0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views16 pages

Tutorial 2

The document discusses Bayesian approaches to credibility theory and loss distributions. It introduces concepts like prior and conditional distributions, hypothetical means, and how to define premiums using pure or Bayesian premium approaches. It provides examples calculating hypothetical means and solving problems involving posterior distributions and expected values.

Uploaded by

ChunmingChan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views16 pages

Tutorial 2

The document discusses Bayesian approaches to credibility theory and loss distributions. It introduces concepts like prior and conditional distributions, hypothetical means, and how to define premiums using pure or Bayesian premium approaches. It provides examples calculating hypothetical means and solving problems involving posterior distributions and expected values.

Uploaded by

ChunmingChan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

STAT 3908: Credibility Theory and Loss

Distributions
Greatest Accuracy Credibility Theory

Tutorial 2

1 / 16
Bayesian framework

I Prior distribution: fΘ (θ), Θ may stand for the risk profile of


individuals and is unobservable
I X : stands for claim size or claim number
I Conditional pdf/pmf of X given Θ: fX |Θ (x|θ)
I Hypothetical mean: µ(θ) = E[X |Θ = θ] = θ
I Joint pdf: fX ,Θ (x, θ)
R
I Marginal pdf/pmf of X : fX (x) = Θ fX ,Θ (x, θ)dθ
I Conditional pdf of Θ given X :

fX ,Θ (x, θ)
fΘ|X (θ|x) = ∝ fX ,Θ (x, θ) = fX |Θ (x|θ)fΘ (θ)
fX (x)

2 / 16
Bayesian approach to credibility

Task:
to “predict” the value of xn+1 given observations X = x.

In general, it is assumed that


I conditioned on Θ = θ, the loss amounts X1 , . . . , Xn , Xn+1 are
independent.
I Also, we assume that the prior pdf/pmf π(θ) and the
condition pdf/pmf fXj |Θ (xj |θ) are known.

Predictive distribution of Xn+1 (hard to obtain!)


Z
fXn+1 |X (xn+1 |x) = fXn+1 |Θ (xn+1 |θ)πΘ|X (θ|x)dθ,

where πΘ|X (θ|x) is the posterior distribution.

3 / 16
Two easy approaches to define the premium

The Pure Premium


1. Use fXn+1 |Θ (xn+1 |θ) to find µ(θ), i.e.,
Z
µ(θ) = E[Xn+1 |Θ = θ] = xn+1 · fXn+1 |Θ (xn+1 |θ)dxn+1

2. Replace θ by Θ, we have µ(Θ)


3. Calculate E[µ(Θ)], i.e.,
Z
E[µ(Θ)] = E[E[Xn+1 |Θ]] = µ(θ) · π(θ)dθ.

4 / 16
The Bayesian Premium
Z
E[Xn+1 |X = x] = πΘ|X (θ|x)µ(θ)dθ= E[µ(Θ)|X = x]

Remark: Computation will be complex if we use


Z
E[Xn+1 |X = x] = xn+1 · fXn+1 |X (xn+1 |x)dxn+1 .

5 / 16
Problem 1
The conditional distribution of the severity X given the risk
parameter Θ is

fX |Θ (x|θ) = θ2 xe −θx , x > 0.

Find the hypothetical mean.

6 / 16
Solution 1
Notice that
x
!2 − 1
1 − x
1 x 2−1 e θ
fX |Θ (x|θ) = θ2 xe −θx = 1
x 2−1 e θ = .
1 2

θ Γ(1) θ

Thus,  
1
X |Θ = θ ∼ Gamma 2, .
θ
The hypothetical mean is
2
µ(θ) = E[X |Θ = θ] = .
θ

7 / 16
Problem 2
You are given:
1. The Pareto distribution has the CDF as

F (x) = 1 − (θ/x)α , x ≥ θ,

where α is the shape parameter and θ is the scale parameter.


2. The prior distribution of the parameter Θ has probability
1
density function π(θ) = 2 , 1 < θ < ∞.
θ
3. Given Θ = θ, claim size follows a Pareto distribution with
parameters α = 2 and θ.
4. A claim of 3 is observed.
Calculate the posterior probability that Θ exceeds 2.

8 / 16
Solution 2
The Pareto distribution has the CDF as
 α
θ
F (x) = 1 − , x ≥ θ.
x

Note that
αθα
fX |Θ (x|θ) = , θ ≤ x.
x (α+1)
Then
2θ2
fX |Θ (3|θ) = , θ ≤ 3.
33
Given an observation of X = 3, the posterior distribution satisfies
that
2θ2 1
πΘ|X (θ|3) ∝ · , 1 < θ ≤ 3.
27 θ2

9 / 16
Then, the normalizing factor for this to be a proper density
function is
1 27
C = R3 2 R∞ = .
4
1 27 dθ + 3 0dθ
Therefore,

2θ2 1 1
πΘ|X (θ|3) = C · · 2 = , 1 < θ ≤ 3.
27 θ 2
Then, Z 3
1 1
P(Θ > 2|X = 3) = dθ + 0 = .
2 2 2

10 / 16
Problem 3
You are given:

Number Claim Count Probabilities


Class of Insureds 0 1 2 3 4
1 3000 1/3 1/3 1/3 0 0
2 2000 0 1/6 2/3 1/6 0
3 1000 0 0 1/6 2/3 1/6

A randomly selected insured has one claim in year 1. Determine


the expected number of claims in year 2 for that insured.

11 / 16
Solution 3
From the table, the prior distributions are
3000 1 2000 1 1000 1
πΘ (1) = = , πΘ (2) = = , πΘ (3) = = .
6000 2 6000 3 6000 6
Therefore, the posterior density given that X1 = 1 is

fX |Θ (1|θ)πΘ (θ)
πΘ|X1 (θ|1) = P3 1 .
f
j=1 1X |Θ (1|j)πΘ (j)

Thus,
(1/3)(1/2) 3
πΘ|X1 (1|1) = = ;
(1/3)(1/2) + (1/6)(1/3) + (0)(1/6) 4

(1/6)(1/3) 1
πΘ|X1 (2|1) = = ;
(1/3)(1/2) + (1/6)(1/3) + (0)(1/6) 4

12 / 16
(0)(1/6)
πΘ|X1 (3|1) = = 0.
(1/3)(1/2) + (1/6)(1/3) + (0)(1/6)
Therefore, the expected number of claims in year 2, denoted by
X2 , for that insured is

E[X2 |X1 = 1] = E[X2 |Θ = 1]πΘ|X1 (1|1) + E[X2 |Θ = 2]πΘ|X1 (2|1)


+E[X2 |Θ = 3]πΘ|X1 (3|1)
        
1 1 1 3
= (0) + (1) + (2)
3 3 3 4
        
1 2 1 1
+ (1) + (2) + (3)
6 3 6 4
= 1.25

13 / 16
Problem 4
Suppose that Θ has pdf π(θ), θ > 0, and Θ1 has pdf
π1 (θ) = π(θ − α), θ > α > 0. If, given Θ1 , X is Poisson
distributed with mean Θ1 , show that X has the same distribution
as Y + Z , where Y and Z are independent, Y is Poisson
distributed with mean α, and Z |Θ is Poisson distributed with
mean Θ.

14 / 16
Solution 4
Note that
e −θ θx e −θ θx
Z Z
fX (x) = π1 (θ)dθ = π(θ − α)dθ,
x! x!

e −α αy
fY (y ) = ,
y!
e −θ θz
Z
fZ (z) = π(θ)dθ.
z!
Let W = Y + Z . Then,

15 / 16
fW (w )
Xw
= fY (y )fZ (w − y )
y =0
w
e −α αy
e −θ θw −y
X Z
= π(θ)dθ
(w − y )!
y!
y =0
Z −(α+θ) w   y  w −y
e (α + θ)w X w α θ
= π(θ)dθ
w! y α+θ α+θ
y =0
Z −(α+θ)
e (α + θ)w
= π(θ)dθ,
w!
with the last line following because the sum contains binomial
probabilities. Let r = α + θ and so
Z −r w
e r
fW (w ) = π(r − α)dr = fX (w ).
w!

16 / 16

You might also like