Tizon, R. - Assignment in NCM 112
Tizon, R. - Assignment in NCM 112
Tizon, R. - Assignment in NCM 112
1. There are “seven deadly barriers” for telemedicine: money, regulations, hype,
adoption, technology, evidence, and success. Some of these barriers are already
present and observable with health care in general but some are new that arose from
the transformation of health care by telemedicine. Money for example is a hindrance
to the development of telemedicine in a way that in order to establish a proper and
working system, you need money. The hype that we are putting on telemedicine also
is a barrier to itself. We tend to talk all about what telemedicine can do but not on the
things it really does. To move forward with telemedicine is to be realistic. So much
more is needed to be fixed in order to establish telemedicine as a regular in our
health care system.
Source:
Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine. The Role of Telehealth in an
Evolving Health Care Environment: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National
Academies Press (US); 2012 Nov 20. 4, Challenges in Telehealth. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207146/
3. The National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) provides guidance for
the technical architecture and standards for nationally reportable condition reporting.
NETSS differs from NEDSS in several ways. NETSS was case based; NEDSS is person
based. In addition, NETSS used proprietary codes, but NEDSS is based on standards
so it can capture data already in electronic healthcare data streams. These differences
precipitated the need to transition to NEDSS.
5. National Quality Strategy (NQS), is based on a translated version of IHI’s triple aims of
“better care, healthy people/healthy community, and affordable care” and six priorities
that target making care safe, coordinated, based on evidence of clinical effectiveness,
development of new care delivery and reimbursement models, and community level
focus for healthier living. Significantly, for post-acute care providers, one of the six
national priorities targets care coordination with expectations for managed care
transitions and communication across care settings. Patients with chronic illness and
disability are to have a current and shared care plan used by all providers, coordinated
through primary care with extensions into community-based providers.
6. Standards for clinical information systems apply to the ways data are named, stored,
and shared as well as to promote accuracy and to work more efficiently. Ultimately,
standardized systems can improve patient safety and lower healthcare costs. When
aspects of care coordination are standardized, it is easier to collect data and share
data pertinent to care across multiple sites by various care providers. Nursing has been
represented in all phases and environments of standards development for care
coordination. Each of the SDOs reviewed here embraces wide engagement from all
disciplines. The SDOs encourage clinicians and clinical informaticists to contribute in
leadership roles, and also as contributors, reviewers, testers, and/or implementers.
Nurses engaged in these development projects represent the full spectrum of nursing
including acute care, pediatric care, chronic care, care management, and post-acute
care.
7. Just as these forces for change are making operational expertise within one sector
insufficient, clinicians and informaticists alike must be informed of the full care
continuum. This knowledge is fundamental to our ability to do effective and
appropriate care planning with coordination that includes the patient and family in
decision-making today and going forward. For those that design, build, test, implement,
and support clinical systems use in organizations, these broader understandings of
integrated and coordinated care are essential. Also, to deliver care and information
systems that support care that is coordinated, inclusive of patient, cost-effective and
achieves highest outcomes, we have to be able to work as a team that goes where the
patient and family go—out into community and mostly home. It could be easily argued
that the majority of healthcare that makes a difference in health levels happens where
the patient lives.
8. From 2000 to 2013, there have been three national surveys conducted on the levels
of EHR adoption in the home health industry. Tracking across these surveys shows a
shift from only 32% of HHAs having clinical systems with the basic EHR functions in
2000 to 58% as reported in the 2013 survey. This means that a bit more than 40% of
the agencies sampled in 2013 are still in paper mode for clinical documentation, and
of those, only 42% reported that they would be looking to buy a system in the next 12
months. Missing from these benchmarks, however, is the degree to which the specific
functionality that is basic to HER standards today is in the systems being used. This
functionality includes clinical decision support; flexibility of views of patient care
information; point-of-care support for clinical documentation; telemedicine and
standardized, structured terminologies; and ability to send and receive patient
information with other external providers. Resnick and Alwan also found that sharing
of health information data with other providers was almost negligible in 2007
stemming from the lack of enabling functionality, such as the Consolidated Clinical
Document Architecture (C-CDA) tool in the home health EHR systems at that time.