Analysis II MS Sol 2015-16
Analysis II MS Sol 2015-16
Analysis II MS Sol 2015-16
(1) State the Substitution theorem (for integration) and use it to evaluate
R 4 cos(√t)
the integral 1 √
t
dt.
(5 marks)
(2) Let f : [1, 2] → R be the function defined by f (x) = x for x ∈ Q ∩ [1, 2] and
f (x) = 0 for x ∈ [1, 2] − Q. Calculate the upper and lower Riemann integrals
U (f ) and L(f ) of f . If f integrable?
(6 marks)
Recall that U (f ) = inf U (P, f ) and L(f ) = sup L(P, f ) where the infimum and supremum
are taken over all the partitions of [1, 2] respectively and for every partition P = {0 =
x0 , x1 , · · · , xn = 1}
n
X
U (P, f ) = Mi (xi − xi−1 ) where Mi = sup f (x)
xi−1 ≤x≤xi
i=1
n
X
L(P, f ) = mi (xi − xi−1 ) where mi = inf f (x)
xi−1 ≤x≤xi
i=1
By the definition of f , for every interval (xi1 , xi ) ⊂ [1, 2], mi = 0. Thus L(f ) = 0. Also,
U (f ) = 23 .
However, f is Riemann integrable if and only if U (f ) = L(f ). Hence f is not Riemann
integrable.
1
(3) Let f : R → R be a uniformly continuous function on R. For n ∈ N, define
fn (x) = f (x + n1 ) for every x ∈ R. Does the sequence of functions (fn )
converge uniformly on R?
(6 marks)
Following the proof Dirchlet’s test Given that the partial sums sn = nk=1 ak are
P
bounded, that is, there exists a positive number M such that |sn | ≤ M . Let s0 = 0.
For every > 0, choose large positive N0 > M −1 . Then n1 < for all n ≥ N0 . Hence
n n
X ak X 1
= (sk − sk−1 )
k=1
k k=1
k
n n−1
X sk X sk
= −
k=1
k k=0
k+1
n−1
sn X 1 1
= + sk − (since s0 = 0)
n k=1
k k + 1
n−1
sn X sk
= +
n k=1
k(k + 1)
Pn ak 1
P∞ an we have | k=1 k | ≤ M + M (1 − n ) < 2M
Now since the partial sums are bounded , that
P∞
is the partial sums of the series n=1 n is a bounded sequence. Thus the series n=1 ann
converges. In other words,
n n
X ak X sk sn sn sn
− = − =
k=1
k k=1
k(k + 1) n n(n + 1) n+1
≤ M = ∀n ≥ N0 − 1
M
Thus the series ∞
P an
P∞ sn
n=1 n+1 converges to n=1 n(n+1) .
2
(5) Let fn (x) = Arctan(nx). Describe the pointwise limit function f of this
sequence. Show that fn converges to f uniformly on (0, ∞).
(6 marks)
−p
For p ≤ 0 if the series converged, then limn→∞ (an + b)P = 0 which is a contradiction.
∞
Let p > 0. Note that the partial sums of the series n=1 (an + b)−p is monotonically
increasing. Hence enough to prove that the partial sums are bounded. Let an = (an + b)p
n
k
X 1
For n < 2 , sn =
k=1
(an + b)p
≤ a1 + (a2 + a3 ) + · · · + (a2k + · · · + a2k+1 −1 )
≤ a1 + 2a2 + · · · 2k a2k
k
2j(1−p) 2k(1−p) −p
X
j
Now 2 aj = < =⇒ s n ≤ a 2−k(p−1)
(a + 2bj )p ap j=0
Since 2−n(p−1) converges if and only if p > 1, the convergence of the series n (an+b)−p
P P
follows for p > 1. And for p ≤ 1, by comparison test, the divergence follows.
References
[1] Bartle, R. G. and Sherbert, D. R., “Introduction to Real analysis”, 2007
[2] Rudin, W., “Principles of Mathematical Analysis”, 1976.