0.576 150 0.005 0.264 396 1135.798 687745.791 3.787
Latanoprost
Solution 600 180.08 0.226 70 0.005 0.1313 78.72 577.544 108625.5443 7.62
Ophthalmic
solution 6000 122.81 0.1547 120 0.005 0.228 1368 1052.368 737912.3684 4.385
23 | Page
4.4 Results and Conclusions :
In this study, an optimal ordering policy has been proposed which equips
wholesaler / retailers to decide their economic order quantity and the inventory
cycle time, which can help them in reducing their operating costs and costs
incurred due to decaying of medicines drastically. This model provides a simple
framework to wholesalers to derive optimal inventory levels.
24 | Page
Comparing EOQs of both cases using graphs:
Lifesaving medicines
General medicines
25 | Page
Emergency medicines
General medicines
26 | Page
Lifesaving medicines
Emergency medicines
27 | Page
General medicines
Lifesaving medicines
Emergency medicines
28 | Page
Conclusions :
The numerical conclusions for one medicine from each category compared to
both analysis is shown below:
29 | Page
Parameters Without Deterioration Rate With Deterioration Rate
(HML Analysis)
EOQ 158 155.4
The below conclusions are made from the above shown tables:
30 | Page
➢ Medicines without deterioration should be ordered less number of times
as compared to the medicines with deterioration.
➢ Medicines with deterioration have very high variable cost and total cost
due to costs incurred due to deterioration of medicines.
6. REFERENCES
Books
31 | Page
2. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, third edition
2013 by R Paneerselvam
Journals
8. Covert, R.P and Philip, G.C. (1973) An EOQ Model for Items with
Weibull Distributed Deterioration. AIIE Transactions, 5, 323-326.
32 | Page
12. H.Bahari-Kashani (1989) “Replenishment schedule for deteriorating
items with time-proportion demand”,Journal of the Operations Research
Society,Journal No.40,pp75-81.
33 | Page